<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_06_1217203</id>
	<title>CDC Adopts Near Real-Time Flu Tracking System</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1257516180000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>CWmike writes <i>"The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention launched an effort this week to better and more easily track for H1N1 and other seasonal influenza activity throughout the US. The CDC said it is <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140403/CDC\_adopts\_new\_near\_real\_time\_flu\_tracking\_system">now tracking data on 14 million patients from physician practices and hospitals</a> stored on a database hosted by GE Healthcare. The data is submitted daily from physicians' offices and hospitals that use GE's electronic medical record system. The data is then uploaded to GE Healthcare's Medical Quality Improvement Consortium, a database repository designed with HIPAA-compliance parameters of patient anonymity and best practices, where it can be the subject of medical data queries. The CDC can <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9132329/E\_health\_data\_collection\_key\_to\_tracking\_swine\_flu\_spread">perform queries to look for flu-like symptoms</a> being reported by physicians, and then disseminate the data for health care providers and local government officials throughout the country, who can alert businesses and others about flu outbreak hot spots. The CDC also hopes its analysis of the data helps it better understand the characteristics of H1N1 outbreaks and to determine who is most at risk for developing complications from the virus. Prior to implementing the new system, the CDC relied heavily on tracking insurance claims data, which could take days or weeks to make its way to the agency's medical staff for analysis. The medical data is normalized so that, for example, reports of hypertension, HTN, and high blood pressure all mean the same thing when a researcher enters a query against the data."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>CWmike writes " The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention launched an effort this week to better and more easily track for H1N1 and other seasonal influenza activity throughout the US .
The CDC said it is now tracking data on 14 million patients from physician practices and hospitals stored on a database hosted by GE Healthcare .
The data is submitted daily from physicians ' offices and hospitals that use GE 's electronic medical record system .
The data is then uploaded to GE Healthcare 's Medical Quality Improvement Consortium , a database repository designed with HIPAA-compliance parameters of patient anonymity and best practices , where it can be the subject of medical data queries .
The CDC can perform queries to look for flu-like symptoms being reported by physicians , and then disseminate the data for health care providers and local government officials throughout the country , who can alert businesses and others about flu outbreak hot spots .
The CDC also hopes its analysis of the data helps it better understand the characteristics of H1N1 outbreaks and to determine who is most at risk for developing complications from the virus .
Prior to implementing the new system , the CDC relied heavily on tracking insurance claims data , which could take days or weeks to make its way to the agency 's medical staff for analysis .
The medical data is normalized so that , for example , reports of hypertension , HTN , and high blood pressure all mean the same thing when a researcher enters a query against the data .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CWmike writes "The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention launched an effort this week to better and more easily track for H1N1 and other seasonal influenza activity throughout the US.
The CDC said it is now tracking data on 14 million patients from physician practices and hospitals stored on a database hosted by GE Healthcare.
The data is submitted daily from physicians' offices and hospitals that use GE's electronic medical record system.
The data is then uploaded to GE Healthcare's Medical Quality Improvement Consortium, a database repository designed with HIPAA-compliance parameters of patient anonymity and best practices, where it can be the subject of medical data queries.
The CDC can perform queries to look for flu-like symptoms being reported by physicians, and then disseminate the data for health care providers and local government officials throughout the country, who can alert businesses and others about flu outbreak hot spots.
The CDC also hopes its analysis of the data helps it better understand the characteristics of H1N1 outbreaks and to determine who is most at risk for developing complications from the virus.
Prior to implementing the new system, the CDC relied heavily on tracking insurance claims data, which could take days or weeks to make its way to the agency's medical staff for analysis.
The medical data is normalized so that, for example, reports of hypertension, HTN, and high blood pressure all mean the same thing when a researcher enters a query against the data.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005550</id>
	<title>Near Real Time - Clutching Tissues</title>
	<author>nozzo</author>
	<datestamp>1257522360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I sneezed and a team of STS (Special Tissue Services) operatives rappelled down and entered through the window feet first to present a tissue and a squirt of antibacterial hand foam.
When they clocked the pepper pot and my cheese bagel much hilarity ensued.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I sneezed and a team of STS ( Special Tissue Services ) operatives rappelled down and entered through the window feet first to present a tissue and a squirt of antibacterial hand foam .
When they clocked the pepper pot and my cheese bagel much hilarity ensued .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I sneezed and a team of STS (Special Tissue Services) operatives rappelled down and entered through the window feet first to present a tissue and a squirt of antibacterial hand foam.
When they clocked the pepper pot and my cheese bagel much hilarity ensued.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005486</id>
	<title>Good data?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257521880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is purely antidotal but a colleague got sick and when to the doctor. The doctor, without testing, said he had H1N1. So is that the kind of data that's being used or is this coming from verified tests? Even if the doctors are telling the CDC it's verified who is checking that they actually did the tests?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is purely antidotal but a colleague got sick and when to the doctor .
The doctor , without testing , said he had H1N1 .
So is that the kind of data that 's being used or is this coming from verified tests ?
Even if the doctors are telling the CDC it 's verified who is checking that they actually did the tests ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is purely antidotal but a colleague got sick and when to the doctor.
The doctor, without testing, said he had H1N1.
So is that the kind of data that's being used or is this coming from verified tests?
Even if the doctors are telling the CDC it's verified who is checking that they actually did the tests?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30007762</id>
	<title>Re:Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>arcmay</author>
	<datestamp>1257536280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please mod the AC up. I was exposed to someone with a confirmed case of H1N1 and came down with symptoms. I everywhere I've called tells me they are only testing patients at a high risk for complications, because otherwise they'd be swamped with people coming in for tests. Supposedly this is the government guideline. So how is the CDC expecting to actually track this thing if the government isn't allowing people to be tested?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please mod the AC up .
I was exposed to someone with a confirmed case of H1N1 and came down with symptoms .
I everywhere I 've called tells me they are only testing patients at a high risk for complications , because otherwise they 'd be swamped with people coming in for tests .
Supposedly this is the government guideline .
So how is the CDC expecting to actually track this thing if the government is n't allowing people to be tested ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please mod the AC up.
I was exposed to someone with a confirmed case of H1N1 and came down with symptoms.
I everywhere I've called tells me they are only testing patients at a high risk for complications, because otherwise they'd be swamped with people coming in for tests.
Supposedly this is the government guideline.
So how is the CDC expecting to actually track this thing if the government isn't allowing people to be tested?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30007326</id>
	<title>Re:And Look at How Useful It Is!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257533520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's South Carolina, not Georgia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's South Carolina , not Georgia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's South Carolina, not Georgia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30008938</id>
	<title>Re:Good data?</title>
	<author>aristofanes</author>
	<datestamp>1257498660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Follow the money<br>The CDC states that only a PCR test can distinguish between seasonal flu and H1N1,<br>PCR tests cost between 100 to 300 dollars and takes about 2 days. ( the costs in India were said to be about 200 dollars.<br>The PCR machines are expensive; from 50,000 to 100,000 dollars.<br>They require trained staff<br>They can only do so many tests ia a day<br>The WHO talks about "confirmed" cases; but not about the lack of PCR machines in most of the world.</p><p>(Hearsay) a distant relative, a nurse in the USA, says that when the results of a "quick" test (that can only indicate flu or not flu,) comes back she is told to always mark it as H1N1.<br>The CDC stats that treatment should begin within the first 48 hours; i.e the time it takes to get the PCR result.<br>So the physician assumes the worst and initiates treatment appropriate to H1N1</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Follow the moneyThe CDC states that only a PCR test can distinguish between seasonal flu and H1N1,PCR tests cost between 100 to 300 dollars and takes about 2 days .
( the costs in India were said to be about 200 dollars.The PCR machines are expensive ; from 50,000 to 100,000 dollars.They require trained staffThey can only do so many tests ia a dayThe WHO talks about " confirmed " cases ; but not about the lack of PCR machines in most of the world .
( Hearsay ) a distant relative , a nurse in the USA , says that when the results of a " quick " test ( that can only indicate flu or not flu , ) comes back she is told to always mark it as H1N1.The CDC stats that treatment should begin within the first 48 hours ; i.e the time it takes to get the PCR result.So the physician assumes the worst and initiates treatment appropriate to H1N1</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Follow the moneyThe CDC states that only a PCR test can distinguish between seasonal flu and H1N1,PCR tests cost between 100 to 300 dollars and takes about 2 days.
( the costs in India were said to be about 200 dollars.The PCR machines are expensive; from 50,000 to 100,000 dollars.They require trained staffThey can only do so many tests ia a dayThe WHO talks about "confirmed" cases; but not about the lack of PCR machines in most of the world.
(Hearsay) a distant relative, a nurse in the USA, says that when the results of a "quick" test (that can only indicate flu or not flu,) comes back she is told to always mark it as H1N1.The CDC stats that treatment should begin within the first 48 hours; i.e the time it takes to get the PCR result.So the physician assumes the worst and initiates treatment appropriate to H1N1</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005980</id>
	<title>Re:Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>afidel</author>
	<datestamp>1257525240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, genetic testing of the virus is EXPENSIVE and generally not needed at this point as we are so early in the normal flu season that it is obvious on the face that the majority of cases are related to H1N1.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , genetic testing of the virus is EXPENSIVE and generally not needed at this point as we are so early in the normal flu season that it is obvious on the face that the majority of cases are related to H1N1 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, genetic testing of the virus is EXPENSIVE and generally not needed at this point as we are so early in the normal flu season that it is obvious on the face that the majority of cases are related to H1N1.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005466</id>
	<title>Re:And Look at How Useful It Is!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257521760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are they correlating this data with the <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/11/06/0837206/Fear-Detector-To-Sniff-Out-Terrorists?art\_pos=2" title="slashdot.org">fear of people</a> [slashdot.org] of getting H1N1 in an airplane?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are they correlating this data with the fear of people [ slashdot.org ] of getting H1N1 in an airplane ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are they correlating this data with the fear of people [slashdot.org] of getting H1N1 in an airplane?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30010132</id>
	<title>Re:And Look at How Useful It Is!</title>
	<author>Mr. DOS</author>
	<datestamp>1257503760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, jQuery's only 55KB and goes down to 19KB if the browser supports gzipping if the server's configured to compress stuff, but I get your point. The difference there is that jQuery, unlike Flash, makes everything easier for the developer (creating a Flash document is easier than an img tag how?), and more importantly, takes care of discrepancies between JavaScript interpreters in different browsers (providing you use pure jQuery). Also, it doesn't require any extras from the browser's perspective: you were going to do it in JavaScript anyway, so all jQuery adds is (a potentially significant amount of) page load time. With Flash, you're also adding a dependency on the Flash plugin. They're both evil, but jQuery is definitely the lesser.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; --- Mr. DOS</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , jQuery 's only 55KB and goes down to 19KB if the browser supports gzipping if the server 's configured to compress stuff , but I get your point .
The difference there is that jQuery , unlike Flash , makes everything easier for the developer ( creating a Flash document is easier than an img tag how ?
) , and more importantly , takes care of discrepancies between JavaScript interpreters in different browsers ( providing you use pure jQuery ) .
Also , it does n't require any extras from the browser 's perspective : you were going to do it in JavaScript anyway , so all jQuery adds is ( a potentially significant amount of ) page load time .
With Flash , you 're also adding a dependency on the Flash plugin .
They 're both evil , but jQuery is definitely the lesser .
      --- Mr. DOS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, jQuery's only 55KB and goes down to 19KB if the browser supports gzipping if the server's configured to compress stuff, but I get your point.
The difference there is that jQuery, unlike Flash, makes everything easier for the developer (creating a Flash document is easier than an img tag how?
), and more importantly, takes care of discrepancies between JavaScript interpreters in different browsers (providing you use pure jQuery).
Also, it doesn't require any extras from the browser's perspective: you were going to do it in JavaScript anyway, so all jQuery adds is (a potentially significant amount of) page load time.
With Flash, you're also adding a dependency on the Flash plugin.
They're both evil, but jQuery is definitely the lesser.
      --- Mr. DOS</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005882</id>
	<title>Already built</title>
	<author>IGnatius T Foobar</author>
	<datestamp>1257524400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's already a "near realtime flu tracking system."  It's called Twitter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's already a " near realtime flu tracking system .
" It 's called Twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's already a "near realtime flu tracking system.
"  It's called Twitter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30007654</id>
	<title>Re:And Look at How Useful It Is!</title>
	<author>ftobin</author>
	<datestamp>1257535620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interestingly, if you have flash disabled (e.g., via NoScript), a JPG does show up instead of the flash image.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interestingly , if you have flash disabled ( e.g. , via NoScript ) , a JPG does show up instead of the flash image .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interestingly, if you have flash disabled (e.g., via NoScript), a JPG does show up instead of the flash image.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005472</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005698</id>
	<title>Re:Almost caught up to google</title>
	<author>ehud42</author>
	<datestamp>1257523200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One interesting thing I have noted in the trends is how 'off the chart' the flu trends are this year - I suspect google may not be able to apply an appropriate media hype attenuator to the results this year. But this is a good thing, as google will probably aggregate the search data with media reporting data and adjust their hype-limiter so that when the next overhyped pandemic / outbreak occurs the results will be more accurate and timely than the current official sources.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One interesting thing I have noted in the trends is how 'off the chart ' the flu trends are this year - I suspect google may not be able to apply an appropriate media hype attenuator to the results this year .
But this is a good thing , as google will probably aggregate the search data with media reporting data and adjust their hype-limiter so that when the next overhyped pandemic / outbreak occurs the results will be more accurate and timely than the current official sources .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One interesting thing I have noted in the trends is how 'off the chart' the flu trends are this year - I suspect google may not be able to apply an appropriate media hype attenuator to the results this year.
But this is a good thing, as google will probably aggregate the search data with media reporting data and adjust their hype-limiter so that when the next overhyped pandemic / outbreak occurs the results will be more accurate and timely than the current official sources.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006300</id>
	<title>Re:Good data?</title>
	<author>TubeSteak</author>
	<datestamp>1257527340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The thing is, this will lead to overprescribing, and also is probably likely to encourage people to self certify themselves ill when they aren't - so they can have a week off work (no sicknote required for Swine Flu, as you can't get in to see your doctor) and get their supply of Tamiflu in before stocks run out...</p></div><p>I know more than a few doctors and after the initial panic (in the USA), they mostly just stopped testing for H1N1.</p><p>Taking Tamiflu sucks almost as bad as the H1N1 flu (which I learned from one of my Doctor friends)<br>and both will put you out of rotation for ~10 days.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing is , this will lead to overprescribing , and also is probably likely to encourage people to self certify themselves ill when they are n't - so they can have a week off work ( no sicknote required for Swine Flu , as you ca n't get in to see your doctor ) and get their supply of Tamiflu in before stocks run out...I know more than a few doctors and after the initial panic ( in the USA ) , they mostly just stopped testing for H1N1.Taking Tamiflu sucks almost as bad as the H1N1 flu ( which I learned from one of my Doctor friends ) and both will put you out of rotation for ~ 10 days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing is, this will lead to overprescribing, and also is probably likely to encourage people to self certify themselves ill when they aren't - so they can have a week off work (no sicknote required for Swine Flu, as you can't get in to see your doctor) and get their supply of Tamiflu in before stocks run out...I know more than a few doctors and after the initial panic (in the USA), they mostly just stopped testing for H1N1.Taking Tamiflu sucks almost as bad as the H1N1 flu (which I learned from one of my Doctor friends)and both will put you out of rotation for ~10 days.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006500</id>
	<title>Swine Flue?  B.S.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257528540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0JqQyl09zQ" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0JqQyl09zQ</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = A0JqQyl09zQ [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0JqQyl09zQ [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005428</id>
	<title>Fir example</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257521460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Gotta love those fir trees</htmltext>
<tokenext>Got ta love those fir trees</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gotta love those fir trees</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30010080</id>
	<title>Re:Almost caught up to google</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1257503520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"do some self diagnosis via google, "<br>worst advice ever.</p><p>Swine fly isn't the easiest to diagnose.</p><p>Sometime people have fever, sometimes they don't. Sometimes they vomit, sometime they don't.</p><p>Anecdote:<br>Before this year I didn't know anyone, or know anyone who knew anyone that dies from the seasonal flu.<br>I know 2 people who are dead from H1N1 and know 1 person who knew someone who dies. All healthy. 2 were reported with minor symptoms, then suddenly they got bad and died.</p><p>To be expected when you have a nasty flu moving into a non-vaccinated populas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" do some self diagnosis via google , " worst advice ever.Swine fly is n't the easiest to diagnose.Sometime people have fever , sometimes they do n't .
Sometimes they vomit , sometime they do n't.Anecdote : Before this year I did n't know anyone , or know anyone who knew anyone that dies from the seasonal flu.I know 2 people who are dead from H1N1 and know 1 person who knew someone who dies .
All healthy .
2 were reported with minor symptoms , then suddenly they got bad and died.To be expected when you have a nasty flu moving into a non-vaccinated populas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"do some self diagnosis via google, "worst advice ever.Swine fly isn't the easiest to diagnose.Sometime people have fever, sometimes they don't.
Sometimes they vomit, sometime they don't.Anecdote:Before this year I didn't know anyone, or know anyone who knew anyone that dies from the seasonal flu.I know 2 people who are dead from H1N1 and know 1 person who knew someone who dies.
All healthy.
2 were reported with minor symptoms, then suddenly they got bad and died.To be expected when you have a nasty flu moving into a non-vaccinated populas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005894</id>
	<title>Re:And Look at How Useful It Is!</title>
	<author>gaspyy</author>
	<datestamp>1257524460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At first I thought the map updated dynamically via an xml, but it seems we have a flash movie that dynamically loads a big JPEG image and shows it - nothing more.</p><p>Improper use of a technology, nothing new.</p><p>Should I also count how many times I've seen a big js framework like jQuery being used for a trivial thing? I mean, load an entire 100Kb library to do something that could be done with 2-5 lines of javascript anyway...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At first I thought the map updated dynamically via an xml , but it seems we have a flash movie that dynamically loads a big JPEG image and shows it - nothing more.Improper use of a technology , nothing new.Should I also count how many times I 've seen a big js framework like jQuery being used for a trivial thing ?
I mean , load an entire 100Kb library to do something that could be done with 2-5 lines of javascript anyway.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At first I thought the map updated dynamically via an xml, but it seems we have a flash movie that dynamically loads a big JPEG image and shows it - nothing more.Improper use of a technology, nothing new.Should I also count how many times I've seen a big js framework like jQuery being used for a trivial thing?
I mean, load an entire 100Kb library to do something that could be done with 2-5 lines of javascript anyway...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005472</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30007852</id>
	<title>So when...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257536820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...will there be a Google maps mashup with this data??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...will there be a Google maps mashup with this data ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...will there be a Google maps mashup with this data?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30010328</id>
	<title>Re:And Look at How Useful It Is!</title>
	<author>greyhueofdoubt</author>
	<datestamp>1257504840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Since there's no report of flu in the Virgin Islands [...]</p> </div><p>Dude, get with the times. Ever since Chuck Norris went there, they're just called "The Islands."</p><p>-b</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since there 's no report of flu in the Virgin Islands [ ... ] Dude , get with the times .
Ever since Chuck Norris went there , they 're just called " The Islands .
" -b</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since there's no report of flu in the Virgin Islands [...] Dude, get with the times.
Ever since Chuck Norris went there, they're just called "The Islands.
"-b
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005496</id>
	<title>Sturdy Examples</title>
	<author>godztempus</author>
	<datestamp>1257522000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While fir is a great building material, I don't think it applies in these examples</htmltext>
<tokenext>While fir is a great building material , I do n't think it applies in these examples</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While fir is a great building material, I don't think it applies in these examples</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006336</id>
	<title>Re:And Look at How Useful It Is!</title>
	<author>zip\_000</author>
	<datestamp>1257527580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Either the map has changed or you suck at geography!<br> <br>

That is South Carolina, not Georgia.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Either the map has changed or you suck at geography !
That is South Carolina , not Georgia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Either the map has changed or you suck at geography!
That is South Carolina, not Georgia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005472</id>
	<title>Re:And Look at How Useful It Is!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257521820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why on earth does the CDC need to use flash for a still, non interactive image??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why on earth does the CDC need to use flash for a still , non interactive image ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why on earth does the CDC need to use flash for a still, non interactive image?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006470</id>
	<title>Re:And Look at How Useful It Is!</title>
	<author>fulldecent</author>
	<datestamp>1257528360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>or.</p><p>you could just look at the google trends to see what CDC will be reporting next week</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>or.you could just look at the google trends to see what CDC will be reporting next week</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or.you could just look at the google trends to see what CDC will be reporting next week</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005892</id>
	<title>Re:Good data?</title>
	<author>shadow349</author>
	<datestamp>1257524460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Back in July, the CDC told the states to not to bother to test people for H1N1; they should just count people that appear to have H1N1 symptoms as a positive test result since it is a "OMG! We're all fucked! Pig are flying and they have teh flu!" situation.</p><p>Of course, the fact that this overestimates the reported occurence of H1N1 by a <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/10/21/cbsnews\_investigates/main5404829.shtml?tag=cbsnewsLeadStoriesArea" title="cbsnews.com">factor of 5 to 50 times</a> [cbsnews.com] is of no concern to us peasants.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Back in July , the CDC told the states to not to bother to test people for H1N1 ; they should just count people that appear to have H1N1 symptoms as a positive test result since it is a " OMG !
We 're all fucked !
Pig are flying and they have teh flu !
" situation.Of course , the fact that this overestimates the reported occurence of H1N1 by a factor of 5 to 50 times [ cbsnews.com ] is of no concern to us peasants .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Back in July, the CDC told the states to not to bother to test people for H1N1; they should just count people that appear to have H1N1 symptoms as a positive test result since it is a "OMG!
We're all fucked!
Pig are flying and they have teh flu!
" situation.Of course, the fact that this overestimates the reported occurence of H1N1 by a factor of 5 to 50 times [cbsnews.com] is of no concern to us peasants.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005206</id>
	<title>And Look at How Useful It Is!</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1257519840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can find the latest map on <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/WeeklyFluActivityMap.htm" title="cdc.gov">the CDC site</a> [cdc.gov] and look at how helpful it is!  Apparently everyone's boned except for DC, Georgia, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands.  Since there's no report of flu in the Virgin Islands, I propose the government provides free plane tickets for anyone who isn't infected so that they might escape the wave of vomit brewing in our fair country.  <br> <br>

But in all seriousness their report does have some <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/index.htm" title="cdc.gov">decent data on it</a> [cdc.gov].</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can find the latest map on the CDC site [ cdc.gov ] and look at how helpful it is !
Apparently everyone 's boned except for DC , Georgia , Guam , Hawaii , Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands .
Since there 's no report of flu in the Virgin Islands , I propose the government provides free plane tickets for anyone who is n't infected so that they might escape the wave of vomit brewing in our fair country .
But in all seriousness their report does have some decent data on it [ cdc.gov ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can find the latest map on the CDC site [cdc.gov] and look at how helpful it is!
Apparently everyone's boned except for DC, Georgia, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands.
Since there's no report of flu in the Virgin Islands, I propose the government provides free plane tickets for anyone who isn't infected so that they might escape the wave of vomit brewing in our fair country.
But in all seriousness their report does have some decent data on it [cdc.gov].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005252</id>
	<title>Real Time?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257520200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why did that green dot just appear over my house on that map?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did that green dot just appear over my house on that map ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why did that green dot just appear over my house on that map?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006236</id>
	<title>OK...</title>
	<author>JustNiz</author>
	<datestamp>1257526920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so where are the pretty graphics? Say a map of the US with color codng for hotspots?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so where are the pretty graphics ?
Say a map of the US with color codng for hotspots ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so where are the pretty graphics?
Say a map of the US with color codng for hotspots?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005622</id>
	<title>Almost caught up to google</title>
	<author>ehud42</author>
	<datestamp>1257522840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So <a href="http://www.google.org/flutrends/about/how.html" title="google.org">google's flu results</a> [google.org] will be validated a few days faster. People start feeling crappy, do some self diagnosis via google, then see a doctor who then files a report when then is summarized and reported by the CDC.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So google 's flu results [ google.org ] will be validated a few days faster .
People start feeling crappy , do some self diagnosis via google , then see a doctor who then files a report when then is summarized and reported by the CDC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So google's flu results [google.org] will be validated a few days faster.
People start feeling crappy, do some self diagnosis via google, then see a doctor who then files a report when then is summarized and reported by the CDC.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005680</id>
	<title>Re:Good data?</title>
	<author>radtea</author>
	<datestamp>1257523140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Even if the doctors are telling the CDC it's verified who is checking that they actually did the tests?</i></p><p>Yeah, the thing that caught my eye was the claim in the summary:   "The medical data is normalized so that fir example reports of hypertension, HTN, and high blood pressure all mean the same thing when a researcher enters a query against the data."</p><p>"Mean the same thing", eh?  To whom?  Meaning is a verb:  it is what knowing subjects do with data, information, raw stuff.</p><p>People mean anything they want by anything they say or hear (just get into an argument with your girlfriend if you want empirical proof...)</p><p>While data normalization can handle trivial terminological differences, it cannot deal with the reality that what one doc means by "hypertension" does not map on to what another doc means by "hypertension", so the database will be full of inconsistent and contradictory information.  This is ok, so long as the people using it realize that the categories are loosely bound statistical clusters that can't be interogated... err... meaningfully... without the use of extremely high-power analytical techniques.  Simply asking questions like, "Where are flu-like symptoms being reported" will give you a probability distribution with significant spacial heteroskedasity, not an answer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if the doctors are telling the CDC it 's verified who is checking that they actually did the tests ? Yeah , the thing that caught my eye was the claim in the summary : " The medical data is normalized so that fir example reports of hypertension , HTN , and high blood pressure all mean the same thing when a researcher enters a query against the data .
" " Mean the same thing " , eh ?
To whom ?
Meaning is a verb : it is what knowing subjects do with data , information , raw stuff.People mean anything they want by anything they say or hear ( just get into an argument with your girlfriend if you want empirical proof... ) While data normalization can handle trivial terminological differences , it can not deal with the reality that what one doc means by " hypertension " does not map on to what another doc means by " hypertension " , so the database will be full of inconsistent and contradictory information .
This is ok , so long as the people using it realize that the categories are loosely bound statistical clusters that ca n't be interogated... err... meaningfully... without the use of extremely high-power analytical techniques .
Simply asking questions like , " Where are flu-like symptoms being reported " will give you a probability distribution with significant spacial heteroskedasity , not an answer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if the doctors are telling the CDC it's verified who is checking that they actually did the tests?Yeah, the thing that caught my eye was the claim in the summary:   "The medical data is normalized so that fir example reports of hypertension, HTN, and high blood pressure all mean the same thing when a researcher enters a query against the data.
""Mean the same thing", eh?
To whom?
Meaning is a verb:  it is what knowing subjects do with data, information, raw stuff.People mean anything they want by anything they say or hear (just get into an argument with your girlfriend if you want empirical proof...)While data normalization can handle trivial terminological differences, it cannot deal with the reality that what one doc means by "hypertension" does not map on to what another doc means by "hypertension", so the database will be full of inconsistent and contradictory information.
This is ok, so long as the people using it realize that the categories are loosely bound statistical clusters that can't be interogated... err... meaningfully... without the use of extremely high-power analytical techniques.
Simply asking questions like, "Where are flu-like symptoms being reported" will give you a probability distribution with significant spacial heteroskedasity, not an answer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005504</id>
	<title>Excellent!</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1257522060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The entirety of the USA has swine flu!<br> <br>What, that's not what the map shows?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The entirety of the USA has swine flu !
What , that 's not what the map shows ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The entirety of the USA has swine flu!
What, that's not what the map shows?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30008020</id>
	<title>Re:Good data?</title>
	<author>slimjim8094</author>
	<datestamp>1257537840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's a chart. In summary:</p><p>* If you don't have a fever or body aches or chills or a headache, you have a cold.<br>* If you have a runny nose and are slightly tired, and sneezing or a sore throat, and a slow onset of a few days, you have the normal flu.<br>* If it shows up over 3-6 hours, with chills, severe aches, headache, and a fever, it's swine flu.</p><p>They're really quite different. No test is needed for most cases...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a chart .
In summary : * If you do n't have a fever or body aches or chills or a headache , you have a cold .
* If you have a runny nose and are slightly tired , and sneezing or a sore throat , and a slow onset of a few days , you have the normal flu .
* If it shows up over 3-6 hours , with chills , severe aches , headache , and a fever , it 's swine flu.They 're really quite different .
No test is needed for most cases.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a chart.
In summary:* If you don't have a fever or body aches or chills or a headache, you have a cold.
* If you have a runny nose and are slightly tired, and sneezing or a sore throat, and a slow onset of a few days, you have the normal flu.
* If it shows up over 3-6 hours, with chills, severe aches, headache, and a fever, it's swine flu.They're really quite different.
No test is needed for most cases...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005658</id>
	<title>Re:Good data?</title>
	<author>RMH101</author>
	<datestamp>1257523020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>In the UK you're banned from entering your doctor's surgery with flu-like symptoms.  You get redirected to the NHS's Pandemic self-diagnosis expert system, which asks you about 10 questions (of which the important one is "do you have more than 2 of the following symptoms: fever, headache, nausea" etc).  At the end it spits out a unique reference number for your flu-buddy to go and pickup your prescription of Tamiflu from a chemists.  That's it.  I did it last week for my partner - she's fine now.<br>
The thing is, this will lead to overprescribing, and also is probably likely to encourage people to self certify themselves ill when they aren't - so they can have a week off work (no sicknote required for Swine Flu, as you can't get in to see your doctor) and get their supply of Tamiflu in before stocks run out...</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the UK you 're banned from entering your doctor 's surgery with flu-like symptoms .
You get redirected to the NHS 's Pandemic self-diagnosis expert system , which asks you about 10 questions ( of which the important one is " do you have more than 2 of the following symptoms : fever , headache , nausea " etc ) .
At the end it spits out a unique reference number for your flu-buddy to go and pickup your prescription of Tamiflu from a chemists .
That 's it .
I did it last week for my partner - she 's fine now .
The thing is , this will lead to overprescribing , and also is probably likely to encourage people to self certify themselves ill when they are n't - so they can have a week off work ( no sicknote required for Swine Flu , as you ca n't get in to see your doctor ) and get their supply of Tamiflu in before stocks run out.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the UK you're banned from entering your doctor's surgery with flu-like symptoms.
You get redirected to the NHS's Pandemic self-diagnosis expert system, which asks you about 10 questions (of which the important one is "do you have more than 2 of the following symptoms: fever, headache, nausea" etc).
At the end it spits out a unique reference number for your flu-buddy to go and pickup your prescription of Tamiflu from a chemists.
That's it.
I did it last week for my partner - she's fine now.
The thing is, this will lead to overprescribing, and also is probably likely to encourage people to self certify themselves ill when they aren't - so they can have a week off work (no sicknote required for Swine Flu, as you can't get in to see your doctor) and get their supply of Tamiflu in before stocks run out...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005470</id>
	<title>Map Google Searches</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257521820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wasn't there something a while back where researchers were tracking the flue via google searches on flu or flu-like symptoms and corelating the requesting IPs with their geographical regions?  That seemed better, because I had the flu, but I didn't go to a doctor...and by the time the doctor knows, the infected individual has already spread the germs.  This GE system still lags considerably IMO.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't there something a while back where researchers were tracking the flue via google searches on flu or flu-like symptoms and corelating the requesting IPs with their geographical regions ?
That seemed better , because I had the flu , but I did n't go to a doctor...and by the time the doctor knows , the infected individual has already spread the germs .
This GE system still lags considerably IMO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't there something a while back where researchers were tracking the flue via google searches on flu or flu-like symptoms and corelating the requesting IPs with their geographical regions?
That seemed better, because I had the flu, but I didn't go to a doctor...and by the time the doctor knows, the infected individual has already spread the germs.
This GE system still lags considerably IMO.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006656</id>
	<title>what happened to google?</title>
	<author>adosch</author>
	<datestamp>1257529500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did Google CEO's mention quite a few months back that they were implementing data mining search technology to track viral pandemics against what people's keyword searches were for on Google?  I wonder what happened of that.  Maybe it'll show up on my new Google Dashboard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did Google CEO 's mention quite a few months back that they were implementing data mining search technology to track viral pandemics against what people 's keyword searches were for on Google ?
I wonder what happened of that .
Maybe it 'll show up on my new Google Dashboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did Google CEO's mention quite a few months back that they were implementing data mining search technology to track viral pandemics against what people's keyword searches were for on Google?
I wonder what happened of that.
Maybe it'll show up on my new Google Dashboard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005788</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257523800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interesting to me though:  Ever since the first outbreak, I've known several people who had symptoms that matched the H1N1 symptoms.  Each one of them wound up seeing a doctor over the severity of the symptoms and NOT A SINGLE ONE was swabbed for culture to see if what they had WAS H1N1.  Does it not seem odd that the only tracking of this epidemic/pandemic is either non-existent or only being done by doctors/medical facilities that have a certain type of records system?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting to me though : Ever since the first outbreak , I 've known several people who had symptoms that matched the H1N1 symptoms .
Each one of them wound up seeing a doctor over the severity of the symptoms and NOT A SINGLE ONE was swabbed for culture to see if what they had WAS H1N1 .
Does it not seem odd that the only tracking of this epidemic/pandemic is either non-existent or only being done by doctors/medical facilities that have a certain type of records system ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting to me though:  Ever since the first outbreak, I've known several people who had symptoms that matched the H1N1 symptoms.
Each one of them wound up seeing a doctor over the severity of the symptoms and NOT A SINGLE ONE was swabbed for culture to see if what they had WAS H1N1.
Does it not seem odd that the only tracking of this epidemic/pandemic is either non-existent or only being done by doctors/medical facilities that have a certain type of records system?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005890</id>
	<title>Re:GE Healthcare</title>
	<author>imakemusic</author>
	<datestamp>1257524460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Keeping Your Robots Healthy (tm)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Keeping Your Robots Healthy ( tm )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Keeping Your Robots Healthy (tm)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005354</id>
	<title>I see..</title>
	<author>Galestar</author>
	<datestamp>1257520920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Time travelling higgs-boson-baguette-dropping-birds you say?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Time travelling higgs-boson-baguette-dropping-birds you say ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Time travelling higgs-boson-baguette-dropping-birds you say?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006284</id>
	<title>Hype!</title>
	<author>toporok</author>
	<datestamp>1257527280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reading CDC's website, it's quite interesting to see that according to them 36,000 people on average die from seasonal flu and that's during the flu season.  H1N1 only caused what, roughly 500-600 deaths since begining of the year and according to them it's active the whole year.
<a href="http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease/us\_flu-related\_deaths.htm" title="cdc.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease/us\_flu-related\_deaths.htm</a> [cdc.gov]
Hmm, is anyone else getting flashbacks to Wag the Dog?  No?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reading CDC 's website , it 's quite interesting to see that according to them 36,000 people on average die from seasonal flu and that 's during the flu season .
H1N1 only caused what , roughly 500-600 deaths since begining of the year and according to them it 's active the whole year .
http : //www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease/us \ _flu-related \ _deaths.htm [ cdc.gov ] Hmm , is anyone else getting flashbacks to Wag the Dog ?
No ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reading CDC's website, it's quite interesting to see that according to them 36,000 people on average die from seasonal flu and that's during the flu season.
H1N1 only caused what, roughly 500-600 deaths since begining of the year and according to them it's active the whole year.
http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease/us\_flu-related\_deaths.htm [cdc.gov]
Hmm, is anyone else getting flashbacks to Wag the Dog?
No?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005282</id>
	<title>The really nice thing about this...</title>
	<author>Cornwallis</author>
	<datestamp>1257520380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is GE can then take the database info and use it to go after their credit card customers who might be sickest, that way ensuring they'll get their dough before the patients croak.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is GE can then take the database info and use it to go after their credit card customers who might be sickest , that way ensuring they 'll get their dough before the patients croak .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is GE can then take the database info and use it to go after their credit card customers who might be sickest, that way ensuring they'll get their dough before the patients croak.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005786</id>
	<title>Re:And Look at How Useful It Is!</title>
	<author>nametaken</author>
	<datestamp>1257523800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't have clearance to see the flashy dots from the tracking beacons we were injected with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't have clearance to see the flashy dots from the tracking beacons we were injected with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't have clearance to see the flashy dots from the tracking beacons we were injected with.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005472</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006668</id>
	<title>Re:And Look at How Useful It Is!</title>
	<author>Quirkz</author>
	<datestamp>1257529560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Georgia? Did you mean South Carolina, or has the data changed in the last 2 hours?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Georgia ?
Did you mean South Carolina , or has the data changed in the last 2 hours ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Georgia?
Did you mean South Carolina, or has the data changed in the last 2 hours?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005876</id>
	<title>Crash it</title>
	<author>YahoKa</author>
	<datestamp>1257524400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Real time flu tracking, eh? Let's all sneeze at once and see if we can crash it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Real time flu tracking , eh ?
Let 's all sneeze at once and see if we can crash it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Real time flu tracking, eh?
Let's all sneeze at once and see if we can crash it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30007094</id>
	<title>Real Science</title>
	<author>MountainLogic</author>
	<datestamp>1257532140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sure that there are lots of studies from manufacturers of hand cleaners and other potions that there products kill xx\% of flue viruses.  I know I'm being bombarded by directions all the way from my HR department to the CDC on how to prevent getting swine flu.  While I'm sure that some of those narrow studies are correct that lots of alcohol will kill the virus, does any of this really make any difference with preventing transmission of the flu.  There are lots of assumptions built into suggestions that people cough into their elbow, wash their hands, etc will prevent the transmission of the flu.  Are there any real world population studies to see if this makes any difference?  I know this is almost like asking<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. if they are sure that the world is not flat, but some times it worth checking.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure that there are lots of studies from manufacturers of hand cleaners and other potions that there products kill xx \ % of flue viruses .
I know I 'm being bombarded by directions all the way from my HR department to the CDC on how to prevent getting swine flu .
While I 'm sure that some of those narrow studies are correct that lots of alcohol will kill the virus , does any of this really make any difference with preventing transmission of the flu .
There are lots of assumptions built into suggestions that people cough into their elbow , wash their hands , etc will prevent the transmission of the flu .
Are there any real world population studies to see if this makes any difference ?
I know this is almost like asking / .
if they are sure that the world is not flat , but some times it worth checking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure that there are lots of studies from manufacturers of hand cleaners and other potions that there products kill xx\% of flue viruses.
I know I'm being bombarded by directions all the way from my HR department to the CDC on how to prevent getting swine flu.
While I'm sure that some of those narrow studies are correct that lots of alcohol will kill the virus, does any of this really make any difference with preventing transmission of the flu.
There are lots of assumptions built into suggestions that people cough into their elbow, wash their hands, etc will prevent the transmission of the flu.
Are there any real world population studies to see if this makes any difference?
I know this is almost like asking /.
if they are sure that the world is not flat, but some times it worth checking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30011538</id>
	<title>Heard behind the CDC building:</title>
	<author>Lost Penguin</author>
	<datestamp>1257514200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"But I don't want to get on the cart"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" But I do n't want to get on the cart "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"But I don't want to get on the cart"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006098</id>
	<title>Re:Good data?</title>
	<author>skiingyac</author>
	<datestamp>1257526080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right now, something like 1\% of all flu in the US that is attempted to be subtyped is NOT H1N1.  See http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/  So basically, if the person has the flu, it is almost definitely H1N1.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right now , something like 1 \ % of all flu in the US that is attempted to be subtyped is NOT H1N1 .
See http : //www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/ So basically , if the person has the flu , it is almost definitely H1N1 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right now, something like 1\% of all flu in the US that is attempted to be subtyped is NOT H1N1.
See http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/  So basically, if the person has the flu, it is almost definitely H1N1.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005376</id>
	<title>GE Healthcare</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1257521160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>General Electric Healthcare?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>General Electric Healthcare ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>General Electric Healthcare?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005902</id>
	<title>It's not meant to be a sampling, more of a census.</title>
	<author>Guppy</author>
	<datestamp>1257524520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is purely antidotal but a colleague got sick and when to the doctor. The doctor, without testing, said he had H1N1.</p> </div><p>This is actually a reasonably diagnosis.</p><p>From statistical sampling of the population (with strain typing) that's been done so far, the normal seasonal flu strains are not really circulating yet, while H1N1 has been observed to be spiking in frequency.  I think there's some diagnosis guideline out there that your family doctor should assume any flu case is H1N1, at this time of the year.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is purely antidotal but a colleague got sick and when to the doctor .
The doctor , without testing , said he had H1N1 .
This is actually a reasonably diagnosis.From statistical sampling of the population ( with strain typing ) that 's been done so far , the normal seasonal flu strains are not really circulating yet , while H1N1 has been observed to be spiking in frequency .
I think there 's some diagnosis guideline out there that your family doctor should assume any flu case is H1N1 , at this time of the year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is purely antidotal but a colleague got sick and when to the doctor.
The doctor, without testing, said he had H1N1.
This is actually a reasonably diagnosis.From statistical sampling of the population (with strain typing) that's been done so far, the normal seasonal flu strains are not really circulating yet, while H1N1 has been observed to be spiking in frequency.
I think there's some diagnosis guideline out there that your family doctor should assume any flu case is H1N1, at this time of the year.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005654</id>
	<title>Re:Good data?</title>
	<author>Whalou</author>
	<datestamp>1257523020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This is purely antidotal but a colleague got sick and when to the doctor.</p></div></blockquote><p>
If it's <em>antidotal</em>, he's probably cured now.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is purely antidotal but a colleague got sick and when to the doctor .
If it 's antidotal , he 's probably cured now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is purely antidotal but a colleague got sick and when to the doctor.
If it's antidotal, he's probably cured now.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30008096</id>
	<title>Re:And Look at How Useful It Is!</title>
	<author>dontmakemethink</author>
	<datestamp>1257538200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, everywhere has widespread flu activity!  Just like every other year at this time!  Everyone run for your lives!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , everywhere has widespread flu activity !
Just like every other year at this time !
Everyone run for your lives !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, everywhere has widespread flu activity!
Just like every other year at this time!
Everyone run for your lives!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005206</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30007762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30010328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30007326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30008096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30010080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30008020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30010132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005894
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30007654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_1217203_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30008938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_1217203.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_1217203.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30008938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005902
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005658
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30008020
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006098
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_1217203.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005282
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_1217203.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005882
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_1217203.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006500
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_1217203.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30010080
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_1217203.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30008096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005472
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005786
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005894
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30010132
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30007654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005466
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30010328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30007326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006336
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_1217203.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005376
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005890
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_1217203.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30006284
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_1217203.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30007094
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_1217203.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30005980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_1217203.30007762
</commentlist>
</conversation>
