<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_05_0147237</id>
	<title>Colleges Secretly Test Music-Industry Project</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1257409920000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"The music industry is still pushing Choruss, a controversial <a href="http://chronicle.com/article/Music-Industry-Changes-Tune-of/49034/">blanket-licensing scheme</a>, but it is far less innovative than first described. Six colleges are setting it up now, but they refuse to have their names released because the issue is a political landmine &mdash; and who wants to be associated with the recording industry?"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " The music industry is still pushing Choruss , a controversial blanket-licensing scheme , but it is far less innovative than first described .
Six colleges are setting it up now , but they refuse to have their names released because the issue is a political landmine    and who wants to be associated with the recording industry ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "The music industry is still pushing Choruss, a controversial blanket-licensing scheme, but it is far less innovative than first described.
Six colleges are setting it up now, but they refuse to have their names released because the issue is a political landmine — and who wants to be associated with the recording industry?
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29999288</id>
	<title>why an industry?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257413820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>there was music before the music industry; the only difference is that was a participatory part of culture rather than a commodity to be kept in a safe.  so when we say "support the artists" remember that we are really saying "support this change".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>there was music before the music industry ; the only difference is that was a participatory part of culture rather than a commodity to be kept in a safe .
so when we say " support the artists " remember that we are really saying " support this change " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there was music before the music industry; the only difference is that was a participatory part of culture rather than a commodity to be kept in a safe.
so when we say "support the artists" remember that we are really saying "support this change".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992270</id>
	<title>Thank you, RIAA...</title>
	<author>reverendbeer</author>
	<datestamp>1257414360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...Thank you for allowing ever single music-oriented organization in the world to believe, accurately or not, that they have rights, imagined or not, upon every and anything that they produce and that compensation, in some manner, should be expected and demanded.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Thank you for allowing ever single music-oriented organization in the world to believe , accurately or not , that they have rights , imagined or not , upon every and anything that they produce and that compensation , in some manner , should be expected and demanded .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Thank you for allowing ever single music-oriented organization in the world to believe, accurately or not, that they have rights, imagined or not, upon every and anything that they produce and that compensation, in some manner, should be expected and demanded.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992302</id>
	<title>Anonymous Cowards?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257414840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure they're scared of being sued! Just look at the track record.
<br> <br>
You know, this wouldn't even be so much of a problem if the music industry (these publishers) charged a reasonable price for a CD that costs them a few cents to make. You know... a CD with 7 songs on it where 5 of the songs suck, 1 song is ok, and you really only wanted that 1 song you paid the $30 bucks for.
<br> <br>
Instead, they want to sue Apple over royalties for the 30 second song previews on iTunes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure they 're scared of being sued !
Just look at the track record .
You know , this would n't even be so much of a problem if the music industry ( these publishers ) charged a reasonable price for a CD that costs them a few cents to make .
You know... a CD with 7 songs on it where 5 of the songs suck , 1 song is ok , and you really only wanted that 1 song you paid the $ 30 bucks for .
Instead , they want to sue Apple over royalties for the 30 second song previews on iTunes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure they're scared of being sued!
Just look at the track record.
You know, this wouldn't even be so much of a problem if the music industry (these publishers) charged a reasonable price for a CD that costs them a few cents to make.
You know... a CD with 7 songs on it where 5 of the songs suck, 1 song is ok, and you really only wanted that 1 song you paid the $30 bucks for.
Instead, they want to sue Apple over royalties for the 30 second song previews on iTunes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992532</id>
	<title>Re:Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>Stereoface</author>
	<datestamp>1257417720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The idea with that is the Blank Media Levy-

It's run by the CPCC, which is the Canadian Private Copying Collective.
<a href="http://www.cpcc.ca/english/index.htm" title="www.cpcc.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.cpcc.ca/english/index.htm</a> [www.cpcc.ca]

They're an extension of SOCAN, and the money generated from the sales goes back to the artists. It works out great for starving musicians, and in general yeah- Blank CDs are mostly used to copy copy written material.

The fact is that Blanket licensing is already in use and in affect almost everywhere. Bars, Clubs, Shopping malls, Radio stations- they all pay blanket licenses to use music. The problem with this idea- letting users get a subscription to all the music they want. It has to expire. As an artist, no way would I let someone download my entire library of songs for a monthly fee. It's simply not fair.

Also- if indie bands want to use burned CDs for music- they can get a rebate from the CPCC. I did it when I was starting out- used 500 CDs and got all of the rebate back... Something like 30 cents a disc back then. It really is a great system.

For more information visit <a href="http://www.socan.ca/" title="socan.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.socan.ca/</a> [socan.ca]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The idea with that is the Blank Media Levy- It 's run by the CPCC , which is the Canadian Private Copying Collective .
http : //www.cpcc.ca/english/index.htm [ www.cpcc.ca ] They 're an extension of SOCAN , and the money generated from the sales goes back to the artists .
It works out great for starving musicians , and in general yeah- Blank CDs are mostly used to copy copy written material .
The fact is that Blanket licensing is already in use and in affect almost everywhere .
Bars , Clubs , Shopping malls , Radio stations- they all pay blanket licenses to use music .
The problem with this idea- letting users get a subscription to all the music they want .
It has to expire .
As an artist , no way would I let someone download my entire library of songs for a monthly fee .
It 's simply not fair .
Also- if indie bands want to use burned CDs for music- they can get a rebate from the CPCC .
I did it when I was starting out- used 500 CDs and got all of the rebate back... Something like 30 cents a disc back then .
It really is a great system .
For more information visit http : //www.socan.ca/ [ socan.ca ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The idea with that is the Blank Media Levy-

It's run by the CPCC, which is the Canadian Private Copying Collective.
http://www.cpcc.ca/english/index.htm [www.cpcc.ca]

They're an extension of SOCAN, and the money generated from the sales goes back to the artists.
It works out great for starving musicians, and in general yeah- Blank CDs are mostly used to copy copy written material.
The fact is that Blanket licensing is already in use and in affect almost everywhere.
Bars, Clubs, Shopping malls, Radio stations- they all pay blanket licenses to use music.
The problem with this idea- letting users get a subscription to all the music they want.
It has to expire.
As an artist, no way would I let someone download my entire library of songs for a monthly fee.
It's simply not fair.
Also- if indie bands want to use burned CDs for music- they can get a rebate from the CPCC.
I did it when I was starting out- used 500 CDs and got all of the rebate back... Something like 30 cents a disc back then.
It really is a great system.
For more information visit http://www.socan.ca/ [socan.ca]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992578</id>
	<title>Re:Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257418140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to the Canadian Copyright Act, Canadians can personally make a copy of a CD from any source (original or not). This backup is for personal use, not anyone else to use.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to the Canadian Copyright Act , Canadians can personally make a copy of a CD from any source ( original or not ) .
This backup is for personal use , not anyone else to use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to the Canadian Copyright Act, Canadians can personally make a copy of a CD from any source (original or not).
This backup is for personal use, not anyone else to use.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29995860</id>
	<title>Re:Still feeds the beast</title>
	<author>Tetsujin</author>
	<datestamp>1257441660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Last music CD I bought: Can't remember</p></div><p>Who recorded that?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Last music CD I bought : Ca n't rememberWho recorded that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last music CD I bought: Can't rememberWho recorded that?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29993078</id>
	<title>Re:Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>s4ltyd0g</author>
	<datestamp>1257423960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>commenting to undo an erroneous mod</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>commenting to undo an erroneous mod</tokentext>
<sentencetext>commenting to undo an erroneous mod</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992550</id>
	<title>Re:Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1257417900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But: Do we care?</p><p>No, really! Are we really so weak and pathetic to care, whenever the designated crazy person of the world goes on again, declaring him a new set of rights?</p><p>I don't see this ever happening.</p><p>Oh, those who have a very twisted view of what is "politically correct", and the weakest spines in the whole universe, will cave in so the dwarf.</p><p>But unofficially, <em>everyone</em> will simply ignore them. Hell, look at Sarkozy. Officially: "Oh hell yeah, we need the 3 strikes law". Unofficially he shares so much music, that he already got caught. <strong>Twice</strong></p><p>I bet money, that every single one of those who are so pathetic to officially support them, are unofficially the biggest file sharers on the planet. I mean imagine you being the manager of one of the big four for a whole continent or country! Will you just leave that huge back archive laying around? LOL. No. way. in. hell! ^^</p><p>And the rest of us? We couldn't even follow their fucked up rules, if we wanted!</p><p>This whole itty bitty tiny industry that is the music reproduction and artist extortion industry (hell, the toilet seat industry is bigger!), is in its final throes. Acting all crazy and funny. Meanwhile the <em>musician industry</em> is growing, rising, and more successful that it ever was.</p><p>Great times lay ahead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But : Do we care ? No , really !
Are we really so weak and pathetic to care , whenever the designated crazy person of the world goes on again , declaring him a new set of rights ? I do n't see this ever happening.Oh , those who have a very twisted view of what is " politically correct " , and the weakest spines in the whole universe , will cave in so the dwarf.But unofficially , everyone will simply ignore them .
Hell , look at Sarkozy .
Officially : " Oh hell yeah , we need the 3 strikes law " .
Unofficially he shares so much music , that he already got caught .
TwiceI bet money , that every single one of those who are so pathetic to officially support them , are unofficially the biggest file sharers on the planet .
I mean imagine you being the manager of one of the big four for a whole continent or country !
Will you just leave that huge back archive laying around ?
LOL. No .
way. in .
hell ! ^ ^ And the rest of us ?
We could n't even follow their fucked up rules , if we wanted ! This whole itty bitty tiny industry that is the music reproduction and artist extortion industry ( hell , the toilet seat industry is bigger !
) , is in its final throes .
Acting all crazy and funny .
Meanwhile the musician industry is growing , rising , and more successful that it ever was.Great times lay ahead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But: Do we care?No, really!
Are we really so weak and pathetic to care, whenever the designated crazy person of the world goes on again, declaring him a new set of rights?I don't see this ever happening.Oh, those who have a very twisted view of what is "politically correct", and the weakest spines in the whole universe, will cave in so the dwarf.But unofficially, everyone will simply ignore them.
Hell, look at Sarkozy.
Officially: "Oh hell yeah, we need the 3 strikes law".
Unofficially he shares so much music, that he already got caught.
TwiceI bet money, that every single one of those who are so pathetic to officially support them, are unofficially the biggest file sharers on the planet.
I mean imagine you being the manager of one of the big four for a whole continent or country!
Will you just leave that huge back archive laying around?
LOL. No.
way. in.
hell! ^^And the rest of us?
We couldn't even follow their fucked up rules, if we wanted!This whole itty bitty tiny industry that is the music reproduction and artist extortion industry (hell, the toilet seat industry is bigger!
), is in its final throes.
Acting all crazy and funny.
Meanwhile the musician industry is growing, rising, and more successful that it ever was.Great times lay ahead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29994062</id>
	<title>Re:Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257432420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>so if i'm a local band who produces an album, burns it to 3000 cd's to try get some kind of exposure, your album is actually taxed and some cocksucker affliated with *AA profits off it via the tax you paid....</p></div><p>The sad fact is some local bands actually pushed for this when pushing to expand copyright law.</p><p>Of course the media interests told the bands they would make some insane amount of money if the laws are passed, and with no critical thinking used, their greed had them vote for the very thing that made that situation happen.</p><p>Now don't get me wrong, I'm not accusing you or your example band of being this way, but there are a good number that are.</p><p>The industry used the artists own greed against them.   If only there wasn't so much collateral damage, I'd say they got what they deserved.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>so if i 'm a local band who produces an album , burns it to 3000 cd 's to try get some kind of exposure , your album is actually taxed and some cocksucker affliated with * AA profits off it via the tax you paid....The sad fact is some local bands actually pushed for this when pushing to expand copyright law.Of course the media interests told the bands they would make some insane amount of money if the laws are passed , and with no critical thinking used , their greed had them vote for the very thing that made that situation happen.Now do n't get me wrong , I 'm not accusing you or your example band of being this way , but there are a good number that are.The industry used the artists own greed against them .
If only there was n't so much collateral damage , I 'd say they got what they deserved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so if i'm a local band who produces an album, burns it to 3000 cd's to try get some kind of exposure, your album is actually taxed and some cocksucker affliated with *AA profits off it via the tax you paid....The sad fact is some local bands actually pushed for this when pushing to expand copyright law.Of course the media interests told the bands they would make some insane amount of money if the laws are passed, and with no critical thinking used, their greed had them vote for the very thing that made that situation happen.Now don't get me wrong, I'm not accusing you or your example band of being this way, but there are a good number that are.The industry used the artists own greed against them.
If only there wasn't so much collateral damage, I'd say they got what they deserved.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29993116</id>
	<title>Re:Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>mister\_playboy</author>
	<datestamp>1257424440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I buy CDs pretty much exclusively to burn Linux distros</p></div><p>Most distros can install from USB these days... it's way faster!</p><p>An older computer that can't boot from USB will need a CD, but that's the only reason not to use USB.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I buy CDs pretty much exclusively to burn Linux distrosMost distros can install from USB these days... it 's way faster ! An older computer that ca n't boot from USB will need a CD , but that 's the only reason not to use USB .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I buy CDs pretty much exclusively to burn Linux distrosMost distros can install from USB these days... it's way faster!An older computer that can't boot from USB will need a CD, but that's the only reason not to use USB.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29996876</id>
	<title>new site legalpiratebay.com</title>
	<author>cellurl</author>
	<datestamp>1257446580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am opening a new site<br>
<a href="http://www.legalpiratebay.com/" title="legalpiratebay.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.legalpiratebay.com/</a> [legalpiratebay.com] <br> <br>

Details: <br>
First download is free.<br>
Then, You have to join with $10 (paypal). Goes into your account.<br>
Download a movie: $0 - $0.60<br>
Download a song:  $0 - $0.60<br>
Download other:   $0 - $0.60<br> <br>

The money gets mailed annomyously to specific places [customer chooses from our list].<br>
Choices:- African children Fund.<br>
Choices:- Specific people associated with the movie/song/game.
<br> <br>
It will not honor TakeDownNotices and operate in Russia.<br> <br>

-jp</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am opening a new site http : //www.legalpiratebay.com/ [ legalpiratebay.com ] Details : First download is free .
Then , You have to join with $ 10 ( paypal ) .
Goes into your account .
Download a movie : $ 0 - $ 0.60 Download a song : $ 0 - $ 0.60 Download other : $ 0 - $ 0.60 The money gets mailed annomyously to specific places [ customer chooses from our list ] .
Choices : - African children Fund .
Choices : - Specific people associated with the movie/song/game .
It will not honor TakeDownNotices and operate in Russia .
-jp</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am opening a new site
http://www.legalpiratebay.com/ [legalpiratebay.com]  

Details: 
First download is free.
Then, You have to join with $10 (paypal).
Goes into your account.
Download a movie: $0 - $0.60
Download a song:  $0 - $0.60
Download other:   $0 - $0.60 

The money gets mailed annomyously to specific places [customer chooses from our list].
Choices:- African children Fund.
Choices:- Specific people associated with the movie/song/game.
It will not honor TakeDownNotices and operate in Russia.
-jp</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288</id>
	<title>Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>erroneus</author>
	<datestamp>1257414720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Canadians have their blank CD tax ostensibly because blank CDs are used to copy music.  Great.  But is it then legal to copy music in Canada?  No.  How does that even work?!</p><p>Doing this other blanket licensing stuff will enjoy similar respect in that anything acquired will be decidedly illegal until proven otherwise and even with proof, there is little doubt in my mind the recording industry will respect it as legal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Canadians have their blank CD tax ostensibly because blank CDs are used to copy music .
Great. But is it then legal to copy music in Canada ?
No. How does that even work ?
! Doing this other blanket licensing stuff will enjoy similar respect in that anything acquired will be decidedly illegal until proven otherwise and even with proof , there is little doubt in my mind the recording industry will respect it as legal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Canadians have their blank CD tax ostensibly because blank CDs are used to copy music.
Great.  But is it then legal to copy music in Canada?
No.  How does that even work?
!Doing this other blanket licensing stuff will enjoy similar respect in that anything acquired will be decidedly illegal until proven otherwise and even with proof, there is little doubt in my mind the recording industry will respect it as legal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992264</id>
	<title>Still feeds the beast</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257414240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't want to feed the recording industry if at all possible.<br>I want to reward artists as much as possible.</p><p>Last thing I actually bought: World of goo.<br>Last music CD I bought: Can't remember<br>Last digital music I bought: Never</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't want to feed the recording industry if at all possible.I want to reward artists as much as possible.Last thing I actually bought : World of goo.Last music CD I bought : Ca n't rememberLast digital music I bought : Never</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't want to feed the recording industry if at all possible.I want to reward artists as much as possible.Last thing I actually bought: World of goo.Last music CD I bought: Can't rememberLast digital music I bought: Never</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29995914</id>
	<title>Re:Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>countertrolling</author>
	<datestamp>1257441900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Individuals do not have access to government.</i></p><p>Yes they do!</p><p><i>Government is influenced by money.</i></p><p>The voters are more influenced by money. Otherwise they wouldn't vote for all that bling.</p><p>Stop with this fucking blame game! Government is corrupt because the electorate is corrupt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Individuals do not have access to government.Yes they do ! Government is influenced by money.The voters are more influenced by money .
Otherwise they would n't vote for all that bling.Stop with this fucking blame game !
Government is corrupt because the electorate is corrupt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Individuals do not have access to government.Yes they do!Government is influenced by money.The voters are more influenced by money.
Otherwise they wouldn't vote for all that bling.Stop with this fucking blame game!
Government is corrupt because the electorate is corrupt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29994608</id>
	<title>Here's two other anonymous cowards</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257435420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know two Universities testing this...because I have set up this turd.</p><p>University of Nebraska - Lincoln<br>Purdue</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know two Universities testing this...because I have set up this turd.University of Nebraska - LincolnPurdue</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know two Universities testing this...because I have set up this turd.University of Nebraska - LincolnPurdue</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29994784</id>
	<title>Re:The music industry is retarded</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257436260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What do you want from them?</p><p>Along with a covenant not to sue the students for illegal filesharing, they're providing a service that lets the students download as much as they want and keep it forever. There's no mention of DRM, but this sounds like a perfectly reasonable service. I'm not sure how much I'd be willing to pay for this service (I'm not currently buying/downloading a lot of music. Though I might take the opportunity to legitimize all the music I acquired through questionable means through the years). I don't see the evil catch that the Industry is going to try to use to screw the students over.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What do you want from them ? Along with a covenant not to sue the students for illegal filesharing , they 're providing a service that lets the students download as much as they want and keep it forever .
There 's no mention of DRM , but this sounds like a perfectly reasonable service .
I 'm not sure how much I 'd be willing to pay for this service ( I 'm not currently buying/downloading a lot of music .
Though I might take the opportunity to legitimize all the music I acquired through questionable means through the years ) .
I do n't see the evil catch that the Industry is going to try to use to screw the students over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do you want from them?Along with a covenant not to sue the students for illegal filesharing, they're providing a service that lets the students download as much as they want and keep it forever.
There's no mention of DRM, but this sounds like a perfectly reasonable service.
I'm not sure how much I'd be willing to pay for this service (I'm not currently buying/downloading a lot of music.
Though I might take the opportunity to legitimize all the music I acquired through questionable means through the years).
I don't see the evil catch that the Industry is going to try to use to screw the students over.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29993524</id>
	<title>Re:Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>macshit</author>
	<datestamp>1257429180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Which means that if I copy your music, and you don't get played on radio, you don't get a cent from it. Celine Dion does though. Which IMO is completely bizarre and a perversion of how things should be. If somebody's going to get paid I'd rather it be the right person.</p></div><p>If there were any justice, Celine Dion would be required to pay <em>us</em> every time her "music" is played on the radio!
</p><p>Not that mere money could undo the damage of course...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Which means that if I copy your music , and you do n't get played on radio , you do n't get a cent from it .
Celine Dion does though .
Which IMO is completely bizarre and a perversion of how things should be .
If somebody 's going to get paid I 'd rather it be the right person.If there were any justice , Celine Dion would be required to pay us every time her " music " is played on the radio !
Not that mere money could undo the damage of course.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which means that if I copy your music, and you don't get played on radio, you don't get a cent from it.
Celine Dion does though.
Which IMO is completely bizarre and a perversion of how things should be.
If somebody's going to get paid I'd rather it be the right person.If there were any justice, Celine Dion would be required to pay us every time her "music" is played on the radio!
Not that mere money could undo the damage of course...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992234</id>
	<title>The music industry is retarded</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257414060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and that is no secret</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and that is no secret</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and that is no secret</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992990</id>
	<title>Re:Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>vadim\_t</author>
	<datestamp>1257423000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It works out great for starving musicians</p></div></blockquote><p>No, it doesn't. Wikipedia says this:</p><blockquote><div><p>The Canadian Private Copying Collective has developed a methodology by which the proceeds are distributed to rights holders based on commercial radio airplay and commercial sales samples, ignoring radio/college airplay and independent record sales not logged by Soundscan.</p></div></blockquote><p>Which means that if I copy your music, and you don't get played on radio, you don't get a cent from it. Celine Dion does though. Which IMO is completely bizarre and a perversion of how things should be. If somebody's going to get paid I'd rather it be the right person.</p><p>In other countries with the same system the money goes to local artists. So in Germany, a german artist would be getting paid for your music.</p><blockquote><div><p>and in general yeah- Blank CDs are mostly used to copy copy written material</p></div></blockquote><p>You must be kidding. Who carries burned music CDs around anymore? I buy CDs pretty much exclusively to burn Linux distros, my brother to distribute his own (graphics) work. Nobody uses CDs to pass music around anymore. They use portable hard drives, laptops, and so on, and carry their music on portable MP3 players. Most of those are taxed too, but the proportion is much lower than for a CD, and they're all rewritable so the payment is a one time one regardless of how much music goes through it.</p><p>I object on principle to this system and avoid buying CDs and CD-Rs because of it.</p><blockquote><div><p> The problem with this idea- letting users get a subscription to all the music they want. It has to expire. As an artist, no way would I let someone download my entire library of songs for a monthly fee. It's simply not fair.</p></div></blockquote><p>It's not a blanket license then, is it?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It works out great for starving musiciansNo , it does n't .
Wikipedia says this : The Canadian Private Copying Collective has developed a methodology by which the proceeds are distributed to rights holders based on commercial radio airplay and commercial sales samples , ignoring radio/college airplay and independent record sales not logged by Soundscan.Which means that if I copy your music , and you do n't get played on radio , you do n't get a cent from it .
Celine Dion does though .
Which IMO is completely bizarre and a perversion of how things should be .
If somebody 's going to get paid I 'd rather it be the right person.In other countries with the same system the money goes to local artists .
So in Germany , a german artist would be getting paid for your music.and in general yeah- Blank CDs are mostly used to copy copy written materialYou must be kidding .
Who carries burned music CDs around anymore ?
I buy CDs pretty much exclusively to burn Linux distros , my brother to distribute his own ( graphics ) work .
Nobody uses CDs to pass music around anymore .
They use portable hard drives , laptops , and so on , and carry their music on portable MP3 players .
Most of those are taxed too , but the proportion is much lower than for a CD , and they 're all rewritable so the payment is a one time one regardless of how much music goes through it.I object on principle to this system and avoid buying CDs and CD-Rs because of it .
The problem with this idea- letting users get a subscription to all the music they want .
It has to expire .
As an artist , no way would I let someone download my entire library of songs for a monthly fee .
It 's simply not fair.It 's not a blanket license then , is it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It works out great for starving musiciansNo, it doesn't.
Wikipedia says this:The Canadian Private Copying Collective has developed a methodology by which the proceeds are distributed to rights holders based on commercial radio airplay and commercial sales samples, ignoring radio/college airplay and independent record sales not logged by Soundscan.Which means that if I copy your music, and you don't get played on radio, you don't get a cent from it.
Celine Dion does though.
Which IMO is completely bizarre and a perversion of how things should be.
If somebody's going to get paid I'd rather it be the right person.In other countries with the same system the money goes to local artists.
So in Germany, a german artist would be getting paid for your music.and in general yeah- Blank CDs are mostly used to copy copy written materialYou must be kidding.
Who carries burned music CDs around anymore?
I buy CDs pretty much exclusively to burn Linux distros, my brother to distribute his own (graphics) work.
Nobody uses CDs to pass music around anymore.
They use portable hard drives, laptops, and so on, and carry their music on portable MP3 players.
Most of those are taxed too, but the proportion is much lower than for a CD, and they're all rewritable so the payment is a one time one regardless of how much music goes through it.I object on principle to this system and avoid buying CDs and CD-Rs because of it.
The problem with this idea- letting users get a subscription to all the music they want.
It has to expire.
As an artist, no way would I let someone download my entire library of songs for a monthly fee.
It's simply not fair.It's not a blanket license then, is it?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29999788</id>
	<title>Re:The music industry is retarded</title>
	<author>DinDaddy</author>
	<datestamp>1257415920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You've conveniently left out the fact that there is no opt out for the students.  Their fees are increased to pay for it whether they want it or not.</p><p>Shall we extend this business model to the public at large and other content industries?  Everyone begins paying a monthly fee of $100 and they get as many free movies, songs, books, newspapers, etc. as they want.  No problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 've conveniently left out the fact that there is no opt out for the students .
Their fees are increased to pay for it whether they want it or not.Shall we extend this business model to the public at large and other content industries ?
Everyone begins paying a monthly fee of $ 100 and they get as many free movies , songs , books , newspapers , etc .
as they want .
No problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You've conveniently left out the fact that there is no opt out for the students.
Their fees are increased to pay for it whether they want it or not.Shall we extend this business model to the public at large and other content industries?
Everyone begins paying a monthly fee of $100 and they get as many free movies, songs, books, newspapers, etc.
as they want.
No problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29994784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29995156</id>
	<title>greed is the problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257438240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem is that the cd costs maybe $.50 to make and burn the songs onto, then the band may only get $.05 a cd depending on their contract, maybe another $.05 a cd to pay for all the design work and packaging and shipping. The rest is profit to the record label.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is that the cd costs maybe $ .50 to make and burn the songs onto , then the band may only get $ .05 a cd depending on their contract , maybe another $ .05 a cd to pay for all the design work and packaging and shipping .
The rest is profit to the record label .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is that the cd costs maybe $.50 to make and burn the songs onto, then the band may only get $.05 a cd depending on their contract, maybe another $.05 a cd to pay for all the design work and packaging and shipping.
The rest is profit to the record label.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.30001012</id>
	<title>Secret for how long?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257421500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a student at one of the universities that was initially approached by Choruss, I have a hard time believing it will take long for the universities testing the programs to be come known. At the very least, the service needs to be publicized to the student body to be useful</p><p>However, even beyond that, funding for the program at some of the universities initially approached is accountable to one or more arms of the student government. Thus, although the governing boards of these universities can agree to this test proposal, it won't get funded without first coming to light and becoming open to student comment.</p><p>Perhaps the six universities that went forward with this program don't have this type of setup? Otherwise, I have a hard time seeing how Choruss tests could move forward this way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a student at one of the universities that was initially approached by Choruss , I have a hard time believing it will take long for the universities testing the programs to be come known .
At the very least , the service needs to be publicized to the student body to be usefulHowever , even beyond that , funding for the program at some of the universities initially approached is accountable to one or more arms of the student government .
Thus , although the governing boards of these universities can agree to this test proposal , it wo n't get funded without first coming to light and becoming open to student comment.Perhaps the six universities that went forward with this program do n't have this type of setup ?
Otherwise , I have a hard time seeing how Choruss tests could move forward this way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a student at one of the universities that was initially approached by Choruss, I have a hard time believing it will take long for the universities testing the programs to be come known.
At the very least, the service needs to be publicized to the student body to be usefulHowever, even beyond that, funding for the program at some of the universities initially approached is accountable to one or more arms of the student government.
Thus, although the governing boards of these universities can agree to this test proposal, it won't get funded without first coming to light and becoming open to student comment.Perhaps the six universities that went forward with this program don't have this type of setup?
Otherwise, I have a hard time seeing how Choruss tests could move forward this way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29993832</id>
	<title>Re:Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>ze\_jua</author>
	<datestamp>1257431340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Same shit in France.</p><p>Every blank media (even extrenal hard drives, USB keys, flash cards and iPods!) have very big "tax" going to the SACEM (French RIAA), but it doesn't give us the right to use these blank medium to... record music!!</p><p>(In fact the system is a bit more complex, but the summary is correct).</p><p>Free bonus, the tax is indexed on the size of the media (in bytes, not in centimeter<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;) !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Same shit in France.Every blank media ( even extrenal hard drives , USB keys , flash cards and iPods !
) have very big " tax " going to the SACEM ( French RIAA ) , but it does n't give us the right to use these blank medium to... record music ! !
( In fact the system is a bit more complex , but the summary is correct ) .Free bonus , the tax is indexed on the size of the media ( in bytes , not in centimeter ; ) !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same shit in France.Every blank media (even extrenal hard drives, USB keys, flash cards and iPods!
) have very big "tax" going to the SACEM (French RIAA), but it doesn't give us the right to use these blank medium to... record music!!
(In fact the system is a bit more complex, but the summary is correct).Free bonus, the tax is indexed on the size of the media (in bytes, not in centimeter ;) !</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992232</id>
	<title>Boobs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257414000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Big round puffy boobs.</p><p>That is all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Big round puffy boobs.That is all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Big round puffy boobs.That is all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29993658</id>
	<title>Re:Anonymous Cowards?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257430320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You know, this wouldn't even be so much of a problem if the music industry (these publishers) charged a reasonable price for a CD that costs them a few cents to make.</p></div><p>Well, since all valuation is subjective, I don't think anyone can come to a fair price. What you see as fair may to me be horrendously expensive.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , this would n't even be so much of a problem if the music industry ( these publishers ) charged a reasonable price for a CD that costs them a few cents to make.Well , since all valuation is subjective , I do n't think anyone can come to a fair price .
What you see as fair may to me be horrendously expensive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, this wouldn't even be so much of a problem if the music industry (these publishers) charged a reasonable price for a CD that costs them a few cents to make.Well, since all valuation is subjective, I don't think anyone can come to a fair price.
What you see as fair may to me be horrendously expensive.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29995078</id>
	<title>I have a dream...</title>
	<author>hatemonger</author>
	<datestamp>1257437820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Imagine an ideal world where artists make their own music; they pay for their own recording and mixing. If they want to make a million dollar music video, they get a loan from a financial institution. Music distributors like MTV and radio stations go out and find music rather than contractually accepting whatever the large recording companies decide will be popular. Whenever I pay $10 for an album, it all goes to the band.

And, since we're talking about hypothetical ideal worlds, I'd wave a magic wand so that modern music wouldn't suck.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine an ideal world where artists make their own music ; they pay for their own recording and mixing .
If they want to make a million dollar music video , they get a loan from a financial institution .
Music distributors like MTV and radio stations go out and find music rather than contractually accepting whatever the large recording companies decide will be popular .
Whenever I pay $ 10 for an album , it all goes to the band .
And , since we 're talking about hypothetical ideal worlds , I 'd wave a magic wand so that modern music would n't suck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine an ideal world where artists make their own music; they pay for their own recording and mixing.
If they want to make a million dollar music video, they get a loan from a financial institution.
Music distributors like MTV and radio stations go out and find music rather than contractually accepting whatever the large recording companies decide will be popular.
Whenever I pay $10 for an album, it all goes to the band.
And, since we're talking about hypothetical ideal worlds, I'd wave a magic wand so that modern music wouldn't suck.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992316</id>
	<title>Re:Boobs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257415080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't go for big boobs. I like a relatively small, pert pair 'o boobs.</p><p>That is all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't go for big boobs .
I like a relatively small , pert pair 'o boobs.That is all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't go for big boobs.
I like a relatively small, pert pair 'o boobs.That is all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992260</id>
	<title>National Security is a joke</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257414240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the government wants to enslave you</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the government wants to enslave you</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the government wants to enslave you</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992460</id>
	<title>Re:Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>mirix</author>
	<datestamp>1257416760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's exceptionally comical is that indie bands, burning CDs of themselves - still pay the levy to big music... wtf?<br> <br> I do think it's made burning dubs de facto legal though...</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's exceptionally comical is that indie bands , burning CDs of themselves - still pay the levy to big music... wtf ? I do think it 's made burning dubs de facto legal though.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's exceptionally comical is that indie bands, burning CDs of themselves - still pay the levy to big music... wtf?  I do think it's made burning dubs de facto legal though...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29995690</id>
	<title>Re:Anonymous Cowards?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257440880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>You know, this wouldn't even be so much of a problem if the music industry (these publishers) charged a reasonable price for a CD that costs them a few cents to make. You know... a CD with 7 songs on it where 5 of the songs suck, 1 song is ok, and you really only wanted that 1 song you paid the $30 bucks for. </i> <br>
<br>
I don't get why the airline is charging me $300 bucks for an airline ticket. It only costs them a few cents to print it. And hell, half the time, I'm printing it myself. Their ripping me off!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , this would n't even be so much of a problem if the music industry ( these publishers ) charged a reasonable price for a CD that costs them a few cents to make .
You know... a CD with 7 songs on it where 5 of the songs suck , 1 song is ok , and you really only wanted that 1 song you paid the $ 30 bucks for .
I do n't get why the airline is charging me $ 300 bucks for an airline ticket .
It only costs them a few cents to print it .
And hell , half the time , I 'm printing it myself .
Their ripping me off !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, this wouldn't even be so much of a problem if the music industry (these publishers) charged a reasonable price for a CD that costs them a few cents to make.
You know... a CD with 7 songs on it where 5 of the songs suck, 1 song is ok, and you really only wanted that 1 song you paid the $30 bucks for.
I don't get why the airline is charging me $300 bucks for an airline ticket.
It only costs them a few cents to print it.
And hell, half the time, I'm printing it myself.
Their ripping me off!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29994618</id>
	<title>Re:Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>mpe</author>
	<datestamp>1257435480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>The Canadians have their blank CD tax ostensibly because blank CDs are used to copy music. Great. But is it then legal to copy music in Canada? No.</i> <br> <br>Unless the music isn't for sale in Canada. Though this is more due to the Canadian judiciary being relativly sane than anything else.<br> <br> <i>How does that even work?!</i> <br> <br>More money for the (big) record companies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Canadians have their blank CD tax ostensibly because blank CDs are used to copy music .
Great. But is it then legal to copy music in Canada ?
No. Unless the music is n't for sale in Canada .
Though this is more due to the Canadian judiciary being relativly sane than anything else .
How does that even work ? !
More money for the ( big ) record companies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Canadians have their blank CD tax ostensibly because blank CDs are used to copy music.
Great. But is it then legal to copy music in Canada?
No.  Unless the music isn't for sale in Canada.
Though this is more due to the Canadian judiciary being relativly sane than anything else.
How does that even work?!
More money for the (big) record companies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29994666</id>
	<title>Re:Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>tibman</author>
	<datestamp>1257435720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can call the government and have a chat, anytime.  Police, fire dept, senator's office, VA, and other stuff i'm sure.  I guess i could call the FBI but i have no idea why i would need to?  The president is wayyy to busy to talk to me though : /</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can call the government and have a chat , anytime .
Police , fire dept , senator 's office , VA , and other stuff i 'm sure .
I guess i could call the FBI but i have no idea why i would need to ?
The president is wayyy to busy to talk to me though : /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can call the government and have a chat, anytime.
Police, fire dept, senator's office, VA, and other stuff i'm sure.
I guess i could call the FBI but i have no idea why i would need to?
The president is wayyy to busy to talk to me though : /</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29995238</id>
	<title>Re:Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>Dragonslicer</author>
	<datestamp>1257438660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Blank CDs are mostly used to copy copy written material.</p></div><p>Why should musicians care if you put a bunch of text from a copywriter on a CD?
<br> <br>
Pro tip: The word you were looking for is "copyrighted".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Blank CDs are mostly used to copy copy written material.Why should musicians care if you put a bunch of text from a copywriter on a CD ?
Pro tip : The word you were looking for is " copyrighted " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Blank CDs are mostly used to copy copy written material.Why should musicians care if you put a bunch of text from a copywriter on a CD?
Pro tip: The word you were looking for is "copyrighted".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29994734</id>
	<title>Re:The music industry is retarded</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257436080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>and that is no secret</p></div></blockquote><p>
You fellow members of my fraternity<br>
Are incapable of denying this truth.</p><p>
(Have we infringed on Sir Mix-A-Lot yet?  Guess it depends on which university...)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and that is no secret You fellow members of my fraternity Are incapable of denying this truth .
( Have we infringed on Sir Mix-A-Lot yet ?
Guess it depends on which university... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and that is no secret
You fellow members of my fraternity
Are incapable of denying this truth.
(Have we infringed on Sir Mix-A-Lot yet?
Guess it depends on which university...)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.30001296</id>
	<title>Re:Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>speedlaw</author>
	<datestamp>1257422940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>note that states tax drugs.  Illegal Drugs.  Failure to pay tax is an additional charge beyond possession.</htmltext>
<tokenext>note that states tax drugs .
Illegal Drugs .
Failure to pay tax is an additional charge beyond possession .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>note that states tax drugs.
Illegal Drugs.
Failure to pay tax is an additional charge beyond possession.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992616</id>
	<title>Re:Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>belmolis</author>
	<datestamp>1257418560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
In Canada it <b>is</b> legal, under <a href="http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/C-42/page-5.html#codese:80" title="justice.gc.ca">Section 80 of the Copyright Act</a> [justice.gc.ca], to copy a recording for one's personal use. It is not legal to distribute copies.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Canada it is legal , under Section 80 of the Copyright Act [ justice.gc.ca ] , to copy a recording for one 's personal use .
It is not legal to distribute copies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
In Canada it is legal, under Section 80 of the Copyright Act [justice.gc.ca], to copy a recording for one's personal use.
It is not legal to distribute copies.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29994310</id>
	<title>Re:Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1257433800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFA:</p><blockquote><div><p>On the basis of those initial talks, the colleges would pay the music industry a blanket licensing fee, similar to what radio stations pay to air popular songs. There was also discussion of the record labels' signing a "covenant not to sue" for any illegal downloading of their songs by users on participating campuses, he said.</p></div></blockquote><p>If there's no sueage covenant, why in the HELL would any school even consider this hare-brained scheme? I hope the names of these schools (if indeed they exist; Warner is a lying sociopathic entity whose word on anything can't be trusted) are revealed soon so I can make sure my daughter doesn't go there (I hope it isn't LLCC; she's applying there). How can a university run by idiots be any good?</p><p>Think about it -- students can get RIAA material from their "service" but not indie material, but if they download indie music from morpheus (is "scatterbrain.mp3" a RIAA song? Some of the hundreds with that name are, hundreds are not) they get sued. I've been saying all along that the RIAA's war on file sharing was really just a war on independant music labels. Where are the Federal anti-trust police?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : On the basis of those initial talks , the colleges would pay the music industry a blanket licensing fee , similar to what radio stations pay to air popular songs .
There was also discussion of the record labels ' signing a " covenant not to sue " for any illegal downloading of their songs by users on participating campuses , he said.If there 's no sueage covenant , why in the HELL would any school even consider this hare-brained scheme ?
I hope the names of these schools ( if indeed they exist ; Warner is a lying sociopathic entity whose word on anything ca n't be trusted ) are revealed soon so I can make sure my daughter does n't go there ( I hope it is n't LLCC ; she 's applying there ) .
How can a university run by idiots be any good ? Think about it -- students can get RIAA material from their " service " but not indie material , but if they download indie music from morpheus ( is " scatterbrain.mp3 " a RIAA song ?
Some of the hundreds with that name are , hundreds are not ) they get sued .
I 've been saying all along that the RIAA 's war on file sharing was really just a war on independant music labels .
Where are the Federal anti-trust police ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA:On the basis of those initial talks, the colleges would pay the music industry a blanket licensing fee, similar to what radio stations pay to air popular songs.
There was also discussion of the record labels' signing a "covenant not to sue" for any illegal downloading of their songs by users on participating campuses, he said.If there's no sueage covenant, why in the HELL would any school even consider this hare-brained scheme?
I hope the names of these schools (if indeed they exist; Warner is a lying sociopathic entity whose word on anything can't be trusted) are revealed soon so I can make sure my daughter doesn't go there (I hope it isn't LLCC; she's applying there).
How can a university run by idiots be any good?Think about it -- students can get RIAA material from their "service" but not indie material, but if they download indie music from morpheus (is "scatterbrain.mp3" a RIAA song?
Some of the hundreds with that name are, hundreds are not) they get sued.
I've been saying all along that the RIAA's war on file sharing was really just a war on independant music labels.
Where are the Federal anti-trust police?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29993960</id>
	<title>Re:Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>realityimpaired</author>
	<datestamp>1257431880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you sign up for SOCAN, you can actually get reimbursed 100\% of the levy that you spend on blank cd's to promote your own work. Since membership in SOCAN is free (as in beer) if you apply online, and costs only a one-time fee of $25 if you apply on paper, there's not any reason for an artist to *not* join SOCAN.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you sign up for SOCAN , you can actually get reimbursed 100 \ % of the levy that you spend on blank cd 's to promote your own work .
Since membership in SOCAN is free ( as in beer ) if you apply online , and costs only a one-time fee of $ 25 if you apply on paper , there 's not any reason for an artist to * not * join SOCAN .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you sign up for SOCAN, you can actually get reimbursed 100\% of the levy that you spend on blank cd's to promote your own work.
Since membership in SOCAN is free (as in beer) if you apply online, and costs only a one-time fee of $25 if you apply on paper, there's not any reason for an artist to *not* join SOCAN.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992608</id>
	<title>Re:Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>erroneus</author>
	<datestamp>1257418500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Individuals do not have access to government.  Government is influenced by money.  The corruption is plain and obvious for all to see and neither the government nor those who are influencing government with money are the slightest bit ashamed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Individuals do not have access to government .
Government is influenced by money .
The corruption is plain and obvious for all to see and neither the government nor those who are influencing government with money are the slightest bit ashamed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Individuals do not have access to government.
Government is influenced by money.
The corruption is plain and obvious for all to see and neither the government nor those who are influencing government with money are the slightest bit ashamed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992648</id>
	<title>Re:Blanket licensing is never legal</title>
	<author>timmarhy</author>
	<datestamp>1257419040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>the cd tax is so flawed it's not funny. only artists who sell over a certain number of cd's ever see a cent, so if i'm a local band who produces an album, burns it to 3000 cd's to try get some kind of exposure, your album is actually taxed and some cocksucker affliated with *AA profits off it via the tax you paid....</htmltext>
<tokenext>the cd tax is so flawed it 's not funny .
only artists who sell over a certain number of cd 's ever see a cent , so if i 'm a local band who produces an album , burns it to 3000 cd 's to try get some kind of exposure , your album is actually taxed and some cocksucker affliated with * AA profits off it via the tax you paid... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the cd tax is so flawed it's not funny.
only artists who sell over a certain number of cd's ever see a cent, so if i'm a local band who produces an album, burns it to 3000 cd's to try get some kind of exposure, your album is actually taxed and some cocksucker affliated with *AA profits off it via the tax you paid....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29993524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29995690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29995914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29999788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29994784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29995238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29993832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29994062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29995860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29993658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.30001296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29994618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29994666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29994310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29993078
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29993116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29993960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_05_0147237_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29994734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0147237.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29995078
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0147237.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992264
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29995860
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0147237.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992270
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0147237.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29994784
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29999788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29994734
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0147237.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992232
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992316
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0147237.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29993658
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29995690
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_05_0147237.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992648
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29994062
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29993960
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29994310
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992578
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992550
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992608
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29994666
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29995914
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29993832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29994618
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.30001296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29993078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992532
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29992990
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29993524
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29993116
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_05_0147237.29995238
</commentlist>
</conversation>
