<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_02_0853219</id>
	<title>For September, Book-Related Apps Overtook Games On iPhone</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1257156000000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>ruphus13 writes <i>"In a sign that ebooks are rising in popularity, a recent survey by mobile analytics company Flurry revealed that users may be using the iPhone for more intellectual pursuits, and not just the visual sizzle.  The <a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/11/01/iphone-e-book-reader/">'book-related' apps on the iPhone overtook games</a> in terms of new apps released.  According to the post, 'Book-related apps saw an upsurge in launches in September ... So much so that book-related applications overtook games in the App Store as a percentage of all released apps. The trend isn't an aberration. In October, one out of every five new applications launching on the iPhone was a book ... from August 2008 to the same month in 2009, more apps were released in the 'games' category than any other and, as a result, the iPhone (and iPod touch) became a new handheld gaming platform, one that impacted the Nintendo DS. '"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>ruphus13 writes " In a sign that ebooks are rising in popularity , a recent survey by mobile analytics company Flurry revealed that users may be using the iPhone for more intellectual pursuits , and not just the visual sizzle .
The 'book-related ' apps on the iPhone overtook games in terms of new apps released .
According to the post , 'Book-related apps saw an upsurge in launches in September ... So much so that book-related applications overtook games in the App Store as a percentage of all released apps .
The trend is n't an aberration .
In October , one out of every five new applications launching on the iPhone was a book ... from August 2008 to the same month in 2009 , more apps were released in the 'games ' category than any other and , as a result , the iPhone ( and iPod touch ) became a new handheld gaming platform , one that impacted the Nintendo DS .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ruphus13 writes "In a sign that ebooks are rising in popularity, a recent survey by mobile analytics company Flurry revealed that users may be using the iPhone for more intellectual pursuits, and not just the visual sizzle.
The 'book-related' apps on the iPhone overtook games in terms of new apps released.
According to the post, 'Book-related apps saw an upsurge in launches in September ... So much so that book-related applications overtook games in the App Store as a percentage of all released apps.
The trend isn't an aberration.
In October, one out of every five new applications launching on the iPhone was a book ... from August 2008 to the same month in 2009, more apps were released in the 'games' category than any other and, as a result, the iPhone (and iPod touch) became a new handheld gaming platform, one that impacted the Nintendo DS.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949460</id>
	<title>It works because people are lazy</title>
	<author>mattwrock</author>
	<datestamp>1257172380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If games are your only way to pass the time, then that is what people will do. I don't think people are "smarter" because book apps are available, they just have a new choice to do something while waiting at the doctor's office. If porn was available, I am sure  you could replace "ebook" with "elook" and have the same article.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If games are your only way to pass the time , then that is what people will do .
I do n't think people are " smarter " because book apps are available , they just have a new choice to do something while waiting at the doctor 's office .
If porn was available , I am sure you could replace " ebook " with " elook " and have the same article .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If games are your only way to pass the time, then that is what people will do.
I don't think people are "smarter" because book apps are available, they just have a new choice to do something while waiting at the doctor's office.
If porn was available, I am sure  you could replace "ebook" with "elook" and have the same article.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29955984</id>
	<title>Re:screw that</title>
	<author>mgblst</author>
	<datestamp>1257160920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, but as I said before, Apple screwed up searching, so if you search for a particular book, your multi book app will not come up.</p><p>Anyway, you can delete if from your iphone, you still have it on itunes, and you can add it back at anytime.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but as I said before , Apple screwed up searching , so if you search for a particular book , your multi book app will not come up.Anyway , you can delete if from your iphone , you still have it on itunes , and you can add it back at anytime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but as I said before, Apple screwed up searching, so if you search for a particular book, your multi book app will not come up.Anyway, you can delete if from your iphone, you still have it on itunes, and you can add it back at anytime.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29952260</id>
	<title>Re:why is slashdot pretending the droid doesnt exi</title>
	<author>highvista63</author>
	<datestamp>1257187140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Give FBReader a try.  I've read a couple dozen books using it so far.  It allows for page turning via screen swipes or the volume control, which make it easier to use than my last ebook reader--a Palm TX.  As long as you can find a way to convert an ebook file into the ePub format, you'll be good to go.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Give FBReader a try .
I 've read a couple dozen books using it so far .
It allows for page turning via screen swipes or the volume control , which make it easier to use than my last ebook reader--a Palm TX .
As long as you can find a way to convert an ebook file into the ePub format , you 'll be good to go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give FBReader a try.
I've read a couple dozen books using it so far.
It allows for page turning via screen swipes or the volume control, which make it easier to use than my last ebook reader--a Palm TX.
As long as you can find a way to convert an ebook file into the ePub format, you'll be good to go.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949184</id>
	<title>Books?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257168900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I didn't think most iPhone users even knew how to read...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't think most iPhone users even knew how to read.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't think most iPhone users even knew how to read...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948888</id>
	<title>Re:No surprise there...</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1257164400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, it's because it's back-to-school season.  Ask any parent.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , it 's because it 's back-to-school season .
Ask any parent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, it's because it's back-to-school season.
Ask any parent.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948766</id>
	<title>Books</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1257162300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Those books would be the complete works of Oscar Wilde, oranges are not the only fruit and the official patient's sourcebook on hemorrhoids.  Am I right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those books would be the complete works of Oscar Wilde , oranges are not the only fruit and the official patient 's sourcebook on hemorrhoids .
Am I right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those books would be the complete works of Oscar Wilde, oranges are not the only fruit and the official patient's sourcebook on hemorrhoids.
Am I right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949174</id>
	<title>"Upsurge"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257168720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Book-related apps saw an upsurge in launches...</p><p>I guess that means other apps saw a "downdecline".</p><p>Now I'm going to "unthaw" some chicken for dinner.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Book-related apps saw an upsurge in launches...I guess that means other apps saw a " downdecline " .Now I 'm going to " unthaw " some chicken for dinner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Book-related apps saw an upsurge in launches...I guess that means other apps saw a "downdecline".Now I'm going to "unthaw" some chicken for dinner.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948832</id>
	<title>not suitable for ebooks</title>
	<author>umberto\_soprano</author>
	<datestamp>1257163680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>320x480, 3.5"
too small for ebooks IMHO</htmltext>
<tokenext>320x480 , 3.5 " too small for ebooks IMHO</tokentext>
<sentencetext>320x480, 3.5"
too small for ebooks IMHO</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29956000</id>
	<title>Re:the iPhone is a so-so ebook reader</title>
	<author>mgblst</author>
	<datestamp>1257160980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>- and the "page-preview" in Safari is not kept up to date with the actual page render, so if you want to know if a longish page has finished downloading, you have to actually fully open it, you can't see it from the "tabs" preview.</i></p><p>This is a good thing in some way, it means you can view pages without having to have internet access. It is good for caching pages as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>- and the " page-preview " in Safari is not kept up to date with the actual page render , so if you want to know if a longish page has finished downloading , you have to actually fully open it , you ca n't see it from the " tabs " preview.This is a good thing in some way , it means you can view pages without having to have internet access .
It is good for caching pages as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>- and the "page-preview" in Safari is not kept up to date with the actual page render, so if you want to know if a longish page has finished downloading, you have to actually fully open it, you can't see it from the "tabs" preview.This is a good thing in some way, it means you can view pages without having to have internet access.
It is good for caching pages as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948986</id>
	<title>Re:No surprise there...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257166020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pointing out anything even slightly positive about Apple on slashdot brings all the anti-Apple trolls out of the woodwork these days -- check out the mod abuse of the GP's comment! Good thing we're geeks and not a bunch o' superstitious, ignernt religious fanatics 'round these parts, ain't it?<br>
--<blockquote><div><p> <tt>&lt;/sarcasm&gt;</tt></p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pointing out anything even slightly positive about Apple on slashdot brings all the anti-Apple trolls out of the woodwork these days -- check out the mod abuse of the GP 's comment !
Good thing we 're geeks and not a bunch o ' superstitious , ignernt religious fanatics 'round these parts , ai n't it ?
--</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pointing out anything even slightly positive about Apple on slashdot brings all the anti-Apple trolls out of the woodwork these days -- check out the mod abuse of the GP's comment!
Good thing we're geeks and not a bunch o' superstitious, ignernt religious fanatics 'round these parts, ain't it?
--  
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948750</id>
	<title>Maybe</title>
	<author>zblack\_eagle</author>
	<datestamp>1257162120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While it may be <i>technically</i> accurate that ebook apps are rising in popularity, I don't think that <i>developers</i> releasing more ebook apps (likely to be more individual books released as apps than app readers) translates to it being popular for <i>users</i>. For one, it is probably relatively easy for publishers to recycle some code to wrap around books they publish and release them as apps in the app store. Making unique games for a somewhat different platform in terms of IO and UI would be more difficult. If anything it just means that the traditional content owners have been moving in on the iphone as yet another platform for releasing their content on to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While it may be technically accurate that ebook apps are rising in popularity , I do n't think that developers releasing more ebook apps ( likely to be more individual books released as apps than app readers ) translates to it being popular for users .
For one , it is probably relatively easy for publishers to recycle some code to wrap around books they publish and release them as apps in the app store .
Making unique games for a somewhat different platform in terms of IO and UI would be more difficult .
If anything it just means that the traditional content owners have been moving in on the iphone as yet another platform for releasing their content on to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While it may be technically accurate that ebook apps are rising in popularity, I don't think that developers releasing more ebook apps (likely to be more individual books released as apps than app readers) translates to it being popular for users.
For one, it is probably relatively easy for publishers to recycle some code to wrap around books they publish and release them as apps in the app store.
Making unique games for a somewhat different platform in terms of IO and UI would be more difficult.
If anything it just means that the traditional content owners have been moving in on the iphone as yet another platform for releasing their content on to.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948764</id>
	<title>Let me quote Steve Jobs ...</title>
	<author>stasike</author>
	<datestamp>1257162300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>People don't read anymore</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=quote+steve+jobs+people+don't+read+Anymore&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=quote+steve+jobs+people+don't+read+Anymore&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t</a> [google.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>People do n't read anymore http : //www.google.com/search ? q = quote + steve + jobs + people + do n't + read + Anymore&amp;ie = utf-8&amp;oe = utf-8&amp;aq = t [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People don't read anymore http://www.google.com/search?q=quote+steve+jobs+people+don't+read+Anymore&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t [google.com]
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29952590</id>
	<title>Not surprising</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1257188820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mobile games are shit. Books on mobiles isn't so bad so e-books will definitely over take one of the shittiest forms of gaming.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mobile games are shit .
Books on mobiles is n't so bad so e-books will definitely over take one of the shittiest forms of gaming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mobile games are shit.
Books on mobiles isn't so bad so e-books will definitely over take one of the shittiest forms of gaming.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948642</id>
	<title>Like iFirst</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257159660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>....haha</htmltext>
<tokenext>....haha</tokentext>
<sentencetext>....haha</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948934</id>
	<title>People drink when thirsty.</title>
	<author>Aldenissin</author>
	<datestamp>1257165240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just decided while researching a publish date on BarnesandNoble.com to look into the Nook, based on what I have read on Slashdot. (decided not to go to Books-A-Million even though one is in town, I guess just to change it up..) Maybe for the holidays.</p><p>The point is, people yearn for knowledge. That is real joy and pleasure, not wasting time pushing buttons... (Have been an avid Counter Strike player, since the betas.)  It seems like we are now giving the people what they need as far as "apps".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just decided while researching a publish date on BarnesandNoble.com to look into the Nook , based on what I have read on Slashdot .
( decided not to go to Books-A-Million even though one is in town , I guess just to change it up.. ) Maybe for the holidays.The point is , people yearn for knowledge .
That is real joy and pleasure , not wasting time pushing buttons... ( Have been an avid Counter Strike player , since the betas .
) It seems like we are now giving the people what they need as far as " apps " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just decided while researching a publish date on BarnesandNoble.com to look into the Nook, based on what I have read on Slashdot.
(decided not to go to Books-A-Million even though one is in town, I guess just to change it up..) Maybe for the holidays.The point is, people yearn for knowledge.
That is real joy and pleasure, not wasting time pushing buttons... (Have been an avid Counter Strike player, since the betas.
)  It seems like we are now giving the people what they need as far as "apps".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948826</id>
	<title>It's easier to produce a 100 book apps</title>
	<author>Chris\_Jefferson</author>
	<datestamp>1257163620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looking through those book apps, there are many groups of people who are just taking every out-of-copyright book they can find and turning each into a separate app. In general, the games don't do the same things, hence the lower quantity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looking through those book apps , there are many groups of people who are just taking every out-of-copyright book they can find and turning each into a separate app .
In general , the games do n't do the same things , hence the lower quantity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looking through those book apps, there are many groups of people who are just taking every out-of-copyright book they can find and turning each into a separate app.
In general, the games don't do the same things, hence the lower quantity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948740</id>
	<title>What's the correlation?</title>
	<author>Necroloth</author>
	<datestamp>1257161880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sorry if I've misread... but from my understanding, there are more book-type apps released, not apps sold/used?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry if I 've misread... but from my understanding , there are more book-type apps released , not apps sold/used ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry if I've misread... but from my understanding, there are more book-type apps released, not apps sold/used?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949578</id>
	<title>It means people think they can make money</title>
	<author>giladpn</author>
	<datestamp>1257173460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yup, everybody commenting that publishing eBooks is not the same as buying eBooks - is right. Absolutely.
<br> <br>
But its still interesting because people would not be spending time on it - unless they thought there is a market.
<br> <br>
The underlying trend is that mobile internet usage is very much going mainstream. This means the audience is not just fanboys and gamers. People who like reading a book - are joining up.
<br> <br>
One wonders how this will impact the wider real-time web. SMS-ing from your mobile to twitter is a big thing right now. As people who actually read books - something longer than 140 chars - join the trend, the center of the market may shift.
<br> <br>
Worth watching.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup , everybody commenting that publishing eBooks is not the same as buying eBooks - is right .
Absolutely . But its still interesting because people would not be spending time on it - unless they thought there is a market .
The underlying trend is that mobile internet usage is very much going mainstream .
This means the audience is not just fanboys and gamers .
People who like reading a book - are joining up .
One wonders how this will impact the wider real-time web .
SMS-ing from your mobile to twitter is a big thing right now .
As people who actually read books - something longer than 140 chars - join the trend , the center of the market may shift .
Worth watching .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup, everybody commenting that publishing eBooks is not the same as buying eBooks - is right.
Absolutely.
 
But its still interesting because people would not be spending time on it - unless they thought there is a market.
The underlying trend is that mobile internet usage is very much going mainstream.
This means the audience is not just fanboys and gamers.
People who like reading a book - are joining up.
One wonders how this will impact the wider real-time web.
SMS-ing from your mobile to twitter is a big thing right now.
As people who actually read books - something longer than 140 chars - join the trend, the center of the market may shift.
Worth watching.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29954548</id>
	<title>Re:the iPhone is a so-so ebook reader</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257154380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You had me at...</p><p><i>I had a go at my sister in law'</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You had me at...I had a go at my sister in law'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You had me at...I had a go at my sister in law'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949652</id>
	<title>Re:not suitable for ebooks</title>
	<author>Cro Magnon</author>
	<datestamp>1257174060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've read ebooks on my iPhone.  It's not as good as my Kindle, but the books are readable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've read ebooks on my iPhone .
It 's not as good as my Kindle , but the books are readable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've read ebooks on my iPhone.
It's not as good as my Kindle, but the books are readable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949442</id>
	<title>Re:not suitable for ebooks</title>
	<author>realityimpaired</author>
	<datestamp>1257172200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With a purpose-built reader for the screen it's actually not that bad. Something like WikiMobile on the Android, for example, is actually very readable. I'd rather do my reading on something like a netbook, or *gasp* an actual book, but for people who don't have the luxury of owning more than one device, or don't have the ability to carry more than one device with them, a smartphone really isn't that bad an option.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With a purpose-built reader for the screen it 's actually not that bad .
Something like WikiMobile on the Android , for example , is actually very readable .
I 'd rather do my reading on something like a netbook , or * gasp * an actual book , but for people who do n't have the luxury of owning more than one device , or do n't have the ability to carry more than one device with them , a smartphone really is n't that bad an option .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With a purpose-built reader for the screen it's actually not that bad.
Something like WikiMobile on the Android, for example, is actually very readable.
I'd rather do my reading on something like a netbook, or *gasp* an actual book, but for people who don't have the luxury of owning more than one device, or don't have the ability to carry more than one device with them, a smartphone really isn't that bad an option.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948982</id>
	<title>Re:not suitable for ebooks</title>
	<author>Chuck Chunder</author>
	<datestamp>1257165900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's good for "enhanced" books though. I've been thoroughly enjoying <a href="http://www.enhanced-editions.com/books/bunny-munro/" title="enhanced-editions.com">The Death of Bunny Munro</a> [enhanced-editions.com] by Nick Cave.
The extra things an iPod can do (audio, video) can really complement the text if it's done well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's good for " enhanced " books though .
I 've been thoroughly enjoying The Death of Bunny Munro [ enhanced-editions.com ] by Nick Cave .
The extra things an iPod can do ( audio , video ) can really complement the text if it 's done well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's good for "enhanced" books though.
I've been thoroughly enjoying The Death of Bunny Munro [enhanced-editions.com] by Nick Cave.
The extra things an iPod can do (audio, video) can really complement the text if it's done well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949694</id>
	<title>Re:why is slashdot pretending the droid doesnt exi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257174360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is there a decent eBook reader on android yet? I was seriously considering it a few months ago, but couldn't find anything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there a decent eBook reader on android yet ?
I was seriously considering it a few months ago , but could n't find anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there a decent eBook reader on android yet?
I was seriously considering it a few months ago, but couldn't find anything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949220</id>
	<title>Development time vs Shovelware time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257169380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The "Percentage of Releases" stat means nothing to me in this case because once a company has released one eBook it costs them virtually nothing in either time or money to release as many others as they want.  All they have to do is release the same app with a different eBook file in it and a different name.  If each game that comes out takes months of development and each eBook beyond the first takes minutes of "development" then it's obvious which will be released in greater quantities.</p><p>Now, if you told me more people were actually BUYING eBooks than games, then I'd be impressed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " Percentage of Releases " stat means nothing to me in this case because once a company has released one eBook it costs them virtually nothing in either time or money to release as many others as they want .
All they have to do is release the same app with a different eBook file in it and a different name .
If each game that comes out takes months of development and each eBook beyond the first takes minutes of " development " then it 's obvious which will be released in greater quantities.Now , if you told me more people were actually BUYING eBooks than games , then I 'd be impressed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "Percentage of Releases" stat means nothing to me in this case because once a company has released one eBook it costs them virtually nothing in either time or money to release as many others as they want.
All they have to do is release the same app with a different eBook file in it and a different name.
If each game that comes out takes months of development and each eBook beyond the first takes minutes of "development" then it's obvious which will be released in greater quantities.Now, if you told me more people were actually BUYING eBooks than games, then I'd be impressed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948800</id>
	<title>interesting for dedicated e-book manufacturers</title>
	<author>Chrisq</author>
	<datestamp>1257163140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>This  could mean that people will become more used to reading books in electronic form and more likely to buy a dedicated e-book reader for the improved contrast, battery life, etc. On the other hand it could mean that people will find the advantage of "one device" means that they will go with phones rather than dedicated readers. It will be interesting anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This could mean that people will become more used to reading books in electronic form and more likely to buy a dedicated e-book reader for the improved contrast , battery life , etc .
On the other hand it could mean that people will find the advantage of " one device " means that they will go with phones rather than dedicated readers .
It will be interesting anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This  could mean that people will become more used to reading books in electronic form and more likely to buy a dedicated e-book reader for the improved contrast, battery life, etc.
On the other hand it could mean that people will find the advantage of "one device" means that they will go with phones rather than dedicated readers.
It will be interesting anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948874</id>
	<title>Calm people, calm...</title>
	<author>omgarthas</author>
	<datestamp>1257164220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's just apps released, I could release tomorrow three millions of "Find your ideal weight" and that wouldn't mean that Fitness apps were rocking the market...<br> <br>Book apps are easy, fast and cheap to release, hence the massive release numbers, not any indication of a success</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's just apps released , I could release tomorrow three millions of " Find your ideal weight " and that would n't mean that Fitness apps were rocking the market... Book apps are easy , fast and cheap to release , hence the massive release numbers , not any indication of a success</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's just apps released, I could release tomorrow three millions of "Find your ideal weight" and that wouldn't mean that Fitness apps were rocking the market... Book apps are easy, fast and cheap to release, hence the massive release numbers, not any indication of a success</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29965782</id>
	<title>Re:No surprise there...</title>
	<author>Phoghat</author>
	<datestamp>1257274080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hi, I'm Tom and used to hate Apple.
<p>Hi Tom
</p><p>I've been a Windows Mobile user for a long time because it did what I wanted. I put up with soft and hard resets, data loss and so forth, but I held in there. Then my old Dell Axim crapped out for the last time and my Zune went away also. I needed to replace both of them and checked out i Pods. I bought a refurbed 16 GB about 2 months ago and haven't regretted it once. I'm Tom and that's mu story.
</p><p>Thanks Tom, coffee and donuts are in the back and we need a volunteer to sweep up.

</p><p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXCRUE4Bip8&amp;feature=PlayList&amp;p=B0BC1F630A7967BD&amp;playnext=1&amp;playnext\_from=PL&amp;index=6</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hi , I 'm Tom and used to hate Apple .
Hi Tom I 've been a Windows Mobile user for a long time because it did what I wanted .
I put up with soft and hard resets , data loss and so forth , but I held in there .
Then my old Dell Axim crapped out for the last time and my Zune went away also .
I needed to replace both of them and checked out i Pods .
I bought a refurbed 16 GB about 2 months ago and have n't regretted it once .
I 'm Tom and that 's mu story .
Thanks Tom , coffee and donuts are in the back and we need a volunteer to sweep up .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = GXCRUE4Bip8&amp;feature = PlayList&amp;p = B0BC1F630A7967BD&amp;playnext = 1&amp;playnext \ _from = PL&amp;index = 6</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hi, I'm Tom and used to hate Apple.
Hi Tom
I've been a Windows Mobile user for a long time because it did what I wanted.
I put up with soft and hard resets, data loss and so forth, but I held in there.
Then my old Dell Axim crapped out for the last time and my Zune went away also.
I needed to replace both of them and checked out i Pods.
I bought a refurbed 16 GB about 2 months ago and haven't regretted it once.
I'm Tom and that's mu story.
Thanks Tom, coffee and donuts are in the back and we need a volunteer to sweep up.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXCRUE4Bip8&amp;feature=PlayList&amp;p=B0BC1F630A7967BD&amp;playnext=1&amp;playnext\_from=PL&amp;index=6</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29950316</id>
	<title>Re:No surprise there...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257178020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You managed to speak nothing about tfa (beside your wild ass speculation that somehow all the 16 year olds with an iphone are "well-educated", ha), throw in a little fanboism attacking other phones and those that don't like the iphone, then you pretend to like linux.  And you got modded up because of all of that, and nothing of value was added to the discussion!  Awesome job everyone involved!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You managed to speak nothing about tfa ( beside your wild ass speculation that somehow all the 16 year olds with an iphone are " well-educated " , ha ) , throw in a little fanboism attacking other phones and those that do n't like the iphone , then you pretend to like linux .
And you got modded up because of all of that , and nothing of value was added to the discussion !
Awesome job everyone involved !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You managed to speak nothing about tfa (beside your wild ass speculation that somehow all the 16 year olds with an iphone are "well-educated", ha), throw in a little fanboism attacking other phones and those that don't like the iphone, then you pretend to like linux.
And you got modded up because of all of that, and nothing of value was added to the discussion!
Awesome job everyone involved!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29950488</id>
	<title>Re:not suitable for ebooks</title>
	<author>ColdWetDog</author>
	<datestamp>1257179040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>320x480, 3.5" too small for ebooks IMHO</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Maybe yes, maybe no.  I just finished reading both Moby Dick and Tale of Two Cities on the iPhone, just to see what the experience was like.  Not bad, but certainly not optimal.  It's just a little too small to handle comfortably for long periods of time, but I found that it was pretty easy to immerse myself in the books even with the small screen because flipping pages (on Stanza) was so easy.  I also found that the reverse screen was quite readable for long periods of time.<br> <br>
I'm still in the market for a dedicated ebook reader (or a decent tablet), but for casual use - or to read on a bus or a plane - it was better than I expected.<br> <br>
YMMV.  Past performance not indicative of future gains or losses.  Don't read while driving or operating machinery.  Do not taunt happy fun ball.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>320x480 , 3.5 " too small for ebooks IMHO Maybe yes , maybe no .
I just finished reading both Moby Dick and Tale of Two Cities on the iPhone , just to see what the experience was like .
Not bad , but certainly not optimal .
It 's just a little too small to handle comfortably for long periods of time , but I found that it was pretty easy to immerse myself in the books even with the small screen because flipping pages ( on Stanza ) was so easy .
I also found that the reverse screen was quite readable for long periods of time .
I 'm still in the market for a dedicated ebook reader ( or a decent tablet ) , but for casual use - or to read on a bus or a plane - it was better than I expected .
YMMV. Past performance not indicative of future gains or losses .
Do n't read while driving or operating machinery .
Do not taunt happy fun ball .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>320x480, 3.5" too small for ebooks IMHO

Maybe yes, maybe no.
I just finished reading both Moby Dick and Tale of Two Cities on the iPhone, just to see what the experience was like.
Not bad, but certainly not optimal.
It's just a little too small to handle comfortably for long periods of time, but I found that it was pretty easy to immerse myself in the books even with the small screen because flipping pages (on Stanza) was so easy.
I also found that the reverse screen was quite readable for long periods of time.
I'm still in the market for a dedicated ebook reader (or a decent tablet), but for casual use - or to read on a bus or a plane - it was better than I expected.
YMMV.  Past performance not indicative of future gains or losses.
Don't read while driving or operating machinery.
Do not taunt happy fun ball.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949408</id>
	<title>Re:No surprise there...</title>
	<author>alen</author>
	<datestamp>1257171720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the iphone is a derivative of OS X which is based on FreeBSD and Apple contributes to open source projects</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the iphone is a derivative of OS X which is based on FreeBSD and Apple contributes to open source projects</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the iphone is a derivative of OS X which is based on FreeBSD and Apple contributes to open source projects</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29955956</id>
	<title>Re:not suitable for ebooks</title>
	<author>david\_thornley</author>
	<datestamp>1257160680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Have you tried it?  It forces columns to be short, which is may be an advantage.  I've read arguments that columns should be narrow for best reading.  It doesn't show many lines, but that's not necessarily important for a novel.  I found the scrolling of the BeamItDown reader to work surprisingly well in practice.  It's not as good as a paper book, but far more portable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you tried it ?
It forces columns to be short , which is may be an advantage .
I 've read arguments that columns should be narrow for best reading .
It does n't show many lines , but that 's not necessarily important for a novel .
I found the scrolling of the BeamItDown reader to work surprisingly well in practice .
It 's not as good as a paper book , but far more portable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Have you tried it?
It forces columns to be short, which is may be an advantage.
I've read arguments that columns should be narrow for best reading.
It doesn't show many lines, but that's not necessarily important for a novel.
I found the scrolling of the BeamItDown reader to work surprisingly well in practice.
It's not as good as a paper book, but far more portable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949944</id>
	<title>Slightly misleading headline</title>
	<author>damn\_registrars</author>
	<datestamp>1257175860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The headline can be read to suggest that more ebook apps are <b>sold</b> than games, while the summary clarifies the matter that there are more ebook apps <b>released</b> than games in the past time period.  The sales data would tell us more about which is more successful on this platform.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The headline can be read to suggest that more ebook apps are sold than games , while the summary clarifies the matter that there are more ebook apps released than games in the past time period .
The sales data would tell us more about which is more successful on this platform .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The headline can be read to suggest that more ebook apps are sold than games, while the summary clarifies the matter that there are more ebook apps released than games in the past time period.
The sales data would tell us more about which is more successful on this platform.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948648</id>
	<title>why is slashdot pretending the droid doesnt exist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257159780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who cares about the iphone anymore, it's all about droid!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who cares about the iphone anymore , it 's all about droid ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who cares about the iphone anymore, it's all about droid!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948698</id>
	<title>No surprise there...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257160980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not at all surprising. In spite of all the very vocal Apple haters who love to accuse Apple's products of being "all style, no function", the truth is a high percentage of Apple users are fairly well-educated people and they chose Apple because it does the work they need done. I still prefer Debian and FreeBSD myself, and would much rather have an Android than an iPhone (still using an old Treo 650 with Palm OS until the Droid comes out), but to most non-geeks free as in freedom is just not as much of an issue as we wish it were.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not at all surprising .
In spite of all the very vocal Apple haters who love to accuse Apple 's products of being " all style , no function " , the truth is a high percentage of Apple users are fairly well-educated people and they chose Apple because it does the work they need done .
I still prefer Debian and FreeBSD myself , and would much rather have an Android than an iPhone ( still using an old Treo 650 with Palm OS until the Droid comes out ) , but to most non-geeks free as in freedom is just not as much of an issue as we wish it were .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not at all surprising.
In spite of all the very vocal Apple haters who love to accuse Apple's products of being "all style, no function", the truth is a high percentage of Apple users are fairly well-educated people and they chose Apple because it does the work they need done.
I still prefer Debian and FreeBSD myself, and would much rather have an Android than an iPhone (still using an old Treo 650 with Palm OS until the Droid comes out), but to most non-geeks free as in freedom is just not as much of an issue as we wish it were.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948952</id>
	<title>screw that</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257165420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The idea of wasting a slot and otherwise cluttering up my springboard for a single book irks me to no end. If I read at even a fraction of the percentage of books I do like this, I'll have no room left and will have to delete books to fit in new ones in a month or two.</p><p>Hey publishers, you don't need to release your books as their own frakking app, release it in a standard format that can be purchased and read in the a reader like Stanza and you'll have my attention. Until then, I'm not interested.</p><p>CAPCHA: sympathy<br>No, they will have none!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The idea of wasting a slot and otherwise cluttering up my springboard for a single book irks me to no end .
If I read at even a fraction of the percentage of books I do like this , I 'll have no room left and will have to delete books to fit in new ones in a month or two.Hey publishers , you do n't need to release your books as their own frakking app , release it in a standard format that can be purchased and read in the a reader like Stanza and you 'll have my attention .
Until then , I 'm not interested.CAPCHA : sympathyNo , they will have none !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The idea of wasting a slot and otherwise cluttering up my springboard for a single book irks me to no end.
If I read at even a fraction of the percentage of books I do like this, I'll have no room left and will have to delete books to fit in new ones in a month or two.Hey publishers, you don't need to release your books as their own frakking app, release it in a standard format that can be purchased and read in the a reader like Stanza and you'll have my attention.
Until then, I'm not interested.CAPCHA: sympathyNo, they will have none!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949910</id>
	<title>Re:not suitable for ebooks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257175560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; 320x480, 3.5" too small for ebooks IMHO</p><p>Agreed. For books: Kindle hardware beats the N800/N180 which beats the iPhone.</p><p>Of course, the Kindle is a non-starter given the DRM and remote removal of books they've done, so that leaves the N800 in the lead.  It's at least got 800x480 res, which makes books more readable than on the iPhone.  Also it's a more open platform.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; 320x480 , 3.5 " too small for ebooks IMHOAgreed .
For books : Kindle hardware beats the N800/N180 which beats the iPhone.Of course , the Kindle is a non-starter given the DRM and remote removal of books they 've done , so that leaves the N800 in the lead .
It 's at least got 800x480 res , which makes books more readable than on the iPhone .
Also it 's a more open platform .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; 320x480, 3.5" too small for ebooks IMHOAgreed.
For books: Kindle hardware beats the N800/N180 which beats the iPhone.Of course, the Kindle is a non-starter given the DRM and remote removal of books they've done, so that leaves the N800 in the lead.
It's at least got 800x480 res, which makes books more readable than on the iPhone.
Also it's a more open platform.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948844</id>
	<title>But this would mean...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257163860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More people interested in reading than in playing games?</p><p>Atlantis rising from the depths of the ocean!</p><p>Cats and dogs living together!</p><p>*runs away in panic*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More people interested in reading than in playing games ? Atlantis rising from the depths of the ocean ! Cats and dogs living together !
* runs away in panic *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More people interested in reading than in playing games?Atlantis rising from the depths of the ocean!Cats and dogs living together!
*runs away in panic*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29951306</id>
	<title>It's OK</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1257182760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read through one book on the iPhone Kindle app (Pursuit of Elegance) on an airplane and it was fine - I still prefer paper but if a book is out only in hardback it's cheaper to buy for the KIndle, plus I dislike owning huge books generally.  You can read charts OK and you the legibility is good, you just turn pages more often but because it's easy enough to do you don't really notice.</p><p>I'm still very reluctant to buy any eBook unless I can loan it out though (some technical books have started to provide PDF versions of eBooks which is perfect).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read through one book on the iPhone Kindle app ( Pursuit of Elegance ) on an airplane and it was fine - I still prefer paper but if a book is out only in hardback it 's cheaper to buy for the KIndle , plus I dislike owning huge books generally .
You can read charts OK and you the legibility is good , you just turn pages more often but because it 's easy enough to do you do n't really notice.I 'm still very reluctant to buy any eBook unless I can loan it out though ( some technical books have started to provide PDF versions of eBooks which is perfect ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read through one book on the iPhone Kindle app (Pursuit of Elegance) on an airplane and it was fine - I still prefer paper but if a book is out only in hardback it's cheaper to buy for the KIndle, plus I dislike owning huge books generally.
You can read charts OK and you the legibility is good, you just turn pages more often but because it's easy enough to do you don't really notice.I'm still very reluctant to buy any eBook unless I can loan it out though (some technical books have started to provide PDF versions of eBooks which is perfect).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949812</id>
	<title>Book-Related Apps On iPhone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257175020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stanza. Check it out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stanza .
Check it out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stanza.
Check it out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949176</id>
	<title>the iPhone is a so-so ebook reader</title>
	<author>obarthelemy</author>
	<datestamp>1257168720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had a go at my sister in law's iPhone over the week-end. The thing certainly is way better then my WinMob 6.1 piece of crap. The user interface in particular is quite good.</p><p>I was especially trying to confirm whether the iPhone would work for me as an ebook reader. I'm used to using PDAs, starting with the original Palm Pilot, on to an aging Palm TX. Sadly, the answer is no: the screen is too small for me. I'm hoping to upcoming 5" android phones will be good.. and not TOO big.</p><p>BTW, my 2 dislikes about the iPhone;<br>- the thing is a fingerprint magnet,<br>- and the "page-preview" in Safari is not kept up to date with the actual page render, so if you want to know if a longish page has finished downloading, you have to actually fully open it, you can't see it from the "tabs" preview.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had a go at my sister in law 's iPhone over the week-end .
The thing certainly is way better then my WinMob 6.1 piece of crap .
The user interface in particular is quite good.I was especially trying to confirm whether the iPhone would work for me as an ebook reader .
I 'm used to using PDAs , starting with the original Palm Pilot , on to an aging Palm TX .
Sadly , the answer is no : the screen is too small for me .
I 'm hoping to upcoming 5 " android phones will be good.. and not TOO big.BTW , my 2 dislikes about the iPhone ; - the thing is a fingerprint magnet,- and the " page-preview " in Safari is not kept up to date with the actual page render , so if you want to know if a longish page has finished downloading , you have to actually fully open it , you ca n't see it from the " tabs " preview .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had a go at my sister in law's iPhone over the week-end.
The thing certainly is way better then my WinMob 6.1 piece of crap.
The user interface in particular is quite good.I was especially trying to confirm whether the iPhone would work for me as an ebook reader.
I'm used to using PDAs, starting with the original Palm Pilot, on to an aging Palm TX.
Sadly, the answer is no: the screen is too small for me.
I'm hoping to upcoming 5" android phones will be good.. and not TOO big.BTW, my 2 dislikes about the iPhone;- the thing is a fingerprint magnet,- and the "page-preview" in Safari is not kept up to date with the actual page render, so if you want to know if a longish page has finished downloading, you have to actually fully open it, you can't see it from the "tabs" preview.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948780</id>
	<title>Re:No surprise there...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257162720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> the truth is a high percentage of Apple users are fairly well-educated people</p></div></blockquote><p>The truth is they pretend they are.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the truth is a high percentage of Apple users are fairly well-educated peopleThe truth is they pretend they are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> the truth is a high percentage of Apple users are fairly well-educated peopleThe truth is they pretend they are.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949802</id>
	<title>Re:What's the correlation?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257174960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's much easier to make a book app than a game, leading to more book apps released than game apps.</p><p>- Captain Obvious</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's much easier to make a book app than a game , leading to more book apps released than game apps.- Captain Obvious</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's much easier to make a book app than a game, leading to more book apps released than game apps.- Captain Obvious</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948998</id>
	<title>"impacted Nintendo DS"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257166320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://xorsyst.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/broken-dslite-2.jpg</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //xorsyst.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/broken-dslite-2.jpg</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://xorsyst.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/broken-dslite-2.jpg</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948892</id>
	<title>Re:Yo Momma's free handjobs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257164400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Down on 5th and State.</p><p>No problem there and very vocal with her advertising.</p><p>Oh yeah, fuck the rotten Apple.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Down on 5th and State.No problem there and very vocal with her advertising.Oh yeah , fuck the rotten Apple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Down on 5th and State.No problem there and very vocal with her advertising.Oh yeah, fuck the rotten Apple.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948698</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29957176</id>
	<title>iPhone = kindle, but without any "Amazon" fuel</title>
	<author>Dan B.</author>
	<datestamp>1257167580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like many others I saw the real reason for the introduction of the app store changes in the 3.0 release of iPhone firmware; the ability to produce a framework app that allowed paid content distribution. This opened up the iPhone to content owners/providers as a portal for their paid content, and in the case of book publishers, a new medium through which to supply ebooks without fear of them hitting the internet for mass duplication as PDF.</p><p>Remember that Apple are big supporters of DRM, and they are just looking for a small piece of the publication profits for e-distribution. With the upcoming 'slate', this will be extended to movies, newspapers and other paid content too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like many others I saw the real reason for the introduction of the app store changes in the 3.0 release of iPhone firmware ; the ability to produce a framework app that allowed paid content distribution .
This opened up the iPhone to content owners/providers as a portal for their paid content , and in the case of book publishers , a new medium through which to supply ebooks without fear of them hitting the internet for mass duplication as PDF.Remember that Apple are big supporters of DRM , and they are just looking for a small piece of the publication profits for e-distribution .
With the upcoming 'slate ' , this will be extended to movies , newspapers and other paid content too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like many others I saw the real reason for the introduction of the app store changes in the 3.0 release of iPhone firmware; the ability to produce a framework app that allowed paid content distribution.
This opened up the iPhone to content owners/providers as a portal for their paid content, and in the case of book publishers, a new medium through which to supply ebooks without fear of them hitting the internet for mass duplication as PDF.Remember that Apple are big supporters of DRM, and they are just looking for a small piece of the publication profits for e-distribution.
With the upcoming 'slate', this will be extended to movies, newspapers and other paid content too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949338</id>
	<title>Re:No surprise there...</title>
	<author>realityimpaired</author>
	<datestamp>1257170940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the iPhone was available with a fold-out keyboard like some Android phones (including the HTC Dream, which is what I bought), then my decision probably would have been harder. It's not a sheeple mentality for me, but the iPhone app store does seem to have a lot more of the kinds of stuff I need. (still looking for a port of something like AbiWord to Android... It would be really nice to be able to receive a document by e-mail, make some modifications, and e-mail it back to the person without having to find a laptop with a network connection). That said, I did find some of the coolest apps ever on the Android store... I *love* Google StarMaps, and the GPS Status app. Coupled with Google Maps (which has the ability to center location based on cell tower and GPS location if enabled), who needs a Garmin any more?</p><p>As it stands, the fold-out QWERTY keyboard makes a huge difference to my typing speed for things like text messages, e-mails, and instant messenger. I guess it depends on what people are intending to do with their phones, but I got mine to serve the same basic function as a Blackberry (but with GPS and a good camera), so the keyboard was a must. That's functionality that the iPhone just doesn't have, and while not a deal-breaker for most, it is one for me.</p><p>On the topic at hand... some people are saying that the small screen is hard to read... I can only guess that those people either haven't used the small screen, or haven't used an app that's specifically designed for the small screen. Facebook mobile is actually very readable on the small screen, especially when you turn it to landscape rendering. There's some scrolling, but not enough to be intrusive or annoying, I think. And that's one that's *not* specifically designed for the screen... get into a reader like WikiMobile, and you'll find that it's actually *very* readable, and easy to follow. If I wanted to read e-books, I'd probably go for an e-book reader for a larger screen (or just use the netbook I already own), but for people who don't have the option of owning more than one device, I'd say that the Android/iPhone isn't anywhere near as bad as some people are making it out to be.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the iPhone was available with a fold-out keyboard like some Android phones ( including the HTC Dream , which is what I bought ) , then my decision probably would have been harder .
It 's not a sheeple mentality for me , but the iPhone app store does seem to have a lot more of the kinds of stuff I need .
( still looking for a port of something like AbiWord to Android... It would be really nice to be able to receive a document by e-mail , make some modifications , and e-mail it back to the person without having to find a laptop with a network connection ) .
That said , I did find some of the coolest apps ever on the Android store... I * love * Google StarMaps , and the GPS Status app .
Coupled with Google Maps ( which has the ability to center location based on cell tower and GPS location if enabled ) , who needs a Garmin any more ? As it stands , the fold-out QWERTY keyboard makes a huge difference to my typing speed for things like text messages , e-mails , and instant messenger .
I guess it depends on what people are intending to do with their phones , but I got mine to serve the same basic function as a Blackberry ( but with GPS and a good camera ) , so the keyboard was a must .
That 's functionality that the iPhone just does n't have , and while not a deal-breaker for most , it is one for me.On the topic at hand... some people are saying that the small screen is hard to read... I can only guess that those people either have n't used the small screen , or have n't used an app that 's specifically designed for the small screen .
Facebook mobile is actually very readable on the small screen , especially when you turn it to landscape rendering .
There 's some scrolling , but not enough to be intrusive or annoying , I think .
And that 's one that 's * not * specifically designed for the screen... get into a reader like WikiMobile , and you 'll find that it 's actually * very * readable , and easy to follow .
If I wanted to read e-books , I 'd probably go for an e-book reader for a larger screen ( or just use the netbook I already own ) , but for people who do n't have the option of owning more than one device , I 'd say that the Android/iPhone is n't anywhere near as bad as some people are making it out to be .
: /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the iPhone was available with a fold-out keyboard like some Android phones (including the HTC Dream, which is what I bought), then my decision probably would have been harder.
It's not a sheeple mentality for me, but the iPhone app store does seem to have a lot more of the kinds of stuff I need.
(still looking for a port of something like AbiWord to Android... It would be really nice to be able to receive a document by e-mail, make some modifications, and e-mail it back to the person without having to find a laptop with a network connection).
That said, I did find some of the coolest apps ever on the Android store... I *love* Google StarMaps, and the GPS Status app.
Coupled with Google Maps (which has the ability to center location based on cell tower and GPS location if enabled), who needs a Garmin any more?As it stands, the fold-out QWERTY keyboard makes a huge difference to my typing speed for things like text messages, e-mails, and instant messenger.
I guess it depends on what people are intending to do with their phones, but I got mine to serve the same basic function as a Blackberry (but with GPS and a good camera), so the keyboard was a must.
That's functionality that the iPhone just doesn't have, and while not a deal-breaker for most, it is one for me.On the topic at hand... some people are saying that the small screen is hard to read... I can only guess that those people either haven't used the small screen, or haven't used an app that's specifically designed for the small screen.
Facebook mobile is actually very readable on the small screen, especially when you turn it to landscape rendering.
There's some scrolling, but not enough to be intrusive or annoying, I think.
And that's one that's *not* specifically designed for the screen... get into a reader like WikiMobile, and you'll find that it's actually *very* readable, and easy to follow.
If I wanted to read e-books, I'd probably go for an e-book reader for a larger screen (or just use the netbook I already own), but for people who don't have the option of owning more than one device, I'd say that the Android/iPhone isn't anywhere near as bad as some people are making it out to be.
:/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948698</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_0853219_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_0853219_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29952260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_0853219_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_0853219_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_0853219_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29955956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_0853219_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_0853219_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29950488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_0853219_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_0853219_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_0853219_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29950316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_0853219_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29951306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_0853219_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_0853219_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_0853219_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29955984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_0853219_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29965782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_0853219_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29954548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_0853219_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_0853219_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29956000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_02_0853219_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948698
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_0853219.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949802
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_0853219.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29954548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29956000
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_0853219.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948764
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_0853219.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29965782
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29950316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948780
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948986
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_0853219.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29955984
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_0853219.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948800
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_0853219.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29955956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29950488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29951306
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_0853219.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948844
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_0853219.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949578
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_0853219.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948874
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_0853219.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949220
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_02_0853219.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29948648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29949694
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_02_0853219.29952260
</commentlist>
</conversation>
