<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_09_171204</id>
	<title>MIT Grad To Make Digital "SixthSense" Open Source</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1257794040000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>yuveraj writes to mention that Pranav Mistry, the brain behind the innovative "SixthSense" application <a href="//hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/03/10/1713257/Demo-of-a-New-Sixth-Sense-Technology">demoed earlier this year</a>, plans to <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=5224">open source the technology</a> in order to get this to the streets faster.  <i>"Mistry&rsquo;s decision has meaning beyond Sixth Sense. The desire of inventors is always to get their work into the market as quickly as possible. Usually this means waiting for it to be turned into a useful, profitable invention. Mistry is bypassing this by going straight to open source.  There is no report on which license he will use, but whichever one he does choose he has put paid to the canard that open source and innovation are incompatible, for all time."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>yuveraj writes to mention that Pranav Mistry , the brain behind the innovative " SixthSense " application demoed earlier this year , plans to open source the technology in order to get this to the streets faster .
" Mistry    s decision has meaning beyond Sixth Sense .
The desire of inventors is always to get their work into the market as quickly as possible .
Usually this means waiting for it to be turned into a useful , profitable invention .
Mistry is bypassing this by going straight to open source .
There is no report on which license he will use , but whichever one he does choose he has put paid to the canard that open source and innovation are incompatible , for all time .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yuveraj writes to mention that Pranav Mistry, the brain behind the innovative "SixthSense" application demoed earlier this year, plans to open source the technology in order to get this to the streets faster.
"Mistry’s decision has meaning beyond Sixth Sense.
The desire of inventors is always to get their work into the market as quickly as possible.
Usually this means waiting for it to be turned into a useful, profitable invention.
Mistry is bypassing this by going straight to open source.
There is no report on which license he will use, but whichever one he does choose he has put paid to the canard that open source and innovation are incompatible, for all time.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30041026</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1257775440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As a society we simply need to find a way to make sure people like Pranav Mistry have gainful employment while they devlop things like this.</p></div><p>Why don't we let current trends continue, and allow Google to eventually become the world government? Not only will I get free e-mail, but my roads will probably either be properly paved or be replaced with a more efficient road technology that I can use for free so long as I never move very large cargo.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>In my opinion the biggest obstacle in the way of innovation is profit.</p></div><p>I think it's corporatism, but we could argue all day. Sometimes I think it's private ownership of land.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a society we simply need to find a way to make sure people like Pranav Mistry have gainful employment while they devlop things like this.Why do n't we let current trends continue , and allow Google to eventually become the world government ?
Not only will I get free e-mail , but my roads will probably either be properly paved or be replaced with a more efficient road technology that I can use for free so long as I never move very large cargo.In my opinion the biggest obstacle in the way of innovation is profit.I think it 's corporatism , but we could argue all day .
Sometimes I think it 's private ownership of land .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a society we simply need to find a way to make sure people like Pranav Mistry have gainful employment while they devlop things like this.Why don't we let current trends continue, and allow Google to eventually become the world government?
Not only will I get free e-mail, but my roads will probably either be properly paved or be replaced with a more efficient road technology that I can use for free so long as I never move very large cargo.In my opinion the biggest obstacle in the way of innovation is profit.I think it's corporatism, but we could argue all day.
Sometimes I think it's private ownership of land.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036992</id>
	<title>SixthSense?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257799200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is the SixthSense project or do we need a sixth sense to figure it out?</p><p>It would have been nice to include a short description in the summary!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is the SixthSense project or do we need a sixth sense to figure it out ? It would have been nice to include a short description in the summary !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is the SixthSense project or do we need a sixth sense to figure it out?It would have been nice to include a short description in the summary!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036796</id>
	<title>ummmm,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257798420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>no it doesn't.</p><p>If further innovation and a product are created then it will, until then this is vapor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>no it does n't.If further innovation and a product are created then it will , until then this is vapor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no it doesn't.If further innovation and a product are created then it will, until then this is vapor.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037272</id>
	<title>Re:*sigh*</title>
	<author>thickdiick</author>
	<datestamp>1257757380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't see how you can have a sense of acceleration. Perhaps change of acceleration....but acceleration? Categorically NO.<br>
We orbit the sun, but i wager you have no sense of angular acceleration about the sun. The other senses are persistent.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see how you can have a sense of acceleration .
Perhaps change of acceleration....but acceleration ?
Categorically NO .
We orbit the sun , but i wager you have no sense of angular acceleration about the sun .
The other senses are persistent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see how you can have a sense of acceleration.
Perhaps change of acceleration....but acceleration?
Categorically NO.
We orbit the sun, but i wager you have no sense of angular acceleration about the sun.
The other senses are persistent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037776</id>
	<title>This should drive...</title>
	<author>schlick</author>
	<datestamp>1257759420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>HMD production.  If it doesn't some one is asleep at the wheel.  For a concept demonstration, projecting stuff onto the real world is fine, but in practice it is horrible.  The missing link for effective augmented reality like this is an effective variable transparency head mounted displays.  I hope something like<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfhEV7l8n-0" title="youtube.com"> this </a> [youtube.com]makes it to mass market sooner rather than later.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>HMD production .
If it does n't some one is asleep at the wheel .
For a concept demonstration , projecting stuff onto the real world is fine , but in practice it is horrible .
The missing link for effective augmented reality like this is an effective variable transparency head mounted displays .
I hope something like this [ youtube.com ] makes it to mass market sooner rather than later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HMD production.
If it doesn't some one is asleep at the wheel.
For a concept demonstration, projecting stuff onto the real world is fine, but in practice it is horrible.
The missing link for effective augmented reality like this is an effective variable transparency head mounted displays.
I hope something like this  [youtube.com]makes it to mass market sooner rather than later.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30043098</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>Waccoon</author>
	<datestamp>1257885600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In my opinion the biggest obstacle in the way of innovation is <b>money</b>.</p></div><p>I think that fits better, if you're one of those people that thinks that things like fame, reputation, and even pride count as a form of profit.  Profit is not a dirty word.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In my opinion the biggest obstacle in the way of innovation is money.I think that fits better , if you 're one of those people that thinks that things like fame , reputation , and even pride count as a form of profit .
Profit is not a dirty word .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In my opinion the biggest obstacle in the way of innovation is money.I think that fits better, if you're one of those people that thinks that things like fame, reputation, and even pride count as a form of profit.
Profit is not a dirty word.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037066</id>
	<title>Re:*sigh*</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257799560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>True. I showed my mother the video on the TED website and she (a physical therapist) immediately spotted it. She said it should be called the eigth sense. after accelleration, proprioception, and orientation.

That last one is the wrong word because I forgot what it was called but I meant the sense of where you are relative to yourself (upside down, horizontal, etc)</htmltext>
<tokenext>True .
I showed my mother the video on the TED website and she ( a physical therapist ) immediately spotted it .
She said it should be called the eigth sense .
after accelleration , proprioception , and orientation .
That last one is the wrong word because I forgot what it was called but I meant the sense of where you are relative to yourself ( upside down , horizontal , etc )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True.
I showed my mother the video on the TED website and she (a physical therapist) immediately spotted it.
She said it should be called the eigth sense.
after accelleration, proprioception, and orientation.
That last one is the wrong word because I forgot what it was called but I meant the sense of where you are relative to yourself (upside down, horizontal, etc)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037262</id>
	<title>Will I see dead people?</title>
	<author>Lilith's Heart-shape</author>
	<datestamp>1257757320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Will this SixthSense device let me see dead people? If so, I don't want to use it. I have enough problems already. I see stupid people. They don't see reason. They only see what they want to see. They don't know they're stupid.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will this SixthSense device let me see dead people ?
If so , I do n't want to use it .
I have enough problems already .
I see stupid people .
They do n't see reason .
They only see what they want to see .
They do n't know they 're stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will this SixthSense device let me see dead people?
If so, I don't want to use it.
I have enough problems already.
I see stupid people.
They don't see reason.
They only see what they want to see.
They don't know they're stupid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037426</id>
	<title>Re:*sigh*</title>
	<author>Absolut187</author>
	<datestamp>1257758040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or is it that the radius of earth's orbit is so large that the centripetal acceleration is actually quite small at any given moment.</p><p>Perhaps we can sense acceleration above a certain magnitude?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or is it that the radius of earth 's orbit is so large that the centripetal acceleration is actually quite small at any given moment.Perhaps we can sense acceleration above a certain magnitude ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or is it that the radius of earth's orbit is so large that the centripetal acceleration is actually quite small at any given moment.Perhaps we can sense acceleration above a certain magnitude?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037678</id>
	<title>Re:Imagine the uses for aviation?!?!</title>
	<author>belthize</author>
	<datestamp>1257758940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This could be a GOD-SEND to pilots in both military and civil use!</p></div><p>God already had his crack at developing our senses, now it's our turn.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This could be a GOD-SEND to pilots in both military and civil use ! God already had his crack at developing our senses , now it 's our turn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This could be a GOD-SEND to pilots in both military and civil use!God already had his crack at developing our senses, now it's our turn.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037818</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>StillNeedMoreCoffee</author>
	<datestamp>1257759600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hear Hear,</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hear Hear,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hear Hear,</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037654</id>
	<title>Re:paid to the canard?</title>
	<author>AmazingChicken</author>
	<datestamp>1257758820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I've been rightfully accused of highfalutin', but this was pretty impressive. On principles, I don't normally recommend writing to the third-grade level, but there is such a thing as too smart.</p></div><p>Open source commentators are a serious lot, <i>that's</i> for sure.  All this and not a single joke about ducks or their relevance to the other five senses.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been rightfully accused of highfalutin ' , but this was pretty impressive .
On principles , I do n't normally recommend writing to the third-grade level , but there is such a thing as too smart.Open source commentators are a serious lot , that 's for sure .
All this and not a single joke about ducks or their relevance to the other five senses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been rightfully accused of highfalutin', but this was pretty impressive.
On principles, I don't normally recommend writing to the third-grade level, but there is such a thing as too smart.Open source commentators are a serious lot, that's for sure.
All this and not a single joke about ducks or their relevance to the other five senses.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036910</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30043520</id>
	<title>BSD-type license please.</title>
	<author>LinuxAndLube</author>
	<datestamp>1257849060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30039318</id>
	<title>Re:*sigh*</title>
	<author>ShieldW0lf</author>
	<datestamp>1257765840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Equilibrioception is the name for the sense of acceleration and the sense of angular momentum.  Technically, they are two senses, with two distinct mechanisms of action.  There are also thermoception, the sense of temperature, and nociception, the sense of pain, which is also actually three senses, one for skin, one for bones, one for organs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Equilibrioception is the name for the sense of acceleration and the sense of angular momentum .
Technically , they are two senses , with two distinct mechanisms of action .
There are also thermoception , the sense of temperature , and nociception , the sense of pain , which is also actually three senses , one for skin , one for bones , one for organs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Equilibrioception is the name for the sense of acceleration and the sense of angular momentum.
Technically, they are two senses, with two distinct mechanisms of action.
There are also thermoception, the sense of temperature, and nociception, the sense of pain, which is also actually three senses, one for skin, one for bones, one for organs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036946</id>
	<title>lol</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257799020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've never gotten paid for anything I've written. I give it all away. The reward is called "Pride"

As a society we simply need to find a way to make sure people like Pranav Mistry have gainful employment while they devlop things like this. As long as I have a decent job that pays my bills and afords me the time to work on software, I will continue to do so. But when employment barely pays my rent and my managers expect me to come in early and work late to the point that I have no time to do anything rewarding at all, everyone suffers because I can not continue to work on things that may or may not be profitable in the end.

In my opinion the biggest obstacle in the way of innovation is profit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never gotten paid for anything I 've written .
I give it all away .
The reward is called " Pride " As a society we simply need to find a way to make sure people like Pranav Mistry have gainful employment while they devlop things like this .
As long as I have a decent job that pays my bills and afords me the time to work on software , I will continue to do so .
But when employment barely pays my rent and my managers expect me to come in early and work late to the point that I have no time to do anything rewarding at all , everyone suffers because I can not continue to work on things that may or may not be profitable in the end .
In my opinion the biggest obstacle in the way of innovation is profit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never gotten paid for anything I've written.
I give it all away.
The reward is called "Pride"

As a society we simply need to find a way to make sure people like Pranav Mistry have gainful employment while they devlop things like this.
As long as I have a decent job that pays my bills and afords me the time to work on software, I will continue to do so.
But when employment barely pays my rent and my managers expect me to come in early and work late to the point that I have no time to do anything rewarding at all, everyone suffers because I can not continue to work on things that may or may not be profitable in the end.
In my opinion the biggest obstacle in the way of innovation is profit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30055882</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>per contra</author>
	<datestamp>1257871440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just a thought, Maybe if you sold one of those things you made instead of giving it away you would have enough money to not worry about making your rent or what your manager expects. As an added bonus you would have more time to develop even more incredible things. Giving everything away only works when you are already wealthy it is not a long term plan for success. Pride doesn't pay the bills.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just a thought , Maybe if you sold one of those things you made instead of giving it away you would have enough money to not worry about making your rent or what your manager expects .
As an added bonus you would have more time to develop even more incredible things .
Giving everything away only works when you are already wealthy it is not a long term plan for success .
Pride does n't pay the bills .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just a thought, Maybe if you sold one of those things you made instead of giving it away you would have enough money to not worry about making your rent or what your manager expects.
As an added bonus you would have more time to develop even more incredible things.
Giving everything away only works when you are already wealthy it is not a long term plan for success.
Pride doesn't pay the bills.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30144756</id>
	<title>Re:paid to the canard?</title>
	<author>ScorpFromHell</author>
	<datestamp>1257095640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The free dictionary tells me that "<i> <a href="http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/put+paid+to" title="thefreedictionary.com">put paid to</a> [thefreedictionary.com] </i>" means "<i>to consider something closed or completed; to mark or indicate that something is no longer important or pending</i>".
And that "<i> <a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/canard" title="thefreedictionary.com">canard</a> [thefreedictionary.com] </i>" means "<i>An unfounded or false, deliberately misleading story.</i>"

So am assuming the author wants to say that the opening up of SixthSense via an open source license will stop the false stories that open source does not lead to innovation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The free dictionary tells me that " put paid to [ thefreedictionary.com ] " means " to consider something closed or completed ; to mark or indicate that something is no longer important or pending " .
And that " canard [ thefreedictionary.com ] " means " An unfounded or false , deliberately misleading story .
" So am assuming the author wants to say that the opening up of SixthSense via an open source license will stop the false stories that open source does not lead to innovation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The free dictionary tells me that " put paid to [thefreedictionary.com] " means "to consider something closed or completed; to mark or indicate that something is no longer important or pending".
And that " canard [thefreedictionary.com] " means "An unfounded or false, deliberately misleading story.
"

So am assuming the author wants to say that the opening up of SixthSense via an open source license will stop the false stories that open source does not lead to innovation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30039074</id>
	<title>Noble, but ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257764820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a grad student, MIT owns his work.</p><p>MIT does not tend to arbitrarily give away its intellectual property, particularly these days. He may discover, as a lot of grad students there discover, that what they want and what MIT wants are not the same thing. They tend to be very cooperative about licensing the work back to the grad student -- for a share of the proceeds, but cooperative licensing is not the same as being willing to give it away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a grad student , MIT owns his work.MIT does not tend to arbitrarily give away its intellectual property , particularly these days .
He may discover , as a lot of grad students there discover , that what they want and what MIT wants are not the same thing .
They tend to be very cooperative about licensing the work back to the grad student -- for a share of the proceeds , but cooperative licensing is not the same as being willing to give it away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a grad student, MIT owns his work.MIT does not tend to arbitrarily give away its intellectual property, particularly these days.
He may discover, as a lot of grad students there discover, that what they want and what MIT wants are not the same thing.
They tend to be very cooperative about licensing the work back to the grad student -- for a share of the proceeds, but cooperative licensing is not the same as being willing to give it away.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037620</id>
	<title>The Real Sixth Sense</title>
	<author>cryoknight</author>
	<datestamp>1257758700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought the sixth sense was "Spidey".  You know, that tingling one when something interesting is about to happen...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought the sixth sense was " Spidey " .
You know , that tingling one when something interesting is about to happen.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought the sixth sense was "Spidey".
You know, that tingling one when something interesting is about to happen...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037294</id>
	<title>Simple English Slashdot, Please</title>
	<author>TheModelEskimo</author>
	<datestamp>1257757500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> he has put paid to the canard</p></div></blockquote><p>
Now there's a new one. *fumbles through idiom dictionary*</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>he has put paid to the canard Now there 's a new one .
* fumbles through idiom dictionary *</tokentext>
<sentencetext> he has put paid to the canard
Now there's a new one.
*fumbles through idiom dictionary*
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037308</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get it...</title>
	<author>mikemsd</author>
	<datestamp>1257757560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, really, I mean, it's like those people that wanted to put computers the size of a room in their house! I mean, it's not like they would have ever been able to make them small enough to fit in your pocket. Think of all the time and effort that would have been wasted. I'm glad I didn't invest that failed IBM startup.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , really , I mean , it 's like those people that wanted to put computers the size of a room in their house !
I mean , it 's not like they would have ever been able to make them small enough to fit in your pocket .
Think of all the time and effort that would have been wasted .
I 'm glad I did n't invest that failed IBM startup .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, really, I mean, it's like those people that wanted to put computers the size of a room in their house!
I mean, it's not like they would have ever been able to make them small enough to fit in your pocket.
Think of all the time and effort that would have been wasted.
I'm glad I didn't invest that failed IBM startup.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036794</id>
	<title>Pilots are being taken out</title>
	<author>Colin Smith</author>
	<datestamp>1257798420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too slow, can't handle the G forces etc.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too slow , ca n't handle the G forces etc .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too slow, can't handle the G forces etc.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036824</id>
	<title>Re:paid to the canard?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257798480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"put paid to" : ended, rendered obsolete, finished off, destroyed, etc.</p><p>http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/293200.html</p><p>"canard": groundless rumour or belief. http://cheetah.eb.com/dictionary/canard</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" put paid to " : ended , rendered obsolete , finished off , destroyed , etc.http : //www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/293200.html " canard " : groundless rumour or belief .
http : //cheetah.eb.com/dictionary/canard</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"put paid to" : ended, rendered obsolete, finished off, destroyed, etc.http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/293200.html"canard": groundless rumour or belief.
http://cheetah.eb.com/dictionary/canard</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037110</id>
	<title>Re:Imagine the uses for aviation?!?!</title>
	<author>thhamm</author>
	<datestamp>1257799800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Imagine having the instruments being "beamed" into your head</p></div><p>Exactly! Just like this fluid gets into this egg, but with gamma radiation! (This post has been beamed into your brain by Lightspeed Brand Briefs).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine having the instruments being " beamed " into your headExactly !
Just like this fluid gets into this egg , but with gamma radiation !
( This post has been beamed into your brain by Lightspeed Brand Briefs ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine having the instruments being "beamed" into your headExactly!
Just like this fluid gets into this egg, but with gamma radiation!
(This post has been beamed into your brain by Lightspeed Brand Briefs).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30042100</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257785400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Abolish the financial economic system, and replace it with an economic system based on ressources. The profit incentive disappears instantly and is replaced by an incentive for efficiency, making symbyosis the optimal, winning strategy (as it really is in nature, and as it should be modeled in our economic systems).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Abolish the financial economic system , and replace it with an economic system based on ressources .
The profit incentive disappears instantly and is replaced by an incentive for efficiency , making symbyosis the optimal , winning strategy ( as it really is in nature , and as it should be modeled in our economic systems ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Abolish the financial economic system, and replace it with an economic system based on ressources.
The profit incentive disappears instantly and is replaced by an incentive for efficiency, making symbyosis the optimal, winning strategy (as it really is in nature, and as it should be modeled in our economic systems).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30046546</id>
	<title>Re:Simple English Slashdot, Please</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257872820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it walks like a canard and quacks like a canard...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it walks like a canard and quacks like a canard.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it walks like a canard and quacks like a canard...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037294</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036682</id>
	<title>Imagine the uses for aviation?!?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257797940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not only have the "sixth sense" used for horizontal awareness, but also vertical awareness! Imagine having the instruments being "beamed" into your head so that you didn't even need to look at the dash to know the pitch and direction of the plane?!?</p><p>This could be a GOD-SEND to pilots in both military and civil use!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only have the " sixth sense " used for horizontal awareness , but also vertical awareness !
Imagine having the instruments being " beamed " into your head so that you did n't even need to look at the dash to know the pitch and direction of the plane ? !
? This could be a GOD-SEND to pilots in both military and civil use !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only have the "sixth sense" used for horizontal awareness, but also vertical awareness!
Imagine having the instruments being "beamed" into your head so that you didn't even need to look at the dash to know the pitch and direction of the plane?!
?This could be a GOD-SEND to pilots in both military and civil use!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037562</id>
	<title>Re:paid to the canard?</title>
	<author>Score Whore</author>
	<datestamp>1257758520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps you are trolling, but the phrase in question is "put paid" not "paid to the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....". And it basically means the debt is paid and you no longer have to worry about it.</p><p>I'm personally more concerned that someone who went to MIT thinks that a technology that interacts with a person is a sense. For something to be a sense, in the accepted meaning of the word, it's going to have to convey information to a person's brain. And for it to be new, it's going to have to not use sight, hearing, touch, taste, or smell.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps you are trolling , but the phrase in question is " put paid " not " paid to the .... " .
And it basically means the debt is paid and you no longer have to worry about it.I 'm personally more concerned that someone who went to MIT thinks that a technology that interacts with a person is a sense .
For something to be a sense , in the accepted meaning of the word , it 's going to have to convey information to a person 's brain .
And for it to be new , it 's going to have to not use sight , hearing , touch , taste , or smell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps you are trolling, but the phrase in question is "put paid" not "paid to the ....".
And it basically means the debt is paid and you no longer have to worry about it.I'm personally more concerned that someone who went to MIT thinks that a technology that interacts with a person is a sense.
For something to be a sense, in the accepted meaning of the word, it's going to have to convey information to a person's brain.
And for it to be new, it's going to have to not use sight, hearing, touch, taste, or smell.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30039728</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1257768180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>As a society we simply need to find a way to make sure people like Pranav Mistry have gainful employment while they devlop things like this.</i> </p><p>Herman Melville found "gainful employment" in a New York customs house. <a href="http://www.melville.org/hmobit.htm" title="melville.org">Herman Melville's Obituary Notices</a> [melville.org] </p><p>It simply would not do for the government to offer an aging artist a pension or employ him full time as a writer.</p><p>The fundamental difference between the amateur and the pro is that the pro is being paid to master his skills and work full time at what he does best.</p><p>It's an equation that the geek intent on his free movie fix has not been able to solve.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a society we simply need to find a way to make sure people like Pranav Mistry have gainful employment while they devlop things like this .
Herman Melville found " gainful employment " in a New York customs house .
Herman Melville 's Obituary Notices [ melville.org ] It simply would not do for the government to offer an aging artist a pension or employ him full time as a writer.The fundamental difference between the amateur and the pro is that the pro is being paid to master his skills and work full time at what he does best.It 's an equation that the geek intent on his free movie fix has not been able to solve .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a society we simply need to find a way to make sure people like Pranav Mistry have gainful employment while they devlop things like this.
Herman Melville found "gainful employment" in a New York customs house.
Herman Melville's Obituary Notices [melville.org] It simply would not do for the government to offer an aging artist a pension or employ him full time as a writer.The fundamental difference between the amateur and the pro is that the pro is being paid to master his skills and work full time at what he does best.It's an equation that the geek intent on his free movie fix has not been able to solve.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30038488</id>
	<title>Re:*sigh*</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257762300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aren't those just different applications of "touch" ? Essentially I know I'm moving or upside down because I feel the effects of Gravity, and the feeling of those things is purely because of the physical pressure applied to nerves. Or at least my limitted understanding of Biology would lead me to believe that, I never took full Bio in high school.</p><p>Wheras Sight is based on light entering your eyes, sound is your interpretation of mini air compressions around you, taste and smell have to do with different recepticals catching different molecules or something like that.</p><p>The other senses you guys are pointing out don't really seem to be anything other then pressure sensation on the inside of your body in the exact same manner we do on the outside of our body.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are n't those just different applications of " touch " ?
Essentially I know I 'm moving or upside down because I feel the effects of Gravity , and the feeling of those things is purely because of the physical pressure applied to nerves .
Or at least my limitted understanding of Biology would lead me to believe that , I never took full Bio in high school.Wheras Sight is based on light entering your eyes , sound is your interpretation of mini air compressions around you , taste and smell have to do with different recepticals catching different molecules or something like that.The other senses you guys are pointing out do n't really seem to be anything other then pressure sensation on the inside of your body in the exact same manner we do on the outside of our body .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aren't those just different applications of "touch" ?
Essentially I know I'm moving or upside down because I feel the effects of Gravity, and the feeling of those things is purely because of the physical pressure applied to nerves.
Or at least my limitted understanding of Biology would lead me to believe that, I never took full Bio in high school.Wheras Sight is based on light entering your eyes, sound is your interpretation of mini air compressions around you, taste and smell have to do with different recepticals catching different molecules or something like that.The other senses you guys are pointing out don't really seem to be anything other then pressure sensation on the inside of your body in the exact same manner we do on the outside of our body.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30039718</id>
	<title>Re:Simple English Slashdot, Please</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257768180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a rare, but well established expression.</p><p>Just try <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=\%22put+paid+to+the+canard\%22" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">googling</a> [google.com] it yourself - 356 hits!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a rare , but well established expression.Just try googling [ google.com ] it yourself - 356 hits !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a rare, but well established expression.Just try googling [google.com] it yourself - 356 hits!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037294</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30041940</id>
	<title>Put the projections in a pair of glasses</title>
	<author>dirkdodgers</author>
	<datestamp>1257783960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Give it the ability to put the projections privately in a pair of glasses, but still interact with them with hand motions where you see private projections in your glasses, and this is the kind of tech that will change the world.</p><p>Being wired isn't a problem anymore. We have wired people walking around everywhere today. It's common to see people walking around with ipod headphone wires running to a device in a pocket.</p><p>Wearing a few colored rings on your fingers wouldn't be a big deal either. Right now they're clips but I'm sure the software could be calibrated to work with rings for many of the applications shown.</p><p>The hardware exists today. The hard part would be mapping between the projection and your hand gestures without having to have the camera in your glasses as well. Calibrating it would probably be too inflexible, but just having your fingers show up as cursors on the projection in your glasses seems reasonable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Give it the ability to put the projections privately in a pair of glasses , but still interact with them with hand motions where you see private projections in your glasses , and this is the kind of tech that will change the world.Being wired is n't a problem anymore .
We have wired people walking around everywhere today .
It 's common to see people walking around with ipod headphone wires running to a device in a pocket.Wearing a few colored rings on your fingers would n't be a big deal either .
Right now they 're clips but I 'm sure the software could be calibrated to work with rings for many of the applications shown.The hardware exists today .
The hard part would be mapping between the projection and your hand gestures without having to have the camera in your glasses as well .
Calibrating it would probably be too inflexible , but just having your fingers show up as cursors on the projection in your glasses seems reasonable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give it the ability to put the projections privately in a pair of glasses, but still interact with them with hand motions where you see private projections in your glasses, and this is the kind of tech that will change the world.Being wired isn't a problem anymore.
We have wired people walking around everywhere today.
It's common to see people walking around with ipod headphone wires running to a device in a pocket.Wearing a few colored rings on your fingers wouldn't be a big deal either.
Right now they're clips but I'm sure the software could be calibrated to work with rings for many of the applications shown.The hardware exists today.
The hard part would be mapping between the projection and your hand gestures without having to have the camera in your glasses as well.
Calibrating it would probably be too inflexible, but just having your fingers show up as cursors on the projection in your glasses seems reasonable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30043522</id>
	<title>MIT Media Lab closed long ago</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257849120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bill Gates dropped money on MIT.  Then MIT shutdown its media lab and fired everyone.   Then MIT hired a bunch of posers and Microsoft cocksuckers to say that they are MIT media lab.</p><p>Where is the link to the project page showing he is not one of those?  Where is the link to the project page talking about the languages, libraries and systems he used?  Oh.  That's right. There aren't any.</p><p>The media lab today has as much resemblance to the old media lab as the new napster has to the old napster.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bill Gates dropped money on MIT .
Then MIT shutdown its media lab and fired everyone .
Then MIT hired a bunch of posers and Microsoft cocksuckers to say that they are MIT media lab.Where is the link to the project page showing he is not one of those ?
Where is the link to the project page talking about the languages , libraries and systems he used ?
Oh. That 's right .
There are n't any.The media lab today has as much resemblance to the old media lab as the new napster has to the old napster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bill Gates dropped money on MIT.
Then MIT shutdown its media lab and fired everyone.
Then MIT hired a bunch of posers and Microsoft cocksuckers to say that they are MIT media lab.Where is the link to the project page showing he is not one of those?
Where is the link to the project page talking about the languages, libraries and systems he used?
Oh.  That's right.
There aren't any.The media lab today has as much resemblance to the old media lab as the new napster has to the old napster.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30038132</id>
	<title>Re:*sigh*</title>
	<author>DorkRawk</author>
	<datestamp>1257760920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This seems like the equivalent of making a big deal about the fact that Red Hat Linux cannot be worn on your head.  You're focusing too much on the name (which is just a name used to draw attention to the "product") and ignoring a much more interesting discussion about cool technology.  The number of senses that humans (or any other animals) have really isn't relevant to this device.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This seems like the equivalent of making a big deal about the fact that Red Hat Linux can not be worn on your head .
You 're focusing too much on the name ( which is just a name used to draw attention to the " product " ) and ignoring a much more interesting discussion about cool technology .
The number of senses that humans ( or any other animals ) have really is n't relevant to this device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This seems like the equivalent of making a big deal about the fact that Red Hat Linux cannot be worn on your head.
You're focusing too much on the name (which is just a name used to draw attention to the "product") and ignoring a much more interesting discussion about cool technology.
The number of senses that humans (or any other animals) have really isn't relevant to this device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036920</id>
	<title>*sigh*</title>
	<author>inviolet</author>
	<datestamp>1257798900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The sixth sense is accelleration.  Sensory data is provided by the semicircular canals and is interpreted as sensations, therefore it deserves the title of 'sense'.  Proprioception may also qualify, even though it is a derived/calculated sense.
</p><p>I give this example to my children to teach the important fact that most every person and most every textbook on Earth can be clearly and demonstrably <i>wrong</i> about something obvious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The sixth sense is accelleration .
Sensory data is provided by the semicircular canals and is interpreted as sensations , therefore it deserves the title of 'sense' .
Proprioception may also qualify , even though it is a derived/calculated sense .
I give this example to my children to teach the important fact that most every person and most every textbook on Earth can be clearly and demonstrably wrong about something obvious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The sixth sense is accelleration.
Sensory data is provided by the semicircular canals and is interpreted as sensations, therefore it deserves the title of 'sense'.
Proprioception may also qualify, even though it is a derived/calculated sense.
I give this example to my children to teach the important fact that most every person and most every textbook on Earth can be clearly and demonstrably wrong about something obvious.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037914</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get it...</title>
	<author>JSC</author>
	<datestamp>1257759960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not a terrible concept.  It's version<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.01 of a brilliant concept.  Yes, right now it's clunky and limited but that'll change.  Let this evolve up to version 1.0 or more and combine it with things like the optical display contact lenses that are being worked on and you have the world of Vernor Vinge's Rainbows End.</p><p>Years from now there's an excellent chance that everyone (except you) will look back at this and marvel at the changes it's brought about.  I mean, look at other version<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.01 devices that have changed the world: Watt's Steam Engine, Trevithick's locomotive, the Wright Flyer, the Babbage Difference Engine.</p><p>Don't look at what it is.  Look at what it can become.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not a terrible concept .
It 's version .01 of a brilliant concept .
Yes , right now it 's clunky and limited but that 'll change .
Let this evolve up to version 1.0 or more and combine it with things like the optical display contact lenses that are being worked on and you have the world of Vernor Vinge 's Rainbows End.Years from now there 's an excellent chance that everyone ( except you ) will look back at this and marvel at the changes it 's brought about .
I mean , look at other version .01 devices that have changed the world : Watt 's Steam Engine , Trevithick 's locomotive , the Wright Flyer , the Babbage Difference Engine.Do n't look at what it is .
Look at what it can become .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not a terrible concept.
It's version .01 of a brilliant concept.
Yes, right now it's clunky and limited but that'll change.
Let this evolve up to version 1.0 or more and combine it with things like the optical display contact lenses that are being worked on and you have the world of Vernor Vinge's Rainbows End.Years from now there's an excellent chance that everyone (except you) will look back at this and marvel at the changes it's brought about.
I mean, look at other version .01 devices that have changed the world: Watt's Steam Engine, Trevithick's locomotive, the Wright Flyer, the Babbage Difference Engine.Don't look at what it is.
Look at what it can become.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037772</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257759360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, you want the government to \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ ??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , you want the government to \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, you want the government to \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ ?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037702</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257759060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're describing fulfillment, not pride.If you get joy out of others enjoying your creation, that's not pride. If you get joy out of praise, that's another thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're describing fulfillment , not pride.If you get joy out of others enjoying your creation , that 's not pride .
If you get joy out of praise , that 's another thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're describing fulfillment, not pride.If you get joy out of others enjoying your creation, that's not pride.
If you get joy out of praise, that's another thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037166</id>
	<title>Can't wait to see it being used on the streets</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1257800100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"I see dead people" will take another meaning.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I see dead people " will take another meaning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I see dead people" will take another meaning.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036870</id>
	<title>Spoiler Alert:</title>
	<author>hatemonger</author>
	<datestamp>1257798660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pranav Mistry is already dead.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pranav Mistry is already dead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pranav Mistry is already dead.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037328</id>
	<title>Re:paid to the canard?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257757620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You missed a step.</p><blockquote><div><p>True innovation takes effort. Effort costs money</p></div></blockquote><p> It's more like this:</p><p>True innovation takes inspiration. Inspiration/innovation takes effort. Effort costs <b>time</b>. Time can cost money, or it can cost effort.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You missed a step.True innovation takes effort .
Effort costs money It 's more like this : True innovation takes inspiration .
Inspiration/innovation takes effort .
Effort costs time .
Time can cost money , or it can cost effort .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You missed a step.True innovation takes effort.
Effort costs money It's more like this:True innovation takes inspiration.
Inspiration/innovation takes effort.
Effort costs time.
Time can cost money, or it can cost effort.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30041902</id>
	<title>Re:*sigh*</title>
	<author>Thinboy00</author>
	<datestamp>1257783660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always thought the existing seven senses were:</p><ol><li>Sight</li><li>Hearing</li><li>Smell</li><li>Taste</li><li>Touch</li><li> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vestibular\_system" title="wikipedia.org">Vestibular</a> [wikipedia.org] </li><li> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sense#Kinesthetic\_sense" title="wikipedia.org">Kinesthetic</a> [wikipedia.org] </li></ol></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always thought the existing seven senses were : SightHearingSmellTasteTouch Vestibular [ wikipedia.org ] Kinesthetic [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always thought the existing seven senses were:SightHearingSmellTasteTouch Vestibular [wikipedia.org]  Kinesthetic [wikipedia.org] </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30039426</id>
	<title>Re:SixthSense?</title>
	<author>nloop</author>
	<datestamp>1257766440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The link titled "demoed earlier this year" links to the slashdot story that was a summary of it.  It requires a tiny bit of thought and/or effort.  If it were summarized again then the story would be flamed with "DUPE! DUPE! DUPE! HOW DARE YOU DUPE ME SLASHDOT!" posts.  Whoever tagged the parent as insightful should not be given any more mod points.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The link titled " demoed earlier this year " links to the slashdot story that was a summary of it .
It requires a tiny bit of thought and/or effort .
If it were summarized again then the story would be flamed with " DUPE !
DUPE ! DUPE !
HOW DARE YOU DUPE ME SLASHDOT !
" posts .
Whoever tagged the parent as insightful should not be given any more mod points .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The link titled "demoed earlier this year" links to the slashdot story that was a summary of it.
It requires a tiny bit of thought and/or effort.
If it were summarized again then the story would be flamed with "DUPE!
DUPE! DUPE!
HOW DARE YOU DUPE ME SLASHDOT!
" posts.
Whoever tagged the parent as insightful should not be given any more mod points.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037058</id>
	<title>I don't get it...</title>
	<author>gabereiser</author>
	<datestamp>1257799500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mean, the tech is cool, don't get me wrong.  Having dealt with multitouch for some years now I get it.  But seriously, would anyone want to strap on a backpack, attach a bunch of gizmos to his chest, tape colors to his fingers, only to display PRE-PROGRAMMED information?  I mean, the video of him is all marketing gimmick.  A preloaded video of Barack Obama on the newspaper, clever bit of camera trickery.  I don't see this gaining traction anymore than those wearable computers with the little lcd screen in your eye glasses.  I would rather have a system that uses Augmented Reality.  This "contraption" was deemed open source by it's creator because it's creator knows no one is willing to fork over the cash to bring this to market because it's a terrible concept.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , the tech is cool , do n't get me wrong .
Having dealt with multitouch for some years now I get it .
But seriously , would anyone want to strap on a backpack , attach a bunch of gizmos to his chest , tape colors to his fingers , only to display PRE-PROGRAMMED information ?
I mean , the video of him is all marketing gimmick .
A preloaded video of Barack Obama on the newspaper , clever bit of camera trickery .
I do n't see this gaining traction anymore than those wearable computers with the little lcd screen in your eye glasses .
I would rather have a system that uses Augmented Reality .
This " contraption " was deemed open source by it 's creator because it 's creator knows no one is willing to fork over the cash to bring this to market because it 's a terrible concept .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, the tech is cool, don't get me wrong.
Having dealt with multitouch for some years now I get it.
But seriously, would anyone want to strap on a backpack, attach a bunch of gizmos to his chest, tape colors to his fingers, only to display PRE-PROGRAMMED information?
I mean, the video of him is all marketing gimmick.
A preloaded video of Barack Obama on the newspaper, clever bit of camera trickery.
I don't see this gaining traction anymore than those wearable computers with the little lcd screen in your eye glasses.
I would rather have a system that uses Augmented Reality.
This "contraption" was deemed open source by it's creator because it's creator knows no one is willing to fork over the cash to bring this to market because it's a terrible concept.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037048</id>
	<title>heh. I want this.</title>
	<author>Gnaythan1</author>
	<datestamp>1257799500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ever since watching the sixth sense TED conference, I've been wanting this, but I want the light projected in something you can't see unless you are wearing special glasses. That way the person I'm tagging doesn't know I've just printed on his chest that he's an idiot to avoid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ever since watching the sixth sense TED conference , I 've been wanting this , but I want the light projected in something you ca n't see unless you are wearing special glasses .
That way the person I 'm tagging does n't know I 've just printed on his chest that he 's an idiot to avoid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ever since watching the sixth sense TED conference, I've been wanting this, but I want the light projected in something you can't see unless you are wearing special glasses.
That way the person I'm tagging doesn't know I've just printed on his chest that he's an idiot to avoid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30043496</id>
	<title>Nothing to sell</title>
	<author>4D6963</author>
	<datestamp>1257848700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>The desire of inventors is always to get their work into the market as quickly as possible. Usually this means waiting for it to be turned into a useful, profitable invention. Mistry is bypassing this by going straight to open source.</i> </p><p>Cut the crap. The demo is nice and couldn't help but make me smile, but what is there to commercialise? This is just the same type of novelty crap you get to see all the time these days, wearable crap, augmented reality, tangible interfaces and other paper interfaces.

</p><p>You see new stuff like that everyday, from a dude making a techno beat by moving beer bottle caps around on a sheet of paper, some other dude cross fading recordings by driving around a desert area using GPS data, all these things are nice and make up for entertaining videos to post on blogs.

</p><p>But these thing have a major flaw: they don't answer to any need, they don't create any need, they don't solve any problem, and they're in no way anything like basic research. They're only novel crap done by bored geeks who want to do something 'cool' (and "look cool like Tom Cruise") with their excess of free time and their love for techy crap. That's why none of these things could be commercialised. You can dick around all you want with electronics and webcams with object recognition/movement detection, but you can't sell what you do because no one needs it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The desire of inventors is always to get their work into the market as quickly as possible .
Usually this means waiting for it to be turned into a useful , profitable invention .
Mistry is bypassing this by going straight to open source .
Cut the crap .
The demo is nice and could n't help but make me smile , but what is there to commercialise ?
This is just the same type of novelty crap you get to see all the time these days , wearable crap , augmented reality , tangible interfaces and other paper interfaces .
You see new stuff like that everyday , from a dude making a techno beat by moving beer bottle caps around on a sheet of paper , some other dude cross fading recordings by driving around a desert area using GPS data , all these things are nice and make up for entertaining videos to post on blogs .
But these thing have a major flaw : they do n't answer to any need , they do n't create any need , they do n't solve any problem , and they 're in no way anything like basic research .
They 're only novel crap done by bored geeks who want to do something 'cool ' ( and " look cool like Tom Cruise " ) with their excess of free time and their love for techy crap .
That 's why none of these things could be commercialised .
You can dick around all you want with electronics and webcams with object recognition/movement detection , but you ca n't sell what you do because no one needs it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> The desire of inventors is always to get their work into the market as quickly as possible.
Usually this means waiting for it to be turned into a useful, profitable invention.
Mistry is bypassing this by going straight to open source.
Cut the crap.
The demo is nice and couldn't help but make me smile, but what is there to commercialise?
This is just the same type of novelty crap you get to see all the time these days, wearable crap, augmented reality, tangible interfaces and other paper interfaces.
You see new stuff like that everyday, from a dude making a techno beat by moving beer bottle caps around on a sheet of paper, some other dude cross fading recordings by driving around a desert area using GPS data, all these things are nice and make up for entertaining videos to post on blogs.
But these thing have a major flaw: they don't answer to any need, they don't create any need, they don't solve any problem, and they're in no way anything like basic research.
They're only novel crap done by bored geeks who want to do something 'cool' (and "look cool like Tom Cruise") with their excess of free time and their love for techy crap.
That's why none of these things could be commercialised.
You can dick around all you want with electronics and webcams with object recognition/movement detection, but you can't sell what you do because no one needs it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30039378</id>
	<title>Re:paid to the canard?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257766200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Paid refers to when you receive your salary.<br>Salary is an old term dating back to the Roman Empire when soldiers were paid in salt due to its value.<br>A canard is a duck</p><p>So as you can see this saying relates to giving your pay check to a duck.</p><p>Wait! This could be an error in translation.<br>By canard he might have mean a young duck like a duckling or chick.</p><p>Ah! Of course! By "Giving your paycheck to a chick.", he means going to one of the towns finer pole dancing establishments.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Paid refers to when you receive your salary.Salary is an old term dating back to the Roman Empire when soldiers were paid in salt due to its value.A canard is a duckSo as you can see this saying relates to giving your pay check to a duck.Wait !
This could be an error in translation.By canard he might have mean a young duck like a duckling or chick.Ah !
Of course !
By " Giving your paycheck to a chick .
" , he means going to one of the towns finer pole dancing establishments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Paid refers to when you receive your salary.Salary is an old term dating back to the Roman Empire when soldiers were paid in salt due to its value.A canard is a duckSo as you can see this saying relates to giving your pay check to a duck.Wait!
This could be an error in translation.By canard he might have mean a young duck like a duckling or chick.Ah!
Of course!
By "Giving your paycheck to a chick.
", he means going to one of the towns finer pole dancing establishments.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037714</id>
	<title>Re:*sigh*</title>
	<author>Hewligan</author>
	<datestamp>1257759120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>I don't see how you can have a sense of acceleration. Perhaps change of acceleration....but acceleration? Categorically NO.
We orbit the sun, but i wager you have no sense of angular acceleration about the sun. The other senses are persistent.</i> </p><p>And, by the same logic, we cannot possibly see cars as we cannot see paramecium.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see how you can have a sense of acceleration .
Perhaps change of acceleration....but acceleration ?
Categorically NO .
We orbit the sun , but i wager you have no sense of angular acceleration about the sun .
The other senses are persistent .
And , by the same logic , we can not possibly see cars as we can not see paramecium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I don't see how you can have a sense of acceleration.
Perhaps change of acceleration....but acceleration?
Categorically NO.
We orbit the sun, but i wager you have no sense of angular acceleration about the sun.
The other senses are persistent.
And, by the same logic, we cannot possibly see cars as we cannot see paramecium.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30041934</id>
	<title>Re:*sigh*</title>
	<author>Thinboy00</author>
	<datestamp>1257783960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a bit of a stretch to consider <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/semicircular\_canals" title="wikipedia.org">this</a> [wikipedia.org] to be part of touch.</p><p>Have a look at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sense#Senses" title="wikipedia.org">this</a> [wikipedia.org] also.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a bit of a stretch to consider this [ wikipedia.org ] to be part of touch.Have a look at this [ wikipedia.org ] also .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a bit of a stretch to consider this [wikipedia.org] to be part of touch.Have a look at this [wikipedia.org] also.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30038488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30040360</id>
	<title>Re:*sigh*</title>
	<author>fatphil</author>
	<datestamp>1257771420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Noooo! The 6th sense is heat. Or cold, depending on how you order them.<br><br>Anyway, as you imply, anyone believing there are only 5 normal senses is living in a state of ignorance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Noooo !
The 6th sense is heat .
Or cold , depending on how you order them.Anyway , as you imply , anyone believing there are only 5 normal senses is living in a state of ignorance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Noooo!
The 6th sense is heat.
Or cold, depending on how you order them.Anyway, as you imply, anyone believing there are only 5 normal senses is living in a state of ignorance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036888</id>
	<title>I'm sure everyone thought of this ...</title>
	<author>NervousWreck</author>
	<datestamp>1257798720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>but this pretty much the embodiment of fears about privacy in the information age.</htmltext>
<tokenext>but this pretty much the embodiment of fears about privacy in the information age .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but this pretty much the embodiment of fears about privacy in the information age.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036842</id>
	<title>Re:paid to the canard?</title>
	<author>Saishuuheiki</author>
	<datestamp>1257798540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>'put paid to the canard'

This one confused me too, since it seemed like a mistake at first

a canard is a groundless rumor / belief

'put paid to' is a phrase meaning "to deal with effectively, to finish something off"

So, it means finishing off the groundless belief that they're incompatible</htmltext>
<tokenext>'put paid to the canard ' This one confused me too , since it seemed like a mistake at first a canard is a groundless rumor / belief 'put paid to ' is a phrase meaning " to deal with effectively , to finish something off " So , it means finishing off the groundless belief that they 're incompatible</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'put paid to the canard'

This one confused me too, since it seemed like a mistake at first

a canard is a groundless rumor / belief

'put paid to' is a phrase meaning "to deal with effectively, to finish something off"

So, it means finishing off the groundless belief that they're incompatible</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036688</id>
	<title>paid to the canard?</title>
	<author>poetmatt</author>
	<datestamp>1257797940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it me, or does this expression make almost no sense? Regardless of the intent I don't get why it follows with "that open source and innovation are incompatible, for all time."</p><p>Can someone translate this expression about canard?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it me , or does this expression make almost no sense ?
Regardless of the intent I do n't get why it follows with " that open source and innovation are incompatible , for all time .
" Can someone translate this expression about canard ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it me, or does this expression make almost no sense?
Regardless of the intent I don't get why it follows with "that open source and innovation are incompatible, for all time.
"Can someone translate this expression about canard?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30038010</id>
	<title>Re:*sigh*</title>
	<author>vlm</author>
	<datestamp>1257760380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't see how you can have a sense of acceleration. Perhaps change of acceleration....but acceleration? Categorically NO.<br>We orbit the sun, but i wager you have no sense of angular acceleration about the sun.</p></div><p>Substitute the word velocity for acceleration throughout your entire post, then you are correct.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see how you can have a sense of acceleration .
Perhaps change of acceleration....but acceleration ?
Categorically NO.We orbit the sun , but i wager you have no sense of angular acceleration about the sun.Substitute the word velocity for acceleration throughout your entire post , then you are correct .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see how you can have a sense of acceleration.
Perhaps change of acceleration....but acceleration?
Categorically NO.We orbit the sun, but i wager you have no sense of angular acceleration about the sun.Substitute the word velocity for acceleration throughout your entire post, then you are correct.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036832</id>
	<title>Re:paid to the canard?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257798540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>True innovation takes effort. Effort costs money. Giving away your stuff isn't usually a good way to make money.</p><p>"Open source" efforts are generally quite effective at delivering answers to problems that are already well-understood and answered. Witness the whole Open-source UNIX phenomenon - UNIX was an long-standing operating system in the 1980s when it really started to gain steam, and it's downright ancient today. The problems of running a POSIX-style system are well understood.</p><p>The BASH shell and environment of today would be quite recognizable by any UNIX developer circa 1978.</p><p>Truly new ideas, however, are usually "held back" and kept proprietary for a while during which time the inventor/developer of the idea profits. After a while, the patent expires, and since the patent itself is public information, when it expires, that information is then added to the pool of general knowledge kept by society.</p><p>In its basic inception, patents are a good thing!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>True innovation takes effort .
Effort costs money .
Giving away your stuff is n't usually a good way to make money .
" Open source " efforts are generally quite effective at delivering answers to problems that are already well-understood and answered .
Witness the whole Open-source UNIX phenomenon - UNIX was an long-standing operating system in the 1980s when it really started to gain steam , and it 's downright ancient today .
The problems of running a POSIX-style system are well understood.The BASH shell and environment of today would be quite recognizable by any UNIX developer circa 1978.Truly new ideas , however , are usually " held back " and kept proprietary for a while during which time the inventor/developer of the idea profits .
After a while , the patent expires , and since the patent itself is public information , when it expires , that information is then added to the pool of general knowledge kept by society.In its basic inception , patents are a good thing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True innovation takes effort.
Effort costs money.
Giving away your stuff isn't usually a good way to make money.
"Open source" efforts are generally quite effective at delivering answers to problems that are already well-understood and answered.
Witness the whole Open-source UNIX phenomenon - UNIX was an long-standing operating system in the 1980s when it really started to gain steam, and it's downright ancient today.
The problems of running a POSIX-style system are well understood.The BASH shell and environment of today would be quite recognizable by any UNIX developer circa 1978.Truly new ideas, however, are usually "held back" and kept proprietary for a while during which time the inventor/developer of the idea profits.
After a while, the patent expires, and since the patent itself is public information, when it expires, that information is then added to the pool of general knowledge kept by society.In its basic inception, patents are a good thing!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30041698</id>
	<title>Here's a great idea...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257781440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone should make this device work with the "beaming a display directly into your retina" story from slashdot two weeks ago. (http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/10/26/1845253/Companies-To-Invade-Your-Retinas-As-Soon-As-Next-Year?art\_pos=1)</p><p>That way,<br>- You wouldn't have to carry around the projector<br>- The camera could be mounted to the (hopefully stylish) glasses, so no carrying that around either<br>- Only you would get to see your "beamed images" (people like privacy)</p><p>Plus, I imagine it works best if you can get the camera as close to your line of eyesight as possible, especially when he makes the picture frame shape with his hands to take pictures.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone should make this device work with the " beaming a display directly into your retina " story from slashdot two weeks ago .
( http : //tech.slashdot.org/story/09/10/26/1845253/Companies-To-Invade-Your-Retinas-As-Soon-As-Next-Year ? art \ _pos = 1 ) That way,- You would n't have to carry around the projector- The camera could be mounted to the ( hopefully stylish ) glasses , so no carrying that around either- Only you would get to see your " beamed images " ( people like privacy ) Plus , I imagine it works best if you can get the camera as close to your line of eyesight as possible , especially when he makes the picture frame shape with his hands to take pictures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone should make this device work with the "beaming a display directly into your retina" story from slashdot two weeks ago.
(http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/10/26/1845253/Companies-To-Invade-Your-Retinas-As-Soon-As-Next-Year?art\_pos=1)That way,- You wouldn't have to carry around the projector- The camera could be mounted to the (hopefully stylish) glasses, so no carrying that around either- Only you would get to see your "beamed images" (people like privacy)Plus, I imagine it works best if you can get the camera as close to your line of eyesight as possible, especially when he makes the picture frame shape with his hands to take pictures.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30038636</id>
	<title>Re:lol</title>
	<author>ect5150</author>
	<datestamp>1257762840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I've never gotten paid for anything I've written. I give it all away. The reward is called "Pride"

As a society we simply need to find a way to make sure people like Pranav Mistry have gainful employment while they devlop things like this. As long as I have a decent job that pays my bills and afords me the time to work on software, I will continue to do so. But when employment barely pays my rent and my managers expect me to come in early and work late to the point that I have no time to do anything rewarding at all, everyone suffers because I can not continue to work on things that may or may not be profitable in the end.

In my opinion the biggest obstacle in the way of innovation is profit.</p></div><p>I think you misunderstand the idea of what profit is.  Re-read what you wrote, </p><p><div class="quote"><p>"to the point that I have no time to do anything rewarding at all"</p></div><p>How are you profiting there?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>"As long as I have a decent job that pays my bills and afords me the time to work on software"</p></div><p>You <b>are</b> profiting here.  But by your logic, if profit stands in the way of innovation, your having a job would stand in the way of your working on this software.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>"As a society we simply need to find a way to make sure people like Pranav Mistry have gainful employment while they develop things like this."</p></div><p>Not everyone values this as much as you may.  If what he develops is truly valued by others, they will actually pay for it.  You will give up some of your money - which came from time and effort on your part - to compensate him for his time and effort.  Otherwise, its just talk.  It would be as if I say I want a better environment, but I wouldn't want to pay for recycling.  This stuff doesn't just come for free - its not some boon society has received - just as your time and effort probably don't come for free.  Its fine if you want to work for free, but then the cost is all on  you.  Most people expect to be paid for their work.  If someone wants to come get my recycling without me paying for it, I'm fine with that.  But don't come to me later claiming you cannot afford your own bills and "barely pay your rent."  That's how you know if I value it or not.<br> <br>I know plenty of people may disagree, but then you are free to hire him for yourself to keep me quiet.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never gotten paid for anything I 've written .
I give it all away .
The reward is called " Pride " As a society we simply need to find a way to make sure people like Pranav Mistry have gainful employment while they devlop things like this .
As long as I have a decent job that pays my bills and afords me the time to work on software , I will continue to do so .
But when employment barely pays my rent and my managers expect me to come in early and work late to the point that I have no time to do anything rewarding at all , everyone suffers because I can not continue to work on things that may or may not be profitable in the end .
In my opinion the biggest obstacle in the way of innovation is profit.I think you misunderstand the idea of what profit is .
Re-read what you wrote , " to the point that I have no time to do anything rewarding at all " How are you profiting there ?
" As long as I have a decent job that pays my bills and afords me the time to work on software " You are profiting here .
But by your logic , if profit stands in the way of innovation , your having a job would stand in the way of your working on this software .
" As a society we simply need to find a way to make sure people like Pranav Mistry have gainful employment while they develop things like this .
" Not everyone values this as much as you may .
If what he develops is truly valued by others , they will actually pay for it .
You will give up some of your money - which came from time and effort on your part - to compensate him for his time and effort .
Otherwise , its just talk .
It would be as if I say I want a better environment , but I would n't want to pay for recycling .
This stuff does n't just come for free - its not some boon society has received - just as your time and effort probably do n't come for free .
Its fine if you want to work for free , but then the cost is all on you .
Most people expect to be paid for their work .
If someone wants to come get my recycling without me paying for it , I 'm fine with that .
But do n't come to me later claiming you can not afford your own bills and " barely pay your rent .
" That 's how you know if I value it or not .
I know plenty of people may disagree , but then you are free to hire him for yourself to keep me quiet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never gotten paid for anything I've written.
I give it all away.
The reward is called "Pride"

As a society we simply need to find a way to make sure people like Pranav Mistry have gainful employment while they devlop things like this.
As long as I have a decent job that pays my bills and afords me the time to work on software, I will continue to do so.
But when employment barely pays my rent and my managers expect me to come in early and work late to the point that I have no time to do anything rewarding at all, everyone suffers because I can not continue to work on things that may or may not be profitable in the end.
In my opinion the biggest obstacle in the way of innovation is profit.I think you misunderstand the idea of what profit is.
Re-read what you wrote, "to the point that I have no time to do anything rewarding at all"How are you profiting there?
"As long as I have a decent job that pays my bills and afords me the time to work on software"You are profiting here.
But by your logic, if profit stands in the way of innovation, your having a job would stand in the way of your working on this software.
"As a society we simply need to find a way to make sure people like Pranav Mistry have gainful employment while they develop things like this.
"Not everyone values this as much as you may.
If what he develops is truly valued by others, they will actually pay for it.
You will give up some of your money - which came from time and effort on your part - to compensate him for his time and effort.
Otherwise, its just talk.
It would be as if I say I want a better environment, but I wouldn't want to pay for recycling.
This stuff doesn't just come for free - its not some boon society has received - just as your time and effort probably don't come for free.
Its fine if you want to work for free, but then the cost is all on  you.
Most people expect to be paid for their work.
If someone wants to come get my recycling without me paying for it, I'm fine with that.
But don't come to me later claiming you cannot afford your own bills and "barely pay your rent.
"  That's how you know if I value it or not.
I know plenty of people may disagree, but then you are free to hire him for yourself to keep me quiet.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036854</id>
	<title>Re:paid to the canard?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257798600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"put paid" -- to finish something off<br>"canard" -- a false or unfounded report or story</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" put paid " -- to finish something off " canard " -- a false or unfounded report or story</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"put paid" -- to finish something off"canard" -- a false or unfounded report or story</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037162</id>
	<title>MIT License ?</title>
	<author>thebiss</author>
	<datestamp>1257800100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps that's too obvious? <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT\_License" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT\_License</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps that 's too obvious ?
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT \ _License [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps that's too obvious?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT\_License [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30043274</id>
	<title>dont break it up, it's "Sixth Sense" for intuition</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257845220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the said device is awesome at <strong>mixing technologies and information</strong> and producing astonishing amount of <strong>deductive / relevant</strong> information in a user-friendly interface.</p><p>that's the <strong>"Sixth Sense" / intuition</strong> part.</p><p>Not a 6th sense organ in the biological sense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the said device is awesome at mixing technologies and information and producing astonishing amount of deductive / relevant information in a user-friendly interface.that 's the " Sixth Sense " / intuition part.Not a 6th sense organ in the biological sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the said device is awesome at mixing technologies and information and producing astonishing amount of deductive / relevant information in a user-friendly interface.that's the "Sixth Sense" / intuition part.Not a 6th sense organ in the biological sense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037562</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037176</id>
	<title>put paid to the canard?</title>
	<author>drdrgivemethenews</author>
	<datestamp>1257800160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; has put paid to the canard that open source and innovation are incompatible for once and for all<br> <br>

Wrong. Depending who you talk to, innovation is either a great idea or a process. If it's a great idea, putting it out as open source says nothing about open source at all.  If it's a process, then it hasn't happened yet, because the idea only just now got introduced as open source and there's been no time for any process at all.<br> <br>

------<br> <br>

It's too bad all the people that really know how to run the country are busy writing blogs and running talk shows.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; has put paid to the canard that open source and innovation are incompatible for once and for all Wrong .
Depending who you talk to , innovation is either a great idea or a process .
If it 's a great idea , putting it out as open source says nothing about open source at all .
If it 's a process , then it has n't happened yet , because the idea only just now got introduced as open source and there 's been no time for any process at all .
------ It 's too bad all the people that really know how to run the country are busy writing blogs and running talk shows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; has put paid to the canard that open source and innovation are incompatible for once and for all 

Wrong.
Depending who you talk to, innovation is either a great idea or a process.
If it's a great idea, putting it out as open source says nothing about open source at all.
If it's a process, then it hasn't happened yet, because the idea only just now got introduced as open source and there's been no time for any process at all.
------ 

It's too bad all the people that really know how to run the country are busy writing blogs and running talk shows.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30039044</id>
	<title>Watched the video</title>
	<author>Dunbal</author>
	<datestamp>1257764640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The device is pretty cool. Of course there's a huge bottle-neck - the communications companies providing your connectivity. I'm sure they'd love a device like this as an excuse to gouge you even more on bandwidth and dig ever deeper into your pockets. So much so that the communication companies would probably make a device like this impractical. Unless you are willing to pay an extra $200/month low low "flat rate".</p><p>We need to get rid of the middlemen. Sadly that's not going to happen soon. Too bad such a creative, innovative machine is utterly impractical.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The device is pretty cool .
Of course there 's a huge bottle-neck - the communications companies providing your connectivity .
I 'm sure they 'd love a device like this as an excuse to gouge you even more on bandwidth and dig ever deeper into your pockets .
So much so that the communication companies would probably make a device like this impractical .
Unless you are willing to pay an extra $ 200/month low low " flat rate " .We need to get rid of the middlemen .
Sadly that 's not going to happen soon .
Too bad such a creative , innovative machine is utterly impractical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The device is pretty cool.
Of course there's a huge bottle-neck - the communications companies providing your connectivity.
I'm sure they'd love a device like this as an excuse to gouge you even more on bandwidth and dig ever deeper into your pockets.
So much so that the communication companies would probably make a device like this impractical.
Unless you are willing to pay an extra $200/month low low "flat rate".We need to get rid of the middlemen.
Sadly that's not going to happen soon.
Too bad such a creative, innovative machine is utterly impractical.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30038298</id>
	<title>Re:Imagine the uses for aviation?!?!</title>
	<author>wjsteele</author>
	<datestamp>1257761640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is already being done!!!  Check this out:  <a href="http://www.virtualhud.com/" title="virtualhud.com">VirtualHUD</a> [virtualhud.com] <br> <br>Bill</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is already being done ! ! !
Check this out : VirtualHUD [ virtualhud.com ] Bill</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is already being done!!!
Check this out:  VirtualHUD [virtualhud.com]  Bill</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30038400</id>
	<title>Media Lab?  Unless it comes from the 1st floor...</title>
	<author>snsh</author>
	<datestamp>1257762000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The stuff that comes out of upper floors of the Media Lab generally don't commercialize well. Anyone remember Charmed Technologies? A couple of grads from the same group tried to commercialize wearable computers - the company didn't survive the bubble collapsing.

The first floor of the Media Lab is different; they're more like traditional researchers and work on things like e-ink. But the upper floors generate demo after demo, that look cute and generate press, but not much commercial value.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The stuff that comes out of upper floors of the Media Lab generally do n't commercialize well .
Anyone remember Charmed Technologies ?
A couple of grads from the same group tried to commercialize wearable computers - the company did n't survive the bubble collapsing .
The first floor of the Media Lab is different ; they 're more like traditional researchers and work on things like e-ink .
But the upper floors generate demo after demo , that look cute and generate press , but not much commercial value .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The stuff that comes out of upper floors of the Media Lab generally don't commercialize well.
Anyone remember Charmed Technologies?
A couple of grads from the same group tried to commercialize wearable computers - the company didn't survive the bubble collapsing.
The first floor of the Media Lab is different; they're more like traditional researchers and work on things like e-ink.
But the upper floors generate demo after demo, that look cute and generate press, but not much commercial value.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037394</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get it...</title>
	<author>DeadDecoy</author>
	<datestamp>1257757920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not a terrible concept, it's simply a solution looking for a problem.<p><div class="quote"><p>But seriously, would anyone want to strap on a backpack, attach a bunch of gizmos to his chest, tape colors to his fingers, only to display PRE-PROGRAMMED information?</p></div><p>The object he's showing is a prototype and will naturally have a larger form-factor relative to any final product. The reason for the backpack is to have something to hold his dev machine which runs the software. This can easily be put into a smaller computer or micro-controller at some later point in time. And all those gizmos amount to the coordination of multiple devices: web cam and projector, simply because no one has thought to combine the items yet. Again, once there is a market for the combined features, products will probably follow. As for the pre-programmed information, it's certainly true that this performs a limited number of operations, but common, this is only one guy demoing his prototype. There could be plenty of additional operations once this product is open sourced. You just have no imagination
<br> <br>
Imagine if such a device was attached to 'the cloud' at some wi-fi cafe. I could be browsing some journal articles projected onto the table, and upon finding an interesting item, send it to a friend somewhere else in the world. Feeling the need to discuss, we could then have a video conference on that table. Once done, I might load up pong and wait until my food is served. A lot of this is a "marketing gimmick" because the uses of such a device have not yet been fully explored. There's a huge pipeline of products and software interfaces that need to be hacked out before its ready for the public, but it certainly holds potential. You just have to make it cheap enough for the average consumer and find that killer app. Personally I wouldn't mind such a device in place of a Kindle/Nook with a decent reference manager, and would probably hack away at the open source to make that happen.
<br> <br>
You're probably against this because you have no idea of how it could be useful or popular. But don't worry, a lot of other, smarter people will probably get it done for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not a terrible concept , it 's simply a solution looking for a problem.But seriously , would anyone want to strap on a backpack , attach a bunch of gizmos to his chest , tape colors to his fingers , only to display PRE-PROGRAMMED information ? The object he 's showing is a prototype and will naturally have a larger form-factor relative to any final product .
The reason for the backpack is to have something to hold his dev machine which runs the software .
This can easily be put into a smaller computer or micro-controller at some later point in time .
And all those gizmos amount to the coordination of multiple devices : web cam and projector , simply because no one has thought to combine the items yet .
Again , once there is a market for the combined features , products will probably follow .
As for the pre-programmed information , it 's certainly true that this performs a limited number of operations , but common , this is only one guy demoing his prototype .
There could be plenty of additional operations once this product is open sourced .
You just have no imagination Imagine if such a device was attached to 'the cloud ' at some wi-fi cafe .
I could be browsing some journal articles projected onto the table , and upon finding an interesting item , send it to a friend somewhere else in the world .
Feeling the need to discuss , we could then have a video conference on that table .
Once done , I might load up pong and wait until my food is served .
A lot of this is a " marketing gimmick " because the uses of such a device have not yet been fully explored .
There 's a huge pipeline of products and software interfaces that need to be hacked out before its ready for the public , but it certainly holds potential .
You just have to make it cheap enough for the average consumer and find that killer app .
Personally I would n't mind such a device in place of a Kindle/Nook with a decent reference manager , and would probably hack away at the open source to make that happen .
You 're probably against this because you have no idea of how it could be useful or popular .
But do n't worry , a lot of other , smarter people will probably get it done for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not a terrible concept, it's simply a solution looking for a problem.But seriously, would anyone want to strap on a backpack, attach a bunch of gizmos to his chest, tape colors to his fingers, only to display PRE-PROGRAMMED information?The object he's showing is a prototype and will naturally have a larger form-factor relative to any final product.
The reason for the backpack is to have something to hold his dev machine which runs the software.
This can easily be put into a smaller computer or micro-controller at some later point in time.
And all those gizmos amount to the coordination of multiple devices: web cam and projector, simply because no one has thought to combine the items yet.
Again, once there is a market for the combined features, products will probably follow.
As for the pre-programmed information, it's certainly true that this performs a limited number of operations, but common, this is only one guy demoing his prototype.
There could be plenty of additional operations once this product is open sourced.
You just have no imagination
 
Imagine if such a device was attached to 'the cloud' at some wi-fi cafe.
I could be browsing some journal articles projected onto the table, and upon finding an interesting item, send it to a friend somewhere else in the world.
Feeling the need to discuss, we could then have a video conference on that table.
Once done, I might load up pong and wait until my food is served.
A lot of this is a "marketing gimmick" because the uses of such a device have not yet been fully explored.
There's a huge pipeline of products and software interfaces that need to be hacked out before its ready for the public, but it certainly holds potential.
You just have to make it cheap enough for the average consumer and find that killer app.
Personally I wouldn't mind such a device in place of a Kindle/Nook with a decent reference manager, and would probably hack away at the open source to make that happen.
You're probably against this because you have no idea of how it could be useful or popular.
But don't worry, a lot of other, smarter people will probably get it done for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036910</id>
	<title>Re:paid to the canard?</title>
	<author>idontgno</author>
	<datestamp>1257798840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <a href="http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/293200.html" title="phrases.org.uk">"put paid to"</a> [phrases.org.uk] </p><p> <a href="http://cheetah.eb.com/dictionary/canard" title="eb.com">"canard"</a> [eb.com] (see def 1b)</p><p>I've been rightfully accused of highfalutin', but this was pretty impressive. On principles, I don't normally recommend writing to the third-grade level, but there is such a thing as too smart.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" put paid to " [ phrases.org.uk ] " canard " [ eb.com ] ( see def 1b ) I 've been rightfully accused of highfalutin ' , but this was pretty impressive .
On principles , I do n't normally recommend writing to the third-grade level , but there is such a thing as too smart .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "put paid to" [phrases.org.uk]  "canard" [eb.com] (see def 1b)I've been rightfully accused of highfalutin', but this was pretty impressive.
On principles, I don't normally recommend writing to the third-grade level, but there is such a thing as too smart.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036688</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30038010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30043522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30040360
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30144756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30041934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30038488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30041026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30046546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037294
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30039378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30055882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30038636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30039718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037294
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30039318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30038132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30042100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30039728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30041902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30038298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30043274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30043098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_171204_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30039426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_171204.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30039718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30046546
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_171204.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30040360
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037066
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30038488
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30041934
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30041902
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30039318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037272
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30038010
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037714
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037426
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30038132
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037620
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_171204.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036910
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037562
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30043274
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036832
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30039378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30144756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036824
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_171204.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30039044
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_171204.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30041698
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_171204.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036870
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_171204.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30055882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30043098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30038636
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30041026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037772
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30042100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30039728
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_171204.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037914
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037308
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_171204.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30039074
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_171204.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036992
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30039426
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_171204.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30038400
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_171204.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30043496
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_171204.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30036794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30043522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30038298
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_171204.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_171204.30037048
</commentlist>
</conversation>
