<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_08_1548211</id>
	<title>Swarm of Giant Jellyfish Capsize 10-Ton Trawler</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1257696780000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hughpickens.com/slashdot/" rel="nofollow">Hugh Pickens</a> writes <i>"The Telegraph reports that the Japanese trawler Diasan Shinsho-maru has capsized off the coast of China, as its three-man crew <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/6483758/Japanese-fishing-trawler-sunk-by-giant-jellyfish.html">dragged their net through a swarm of giant  jellyfish</a> (which can grow up to six feet in diameter and travel in packs) and tried to haul up a net that was too heavy. The crew was thrown into the sea when the vessel capsized, but the three men were rescued by another trawler. Relatively little is known about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nomura's\_Jellyfish">Nomura's jellyfish</a>, such as why some years see<a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/01/0119\_060119\_jellyfish.html"> thousands of the creatures floating across the Sea of Japan</a> on the Tsushima Current, but last year there were virtually no sightings. In 2007, there were 15,500 reports of damage to fishing equipment caused by the creatures. Experts believe that one contributing factor to the jellyfish becoming more frequent visitors to Japanese waters may be a decline in the number of predators, which include sea turtles and certain species of fish. 'Jellies have likely <a href="http://www.livescience.com/animals/081219-bts-jellyfish.html">swum and swarmed in our seas for over 600 million years</a>,' says scientist Monty Graham of the Dauphin Island Sea Lab in Alabama. 'When conditions are right, jelly swarms can form quickly. They appear to do this for sexual reproduction.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hugh Pickens writes " The Telegraph reports that the Japanese trawler Diasan Shinsho-maru has capsized off the coast of China , as its three-man crew dragged their net through a swarm of giant jellyfish ( which can grow up to six feet in diameter and travel in packs ) and tried to haul up a net that was too heavy .
The crew was thrown into the sea when the vessel capsized , but the three men were rescued by another trawler .
Relatively little is known about Nomura 's jellyfish , such as why some years see thousands of the creatures floating across the Sea of Japan on the Tsushima Current , but last year there were virtually no sightings .
In 2007 , there were 15,500 reports of damage to fishing equipment caused by the creatures .
Experts believe that one contributing factor to the jellyfish becoming more frequent visitors to Japanese waters may be a decline in the number of predators , which include sea turtles and certain species of fish .
'Jellies have likely swum and swarmed in our seas for over 600 million years, ' says scientist Monty Graham of the Dauphin Island Sea Lab in Alabama .
'When conditions are right , jelly swarms can form quickly .
They appear to do this for sexual reproduction .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hugh Pickens writes "The Telegraph reports that the Japanese trawler Diasan Shinsho-maru has capsized off the coast of China, as its three-man crew dragged their net through a swarm of giant  jellyfish (which can grow up to six feet in diameter and travel in packs) and tried to haul up a net that was too heavy.
The crew was thrown into the sea when the vessel capsized, but the three men were rescued by another trawler.
Relatively little is known about Nomura's jellyfish, such as why some years see thousands of the creatures floating across the Sea of Japan on the Tsushima Current, but last year there were virtually no sightings.
In 2007, there were 15,500 reports of damage to fishing equipment caused by the creatures.
Experts believe that one contributing factor to the jellyfish becoming more frequent visitors to Japanese waters may be a decline in the number of predators, which include sea turtles and certain species of fish.
'Jellies have likely swum and swarmed in our seas for over 600 million years,' says scientist Monty Graham of the Dauphin Island Sea Lab in Alabama.
'When conditions are right, jelly swarms can form quickly.
They appear to do this for sexual reproduction.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023002</id>
	<title>Re:I don't mean to Troll</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257703440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> In 2007, there were 15,500 reports of damage to fishing equipment caused by the creatures.</p></div></blockquote><p>In other news: Last year several thousands of SUVs were damaged by children who, for some reasons, were not constrained by their parents to stay inside all the time and instead failed to stay at the proper speed to move smoothly with the traffic. Due to the excellent structural protection from the SUVs their drivers did not suffer major physical injuries.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In 2007 , there were 15,500 reports of damage to fishing equipment caused by the creatures.In other news : Last year several thousands of SUVs were damaged by children who , for some reasons , were not constrained by their parents to stay inside all the time and instead failed to stay at the proper speed to move smoothly with the traffic .
Due to the excellent structural protection from the SUVs their drivers did not suffer major physical injuries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> In 2007, there were 15,500 reports of damage to fishing equipment caused by the creatures.In other news: Last year several thousands of SUVs were damaged by children who, for some reasons, were not constrained by their parents to stay inside all the time and instead failed to stay at the proper speed to move smoothly with the traffic.
Due to the excellent structural protection from the SUVs their drivers did not suffer major physical injuries.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023138</id>
	<title>polka face?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257704460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another thing for Japanese to hate....including dolphins, whales, and the Enola Gay</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another thing for Japanese to hate....including dolphins , whales , and the Enola Gay</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another thing for Japanese to hate....including dolphins, whales, and the Enola Gay</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30053948</id>
	<title>Re:I don't think we're ready for this jelly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257859620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You really can't kill them, if you do they proliferate even more and more will come.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You really ca n't kill them , if you do they proliferate even more and more will come .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You really can't kill them, if you do they proliferate even more and more will come.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30026070</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257681420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
The problem with farmed fish is that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aquaculture\_of\_salmon#Disease\_and\_parasites" title="wikipedia.org">most of the meat is contaminated with parasites</a> [wikipedia.org], such as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea\_louse" title="wikipedia.org">sea lice</a> [wikipedia.org].
</p><p>
Talk to anyone who works in a cannery that works with farmed fish - they'll tell you about having to pick the parasites off the flesh all day.
</p><p>
If these were land animals instead of fish, they would be classified as unfit for human consumption.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with farmed fish is that most of the meat is contaminated with parasites [ wikipedia.org ] , such as sea lice [ wikipedia.org ] .
Talk to anyone who works in a cannery that works with farmed fish - they 'll tell you about having to pick the parasites off the flesh all day .
If these were land animals instead of fish , they would be classified as unfit for human consumption .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
The problem with farmed fish is that most of the meat is contaminated with parasites [wikipedia.org], such as sea lice [wikipedia.org].
Talk to anyone who works in a cannery that works with farmed fish - they'll tell you about having to pick the parasites off the flesh all day.
If these were land animals instead of fish, they would be classified as unfit for human consumption.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30027970</id>
	<title>Re:Human Error</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257694560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's probably not the winching power which capsized the boat. A boat takes several times its own length to stop from any reasonable speed (or much worse; a large shipping freighter will take well over a mile to 'brake' to a halt from cruising speed).</p><p>I expect the boat was trawling along under power and the resistance suddenly came on the net. The winch probably locked up and the boat's momentum probably caused it to carry on forwards while the boom-mounted net pulled backwards, causing the capsize. Much like deploying a parachute out one side of the boat, really.</p><p>To address the article's stating they were "hauling in", they may simply have been winching while the boat was also under power. Cover more ocean that way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's probably not the winching power which capsized the boat .
A boat takes several times its own length to stop from any reasonable speed ( or much worse ; a large shipping freighter will take well over a mile to 'brake ' to a halt from cruising speed ) .I expect the boat was trawling along under power and the resistance suddenly came on the net .
The winch probably locked up and the boat 's momentum probably caused it to carry on forwards while the boom-mounted net pulled backwards , causing the capsize .
Much like deploying a parachute out one side of the boat , really.To address the article 's stating they were " hauling in " , they may simply have been winching while the boat was also under power .
Cover more ocean that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's probably not the winching power which capsized the boat.
A boat takes several times its own length to stop from any reasonable speed (or much worse; a large shipping freighter will take well over a mile to 'brake' to a halt from cruising speed).I expect the boat was trawling along under power and the resistance suddenly came on the net.
The winch probably locked up and the boat's momentum probably caused it to carry on forwards while the boom-mounted net pulled backwards, causing the capsize.
Much like deploying a parachute out one side of the boat, really.To address the article's stating they were "hauling in", they may simply have been winching while the boat was also under power.
Cover more ocean that way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022792</id>
	<title>Re:I don't think we're ready for this jelly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257702300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not just ecosystem balance, those things creep me the fuck out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not just ecosystem balance , those things creep me the fuck out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not just ecosystem balance, those things creep me the fuck out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30025352</id>
	<title>Alternative Use</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257676620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While I may be off base here I do have a suggestion; perhaps we could all cut a deal with the Japanese, give them a new country, preferably NOT in the middle of cyclone central, and far away from the Chinese, we then decimate the island, place all of the prison lifers/deathers on the island giving them only tools to hunt Jellyfish, and leave. We either get rid of the prisoners or the jellyfish and preferably BOTH. What's this "humane" you speak of?</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I may be off base here I do have a suggestion ; perhaps we could all cut a deal with the Japanese , give them a new country , preferably NOT in the middle of cyclone central , and far away from the Chinese , we then decimate the island , place all of the prison lifers/deathers on the island giving them only tools to hunt Jellyfish , and leave .
We either get rid of the prisoners or the jellyfish and preferably BOTH .
What 's this " humane " you speak of ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I may be off base here I do have a suggestion; perhaps we could all cut a deal with the Japanese, give them a new country, preferably NOT in the middle of cyclone central, and far away from the Chinese, we then decimate the island, place all of the prison lifers/deathers on the island giving them only tools to hunt Jellyfish, and leave.
We either get rid of the prisoners or the jellyfish and preferably BOTH.
What's this "humane" you speak of?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022522</id>
	<title>jelly fhish</title>
	<author>alxkit</author>
	<datestamp>1257700920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it looks like a job for SpongeBob and friends...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it looks like a job for SpongeBob and friends.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it looks like a job for SpongeBob and friends...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30032418</id>
	<title>Re:I don't mean to Troll</title>
	<author>Benfea</author>
	<datestamp>1257780840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I for one welcome our new Jellyfish overlords.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one welcome our new Jellyfish overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one welcome our new Jellyfish overlords.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30025390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024734</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257672240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah great, toxic giant squids, lets feed them to the poor sharks and get rid of both.</p><p>Anyhow, which species of 'giant squid' was it that was 'recorded on video for the first time' a couple years ago?...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah great , toxic giant squids , lets feed them to the poor sharks and get rid of both.Anyhow , which species of 'giant squid ' was it that was 'recorded on video for the first time ' a couple years ago ? .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah great, toxic giant squids, lets feed them to the poor sharks and get rid of both.Anyhow, which species of 'giant squid' was it that was 'recorded on video for the first time' a couple years ago?...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30028580</id>
	<title>This is happening in the US too</title>
	<author>MobyDisk</author>
	<datestamp>1257699720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the Chesapeake Bay, jellyfish populations are proportional to pollution.  Pollution kills the turtles that eat the jellyfish eggs and feeds the jellies.  They don't mind the cruddy water.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the Chesapeake Bay , jellyfish populations are proportional to pollution .
Pollution kills the turtles that eat the jellyfish eggs and feeds the jellies .
They do n't mind the cruddy water .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the Chesapeake Bay, jellyfish populations are proportional to pollution.
Pollution kills the turtles that eat the jellyfish eggs and feeds the jellies.
They don't mind the cruddy water.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023356</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257705660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the feed.  Ever eaten rabbit?  A wild rabbit has a taste that is very distinctive.  Farm raised rabbit has a rather soapy taste, so I won't eat it.  The only difference is, wild rabbit eat what wild rabbits are SUPPOSED to eat - green vegetation.  Farm raised rabbits eat prepared feed, which includes anti-biotics, possibly hormonal growth accelerators like they use for cattle - whatever the eggheads believe will grow the most meat for the least money.  Farm fisheries are the same.  It's near impossible to duplicate their natural diet, and if you could duplicate it, they would be far more expensive than wild fish.</p><p>Diet has everything to do with the flavor of the meat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the feed .
Ever eaten rabbit ?
A wild rabbit has a taste that is very distinctive .
Farm raised rabbit has a rather soapy taste , so I wo n't eat it .
The only difference is , wild rabbit eat what wild rabbits are SUPPOSED to eat - green vegetation .
Farm raised rabbits eat prepared feed , which includes anti-biotics , possibly hormonal growth accelerators like they use for cattle - whatever the eggheads believe will grow the most meat for the least money .
Farm fisheries are the same .
It 's near impossible to duplicate their natural diet , and if you could duplicate it , they would be far more expensive than wild fish.Diet has everything to do with the flavor of the meat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the feed.
Ever eaten rabbit?
A wild rabbit has a taste that is very distinctive.
Farm raised rabbit has a rather soapy taste, so I won't eat it.
The only difference is, wild rabbit eat what wild rabbits are SUPPOSED to eat - green vegetation.
Farm raised rabbits eat prepared feed, which includes anti-biotics, possibly hormonal growth accelerators like they use for cattle - whatever the eggheads believe will grow the most meat for the least money.
Farm fisheries are the same.
It's near impossible to duplicate their natural diet, and if you could duplicate it, they would be far more expensive than wild fish.Diet has everything to do with the flavor of the meat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024400</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>Scrameustache</author>
	<datestamp>1257713340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>wild rabbit eat what wild rabbits are SUPPOSED to eat</p></div><p>Their own poop?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>wild rabbit eat what wild rabbits are SUPPOSED to eatTheir own poop ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wild rabbit eat what wild rabbits are SUPPOSED to eatTheir own poop?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30032772</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>Civil\_Disobedient</author>
	<datestamp>1257782100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The problem with farmed fish is that most of the meat is contaminated with parasites [wikipedia.org], such as sea lice [wikipedia.org].</i></p><p>The wikipedia article you link to does not say that <b>most of the meat is contaminated</b>.  If you're going to make outrageous statements like this, please pick sources that actually back your claim.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with farmed fish is that most of the meat is contaminated with parasites [ wikipedia.org ] , such as sea lice [ wikipedia.org ] .The wikipedia article you link to does not say that most of the meat is contaminated .
If you 're going to make outrageous statements like this , please pick sources that actually back your claim .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with farmed fish is that most of the meat is contaminated with parasites [wikipedia.org], such as sea lice [wikipedia.org].The wikipedia article you link to does not say that most of the meat is contaminated.
If you're going to make outrageous statements like this, please pick sources that actually back your claim.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30026070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022564</id>
	<title>Woho!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257701100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's peanut butter jelly... fish?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's peanut butter jelly... fish ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's peanut butter jelly... fish?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023300</id>
	<title>I for one welcome...</title>
	<author>smitty777</author>
	<datestamp>1257705360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...our Cnidarian Overlords</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...our Cnidarian Overlords</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...our Cnidarian Overlords</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022768</id>
	<title>Re:I don't think we're ready for this jelly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257702180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What could possibly eat these things ?  THEY are the apex predator.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What could possibly eat these things ?
THEY are the apex predator .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What could possibly eat these things ?
THEY are the apex predator.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024110</id>
	<title>Re:'Sexual' reproduction?</title>
	<author>tomhath</author>
	<datestamp>1257711060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As opposed to what? Cloning?</p></div><p>No, as opposed to swarming for some other reason such as protection from predators, attacking Japanese fishermen, or as part of their agile software development process.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As opposed to what ?
Cloning ? No , as opposed to swarming for some other reason such as protection from predators , attacking Japanese fishermen , or as part of their agile software development process .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As opposed to what?
Cloning?No, as opposed to swarming for some other reason such as protection from predators, attacking Japanese fishermen, or as part of their agile software development process.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30034192</id>
	<title>Obl. South Park</title>
	<author>Taibhsear</author>
	<datestamp>1257787860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fuck you Dolphin! Fuck you Whale! Fuck you Jellyfish! (stab stab stab)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck you Dolphin !
Fuck you Whale !
Fuck you Jellyfish !
( stab stab stab )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck you Dolphin!
Fuck you Whale!
Fuck you Jellyfish!
(stab stab stab)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30025776</id>
	<title>Re:I don't think we're ready for this jelly</title>
	<author>Stormie</author>
	<datestamp>1257679620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Not to mention that every part of this particular jellyfish contains toxins. Every touching the top of the jellyfish will result in temporary numbness.</p></div></blockquote><p>So, it's no good for food, but it sounds like it could be great for getting high!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention that every part of this particular jellyfish contains toxins .
Every touching the top of the jellyfish will result in temporary numbness.So , it 's no good for food , but it sounds like it could be great for getting high !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention that every part of this particular jellyfish contains toxins.
Every touching the top of the jellyfish will result in temporary numbness.So, it's no good for food, but it sounds like it could be great for getting high!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474</id>
	<title>I don't think we're ready for this jelly</title>
	<author>BadAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1257700620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The worst part of this "invasion" is that the species isn't really tasty at all. Not to mention that every part of this particular jellyfish contains toxins. Every touching the top of the jellyfish will result in temporary numbness.</p><p>If they are proliferating because of a lack of predators, we should probably go ahead and kill as many of these as we can to maintain a good ecosystem balance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The worst part of this " invasion " is that the species is n't really tasty at all .
Not to mention that every part of this particular jellyfish contains toxins .
Every touching the top of the jellyfish will result in temporary numbness.If they are proliferating because of a lack of predators , we should probably go ahead and kill as many of these as we can to maintain a good ecosystem balance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The worst part of this "invasion" is that the species isn't really tasty at all.
Not to mention that every part of this particular jellyfish contains toxins.
Every touching the top of the jellyfish will result in temporary numbness.If they are proliferating because of a lack of predators, we should probably go ahead and kill as many of these as we can to maintain a good ecosystem balance.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022464</id>
	<title>But...</title>
	<author>Mitchell314</author>
	<datestamp>1257700560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do the jellyfish also serve as flotation devices?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do the jellyfish also serve as flotation devices ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do the jellyfish also serve as flotation devices?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024300</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>Runaway1956</author>
	<datestamp>1257712680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pigs have often been allowed to forage for mast, then penned up and fed corn and maybe some sweet feed for some weeks before slaughter.  Remember that a hog is an omnivore, so free ranging hogs eat some really NASTY stuff!<br>Even today, farmers who slaughter their own hogs for private consumption will replace the commercially prepared feeds with corn.<br>Would it work for rabbits?  Probably.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pigs have often been allowed to forage for mast , then penned up and fed corn and maybe some sweet feed for some weeks before slaughter .
Remember that a hog is an omnivore , so free ranging hogs eat some really NASTY stuff ! Even today , farmers who slaughter their own hogs for private consumption will replace the commercially prepared feeds with corn.Would it work for rabbits ?
Probably .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pigs have often been allowed to forage for mast, then penned up and fed corn and maybe some sweet feed for some weeks before slaughter.
Remember that a hog is an omnivore, so free ranging hogs eat some really NASTY stuff!Even today, farmers who slaughter their own hogs for private consumption will replace the commercially prepared feeds with corn.Would it work for rabbits?
Probably.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023574</id>
	<title>History shows again and again...</title>
	<author>denzacar</author>
	<datestamp>1257706920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>With a purposeful grimace and a terrible sound<br>He pulls the spitting high tension wires down</p><p>Helpless people on a subway train<br>Scream bug-eyed as he looks in on them</p><p>He picks up a bus and he throws it back down<br>As he wades through the buildings toward the center of town</p><p>Oh no, they say hes got to go<br>Go go Godzilla, yeah<br>Oh no, there goes Tokyo<br>Go go Godzilla, yeah</p><p>Rinji news o moshiagemasu!<br>Rinji news o moshiagemasu!<br>Godzilla ga ginza hoomen e mukatte imasu!<br>Daishkyu hinan shite kudasai!<br>Daishkyu hinan shite kudasai!</p><p>Oh no, they say hes got to go<br>Go go Godzilla, yeah<br>Oh no, there goes Tokyo<br>Go go Godzilla, yeah</p><p>History shows again and again<br>How nature points up the folly of men<br>Godzilla!</p> </div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>With a purposeful grimace and a terrible soundHe pulls the spitting high tension wires downHelpless people on a subway trainScream bug-eyed as he looks in on themHe picks up a bus and he throws it back downAs he wades through the buildings toward the center of townOh no , they say hes got to goGo go Godzilla , yeahOh no , there goes TokyoGo go Godzilla , yeahRinji news o moshiagemasu ! Rinji news o moshiagemasu ! Godzilla ga ginza hoomen e mukatte imasu ! Daishkyu hinan shite kudasai ! Daishkyu hinan shite kudasai ! Oh no , they say hes got to goGo go Godzilla , yeahOh no , there goes TokyoGo go Godzilla , yeahHistory shows again and againHow nature points up the folly of menGodzilla !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With a purposeful grimace and a terrible soundHe pulls the spitting high tension wires downHelpless people on a subway trainScream bug-eyed as he looks in on themHe picks up a bus and he throws it back downAs he wades through the buildings toward the center of townOh no, they say hes got to goGo go Godzilla, yeahOh no, there goes TokyoGo go Godzilla, yeahRinji news o moshiagemasu!Rinji news o moshiagemasu!Godzilla ga ginza hoomen e mukatte imasu!Daishkyu hinan shite kudasai!Daishkyu hinan shite kudasai!Oh no, they say hes got to goGo go Godzilla, yeahOh no, there goes TokyoGo go Godzilla, yeahHistory shows again and againHow nature points up the folly of menGodzilla! 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30025390</id>
	<title>Re:I don't mean to Troll</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257676860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, it's only human error when several truck loads of small sardines capsize your ship. In fact, when it comes to the hierarchy of Japanese fishermen, the fishermen that get capsized by sardines tend not to want to talk about it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it 's only human error when several truck loads of small sardines capsize your ship .
In fact , when it comes to the hierarchy of Japanese fishermen , the fishermen that get capsized by sardines tend not to want to talk about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it's only human error when several truck loads of small sardines capsize your ship.
In fact, when it comes to the hierarchy of Japanese fishermen, the fishermen that get capsized by sardines tend not to want to talk about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023596</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257707040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bingo. There's actually plenty of active research on what happens to habitats that lose their predators. It of course varies dramatically between habitats, but there's good evidence that humans actually can not (or will not) replicate the effects of these predators in a habitat.</p><p>I saw a talk recently by this guy (Bill Ripple) discussing research results that will be coming out fairly soon. Basically, they examined a couple of habitats and found that habitats with predators (wolves and cougars, in the places they did their studies checked) were -dramatically- more healthy than those without.</p><p>This seems obvious, but the slides he had were eye-opening, for me. I recommend reading more, though the main research isn't published yet. There is still plenty of good stuff here:<br><a href="http://www.forestry.oregonstate.edu/wolves/" title="oregonstate.edu" rel="nofollow">http://www.forestry.oregonstate.edu/wolves/</a> [oregonstate.edu]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bingo .
There 's actually plenty of active research on what happens to habitats that lose their predators .
It of course varies dramatically between habitats , but there 's good evidence that humans actually can not ( or will not ) replicate the effects of these predators in a habitat.I saw a talk recently by this guy ( Bill Ripple ) discussing research results that will be coming out fairly soon .
Basically , they examined a couple of habitats and found that habitats with predators ( wolves and cougars , in the places they did their studies checked ) were -dramatically- more healthy than those without.This seems obvious , but the slides he had were eye-opening , for me .
I recommend reading more , though the main research is n't published yet .
There is still plenty of good stuff here : http : //www.forestry.oregonstate.edu/wolves/ [ oregonstate.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bingo.
There's actually plenty of active research on what happens to habitats that lose their predators.
It of course varies dramatically between habitats, but there's good evidence that humans actually can not (or will not) replicate the effects of these predators in a habitat.I saw a talk recently by this guy (Bill Ripple) discussing research results that will be coming out fairly soon.
Basically, they examined a couple of habitats and found that habitats with predators (wolves and cougars, in the places they did their studies checked) were -dramatically- more healthy than those without.This seems obvious, but the slides he had were eye-opening, for me.
I recommend reading more, though the main research isn't published yet.
There is still plenty of good stuff here:http://www.forestry.oregonstate.edu/wolves/ [oregonstate.edu]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024272</id>
	<title>Its a potent of future diaster</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257712380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Japanese nuclear radiation has stirred up Godzilla into an attack on
one of the Cephalopod kings of the Major Arcana. The world is
doomed. The only question is how we will die. Screaming Mad
from Cthulhu, or Alien inversion from Waking Kraken.
<p>
---
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/blogs/Cryptozoology/feed.html" title="feeddistiller.com">Cryptozoology</a> [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ <a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/" title="feeddistiller.com">Feed Distiller</a> [feeddistiller.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Japanese nuclear radiation has stirred up Godzilla into an attack on one of the Cephalopod kings of the Major Arcana .
The world is doomed .
The only question is how we will die .
Screaming Mad from Cthulhu , or Alien inversion from Waking Kraken .
--- Cryptozoology [ feeddistiller.com ] Feed @ Feed Distiller [ feeddistiller.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Japanese nuclear radiation has stirred up Godzilla into an attack on
one of the Cephalopod kings of the Major Arcana.
The world is
doomed.
The only question is how we will die.
Screaming Mad
from Cthulhu, or Alien inversion from Waking Kraken.
---

Cryptozoology [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ Feed Distiller [feeddistiller.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30028100</id>
	<title>Re:I don't mean to Troll</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257695760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Note to larger audience:</p><p>The parent is referring to the US Iron chef - not the Japanese one that the rest of the world watches...........</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Note to larger audience : The parent is referring to the US Iron chef - not the Japanese one that the rest of the world watches.......... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Note to larger audience:The parent is referring to the US Iron chef - not the Japanese one that the rest of the world watches...........</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30025406</id>
	<title>Be prepared (or at least forewarned)</title>
	<author>Daetrin</author>
	<datestamp>1257677040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am totally unsurprised by this development after reading about the <a href="http://www.cracked.com/article/82\_5-species-that-seem-to-be-trying-to-take-over-earth/" title="cracked.com">5 species that seem to be trying to take over the earth</a> [cracked.com] article at Cracked.com.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am totally unsurprised by this development after reading about the 5 species that seem to be trying to take over the earth [ cracked.com ] article at Cracked.com .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am totally unsurprised by this development after reading about the 5 species that seem to be trying to take over the earth [cracked.com] article at Cracked.com.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024016</id>
	<title>Re:I don't mean to Troll</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257710100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in other news visitors from the middle east were tragically killed when the twin towers of the world trade center blocked the path of the jet they were traveling on. the pentagon building and a field in Pennsylvania were responsible for similar incidents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in other news visitors from the middle east were tragically killed when the twin towers of the world trade center blocked the path of the jet they were traveling on .
the pentagon building and a field in Pennsylvania were responsible for similar incidents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in other news visitors from the middle east were tragically killed when the twin towers of the world trade center blocked the path of the jet they were traveling on.
the pentagon building and a field in Pennsylvania were responsible for similar incidents.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30030692</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>unick</author>
	<datestamp>1257766440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A subtle difference in taste is enough for you to not save an ecosystem ?  Maybe we should not be so snobbish food if it can help the planet.  I stopped eating meat even though I find it tasteful.  If farmed fish would indeed be a solution to keeping the ecosystem in balance, then surely this small sacrifice in taste is worth it ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>A subtle difference in taste is enough for you to not save an ecosystem ?
Maybe we should not be so snobbish food if it can help the planet .
I stopped eating meat even though I find it tasteful .
If farmed fish would indeed be a solution to keeping the ecosystem in balance , then surely this small sacrifice in taste is worth it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A subtle difference in taste is enough for you to not save an ecosystem ?
Maybe we should not be so snobbish food if it can help the planet.
I stopped eating meat even though I find it tasteful.
If farmed fish would indeed be a solution to keeping the ecosystem in balance, then surely this small sacrifice in taste is worth it ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023848</id>
	<title>Re:'Sexual' reproduction?</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1257708840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As opposed to what? Cloning?</p></div><p>Actually, yes.  Jellyfish normally asexually reproduce; essentially cloning.  They can also sexually reproduce.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As opposed to what ?
Cloning ? Actually , yes .
Jellyfish normally asexually reproduce ; essentially cloning .
They can also sexually reproduce .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As opposed to what?
Cloning?Actually, yes.
Jellyfish normally asexually reproduce; essentially cloning.
They can also sexually reproduce.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022930</id>
	<title>Re:I don't think we're ready for this jelly</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1257702960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>More activity to hunt this things probably will also hurt even more their predators or whatever contributed to regulate their numbers. The best way to get to balance is to try to repair what we did to unbalance things, like stop/minimize hunting sea turtles or that species of fishes that controlled their numbers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>More activity to hunt this things probably will also hurt even more their predators or whatever contributed to regulate their numbers .
The best way to get to balance is to try to repair what we did to unbalance things , like stop/minimize hunting sea turtles or that species of fishes that controlled their numbers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More activity to hunt this things probably will also hurt even more their predators or whatever contributed to regulate their numbers.
The best way to get to balance is to try to repair what we did to unbalance things, like stop/minimize hunting sea turtles or that species of fishes that controlled their numbers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30030290</id>
	<title>Re:I don't mean to Troll</title>
	<author>EricTheO</author>
	<datestamp>1257761580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But didn't human error capsize this ship?</p></div><p>YES!<br>
&nbsp; If you don't have sense enough to properly gauge the strain on you trawling rig and factor in... say the current sea state and speed of the vessel, you are bound to have trouble.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But did n't human error capsize this ship ? YES !
  If you do n't have sense enough to properly gauge the strain on you trawling rig and factor in... say the current sea state and speed of the vessel , you are bound to have trouble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But didn't human error capsize this ship?YES!
  If you don't have sense enough to properly gauge the strain on you trawling rig and factor in... say the current sea state and speed of the vessel, you are bound to have trouble.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022584</id>
	<title>Re:I don't mean to Troll</title>
	<author>OzPeter</author>
	<datestamp>1257701220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But didn't human error capsize this ship?</p></div><p>Another fine first post wasted by common sense and intelligence.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But did n't human error capsize this ship ? Another fine first post wasted by common sense and intelligence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But didn't human error capsize this ship?Another fine first post wasted by common sense and intelligence.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023366</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>spitzak</author>
	<datestamp>1257705720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um, "fresh" for fish means "not-frozen", and has nothing to do with whether it is farmed or not. I think the term you are looking for is "wild" or perhaps "not-farmed".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , " fresh " for fish means " not-frozen " , and has nothing to do with whether it is farmed or not .
I think the term you are looking for is " wild " or perhaps " not-farmed " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, "fresh" for fish means "not-frozen", and has nothing to do with whether it is farmed or not.
I think the term you are looking for is "wild" or perhaps "not-farmed".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023600</id>
	<title>Soylent</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257707100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>After all, fishing is *so* primitive. Civilized people *grow* their food, hunter/gatherer economics are for barbarians.</p></div><p>I for one welcome our new Soylent Green overloards.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>After all , fishing is * so * primitive .
Civilized people * grow * their food , hunter/gatherer economics are for barbarians.I for one welcome our new Soylent Green overloards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all, fishing is *so* primitive.
Civilized people *grow* their food, hunter/gatherer economics are for barbarians.I for one welcome our new Soylent Green overloards.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023800</id>
	<title>Oblig. South Park reference</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257708480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Japanese fishers running into problems, again?</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ikr5\_QpdQpY" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">"Fuck you, jellyfish!"</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Japanese fishers running into problems , again ?
" Fuck you , jellyfish !
" [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Japanese fishers running into problems, again?
"Fuck you, jellyfish!
" [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30028758</id>
	<title>Catalyst Video/Story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257701400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> Anyone interested in some background on these jellyfish in video form can have a look at the (Australian) ABC's catalyst program - <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/2721180.htm" title="abc.net.au" rel="nofollow">http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/2721180.htm</a> [abc.net.au]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone interested in some background on these jellyfish in video form can have a look at the ( Australian ) ABC 's catalyst program - http : //www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/2721180.htm [ abc.net.au ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Anyone interested in some background on these jellyfish in video form can have a look at the (Australian) ABC's catalyst program - http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/2721180.htm [abc.net.au]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023160</id>
	<title>Re:I don't mean to Troll</title>
	<author>flyneye</author>
	<datestamp>1257704580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It definitely was, but I'm sure they weren't " trolling" for jellyfish.   (BA BOOM CHANG)</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; NEXT!</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It definitely was , but I 'm sure they were n't " trolling " for jellyfish .
( BA BOOM CHANG )           NEXT !
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>It definitely was, but I'm sure they weren't " trolling" for jellyfish.
(BA BOOM CHANG)
          NEXT!
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30026042</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>willy\_me</author>
	<datestamp>1257681300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Diet has everything to do with the flavor of the meat.</p></div><p>Not just diet - also exercise.  Unused muscle tends to not taste very good.  If it were just diet, farmers would simply change the diet of the animal for the last couple of weeks to change the taste.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Diet has everything to do with the flavor of the meat.Not just diet - also exercise .
Unused muscle tends to not taste very good .
If it were just diet , farmers would simply change the diet of the animal for the last couple of weeks to change the taste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Diet has everything to do with the flavor of the meat.Not just diet - also exercise.
Unused muscle tends to not taste very good.
If it were just diet, farmers would simply change the diet of the animal for the last couple of weeks to change the taste.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023618</id>
	<title>'Sexual' reproduction?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257707220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>When conditions are right, jelly swarms can form quickly. They appear to do this for sexual reproduction.</p></div></blockquote><p>As opposed to what? Cloning?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When conditions are right , jelly swarms can form quickly .
They appear to do this for sexual reproduction.As opposed to what ?
Cloning ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When conditions are right, jelly swarms can form quickly.
They appear to do this for sexual reproduction.As opposed to what?
Cloning?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023562</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257706800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Civilized people *grow* their food, hunter/gatherer economics are for barbarians.</p><p>That's what \_you\_ think.</p><p>Civilized ones over here know e.g. that grown salmon has more pollutants than natural fished.</p><p>Also, this idea of growing is a lot more complex than it seems... some primitive folks have rituals to seed new "harvests" (which they won't tend, but will use), to help predators and natural defenders (like insects).</p><p>Seems the civilized ones cannot learn how to behave inside their society \_and\_ outside, too.</p><p>FWIW, I believe there will come a day -- too far in the future from now -- when we will relearn how to profit from Nature being gatherers again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Civilized people * grow * their food , hunter/gatherer economics are for barbarians.That 's what \ _you \ _ think.Civilized ones over here know e.g .
that grown salmon has more pollutants than natural fished.Also , this idea of growing is a lot more complex than it seems... some primitive folks have rituals to seed new " harvests " ( which they wo n't tend , but will use ) , to help predators and natural defenders ( like insects ) .Seems the civilized ones can not learn how to behave inside their society \ _and \ _ outside , too.FWIW , I believe there will come a day -- too far in the future from now -- when we will relearn how to profit from Nature being gatherers again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Civilized people *grow* their food, hunter/gatherer economics are for barbarians.That's what \_you\_ think.Civilized ones over here know e.g.
that grown salmon has more pollutants than natural fished.Also, this idea of growing is a lot more complex than it seems... some primitive folks have rituals to seed new "harvests" (which they won't tend, but will use), to help predators and natural defenders (like insects).Seems the civilized ones cannot learn how to behave inside their society \_and\_ outside, too.FWIW, I believe there will come a day -- too far in the future from now -- when we will relearn how to profit from Nature being gatherers again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30033204</id>
	<title>Sea Lab in Alabama</title>
	<author>cons-cell</author>
	<datestamp>1257783900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're doing it wrong.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're doing it wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're doing it wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023122</id>
	<title>Human Error</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257704400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>But didn't human error capsize this ship?</p></div></blockquote><p>Seems likely.
</p><p>The article at Telegraph states: "The trawler, the Diasan Shinsho-maru, capsized off Chiba`as its three-man crew was trying to haul in a net containing dozens of huge Nomura's jellyfish."</p><p>The Slashdot submitter states:  "... three-man crew dragged their net through a swarm of giant jellyfish<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and tried to haul up a net that was too heavy."</p><p>There's some difference between "haul in" and "haul up", but in both cases the ship's crew is hauling. Sounds to me like the crew capsized their boat by hauling too hard.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But did n't human error capsize this ship ? Seems likely .
The article at Telegraph states : " The trawler , the Diasan Shinsho-maru , capsized off Chiba ` as its three-man crew was trying to haul in a net containing dozens of huge Nomura 's jellyfish .
" The Slashdot submitter states : " ... three-man crew dragged their net through a swarm of giant jellyfish ... and tried to haul up a net that was too heavy .
" There 's some difference between " haul in " and " haul up " , but in both cases the ship 's crew is hauling .
Sounds to me like the crew capsized their boat by hauling too hard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But didn't human error capsize this ship?Seems likely.
The article at Telegraph states: "The trawler, the Diasan Shinsho-maru, capsized off Chiba`as its three-man crew was trying to haul in a net containing dozens of huge Nomura's jellyfish.
"The Slashdot submitter states:  "... three-man crew dragged their net through a swarm of giant jellyfish ... and tried to haul up a net that was too heavy.
"There's some difference between "haul in" and "haul up", but in both cases the ship's crew is hauling.
Sounds to me like the crew capsized their boat by hauling too hard.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024346</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>Brigadier</author>
	<datestamp>1257713040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always thought it interesting that people think equilibrium is a ecosystem free of humans. Aren't humans a part of the ecosystem. True equilibrium is our food source dying, followed by world starvation.  The environmental push has nothing to do with the environment but is in fact human preservation. Let's call it exactly what it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always thought it interesting that people think equilibrium is a ecosystem free of humans .
Are n't humans a part of the ecosystem .
True equilibrium is our food source dying , followed by world starvation .
The environmental push has nothing to do with the environment but is in fact human preservation .
Let 's call it exactly what it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always thought it interesting that people think equilibrium is a ecosystem free of humans.
Aren't humans a part of the ecosystem.
True equilibrium is our food source dying, followed by world starvation.
The environmental push has nothing to do with the environment but is in fact human preservation.
Let's call it exactly what it is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30025614</id>
	<title>It explains itself</title>
	<author>arielCo</author>
	<datestamp>1257678300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They appear to do this for sexual reproduction.</p></div><p>I don't know you, but I'd be pretty pissed if someone dragged me in a net while looking around to hook up. Not that jellyfish get blue balls or anything like that, but still sucks.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They appear to do this for sexual reproduction.I do n't know you , but I 'd be pretty pissed if someone dragged me in a net while looking around to hook up .
Not that jellyfish get blue balls or anything like that , but still sucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They appear to do this for sexual reproduction.I don't know you, but I'd be pretty pissed if someone dragged me in a net while looking around to hook up.
Not that jellyfish get blue balls or anything like that, but still sucks.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30041608</id>
	<title>Re:I don't mean to Troll</title>
	<author>narcberry</author>
	<datestamp>1257780600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, it was global warming.</p><p>Wait, there really wasn't a reference to global warming? Are we growing up as a society?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it was global warming.Wait , there really was n't a reference to global warming ?
Are we growing up as a society ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it was global warming.Wait, there really wasn't a reference to global warming?
Are we growing up as a society?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30037664</id>
	<title>Secret Saturdays</title>
	<author>mhajicek</author>
	<datestamp>1257758880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've seen that episode of Secret Saturdays.  Someone on board must have had a sonic mind control device that attracted them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen that episode of Secret Saturdays .
Someone on board must have had a sonic mind control device that attracted them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen that episode of Secret Saturdays.
Someone on board must have had a sonic mind control device that attracted them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30028440</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257698700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>True equilibrium is our food source dying, followed by world starvation.</i></p><p>(Insert Inigo Montoya quote about word definitions here)</p><p>True equilibrium would be when the rate at which people consume natural resources matches the rate at which those resources respawn.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>True equilibrium is our food source dying , followed by world starvation .
( Insert Inigo Montoya quote about word definitions here ) True equilibrium would be when the rate at which people consume natural resources matches the rate at which those resources respawn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True equilibrium is our food source dying, followed by world starvation.
(Insert Inigo Montoya quote about word definitions here)True equilibrium would be when the rate at which people consume natural resources matches the rate at which those resources respawn.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023846</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257708780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So I wonder... would a farm rabbit raised on feed taste better if its diet were changed to something more natural say... a month or so... before it was killed?  Or is this something that happens over the entire course of its life?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So I wonder... would a farm rabbit raised on feed taste better if its diet were changed to something more natural say... a month or so... before it was killed ?
Or is this something that happens over the entire course of its life ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I wonder... would a farm rabbit raised on feed taste better if its diet were changed to something more natural say... a month or so... before it was killed?
Or is this something that happens over the entire course of its life?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023790</id>
	<title>Re:I don't think we're ready for this jelly</title>
	<author>grumling</author>
	<datestamp>1257708420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like it could be the next big recreational drug.</p><p>One man's toxin is another man's lost weekend.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like it could be the next big recreational drug.One man 's toxin is another man 's lost weekend .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like it could be the next big recreational drug.One man's toxin is another man's lost weekend.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024170</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>drsquare</author>
	<datestamp>1257711480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>After all, fishing is *so* primitive. Civilized people *grow* their food, hunter/gatherer economics are for barbarians.</p></div></blockquote><p>Farmed fish are inferior to wild fish, and need to be fed from wild fish anyway. Civilised people eat whatever's nicest and most convenient.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>After all , fishing is * so * primitive .
Civilized people * grow * their food , hunter/gatherer economics are for barbarians.Farmed fish are inferior to wild fish , and need to be fed from wild fish anyway .
Civilised people eat whatever 's nicest and most convenient .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all, fishing is *so* primitive.
Civilized people *grow* their food, hunter/gatherer economics are for barbarians.Farmed fish are inferior to wild fish, and need to be fed from wild fish anyway.
Civilised people eat whatever's nicest and most convenient.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023812</id>
	<title>Re:'Sexual' reproduction?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257708540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; As opposed to what? Cloning?</p><p>Well, yes, actually.  Jellyfish reproduce both sexually and asexually.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; As opposed to what ?
Cloning ? Well , yes , actually .
Jellyfish reproduce both sexually and asexually .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; As opposed to what?
Cloning?Well, yes, actually.
Jellyfish reproduce both sexually and asexually.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022628</id>
	<title>Re:I don't think we're ready for this jelly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257701460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a big todo about nothing. Though jellyfish are a problem in and around Japan, it's not a problem in the seas of China because of the Chinese needle fish. It is confused for a snake (the Chinese needle snake) but is actually an eel.  The easiest thing to do is to introduce the needle fish to the waters around Japan.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a big todo about nothing .
Though jellyfish are a problem in and around Japan , it 's not a problem in the seas of China because of the Chinese needle fish .
It is confused for a snake ( the Chinese needle snake ) but is actually an eel .
The easiest thing to do is to introduce the needle fish to the waters around Japan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a big todo about nothing.
Though jellyfish are a problem in and around Japan, it's not a problem in the seas of China because of the Chinese needle fish.
It is confused for a snake (the Chinese needle snake) but is actually an eel.
The easiest thing to do is to introduce the needle fish to the waters around Japan.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022948</id>
	<title>It's not that</title>
	<author>Das Auge</author>
	<datestamp>1257703080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not a lack of predators.  The problem with this particular jellyfish stems from increased global temperature and pollution from China (near Hong Kong).<br>
<br>
Thinking about it, the Chinese and Japanese will eat <b>rhino <i>penis</i> </b> because they think it's an aphrodisiac.  Someone should tell them that eating giant jellyfish will give them a bigger penis.<br>
<br>Problem solved.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not a lack of predators .
The problem with this particular jellyfish stems from increased global temperature and pollution from China ( near Hong Kong ) .
Thinking about it , the Chinese and Japanese will eat rhino penis because they think it 's an aphrodisiac .
Someone should tell them that eating giant jellyfish will give them a bigger penis .
Problem solved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not a lack of predators.
The problem with this particular jellyfish stems from increased global temperature and pollution from China (near Hong Kong).
Thinking about it, the Chinese and Japanese will eat rhino penis  because they think it's an aphrodisiac.
Someone should tell them that eating giant jellyfish will give them a bigger penis.
Problem solved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30026396</id>
	<title>Re:I don't think we're ready for this jelly</title>
	<author>blyloveranger</author>
	<datestamp>1257683580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While I can't say anything about the test of them, but Nomura's Jelly Fish is one of the (I think) two jelly fish eaten in China and Japan.  Along with, according to the Japanese Wikipedia, a jelly fish, appropriately called the Edible jellyfish, though the scientific name is Rhopilema esculenta. While the Edible jellyfish is know as more delicious and fetches a higher price in China they are both perfectly edible.

The other problem is China and Japan view the problem differently, because Japanese people do not traditionally eat jellyfish they tend to view the surplus of jellyfish in terms of invaders, while China has a tendency to view it as more jellyfish to eat.

Though there are several Japanese companies who have started using Nomura's jellyfish as an ingredient in different foods as a way to try to deal with the influx of the jellyfish in recent years.  This caused several problems last year, when several companies were expecting hauls of jellyfish last year to find almost none appearing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I ca n't say anything about the test of them , but Nomura 's Jelly Fish is one of the ( I think ) two jelly fish eaten in China and Japan .
Along with , according to the Japanese Wikipedia , a jelly fish , appropriately called the Edible jellyfish , though the scientific name is Rhopilema esculenta .
While the Edible jellyfish is know as more delicious and fetches a higher price in China they are both perfectly edible .
The other problem is China and Japan view the problem differently , because Japanese people do not traditionally eat jellyfish they tend to view the surplus of jellyfish in terms of invaders , while China has a tendency to view it as more jellyfish to eat .
Though there are several Japanese companies who have started using Nomura 's jellyfish as an ingredient in different foods as a way to try to deal with the influx of the jellyfish in recent years .
This caused several problems last year , when several companies were expecting hauls of jellyfish last year to find almost none appearing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I can't say anything about the test of them, but Nomura's Jelly Fish is one of the (I think) two jelly fish eaten in China and Japan.
Along with, according to the Japanese Wikipedia, a jelly fish, appropriately called the Edible jellyfish, though the scientific name is Rhopilema esculenta.
While the Edible jellyfish is know as more delicious and fetches a higher price in China they are both perfectly edible.
The other problem is China and Japan view the problem differently, because Japanese people do not traditionally eat jellyfish they tend to view the surplus of jellyfish in terms of invaders, while China has a tendency to view it as more jellyfish to eat.
Though there are several Japanese companies who have started using Nomura's jellyfish as an ingredient in different foods as a way to try to deal with the influx of the jellyfish in recent years.
This caused several problems last year, when several companies were expecting hauls of jellyfish last year to find almost none appearing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023688</id>
	<title>Re:I don't think we're ready for this jelly</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1257707760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well duh.  Fish Jelly is the worst idea since slug paste.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well duh .
Fish Jelly is the worst idea since slug paste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well duh.
Fish Jelly is the worst idea since slug paste.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30026600</id>
	<title>Owned.</title>
	<author>atheistmonk</author>
	<datestamp>1257684720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looks like the ocean is getting back at the planet destroying trawlers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like the ocean is getting back at the planet destroying trawlers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like the ocean is getting back at the planet destroying trawlers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30033432</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1257784740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I prefer my bunny to be the pet of small children. When it has been hugged and loved, it really tenderizes the meat, falls right off the bone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer my bunny to be the pet of small children .
When it has been hugged and loved , it really tenderizes the meat , falls right off the bone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer my bunny to be the pet of small children.
When it has been hugged and loved, it really tenderizes the meat, falls right off the bone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024918</id>
	<title>Re:I don't mean to Troll</title>
	<author>sstern</author>
	<datestamp>1257673440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only an Iron Chef can save us.  Send for Morimoto.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only an Iron Chef can save us .
Send for Morimoto .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only an Iron Chef can save us.
Send for Morimoto.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656</id>
	<title>Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257701640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If they are proliferating because of a lack of predators, we should probably go ahead and kill as many of these as we can to maintain a good ecosystem balance.</p></div></blockquote><p>Wrong, we should stop killing predators. The seas have been overfished for too long, equilibrium is broken on so many levels that only true regulation and control of fishing will get any results.</p><p>After all, fishing is *so* primitive. Civilized people *grow* their food, hunter/gatherer economics are for barbarians.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they are proliferating because of a lack of predators , we should probably go ahead and kill as many of these as we can to maintain a good ecosystem balance.Wrong , we should stop killing predators .
The seas have been overfished for too long , equilibrium is broken on so many levels that only true regulation and control of fishing will get any results.After all , fishing is * so * primitive .
Civilized people * grow * their food , hunter/gatherer economics are for barbarians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they are proliferating because of a lack of predators, we should probably go ahead and kill as many of these as we can to maintain a good ecosystem balance.Wrong, we should stop killing predators.
The seas have been overfished for too long, equilibrium is broken on so many levels that only true regulation and control of fishing will get any results.After all, fishing is *so* primitive.
Civilized people *grow* their food, hunter/gatherer economics are for barbarians.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30028238</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>dafing</author>
	<datestamp>1257696840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Not just diet - also exercise. Unused muscle tends to not taste very good.</p></div><p>
Dont some people prefer to order "THE" veal?  The calves are kept so they CANNOT exercise to keep their muscles "tender"?

I'm vegan, so dont ask me about how meat tastes<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not just diet - also exercise .
Unused muscle tends to not taste very good .
Dont some people prefer to order " THE " veal ?
The calves are kept so they CAN NOT exercise to keep their muscles " tender " ?
I 'm vegan , so dont ask me about how meat tastes : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not just diet - also exercise.
Unused muscle tends to not taste very good.
Dont some people prefer to order "THE" veal?
The calves are kept so they CANNOT exercise to keep their muscles "tender"?
I'm vegan, so dont ask me about how meat tastes :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30026042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30025368</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>Acer500</author>
	<datestamp>1257676740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Farm fisheries are the same.  It's near impossible to duplicate their natural diet, and if you could duplicate it, they would be far more expensive than wild fish.</p></div><p>That's the point right there. The seas these days, though somewhat regulated, are still in the "tragedy of the commons" phase (heck, it's cited on Wikipedia as one of the current modern examples: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy\_of\_the\_commons" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy\_of\_the\_commons</a> [wikipedia.org] ).
<br> <br>The current economic idea, (if I understood something of the pop-economics books I've read), is to internalize those costs (externalities). How, I don't have an idea<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P - maybe by setting some kind of global tax on fishing (not that I'm usually in favor of taxes). Whichever the solution, I hope someone finds it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Farm fisheries are the same .
It 's near impossible to duplicate their natural diet , and if you could duplicate it , they would be far more expensive than wild fish.That 's the point right there .
The seas these days , though somewhat regulated , are still in the " tragedy of the commons " phase ( heck , it 's cited on Wikipedia as one of the current modern examples : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy \ _of \ _the \ _commons [ wikipedia.org ] ) .
The current economic idea , ( if I understood something of the pop-economics books I 've read ) , is to internalize those costs ( externalities ) .
How , I do n't have an idea : P - maybe by setting some kind of global tax on fishing ( not that I 'm usually in favor of taxes ) .
Whichever the solution , I hope someone finds it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Farm fisheries are the same.
It's near impossible to duplicate their natural diet, and if you could duplicate it, they would be far more expensive than wild fish.That's the point right there.
The seas these days, though somewhat regulated, are still in the "tragedy of the commons" phase (heck, it's cited on Wikipedia as one of the current modern examples: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy\_of\_the\_commons [wikipedia.org] ).
The current economic idea, (if I understood something of the pop-economics books I've read), is to internalize those costs (externalities).
How, I don't have an idea :P - maybe by setting some kind of global tax on fishing (not that I'm usually in favor of taxes).
Whichever the solution, I hope someone finds it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30028462</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>Jeremi</author>
	<datestamp>1257698880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>There's something about fresh fish that makes for a better meal in whatever you tend to use it in. It's considerably more noticeable in Sushi.</i></p><p>Agreed.  The way things are going, however, that problem will solve itself, since 70 years from now nobody living will remember what a wild-caught fish tasted like.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's something about fresh fish that makes for a better meal in whatever you tend to use it in .
It 's considerably more noticeable in Sushi.Agreed .
The way things are going , however , that problem will solve itself , since 70 years from now nobody living will remember what a wild-caught fish tasted like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's something about fresh fish that makes for a better meal in whatever you tend to use it in.
It's considerably more noticeable in Sushi.Agreed.
The way things are going, however, that problem will solve itself, since 70 years from now nobody living will remember what a wild-caught fish tasted like.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456</id>
	<title>I don't mean to Troll</title>
	<author>Nerdfest</author>
	<datestamp>1257700500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>But didn't human error capsize this ship?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But did n't human error capsize this ship ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But didn't human error capsize this ship?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30026802</id>
	<title>Re:I don't think we're ready for this jelly</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1257686100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's see. Seafood that's not tasty and contains toxins. And you think that's going to keep Japanese foodies from eating it?</p><p>I've eaten (non-toxic) jellyfish.  It's about as interesting as chewing on one of those rawhide bones they give to dogs.  You wouldn't think there'd be any point to collecting, drying, shipping and lavishing culinary talent on such a thing.  But of course, that's exactly what makes it a delicacy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's see .
Seafood that 's not tasty and contains toxins .
And you think that 's going to keep Japanese foodies from eating it ? I 've eaten ( non-toxic ) jellyfish .
It 's about as interesting as chewing on one of those rawhide bones they give to dogs .
You would n't think there 'd be any point to collecting , drying , shipping and lavishing culinary talent on such a thing .
But of course , that 's exactly what makes it a delicacy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's see.
Seafood that's not tasty and contains toxins.
And you think that's going to keep Japanese foodies from eating it?I've eaten (non-toxic) jellyfish.
It's about as interesting as chewing on one of those rawhide bones they give to dogs.
You wouldn't think there'd be any point to collecting, drying, shipping and lavishing culinary talent on such a thing.
But of course, that's exactly what makes it a delicacy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023444</id>
	<title>Life Imitates Art...</title>
	<author>OmniGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1257706140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In this case, a German eco-thriller by Frank Sch&#228;tzing entitled "Der Schwarm" (The Swarm), which features just such an attack, orchestrated by an intelligent marine species, (named the Yrr 'cause that randomly-typed letter sequence worked as well as any) that has decided to get rid of those messy, polluting land-dwellers, AKA us.</p><p>Next up: Swarms of highly-toxic white crabs invade the beaches of the US East Coast, while Canadian Orcas start dining on whale-watchers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In this case , a German eco-thriller by Frank Sch   tzing entitled " Der Schwarm " ( The Swarm ) , which features just such an attack , orchestrated by an intelligent marine species , ( named the Yrr 'cause that randomly-typed letter sequence worked as well as any ) that has decided to get rid of those messy , polluting land-dwellers , AKA us.Next up : Swarms of highly-toxic white crabs invade the beaches of the US East Coast , while Canadian Orcas start dining on whale-watchers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In this case, a German eco-thriller by Frank Schätzing entitled "Der Schwarm" (The Swarm), which features just such an attack, orchestrated by an intelligent marine species, (named the Yrr 'cause that randomly-typed letter sequence worked as well as any) that has decided to get rid of those messy, polluting land-dwellers, AKA us.Next up: Swarms of highly-toxic white crabs invade the beaches of the US East Coast, while Canadian Orcas start dining on whale-watchers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023168</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>Kneo24</author>
	<datestamp>1257704640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some people speculate, and I agree with this based on subjective experience, that farmed fish doesn't taste as good as fresh fish. You can grow all the fish you want. Sure, it tastes okay, but I prefer fresh. There's something about fresh fish that makes for a better meal in whatever you tend to use it in. It's considerably more noticeable in Sushi.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some people speculate , and I agree with this based on subjective experience , that farmed fish does n't taste as good as fresh fish .
You can grow all the fish you want .
Sure , it tastes okay , but I prefer fresh .
There 's something about fresh fish that makes for a better meal in whatever you tend to use it in .
It 's considerably more noticeable in Sushi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some people speculate, and I agree with this based on subjective experience, that farmed fish doesn't taste as good as fresh fish.
You can grow all the fish you want.
Sure, it tastes okay, but I prefer fresh.
There's something about fresh fish that makes for a better meal in whatever you tend to use it in.
It's considerably more noticeable in Sushi.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30029258</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257706860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I always thought it interesting that people think equilibrium is a ecosystem free of humans. Aren't humans a part of the ecosystem. True equilibrium is our food source dying, followed by world starvation.  The environmental push has nothing to do with the environment but is in fact human preservation. Let's call it exactly what it is.</p></div><p>I've never heard that argument, and I think that it would find more resonance than the current environmentalist PR.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I always thought it interesting that people think equilibrium is a ecosystem free of humans .
Are n't humans a part of the ecosystem .
True equilibrium is our food source dying , followed by world starvation .
The environmental push has nothing to do with the environment but is in fact human preservation .
Let 's call it exactly what it is.I 've never heard that argument , and I think that it would find more resonance than the current environmentalist PR .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always thought it interesting that people think equilibrium is a ecosystem free of humans.
Aren't humans a part of the ecosystem.
True equilibrium is our food source dying, followed by world starvation.
The environmental push has nothing to do with the environment but is in fact human preservation.
Let's call it exactly what it is.I've never heard that argument, and I think that it would find more resonance than the current environmentalist PR.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30026708</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>youngone</author>
	<datestamp>1257685440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yup, you're right. Commercial fishing has always been a business of finite duration. Ask the Atlantic cod fishermen. (Oh, wait, the fish are all gone). Here in New Zealand we have a pretty good system of regulating commercial fishing, but the stocks are still going down. The only way we'll ever be rid of commercial fishing is through commercial extiction of fish species. Personally I'm cheering for the jellyfish.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup , you 're right .
Commercial fishing has always been a business of finite duration .
Ask the Atlantic cod fishermen .
( Oh , wait , the fish are all gone ) .
Here in New Zealand we have a pretty good system of regulating commercial fishing , but the stocks are still going down .
The only way we 'll ever be rid of commercial fishing is through commercial extiction of fish species .
Personally I 'm cheering for the jellyfish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup, you're right.
Commercial fishing has always been a business of finite duration.
Ask the Atlantic cod fishermen.
(Oh, wait, the fish are all gone).
Here in New Zealand we have a pretty good system of regulating commercial fishing, but the stocks are still going down.
The only way we'll ever be rid of commercial fishing is through commercial extiction of fish species.
Personally I'm cheering for the jellyfish.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30031382</id>
	<title>Mod parent redundant</title>
	<author>PinkyDead</author>
	<datestamp>1257775080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, fair's fair... I doubt he tastes good either, why should we care about him?  He just wants to get out his shotgun and start hunting these poor creatures.</p><p>Equal treatment for Jellyfish NOW!!!  We need naked models to raise awareness of this issue!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , fair 's fair... I doubt he tastes good either , why should we care about him ?
He just wants to get out his shotgun and start hunting these poor creatures.Equal treatment for Jellyfish NOW ! ! !
We need naked models to raise awareness of this issue !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, fair's fair... I doubt he tastes good either, why should we care about him?
He just wants to get out his shotgun and start hunting these poor creatures.Equal treatment for Jellyfish NOW!!!
We need naked models to raise awareness of this issue!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022922</id>
	<title>Re:I don't think we're ready for this jelly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257702960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bet there's some group of Chinese that will market eating this jellyfish as curing $DISEASE or improving $HEALTH.  Then in a few years, this predator like the shark/whale will end up on the endangered species list.</p><p>I recall a while back that the Swiss were angry at the Chinese for eating Switzerland's national animal (the St. Bernard); people were joking that the Swiss should start eating Panda.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet there 's some group of Chinese that will market eating this jellyfish as curing $ DISEASE or improving $ HEALTH .
Then in a few years , this predator like the shark/whale will end up on the endangered species list.I recall a while back that the Swiss were angry at the Chinese for eating Switzerland 's national animal ( the St. Bernard ) ; people were joking that the Swiss should start eating Panda .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet there's some group of Chinese that will market eating this jellyfish as curing $DISEASE or improving $HEALTH.
Then in a few years, this predator like the shark/whale will end up on the endangered species list.I recall a while back that the Swiss were angry at the Chinese for eating Switzerland's national animal (the St. Bernard); people were joking that the Swiss should start eating Panda.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023862</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1257708900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He's talking short-term, you are talking long-term. Both solutions should be pursued on an appropriate time-scale.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's talking short-term , you are talking long-term .
Both solutions should be pursued on an appropriate time-scale .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's talking short-term, you are talking long-term.
Both solutions should be pursued on an appropriate time-scale.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30030492</id>
	<title>Re:Don't kill predators</title>
	<author>mvdwege</author>
	<datestamp>1257764100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If farmed fish tastes 'okay', and the alternative is no fish at all due to overfishing, what is the better alternative?</p><p>
Mart</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If farmed fish tastes 'okay ' , and the alternative is no fish at all due to overfishing , what is the better alternative ?
Mart</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If farmed fish tastes 'okay', and the alternative is no fish at all due to overfishing, what is the better alternative?
Mart</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024842</id>
	<title>southpark</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257673020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fuck you Whale, Dolphin, and Jellyfish.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck you Whale , Dolphin , and Jellyfish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck you Whale, Dolphin, and Jellyfish.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30032170</id>
	<title>"They appear to do this for sexual reproduction."</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257779700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've done crazier things than sink a boat for sexual reproduction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've done crazier things than sink a boat for sexual reproduction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've done crazier things than sink a boat for sexual reproduction.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30030692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30053948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30031382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023618
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30025368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30028462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30030290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30028440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30029258
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30025776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30041608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30032418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30025390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30028100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30033432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30026396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023618
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30026708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023618
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30026802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30028238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30026042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30027970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30030492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30032772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30026070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_08_1548211_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_08_1548211.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30031382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30025776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30026802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30026396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022656
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024170
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023600
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024346
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30029258
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30028440
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023862
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023168
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023366
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30028462
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30030492
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30026070
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30032772
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023356
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30033432
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024400
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30030692
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023846
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024300
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30026042
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30028238
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30025368
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023596
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023562
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30026708
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022922
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30053948
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_08_1548211.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022456
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30041608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023122
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30027970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024918
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30028100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30022584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30030290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30025390
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30032418
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_08_1548211.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024272
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_08_1548211.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30025352
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_08_1548211.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023618
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30024110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023848
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_08_1548211.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_08_1548211.30023138
</commentlist>
</conversation>
