<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_29_2026217</id>
	<title>Nintendo Announces DSi XL</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1256808180000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>lbalbalba writes <i>"This morning, Nintendo announced the <a href="http://www.betanews.com/article/Nintendo-makes-DSi-screens-bigger-than-competitors/1256840623">third upgrade to the DS family, the DSi LL</a> (or DSi XL). It will be released in Japan on November 21, one year after the DSi debuted, for &yen;20,000 (approx. $220). The LL's main improvement is the size of its screens, which have been increased from 3.25" to 4.2" with a moderate increase to the size of the chassis. The device also includes a much bigger stylus, which looks to be the size of a ballpoint pen, and battery life has reportedly been increased to five hours at maximum screen brightness."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>lbalbalba writes " This morning , Nintendo announced the third upgrade to the DS family , the DSi LL ( or DSi XL ) .
It will be released in Japan on November 21 , one year after the DSi debuted , for   20,000 ( approx .
$ 220 ) . The LL 's main improvement is the size of its screens , which have been increased from 3.25 " to 4.2 " with a moderate increase to the size of the chassis .
The device also includes a much bigger stylus , which looks to be the size of a ballpoint pen , and battery life has reportedly been increased to five hours at maximum screen brightness .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lbalbalba writes "This morning, Nintendo announced the third upgrade to the DS family, the DSi LL (or DSi XL).
It will be released in Japan on November 21, one year after the DSi debuted, for ¥20,000 (approx.
$220). The LL's main improvement is the size of its screens, which have been increased from 3.25" to 4.2" with a moderate increase to the size of the chassis.
The device also includes a much bigger stylus, which looks to be the size of a ballpoint pen, and battery life has reportedly been increased to five hours at maximum screen brightness.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917511</id>
	<title>Re:Price</title>
	<author>PaganRitual</author>
	<datestamp>1256814960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is this insightful? Making things smaller has always been half the point of hardware manufacture, and has always been one of the most expensive things to achieve.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this insightful ?
Making things smaller has always been half the point of hardware manufacture , and has always been one of the most expensive things to achieve .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this insightful?
Making things smaller has always been half the point of hardware manufacture, and has always been one of the most expensive things to achieve.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917539</id>
	<title>Re:Nintendo's Niche</title>
	<author>stoolpigeon</author>
	<datestamp>1256815080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They've done very well doing new and different.  They have done just as well (possibly more so) taking what they know works and making small changes.  If you doubt this at all, come by and look at my stack of Zelda games some time.  If you wait a while you can check out Zelda: Spirit Tracks with me - I can't wait to play it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've done very well doing new and different .
They have done just as well ( possibly more so ) taking what they know works and making small changes .
If you doubt this at all , come by and look at my stack of Zelda games some time .
If you wait a while you can check out Zelda : Spirit Tracks with me - I ca n't wait to play it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've done very well doing new and different.
They have done just as well (possibly more so) taking what they know works and making small changes.
If you doubt this at all, come by and look at my stack of Zelda games some time.
If you wait a while you can check out Zelda: Spirit Tracks with me - I can't wait to play it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917283</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918681</id>
	<title>Maybe this one will support WPA?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256821740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I kept wep on my router longer than I should have because I just liked playing Mario Kart just that much. I lost my dslite and thought to buy the new model, but it still doesn't support wpa, just wep. I decided I wasn't going to switch back just for one game, and opted instead to buy nothing. Maybe I'll get the new one if it can do wpa, but if not, no sale.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I kept wep on my router longer than I should have because I just liked playing Mario Kart just that much .
I lost my dslite and thought to buy the new model , but it still does n't support wpa , just wep .
I decided I was n't going to switch back just for one game , and opted instead to buy nothing .
Maybe I 'll get the new one if it can do wpa , but if not , no sale .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I kept wep on my router longer than I should have because I just liked playing Mario Kart just that much.
I lost my dslite and thought to buy the new model, but it still doesn't support wpa, just wep.
I decided I wasn't going to switch back just for one game, and opted instead to buy nothing.
Maybe I'll get the new one if it can do wpa, but if not, no sale.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918899</id>
	<title>Re:After reading the tech specs I can see</title>
	<author>billcopc</author>
	<datestamp>1256822700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't see how a shortage of stock and rampant hoarding equates to a successful product launch.  Had Nintendo not botched the launch supply, they probably would have sold far more Wiis.  A lot of people got tired of waiting and bought something else, or they waited for the early adopters to get bored (they all do), and bought one second-hand.</p><p>The problem with the Wii is it has no staying power.  It has too few "killer games", thus is relegated to being that thing you fire up when you have company over, who have never played it before.  They toss a few rounds of bowling, maybe torture a few Rabbids until they leave, at which point you continue playing it for a day or two, then unplug the cursed thing.  I don't think there's any Wii title right now, that you could say you'll remember fondly in 10 years.  No Final Fantasy 7, no Super Mario 3, no Goldeneye...  I have a pile of old PS2 games I could play for days, but I can't think of a single Wii title that would entertain me for more than a few hours.</p><p>I don't call that a win, because today's game developers know the Wii community isn't very spendy.  They'd much rather release a PS3 or X360 title that will be far more lucrative in the long run, which again leads to the chicken and egg problem of Wii not having enough great software.</p><p>A high reliance on the motion gimmick, plus a lack of hardcore games, results in a console that everyone wants to try but no one really sticks to.  Had Nintendo been able to sell more at launch, they would have gotten those sales in before the suck factor became widely known.  The bigger numbers might have convinced more developers to jump on the bandwagon.</p><p>Now with a bunch of me-too DS variants, yet no real progress, Nintendo is playing the old GB/GBC/GBP shell game.  Spend more money for an old portable with a fresh coat of paint...  Come on, are we that gullible as consumers ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see how a shortage of stock and rampant hoarding equates to a successful product launch .
Had Nintendo not botched the launch supply , they probably would have sold far more Wiis .
A lot of people got tired of waiting and bought something else , or they waited for the early adopters to get bored ( they all do ) , and bought one second-hand.The problem with the Wii is it has no staying power .
It has too few " killer games " , thus is relegated to being that thing you fire up when you have company over , who have never played it before .
They toss a few rounds of bowling , maybe torture a few Rabbids until they leave , at which point you continue playing it for a day or two , then unplug the cursed thing .
I do n't think there 's any Wii title right now , that you could say you 'll remember fondly in 10 years .
No Final Fantasy 7 , no Super Mario 3 , no Goldeneye... I have a pile of old PS2 games I could play for days , but I ca n't think of a single Wii title that would entertain me for more than a few hours.I do n't call that a win , because today 's game developers know the Wii community is n't very spendy .
They 'd much rather release a PS3 or X360 title that will be far more lucrative in the long run , which again leads to the chicken and egg problem of Wii not having enough great software.A high reliance on the motion gimmick , plus a lack of hardcore games , results in a console that everyone wants to try but no one really sticks to .
Had Nintendo been able to sell more at launch , they would have gotten those sales in before the suck factor became widely known .
The bigger numbers might have convinced more developers to jump on the bandwagon.Now with a bunch of me-too DS variants , yet no real progress , Nintendo is playing the old GB/GBC/GBP shell game .
Spend more money for an old portable with a fresh coat of paint... Come on , are we that gullible as consumers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see how a shortage of stock and rampant hoarding equates to a successful product launch.
Had Nintendo not botched the launch supply, they probably would have sold far more Wiis.
A lot of people got tired of waiting and bought something else, or they waited for the early adopters to get bored (they all do), and bought one second-hand.The problem with the Wii is it has no staying power.
It has too few "killer games", thus is relegated to being that thing you fire up when you have company over, who have never played it before.
They toss a few rounds of bowling, maybe torture a few Rabbids until they leave, at which point you continue playing it for a day or two, then unplug the cursed thing.
I don't think there's any Wii title right now, that you could say you'll remember fondly in 10 years.
No Final Fantasy 7, no Super Mario 3, no Goldeneye...  I have a pile of old PS2 games I could play for days, but I can't think of a single Wii title that would entertain me for more than a few hours.I don't call that a win, because today's game developers know the Wii community isn't very spendy.
They'd much rather release a PS3 or X360 title that will be far more lucrative in the long run, which again leads to the chicken and egg problem of Wii not having enough great software.A high reliance on the motion gimmick, plus a lack of hardcore games, results in a console that everyone wants to try but no one really sticks to.
Had Nintendo been able to sell more at launch, they would have gotten those sales in before the suck factor became widely known.
The bigger numbers might have convinced more developers to jump on the bandwagon.Now with a bunch of me-too DS variants, yet no real progress, Nintendo is playing the old GB/GBC/GBP shell game.
Spend more money for an old portable with a fresh coat of paint...  Come on, are we that gullible as consumers ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917741</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918807</id>
	<title>Re:Price</title>
	<author>Toonol</author>
	<datestamp>1256822340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not if your portable is still outselling your home system, which in turn is outselling all competitors.  That probably indicates you're doing something right.  It's not like products are 'supposed' to be certain prices.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not if your portable is still outselling your home system , which in turn is outselling all competitors .
That probably indicates you 're doing something right .
It 's not like products are 'supposed ' to be certain prices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not if your portable is still outselling your home system, which in turn is outselling all competitors.
That probably indicates you're doing something right.
It's not like products are 'supposed' to be certain prices.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917741</id>
	<title>Re:After reading the tech specs I can see</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1256815980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Nintendo might not win the console wars</p></div><p>Perhaps the most ill-informed thing I've read today.</p><p>Nintendo won the console wars years ago.</p><p>It took nearly 2 full years for Wii stock to meet demand.</p><p>The Wii is tracking ahead of the PS2 in terms of sales, despite the global recession and the high failure rate of early PS2 models.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nintendo might not win the console warsPerhaps the most ill-informed thing I 've read today.Nintendo won the console wars years ago.It took nearly 2 full years for Wii stock to meet demand.The Wii is tracking ahead of the PS2 in terms of sales , despite the global recession and the high failure rate of early PS2 models .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nintendo might not win the console warsPerhaps the most ill-informed thing I've read today.Nintendo won the console wars years ago.It took nearly 2 full years for Wii stock to meet demand.The Wii is tracking ahead of the PS2 in terms of sales, despite the global recession and the high failure rate of early PS2 models.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917261</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757</id>
	<title>Price</title>
	<author>Ceiynt</author>
	<datestamp>1256811960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>When your portable costs more then your home system, something is wrong with your pricing path.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When your portable costs more then your home system , something is wrong with your pricing path .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When your portable costs more then your home system, something is wrong with your pricing path.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29919393</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>mqduck</author>
	<datestamp>1256826000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The one person who uses his NDS Lite more than any other person I know</p></div><p>Yes, that number usually turns out to be 1.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The one person who uses his NDS Lite more than any other person I knowYes , that number usually turns out to be 1. ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The one person who uses his NDS Lite more than any other person I knowYes, that number usually turns out to be 1. ;)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.30038932</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe this one will support WPA?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257764160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I kept wep on my router longer than I should have because I just liked playing Mario Kart just that much. I lost my dslite and thought to buy the new model, but it still doesn't support wpa, just wep. I decided I wasn't going to switch back just for one game, and opted instead to buy nothing. Maybe I'll get the new one if it can do wpa, but if not, no sale.</p></div><p>The dsi does support wpa/wpa2. your doing it wrong.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I kept wep on my router longer than I should have because I just liked playing Mario Kart just that much .
I lost my dslite and thought to buy the new model , but it still does n't support wpa , just wep .
I decided I was n't going to switch back just for one game , and opted instead to buy nothing .
Maybe I 'll get the new one if it can do wpa , but if not , no sale.The dsi does support wpa/wpa2 .
your doing it wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I kept wep on my router longer than I should have because I just liked playing Mario Kart just that much.
I lost my dslite and thought to buy the new model, but it still doesn't support wpa, just wep.
I decided I wasn't going to switch back just for one game, and opted instead to buy nothing.
Maybe I'll get the new one if it can do wpa, but if not, no sale.The dsi does support wpa/wpa2.
your doing it wrong.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918681</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918343</id>
	<title>Re:Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Goaway</author>
	<datestamp>1256819700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is there to be puzzled about? It's a DSi with big screen for old people who have trouble seeing the regular one. You're not supposed to run out and buy one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is there to be puzzled about ?
It 's a DSi with big screen for old people who have trouble seeing the regular one .
You 're not supposed to run out and buy one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is there to be puzzled about?
It's a DSi with big screen for old people who have trouble seeing the regular one.
You're not supposed to run out and buy one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917073</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917235</id>
	<title>Dropping profits</title>
	<author>ItsJustAPseudonym</author>
	<datestamp>1256813760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the article: "Nintendo's handheld sales dropped nearly 20\% in 2009. This, paired with unfavorable exchange rates, brought Nintendo's profits down 61\% in mid-summer."<br>

While it's never good for a company to have dropping profits, this might not be too unexpected.  Their biggest earning seasons are probably Christmas and Chinese New Year.<br>

I wonder what last summer's profits were like, for Nintendo?</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article : " Nintendo 's handheld sales dropped nearly 20 \ % in 2009 .
This , paired with unfavorable exchange rates , brought Nintendo 's profits down 61 \ % in mid-summer .
" While it 's never good for a company to have dropping profits , this might not be too unexpected .
Their biggest earning seasons are probably Christmas and Chinese New Year .
I wonder what last summer 's profits were like , for Nintendo ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article: "Nintendo's handheld sales dropped nearly 20\% in 2009.
This, paired with unfavorable exchange rates, brought Nintendo's profits down 61\% in mid-summer.
"

While it's never good for a company to have dropping profits, this might not be too unexpected.
Their biggest earning seasons are probably Christmas and Chinese New Year.
I wonder what last summer's profits were like, for Nintendo?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916999</id>
	<title>Makes sense</title>
	<author>Weedhopper</author>
	<datestamp>1256812860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The one person who uses his NDS Lite more than any other person I know is my 63 year old father.  He likes to play all those brain games as well as card/puzzle games and those My Language Coach series.  His only complaint - the size of the screen and the size of the stylus.</p><p>Nintendo knows EXACTLY what they're doing.  Giving "casual" gamers exactly what they want.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The one person who uses his NDS Lite more than any other person I know is my 63 year old father .
He likes to play all those brain games as well as card/puzzle games and those My Language Coach series .
His only complaint - the size of the screen and the size of the stylus.Nintendo knows EXACTLY what they 're doing .
Giving " casual " gamers exactly what they want .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The one person who uses his NDS Lite more than any other person I know is my 63 year old father.
He likes to play all those brain games as well as card/puzzle games and those My Language Coach series.
His only complaint - the size of the screen and the size of the stylus.Nintendo knows EXACTLY what they're doing.
Giving "casual" gamers exactly what they want.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29921263</id>
	<title>Re:After reading the tech specs I can see</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1256934540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Nintendo might not win the console wars, but they'll infiltrate the homes of everyone else.</p></div><p>They already won the console wars. While the others still think about who creates the most powerful console, while making losses, Nintendo made money like crazy.</p><p>And before they know what the real goal was, Nintendo will kick their asses through total dominance.</p><p>(*Hopes it will not come to a monopoly.*)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nintendo might not win the console wars , but they 'll infiltrate the homes of everyone else.They already won the console wars .
While the others still think about who creates the most powerful console , while making losses , Nintendo made money like crazy.And before they know what the real goal was , Nintendo will kick their asses through total dominance .
( * Hopes it will not come to a monopoly .
* )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nintendo might not win the console wars, but they'll infiltrate the homes of everyone else.They already won the console wars.
While the others still think about who creates the most powerful console, while making losses, Nintendo made money like crazy.And before they know what the real goal was, Nintendo will kick their asses through total dominance.
(*Hopes it will not come to a monopoly.
*)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917261</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29928471</id>
	<title>Re:Price</title>
	<author>trdrstv</author>
	<datestamp>1256894880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Agreed. Remember when gameboys were $90-$100 ? As the price goes higher and higher, I find myself less interested simply due to the number of other 'entertainment' devices competing with it (iPod touch, netbooks) around that price.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
Remember when gameboys were $ 90- $ 100 ?
As the price goes higher and higher , I find myself less interested simply due to the number of other 'entertainment ' devices competing with it ( iPod touch , netbooks ) around that price .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
Remember when gameboys were $90-$100 ?
As the price goes higher and higher, I find myself less interested simply due to the number of other 'entertainment' devices competing with it (iPod touch, netbooks) around that price.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917071</id>
	<title>Its a great option for geriatric gamers</title>
	<author>grapeape</author>
	<datestamp>1256813160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nintendo has been trying to broaden its market with handhelds the same way that they have with the Wii.  Games like brain age, professor layton and the Personal Trainer series appeal to and older crowd but the small screen size can make it rather limited.  My mother for instance loves her DS but constantly complains about the text being too small or icons being indistinguishable, a larger screen size would be great for her.  Based on the included bundle that appears to be the audience they are going for...smart idea IMHO.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nintendo has been trying to broaden its market with handhelds the same way that they have with the Wii .
Games like brain age , professor layton and the Personal Trainer series appeal to and older crowd but the small screen size can make it rather limited .
My mother for instance loves her DS but constantly complains about the text being too small or icons being indistinguishable , a larger screen size would be great for her .
Based on the included bundle that appears to be the audience they are going for...smart idea IMHO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nintendo has been trying to broaden its market with handhelds the same way that they have with the Wii.
Games like brain age, professor layton and the Personal Trainer series appeal to and older crowd but the small screen size can make it rather limited.
My mother for instance loves her DS but constantly complains about the text being too small or icons being indistinguishable, a larger screen size would be great for her.
Based on the included bundle that appears to be the audience they are going for...smart idea IMHO.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29919059</id>
	<title>Re:After reading the tech specs I can see</title>
	<author>BakaHoushi</author>
	<datestamp>1256823660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Only due to a deliberate decision by Nintendo to *not* increase production."</p><p>Which was a smart idea. To increase production would have required an additional factory. When they finally DO meet demand, they'd simply have an extra factory to maintain and lost money in building it. Their decision cost them an immediate access to the demand but secured a steady revenue  stream for years.</p><p>No matter how "hardcore" gamers view Nintendo, it's hard to not respect their business savvy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Only due to a deliberate decision by Nintendo to * not * increase production .
" Which was a smart idea .
To increase production would have required an additional factory .
When they finally DO meet demand , they 'd simply have an extra factory to maintain and lost money in building it .
Their decision cost them an immediate access to the demand but secured a steady revenue stream for years.No matter how " hardcore " gamers view Nintendo , it 's hard to not respect their business savvy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Only due to a deliberate decision by Nintendo to *not* increase production.
"Which was a smart idea.
To increase production would have required an additional factory.
When they finally DO meet demand, they'd simply have an extra factory to maintain and lost money in building it.
Their decision cost them an immediate access to the demand but secured a steady revenue  stream for years.No matter how "hardcore" gamers view Nintendo, it's hard to not respect their business savvy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917135</id>
	<title>Larger screen but same resolution?</title>
	<author>Avalain</author>
	<datestamp>1256813460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>One of the comments that came out from people reviewing the PSP Go was that the screen looked "sharper" because it was smaller with the same resolution as the PSP 3000. Wouldn't this just have the opposite effect for the DSi? As it is the DSi has a rather low resolution and I'd be worried that increasing the screen size will just make games "bigger and uglier". I'm skeptical that this is going to do anything but highlight the shortfalls of the system; it being both the oldest and the slowest architecture on the market.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the comments that came out from people reviewing the PSP Go was that the screen looked " sharper " because it was smaller with the same resolution as the PSP 3000 .
Would n't this just have the opposite effect for the DSi ?
As it is the DSi has a rather low resolution and I 'd be worried that increasing the screen size will just make games " bigger and uglier " .
I 'm skeptical that this is going to do anything but highlight the shortfalls of the system ; it being both the oldest and the slowest architecture on the market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the comments that came out from people reviewing the PSP Go was that the screen looked "sharper" because it was smaller with the same resolution as the PSP 3000.
Wouldn't this just have the opposite effect for the DSi?
As it is the DSi has a rather low resolution and I'd be worried that increasing the screen size will just make games "bigger and uglier".
I'm skeptical that this is going to do anything but highlight the shortfalls of the system; it being both the oldest and the slowest architecture on the market.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29925545</id>
	<title>Re:I'm confused....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256924580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone who's played Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney will tell you it's DL6, incidentally<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone who 's played Phoenix Wright : Ace Attorney will tell you it 's DL6 , incidentally ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone who's played Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney will tell you it's DL6, incidentally ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916839</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917435</id>
	<title>Re:Price</title>
	<author>tbradshaw</author>
	<datestamp>1256814600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Only holding the assumption that a portable gaming system is <i>less valuable</i> than a home system.  This assumption turns out to not be universally true...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Only holding the assumption that a portable gaming system is less valuable than a home system .
This assumption turns out to not be universally true.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only holding the assumption that a portable gaming system is less valuable than a home system.
This assumption turns out to not be universally true...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29922359</id>
	<title>Re:5 hour battery life!??!?!</title>
	<author>DrXym</author>
	<datestamp>1256908740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember the good old days where you barely even see what you were doing on a Gameboy / Gameboy Color / Game Boy Advance because the screen was so atrocious that it only worked in direct sunlight. I expect backlighting and other advances come at a cost to battery life.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember the good old days where you barely even see what you were doing on a Gameboy / Gameboy Color / Game Boy Advance because the screen was so atrocious that it only worked in direct sunlight .
I expect backlighting and other advances come at a cost to battery life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember the good old days where you barely even see what you were doing on a Gameboy / Gameboy Color / Game Boy Advance because the screen was so atrocious that it only worked in direct sunlight.
I expect backlighting and other advances come at a cost to battery life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29999966</id>
	<title>Re:After reading the tech specs I can see</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257416640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am a visually impaired gamer and this makes me very happy! I have a DS Lite and am so glad there is going to be a bigger screen on the DSI XL! I will now be able to play my DS games again without having to strain my eyesight. It is about time we had a portable gaming system for people like me and the older generations. I am really glad that Nintendo has made a niche for this often overlooked market. This system may not be for everyone but at least now I will be able to play on the go again. I game a lot on the go in the car on the plane waiting for class to start so I really appreciate a system that will let me enjoy the same games as my husband on a bigger screen.  An 1.5" might not sound like a lot to everyone but for someone who can't see well it is awesome! I look forward to being able to game on the go again!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am a visually impaired gamer and this makes me very happy !
I have a DS Lite and am so glad there is going to be a bigger screen on the DSI XL !
I will now be able to play my DS games again without having to strain my eyesight .
It is about time we had a portable gaming system for people like me and the older generations .
I am really glad that Nintendo has made a niche for this often overlooked market .
This system may not be for everyone but at least now I will be able to play on the go again .
I game a lot on the go in the car on the plane waiting for class to start so I really appreciate a system that will let me enjoy the same games as my husband on a bigger screen .
An 1.5 " might not sound like a lot to everyone but for someone who ca n't see well it is awesome !
I look forward to being able to game on the go again !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am a visually impaired gamer and this makes me very happy!
I have a DS Lite and am so glad there is going to be a bigger screen on the DSI XL!
I will now be able to play my DS games again without having to strain my eyesight.
It is about time we had a portable gaming system for people like me and the older generations.
I am really glad that Nintendo has made a niche for this often overlooked market.
This system may not be for everyone but at least now I will be able to play on the go again.
I game a lot on the go in the car on the plane waiting for class to start so I really appreciate a system that will let me enjoy the same games as my husband on a bigger screen.
An 1.5" might not sound like a lot to everyone but for someone who can't see well it is awesome!
I look forward to being able to game on the go again!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917261</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917751</id>
	<title>It's obvious...</title>
	<author>Overzeetop</author>
	<datestamp>1256816040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Technology from a couple years ago, larger fonts for older eyes...they're clearly targeting the Korean market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Technology from a couple years ago , larger fonts for older eyes...they 're clearly targeting the Korean market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Technology from a couple years ago, larger fonts for older eyes...they're clearly targeting the Korean market.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916841</id>
	<title>Nintendo predicts 10" screens on DS XXXL for 2012</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256812260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nintendo predicts 10" screens on Nintendo DS Lite XXXL by 2012 - citing expected simultaneous advances in screens which allow for very large pixel elements and cargo pants with exceedingly large pockets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nintendo predicts 10 " screens on Nintendo DS Lite XXXL by 2012 - citing expected simultaneous advances in screens which allow for very large pixel elements and cargo pants with exceedingly large pockets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nintendo predicts 10" screens on Nintendo DS Lite XXXL by 2012 - citing expected simultaneous advances in screens which allow for very large pixel elements and cargo pants with exceedingly large pockets.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916831</id>
	<title>Demand?</title>
	<author>hansamurai</author>
	<datestamp>1256812260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm wondering where the demand for this was?  It's not like they're increasing the resolution and now the DS size history has gone from its original size, shrunk down to the Lite version, then the DSi came out which was comparable to the Lite, and now they're making it larger than the original DS with the XL.</p><p>But Nintendo usually knows what they're doing, as long as they don't color it red and require it be strapped to your face, that is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm wondering where the demand for this was ?
It 's not like they 're increasing the resolution and now the DS size history has gone from its original size , shrunk down to the Lite version , then the DSi came out which was comparable to the Lite , and now they 're making it larger than the original DS with the XL.But Nintendo usually knows what they 're doing , as long as they do n't color it red and require it be strapped to your face , that is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm wondering where the demand for this was?
It's not like they're increasing the resolution and now the DS size history has gone from its original size, shrunk down to the Lite version, then the DSi came out which was comparable to the Lite, and now they're making it larger than the original DS with the XL.But Nintendo usually knows what they're doing, as long as they don't color it red and require it be strapped to your face, that is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917467</id>
	<title>Re:Demand?</title>
	<author>dbIII</author>
	<datestamp>1256814780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not all that old, but yes I have spent a lot of time in doctor's waiting rooms reading books on the original DS since the thing fits in a jacket pocket.  So far I've been through Lord Jim (Conrad), Treasure Island and part way through King Solomon's Mines.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not all that old , but yes I have spent a lot of time in doctor 's waiting rooms reading books on the original DS since the thing fits in a jacket pocket .
So far I 've been through Lord Jim ( Conrad ) , Treasure Island and part way through King Solomon 's Mines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not all that old, but yes I have spent a lot of time in doctor's waiting rooms reading books on the original DS since the thing fits in a jacket pocket.
So far I've been through Lord Jim (Conrad), Treasure Island and part way through King Solomon's Mines.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918531</id>
	<title>Re:After reading the tech specs I can see</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256821020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey Milz, I herd u like mudkips</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey Milz , I herd u like mudkips</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey Milz, I herd u like mudkips</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916753</id>
	<title>After reading the tech specs I can see</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256811960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It prints free money for nintendo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It prints free money for nintendo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It prints free money for nintendo.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916961</id>
	<title>5 hour battery life!??!?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256812740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember the good ol' days when the gameboy color could entertain you for days and days without the need to replace (or recharge) your batteries. The battery life alone would make me not buy this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember the good ol ' days when the gameboy color could entertain you for days and days without the need to replace ( or recharge ) your batteries .
The battery life alone would make me not buy this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember the good ol' days when the gameboy color could entertain you for days and days without the need to replace (or recharge) your batteries.
The battery life alone would make me not buy this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917873</id>
	<title>Re:Price</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256816760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>when you're insuring your entire home entertainment system for more then your home is worth, when you work in the military as well.  that's an issue where I work during the summer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>when you 're insuring your entire home entertainment system for more then your home is worth , when you work in the military as well .
that 's an issue where I work during the summer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>when you're insuring your entire home entertainment system for more then your home is worth, when you work in the military as well.
that's an issue where I work during the summer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917265</id>
	<title>Sigh...</title>
	<author>XPeter</author>
	<datestamp>1256813940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mediocre upgrade with no real reason to buy.<br><br>I'll be waiting for the rumoured  TS next year<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mediocre upgrade with no real reason to buy.I 'll be waiting for the rumoured TS next year : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mediocre upgrade with no real reason to buy.I'll be waiting for the rumoured  TS next year :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918815</id>
	<title>Re:Larger screen but same resolution?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256822400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>One of the comments that came out from people reviewing the PSP Go was that the screen looked "sharper" because it was smaller with the same resolution as the PSP 3000.</p></div><p>Same case was true of the GameBoy Micro compared to the GBA and GBA SP.  For GBA software, GBM is great.</p><p>The important thing is that, hopefully, they will simply use a combination of a larger pixel size and (possibly) a slightly higher pixel pitch instead of hardware scaling. Without a large enough difference between the DSi LL and DSi screens' pixel densities (at least 2:1 in both directions - 4x total pixel count), scaling would likely worsen the visible artifacts to an even greater degree.  A larger pixel size (same density as DSi) would merely make pixel corners more apparent, rather than distorting sprite geometries.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the comments that came out from people reviewing the PSP Go was that the screen looked " sharper " because it was smaller with the same resolution as the PSP 3000.Same case was true of the GameBoy Micro compared to the GBA and GBA SP .
For GBA software , GBM is great.The important thing is that , hopefully , they will simply use a combination of a larger pixel size and ( possibly ) a slightly higher pixel pitch instead of hardware scaling .
Without a large enough difference between the DSi LL and DSi screens ' pixel densities ( at least 2 : 1 in both directions - 4x total pixel count ) , scaling would likely worsen the visible artifacts to an even greater degree .
A larger pixel size ( same density as DSi ) would merely make pixel corners more apparent , rather than distorting sprite geometries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the comments that came out from people reviewing the PSP Go was that the screen looked "sharper" because it was smaller with the same resolution as the PSP 3000.Same case was true of the GameBoy Micro compared to the GBA and GBA SP.
For GBA software, GBM is great.The important thing is that, hopefully, they will simply use a combination of a larger pixel size and (possibly) a slightly higher pixel pitch instead of hardware scaling.
Without a large enough difference between the DSi LL and DSi screens' pixel densities (at least 2:1 in both directions - 4x total pixel count), scaling would likely worsen the visible artifacts to an even greater degree.
A larger pixel size (same density as DSi) would merely make pixel corners more apparent, rather than distorting sprite geometries.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917135</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917377</id>
	<title>Re:Nintendo predicts 10" screens on DS XXXL for 20</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1256814360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Nintendo predicts 10" screens on Nintendo DS Lite XXXL by 2012</p></div><p>By that time, they might as well introduce the TV adapter already.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nintendo predicts 10 " screens on Nintendo DS Lite XXXL by 2012By that time , they might as well introduce the TV adapter already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nintendo predicts 10" screens on Nintendo DS Lite XXXL by 2012By that time, they might as well introduce the TV adapter already.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918333</id>
	<title>Re:I'm confused....</title>
	<author>d4nowar</author>
	<datestamp>1256819580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the DSi XL, clearly stated many times...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the DSi XL , clearly stated many times.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the DSi XL, clearly stated many times...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916839</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917317</id>
	<title>Maybe this time</title>
	<author>Tiger\_Storms</author>
	<datestamp>1256814180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now with it's two wide screens they will finally listen to my demands for it to play two movies at the same time! or watch a movie on the top wile playing an old 1 screen game on the bottom, the options are endless mwaahahahha!.... seriously two screen even bigger... don't really see how this is going to improve their sales, they might as well make a four screen device...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now with it 's two wide screens they will finally listen to my demands for it to play two movies at the same time !
or watch a movie on the top wile playing an old 1 screen game on the bottom , the options are endless mwaahahahha ! ... .
seriously two screen even bigger... do n't really see how this is going to improve their sales , they might as well make a four screen device.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now with it's two wide screens they will finally listen to my demands for it to play two movies at the same time!
or watch a movie on the top wile playing an old 1 screen game on the bottom, the options are endless mwaahahahha!....
seriously two screen even bigger... don't really see how this is going to improve their sales, they might as well make a four screen device...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916817</id>
	<title>Re:Price</title>
	<author>Avalain</author>
	<datestamp>1256812200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or maybe your portable is more popular than your home system?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or maybe your portable is more popular than your home system ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or maybe your portable is more popular than your home system?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917507</id>
	<title>money reasons</title>
	<author>jlebrech</author>
	<datestamp>1256814960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or maybe they struck a deal with an lcd manufacturer that gave them a really good price on some over sized stock?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or maybe they struck a deal with an lcd manufacturer that gave them a really good price on some over sized stock ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or maybe they struck a deal with an lcd manufacturer that gave them a really good price on some over sized stock?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917689</id>
	<title>Because they can.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256815740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nintendo does it because they can, plain and simple.</p><p>Stop arguing about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nintendo does it because they can , plain and simple.Stop arguing about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nintendo does it because they can, plain and simple.Stop arguing about it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917341</id>
	<title>Re:Demand?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256814240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Something like this actually tempts original DS owners like myself, which I suppose is the way to sell them since the main mode of failure for a DS seems to be theft.<br>It would be nice with the "100 classics book collection" as an ebook reader (original screen is a bit dark) and nice for the "colors" howebrew in paticular.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Something like this actually tempts original DS owners like myself , which I suppose is the way to sell them since the main mode of failure for a DS seems to be theft.It would be nice with the " 100 classics book collection " as an ebook reader ( original screen is a bit dark ) and nice for the " colors " howebrew in paticular .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something like this actually tempts original DS owners like myself, which I suppose is the way to sell them since the main mode of failure for a DS seems to be theft.It would be nice with the "100 classics book collection" as an ebook reader (original screen is a bit dark) and nice for the "colors" howebrew in paticular.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917047</id>
	<title>Re:Price</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1256813040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When your portable costs more then your home system, something is wrong with your pricing path.</p></div><p>To be fair, the DSi is cheaper than a Wii.  This is the 'premium' edition for those who want it to look a little nicer cosmetically.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When your portable costs more then your home system , something is wrong with your pricing path.To be fair , the DSi is cheaper than a Wii .
This is the 'premium ' edition for those who want it to look a little nicer cosmetically .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When your portable costs more then your home system, something is wrong with your pricing path.To be fair, the DSi is cheaper than a Wii.
This is the 'premium' edition for those who want it to look a little nicer cosmetically.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29926399</id>
	<title>Re:Nintendo predicts 10" screens on DS XXXL for 20</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256928660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://home.comcast.net/~olimar/DS/jumbotron/" title="comcast.net" rel="nofollow">http://home.comcast.net/~olimar/DS/jumbotron/</a> [comcast.net]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //home.comcast.net/ ~ olimar/DS/jumbotron/ [ comcast.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://home.comcast.net/~olimar/DS/jumbotron/ [comcast.net]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917697</id>
	<title>"tubgirl</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256815740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>nearly two years a BSD over other Centralized models</htmltext>
<tokenext>nearly two years a BSD over other Centralized models</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nearly two years a BSD over other Centralized models</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916839</id>
	<title>I'm confused....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256812260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So is this "DS 39" or "DSi 40" or "DS9L" or "D6L" or what?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So is this " DS 39 " or " DSi 40 " or " DS9L " or " D6L " or what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So is this "DS 39" or "DSi 40" or "DS9L" or "D6L" or what?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918323</id>
	<title>Re:Larger screen but same resolution?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256819580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>very much this! after playing games on an iphone for a while, the resolution on a DS lite looks appallingly low (no comment about the quality of games on either platform in that statement, they each have their own pros and cons). I cant imaging how bad this new DSi is going to look with even bigger pixels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>very much this !
after playing games on an iphone for a while , the resolution on a DS lite looks appallingly low ( no comment about the quality of games on either platform in that statement , they each have their own pros and cons ) .
I cant imaging how bad this new DSi is going to look with even bigger pixels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>very much this!
after playing games on an iphone for a while, the resolution on a DS lite looks appallingly low (no comment about the quality of games on either platform in that statement, they each have their own pros and cons).
I cant imaging how bad this new DSi is going to look with even bigger pixels.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917135</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29919009</id>
	<title>Re:Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Toonol</author>
	<datestamp>1256823300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're not supposed to switch, any more than you should buy a new DS because they introduce a new color.  This is just a different variant of the DSi.  They've kept all specs except for physical size the same.<br> <br>

There's no reason for anybody to get this if they are satisfied with the size of the standard DS screen... and if they AREN'T satisfied, this is a good option to have.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're not supposed to switch , any more than you should buy a new DS because they introduce a new color .
This is just a different variant of the DSi .
They 've kept all specs except for physical size the same .
There 's no reason for anybody to get this if they are satisfied with the size of the standard DS screen... and if they ARE N'T satisfied , this is a good option to have .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're not supposed to switch, any more than you should buy a new DS because they introduce a new color.
This is just a different variant of the DSi.
They've kept all specs except for physical size the same.
There's no reason for anybody to get this if they are satisfied with the size of the standard DS screen... and if they AREN'T satisfied, this is a good option to have.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917073</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918865</id>
	<title>Nintendo's Kindle killer?</title>
	<author>rivercityrandom</author>
	<datestamp>1256822580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Larger screens, more legible text, better wifi features... perhaps Nintendo is trying to break into the e-book reader market with this device. After all, e-book readers are popular in the DS homebrew scene, which Nintendo is not totally unaware of, and a company with Nintendo's clout could arrange a deal with Amazon for a Kindle app. I have limited pocket space, and when I'm on the go, I know I'd rather carry around a sightly larger DS than a DS and a Kindle...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Larger screens , more legible text , better wifi features... perhaps Nintendo is trying to break into the e-book reader market with this device .
After all , e-book readers are popular in the DS homebrew scene , which Nintendo is not totally unaware of , and a company with Nintendo 's clout could arrange a deal with Amazon for a Kindle app .
I have limited pocket space , and when I 'm on the go , I know I 'd rather carry around a sightly larger DS than a DS and a Kindle.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Larger screens, more legible text, better wifi features... perhaps Nintendo is trying to break into the e-book reader market with this device.
After all, e-book readers are popular in the DS homebrew scene, which Nintendo is not totally unaware of, and a company with Nintendo's clout could arrange a deal with Amazon for a Kindle app.
I have limited pocket space, and when I'm on the go, I know I'd rather carry around a sightly larger DS than a DS and a Kindle...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29921113</id>
	<title>Re:I'm confused....</title>
	<author>maglor\_83</author>
	<datestamp>1256845140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a DSi XL.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a DSi XL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a DSi XL.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916839</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29937069</id>
	<title>Re:What about memory?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256983500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nintendo DS Lite is no more powerful than the orgiinal DS.  Its only non-physical change is the ability to switch brightness levels, whereas the original DS only had an on/off switch for its backlight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nintendo DS Lite is no more powerful than the orgiinal DS .
Its only non-physical change is the ability to switch brightness levels , whereas the original DS only had an on/off switch for its backlight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nintendo DS Lite is no more powerful than the orgiinal DS.
Its only non-physical change is the ability to switch brightness levels, whereas the original DS only had an on/off switch for its backlight.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917229</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917483</id>
	<title>Re:Demand?</title>
	<author>thule</author>
	<datestamp>1256814900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What about all the old people they introduced to gaming with the Gameboy and Tetris?  Nintendo moved over 100 million Gameboys.  Do you think only "hardcore" gamers bought them?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What about all the old people they introduced to gaming with the Gameboy and Tetris ?
Nintendo moved over 100 million Gameboys .
Do you think only " hardcore " gamers bought them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about all the old people they introduced to gaming with the Gameboy and Tetris?
Nintendo moved over 100 million Gameboys.
Do you think only "hardcore" gamers bought them?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918309</id>
	<title>Re:After reading the tech specs I can see</title>
	<author>node 3</author>
	<datestamp>1256819520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Nintendo won the console wars years ago.</p></div><p>The NES and SNES console wars. Not the N64 or GameCube wars.</p><p>The present war is still in effect.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It took nearly 2 full years for Wii stock to meet demand.</p></div><p>Only due to a deliberate decision by Nintendo to *not* increase production.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The Wii is tracking ahead of the PS2 in terms of sales, despite the global recession and the high failure rate of early PS2 models.</p></div><p>What does the "high failure rate" (oh, please. the "high failure rate" is *nothing* like the *present* failure rate of the Xbox 360) of early PS2s have to do with Wii sales rates?</p><p>How far out do you have to extrapolate for the Wii to surpass the PS2 as the top selling console of all time? The Wii hasn't even surpassed the NES, which itself has sold less than *half* the number of units the PS2 has, and is Nintendo's top selling console to date.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nintendo won the console wars years ago.The NES and SNES console wars .
Not the N64 or GameCube wars.The present war is still in effect.It took nearly 2 full years for Wii stock to meet demand.Only due to a deliberate decision by Nintendo to * not * increase production.The Wii is tracking ahead of the PS2 in terms of sales , despite the global recession and the high failure rate of early PS2 models.What does the " high failure rate " ( oh , please .
the " high failure rate " is * nothing * like the * present * failure rate of the Xbox 360 ) of early PS2s have to do with Wii sales rates ? How far out do you have to extrapolate for the Wii to surpass the PS2 as the top selling console of all time ?
The Wii has n't even surpassed the NES , which itself has sold less than * half * the number of units the PS2 has , and is Nintendo 's top selling console to date .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nintendo won the console wars years ago.The NES and SNES console wars.
Not the N64 or GameCube wars.The present war is still in effect.It took nearly 2 full years for Wii stock to meet demand.Only due to a deliberate decision by Nintendo to *not* increase production.The Wii is tracking ahead of the PS2 in terms of sales, despite the global recession and the high failure rate of early PS2 models.What does the "high failure rate" (oh, please.
the "high failure rate" is *nothing* like the *present* failure rate of the Xbox 360) of early PS2s have to do with Wii sales rates?How far out do you have to extrapolate for the Wii to surpass the PS2 as the top selling console of all time?
The Wii hasn't even surpassed the NES, which itself has sold less than *half* the number of units the PS2 has, and is Nintendo's top selling console to date.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917741</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29924869</id>
	<title>Re:After reading the tech specs I can see</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1256922000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shortage of stock?</p><p>It was MS who botched the 360 launch.<br>In fact, stock was so low that 2 months later they had a second "launch".</p><p>Everything else you said is just stupid.</p><p>Look at sales.<br>Nintendo dominated this generation, and it was clear that they "won" within 6 months of the Wii's launch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shortage of stock ? It was MS who botched the 360 launch.In fact , stock was so low that 2 months later they had a second " launch " .Everything else you said is just stupid.Look at sales.Nintendo dominated this generation , and it was clear that they " won " within 6 months of the Wii 's launch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shortage of stock?It was MS who botched the 360 launch.In fact, stock was so low that 2 months later they had a second "launch".Everything else you said is just stupid.Look at sales.Nintendo dominated this generation, and it was clear that they "won" within 6 months of the Wii's launch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918899</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29923941</id>
	<title>Re:Larger screen but same resolution?</title>
	<author>ookaze</author>
	<datestamp>1256918340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>One of the comments that came out from people reviewing the PSP Go was that the screen looked "sharper" because it was smaller with the same resolution as the PSP 3000. Wouldn't this just have the opposite effect for the DSi? As it is the DSi has a rather low resolution and I'd be worried that increasing the screen size will just make games "bigger and uglier". I'm skeptical that this is going to do anything but highlight the shortfalls of the system; it being both the oldest and the slowest architecture on the market.</p></div><p>You can be worried. But this isn't aimed at the tiny group of people that care about this.<br>Instead, this is aimed at older people that don't care one bit about these silly technical things, and just want to entertain themselves.<br>The games are not ugly to most people owning a DS, and actually most people don't care about that.</p><p>And don't care either about highlighting shortfalls. The DS is on its way to become the most successful dedicated videogame system in history, already at 110+ millions units sold in 5 years. The DSi LL won't highlight any entertainment shortfalls the DSi might have, on the contrary, it's designed to destroy some entertainment shortfalls the DS have, like not being big enough for elder people, which are becoming a huge market (baby boomers).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the comments that came out from people reviewing the PSP Go was that the screen looked " sharper " because it was smaller with the same resolution as the PSP 3000 .
Would n't this just have the opposite effect for the DSi ?
As it is the DSi has a rather low resolution and I 'd be worried that increasing the screen size will just make games " bigger and uglier " .
I 'm skeptical that this is going to do anything but highlight the shortfalls of the system ; it being both the oldest and the slowest architecture on the market.You can be worried .
But this is n't aimed at the tiny group of people that care about this.Instead , this is aimed at older people that do n't care one bit about these silly technical things , and just want to entertain themselves.The games are not ugly to most people owning a DS , and actually most people do n't care about that.And do n't care either about highlighting shortfalls .
The DS is on its way to become the most successful dedicated videogame system in history , already at 110 + millions units sold in 5 years .
The DSi LL wo n't highlight any entertainment shortfalls the DSi might have , on the contrary , it 's designed to destroy some entertainment shortfalls the DS have , like not being big enough for elder people , which are becoming a huge market ( baby boomers ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the comments that came out from people reviewing the PSP Go was that the screen looked "sharper" because it was smaller with the same resolution as the PSP 3000.
Wouldn't this just have the opposite effect for the DSi?
As it is the DSi has a rather low resolution and I'd be worried that increasing the screen size will just make games "bigger and uglier".
I'm skeptical that this is going to do anything but highlight the shortfalls of the system; it being both the oldest and the slowest architecture on the market.You can be worried.
But this isn't aimed at the tiny group of people that care about this.Instead, this is aimed at older people that don't care one bit about these silly technical things, and just want to entertain themselves.The games are not ugly to most people owning a DS, and actually most people don't care about that.And don't care either about highlighting shortfalls.
The DS is on its way to become the most successful dedicated videogame system in history, already at 110+ millions units sold in 5 years.
The DSi LL won't highlight any entertainment shortfalls the DSi might have, on the contrary, it's designed to destroy some entertainment shortfalls the DS have, like not being big enough for elder people, which are becoming a huge market (baby boomers).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917135</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917261</id>
	<title>Re:After reading the tech specs I can see</title>
	<author>tlhIngan</author>
	<datestamp>1256813940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It prints free money for nintendo.</p></div></blockquote><p>You jest, but that's exactly right.</p><p>The target market for this DS is big and growing. Older people (parents, etc) find the current DS line with screens that are too small - now Nintendo sees a huge market for large screens and less agile hands.</p><p>Nintendo's no longer just a "kiddy" company - their products are aimed at everyone, particularly non-gamers. Nintendo might not win the console wars, but they'll infiltrate the homes of everyone else.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It prints free money for nintendo.You jest , but that 's exactly right.The target market for this DS is big and growing .
Older people ( parents , etc ) find the current DS line with screens that are too small - now Nintendo sees a huge market for large screens and less agile hands.Nintendo 's no longer just a " kiddy " company - their products are aimed at everyone , particularly non-gamers .
Nintendo might not win the console wars , but they 'll infiltrate the homes of everyone else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It prints free money for nintendo.You jest, but that's exactly right.The target market for this DS is big and growing.
Older people (parents, etc) find the current DS line with screens that are too small - now Nintendo sees a huge market for large screens and less agile hands.Nintendo's no longer just a "kiddy" company - their products are aimed at everyone, particularly non-gamers.
Nintendo might not win the console wars, but they'll infiltrate the homes of everyone else.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917229</id>
	<title>What about memory?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256813760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the DSi added more memory to the DS, just like the DS-lite added more power over the original DS-phat.</p><p>With a bigger screen, there has to be more power, memory and battery capacity, otherwise this thing is just a brick</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the DSi added more memory to the DS , just like the DS-lite added more power over the original DS-phat.With a bigger screen , there has to be more power , memory and battery capacity , otherwise this thing is just a brick</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the DSi added more memory to the DS, just like the DS-lite added more power over the original DS-phat.With a bigger screen, there has to be more power, memory and battery capacity, otherwise this thing is just a brick</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917459</id>
	<title>Re:After reading the tech specs I can see</title>
	<author>thule</author>
	<datestamp>1256814720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><blockquote><div><p>Nintendo's no longer just a "kiddy" company - their products are aimed at everyone, particularly non-gamers. Nintendo might not win the console wars, but they'll infiltrate the homes of everyone else.</p></div></blockquote> </div><p>
I think their products have been aimed at everyone for a long time.  Look how many NES' Nintendo shipped (over 60 million).  Tetris on the Gameboy was HUGE!  Nintendo sold over 100 million Gameboys. The original Mario Brothers was an arcade like game that worked with two players.  Their products are not aimed at "non-gamers". Their products are designed to *create* gamers.  Maybe not the gamers the "hardcore" or the "game industry" thinks of (M-rated of course), but gamers none-the-less.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nintendo 's no longer just a " kiddy " company - their products are aimed at everyone , particularly non-gamers .
Nintendo might not win the console wars , but they 'll infiltrate the homes of everyone else .
I think their products have been aimed at everyone for a long time .
Look how many NES ' Nintendo shipped ( over 60 million ) .
Tetris on the Gameboy was HUGE !
Nintendo sold over 100 million Gameboys .
The original Mario Brothers was an arcade like game that worked with two players .
Their products are not aimed at " non-gamers " .
Their products are designed to * create * gamers .
Maybe not the gamers the " hardcore " or the " game industry " thinks of ( M-rated of course ) , but gamers none-the-less .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nintendo's no longer just a "kiddy" company - their products are aimed at everyone, particularly non-gamers.
Nintendo might not win the console wars, but they'll infiltrate the homes of everyone else.
I think their products have been aimed at everyone for a long time.
Look how many NES' Nintendo shipped (over 60 million).
Tetris on the Gameboy was HUGE!
Nintendo sold over 100 million Gameboys.
The original Mario Brothers was an arcade like game that worked with two players.
Their products are not aimed at "non-gamers".
Their products are designed to *create* gamers.
Maybe not the gamers the "hardcore" or the "game industry" thinks of (M-rated of course), but gamers none-the-less.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917261</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918061</id>
	<title>Yeah, but can it run Windows 7?</title>
	<author>lie2me</author>
	<datestamp>1256817900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iDon't</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iDo n't</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iDon't</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916977</id>
	<title>Re:Demand?</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1256812800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's for the old people they introduced to gaming with the Wii.  Now they have a handheld they can see with their aging eyes, and probably a larger stylus they can grasp with their arthritic hands. If you spend a lot of time in doctor's waiting rooms, these things come in handy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's for the old people they introduced to gaming with the Wii .
Now they have a handheld they can see with their aging eyes , and probably a larger stylus they can grasp with their arthritic hands .
If you spend a lot of time in doctor 's waiting rooms , these things come in handy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's for the old people they introduced to gaming with the Wii.
Now they have a handheld they can see with their aging eyes, and probably a larger stylus they can grasp with their arthritic hands.
If you spend a lot of time in doctor's waiting rooms, these things come in handy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29919477</id>
	<title>i think i figured it out....</title>
	<author>garynuman</author>
	<datestamp>1256826720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>anyone else think its possible- nay probable- that Nintendo and Apple are locked in a vicious Trading Places-esque gentleman's wager over who can most rapidly refresh their product lines</htmltext>
<tokenext>anyone else think its possible- nay probable- that Nintendo and Apple are locked in a vicious Trading Places-esque gentleman 's wager over who can most rapidly refresh their product lines</tokentext>
<sentencetext>anyone else think its possible- nay probable- that Nintendo and Apple are locked in a vicious Trading Places-esque gentleman's wager over who can most rapidly refresh their product lines</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917503</id>
	<title>Sure about that?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256814960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On what page of the Rule Book For Everything does it say that Portable + Weaker = Cheaper?</p><p>Prices are typically based on value.  Value is typically based on what the market will bear.</p><p>Given their sales performance across the board, whether you like it or not, there are few things wrong with Nintendo's price structure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On what page of the Rule Book For Everything does it say that Portable + Weaker = Cheaper ? Prices are typically based on value .
Value is typically based on what the market will bear.Given their sales performance across the board , whether you like it or not , there are few things wrong with Nintendo 's price structure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On what page of the Rule Book For Everything does it say that Portable + Weaker = Cheaper?Prices are typically based on value.
Value is typically based on what the market will bear.Given their sales performance across the board, whether you like it or not, there are few things wrong with Nintendo's price structure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918433</id>
	<title>Re:Larger screen but same resolution?</title>
	<author>macshit</author>
	<datestamp>1256820300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm skeptical that this is going to do anything but highlight the shortfalls of the system; it being both the oldest and the slowest architecture on the market.</p></div><p>Actually the DSi has a fair bit more processor power (and memory I believe) than the DS, but few devs have taken advantage of it (for many games it's not really necessary, and obviously at this point the original DS still has a lot more market share).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm skeptical that this is going to do anything but highlight the shortfalls of the system ; it being both the oldest and the slowest architecture on the market.Actually the DSi has a fair bit more processor power ( and memory I believe ) than the DS , but few devs have taken advantage of it ( for many games it 's not really necessary , and obviously at this point the original DS still has a lot more market share ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm skeptical that this is going to do anything but highlight the shortfalls of the system; it being both the oldest and the slowest architecture on the market.Actually the DSi has a fair bit more processor power (and memory I believe) than the DS, but few devs have taken advantage of it (for many games it's not really necessary, and obviously at this point the original DS still has a lot more market share).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917135</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29925989</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe this one will support WPA?</title>
	<author>tangelogee</author>
	<datestamp>1256926800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I kept wep on my router longer than I should have because I just liked playing Mario Kart just that much. I lost my dslite and thought to buy the new model, but it still doesn't support wpa, just wep. I decided I wasn't going to switch back just for one game, and opted instead to buy nothing. Maybe I'll get the new one if it can do wpa, but if not, no sale.</p></div><p>the DSi does support WPA, it's in the advanced options.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I kept wep on my router longer than I should have because I just liked playing Mario Kart just that much .
I lost my dslite and thought to buy the new model , but it still does n't support wpa , just wep .
I decided I was n't going to switch back just for one game , and opted instead to buy nothing .
Maybe I 'll get the new one if it can do wpa , but if not , no sale.the DSi does support WPA , it 's in the advanced options .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I kept wep on my router longer than I should have because I just liked playing Mario Kart just that much.
I lost my dslite and thought to buy the new model, but it still doesn't support wpa, just wep.
I decided I wasn't going to switch back just for one game, and opted instead to buy nothing.
Maybe I'll get the new one if it can do wpa, but if not, no sale.the DSi does support WPA, it's in the advanced options.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918681</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29920095</id>
	<title>Why specialized hardware?</title>
	<author>dirkdodgers</author>
	<datestamp>1256831700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why don't DS and PSP publishers just partner with cell phone manufacturers to build mass market crossover devices with the same hardware specs?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't DS and PSP publishers just partner with cell phone manufacturers to build mass market crossover devices with the same hardware specs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't DS and PSP publishers just partner with cell phone manufacturers to build mass market crossover devices with the same hardware specs?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29920563</id>
	<title>Re:After reading the tech specs I can see</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256836740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Nintendo might not win the console wars</i></p><p>If you mean sales, there's no contest or war. Nintendo has sold over 100 millions DSs and over 50 million Wiis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nintendo might not win the console warsIf you mean sales , there 's no contest or war .
Nintendo has sold over 100 millions DSs and over 50 million Wiis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nintendo might not win the console warsIf you mean sales, there's no contest or war.
Nintendo has sold over 100 millions DSs and over 50 million Wiis.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917261</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917125</id>
	<title>Re:Demand?</title>
	<author>Bagels</author>
	<datestamp>1256813400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe they mentioned that customers were asking for bigger screens on surveys.  Also, speaking anecdotally, I remember my mom wondering aloud "how can you see anything on that tiny screen?" several times with the older Gameboys and the original Nintendo DS.  Of course, she now uses a smartphone with a screen that's not much bigger, so I suppose she's got that worked out now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe they mentioned that customers were asking for bigger screens on surveys .
Also , speaking anecdotally , I remember my mom wondering aloud " how can you see anything on that tiny screen ?
" several times with the older Gameboys and the original Nintendo DS .
Of course , she now uses a smartphone with a screen that 's not much bigger , so I suppose she 's got that worked out now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe they mentioned that customers were asking for bigger screens on surveys.
Also, speaking anecdotally, I remember my mom wondering aloud "how can you see anything on that tiny screen?
" several times with the older Gameboys and the original Nintendo DS.
Of course, she now uses a smartphone with a screen that's not much bigger, so I suppose she's got that worked out now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918673</id>
	<title>Re:I'm confused....</title>
	<author>siddesu</author>
	<datestamp>1256821680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>DD XXL</htmltext>
<tokenext>DD XXL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DD XXL</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916839</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918527</id>
	<title>It doesn't cost more than Wii</title>
	<author>joeflies</author>
	<datestamp>1256820960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's the same price (in Japan).  The Wii is &yen;20,000 in Japan, and apparently so is the DSi LL.

It looks like you're converting the price of the DSi LL against the weak dollar and using the $220 price, and comparing that against the US price of the Wii ($199).</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the same price ( in Japan ) .
The Wii is   20,000 in Japan , and apparently so is the DSi LL .
It looks like you 're converting the price of the DSi LL against the weak dollar and using the $ 220 price , and comparing that against the US price of the Wii ( $ 199 ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the same price (in Japan).
The Wii is ¥20,000 in Japan, and apparently so is the DSi LL.
It looks like you're converting the price of the DSi LL against the weak dollar and using the $220 price, and comparing that against the US price of the Wii ($199).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917115</id>
	<title>Re:Price</title>
	<author>tonycheese</author>
	<datestamp>1256813340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, Nintendo's 130 million+ sales beg to differ... all the consoles sold at a higher price initially, then dropped over time. The DS Lite sold for 180 dollars in Japan's debut, but was 130 when the DSi came out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , Nintendo 's 130 million + sales beg to differ... all the consoles sold at a higher price initially , then dropped over time .
The DS Lite sold for 180 dollars in Japan 's debut , but was 130 when the DSi came out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, Nintendo's 130 million+ sales beg to differ... all the consoles sold at a higher price initially, then dropped over time.
The DS Lite sold for 180 dollars in Japan's debut, but was 130 when the DSi came out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918101</id>
	<title>Re:Nintendo's Niche</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256818260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not really though. Backwards compatibility is key for portable games. For example the Game Boy Advance SP had perhaps the largest library for any portable game console. The GBA SP (along with the first GBA) could play games from 1989 to 2007. Few consoles can play 18 years of games without any emulation. And when the games are cheap ($30 when they were new, and you can get them for $10 max used) that gives the average person a huge game library without much initial investment. Even though Super Mario Land wasn't exactly the most advanced games, no was it that long but it still was fun. Now Nintendo has the DS (and Lite) that can play games from 2001-present and the DSi that can play physical games from 2004-present along with downloadable games. A major new console would more than likely change the hardware in a radical way, if you don't have either 2 screens or don't have one as a touch screen the DS games are nearly unplayable. Without a large back catalog they probably won't gain much traction (just look at how much of a failure the PSP Go is since it doesn't have a UMD drive).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not really though .
Backwards compatibility is key for portable games .
For example the Game Boy Advance SP had perhaps the largest library for any portable game console .
The GBA SP ( along with the first GBA ) could play games from 1989 to 2007 .
Few consoles can play 18 years of games without any emulation .
And when the games are cheap ( $ 30 when they were new , and you can get them for $ 10 max used ) that gives the average person a huge game library without much initial investment .
Even though Super Mario Land was n't exactly the most advanced games , no was it that long but it still was fun .
Now Nintendo has the DS ( and Lite ) that can play games from 2001-present and the DSi that can play physical games from 2004-present along with downloadable games .
A major new console would more than likely change the hardware in a radical way , if you do n't have either 2 screens or do n't have one as a touch screen the DS games are nearly unplayable .
Without a large back catalog they probably wo n't gain much traction ( just look at how much of a failure the PSP Go is since it does n't have a UMD drive ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not really though.
Backwards compatibility is key for portable games.
For example the Game Boy Advance SP had perhaps the largest library for any portable game console.
The GBA SP (along with the first GBA) could play games from 1989 to 2007.
Few consoles can play 18 years of games without any emulation.
And when the games are cheap ($30 when they were new, and you can get them for $10 max used) that gives the average person a huge game library without much initial investment.
Even though Super Mario Land wasn't exactly the most advanced games, no was it that long but it still was fun.
Now Nintendo has the DS (and Lite) that can play games from 2001-present and the DSi that can play physical games from 2004-present along with downloadable games.
A major new console would more than likely change the hardware in a radical way, if you don't have either 2 screens or don't have one as a touch screen the DS games are nearly unplayable.
Without a large back catalog they probably won't gain much traction (just look at how much of a failure the PSP Go is since it doesn't have a UMD drive).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917283</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917283</id>
	<title>Nintendo's Niche</title>
	<author>allknowingfrog</author>
	<datestamp>1256814000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nintendo's niche isn't making things bigger, faster and stronger. They make things that are new and different. The Wii has been hugely successful, not because it pushes boundaries in graphics and processing speed, but because it is a brand new idea. Taking the same old DS and making the screen bigger isn't going to boost sales the way that going in a new direction would.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nintendo 's niche is n't making things bigger , faster and stronger .
They make things that are new and different .
The Wii has been hugely successful , not because it pushes boundaries in graphics and processing speed , but because it is a brand new idea .
Taking the same old DS and making the screen bigger is n't going to boost sales the way that going in a new direction would .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nintendo's niche isn't making things bigger, faster and stronger.
They make things that are new and different.
The Wii has been hugely successful, not because it pushes boundaries in graphics and processing speed, but because it is a brand new idea.
Taking the same old DS and making the screen bigger isn't going to boost sales the way that going in a new direction would.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29920219</id>
	<title>Re:After reading the tech specs I can see</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256832840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or just the NES console war. The Mega Drive/Genesis and SFC/SNES both did well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or just the NES console war .
The Mega Drive/Genesis and SFC/SNES both did well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or just the NES console war.
The Mega Drive/Genesis and SFC/SNES both did well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917073</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256813160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As with the DSi, this move puzzles me.  I've had a DS Lite for years, and it works perfectly fine, plus it still plays the GameBoy Advance titles, with a longer battery life than either the DSi or the DSi XL (DSLite: 15-19 hours min brightness, DSi: 9-14 hours, DSi XL: 13-17 hours; source: http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/nintendo-dsi-ll-goes-large-in-japan-on-november-21/).  Why should I switch?  No good reason I can see, unless I had difficulty with the small screen, in which case I would not be using a portable console in the first place.  Maybe there is a demand for a new console every year in the 'home market' of Japan?</p><p>[posting as AC, as I can't be bothered to register]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As with the DSi , this move puzzles me .
I 've had a DS Lite for years , and it works perfectly fine , plus it still plays the GameBoy Advance titles , with a longer battery life than either the DSi or the DSi XL ( DSLite : 15-19 hours min brightness , DSi : 9-14 hours , DSi XL : 13-17 hours ; source : http : //www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/nintendo-dsi-ll-goes-large-in-japan-on-november-21/ ) .
Why should I switch ?
No good reason I can see , unless I had difficulty with the small screen , in which case I would not be using a portable console in the first place .
Maybe there is a demand for a new console every year in the 'home market ' of Japan ?
[ posting as AC , as I ca n't be bothered to register ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As with the DSi, this move puzzles me.
I've had a DS Lite for years, and it works perfectly fine, plus it still plays the GameBoy Advance titles, with a longer battery life than either the DSi or the DSi XL (DSLite: 15-19 hours min brightness, DSi: 9-14 hours, DSi XL: 13-17 hours; source: http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/nintendo-dsi-ll-goes-large-in-japan-on-november-21/).
Why should I switch?
No good reason I can see, unless I had difficulty with the small screen, in which case I would not be using a portable console in the first place.
Maybe there is a demand for a new console every year in the 'home market' of Japan?
[posting as AC, as I can't be bothered to register]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29925201</id>
	<title>Re:After reading the tech specs I can see</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1256923200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NES - 1 out of 2 (2 main...)<br>SNES - 1 out of 2 (2 main...)<br>N64 - 2 out of 3<br>GC - Tied for 2 out of 4<br>Wii - 1 out of 3, by a fucking mile.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NES - 1 out of 2 ( 2 main... ) SNES - 1 out of 2 ( 2 main... ) N64 - 2 out of 3GC - Tied for 2 out of 4Wii - 1 out of 3 , by a fucking mile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NES - 1 out of 2 (2 main...)SNES - 1 out of 2 (2 main...)N64 - 2 out of 3GC - Tied for 2 out of 4Wii - 1 out of 3, by a fucking mile.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917835</id>
	<title>Typo?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256816520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The LL's main improvement is the size of its screens, which have been increased from 3.25" to 4.2" with a moderate increase to the size of the chassis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The LL 's main improvement is the size of its screens , which have been increased from 3.25 " to 4.2 " with a moderate increase to the size of the chassis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The LL's main improvement is the size of its screens, which have been increased from 3.25" to 4.2" with a moderate increase to the size of the chassis.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917115
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29924869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918899
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917741
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917261
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29920563
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917261
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29921263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917261
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.30038932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918681
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917511
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918531
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29920219
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917741
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917261
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29919393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916999
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29926399
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29922359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916961
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917873
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917459
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917261
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29925201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917741
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917261
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917483
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916831
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916831
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917135
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918323
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917135
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917503
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917073
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916839
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29919059
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917741
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917261
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916839
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917539
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917047
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29921113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916839
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917125
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916831
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918527
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29999966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917261
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918101
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29928471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917467
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916831
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917435
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29919009
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917073
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29925989
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918681
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918815
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917135
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29937069
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917229
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917377
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29923941
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917135
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_2026217_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29925545
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916839
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2026217.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918681
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.30038932
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29925989
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2026217.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917751
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2026217.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916831
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916977
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917483
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917467
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917125
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917341
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2026217.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916753
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918531
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917261
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917459
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29921263
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917741
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918309
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29925201
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29919059
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29920219
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918899
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29924869
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29920563
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29999966
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2026217.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916839
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29925545
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918333
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918673
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29921113
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2026217.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917283
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917539
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918101
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2026217.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917265
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2026217.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917135
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918323
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29923941
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918815
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918433
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2026217.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916961
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29922359
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2026217.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917317
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2026217.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916999
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29919393
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2026217.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916757
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917047
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917435
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916817
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917873
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917503
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918807
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917511
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918527
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917115
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29928471
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2026217.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917229
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29937069
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2026217.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917073
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29919009
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29918343
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2026217.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29916841
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29917377
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29926399
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_2026217.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_2026217.29920095
</commentlist>
</conversation>
