<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_29_2156228</id>
	<title>The Internet Turns 40, For a Second Time</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1256811240000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>sean\_nestor writes with this excerpt from The Register: <i>"Some date the dawn of the net to September 12, 1969, when a team of engineers at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) connected the first two machines on the first node of ARPAnet, the US Department of Defense-funded network that eventually morphed into the modern interwebs. But others &mdash; including Professor Leonard Kleinrock, who led that engineering team &mdash; peg the birthday to <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/29/internet\_celebrates\_second\_fortieth\_birthday/">October 29, when the first message was sent between the remote nodes</a>. 'That's the day,' Kleinrock tells The Reg, 'the internet uttered its first words.' ...A 50kbps AT&amp;T pipe connected the UCLA and SRI nodes, and the first message sent was the word 'log' &mdash; or at least that was the idea. UCLA would send the 'log' and SRI would respond with 'in.' But after UCLA typed the 'l' and the 'o,' the 'g' caused a memory overflow on the SRI IMP. ... 'So the first message was "Lo," as in "Lo and Behold,"' Kleinrock says. 'We couldn't have asked for a better message &mdash; and we didn't plan it.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>sean \ _nestor writes with this excerpt from The Register : " Some date the dawn of the net to September 12 , 1969 , when a team of engineers at the University of California , Los Angeles ( UCLA ) connected the first two machines on the first node of ARPAnet , the US Department of Defense-funded network that eventually morphed into the modern interwebs .
But others    including Professor Leonard Kleinrock , who led that engineering team    peg the birthday to October 29 , when the first message was sent between the remote nodes .
'That 's the day, ' Kleinrock tells The Reg , 'the internet uttered its first words .
' ...A 50kbps AT&amp;T pipe connected the UCLA and SRI nodes , and the first message sent was the word 'log '    or at least that was the idea .
UCLA would send the 'log ' and SRI would respond with 'in .
' But after UCLA typed the 'l ' and the 'o, ' the 'g ' caused a memory overflow on the SRI IMP .
... 'So the first message was " Lo , " as in " Lo and Behold , " ' Kleinrock says .
'We could n't have asked for a better message    and we did n't plan it .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sean\_nestor writes with this excerpt from The Register: "Some date the dawn of the net to September 12, 1969, when a team of engineers at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) connected the first two machines on the first node of ARPAnet, the US Department of Defense-funded network that eventually morphed into the modern interwebs.
But others — including Professor Leonard Kleinrock, who led that engineering team — peg the birthday to October 29, when the first message was sent between the remote nodes.
'That's the day,' Kleinrock tells The Reg, 'the internet uttered its first words.
' ...A 50kbps AT&amp;T pipe connected the UCLA and SRI nodes, and the first message sent was the word 'log' — or at least that was the idea.
UCLA would send the 'log' and SRI would respond with 'in.
' But after UCLA typed the 'l' and the 'o,' the 'g' caused a memory overflow on the SRI IMP.
... 'So the first message was "Lo," as in "Lo and Behold,"' Kleinrock says.
'We couldn't have asked for a better message — and we didn't plan it.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29921943</id>
	<title>Re:So whatcha saying is....</title>
	<author>fredrik70</author>
	<datestamp>1256902560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...sort of a prophecy of things to come...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...sort of a prophecy of things to come.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...sort of a prophecy of things to come...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917547</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918525</id>
	<title>CNN has an interview ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256820900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...with Professor Kleinrock, the chair of the UCLA group that created the first node.  You can find it <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/10/29/kleinrock.internet/index.html" title="cnn.com" rel="nofollow">here</a> [cnn.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...with Professor Kleinrock , the chair of the UCLA group that created the first node .
You can find it here [ cnn.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...with Professor Kleinrock, the chair of the UCLA group that created the first node.
You can find it here [cnn.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917933</id>
	<title>Oblig.</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1256817060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>But after UCLA typed the 'l' and the 'o,' the 'g' caused a memory overflow on the SRI IMP</i></p><p>ok, here goes:</p><p>1. Imagine a beowulf cluster of these.<br>2. Does it run Windows 7?<br>3. Does it run Linux?<br>4. ???<br>5. Profit</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But after UCLA typed the 'l ' and the 'o, ' the 'g ' caused a memory overflow on the SRI IMPok , here goes : 1 .
Imagine a beowulf cluster of these.2 .
Does it run Windows 7 ? 3 .
Does it run Linux ? 4 .
? ? ? 5. Profit</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But after UCLA typed the 'l' and the 'o,' the 'g' caused a memory overflow on the SRI IMPok, here goes:1.
Imagine a beowulf cluster of these.2.
Does it run Windows 7?3.
Does it run Linux?4.
???5. Profit</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917715</id>
	<title>What is this Bullshit?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256815860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Assigning arbitrary dates to mark an amorphous event?</p><p>Why was this the "birthday" and not when two machines were first connected to eachother?</p><p>Why not when a printer was attached to a computer?</p><p>Why not when two people talked over the phone?<br>Shit - you know this was done over the phone.<br>"Okay, start typing!"<br>"L"<br>"Got it."<br>"O"<br>"GOT IT!"<br>"G"<br>"..."<br>"G?"<br>"FUCK!  God dammit Bill you fucking moron FIX THIS SHIT."</p><p>It's nice to mark significant points and transitions, but with an amorphous, ill-defined thing like the internet, it's akin to saying your restaurant has the best burgers in town.</p><p>The end result, of course, is a non-news fluff story and my raging post, which will be modded as "Troll" even though I have completely valid points.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Assigning arbitrary dates to mark an amorphous event ? Why was this the " birthday " and not when two machines were first connected to eachother ? Why not when a printer was attached to a computer ? Why not when two people talked over the phone ? Shit - you know this was done over the phone .
" Okay , start typing !
" " L " " Got it .
" " O " " GOT IT ! " " G " " ... " " G ? " " FUCK !
God dammit Bill you fucking moron FIX THIS SHIT .
" It 's nice to mark significant points and transitions , but with an amorphous , ill-defined thing like the internet , it 's akin to saying your restaurant has the best burgers in town.The end result , of course , is a non-news fluff story and my raging post , which will be modded as " Troll " even though I have completely valid points .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Assigning arbitrary dates to mark an amorphous event?Why was this the "birthday" and not when two machines were first connected to eachother?Why not when a printer was attached to a computer?Why not when two people talked over the phone?Shit - you know this was done over the phone.
"Okay, start typing!
""L""Got it.
""O""GOT IT!""G""...""G?""FUCK!
God dammit Bill you fucking moron FIX THIS SHIT.
"It's nice to mark significant points and transitions, but with an amorphous, ill-defined thing like the internet, it's akin to saying your restaurant has the best burgers in town.The end result, of course, is a non-news fluff story and my raging post, which will be modded as "Troll" even though I have completely valid points.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917827</id>
	<title>Re:Ping Time?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256816520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bet it was very quick since the tubes weren't clogged with poker chips and race horses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet it was very quick since the tubes were n't clogged with poker chips and race horses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet it was very quick since the tubes weren't clogged with poker chips and race horses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29920655</id>
	<title>40 years ago the destruction of the music industry</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1256837880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>commenced, when the ARPAnet was born, and someone immediately started a query for music by Kenny Loggins</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>commenced , when the ARPAnet was born , and someone immediately started a query for music by Kenny Loggins</tokentext>
<sentencetext>commenced, when the ARPAnet was born, and someone immediately started a query for music by Kenny Loggins</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917929</id>
	<title>First Packet?</title>
	<author>Comatose51</author>
	<datestamp>1256817060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>When was the first IP packet sent?  Shouldn't that be the birthday of the Internet?</htmltext>
<tokenext>When was the first IP packet sent ?
Should n't that be the birthday of the Internet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When was the first IP packet sent?
Shouldn't that be the birthday of the Internet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918029</id>
	<title>Re:second message</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1256817660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was 1969.</p><p>"Buy healthy c1gerett5!"<br>
&nbsp; Followed buy how pirates were causing a decrease in Beatles record sales.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was 1969 .
" Buy healthy c1gerett5 !
"   Followed buy how pirates were causing a decrease in Beatles record sales .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was 1969.
"Buy healthy c1gerett5!
"
  Followed buy how pirates were causing a decrease in Beatles record sales.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917675</id>
	<title>The FIRST internet session had a buffer overflow?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256815620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My god, that's more apropos than they could possibly have realized.  Things haven't changed since then either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My god , that 's more apropos than they could possibly have realized .
Things have n't changed since then either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My god, that's more apropos than they could possibly have realized.
Things haven't changed since then either.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919773</id>
	<title>Re:What is this Bullshit?</title>
	<author>darkpixel2k</author>
	<datestamp>1256829000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Assigning arbitrary dates to mark an amorphous event?</p></div><p>
Yeah--I hear daylight savings time is this Sunday...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Assigning arbitrary dates to mark an amorphous event ?
Yeah--I hear daylight savings time is this Sunday.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Assigning arbitrary dates to mark an amorphous event?
Yeah--I hear daylight savings time is this Sunday...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917941</id>
	<title>Re:Hello</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256817060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>'Lo? Enybody here? Lolz internetz is lonely.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(((<br>
&nbsp; <br>I wesh sum1 wuld see this funny catz picture that I maed.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(((((</p></div><p>And so it began.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>'Lo ?
Enybody here ?
Lolz internetz is lonely .
: ( ( (   I wesh sum1 wuld see this funny catz picture that I maed .
: ( ( ( ( ( And so it began .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Lo?
Enybody here?
Lolz internetz is lonely.
:(((
  I wesh sum1 wuld see this funny catz picture that I maed.
:(((((And so it began.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917521</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917895</id>
	<title>Mid-life crisis...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256816820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So all the porn and penis enlargement advertisements are just the internet's way of handling a mid-life crisis?  Can't wait for the hilarity that'll ensue when it goes senile.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So all the porn and penis enlargement advertisements are just the internet 's way of handling a mid-life crisis ?
Ca n't wait for the hilarity that 'll ensue when it goes senile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So all the porn and penis enlargement advertisements are just the internet's way of handling a mid-life crisis?
Can't wait for the hilarity that'll ensue when it goes senile.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918833</id>
	<title>It's like celebrating</title>
	<author>OldSoldier</author>
	<datestamp>1256822460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Conception AND Birth</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Conception AND Birth</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Conception AND Birth</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917541</id>
	<title>Oh great...</title>
	<author>MindlessAutomata</author>
	<datestamp>1256815080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great, I can just imagine all the corny jokes Slashdotters are goin[NO CARRIER]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great , I can just imagine all the corny jokes Slashdotters are goin [ NO CARRIER ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great, I can just imagine all the corny jokes Slashdotters are goin[NO CARRIER]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918895</id>
	<title>The Mother of All First Posts</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1256822700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Call it "First Post" day, almost as important as the first spam, or first dupe, or first goatse...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Call it " First Post " day , almost as important as the first spam , or first dupe , or first goatse.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Call it "First Post" day, almost as important as the first spam, or first dupe, or first goatse...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918927</id>
	<title>Re:7 Weeks Gestation</title>
	<author>shaitand</author>
	<datestamp>1256822820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Celebrating the day the Internet was *conceived*... well, that seems a bit weird."</p><p>Not if you are looking at it from dad's perspective. From the dad's perspective it is all down hill from the moment of conception.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Celebrating the day the Internet was * conceived * ... well , that seems a bit weird .
" Not if you are looking at it from dad 's perspective .
From the dad 's perspective it is all down hill from the moment of conception .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Celebrating the day the Internet was *conceived*... well, that seems a bit weird.
"Not if you are looking at it from dad's perspective.
From the dad's perspective it is all down hill from the moment of conception.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917677</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29925337</id>
	<title>Re:second message</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1256923620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Er, there was no such thing as c1al!5. They hadn't even invented V1a6ra!</p><p>I know, you woosh I wouldn't have pointed that out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Er , there was no such thing as c1al ! 5 .
They had n't even invented V1a6ra ! I know , you woosh I would n't have pointed that out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Er, there was no such thing as c1al!5.
They hadn't even invented V1a6ra!I know, you woosh I wouldn't have pointed that out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29925809</id>
	<title>Re:Ping Time?</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1256925840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> I am not sure if it even used 8-bit ASCII</p></div><p>Probably not, given that there is no such thing.  There is also no such thing as 6-bit ASCII.  ASCII is a 7-bit encoding.  There were a few 6-bit encodings.  The IBM 1620, for example, used 6-bit bytes (and variable length words) as did a number of IBMs other machines.  Later, when 8-bit bytes were common, people used the missing bit to add another 128 characters for things that the Americans didn't think were important.
</p><p>
Also, I'd be quite surprised if you were playing Zork on an ITS.  It's more likely that you were playing the Colossal Cave Adventure.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am not sure if it even used 8-bit ASCIIProbably not , given that there is no such thing .
There is also no such thing as 6-bit ASCII .
ASCII is a 7-bit encoding .
There were a few 6-bit encodings .
The IBM 1620 , for example , used 6-bit bytes ( and variable length words ) as did a number of IBMs other machines .
Later , when 8-bit bytes were common , people used the missing bit to add another 128 characters for things that the Americans did n't think were important .
Also , I 'd be quite surprised if you were playing Zork on an ITS .
It 's more likely that you were playing the Colossal Cave Adventure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I am not sure if it even used 8-bit ASCIIProbably not, given that there is no such thing.
There is also no such thing as 6-bit ASCII.
ASCII is a 7-bit encoding.
There were a few 6-bit encodings.
The IBM 1620, for example, used 6-bit bytes (and variable length words) as did a number of IBMs other machines.
Later, when 8-bit bytes were common, people used the missing bit to add another 128 characters for things that the Americans didn't think were important.
Also, I'd be quite surprised if you were playing Zork on an ITS.
It's more likely that you were playing the Colossal Cave Adventure.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917839</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918573</id>
	<title>Re:First Packet?</title>
	<author>Alien Being</author>
	<datestamp>1256821260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eventually IPv4 will go away just as but I won't consider that the death of the Internet.  Plus, the IMPs were the implementation of RFC 1.</p><p>September 12 was the day the Internet was hatched. October 29 was the day it took flight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eventually IPv4 will go away just as but I wo n't consider that the death of the Internet .
Plus , the IMPs were the implementation of RFC 1.September 12 was the day the Internet was hatched .
October 29 was the day it took flight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eventually IPv4 will go away just as but I won't consider that the death of the Internet.
Plus, the IMPs were the implementation of RFC 1.September 12 was the day the Internet was hatched.
October 29 was the day it took flight.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917929</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917979</id>
	<title>Re:What is this Bullshit?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256817360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Why was this the "birthday" and not when two machines were first connected to eachother?</i> <br> <br>
Considering that an internet is when two NETWORKS are connected together, the event of the first connection between two machines does not qualify.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why was this the " birthday " and not when two machines were first connected to eachother ?
Considering that an internet is when two NETWORKS are connected together , the event of the first connection between two machines does not qualify .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why was this the "birthday" and not when two machines were first connected to eachother?
Considering that an internet is when two NETWORKS are connected together, the event of the first connection between two machines does not qualify.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918017</id>
	<title>It was like this:</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1256817540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1&gt;First<br>2&gt;First1<br>2&gt; damn<br>1&gt; N00b</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 &gt; First2 &gt; First12 &gt; damn1 &gt; N00b</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1&gt;First2&gt;First12&gt; damn1&gt; N00b</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29921163</id>
	<title>Second Birthday? I'm not complaining!</title>
	<author>pinkushun</author>
	<datestamp>1256846040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any reason to have more cake, is a good reason!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any reason to have more cake , is a good reason !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any reason to have more cake, is a good reason!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29924565</id>
	<title>Re:Honestly...</title>
	<author>thethibs</author>
	<datestamp>1256920740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Probably a very long time before anyone who uses "intertubes" was born.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably a very long time before anyone who uses " intertubes " was born .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably a very long time before anyone who uses "intertubes" was born.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917879</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917711</id>
	<title>surprising first message</title>
	<author>corbettw</author>
	<datestamp>1256815800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What, nothing about penis size or how to make money at home? Things really were different back then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What , nothing about penis size or how to make money at home ?
Things really were different back then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, nothing about penis size or how to make money at home?
Things really were different back then.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917819</id>
	<title>If i remember my computing history class correctly</title>
	<author>kalpol</author>
	<datestamp>1256816460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It wasn't caused by two characters, it was caused by the automatic command recognition on the receiving host - typing "LO" listed all the commands that started with those letters, and that caused the overflow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was n't caused by two characters , it was caused by the automatic command recognition on the receiving host - typing " LO " listed all the commands that started with those letters , and that caused the overflow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It wasn't caused by two characters, it was caused by the automatic command recognition on the receiving host - typing "LO" listed all the commands that started with those letters, and that caused the overflow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918537</id>
	<title>Re:Drinking Straw</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1256821080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's more like a series of tubes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's more like a series of tubes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's more like a series of tubes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917703</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917547</id>
	<title>So whatcha saying is....</title>
	<author>thatseattleguy</author>
	<datestamp>1256815140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>...that the very first even to occur on the Internet was a **buffer overflow**?

Talk about a zero-day exploit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...that the very first even to occur on the Internet was a * * buffer overflow * * ?
Talk about a zero-day exploit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that the very first even to occur on the Internet was a **buffer overflow**?
Talk about a zero-day exploit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29921211</id>
	<title>Re:40 years of 40th birthdays</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256933640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I say the Internet isn't really born until it has self-awareness, sentience, has tricked us into believing a false reality, and is breeding us as an energy source.</p><p>Or, has it already happened... which pill was I supposed to take again?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I say the Internet is n't really born until it has self-awareness , sentience , has tricked us into believing a false reality , and is breeding us as an energy source.Or , has it already happened... which pill was I supposed to take again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I say the Internet isn't really born until it has self-awareness, sentience, has tricked us into believing a false reality, and is breeding us as an energy source.Or, has it already happened... which pill was I supposed to take again?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917523</id>
	<title>Ping Time?</title>
	<author>xmas2003</author>
	<datestamp>1256815080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>So what was the ping time of the first message?
<p>
I.e. my guess is with a memory overflow after two characters, the network stack wasn't exactly the fastest thing around.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what was the ping time of the first message ?
I.e. my guess is with a memory overflow after two characters , the network stack was n't exactly the fastest thing around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what was the ping time of the first message?
I.e. my guess is with a memory overflow after two characters, the network stack wasn't exactly the fastest thing around.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917795</id>
	<title>second message</title>
	<author>cheebie</author>
	<datestamp>1256816340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And the second message was "Buy cheep c1al!5 now!".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And the second message was " Buy cheep c1al ! 5 now !
" .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the second message was "Buy cheep c1al!5 now!
".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919993</id>
	<title>Who designs this stuff, anyhow?</title>
	<author>verbatim</author>
	<datestamp>1256830800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But after UCLA typed the 'l' and the 'o,' the 'g' caused a memory overflow on the SRI IMP.</p></div><p>So the Internets wasn't even 3 characters old and it was already being hacked and DOS'd. So, so lame.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But after UCLA typed the 'l ' and the 'o, ' the 'g ' caused a memory overflow on the SRI IMP.So the Internets was n't even 3 characters old and it was already being hacked and DOS 'd .
So , so lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But after UCLA typed the 'l' and the 'o,' the 'g' caused a memory overflow on the SRI IMP.So the Internets wasn't even 3 characters old and it was already being hacked and DOS'd.
So, so lame.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918971</id>
	<title>Re:Hello</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1256823120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The first true AI may just be a grand spam bot. Cylons born of v1agra ads.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The first true AI may just be a grand spam bot .
Cylons born of v1agra ads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first true AI may just be a grand spam bot.
Cylons born of v1agra ads.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917521</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917649</id>
	<title>40 years of 40th birthdays</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1256815500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Where you draw the line when really started the internet as we know it? Probably in the next days or years several dates will be claimed as the 40th anniversary of a basic and fundamental moment that we could say as the birth of internet, 1st ping, 1st mail, 1st web, 1st spam, 1st botnet, etc there are a lot of things on which we can draw a line and say that what was before wasnt properly "internet"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where you draw the line when really started the internet as we know it ?
Probably in the next days or years several dates will be claimed as the 40th anniversary of a basic and fundamental moment that we could say as the birth of internet , 1st ping , 1st mail , 1st web , 1st spam , 1st botnet , etc there are a lot of things on which we can draw a line and say that what was before wasnt properly " internet "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where you draw the line when really started the internet as we know it?
Probably in the next days or years several dates will be claimed as the 40th anniversary of a basic and fundamental moment that we could say as the birth of internet, 1st ping, 1st mail, 1st web, 1st spam, 1st botnet, etc there are a lot of things on which we can draw a line and say that what was before wasnt properly "internet"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917879</id>
	<title>Honestly...</title>
	<author>Smooth and Shiny</author>
	<datestamp>1256816760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Someone get Al Gore on the phone, please.  He can clear this all up and tell us the very SECOND the intertubes was born.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone get Al Gore on the phone , please .
He can clear this all up and tell us the very SECOND the intertubes was born .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone get Al Gore on the phone, please.
He can clear this all up and tell us the very SECOND the intertubes was born.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917779</id>
	<title>Re:From the Start</title>
	<author>NotBornYesterday</author>
	<datestamp>1256816280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and buffer overflow attacks have been common ever since.</htmltext>
<tokenext>and buffer overflow attacks have been common ever since .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and buffer overflow attacks have been common ever since.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917545</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918419</id>
	<title>Re:Drinking Straw</title>
	<author>Kenshin</author>
	<datestamp>1256820240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Drinking straw? Nah, more like one of those plastic coffee stirring things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Drinking straw ?
Nah , more like one of those plastic coffee stirring things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Drinking straw?
Nah, more like one of those plastic coffee stirring things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917703</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29924343</id>
	<title>Re:50kbps?</title>
	<author>cstacy</author>
	<datestamp>1256919960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Isn't 50kbps really, really fast for 1969?  I was expecting something more like 1200 baud at most</p></div><p>These were dedicated conditioned lines, not regular phone lines like at your house.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't 50kbps really , really fast for 1969 ?
I was expecting something more like 1200 baud at mostThese were dedicated conditioned lines , not regular phone lines like at your house .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't 50kbps really, really fast for 1969?
I was expecting something more like 1200 baud at mostThese were dedicated conditioned lines, not regular phone lines like at your house.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919791</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918097</id>
	<title>Re:What is this Bullshit?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256818200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Why was this the "birthday" and not when two machines were first connected to eachother?</p></div></blockquote><p>Simple.  This was not the first time two hosts were connected together via a serial line.  If you only cared about that, you'd have to go back a lot farther.  Heck, the first modem dates back to 1962.  What made the Internet possible was not the notion of having computers that could talk to other computers.  The key change that made the Internet possible was the notion of all the computers speaking a single language and having routers that knew how to pass messages on to other routers, eventually to another computer.  That was not realized until the first packet was sent on a packet-switched network, which in its most primitive form, occurred on October 29, 1969.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why was this the " birthday " and not when two machines were first connected to eachother ? Simple .
This was not the first time two hosts were connected together via a serial line .
If you only cared about that , you 'd have to go back a lot farther .
Heck , the first modem dates back to 1962 .
What made the Internet possible was not the notion of having computers that could talk to other computers .
The key change that made the Internet possible was the notion of all the computers speaking a single language and having routers that knew how to pass messages on to other routers , eventually to another computer .
That was not realized until the first packet was sent on a packet-switched network , which in its most primitive form , occurred on October 29 , 1969 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why was this the "birthday" and not when two machines were first connected to eachother?Simple.
This was not the first time two hosts were connected together via a serial line.
If you only cared about that, you'd have to go back a lot farther.
Heck, the first modem dates back to 1962.
What made the Internet possible was not the notion of having computers that could talk to other computers.
The key change that made the Internet possible was the notion of all the computers speaking a single language and having routers that knew how to pass messages on to other routers, eventually to another computer.
That was not realized until the first packet was sent on a packet-switched network, which in its most primitive form, occurred on October 29, 1969.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29923135</id>
	<title>Thanks Al Gore!</title>
	<author>KiwiCanuck</author>
	<datestamp>1256914500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if he got two 40th's?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if he got two 40th 's ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if he got two 40th's?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917985</id>
	<title>Re:Ping Time?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1256817360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...the network stack wasn't exactly the fastest thing around."</p><p>you want to think that through again?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...the network stack was n't exactly the fastest thing around .
" you want to think that through again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...the network stack wasn't exactly the fastest thing around.
"you want to think that through again?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917545</id>
	<title>From the Start</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256815140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So from the start, the internet caused computers to crash... seems like a bad omen to me...</htmltext>
<tokenext>So from the start , the internet caused computers to crash... seems like a bad omen to me.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So from the start, the internet caused computers to crash... seems like a bad omen to me...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917521</id>
	<title>Hello</title>
	<author>Lord Lode</author>
	<datestamp>1256815020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lo, as in "Hello, here I am". I wonder if the internet is developing some kind of AI, after all it's a complex network just like the human brain is.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lo , as in " Hello , here I am " .
I wonder if the internet is developing some kind of AI , after all it 's a complex network just like the human brain is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lo, as in "Hello, here I am".
I wonder if the internet is developing some kind of AI, after all it's a complex network just like the human brain is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917947</id>
	<title>Try 18 years.  Re:40 years of 40th birthdays</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1256817120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Funny.</p><p>I thought the internet was not born until January 1, 1981 - the day when the ARPAnet was replaced with today's modern IP addressing.  That would make the internet only 18 years old.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny.I thought the internet was not born until January 1 , 1981 - the day when the ARPAnet was replaced with today 's modern IP addressing .
That would make the internet only 18 years old .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny.I thought the internet was not born until January 1, 1981 - the day when the ARPAnet was replaced with today's modern IP addressing.
That would make the internet only 18 years old.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918283</id>
	<title>Re:40 years of 40th birthdays</title>
	<author>lhoguin</author>
	<datestamp>1256819340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Internet just wants to get more presents every year.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Internet just wants to get more presents every year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Internet just wants to get more presents every year.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918711</id>
	<title>Re:Oh great...</title>
	<author>Cur8or</author>
	<datestamp>1256821920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your mom just turned 39 for the 15th time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your mom just turned 39 for the 15th time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your mom just turned 39 for the 15th time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919791</id>
	<title>50kbps?</title>
	<author>Dan East</author>
	<datestamp>1256829180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't 50kbps really, really fast for 1969?  I was expecting something more like 1200 baud at most. I remember how big a deal it was in the late 1980s that my 2400 baud modem supported MNP level 5 (compression and error correction), and then lusting after the 14.4 modems in 1990.  I remember an engineer at Loral (defense aerospace contractor) in Akron in 1989 telling me that 56k modems were impossible, and that they couldn't even reliably sustain 56k on the LAN across campus.  So I was rather surprised to see this sort of throughput in 1969.  What also doesn't make sense is how could they begin to utilize 50kbps when their hardware couldn't even handle 3 bytes of data, or when computers only had 12k of memory?  Just doesn't seem accurate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't 50kbps really , really fast for 1969 ?
I was expecting something more like 1200 baud at most .
I remember how big a deal it was in the late 1980s that my 2400 baud modem supported MNP level 5 ( compression and error correction ) , and then lusting after the 14.4 modems in 1990 .
I remember an engineer at Loral ( defense aerospace contractor ) in Akron in 1989 telling me that 56k modems were impossible , and that they could n't even reliably sustain 56k on the LAN across campus .
So I was rather surprised to see this sort of throughput in 1969 .
What also does n't make sense is how could they begin to utilize 50kbps when their hardware could n't even handle 3 bytes of data , or when computers only had 12k of memory ?
Just does n't seem accurate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't 50kbps really, really fast for 1969?
I was expecting something more like 1200 baud at most.
I remember how big a deal it was in the late 1980s that my 2400 baud modem supported MNP level 5 (compression and error correction), and then lusting after the 14.4 modems in 1990.
I remember an engineer at Loral (defense aerospace contractor) in Akron in 1989 telling me that 56k modems were impossible, and that they couldn't even reliably sustain 56k on the LAN across campus.
So I was rather surprised to see this sort of throughput in 1969.
What also doesn't make sense is how could they begin to utilize 50kbps when their hardware couldn't even handle 3 bytes of data, or when computers only had 12k of memory?
Just doesn't seem accurate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918725</id>
	<title>Re:First Packet?</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1256821980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The internet is more than TCP/IP,though that's the main part. This was the first protocol used in any capacity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The internet is more than TCP/IP,though that 's the main part .
This was the first protocol used in any capacity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The internet is more than TCP/IP,though that's the main part.
This was the first protocol used in any capacity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917929</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919859</id>
	<title>Re:What is this Bullshit?</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1256829720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Funny. I *thought* that date looked familiar...</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Four phrases--Black Thursday, Black Friday, then Black Monday, and Black Tuesday--are commonly used to describe this collapse of stock values. All four are appropriate, for the crash was not a one-day affair. The initial crash occurred on Thursday, October 24, 1929, but the catastrophic downturn of Monday, October 28, and Tuesday, October 29, precipitated widespread alarm and the onset of an unprecedented and long-lasting economic depression for the United States and the world.</p></div><p>From stock market crash to Internet in 40 years, then from Internet to LOLcats in another 40. (more or less.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny .
I * thought * that date looked familiar...Four phrases--Black Thursday , Black Friday , then Black Monday , and Black Tuesday--are commonly used to describe this collapse of stock values .
All four are appropriate , for the crash was not a one-day affair .
The initial crash occurred on Thursday , October 24 , 1929 , but the catastrophic downturn of Monday , October 28 , and Tuesday , October 29 , precipitated widespread alarm and the onset of an unprecedented and long-lasting economic depression for the United States and the world.From stock market crash to Internet in 40 years , then from Internet to LOLcats in another 40 .
( more or less .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny.
I *thought* that date looked familiar...Four phrases--Black Thursday, Black Friday, then Black Monday, and Black Tuesday--are commonly used to describe this collapse of stock values.
All four are appropriate, for the crash was not a one-day affair.
The initial crash occurred on Thursday, October 24, 1929, but the catastrophic downturn of Monday, October 28, and Tuesday, October 29, precipitated widespread alarm and the onset of an unprecedented and long-lasting economic depression for the United States and the world.From stock market crash to Internet in 40 years, then from Internet to LOLcats in another 40.
(more or less.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918097</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917787</id>
	<title>of course</title>
	<author>nomadic</author>
	<datestamp>1256816280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>But after UCLA typed the 'l' and the 'o,' the 'g' caused a memory overflow on the SRI IMP.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... 'So the first message was "Lo," as in "Lo and Behold,</i>
<br>
<br>
At the time they couldn't fathom anyone needing more than 2 bytes of memory.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But after UCLA typed the 'l ' and the 'o, ' the 'g ' caused a memory overflow on the SRI IMP .
... 'So the first message was " Lo , " as in " Lo and Behold , At the time they could n't fathom anyone needing more than 2 bytes of memory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But after UCLA typed the 'l' and the 'o,' the 'g' caused a memory overflow on the SRI IMP.
... 'So the first message was "Lo," as in "Lo and Behold,


At the time they couldn't fathom anyone needing more than 2 bytes of memory.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29920803</id>
	<title>I didnt know Al Gore went to UCLA!</title>
	<author>gearloos</author>
	<datestamp>1256840220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But hey, facts is facts! and you know it's true! it's on the internet!</htmltext>
<tokenext>But hey , facts is facts !
and you know it 's true !
it 's on the internet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But hey, facts is facts!
and you know it's true!
it's on the internet!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919131</id>
	<title>Re:Drinking Straw</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256824140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually I was thinking the opposite - 50kbps seems pretty fast for 1969.</p><p>I wasn't around in the 80's, but wasn't 300bit/s the norm even then?  My first modem was 9600 and that was in the 90's!</p><p>Maybe they mean 50bit/s<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually I was thinking the opposite - 50kbps seems pretty fast for 1969.I was n't around in the 80 's , but was n't 300bit/s the norm even then ?
My first modem was 9600 and that was in the 90 's ! Maybe they mean 50bit/s ... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually I was thinking the opposite - 50kbps seems pretty fast for 1969.I wasn't around in the 80's, but wasn't 300bit/s the norm even then?
My first modem was 9600 and that was in the 90's!Maybe they mean 50bit/s ... ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917703</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917913</id>
	<title>Re:7 Weeks Gestation</title>
	<author>dgatwood</author>
	<datestamp>1256817000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Of course "G" caused a fault, because the next letter was supposed to be "L".</p></div></blockquote><p>Either that or the first two letters were supposed to be "OM".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course " G " caused a fault , because the next letter was supposed to be " L " .Either that or the first two letters were supposed to be " OM " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course "G" caused a fault, because the next letter was supposed to be "L".Either that or the first two letters were supposed to be "OM".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917677</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29928181</id>
	<title>Re:50kbps?</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1256893500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In (iirc) 1983 I was on Compuserve with a 300 (count 'em three hundred!) baud modem. I didn't get 56k until the late nineties.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In ( iirc ) 1983 I was on Compuserve with a 300 ( count 'em three hundred !
) baud modem .
I did n't get 56k until the late nineties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In (iirc) 1983 I was on Compuserve with a 300 (count 'em three hundred!
) baud modem.
I didn't get 56k until the late nineties.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919791</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917509</id>
	<title>First!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256814960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919999</id>
	<title>Re:Ping Time?</title>
	<author>Mister Whirly</author>
	<datestamp>1256830860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>thought the Arpanet was there so I could play Zork</p></div><p>
Ah, the Original Adventure. XYZZY. I think it took me weeks of trying to map out the damn maze of twisty little paths to get by that part. There was that and black box, and the star trek game too ("hunt the klingons" maybe was it's name? or at least that was what everyone called it). So I guess I could say I have been computer gaming for about 30 some odd years, even before home computers. At the time I didn't care why it existed, only that it let me play games. But it was all over when I got my first 300 baud modem and discovered the rest of the world of computing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>thought the Arpanet was there so I could play Zork Ah , the Original Adventure .
XYZZY. I think it took me weeks of trying to map out the damn maze of twisty little paths to get by that part .
There was that and black box , and the star trek game too ( " hunt the klingons " maybe was it 's name ?
or at least that was what everyone called it ) .
So I guess I could say I have been computer gaming for about 30 some odd years , even before home computers .
At the time I did n't care why it existed , only that it let me play games .
But it was all over when I got my first 300 baud modem and discovered the rest of the world of computing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>thought the Arpanet was there so I could play Zork
Ah, the Original Adventure.
XYZZY. I think it took me weeks of trying to map out the damn maze of twisty little paths to get by that part.
There was that and black box, and the star trek game too ("hunt the klingons" maybe was it's name?
or at least that was what everyone called it).
So I guess I could say I have been computer gaming for about 30 some odd years, even before home computers.
At the time I didn't care why it existed, only that it let me play games.
But it was all over when I got my first 300 baud modem and discovered the rest of the world of computing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917839</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918361</id>
	<title>insert skynet meme</title>
	<author>kaini</author>
	<datestamp>1256819760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>he</htmltext>
<tokenext>he</tokentext>
<sentencetext>he</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918071</id>
	<title>Make believe</title>
	<author>theverylastperson</author>
	<datestamp>1256817960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The 'Internet', in MHO, goes back further.</p><p>Did it really start with digital machine communication?</p><p>Or did it start when we first learned distanced communication and created the wiring infrastructure that really gave rise to Internet.</p><p>What is the oldest form of long distance communication? There's people in Wales that have a whistle language that travels pretty far, I think.</p><p>Maybe we should date it to smoke signals?</p><p>Drum beats?</p><p>Screams?</p><p>I get it, it all started when Adam dropped his fig leaf. Eve's first scream. I think I have a jpeg of that. Stupid fig leaf...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The 'Internet ' , in MHO , goes back further.Did it really start with digital machine communication ? Or did it start when we first learned distanced communication and created the wiring infrastructure that really gave rise to Internet.What is the oldest form of long distance communication ?
There 's people in Wales that have a whistle language that travels pretty far , I think.Maybe we should date it to smoke signals ? Drum beats ? Screams ? I get it , it all started when Adam dropped his fig leaf .
Eve 's first scream .
I think I have a jpeg of that .
Stupid fig leaf.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 'Internet', in MHO, goes back further.Did it really start with digital machine communication?Or did it start when we first learned distanced communication and created the wiring infrastructure that really gave rise to Internet.What is the oldest form of long distance communication?
There's people in Wales that have a whistle language that travels pretty far, I think.Maybe we should date it to smoke signals?Drum beats?Screams?I get it, it all started when Adam dropped his fig leaf.
Eve's first scream.
I think I have a jpeg of that.
Stupid fig leaf...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29929297</id>
	<title>And a little-known side event</title>
	<author>Walt Dismal</author>
	<datestamp>1256899680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course, in this historic event, after the buffer overflow at the SRI end, another Internet first occurred: the Sys Admin's pager went off at 3 AM, awakening him with a demand he rush over and fix things.  This was the beginning of a glorious future for Sys Admins everywhere.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , in this historic event , after the buffer overflow at the SRI end , another Internet first occurred : the Sys Admin 's pager went off at 3 AM , awakening him with a demand he rush over and fix things .
This was the beginning of a glorious future for Sys Admins everywhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, in this historic event, after the buffer overflow at the SRI end, another Internet first occurred: the Sys Admin's pager went off at 3 AM, awakening him with a demand he rush over and fix things.
This was the beginning of a glorious future for Sys Admins everywhere.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918449</id>
	<title>For a second time?</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1256820480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So it's 80 years old now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So it 's 80 years old now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it's 80 years old now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917703</id>
	<title>Drinking Straw</title>
	<author>BlindSpot</author>
	<datestamp>1256815800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A 50kbps AT&amp;T pipe</p></div><p>Haha, had to laugh at that phrasing.  Although I was around for the era where 50kbps would have qualified as a pipe, by today's standards it is more of a drinking straw... and a really thin one at that!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A 50kbps AT&amp;T pipeHaha , had to laugh at that phrasing .
Although I was around for the era where 50kbps would have qualified as a pipe , by today 's standards it is more of a drinking straw... and a really thin one at that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A 50kbps AT&amp;T pipeHaha, had to laugh at that phrasing.
Although I was around for the era where 50kbps would have qualified as a pipe, by today's standards it is more of a drinking straw... and a really thin one at that!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918649</id>
	<title>Rick Rolled</title>
	<author>dijjnn</author>
	<datestamp>1256821620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really, Really, *really* wish that the first message sent across the internet had been for the purpose of rick-rolling someone. I know that it would've taken a completely weird time-inversion to make that possible, but admit to yourself for just one second: it would've been effing hilarious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really , Really , * really * wish that the first message sent across the internet had been for the purpose of rick-rolling someone .
I know that it would 've taken a completely weird time-inversion to make that possible , but admit to yourself for just one second : it would 've been effing hilarious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really, Really, *really* wish that the first message sent across the internet had been for the purpose of rick-rolling someone.
I know that it would've taken a completely weird time-inversion to make that possible, but admit to yourself for just one second: it would've been effing hilarious.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917839</id>
	<title>Re:Ping Time?</title>
	<author>kevmeister</author>
	<datestamp>1256816580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ping time? <p>I'm sorry, but the original Arpanet did not have ICMP or pings. This was years before the invention of IP. </p><p>I am not sure if it even used 8-bit ASCII. Many, many systems of that day were 6-bit ASCII (no lower-case letters) or EBCDIC. A "word" could have been 12, 16, 18, 24, 36, or 60 bits. (There were MANY other lengths including 1 and 29, but these were oddities.) Note that most of those were multiples of 6, so 6-bit ASCII was the more common unless it was an IBM Computer. I suspect that this initial use lacked anything that could be called a "protocol stack", but I was still in high school and thought the Arpanet was there so I could play Zork on the ITS systems at MIT, so I am far from sure.</p><p>
Now, 40 years later, I'm pretty sure I was right about the reason for the Arpanet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ping time ?
I 'm sorry , but the original Arpanet did not have ICMP or pings .
This was years before the invention of IP .
I am not sure if it even used 8-bit ASCII .
Many , many systems of that day were 6-bit ASCII ( no lower-case letters ) or EBCDIC .
A " word " could have been 12 , 16 , 18 , 24 , 36 , or 60 bits .
( There were MANY other lengths including 1 and 29 , but these were oddities .
) Note that most of those were multiples of 6 , so 6-bit ASCII was the more common unless it was an IBM Computer .
I suspect that this initial use lacked anything that could be called a " protocol stack " , but I was still in high school and thought the Arpanet was there so I could play Zork on the ITS systems at MIT , so I am far from sure .
Now , 40 years later , I 'm pretty sure I was right about the reason for the Arpanet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ping time?
I'm sorry, but the original Arpanet did not have ICMP or pings.
This was years before the invention of IP.
I am not sure if it even used 8-bit ASCII.
Many, many systems of that day were 6-bit ASCII (no lower-case letters) or EBCDIC.
A "word" could have been 12, 16, 18, 24, 36, or 60 bits.
(There were MANY other lengths including 1 and 29, but these were oddities.
) Note that most of those were multiples of 6, so 6-bit ASCII was the more common unless it was an IBM Computer.
I suspect that this initial use lacked anything that could be called a "protocol stack", but I was still in high school and thought the Arpanet was there so I could play Zork on the ITS systems at MIT, so I am far from sure.
Now, 40 years later, I'm pretty sure I was right about the reason for the Arpanet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917523</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917717</id>
	<title>Midlife crisis</title>
	<author>Dice</author>
	<datestamp>1256815860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder what sort of sporty two seater the Internet is going to buy for itself.  A Miata?  Z3?  Or is the Internet going to go whole-hog and get a Ferrari?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder what sort of sporty two seater the Internet is going to buy for itself .
A Miata ?
Z3 ? Or is the Internet going to go whole-hog and get a Ferrari ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder what sort of sporty two seater the Internet is going to buy for itself.
A Miata?
Z3?  Or is the Internet going to go whole-hog and get a Ferrari?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919335</id>
	<title>Re:First Packet?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256825640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By "IP packet" do you mean "IP datagram" or the first time the RIAA tried to subpoena someone's ISP? Because there is a crucial 24 hour difference to account for...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By " IP packet " do you mean " IP datagram " or the first time the RIAA tried to subpoena someone 's ISP ?
Because there is a crucial 24 hour difference to account for.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By "IP packet" do you mean "IP datagram" or the first time the RIAA tried to subpoena someone's ISP?
Because there is a crucial 24 hour difference to account for...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917929</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917753</id>
	<title>too soon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256816100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would have worked on being able to fit more than 2 characters in memory before I tried to tackle the whole networking thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would have worked on being able to fit more than 2 characters in memory before I tried to tackle the whole networking thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would have worked on being able to fit more than 2 characters in memory before I tried to tackle the whole networking thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29923983</id>
	<title>Re:Hello</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256918460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, it was just trying to type Lol.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it was just trying to type Lol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it was just trying to type Lol.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917521</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29920427</id>
	<title>And thus it was said</title>
	<author>wonkavader</author>
	<datestamp>1256835300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And thus it was said "Lo -- It is a feature, not a bug," and all were pleased.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And thus it was said " Lo -- It is a feature , not a bug , " and all were pleased .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And thus it was said "Lo -- It is a feature, not a bug," and all were pleased.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918953</id>
	<title>The Creator</title>
	<author>ElephanTS</author>
	<datestamp>1256823000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's funny, they didn't mention Al Gore was there?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's funny , they did n't mention Al Gore was there ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's funny, they didn't mention Al Gore was there?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918999</id>
	<title>Re:Make believe</title>
	<author>shaitand</author>
	<datestamp>1256823240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I get it, it all started when Adam dropped his fig leaf. Eve's first scream. I think I have a jpeg of that. Stupid fig leaf..."</p><p>I think it started when that pic was first transferred. We all know the internet is for pr0n.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I get it , it all started when Adam dropped his fig leaf .
Eve 's first scream .
I think I have a jpeg of that .
Stupid fig leaf... " I think it started when that pic was first transferred .
We all know the internet is for pr0n .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I get it, it all started when Adam dropped his fig leaf.
Eve's first scream.
I think I have a jpeg of that.
Stupid fig leaf..."I think it started when that pic was first transferred.
We all know the internet is for pr0n.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918071</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917685</id>
	<title>Happy birthday</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1256815740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ha</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ha</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ha</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29924303</id>
	<title>ARPANET was functioning earlier, and later</title>
	<author>cstacy</author>
	<datestamp>1256919840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The ARPANET was composed of packet routers called IMPs, and a host-to-host higher layer of software called NCP (Network Control Program).   The first messages sent over the ARPANET (between UCLA and SRI) were sent a month before the "lo(gin)" story that's being told here.  Ben Barker of BBN and Marty Thrope sent messages between TTYs attached to these IMPs to test them shortly after #2 was plugged in.  That didn't involve NCP, but neither did Kline's attempt -- it was just a hack to shove bits across without NCP.   (I think NCP was not actually defined until almost a year later.)  So if you want to count "long-distance communication between nodes" it was earlier, if you want to count "kludged up host-host" it was 40 years today, and if you want to count "actual ARPANET protocols" we get to have this celebration again in a couple years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The ARPANET was composed of packet routers called IMPs , and a host-to-host higher layer of software called NCP ( Network Control Program ) .
The first messages sent over the ARPANET ( between UCLA and SRI ) were sent a month before the " lo ( gin ) " story that 's being told here .
Ben Barker of BBN and Marty Thrope sent messages between TTYs attached to these IMPs to test them shortly after # 2 was plugged in .
That did n't involve NCP , but neither did Kline 's attempt -- it was just a hack to shove bits across without NCP .
( I think NCP was not actually defined until almost a year later .
) So if you want to count " long-distance communication between nodes " it was earlier , if you want to count " kludged up host-host " it was 40 years today , and if you want to count " actual ARPANET protocols " we get to have this celebration again in a couple years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The ARPANET was composed of packet routers called IMPs, and a host-to-host higher layer of software called NCP (Network Control Program).
The first messages sent over the ARPANET (between UCLA and SRI) were sent a month before the "lo(gin)" story that's being told here.
Ben Barker of BBN and Marty Thrope sent messages between TTYs attached to these IMPs to test them shortly after #2 was plugged in.
That didn't involve NCP, but neither did Kline's attempt -- it was just a hack to shove bits across without NCP.
(I think NCP was not actually defined until almost a year later.
)  So if you want to count "long-distance communication between nodes" it was earlier, if you want to count "kludged up host-host" it was 40 years today, and if you want to count "actual ARPANET protocols" we get to have this celebration again in a couple years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29928433</id>
	<title>Re:So whatcha saying is....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256894760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>pwnd!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>pwnd !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>pwnd!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917547</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29926343</id>
	<title>Re:Honestly...</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1256928480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He wasn't even born yet! The inner tube was patented in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tire#History" title="wikipedia.org">1846</a> [wikipedia.org] (well, pneumatic tires were, and the inner tube was an integral part of a tire back then) and produced commercially in 1888. But what does it have to do with Al Gore or the information highway?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He was n't even born yet !
The inner tube was patented in 1846 [ wikipedia.org ] ( well , pneumatic tires were , and the inner tube was an integral part of a tire back then ) and produced commercially in 1888 .
But what does it have to do with Al Gore or the information highway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He wasn't even born yet!
The inner tube was patented in 1846 [wikipedia.org] (well, pneumatic tires were, and the inner tube was an integral part of a tire back then) and produced commercially in 1888.
But what does it have to do with Al Gore or the information highway?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917879</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29926357</id>
	<title>LOL!</title>
	<author>spitzak</author>
	<datestamp>1256928540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since the next message was them trying a second time, the first three letters sent were "LOL"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since the next message was them trying a second time , the first three letters sent were " LOL "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since the next message was them trying a second time, the first three letters sent were "LOL"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917677</id>
	<title>7 Weeks Gestation</title>
	<author>RobertB-DC</author>
	<datestamp>1256815680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><em>Some date the dawn of the net to September 12, 1969, when a team of engineers at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) connected the first two machines on the first node of ARPAnet... others peg the birthday to October 29, when the first message was sent between the remote nodes.</em></p><p>That's not such a difficult metaphor to construct.  The net was *conceived* when the two nodes came together, just as you and I were *conceived* when two nodes, um, er, yeah.  And just like then, nobody knew what the result of coupling of the first Internet nodes would be, if anything.</p><p>It was *born* when someone slapped it on the bottom and it did something seen by the people gathered around.  You probably went "WAAAA!".  The Internet went "LO".  Of course "G" caused a fault, because the next letter was supposed to be "L".</p><p>So I think it would be fair to say that the world would want to celebrate the "birthday" of the Internet today, October 29, just as the world (or your corner of it) celebrate your birthday on the day you made your emergence into the world.</p><p>Celebrating the day the Internet was *conceived*... well, that seems a bit weird.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some date the dawn of the net to September 12 , 1969 , when a team of engineers at the University of California , Los Angeles ( UCLA ) connected the first two machines on the first node of ARPAnet... others peg the birthday to October 29 , when the first message was sent between the remote nodes.That 's not such a difficult metaphor to construct .
The net was * conceived * when the two nodes came together , just as you and I were * conceived * when two nodes , um , er , yeah .
And just like then , nobody knew what the result of coupling of the first Internet nodes would be , if anything.It was * born * when someone slapped it on the bottom and it did something seen by the people gathered around .
You probably went " WAAAA ! " .
The Internet went " LO " .
Of course " G " caused a fault , because the next letter was supposed to be " L " .So I think it would be fair to say that the world would want to celebrate the " birthday " of the Internet today , October 29 , just as the world ( or your corner of it ) celebrate your birthday on the day you made your emergence into the world.Celebrating the day the Internet was * conceived * ... well , that seems a bit weird .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some date the dawn of the net to September 12, 1969, when a team of engineers at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) connected the first two machines on the first node of ARPAnet... others peg the birthday to October 29, when the first message was sent between the remote nodes.That's not such a difficult metaphor to construct.
The net was *conceived* when the two nodes came together, just as you and I were *conceived* when two nodes, um, er, yeah.
And just like then, nobody knew what the result of coupling of the first Internet nodes would be, if anything.It was *born* when someone slapped it on the bottom and it did something seen by the people gathered around.
You probably went "WAAAA!".
The Internet went "LO".
Of course "G" caused a fault, because the next letter was supposed to be "L".So I think it would be fair to say that the world would want to celebrate the "birthday" of the Internet today, October 29, just as the world (or your corner of it) celebrate your birthday on the day you made your emergence into the world.Celebrating the day the Internet was *conceived*... well, that seems a bit weird.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917631</id>
	<title>Can you believe this?</title>
	<author>Rosco P. Coltrane</author>
	<datestamp>1256815440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The first 3 bytes transmitted over what was to become the intarwebs were "log", and already it was porn - scatophilia in that case. Was that a sign or what...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The first 3 bytes transmitted over what was to become the intarwebs were " log " , and already it was porn - scatophilia in that case .
Was that a sign or what.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first 3 bytes transmitted over what was to become the intarwebs were "log", and already it was porn - scatophilia in that case.
Was that a sign or what...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918267</id>
	<title>re:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256819220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you think the internet's birthay is to day. You got it<br>if you think is octuber 12, you got it. what's the problem?<br>Internet is not breathing, just still here</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you think the internet 's birthay is to day .
You got itif you think is octuber 12 , you got it .
what 's the problem ? Internet is not breathing , just still here</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you think the internet's birthay is to day.
You got itif you think is octuber 12, you got it.
what's the problem?Internet is not breathing, just still here</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29927905</id>
	<title>Leonard Kleinrock is also a Karate master</title>
	<author>TarPitt</author>
	<datestamp>1256935380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would train at the <a href="http://www.jkasm.com/shotokan.html" title="jkasm.com">JKA Dojo in Santa Monica</a> [jkasm.com] maybe 20 years ago.  Leonard was one of the students.  I recall when he was promoted from brown belt to black belt.  Shotokan Karate is a very intense discipline.</p><p>Nothing like having the crap beat out of me by one of the founders of the Internet...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would train at the JKA Dojo in Santa Monica [ jkasm.com ] maybe 20 years ago .
Leonard was one of the students .
I recall when he was promoted from brown belt to black belt .
Shotokan Karate is a very intense discipline.Nothing like having the crap beat out of me by one of the founders of the Internet.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would train at the JKA Dojo in Santa Monica [jkasm.com] maybe 20 years ago.
Leonard was one of the students.
I recall when he was promoted from brown belt to black belt.
Shotokan Karate is a very intense discipline.Nothing like having the crap beat out of me by one of the founders of the Internet...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29923121</id>
	<title>Re:Hello</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1256914380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i> I wonder if the internet is developing some kind of AI, after all it's a complex network just like the human brain is.</i></p><p>No, it's a complex network completely unlike the human brain is. The world's weather systems are complex networks of air currents, temperature and humidity differentiuals, etc. It, too, is completely unlike a human brain.</p><p>A dog's brain is a complex network that is far more like a human brain than anything digital. But I don't see dogs plotting to take over the world, nor do I see the internet doing anything human brains don't make it do.</p><p>I love science fiction, but you have to realise that it's fiction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if the internet is developing some kind of AI , after all it 's a complex network just like the human brain is.No , it 's a complex network completely unlike the human brain is .
The world 's weather systems are complex networks of air currents , temperature and humidity differentiuals , etc .
It , too , is completely unlike a human brain.A dog 's brain is a complex network that is far more like a human brain than anything digital .
But I do n't see dogs plotting to take over the world , nor do I see the internet doing anything human brains do n't make it do.I love science fiction , but you have to realise that it 's fiction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I wonder if the internet is developing some kind of AI, after all it's a complex network just like the human brain is.No, it's a complex network completely unlike the human brain is.
The world's weather systems are complex networks of air currents, temperature and humidity differentiuals, etc.
It, too, is completely unlike a human brain.A dog's brain is a complex network that is far more like a human brain than anything digital.
But I don't see dogs plotting to take over the world, nor do I see the internet doing anything human brains don't make it do.I love science fiction, but you have to realise that it's fiction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917521</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918089</id>
	<title>Better Message?</title>
	<author>Ksevio</author>
	<datestamp>1256818140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We couldn't have asked for a better message  and we didn't plan it</p></div><p>That's funny, since one of the guys who was working on it was just on NPR talking about how all these other historical firsts had meaningful or interesting messages, while this one was boring.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We could n't have asked for a better message and we did n't plan itThat 's funny , since one of the guys who was working on it was just on NPR talking about how all these other historical firsts had meaningful or interesting messages , while this one was boring .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We couldn't have asked for a better message  and we didn't plan itThat's funny, since one of the guys who was working on it was just on NPR talking about how all these other historical firsts had meaningful or interesting messages, while this one was boring.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29923983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917521
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918999
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918071
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917521
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919773
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29928181
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919791
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918711
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919335
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917929
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917979
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917947
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917649
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918029
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917795
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918573
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917929
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29924565
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917879
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29926343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917879
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917677
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918537
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917703
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29921211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917649
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917523
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29923121
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917521
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918927
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917677
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917523
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917545
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29928433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917547
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917929
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29924343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919791
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917703
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917703
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29921943
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917547
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917941
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917521
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29925337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917795
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917985
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917523
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919999
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917839
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917523
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29925809
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917839
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917523
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918283
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917649
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2156228_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917675
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917879
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29924565
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29926343
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917547
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29921943
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29928433
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918283
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917947
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29921211
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917795
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29925337
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918029
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917703
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918537
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919131
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918419
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917933
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918449
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917929
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919335
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918725
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918573
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918649
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917711
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917677
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917913
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918927
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917541
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918711
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918089
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917523
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917827
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917985
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917839
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919999
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29925809
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917819
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919791
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29924343
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29928181
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917631
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918071
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918999
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917509
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917715
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917979
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919773
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918097
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29919859
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917521
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918971
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29923983
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917941
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29923121
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29918953
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917787
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917717
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2156228.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917545
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2156228.29917779
</commentlist>
</conversation>
