<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_01_1653202</id>
	<title>1,600 Names Suggested Daily For FBI's Watch List</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1257095760000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>schwit1 writes with this excerpt from the Washington Post:
<i>"During a 12-month period ended in March this year... the US intelligence community suggested on a daily basis that <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/31/AR2009103102141.html">1,600 people qualified for the list because they presented a 'reasonable suspicion,'</a> according to data provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee by the FBI in September and made public last week. ... The ever-churning list is said to contain more than 400,000 unique names and over 1 million entries. The committee was told that over that same period, officials asked each day that 600 names be removed and 4,800 records be modified. Fewer than 5 percent of the people on the list are US citizens or legal permanent residents. Nine percent of those on the terrorism list, the FBI said, are also on the government's 'no fly' list."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>schwit1 writes with this excerpt from the Washington Post : " During a 12-month period ended in March this year... the US intelligence community suggested on a daily basis that 1,600 people qualified for the list because they presented a 'reasonable suspicion, ' according to data provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee by the FBI in September and made public last week .
... The ever-churning list is said to contain more than 400,000 unique names and over 1 million entries .
The committee was told that over that same period , officials asked each day that 600 names be removed and 4,800 records be modified .
Fewer than 5 percent of the people on the list are US citizens or legal permanent residents .
Nine percent of those on the terrorism list , the FBI said , are also on the government 's 'no fly ' list .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>schwit1 writes with this excerpt from the Washington Post:
"During a 12-month period ended in March this year... the US intelligence community suggested on a daily basis that 1,600 people qualified for the list because they presented a 'reasonable suspicion,' according to data provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee by the FBI in September and made public last week.
... The ever-churning list is said to contain more than 400,000 unique names and over 1 million entries.
The committee was told that over that same period, officials asked each day that 600 names be removed and 4,800 records be modified.
Fewer than 5 percent of the people on the list are US citizens or legal permanent residents.
Nine percent of those on the terrorism list, the FBI said, are also on the government's 'no fly' list.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942534</id>
	<title>Re:How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?</title>
	<author>ColdWetDog</author>
	<datestamp>1257100020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>How do they define "reasonable suspicion"? I couldn't find that information in the article.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
I'm a reasonable guy.  You look suspicious.  And so do you.  And in fact YOU are looking kinda odd today.  I think I will stick you all on the list, just to be sure.<br> <br>
I wonder if anyone over at the FBI understands the concept of signal to noise?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do they define " reasonable suspicion " ?
I could n't find that information in the article .
I 'm a reasonable guy .
You look suspicious .
And so do you .
And in fact YOU are looking kinda odd today .
I think I will stick you all on the list , just to be sure .
I wonder if anyone over at the FBI understands the concept of signal to noise ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?
I couldn't find that information in the article.
I'm a reasonable guy.
You look suspicious.
And so do you.
And in fact YOU are looking kinda odd today.
I think I will stick you all on the list, just to be sure.
I wonder if anyone over at the FBI understands the concept of signal to noise?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942730</id>
	<title>Re:Inefficient System</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257102060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would take quite a heroic effort to increase the likelihood of a false positive, given that so far, it's stuck at 100\%.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would take quite a heroic effort to increase the likelihood of a false positive , given that so far , it 's stuck at 100 \ % .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would take quite a heroic effort to increase the likelihood of a false positive, given that so far, it's stuck at 100\%.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29950404</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the terrorism?</title>
	<author>yivi</author>
	<datestamp>1257178620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>1600 suspected terrorists a day? If even 1\% of that was real then we'd be dealing with 58,000 people a year intending to commit terrorist acts a year? Are we suppose to believe that the FBI has managed to stop them all in every case??? It's not that hard to blow a bus up or derail a train, so why aren't they doing it? Oh I know, because it's all bullshit.</p></div></blockquote><p>Sorry to nitpick since it doesn't have anything to do with your point, but if 1\% of the suspected people were real terrorists the actual number would be over 5800, not 58000 (1600 * 365 * 0.01 = 5840).</p><p>I.-</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>1600 suspected terrorists a day ?
If even 1 \ % of that was real then we 'd be dealing with 58,000 people a year intending to commit terrorist acts a year ?
Are we suppose to believe that the FBI has managed to stop them all in every case ? ? ?
It 's not that hard to blow a bus up or derail a train , so why are n't they doing it ?
Oh I know , because it 's all bullshit.Sorry to nitpick since it does n't have anything to do with your point , but if 1 \ % of the suspected people were real terrorists the actual number would be over 5800 , not 58000 ( 1600 * 365 * 0.01 = 5840 ) .I.-</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1600 suspected terrorists a day?
If even 1\% of that was real then we'd be dealing with 58,000 people a year intending to commit terrorist acts a year?
Are we suppose to believe that the FBI has managed to stop them all in every case???
It's not that hard to blow a bus up or derail a train, so why aren't they doing it?
Oh I know, because it's all bullshit.Sorry to nitpick since it doesn't have anything to do with your point, but if 1\% of the suspected people were real terrorists the actual number would be over 5800, not 58000 (1600 * 365 * 0.01 = 5840).I.-
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942944</id>
	<title>Due Diligence</title>
	<author>mindbrane</author>
	<datestamp>1257104040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Recently, in Vancouver, RCMP officers were publicly challenged for stopping known protesters to the upcoming Olympic winter games and asking them why they were against the games. I don't know the ins and outs of the whole episode but the criticism of the RCMP in the media seemed to centre on their stopping people in public places and questioning the reasons for their political opinions. A news broadcast carried the response from an RCMP public relations officer who used the term "due diligence" in defense of the RCMP's actions. Due diligence as I was schooled in the subject matter had to do only with commercial dealings wherein a party to a contract was expected to have scrutinized the terms of a pending contract to ensure they understood the value they would receive for their part in the contract. It may be that in law the term "due diligence" has a wider meaning, but, I think, the RCMP's use of the term is symptomatic of the use of law suits to resolve many issues in terms of monetary damages and contractual obligations that tacitly put aside principles that should invest more fundamental laws addressing vital issues like freedom of speech. There seems to be developing an adversarial, highly litigious approach to addressing issues that rightly belong to more sober venues.</p><p> Law enforcement agencies wield what should be illegal force. Force that necessarily must be used for a variety of reasons, not least of which is the infantile need among a high proportion of people to make the world in their image, but, if we take the core principles of democracy and subject them to remedies that belong in commercial enterprises then, I think, we run the risk of debasing those principles and turning democracy into a commercial venture wherein all principles and actions are arbitrated by monetary awards, and, the duties and responsibilites of persons with extraordinary powers are also simply monetized.</p><p>I'm a strong backer of the military and the police, the more so because I believe the current state of affairs places them collectively and individually in conflicts both individual and collective that subject them to more stress than their pay warrants and, perhaps, more stress than can be expected to be suffered without considerable negative consequences, but, I sure, this being<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. many will disagree.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Recently , in Vancouver , RCMP officers were publicly challenged for stopping known protesters to the upcoming Olympic winter games and asking them why they were against the games .
I do n't know the ins and outs of the whole episode but the criticism of the RCMP in the media seemed to centre on their stopping people in public places and questioning the reasons for their political opinions .
A news broadcast carried the response from an RCMP public relations officer who used the term " due diligence " in defense of the RCMP 's actions .
Due diligence as I was schooled in the subject matter had to do only with commercial dealings wherein a party to a contract was expected to have scrutinized the terms of a pending contract to ensure they understood the value they would receive for their part in the contract .
It may be that in law the term " due diligence " has a wider meaning , but , I think , the RCMP 's use of the term is symptomatic of the use of law suits to resolve many issues in terms of monetary damages and contractual obligations that tacitly put aside principles that should invest more fundamental laws addressing vital issues like freedom of speech .
There seems to be developing an adversarial , highly litigious approach to addressing issues that rightly belong to more sober venues .
Law enforcement agencies wield what should be illegal force .
Force that necessarily must be used for a variety of reasons , not least of which is the infantile need among a high proportion of people to make the world in their image , but , if we take the core principles of democracy and subject them to remedies that belong in commercial enterprises then , I think , we run the risk of debasing those principles and turning democracy into a commercial venture wherein all principles and actions are arbitrated by monetary awards , and , the duties and responsibilites of persons with extraordinary powers are also simply monetized.I 'm a strong backer of the military and the police , the more so because I believe the current state of affairs places them collectively and individually in conflicts both individual and collective that subject them to more stress than their pay warrants and , perhaps , more stress than can be expected to be suffered without considerable negative consequences , but , I sure , this being / .
many will disagree .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Recently, in Vancouver, RCMP officers were publicly challenged for stopping known protesters to the upcoming Olympic winter games and asking them why they were against the games.
I don't know the ins and outs of the whole episode but the criticism of the RCMP in the media seemed to centre on their stopping people in public places and questioning the reasons for their political opinions.
A news broadcast carried the response from an RCMP public relations officer who used the term "due diligence" in defense of the RCMP's actions.
Due diligence as I was schooled in the subject matter had to do only with commercial dealings wherein a party to a contract was expected to have scrutinized the terms of a pending contract to ensure they understood the value they would receive for their part in the contract.
It may be that in law the term "due diligence" has a wider meaning, but, I think, the RCMP's use of the term is symptomatic of the use of law suits to resolve many issues in terms of monetary damages and contractual obligations that tacitly put aside principles that should invest more fundamental laws addressing vital issues like freedom of speech.
There seems to be developing an adversarial, highly litigious approach to addressing issues that rightly belong to more sober venues.
Law enforcement agencies wield what should be illegal force.
Force that necessarily must be used for a variety of reasons, not least of which is the infantile need among a high proportion of people to make the world in their image, but, if we take the core principles of democracy and subject them to remedies that belong in commercial enterprises then, I think, we run the risk of debasing those principles and turning democracy into a commercial venture wherein all principles and actions are arbitrated by monetary awards, and, the duties and responsibilites of persons with extraordinary powers are also simply monetized.I'm a strong backer of the military and the police, the more so because I believe the current state of affairs places them collectively and individually in conflicts both individual and collective that subject them to more stress than their pay warrants and, perhaps, more stress than can be expected to be suffered without considerable negative consequences, but, I sure, this being /.
many will disagree.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942674</id>
	<title>Mandatory reading if this concerns you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257101460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cory Doctorow's book Little Brother. Free PDF download from his site:

<a href="http://craphound.com/littlebrother/" title="craphound.com" rel="nofollow">http://craphound.com/littlebrother/</a> [craphound.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cory Doctorow 's book Little Brother .
Free PDF download from his site : http : //craphound.com/littlebrother/ [ craphound.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cory Doctorow's book Little Brother.
Free PDF download from his site:

http://craphound.com/littlebrother/ [craphound.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29947934</id>
	<title>Re:How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?</title>
	<author>falconwolf</author>
	<datestamp>1257103860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>They don't. It's modern-day McCarthyism, it's just that no one senator has stepped up to bat and get his name attached to this whole racket.</i></p><p>Sen, Ed Kennedy was on the <a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi\_qn4176/is\_20040820/ai\_n14584370/" title="findarticles.com">No Fly list</a> [findarticles.com].</p><p>

Falcon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They do n't .
It 's modern-day McCarthyism , it 's just that no one senator has stepped up to bat and get his name attached to this whole racket.Sen , Ed Kennedy was on the No Fly list [ findarticles.com ] .
Falcon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They don't.
It's modern-day McCarthyism, it's just that no one senator has stepped up to bat and get his name attached to this whole racket.Sen, Ed Kennedy was on the No Fly list [findarticles.com].
Falcon</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943322</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29947898</id>
	<title>Watch lists</title>
	<author>falconwolf</author>
	<datestamp>1257103260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Number of names on terrorist watch list at 400,000, agency says</i></p><p>And how many slashdotters are on the lists?  A bunch I bet.  First those who criticized Bush were put on the lists, and now those criticizing Obama are being added.</p><p>So some of us were put on the lists twice.</p><p>

Falcon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Number of names on terrorist watch list at 400,000 , agency saysAnd how many slashdotters are on the lists ?
A bunch I bet .
First those who criticized Bush were put on the lists , and now those criticizing Obama are being added.So some of us were put on the lists twice .
Falcon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Number of names on terrorist watch list at 400,000, agency saysAnd how many slashdotters are on the lists?
A bunch I bet.
First those who criticized Bush were put on the lists, and now those criticizing Obama are being added.So some of us were put on the lists twice.
Falcon</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943840</id>
	<title>Re:How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257067080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How do they define "reasonable suspicion"? I couldn't find that information in the article.</p></div><p>Judging by the numbers, I have a guess.  If they arrest a terror suspect and search his house and find your contact information, you're on the list.  Terrorists incidentally keep a LOT of contacts in things they call "Phone books," suprisingly well organized.  Alphabetical and everything.  Very neat handwriting as well.  Business contacts are usually kept in books with yellowish pages, the significance of which is unknown.  What's scary is that they have a number of contacts IN THE GOVERNMENT, on blue pages indicating they may be democrats.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do they define " reasonable suspicion " ?
I could n't find that information in the article.Judging by the numbers , I have a guess .
If they arrest a terror suspect and search his house and find your contact information , you 're on the list .
Terrorists incidentally keep a LOT of contacts in things they call " Phone books , " suprisingly well organized .
Alphabetical and everything .
Very neat handwriting as well .
Business contacts are usually kept in books with yellowish pages , the significance of which is unknown .
What 's scary is that they have a number of contacts IN THE GOVERNMENT , on blue pages indicating they may be democrats .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?
I couldn't find that information in the article.Judging by the numbers, I have a guess.
If they arrest a terror suspect and search his house and find your contact information, you're on the list.
Terrorists incidentally keep a LOT of contacts in things they call "Phone books," suprisingly well organized.
Alphabetical and everything.
Very neat handwriting as well.
Business contacts are usually kept in books with yellowish pages, the significance of which is unknown.
What's scary is that they have a number of contacts IN THE GOVERNMENT, on blue pages indicating they may be democrats.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942628</id>
	<title>bummer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257100920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>a socialist (caucasian) Belgian politician got on that list because the immigration officer thought he had too much South American stamps on his passport. So after taking him into a small office, they googled his name and found his articles to be too "left wing" to their taste and he was refused access and said that if he wanted to come to the US he had to apply for a visa. He did just that and of course it was refused. Lately, he took the plane to Brazil (a direct flight), and they had to detour the whole plane for hundreds of miles, because he was on it and they weren't allowed to fly over US territory (the crew told him afterwards) .
And of course, there is no way to get off that list.</htmltext>
<tokenext>a socialist ( caucasian ) Belgian politician got on that list because the immigration officer thought he had too much South American stamps on his passport .
So after taking him into a small office , they googled his name and found his articles to be too " left wing " to their taste and he was refused access and said that if he wanted to come to the US he had to apply for a visa .
He did just that and of course it was refused .
Lately , he took the plane to Brazil ( a direct flight ) , and they had to detour the whole plane for hundreds of miles , because he was on it and they were n't allowed to fly over US territory ( the crew told him afterwards ) .
And of course , there is no way to get off that list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a socialist (caucasian) Belgian politician got on that list because the immigration officer thought he had too much South American stamps on his passport.
So after taking him into a small office, they googled his name and found his articles to be too "left wing" to their taste and he was refused access and said that if he wanted to come to the US he had to apply for a visa.
He did just that and of course it was refused.
Lately, he took the plane to Brazil (a direct flight), and they had to detour the whole plane for hundreds of miles, because he was on it and they weren't allowed to fly over US territory (the crew told him afterwards) .
And of course, there is no way to get off that list.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943606</id>
	<title>Re:How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?</title>
	<author>Runaway1956</author>
	<datestamp>1257109080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What does everyone think those botnets are for?  They're just raking in the names.  Do a search for "Al-Queda.net" and the bot reports you.  You only THOUGHT the botnets were all monitored by the criminal element, LOL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What does everyone think those botnets are for ?
They 're just raking in the names .
Do a search for " Al-Queda.net " and the bot reports you .
You only THOUGHT the botnets were all monitored by the criminal element , LOL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What does everyone think those botnets are for?
They're just raking in the names.
Do a search for "Al-Queda.net" and the bot reports you.
You only THOUGHT the botnets were all monitored by the criminal element, LOL</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942650</id>
	<title>Re:one on there</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257101100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It has come to my attention that the entire Linux community is a hotbed of so called 'alternative sexuality,' which includes anything from hedonistic orgies to homosexuality to pedophilia.</p><p>What better way of demonstrating this than by looking at the hidden messages contained within the names of some of Linux's most outspoken advocates:</p><ul><li> <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/billgates/" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">Linus Torvalds</a> [microsoft.com] is an anagram of <b>slit anus or VD 'L,'</b> clearly referring to himself by the first initial.</li><li> <a href="http://www.geocities.com/stallmanus/" title="geocities.com" rel="nofollow">Richard M. Stallman</a> [geocities.com], spokespervert for the <b>G</b>aysex's <b>N</b>ot <b>U</b>nusual 'movement' is an anagram of <b>mans cram thrill ad.</b> </li><li> <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">Alan Cox</a> [microsoft.com] is <i>barely</i> an anagram of <b>anal cox</b> which is just so filthy and unchristian it unnerves me.</li></ul><p>I'm sure that Eric S. Raymond, composer of the satanic <a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">homosexual</a> [goatse.fr] propaganda diatribe <i>The Cathedral and the Bizarre,</i> is probably an anagram of something queer, but we don't need to look that far as we know he's always shoving a gun up some poor little boy's rectum. <i>Update:</i> Eric S. Raymond is actually an anagram for <b>secondary rim</b> and <b>cord in my arse.</b> It just goes to show you that he is indeed queer.</p><p> <i>Update the Second:</i> It is also documented that Evil Sicko Gaymond is responsible for a nauseating piece of code called <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">Fetchmail</a> [microsoft.com], which is obviously sinister sodomite slang for 'Felch Male' -- a disgusting practise. For those not in the know, 'felching' is the act performed by two perverts wherein one sucks their own post-coital ejaculate out of the other's rectum. In fact, it appears that the dirty Linux faggots set out to undermine the good Republican institution of e-mail, turning it into 'e-male.'</p><p>As far as Richard 'Master' Stallman goes, that filthy fudge-packer was <a href="http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2000/05/26/free\_love/index.html" title="salon.com" rel="nofollow">actually quoted</a> [salon.com] on leftist commie propaganda site Salon.com as saying the following: 'I've been resistant to the pressure to conform in any circumstance,' he says. 'It's about being able to question conventional wisdom,' he asserts. 'I believe in love, but not monogamy,' he says plainly.</p><p>And this isn't a made up troll bullshit either! He actually stated this tripe, which makes it obvious that he is trying to politely say that he's a flaming <a href="http://www.comp-u-geek.net/" title="comp-u-geek.net" rel="nofollow">homo</a> [comp-u-geek.net] <a href="http://vagina.rotten.com/fecaljapan/" title="rotten.com" rel="nofollow">slut</a> [rotten.com]!</p><p>Speaking about 'flaming,' who better to point out as a filthy chutney ferret than Slashdot's very own self-confessed pederast Jon Katz. Although an obvious deviant anagram cannot be found from his name, he has already confessed, nay boasted of the <a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">homosexual</a> [goatse.fr] perversion of <a href="http://slashdot.org/features/99/07/22/173256.shtml" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">corrupting the innocence of young children</a> [slashdot.org]. To quote from the article linked:</p><p>'I've got a rare kidney disease,' I told her. 'I have to go to the bathroom a lot. You can come with me if you want, but it takes a while. Is that okay with you? Do you want a note from my doctor?'</p><p>Is this why you were touching your <a href="http://smoke.rotten.com/bird/" title="rotten.com" rel="nofollow">penis</a> [rotten.com] in the cinema, Jon? And letting the other boys touch it too?</p><p>We should also point out that Jon Katz refers to himself as 'Slashdot's resident Gasbag.' <i>Is there any more doubt?</i> For those fortunate few who aren't aware of the list of <a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">homosexual</a> [goatse.fr] terminology found inside the Linux 'Sauce Code,' a 'Gasbag' is a pervert who gains sexual gratification from having a thin straw inserted into his urethra (or to use the common parlance, 'piss-pipe'), then his <a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">homosexual</a> [goatse.fr] lover blows firmly down the straw to inflate his scrotum. This is, of course, when he's not busy violating the dignity and copyright of posters to Slashdot by gathering together their postings and publishing them en masse to further his twisted and manipulative journalistic agenda.</p><p>Sick, disgusting antichristian perverts, the lot of them.</p><p>In addition, many of the Linux distributions (a 'distribution' is the most common way to spread the faggots' wares) are run by faggot groups. The <a href="http://www.redhat.com/" title="redhat.com" rel="nofollow">Slackware</a> [redhat.com] distro is named after the 'Slack-wear' fags wear to allow easy access to the anus for sexual purposes. Furthermore, Slackware is a close anagram of <b>claw arse</b>, a reference to the <a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">homosexual</a> [goatse.fr] practise of anal fisting. The <a href="http://www.slackware.com/" title="slackware.com" rel="nofollow">Mandrake</a> [slackware.com] product is run by a group of French faggot satanists, and is named after the faggot nickname for the vibrator. It was also chosen because it is an anagram for <b>dark amen</b> and <b>ram naked,</b> which is what they do.</p><p>Another 'distro,' (abbrieviated as such because it sounds a bit like 'Disco,' which is where <a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">homosexuals</a> [goatse.fr] preyed on young boys in the 1970s), is <a href="http://www.mandrake.com/" title="mandrake.com" rel="nofollow">Debian,</a> [mandrake.com] an anagram of <b>in a bed,</b> which could be considered innocent enough (after all, a bed is both where we sleep and pray), until we realise what other names Debian uses to describe their foul wares. 'Woody' is obvious enough, being a term for the erect male <a href="http://smoke.rotten.com/bird/" title="rotten.com" rel="nofollow">penis</a> [rotten.com], glistening with pre-cum. But far sicker is the phrase 'Frozen Potato' that they use. This filthy term, again found in the secret <a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">homosexual</a> [goatse.fr] 'Sauce Code,' refers to the solo <a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">homosexual</a> [goatse.fr] practice of defecating into a clear polythene bag, shaping the turd into a crude approximation of the male phallus, then leaving it in the freezer overnight until it becomes solid. The practitioner then proceeds to push the frozen 'potato' up his own rectum, squeezing it in and out until his tight young balls erupt in a screaming orgasm.</p><p>And <a href="http://www.debian.org/" title="debian.org" rel="nofollow">Red Hat</a> [debian.org] is secret <a href="http://www.comp-u-geek.net/" title="comp-u-geek.net" rel="nofollow">homo</a> [comp-u-geek.net] slang for the tip of a <a href="http://smoke.rotten.com/bird/" title="rotten.com" rel="nofollow">penis</a> [rotten.com] that is soaked in blood from a freshly violated underage ringpiece.</p><p>The fags have even invented special tools to aid their faggotry! For example, the 'supermount' tool was devised to allow deeper penetration, which is good for fags because it gives more pressure on the prostate gland. 'Automount' is used, on the other hand, because Linux users are all fat and gay, and need to <a href="http://www.comp-u-geek.net/" title="comp-u-geek.net" rel="nofollow">mount each other</a> [comp-u-geek.net] automatically.</p><p>The depths of their depravity can be seen in their use of 'mount points.' These are, plainly speaking, the different points of penetration. The main one is obviously<tt>/anus</tt>, but there are others. Militant fags even say 'there is no<tt>/opt</tt> mount point' because for these dirty perverts faggotry is not optional but a way of life.</p><p>More evidence is in the fact that Linux users say how much they love <tt>`man`</tt>, even going so far as to say that all new Linux users (who are in fact just innocent heterosexuals indoctrinated by the gay propaganda) should try out <tt>`man`</tt>. In no other system do users boast of their frequent recourse to a man.</p><p>Other areas of the system also show Linux's inherit <i>gayness.</i> For example, people are often told of the 'FAQ,' but how many innocent heterosexual <a href="http://www.amiga.com/" title="amiga.com" rel="nofollow">Windows</a> [amiga.com] users know what this actually means. The answer is shocking: <i>Faggot Anal Quest:</i> the voyage of discovery for newly converted fags!</p><p>Even the title '<a href="http://www.geekizoid.com/" title="geekizoid.com" rel="nofollow">Slashdot</a> [geekizoid.com]' originally referred to a <a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">homosexual</a> [goatse.fr] practice. <a href="http://www.kuro5hin.org/" title="kuro5hin.org" rel="nofollow">Slashdot</a> [kuro5hin.org] of course refers to the popular gay practice of blood-letting. The Slashbots, of course are those super-zealous <a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">homosexuals</a> [goatse.fr] who take this perversion to its extreme by ripping open their anuses, as seen on the site most popular with Slashdot users, the depraved work of Satan, <a href="http://www.eff.org/" title="eff.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.eff.org/</a> [eff.org].</p><p>The editors of <a href="http://www.slashduh.org/" title="slashduh.org" rel="nofollow">Slashdot</a> [slashduh.org] also have <a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">homosexual</a> [goatse.fr] names: 'Hemos' is obvious in itself, being one vowel away from 'Homos.' But even more sickening is 'Commander Taco' which sounds a bit like 'Commode in Taco,' filthy gay slang for a pair of spreadeagled buttocks that are caked with <a href="http://pboy.com/shteatrfrk/images01/" title="pboy.com" rel="nofollow">excrement</a> [pboy.com]. (The best form of lubrication, they insist.) Sometimes, these 'Taco Commodes' have special 'Salsa Sauce' (blood from a ruptured rectum) and 'Cheese' (rancid flakes of <a href="http://smoke.rotten.com/bird/" title="rotten.com" rel="nofollow">penis</a> [rotten.com] discharge) toppings. And to make it even worse, <a href="http://notslashdot.org/" title="notslashdot.org" rel="nofollow">Slashdot</a> [notslashdot.org] runs on <i>Apache!</i> </p><p>The <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/iis/" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">Apache</a> [microsoft.com] server, whose use among fags is as prevalent as AIDS, is named after <a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">homosexual</a> [goatse.fr] activity -- as everyone knows, popular faggot band, the Village People, featured an Apache Indian, and it is for him that this gay program is named.</p><p>And that's not forgetting the use of patches in the Linux fag world -- patches are used to make the anus accessible for repeated anal sex even after its rupture by a session of fisting.</p><p>To summarise: Linux is gay. 'Slash -- Dot' is the graphical description of the space between a young boy's scrotum and anus. And <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/" title="apple.com" rel="nofollow">BeOS</a> [apple.com] is for hermaphrodites and disabled 'stumpers.'</p><p> <b>FEEDBACK</b> </p><blockquote><div><p> <i>What worries me is how much you know about what gay people do. I'm scared I actually read this whole thing. I think this post is a good example of the negative effects of Internet usage on people. This person obviously has no social life anymore and had to result to writing something as stupid as this. And actually take the time to do it too. Although... I think it was satire.. blah.. it's early.</i> -- Anonymous Coward, Slashdot</p></div></blockquote><p>Well, the only reason I know all about this is because I had the misfortune to read the Linux 'Sauce code' once. Although publicised as the computer code needed to get Linux up and running on a computer (and haven't you always been worried about the phrase 'Monolithic Kernel'?), this foul document is actually a detailed and graphic description of every conceivable degrading perversion known to the human race, as well as a few of the major animal species. It has shocked and disturbed me, to the point of needing to shock and disturb the common man to <i>warn</i> them of the impending <a href="http://www.comp-u-geek.net/" title="comp-u-geek.net" rel="nofollow">homo</a> [comp-u-geek.net]-calypse which threatens to engulf our planet.</p><blockquote><div><p> <i>You must work for the government. Trying to post the most obscene stuff in hopes that slashdot won't be able to continue or something, due to legal woes. If i ever see your ugly face, i'm going to stick my fireplace poker up your ass, after it's nice and hot, to weld shut that nasty gaping hole of yours.</i> -- Anonymous Coward, Slashdot</p></div></blockquote><p>Doesn't it give you a hard-on to imagine your thick strong poker ramming it's way up my most sacred of sphincters? You're beyond help, my friend, as the only thing you can imagine is the foul penetrative violation of another man. Are you sure you're not Eric Raymond? The government, being populated by limp-wristed liberals, could never stem the sickening tide of <a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">homosexual</a> [goatse.fr] child molesting Linux advocacy. Hell, they've given NAMBLA free reign for years!</p><blockquote><div><p> <i>you really should post this logged in. i wish i could remember jebus's password, cuz i'd give it to you.</i> -- <a href="http://slashdot.org/users.pl?nick=mighty\%20jebus" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">mighty jebus</a> [slashdot.org], Slashdot</p></div></blockquote><p>Thank you for your kind words of support. However, this document shall only ever be posted anonymously. This is because the 'Open Sauce' movement is a sham, proposing homoerotic cults of hero worshipping in the name of freedom. I speak for the common man. For any man who prefers the warm, enveloping velvet folds of a woman's <a href="http://www.happy.bodysnatchers.co.uk/deadcunt/" title="bodysnatchers.co.uk" rel="nofollow">vagina</a> [bodysnatchers.co.uk] to the tight puckered ringpiece of a child. These men, being common, decent folk, don't have a say in the political hypocrisy that is Slashdot culture. I am the <a href="http://www.hitler.org/" title="hitler.org" rel="nofollow">unknown liberator</a> [hitler.org].</p><blockquote><div><p> <i>ROLF LAMO i hate linux FAGGOTS</i> -- Anonymous Coward, Slashdot</p></div></blockquote><p>We shouldn't hate them, we should pity them for the misguided fools they are... Fanatical Linux zeal-outs need to be herded into camps for re-education and subsequent rehabilitation into normal heterosexual society. This re-education shall be achieved by forcing them to watch repeats of <i>Baywatch</i> until the very mention of <a href="http://fotm.rotten.com/fotm/vertical.html" title="rotten.com" rel="nofollow">Pamela Anderson</a> [rotten.com] causes them to fill their pants with healthy heterosexual <a href="http://www.zillabunny.com/express/" title="zillabunny.com" rel="nofollow">jism</a> [zillabunny.com].</p><blockquote><div><p> <i>Actually, that's not at all how scrotal inflation works. I understand it involves injecting sterile saline solution into the scrotum. I've never tried this, but you can read how to do it safely in case you're interested. (Before you moderate this down, ask yourself honestly -- who are the real crazies -- people who do scrotal inflation, or people who pay $1000+ for a game console?)</i> -- <a href="http://slashdot.org/users.pl?nick=double\_h" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">double\_h</a> [slashdot.org], Slashdot</p></div></blockquote><p>Well, it just goes to show that even the holy Linux 'sauce code' is riddled with bugs that need fixing. (The irony of Jon Katz not even being able to inflate his scrotum correctly has not been lost on me.) The Linux pervert elite already acknowledge this, with their queer slogan: 'Given enough arms, all rectums are shallow.' And anyway, the <a href="http://www.xbox.com/" title="xbox.com" rel="nofollow">PS2</a> [xbox.com] sucks major cock and isn't worth the money. Intellivision forever!</p><blockquote><div><p> <i>dude did u used to post on msnbc's nt bulletin board now that u are doing anti-gay posts u also need to start in with anti-black stuff too c u in church</i> -- Anonymous Coward, Slashdot</p></div></blockquote><p>For one thing, whilst Linux is a cavalcade of queer propaganda masquerading as the future of computing, <a href="http://www.linux.com/" title="linux.com" rel="nofollow">NT</a> [linux.com] is used by people who think nothing better of encasing their genitals in quick setting plaster then going to see a really dirty porno film, enjoying the restriction enforced onto them. Remember, a wasted arousal is a <i>sin</i> in the eyes of the <a href="http://www.atheism.org/" title="atheism.org" rel="nofollow">Catholic church</a> [atheism.org]. Clearly, the only god-fearing Christian operating system in existence is CP/M -- The Christian Program Monitor. All computer users should immediately ask their local pastor to install this fine OS onto their systems. It is the only route to salvation.</p><p>Secondly, this message is for <i>every</i> man. Computers know no colour. Not only that, but one of the finest websites in the world is maintained by <i> <a href="http://www.stileproject.com/" title="stileproject.com" rel="nofollow">a Black Man</a> [stileproject.com] </i>. Now fuck off you racist donkey felcher.</p><blockquote><div><p> <i>And don't forget that slashdot was written in Perl, which is just too close to 'Pearl Necklace' for comfort.... oh wait; that's something all you heterosexuals do.... I can't help but wonder how much faster the trolls could do First-Posts on this site if it were redone in PHP... I could hand-type dynamic HTML pages faster than Perl can do them.</i> -- <a href="http://slashdot.org/users.pl?nick=phee" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">phee</a> [slashdot.org], Slashdot</p></div></blockquote><p>Although there is nothing unholy about the fine heterosexual act of ejaculating between a woman's breasts, squirting one's load up towards her neck and chin area, it should be noted that <a href="http://www.python.org/" title="python.org" rel="nofollow">Perl</a> [python.org] (standing for <b>P</b>ansies <b>E</b>ntering <b>R</b>ectums <b>L</b>ocally) is also close to 'Pearl Monocle,' 'Pearl Nosering,' and the ubiquitous 'Pearl Enema.'</p><p>One scary thing about <a href="http://java.sun.com/" title="sun.com" rel="nofollow">Perl</a> [sun.com] is that it contains hidden <a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">homosexual</a> [goatse.fr] messages. Take the following code: <tt>LWP::Simple</tt> -- It looks innocuous enough, doesn't it? But look at the line closely: <i>There are two colons next to each other!</i> As Larry 'Balls to the' Wall would openly admit in the Perl Documentation, Perl was designed from the ground up to indoctrinate it's programmers into performing unnatural sexual acts -- having two colons so closely together is clearly a reference to the perverse sickening act of 'colon kissing,' whereby two <a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">homosexual</a> [goatse.fr] queers spread their buttocks wide, pressing their filthy torn sphincters together. They then share small round objects like marbles or golfballs by passing them from one rectum to another using muscle contraction alone. This is also referred to in programming 'circles' as 'Parameter Passing.'</p><p>And <a href="http://www.perl.org/" title="perl.org" rel="nofollow">PHP</a> [perl.org] stands for <b>P</b>erverted <b>H</b>omosexual <b>P</b>enetration. Didn't you know?</p><blockquote><div><p> <i>Thank you for your valuable input on this. I am sure you will be never forgotten. BTW: Did I mention that this could be useful in terraforming Mars? Mars rulaa.</i> -- <a href="http://slashdot.org/users.pl?nick=Eimernase" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">Eimernase</a> [slashdot.org], Slashdot</p></div></blockquote><p>Well, I don't know about terraforming Mars, but I <i>do</i> know that <a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">homosexual</a> [goatse.fr] Linux Advocates have been probing Uranus for years.</p><blockquote><div><p> <i>That's inspiring. Keep up the good work, AC. May God in his wisdom grant you the strength to bring the plain honest truth to this community, and make it pure again. Yours, Cerberus.</i> -- Anonymous Coward, Slashdot</p></div></blockquote><p> <i>*sniff*</i> That brings a tear to my eye. Thank you once more for your kind support. I have taken faith in the knowledge that I am doing the <a href="http://www.atheism.org/" title="atheism.org" rel="nofollow">Good Lord</a> [atheism.org]'s work, but it is encouraging to know that I am helping out the common man here.</p><p>However, I should be cautious about revealing your name 'Cerberus' on such a filthy den of depravity as Slashdot. It is a well known fact that the 'Kerberos' documentation from Microsoft is a detailed manual describing, in intimate, exacting detail, how to sexually penetrate a variety of unwilling canine animals; be they domesticated, wild, or mythical. Slashdot posters have taken great pleasure in illegally spreading this documentation far and wide, treating it as an 'extension' to the Linux 'Sauce Code,' for the sake of 'interoperability.' (The slang term they use for nonconsensual intercourse -- their favourite kind.)</p><p>In fact, sick twisted Linux deviants are known to have LAN parties, (<b>L</b>ove of <b>A</b>nal <b>N</b>aughtiness, needless to say.), wherein they entice a stray dog, known as the 'Samba Mount,' into their homes. Up to four of these filth-sodden blasphemers against nature take turns to plunge their erect, throbbing, uncircumcised members, conkers-deep, into the rectum, mouth, and other fleshy orifices of the poor animal. Eventually, the 'Samba Mount' collapses due to 'overload,' and needs to be 'rebooted.' (<i>i.e.,</i> kicked out into the street, and left to fend for itself.) Many Linux users boast about their 'uptime' in such situations.</p><blockquote><div><p> <i>Inspiring stuff! If only all trolls were this quality!</i> -- Anonymous Coward, Slashdot</p></div></blockquote><p>If only indeed. You can help our brave cause by moderating this message up as often as possible. I recommend '+1, Underrated,' as that will protect your precious Karma in <a href="http://slashdot.org/metamod.pl" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">Metamoderation</a> [slashdot.org]. Only then can we break through the glass ceiling of Homosexual Slashdot Culture. Is it any wonder that the new version of Slashcode has been christened 'Bender'???</p><p>If we can get just one of these postings up to at least '+1,' then it will be archived <i>forever!</i> Others will learn of our struggle, and join with us in our battle for freedom!</p><blockquote><div><p> <i>It's pathetic you've spent so much time writing this.</i> -- Anonymous Coward, Slashdot</p></div></blockquote><p>I am compelled to document the foulness and <a href="http://www.catholic.net/" title="catholic.net" rel="nofollow">carnal depravity</a> [catholic.net] that is Linux, in order that we may prepare ourselves for the great holy war that is to follow. It is my solemn duty to peel back the foreskin of ignorance and apply the wire brush of enlightenment.</p><blockquote><div><p> <i>As with any great open-source project, you need someone asking this question, so I'll do it. When the hell is version 2.0 going to be ready?!?!</i> -- Anonymous Coward, Slashdot</p></div></blockquote><p>I could make an arrogant, childish comment along the lines of 'Every time someone asks for 2.0, I won't release it for another 24 hours,' but the truth of the matter is that I'm quite nervous of releasing a 'number two,' as I can guarantee some filthy shit-slurping Linux pervert would want to suck it straight out of my anus before I've even had chance to wipe.</p><blockquote><div><p> <i>I desperately want to suck your monolithic kernel, you sexy hunk, you.</i> -- Anonymous Coward, Slashdot</p></div></blockquote><p>I sincerely hope you're <a href="http://www.geocities.com/signal\_sig/petri.html" title="geocities.com" rel="nofollow">Natalie Portman</a> [geocities.com].</p><blockquote><div><p> <i>Dude, nothing on slashdot larger than 3 paragraphs is worth reading. Try to distill the message, whatever it was, and maybe I'll read it. As it is, I have to much open source software to write to waste even 10 seconds of precious time. 10 seconds is all its gonna take M$ to whoop Linux's ass. Vigilence is the price of Free (as in libre -- from the fine, frou frou French language) Software. Hack on fellow geeks, and remember: Friday is Bouillabaisse day except for heathens who do not believe that Jesus died for their sins. Those godless, oil drench, bearded sexist clowns can pull grits from their pantaloons (another fine, fine French word) and eat that. Anyway, try to keep your message focused and concise. For concision is the soul of derision. Way.</i> -- Anonymous Coward, Slashdot</p></div></blockquote><p>What the <i>fuck?</i> </p><blockquote><div><p> <i>I've read your gay conspiracy post version 1.3.0 and I must say I'm impressed. In particular, I appreciate how you have managed to squeeze in a healthy dose of the latent homosexuality you gay-bashing <a href="http://www.comp-u-geek.net/" title="comp-u-geek.net" rel="nofollow">homos</a> [comp-u-geek.net] tend to be full of. Thank you again.</i> -- Anonymous Coward, Slashdot</p></div></blockquote><p>Well bugger me!</p><blockquote><div><p> <i>ooooh honey. how insecure are you!!! wann a little massage from deare bruci. love you</i> -- Anonymous Coward, Slashdot</p></div></blockquote><p>Fuck <i>right</i> off!</p><p>IMPORTANT: This message needs to be heard (Not <a href="http://www.linux.org/" title="linux.org" rel="nofollow">HURD</a> [linux.org], which is an acronym for '<b>H</b>uge <b>U</b>nclean <b>R</b>ectal <b>D</b>ilator') across the whole community, so it has been released into the <a href="http://www.icopyright.com/" title="icopyright.com" rel="nofollow">Public Domain</a> [icopyright.com]. You know, that licence that we all had before those homoerotic crypto-fascists came out with the <a href="http://www.publicsource.apple.com/apsl/" title="apple.com" rel="nofollow">GPL</a> [apple.com] (<b>G</b>ay <b>P</b>enetration <b>L</b>icense) that is no more than an excuse to see who's got the biggest <a href="http://vagina.rotten.com/fecaljapan/" title="rotten.com" rel="nofollow">feces-encrusted</a> [rotten.com] cock. I would have put this up on <a href="http://www.adultmember.com/freshmeat/" title="adultmember.com" rel="nofollow">Freshmeat</a> [adultmember.com], but that name is <i>known</i> to be a euphemism for the tight rump of a young boy.</p><p>Come to think of it, the whole concept of 'Source Control' unnerves me, because it sounds a bit like 'Sauce Control,' which is a description of the <a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">homosexual</a> [goatse.fr] practice of holding the base of the cock shaft tightly upon the point of ejaculation, thus causing a build up of semenal fluid that is only released upon entry into an incision made into the base of the receiver's scrotum. And 'Open Sauce' is the act of ejaculating into another mans face or perhaps a biscuit to be shared later. Obviously, 'Closed Sauce' is the only Christian thing to do, as evidenced by the fact that it is what Cathedrals are all about.</p><p> <b>Contributors:</b> (although not to the eternal game of 'soggy biscuit' that open 'sauce' development has become) Anonymous Coward, Anonymous Coward, phee, Anonymous Coward, mighty jebus, Anonymous Coward, Anonymous Coward, double\_h, Anonymous Coward, Eimernase, Anonymous Coward, Anonymous Coward, Anonymous Coward, Anonymous Coward, Anonymous Coward, Anonymous Coward, Anonymous Coward, Anonymous Coward. Further contributions are welcome.</p><p> <b>Current changes:</b> This version sent to <a href="http://slashdot.org/~Free\%20WIPO/" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow"> <em>FreeWIPO</em> </a> [slashdot.org] by 'Bring BackATV' as plain text. Reformatted everything, added all links back in (that we could match from the previous version), many new ones (Slashbot bait links). Even more spelling fixed. Who wrote this thing, CmdrTaco himself?</p><p> <b>Previous changes:</b> Yet more changes added. Spelling fixed. Feedback added. Explanation of 'distro' system. 'Mount Point' syntax described. More filth regarding <tt>`man`</tt> and Slashdot. Yet more fucking spelling fixed. 'Fetchmail' uncovered further. More Slashbot baiting. Apache exposed. Distribution licence at foot of document.</p><p> <b>ANUX -- A full Linux distribution... <i>Up your ass!</i> </b> </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It has come to my attention that the entire Linux community is a hotbed of so called 'alternative sexuality, ' which includes anything from hedonistic orgies to homosexuality to pedophilia.What better way of demonstrating this than by looking at the hidden messages contained within the names of some of Linux 's most outspoken advocates : Linus Torvalds [ microsoft.com ] is an anagram of slit anus or VD 'L, ' clearly referring to himself by the first initial .
Richard M. Stallman [ geocities.com ] , spokespervert for the Gaysex 's Not Unusual 'movement ' is an anagram of mans cram thrill ad .
Alan Cox [ microsoft.com ] is barely an anagram of anal cox which is just so filthy and unchristian it unnerves me.I 'm sure that Eric S. Raymond , composer of the satanic homosexual [ goatse.fr ] propaganda diatribe The Cathedral and the Bizarre , is probably an anagram of something queer , but we do n't need to look that far as we know he 's always shoving a gun up some poor little boy 's rectum .
Update : Eric S. Raymond is actually an anagram for secondary rim and cord in my arse .
It just goes to show you that he is indeed queer .
Update the Second : It is also documented that Evil Sicko Gaymond is responsible for a nauseating piece of code called Fetchmail [ microsoft.com ] , which is obviously sinister sodomite slang for 'Felch Male ' -- a disgusting practise .
For those not in the know , 'felching ' is the act performed by two perverts wherein one sucks their own post-coital ejaculate out of the other 's rectum .
In fact , it appears that the dirty Linux faggots set out to undermine the good Republican institution of e-mail , turning it into 'e-male .
'As far as Richard 'Master ' Stallman goes , that filthy fudge-packer was actually quoted [ salon.com ] on leftist commie propaganda site Salon.com as saying the following : 'I 've been resistant to the pressure to conform in any circumstance, ' he says .
'It 's about being able to question conventional wisdom, ' he asserts .
'I believe in love , but not monogamy, ' he says plainly.And this is n't a made up troll bullshit either !
He actually stated this tripe , which makes it obvious that he is trying to politely say that he 's a flaming homo [ comp-u-geek.net ] slut [ rotten.com ] ! Speaking about 'flaming, ' who better to point out as a filthy chutney ferret than Slashdot 's very own self-confessed pederast Jon Katz .
Although an obvious deviant anagram can not be found from his name , he has already confessed , nay boasted of the homosexual [ goatse.fr ] perversion of corrupting the innocence of young children [ slashdot.org ] .
To quote from the article linked : 'I 've got a rare kidney disease, ' I told her .
'I have to go to the bathroom a lot .
You can come with me if you want , but it takes a while .
Is that okay with you ?
Do you want a note from my doctor ?
'Is this why you were touching your penis [ rotten.com ] in the cinema , Jon ?
And letting the other boys touch it too ? We should also point out that Jon Katz refers to himself as 'Slashdot 's resident Gasbag .
' Is there any more doubt ?
For those fortunate few who are n't aware of the list of homosexual [ goatse.fr ] terminology found inside the Linux 'Sauce Code, ' a 'Gasbag ' is a pervert who gains sexual gratification from having a thin straw inserted into his urethra ( or to use the common parlance , 'piss-pipe ' ) , then his homosexual [ goatse.fr ] lover blows firmly down the straw to inflate his scrotum .
This is , of course , when he 's not busy violating the dignity and copyright of posters to Slashdot by gathering together their postings and publishing them en masse to further his twisted and manipulative journalistic agenda.Sick , disgusting antichristian perverts , the lot of them.In addition , many of the Linux distributions ( a 'distribution ' is the most common way to spread the faggots ' wares ) are run by faggot groups .
The Slackware [ redhat.com ] distro is named after the 'Slack-wear ' fags wear to allow easy access to the anus for sexual purposes .
Furthermore , Slackware is a close anagram of claw arse , a reference to the homosexual [ goatse.fr ] practise of anal fisting .
The Mandrake [ slackware.com ] product is run by a group of French faggot satanists , and is named after the faggot nickname for the vibrator .
It was also chosen because it is an anagram for dark amen and ram naked , which is what they do.Another 'distro, ' ( abbrieviated as such because it sounds a bit like 'Disco, ' which is where homosexuals [ goatse.fr ] preyed on young boys in the 1970s ) , is Debian , [ mandrake.com ] an anagram of in a bed , which could be considered innocent enough ( after all , a bed is both where we sleep and pray ) , until we realise what other names Debian uses to describe their foul wares .
'Woody ' is obvious enough , being a term for the erect male penis [ rotten.com ] , glistening with pre-cum .
But far sicker is the phrase 'Frozen Potato ' that they use .
This filthy term , again found in the secret homosexual [ goatse.fr ] 'Sauce Code, ' refers to the solo homosexual [ goatse.fr ] practice of defecating into a clear polythene bag , shaping the turd into a crude approximation of the male phallus , then leaving it in the freezer overnight until it becomes solid .
The practitioner then proceeds to push the frozen 'potato ' up his own rectum , squeezing it in and out until his tight young balls erupt in a screaming orgasm.And Red Hat [ debian.org ] is secret homo [ comp-u-geek.net ] slang for the tip of a penis [ rotten.com ] that is soaked in blood from a freshly violated underage ringpiece.The fags have even invented special tools to aid their faggotry !
For example , the 'supermount ' tool was devised to allow deeper penetration , which is good for fags because it gives more pressure on the prostate gland .
'Automount ' is used , on the other hand , because Linux users are all fat and gay , and need to mount each other [ comp-u-geek.net ] automatically.The depths of their depravity can be seen in their use of 'mount points .
' These are , plainly speaking , the different points of penetration .
The main one is obviously/anus , but there are others .
Militant fags even say 'there is no/opt mount point ' because for these dirty perverts faggotry is not optional but a way of life.More evidence is in the fact that Linux users say how much they love ` man ` , even going so far as to say that all new Linux users ( who are in fact just innocent heterosexuals indoctrinated by the gay propaganda ) should try out ` man ` .
In no other system do users boast of their frequent recourse to a man.Other areas of the system also show Linux 's inherit gayness .
For example , people are often told of the 'FAQ, ' but how many innocent heterosexual Windows [ amiga.com ] users know what this actually means .
The answer is shocking : Faggot Anal Quest : the voyage of discovery for newly converted fags ! Even the title 'Slashdot [ geekizoid.com ] ' originally referred to a homosexual [ goatse.fr ] practice .
Slashdot [ kuro5hin.org ] of course refers to the popular gay practice of blood-letting .
The Slashbots , of course are those super-zealous homosexuals [ goatse.fr ] who take this perversion to its extreme by ripping open their anuses , as seen on the site most popular with Slashdot users , the depraved work of Satan , http : //www.eff.org/ [ eff.org ] .The editors of Slashdot [ slashduh.org ] also have homosexual [ goatse.fr ] names : 'Hemos ' is obvious in itself , being one vowel away from 'Homos .
' But even more sickening is 'Commander Taco ' which sounds a bit like 'Commode in Taco, ' filthy gay slang for a pair of spreadeagled buttocks that are caked with excrement [ pboy.com ] .
( The best form of lubrication , they insist .
) Sometimes , these 'Taco Commodes ' have special 'Salsa Sauce ' ( blood from a ruptured rectum ) and 'Cheese ' ( rancid flakes of penis [ rotten.com ] discharge ) toppings .
And to make it even worse , Slashdot [ notslashdot.org ] runs on Apache !
The Apache [ microsoft.com ] server , whose use among fags is as prevalent as AIDS , is named after homosexual [ goatse.fr ] activity -- as everyone knows , popular faggot band , the Village People , featured an Apache Indian , and it is for him that this gay program is named.And that 's not forgetting the use of patches in the Linux fag world -- patches are used to make the anus accessible for repeated anal sex even after its rupture by a session of fisting.To summarise : Linux is gay .
'Slash -- Dot ' is the graphical description of the space between a young boy 's scrotum and anus .
And BeOS [ apple.com ] is for hermaphrodites and disabled 'stumpers .
' FEEDBACK What worries me is how much you know about what gay people do .
I 'm scared I actually read this whole thing .
I think this post is a good example of the negative effects of Internet usage on people .
This person obviously has no social life anymore and had to result to writing something as stupid as this .
And actually take the time to do it too .
Although... I think it was satire.. blah.. it 's early .
-- Anonymous Coward , SlashdotWell , the only reason I know all about this is because I had the misfortune to read the Linux 'Sauce code ' once .
Although publicised as the computer code needed to get Linux up and running on a computer ( and have n't you always been worried about the phrase 'Monolithic Kernel ' ?
) , this foul document is actually a detailed and graphic description of every conceivable degrading perversion known to the human race , as well as a few of the major animal species .
It has shocked and disturbed me , to the point of needing to shock and disturb the common man to warn them of the impending homo [ comp-u-geek.net ] -calypse which threatens to engulf our planet .
You must work for the government .
Trying to post the most obscene stuff in hopes that slashdot wo n't be able to continue or something , due to legal woes .
If i ever see your ugly face , i 'm going to stick my fireplace poker up your ass , after it 's nice and hot , to weld shut that nasty gaping hole of yours .
-- Anonymous Coward , SlashdotDoes n't it give you a hard-on to imagine your thick strong poker ramming it 's way up my most sacred of sphincters ?
You 're beyond help , my friend , as the only thing you can imagine is the foul penetrative violation of another man .
Are you sure you 're not Eric Raymond ?
The government , being populated by limp-wristed liberals , could never stem the sickening tide of homosexual [ goatse.fr ] child molesting Linux advocacy .
Hell , they 've given NAMBLA free reign for years !
you really should post this logged in .
i wish i could remember jebus 's password , cuz i 'd give it to you .
-- mighty jebus [ slashdot.org ] , SlashdotThank you for your kind words of support .
However , this document shall only ever be posted anonymously .
This is because the 'Open Sauce ' movement is a sham , proposing homoerotic cults of hero worshipping in the name of freedom .
I speak for the common man .
For any man who prefers the warm , enveloping velvet folds of a woman 's vagina [ bodysnatchers.co.uk ] to the tight puckered ringpiece of a child .
These men , being common , decent folk , do n't have a say in the political hypocrisy that is Slashdot culture .
I am the unknown liberator [ hitler.org ] .
ROLF LAMO i hate linux FAGGOTS -- Anonymous Coward , SlashdotWe should n't hate them , we should pity them for the misguided fools they are... Fanatical Linux zeal-outs need to be herded into camps for re-education and subsequent rehabilitation into normal heterosexual society .
This re-education shall be achieved by forcing them to watch repeats of Baywatch until the very mention of Pamela Anderson [ rotten.com ] causes them to fill their pants with healthy heterosexual jism [ zillabunny.com ] .
Actually , that 's not at all how scrotal inflation works .
I understand it involves injecting sterile saline solution into the scrotum .
I 've never tried this , but you can read how to do it safely in case you 're interested .
( Before you moderate this down , ask yourself honestly -- who are the real crazies -- people who do scrotal inflation , or people who pay $ 1000 + for a game console ?
) -- double \ _h [ slashdot.org ] , SlashdotWell , it just goes to show that even the holy Linux 'sauce code ' is riddled with bugs that need fixing .
( The irony of Jon Katz not even being able to inflate his scrotum correctly has not been lost on me .
) The Linux pervert elite already acknowledge this , with their queer slogan : 'Given enough arms , all rectums are shallow .
' And anyway , the PS2 [ xbox.com ] sucks major cock and is n't worth the money .
Intellivision forever !
dude did u used to post on msnbc 's nt bulletin board now that u are doing anti-gay posts u also need to start in with anti-black stuff too c u in church -- Anonymous Coward , SlashdotFor one thing , whilst Linux is a cavalcade of queer propaganda masquerading as the future of computing , NT [ linux.com ] is used by people who think nothing better of encasing their genitals in quick setting plaster then going to see a really dirty porno film , enjoying the restriction enforced onto them .
Remember , a wasted arousal is a sin in the eyes of the Catholic church [ atheism.org ] .
Clearly , the only god-fearing Christian operating system in existence is CP/M -- The Christian Program Monitor .
All computer users should immediately ask their local pastor to install this fine OS onto their systems .
It is the only route to salvation.Secondly , this message is for every man .
Computers know no colour .
Not only that , but one of the finest websites in the world is maintained by a Black Man [ stileproject.com ] .
Now fuck off you racist donkey felcher .
And do n't forget that slashdot was written in Perl , which is just too close to 'Pearl Necklace ' for comfort.... oh wait ; that 's something all you heterosexuals do.... I ca n't help but wonder how much faster the trolls could do First-Posts on this site if it were redone in PHP... I could hand-type dynamic HTML pages faster than Perl can do them .
-- phee [ slashdot.org ] , SlashdotAlthough there is nothing unholy about the fine heterosexual act of ejaculating between a woman 's breasts , squirting one 's load up towards her neck and chin area , it should be noted that Perl [ python.org ] ( standing for Pansies Entering Rectums Locally ) is also close to 'Pearl Monocle, ' 'Pearl Nosering, ' and the ubiquitous 'Pearl Enema .
'One scary thing about Perl [ sun.com ] is that it contains hidden homosexual [ goatse.fr ] messages .
Take the following code : LWP : : Simple -- It looks innocuous enough , does n't it ?
But look at the line closely : There are two colons next to each other !
As Larry 'Balls to the ' Wall would openly admit in the Perl Documentation , Perl was designed from the ground up to indoctrinate it 's programmers into performing unnatural sexual acts -- having two colons so closely together is clearly a reference to the perverse sickening act of 'colon kissing, ' whereby two homosexual [ goatse.fr ] queers spread their buttocks wide , pressing their filthy torn sphincters together .
They then share small round objects like marbles or golfballs by passing them from one rectum to another using muscle contraction alone .
This is also referred to in programming 'circles ' as 'Parameter Passing .
'And PHP [ perl.org ] stands for Perverted Homosexual Penetration .
Did n't you know ?
Thank you for your valuable input on this .
I am sure you will be never forgotten .
BTW : Did I mention that this could be useful in terraforming Mars ?
Mars rulaa .
-- Eimernase [ slashdot.org ] , SlashdotWell , I do n't know about terraforming Mars , but I do know that homosexual [ goatse.fr ] Linux Advocates have been probing Uranus for years .
That 's inspiring .
Keep up the good work , AC .
May God in his wisdom grant you the strength to bring the plain honest truth to this community , and make it pure again .
Yours , Cerberus .
-- Anonymous Coward , Slashdot * sniff * That brings a tear to my eye .
Thank you once more for your kind support .
I have taken faith in the knowledge that I am doing the Good Lord [ atheism.org ] 's work , but it is encouraging to know that I am helping out the common man here.However , I should be cautious about revealing your name 'Cerberus ' on such a filthy den of depravity as Slashdot .
It is a well known fact that the 'Kerberos ' documentation from Microsoft is a detailed manual describing , in intimate , exacting detail , how to sexually penetrate a variety of unwilling canine animals ; be they domesticated , wild , or mythical .
Slashdot posters have taken great pleasure in illegally spreading this documentation far and wide , treating it as an 'extension ' to the Linux 'Sauce Code, ' for the sake of 'interoperability .
' ( The slang term they use for nonconsensual intercourse -- their favourite kind .
) In fact , sick twisted Linux deviants are known to have LAN parties , ( Love of Anal Naughtiness , needless to say .
) , wherein they entice a stray dog , known as the 'Samba Mount, ' into their homes .
Up to four of these filth-sodden blasphemers against nature take turns to plunge their erect , throbbing , uncircumcised members , conkers-deep , into the rectum , mouth , and other fleshy orifices of the poor animal .
Eventually , the 'Samba Mount ' collapses due to 'overload, ' and needs to be 'rebooted .
' ( i.e. , kicked out into the street , and left to fend for itself .
) Many Linux users boast about their 'uptime ' in such situations .
Inspiring stuff !
If only all trolls were this quality !
-- Anonymous Coward , SlashdotIf only indeed .
You can help our brave cause by moderating this message up as often as possible .
I recommend ' + 1 , Underrated, ' as that will protect your precious Karma in Metamoderation [ slashdot.org ] .
Only then can we break through the glass ceiling of Homosexual Slashdot Culture .
Is it any wonder that the new version of Slashcode has been christened 'Bender ' ? ?
? If we can get just one of these postings up to at least ' + 1, ' then it will be archived forever !
Others will learn of our struggle , and join with us in our battle for freedom !
It 's pathetic you 've spent so much time writing this .
-- Anonymous Coward , SlashdotI am compelled to document the foulness and carnal depravity [ catholic.net ] that is Linux , in order that we may prepare ourselves for the great holy war that is to follow .
It is my solemn duty to peel back the foreskin of ignorance and apply the wire brush of enlightenment .
As with any great open-source project , you need someone asking this question , so I 'll do it .
When the hell is version 2.0 going to be ready ? ! ? !
-- Anonymous Coward , SlashdotI could make an arrogant , childish comment along the lines of 'Every time someone asks for 2.0 , I wo n't release it for another 24 hours, ' but the truth of the matter is that I 'm quite nervous of releasing a 'number two, ' as I can guarantee some filthy shit-slurping Linux pervert would want to suck it straight out of my anus before I 've even had chance to wipe .
I desperately want to suck your monolithic kernel , you sexy hunk , you .
-- Anonymous Coward , SlashdotI sincerely hope you 're Natalie Portman [ geocities.com ] .
Dude , nothing on slashdot larger than 3 paragraphs is worth reading .
Try to distill the message , whatever it was , and maybe I 'll read it .
As it is , I have to much open source software to write to waste even 10 seconds of precious time .
10 seconds is all its gon na take M $ to whoop Linux 's ass .
Vigilence is the price of Free ( as in libre -- from the fine , frou frou French language ) Software .
Hack on fellow geeks , and remember : Friday is Bouillabaisse day except for heathens who do not believe that Jesus died for their sins .
Those godless , oil drench , bearded sexist clowns can pull grits from their pantaloons ( another fine , fine French word ) and eat that .
Anyway , try to keep your message focused and concise .
For concision is the soul of derision .
Way. -- Anonymous Coward , SlashdotWhat the fuck ?
I 've read your gay conspiracy post version 1.3.0 and I must say I 'm impressed .
In particular , I appreciate how you have managed to squeeze in a healthy dose of the latent homosexuality you gay-bashing homos [ comp-u-geek.net ] tend to be full of .
Thank you again .
-- Anonymous Coward , SlashdotWell bugger me !
ooooh honey .
how insecure are you ! ! !
wann a little massage from deare bruci .
love you -- Anonymous Coward , SlashdotFuck right off ! IMPORTANT : This message needs to be heard ( Not HURD [ linux.org ] , which is an acronym for 'Huge Unclean Rectal Dilator ' ) across the whole community , so it has been released into the Public Domain [ icopyright.com ] .
You know , that licence that we all had before those homoerotic crypto-fascists came out with the GPL [ apple.com ] ( Gay Penetration License ) that is no more than an excuse to see who 's got the biggest feces-encrusted [ rotten.com ] cock .
I would have put this up on Freshmeat [ adultmember.com ] , but that name is known to be a euphemism for the tight rump of a young boy.Come to think of it , the whole concept of 'Source Control ' unnerves me , because it sounds a bit like 'Sauce Control, ' which is a description of the homosexual [ goatse.fr ] practice of holding the base of the cock shaft tightly upon the point of ejaculation , thus causing a build up of semenal fluid that is only released upon entry into an incision made into the base of the receiver 's scrotum .
And 'Open Sauce ' is the act of ejaculating into another mans face or perhaps a biscuit to be shared later .
Obviously , 'Closed Sauce ' is the only Christian thing to do , as evidenced by the fact that it is what Cathedrals are all about .
Contributors : ( although not to the eternal game of 'soggy biscuit ' that open 'sauce ' development has become ) Anonymous Coward , Anonymous Coward , phee , Anonymous Coward , mighty jebus , Anonymous Coward , Anonymous Coward , double \ _h , Anonymous Coward , Eimernase , Anonymous Coward , Anonymous Coward , Anonymous Coward , Anonymous Coward , Anonymous Coward , Anonymous Coward , Anonymous Coward , Anonymous Coward .
Further contributions are welcome .
Current changes : This version sent to FreeWIPO [ slashdot.org ] by 'Bring BackATV ' as plain text .
Reformatted everything , added all links back in ( that we could match from the previous version ) , many new ones ( Slashbot bait links ) .
Even more spelling fixed .
Who wrote this thing , CmdrTaco himself ?
Previous changes : Yet more changes added .
Spelling fixed .
Feedback added .
Explanation of 'distro ' system .
'Mount Point ' syntax described .
More filth regarding ` man ` and Slashdot .
Yet more fucking spelling fixed .
'Fetchmail ' uncovered further .
More Slashbot baiting .
Apache exposed .
Distribution licence at foot of document .
ANUX -- A full Linux distribution... Up your ass !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has come to my attention that the entire Linux community is a hotbed of so called 'alternative sexuality,' which includes anything from hedonistic orgies to homosexuality to pedophilia.What better way of demonstrating this than by looking at the hidden messages contained within the names of some of Linux's most outspoken advocates: Linus Torvalds [microsoft.com] is an anagram of slit anus or VD 'L,' clearly referring to himself by the first initial.
Richard M. Stallman [geocities.com], spokespervert for the Gaysex's Not Unusual 'movement' is an anagram of mans cram thrill ad.
Alan Cox [microsoft.com] is barely an anagram of anal cox which is just so filthy and unchristian it unnerves me.I'm sure that Eric S. Raymond, composer of the satanic homosexual [goatse.fr] propaganda diatribe The Cathedral and the Bizarre, is probably an anagram of something queer, but we don't need to look that far as we know he's always shoving a gun up some poor little boy's rectum.
Update: Eric S. Raymond is actually an anagram for secondary rim and cord in my arse.
It just goes to show you that he is indeed queer.
Update the Second: It is also documented that Evil Sicko Gaymond is responsible for a nauseating piece of code called Fetchmail [microsoft.com], which is obviously sinister sodomite slang for 'Felch Male' -- a disgusting practise.
For those not in the know, 'felching' is the act performed by two perverts wherein one sucks their own post-coital ejaculate out of the other's rectum.
In fact, it appears that the dirty Linux faggots set out to undermine the good Republican institution of e-mail, turning it into 'e-male.
'As far as Richard 'Master' Stallman goes, that filthy fudge-packer was actually quoted [salon.com] on leftist commie propaganda site Salon.com as saying the following: 'I've been resistant to the pressure to conform in any circumstance,' he says.
'It's about being able to question conventional wisdom,' he asserts.
'I believe in love, but not monogamy,' he says plainly.And this isn't a made up troll bullshit either!
He actually stated this tripe, which makes it obvious that he is trying to politely say that he's a flaming homo [comp-u-geek.net] slut [rotten.com]!Speaking about 'flaming,' who better to point out as a filthy chutney ferret than Slashdot's very own self-confessed pederast Jon Katz.
Although an obvious deviant anagram cannot be found from his name, he has already confessed, nay boasted of the homosexual [goatse.fr] perversion of corrupting the innocence of young children [slashdot.org].
To quote from the article linked:'I've got a rare kidney disease,' I told her.
'I have to go to the bathroom a lot.
You can come with me if you want, but it takes a while.
Is that okay with you?
Do you want a note from my doctor?
'Is this why you were touching your penis [rotten.com] in the cinema, Jon?
And letting the other boys touch it too?We should also point out that Jon Katz refers to himself as 'Slashdot's resident Gasbag.
' Is there any more doubt?
For those fortunate few who aren't aware of the list of homosexual [goatse.fr] terminology found inside the Linux 'Sauce Code,' a 'Gasbag' is a pervert who gains sexual gratification from having a thin straw inserted into his urethra (or to use the common parlance, 'piss-pipe'), then his homosexual [goatse.fr] lover blows firmly down the straw to inflate his scrotum.
This is, of course, when he's not busy violating the dignity and copyright of posters to Slashdot by gathering together their postings and publishing them en masse to further his twisted and manipulative journalistic agenda.Sick, disgusting antichristian perverts, the lot of them.In addition, many of the Linux distributions (a 'distribution' is the most common way to spread the faggots' wares) are run by faggot groups.
The Slackware [redhat.com] distro is named after the 'Slack-wear' fags wear to allow easy access to the anus for sexual purposes.
Furthermore, Slackware is a close anagram of claw arse, a reference to the homosexual [goatse.fr] practise of anal fisting.
The Mandrake [slackware.com] product is run by a group of French faggot satanists, and is named after the faggot nickname for the vibrator.
It was also chosen because it is an anagram for dark amen and ram naked, which is what they do.Another 'distro,' (abbrieviated as such because it sounds a bit like 'Disco,' which is where homosexuals [goatse.fr] preyed on young boys in the 1970s), is Debian, [mandrake.com] an anagram of in a bed, which could be considered innocent enough (after all, a bed is both where we sleep and pray), until we realise what other names Debian uses to describe their foul wares.
'Woody' is obvious enough, being a term for the erect male penis [rotten.com], glistening with pre-cum.
But far sicker is the phrase 'Frozen Potato' that they use.
This filthy term, again found in the secret homosexual [goatse.fr] 'Sauce Code,' refers to the solo homosexual [goatse.fr] practice of defecating into a clear polythene bag, shaping the turd into a crude approximation of the male phallus, then leaving it in the freezer overnight until it becomes solid.
The practitioner then proceeds to push the frozen 'potato' up his own rectum, squeezing it in and out until his tight young balls erupt in a screaming orgasm.And Red Hat [debian.org] is secret homo [comp-u-geek.net] slang for the tip of a penis [rotten.com] that is soaked in blood from a freshly violated underage ringpiece.The fags have even invented special tools to aid their faggotry!
For example, the 'supermount' tool was devised to allow deeper penetration, which is good for fags because it gives more pressure on the prostate gland.
'Automount' is used, on the other hand, because Linux users are all fat and gay, and need to mount each other [comp-u-geek.net] automatically.The depths of their depravity can be seen in their use of 'mount points.
' These are, plainly speaking, the different points of penetration.
The main one is obviously/anus, but there are others.
Militant fags even say 'there is no/opt mount point' because for these dirty perverts faggotry is not optional but a way of life.More evidence is in the fact that Linux users say how much they love `man`, even going so far as to say that all new Linux users (who are in fact just innocent heterosexuals indoctrinated by the gay propaganda) should try out `man`.
In no other system do users boast of their frequent recourse to a man.Other areas of the system also show Linux's inherit gayness.
For example, people are often told of the 'FAQ,' but how many innocent heterosexual Windows [amiga.com] users know what this actually means.
The answer is shocking: Faggot Anal Quest: the voyage of discovery for newly converted fags!Even the title 'Slashdot [geekizoid.com]' originally referred to a homosexual [goatse.fr] practice.
Slashdot [kuro5hin.org] of course refers to the popular gay practice of blood-letting.
The Slashbots, of course are those super-zealous homosexuals [goatse.fr] who take this perversion to its extreme by ripping open their anuses, as seen on the site most popular with Slashdot users, the depraved work of Satan, http://www.eff.org/ [eff.org].The editors of Slashdot [slashduh.org] also have homosexual [goatse.fr] names: 'Hemos' is obvious in itself, being one vowel away from 'Homos.
' But even more sickening is 'Commander Taco' which sounds a bit like 'Commode in Taco,' filthy gay slang for a pair of spreadeagled buttocks that are caked with excrement [pboy.com].
(The best form of lubrication, they insist.
) Sometimes, these 'Taco Commodes' have special 'Salsa Sauce' (blood from a ruptured rectum) and 'Cheese' (rancid flakes of penis [rotten.com] discharge) toppings.
And to make it even worse, Slashdot [notslashdot.org] runs on Apache!
The Apache [microsoft.com] server, whose use among fags is as prevalent as AIDS, is named after homosexual [goatse.fr] activity -- as everyone knows, popular faggot band, the Village People, featured an Apache Indian, and it is for him that this gay program is named.And that's not forgetting the use of patches in the Linux fag world -- patches are used to make the anus accessible for repeated anal sex even after its rupture by a session of fisting.To summarise: Linux is gay.
'Slash -- Dot' is the graphical description of the space between a young boy's scrotum and anus.
And BeOS [apple.com] is for hermaphrodites and disabled 'stumpers.
' FEEDBACK  What worries me is how much you know about what gay people do.
I'm scared I actually read this whole thing.
I think this post is a good example of the negative effects of Internet usage on people.
This person obviously has no social life anymore and had to result to writing something as stupid as this.
And actually take the time to do it too.
Although... I think it was satire.. blah.. it's early.
-- Anonymous Coward, SlashdotWell, the only reason I know all about this is because I had the misfortune to read the Linux 'Sauce code' once.
Although publicised as the computer code needed to get Linux up and running on a computer (and haven't you always been worried about the phrase 'Monolithic Kernel'?
), this foul document is actually a detailed and graphic description of every conceivable degrading perversion known to the human race, as well as a few of the major animal species.
It has shocked and disturbed me, to the point of needing to shock and disturb the common man to warn them of the impending homo [comp-u-geek.net]-calypse which threatens to engulf our planet.
You must work for the government.
Trying to post the most obscene stuff in hopes that slashdot won't be able to continue or something, due to legal woes.
If i ever see your ugly face, i'm going to stick my fireplace poker up your ass, after it's nice and hot, to weld shut that nasty gaping hole of yours.
-- Anonymous Coward, SlashdotDoesn't it give you a hard-on to imagine your thick strong poker ramming it's way up my most sacred of sphincters?
You're beyond help, my friend, as the only thing you can imagine is the foul penetrative violation of another man.
Are you sure you're not Eric Raymond?
The government, being populated by limp-wristed liberals, could never stem the sickening tide of homosexual [goatse.fr] child molesting Linux advocacy.
Hell, they've given NAMBLA free reign for years!
you really should post this logged in.
i wish i could remember jebus's password, cuz i'd give it to you.
-- mighty jebus [slashdot.org], SlashdotThank you for your kind words of support.
However, this document shall only ever be posted anonymously.
This is because the 'Open Sauce' movement is a sham, proposing homoerotic cults of hero worshipping in the name of freedom.
I speak for the common man.
For any man who prefers the warm, enveloping velvet folds of a woman's vagina [bodysnatchers.co.uk] to the tight puckered ringpiece of a child.
These men, being common, decent folk, don't have a say in the political hypocrisy that is Slashdot culture.
I am the unknown liberator [hitler.org].
ROLF LAMO i hate linux FAGGOTS -- Anonymous Coward, SlashdotWe shouldn't hate them, we should pity them for the misguided fools they are... Fanatical Linux zeal-outs need to be herded into camps for re-education and subsequent rehabilitation into normal heterosexual society.
This re-education shall be achieved by forcing them to watch repeats of Baywatch until the very mention of Pamela Anderson [rotten.com] causes them to fill their pants with healthy heterosexual jism [zillabunny.com].
Actually, that's not at all how scrotal inflation works.
I understand it involves injecting sterile saline solution into the scrotum.
I've never tried this, but you can read how to do it safely in case you're interested.
(Before you moderate this down, ask yourself honestly -- who are the real crazies -- people who do scrotal inflation, or people who pay $1000+ for a game console?
) -- double\_h [slashdot.org], SlashdotWell, it just goes to show that even the holy Linux 'sauce code' is riddled with bugs that need fixing.
(The irony of Jon Katz not even being able to inflate his scrotum correctly has not been lost on me.
) The Linux pervert elite already acknowledge this, with their queer slogan: 'Given enough arms, all rectums are shallow.
' And anyway, the PS2 [xbox.com] sucks major cock and isn't worth the money.
Intellivision forever!
dude did u used to post on msnbc's nt bulletin board now that u are doing anti-gay posts u also need to start in with anti-black stuff too c u in church -- Anonymous Coward, SlashdotFor one thing, whilst Linux is a cavalcade of queer propaganda masquerading as the future of computing, NT [linux.com] is used by people who think nothing better of encasing their genitals in quick setting plaster then going to see a really dirty porno film, enjoying the restriction enforced onto them.
Remember, a wasted arousal is a sin in the eyes of the Catholic church [atheism.org].
Clearly, the only god-fearing Christian operating system in existence is CP/M -- The Christian Program Monitor.
All computer users should immediately ask their local pastor to install this fine OS onto their systems.
It is the only route to salvation.Secondly, this message is for every man.
Computers know no colour.
Not only that, but one of the finest websites in the world is maintained by  a Black Man [stileproject.com] .
Now fuck off you racist donkey felcher.
And don't forget that slashdot was written in Perl, which is just too close to 'Pearl Necklace' for comfort.... oh wait; that's something all you heterosexuals do.... I can't help but wonder how much faster the trolls could do First-Posts on this site if it were redone in PHP... I could hand-type dynamic HTML pages faster than Perl can do them.
-- phee [slashdot.org], SlashdotAlthough there is nothing unholy about the fine heterosexual act of ejaculating between a woman's breasts, squirting one's load up towards her neck and chin area, it should be noted that Perl [python.org] (standing for Pansies Entering Rectums Locally) is also close to 'Pearl Monocle,' 'Pearl Nosering,' and the ubiquitous 'Pearl Enema.
'One scary thing about Perl [sun.com] is that it contains hidden homosexual [goatse.fr] messages.
Take the following code: LWP::Simple -- It looks innocuous enough, doesn't it?
But look at the line closely: There are two colons next to each other!
As Larry 'Balls to the' Wall would openly admit in the Perl Documentation, Perl was designed from the ground up to indoctrinate it's programmers into performing unnatural sexual acts -- having two colons so closely together is clearly a reference to the perverse sickening act of 'colon kissing,' whereby two homosexual [goatse.fr] queers spread their buttocks wide, pressing their filthy torn sphincters together.
They then share small round objects like marbles or golfballs by passing them from one rectum to another using muscle contraction alone.
This is also referred to in programming 'circles' as 'Parameter Passing.
'And PHP [perl.org] stands for Perverted Homosexual Penetration.
Didn't you know?
Thank you for your valuable input on this.
I am sure you will be never forgotten.
BTW: Did I mention that this could be useful in terraforming Mars?
Mars rulaa.
-- Eimernase [slashdot.org], SlashdotWell, I don't know about terraforming Mars, but I do know that homosexual [goatse.fr] Linux Advocates have been probing Uranus for years.
That's inspiring.
Keep up the good work, AC.
May God in his wisdom grant you the strength to bring the plain honest truth to this community, and make it pure again.
Yours, Cerberus.
-- Anonymous Coward, Slashdot *sniff* That brings a tear to my eye.
Thank you once more for your kind support.
I have taken faith in the knowledge that I am doing the Good Lord [atheism.org]'s work, but it is encouraging to know that I am helping out the common man here.However, I should be cautious about revealing your name 'Cerberus' on such a filthy den of depravity as Slashdot.
It is a well known fact that the 'Kerberos' documentation from Microsoft is a detailed manual describing, in intimate, exacting detail, how to sexually penetrate a variety of unwilling canine animals; be they domesticated, wild, or mythical.
Slashdot posters have taken great pleasure in illegally spreading this documentation far and wide, treating it as an 'extension' to the Linux 'Sauce Code,' for the sake of 'interoperability.
' (The slang term they use for nonconsensual intercourse -- their favourite kind.
)In fact, sick twisted Linux deviants are known to have LAN parties, (Love of Anal Naughtiness, needless to say.
), wherein they entice a stray dog, known as the 'Samba Mount,' into their homes.
Up to four of these filth-sodden blasphemers against nature take turns to plunge their erect, throbbing, uncircumcised members, conkers-deep, into the rectum, mouth, and other fleshy orifices of the poor animal.
Eventually, the 'Samba Mount' collapses due to 'overload,' and needs to be 'rebooted.
' (i.e., kicked out into the street, and left to fend for itself.
) Many Linux users boast about their 'uptime' in such situations.
Inspiring stuff!
If only all trolls were this quality!
-- Anonymous Coward, SlashdotIf only indeed.
You can help our brave cause by moderating this message up as often as possible.
I recommend '+1, Underrated,' as that will protect your precious Karma in Metamoderation [slashdot.org].
Only then can we break through the glass ceiling of Homosexual Slashdot Culture.
Is it any wonder that the new version of Slashcode has been christened 'Bender'??
?If we can get just one of these postings up to at least '+1,' then it will be archived forever!
Others will learn of our struggle, and join with us in our battle for freedom!
It's pathetic you've spent so much time writing this.
-- Anonymous Coward, SlashdotI am compelled to document the foulness and carnal depravity [catholic.net] that is Linux, in order that we may prepare ourselves for the great holy war that is to follow.
It is my solemn duty to peel back the foreskin of ignorance and apply the wire brush of enlightenment.
As with any great open-source project, you need someone asking this question, so I'll do it.
When the hell is version 2.0 going to be ready?!?!
-- Anonymous Coward, SlashdotI could make an arrogant, childish comment along the lines of 'Every time someone asks for 2.0, I won't release it for another 24 hours,' but the truth of the matter is that I'm quite nervous of releasing a 'number two,' as I can guarantee some filthy shit-slurping Linux pervert would want to suck it straight out of my anus before I've even had chance to wipe.
I desperately want to suck your monolithic kernel, you sexy hunk, you.
-- Anonymous Coward, SlashdotI sincerely hope you're Natalie Portman [geocities.com].
Dude, nothing on slashdot larger than 3 paragraphs is worth reading.
Try to distill the message, whatever it was, and maybe I'll read it.
As it is, I have to much open source software to write to waste even 10 seconds of precious time.
10 seconds is all its gonna take M$ to whoop Linux's ass.
Vigilence is the price of Free (as in libre -- from the fine, frou frou French language) Software.
Hack on fellow geeks, and remember: Friday is Bouillabaisse day except for heathens who do not believe that Jesus died for their sins.
Those godless, oil drench, bearded sexist clowns can pull grits from their pantaloons (another fine, fine French word) and eat that.
Anyway, try to keep your message focused and concise.
For concision is the soul of derision.
Way. -- Anonymous Coward, SlashdotWhat the fuck?
I've read your gay conspiracy post version 1.3.0 and I must say I'm impressed.
In particular, I appreciate how you have managed to squeeze in a healthy dose of the latent homosexuality you gay-bashing homos [comp-u-geek.net] tend to be full of.
Thank you again.
-- Anonymous Coward, SlashdotWell bugger me!
ooooh honey.
how insecure are you!!!
wann a little massage from deare bruci.
love you -- Anonymous Coward, SlashdotFuck right off!IMPORTANT: This message needs to be heard (Not HURD [linux.org], which is an acronym for 'Huge Unclean Rectal Dilator') across the whole community, so it has been released into the Public Domain [icopyright.com].
You know, that licence that we all had before those homoerotic crypto-fascists came out with the GPL [apple.com] (Gay Penetration License) that is no more than an excuse to see who's got the biggest feces-encrusted [rotten.com] cock.
I would have put this up on Freshmeat [adultmember.com], but that name is known to be a euphemism for the tight rump of a young boy.Come to think of it, the whole concept of 'Source Control' unnerves me, because it sounds a bit like 'Sauce Control,' which is a description of the homosexual [goatse.fr] practice of holding the base of the cock shaft tightly upon the point of ejaculation, thus causing a build up of semenal fluid that is only released upon entry into an incision made into the base of the receiver's scrotum.
And 'Open Sauce' is the act of ejaculating into another mans face or perhaps a biscuit to be shared later.
Obviously, 'Closed Sauce' is the only Christian thing to do, as evidenced by the fact that it is what Cathedrals are all about.
Contributors: (although not to the eternal game of 'soggy biscuit' that open 'sauce' development has become) Anonymous Coward, Anonymous Coward, phee, Anonymous Coward, mighty jebus, Anonymous Coward, Anonymous Coward, double\_h, Anonymous Coward, Eimernase, Anonymous Coward, Anonymous Coward, Anonymous Coward, Anonymous Coward, Anonymous Coward, Anonymous Coward, Anonymous Coward, Anonymous Coward.
Further contributions are welcome.
Current changes: This version sent to  FreeWIPO  [slashdot.org] by 'Bring BackATV' as plain text.
Reformatted everything, added all links back in (that we could match from the previous version), many new ones (Slashbot bait links).
Even more spelling fixed.
Who wrote this thing, CmdrTaco himself?
Previous changes: Yet more changes added.
Spelling fixed.
Feedback added.
Explanation of 'distro' system.
'Mount Point' syntax described.
More filth regarding `man` and Slashdot.
Yet more fucking spelling fixed.
'Fetchmail' uncovered further.
More Slashbot baiting.
Apache exposed.
Distribution licence at foot of document.
ANUX -- A full Linux distribution... Up your ass!  
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942552</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943428</id>
	<title>I recommend to add "Anonymous coward"  to the list</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257108000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>every one of them. yeah.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>every one of them .
yeah .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>every one of them.
yeah.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29946076</id>
	<title>can i check if my name is on the list ?</title>
	<author>mr\_musan</author>
	<datestamp>1257085140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Any one know if there is a way to check if ones name has been put on the list, like a freedom of information act or something ?

i had planed to visit usa for a short holiday, something i had already dreaded doing but if i get put on some stupid list i just won't bother</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any one know if there is a way to check if ones name has been put on the list , like a freedom of information act or something ?
i had planed to visit usa for a short holiday , something i had already dreaded doing but if i get put on some stupid list i just wo n't bother</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any one know if there is a way to check if ones name has been put on the list, like a freedom of information act or something ?
i had planed to visit usa for a short holiday, something i had already dreaded doing but if i get put on some stupid list i just won't bother</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29946506</id>
	<title>"reasonable suspicion" is defined in the article</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257088860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The inquiries can be opened by individual agents "proactively," meaning on his or her own or in response to a lead about a threat."</p><p>"reasonable suspicion" == "because the agent said so".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The inquiries can be opened by individual agents " proactively , " meaning on his or her own or in response to a lead about a threat .
" " reasonable suspicion " = = " because the agent said so " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The inquiries can be opened by individual agents "proactively," meaning on his or her own or in response to a lead about a threat.
""reasonable suspicion" == "because the agent said so".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29945732</id>
	<title>Re:Slashdot effect and the watch list</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257081840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdot is not your personal army.</p><p>try 4chan</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot is not your personal army.try 4chan</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot is not your personal army.try 4chan</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943820</id>
	<title>Re:How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257067020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It's modern-day McCarthyism, it's just that no one senator has stepped up to bat and get his name attached to this whole racket.</p></div></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/cypherpunks-moderated@minder.net/msg09873.html" title="mail-archive.com" rel="nofollow">Senator Ted Kennedy did end up on the DHS list of known terrorists.</a> [mail-archive.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's modern-day McCarthyism , it 's just that no one senator has stepped up to bat and get his name attached to this whole racket.Senator Ted Kennedy did end up on the DHS list of known terrorists .
[ mail-archive.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's modern-day McCarthyism, it's just that no one senator has stepped up to bat and get his name attached to this whole racket.Senator Ted Kennedy did end up on the DHS list of known terrorists.
[mail-archive.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943322</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942840</id>
	<title>The crap list</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257103200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My son, 12 now, with a middle eastern name but born in the US. We travel a lot and they always flag his name for a second check. Ever since he was a toddler. You would think that after the first or second time, they will somehow amend the records with my name, his mom's name and DOB. But no, we go through the process every time we fly. It is a minor irritant at his age now, but I am very worried about him when he is an adult. We are seriously thinking about changing his name but I am not sure that it will make a difference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My son , 12 now , with a middle eastern name but born in the US .
We travel a lot and they always flag his name for a second check .
Ever since he was a toddler .
You would think that after the first or second time , they will somehow amend the records with my name , his mom 's name and DOB .
But no , we go through the process every time we fly .
It is a minor irritant at his age now , but I am very worried about him when he is an adult .
We are seriously thinking about changing his name but I am not sure that it will make a difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My son, 12 now, with a middle eastern name but born in the US.
We travel a lot and they always flag his name for a second check.
Ever since he was a toddler.
You would think that after the first or second time, they will somehow amend the records with my name, his mom's name and DOB.
But no, we go through the process every time we fly.
It is a minor irritant at his age now, but I am very worried about him when he is an adult.
We are seriously thinking about changing his name but I am not sure that it will make a difference.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29948672</id>
	<title>Alternative Slashdot effect</title>
	<author>tinkerton</author>
	<datestamp>1257160380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Monday: everyone on slashdot recommends all their work collegues<br>Tuesday: recommend all friends and family<br>Wednesday: recommend random sample from phonebook<br>Thursday: everyone who owns a black dog.<br>Friday: Lieberman.</p><p>That way we'll slashdot the service AND do the nation a favor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Monday : everyone on slashdot recommends all their work colleguesTuesday : recommend all friends and familyWednesday : recommend random sample from phonebookThursday : everyone who owns a black dog.Friday : Lieberman.That way we 'll slashdot the service AND do the nation a favor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Monday: everyone on slashdot recommends all their work colleguesTuesday: recommend all friends and familyWednesday: recommend random sample from phonebookThursday: everyone who owns a black dog.Friday: Lieberman.That way we'll slashdot the service AND do the nation a favor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943408</id>
	<title>This is pretty good, actually.</title>
	<author>RudeIota</author>
	<datestamp>1257107820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How *ever* do we intend to qualify everyone in the U.S. populace as a terrorist if we can't even keep up with the rate of population growth? <br> <br>Slackers!<br> <br>At this rate, I'll take nearly 5 centuries to burn our current citizenry at the stake. I'm sure we'll have many more people by then...</htmltext>
<tokenext>How * ever * do we intend to qualify everyone in the U.S. populace as a terrorist if we ca n't even keep up with the rate of population growth ?
Slackers ! At this rate , I 'll take nearly 5 centuries to burn our current citizenry at the stake .
I 'm sure we 'll have many more people by then.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How *ever* do we intend to qualify everyone in the U.S. populace as a terrorist if we can't even keep up with the rate of population growth?
Slackers! At this rate, I'll take nearly 5 centuries to burn our current citizenry at the stake.
I'm sure we'll have many more people by then...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29949110</id>
	<title>Change Your Name</title>
	<author>mahadiga</author>
	<datestamp>1257167880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/17/1824232" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/17/1824232</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //yro.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 09/02/17/1824232 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/17/1824232 [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29944922</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29952166</id>
	<title>not me tho</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257186720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Posting in this thread more than likely gets you on the list.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Posting in this thread more than likely gets you on the list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Posting in this thread more than likely gets you on the list.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29948332</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the terrorism?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257153780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One minor point on the 58,000 number you quote is that most terrorist networks are made up mostly of support elements. Take the IRA, they had large sections of the community support the formally joined IRA membership with again a minority of them in the armed ASU's (Active Service Units). However you are still correct in my mind, even if you set support to ASU ratio at 100 to 1 (580 ASU members) you'd think 'the evildoers' would be able to get one successful attack inside the US since 911. On the other hand if the FBI is correct and there are that many hostile people to watch then considering how long its been since 911 without attacks we can assume the opposition is entirely unmotivated and incompetent and not worth flushing our hard fought and won freedoms down the toilet.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One minor point on the 58,000 number you quote is that most terrorist networks are made up mostly of support elements .
Take the IRA , they had large sections of the community support the formally joined IRA membership with again a minority of them in the armed ASU 's ( Active Service Units ) .
However you are still correct in my mind , even if you set support to ASU ratio at 100 to 1 ( 580 ASU members ) you 'd think 'the evildoers ' would be able to get one successful attack inside the US since 911 .
On the other hand if the FBI is correct and there are that many hostile people to watch then considering how long its been since 911 without attacks we can assume the opposition is entirely unmotivated and incompetent and not worth flushing our hard fought and won freedoms down the toilet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One minor point on the 58,000 number you quote is that most terrorist networks are made up mostly of support elements.
Take the IRA, they had large sections of the community support the formally joined IRA membership with again a minority of them in the armed ASU's (Active Service Units).
However you are still correct in my mind, even if you set support to ASU ratio at 100 to 1 (580 ASU members) you'd think 'the evildoers' would be able to get one successful attack inside the US since 911.
On the other hand if the FBI is correct and there are that many hostile people to watch then considering how long its been since 911 without attacks we can assume the opposition is entirely unmotivated and incompetent and not worth flushing our hard fought and won freedoms down the toilet.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943586</id>
	<title>Re:How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?</title>
	<author>Latinhypercube</author>
	<datestamp>1257108900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Probably being brown skinned is enough, which seems to be the current trend of most western nations.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably being brown skinned is enough , which seems to be the current trend of most western nations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably being brown skinned is enough, which seems to be the current trend of most western nations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942522</id>
	<title>91\% of terrorists are allowed on planes</title>
	<author>SSpade</author>
	<datestamp>1257099840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If 9\% of the list o' terrorists are also on the no-fly list, that means that the feds are happy with 91\% of terrorists being on airplanes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If 9 \ % of the list o ' terrorists are also on the no-fly list , that means that the feds are happy with 91 \ % of terrorists being on airplanes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If 9\% of the list o' terrorists are also on the no-fly list, that means that the feds are happy with 91\% of terrorists being on airplanes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942680</id>
	<title>i'm on the list</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257101520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One family friend is a military lawyer; another works in sigint. Two things I learnt:</p><p>(1) Since I wrote a bunch of anti-war articles a few years ago, I am at least documented - although nothing much is said, I guess since most of what I co-wrote with my partner was published only under their name.</p><p>(2) It's worryingly trivial to obtain a list of recent peers of any particular US IP. IOW, even a routine background check will include a list of regular web sites visited.</p><p>What is needed is for any as many as possible to be on such lists: it is only by getting as many people as possible inconvenienced, while making the amount of data too great to focus too hard on harassing any one individual or small group, that such methods lose their efficacy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One family friend is a military lawyer ; another works in sigint .
Two things I learnt : ( 1 ) Since I wrote a bunch of anti-war articles a few years ago , I am at least documented - although nothing much is said , I guess since most of what I co-wrote with my partner was published only under their name .
( 2 ) It 's worryingly trivial to obtain a list of recent peers of any particular US IP .
IOW , even a routine background check will include a list of regular web sites visited.What is needed is for any as many as possible to be on such lists : it is only by getting as many people as possible inconvenienced , while making the amount of data too great to focus too hard on harassing any one individual or small group , that such methods lose their efficacy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One family friend is a military lawyer; another works in sigint.
Two things I learnt:(1) Since I wrote a bunch of anti-war articles a few years ago, I am at least documented - although nothing much is said, I guess since most of what I co-wrote with my partner was published only under their name.
(2) It's worryingly trivial to obtain a list of recent peers of any particular US IP.
IOW, even a routine background check will include a list of regular web sites visited.What is needed is for any as many as possible to be on such lists: it is only by getting as many people as possible inconvenienced, while making the amount of data too great to focus too hard on harassing any one individual or small group, that such methods lose their efficacy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29946528</id>
	<title>That's what i thought</title>
	<author>EspressoFreak</author>
	<datestamp>1257088980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Sir, you've been randomly selected for the screening process."

my ass!</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Sir , you 've been randomly selected for the screening process .
" my ass !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Sir, you've been randomly selected for the screening process.
"

my ass!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29949020</id>
	<title>false positives</title>
	<author>tinkerton</author>
	<datestamp>1257166620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The wikipage on the no fly list has an interesting take on false positives. They're people who have the same name as someone on the list. The guy who wrote that apparently can't conceive of the possibility that someone may be on the list for no reason at all, let alone the possibility that the list scores about the same as a list consisting of a random sample of the population.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The wikipage on the no fly list has an interesting take on false positives .
They 're people who have the same name as someone on the list .
The guy who wrote that apparently ca n't conceive of the possibility that someone may be on the list for no reason at all , let alone the possibility that the list scores about the same as a list consisting of a random sample of the population .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The wikipage on the no fly list has an interesting take on false positives.
They're people who have the same name as someone on the list.
The guy who wrote that apparently can't conceive of the possibility that someone may be on the list for no reason at all, let alone the possibility that the list scores about the same as a list consisting of a random sample of the population.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29944922</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942826</id>
	<title>Re:How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257103140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?</p></div><p>That's their euphemism for "foreign."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do they define " reasonable suspicion " ? That 's their euphemism for " foreign .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?That's their euphemism for "foreign.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29950190</id>
	<title>Oblig SNL</title>
	<author>LtGordon</author>
	<datestamp>1257177180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"In the past few weeks, through our national hotline, we have collected hundreds of names of suspected terrorists, and I'm proud to say that most of the calls have come from high school and college students nationwide. In fact, we received over 475 calls alone regarding this man: M'Balz Es-Hari."</htmltext>
<tokenext>" In the past few weeks , through our national hotline , we have collected hundreds of names of suspected terrorists , and I 'm proud to say that most of the calls have come from high school and college students nationwide .
In fact , we received over 475 calls alone regarding this man : M'Balz Es-Hari .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"In the past few weeks, through our national hotline, we have collected hundreds of names of suspected terrorists, and I'm proud to say that most of the calls have come from high school and college students nationwide.
In fact, we received over 475 calls alone regarding this man: M'Balz Es-Hari.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942802</id>
	<title>Leak the List.</title>
	<author>arthurpaliden</author>
	<datestamp>1257102900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am still waiting for the list to be released into the wild.  It would prove to be an interesting read.  Much like the lists of 'evil' web sites.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am still waiting for the list to be released into the wild .
It would prove to be an interesting read .
Much like the lists of 'evil ' web sites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am still waiting for the list to be released into the wild.
It would prove to be an interesting read.
Much like the lists of 'evil' web sites.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942596</id>
	<title>Lessons from the STASI</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257100560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The STASI (East German Secret Police) got awesome participation from its citizens when it asked them to help them spy on their fellow citizens.</p><p>There is a scary lesson in that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The STASI ( East German Secret Police ) got awesome participation from its citizens when it asked them to help them spy on their fellow citizens.There is a scary lesson in that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The STASI (East German Secret Police) got awesome participation from its citizens when it asked them to help them spy on their fellow citizens.There is a scary lesson in that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29947160</id>
	<title>Are they listing the Living Souls or...</title>
	<author>Tastecicles</author>
	<datestamp>1257095280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...the LEGAL ENTITIES?</p><p>There is a difference, and in case it flew by you, here it is:</p><p>A LEGAL ENTITY is a FICTION. That name entered in block capitals on a FORM is the LEGAL REPRESENTATION of one's SELF. It is an entirely separate and distinct entity, used by corporate entities to enforce STATUTES upon your Living Soul.</p><p>A Living Soul is covered under Natural Law. This boils down to two things: DO NO HARM and DO NOT DEPRIVE. Natural Law IS NOT SUPERSEDED by STATUTES. STATUTES are enforced using POLICY and with the application of CORPORATE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, also known as POLICE OFFICERS.</p><p>THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION is a CORPORATE ENTITY. It answers to the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, which in turn answers to BANKS in LONDON. It is these BANKS which make STATUTES, the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT makes and enforces POLICY to impose these statutes upon those FICTIONS which are entered onto FORMS.</p><p>Welcome to the New World Corporate Order. You have no natural rights as long as you subscribe to the LIE that CORPORATE STATUTE AND POLICY applies to YOU THE HUMAN BEING.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...the LEGAL ENTITIES ? There is a difference , and in case it flew by you , here it is : A LEGAL ENTITY is a FICTION .
That name entered in block capitals on a FORM is the LEGAL REPRESENTATION of one 's SELF .
It is an entirely separate and distinct entity , used by corporate entities to enforce STATUTES upon your Living Soul.A Living Soul is covered under Natural Law .
This boils down to two things : DO NO HARM and DO NOT DEPRIVE .
Natural Law IS NOT SUPERSEDED by STATUTES .
STATUTES are enforced using POLICY and with the application of CORPORATE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS , also known as POLICE OFFICERS.THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION is a CORPORATE ENTITY .
It answers to the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT , which in turn answers to BANKS in LONDON .
It is these BANKS which make STATUTES , the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT makes and enforces POLICY to impose these statutes upon those FICTIONS which are entered onto FORMS.Welcome to the New World Corporate Order .
You have no natural rights as long as you subscribe to the LIE that CORPORATE STATUTE AND POLICY applies to YOU THE HUMAN BEING .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...the LEGAL ENTITIES?There is a difference, and in case it flew by you, here it is:A LEGAL ENTITY is a FICTION.
That name entered in block capitals on a FORM is the LEGAL REPRESENTATION of one's SELF.
It is an entirely separate and distinct entity, used by corporate entities to enforce STATUTES upon your Living Soul.A Living Soul is covered under Natural Law.
This boils down to two things: DO NO HARM and DO NOT DEPRIVE.
Natural Law IS NOT SUPERSEDED by STATUTES.
STATUTES are enforced using POLICY and with the application of CORPORATE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, also known as POLICE OFFICERS.THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION is a CORPORATE ENTITY.
It answers to the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, which in turn answers to BANKS in LONDON.
It is these BANKS which make STATUTES, the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT makes and enforces POLICY to impose these statutes upon those FICTIONS which are entered onto FORMS.Welcome to the New World Corporate Order.
You have no natural rights as long as you subscribe to the LIE that CORPORATE STATUTE AND POLICY applies to YOU THE HUMAN BEING.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29946620</id>
	<title>Re:Inefficient System</title>
	<author>rcamans</author>
	<datestamp>1257089820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The bad guys are not going to fly under their own names. Hello.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The bad guys are not going to fly under their own names .
Hello .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The bad guys are not going to fly under their own names.
Hello.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943776</id>
	<title>Re:Watch list?</title>
	<author>Threni</author>
	<datestamp>1257066840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; I'd be more interested in knowing what the average length of time a person remains on the list, and a demographic breakdown.</p><p>I'd like to know why these people aren't arrested, if they're so dangerous?  Shouldn't the list be provided to the owners of other transit systems, shopping centres etc?  Or have these people been shown to only be interested in performing terrorist activities on planes?</p><p>If CCTV and ID cards are Orwell's `Big Brother`, then this sort of moderate, impersonal persecution is closer to Kafka's `The Trial`.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I 'd be more interested in knowing what the average length of time a person remains on the list , and a demographic breakdown.I 'd like to know why these people are n't arrested , if they 're so dangerous ?
Should n't the list be provided to the owners of other transit systems , shopping centres etc ?
Or have these people been shown to only be interested in performing terrorist activities on planes ? If CCTV and ID cards are Orwell 's ` Big Brother ` , then this sort of moderate , impersonal persecution is closer to Kafka 's ` The Trial ` .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; I'd be more interested in knowing what the average length of time a person remains on the list, and a demographic breakdown.I'd like to know why these people aren't arrested, if they're so dangerous?
Shouldn't the list be provided to the owners of other transit systems, shopping centres etc?
Or have these people been shown to only be interested in performing terrorist activities on planes?If CCTV and ID cards are Orwell's `Big Brother`, then this sort of moderate, impersonal persecution is closer to Kafka's `The Trial`.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943144</id>
	<title>Re:The crap list</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257105720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you and your son are of a terrorist persuasion, then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you and your son are of a terrorist persuasion , then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you and your son are of a terrorist persuasion, then.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508</id>
	<title>How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?</title>
	<author>HalAtWork</author>
	<datestamp>1257099660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?  I couldn't find that information in the article.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How do they define " reasonable suspicion " ?
I could n't find that information in the article .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?
I couldn't find that information in the article.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942868</id>
	<title>Need a 'priority list'</title>
	<author>gurps\_npc</author>
	<datestamp>1257103440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they don't have a second, smaller list, restricted to say no more than 1,000 names that would actually be likely to be used, then they are idiots.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they do n't have a second , smaller list , restricted to say no more than 1,000 names that would actually be likely to be used , then they are idiots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they don't have a second, smaller list, restricted to say no more than 1,000 names that would actually be likely to be used, then they are idiots.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942818</id>
	<title>Can I join in?</title>
	<author>Lemming Mark</author>
	<datestamp>1257103080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dear US Authorities,</p><p>I have heard so much about your big list of suspicious people; with so many other people being included I am beginning to feel left out.  I'm not a very naughty person but sometimes I wave subversively at CCTV cameras.  If it would help, I could also wear a long trenchcoat and shades and carry a briefcase.  I've been practicing looking at things through narrowed eyes a lot, so I would probably be quite good at being suspicious.</p><p>If you will put me on your special suspicious list, I will return the favour by putting you on my list of suspicious countries.  It currently includes every other country in the world, ever - but I'm sure it's still not as long and impressive as your list is.</p><p>Love and hugs,<br>Lemming Mark</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear US Authorities,I have heard so much about your big list of suspicious people ; with so many other people being included I am beginning to feel left out .
I 'm not a very naughty person but sometimes I wave subversively at CCTV cameras .
If it would help , I could also wear a long trenchcoat and shades and carry a briefcase .
I 've been practicing looking at things through narrowed eyes a lot , so I would probably be quite good at being suspicious.If you will put me on your special suspicious list , I will return the favour by putting you on my list of suspicious countries .
It currently includes every other country in the world , ever - but I 'm sure it 's still not as long and impressive as your list is.Love and hugs,Lemming Mark</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear US Authorities,I have heard so much about your big list of suspicious people; with so many other people being included I am beginning to feel left out.
I'm not a very naughty person but sometimes I wave subversively at CCTV cameras.
If it would help, I could also wear a long trenchcoat and shades and carry a briefcase.
I've been practicing looking at things through narrowed eyes a lot, so I would probably be quite good at being suspicious.If you will put me on your special suspicious list, I will return the favour by putting you on my list of suspicious countries.
It currently includes every other country in the world, ever - but I'm sure it's still not as long and impressive as your list is.Love and hugs,Lemming Mark</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29945356</id>
	<title>NSA will succeed where STASI didn't</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257078240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>STASI and Gestapo actually had the same problem: They were able to acquire huge amounts of data (due to many agents, public co-operation, etc.) but they were nowhere near being able to actually analyze it. They just didn't have the manpower to go through even half their data.</p><p>That was before computers. Also, they both had a lot less resources (compared to the population) than CIA+FBI+NSA+...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>STASI and Gestapo actually had the same problem : They were able to acquire huge amounts of data ( due to many agents , public co-operation , etc .
) but they were nowhere near being able to actually analyze it .
They just did n't have the manpower to go through even half their data.That was before computers .
Also , they both had a lot less resources ( compared to the population ) than CIA + FBI + NSA + .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>STASI and Gestapo actually had the same problem: They were able to acquire huge amounts of data (due to many agents, public co-operation, etc.
) but they were nowhere near being able to actually analyze it.
They just didn't have the manpower to go through even half their data.That was before computers.
Also, they both had a lot less resources (compared to the population) than CIA+FBI+NSA+...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943648</id>
	<title>Re:How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?</title>
	<author>Narnie</author>
	<datestamp>1257066180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Suspicion: (n)<br>If you read<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. your name has been added.<br>If you comment on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. your name has been double plus added.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Suspicion : ( n ) If you read / .
your name has been added.If you comment on / .
your name has been double plus added .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Suspicion: (n)If you read /.
your name has been added.If you comment on /.
your name has been double plus added.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29947698</id>
	<title>Re:i'm on the list</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257100740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>What is needed is for any as many as possible to be on such lists: it is only by getting as many people as possible inconvenienced, while making the amount of data too great to focus too hard on harassing any one individual or small group, that such methods lose their efficacy.</i></p><p>No, what is needed is for as many as possible to <a href="http://www.no-fly-list.com/" title="no-fly-list.com" rel="nofollow">create their own no-fly list</a> [no-fly-list.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is needed is for any as many as possible to be on such lists : it is only by getting as many people as possible inconvenienced , while making the amount of data too great to focus too hard on harassing any one individual or small group , that such methods lose their efficacy.No , what is needed is for as many as possible to create their own no-fly list [ no-fly-list.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is needed is for any as many as possible to be on such lists: it is only by getting as many people as possible inconvenienced, while making the amount of data too great to focus too hard on harassing any one individual or small group, that such methods lose their efficacy.No, what is needed is for as many as possible to create their own no-fly list [no-fly-list.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942680</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29951664</id>
	<title>Cat Stevens...</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1257184260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey he changed his name to Mohammad something or other and became a Muslim... Get 'em!</p><p>I mean seriously Cat Stevens? If ever there was anybody that wasn't going to hurt anyone...</p><p>Having a "no fly list" may sound like a good idea, just not a particularity well thought out one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey he changed his name to Mohammad something or other and became a Muslim... Get 'em ! I mean seriously Cat Stevens ?
If ever there was anybody that was n't going to hurt anyone...Having a " no fly list " may sound like a good idea , just not a particularity well thought out one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey he changed his name to Mohammad something or other and became a Muslim... Get 'em!I mean seriously Cat Stevens?
If ever there was anybody that wasn't going to hurt anyone...Having a "no fly list" may sound like a good idea, just not a particularity well thought out one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29944660</id>
	<title>Re:Inefficient System</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257072720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nah. From the +1600 but -600 daily changes, I'd guessing they're modeling associations between people, using their connections in a big relationship graph - since the list will include some people already confirmed as terrorists by good old fashioned traditional investigation - to score each person on the list. Actual manpower is only divided among the high scorers. Low scorers get pruned from the list. This prunes the vast majority of false accusations before any human time/effort/money is ever wasted on them.</p><p>The reason the add:drop ratio is so high is that every human being has a LOT of connections to other humans. List inflation is naturally going to be way higher than linear. But you can't always tell which associations are trivial until AFTER you've run them through the computer. And since the algorithm is traveling-salesman-like in complexity, this means you need to both add lots of people into it AND aggressively remove the low scorers from the list. That's the most efficient use of time/money/effort/manpower for the best results.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nah .
From the + 1600 but -600 daily changes , I 'd guessing they 're modeling associations between people , using their connections in a big relationship graph - since the list will include some people already confirmed as terrorists by good old fashioned traditional investigation - to score each person on the list .
Actual manpower is only divided among the high scorers .
Low scorers get pruned from the list .
This prunes the vast majority of false accusations before any human time/effort/money is ever wasted on them.The reason the add : drop ratio is so high is that every human being has a LOT of connections to other humans .
List inflation is naturally going to be way higher than linear .
But you ca n't always tell which associations are trivial until AFTER you 've run them through the computer .
And since the algorithm is traveling-salesman-like in complexity , this means you need to both add lots of people into it AND aggressively remove the low scorers from the list .
That 's the most efficient use of time/money/effort/manpower for the best results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nah.
From the +1600 but -600 daily changes, I'd guessing they're modeling associations between people, using their connections in a big relationship graph - since the list will include some people already confirmed as terrorists by good old fashioned traditional investigation - to score each person on the list.
Actual manpower is only divided among the high scorers.
Low scorers get pruned from the list.
This prunes the vast majority of false accusations before any human time/effort/money is ever wasted on them.The reason the add:drop ratio is so high is that every human being has a LOT of connections to other humans.
List inflation is naturally going to be way higher than linear.
But you can't always tell which associations are trivial until AFTER you've run them through the computer.
And since the algorithm is traveling-salesman-like in complexity, this means you need to both add lots of people into it AND aggressively remove the low scorers from the list.
That's the most efficient use of time/money/effort/manpower for the best results.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29944404</id>
	<title>Re:How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257071040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Acting suspiciously reasonable?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Acting suspiciously reasonable ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Acting suspiciously reasonable?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29945980</id>
	<title>Is it wrong...</title>
	<author>reverendbeer</author>
	<datestamp>1257084360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...to nominate yourself for the watch list because you're lonely?

[sniffle]

Oh, and just ignore the semtex...that's for something else.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...to nominate yourself for the watch list because you 're lonely ?
[ sniffle ] Oh , and just ignore the semtex...that 's for something else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...to nominate yourself for the watch list because you're lonely?
[sniffle]

Oh, and just ignore the semtex...that's for something else.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942902</id>
	<title>Re:How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257103740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm familiar with the case of someone who got on the no-fly list for repeated short notice, one-way trips between Boston and Palm Beach. It involved considerable harassment to get off the list.  An alternative explanation might be: affluent person with house in both cities. For an added dose of common sense it was a mother flying with multiple children. A human can see this immediately, but I suspect that a computer program put the person on the list.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm familiar with the case of someone who got on the no-fly list for repeated short notice , one-way trips between Boston and Palm Beach .
It involved considerable harassment to get off the list .
An alternative explanation might be : affluent person with house in both cities .
For an added dose of common sense it was a mother flying with multiple children .
A human can see this immediately , but I suspect that a computer program put the person on the list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm familiar with the case of someone who got on the no-fly list for repeated short notice, one-way trips between Boston and Palm Beach.
It involved considerable harassment to get off the list.
An alternative explanation might be: affluent person with house in both cities.
For an added dose of common sense it was a mother flying with multiple children.
A human can see this immediately, but I suspect that a computer program put the person on the list.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943250</id>
	<title>Keeps them employed</title>
	<author>Alain Williams</author>
	<datestamp>1257106560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>something that is very important in these uncertain times, no one wants to loose their job. ''Hey Joe - I have a new batch of names for our list''</htmltext>
<tokenext>something that is very important in these uncertain times , no one wants to loose their job .
''Hey Joe - I have a new batch of names for our list''</tokentext>
<sentencetext>something that is very important in these uncertain times, no one wants to loose their job.
''Hey Joe - I have a new batch of names for our list''</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29953814</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257194460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dear Mr. Government,<br>Is it I?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear Mr. Government,Is it I ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear Mr. Government,Is it I?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943386</id>
	<title>Re:The crap list</title>
	<author>lena\_10326</author>
	<datestamp>1257107700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's much easier to change a name before 18. Once they go to college, start working, and start buying things... it's a major pain in the ass to redo that trail of documents and papers. If you're serious, I would do it sooner rather than later.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's much easier to change a name before 18 .
Once they go to college , start working , and start buying things... it 's a major pain in the ass to redo that trail of documents and papers .
If you 're serious , I would do it sooner rather than later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's much easier to change a name before 18.
Once they go to college, start working, and start buying things... it's a major pain in the ass to redo that trail of documents and papers.
If you're serious, I would do it sooner rather than later.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29947484</id>
	<title>You can call him whatever you want.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257098640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just change his "official", documented name. Pick something that will be innocuous, or even give him an advantage. You can still call him whatever you want yourselves. (It is a free country, in such minor situations.)</p><p>John Smith. Too common?</p><p>Quincy Bigbucks III. Too obvious?</p><p>George Bush. Too embarrasing?</p><p>Obama Bin Hussein. Well, that would probably not help.</p><p>Read about how actors and other performers pick a name to give an advantage. There are probably psychological and sociological tricks you can leverage.</p><p>Change first and last name. Use a middle name if you want, but probably that is just overkill. I would keep it simple, but powerful.</p><p>I predict that in the future everyone will have such an "official" name, not unlike a social security number or brand name, and then a personal name that friends and family use. Probably already done in some sci-fi story.</p><p>Geek provides reference in 3<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... 2<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... 1<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just change his " official " , documented name .
Pick something that will be innocuous , or even give him an advantage .
You can still call him whatever you want yourselves .
( It is a free country , in such minor situations .
) John Smith .
Too common ? Quincy Bigbucks III .
Too obvious ? George Bush .
Too embarrasing ? Obama Bin Hussein .
Well , that would probably not help.Read about how actors and other performers pick a name to give an advantage .
There are probably psychological and sociological tricks you can leverage.Change first and last name .
Use a middle name if you want , but probably that is just overkill .
I would keep it simple , but powerful.I predict that in the future everyone will have such an " official " name , not unlike a social security number or brand name , and then a personal name that friends and family use .
Probably already done in some sci-fi story.Geek provides reference in 3 ... 2 ... 1 .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just change his "official", documented name.
Pick something that will be innocuous, or even give him an advantage.
You can still call him whatever you want yourselves.
(It is a free country, in such minor situations.
)John Smith.
Too common?Quincy Bigbucks III.
Too obvious?George Bush.
Too embarrasing?Obama Bin Hussein.
Well, that would probably not help.Read about how actors and other performers pick a name to give an advantage.
There are probably psychological and sociological tricks you can leverage.Change first and last name.
Use a middle name if you want, but probably that is just overkill.
I would keep it simple, but powerful.I predict that in the future everyone will have such an "official" name, not unlike a social security number or brand name, and then a personal name that friends and family use.
Probably already done in some sci-fi story.Geek provides reference in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942690</id>
	<title>#'s, lists, names etc..., what's it all amount to?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257101520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>less than a hill of beans in relation to the creators' wwwildly popular newclear powered planet/population rescue initiative/mandate, aka 'the big flash'. the lights are coming up all over now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>less than a hill of beans in relation to the creators ' wwwildly popular newclear powered planet/population rescue initiative/mandate , aka 'the big flash' .
the lights are coming up all over now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>less than a hill of beans in relation to the creators' wwwildly popular newclear powered planet/population rescue initiative/mandate, aka 'the big flash'.
the lights are coming up all over now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943998</id>
	<title>Really Good Idea</title>
	<author>omb</author>
	<datestamp>1257068280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You have, what about 600 Congresmen+Senators, so in about 2 years you could do them all, then start over if the list isnt abolished yet<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... LOL</htmltext>
<tokenext>You have , what about 600 Congresmen + Senators , so in about 2 years you could do them all , then start over if the list isnt abolished yet ... LOL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have, what about 600 Congresmen+Senators, so in about 2 years you could do them all, then start over if the list isnt abolished yet ... LOL</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943558</id>
	<title>Manypulation?</title>
	<author>sepelester</author>
	<datestamp>1257108720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Those not on the list should be suspected of manipulating the list</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those not on the list should be suspected of manipulating the list</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those not on the list should be suspected of manipulating the list</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942556</id>
	<title>Woohoo!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257100200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good ol' Germany is catching up to you suckers. Back in the day, before my beloved wall was torn down, I loved the Stasi. It made feel secure! I knew how many of my neighbours were working undercover for them, too. It was like totally out of Soviet Russia. &lt;3</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good ol ' Germany is catching up to you suckers .
Back in the day , before my beloved wall was torn down , I loved the Stasi .
It made feel secure !
I knew how many of my neighbours were working undercover for them , too .
It was like totally out of Soviet Russia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good ol' Germany is catching up to you suckers.
Back in the day, before my beloved wall was torn down, I loved the Stasi.
It made feel secure!
I knew how many of my neighbours were working undercover for them, too.
It was like totally out of Soviet Russia. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943950</id>
	<title>Where's the terrorism?</title>
	<author>Maltheus</author>
	<datestamp>1257067980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1600 suspected terrorists a day? If even 1\% of that was real then we'd be dealing with 58,000 people a year intending to commit terrorist acts a year? Are we suppose to believe that the FBI has managed to stop them all in every case??? It's not that hard to blow a bus up or derail a train, so why aren't they doing it? Oh I know, because it's all bullshit.</p><p>The only terrorists I see are in the government and the media. They're the only ones using terror to get us to change our way of life. Ooh, Iran is gonna nuke the world, global warming/cooling is going to put our cities underwater/put us in a deep freeze, swine/bird flu/monkey pox/SARS is going to be the next plague that kills us all, main street will starve to death if we don't give your money to these bankers over here, Islamofascism seeks to establish a dictatorship over the world. Eurasia is our friend, Eastasia is our enemy. Eastasia is our friend, Eurasia is our enemy. It's gone well beyond the little boy who cried wolf at this point and has become more akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater. And in each case, the cry is the same: "We can protect you from all these horrors if only you give us more power. We all have to sacrifice to do what is necessary."</p><p>"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves." -- William Pitt</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1600 suspected terrorists a day ?
If even 1 \ % of that was real then we 'd be dealing with 58,000 people a year intending to commit terrorist acts a year ?
Are we suppose to believe that the FBI has managed to stop them all in every case ? ? ?
It 's not that hard to blow a bus up or derail a train , so why are n't they doing it ?
Oh I know , because it 's all bullshit.The only terrorists I see are in the government and the media .
They 're the only ones using terror to get us to change our way of life .
Ooh , Iran is gon na nuke the world , global warming/cooling is going to put our cities underwater/put us in a deep freeze , swine/bird flu/monkey pox/SARS is going to be the next plague that kills us all , main street will starve to death if we do n't give your money to these bankers over here , Islamofascism seeks to establish a dictatorship over the world .
Eurasia is our friend , Eastasia is our enemy .
Eastasia is our friend , Eurasia is our enemy .
It 's gone well beyond the little boy who cried wolf at this point and has become more akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater .
And in each case , the cry is the same : " We can protect you from all these horrors if only you give us more power .
We all have to sacrifice to do what is necessary .
" " Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom .
It is the argument of tyrants ; it is the creed of slaves .
" -- William Pitt</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1600 suspected terrorists a day?
If even 1\% of that was real then we'd be dealing with 58,000 people a year intending to commit terrorist acts a year?
Are we suppose to believe that the FBI has managed to stop them all in every case???
It's not that hard to blow a bus up or derail a train, so why aren't they doing it?
Oh I know, because it's all bullshit.The only terrorists I see are in the government and the media.
They're the only ones using terror to get us to change our way of life.
Ooh, Iran is gonna nuke the world, global warming/cooling is going to put our cities underwater/put us in a deep freeze, swine/bird flu/monkey pox/SARS is going to be the next plague that kills us all, main street will starve to death if we don't give your money to these bankers over here, Islamofascism seeks to establish a dictatorship over the world.
Eurasia is our friend, Eastasia is our enemy.
Eastasia is our friend, Eurasia is our enemy.
It's gone well beyond the little boy who cried wolf at this point and has become more akin to yelling fire in a crowded theater.
And in each case, the cry is the same: "We can protect you from all these horrors if only you give us more power.
We all have to sacrifice to do what is necessary.
""Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.
It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
" -- William Pitt</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29949448</id>
	<title>Re:How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257172200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?  I couldn't find that information in the article.</p></div><p>Well<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... these are the three questions.</p><p>1. Are you muslim? (if yes, then go to 2)<br>2. Are you ready to go on Television and denounce 9/11 attacks without any ifs and buts<br>3. Do you believe in separation of church and state?</p><p>if these answers are Y/N/N - then put that person in suspect list. Terrorism works only when there is not only active but also people passively supports it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do they define " reasonable suspicion " ?
I could n't find that information in the article.Well ... these are the three questions.1 .
Are you muslim ?
( if yes , then go to 2 ) 2 .
Are you ready to go on Television and denounce 9/11 attacks without any ifs and buts3 .
Do you believe in separation of church and state ? if these answers are Y/N/N - then put that person in suspect list .
Terrorism works only when there is not only active but also people passively supports it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?
I couldn't find that information in the article.Well ... these are the three questions.1.
Are you muslim?
(if yes, then go to 2)2.
Are you ready to go on Television and denounce 9/11 attacks without any ifs and buts3.
Do you believe in separation of church and state?if these answers are Y/N/N - then put that person in suspect list.
Terrorism works only when there is not only active but also people passively supports it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942860</id>
	<title>This is absolutely ridiculous.</title>
	<author>moxley</author>
	<datestamp>1257103380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately I suspect that the story of all of this, that has happened since 9/11, will one day be a disgusting, cautionary tale about how an open and free society was slowly transitioned into an authoritarian fascist nightmare...I'm not sayuig we're completely there yet, but there is a progression - and once these rights, civiliberties, freedoms (whatever you call them) are taken, they never get given back without a severe upheaval or revolution or some sort. Once the security apparatus gets used to being able to list anyone at will for simply having divergent political or religious views (and we all know that is what is happening), good things do not follow.</p><p>Once torture (and the stuff we've heard about, sexual torture of children, people being tortured to death, people being tortured until they should have died but being kept alive only so that so they can be tortured further, people being boiled alive....severe psychological torture...It disgusts me and makes those who practice it no different than the most heinous members of the deathshead SS contingents and those who blindly support it share their shame.</p><p>I want my country back - but I fear we're in for some terrible days ahead..I hope I am wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately I suspect that the story of all of this , that has happened since 9/11 , will one day be a disgusting , cautionary tale about how an open and free society was slowly transitioned into an authoritarian fascist nightmare...I 'm not sayuig we 're completely there yet , but there is a progression - and once these rights , civiliberties , freedoms ( whatever you call them ) are taken , they never get given back without a severe upheaval or revolution or some sort .
Once the security apparatus gets used to being able to list anyone at will for simply having divergent political or religious views ( and we all know that is what is happening ) , good things do not follow.Once torture ( and the stuff we 've heard about , sexual torture of children , people being tortured to death , people being tortured until they should have died but being kept alive only so that so they can be tortured further , people being boiled alive....severe psychological torture...It disgusts me and makes those who practice it no different than the most heinous members of the deathshead SS contingents and those who blindly support it share their shame.I want my country back - but I fear we 're in for some terrible days ahead..I hope I am wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately I suspect that the story of all of this, that has happened since 9/11, will one day be a disgusting, cautionary tale about how an open and free society was slowly transitioned into an authoritarian fascist nightmare...I'm not sayuig we're completely there yet, but there is a progression - and once these rights, civiliberties, freedoms (whatever you call them) are taken, they never get given back without a severe upheaval or revolution or some sort.
Once the security apparatus gets used to being able to list anyone at will for simply having divergent political or religious views (and we all know that is what is happening), good things do not follow.Once torture (and the stuff we've heard about, sexual torture of children, people being tortured to death, people being tortured until they should have died but being kept alive only so that so they can be tortured further, people being boiled alive....severe psychological torture...It disgusts me and makes those who practice it no different than the most heinous members of the deathshead SS contingents and those who blindly support it share their shame.I want my country back - but I fear we're in for some terrible days ahead..I hope I am wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942654</id>
	<title>r2k-in-the-vortex</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257101160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wow united states are turning more and more like cccp used to be</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wow united states are turning more and more like cccp used to be</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wow united states are turning more and more like cccp used to be</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29944148</id>
	<title>Re:How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257069300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some of the "humans" doing the suggestions have no more common sense than a 1-bit "computer program". So, one can never know.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some of the " humans " doing the suggestions have no more common sense than a 1-bit " computer program " .
So , one can never know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some of the "humans" doing the suggestions have no more common sense than a 1-bit "computer program".
So, one can never know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942902</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29948186</id>
	<title>Re:The crap list</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1257194520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>My son, 12 now, with a middle eastern name but born in the US. We travel a lot and they always flag his name for a second check. [...] It is a minor irritant at his age now, but I am very worried about him when he is an adult. We are seriously thinking about changing his name but I am not sure that it will make a difference.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>Change his name? He's gotten a first-rate education in what government really is and does. Not many kids have this opportunity.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My son , 12 now , with a middle eastern name but born in the US .
We travel a lot and they always flag his name for a second check .
[ ... ] It is a minor irritant at his age now , but I am very worried about him when he is an adult .
We are seriously thinking about changing his name but I am not sure that it will make a difference .
Change his name ?
He 's gotten a first-rate education in what government really is and does .
Not many kids have this opportunity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My son, 12 now, with a middle eastern name but born in the US.
We travel a lot and they always flag his name for a second check.
[...] It is a minor irritant at his age now, but I am very worried about him when he is an adult.
We are seriously thinking about changing his name but I am not sure that it will make a difference.
Change his name?
He's gotten a first-rate education in what government really is and does.
Not many kids have this opportunity.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943038</id>
	<title>You may not have room to complain...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257104880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... if you've been critical of the US government for knowing that terrorists were intending to attack on September 11, 2001.
Before 9/11, the FBI received word of possible threats all the time, and there was no way they could possibly pursue all of them. Thus they glossed over the possibility of a terrorist-instigated hijacking of planes and subsequent piloting into buildings.
Now the FBI is trying their best to make sure that doesn't happen again, and are keeping a better eye on ALL possible threats with their Watch List.
So what's it going to be, folks? You can't have it both ways. Don't complain that they're doing their jobs if that's what you demanded in the first place.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... if you 've been critical of the US government for knowing that terrorists were intending to attack on September 11 , 2001 .
Before 9/11 , the FBI received word of possible threats all the time , and there was no way they could possibly pursue all of them .
Thus they glossed over the possibility of a terrorist-instigated hijacking of planes and subsequent piloting into buildings .
Now the FBI is trying their best to make sure that does n't happen again , and are keeping a better eye on ALL possible threats with their Watch List .
So what 's it going to be , folks ?
You ca n't have it both ways .
Do n't complain that they 're doing their jobs if that 's what you demanded in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... if you've been critical of the US government for knowing that terrorists were intending to attack on September 11, 2001.
Before 9/11, the FBI received word of possible threats all the time, and there was no way they could possibly pursue all of them.
Thus they glossed over the possibility of a terrorist-instigated hijacking of planes and subsequent piloting into buildings.
Now the FBI is trying their best to make sure that doesn't happen again, and are keeping a better eye on ALL possible threats with their Watch List.
So what's it going to be, folks?
You can't have it both ways.
Don't complain that they're doing their jobs if that's what you demanded in the first place.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942634</id>
	<title>Watch list?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257100980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd be more interested in knowing what the average length of time a person remains on the list, and a demographic breakdown. The problem with compiling lists like this is the same as with sex offender registries: Even after people are removed from it (sometimes winding up on it for petty reasons in the first place), they continue to be linked to it. Computers don't forget, and there's always some bureaucrat who wants to keep a list of everyone that's ever been on the list available and searchable. There is a point at which even justice becomes injust.</p><p>So what are the numbers, Big Brother?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd be more interested in knowing what the average length of time a person remains on the list , and a demographic breakdown .
The problem with compiling lists like this is the same as with sex offender registries : Even after people are removed from it ( sometimes winding up on it for petty reasons in the first place ) , they continue to be linked to it .
Computers do n't forget , and there 's always some bureaucrat who wants to keep a list of everyone that 's ever been on the list available and searchable .
There is a point at which even justice becomes injust.So what are the numbers , Big Brother ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd be more interested in knowing what the average length of time a person remains on the list, and a demographic breakdown.
The problem with compiling lists like this is the same as with sex offender registries: Even after people are removed from it (sometimes winding up on it for petty reasons in the first place), they continue to be linked to it.
Computers don't forget, and there's always some bureaucrat who wants to keep a list of everyone that's ever been on the list available and searchable.
There is a point at which even justice becomes injust.So what are the numbers, Big Brother?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942820</id>
	<title>Slashdot effect and the watch list</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257103080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Okay let's test the slashdot effect.<br>monday:  everyone reccomend sarah palin for the watch list<br>tuesday:  everyone reccomend Nancy Pelosi<br>wednesday:  Hannity<br>thursaday:  Harry reid<br>friday:  Lieberman.</p><p>either we'll slashdot the service or do the nation a favor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay let 's test the slashdot effect.monday : everyone reccomend sarah palin for the watch listtuesday : everyone reccomend Nancy Pelosiwednesday : Hannitythursaday : Harry reidfriday : Lieberman.either we 'll slashdot the service or do the nation a favor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay let's test the slashdot effect.monday:  everyone reccomend sarah palin for the watch listtuesday:  everyone reccomend Nancy Pelosiwednesday:  Hannitythursaday:  Harry reidfriday:  Lieberman.either we'll slashdot the service or do the nation a favor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29946662</id>
	<title>Re:The crap list</title>
	<author>rcamans</author>
	<datestamp>1257090120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Change his name!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Change his name !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Change his name!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29949604</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257173640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quoting for the end of the original Washington Post article:<br>"In a different vein, the FBI was asked why it is losing new recruits as special agents and support personnel at a time when terrorist investigations are increasing. The FBI responded that failed polygraph tests rather than other factors, such as the length of time for getting security clearances, are the main reason recruits are ending their efforts to join the bureau. In the past year, polygraphs were the cause of roughly 40 percent of special-agent applicants dropping out, the records showed."</p><p>http://www.polygraphplace.com/ubb/NonCGI/Forum2/HTML/000093.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quoting for the end of the original Washington Post article : " In a different vein , the FBI was asked why it is losing new recruits as special agents and support personnel at a time when terrorist investigations are increasing .
The FBI responded that failed polygraph tests rather than other factors , such as the length of time for getting security clearances , are the main reason recruits are ending their efforts to join the bureau .
In the past year , polygraphs were the cause of roughly 40 percent of special-agent applicants dropping out , the records showed .
" http : //www.polygraphplace.com/ubb/NonCGI/Forum2/HTML/000093.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quoting for the end of the original Washington Post article:"In a different vein, the FBI was asked why it is losing new recruits as special agents and support personnel at a time when terrorist investigations are increasing.
The FBI responded that failed polygraph tests rather than other factors, such as the length of time for getting security clearances, are the main reason recruits are ending their efforts to join the bureau.
In the past year, polygraphs were the cause of roughly 40 percent of special-agent applicants dropping out, the records showed.
"http://www.polygraphplace.com/ubb/NonCGI/Forum2/HTML/000093.html</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29949540</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the terrorism?</title>
	<author>neo-mkrey</author>
	<datestamp>1257173160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OK, Francis, you're on the list now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , Francis , you 're on the list now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, Francis, you're on the list now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943416</id>
	<title>ReNo, it just means that the other 91\%</title>
	<author>wiredog</author>
	<datestamp>1257107880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aren't considered a possible threat to aviation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are n't considered a possible threat to aviation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aren't considered a possible threat to aviation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29950792</id>
	<title>Re:Lessons from the STASI</title>
	<author>relguj9</author>
	<datestamp>1257180480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The STASI (East German Secret Police) got awesome participation from its citizens when it asked them to help them spy on their fellow citizens.</p><p>There is a scary lesson in that.</p></div><p>Yea... and the FBI is trying to find terrorists who plan on killing American citizens and people who plan on raping children.  Big fucking difference.  Increasing their effectiveness and ability to find actual criminals through citizen participation over patriot-act-esque big brothering is a good thing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The STASI ( East German Secret Police ) got awesome participation from its citizens when it asked them to help them spy on their fellow citizens.There is a scary lesson in that.Yea... and the FBI is trying to find terrorists who plan on killing American citizens and people who plan on raping children .
Big fucking difference .
Increasing their effectiveness and ability to find actual criminals through citizen participation over patriot-act-esque big brothering is a good thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The STASI (East German Secret Police) got awesome participation from its citizens when it asked them to help them spy on their fellow citizens.There is a scary lesson in that.Yea... and the FBI is trying to find terrorists who plan on killing American citizens and people who plan on raping children.
Big fucking difference.
Increasing their effectiveness and ability to find actual criminals through citizen participation over patriot-act-esque big brothering is a good thing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942652</id>
	<title>A question of resources.</title>
	<author>nuckfuts</author>
	<datestamp>1257101160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does the FBI actually have the manpower and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/or systems to effectively monitor the activities of 400,000 people? If not, they are are watering down their list and reducing its usefulness.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does the FBI actually have the manpower and /or systems to effectively monitor the activities of 400,000 people ?
If not , they are are watering down their list and reducing its usefulness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does the FBI actually have the manpower and /or systems to effectively monitor the activities of 400,000 people?
If not, they are are watering down their list and reducing its usefulness.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29944010</id>
	<title>Re:The crap list</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257068400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's all security theater. If they really cared about the security of the country they would whittle down the list as fast as they can, so that they can concentrate on the true potential threats.</p><p>For nearly five years I was on some form of list and an analyst back in Washington DC had to waste an hour looking at my file every time I crossed the border just to confirm that, as in the previous n-1 times, I still pose no threat to the USA.  Eventually I did get off the list (no reason given) and for the last two years or so I can go through without any hassle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's all security theater .
If they really cared about the security of the country they would whittle down the list as fast as they can , so that they can concentrate on the true potential threats.For nearly five years I was on some form of list and an analyst back in Washington DC had to waste an hour looking at my file every time I crossed the border just to confirm that , as in the previous n-1 times , I still pose no threat to the USA .
Eventually I did get off the list ( no reason given ) and for the last two years or so I can go through without any hassle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's all security theater.
If they really cared about the security of the country they would whittle down the list as fast as they can, so that they can concentrate on the true potential threats.For nearly five years I was on some form of list and an analyst back in Washington DC had to waste an hour looking at my file every time I crossed the border just to confirm that, as in the previous n-1 times, I still pose no threat to the USA.
Eventually I did get off the list (no reason given) and for the last two years or so I can go through without any hassle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29944586</id>
	<title>Where is the list?</title>
	<author>boltik</author>
	<datestamp>1257072180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How do i check if my name is on the list?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do i check if my name is on the list ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do i check if my name is on the list?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29944922</id>
	<title>Re:bummer</title>
	<author>buchner.johannes</author>
	<datestamp>1257074580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No\_Fly\_List" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No\_Fly\_List</a> [wikipedia.org] </p><p><div class="quote"><p>In an article in The Atlantic[11], security expert Bruce Schneier described a simple way for people to defeat the No Fly List:</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Use a stolen credit card to buy a ticket under a fake name. Print a fake boarding pass with your real name on it and go to the airport. You give your real ID, and the fake boarding pass with your real name on it, to security. They&rsquo;re checking the documents against each other. They&rsquo;re not checking your name against the no-fly list&mdash;that was done on the airline&rsquo;s computers. Once you&rsquo;re through security, you rip up the fake boarding pass, and use the real boarding pass that has the name from the stolen credit card. Then you board the plane, because they&rsquo;re not checking your name against your ID at boarding.</p></div><p>Among other problems, it is unknown<br>
&nbsp; - who is on the list,<br>
&nbsp; - what criteria are used to get on the list<br>
&nbsp; - how you can get off the list</p><p>Effectively, it is a reversal of the presumption of innocence. Terrorists should be treated as criminals, we should not forget that they are human. The situation is truly Kafkaesque, with the public being happy to not be on the list.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No \ _Fly \ _List [ wikipedia.org ] In an article in The Atlantic [ 11 ] , security expert Bruce Schneier described a simple way for people to defeat the No Fly List :         Use a stolen credit card to buy a ticket under a fake name .
Print a fake boarding pass with your real name on it and go to the airport .
You give your real ID , and the fake boarding pass with your real name on it , to security .
They    re checking the documents against each other .
They    re not checking your name against the no-fly list    that was done on the airline    s computers .
Once you    re through security , you rip up the fake boarding pass , and use the real boarding pass that has the name from the stolen credit card .
Then you board the plane , because they    re not checking your name against your ID at boarding.Among other problems , it is unknown   - who is on the list ,   - what criteria are used to get on the list   - how you can get off the listEffectively , it is a reversal of the presumption of innocence .
Terrorists should be treated as criminals , we should not forget that they are human .
The situation is truly Kafkaesque , with the public being happy to not be on the list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No\_Fly\_List [wikipedia.org] In an article in The Atlantic[11], security expert Bruce Schneier described a simple way for people to defeat the No Fly List:
        Use a stolen credit card to buy a ticket under a fake name.
Print a fake boarding pass with your real name on it and go to the airport.
You give your real ID, and the fake boarding pass with your real name on it, to security.
They’re checking the documents against each other.
They’re not checking your name against the no-fly list—that was done on the airline’s computers.
Once you’re through security, you rip up the fake boarding pass, and use the real boarding pass that has the name from the stolen credit card.
Then you board the plane, because they’re not checking your name against your ID at boarding.Among other problems, it is unknown
  - who is on the list,
  - what criteria are used to get on the list
  - how you can get off the listEffectively, it is a reversal of the presumption of innocence.
Terrorists should be treated as criminals, we should not forget that they are human.
The situation is truly Kafkaesque, with the public being happy to not be on the list.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29948714</id>
	<title>Re:Where's the terrorism?</title>
	<author>Kashgarinn</author>
	<datestamp>1257161160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remember, Bush put alot of right-wing religious political allies into what should be government neutral jobs.</p><p>The right-wing religious zealots see everything and everyone who isn't a baby-jesus lover as a potential target to side against, and that means you.</p><p>There's definitely way too much of a difference between states and between representatives and the will of the people for this to continue.</p><p>the best thing the states could do is to become a lot more individual regarding power and legislation, corruption would then be dealt with locally and hopefully better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember , Bush put alot of right-wing religious political allies into what should be government neutral jobs.The right-wing religious zealots see everything and everyone who is n't a baby-jesus lover as a potential target to side against , and that means you.There 's definitely way too much of a difference between states and between representatives and the will of the people for this to continue.the best thing the states could do is to become a lot more individual regarding power and legislation , corruption would then be dealt with locally and hopefully better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember, Bush put alot of right-wing religious political allies into what should be government neutral jobs.The right-wing religious zealots see everything and everyone who isn't a baby-jesus lover as a potential target to side against, and that means you.There's definitely way too much of a difference between states and between representatives and the will of the people for this to continue.the best thing the states could do is to become a lot more individual regarding power and legislation, corruption would then be dealt with locally and hopefully better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29949780</id>
	<title>Re:Watch list?</title>
	<author>mpe</author>
	<datestamp>1257174900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I'd like to know why these people aren't arrested, if they're so dangerous? Shouldn't the list be provided to the owners of other transit systems, shopping centres etc? Or have these people been shown to only be interested in performing terrorist activities on planes?</i> <br> <br>Bruce Schneier commented on this some years ago. That it was incredible that someone could be both so innocent that they couldn't be arrested and so dangerous that they couldn't be allowed near a commercial airliner.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to know why these people are n't arrested , if they 're so dangerous ?
Should n't the list be provided to the owners of other transit systems , shopping centres etc ?
Or have these people been shown to only be interested in performing terrorist activities on planes ?
Bruce Schneier commented on this some years ago .
That it was incredible that someone could be both so innocent that they could n't be arrested and so dangerous that they could n't be allowed near a commercial airliner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like to know why these people aren't arrested, if they're so dangerous?
Shouldn't the list be provided to the owners of other transit systems, shopping centres etc?
Or have these people been shown to only be interested in performing terrorist activities on planes?
Bruce Schneier commented on this some years ago.
That it was incredible that someone could be both so innocent that they couldn't be arrested and so dangerous that they couldn't be allowed near a commercial airliner.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943322</id>
	<title>Re:How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?</title>
	<author>Hadlock</author>
	<datestamp>1257107040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They don't. It's modern-day McCarthyism, it's just that no one senator has stepped up to bat and get his name attached to this whole racket. At 1600 per day, either their criteria are completely wrong, or many of the government's policies are so out of whack with public opinion (although maybe admittedly a minority)that even discussing them gets you labeled as a "terrorist". <br>
&nbsp; <br>BEGIN RANT: I mean really, that number should be closer to 2 or 3 per day, with most of them being false positives. Most people are too busy finding a job, waxing their BMW (or something else...) drinking griping about the stock market to pick up "radical islamic tendencies". Let alone act on them. My guess would be that the CIA pays civilians to collect domestic intel, and they have a quota of "suspicious persons" to report each month (say, 10), and you have 160 people on the CIA payroll with this quota... well there's your number.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They do n't .
It 's modern-day McCarthyism , it 's just that no one senator has stepped up to bat and get his name attached to this whole racket .
At 1600 per day , either their criteria are completely wrong , or many of the government 's policies are so out of whack with public opinion ( although maybe admittedly a minority ) that even discussing them gets you labeled as a " terrorist " .
  BEGIN RANT : I mean really , that number should be closer to 2 or 3 per day , with most of them being false positives .
Most people are too busy finding a job , waxing their BMW ( or something else... ) drinking griping about the stock market to pick up " radical islamic tendencies " .
Let alone act on them .
My guess would be that the CIA pays civilians to collect domestic intel , and they have a quota of " suspicious persons " to report each month ( say , 10 ) , and you have 160 people on the CIA payroll with this quota... well there 's your number .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They don't.
It's modern-day McCarthyism, it's just that no one senator has stepped up to bat and get his name attached to this whole racket.
At 1600 per day, either their criteria are completely wrong, or many of the government's policies are so out of whack with public opinion (although maybe admittedly a minority)that even discussing them gets you labeled as a "terrorist".
  BEGIN RANT: I mean really, that number should be closer to 2 or 3 per day, with most of them being false positives.
Most people are too busy finding a job, waxing their BMW (or something else...) drinking griping about the stock market to pick up "radical islamic tendencies".
Let alone act on them.
My guess would be that the CIA pays civilians to collect domestic intel, and they have a quota of "suspicious persons" to report each month (say, 10), and you have 160 people on the CIA payroll with this quota... well there's your number.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942544</id>
	<title>Inefficient System</title>
	<author>Cabriel</author>
	<datestamp>1257100140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It only requires a few unscrupulous groups to voluntarily suggest names of innocent people to inflate the list, increasing the likelihood of false-positives on any given search and reducing the likelihood of being matched themselves within a meaningful time frame.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It only requires a few unscrupulous groups to voluntarily suggest names of innocent people to inflate the list , increasing the likelihood of false-positives on any given search and reducing the likelihood of being matched themselves within a meaningful time frame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It only requires a few unscrupulous groups to voluntarily suggest names of innocent people to inflate the list, increasing the likelihood of false-positives on any given search and reducing the likelihood of being matched themselves within a meaningful time frame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942552</id>
	<title>one on there</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257100140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>CmdrTaco. What exactly is he commanding?</htmltext>
<tokenext>CmdrTaco .
What exactly is he commanding ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CmdrTaco.
What exactly is he commanding?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943002</id>
	<title>Re:How do they define "reasonable suspicion"?</title>
	<author>CHRONOSS2008</author>
	<datestamp>1257104640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>um anyone that won't bend over and get there rights abused up the ahole</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>um anyone that wo n't bend over and get there rights abused up the ahole</tokentext>
<sentencetext>um anyone that won't bend over and get there rights abused up the ahole</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29948332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29948186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29949110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29944922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29946506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29947934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29946620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29949540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29948672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29950792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943586
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29945732
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29949780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29944404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29944660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29946662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29947698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29944148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29947484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29944010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29945356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29949448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29948714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29950404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942552
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_01_1653202_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29949020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29944922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_01_1653202.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29949604
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_01_1653202.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29946662
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943144
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29947484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29944010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29948186
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_01_1653202.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942652
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_01_1653202.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942674
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_01_1653202.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942802
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_01_1653202.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29947698
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_01_1653202.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29946506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942820
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943998
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29948672
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29945732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942534
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943606
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29944404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29949448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943586
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942902
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29944148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943322
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943820
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29947934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943648
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_01_1653202.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29944586
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_01_1653202.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943776
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29949780
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_01_1653202.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29944922
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29949110
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29949020
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_01_1653202.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942650
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_01_1653202.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943038
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_01_1653202.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29944660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29946620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942730
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_01_1653202.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943416
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_01_1653202.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29942596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29950792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29945356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_01_1653202.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29943950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29950404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29948714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29948332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_01_1653202.29949540
</commentlist>
</conversation>
