<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_30_209251</id>
	<title>Hunt For Earth-Like Planets Delayed</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1256892240000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader sends along this excerpt from <em>Nature News</em>:
<i>"Kepler, NASA's mission to search for planets around other stars, <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/2009/091030/full/news.2009.1051.html">will not be able to spot an Earth-sized planet until 2011</a>, according to the mission's team. The delays are caused by noisy amplifiers in the telescope's electronics. ... The problem is caused by amplifiers that boost the signals from the charge-coupled devices that form the heart of the 0.95-metre telescope's 95-million-pixel photometer, which detects the light emitted from the distant stars. Three of the amplifiers are creating noise that compromises Kepler's view. The noise affects only a small portion of the data, Borucki says, but the team has to fix the software &mdash; it would be 'too cumbersome' to remove the bad data manually &mdash; so that it accounts for the noise automatically. He says that the fix should be in place by 2011."</i>
Mindful of Halloween's approach, NASA has put up a piece looking at some of the already-known exoplanets that <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/topics/universe/features/exoplanetHouseOfHorrors.html">wouldn't be very friendly to human life</a>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader sends along this excerpt from Nature News : " Kepler , NASA 's mission to search for planets around other stars , will not be able to spot an Earth-sized planet until 2011 , according to the mission 's team .
The delays are caused by noisy amplifiers in the telescope 's electronics .
... The problem is caused by amplifiers that boost the signals from the charge-coupled devices that form the heart of the 0.95-metre telescope 's 95-million-pixel photometer , which detects the light emitted from the distant stars .
Three of the amplifiers are creating noise that compromises Kepler 's view .
The noise affects only a small portion of the data , Borucki says , but the team has to fix the software    it would be 'too cumbersome ' to remove the bad data manually    so that it accounts for the noise automatically .
He says that the fix should be in place by 2011 .
" Mindful of Halloween 's approach , NASA has put up a piece looking at some of the already-known exoplanets that would n't be very friendly to human life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader sends along this excerpt from Nature News:
"Kepler, NASA's mission to search for planets around other stars, will not be able to spot an Earth-sized planet until 2011, according to the mission's team.
The delays are caused by noisy amplifiers in the telescope's electronics.
... The problem is caused by amplifiers that boost the signals from the charge-coupled devices that form the heart of the 0.95-metre telescope's 95-million-pixel photometer, which detects the light emitted from the distant stars.
Three of the amplifiers are creating noise that compromises Kepler's view.
The noise affects only a small portion of the data, Borucki says, but the team has to fix the software — it would be 'too cumbersome' to remove the bad data manually — so that it accounts for the noise automatically.
He says that the fix should be in place by 2011.
"
Mindful of Halloween's approach, NASA has put up a piece looking at some of the already-known exoplanets that wouldn't be very friendly to human life.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929233</id>
	<title>Re:Monster Cables &amp; Tube Amplifiers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256899080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, and maybe if everyone at NASA wore shirts with three wolves on them they'd get more done.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , and maybe if everyone at NASA wore shirts with three wolves on them they 'd get more done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, and maybe if everyone at NASA wore shirts with three wolves on them they'd get more done.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928767</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29930279</id>
	<title>Re:Damn!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256906100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We're still waiting on someone to develop FTL drive so we can visit these planets and exploit and plunder them without having to spend several lifetimes getting there.  In the meantime, this search will help us know where to go when we develop the FTL drive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're still waiting on someone to develop FTL drive so we can visit these planets and exploit and plunder them without having to spend several lifetimes getting there .
In the meantime , this search will help us know where to go when we develop the FTL drive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're still waiting on someone to develop FTL drive so we can visit these planets and exploit and plunder them without having to spend several lifetimes getting there.
In the meantime, this search will help us know where to go when we develop the FTL drive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929307</id>
	<title>This is just stupid.</title>
	<author>NotBorg</author>
	<datestamp>1256899740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why are we wasting so much money trying to find planets we can't get to?  We should be looking for the Stargate instead.  Sure we might get targeted by the snake heads but you'd be amazed what you can do with a little C4, a P90, and the occasional nuke.  Throw in a language nerd and a hot chick...  This at least is doable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why are we wasting so much money trying to find planets we ca n't get to ?
We should be looking for the Stargate instead .
Sure we might get targeted by the snake heads but you 'd be amazed what you can do with a little C4 , a P90 , and the occasional nuke .
Throw in a language nerd and a hot chick... This at least is doable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why are we wasting so much money trying to find planets we can't get to?
We should be looking for the Stargate instead.
Sure we might get targeted by the snake heads but you'd be amazed what you can do with a little C4, a P90, and the occasional nuke.
Throw in a language nerd and a hot chick...  This at least is doable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29934309</id>
	<title>Re:Damn!</title>
	<author>smoker2</author>
	<datestamp>1257002160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You don't know what bronze is do you ? I know what you're trying to say but making stupid comments doesn't help. There was an obvious benefit to using bronze over say copper or tin <i>individually</i> - that is it is harder. It is hard to see an obvious benefit to finding exoplanets. That doesn't mean there isn't one, but you have to dig a bit deeper for the reason. And contrary to popular belief it isn't to have somewhere to go. The more we know about the universe, and in particular other planets, the more we can know about the earth, which I'm sure you'll agree is relevant. A sample size of one does not a good model make.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't know what bronze is do you ?
I know what you 're trying to say but making stupid comments does n't help .
There was an obvious benefit to using bronze over say copper or tin individually - that is it is harder .
It is hard to see an obvious benefit to finding exoplanets .
That does n't mean there is n't one , but you have to dig a bit deeper for the reason .
And contrary to popular belief it is n't to have somewhere to go .
The more we know about the universe , and in particular other planets , the more we can know about the earth , which I 'm sure you 'll agree is relevant .
A sample size of one does not a good model make .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't know what bronze is do you ?
I know what you're trying to say but making stupid comments doesn't help.
There was an obvious benefit to using bronze over say copper or tin individually - that is it is harder.
It is hard to see an obvious benefit to finding exoplanets.
That doesn't mean there isn't one, but you have to dig a bit deeper for the reason.
And contrary to popular belief it isn't to have somewhere to go.
The more we know about the universe, and in particular other planets, the more we can know about the earth, which I'm sure you'll agree is relevant.
A sample size of one does not a good model make.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29932007</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929593</id>
	<title>Re:What's wrong with this planet?</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1256901960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nothing. But just because Canada is okay doesn't mean I don't want to visit Europe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing .
But just because Canada is okay does n't mean I do n't want to visit Europe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing.
But just because Canada is okay doesn't mean I don't want to visit Europe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928921</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928905</id>
	<title>Re:head scratch...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256897040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dunno.
Maybe there's too much data to transmit, so they do much of the data processing on the satellite.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dunno .
Maybe there 's too much data to transmit , so they do much of the data processing on the satellite .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dunno.
Maybe there's too much data to transmit, so they do much of the data processing on the satellite.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928699</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929323</id>
	<title>Re:What's wrong with this planet?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256899860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm from Tahiti so I might have missed something in the translation, but what is wrong with this planet?</p></div><p>People like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolph\_hitler" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Hitler</a> [wikipedia.org] and <a href="http://vitruviusfootsteps.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/chris1.jpg?w=300&amp;h=270" title="wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">Chris Boswell</a> [wordpress.com] are the problem with this planet.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm from Tahiti so I might have missed something in the translation , but what is wrong with this planet ? People like Hitler [ wikipedia.org ] and Chris Boswell [ wordpress.com ] are the problem with this planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm from Tahiti so I might have missed something in the translation, but what is wrong with this planet?People like Hitler [wikipedia.org] and Chris Boswell [wordpress.com] are the problem with this planet.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928921</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929741</id>
	<title>Re:head scratch...</title>
	<author>beelsebob</author>
	<datestamp>1256902800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps because introducing incorrect data to your data stream destroys some of your bandwidth.  Each incorrect byte is a byte that isn't carrying useful information, whether it's post-processed to be almost-right or not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps because introducing incorrect data to your data stream destroys some of your bandwidth .
Each incorrect byte is a byte that is n't carrying useful information , whether it 's post-processed to be almost-right or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps because introducing incorrect data to your data stream destroys some of your bandwidth.
Each incorrect byte is a byte that isn't carrying useful information, whether it's post-processed to be almost-right or not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928699</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29930527</id>
	<title>Re:head scratch...</title>
	<author>bughunter</author>
	<datestamp>1256907420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I used to design these kinds of cameras, and there are at least two potential reasons why this can't be done on the ground:</p><p>Firstly, and most likely, there's an essential step that needs to be done in the camera hardware.  Perhaps something related to <a href="http://www.ccd.com/ccd107.html" title="ccd.com">Correlated Double Sampling</a> [ccd.com] or <a href="http://www.ccd.com/ccd103.html" title="ccd.com">Pixel Binning</a> [ccd.com] needs to be adjusted.  In the first case, the signal and reset measurements need to be done as close together as possible to reduce 1/f noise, which can quickly dominate the noise side of the SNR expression, and it may be the timing of these measurements that is at fault.  In the latter case, there would be a sqrt(N) penalty for measuring the charge on each pixel and then adding the N pixels together.  Conversely, reading each pixel multiple times may be necessary to overcome an unexpected noise source - a sqrt(N) improvement in readout noise can be had by measuring the pixel N times and calculating the average of the measurements.  All of these adjustments can only be made at the camera; there's no way to accomplish this after the data has been digitized and radioed to Earth.</p><p>2 - Bandwidth.  There's just no bandwidth available to ship down the raw data so it can be processed on Earth.  The spacecraft must send down reduced data and derivative results.  Therefore, these corrections need to be made onboard.</p><p>These reasons aren't necessarily exclusive, either... both could be true.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to design these kinds of cameras , and there are at least two potential reasons why this ca n't be done on the ground : Firstly , and most likely , there 's an essential step that needs to be done in the camera hardware .
Perhaps something related to Correlated Double Sampling [ ccd.com ] or Pixel Binning [ ccd.com ] needs to be adjusted .
In the first case , the signal and reset measurements need to be done as close together as possible to reduce 1/f noise , which can quickly dominate the noise side of the SNR expression , and it may be the timing of these measurements that is at fault .
In the latter case , there would be a sqrt ( N ) penalty for measuring the charge on each pixel and then adding the N pixels together .
Conversely , reading each pixel multiple times may be necessary to overcome an unexpected noise source - a sqrt ( N ) improvement in readout noise can be had by measuring the pixel N times and calculating the average of the measurements .
All of these adjustments can only be made at the camera ; there 's no way to accomplish this after the data has been digitized and radioed to Earth.2 - Bandwidth .
There 's just no bandwidth available to ship down the raw data so it can be processed on Earth .
The spacecraft must send down reduced data and derivative results .
Therefore , these corrections need to be made onboard.These reasons are n't necessarily exclusive , either... both could be true .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to design these kinds of cameras, and there are at least two potential reasons why this can't be done on the ground:Firstly, and most likely, there's an essential step that needs to be done in the camera hardware.
Perhaps something related to Correlated Double Sampling [ccd.com] or Pixel Binning [ccd.com] needs to be adjusted.
In the first case, the signal and reset measurements need to be done as close together as possible to reduce 1/f noise, which can quickly dominate the noise side of the SNR expression, and it may be the timing of these measurements that is at fault.
In the latter case, there would be a sqrt(N) penalty for measuring the charge on each pixel and then adding the N pixels together.
Conversely, reading each pixel multiple times may be necessary to overcome an unexpected noise source - a sqrt(N) improvement in readout noise can be had by measuring the pixel N times and calculating the average of the measurements.
All of these adjustments can only be made at the camera; there's no way to accomplish this after the data has been digitized and radioed to Earth.2 - Bandwidth.
There's just no bandwidth available to ship down the raw data so it can be processed on Earth.
The spacecraft must send down reduced data and derivative results.
Therefore, these corrections need to be made onboard.These reasons aren't necessarily exclusive, either... both could be true.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928699</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929081</id>
	<title>Re:Monster Cables &amp; Tube Amplifiers</title>
	<author>Daimanta</author>
	<datestamp>1256898120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That or invert the polarity of the quantum-modulator. Then the only thing they will have to worry about is local tachyon-fields that are hard to nullify even with Sierpinski-singularities. But I'm sure they will find an elegant solution for that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That or invert the polarity of the quantum-modulator .
Then the only thing they will have to worry about is local tachyon-fields that are hard to nullify even with Sierpinski-singularities .
But I 'm sure they will find an elegant solution for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That or invert the polarity of the quantum-modulator.
Then the only thing they will have to worry about is local tachyon-fields that are hard to nullify even with Sierpinski-singularities.
But I'm sure they will find an elegant solution for that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928767</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929515</id>
	<title>Well, sure: take your time...</title>
	<author>WheelDweller</author>
	<datestamp>1256901480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you need:</p><p>"amplifiers that boost the signals from the charge-coupled devices that form the heart of the 0.95-metre telescope's 95-million-pixel photometer, which detects the light emitted from the distant stars."</p><p>We're not going to them any time soon, anyway. Still sublight, guys. If they're not less than a generation away, we can't even send an 'Adam and Eve" to hope for another planet in an emergency.</p><p>Thankfully, that won't be necessary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you need : " amplifiers that boost the signals from the charge-coupled devices that form the heart of the 0.95-metre telescope 's 95-million-pixel photometer , which detects the light emitted from the distant stars .
" We 're not going to them any time soon , anyway .
Still sublight , guys .
If they 're not less than a generation away , we ca n't even send an 'Adam and Eve " to hope for another planet in an emergency.Thankfully , that wo n't be necessary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you need:"amplifiers that boost the signals from the charge-coupled devices that form the heart of the 0.95-metre telescope's 95-million-pixel photometer, which detects the light emitted from the distant stars.
"We're not going to them any time soon, anyway.
Still sublight, guys.
If they're not less than a generation away, we can't even send an 'Adam and Eve" to hope for another planet in an emergency.Thankfully, that won't be necessary.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29932269</id>
	<title>Cylons</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256925540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We should build Cylons first, then go exploring for habitable planets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We should build Cylons first , then go exploring for habitable planets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We should build Cylons first, then go exploring for habitable planets.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928895</id>
	<title>That's OK</title>
	<author>tverbeek</author>
	<datestamp>1256897040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think we can wait another couple years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think we can wait another couple years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think we can wait another couple years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29932807</id>
	<title>Re:This is just stupid.</title>
	<author>Boronx</author>
	<datestamp>1256979600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We need to know which direction to look for the invasion fleet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We need to know which direction to look for the invasion fleet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We need to know which direction to look for the invasion fleet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929307</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928699</id>
	<title>head scratch...</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1256896080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>but the team has to fix the software</p> </div><p>Why can't we just develop software on the ground to post-process the data?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>but the team has to fix the software Why ca n't we just develop software on the ground to post-process the data ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but the team has to fix the software Why can't we just develop software on the ground to post-process the data?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928955</id>
	<title>Thats a long time for a bug fix</title>
	<author>dragonxtc</author>
	<datestamp>1256897340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wish my project time lines gave me 3 years to fix a bug!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish my project time lines gave me 3 years to fix a bug !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish my project time lines gave me 3 years to fix a bug!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29931373</id>
	<title>Re:head scratch...</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1256915040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Why can't we just develop software on the ground to post-process the data?</p></div></blockquote><p>You mean they're sending the developers <i>to</i> the probe? Now <i>that's</i> <b>out</b>sourcing!<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ca n't we just develop software on the ground to post-process the data ? You mean they 're sending the developers to the probe ?
Now that 's outsourcing !
     </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why can't we just develop software on the ground to post-process the data?You mean they're sending the developers to the probe?
Now that's outsourcing!
     
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928699</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29931301</id>
	<title>Re:Damn!</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1256914200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>That pushes back the date I'll actually be able to visit those planets by at least two years!</p></div></blockquote><p>Dude, give up on your 3-breasted green babe fantasy already.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That pushes back the date I 'll actually be able to visit those planets by at least two years ! Dude , give up on your 3-breasted green babe fantasy already .
     </tokentext>
<sentencetext>That pushes back the date I'll actually be able to visit those planets by at least two years!Dude, give up on your 3-breasted green babe fantasy already.
     
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928969</id>
	<title>Home planet...</title>
	<author>stakovahflow</author>
	<datestamp>1256897460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whew! I almost thought my home planet would soon be discovered! Silly humans...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whew !
I almost thought my home planet would soon be discovered !
Silly humans.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whew!
I almost thought my home planet would soon be discovered!
Silly humans...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928735</id>
	<title>Hunt? Delayed?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256896320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's alright.  I'll have another glass of this sherry, and warm me arse by the fire with the hounds.</p><p>By the time day is out, we'll have roused to the horns and have the skin of these <i>planets</i> stretched for the drying, before the groom is done brushing nettles from the tail of the ol' horse.</p><p>Now, where'd I lay that toothpick?  I <i>could</i> use another one of those delightful sandwiches!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's alright .
I 'll have another glass of this sherry , and warm me arse by the fire with the hounds.By the time day is out , we 'll have roused to the horns and have the skin of these planets stretched for the drying , before the groom is done brushing nettles from the tail of the ol ' horse.Now , where 'd I lay that toothpick ?
I could use another one of those delightful sandwiches !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's alright.
I'll have another glass of this sherry, and warm me arse by the fire with the hounds.By the time day is out, we'll have roused to the horns and have the skin of these planets stretched for the drying, before the groom is done brushing nettles from the tail of the ol' horse.Now, where'd I lay that toothpick?
I could use another one of those delightful sandwiches!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928925</id>
	<title>Your Satellite Is The New World Order</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256897220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"according to the mission's team. "</p><p>owned by <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2Wg70abKTg&amp;feature=related" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Space Nazis</a> [youtube.com].</p><p>Go Energia !</p><p>Yours In Petrograd,<br>Kilgore Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" according to the mission 's team .
" owned by Space Nazis [ youtube.com ] .Go Energia ! Yours In Petrograd,Kilgore Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"according to the mission's team.
"owned by Space Nazis [youtube.com].Go Energia !Yours In Petrograd,Kilgore Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29932187</id>
	<title>Re:head scratch...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256924160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>but the team has to fix the software</p></div><p>Why can't we just develop software on the ground to post-process the data?</p></div><p>It is the software on the ground that needs fixing.</p><p>http://www.ias.u-psud.fr/kepler/KASC-29-October/Morning/KASC\_SOC\_Pipeline\_JMJ.pdf</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>but the team has to fix the softwareWhy ca n't we just develop software on the ground to post-process the data ? It is the software on the ground that needs fixing.http : //www.ias.u-psud.fr/kepler/KASC-29-October/Morning/KASC \ _SOC \ _Pipeline \ _JMJ.pdf</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but the team has to fix the softwareWhy can't we just develop software on the ground to post-process the data?It is the software on the ground that needs fixing.http://www.ias.u-psud.fr/kepler/KASC-29-October/Morning/KASC\_SOC\_Pipeline\_JMJ.pdf
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928699</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929171</id>
	<title>riskier to fix on the ground?</title>
	<author>BigHungryJoe</author>
	<datestamp>1256898660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>But in the end, he says, the team thought it was riskier to pry apart the telescope's electronic guts than to deal with the problem after launch.</i></p><p>Can someone explain to me why this was the case?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But in the end , he says , the team thought it was riskier to pry apart the telescope 's electronic guts than to deal with the problem after launch.Can someone explain to me why this was the case ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But in the end, he says, the team thought it was riskier to pry apart the telescope's electronic guts than to deal with the problem after launch.Can someone explain to me why this was the case?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929073</id>
	<title>So in the meantime</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256898060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thety will just have to hunt for Pluto-like planets?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thety will just have to hunt for Pluto-like planets ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thety will just have to hunt for Pluto-like planets?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929387</id>
	<title>Is this the real answer or?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256900400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are we making a public excuse so that the images of Planet Nirubu or Planet X are not presented to the public?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are we making a public excuse so that the images of Planet Nirubu or Planet X are not presented to the public ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are we making a public excuse so that the images of Planet Nirubu or Planet X are not presented to the public?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928999</id>
	<title>Damn!</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1256897640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That pushes back the date I'll actually be able to visit those planets by at least two years!<br> <br>
What? You say we weren't planning on doing anything useful with the data anyway? Well in that case... who cares?!?</htmltext>
<tokenext>That pushes back the date I 'll actually be able to visit those planets by at least two years !
What ? You say we were n't planning on doing anything useful with the data anyway ?
Well in that case... who cares ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That pushes back the date I'll actually be able to visit those planets by at least two years!
What? You say we weren't planning on doing anything useful with the data anyway?
Well in that case... who cares?!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929499</id>
	<title>missing the point</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256901180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thing there's a bit of misunderstanding here...  Point of fact, it will take several years worth of data to identify a rocky planet in the habitable zone anyway.  Why?  Because your looking for a planet which you must identify as it makes several passes in front of it's star, a planet whose orbital period is going to be on the order of... a year.  (depending on the star's output, of course).  So, perhaps they're saying that the earliest they would be able to identify an Earth like planet would be 2011.  Yes, I read the article but I think the author may have misunderstood.  And let us not forget that this only affects <i>some</i> of the channels.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thing there 's a bit of misunderstanding here... Point of fact , it will take several years worth of data to identify a rocky planet in the habitable zone anyway .
Why ? Because your looking for a planet which you must identify as it makes several passes in front of it 's star , a planet whose orbital period is going to be on the order of... a year .
( depending on the star 's output , of course ) .
So , perhaps they 're saying that the earliest they would be able to identify an Earth like planet would be 2011 .
Yes , I read the article but I think the author may have misunderstood .
And let us not forget that this only affects some of the channels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thing there's a bit of misunderstanding here...  Point of fact, it will take several years worth of data to identify a rocky planet in the habitable zone anyway.
Why?  Because your looking for a planet which you must identify as it makes several passes in front of it's star, a planet whose orbital period is going to be on the order of... a year.
(depending on the star's output, of course).
So, perhaps they're saying that the earliest they would be able to identify an Earth like planet would be 2011.
Yes, I read the article but I think the author may have misunderstood.
And let us not forget that this only affects some of the channels.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928989</id>
	<title>Higgs</title>
	<author>mooingyak</author>
	<datestamp>1256897580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like the project might have inadvertently discovered the higgs boson at some point in the future.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like the project might have inadvertently discovered the higgs boson at some point in the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like the project might have inadvertently discovered the higgs boson at some point in the future.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29934325</id>
	<title>The Earth is a DEATH TRAP!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257002280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Earth is a DEATH TRAP!</p><p>At some point, human life on Earth WILL be wiped out.  To continue the species, we need to get off this rock.  Further, our solar system is a death trap.</p><p>Eventually, a gamma ray producing star will focus on our entire solar system gamma rays that will destroy all life. If we get lucky, that won't happen and just our Sun will turn into a Red Giant and expand into Mars' orbit. The Earth will be burned up.</p><p>We need to get as far from here as possible.  Like any trip, the journey begins with the first step.</p><p>Being from Tahiti, I would have thought you'd be planning ahead.  The whole rising oceans thing should be important to lots of Tahitians about now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Earth is a DEATH TRAP ! At some point , human life on Earth WILL be wiped out .
To continue the species , we need to get off this rock .
Further , our solar system is a death trap.Eventually , a gamma ray producing star will focus on our entire solar system gamma rays that will destroy all life .
If we get lucky , that wo n't happen and just our Sun will turn into a Red Giant and expand into Mars ' orbit .
The Earth will be burned up.We need to get as far from here as possible .
Like any trip , the journey begins with the first step.Being from Tahiti , I would have thought you 'd be planning ahead .
The whole rising oceans thing should be important to lots of Tahitians about now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Earth is a DEATH TRAP!At some point, human life on Earth WILL be wiped out.
To continue the species, we need to get off this rock.
Further, our solar system is a death trap.Eventually, a gamma ray producing star will focus on our entire solar system gamma rays that will destroy all life.
If we get lucky, that won't happen and just our Sun will turn into a Red Giant and expand into Mars' orbit.
The Earth will be burned up.We need to get as far from here as possible.
Like any trip, the journey begins with the first step.Being from Tahiti, I would have thought you'd be planning ahead.
The whole rising oceans thing should be important to lots of Tahitians about now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928921</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929259</id>
	<title>Re:What's wrong with this planet?</title>
	<author>bakawolf</author>
	<datestamp>1256899320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It seems to have a nasty infestation of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo\_sapiens" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Homo Sapiens</a> [wikipedia.org].

Known for causing all sorts of problems, and terribly hard to get rid of.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems to have a nasty infestation of Homo Sapiens [ wikipedia.org ] .
Known for causing all sorts of problems , and terribly hard to get rid of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems to have a nasty infestation of Homo Sapiens [wikipedia.org].
Known for causing all sorts of problems, and terribly hard to get rid of.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928921</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29932007</id>
	<title>Re:Damn!</title>
	<author>Kjella</author>
	<datestamp>1256921640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how humanity would be if it was full of people like you, I'm thinking they'd still be in the same cave in the same valley using stone age technology, because there's nothing obviously useful about ever going outside that box and start to melt bronze to get to the bronze age. We want to know because we want to know, whether it's astrophysics or social sciences (try putting a ROI on most of that stuff) or whatever. Of course this we can guess at but that's only because you can guess at what's just a little bit out. When I was a kid they didn't know of a single exoplanet, they just had some models of it. In another 50-100 years we might be looking at earth size planets, moon-sized satellites, spectral atmospheric analysis trying to figure out if there are habitable planets and sooner or later they might even get going.</p><p>Why does everything have to have a ROI right now? A lot of people wouldn't see money their children inherit as "wasted" even if they didn't get to spend it themselves, why would you think so with knowledge? If we've started them off on research they will complete that's as good an investment in the future as any. They're still working on fusion for power. They're still working on nanotechnology. Things take decades to go from idea to reality and that's actually fast - in the older days it could take centuries. There's plenty denial going around in religious circles because science has always been a thorn in their side suggesting that earth isn't the center of the universe nor that we're all that unique. Copycat earths would be another indicator of that, and I think that'd do humanity far more good in the long run. Of course unless they said "God is just playing tricks on us and the dinosaur bones is a test or not real or from a young earth or whatever.", but those people are pretty much lost anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how humanity would be if it was full of people like you , I 'm thinking they 'd still be in the same cave in the same valley using stone age technology , because there 's nothing obviously useful about ever going outside that box and start to melt bronze to get to the bronze age .
We want to know because we want to know , whether it 's astrophysics or social sciences ( try putting a ROI on most of that stuff ) or whatever .
Of course this we can guess at but that 's only because you can guess at what 's just a little bit out .
When I was a kid they did n't know of a single exoplanet , they just had some models of it .
In another 50-100 years we might be looking at earth size planets , moon-sized satellites , spectral atmospheric analysis trying to figure out if there are habitable planets and sooner or later they might even get going.Why does everything have to have a ROI right now ?
A lot of people would n't see money their children inherit as " wasted " even if they did n't get to spend it themselves , why would you think so with knowledge ?
If we 've started them off on research they will complete that 's as good an investment in the future as any .
They 're still working on fusion for power .
They 're still working on nanotechnology .
Things take decades to go from idea to reality and that 's actually fast - in the older days it could take centuries .
There 's plenty denial going around in religious circles because science has always been a thorn in their side suggesting that earth is n't the center of the universe nor that we 're all that unique .
Copycat earths would be another indicator of that , and I think that 'd do humanity far more good in the long run .
Of course unless they said " God is just playing tricks on us and the dinosaur bones is a test or not real or from a young earth or whatever .
" , but those people are pretty much lost anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how humanity would be if it was full of people like you, I'm thinking they'd still be in the same cave in the same valley using stone age technology, because there's nothing obviously useful about ever going outside that box and start to melt bronze to get to the bronze age.
We want to know because we want to know, whether it's astrophysics or social sciences (try putting a ROI on most of that stuff) or whatever.
Of course this we can guess at but that's only because you can guess at what's just a little bit out.
When I was a kid they didn't know of a single exoplanet, they just had some models of it.
In another 50-100 years we might be looking at earth size planets, moon-sized satellites, spectral atmospheric analysis trying to figure out if there are habitable planets and sooner or later they might even get going.Why does everything have to have a ROI right now?
A lot of people wouldn't see money their children inherit as "wasted" even if they didn't get to spend it themselves, why would you think so with knowledge?
If we've started them off on research they will complete that's as good an investment in the future as any.
They're still working on fusion for power.
They're still working on nanotechnology.
Things take decades to go from idea to reality and that's actually fast - in the older days it could take centuries.
There's plenty denial going around in religious circles because science has always been a thorn in their side suggesting that earth isn't the center of the universe nor that we're all that unique.
Copycat earths would be another indicator of that, and I think that'd do humanity far more good in the long run.
Of course unless they said "God is just playing tricks on us and the dinosaur bones is a test or not real or from a young earth or whatever.
", but those people are pretty much lost anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928921</id>
	<title>What's wrong with this planet?</title>
	<author>PocariSweat1991</author>
	<datestamp>1256897160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm from Tahiti so I might have missed something in the translation, but what is wrong with this planet?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm from Tahiti so I might have missed something in the translation , but what is wrong with this planet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm from Tahiti so I might have missed something in the translation, but what is wrong with this planet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928767</id>
	<title>Monster Cables &amp; Tube Amplifiers</title>
	<author>PolygamousRanchKid </author>
	<datestamp>1256896500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That ought to fix the problem.
</p><p>At least, that's what they claim.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That ought to fix the problem .
At least , that 's what they claim .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That ought to fix the problem.
At least, that's what they claim.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929261</id>
	<title>Urgency?</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1256899380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>2 years delay to analize that data... for?<br><br>Communicate? Will take a lot of years to do a "conversation" if there happens to be intelligent life there<br><br>Getting there? Still a lot to develop to be able to do such trip for human beings, just doing the technology to make us able to live for years or generations to get there is something potentially more important than finding a "good enough" planet out there. For machines the technology could be ready or close enough, but still, would be a version of the communicate option, once the ship its there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>2 years delay to analize that data... for ? Communicate ? Will take a lot of years to do a " conversation " if there happens to be intelligent life thereGetting there ?
Still a lot to develop to be able to do such trip for human beings , just doing the technology to make us able to live for years or generations to get there is something potentially more important than finding a " good enough " planet out there .
For machines the technology could be ready or close enough , but still , would be a version of the communicate option , once the ship its there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2 years delay to analize that data... for?Communicate? Will take a lot of years to do a "conversation" if there happens to be intelligent life thereGetting there?
Still a lot to develop to be able to do such trip for human beings, just doing the technology to make us able to live for years or generations to get there is something potentially more important than finding a "good enough" planet out there.
For machines the technology could be ready or close enough, but still, would be a version of the communicate option, once the ship its there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29938841</id>
	<title>Kepler Mission is doing well; finding planets</title>
	<author>KeplerMission</author>
	<datestamp>1257003360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Kepler Mission is actually doing very well, producing planetary discoveries that will be announced early next year, and expects to meet all its science goals. Data from the low level noise in a few of the 84 channels will be corrected prior to the time that an Earth twin could be found.

William Borucki, Kepler Science Principal Investigator</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Kepler Mission is actually doing very well , producing planetary discoveries that will be announced early next year , and expects to meet all its science goals .
Data from the low level noise in a few of the 84 channels will be corrected prior to the time that an Earth twin could be found .
William Borucki , Kepler Science Principal Investigator</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Kepler Mission is actually doing very well, producing planetary discoveries that will be announced early next year, and expects to meet all its science goals.
Data from the low level noise in a few of the 84 channels will be corrected prior to the time that an Earth twin could be found.
William Borucki, Kepler Science Principal Investigator</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929179</id>
	<title>The assumption being, of course...</title>
	<author>ibsteve2u</author>
	<datestamp>1256898720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...that no planet's signature will approximate a noisy amplifier.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...that no planet 's signature will approximate a noisy amplifier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that no planet's signature will approximate a noisy amplifier.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928907</id>
	<title>Re:Monster Cables &amp; Tube Amplifiers</title>
	<author>oldspewey</author>
	<datestamp>1256897100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They just need to find out which of the lab technicians has been running around cranking up all the knobs and saying "this one goes to eleven!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>They just need to find out which of the lab technicians has been running around cranking up all the knobs and saying " this one goes to eleven !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They just need to find out which of the lab technicians has been running around cranking up all the knobs and saying "this one goes to eleven!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928767</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_209251_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29932187
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928699
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_209251_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29931301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_209251_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29932807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929307
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_209251_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928699
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_209251_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929323
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_209251_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29930279
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_209251_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929233
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928767
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_209251_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928907
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928767
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_209251_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_209251_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29934309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29932007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_209251_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_209251_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929741
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928699
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_209251_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929081
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928767
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_209251_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29931373
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928699
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_209251_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29930527
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928699
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_209251_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29934325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_209251.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928955
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_209251.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928699
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928905
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29930527
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29932187
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929741
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29931373
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_209251.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928767
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928907
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929233
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929081
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_209251.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928999
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29931301
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29930279
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29932007
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29934309
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_209251.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929171
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_209251.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928921
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929323
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929259
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29934325
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929593
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_209251.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928925
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_209251.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29928735
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_209251.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929307
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29932807
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_209251.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929261
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_209251.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_209251.29929499
</commentlist>
</conversation>
