<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_06_0453232</id>
	<title>Dashboard Reveals What Google Knows About You</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1257529560000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>CWmike writes <i>"Ever wonder exactly what Google knows about you? Google took a step today to answer that question <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140411/Dashboard\_shows\_what\_Google\_knows\_about\_you">with the unveiling of Google Dashboard</a>, which is designed to let users see and control the copious amounts of data that <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9129916/FTC\_urged\_to\_investigate\_Google\_s\_hosted\_services">Google has stored in its servers</a> about them. 'Over the past 11 years, Google has focused on building innovative products for our users. Today, with hundreds of millions of people using those products around the world, we are very aware of the trust that you have placed in us, and our responsibility to protect your privacy and data,' <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/transparency-choice-and-control-now.html">Google said in a blog post today</a>. 'In an effort to provide you with greater transparency and control over their own data, we've built the Google Dashboard.' Dashboard is set up so that users can control the personal settings in each Google product that they use. Google said the tool supports more than 20 products, including Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Web History, YouTube, Picasa, Talk, Reader, Alerts and Google Latitude. Consumer Watchdog said in a statement today that it applauds Google for giving users a single place to go to manage their data. But at the same tine, the group also came down hard on Google, contending that it needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>CWmike writes " Ever wonder exactly what Google knows about you ?
Google took a step today to answer that question with the unveiling of Google Dashboard , which is designed to let users see and control the copious amounts of data that Google has stored in its servers about them .
'Over the past 11 years , Google has focused on building innovative products for our users .
Today , with hundreds of millions of people using those products around the world , we are very aware of the trust that you have placed in us , and our responsibility to protect your privacy and data, ' Google said in a blog post today .
'In an effort to provide you with greater transparency and control over their own data , we 've built the Google Dashboard .
' Dashboard is set up so that users can control the personal settings in each Google product that they use .
Google said the tool supports more than 20 products , including Gmail , Calendar , Docs , Web History , YouTube , Picasa , Talk , Reader , Alerts and Google Latitude .
Consumer Watchdog said in a statement today that it applauds Google for giving users a single place to go to manage their data .
But at the same tine , the group also came down hard on Google , contending that it needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CWmike writes "Ever wonder exactly what Google knows about you?
Google took a step today to answer that question with the unveiling of Google Dashboard, which is designed to let users see and control the copious amounts of data that Google has stored in its servers about them.
'Over the past 11 years, Google has focused on building innovative products for our users.
Today, with hundreds of millions of people using those products around the world, we are very aware of the trust that you have placed in us, and our responsibility to protect your privacy and data,' Google said in a blog post today.
'In an effort to provide you with greater transparency and control over their own data, we've built the Google Dashboard.
' Dashboard is set up so that users can control the personal settings in each Google product that they use.
Google said the tool supports more than 20 products, including Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Web History, YouTube, Picasa, Talk, Reader, Alerts and Google Latitude.
Consumer Watchdog said in a statement today that it applauds Google for giving users a single place to go to manage their data.
But at the same tine, the group also came down hard on Google, contending that it needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30005846</id>
	<title>It's Friday morning</title>
	<author>The name is Dave. Ja</author>
	<datestamp>1257524220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But at the same tine, the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>I guess we'll see a fork coming soon.
<br> <br>
---</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But at the same tine , the ...I guess we 'll see a fork coming soon .
---</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But at the same tine, the ...I guess we'll see a fork coming soon.
---
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003804</id>
	<title>Re:Bleedingly obvious?</title>
	<author>Virak</author>
	<datestamp>1257500460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, just one. Do you think Google has never heard of IP addresses?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , just one .
Do you think Google has never heard of IP addresses ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, just one.
Do you think Google has never heard of IP addresses?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003494</id>
	<title>It's a trap !!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257450780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it just me, or is it ironic that they make you create an account just to view what they claim they know about you?</p><p>I block cookies and js from google, and I could swear it still manages to personalize search results. (by ip?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or is it ironic that they make you create an account just to view what they claim they know about you ? I block cookies and js from google , and I could swear it still manages to personalize search results .
( by ip ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or is it ironic that they make you create an account just to view what they claim they know about you?I block cookies and js from google, and I could swear it still manages to personalize search results.
(by ip?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004580</id>
	<title>Re:Let's add a link.</title>
	<author>insane\_coder</author>
	<datestamp>1257513780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have that exact problem too, and I <a href="http://insanecoding.blogspot.com/2009/10/why-online-services-suck.html" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">hate</a> [blogspot.com] it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have that exact problem too , and I hate [ blogspot.com ] it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have that exact problem too, and I hate [blogspot.com] it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004780</id>
	<title>Re: My data isnt Google's data</title>
	<author>u64</author>
	<datestamp>1257516660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have the freedom to share your data with Google.<br>But i dont have the freedom to choose not to. That's<br>the principle. I want you to have the freedom of chioce.<br>But i also want that freedom for me too.</p><p>At this point Google isnt a BadGuy. But Google cant guarantee<br>us that it will behave like this next year or even next week.<br>That's the second principle.</p><p>CONCLUSION<br>Google = Spyware</p><p>I'm doing everything i can think of to protect my freedom of<br>choice over who and what have my data.</p><p>Opera default settings: NoCookies NoFlash NoReferer<br>Then edit 'Site Preferences' for sites that really need it.<br>(More work is in progress...)</p><p>I also block Flash-Cookies.<br>rd<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/s<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/q    "\%AppData\%\Adobe"<br>rd<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/s<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/q    "\%AppData\%\Macromedia"<br>md          "\%AppData\%\Adobe"<br>md          "\%AppData\%\Macromedia"<br>copy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/y NUL "\%AppData\%\Adobe\Flash Player"<br>copy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/y NUL "\%AppData\%\Macromedia\Flash Player"<br>md          "\%UserProfile\%\..\Default User\Application Data\Adobe"<br>md          "\%UserProfile\%\..\Default User\Application Data\Macromedia"<br>copy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/y NUL "\%UserProfile\%\..\Default User\Application Data\Adobe\Flash Player"<br>copy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/y NUL "\%UserProfile\%\..\Default User\Application Data\Macromedia\Flash Player"</p><p>Btw, i would never PAY to be anonymous. I see it as a Human Right, and we should<br>never have to pay for that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have the freedom to share your data with Google.But i dont have the freedom to choose not to .
That'sthe principle .
I want you to have the freedom of chioce.But i also want that freedom for me too.At this point Google isnt a BadGuy .
But Google cant guaranteeus that it will behave like this next year or even next week.That 's the second principle.CONCLUSIONGoogle = SpywareI 'm doing everything i can think of to protect my freedom ofchoice over who and what have my data.Opera default settings : NoCookies NoFlash NoRefererThen edit 'Site Preferences ' for sites that really need it .
( More work is in progress... ) I also block Flash-Cookies.rd /s /q " \ % AppData \ % \ Adobe " rd /s /q " \ % AppData \ % \ Macromedia " md " \ % AppData \ % \ Adobe " md " \ % AppData \ % \ Macromedia " copy /y NUL " \ % AppData \ % \ Adobe \ Flash Player " copy /y NUL " \ % AppData \ % \ Macromedia \ Flash Player " md " \ % UserProfile \ % \ .. \ Default User \ Application Data \ Adobe " md " \ % UserProfile \ % \ .. \ Default User \ Application Data \ Macromedia " copy /y NUL " \ % UserProfile \ % \ .. \ Default User \ Application Data \ Adobe \ Flash Player " copy /y NUL " \ % UserProfile \ % \ .. \ Default User \ Application Data \ Macromedia \ Flash Player " Btw , i would never PAY to be anonymous .
I see it as a Human Right , and we shouldnever have to pay for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have the freedom to share your data with Google.But i dont have the freedom to choose not to.
That'sthe principle.
I want you to have the freedom of chioce.But i also want that freedom for me too.At this point Google isnt a BadGuy.
But Google cant guaranteeus that it will behave like this next year or even next week.That's the second principle.CONCLUSIONGoogle = SpywareI'm doing everything i can think of to protect my freedom ofchoice over who and what have my data.Opera default settings: NoCookies NoFlash NoRefererThen edit 'Site Preferences' for sites that really need it.
(More work is in progress...)I also block Flash-Cookies.rd /s /q    "\%AppData\%\Adobe"rd /s /q    "\%AppData\%\Macromedia"md          "\%AppData\%\Adobe"md          "\%AppData\%\Macromedia"copy /y NUL "\%AppData\%\Adobe\Flash Player"copy /y NUL "\%AppData\%\Macromedia\Flash Player"md          "\%UserProfile\%\..\Default User\Application Data\Adobe"md          "\%UserProfile\%\..\Default User\Application Data\Macromedia"copy /y NUL "\%UserProfile\%\..\Default User\Application Data\Adobe\Flash Player"copy /y NUL "\%UserProfile\%\..\Default User\Application Data\Macromedia\Flash Player"Btw, i would never PAY to be anonymous.
I see it as a Human Right, and we shouldnever have to pay for that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003524</id>
	<title>Re:More like what Google THINKS it knows</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257537780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looking in the Dashboard at what they "know" about for the last three years and it strikes me that it would be very easy for someone to draw some pretty outrageous conclusions about who I am, what I think and what I do.</p><p>Pray that governments never get open access to mine their database I say!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looking in the Dashboard at what they " know " about for the last three years and it strikes me that it would be very easy for someone to draw some pretty outrageous conclusions about who I am , what I think and what I do.Pray that governments never get open access to mine their database I say !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looking in the Dashboard at what they "know" about for the last three years and it strikes me that it would be very easy for someone to draw some pretty outrageous conclusions about who I am, what I think and what I do.Pray that governments never get open access to mine their database I say!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003470</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257450360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh my gosh! Google has ALL my chats and email and calendar info that I uh posted there...right</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh my gosh !
Google has ALL my chats and email and calendar info that I uh posted there...right</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh my gosh!
Google has ALL my chats and email and calendar info that I uh posted there...right</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003302</id>
	<title>This might help...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257447900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you forgot something...like maybe a link to Google Dashboard?</p><p>https://www.google.com/dashboard/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you forgot something...like maybe a link to Google Dashboard ? https : //www.google.com/dashboard/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you forgot something...like maybe a link to Google Dashboard?https://www.google.com/dashboard/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004038</id>
	<title>Re:Bleedingly obvious?</title>
	<author>Yvanhoe</author>
	<datestamp>1257504420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah... Do they log IP address for their searches ? Wouldn't it be illegal for them NOT to do it according to some stupid antiterrorist law ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah... Do they log IP address for their searches ?
Would n't it be illegal for them NOT to do it according to some stupid antiterrorist law ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah... Do they log IP address for their searches ?
Wouldn't it be illegal for them NOT to do it according to some stupid antiterrorist law ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004510</id>
	<title>Re:Great! One basket for all our eggs...</title>
	<author>bickerdyke</author>
	<datestamp>1257512640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunatly it's the ONLY basket available, that is desigend to let you take out the eggs again.</p><p>All other freemailers I know about are information black holes. store your data there, but moving on the the next provider is a huge PITA.</p><p>Google is the only companyI know who activly offers means for other sites to acces the stored data in a secure and reliable way. (APIs, OAuth, Data Liberation and so on)</p><p>Sad but true, google would offer to distribute your eggs in more baskets you could carry alone, but the other basket makers are on strike.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunatly it 's the ONLY basket available , that is desigend to let you take out the eggs again.All other freemailers I know about are information black holes .
store your data there , but moving on the the next provider is a huge PITA.Google is the only companyI know who activly offers means for other sites to acces the stored data in a secure and reliable way .
( APIs , OAuth , Data Liberation and so on ) Sad but true , google would offer to distribute your eggs in more baskets you could carry alone , but the other basket makers are on strike .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunatly it's the ONLY basket available, that is desigend to let you take out the eggs again.All other freemailers I know about are information black holes.
store your data there, but moving on the the next provider is a huge PITA.Google is the only companyI know who activly offers means for other sites to acces the stored data in a secure and reliable way.
(APIs, OAuth, Data Liberation and so on)Sad but true, google would offer to distribute your eggs in more baskets you could carry alone, but the other basket makers are on strike.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003952</id>
	<title>Re:Mottos</title>
	<author>muckracer</author>
	<datestamp>1257502860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Soviet Russia government googles you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Soviet Russia government googles you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Soviet Russia government googles you!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003316</id>
	<title>Great! One basket for all our eggs...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257448320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not to look down on the efforts made by Google to prevent attacks, but doesn't this pose a huge security risk? The payload from being able to hack into a users profile from this service would be huge...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to look down on the efforts made by Google to prevent attacks , but does n't this pose a huge security risk ?
The payload from being able to hack into a users profile from this service would be huge.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to look down on the efforts made by Google to prevent attacks, but doesn't this pose a huge security risk?
The payload from being able to hack into a users profile from this service would be huge...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003678</id>
	<title>Real or Illusion?</title>
	<author>gooman</author>
	<datestamp>1257540720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just logged in and looked at it. It seems like a very nice feature. I found it amusing that you can "remove" information.<br>Since none of my recent web searches are listed, the Dashboard appears to only keep track of your activity while you are logged in. Obvious, but still interesting.<br>I imagine most searches can be identified by an IP address. Google must keep track of that too. Linking it together seem trivial.<br>So the question remains: Is it real control or just the illusion of control? I guess only time will answer that question.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just logged in and looked at it .
It seems like a very nice feature .
I found it amusing that you can " remove " information.Since none of my recent web searches are listed , the Dashboard appears to only keep track of your activity while you are logged in .
Obvious , but still interesting.I imagine most searches can be identified by an IP address .
Google must keep track of that too .
Linking it together seem trivial.So the question remains : Is it real control or just the illusion of control ?
I guess only time will answer that question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just logged in and looked at it.
It seems like a very nice feature.
I found it amusing that you can "remove" information.Since none of my recent web searches are listed, the Dashboard appears to only keep track of your activity while you are logged in.
Obvious, but still interesting.I imagine most searches can be identified by an IP address.
Google must keep track of that too.
Linking it together seem trivial.So the question remains: Is it real control or just the illusion of control?
I guess only time will answer that question.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30006152</id>
	<title>Re:Let's add a link.</title>
	<author>ShakaUVM</author>
	<datestamp>1257526440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;Google, you KNOW I speak English, stop overriding my account setting for my language with demographic data based on my IP address. When I'm traveling it doesn't make me fluent in the local language...</p><p>Yeah, that drives me nuts, too.</p><p>I try to override the damn feature by going to <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/" title="google.co.uk">http://www.google.co.uk/</a> [google.co.uk], but even that gets overriden half the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; Google , you KNOW I speak English , stop overriding my account setting for my language with demographic data based on my IP address .
When I 'm traveling it does n't make me fluent in the local language...Yeah , that drives me nuts , too.I try to override the damn feature by going to http : //www.google.co.uk/ [ google.co.uk ] , but even that gets overriden half the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;Google, you KNOW I speak English, stop overriding my account setting for my language with demographic data based on my IP address.
When I'm traveling it doesn't make me fluent in the local language...Yeah, that drives me nuts, too.I try to override the damn feature by going to http://www.google.co.uk/ [google.co.uk], but even that gets overriden half the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003572</id>
	<title>Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to</title>
	<author>Sam Douglas</author>
	<datestamp>1257538560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.google.com/support/accounts/bin/answer.py?answer=162743" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/support/accounts/bin/answer.py?answer=162743</a> [google.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.google.com/support/accounts/bin/answer.py ? answer = 162743 [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.google.com/support/accounts/bin/answer.py?answer=162743 [google.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004708</id>
	<title>Re:It should be OPT IN</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1257515520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Read this page:</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/support/accounts/bin/answer.py?answer=162743" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/support/accounts/bin/answer.py?answer=162743</a> [google.com]</p><p>The Google dashboard shows data actively generated by users, not things like server logs and cookies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Read this page : http : //www.google.com/support/accounts/bin/answer.py ? answer = 162743 [ google.com ] The Google dashboard shows data actively generated by users , not things like server logs and cookies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Read this page:http://www.google.com/support/accounts/bin/answer.py?answer=162743 [google.com]The Google dashboard shows data actively generated by users, not things like server logs and cookies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003958</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003380</id>
	<title>Stop collecting personal data</title>
	<author>wiredlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1257449220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data.</p></div><p>Um.. It's a free service, and collecting user data (most of which is anonymized) is a core feature of their ad services. Why exactly does Google need to hobble its business model again?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data.Um.. It 's a free service , and collecting user data ( most of which is anonymized ) is a core feature of their ad services .
Why exactly does Google need to hobble its business model again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data.Um.. It's a free service, and collecting user data (most of which is anonymized) is a core feature of their ad services.
Why exactly does Google need to hobble its business model again?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30007504</id>
	<title>Re:How to prevent companies from collecting data..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257534720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>um, dude, how are you going to monitor the licensees?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>um , dude , how are you going to monitor the licensees ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>um, dude, how are you going to monitor the licensees?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003260</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003680</id>
	<title>Re:Bleedingly obvious?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257540720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>But at the same tine, the group also came down hard on Google, contending that it needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data.</p></div><p>Don't login. Disable cookies. Any questions?</p></div><p>Just one.</p><p>Do you really think people listen to reason when they're scared out of their minds about their porn searches?</p><p>Maybe Mozilla is in collusion with Google and is secretly storing my cookies, man!  I delete 'em but who knows, they might be there! I just don't fucking know! FUCK!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But at the same tine , the group also came down hard on Google , contending that it needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data.Do n't login .
Disable cookies .
Any questions ? Just one.Do you really think people listen to reason when they 're scared out of their minds about their porn searches ? Maybe Mozilla is in collusion with Google and is secretly storing my cookies , man !
I delete 'em but who knows , they might be there !
I just do n't fucking know !
FUCK !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But at the same tine, the group also came down hard on Google, contending that it needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data.Don't login.
Disable cookies.
Any questions?Just one.Do you really think people listen to reason when they're scared out of their minds about their porn searches?Maybe Mozilla is in collusion with Google and is secretly storing my cookies, man!
I delete 'em but who knows, they might be there!
I just don't fucking know!
FUCK!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003728</id>
	<title>Re:Stop collecting personal data</title>
	<author>houghi</author>
	<datestamp>1257498600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Gazillions of users won't bother to turn things off, so to have a few geeks from<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. do it is to show they play nice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gazillions of users wo n't bother to turn things off , so to have a few geeks from / .
do it is to show they play nice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gazillions of users won't bother to turn things off, so to have a few geeks from /.
do it is to show they play nice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003324</id>
	<title>Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257448500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course. In reality, Google probably knows everything about you already. Most people don't seem to mind, but it's still taboo for some reason for Google to come out and say it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course .
In reality , Google probably knows everything about you already .
Most people do n't seem to mind , but it 's still taboo for some reason for Google to come out and say it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course.
In reality, Google probably knows everything about you already.
Most people don't seem to mind, but it's still taboo for some reason for Google to come out and say it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003704</id>
	<title>Re:Let's add a link.</title>
	<author>jrumney</author>
	<datestamp>1257498180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is a problem that was solved in the very early days of the web with the "Accept-Language" header, which is supported by all browsers since at least Netscape 2.0.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a problem that was solved in the very early days of the web with the " Accept-Language " header , which is supported by all browsers since at least Netscape 2.0 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a problem that was solved in the very early days of the web with the "Accept-Language" header, which is supported by all browsers since at least Netscape 2.0.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003718</id>
	<title>Re:Let's add a link.</title>
	<author>Zarhan</author>
	<datestamp>1257498480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Umm. Allow cookies from google. Go to Search Settings. Set your language preferences. They stick.</p><p>That's how I haven't seen Finnish version of Google except when browser sometimes decides to delete all cookies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm .
Allow cookies from google .
Go to Search Settings .
Set your language preferences .
They stick.That 's how I have n't seen Finnish version of Google except when browser sometimes decides to delete all cookies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm.
Allow cookies from google.
Go to Search Settings.
Set your language preferences.
They stick.That's how I haven't seen Finnish version of Google except when browser sometimes decides to delete all cookies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400</id>
	<title>Re:Let's add a link.</title>
	<author>Pete (big-pete)</author>
	<datestamp>1257449520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Well that's annoying...one thing Google doesn't do intelligently is languages.  I am logged into my account, they KNOW I speak English as a preferred language, but when I go to my <a href="http://www.google.com/ig" title="google.com">iGoogle</a> [google.com] page on my iPhone whilst I'm in Belgium it insists on displaying everything in Dutch.
</p><p>
That was annoying enough...but now the dashboard is doing the same, even when I visit the page from my laptop.
</p><p>
Google, you <b>KNOW</b> I speak English, stop overriding my account setting for my language with demographic data based on my IP address.  When I'm traveling it doesn't make me fluent in the local language...
</p><p>
*slaps the company on the nose with a rolled up newspaper*  Bad Google, bad bad portal!
</p><p>
-- Pete.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well that 's annoying...one thing Google does n't do intelligently is languages .
I am logged into my account , they KNOW I speak English as a preferred language , but when I go to my iGoogle [ google.com ] page on my iPhone whilst I 'm in Belgium it insists on displaying everything in Dutch .
That was annoying enough...but now the dashboard is doing the same , even when I visit the page from my laptop .
Google , you KNOW I speak English , stop overriding my account setting for my language with demographic data based on my IP address .
When I 'm traveling it does n't make me fluent in the local language.. . * slaps the company on the nose with a rolled up newspaper * Bad Google , bad bad portal !
-- Pete .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Well that's annoying...one thing Google doesn't do intelligently is languages.
I am logged into my account, they KNOW I speak English as a preferred language, but when I go to my iGoogle [google.com] page on my iPhone whilst I'm in Belgium it insists on displaying everything in Dutch.
That was annoying enough...but now the dashboard is doing the same, even when I visit the page from my laptop.
Google, you KNOW I speak English, stop overriding my account setting for my language with demographic data based on my IP address.
When I'm traveling it doesn't make me fluent in the local language...

*slaps the company on the nose with a rolled up newspaper*  Bad Google, bad bad portal!
-- Pete.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003278</id>
	<title>Let's add another hole.</title>
	<author>pspahn</author>
	<datestamp>1257447540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Headline reads:</i> <br>
Starbucks wifi user identity stolen when rogue AP steals dashboard info.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Headline reads : Starbucks wifi user identity stolen when rogue AP steals dashboard info .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Headline reads: 
Starbucks wifi user identity stolen when rogue AP steals dashboard info.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30012276</id>
	<title>Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to</title>
	<author>RealGrouchy</author>
	<datestamp>1257525240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I didn't realise my Youtube account was sharing my name (username), age and gender publicly.</p></div><p>Neither did I, and I'm pretty protective of that information. (I don't even remember giving them that info)</p><p>YouTube just went down for "maintenance"; I wonder if they're fixing that...</p><p>- RG&gt;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't realise my Youtube account was sharing my name ( username ) , age and gender publicly.Neither did I , and I 'm pretty protective of that information .
( I do n't even remember giving them that info ) YouTube just went down for " maintenance " ; I wonder if they 're fixing that...- RG &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't realise my Youtube account was sharing my name (username), age and gender publicly.Neither did I, and I'm pretty protective of that information.
(I don't even remember giving them that info)YouTube just went down for "maintenance"; I wonder if they're fixing that...- RG&gt;
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30007970</id>
	<title>Re:Let's add a link.</title>
	<author>physburn</author>
	<datestamp>1257537600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thanks for the Link, Google doesn't really store that much about you, the dashboard knows
my you tube and blogger accouts, doesn't now my other google account for adsense, and
since I never activate web history, doesn't rembember what i've searched for or what web
pages i've visited. It does now all my email though, so if you privacy would be better served
by using other services for that, but Gmail is just to good not to use. My web browser looks
private from the dashboard, I wonder though if it really is.
<p>
---
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/blogs/Privacy\%20vs\%20surveillance/feed.html" title="feeddistiller.com">Privacy vs Surveillance</a> [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ <a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/" title="feeddistiller.com">Feed Distiller</a> [feeddistiller.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for the Link , Google does n't really store that much about you , the dashboard knows my you tube and blogger accouts , does n't now my other google account for adsense , and since I never activate web history , does n't rembember what i 've searched for or what web pages i 've visited .
It does now all my email though , so if you privacy would be better served by using other services for that , but Gmail is just to good not to use .
My web browser looks private from the dashboard , I wonder though if it really is .
--- Privacy vs Surveillance [ feeddistiller.com ] Feed @ Feed Distiller [ feeddistiller.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for the Link, Google doesn't really store that much about you, the dashboard knows
my you tube and blogger accouts, doesn't now my other google account for adsense, and
since I never activate web history, doesn't rembember what i've searched for or what web
pages i've visited.
It does now all my email though, so if you privacy would be better served
by using other services for that, but Gmail is just to good not to use.
My web browser looks
private from the dashboard, I wonder though if it really is.
---

Privacy vs Surveillance [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ Feed Distiller [feeddistiller.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003886</id>
	<title>Re:How about a link to the dashboard?</title>
	<author>lul\_wat</author>
	<datestamp>1257501840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>how else will a random slashdotter get modded +5 Informative if they include the ACTUAL link in the summary?</htmltext>
<tokenext>how else will a random slashdotter get modded + 5 Informative if they include the ACTUAL link in the summary ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how else will a random slashdotter get modded +5 Informative if they include the ACTUAL link in the summary?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003268</id>
	<title>More like what Google THINKS it knows</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257447420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would say only about 5\% of my Google searches are something that pertain to me. The rest are queries to answer questions others have asked, or nonsense searches triggered by external events - random words heard on the radio, items from junk mail my uncle sends, stuff from the newspaper.
<br>
<br>
I clear my cache often, and often search for the equal and opposite of what I want to know about. Search for elder care, followed by kindergartens, then diabetes tests and discount candy bars.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would say only about 5 \ % of my Google searches are something that pertain to me .
The rest are queries to answer questions others have asked , or nonsense searches triggered by external events - random words heard on the radio , items from junk mail my uncle sends , stuff from the newspaper .
I clear my cache often , and often search for the equal and opposite of what I want to know about .
Search for elder care , followed by kindergartens , then diabetes tests and discount candy bars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would say only about 5\% of my Google searches are something that pertain to me.
The rest are queries to answer questions others have asked, or nonsense searches triggered by external events - random words heard on the radio, items from junk mail my uncle sends, stuff from the newspaper.
I clear my cache often, and often search for the equal and opposite of what I want to know about.
Search for elder care, followed by kindergartens, then diabetes tests and discount candy bars.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004088</id>
	<title>Don't forget Flash cookies!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257505500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In my humble opinion they're far worse than regular cookies! ( in that they are more pervasive / sneaky / hidden )</p><p>Firefox Plugin to delete the Flash cookies:<br><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6623" title="mozilla.org" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6623</a> [mozilla.org]</p><p>Wikipedia page on Flash cookies:<br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local\_Shared\_Object" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local\_Shared\_Object</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In my humble opinion they 're far worse than regular cookies !
( in that they are more pervasive / sneaky / hidden ) Firefox Plugin to delete the Flash cookies : https : //addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6623 [ mozilla.org ] Wikipedia page on Flash cookies : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local \ _Shared \ _Object [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In my humble opinion they're far worse than regular cookies!
( in that they are more pervasive / sneaky / hidden )Firefox Plugin to delete the Flash cookies:https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6623 [mozilla.org]Wikipedia page on Flash cookies:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local\_Shared\_Object [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003788</id>
	<title>The "Softly Softly" Google Social strategy</title>
	<author>Phurge</author>
	<datestamp>1257500040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you haven't noticed, Google is building a social network strategy across its properties. Chat, Reader, Followers, Friends, Voice, Public Profiles, Blogger etc etc. All of these are just starting to link into one another. As opposed to to the download and spam your email address book model a la facebook, it has been a very quiet and light touch adoption path. This is just another step towards gaining user's trust and therefore adoption.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have n't noticed , Google is building a social network strategy across its properties .
Chat , Reader , Followers , Friends , Voice , Public Profiles , Blogger etc etc .
All of these are just starting to link into one another .
As opposed to to the download and spam your email address book model a la facebook , it has been a very quiet and light touch adoption path .
This is just another step towards gaining user 's trust and therefore adoption .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you haven't noticed, Google is building a social network strategy across its properties.
Chat, Reader, Followers, Friends, Voice, Public Profiles, Blogger etc etc.
All of these are just starting to link into one another.
As opposed to to the download and spam your email address book model a la facebook, it has been a very quiet and light touch adoption path.
This is just another step towards gaining user's trust and therefore adoption.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30005160</id>
	<title>YouTube</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257519480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I didn't realise my Youtube account was sharing my name (username), age and gender publicly.</p></div><p>I discovered I am a female on my youtube acct.  No wonder I get so many personal messages from guys.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't realise my Youtube account was sharing my name ( username ) , age and gender publicly.I discovered I am a female on my youtube acct .
No wonder I get so many personal messages from guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't realise my Youtube account was sharing my name (username), age and gender publicly.I discovered I am a female on my youtube acct.
No wonder I get so many personal messages from guys.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004452</id>
	<title>IF you don't like it, don't use it.</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1257511680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The very essence of Google is to be a service that uses information it gathers about you to connect you to the people that you want.  If you don't want that service, then don't use Google. How's that?  The reason I say that is, many of us don't really care about the collection of personal data, and making Google jump through hoops to do what you want undermines the services that we want.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The very essence of Google is to be a service that uses information it gathers about you to connect you to the people that you want .
If you do n't want that service , then do n't use Google .
How 's that ?
The reason I say that is , many of us do n't really care about the collection of personal data , and making Google jump through hoops to do what you want undermines the services that we want .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The very essence of Google is to be a service that uses information it gathers about you to connect you to the people that you want.
If you don't want that service, then don't use Google.
How's that?
The reason I say that is, many of us don't really care about the collection of personal data, and making Google jump through hoops to do what you want undermines the services that we want.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003248</id>
	<title>Dashboard reveals what they want to</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257447000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Their dashboard simply reveals what they want you to know you keep.</p><p>Love or hate Google it would be naive to think otherwise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Their dashboard simply reveals what they want you to know you keep.Love or hate Google it would be naive to think otherwise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their dashboard simply reveals what they want you to know you keep.Love or hate Google it would be naive to think otherwise.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003508</id>
	<title>Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to</title>
	<author>twostix</author>
	<datestamp>1257451140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even so, just looking at what's there, all in one place there's only one word for it faaaaaark.</p><p>It's like a time machine where I can look into my life for the last 3 and half years and see what my state of mind was at any point in time.</p><p>Sometimes it was not pretty, things we forget over time ey?</p><p>Also at what point did the search tracking automatically become opt-in? Last I heard it was only voluntary when did they sneak that change through?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even so , just looking at what 's there , all in one place there 's only one word for it faaaaaark.It 's like a time machine where I can look into my life for the last 3 and half years and see what my state of mind was at any point in time.Sometimes it was not pretty , things we forget over time ey ? Also at what point did the search tracking automatically become opt-in ?
Last I heard it was only voluntary when did they sneak that change through ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even so, just looking at what's there, all in one place there's only one word for it faaaaaark.It's like a time machine where I can look into my life for the last 3 and half years and see what my state of mind was at any point in time.Sometimes it was not pretty, things we forget over time ey?Also at what point did the search tracking automatically become opt-in?
Last I heard it was only voluntary when did they sneak that change through?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30008996</id>
	<title>Scroogle!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257498900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nobody mentioned Scroogle. Think Scroogle should be mentioned. You can start Scroogling by going to the Scroogle homepage: https://ssl.scroogle.org/ . Note the https: something Google doesn't provide.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody mentioned Scroogle .
Think Scroogle should be mentioned .
You can start Scroogling by going to the Scroogle homepage : https : //ssl.scroogle.org/ .
Note the https : something Google does n't provide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody mentioned Scroogle.
Think Scroogle should be mentioned.
You can start Scroogling by going to the Scroogle homepage: https://ssl.scroogle.org/ .
Note the https: something Google doesn't provide.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003296</id>
	<title>Let's add a link.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257447780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because it wasn't in the summary, <a href="https://www.google.com/dashboard/" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.com/dashboard/</a> [google.com] is Google Dashboard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because it was n't in the summary , https : //www.google.com/dashboard/ [ google.com ] is Google Dashboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because it wasn't in the summary, https://www.google.com/dashboard/ [google.com] is Google Dashboard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454</id>
	<title>Bleedingly obvious?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257450120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But at the same tine, the group also came down hard on Google, contending that it needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data.</p></div><p>Don't login. Disable cookies. Any questions?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But at the same tine , the group also came down hard on Google , contending that it needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data.Do n't login .
Disable cookies .
Any questions ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But at the same tine, the group also came down hard on Google, contending that it needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data.Don't login.
Disable cookies.
Any questions?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003604</id>
	<title>Re:Bleedingly obvious?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257539280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How to hide IP or MAC without extra costs?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How to hide IP or MAC without extra costs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How to hide IP or MAC without extra costs?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003544</id>
	<title>Re:Let's add a link.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257538080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Belgium it insists on displaying everything in Dutch. "</p><p>No wonder, its because they have a common border with the bloody dutch...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Belgium it insists on displaying everything in Dutch .
" No wonder , its because they have a common border with the bloody dutch.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Belgium it insists on displaying everything in Dutch.
"No wonder, its because they have a common border with the bloody dutch...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003468</id>
	<title>I WANT them to collect my data!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257450360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Believe it or not, Google is a free service (for the most part) supported by advertising. I <em>love</em> the stuff that Google does, the way they handle advertising, and the way that advertising is actually (for the first time ever on the net) actually relevant. They've never done anything to earn my mistrust, far from it. So if by giving them my search histories I can improve both their overall advertising revenue <em>and</em> my own browsing experience, then I am more than willing to do so.

<p>If things ever go wrong, well, then I'll suffer the consequences. But people demanding Google stop collecting this information is just crazy talk. Yes, Google is fast becoming a necessity because of its sheer usefulness, but it's by no means crossed the line and doesn't look like it will. If you're really that worried - just don't use Gmail, Gcalendar or any of those other things. Your Google searches will still be reasonably anonymous!

</p><p>Honestly, it's rubbish like this that gives privacy advocates a bad name. Fight a battle worth fighting, for cryin' out loud.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Believe it or not , Google is a free service ( for the most part ) supported by advertising .
I love the stuff that Google does , the way they handle advertising , and the way that advertising is actually ( for the first time ever on the net ) actually relevant .
They 've never done anything to earn my mistrust , far from it .
So if by giving them my search histories I can improve both their overall advertising revenue and my own browsing experience , then I am more than willing to do so .
If things ever go wrong , well , then I 'll suffer the consequences .
But people demanding Google stop collecting this information is just crazy talk .
Yes , Google is fast becoming a necessity because of its sheer usefulness , but it 's by no means crossed the line and does n't look like it will .
If you 're really that worried - just do n't use Gmail , Gcalendar or any of those other things .
Your Google searches will still be reasonably anonymous !
Honestly , it 's rubbish like this that gives privacy advocates a bad name .
Fight a battle worth fighting , for cryin ' out loud .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Believe it or not, Google is a free service (for the most part) supported by advertising.
I love the stuff that Google does, the way they handle advertising, and the way that advertising is actually (for the first time ever on the net) actually relevant.
They've never done anything to earn my mistrust, far from it.
So if by giving them my search histories I can improve both their overall advertising revenue and my own browsing experience, then I am more than willing to do so.
If things ever go wrong, well, then I'll suffer the consequences.
But people demanding Google stop collecting this information is just crazy talk.
Yes, Google is fast becoming a necessity because of its sheer usefulness, but it's by no means crossed the line and doesn't look like it will.
If you're really that worried - just don't use Gmail, Gcalendar or any of those other things.
Your Google searches will still be reasonably anonymous!
Honestly, it's rubbish like this that gives privacy advocates a bad name.
Fight a battle worth fighting, for cryin' out loud.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003520</id>
	<title>useful to learn of hackings</title>
	<author>story645</author>
	<datestamp>1257537720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I learned that a youtube account was registered using my email address, and that I could access the account with my gmail account. So dashboard forced me to change my email address and try to navigate youtube's awful (non-existent) reporting pages. I finally got the right page by sending an email to the wrong people. Otherwise, dashboard showed the existence of things that clicking didn't show up, and the whole thing comes across as a gimmick to get people to sign up for the google services they're not already signed up for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I learned that a youtube account was registered using my email address , and that I could access the account with my gmail account .
So dashboard forced me to change my email address and try to navigate youtube 's awful ( non-existent ) reporting pages .
I finally got the right page by sending an email to the wrong people .
Otherwise , dashboard showed the existence of things that clicking did n't show up , and the whole thing comes across as a gimmick to get people to sign up for the google services they 're not already signed up for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I learned that a youtube account was registered using my email address, and that I could access the account with my gmail account.
So dashboard forced me to change my email address and try to navigate youtube's awful (non-existent) reporting pages.
I finally got the right page by sending an email to the wrong people.
Otherwise, dashboard showed the existence of things that clicking didn't show up, and the whole thing comes across as a gimmick to get people to sign up for the google services they're not already signed up for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30008396</id>
	<title>It is like they are trolling own "customers"</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1257539460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google really started to act like Microsoft, they are annoying their own customers and almost proud of it. Privacy organizations should sue them for this joke claiming to show what they know about you. It is just a freaking account control panel trick, nothing else. If it is \_really\_ what Google knows about a web surfer, their share price is not right and that should be investigated.</p><p>Note to Google (same thing I said to MS, Apple etc.): We aren't stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google really started to act like Microsoft , they are annoying their own customers and almost proud of it .
Privacy organizations should sue them for this joke claiming to show what they know about you .
It is just a freaking account control panel trick , nothing else .
If it is \ _really \ _ what Google knows about a web surfer , their share price is not right and that should be investigated.Note to Google ( same thing I said to MS , Apple etc .
) : We are n't stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google really started to act like Microsoft, they are annoying their own customers and almost proud of it.
Privacy organizations should sue them for this joke claiming to show what they know about you.
It is just a freaking account control panel trick, nothing else.
If it is \_really\_ what Google knows about a web surfer, their share price is not right and that should be investigated.Note to Google (same thing I said to MS, Apple etc.
): We aren't stupid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003716</id>
	<title>Re:Let's add a link.</title>
	<author>brentonboy</author>
	<datestamp>1257498300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait... we're mad at Google for not keeping track of some personal data on you (language) and using it? I thought we were mad at Google because they *do* do that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait... we 're mad at Google for not keeping track of some personal data on you ( language ) and using it ?
I thought we were mad at Google because they * do * do that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait... we're mad at Google for not keeping track of some personal data on you (language) and using it?
I thought we were mad at Google because they *do* do that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003510</id>
	<title>Re:Let's add a link.</title>
	<author>tknd</author>
	<datestamp>1257537660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They seem to base it on your IP address. When I was in Japan it would come up in Japanese and it was pretty annoying. But now that I'm back in the U.S. and I want to learn Japanese it will default to English.

</p><p>Eventually I figured out that you can set your homepage to  "Google in English" instead of the plain google.com.

</p><p>But sometimes though when you switch areas on Google it goes back to guessing your language from your IP and defaulting to something else again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They seem to base it on your IP address .
When I was in Japan it would come up in Japanese and it was pretty annoying .
But now that I 'm back in the U.S. and I want to learn Japanese it will default to English .
Eventually I figured out that you can set your homepage to " Google in English " instead of the plain google.com .
But sometimes though when you switch areas on Google it goes back to guessing your language from your IP and defaulting to something else again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They seem to base it on your IP address.
When I was in Japan it would come up in Japanese and it was pretty annoying.
But now that I'm back in the U.S. and I want to learn Japanese it will default to English.
Eventually I figured out that you can set your homepage to  "Google in English" instead of the plain google.com.
But sometimes though when you switch areas on Google it goes back to guessing your language from your IP and defaulting to something else again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30005650</id>
	<title>What do they save when you use Dashboard?</title>
	<author>rbrightwell</author>
	<datestamp>1257522960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>HasSomethingToHideFlag = True;</htmltext>
<tokenext>HasSomethingToHideFlag = True ;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HasSomethingToHideFlag = True;</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003688</id>
	<title>Easy solution</title>
	<author>Errtu76</author>
	<datestamp>1257540840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"But at the same tine, the group also came down hard on Google, contending that it needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data."</p><p>How about you don't use their services if you have a problem with their policy? Or don't give out (valid) personal details. How hard was that? One thing i do have to agree with is the automatic adding of contacts to my address book in GMail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" But at the same tine , the group also came down hard on Google , contending that it needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data .
" How about you do n't use their services if you have a problem with their policy ?
Or do n't give out ( valid ) personal details .
How hard was that ?
One thing i do have to agree with is the automatic adding of contacts to my address book in GMail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"But at the same tine, the group also came down hard on Google, contending that it needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data.
"How about you don't use their services if you have a problem with their policy?
Or don't give out (valid) personal details.
How hard was that?
One thing i do have to agree with is the automatic adding of contacts to my address book in GMail.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004086</id>
	<title>Re:Bleedingly obvious?</title>
	<author>rdnetto</author>
	<datestamp>1257505440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Alternatively, you could just use the Incognito mode in Google Chrome...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Alternatively , you could just use the Incognito mode in Google Chrome.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Alternatively, you could just use the Incognito mode in Google Chrome...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003944</id>
	<title>Freudian slip?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1257502740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>'In an effort to provide <strong>you</strong> with greater transparency and control over <strong>their</strong> own data, we've built the Google Dashboard.'</p></div><p>So I get to control other users' data? Yay. Does that make me part of Google?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>'In an effort to provide you with greater transparency and control over their own data , we 've built the Google Dashboard .
'So I get to control other users ' data ?
Yay. Does that make me part of Google ?
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'In an effort to provide you with greater transparency and control over their own data, we've built the Google Dashboard.
'So I get to control other users' data?
Yay. Does that make me part of Google?
:P
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003344</id>
	<title>Window dressing</title>
	<author>rpp3po</author>
	<datestamp>1257448680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would have expected Slashdot to note the fact, that Google does not mention anywhere wether the presented data is <i>even nearly</i> complete. Without that it is just a sham, giving you the feeling of control, but possibly only touching the tip of the iceberg.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would have expected Slashdot to note the fact , that Google does not mention anywhere wether the presented data is even nearly complete .
Without that it is just a sham , giving you the feeling of control , but possibly only touching the tip of the iceberg .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would have expected Slashdot to note the fact, that Google does not mention anywhere wether the presented data is even nearly complete.
Without that it is just a sham, giving you the feeling of control, but possibly only touching the tip of the iceberg.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003958</id>
	<title>It should be OPT IN</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1257503100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Properly done, it's clear, that this should be opt-in at the creation of the account. And not only the option of making it public. But also the option of storing it on a computer you don't own in the first place.</p><p>Everything else should be illegal and get you into PMITA prison.</p><p>That model is already law for "please give my data to third parties" and "please send me spam" options in account creation forms in Germany. It should be law for all other data storage as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Properly done , it 's clear , that this should be opt-in at the creation of the account .
And not only the option of making it public .
But also the option of storing it on a computer you do n't own in the first place.Everything else should be illegal and get you into PMITA prison.That model is already law for " please give my data to third parties " and " please send me spam " options in account creation forms in Germany .
It should be law for all other data storage as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Properly done, it's clear, that this should be opt-in at the creation of the account.
And not only the option of making it public.
But also the option of storing it on a computer you don't own in the first place.Everything else should be illegal and get you into PMITA prison.That model is already law for "please give my data to third parties" and "please send me spam" options in account creation forms in Germany.
It should be law for all other data storage as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003602</id>
	<title>Re:Window dressing</title>
	<author>BikeHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1257539220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least it makes managing settings a bit easier.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least it makes managing settings a bit easier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least it makes managing settings a bit easier.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003564</id>
	<title>Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to</title>
	<author>Sam Douglas</author>
	<datestamp>1257538440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, its real utility is seeing what is publicly accessible. I didn't realise my Youtube account was sharing my name (username), age and gender publicly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , its real utility is seeing what is publicly accessible .
I did n't realise my Youtube account was sharing my name ( username ) , age and gender publicly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, its real utility is seeing what is publicly accessible.
I didn't realise my Youtube account was sharing my name (username), age and gender publicly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30017314</id>
	<title>Re:More like what Google THINKS it knows</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257593940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Looking in the Dashboard at what they "know" about for the last three years and it strikes me that it would be very easy for someone to draw some pretty outrageous conclusions about who I am, what I think and what I do.</i></p><p><i>Pray that governments never get open access to mine their database I say!<br></i> </p><p>Same with Amazon.</p><p>They could put together a pretty amazing profile of me, since I often buy books for others who either have interests different from mine or who are too squeamish about having their name and address associated with a particular order or who just don't trust putting their own credit card information online.</p><p>So that makes me one who is interested in solo sex, Victorian lingerie, transsexuality and government-published information on how to identify a terrorist.</p><p>This is coupled with my own real interests in sci-fi, electronics, computers, general science, oceanography and marine biology, the  American prison system, civil rights, etc.</p><p>As for chilling, I once was greeted with a logon message from Amazon reading, "Since you seem to have an interest in the dark side of the American dream, may we recommend the following:" Shit -- talk about amateur profiling! I'm sure an opposing lawyer would be tremendously interested in picking that bit up during discovery.</p><p>My local library keeps a history of what I take out, "in case I want to find a particular book I once read". But they at least have a prominently-displayed option on my account page which is a checkoff for "Do not retain a history of my borrowed books."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looking in the Dashboard at what they " know " about for the last three years and it strikes me that it would be very easy for someone to draw some pretty outrageous conclusions about who I am , what I think and what I do.Pray that governments never get open access to mine their database I say !
Same with Amazon.They could put together a pretty amazing profile of me , since I often buy books for others who either have interests different from mine or who are too squeamish about having their name and address associated with a particular order or who just do n't trust putting their own credit card information online.So that makes me one who is interested in solo sex , Victorian lingerie , transsexuality and government-published information on how to identify a terrorist.This is coupled with my own real interests in sci-fi , electronics , computers , general science , oceanography and marine biology , the American prison system , civil rights , etc.As for chilling , I once was greeted with a logon message from Amazon reading , " Since you seem to have an interest in the dark side of the American dream , may we recommend the following : " Shit -- talk about amateur profiling !
I 'm sure an opposing lawyer would be tremendously interested in picking that bit up during discovery.My local library keeps a history of what I take out , " in case I want to find a particular book I once read " .
But they at least have a prominently-displayed option on my account page which is a checkoff for " Do not retain a history of my borrowed books .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looking in the Dashboard at what they "know" about for the last three years and it strikes me that it would be very easy for someone to draw some pretty outrageous conclusions about who I am, what I think and what I do.Pray that governments never get open access to mine their database I say!
Same with Amazon.They could put together a pretty amazing profile of me, since I often buy books for others who either have interests different from mine or who are too squeamish about having their name and address associated with a particular order or who just don't trust putting their own credit card information online.So that makes me one who is interested in solo sex, Victorian lingerie, transsexuality and government-published information on how to identify a terrorist.This is coupled with my own real interests in sci-fi, electronics, computers, general science, oceanography and marine biology, the  American prison system, civil rights, etc.As for chilling, I once was greeted with a logon message from Amazon reading, "Since you seem to have an interest in the dark side of the American dream, may we recommend the following:" Shit -- talk about amateur profiling!
I'm sure an opposing lawyer would be tremendously interested in picking that bit up during discovery.My local library keeps a history of what I take out, "in case I want to find a particular book I once read".
But they at least have a prominently-displayed option on my account page which is a checkoff for "Do not retain a history of my borrowed books.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003578</id>
	<title>delicious data</title>
	<author>hyperion2010</author>
	<datestamp>1257538740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sure if you cooked up some algorithms you would have no trouble finding out so pretty darned interesting things about yourself, google doesnt give you those, it just gives you the raw data, which is pretty much useless by itself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure if you cooked up some algorithms you would have no trouble finding out so pretty darned interesting things about yourself , google doesnt give you those , it just gives you the raw data , which is pretty much useless by itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure if you cooked up some algorithms you would have no trouble finding out so pretty darned interesting things about yourself, google doesnt give you those, it just gives you the raw data, which is pretty much useless by itself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003310</id>
	<title>Bosses around the world say 'Thank You'</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257448080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now there's an easy tool provided by Google to identify what employees are doing with Google-related products while on the job.  You didn't think anything you did on your work computer was your private information, did you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now there 's an easy tool provided by Google to identify what employees are doing with Google-related products while on the job .
You did n't think anything you did on your work computer was your private information , did you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now there's an easy tool provided by Google to identify what employees are doing with Google-related products while on the job.
You didn't think anything you did on your work computer was your private information, did you?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003260</id>
	<title>How to prevent companies from collecting data...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257447360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>the group also came down hard on Google, contending that it needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data.</p></div><p>
1. I'm going to patent 'not using a company's products and services' in order to prevent them from collecting data.  <br>
2. License my fantastic invention <br>
3. Profit!!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the group also came down hard on Google , contending that it needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data .
1. I 'm going to patent 'not using a company 's products and services ' in order to prevent them from collecting data .
2. License my fantastic invention 3 .
Profit ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the group also came down hard on Google, contending that it needs to give users a vehicle for stopping the company from collecting any personal data.
1. I'm going to patent 'not using a company's products and services' in order to prevent them from collecting data.
2. License my fantastic invention 
3.
Profit!!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30007374</id>
	<title>Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1257533760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yea, because we couldn't determine two of those three things of your username alone, real shocker.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea , because we could n't determine two of those three things of your username alone , real shocker .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea, because we couldn't determine two of those three things of your username alone, real shocker.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30007328</id>
	<title>Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1257533520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or just a little paranoia to assume they are hiding something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or just a little paranoia to assume they are hiding something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or just a little paranoia to assume they are hiding something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004594</id>
	<title>If MS was smart, ....</title>
	<author>WindBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1257514020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They would borrow from Google (as opposed to out and out stealing from small companies).  In particular, MS grips all the time about Windows being stolen. Simply put a dashboard on it and tell the user what they know of the user (which MS has even MORE knowledge of the user). The reason is that a number of the users simply do not know that they are using a stolen version. I suspect that most users who 'borrow' a copy of MS do not think about it, but would rethink it through if they were labeled theves by MS and SAW IT. Heck, it might have been enough money to avoid those massive layoffs (nah; that is really about shifting jobs to India and China; like Verizon, Qwest, IBM, GE, etc).</htmltext>
<tokenext>They would borrow from Google ( as opposed to out and out stealing from small companies ) .
In particular , MS grips all the time about Windows being stolen .
Simply put a dashboard on it and tell the user what they know of the user ( which MS has even MORE knowledge of the user ) .
The reason is that a number of the users simply do not know that they are using a stolen version .
I suspect that most users who 'borrow ' a copy of MS do not think about it , but would rethink it through if they were labeled theves by MS and SAW IT .
Heck , it might have been enough money to avoid those massive layoffs ( nah ; that is really about shifting jobs to India and China ; like Verizon , Qwest , IBM , GE , etc ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They would borrow from Google (as opposed to out and out stealing from small companies).
In particular, MS grips all the time about Windows being stolen.
Simply put a dashboard on it and tell the user what they know of the user (which MS has even MORE knowledge of the user).
The reason is that a number of the users simply do not know that they are using a stolen version.
I suspect that most users who 'borrow' a copy of MS do not think about it, but would rethink it through if they were labeled theves by MS and SAW IT.
Heck, it might have been enough money to avoid those massive layoffs (nah; that is really about shifting jobs to India and China; like Verizon, Qwest, IBM, GE, etc).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30007350</id>
	<title>Re:How to prevent companies from collecting data..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257533700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. Avoid directly using a company's services to protest "the capitalism ahoy" way!<br>2. Take no steps towards consumer protection regulation<br>3. Watch as the company utterly ignores the tens of slashdot geeks avoiding their service.<br>4. Company profits!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Avoid directly using a company 's services to protest " the capitalism ahoy " way ! 2 .
Take no steps towards consumer protection regulation3 .
Watch as the company utterly ignores the tens of slashdot geeks avoiding their service.4 .
Company profits ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Avoid directly using a company's services to protest "the capitalism ahoy" way!2.
Take no steps towards consumer protection regulation3.
Watch as the company utterly ignores the tens of slashdot geeks avoiding their service.4.
Company profits!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003260</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004024</id>
	<title>Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257504240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly... my record appears suspiciously clean.  Almost ridiculously so in fact...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly... my record appears suspiciously clean .
Almost ridiculously so in fact.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly... my record appears suspiciously clean.
Almost ridiculously so in fact...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30007522</id>
	<title>I am a figment of the GooglePlex imagination</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1257534900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I dont not really exist, save as an extension of the GooglePlex.
<br>
And I will never die, living forever in the GooglePlex.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I dont not really exist , save as an extension of the GooglePlex .
And I will never die , living forever in the GooglePlex .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dont not really exist, save as an extension of the GooglePlex.
And I will never die, living forever in the GooglePlex.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003498</id>
	<title>Re:Window dressing</title>
	<author>M3gaBight</author>
	<datestamp>1257450840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>What they have here isn't even a collection of data. It's just a tool to look over all of your preferences/settings.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What they have here is n't even a collection of data .
It 's just a tool to look over all of your preferences/settings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What they have here isn't even a collection of data.
It's just a tool to look over all of your preferences/settings.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30005862</id>
	<title>Re:Let's add a link.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257524340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>?hl=en is your friend</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>? hl = en is your friend</tokentext>
<sentencetext>?hl=en is your friend</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003774</id>
	<title>everything</title>
	<author>z\_gringo</author>
	<datestamp>1257499920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>between googlemail, google calendar, google voice, igoogle, google lattitude, google talk and who knows what else, there is no getting around it.  They know everything about me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>between googlemail , google calendar , google voice , igoogle , google lattitude , google talk and who knows what else , there is no getting around it .
They know everything about me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>between googlemail, google calendar, google voice, igoogle, google lattitude, google talk and who knows what else, there is no getting around it.
They know everything about me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004172</id>
	<title>Re:Let's add a link.</title>
	<author>SharpFang</author>
	<datestamp>1257506700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The most ironical thing would be using Google Translate to translate the Google services to your native language while you're traveling.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The most ironical thing would be using Google Translate to translate the Google services to your native language while you 're traveling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The most ironical thing would be using Google Translate to translate the Google services to your native language while you're traveling.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004318</id>
	<title>Re:Bleedingly obvious?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257509520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes. Do you really think you are not recognized (and tracked) if you do not log in?</p><p>You still reveal your IP address, probably user agent string and referrer information. I'm sure smart guys at Google have some others ways to identify user.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
Do you really think you are not recognized ( and tracked ) if you do not log in ? You still reveal your IP address , probably user agent string and referrer information .
I 'm sure smart guys at Google have some others ways to identify user .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
Do you really think you are not recognized (and tracked) if you do not log in?You still reveal your IP address, probably user agent string and referrer information.
I'm sure smart guys at Google have some others ways to identify user.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003342</id>
	<title>WTF?</title>
	<author>BodeNGE</author>
	<datestamp>1257448680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's asking me to login.  I don't have a login to Google "services".  How do I see the info that Google has on my browsing history without logging in?</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's asking me to login .
I do n't have a login to Google " services " .
How do I see the info that Google has on my browsing history without logging in ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's asking me to login.
I don't have a login to Google "services".
How do I see the info that Google has on my browsing history without logging in?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003736</id>
	<title>Re:Bleedingly obvious?</title>
	<author>houghi</author>
	<datestamp>1257498720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Don't login. Disable cookies. Any questions?</p></div></blockquote><p>Just one. Why is it that opt-out is never good, except when people are talking about Google?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't login .
Disable cookies .
Any questions ? Just one .
Why is it that opt-out is never good , except when people are talking about Google ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't login.
Disable cookies.
Any questions?Just one.
Why is it that opt-out is never good, except when people are talking about Google?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30006866</id>
	<title>Forget google, worry about your cell phone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257530880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your cell phone provider knows where you are, who you call, what you text, the people you call, where you are travelling, the sites you are surfing, etc. Forget google and start worrying about the real issues.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your cell phone provider knows where you are , who you call , what you text , the people you call , where you are travelling , the sites you are surfing , etc .
Forget google and start worrying about the real issues .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your cell phone provider knows where you are, who you call, what you text, the people you call, where you are travelling, the sites you are surfing, etc.
Forget google and start worrying about the real issues.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003712</id>
	<title>Track me not</title>
	<author>muffen</author>
	<datestamp>1257498300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've used <a href="http://mrl.nyu.edu/~dhowe/trackmenot/" title="nyu.edu">TrackmeNot</a> [nyu.edu] for a long time, and today I can see why that's been a great idea!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've used TrackmeNot [ nyu.edu ] for a long time , and today I can see why that 's been a great idea !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've used TrackmeNot [nyu.edu] for a long time, and today I can see why that's been a great idea!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30006156</id>
	<title>Re:Dashboard reveals what they want to</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1257526440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, no shit. Somehow Latitude was on (which I *swear* I never enabled) and while it only had a (wrong?) location from a few months ago, it's not something I want on at all. EVERYONE should check out their <a href="https://www.google.com/dashboard/" title="google.com">dashboard.</a> [google.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , no shit .
Somehow Latitude was on ( which I * swear * I never enabled ) and while it only had a ( wrong ?
) location from a few months ago , it 's not something I want on at all .
EVERYONE should check out their dashboard .
[ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, no shit.
Somehow Latitude was on (which I *swear* I never enabled) and while it only had a (wrong?
) location from a few months ago, it's not something I want on at all.
EVERYONE should check out their dashboard.
[google.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30005870</id>
	<title>Re:Let's add a link.</title>
	<author>mspohr</author>
	<datestamp>1257524340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have the same problem in Switzerland but it is even more confused since I live in Geneva (francophone part of Switzerland) but Google insists on giving me pages in German even though I have every preference I can find set to English.  If I set Google Docs to Switzerland location, I get everything in German.  They can't deal with a country that has more than one language or with people who have a different native language.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have the same problem in Switzerland but it is even more confused since I live in Geneva ( francophone part of Switzerland ) but Google insists on giving me pages in German even though I have every preference I can find set to English .
If I set Google Docs to Switzerland location , I get everything in German .
They ca n't deal with a country that has more than one language or with people who have a different native language .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have the same problem in Switzerland but it is even more confused since I live in Geneva (francophone part of Switzerland) but Google insists on giving me pages in German even though I have every preference I can find set to English.
If I set Google Docs to Switzerland location, I get everything in German.
They can't deal with a country that has more than one language or with people who have a different native language.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30007214</id>
	<title>You can also use Scroogle</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257532860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you want to do a bit of anonymizing on your google searches you can use <a href="http://www.scroogle.org/" title="scroogle.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.scroogle.org/</a> [scroogle.org] or <a href="https://ssl.scroogle.org/" title="scroogle.org" rel="nofollow">https://ssl.scroogle.org/</a> [scroogle.org] . These can be added to your browser search bar (e.g. so Ctrl-K sends off a search).</p><p>Note: NOT scroogle.com: that is a NSFW site<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want to do a bit of anonymizing on your google searches you can use http : //www.scroogle.org/ [ scroogle.org ] or https : //ssl.scroogle.org/ [ scroogle.org ] .
These can be added to your browser search bar ( e.g .
so Ctrl-K sends off a search ) .Note : NOT scroogle.com : that is a NSFW site : -/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want to do a bit of anonymizing on your google searches you can use http://www.scroogle.org/ [scroogle.org] or https://ssl.scroogle.org/ [scroogle.org] .
These can be added to your browser search bar (e.g.
so Ctrl-K sends off a search).Note: NOT scroogle.com: that is a NSFW site :-/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30005900</id>
	<title>Re:Stop collecting personal data</title>
	<author>R2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1257524520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Um.. It's a free service, and collecting user data (most of which is anonymized) is a core feature of their ad services. Why exactly does Google need to hobble its business model again?"</p><p>Because not only do people believe they are entitled to benefits with no cost to them, they want others, including the government, to mandate it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Um.. It 's a free service , and collecting user data ( most of which is anonymized ) is a core feature of their ad services .
Why exactly does Google need to hobble its business model again ?
" Because not only do people believe they are entitled to benefits with no cost to them , they want others , including the government , to mandate it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Um.. It's a free service, and collecting user data (most of which is anonymized) is a core feature of their ad services.
Why exactly does Google need to hobble its business model again?
"Because not only do people believe they are entitled to benefits with no cost to them, they want others, including the government, to mandate it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003660</id>
	<title>Missing data</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257540360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about the google analytics script put in the bottom on all the webpages combined with my ip? I forgot an url i visited yesterday, though google could tell me<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about the google analytics script put in the bottom on all the webpages combined with my ip ?
I forgot an url i visited yesterday , though google could tell me : - (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about the google analytics script put in the bottom on all the webpages combined with my ip?
I forgot an url i visited yesterday, though google could tell me :-(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30008178</id>
	<title>Different accounts now LINKED!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257538500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So in an attempt to have Google know less about me I need to use a utility that will LINK my different accounts into one Dashboard?</p><p>I can't even remember the details of the different account I continuously create to use, post,review, etc.  Why would I want to link them TOGETHER for Google to know MORE about me!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So in an attempt to have Google know less about me I need to use a utility that will LINK my different accounts into one Dashboard ? I ca n't even remember the details of the different account I continuously create to use , post,review , etc .
Why would I want to link them TOGETHER for Google to know MORE about me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So in an attempt to have Google know less about me I need to use a utility that will LINK my different accounts into one Dashboard?I can't even remember the details of the different account I continuously create to use, post,review, etc.
Why would I want to link them TOGETHER for Google to know MORE about me!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004170</id>
	<title>My search history</title>
	<author>the\_one(2)</author>
	<datestamp>1257506640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There really wasn't much information in my search history that can't be found in other ways:</p><ul><li>Apparently i search much for function documentation for different programming languages : I study computer science</li><li>I'm politically interested in filesharing (search for arguments for and against stuff and visited piratpartiet.se ) : I'm publicly a member of the pirate party</li><li>I watch a nonzero amount of porn : I'm a man</li></ul><p>I've only looked through a few months of my search history and it was pretty interesting to see what i searched for back then</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There really was n't much information in my search history that ca n't be found in other ways : Apparently i search much for function documentation for different programming languages : I study computer scienceI 'm politically interested in filesharing ( search for arguments for and against stuff and visited piratpartiet.se ) : I 'm publicly a member of the pirate partyI watch a nonzero amount of porn : I 'm a manI 've only looked through a few months of my search history and it was pretty interesting to see what i searched for back then</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There really wasn't much information in my search history that can't be found in other ways:Apparently i search much for function documentation for different programming languages : I study computer scienceI'm politically interested in filesharing (search for arguments for and against stuff and visited piratpartiet.se ) : I'm publicly a member of the pirate partyI watch a nonzero amount of porn : I'm a manI've only looked through a few months of my search history and it was pretty interesting to see what i searched for back then</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003290</id>
	<title>Mottos</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257447720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Slashdot: New for nerds, stuff that matters<br><br>Google Dashboard: All your data are belong to us</htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot : New for nerds , stuff that mattersGoogle Dashboard : All your data are belong to us</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot: New for nerds, stuff that mattersGoogle Dashboard: All your data are belong to us</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003584</id>
	<title>How about a link to the dashboard?</title>
	<author>seifried</author>
	<datestamp>1257538860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>3 links, not a single one to the actual dashboard.</p><p> <a href="http://www.google.com/dashboard" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/dashboard</a> [google.com] </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>3 links , not a single one to the actual dashboard .
http : //www.google.com/dashboard [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>3 links, not a single one to the actual dashboard.
http://www.google.com/dashboard [google.com] </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003560</id>
	<title>Re: Dashboard reveals what Reptoids want to</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257538380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Their dashboard simply reveals what they want you to know you keep.</p><p>Love or hate Google it would be naive to think otherwise.</p></div><p>Hmm.... reminds me a David Cross quote.</p><p>"How can I be paranoid if the paranoid motherfuckers who are makin' me paranoid are really out there."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Their dashboard simply reveals what they want you to know you keep.Love or hate Google it would be naive to think otherwise.Hmm.... reminds me a David Cross quote .
" How can I be paranoid if the paranoid motherfuckers who are makin ' me paranoid are really out there .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their dashboard simply reveals what they want you to know you keep.Love or hate Google it would be naive to think otherwise.Hmm.... reminds me a David Cross quote.
"How can I be paranoid if the paranoid motherfuckers who are makin' me paranoid are really out there.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003710</id>
	<title>Re:Mottos</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1257498240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> All your data are belong to us</p></div></blockquote><p>TFA says "In an effort to provide <i>you</i> with greater transparency and control over <i>their</i> own data"</p><p>So it looks like all somebody's data are belong to me.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>All your data are belong to usTFA says " In an effort to provide you with greater transparency and control over their own data " So it looks like all somebody 's data are belong to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> All your data are belong to usTFA says "In an effort to provide you with greater transparency and control over their own data"So it looks like all somebody's data are belong to me.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30009352</id>
	<title>Re:Let's add a link.</title>
	<author>JorDan Clock</author>
	<datestamp>1257500340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm in Michigan, but every few visits to Google from my phone ends up in Spanish. Couldn't I at least get French? And what the hell is my carrier (Sprint) doing with their routers to make Google think I'm in Mexico, or worse, across the Atlantic in Spain?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm in Michigan , but every few visits to Google from my phone ends up in Spanish .
Could n't I at least get French ?
And what the hell is my carrier ( Sprint ) doing with their routers to make Google think I 'm in Mexico , or worse , across the Atlantic in Spain ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm in Michigan, but every few visits to Google from my phone ends up in Spanish.
Couldn't I at least get French?
And what the hell is my carrier (Sprint) doing with their routers to make Google think I'm in Mexico, or worse, across the Atlantic in Spain?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30012546</id>
	<title>Medical Privacy Protection???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257530820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read on one reputable computer magazinesite, and they confirmed to another that I use, that attorneys for MS, Google, etc., argue, surprisingly, that your medical data stored with them is NOT protected by the federal HIPAA or state medical privacy laws.   Why not?   More verifiable iinfo please.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read on one reputable computer magazinesite , and they confirmed to another that I use , that attorneys for MS , Google , etc. , argue , surprisingly , that your medical data stored with them is NOT protected by the federal HIPAA or state medical privacy laws .
Why not ?
More verifiable iinfo please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read on one reputable computer magazinesite, and they confirmed to another that I use, that attorneys for MS, Google, etc., argue, surprisingly, that your medical data stored with them is NOT protected by the federal HIPAA or state medical privacy laws.
Why not?
More verifiable iinfo please.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30007236</id>
	<title>Irony</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1257532980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To use Dashboard, you cannot remain anonymous.</p><p>Occurs to me that you could also use it to learn what the system knows about *other* people...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To use Dashboard , you can not remain anonymous.Occurs to me that you could also use it to learn what the system knows about * other * people.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To use Dashboard, you cannot remain anonymous.Occurs to me that you could also use it to learn what the system knows about *other* people...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004456</id>
	<title>Not so obvious</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257511680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google is a service which most people who use the internet use. If a service is sufficiently successful it increasingly becomes an obligatory part of life. The pressure builds up to use the service. For example, in London in order to travel on the underground or the buses without the system logging your travel details you have to pay twice as much for day tickets. That cash incentive is there to put pressure on you to give in.</p><p>Google provides a whole range of services too. Many of them are only available if you log in. The more and better those services are, the more people will succumb.</p><p>It is very hard indeed to not register somewhere on the internet if you are to take advantage of the services available.</p><p>No, it is not bleedingly obvious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google is a service which most people who use the internet use .
If a service is sufficiently successful it increasingly becomes an obligatory part of life .
The pressure builds up to use the service .
For example , in London in order to travel on the underground or the buses without the system logging your travel details you have to pay twice as much for day tickets .
That cash incentive is there to put pressure on you to give in.Google provides a whole range of services too .
Many of them are only available if you log in .
The more and better those services are , the more people will succumb.It is very hard indeed to not register somewhere on the internet if you are to take advantage of the services available.No , it is not bleedingly obvious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google is a service which most people who use the internet use.
If a service is sufficiently successful it increasingly becomes an obligatory part of life.
The pressure builds up to use the service.
For example, in London in order to travel on the underground or the buses without the system logging your travel details you have to pay twice as much for day tickets.
That cash incentive is there to put pressure on you to give in.Google provides a whole range of services too.
Many of them are only available if you log in.
The more and better those services are, the more people will succumb.It is very hard indeed to not register somewhere on the internet if you are to take advantage of the services available.No, it is not bleedingly obvious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003682</id>
	<title>Re:Bleedingly obvious?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257540720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>a/s/l?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a/s/l ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a/s/l?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30006156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003544
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30012276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30007970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30007350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003260
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30005870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30006152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30007504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003260
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30005160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30017314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30005900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003958
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004456
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30009352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30005862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30007328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003716
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30007374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_06_0453232_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0453232.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003952
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0453232.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003310
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0453232.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003886
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0453232.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003524
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30017314
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0453232.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004708
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0453232.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004780
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0453232.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003520
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0453232.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0453232.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003342
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0453232.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30005900
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0453232.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004456
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004088
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004086
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0453232.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003602
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0453232.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004510
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0453232.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30007328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003564
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30005160
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30006156
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30007374
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30012276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003508
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0453232.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003774
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0453232.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30007236
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0453232.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003260
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30007350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30007504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_06_0453232.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003400
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003704
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003718
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003510
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003544
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30003716
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004172
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30005870
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30004580
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30009352
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30006152
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30005862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_06_0453232.30007970
</commentlist>
</conversation>
