<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_07_014245</id>
	<title>KDE Founder Receives Highest German Honor</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1257606420000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Jiilik Oiolosse writes <i>"KDE founder Matthias Ettrich was <a href="http://dot.kde.org/2009/11/06/matthias-ettrich-receives-german-federal-cross-merit">decorated today with the German Federal Cross of Merit</a> for his contributions to Free Software. The Federal Cross of Merit is both the most prestigious as well as the only general decoration awarded by the Federal Republic of Germany. It is awarded by the Federal President for outstanding achievements in the political, economic, cultural, and other fields. Matthias was awarded the medal in recognition of his work spurring innovation and spreading knowledge for the common good."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jiilik Oiolosse writes " KDE founder Matthias Ettrich was decorated today with the German Federal Cross of Merit for his contributions to Free Software .
The Federal Cross of Merit is both the most prestigious as well as the only general decoration awarded by the Federal Republic of Germany .
It is awarded by the Federal President for outstanding achievements in the political , economic , cultural , and other fields .
Matthias was awarded the medal in recognition of his work spurring innovation and spreading knowledge for the common good .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jiilik Oiolosse writes "KDE founder Matthias Ettrich was decorated today with the German Federal Cross of Merit for his contributions to Free Software.
The Federal Cross of Merit is both the most prestigious as well as the only general decoration awarded by the Federal Republic of Germany.
It is awarded by the Federal President for outstanding achievements in the political, economic, cultural, and other fields.
Matthias was awarded the medal in recognition of his work spurring innovation and spreading knowledge for the common good.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012290</id>
	<title>Well, there ARE different classes of the Cross</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257525480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So you can argue it's not THE highest honor... He received the lowest class of the Federal Cross of Merit. But that still is some achievement!</htmltext>
<tokenext>So you can argue it 's not THE highest honor... He received the lowest class of the Federal Cross of Merit .
But that still is some achievement !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you can argue it's not THE highest honor... He received the lowest class of the Federal Cross of Merit.
But that still is some achievement!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30014102</id>
	<title>Re:Kongratulations!</title>
	<author>jo42</author>
	<datestamp>1257606660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Still no <b>K</b>DE <b>U</b>ser <b>N</b>etwork <b>T</b>ool...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Still no KDE User Network Tool.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Still no KDE User Network Tool...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012386</id>
	<title>Germany's highest honor ??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257527160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A jelly donut ?</p><p>ich ein berliner</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A jelly donut ? ich ein berliner</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A jelly donut ?ich ein berliner</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012572</id>
	<title>Re:not that happy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257531660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1) I can hardly say c++ is a bad language, especially from the perspective of the time when kde was started at. 1996 (the start of kde) was the pentium 1 era where performance was more looked at and higher level language less mature then they are today.</p><p>2) Key word, *could* have but they managed this department pretty well i'd say with from written the guarantee to the eventual lgpl of QT (thus making it FOSS). So I fail to see the error in their choice as choosing QT did not affect them in any major way license wise. If kde died early on, it would have been no biggie as it would only take away the value kde initially added. But this issue was addressed pretty early and is a non-issue now.</p><p>If you mean, the development (creation of kde and gnome) is the issue. Well, they got popular for a reason. If somebody could write a *Better* windows enviroment using what you/they thought would be a "good" language and toolkit (I assume you mean toolkits when you say platforms instead of things like x86 and ppc), they could have and still can write it. The great thing about foss is that you CAN'T take away from it, only add value to it. The absence of added value is not a loss as eveything would just stay the same.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) I can hardly say c + + is a bad language , especially from the perspective of the time when kde was started at .
1996 ( the start of kde ) was the pentium 1 era where performance was more looked at and higher level language less mature then they are today.2 ) Key word , * could * have but they managed this department pretty well i 'd say with from written the guarantee to the eventual lgpl of QT ( thus making it FOSS ) .
So I fail to see the error in their choice as choosing QT did not affect them in any major way license wise .
If kde died early on , it would have been no biggie as it would only take away the value kde initially added .
But this issue was addressed pretty early and is a non-issue now.If you mean , the development ( creation of kde and gnome ) is the issue .
Well , they got popular for a reason .
If somebody could write a * Better * windows enviroment using what you/they thought would be a " good " language and toolkit ( I assume you mean toolkits when you say platforms instead of things like x86 and ppc ) , they could have and still can write it .
The great thing about foss is that you CA N'T take away from it , only add value to it .
The absence of added value is not a loss as eveything would just stay the same .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) I can hardly say c++ is a bad language, especially from the perspective of the time when kde was started at.
1996 (the start of kde) was the pentium 1 era where performance was more looked at and higher level language less mature then they are today.2) Key word, *could* have but they managed this department pretty well i'd say with from written the guarantee to the eventual lgpl of QT (thus making it FOSS).
So I fail to see the error in their choice as choosing QT did not affect them in any major way license wise.
If kde died early on, it would have been no biggie as it would only take away the value kde initially added.
But this issue was addressed pretty early and is a non-issue now.If you mean, the development (creation of kde and gnome) is the issue.
Well, they got popular for a reason.
If somebody could write a *Better* windows enviroment using what you/they thought would be a "good" language and toolkit (I assume you mean toolkits when you say platforms instead of things like x86 and ppc), they could have and still can write it.
The great thing about foss is that you CAN'T take away from it, only add value to it.
The absence of added value is not a loss as eveything would just stay the same.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30017472</id>
	<title>Re:Well, there ARE different classes of the Cross</title>
	<author>lordtoran</author>
	<datestamp>1257595560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to the article in the German Wikipedia, first-time receivers *never* receive a higher rank than the second-lowest one, except of heads of states. So it's still quite an achievement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to the article in the German Wikipedia , first-time receivers * never * receive a higher rank than the second-lowest one , except of heads of states .
So it 's still quite an achievement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to the article in the German Wikipedia, first-time receivers *never* receive a higher rank than the second-lowest one, except of heads of states.
So it's still quite an achievement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30030724</id>
	<title>Maybe AmaroK can be fixed now :-)</title>
	<author>jotaeleemeese</author>
	<datestamp>1257766800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Congrats.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congrats .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congrats.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013610</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, the culture must be very different from U.</title>
	<author>gerddie</author>
	<datestamp>1257598740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't get too comfortable with that Idea, we just finished 11 years of governments  that brought us the RFID chip in the passport, finger prints in passports, a half year of storing of all connection data, and who tried to bring us the infamous "stop" sign for censoring the Internet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't get too comfortable with that Idea , we just finished 11 years of governments that brought us the RFID chip in the passport , finger prints in passports , a half year of storing of all connection data , and who tried to bring us the infamous " stop " sign for censoring the Internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't get too comfortable with that Idea, we just finished 11 years of governments  that brought us the RFID chip in the passport, finger prints in passports, a half year of storing of all connection data, and who tried to bring us the infamous "stop" sign for censoring the Internet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012206</id>
	<title>Hmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257524340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shouldn't they have given him the German Federal Kross of Merit?<br> <br>

Posted from Konqueror.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't they have given him the German Federal Kross of Merit ?
Posted from Konqueror .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't they have given him the German Federal Kross of Merit?
Posted from Konqueror.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012616</id>
	<title>Wow, the culture must be very different from U.S.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257532920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kind of ironic, given, umm, World War II and stuff, which country seems more free now.</p><p>But that represents such a freer mindset than exists in the USA.  I can't imagine in my wildest dreams the highest national medal of the US going to a libre software person.  It would take Linus Torvalds being elected our President<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and even then, he'd have no way to push this past Congress.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kind of ironic , given , umm , World War II and stuff , which country seems more free now.But that represents such a freer mindset than exists in the USA .
I ca n't imagine in my wildest dreams the highest national medal of the US going to a libre software person .
It would take Linus Torvalds being elected our President ... and even then , he 'd have no way to push this past Congress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kind of ironic, given, umm, World War II and stuff, which country seems more free now.But that represents such a freer mindset than exists in the USA.
I can't imagine in my wildest dreams the highest national medal of the US going to a libre software person.
It would take Linus Torvalds being elected our President ... and even then, he'd have no way to push this past Congress.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012178</id>
	<title>Ha</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257523800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Take THAT gnome!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Take THAT gnome !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take THAT gnome!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012950</id>
	<title>which accent?</title>
	<author>Capt. Beyond</author>
	<datestamp>1257626640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if he used his British accent to accept this award?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if he used his British accent to accept this award ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if he used his British accent to accept this award?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013418</id>
	<title>Re:It stands to reason</title>
	<author>bcmm</author>
	<datestamp>1257595320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They may mean the most prestigious award in Germany is also the only one awarded by the <b>Federal</b> Government.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They may mean the most prestigious award in Germany is also the only one awarded by the Federal Government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They may mean the most prestigious award in Germany is also the only one awarded by the Federal Government.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30014608</id>
	<title>Thank you ...</title>
	<author>kbahey</author>
	<datestamp>1257613980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mattias</p><p>Thank you and the entire KDE team for a nice desktop environment. Your vision and dedication deserves this award.</p><p>My desktop has been KDE for a several years, and I always like it. The early KDE4 in Kubuntu 9.04 was fragile and broken in many ways. I almost gave up on it, but decided to give it a shot in the one week old Kubuntu 9.10 (karmic) which has KDE 4.3.2. I can say it is usable again, and I am exploring the new features and liking them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MattiasThank you and the entire KDE team for a nice desktop environment .
Your vision and dedication deserves this award.My desktop has been KDE for a several years , and I always like it .
The early KDE4 in Kubuntu 9.04 was fragile and broken in many ways .
I almost gave up on it , but decided to give it a shot in the one week old Kubuntu 9.10 ( karmic ) which has KDE 4.3.2 .
I can say it is usable again , and I am exploring the new features and liking them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MattiasThank you and the entire KDE team for a nice desktop environment.
Your vision and dedication deserves this award.My desktop has been KDE for a several years, and I always like it.
The early KDE4 in Kubuntu 9.04 was fragile and broken in many ways.
I almost gave up on it, but decided to give it a shot in the one week old Kubuntu 9.10 (karmic) which has KDE 4.3.2.
I can say it is usable again, and I am exploring the new features and liking them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013460</id>
	<title>The allies liberated Germany.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257596100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well I guess the allies liberated Germany, but I guess they never got round to liberating the US<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P. (Oh and the CAPTCHA word was medals,  ironically enough).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well I guess the allies liberated Germany , but I guess they never got round to liberating the US : P. ( Oh and the CAPTCHA word was medals , ironically enough ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well I guess the allies liberated Germany, but I guess they never got round to liberating the US :P. (Oh and the CAPTCHA word was medals,  ironically enough).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012508</id>
	<title>Re:Kongratulations!</title>
	<author>turing\_m</author>
	<datestamp>1257529740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All the kommedians out of work, and you had to start.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All the kommedians out of work , and you had to start .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the kommedians out of work, and you had to start.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30020220</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>t\_ban</author>
	<datestamp>1257678480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wouldn't that also make it the least prestigious general decoration?</p></div><p>This is how I parsed the sentence:<br>
&nbsp; </p><p><div class="quote"><p>The Federal Cross of Merit is both (the most prestigious) as well as (the only general) decoration awarded by...</p></div><p>That is, there are many decorations, but of them only one is a <b>general</b> decoration. This decoration also happens to be the most prestigious of all existing decorations, general or specific.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't that also make it the least prestigious general decoration ? This is how I parsed the sentence :   The Federal Cross of Merit is both ( the most prestigious ) as well as ( the only general ) decoration awarded by...That is , there are many decorations , but of them only one is a general decoration .
This decoration also happens to be the most prestigious of all existing decorations , general or specific .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't that also make it the least prestigious general decoration?This is how I parsed the sentence:
  The Federal Cross of Merit is both (the most prestigious) as well as (the only general) decoration awarded by...That is, there are many decorations, but of them only one is a general decoration.
This decoration also happens to be the most prestigious of all existing decorations, general or specific.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012448</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>pookemon</author>
	<datestamp>1257528300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nein!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nein !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nein!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012438</id>
	<title>not that happy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257528120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I understand why he got it, and the effort he has managed to rally for KDE is impressive.  However, I think KDE and Gnome together really screwed the community by picking such bad languages and platforms to build on.   And KDE's pick of a non-FOSS toolkit to build on was a grave error that could have done enormous damage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I understand why he got it , and the effort he has managed to rally for KDE is impressive .
However , I think KDE and Gnome together really screwed the community by picking such bad languages and platforms to build on .
And KDE 's pick of a non-FOSS toolkit to build on was a grave error that could have done enormous damage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I understand why he got it, and the effort he has managed to rally for KDE is impressive.
However, I think KDE and Gnome together really screwed the community by picking such bad languages and platforms to build on.
And KDE's pick of a non-FOSS toolkit to build on was a grave error that could have done enormous damage.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013812</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257602280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>The Federal Cross of Merit is both the most prestigious as well as the only general decoration awarded by the Federal Republic of Germany.</p></div><p>Wouldn't that also make it the least prestigious general decoration?</p></div><p>It does. Sad part is you don't exactly have to be familiar with Dedekind cuts to figure that out. If he'd dropped the 'only'<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Federal Cross of Merit is both the most prestigious as well as the only general decoration awarded by the Federal Republic of Germany.Would n't that also make it the least prestigious general decoration ? It does .
Sad part is you do n't exactly have to be familiar with Dedekind cuts to figure that out .
If he 'd dropped the 'only ' ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Federal Cross of Merit is both the most prestigious as well as the only general decoration awarded by the Federal Republic of Germany.Wouldn't that also make it the least prestigious general decoration?It does.
Sad part is you don't exactly have to be familiar with Dedekind cuts to figure that out.
If he'd dropped the 'only' ....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012252</id>
	<title>Runner up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257524940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is really just consolation for the Nobel Peace Prize he was supposed to win.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is really just consolation for the Nobel Peace Prize he was supposed to win .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is really just consolation for the Nobel Peace Prize he was supposed to win.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012486</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257529080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In "The Great Escape", Steve McQueen kept getting awarded <i>"Coolahh!"</i> by his German hosts.  I think that would be considered less desireable than what Ettrich got.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In " The Great Escape " , Steve McQueen kept getting awarded " Coolahh !
" by his German hosts .
I think that would be considered less desireable than what Ettrich got .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In "The Great Escape", Steve McQueen kept getting awarded "Coolahh!
" by his German hosts.
I think that would be considered less desireable than what Ettrich got.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012408</id>
	<title>The bad news</title>
	<author>ChienAndalu</author>
	<datestamp>1257527520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He received it as a plasmoid and it crashed his desktop. But it looks nice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He received it as a plasmoid and it crashed his desktop .
But it looks nice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He received it as a plasmoid and it crashed his desktop.
But it looks nice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30014340</id>
	<title>How prestigious can the award be?</title>
	<author>amightywind</author>
	<datestamp>1257610440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't Obama be more deserving? He did speak in Berlin once.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't Obama be more deserving ?
He did speak in Berlin once .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't Obama be more deserving?
He did speak in Berlin once.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30014112</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257606780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Germany<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... yuck!</p><p>Kermany!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Germany ... yuck ! Kermany !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Germany ... yuck!Kermany!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012792</id>
	<title>Re:not that happy</title>
	<author>vivek7006</author>
	<datestamp>1257537360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I think KDE and Gnome together really screwed the community by picking such bad languages and platforms"</p><p>Are you a fucking retard? C and C++ are bad languages??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I think KDE and Gnome together really screwed the community by picking such bad languages and platforms " Are you a fucking retard ?
C and C + + are bad languages ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I think KDE and Gnome together really screwed the community by picking such bad languages and platforms"Are you a fucking retard?
C and C++ are bad languages?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012592</id>
	<title>Re:Runner up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257531960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They were too busy giving it to people who bomb third world countries. . .</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They were too busy giving it to people who bomb third world countries .
. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They were too busy giving it to people who bomb third world countries.
. .</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012348</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257526320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, the German word for "cross" ("Kreuz") already starts with a K. Yes, we love KDE <em>that much</em>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , the German word for " cross " ( " Kreuz " ) already starts with a K. Yes , we love KDE that much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, the German word for "cross" ("Kreuz") already starts with a K. Yes, we love KDE that much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012312</id>
	<title>Heil Hitler to all my German KDE Friends!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257525840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wish to offer my best wishes and a hearty and heartfelt Heil Hitler to all my German KDE friends! Sieg Heil KDE!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish to offer my best wishes and a hearty and heartfelt Heil Hitler to all my German KDE friends !
Sieg Heil KDE !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish to offer my best wishes and a hearty and heartfelt Heil Hitler to all my German KDE friends!
Sieg Heil KDE!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012184</id>
	<title>Kongratulations!</title>
	<author>Penguinshit</author>
	<datestamp>1257523920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>My kompliments...</htmltext>
<tokenext>My kompliments.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My kompliments...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30020266</id>
	<title>Re:Runner up</title>
	<author>Hal\_Porter</author>
	<datestamp>1257679140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They were too busy giving it to people who bomb third world countries <b>less</b> </p></div><p>Fixed that for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They were too busy giving it to people who bomb third world countries less Fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They were too busy giving it to people who bomb third world countries less Fixed that for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012214</id>
	<title>The German Federal cross</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257524400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Nazi\_Swastika.svg?J.delanoyrapesbabies" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Yes its an honour.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes its an honour .
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes its an honour.
[wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30015958</id>
	<title>Re:It is the least prestigious..</title>
	<author>Marcika</author>
	<datestamp>1257623940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Actually, it is the "least prestigious" form of the "most prestigious" decoration.

There are several classes of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal\_Cross\_of\_Merit" title="wikipedia.org">Cross of Merit</a> [wikipedia.org] and from the picture it looks like he was awarded the "Medal of Merit", i.e. the lowest one.</p></div><p>It is the lowest class - but the lower classes are way more prestigious, since the highest classes are only awarded to politicians and their personal friends (rather than people of merit)...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , it is the " least prestigious " form of the " most prestigious " decoration .
There are several classes of the Cross of Merit [ wikipedia.org ] and from the picture it looks like he was awarded the " Medal of Merit " , i.e .
the lowest one.It is the lowest class - but the lower classes are way more prestigious , since the highest classes are only awarded to politicians and their personal friends ( rather than people of merit ) .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, it is the "least prestigious" form of the "most prestigious" decoration.
There are several classes of the Cross of Merit [wikipedia.org] and from the picture it looks like he was awarded the "Medal of Merit", i.e.
the lowest one.It is the lowest class - but the lower classes are way more prestigious, since the highest classes are only awarded to politicians and their personal friends (rather than people of merit)...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012318</id>
	<title>He, and many others, deserve it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257525900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Congrats Matthias.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Congrats Matthias .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congrats Matthias.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013164</id>
	<title>Re:For me, there are no Big *Two.*</title>
	<author>RichiH</author>
	<datestamp>1257589140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>KDE 4 has limited the usefulness of Konqueror in favour of Dolphin. KDE being open source, this will certainly improve over time, but I am running 4.3.2 and some pills are still hard to swallow.<br>Fwiw, my gf and my work boxes run 3.5.10 and will unfortunately continue to do so for some time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>KDE 4 has limited the usefulness of Konqueror in favour of Dolphin .
KDE being open source , this will certainly improve over time , but I am running 4.3.2 and some pills are still hard to swallow.Fwiw , my gf and my work boxes run 3.5.10 and will unfortunately continue to do so for some time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>KDE 4 has limited the usefulness of Konqueror in favour of Dolphin.
KDE being open source, this will certainly improve over time, but I am running 4.3.2 and some pills are still hard to swallow.Fwiw, my gf and my work boxes run 3.5.10 and will unfortunately continue to do so for some time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30018774</id>
	<title>Re:not that happy</title>
	<author>jipn4</author>
	<datestamp>1257609660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>KDE was founded by open sourcers, not free software evangelists, as such, it was founded on a pragmatic baseGNOME came into existence by the Free Software people who couldn't bare having proprietary code touching their hardware, not exactly the most compelling reason to start a DE project.</i></p><p>Choosing a QPL-licensed toolkit wasn't pragmatic, it was idiotic.  The QPL/GPL dual license meant that developing commercial Linux desktop apps cost a lot of money, while developing for Microsoft and Macintosh was nearly free.  How was Linux supposed to compete like that?  Gtk+ has been free even for commercial software development since its inception.</p><p><i>As for the snipe about languages... What do you propose</i></p><p>I don't "snipe" about languages, I'm telling you outright.</p><p>What should they have used?   Almost anything.  Even creating a simple compiled language is less work than all the crap that Qt added to C++.</p><p><i>People always bitch about C++ but that language is ultimately as messy or clean as you make it</i></p><p>KDE's bug database contains 2461 bugs related to crashes.  Almost all of those simply would not exist if that code was written in a decent language.</p><p><i>The real crime on their part is GLib GObject, it's object-oriented C and is more ugly then Satan's backside -- if you're going to use C then use C, don't half-ass C++ features into it.</i></p><p>Qt commits exactly the same crime by layering its own object system on top of C++; it just hides it a little better using C++ syntax.   Both tradeoffs are bad.</p><p><i>although I suspect you also think not having to declare variables before you use them is a good idea</i></p><p>You're really so inexperienced that the only languages that come to your mind are Ruby, Perl, C, and C++?  You really can't imagine languages that actually work better?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>KDE was founded by open sourcers , not free software evangelists , as such , it was founded on a pragmatic baseGNOME came into existence by the Free Software people who could n't bare having proprietary code touching their hardware , not exactly the most compelling reason to start a DE project.Choosing a QPL-licensed toolkit was n't pragmatic , it was idiotic .
The QPL/GPL dual license meant that developing commercial Linux desktop apps cost a lot of money , while developing for Microsoft and Macintosh was nearly free .
How was Linux supposed to compete like that ?
Gtk + has been free even for commercial software development since its inception.As for the snipe about languages... What do you proposeI do n't " snipe " about languages , I 'm telling you outright.What should they have used ?
Almost anything .
Even creating a simple compiled language is less work than all the crap that Qt added to C + + .People always bitch about C + + but that language is ultimately as messy or clean as you make itKDE 's bug database contains 2461 bugs related to crashes .
Almost all of those simply would not exist if that code was written in a decent language.The real crime on their part is GLib GObject , it 's object-oriented C and is more ugly then Satan 's backside -- if you 're going to use C then use C , do n't half-ass C + + features into it.Qt commits exactly the same crime by layering its own object system on top of C + + ; it just hides it a little better using C + + syntax .
Both tradeoffs are bad.although I suspect you also think not having to declare variables before you use them is a good ideaYou 're really so inexperienced that the only languages that come to your mind are Ruby , Perl , C , and C + + ?
You really ca n't imagine languages that actually work better ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>KDE was founded by open sourcers, not free software evangelists, as such, it was founded on a pragmatic baseGNOME came into existence by the Free Software people who couldn't bare having proprietary code touching their hardware, not exactly the most compelling reason to start a DE project.Choosing a QPL-licensed toolkit wasn't pragmatic, it was idiotic.
The QPL/GPL dual license meant that developing commercial Linux desktop apps cost a lot of money, while developing for Microsoft and Macintosh was nearly free.
How was Linux supposed to compete like that?
Gtk+ has been free even for commercial software development since its inception.As for the snipe about languages... What do you proposeI don't "snipe" about languages, I'm telling you outright.What should they have used?
Almost anything.
Even creating a simple compiled language is less work than all the crap that Qt added to C++.People always bitch about C++ but that language is ultimately as messy or clean as you make itKDE's bug database contains 2461 bugs related to crashes.
Almost all of those simply would not exist if that code was written in a decent language.The real crime on their part is GLib GObject, it's object-oriented C and is more ugly then Satan's backside -- if you're going to use C then use C, don't half-ass C++ features into it.Qt commits exactly the same crime by layering its own object system on top of C++; it just hides it a little better using C++ syntax.
Both tradeoffs are bad.although I suspect you also think not having to declare variables before you use them is a good ideaYou're really so inexperienced that the only languages that come to your mind are Ruby, Perl, C, and C++?
You really can't imagine languages that actually work better?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30019220</id>
	<title>Thanks</title>
	<author>mrdtr</author>
	<datestamp>1257615480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After reading many comments on here, I've got to wonder if some  will complain just for the sake of complaining. Blah, blah, blah, KDE wasn't totally free, Blah, blah, blah, KDE didn't do this or that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..... who cares already that's the past, how about focusing on what KDE is nowadays. The most recent version is very usable, and I would rate it as one of the best desktops to use.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After reading many comments on here , I 've got to wonder if some will complain just for the sake of complaining .
Blah , blah , blah , KDE was n't totally free , Blah , blah , blah , KDE did n't do this or that ..... who cares already that 's the past , how about focusing on what KDE is nowadays .
The most recent version is very usable , and I would rate it as one of the best desktops to use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After reading many comments on here, I've got to wonder if some  will complain just for the sake of complaining.
Blah, blah, blah, KDE wasn't totally free, Blah, blah, blah, KDE didn't do this or that ..... who cares already that's the past, how about focusing on what KDE is nowadays.
The most recent version is very usable, and I would rate it as one of the best desktops to use.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012518</id>
	<title>It is the least prestigious..</title>
	<author>henni16</author>
	<datestamp>1257530100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, it is the "least prestigious" form of the "most prestigious" decoration.<br>
There are several classes of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal\_Cross\_of\_Merit" title="wikipedia.org">Cross of Merit</a> [wikipedia.org] and from the picture it looks like he was awarded the "Medal of Merit", i.e. the lowest one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , it is the " least prestigious " form of the " most prestigious " decoration .
There are several classes of the Cross of Merit [ wikipedia.org ] and from the picture it looks like he was awarded the " Medal of Merit " , i.e .
the lowest one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, it is the "least prestigious" form of the "most prestigious" decoration.
There are several classes of the Cross of Merit [wikipedia.org] and from the picture it looks like he was awarded the "Medal of Merit", i.e.
the lowest one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012544</id>
	<title>On the other side of the fence</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257530820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On other unrelated news, Miguel de Icaza was given the Golden Windows medal by Microsoft's Steve Ballmer, for his outstanding job at undermining Free Software principles, and destroying Linux from within.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On other unrelated news , Miguel de Icaza was given the Golden Windows medal by Microsoft 's Steve Ballmer , for his outstanding job at undermining Free Software principles , and destroying Linux from within .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On other unrelated news, Miguel de Icaza was given the Golden Windows medal by Microsoft's Steve Ballmer, for his outstanding job at undermining Free Software principles, and destroying Linux from within.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012822</id>
	<title>For me, there are no Big *Two.*</title>
	<author>petrus4</author>
	<datestamp>1257624480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Although I don't normally use the Big Two, when I have, the only positive experiences I've ever had, have been with KDE.</p><p>Despite its' bloat, the system is absolutely gorgeous visually, and to my mind has been ahead of XP in that department almost since its' inception.  Konqueror is also the single most versatile and powerful file manager that I've ever used.  Local file management and remote web browsing in two panes of the same window are awesome, but it is still more versatile than IE as well, in terms of the number of different modes, and the integration with Konsole that it allows.</p><p>Although it isn't much, KDE is also closer in design terms to the UNIX philosophy as well; the different parts are more cleanly encapsulated than GNOME, and it's more self-contained, as well.</p><p>It isn't the more popular of the two major DEs, presumably due to not being Stallman-approved for the entirety of its' history...but it is overwhelmingly the better one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Although I do n't normally use the Big Two , when I have , the only positive experiences I 've ever had , have been with KDE.Despite its ' bloat , the system is absolutely gorgeous visually , and to my mind has been ahead of XP in that department almost since its ' inception .
Konqueror is also the single most versatile and powerful file manager that I 've ever used .
Local file management and remote web browsing in two panes of the same window are awesome , but it is still more versatile than IE as well , in terms of the number of different modes , and the integration with Konsole that it allows.Although it is n't much , KDE is also closer in design terms to the UNIX philosophy as well ; the different parts are more cleanly encapsulated than GNOME , and it 's more self-contained , as well.It is n't the more popular of the two major DEs , presumably due to not being Stallman-approved for the entirety of its ' history...but it is overwhelmingly the better one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although I don't normally use the Big Two, when I have, the only positive experiences I've ever had, have been with KDE.Despite its' bloat, the system is absolutely gorgeous visually, and to my mind has been ahead of XP in that department almost since its' inception.
Konqueror is also the single most versatile and powerful file manager that I've ever used.
Local file management and remote web browsing in two panes of the same window are awesome, but it is still more versatile than IE as well, in terms of the number of different modes, and the integration with Konsole that it allows.Although it isn't much, KDE is also closer in design terms to the UNIX philosophy as well; the different parts are more cleanly encapsulated than GNOME, and it's more self-contained, as well.It isn't the more popular of the two major DEs, presumably due to not being Stallman-approved for the entirety of its' history...but it is overwhelmingly the better one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013092</id>
	<title>Re:It stands to reason</title>
	<author>Sique</author>
	<datestamp>1257586860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, the Germans named all their awards the same and make a difference just by the level. The Federal Cross of Merit thus has nine levels. (I am still trying to find out which level he got.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , the Germans named all their awards the same and make a difference just by the level .
The Federal Cross of Merit thus has nine levels .
( I am still trying to find out which level he got .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, the Germans named all their awards the same and make a difference just by the level.
The Federal Cross of Merit thus has nine levels.
(I am still trying to find out which level he got.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013690</id>
	<title>Re:not that happy</title>
	<author>gerddie</author>
	<datestamp>1257600300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>KDE was founded by open sourcers, not free software evangelists, as such, it was founded on a pragmatic base. Qt was one of the best GUI toolkits at the time and KDE got a free-as-in-beer deal to use it,</p> </div><p>There was also wxWidgets (wxWindows), it was quite usable and IIRC LGPL and with Lyx Mr Ettritch, also choose the non-free XForms toolkit. In that sense it's quite ironic that he gets a medal for his contribution to <i>free</i> software. That aside and although I don't use it, KDE is certainly a nice piece of work and nowadays, with all the licensing issues resolved, there's nothing more to complain about. Congratulations to Mr. Ettritch!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>KDE was founded by open sourcers , not free software evangelists , as such , it was founded on a pragmatic base .
Qt was one of the best GUI toolkits at the time and KDE got a free-as-in-beer deal to use it , There was also wxWidgets ( wxWindows ) , it was quite usable and IIRC LGPL and with Lyx Mr Ettritch , also choose the non-free XForms toolkit .
In that sense it 's quite ironic that he gets a medal for his contribution to free software .
That aside and although I do n't use it , KDE is certainly a nice piece of work and nowadays , with all the licensing issues resolved , there 's nothing more to complain about .
Congratulations to Mr. Ettritch !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>KDE was founded by open sourcers, not free software evangelists, as such, it was founded on a pragmatic base.
Qt was one of the best GUI toolkits at the time and KDE got a free-as-in-beer deal to use it, There was also wxWidgets (wxWindows), it was quite usable and IIRC LGPL and with Lyx Mr Ettritch, also choose the non-free XForms toolkit.
In that sense it's quite ironic that he gets a medal for his contribution to free software.
That aside and although I don't use it, KDE is certainly a nice piece of work and nowadays, with all the licensing issues resolved, there's nothing more to complain about.
Congratulations to Mr. Ettritch!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013250</id>
	<title>Re:Ha</title>
	<author>Hymer</author>
	<datestamp>1257592260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except US Corporate titles (except CEO) are not worth the paper they are printed on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except US Corporate titles ( except CEO ) are not worth the paper they are printed on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except US Corporate titles (except CEO) are not worth the paper they are printed on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012860</id>
	<title>Re:not that happy</title>
	<author>petrus4</author>
	<datestamp>1257625140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And KDE's pick of a non-FOSS toolkit to build on was a grave error that could have done enormous damage.</p></div><p>Its' lack of Stallman's approval has enormously harmed KDE's degree of uptake and use, yes.</p><p>I continue to pray for the end of the Free Software Foundation.  If Stallman and its' other members truly wanted to help their fellow man at this point, they would voluntarily dissolve the organisation, and withdraw into anonymity.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And KDE 's pick of a non-FOSS toolkit to build on was a grave error that could have done enormous damage.Its ' lack of Stallman 's approval has enormously harmed KDE 's degree of uptake and use , yes.I continue to pray for the end of the Free Software Foundation .
If Stallman and its ' other members truly wanted to help their fellow man at this point , they would voluntarily dissolve the organisation , and withdraw into anonymity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And KDE's pick of a non-FOSS toolkit to build on was a grave error that could have done enormous damage.Its' lack of Stallman's approval has enormously harmed KDE's degree of uptake and use, yes.I continue to pray for the end of the Free Software Foundation.
If Stallman and its' other members truly wanted to help their fellow man at this point, they would voluntarily dissolve the organisation, and withdraw into anonymity.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012196</id>
	<title>This would never happen in the United States.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257524100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This would never happen in the United States. They are too busy patting themselves on the back for outsourcing development to India and synergizing the next mission statement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This would never happen in the United States .
They are too busy patting themselves on the back for outsourcing development to India and synergizing the next mission statement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would never happen in the United States.
They are too busy patting themselves on the back for outsourcing development to India and synergizing the next mission statement.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012212</id>
	<title>Interesting Wired article</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257524400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/9705/unh1.jpg" title="imageshack.us" rel="nofollow">Here's a picture</a> [imageshack.us] I drew of two people having sex while they're both in the woman's panties. I thought the expression on her face was pretty funny. Questions? Comments? Suggestions? Please mod this up if you enjoyed my picture, or if you like the fact that I think Linux is better than Windows.</p><p>http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/9705/unh1.jpg</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's a picture [ imageshack.us ] I drew of two people having sex while they 're both in the woman 's panties .
I thought the expression on her face was pretty funny .
Questions ? Comments ?
Suggestions ? Please mod this up if you enjoyed my picture , or if you like the fact that I think Linux is better than Windows.http : //img4.imageshack.us/img4/9705/unh1.jpg</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's a picture [imageshack.us] I drew of two people having sex while they're both in the woman's panties.
I thought the expression on her face was pretty funny.
Questions? Comments?
Suggestions? Please mod this up if you enjoyed my picture, or if you like the fact that I think Linux is better than Windows.http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/9705/unh1.jpg</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013784</id>
	<title>His name is Mark Owen methinks ...</title>
	<author>meist3r</author>
	<datestamp>1257601740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>you case-insensitive clod!</htmltext>
<tokenext>you case-insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you case-insensitive clod!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012762</id>
	<title>He deserves it more than Obama / Gore do.</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1257536460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And, I'm not saying that just because I happen to be a Republican...</p><p>I'm saying that, as, a practical matter of bringing about world peace, its awfully hard to hate the Germans when they've done such a wonderful job through the years with KDE and KDevelop.  There's a world peace argument to be made for that.  How many hundreds of thousands of people use KDE?</p><p>Now, can they finish KDevelop 4, PLEASE.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And , I 'm not saying that just because I happen to be a Republican...I 'm saying that , as , a practical matter of bringing about world peace , its awfully hard to hate the Germans when they 've done such a wonderful job through the years with KDE and KDevelop .
There 's a world peace argument to be made for that .
How many hundreds of thousands of people use KDE ? Now , can they finish KDevelop 4 , PLEASE .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And, I'm not saying that just because I happen to be a Republican...I'm saying that, as, a practical matter of bringing about world peace, its awfully hard to hate the Germans when they've done such a wonderful job through the years with KDE and KDevelop.
There's a world peace argument to be made for that.
How many hundreds of thousands of people use KDE?Now, can they finish KDevelop 4, PLEASE.
:-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012868</id>
	<title>Re:not that happy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257625320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>KDE was founded by open sourcers, not free software evangelists, as such, it was founded on a pragmatic base. Qt was one of the best GUI toolkits at the time and KDE got a free-as-in-beer deal to use it, the devs acknowledged that the whole wasn't open but (shock, horror) they thought producing a working Desktop Environment to be more important then rewriting Qt from scratch (that was on a roadmap I believe, but it was low priority). GNOME came into existence by the Free Software people who couldn't bare having proprietary code touching their hardware, not exactly the most compelling reason to start a DE project.</p><p>As for the snipe about languages... What do you propose, Python? Ruby? (Ignoring the fact that neither existed in a usable form) Perl? People always bitch about C++ but that language is ultimately as messy or clean as you make it (Don't do stupid crap, use simpler constructs when they're good enough), although I suspect you also think not having to declare variables before you use them is a <em>good idea</em> (blech &mdash; almost the definition of write-once-read-never code). I'm not going to criticise GNOME's choice of C either, the more off putting thing is the absurd superiority complexes that the coders often seem to have despite the code being longer and often more complicated than the C++/other equivalent (without being faster either). The real crime on their part is GLib GObject, it's <em>object-oriented C</em> and is more ugly then Satan's backside &mdash; if you're going to use C then use C, don't half-ass C++ features into it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>KDE was founded by open sourcers , not free software evangelists , as such , it was founded on a pragmatic base .
Qt was one of the best GUI toolkits at the time and KDE got a free-as-in-beer deal to use it , the devs acknowledged that the whole was n't open but ( shock , horror ) they thought producing a working Desktop Environment to be more important then rewriting Qt from scratch ( that was on a roadmap I believe , but it was low priority ) .
GNOME came into existence by the Free Software people who could n't bare having proprietary code touching their hardware , not exactly the most compelling reason to start a DE project.As for the snipe about languages... What do you propose , Python ?
Ruby ? ( Ignoring the fact that neither existed in a usable form ) Perl ?
People always bitch about C + + but that language is ultimately as messy or clean as you make it ( Do n't do stupid crap , use simpler constructs when they 're good enough ) , although I suspect you also think not having to declare variables before you use them is a good idea ( blech    almost the definition of write-once-read-never code ) .
I 'm not going to criticise GNOME 's choice of C either , the more off putting thing is the absurd superiority complexes that the coders often seem to have despite the code being longer and often more complicated than the C + + /other equivalent ( without being faster either ) .
The real crime on their part is GLib GObject , it 's object-oriented C and is more ugly then Satan 's backside    if you 're going to use C then use C , do n't half-ass C + + features into it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>KDE was founded by open sourcers, not free software evangelists, as such, it was founded on a pragmatic base.
Qt was one of the best GUI toolkits at the time and KDE got a free-as-in-beer deal to use it, the devs acknowledged that the whole wasn't open but (shock, horror) they thought producing a working Desktop Environment to be more important then rewriting Qt from scratch (that was on a roadmap I believe, but it was low priority).
GNOME came into existence by the Free Software people who couldn't bare having proprietary code touching their hardware, not exactly the most compelling reason to start a DE project.As for the snipe about languages... What do you propose, Python?
Ruby? (Ignoring the fact that neither existed in a usable form) Perl?
People always bitch about C++ but that language is ultimately as messy or clean as you make it (Don't do stupid crap, use simpler constructs when they're good enough), although I suspect you also think not having to declare variables before you use them is a good idea (blech — almost the definition of write-once-read-never code).
I'm not going to criticise GNOME's choice of C either, the more off putting thing is the absurd superiority complexes that the coders often seem to have despite the code being longer and often more complicated than the C++/other equivalent (without being faster either).
The real crime on their part is GLib GObject, it's object-oriented C and is more ugly then Satan's backside — if you're going to use C then use C, don't half-ass C++ features into it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012284</id>
	<title>KDE KBE</title>
	<author>RealGrouchy</author>
	<datestamp>1257525360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If only he were from a Commonwealth country, then he could be made a KBE.</p><p>- RG&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If only he were from a Commonwealth country , then he could be made a KBE.- RG &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If only he were from a Commonwealth country, then he could be made a KBE.- RG&gt;</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30014290</id>
	<title>Germany's Greatest Honor</title>
	<author>sorak</author>
	<datestamp>1257609780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought Germany's greatest honor was meeting David Hasselhoff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought Germany 's greatest honor was meeting David Hasselhoff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought Germany's greatest honor was meeting David Hasselhoff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013564</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm...</title>
	<author>gerddie</author>
	<datestamp>1257598080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well it's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal\_Cross\_of\_Merit" title="wikipedia.org">Bundesverdienst<b>k</b>reuz</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well it 's Bundesverdienstkreuz [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well it's Bundesverdienstkreuz [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012258</id>
	<title>It stands to reason</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257525000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If this is the only general award given by the German government that it is also the least prestigious, too?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this is the only general award given by the German government that it is also the least prestigious , too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this is the only general award given by the German government that it is also the least prestigious, too?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012532</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>the\_other\_chewey</author>
	<datestamp>1257530580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>The Federal Cross of Merit is both the most prestigious as well as the only general decoration awarded by the Federal Republic of Germany.</p></div><p>Wouldn't that also make it the least prestigious general decoration?</p></div><p>
Yeah, that's worded weirdly.<br>
<br>
It is the only <b>federal</b> award, making it the most prestigious amongst all (federal + <b>non</b>-federal - there's lots of those) official German state awards.<br>
It has multiple classes however, see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal\_Cross\_of\_Merit" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal\_Cross\_of\_Merit</a> [wikipedia.org] I can't find any reference to which<br>
one was awarded to Mr. Ettrich - I'd suspect it to be one of the not-so-high ones however.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Federal Cross of Merit is both the most prestigious as well as the only general decoration awarded by the Federal Republic of Germany.Would n't that also make it the least prestigious general decoration ?
Yeah , that 's worded weirdly .
It is the only federal award , making it the most prestigious amongst all ( federal + non-federal - there 's lots of those ) official German state awards .
It has multiple classes however , see http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal \ _Cross \ _of \ _Merit [ wikipedia.org ] I ca n't find any reference to which one was awarded to Mr. Ettrich - I 'd suspect it to be one of the not-so-high ones however .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Federal Cross of Merit is both the most prestigious as well as the only general decoration awarded by the Federal Republic of Germany.Wouldn't that also make it the least prestigious general decoration?
Yeah, that's worded weirdly.
It is the only federal award, making it the most prestigious amongst all (federal + non-federal - there's lots of those) official German state awards.
It has multiple classes however, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal\_Cross\_of\_Merit [wikipedia.org] I can't find any reference to which
one was awarded to Mr. Ettrich - I'd suspect it to be one of the not-so-high ones however.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013908</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, the culture must be very different from U.</title>
	<author>jmac\_the\_man</author>
	<datestamp>1257604020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you think the birth certificate people are bad now, just wait for what they'll do to a Torvalds presidency.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you think the birth certificate people are bad now , just wait for what they 'll do to a Torvalds presidency .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you think the birth certificate people are bad now, just wait for what they'll do to a Torvalds presidency.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013488</id>
	<title>Shh! Don't mention the flamewar!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257596580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know mailservers that died in the great flamewar of '98. I think they are still a bit sensitive about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know mailservers that died in the great flamewar of '98 .
I think they are still a bit sensitive about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know mailservers that died in the great flamewar of '98.
I think they are still a bit sensitive about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012292</id>
	<title>Wait, what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous Psychopath</author>
	<datestamp>1257525540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The Federal Cross of Merit is both the most prestigious as well as the only general decoration awarded by the Federal Republic of Germany.</p></div><p>Wouldn't that also make it the least prestigious general decoration?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Federal Cross of Merit is both the most prestigious as well as the only general decoration awarded by the Federal Republic of Germany.Would n't that also make it the least prestigious general decoration ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Federal Cross of Merit is both the most prestigious as well as the only general decoration awarded by the Federal Republic of Germany.Wouldn't that also make it the least prestigious general decoration?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30018440</id>
	<title>Re:Great now can he...</title>
	<author>Carewolf</author>
	<datestamp>1257604740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Several old features are missing on the desktop, but there have been no major features removed from Konqueror (maybe you are missing a specific kpart/view?). Just replace dolphin with konqueror for webbrowsing (using the File Management profile of course), and you will avoid the "tuna bait". On the other hand Dolphin is just a specialized konqueror for file management, and uses the same KParts as Konqueror.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Several old features are missing on the desktop , but there have been no major features removed from Konqueror ( maybe you are missing a specific kpart/view ? ) .
Just replace dolphin with konqueror for webbrowsing ( using the File Management profile of course ) , and you will avoid the " tuna bait " .
On the other hand Dolphin is just a specialized konqueror for file management , and uses the same KParts as Konqueror .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Several old features are missing on the desktop, but there have been no major features removed from Konqueror (maybe you are missing a specific kpart/view?).
Just replace dolphin with konqueror for webbrowsing (using the File Management profile of course), and you will avoid the "tuna bait".
On the other hand Dolphin is just a specialized konqueror for file management, and uses the same KParts as Konqueror.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30014680</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012224</id>
	<title>Re:Ha</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257524520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, Miguel de Icaza has already received one of the highest American honors: a corporate vice-presidency.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , Miguel de Icaza has already received one of the highest American honors : a corporate vice-presidency .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, Miguel de Icaza has already received one of the highest American honors: a corporate vice-presidency.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012584</id>
	<title>Congratulations Matthias</title>
	<author>yorkshiredale</author>
	<datestamp>1257531780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdot humor aside for a moment, it's truly a great honour to be recognized by one's country, and Matthias ought to be proud of the accomplishments of himself and the KDE community.
</p><p>Keep up the good work Matthias and all the KDE folks. You deserve this, and your efforts are appreciated (though sorry, slashdot doesn't give out Crosses of Merit, yet)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot humor aside for a moment , it 's truly a great honour to be recognized by one 's country , and Matthias ought to be proud of the accomplishments of himself and the KDE community .
Keep up the good work Matthias and all the KDE folks .
You deserve this , and your efforts are appreciated ( though sorry , slashdot does n't give out Crosses of Merit , yet )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot humor aside for a moment, it's truly a great honour to be recognized by one's country, and Matthias ought to be proud of the accomplishments of himself and the KDE community.
Keep up the good work Matthias and all the KDE folks.
You deserve this, and your efforts are appreciated (though sorry, slashdot doesn't give out Crosses of Merit, yet)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013366</id>
	<title>Re:not that happy</title>
	<author>Have Brain Will Rent</author>
	<datestamp>1257594540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Are you a fucking retard? C and C++ are bad languages??</i> </p><p>
Only from an engineering and systems design point of view. Otherwise they're fine.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you a fucking retard ?
C and C + + are bad languages ? ?
Only from an engineering and systems design point of view .
Otherwise they 're fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Are you a fucking retard?
C and C++ are bad languages??
Only from an engineering and systems design point of view.
Otherwise they're fine.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012898</id>
	<title>Re:not that happy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257625800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, one of them is. (It's the one with the OO strap-on, of course.) High-level programming needn't necessarily be LISP, but can at least be less sucky than C++.</p><p>C, OTOH, is a perfectly good systems language; I'm with you there. He is a fucking retard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , one of them is .
( It 's the one with the OO strap-on , of course .
) High-level programming need n't necessarily be LISP , but can at least be less sucky than C + + .C , OTOH , is a perfectly good systems language ; I 'm with you there .
He is a fucking retard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, one of them is.
(It's the one with the OO strap-on, of course.
) High-level programming needn't necessarily be LISP, but can at least be less sucky than C++.C, OTOH, is a perfectly good systems language; I'm with you there.
He is a fucking retard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013782</id>
	<title>About time!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257601680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Congratulations!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012866</id>
	<title>Re:It stands to reason</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1257625260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since they discontinued the iron cross (with oak leaves) then yes, it is.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since they discontinued the iron cross ( with oak leaves ) then yes , it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since they discontinued the iron cross (with oak leaves) then yes, it is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30014680</id>
	<title>Great now can he...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257614760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>PLEASE get KDE 4 back on track to being as useful as KDE 3.5.10 and take sagio out and bury him and the dolphin with the fishes!</p><p>KDE is bar none the best X WM out there, but KDE 4.x is doing nothing but hurting all the ground made up during the 3.5.x releases.</p><p>NO, I do NOT want my desktop as a widget<br>NO, I do NOT want dolphin as anything except as tuna bait</p><p>The "look" of KDE is just fine, move on!</p><p>Konqueror is the BROWSER and the FILE MANAGER, now RESTORE all the features you ripped out of Konqi so it can be used again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>PLEASE get KDE 4 back on track to being as useful as KDE 3.5.10 and take sagio out and bury him and the dolphin with the fishes ! KDE is bar none the best X WM out there , but KDE 4.x is doing nothing but hurting all the ground made up during the 3.5.x releases.NO , I do NOT want my desktop as a widgetNO , I do NOT want dolphin as anything except as tuna baitThe " look " of KDE is just fine , move on ! Konqueror is the BROWSER and the FILE MANAGER , now RESTORE all the features you ripped out of Konqi so it can be used again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PLEASE get KDE 4 back on track to being as useful as KDE 3.5.10 and take sagio out and bury him and the dolphin with the fishes!KDE is bar none the best X WM out there, but KDE 4.x is doing nothing but hurting all the ground made up during the 3.5.x releases.NO, I do NOT want my desktop as a widgetNO, I do NOT want dolphin as anything except as tuna baitThe "look" of KDE is just fine, move on!Konqueror is the BROWSER and the FILE MANAGER, now RESTORE all the features you ripped out of Konqi so it can be used again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012354</id>
	<title>Good</title>
	<author>Broodje</author>
	<datestamp>1257526380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good - What a nice recognition for hard work in public service.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good - What a nice recognition for hard work in public service .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good - What a nice recognition for hard work in public service.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30017404</id>
	<title>Re:The German Federal cross</title>
	<author>lordtoran</author>
	<datestamp>1257594840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Arschloch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Arschloch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Arschloch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30017790</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, the culture must be very different from U.</title>
	<author>lordtoran</author>
	<datestamp>1257598440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Kind of ironic, given, umm, World War II and stuff, which country seems more free now.</p><p>World War II has been discussed to death, and it gets boring. It's just 12 damn years out of 1200 of German history. Besides of the fact that we will (because of these 12 years) never allow Austrians to make politics here again, I find the Weimar Republic, the imperial period and the troublesome centuries that led to them much more interesting in regards to how we attained our freedom oriented mindset. These were the times when we tried to find our identity as a nation state while everyone else was up and running and busy building colonies in Africa. Before 1871, travel was hard because a patchwork of microstates existed where our nation is today. Yes, that has probably resulted in our upholding of individual freedom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Kind of ironic , given , umm , World War II and stuff , which country seems more free now.World War II has been discussed to death , and it gets boring .
It 's just 12 damn years out of 1200 of German history .
Besides of the fact that we will ( because of these 12 years ) never allow Austrians to make politics here again , I find the Weimar Republic , the imperial period and the troublesome centuries that led to them much more interesting in regards to how we attained our freedom oriented mindset .
These were the times when we tried to find our identity as a nation state while everyone else was up and running and busy building colonies in Africa .
Before 1871 , travel was hard because a patchwork of microstates existed where our nation is today .
Yes , that has probably resulted in our upholding of individual freedom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Kind of ironic, given, umm, World War II and stuff, which country seems more free now.World War II has been discussed to death, and it gets boring.
It's just 12 damn years out of 1200 of German history.
Besides of the fact that we will (because of these 12 years) never allow Austrians to make politics here again, I find the Weimar Republic, the imperial period and the troublesome centuries that led to them much more interesting in regards to how we attained our freedom oriented mindset.
These were the times when we tried to find our identity as a nation state while everyone else was up and running and busy building colonies in Africa.
Before 1871, travel was hard because a patchwork of microstates existed where our nation is today.
Yes, that has probably resulted in our upholding of individual freedom.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012616</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012452</id>
	<title>did the SAP guys ever win that?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257528360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>just wondering</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>just wondering</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just wondering</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013374</id>
	<title>Mercy</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1257594720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Gnome doesn't need any more beating while that MS employee is still in the project itself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gnome does n't need any more beating while that MS employee is still in the project itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gnome doesn't need any more beating while that MS employee is still in the project itself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012964</id>
	<title>Re:It stands to reason</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257626880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If this is the only general award given by the German government that it is also the least prestigious, too?</p></div><p>Yes, it is.<br>There are, however, six different classes, so there is an "most" and "least" prestigious: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal\_Cross\_of\_Merit<br>3k to 5k decorations given each year, a total of 240k from 1951 (wikipedia).</p><p>Nonetheless: Kongrats to him!!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this is the only general award given by the German government that it is also the least prestigious , too ? Yes , it is.There are , however , six different classes , so there is an " most " and " least " prestigious : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal \ _Cross \ _of \ _Merit3k to 5k decorations given each year , a total of 240k from 1951 ( wikipedia ) .Nonetheless : Kongrats to him !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this is the only general award given by the German government that it is also the least prestigious, too?Yes, it is.There are, however, six different classes, so there is an "most" and "least" prestigious: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal\_Cross\_of\_Merit3k to 5k decorations given each year, a total of 240k from 1951 (wikipedia).Nonetheless: Kongrats to him!
!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012258</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013610
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012616
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30014102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012616
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30020266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30018440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30014680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30017790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012616
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30015958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30020220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30014112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012616
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30017472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30018774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30017404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012438
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_07_014245_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012616
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_07_014245.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012318
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_07_014245.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013164
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_07_014245.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012196
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_07_014245.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30014680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30018440
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_07_014245.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012312
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_07_014245.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30017790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013460
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_07_014245.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012792
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012898
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012868
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30018774
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013690
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_07_014245.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012258
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013418
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013092
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012964
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_07_014245.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30014112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013564
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_07_014245.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30014102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012508
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_07_014245.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012592
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30020266
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012762
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_07_014245.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30017404
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_07_014245.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013784
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012224
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013250
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_07_014245.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30020220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012518
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30015958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30013812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012532
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012448
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_07_014245.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012212
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_07_014245.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30017472
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_07_014245.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012386
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_07_014245.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012584
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_07_014245.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_07_014245.30012408
</commentlist>
</conversation>
