<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_30_1539241</id>
	<title>Metadata In Arizona Public Records Can't Be Withheld</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1256922060000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>jasonbuechler writes in with news of the <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j7Pv4GxmVPmMxHAPCnllDd0LyPJQD9BL1IN81">first state to declare that metadata is part of public records</a> and must be released when the records are. <i>"Hidden data embedded in electronic public records must be disclosed under Arizona's public records law, the state Supreme Court said Thursday... The Supreme Court's unanimous decision, which overturned lower court rulings, is believed to be the first by a state supreme court on whether a public records law applies to so-called metadata. 'This is at the cutting edge &mdash; it's the law trying to catch up with technology,' [one lawyer said]. The Arizona ruling came in a case involving a demoted Phoenix police officer's request for data embedded in notes written by a supervisor. The officer got a printed copy but said he wanted the metadata to see whether the supervisor backdated the notes to before the demotion."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>jasonbuechler writes in with news of the first state to declare that metadata is part of public records and must be released when the records are .
" Hidden data embedded in electronic public records must be disclosed under Arizona 's public records law , the state Supreme Court said Thursday... The Supreme Court 's unanimous decision , which overturned lower court rulings , is believed to be the first by a state supreme court on whether a public records law applies to so-called metadata .
'This is at the cutting edge    it 's the law trying to catch up with technology, ' [ one lawyer said ] .
The Arizona ruling came in a case involving a demoted Phoenix police officer 's request for data embedded in notes written by a supervisor .
The officer got a printed copy but said he wanted the metadata to see whether the supervisor backdated the notes to before the demotion .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>jasonbuechler writes in with news of the first state to declare that metadata is part of public records and must be released when the records are.
"Hidden data embedded in electronic public records must be disclosed under Arizona's public records law, the state Supreme Court said Thursday... The Supreme Court's unanimous decision, which overturned lower court rulings, is believed to be the first by a state supreme court on whether a public records law applies to so-called metadata.
'This is at the cutting edge — it's the law trying to catch up with technology,' [one lawyer said].
The Arizona ruling came in a case involving a demoted Phoenix police officer's request for data embedded in notes written by a supervisor.
The officer got a printed copy but said he wanted the metadata to see whether the supervisor backdated the notes to before the demotion.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926239</id>
	<title>Re:Grammar Police</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256928060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.qwantz.com/index.php?comic=1534" title="qwantz.com" rel="nofollow">I'm not bitches.</a> [qwantz.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not bitches .
[ qwantz.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not bitches.
[qwantz.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926079</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926215</id>
	<title>Re:A big step forward for freedom</title>
	<author>JWSmythe</author>
	<datestamp>1256927940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>  I don't know what kind of American you are, but I have plenty of manhood to go around.  I really don't mind sharing my mahood with <a href="http://www.boreme.com/boreme/funny-2008/carla-bruni-pics-p1.php" title="boreme.com" rel="nofollow">the Italians</a> [boreme.com] at all.  I assure you, it's all in the interest of international relations and world peace.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know what kind of American you are , but I have plenty of manhood to go around .
I really do n't mind sharing my mahood with the Italians [ boreme.com ] at all .
I assure you , it 's all in the interest of international relations and world peace .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  I don't know what kind of American you are, but I have plenty of manhood to go around.
I really don't mind sharing my mahood with the Italians [boreme.com] at all.
I assure you, it's all in the interest of international relations and world peace.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925805</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926023</id>
	<title>Re:Cutting edge?</title>
	<author>TubeSteak</author>
	<datestamp>1256926920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So it's not really the cutting edge then, is it? It's the law only now trying to cope with decades-old technology.</p></div><p>Most law enforcement systems are decades old.<br>It wasn't until after 9/11 that serious $$$ started going towards modernization of records.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So it 's not really the cutting edge then , is it ?
It 's the law only now trying to cope with decades-old technology.Most law enforcement systems are decades old.It was n't until after 9/11 that serious $ $ $ started going towards modernization of records .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it's not really the cutting edge then, is it?
It's the law only now trying to cope with decades-old technology.Most law enforcement systems are decades old.It wasn't until after 9/11 that serious $$$ started going towards modernization of records.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925921</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926591</id>
	<title>[[citation needed]]</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256929440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Every source I can find says that "data" can be either singular or plural.</p><p>If you have an authoritative source* that claims it can <i>only</i> be plural, please cite it. Otherwise, as your supervisor, I'm going to demote you to a lower rank within the grammar police.</p><p>(*An authoritative <i>english language</i> source. We're not speaking Latin, here)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every source I can find says that " data " can be either singular or plural.If you have an authoritative source * that claims it can only be plural , please cite it .
Otherwise , as your supervisor , I 'm going to demote you to a lower rank within the grammar police .
( * An authoritative english language source .
We 're not speaking Latin , here )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every source I can find says that "data" can be either singular or plural.If you have an authoritative source* that claims it can only be plural, please cite it.
Otherwise, as your supervisor, I'm going to demote you to a lower rank within the grammar police.
(*An authoritative english language source.
We're not speaking Latin, here)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926079</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925961</id>
	<title>Re:Smart police officer</title>
	<author>timeOday</author>
	<datestamp>1256926680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would imagine when cops turn against each other, all sorts of hilarity ensues.  They know their rights, plus they known the workings of the system, plus they have a lot of exposure to nefarious/criminal minds.  Sort of like when two ambulance-chasing lawyers have a fender-bender.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would imagine when cops turn against each other , all sorts of hilarity ensues .
They know their rights , plus they known the workings of the system , plus they have a lot of exposure to nefarious/criminal minds .
Sort of like when two ambulance-chasing lawyers have a fender-bender .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would imagine when cops turn against each other, all sorts of hilarity ensues.
They know their rights, plus they known the workings of the system, plus they have a lot of exposure to nefarious/criminal minds.
Sort of like when two ambulance-chasing lawyers have a fender-bender.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925863</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29927379</id>
	<title>Re:Grammar Police</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256933100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How ironic that your post title is Grammar Police whilst your metadatum is synonymous with "To leave quickly and secretly and hide oneself, often to avoid arrest or prosecution".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How ironic that your post title is Grammar Police whilst your metadatum is synonymous with " To leave quickly and secretly and hide oneself , often to avoid arrest or prosecution " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How ironic that your post title is Grammar Police whilst your metadatum is synonymous with "To leave quickly and secretly and hide oneself, often to avoid arrest or prosecution".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926079</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926659</id>
	<title>OMG now I have to know</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256929740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yeah yeah...court case, metadata, blah blah.<br>Did he actually get the metadata? Were the notes backdated? I MUST KNOW. The truth is out there, hidden in the bits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah yeah...court case , metadata , blah blah.Did he actually get the metadata ?
Were the notes backdated ?
I MUST KNOW .
The truth is out there , hidden in the bits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah yeah...court case, metadata, blah blah.Did he actually get the metadata?
Were the notes backdated?
I MUST KNOW.
The truth is out there, hidden in the bits.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29928281</id>
	<title>Re:Smart police officer</title>
	<author>SoTerrified</author>
	<datestamp>1256893920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>He told me to make sure to pay taxes as if she was a contractor, and turned back to his work obviously not wanting to be disturbed again.</p></div><p>
Ok, that made me laugh.  You just heard it as "Oh, you're not going to sue him, you're just going to let him get away with it?  And all you care about is taxes are being paid?"  But when I read it, I heard a smart lawyer saying it wasn't worth his time to go after the embezzler... But by declaring it on the taxes, he'd be raising a flag that the IRS could very likely investigate causing all sorts of problems.  (It's highly unlikely the embezzler declared his embezzled income.)  In other words, the lawyer quickly found a zero cost, legal way to get his 'revenge'.  Tell me that's not worthy of a chuckle.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He told me to make sure to pay taxes as if she was a contractor , and turned back to his work obviously not wanting to be disturbed again .
Ok , that made me laugh .
You just heard it as " Oh , you 're not going to sue him , you 're just going to let him get away with it ?
And all you care about is taxes are being paid ?
" But when I read it , I heard a smart lawyer saying it was n't worth his time to go after the embezzler... But by declaring it on the taxes , he 'd be raising a flag that the IRS could very likely investigate causing all sorts of problems .
( It 's highly unlikely the embezzler declared his embezzled income .
) In other words , the lawyer quickly found a zero cost , legal way to get his 'revenge' .
Tell me that 's not worthy of a chuckle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He told me to make sure to pay taxes as if she was a contractor, and turned back to his work obviously not wanting to be disturbed again.
Ok, that made me laugh.
You just heard it as "Oh, you're not going to sue him, you're just going to let him get away with it?
And all you care about is taxes are being paid?
"  But when I read it, I heard a smart lawyer saying it wasn't worth his time to go after the embezzler... But by declaring it on the taxes, he'd be raising a flag that the IRS could very likely investigate causing all sorts of problems.
(It's highly unlikely the embezzler declared his embezzled income.
)  In other words, the lawyer quickly found a zero cost, legal way to get his 'revenge'.
Tell me that's not worthy of a chuckle.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926335</id>
	<title>So, were they back dated?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256928420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I want to know if they really were back dated.  And if so, I hope his supervisor gets fired and that they re-hire this officer.  And give him a medal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So I want to know if they really were back dated .
And if so , I hope his supervisor gets fired and that they re-hire this officer .
And give him a medal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I want to know if they really were back dated.
And if so, I hope his supervisor gets fired and that they re-hire this officer.
And give him a medal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926939</id>
	<title>Re:Smart police officer</title>
	<author>Fulcrum of Evil</author>
	<datestamp>1256930940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That sort of makes sense: when you're the plaintiff, you can always lose, but as a lawyer, the only question is whether you can collect your fees.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That sort of makes sense : when you 're the plaintiff , you can always lose , but as a lawyer , the only question is whether you can collect your fees .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That sort of makes sense: when you're the plaintiff, you can always lose, but as a lawyer, the only question is whether you can collect your fees.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29928455</id>
	<title>change the metadata</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256894820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the guy was dishonest enough to backdate the document, he may very well backdate the metadata too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the guy was dishonest enough to backdate the document , he may very well backdate the metadata too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the guy was dishonest enough to backdate the document, he may very well backdate the metadata too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925917</id>
	<title>The Likeliest Policy Change ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256926440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the desk of the Chief of Police:</p><p>Effective immediately all precinct officers should destroy all electronic devices with central processing units. All document production will be performed using manual typewriters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the desk of the Chief of Police : Effective immediately all precinct officers should destroy all electronic devices with central processing units .
All document production will be performed using manual typewriters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the desk of the Chief of Police:Effective immediately all precinct officers should destroy all electronic devices with central processing units.
All document production will be performed using manual typewriters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29927727</id>
	<title>Re:[[citation needed]]</title>
	<author>pyrr</author>
	<datestamp>1256934540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As I note just above, while technically "data" is actually plural in Latin, English uses it as a mass noun. Therefore, it is no longer singular or plural, it just <i>is</i>. It makes the most sense that way since it's a vague term.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As I note just above , while technically " data " is actually plural in Latin , English uses it as a mass noun .
Therefore , it is no longer singular or plural , it just is .
It makes the most sense that way since it 's a vague term .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I note just above, while technically "data" is actually plural in Latin, English uses it as a mass noun.
Therefore, it is no longer singular or plural, it just is.
It makes the most sense that way since it's a vague term.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925861</id>
	<title>New kikes!! Show your kike pride!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256926140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/10/28/new.and.emergent.jews/index.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/10/28/new.and.emergent.jews/index.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/10/28/new.and.emergent.jews/index.html</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29927431</id>
	<title>Re:Smart police officer</title>
	<author>timeOday</author>
	<datestamp>1256933340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is interesting.  I have an uncle who used to work for EF Hutton as a stock broker (which is going back a few years, but you may remember their motto, "When E.F. Hutton Talks, People Listen."  They were very prestigious at the time.)   I asked him if, among the more wealthy brokers he knew, they made their fortunes on stock picks, or on commissions, to which he immediately replied "commissions."  That told me all I needed to know about paying for their advice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is interesting .
I have an uncle who used to work for EF Hutton as a stock broker ( which is going back a few years , but you may remember their motto , " When E.F. Hutton Talks , People Listen .
" They were very prestigious at the time .
) I asked him if , among the more wealthy brokers he knew , they made their fortunes on stock picks , or on commissions , to which he immediately replied " commissions .
" That told me all I needed to know about paying for their advice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is interesting.
I have an uncle who used to work for EF Hutton as a stock broker (which is going back a few years, but you may remember their motto, "When E.F. Hutton Talks, People Listen.
"  They were very prestigious at the time.
)   I asked him if, among the more wealthy brokers he knew, they made their fortunes on stock picks, or on commissions, to which he immediately replied "commissions.
"  That told me all I needed to know about paying for their advice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926079</id>
	<title>Grammar Police</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256927220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Metadata ARE part of the records. They're plural, bitches.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Metadata ARE part of the records .
They 're plural , bitches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Metadata ARE part of the records.
They're plural, bitches.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925863</id>
	<title>Smart police officer</title>
	<author>bennomatic</author>
	<datestamp>1256926200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Probably deserves a promotion.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably deserves a promotion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably deserves a promotion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925921</id>
	<title>Cutting edge?</title>
	<author>amicusNYCL</author>
	<datestamp>1256926440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quoth the lawyer:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>'This is at the cutting edge &mdash; it's the law trying to catch up with technology'</p> </div><p>So it's <i>not</i> really the cutting edge then, is it?  It's the law only now trying to cope with decades-old technology.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Quoth the lawyer : 'This is at the cutting edge    it 's the law trying to catch up with technology ' So it 's not really the cutting edge then , is it ?
It 's the law only now trying to cope with decades-old technology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quoth the lawyer:'This is at the cutting edge — it's the law trying to catch up with technology' So it's not really the cutting edge then, is it?
It's the law only now trying to cope with decades-old technology.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926013</id>
	<title>keeping the (wall street of deceit) lie alive...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256926860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is presently costing US (you &amp; me) billions of $$ per day. seems as though the dough could go to something sustainable/worthwhile instead. does anyone remember the process of the nazis in germany, as in stealing all of the regions' remaining resources as they took flight?</p><p>mynuts won; to be censored/deleted post haste.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is presently costing US ( you &amp; me ) billions of $ $ per day .
seems as though the dough could go to something sustainable/worthwhile instead .
does anyone remember the process of the nazis in germany , as in stealing all of the regions ' remaining resources as they took flight ? mynuts won ; to be censored/deleted post haste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is presently costing US (you &amp; me) billions of $$ per day.
seems as though the dough could go to something sustainable/worthwhile instead.
does anyone remember the process of the nazis in germany, as in stealing all of the regions' remaining resources as they took flight?mynuts won; to be censored/deleted post haste.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926111</id>
	<title>Sterilize documents</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256927400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sooner or later you'll see departments classify "temporary working notes" as mandatory-shred items, and require all "permanent records" to go through some process that strips them of non-visible information.</p><p>One relatively cheap way to do this is to print all documents to a digitally signed PDF or a graphics format.  The digital signature is a bonus that authenticates the document.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sooner or later you 'll see departments classify " temporary working notes " as mandatory-shred items , and require all " permanent records " to go through some process that strips them of non-visible information.One relatively cheap way to do this is to print all documents to a digitally signed PDF or a graphics format .
The digital signature is a bonus that authenticates the document .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sooner or later you'll see departments classify "temporary working notes" as mandatory-shred items, and require all "permanent records" to go through some process that strips them of non-visible information.One relatively cheap way to do this is to print all documents to a digitally signed PDF or a graphics format.
The digital signature is a bonus that authenticates the document.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925967</id>
	<title>Apple really doesn't have a choice</title>
	<author>johofnovi</author>
	<datestamp>1256926680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are damned if they do and damned if they don't. Look at recent outcry's over the Pepsi "pick up chicks" app or the "shaken baby" app. They may be tasteless but Apple let them through their "closed" system and caught hell for it. As a company they are really left with little choice but to somewhat sensor the material to mitigate lawsuits from "offended persons". If those apps made the grade, I shudder to think what drivel didn't.
I don't like it, but I understand it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are damned if they do and damned if they do n't .
Look at recent outcry 's over the Pepsi " pick up chicks " app or the " shaken baby " app .
They may be tasteless but Apple let them through their " closed " system and caught hell for it .
As a company they are really left with little choice but to somewhat sensor the material to mitigate lawsuits from " offended persons " .
If those apps made the grade , I shudder to think what drivel did n't .
I do n't like it , but I understand it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are damned if they do and damned if they don't.
Look at recent outcry's over the Pepsi "pick up chicks" app or the "shaken baby" app.
They may be tasteless but Apple let them through their "closed" system and caught hell for it.
As a company they are really left with little choice but to somewhat sensor the material to mitigate lawsuits from "offended persons".
If those apps made the grade, I shudder to think what drivel didn't.
I don't like it, but I understand it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926107</id>
	<title>Re:Cutting edge?</title>
	<author>Interoperable</author>
	<datestamp>1256927340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Decades-old is bleeding edge as far as the law is concerned.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Decades-old is bleeding edge as far as the law is concerned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Decades-old is bleeding edge as far as the law is concerned.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925921</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925933</id>
	<title>Re:Smart police officer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256926500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Should probably get out of police work if he's got that much sense.</p><p>Nothing against police officers, but once you cut through the hyperbole it's mostly a processing job with a car and a gun. If you step out of that role as a processor you're likely to harm yourself or others.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Should probably get out of police work if he 's got that much sense.Nothing against police officers , but once you cut through the hyperbole it 's mostly a processing job with a car and a gun .
If you step out of that role as a processor you 're likely to harm yourself or others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Should probably get out of police work if he's got that much sense.Nothing against police officers, but once you cut through the hyperbole it's mostly a processing job with a car and a gun.
If you step out of that role as a processor you're likely to harm yourself or others.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925863</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29939467</id>
	<title>There's another implication: public records COSTS</title>
	<author>JimMarch(equalccw)</author>
	<datestamp>1257011040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which do you think is cheaper, asking for a bunch of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.DOC files as data put on a 25 cent CD, or an 8" stack of paper printouts?</p><p>And then once you get 'em, you have the ability to run searches.</p><p>Running up the costs by printing dead trees out is an old trick that can now be beat by asking for metadata.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which do you think is cheaper , asking for a bunch of .DOC files as data put on a 25 cent CD , or an 8 " stack of paper printouts ? And then once you get 'em , you have the ability to run searches.Running up the costs by printing dead trees out is an old trick that can now be beat by asking for metadata .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which do you think is cheaper, asking for a bunch of .DOC files as data put on a 25 cent CD, or an 8" stack of paper printouts?And then once you get 'em, you have the ability to run searches.Running up the costs by printing dead trees out is an old trick that can now be beat by asking for metadata.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29927453</id>
	<title>Actually they denied it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256933400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know if anyone actually read the order, but it seems like they actually denied the fact that metadata was public information. Or am I missing something?</p><p>CV-09-0036-PR</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know if anyone actually read the order , but it seems like they actually denied the fact that metadata was public information .
Or am I missing something ? CV-09-0036-PR</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know if anyone actually read the order, but it seems like they actually denied the fact that metadata was public information.
Or am I missing something?CV-09-0036-PR</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926117</id>
	<title>How TOUCHing.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256927400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hopefully, the supervisor didn't know how to use the basic filesystem tools when pre-dating the notes.  Assuming he pre-dated the notes.</p><p>I feel safe mentioning that.  By now the file, with all its appropriate metadata, is backed up somewhere that the supervisor can't write to without bullying someone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully , the supervisor did n't know how to use the basic filesystem tools when pre-dating the notes .
Assuming he pre-dated the notes.I feel safe mentioning that .
By now the file , with all its appropriate metadata , is backed up somewhere that the supervisor ca n't write to without bullying someone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully, the supervisor didn't know how to use the basic filesystem tools when pre-dating the notes.
Assuming he pre-dated the notes.I feel safe mentioning that.
By now the file, with all its appropriate metadata, is backed up somewhere that the supervisor can't write to without bullying someone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926175</id>
	<title>Re:Apple really doesn't have a choice</title>
	<author>bsDaemon</author>
	<datestamp>1256927700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>are you sure you know what thread you're posting in?</htmltext>
<tokenext>are you sure you know what thread you 're posting in ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>are you sure you know what thread you're posting in?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29927981</id>
	<title>Not Cutting Edge Law</title>
	<author>HandleMyBidness</author>
	<datestamp>1256935800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The federal rules for civil procedure (FRCP) were updated in 2006 to address issues like this.  Part of the FRCP is what guides production formats during civil suits.  A lot of state courts are now using the FRCP as a guide for developing their own standards with regards to management of electronic data for legal purposes.  This is the rule, pretty clear.  <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule34.htm" title="cornell.edu" rel="nofollow">http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule34.htm</a> [cornell.edu]</p><p>Previously if you have 10,000 emails you could just print them out to loose piles of paper and turn over boxes (sometimes 100s of boxes) of paper to opposing counsel.  After 2006 there is a default that the other side of a lawsuit is entitled to the documents in the same format they are kept in the course of business.  This includes meta data and it is specifically mentioned in the FRCP.  Most lawyers will make agreements during their discovery conferences (aka 30b6) to agree to production formats that both sides won't find unduly burdensome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The federal rules for civil procedure ( FRCP ) were updated in 2006 to address issues like this .
Part of the FRCP is what guides production formats during civil suits .
A lot of state courts are now using the FRCP as a guide for developing their own standards with regards to management of electronic data for legal purposes .
This is the rule , pretty clear .
http : //www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule34.htm [ cornell.edu ] Previously if you have 10,000 emails you could just print them out to loose piles of paper and turn over boxes ( sometimes 100s of boxes ) of paper to opposing counsel .
After 2006 there is a default that the other side of a lawsuit is entitled to the documents in the same format they are kept in the course of business .
This includes meta data and it is specifically mentioned in the FRCP .
Most lawyers will make agreements during their discovery conferences ( aka 30b6 ) to agree to production formats that both sides wo n't find unduly burdensome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The federal rules for civil procedure (FRCP) were updated in 2006 to address issues like this.
Part of the FRCP is what guides production formats during civil suits.
A lot of state courts are now using the FRCP as a guide for developing their own standards with regards to management of electronic data for legal purposes.
This is the rule, pretty clear.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule34.htm [cornell.edu]Previously if you have 10,000 emails you could just print them out to loose piles of paper and turn over boxes (sometimes 100s of boxes) of paper to opposing counsel.
After 2006 there is a default that the other side of a lawsuit is entitled to the documents in the same format they are kept in the course of business.
This includes meta data and it is specifically mentioned in the FRCP.
Most lawyers will make agreements during their discovery conferences (aka 30b6) to agree to production formats that both sides won't find unduly burdensome.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925805</id>
	<title>A big step forward for freedom</title>
	<author>For a Free Internet</author>
	<datestamp>1256925780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These "meatadactals" are where the Italian spies hide their tracking devices and computer code viruses to steal our manhood away from us real Americans.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These " meatadactals " are where the Italian spies hide their tracking devices and computer code viruses to steal our manhood away from us real Americans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These "meatadactals" are where the Italian spies hide their tracking devices and computer code viruses to steal our manhood away from us real Americans.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925909</id>
	<title>Re:Smart police officer</title>
	<author>jep77</author>
	<datestamp>1256926440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To the computer forensics division. Or something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To the computer forensics division .
Or something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To the computer forensics division.
Or something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925863</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29930735</id>
	<title>Re:Smart police officer</title>
	<author>rubi</author>
	<datestamp>1256908980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Should get out of the job, but not because of the job itself. Even if he gets re-moted/promoted/I-don't-know-what (isn't english as a second language wonderful?), he will get harrassed and looked down, passed-over, etc. probably for the rest of his career unless he finds some heavy-weight politician to back him up. At least that is how it is done here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Should get out of the job , but not because of the job itself .
Even if he gets re-moted/promoted/I-do n't-know-what ( is n't english as a second language wonderful ?
) , he will get harrassed and looked down , passed-over , etc .
probably for the rest of his career unless he finds some heavy-weight politician to back him up .
At least that is how it is done here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Should get out of the job, but not because of the job itself.
Even if he gets re-moted/promoted/I-don't-know-what (isn't english as a second language wonderful?
), he will get harrassed and looked down, passed-over, etc.
probably for the rest of his career unless he finds some heavy-weight politician to back him up.
At least that is how it is done here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925933</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926673</id>
	<title>Re:Smart police officer</title>
	<author>StormyWeather</author>
	<datestamp>1256929740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I ran an ISP owned by a lawyer once upon a time.  The guy before me I found out had embezzled like 60 grand by writing checks to his wife for "services rendered".    I told the lawyer, and he said, "that figures" and went back to his work.  I asked aren't you going to sue him?  He said that smart lawyers never sue anyone themselves, it's much more profitable to sue for other people.  He told me to make sure to pay taxes as if she was a contractor, and turned back to his work obviously not wanting to be disturbed again.</p><p>So two ambulance chasing lawyers would probably just file insurance, and be done with it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ran an ISP owned by a lawyer once upon a time .
The guy before me I found out had embezzled like 60 grand by writing checks to his wife for " services rendered " .
I told the lawyer , and he said , " that figures " and went back to his work .
I asked are n't you going to sue him ?
He said that smart lawyers never sue anyone themselves , it 's much more profitable to sue for other people .
He told me to make sure to pay taxes as if she was a contractor , and turned back to his work obviously not wanting to be disturbed again.So two ambulance chasing lawyers would probably just file insurance , and be done with it : ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I ran an ISP owned by a lawyer once upon a time.
The guy before me I found out had embezzled like 60 grand by writing checks to his wife for "services rendered".
I told the lawyer, and he said, "that figures" and went back to his work.
I asked aren't you going to sue him?
He said that smart lawyers never sue anyone themselves, it's much more profitable to sue for other people.
He told me to make sure to pay taxes as if she was a contractor, and turned back to his work obviously not wanting to be disturbed again.So two ambulance chasing lawyers would probably just file insurance, and be done with it :).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29932239</id>
	<title>Re:The Likeliest Policy Change ...</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1256925060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Effective immediately all precinct officers should destroy all electronic devices with central processing units. All document production will be performed using manual typewriters.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>And you think an old typewriter embeds <i>less</i> meta-information? Forensics can probably dig up a lot more, and it's much harder to fake or alter.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Effective immediately all precinct officers should destroy all electronic devices with central processing units .
All document production will be performed using manual typewriters .
And you think an old typewriter embeds less meta-information ?
Forensics can probably dig up a lot more , and it 's much harder to fake or alter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Effective immediately all precinct officers should destroy all electronic devices with central processing units.
All document production will be performed using manual typewriters.
And you think an old typewriter embeds less meta-information?
Forensics can probably dig up a lot more, and it's much harder to fake or alter.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925917</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926163</id>
	<title>Re:Grammar Police</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256927640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unless it's a collective noun, or a concept.</p><p>"People is stupid," is gramatically correct when you understand that 'people' refers to the single-organism, mob-mentality that happens when multiple individuals tend to gather. "People are not stupid," is also gramatically correct when it's the plural of person, meaning multiple individuals.</p><p>Maybe we can cut the guy a little slack and hope he understood in what context he was posting?</p><p>. . .</p><p>Bitches.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless it 's a collective noun , or a concept .
" People is stupid , " is gramatically correct when you understand that 'people ' refers to the single-organism , mob-mentality that happens when multiple individuals tend to gather .
" People are not stupid , " is also gramatically correct when it 's the plural of person , meaning multiple individuals.Maybe we can cut the guy a little slack and hope he understood in what context he was posting ? .
. .Bitches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless it's a collective noun, or a concept.
"People is stupid," is gramatically correct when you understand that 'people' refers to the single-organism, mob-mentality that happens when multiple individuals tend to gather.
"People are not stupid," is also gramatically correct when it's the plural of person, meaning multiple individuals.Maybe we can cut the guy a little slack and hope he understood in what context he was posting?.
. .Bitches.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926079</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926825</id>
	<title>mod 0p</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256930400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>move any equip8ent hobbyist dilettante</htmltext>
<tokenext>move any equip8ent hobbyist dilettante</tokentext>
<sentencetext>move any equip8ent hobbyist dilettante</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926213</id>
	<title>Re:Smart police officer</title>
	<author>Swanktastic</author>
	<datestamp>1256927940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't you think it was just his lawyer or union representative asking for the documents?  I don't know how demotion hearings work, but I would imagine you get a little help from an expert.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't you think it was just his lawyer or union representative asking for the documents ?
I do n't know how demotion hearings work , but I would imagine you get a little help from an expert .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't you think it was just his lawyer or union representative asking for the documents?
I don't know how demotion hearings work, but I would imagine you get a little help from an expert.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925863</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925799</id>
	<title>Just a part</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256925780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>of an ordinary "Audit Trail".  Now, you don't have to rely on manual log-entries and sign-out sheets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>of an ordinary " Audit Trail " .
Now , you do n't have to rely on manual log-entries and sign-out sheets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>of an ordinary "Audit Trail".
Now, you don't have to rely on manual log-entries and sign-out sheets.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_1539241_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_1539241_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_1539241_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926215
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925805
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_1539241_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29932239
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925917
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_1539241_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926163
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926079
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_1539241_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926239
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926079
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_1539241_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29927379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926079
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_1539241_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_1539241_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29927431
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_1539241_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926175
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925967
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_1539241_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29928281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_1539241_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926213
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_1539241_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925909
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_1539241_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29930735
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_30_1539241_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29927727
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926079
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_1539241.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925967
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926175
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_1539241.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29928455
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_1539241.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926335
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_1539241.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925805
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926215
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_1539241.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925861
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_1539241.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926659
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_1539241.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925921
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926023
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926107
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_1539241.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925863
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926213
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925933
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29930735
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925961
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926673
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29927431
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29928281
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926939
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925909
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_1539241.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926079
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29927379
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926239
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926591
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29927727
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926163
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_1539241.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29926111
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_1539241.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925799
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_30_1539241.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29925917
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_30_1539241.29932239
</commentlist>
</conversation>
