<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_29_1615214</id>
	<title>Bad Driving May Have Genetic Basis</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1256836260000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Serenissima writes <i>"Bad drivers may in part have their genes to blame, suggests a new study by UC Irvine neuroscientists. People with a particular gene variant <a href="http://www.uci.edu/features/feature\_bdnfdriving\_091028.php">performed more than 20 percent worse on a driving test</a> than people without it &mdash; and a follow-up test a few days later yielded similar results. About 30 percent of Americans have the variant. 'These people make more errors from the get-go, and they forget more of what they learned after time away,' said Dr. Steven Cramer, neurology associate professor and senior author of the study published recently in the journal Cerebral Cortex."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Serenissima writes " Bad drivers may in part have their genes to blame , suggests a new study by UC Irvine neuroscientists .
People with a particular gene variant performed more than 20 percent worse on a driving test than people without it    and a follow-up test a few days later yielded similar results .
About 30 percent of Americans have the variant .
'These people make more errors from the get-go , and they forget more of what they learned after time away, ' said Dr. Steven Cramer , neurology associate professor and senior author of the study published recently in the journal Cerebral Cortex .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Serenissima writes "Bad drivers may in part have their genes to blame, suggests a new study by UC Irvine neuroscientists.
People with a particular gene variant performed more than 20 percent worse on a driving test than people without it — and a follow-up test a few days later yielded similar results.
About 30 percent of Americans have the variant.
'These people make more errors from the get-go, and they forget more of what they learned after time away,' said Dr. Steven Cramer, neurology associate professor and senior author of the study published recently in the journal Cerebral Cortex.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29925519</id>
	<title>Re:Chromosomes?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256924460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's like accusing the F/OSS world of having unfair biases towards blonds (e.g. the blond joke). Poor female drivers is just another stereotype and you need to prove to us that it is higher in F/OSS than in the world at large.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's like accusing the F/OSS world of having unfair biases towards blonds ( e.g .
the blond joke ) .
Poor female drivers is just another stereotype and you need to prove to us that it is higher in F/OSS than in the world at large .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's like accusing the F/OSS world of having unfair biases towards blonds (e.g.
the blond joke).
Poor female drivers is just another stereotype and you need to prove to us that it is higher in F/OSS than in the world at large.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915679</id>
	<title>It's all genetic</title>
	<author>Haxx</author>
	<datestamp>1256808120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; You could make an argument that all human behavior can be traced to genetics. In fact my father is typing this same reply at another forum over at AARP.COM. He can't spell either.</p><p>
&nbsp; year 2600 dictionary: Capitalism --- [kap-i-tl-iz-uhm] -noun. An economic system in which the means of production and distribution are privately owned by Walmart.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>  You could make an argument that all human behavior can be traced to genetics .
In fact my father is typing this same reply at another forum over at AARP.COM .
He ca n't spell either .
  year 2600 dictionary : Capitalism --- [ kap-i-tl-iz-uhm ] -noun .
An economic system in which the means of production and distribution are privately owned by Walmart .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
  You could make an argument that all human behavior can be traced to genetics.
In fact my father is typing this same reply at another forum over at AARP.COM.
He can't spell either.
  year 2600 dictionary: Capitalism --- [kap-i-tl-iz-uhm] -noun.
An economic system in which the means of production and distribution are privately owned by Walmart.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912745</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914769</id>
	<title>Are we sure...</title>
	<author>that IT girl</author>
	<datestamp>1256847900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...that this gene just affects driving? Because making errors, forgetting things frequently... that sounds like some of the people I work with. Aren't we really just isolating the "stupid" gene at this point?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...that this gene just affects driving ?
Because making errors , forgetting things frequently... that sounds like some of the people I work with .
Are n't we really just isolating the " stupid " gene at this point ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that this gene just affects driving?
Because making errors, forgetting things frequently... that sounds like some of the people I work with.
Aren't we really just isolating the "stupid" gene at this point?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29921351</id>
	<title>X chromosome</title>
	<author>1s44c</author>
	<datestamp>1256936100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a well known thing that people with two X chromosomes are very bad drivers, they are prone to panic attacks in any adverse conditions, and have no sense of direction or consideration for other drivers. They also can't read maps.</p><p>If we can get these potential killers off the roads and perhaps isolate the boy-racer gene and get them off the roads too it will save many, many, lives.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a well known thing that people with two X chromosomes are very bad drivers , they are prone to panic attacks in any adverse conditions , and have no sense of direction or consideration for other drivers .
They also ca n't read maps.If we can get these potential killers off the roads and perhaps isolate the boy-racer gene and get them off the roads too it will save many , many , lives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a well known thing that people with two X chromosomes are very bad drivers, they are prone to panic attacks in any adverse conditions, and have no sense of direction or consideration for other drivers.
They also can't read maps.If we can get these potential killers off the roads and perhaps isolate the boy-racer gene and get them off the roads too it will save many, many, lives.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912787</id>
	<title>This is old news</title>
	<author>Myria</author>
	<datestamp>1256840040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This was long ago identified to have a genetic basis, known as "a second X chromosome".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This was long ago identified to have a genetic basis , known as " a second X chromosome " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was long ago identified to have a genetic basis, known as "a second X chromosome".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913223</id>
	<title>+1 UCI</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256841780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>ZOT!</htmltext>
<tokenext>ZOT !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ZOT!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912973</id>
	<title>Re:New Jersey Drivers</title>
	<author>furby076</author>
	<datestamp>1256840700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Inbreeding.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Inbreeding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Inbreeding.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914145</id>
	<title>Texting, talking, fiddling, eating, smoking, etc..</title>
	<author>Paracelcus</author>
	<datestamp>1256845320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While racing at top speed and taking the road as a slolem course weaving through traffic, raging and cursing everybody else on the freeway!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While racing at top speed and taking the road as a slolem course weaving through traffic , raging and cursing everybody else on the freeway !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While racing at top speed and taking the road as a slolem course weaving through traffic, raging and cursing everybody else on the freeway!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29918233</id>
	<title>Re:My daughter is a lousy driver</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256819040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How long till they want to base my insurance rates off of this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How long till they want to base my insurance rates off of this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long till they want to base my insurance rates off of this?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912745</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915793</id>
	<title>Re:Chromosomes?</title>
	<author>19thNervousBreakdown</author>
	<datestamp>1256808720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, well, it's Score 4: Funny, so apparently<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... there's one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , well , it 's Score 4 : Funny , so apparently ... there 's one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, well, it's Score 4: Funny, so apparently ... there's one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913583</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915401</id>
	<title>Re:My daughter is a lousy driver</title>
	<author>Notegg Nornoggin</author>
	<datestamp>1256807220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; She gets it from her mother.</p><p>I get it from your mother, and so do half the 'hood.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; She gets it from her mother.I get it from your mother , and so do half the 'hood .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; She gets it from her mother.I get it from your mother, and so do half the 'hood.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912745</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29921869</id>
	<title>Re:First... define worse...</title>
	<author>RichiH</author>
	<datestamp>1256901540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Do you realize that traffic rules were designed \_specifically\_ to minimize the impact of drivers' mistakes? And that if your 'best drivers' actually obeyed the laws, they'd have most probably avoided accidents. Even the ones caused by other drivers.</p><p>Do you realize that if you never test the limits, you are less likely to be able to control a situation which approaches your limits?<br>Oh, and in the one accident I was involved in, I was standing and already in reverse to make room for the other car that came from the left? I did not get out of its path in time, but I know two people (including myself) who would be fast enough to react like that. We both speed.<br>Correlation does not imply causation etc, but it definitely does not disprove anything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Do you realize that traffic rules were designed \ _specifically \ _ to minimize the impact of drivers ' mistakes ?
And that if your 'best drivers ' actually obeyed the laws , they 'd have most probably avoided accidents .
Even the ones caused by other drivers.Do you realize that if you never test the limits , you are less likely to be able to control a situation which approaches your limits ? Oh , and in the one accident I was involved in , I was standing and already in reverse to make room for the other car that came from the left ?
I did not get out of its path in time , but I know two people ( including myself ) who would be fast enough to react like that .
We both speed.Correlation does not imply causation etc , but it definitely does not disprove anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Do you realize that traffic rules were designed \_specifically\_ to minimize the impact of drivers' mistakes?
And that if your 'best drivers' actually obeyed the laws, they'd have most probably avoided accidents.
Even the ones caused by other drivers.Do you realize that if you never test the limits, you are less likely to be able to control a situation which approaches your limits?Oh, and in the one accident I was involved in, I was standing and already in reverse to make room for the other car that came from the left?
I did not get out of its path in time, but I know two people (including myself) who would be fast enough to react like that.
We both speed.Correlation does not imply causation etc, but it definitely does not disprove anything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912921</id>
	<title>Re:First... define worse...</title>
	<author>blueg3</author>
	<datestamp>1256840520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, defining the problem! I wonder if the researchers thought of such a novel concept?</p><p>If only there was some sort of written description of the research, longer than a summary, that might shed light on if they independently came to the same conclusion that problem-definition might be worthwhile and, if so, what they defined as "better" and "worse"...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , defining the problem !
I wonder if the researchers thought of such a novel concept ? If only there was some sort of written description of the research , longer than a summary , that might shed light on if they independently came to the same conclusion that problem-definition might be worthwhile and , if so , what they defined as " better " and " worse " .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, defining the problem!
I wonder if the researchers thought of such a novel concept?If only there was some sort of written description of the research, longer than a summary, that might shed light on if they independently came to the same conclusion that problem-definition might be worthwhile and, if so, what they defined as "better" and "worse"...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913751</id>
	<title>Re:No surprise here</title>
	<author>TimedArt</author>
	<datestamp>1256843880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I live in an area with an astonishing number of epically bad drivers.  I figured the epically bad drivers were (unfortunately) surviving long enough to have children, who themselves grew up to be epically bad drivers.  A genetic component to epically bad driving doesn't surprise me in the least.</p></div><p>So what part of Florida do you live in?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in an area with an astonishing number of epically bad drivers .
I figured the epically bad drivers were ( unfortunately ) surviving long enough to have children , who themselves grew up to be epically bad drivers .
A genetic component to epically bad driving does n't surprise me in the least.So what part of Florida do you live in ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in an area with an astonishing number of epically bad drivers.
I figured the epically bad drivers were (unfortunately) surviving long enough to have children, who themselves grew up to be epically bad drivers.
A genetic component to epically bad driving doesn't surprise me in the least.So what part of Florida do you live in?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916163</id>
	<title>Re:First... define worse...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256809920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you cannot maintain your speed at the posted limit, and have no respect for when a U-Turn is allowed or appropriate, than you are not maintaining "superior control" of your vehicle.  You're just trying to justify your asshattery.  (Yes, we all got that you're talking about youself.)</p></div><p>Pardon me for interrupting your self-righteous little rant there, but it is not that simple. There is a difference between mindlessly obeying every little traffic law just because it's the law, and using common sense and good judgment to determine what is appropriate for a given situation. You can't tell me that stopping at a red light at 3 in the morning with no cars as far as the eye can see and going through it makes you a bad driver.</p><p>If everyone in the world always maintained a completely legal speed, then sure, going five or even 10 miles over the speed limit might be dangerous. I hate to break this to you, but basically everyone drives five or ten over. So by your standards 95\% of the people on the road are bad drivers.</p><p>
&nbsp; And if you say that you always go 25 in a 25, then, sir, you are either a liar, or you need to speed the hell up, I have places to go for crying out loud.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you can not maintain your speed at the posted limit , and have no respect for when a U-Turn is allowed or appropriate , than you are not maintaining " superior control " of your vehicle .
You 're just trying to justify your asshattery .
( Yes , we all got that you 're talking about youself .
) Pardon me for interrupting your self-righteous little rant there , but it is not that simple .
There is a difference between mindlessly obeying every little traffic law just because it 's the law , and using common sense and good judgment to determine what is appropriate for a given situation .
You ca n't tell me that stopping at a red light at 3 in the morning with no cars as far as the eye can see and going through it makes you a bad driver.If everyone in the world always maintained a completely legal speed , then sure , going five or even 10 miles over the speed limit might be dangerous .
I hate to break this to you , but basically everyone drives five or ten over .
So by your standards 95 \ % of the people on the road are bad drivers .
  And if you say that you always go 25 in a 25 , then , sir , you are either a liar , or you need to speed the hell up , I have places to go for crying out loud .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you cannot maintain your speed at the posted limit, and have no respect for when a U-Turn is allowed or appropriate, than you are not maintaining "superior control" of your vehicle.
You're just trying to justify your asshattery.
(Yes, we all got that you're talking about youself.
)Pardon me for interrupting your self-righteous little rant there, but it is not that simple.
There is a difference between mindlessly obeying every little traffic law just because it's the law, and using common sense and good judgment to determine what is appropriate for a given situation.
You can't tell me that stopping at a red light at 3 in the morning with no cars as far as the eye can see and going through it makes you a bad driver.If everyone in the world always maintained a completely legal speed, then sure, going five or even 10 miles over the speed limit might be dangerous.
I hate to break this to you, but basically everyone drives five or ten over.
So by your standards 95\% of the people on the road are bad drivers.
  And if you say that you always go 25 in a 25, then, sir, you are either a liar, or you need to speed the hell up, I have places to go for crying out loud.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915385</id>
	<title>Re:No surprise here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256807100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're from Florida?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're from Florida ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're from Florida?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913607</id>
	<title>Re:First... define worse...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256843340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, his post was kind of asshatty.  But here's another way to think about it.  There are two modes of driving.  In one mode, you are alert, aware of your surroundings, you know what lane changes and turns you can make without causing an accident.  In the other mode, your brain is on autopilot and you should follow the rules to a T.  People who haven't had enough experience driving don't really fit into these categories yet.</p><p>The laws are there to stop people from driving recklessly on autopilot, and indeed, that is when most accidents and tickets of experienced drivers happen.  People who are distracted with daydreaming, eating, talking on the phone, passengers, etc should be in mode 2 and following the rules.</p><p>If you're in mode 1 and following all of the traffic laws, then you're probably bored out of your head.  That's just how humans work.  As long as driving is *the activity*, people are going to get bored, impatient, and ultimately break laws to make things quicker and more interesting.  As long as the driver is being responsible, then it's generally okay, and I can prove that by the fact there aren't more accidents and traffic cops.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , his post was kind of asshatty .
But here 's another way to think about it .
There are two modes of driving .
In one mode , you are alert , aware of your surroundings , you know what lane changes and turns you can make without causing an accident .
In the other mode , your brain is on autopilot and you should follow the rules to a T. People who have n't had enough experience driving do n't really fit into these categories yet.The laws are there to stop people from driving recklessly on autopilot , and indeed , that is when most accidents and tickets of experienced drivers happen .
People who are distracted with daydreaming , eating , talking on the phone , passengers , etc should be in mode 2 and following the rules.If you 're in mode 1 and following all of the traffic laws , then you 're probably bored out of your head .
That 's just how humans work .
As long as driving is * the activity * , people are going to get bored , impatient , and ultimately break laws to make things quicker and more interesting .
As long as the driver is being responsible , then it 's generally okay , and I can prove that by the fact there are n't more accidents and traffic cops .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, his post was kind of asshatty.
But here's another way to think about it.
There are two modes of driving.
In one mode, you are alert, aware of your surroundings, you know what lane changes and turns you can make without causing an accident.
In the other mode, your brain is on autopilot and you should follow the rules to a T.  People who haven't had enough experience driving don't really fit into these categories yet.The laws are there to stop people from driving recklessly on autopilot, and indeed, that is when most accidents and tickets of experienced drivers happen.
People who are distracted with daydreaming, eating, talking on the phone, passengers, etc should be in mode 2 and following the rules.If you're in mode 1 and following all of the traffic laws, then you're probably bored out of your head.
That's just how humans work.
As long as driving is *the activity*, people are going to get bored, impatient, and ultimately break laws to make things quicker and more interesting.
As long as the driver is being responsible, then it's generally okay, and I can prove that by the fact there aren't more accidents and traffic cops.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915677</id>
	<title>midewest</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256808120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That would explain midwest drivers, get out of the fast lane, slowass!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That would explain midwest drivers , get out of the fast lane , slowass !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would explain midwest drivers, get out of the fast lane, slowass!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29922363</id>
	<title>Re:Chromosomes?</title>
	<author>Idaho</author>
	<datestamp>1256908740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Remember that story about sexism in the F/OSS world a few weeks back? [slashdot.org] Remember how many people denied that such a thing could exist? Here's your proof.</p></div></blockquote><p>1) Slashdot != the FOSS community<br>2) Is it still sexism if it's true? I recently read a report (in the Netherlands) based on compiled statistics from insurance companies: male drivers who own a car (and hence, have to have obligatory insurance against personal liability for accidents involving that car) are involved in accidents on average once per 17 years, whereas for female drivers the average is 14 years.</p><p>If anyone would know it's the insurance companies, I'm sure.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember that story about sexism in the F/OSS world a few weeks back ?
[ slashdot.org ] Remember how many people denied that such a thing could exist ?
Here 's your proof.1 ) Slashdot ! = the FOSS community2 ) Is it still sexism if it 's true ?
I recently read a report ( in the Netherlands ) based on compiled statistics from insurance companies : male drivers who own a car ( and hence , have to have obligatory insurance against personal liability for accidents involving that car ) are involved in accidents on average once per 17 years , whereas for female drivers the average is 14 years.If anyone would know it 's the insurance companies , I 'm sure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember that story about sexism in the F/OSS world a few weeks back?
[slashdot.org] Remember how many people denied that such a thing could exist?
Here's your proof.1) Slashdot != the FOSS community2) Is it still sexism if it's true?
I recently read a report (in the Netherlands) based on compiled statistics from insurance companies: male drivers who own a car (and hence, have to have obligatory insurance against personal liability for accidents involving that car) are involved in accidents on average once per 17 years, whereas for female drivers the average is 14 years.If anyone would know it's the insurance companies, I'm sure.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916389</id>
	<title>Asians</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256810640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd love to see some research into why asians insist on reversing into every park (not just parellel ones), and why even with all that practice are they unable to do it without making 100 failed attempts first</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd love to see some research into why asians insist on reversing into every park ( not just parellel ones ) , and why even with all that practice are they unable to do it without making 100 failed attempts first</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd love to see some research into why asians insist on reversing into every park (not just parellel ones), and why even with all that practice are they unable to do it without making 100 failed attempts first</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913659</id>
	<title>Re:First... define worse...</title>
	<author>Scrameustache</author>
	<datestamp>1256843520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you cannot maintain your speed at the posted limit [...] you are not maintaining "superior control" of your vehicle.  You're just trying to justify your asshattery.  (Yes, we all got that you're talking about youself.)</p></div><p>The posted limit is just a money-making threshold, it has nothing to do with control of the vehicle.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you can not maintain your speed at the posted limit [ ... ] you are not maintaining " superior control " of your vehicle .
You 're just trying to justify your asshattery .
( Yes , we all got that you 're talking about youself .
) The posted limit is just a money-making threshold , it has nothing to do with control of the vehicle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you cannot maintain your speed at the posted limit [...] you are not maintaining "superior control" of your vehicle.
You're just trying to justify your asshattery.
(Yes, we all got that you're talking about youself.
)The posted limit is just a money-making threshold, it has nothing to do with control of the vehicle.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915069</id>
	<title>Re:New Jersey Drivers</title>
	<author>slimjim8094</author>
	<datestamp>1256849160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I grew up and live in NJ, albeit a really nice part. The only general complaint I have about NJ drivers is that they consider the turn signal a sign of weakness - as a rule, if it goes on at all it's in the middle of a turn. I'm an excellent driver (I drive a 7-ton ambulance safely with no trouble), and I can count on one hand the times where I <i>haven't</i> signaled, in the two years I've been driving.</p><p>In any case, there are bad drivers anywhere. There's a lot of people in NJ; you'll tend to see more of them per mile...</p><p>What's with all the NJ hate? Parts of it are grimy and will get you shot (Irvington) but that's true anywhere... Maybe it's the governance? We haven't had a non-corrupt governor in like 10 years... yet things work out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I grew up and live in NJ , albeit a really nice part .
The only general complaint I have about NJ drivers is that they consider the turn signal a sign of weakness - as a rule , if it goes on at all it 's in the middle of a turn .
I 'm an excellent driver ( I drive a 7-ton ambulance safely with no trouble ) , and I can count on one hand the times where I have n't signaled , in the two years I 've been driving.In any case , there are bad drivers anywhere .
There 's a lot of people in NJ ; you 'll tend to see more of them per mile...What 's with all the NJ hate ?
Parts of it are grimy and will get you shot ( Irvington ) but that 's true anywhere... Maybe it 's the governance ?
We have n't had a non-corrupt governor in like 10 years... yet things work out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I grew up and live in NJ, albeit a really nice part.
The only general complaint I have about NJ drivers is that they consider the turn signal a sign of weakness - as a rule, if it goes on at all it's in the middle of a turn.
I'm an excellent driver (I drive a 7-ton ambulance safely with no trouble), and I can count on one hand the times where I haven't signaled, in the two years I've been driving.In any case, there are bad drivers anywhere.
There's a lot of people in NJ; you'll tend to see more of them per mile...What's with all the NJ hate?
Parts of it are grimy and will get you shot (Irvington) but that's true anywhere... Maybe it's the governance?
We haven't had a non-corrupt governor in like 10 years... yet things work out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914829</id>
	<title>East Asian here.</title>
	<author>HungWeiLo</author>
	<datestamp>1256848260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and my friends, family, and I all agree that Asians (East Asians, SE Asians, S Asians) are all collectively pretty terrible. I've heard Middle Eastern guys are not too much better either.</p><p>Whether this is genetic is debatable, however. Many immigrants and their first/second-generation kids typically come from highly urban areas with very cheap and convenient mass transit, which decreases the number of car drivers (and hence, driving experience) in this demographic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and my friends , family , and I all agree that Asians ( East Asians , SE Asians , S Asians ) are all collectively pretty terrible .
I 've heard Middle Eastern guys are not too much better either.Whether this is genetic is debatable , however .
Many immigrants and their first/second-generation kids typically come from highly urban areas with very cheap and convenient mass transit , which decreases the number of car drivers ( and hence , driving experience ) in this demographic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and my friends, family, and I all agree that Asians (East Asians, SE Asians, S Asians) are all collectively pretty terrible.
I've heard Middle Eastern guys are not too much better either.Whether this is genetic is debatable, however.
Many immigrants and their first/second-generation kids typically come from highly urban areas with very cheap and convenient mass transit, which decreases the number of car drivers (and hence, driving experience) in this demographic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29918231</id>
	<title>Darwin</title>
	<author>ascari</author>
	<datestamp>1256818980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is almost like a test case for Darwinian evolution: We have a gene that has a bad effect on it's carriers, and a mechanism ("horrid accident") that potentially removes that gene from the gene pool. So the over time the gene should disappear and everybody will be better drivers. The old joke about every American being an above-average driver will actually be reality.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is almost like a test case for Darwinian evolution : We have a gene that has a bad effect on it 's carriers , and a mechanism ( " horrid accident " ) that potentially removes that gene from the gene pool .
So the over time the gene should disappear and everybody will be better drivers .
The old joke about every American being an above-average driver will actually be reality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is almost like a test case for Darwinian evolution: We have a gene that has a bad effect on it's carriers, and a mechanism ("horrid accident") that potentially removes that gene from the gene pool.
So the over time the gene should disappear and everybody will be better drivers.
The old joke about every American being an above-average driver will actually be reality.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915545</id>
	<title>Re:New Jersey Drivers</title>
	<author>Schadrach</author>
	<datestamp>1256807700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For WV's sake, I can probably guess it's due to having a different mark of what a bad driver is.  You learn very quickly how fast you can round a sharp turn on an untreated ice covered road with a cliff on one side and mountainside on the other, or else you don't drive very long.  =)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For WV 's sake , I can probably guess it 's due to having a different mark of what a bad driver is .
You learn very quickly how fast you can round a sharp turn on an untreated ice covered road with a cliff on one side and mountainside on the other , or else you do n't drive very long .
= )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For WV's sake, I can probably guess it's due to having a different mark of what a bad driver is.
You learn very quickly how fast you can round a sharp turn on an untreated ice covered road with a cliff on one side and mountainside on the other, or else you don't drive very long.
=)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913197</id>
	<title>Insurance companies must be salivating</title>
	<author>Jordan ez</author>
	<datestamp>1256841600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Man, and I thought the main cause for concern with the upcoming revolution in genetic testing was losing my <i>health</i> insurance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , and I thought the main cause for concern with the upcoming revolution in genetic testing was losing my health insurance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, and I thought the main cause for concern with the upcoming revolution in genetic testing was losing my health insurance.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914799</id>
	<title>Re:Chromosomes?</title>
	<author>Daniel Dvorkin</author>
	<datestamp>1256848020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently there's also a gene carried on the Y chromosome of which one common variant makes its carriers unable to notice bad driving in 50\% of the population.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently there 's also a gene carried on the Y chromosome of which one common variant makes its carriers unable to notice bad driving in 50 \ % of the population .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently there's also a gene carried on the Y chromosome of which one common variant makes its carriers unable to notice bad driving in 50\% of the population.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914073</id>
	<title>Bonferroni Correction</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256845080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The chances of this being anything more than a simple correlation are extremely unlikely, unless this gene has a role in vision or concentration that affects many other things, like ability to read, etc.  In this case the gene responsible is supposedly BDNF, which has a role in memory.

There are approximately 30,000 known coding genes in the human genome.  If you keep running comparisons on a bunch of them, then you're going to find a correlation eventually.  This is why you're supposed to do a "Bonferroni correction".  For example, if they checked out 500 genes looking for a correlation with driving ability, then the P-value they're supposed to accept as "significant" should be 0.05/500 = 0.0001 (although there are other ways of doing the correction as well). The article doesn't say how many genes they actually tested or if they altered their level of significance accordingly.

Bottom line - the genome is a big place, and you may well find the correlation you're looking for if you just keep testing enough genes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The chances of this being anything more than a simple correlation are extremely unlikely , unless this gene has a role in vision or concentration that affects many other things , like ability to read , etc .
In this case the gene responsible is supposedly BDNF , which has a role in memory .
There are approximately 30,000 known coding genes in the human genome .
If you keep running comparisons on a bunch of them , then you 're going to find a correlation eventually .
This is why you 're supposed to do a " Bonferroni correction " .
For example , if they checked out 500 genes looking for a correlation with driving ability , then the P-value they 're supposed to accept as " significant " should be 0.05/500 = 0.0001 ( although there are other ways of doing the correction as well ) .
The article does n't say how many genes they actually tested or if they altered their level of significance accordingly .
Bottom line - the genome is a big place , and you may well find the correlation you 're looking for if you just keep testing enough genes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The chances of this being anything more than a simple correlation are extremely unlikely, unless this gene has a role in vision or concentration that affects many other things, like ability to read, etc.
In this case the gene responsible is supposedly BDNF, which has a role in memory.
There are approximately 30,000 known coding genes in the human genome.
If you keep running comparisons on a bunch of them, then you're going to find a correlation eventually.
This is why you're supposed to do a "Bonferroni correction".
For example, if they checked out 500 genes looking for a correlation with driving ability, then the P-value they're supposed to accept as "significant" should be 0.05/500 = 0.0001 (although there are other ways of doing the correction as well).
The article doesn't say how many genes they actually tested or if they altered their level of significance accordingly.
Bottom line - the genome is a big place, and you may well find the correlation you're looking for if you just keep testing enough genes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913927</id>
	<title>Re: Bad Driving</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256844540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I kid, I kid!</p></div><p>Who are you hiding from? It's not like any women are going to be reading your post.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I kid , I kid ! Who are you hiding from ?
It 's not like any women are going to be reading your post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I kid, I kid!Who are you hiding from?
It's not like any women are going to be reading your post.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912773</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914775</id>
	<title>Re:First... define worse...</title>
	<author>amplt1337</author>
	<datestamp>1256847960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to mention that these "best drivers" may well be <i>causing</i> accidents by breaking the rules, encouraging unpredictability and spreading the results of their mistakes to others?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention that these " best drivers " may well be causing accidents by breaking the rules , encouraging unpredictability and spreading the results of their mistakes to others ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention that these "best drivers" may well be causing accidents by breaking the rules, encouraging unpredictability and spreading the results of their mistakes to others?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915193</id>
	<title>My father always said...</title>
	<author>hallux.sinister</author>
	<datestamp>1256849640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My father always said, (and long before this study too,) that it is either an absence of y-chromosomes, or an overabundance of x-chromosomes, or possibly a combination of the two.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My father always said , ( and long before this study too , ) that it is either an absence of y-chromosomes , or an overabundance of x-chromosomes , or possibly a combination of the two .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My father always said, (and long before this study too,) that it is either an absence of y-chromosomes, or an overabundance of x-chromosomes, or possibly a combination of the two.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29917421</id>
	<title>Re:East Asian here.</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1256814540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you got the balls to start a new life in another country, then you probably have a high testosterone level which  can be a key ingredient is driving douche baggery.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you got the balls to start a new life in another country , then you probably have a high testosterone level which can be a key ingredient is driving douche baggery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you got the balls to start a new life in another country, then you probably have a high testosterone level which  can be a key ingredient is driving douche baggery.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914829</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913245</id>
	<title>A women?</title>
	<author>ghislain\_leblanc</author>
	<datestamp>1256841900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are they saying that being a woman is genetic?

I am truly chocked, choked I tell you!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are they saying that being a woman is genetic ?
I am truly chocked , choked I tell you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are they saying that being a woman is genetic?
I am truly chocked, choked I tell you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912745</id>
	<title>My daughter is a lousy driver</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256839920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>She gets it from her mother.</htmltext>
<tokenext>She gets it from her mother .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She gets it from her mother.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29919377</id>
	<title>Re: Bad Driving</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256825880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only men with beards; high voices and throwing stones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only men with beards ; high voices and throwing stones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only men with beards; high voices and throwing stones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913927</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29917323</id>
	<title>Re:East Asian here.</title>
	<author>drkoemans</author>
	<datestamp>1256814180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yea, not sure about that. These guys seem to drive pretty well.
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUqeoXAgRBk&amp;feature=related" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUqeoXAgRBk&amp;feature=related</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea , not sure about that .
These guys seem to drive pretty well .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = sUqeoXAgRBk&amp;feature = related [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea, not sure about that.
These guys seem to drive pretty well.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUqeoXAgRBk&amp;feature=related [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914829</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29922015</id>
	<title>Re:Chromosomes?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256903640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Erm, no. The argument was that F/OSS is about "show me the code", and the gender of the person is irrelevant.</p><p>This, however, is a slashdot discussion. It's not about "show me the code" - generally it's not even about code at all. It's a completely different thing.</p><p>You might as well has used China as a proof of human rights violations in Canada.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Erm , no .
The argument was that F/OSS is about " show me the code " , and the gender of the person is irrelevant.This , however , is a slashdot discussion .
It 's not about " show me the code " - generally it 's not even about code at all .
It 's a completely different thing.You might as well has used China as a proof of human rights violations in Canada .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Erm, no.
The argument was that F/OSS is about "show me the code", and the gender of the person is irrelevant.This, however, is a slashdot discussion.
It's not about "show me the code" - generally it's not even about code at all.
It's a completely different thing.You might as well has used China as a proof of human rights violations in Canada.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913057</id>
	<title>Re:First... define worse...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256840940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In the eyes of the law, and some others - getting a speeding ticket = being a bad driver.  Though I challenge that since Nascar drivers are some of the best in the world - and drive the fastest too.  Making a u-turn does not make you a bad driver.  Making a u-turn into oncoming traffic and getting into a wreck makes you a bad driver.  Insurance companies jsut want extra money.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the eyes of the law , and some others - getting a speeding ticket = being a bad driver .
Though I challenge that since Nascar drivers are some of the best in the world - and drive the fastest too .
Making a u-turn does not make you a bad driver .
Making a u-turn into oncoming traffic and getting into a wreck makes you a bad driver .
Insurance companies jsut want extra money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the eyes of the law, and some others - getting a speeding ticket = being a bad driver.
Though I challenge that since Nascar drivers are some of the best in the world - and drive the fastest too.
Making a u-turn does not make you a bad driver.
Making a u-turn into oncoming traffic and getting into a wreck makes you a bad driver.
Insurance companies jsut want extra money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29921779</id>
	<title>Another Study</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256900340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These results demand another study! The question to be answered is this: Why is there such an overabundance of these genetically-hampered drivers in the Washington, DC area?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These results demand another study !
The question to be answered is this : Why is there such an overabundance of these genetically-hampered drivers in the Washington , DC area ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These results demand another study!
The question to be answered is this: Why is there such an overabundance of these genetically-hampered drivers in the Washington, DC area?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916269</id>
	<title>It's possible they drive poorly because</title>
	<author>Maxo-Texas</author>
	<datestamp>1256810220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the people setting the rules think from the point of view of someone with the other gene setting.</p><p>I.e. if the 20\% set the rules, then would the 80\% be able to comply or would most of them make errors?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the people setting the rules think from the point of view of someone with the other gene setting.I.e .
if the 20 \ % set the rules , then would the 80 \ % be able to comply or would most of them make errors ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the people setting the rules think from the point of view of someone with the other gene setting.I.e.
if the 20\% set the rules, then would the 80\% be able to comply or would most of them make errors?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914223</id>
	<title>Re:New Jersey Drivers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256845680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After I read your list of safe states I thought there might be a correlation between snowfall and driving safety- I didn't see MN, WI, ND, SD, MT, AK, or CO (heavy snowfall/ice states) in your list. So I looked around and found this:</p><p><a href="http://maps.howstuffworks.com/united-states-annual-snowfall-map.htm" title="howstuffworks.com">http://maps.howstuffworks.com/united-states-annual-snowfall-map.htm</a> [howstuffworks.com]</p><p>It looks like there is more to this than just snow, since several of the safest states have pretty decent snowfall. I did notice a stricking lack of 'warm' states on the safe list; with the exception of GA, none of the states that are mostly or wholly in the tan "less than 8 inches" band across the southern US made it onto the list.</p><p>This map of population density:<br><a href="http://www.census.gov/popest/gallery/maps/popdens-2008.html" title="census.gov">http://www.census.gov/popest/gallery/maps/popdens-2008.html</a> [census.gov]</p><p>shows that most of the safer states have fairly low population densities (NJ being the exception). More specific maps showing population centers would be helpful. However, many of the 'less safe' states also have very low population densities as well.</p><p>Perhaps there's an actuary here on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. who could tie all this together?</p><p>-b</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After I read your list of safe states I thought there might be a correlation between snowfall and driving safety- I did n't see MN , WI , ND , SD , MT , AK , or CO ( heavy snowfall/ice states ) in your list .
So I looked around and found this : http : //maps.howstuffworks.com/united-states-annual-snowfall-map.htm [ howstuffworks.com ] It looks like there is more to this than just snow , since several of the safest states have pretty decent snowfall .
I did notice a stricking lack of 'warm ' states on the safe list ; with the exception of GA , none of the states that are mostly or wholly in the tan " less than 8 inches " band across the southern US made it onto the list.This map of population density : http : //www.census.gov/popest/gallery/maps/popdens-2008.html [ census.gov ] shows that most of the safer states have fairly low population densities ( NJ being the exception ) .
More specific maps showing population centers would be helpful .
However , many of the 'less safe ' states also have very low population densities as well.Perhaps there 's an actuary here on / .
who could tie all this together ? -b</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After I read your list of safe states I thought there might be a correlation between snowfall and driving safety- I didn't see MN, WI, ND, SD, MT, AK, or CO (heavy snowfall/ice states) in your list.
So I looked around and found this:http://maps.howstuffworks.com/united-states-annual-snowfall-map.htm [howstuffworks.com]It looks like there is more to this than just snow, since several of the safest states have pretty decent snowfall.
I did notice a stricking lack of 'warm' states on the safe list; with the exception of GA, none of the states that are mostly or wholly in the tan "less than 8 inches" band across the southern US made it onto the list.This map of population density:http://www.census.gov/popest/gallery/maps/popdens-2008.html [census.gov]shows that most of the safer states have fairly low population densities (NJ being the exception).
More specific maps showing population centers would be helpful.
However, many of the 'less safe' states also have very low population densities as well.Perhaps there's an actuary here on /.
who could tie all this together?-b</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29922073</id>
	<title>This is nonsense.</title>
	<author>Hacker\_PingWu</author>
	<datestamp>1256904660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>A relation does not a correlation make. And less so does a correlation make a causation. They are drawing the conclusion that the gene is associated with bad driving for... I don't know why, or what logic. Probably little to none. I couldn't tell without looking at the study, but their sample size probably is too small to even be statistically significant. And even if it was, they can't provide an explanation as to *why* this gene could have the effect of making you a bad driver, and *what causes it*. And there are *so* many factors that can affect the test scores than just the gene. The researchers cannot possibly have justification for drawing a causal relationship between said gene and bad driving. This isn't any more scientific than eugenics.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A relation does not a correlation make .
And less so does a correlation make a causation .
They are drawing the conclusion that the gene is associated with bad driving for... I do n't know why , or what logic .
Probably little to none .
I could n't tell without looking at the study , but their sample size probably is too small to even be statistically significant .
And even if it was , they ca n't provide an explanation as to * why * this gene could have the effect of making you a bad driver , and * what causes it * .
And there are * so * many factors that can affect the test scores than just the gene .
The researchers can not possibly have justification for drawing a causal relationship between said gene and bad driving .
This is n't any more scientific than eugenics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A relation does not a correlation make.
And less so does a correlation make a causation.
They are drawing the conclusion that the gene is associated with bad driving for... I don't know why, or what logic.
Probably little to none.
I couldn't tell without looking at the study, but their sample size probably is too small to even be statistically significant.
And even if it was, they can't provide an explanation as to *why* this gene could have the effect of making you a bad driver, and *what causes it*.
And there are *so* many factors that can affect the test scores than just the gene.
The researchers cannot possibly have justification for drawing a causal relationship between said gene and bad driving.
This isn't any more scientific than eugenics.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916855</id>
	<title>Is this the "quick learning" gene?</title>
	<author>Firedog</author>
	<datestamp>1256812380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if people without this genetic variant are quicker learners in general. Or if the quick learning is limited to spatial and motor skills.

I'd like to see them study other activities, like playing video games of other types, learning some non-physical skill, rock climbing, playing basketball, riding a bike, etc. It would be interesting to see where correlations pop up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if people without this genetic variant are quicker learners in general .
Or if the quick learning is limited to spatial and motor skills .
I 'd like to see them study other activities , like playing video games of other types , learning some non-physical skill , rock climbing , playing basketball , riding a bike , etc .
It would be interesting to see where correlations pop up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if people without this genetic variant are quicker learners in general.
Or if the quick learning is limited to spatial and motor skills.
I'd like to see them study other activities, like playing video games of other types, learning some non-physical skill, rock climbing, playing basketball, riding a bike, etc.
It would be interesting to see where correlations pop up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915189</id>
	<title>Re:New Jersey Drivers</title>
	<author>IorDMUX</author>
	<datestamp>1256849580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Correction, New Jersey is one of the 10 safest states to drive in <i>when only alcohol-related crashes are considered</i>.  It may be a wonderful safe place to drive otherwise, or it may not, but the study doesn't look at that.<br> <br>From the linked article: <p><div class="quote"><p>The Coalition to End Needless Death on Our Roadways (END), a physician-led safety advocacy group, looks specifically at those fatal car crashes in which alcohol was involved. On Nov. 30, it put out its annual study on the states where alcohol most frequently played a part in fatal auto accidents. [...] Here's a look at the 10 safest states in reference to alcohol-related car crashes</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Correction , New Jersey is one of the 10 safest states to drive in when only alcohol-related crashes are considered .
It may be a wonderful safe place to drive otherwise , or it may not , but the study does n't look at that .
From the linked article : The Coalition to End Needless Death on Our Roadways ( END ) , a physician-led safety advocacy group , looks specifically at those fatal car crashes in which alcohol was involved .
On Nov. 30 , it put out its annual study on the states where alcohol most frequently played a part in fatal auto accidents .
[ ... ] Here 's a look at the 10 safest states in reference to alcohol-related car crashes</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correction, New Jersey is one of the 10 safest states to drive in when only alcohol-related crashes are considered.
It may be a wonderful safe place to drive otherwise, or it may not, but the study doesn't look at that.
From the linked article: The Coalition to End Needless Death on Our Roadways (END), a physician-led safety advocacy group, looks specifically at those fatal car crashes in which alcohol was involved.
On Nov. 30, it put out its annual study on the states where alcohol most frequently played a part in fatal auto accidents.
[...] Here's a look at the 10 safest states in reference to alcohol-related car crashes
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912773</id>
	<title>Re: Bad Driving</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256840040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is the "particular gene" a second X chromosome?<br> <br>

I kid, I kid!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is the " particular gene " a second X chromosome ?
I kid , I kid !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is the "particular gene" a second X chromosome?
I kid, I kid!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914467</id>
	<title>Re:First... define worse...</title>
	<author>stephanruby</author>
	<datestamp>1256846640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Do you realize that traffic rules were designed \_specifically\_ to minimize the impact of drivers' mistakes?</p></div><p>Not that I disagree with the fact that the parent poster might be deluding himself, I really don't know if he's a good driver or not, but...</p><p> <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/2185762/German-town-bans-road-signs-to-cut-accidents.html" title="telegraph.co.uk">German town bans road signs to cut accidents</a> [telegraph.co.uk] </p><p>This is not to say that the German town is a perfect counter-example to what you're saying, it's not, for instance even if they took out all the signs and many of the rules -- they still kept a town-wide speed-limit of 30 mph. But perhaps something can be learned from this experiment, and perhaps we should try to run such experiments ourselves in the US, first in smaller towns just like they did, and then in slightly larger and larger towns to see if the concept still works.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you realize that traffic rules were designed \ _specifically \ _ to minimize the impact of drivers ' mistakes ? Not that I disagree with the fact that the parent poster might be deluding himself , I really do n't know if he 's a good driver or not , but... German town bans road signs to cut accidents [ telegraph.co.uk ] This is not to say that the German town is a perfect counter-example to what you 're saying , it 's not , for instance even if they took out all the signs and many of the rules -- they still kept a town-wide speed-limit of 30 mph .
But perhaps something can be learned from this experiment , and perhaps we should try to run such experiments ourselves in the US , first in smaller towns just like they did , and then in slightly larger and larger towns to see if the concept still works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you realize that traffic rules were designed \_specifically\_ to minimize the impact of drivers' mistakes?Not that I disagree with the fact that the parent poster might be deluding himself, I really don't know if he's a good driver or not, but... German town bans road signs to cut accidents [telegraph.co.uk] This is not to say that the German town is a perfect counter-example to what you're saying, it's not, for instance even if they took out all the signs and many of the rules -- they still kept a town-wide speed-limit of 30 mph.
But perhaps something can be learned from this experiment, and perhaps we should try to run such experiments ourselves in the US, first in smaller towns just like they did, and then in slightly larger and larger towns to see if the concept still works.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916259</id>
	<title>Re:First... define worse...</title>
	<author>stewbacca</author>
	<datestamp>1256810220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most traffic rules are designed to generate revenue. Most speed limits in the US are artificially low on purpose. I've lived in Germany, England and America and the German and English roads, albeit smaller, windier and having more elevation, usually have higher speed limits than US roads. Why do the US roads have an arbitrary speed limit of 35, when the same road in Germany would be 100km/h or 50mph in England? Better yet, why is the US obsessed with speed limits, when Germany and England tend to enforce/emphasize them only when there is a real danger?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most traffic rules are designed to generate revenue .
Most speed limits in the US are artificially low on purpose .
I 've lived in Germany , England and America and the German and English roads , albeit smaller , windier and having more elevation , usually have higher speed limits than US roads .
Why do the US roads have an arbitrary speed limit of 35 , when the same road in Germany would be 100km/h or 50mph in England ?
Better yet , why is the US obsessed with speed limits , when Germany and England tend to enforce/emphasize them only when there is a real danger ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most traffic rules are designed to generate revenue.
Most speed limits in the US are artificially low on purpose.
I've lived in Germany, England and America and the German and English roads, albeit smaller, windier and having more elevation, usually have higher speed limits than US roads.
Why do the US roads have an arbitrary speed limit of 35, when the same road in Germany would be 100km/h or 50mph in England?
Better yet, why is the US obsessed with speed limits, when Germany and England tend to enforce/emphasize them only when there is a real danger?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914443</id>
	<title>Re:First... define worse...</title>
	<author>Alpha830RulZ</author>
	<datestamp>1256846580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>  Insurance companies jsut want extra money.</p></div><p>While that is quite likely the case, the insurance companies put a lot of effort and expense into the risk models, and it's unlikely that those models are far wrong.  People with lots of tickets are statistically more likely to get into accidents.  If they weren't, some insurance company would figure it out, and price their insurance lower to get more money, because, as you note, they want more money.</p><p>The same logic holds for under 25 males, people with bad credit, etc. These are used to price your insurance, BECAUSE THEY WORK from a statistical standpoint.  Insurance is all about stats.   The logic also likely holds for some sets of ethnic/demographic groups, but there are a lot of legal restrictions on what you can use in the models.  Hence, zip code gets used, which is a pretty good proxy for ethnicity and economic status.</p><p>As a side note on that last point, I worked for a few years developing collections recovery models.  We did some work with census data and zip codes.  We found that zip code captured most of the predictive signal that was available from ethnicity and economic status, of which there is plenty.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Insurance companies jsut want extra money.While that is quite likely the case , the insurance companies put a lot of effort and expense into the risk models , and it 's unlikely that those models are far wrong .
People with lots of tickets are statistically more likely to get into accidents .
If they were n't , some insurance company would figure it out , and price their insurance lower to get more money , because , as you note , they want more money.The same logic holds for under 25 males , people with bad credit , etc .
These are used to price your insurance , BECAUSE THEY WORK from a statistical standpoint .
Insurance is all about stats .
The logic also likely holds for some sets of ethnic/demographic groups , but there are a lot of legal restrictions on what you can use in the models .
Hence , zip code gets used , which is a pretty good proxy for ethnicity and economic status.As a side note on that last point , I worked for a few years developing collections recovery models .
We did some work with census data and zip codes .
We found that zip code captured most of the predictive signal that was available from ethnicity and economic status , of which there is plenty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  Insurance companies jsut want extra money.While that is quite likely the case, the insurance companies put a lot of effort and expense into the risk models, and it's unlikely that those models are far wrong.
People with lots of tickets are statistically more likely to get into accidents.
If they weren't, some insurance company would figure it out, and price their insurance lower to get more money, because, as you note, they want more money.The same logic holds for under 25 males, people with bad credit, etc.
These are used to price your insurance, BECAUSE THEY WORK from a statistical standpoint.
Insurance is all about stats.
The logic also likely holds for some sets of ethnic/demographic groups, but there are a lot of legal restrictions on what you can use in the models.
Hence, zip code gets used, which is a pretty good proxy for ethnicity and economic status.As a side note on that last point, I worked for a few years developing collections recovery models.
We did some work with census data and zip codes.
We found that zip code captured most of the predictive signal that was available from ethnicity and economic status, of which there is plenty.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913057</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29918879</id>
	<title>Re:Chromosomes?</title>
	<author>electrons\_are\_brave</author>
	<datestamp>1256822640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>OK, so I need to remind everyone that males have more accidents than females? Greater injury rates? More traffic violation fines? Higher drink driving rates? (Even after controlling for greater time on the roads).<p>

No, I probably don't because the fact that men are (on average) worse drivers than females on pretty much every measure is well known. Judging by the sexism of a lot of these posts (above and below), this really pisses some people off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , so I need to remind everyone that males have more accidents than females ?
Greater injury rates ?
More traffic violation fines ?
Higher drink driving rates ?
( Even after controlling for greater time on the roads ) .
No , I probably do n't because the fact that men are ( on average ) worse drivers than females on pretty much every measure is well known .
Judging by the sexism of a lot of these posts ( above and below ) , this really pisses some people off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, so I need to remind everyone that males have more accidents than females?
Greater injury rates?
More traffic violation fines?
Higher drink driving rates?
(Even after controlling for greater time on the roads).
No, I probably don't because the fact that men are (on average) worse drivers than females on pretty much every measure is well known.
Judging by the sexism of a lot of these posts (above and below), this really pisses some people off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915023</id>
	<title>Re: Bad Driving</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1256848980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was in the car once with my girlfriend (driving) and we got stuck behind a slow driver, swerving all over the place.  In our frustration we engaged in some stereotyping.  "Probably old" I said.  "And asian, she replied".  When we were finally able to get around this person, I look over.  "Sure enough, an old asian lady."  My GF says "Yep, that's two strikes against her"  At which point I say "No, that's three."</p><p>I was glad she was driving and had only one hand to hit me with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was in the car once with my girlfriend ( driving ) and we got stuck behind a slow driver , swerving all over the place .
In our frustration we engaged in some stereotyping .
" Probably old " I said .
" And asian , she replied " .
When we were finally able to get around this person , I look over .
" Sure enough , an old asian lady .
" My GF says " Yep , that 's two strikes against her " At which point I say " No , that 's three .
" I was glad she was driving and had only one hand to hit me with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was in the car once with my girlfriend (driving) and we got stuck behind a slow driver, swerving all over the place.
In our frustration we engaged in some stereotyping.
"Probably old" I said.
"And asian, she replied".
When we were finally able to get around this person, I look over.
"Sure enough, an old asian lady.
"  My GF says "Yep, that's two strikes against her"  At which point I say "No, that's three.
"I was glad she was driving and had only one hand to hit me with.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912773</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913033</id>
	<title>Re:New Jersey Drivers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256840940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm? According to 2005 data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), New Jersey is actually <a href="http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/11/1130\_safest\_states/index\_01.htm" title="businessweek.com">one of the safest states to drive in</a> [businessweek.com]. New Jersey is number 10 on this list, behind Utah, Iowa, Georgia, Kentucky,Idaho, Nebraska,West Virginia, Indiana, and Maine.</p><p>Also interesting, but not directly related to New Jersey drivers, is an <a href="http://www.allstatenewsroom.com/releases/4529-fifth-annual-allstate-america" title="allstatenewsroom.com">Allstate study</a> [allstatenewsroom.com] of driver safety by city.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm ?
According to 2005 data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ) , New Jersey is actually one of the safest states to drive in [ businessweek.com ] .
New Jersey is number 10 on this list , behind Utah , Iowa , Georgia , Kentucky,Idaho , Nebraska,West Virginia , Indiana , and Maine.Also interesting , but not directly related to New Jersey drivers , is an Allstate study [ allstatenewsroom.com ] of driver safety by city .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm?
According to 2005 data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), New Jersey is actually one of the safest states to drive in [businessweek.com].
New Jersey is number 10 on this list, behind Utah, Iowa, Georgia, Kentucky,Idaho, Nebraska,West Virginia, Indiana, and Maine.Also interesting, but not directly related to New Jersey drivers, is an Allstate study [allstatenewsroom.com] of driver safety by city.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913583</id>
	<title>Re:Chromosomes?</title>
	<author>b96miata</author>
	<datestamp>1256843220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The fact that this isn't (Score: 5, Funny)  is proof that not only are there women on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/., they have mod points.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The fact that this is n't ( Score : 5 , Funny ) is proof that not only are there women on /. , they have mod points .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fact that this isn't (Score: 5, Funny)  is proof that not only are there women on /., they have mod points.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916327</id>
	<title>Re:Chromosomes?</title>
	<author>Mr. Slippery</author>
	<datestamp>1256810400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>You mean the double-X chromosome?</p></div></blockquote><p>A lot of comments (and tags) to that effect on this story.

</p><p>Remember that story about <a href="http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/10/12/1512238/FOSS-Sexism-Claims-Met-With-Ire-and-Denial?from=rss" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">sexism in the F/OSS world a few weeks back?</a> [slashdot.org] Remember how many people denied that such a thing could exist? Here's your proof.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean the double-X chromosome ? A lot of comments ( and tags ) to that effect on this story .
Remember that story about sexism in the F/OSS world a few weeks back ?
[ slashdot.org ] Remember how many people denied that such a thing could exist ?
Here 's your proof .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean the double-X chromosome?A lot of comments (and tags) to that effect on this story.
Remember that story about sexism in the F/OSS world a few weeks back?
[slashdot.org] Remember how many people denied that such a thing could exist?
Here's your proof.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913205</id>
	<title>Yup its genetic no doubt ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256841660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yup its genetic no doubt<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>Two X cromossomes makes you a BAD driver, one X and Y makes you a good one !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup its genetic no doubt ...Two X cromossomes makes you a BAD driver , one X and Y makes you a good one !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup its genetic no doubt ...Two X cromossomes makes you a BAD driver, one X and Y makes you a good one !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913597</id>
	<title>Gene variant also correlates highly with "dumbass"</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1256843280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We used to just call it "stupid."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We used to just call it " stupid .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We used to just call it "stupid.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913145</id>
	<title>Wait, Don't Tell Me - They're ALL From Utah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256841360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Frickin' Mormons on the I-15 goin' to Zion! (and not the park, either)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Frickin ' Mormons on the I-15 goin ' to Zion !
( and not the park , either )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frickin' Mormons on the I-15 goin' to Zion!
(and not the park, either)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29918201</id>
	<title>asianness</title>
	<author>hooshman</author>
	<datestamp>1256818800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>there are lots of asians at uci</htmltext>
<tokenext>there are lots of asians at uci</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there are lots of asians at uci</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915139</id>
	<title>Maintaining Sharpness...</title>
	<author>DomNF15</author>
	<datestamp>1256849400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the article: "The gene variant isn't always bad, though. Studies have found that people with it maintain their usual mental sharpness longer than those without it when neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's, Huntington's and multiple sclerosis are present."
<br> <br>

My take: "usual mental sharpness"  - a dull knife is still dull after you run it over concrete.  Maybe the people with the gene variant just aren't as "sharp" to begin with, which is why they appear not to change for a longer period of time.

<br> <br>
Alright so here's my contribution to the whole driving/traffic laws discussion - I was driving home from work during rush hour one day and coming up to an automated toll plaza (the booth accepted either exact change or EZPass, here's a link for those who don't know what EZPass is - <a href="http://www.ezpass.com/" title="ezpass.com">http://www.ezpass.com/</a> [ezpass.com]).  So this car in front of me decided to go through the clearly marked EZPass only lane of the toll booth, only, she didn't have an EZPass.  So, she stopped her car at the booth.  And I stopped behind her, and traffic started piling up behind me rather quickly since it was rush hour and she was blocking the only EZPass lane at the toll plaza.  I gave her 2 minutes to figure out what she should do, and then proceeded to get out of my car and walk up to hers.  I asked her what the (expletive) she thought she was doing there.  She told me she was driving a rental car and forgot she didn't have EZPass.  So I replied, "What the (expletive) do you think is going to happen here?  This is an automated plaza, no human being works here, and no one is going to magically show up and fix this.  There's at least half a mile of cars backed up here because you've stopped.  Just continue to drive through and you'll get a ticket in the mail, the camera (I pointed out the security camera that was aimed at her license plate) already took a picture of your plate because you have no EZPass, so the damage is done.  You can't do anything about it now."
<br> <br>
Moral: If you have no common sense, do not operate a motor vehicle.  You will definitely injure, kill, or piss people off.  Do everyone a favor and use mass transit, or just shop on the Internet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article : " The gene variant is n't always bad , though .
Studies have found that people with it maintain their usual mental sharpness longer than those without it when neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson 's , Huntington 's and multiple sclerosis are present .
" My take : " usual mental sharpness " - a dull knife is still dull after you run it over concrete .
Maybe the people with the gene variant just are n't as " sharp " to begin with , which is why they appear not to change for a longer period of time .
Alright so here 's my contribution to the whole driving/traffic laws discussion - I was driving home from work during rush hour one day and coming up to an automated toll plaza ( the booth accepted either exact change or EZPass , here 's a link for those who do n't know what EZPass is - http : //www.ezpass.com/ [ ezpass.com ] ) .
So this car in front of me decided to go through the clearly marked EZPass only lane of the toll booth , only , she did n't have an EZPass .
So , she stopped her car at the booth .
And I stopped behind her , and traffic started piling up behind me rather quickly since it was rush hour and she was blocking the only EZPass lane at the toll plaza .
I gave her 2 minutes to figure out what she should do , and then proceeded to get out of my car and walk up to hers .
I asked her what the ( expletive ) she thought she was doing there .
She told me she was driving a rental car and forgot she did n't have EZPass .
So I replied , " What the ( expletive ) do you think is going to happen here ?
This is an automated plaza , no human being works here , and no one is going to magically show up and fix this .
There 's at least half a mile of cars backed up here because you 've stopped .
Just continue to drive through and you 'll get a ticket in the mail , the camera ( I pointed out the security camera that was aimed at her license plate ) already took a picture of your plate because you have no EZPass , so the damage is done .
You ca n't do anything about it now .
" Moral : If you have no common sense , do not operate a motor vehicle .
You will definitely injure , kill , or piss people off .
Do everyone a favor and use mass transit , or just shop on the Internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article: "The gene variant isn't always bad, though.
Studies have found that people with it maintain their usual mental sharpness longer than those without it when neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's, Huntington's and multiple sclerosis are present.
"
 

My take: "usual mental sharpness"  - a dull knife is still dull after you run it over concrete.
Maybe the people with the gene variant just aren't as "sharp" to begin with, which is why they appear not to change for a longer period of time.
Alright so here's my contribution to the whole driving/traffic laws discussion - I was driving home from work during rush hour one day and coming up to an automated toll plaza (the booth accepted either exact change or EZPass, here's a link for those who don't know what EZPass is - http://www.ezpass.com/ [ezpass.com]).
So this car in front of me decided to go through the clearly marked EZPass only lane of the toll booth, only, she didn't have an EZPass.
So, she stopped her car at the booth.
And I stopped behind her, and traffic started piling up behind me rather quickly since it was rush hour and she was blocking the only EZPass lane at the toll plaza.
I gave her 2 minutes to figure out what she should do, and then proceeded to get out of my car and walk up to hers.
I asked her what the (expletive) she thought she was doing there.
She told me she was driving a rental car and forgot she didn't have EZPass.
So I replied, "What the (expletive) do you think is going to happen here?
This is an automated plaza, no human being works here, and no one is going to magically show up and fix this.
There's at least half a mile of cars backed up here because you've stopped.
Just continue to drive through and you'll get a ticket in the mail, the camera (I pointed out the security camera that was aimed at her license plate) already took a picture of your plate because you have no EZPass, so the damage is done.
You can't do anything about it now.
"
 
Moral: If you have no common sense, do not operate a motor vehicle.
You will definitely injure, kill, or piss people off.
Do everyone a favor and use mass transit, or just shop on the Internet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914507</id>
	<title>Re:First... define worse...</title>
	<author>bmwEnthusiast</author>
	<datestamp>1256846880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please tell me how I could have avoided being rear ended while waiting to make a left hand turn with traffic turning in front of me and coming at me in the lanes i'm trying to cross. Your theory of rules helping me the common driver avoid accidents by obeying laws is full of flaws.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please tell me how I could have avoided being rear ended while waiting to make a left hand turn with traffic turning in front of me and coming at me in the lanes i 'm trying to cross .
Your theory of rules helping me the common driver avoid accidents by obeying laws is full of flaws .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please tell me how I could have avoided being rear ended while waiting to make a left hand turn with traffic turning in front of me and coming at me in the lanes i'm trying to cross.
Your theory of rules helping me the common driver avoid accidents by obeying laws is full of flaws.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913121</id>
	<title>Re:New Jersey Drivers</title>
	<author>KiltedKnight</author>
	<datestamp>1256841300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yeah, but how do you explain all the bad drivers in New Jersey?</p></div><p>Easy... New York City and Philadelphia.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but how do you explain all the bad drivers in New Jersey ? Easy... New York City and Philadelphia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but how do you explain all the bad drivers in New Jersey?Easy... New York City and Philadelphia.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914835</id>
	<title>Re:My daughter is a lousy driver</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256848260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's a Wurst 'N' Timer and why is it set for a Year?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's a Wurst 'N ' Timer and why is it set for a Year ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's a Wurst 'N' Timer and why is it set for a Year?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912745</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916719</id>
	<title>Re:New Jersey Drivers</title>
	<author>mycroft822</author>
	<datestamp>1256811840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The page you linked to is a little misleading with its title.  The "safety" measure they are using to rank each state is percentage of fatal crashes in which at least one driver tested positive for alcohol.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The page you linked to is a little misleading with its title .
The " safety " measure they are using to rank each state is percentage of fatal crashes in which at least one driver tested positive for alcohol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The page you linked to is a little misleading with its title.
The "safety" measure they are using to rank each state is percentage of fatal crashes in which at least one driver tested positive for alcohol.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913239</id>
	<title>I think it would save us a lot of time...</title>
	<author>The Ultimate Fartkno</author>
	<datestamp>1256841840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...if we could just start making a list of all the people who *didn't* come here to make the XX/XY joke.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...if we could just start making a list of all the people who * did n't * come here to make the XX/XY joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...if we could just start making a list of all the people who *didn't* come here to make the XX/XY joke.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29920731</id>
	<title>All together now</title>
	<author>Naznarreb</author>
	<datestamp>1256838960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Say it with me folks: Correlation does not equal causality.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Say it with me folks : Correlation does not equal causality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Say it with me folks: Correlation does not equal causality.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913621</id>
	<title>Re:First... define worse...</title>
	<author>jhfry</author>
	<datestamp>1256843340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Traffic rules are designed to balance speed and safety for the majority of drivers... if they were designed "to minimize the impact of drivers' mistakes" you wouldn't be driving.</p><p>I can show you many cases, where a person is not capable of driving safely even within the confines of the law.  While I can show you an equal number of cases where the laws actually restrict a driver from achieving their optimal balance between speed and safety.</p><p>I could also argue that some drivers become more complacent when they fail to drive in their optimal speed/risk range, which might actually make them less safe... but that is purely speculative.</p><p>Avoiding accidents is far more about being defensive, aware, practiced, and very comfortable with the capabilities of your vehicle.  The first thing I do every winter is take my wife and I out to an icy parking lot to practice stopping, swerving, and spin out recovery because I know that these skills are FAR more valuable than obeying traffic laws.</p><p>Finally, your argument that accidents would be avoided if those drivers had obeyed the traffic laws is moot.  I wasn't suggesting that they were disobeying when the accidents occurred... I just didn't want to say that they NEVER got into an accident as that would have been a lie.  Its just as likely that the accident would have been much worse if they had been conforming.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Traffic rules are designed to balance speed and safety for the majority of drivers... if they were designed " to minimize the impact of drivers ' mistakes " you would n't be driving.I can show you many cases , where a person is not capable of driving safely even within the confines of the law .
While I can show you an equal number of cases where the laws actually restrict a driver from achieving their optimal balance between speed and safety.I could also argue that some drivers become more complacent when they fail to drive in their optimal speed/risk range , which might actually make them less safe... but that is purely speculative.Avoiding accidents is far more about being defensive , aware , practiced , and very comfortable with the capabilities of your vehicle .
The first thing I do every winter is take my wife and I out to an icy parking lot to practice stopping , swerving , and spin out recovery because I know that these skills are FAR more valuable than obeying traffic laws.Finally , your argument that accidents would be avoided if those drivers had obeyed the traffic laws is moot .
I was n't suggesting that they were disobeying when the accidents occurred... I just did n't want to say that they NEVER got into an accident as that would have been a lie .
Its just as likely that the accident would have been much worse if they had been conforming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Traffic rules are designed to balance speed and safety for the majority of drivers... if they were designed "to minimize the impact of drivers' mistakes" you wouldn't be driving.I can show you many cases, where a person is not capable of driving safely even within the confines of the law.
While I can show you an equal number of cases where the laws actually restrict a driver from achieving their optimal balance between speed and safety.I could also argue that some drivers become more complacent when they fail to drive in their optimal speed/risk range, which might actually make them less safe... but that is purely speculative.Avoiding accidents is far more about being defensive, aware, practiced, and very comfortable with the capabilities of your vehicle.
The first thing I do every winter is take my wife and I out to an icy parking lot to practice stopping, swerving, and spin out recovery because I know that these skills are FAR more valuable than obeying traffic laws.Finally, your argument that accidents would be avoided if those drivers had obeyed the traffic laws is moot.
I wasn't suggesting that they were disobeying when the accidents occurred... I just didn't want to say that they NEVER got into an accident as that would have been a lie.
Its just as likely that the accident would have been much worse if they had been conforming.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914257</id>
	<title>Not surprised</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256845800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My wife is a self proclaimed bad driver, but she always says it's not her fault and is genetic. At first I thought she was kidding, but it's true : her mom, her dad, her brother, many of her cousins -- a whole family of bad drivers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My wife is a self proclaimed bad driver , but she always says it 's not her fault and is genetic .
At first I thought she was kidding , but it 's true : her mom , her dad , her brother , many of her cousins -- a whole family of bad drivers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My wife is a self proclaimed bad driver, but she always says it's not her fault and is genetic.
At first I thought she was kidding, but it's true : her mom, her dad, her brother, many of her cousins -- a whole family of bad drivers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912761</id>
	<title>New Jersey Drivers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256839980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, but how do you explain all the bad drivers in New Jersey?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but how do you explain all the bad drivers in New Jersey ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but how do you explain all the bad drivers in New Jersey?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914455</id>
	<title>Insurance</title>
	<author>JesseBHolmes</author>
	<datestamp>1256846580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh, no! No if my uncle gets in a car accident, I get my rates upped by my insurance. Thanks a lot, UC Irvine!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , no !
No if my uncle gets in a car accident , I get my rates upped by my insurance .
Thanks a lot , UC Irvine !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, no!
No if my uncle gets in a car accident, I get my rates upped by my insurance.
Thanks a lot, UC Irvine!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29918657</id>
	<title>Re:No surprise here</title>
	<author>Grishnakh</author>
	<datestamp>1256821620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What part of Arizona do you live in?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What part of Arizona do you live in ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What part of Arizona do you live in?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914491</id>
	<title>Re:Chromosomes?</title>
	<author>HidingMyName</author>
	<datestamp>1256846760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"People with a particular gene variant performed more than 20 percent worse on a driving test"
You mean the double-X chromosome?</p></div><p>Although I'm a man, I'd have to admit I've seen some pretty bad driving from people with a Y chromosome too.  In fact, very smart people can be very bad drivers (e.g. <a href="http://www.anecdotage.com/index.php?aid=14098" title="anecdotage.com">von Neumann's corner</a> [anecdotage.com] was named after a notoriously bad driver, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John\_von\_Neumann" title="wikipedia.org">John von Neumann</a> [wikipedia.org] who you might have heard about).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" People with a particular gene variant performed more than 20 percent worse on a driving test " You mean the double-X chromosome ? Although I 'm a man , I 'd have to admit I 've seen some pretty bad driving from people with a Y chromosome too .
In fact , very smart people can be very bad drivers ( e.g .
von Neumann 's corner [ anecdotage.com ] was named after a notoriously bad driver , John von Neumann [ wikipedia.org ] who you might have heard about ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"People with a particular gene variant performed more than 20 percent worse on a driving test"
You mean the double-X chromosome?Although I'm a man, I'd have to admit I've seen some pretty bad driving from people with a Y chromosome too.
In fact, very smart people can be very bad drivers (e.g.
von Neumann's corner [anecdotage.com] was named after a notoriously bad driver, John von Neumann [wikipedia.org] who you might have heard about).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29931339</id>
	<title>Re:Chromosomes?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256914560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><blockquote><div><p>You mean the double-X chromosome?</p></div></blockquote><p>A lot of comments (and tags) to that effect on this story.</p><p>Remember that story about <a href="http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/10/12/1512238/FOSS-Sexism-Claims-Met-With-Ire-and-Denial?from=rss" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">sexism in the F/OSS world a few weeks back?</a> [slashdot.org] Remember how many people denied that such a thing could exist? Here's your proof.</p></div><p>Truth &gt; Sexism.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean the double-X chromosome ? A lot of comments ( and tags ) to that effect on this story.Remember that story about sexism in the F/OSS world a few weeks back ?
[ slashdot.org ] Remember how many people denied that such a thing could exist ?
Here 's your proof.Truth &gt; Sexism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean the double-X chromosome?A lot of comments (and tags) to that effect on this story.Remember that story about sexism in the F/OSS world a few weeks back?
[slashdot.org] Remember how many people denied that such a thing could exist?
Here's your proof.Truth &gt; Sexism.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29918299</id>
	<title>Re:Chromosomes?</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1256819400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's Score 5: Funny now. Of course, if you actually try to do a survey here based on Slashdot everyone will scream about insufficient sample size.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's Score 5 : Funny now .
Of course , if you actually try to do a survey here based on Slashdot everyone will scream about insufficient sample size .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's Score 5: Funny now.
Of course, if you actually try to do a survey here based on Slashdot everyone will scream about insufficient sample size.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913583</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913985</id>
	<title>What the heck...</title>
	<author>ctrl-alt-canc</author>
	<datestamp>1256844780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; Bad drivers may in part have their genes to blame<br>

I started thinking about poorly designed device drivers written by genetically-damaged programmers. Time to shut down the PC and go home...</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Bad drivers may in part have their genes to blame I started thinking about poorly designed device drivers written by genetically-damaged programmers .
Time to shut down the PC and go home.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Bad drivers may in part have their genes to blame

I started thinking about poorly designed device drivers written by genetically-damaged programmers.
Time to shut down the PC and go home...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29925901</id>
	<title>Re:First... define worse...</title>
	<author>Cornflake917</author>
	<datestamp>1256926380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you cannot maintain your speed at the posted limit, and have no respect for when a U-Turn is allowed or appropriate, than you are not maintaining "superior control" of your vehicle. You're just trying to justify your asshattery. (Yes, we all got that you're talking about youself.)</p></div><p>Keeping your car at the posted speed limit has nothing to do with control or being an asshat.  Don't tell me you never driven on a section of road where the speed limit is complete bullshit, and no other drivers pay attention to it. I remember a section a road where the posted limited was 40, but the traffic rarely went under 55.  Driving the posted speed limit would have just created a dangerous situation for both me and the other drivers.  Speed isn't necessarily the determining factor of how dangerous you're driving.  It's your RELATIVE speed to the objects around you.</p><p>However, in some situations people making illegal turns piss me off to no end.  If their illegal turn is causing people to wait unnecessarily, they totally deserve the "asshat" label.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you can not maintain your speed at the posted limit , and have no respect for when a U-Turn is allowed or appropriate , than you are not maintaining " superior control " of your vehicle .
You 're just trying to justify your asshattery .
( Yes , we all got that you 're talking about youself .
) Keeping your car at the posted speed limit has nothing to do with control or being an asshat .
Do n't tell me you never driven on a section of road where the speed limit is complete bullshit , and no other drivers pay attention to it .
I remember a section a road where the posted limited was 40 , but the traffic rarely went under 55 .
Driving the posted speed limit would have just created a dangerous situation for both me and the other drivers .
Speed is n't necessarily the determining factor of how dangerous you 're driving .
It 's your RELATIVE speed to the objects around you.However , in some situations people making illegal turns piss me off to no end .
If their illegal turn is causing people to wait unnecessarily , they totally deserve the " asshat " label .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you cannot maintain your speed at the posted limit, and have no respect for when a U-Turn is allowed or appropriate, than you are not maintaining "superior control" of your vehicle.
You're just trying to justify your asshattery.
(Yes, we all got that you're talking about youself.
)Keeping your car at the posted speed limit has nothing to do with control or being an asshat.
Don't tell me you never driven on a section of road where the speed limit is complete bullshit, and no other drivers pay attention to it.
I remember a section a road where the posted limited was 40, but the traffic rarely went under 55.
Driving the posted speed limit would have just created a dangerous situation for both me and the other drivers.
Speed isn't necessarily the determining factor of how dangerous you're driving.
It's your RELATIVE speed to the objects around you.However, in some situations people making illegal turns piss me off to no end.
If their illegal turn is causing people to wait unnecessarily, they totally deserve the "asshat" label.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913107</id>
	<title>Re:First... define worse...</title>
	<author>Cyberax</author>
	<datestamp>1256841180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"However these same folks maintain superior control of their vehicles and never get into accidents unless they are caused by another driver's lack of control."</p><p>Do you realize that traffic rules were designed \_specifically\_ to minimize the impact of drivers' mistakes? And that if your 'best drivers' actually obeyed the laws, they'd have most probably avoided accidents. Even the ones caused by other drivers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" However these same folks maintain superior control of their vehicles and never get into accidents unless they are caused by another driver 's lack of control .
" Do you realize that traffic rules were designed \ _specifically \ _ to minimize the impact of drivers ' mistakes ?
And that if your 'best drivers ' actually obeyed the laws , they 'd have most probably avoided accidents .
Even the ones caused by other drivers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"However these same folks maintain superior control of their vehicles and never get into accidents unless they are caused by another driver's lack of control.
"Do you realize that traffic rules were designed \_specifically\_ to minimize the impact of drivers' mistakes?
And that if your 'best drivers' actually obeyed the laws, they'd have most probably avoided accidents.
Even the ones caused by other drivers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913143</id>
	<title>Re:First... define worse...</title>
	<author>Shadow Wrought</author>
	<datestamp>1256841360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Some of the best drivers I know are the ones who can't obey speed limits, make illegal turns, and ultimately are deemed as "bad" drivers. However these same folks maintain superior control of their vehicles and never get into accidents unless they are caused by another driver's lack of control.</i>
<br> <br>
If you cannot maintain your speed at the posted limit, and have no respect for when a U-Turn is allowed or appropriate, than you are not maintaining "superior control" of your vehicle.  You're just trying to justify your asshattery.  (Yes, we all got that you're talking about youself.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some of the best drivers I know are the ones who ca n't obey speed limits , make illegal turns , and ultimately are deemed as " bad " drivers .
However these same folks maintain superior control of their vehicles and never get into accidents unless they are caused by another driver 's lack of control .
If you can not maintain your speed at the posted limit , and have no respect for when a U-Turn is allowed or appropriate , than you are not maintaining " superior control " of your vehicle .
You 're just trying to justify your asshattery .
( Yes , we all got that you 're talking about youself .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some of the best drivers I know are the ones who can't obey speed limits, make illegal turns, and ultimately are deemed as "bad" drivers.
However these same folks maintain superior control of their vehicles and never get into accidents unless they are caused by another driver's lack of control.
If you cannot maintain your speed at the posted limit, and have no respect for when a U-Turn is allowed or appropriate, than you are not maintaining "superior control" of your vehicle.
You're just trying to justify your asshattery.
(Yes, we all got that you're talking about youself.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913189</id>
	<title>It's called the XX chromosome</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256841540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex\_determination\_system" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex\_determination\_system</a> [wikipedia.org] to type a bit more for the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. filter<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex \ _determination \ _system [ wikipedia.org ] to type a bit more for the / .
filter .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex\_determination\_system [wikipedia.org] to type a bit more for the /.
filter ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914955</id>
	<title>Reminds me of the old joke.....</title>
	<author>ChrisLeif</author>
	<datestamp>1256848680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>How do you blind a [ethnic group]? Put a windshield in front of him/her.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you blind a [ ethnic group ] ?
Put a windshield in front of him/her .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you blind a [ethnic group]?
Put a windshield in front of him/her.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29921303</id>
	<title>The Oval Gene</title>
	<author>pmontra</author>
	<datestamp>1256935260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>About 30 percent of Americans have the variant</p></div></blockquote><p>Researchers should also investigate which gene variant prevents most American professional drivers to correctly turn right at high speed. That ultimately led to the creation of oval tracks and gave a competitive advantage to foreign drivers which find it easy to go to the USA and win races and titles.</p><p>Disclaimer: that was intended to be both fun and informative<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>About 30 percent of Americans have the variantResearchers should also investigate which gene variant prevents most American professional drivers to correctly turn right at high speed .
That ultimately led to the creation of oval tracks and gave a competitive advantage to foreign drivers which find it easy to go to the USA and win races and titles.Disclaimer : that was intended to be both fun and informative ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>About 30 percent of Americans have the variantResearchers should also investigate which gene variant prevents most American professional drivers to correctly turn right at high speed.
That ultimately led to the creation of oval tracks and gave a competitive advantage to foreign drivers which find it easy to go to the USA and win races and titles.Disclaimer: that was intended to be both fun and informative ;-)
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29930995</id>
	<title>Re:Chromosomes?</title>
	<author>JThundley</author>
	<datestamp>1256910900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This isn't F/OSS. This is a message board on the internet. Browse at 0 and you'll see that this thing called the internet has stuff worse than sexism.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't F/OSS .
This is a message board on the internet .
Browse at 0 and you 'll see that this thing called the internet has stuff worse than sexism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't F/OSS.
This is a message board on the internet.
Browse at 0 and you'll see that this thing called the internet has stuff worse than sexism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29918347</id>
	<title>Yup</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256819700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes its true, its called being Asian.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes its true , its called being Asian .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes its true, its called being Asian.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29921541</id>
	<title>Finland</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256895600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well that's the explanation for Finns who drive Audis, Volvos and BMWs<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... aparently the same gene causes a small penile development, delusions of granedur (hey, I can drive like Kimi Raikkonen) and a severe lack of self confidence...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well that 's the explanation for Finns who drive Audis , Volvos and BMWs .... aparently the same gene causes a small penile development , delusions of granedur ( hey , I can drive like Kimi Raikkonen ) and a severe lack of self confidence.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well that's the explanation for Finns who drive Audis, Volvos and BMWs .... aparently the same gene causes a small penile development, delusions of granedur (hey, I can drive like Kimi Raikkonen) and a severe lack of self confidence...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29921899</id>
	<title>Re:First... define worse...</title>
	<author>RichiH</author>
	<datestamp>1256901960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; for when a U-Turn is allowed or appropriate</p><p>A U-turn may be forbidden 24/7, but at 0300 there is no one who cares. Allowed != appropriate.</p><p>&gt; you are not maintaining "superior control" of your vehicle</p><p>Uh, OK? The one is a legal aspect, the other a technical one. I can drive at 150 km/h through a street that is winding and limited to 30 km/h. Superior control of the car (as others can not do it at that speed), but forbidden.</p><p>Question: With asshattery, were you also talking about yourself?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; for when a U-Turn is allowed or appropriateA U-turn may be forbidden 24/7 , but at 0300 there is no one who cares .
Allowed ! = appropriate. &gt; you are not maintaining " superior control " of your vehicleUh , OK ?
The one is a legal aspect , the other a technical one .
I can drive at 150 km/h through a street that is winding and limited to 30 km/h .
Superior control of the car ( as others can not do it at that speed ) , but forbidden.Question : With asshattery , were you also talking about yourself ?
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; for when a U-Turn is allowed or appropriateA U-turn may be forbidden 24/7, but at 0300 there is no one who cares.
Allowed != appropriate.&gt; you are not maintaining "superior control" of your vehicleUh, OK?
The one is a legal aspect, the other a technical one.
I can drive at 150 km/h through a street that is winding and limited to 30 km/h.
Superior control of the car (as others can not do it at that speed), but forbidden.Question: With asshattery, were you also talking about yourself?
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915657</id>
	<title>Re:New Jersey Drivers= very good - I concur</title>
	<author>spineboy</author>
	<datestamp>1256808000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering accidents are probably proportional to traffic density, then comparing Jersey to the other states on the list, the drivers are superb.  What do you think the population density is in those others states?</p><p>Interesting note - having lived in many of the states on the eastern seaboard, and now California (don't get me started how BAD the drivers are here), New Jersey drivers (and NYC drivers)  appear to me to very good. New Jersey also has some of the highest insurance premiums as well.</p><p>Would be nice to look at safety vs insurance costs - i.e. it costs too much to get into an accident, so people drive more safely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering accidents are probably proportional to traffic density , then comparing Jersey to the other states on the list , the drivers are superb .
What do you think the population density is in those others states ? Interesting note - having lived in many of the states on the eastern seaboard , and now California ( do n't get me started how BAD the drivers are here ) , New Jersey drivers ( and NYC drivers ) appear to me to very good .
New Jersey also has some of the highest insurance premiums as well.Would be nice to look at safety vs insurance costs - i.e .
it costs too much to get into an accident , so people drive more safely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering accidents are probably proportional to traffic density, then comparing Jersey to the other states on the list, the drivers are superb.
What do you think the population density is in those others states?Interesting note - having lived in many of the states on the eastern seaboard, and now California (don't get me started how BAD the drivers are here), New Jersey drivers (and NYC drivers)  appear to me to very good.
New Jersey also has some of the highest insurance premiums as well.Would be nice to look at safety vs insurance costs - i.e.
it costs too much to get into an accident, so people drive more safely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29920145</id>
	<title>Not male or female but where you come from matters</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256832060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interesting to look at the HapMap.  You should feel very safe if your driver is of sub saharan African descent.  They don't seem to have the minor allele at all
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/snp\_ref.cgi?rs=6265#Diversity" title="nih.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/snp\_ref.cgi?rs=6265#Diversity</a> [nih.gov] .  Of course one allele rarely controls the whole show.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting to look at the HapMap .
You should feel very safe if your driver is of sub saharan African descent .
They do n't seem to have the minor allele at all http : //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/snp \ _ref.cgi ? rs = 6265 # Diversity [ nih.gov ] .
Of course one allele rarely controls the whole show .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting to look at the HapMap.
You should feel very safe if your driver is of sub saharan African descent.
They don't seem to have the minor allele at all
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/snp\_ref.cgi?rs=6265#Diversity [nih.gov] .
Of course one allele rarely controls the whole show.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913361</id>
	<title>Re:First... define worse...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256842380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Some of the best drivers I know are the ones who can't obey speed limits, make illegal turns, and ultimately are deemed as "bad" drivers. However these same folks maintain superior control of their vehicles and never get into accidents unless they are caused by another driver's lack of control.</p></div><p>If you cannot maintain your speed at the posted limit, and have no respect for when a U-Turn is allowed or appropriate, than you are not maintaining "superior control" of your vehicle.  You're just trying to justify your asshattery.  (Yes, we all got that you're talking about youself.)</p></div><p>No, you're confounding skills with ethics here. A hacker can both be skilled and be a blackhat; by the same token, a driver can be skilled and be an asshat. (Of course there is not necessarily always a positive correlation - cf. script-kiddies)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some of the best drivers I know are the ones who ca n't obey speed limits , make illegal turns , and ultimately are deemed as " bad " drivers .
However these same folks maintain superior control of their vehicles and never get into accidents unless they are caused by another driver 's lack of control.If you can not maintain your speed at the posted limit , and have no respect for when a U-Turn is allowed or appropriate , than you are not maintaining " superior control " of your vehicle .
You 're just trying to justify your asshattery .
( Yes , we all got that you 're talking about youself .
) No , you 're confounding skills with ethics here .
A hacker can both be skilled and be a blackhat ; by the same token , a driver can be skilled and be an asshat .
( Of course there is not necessarily always a positive correlation - cf .
script-kiddies )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some of the best drivers I know are the ones who can't obey speed limits, make illegal turns, and ultimately are deemed as "bad" drivers.
However these same folks maintain superior control of their vehicles and never get into accidents unless they are caused by another driver's lack of control.If you cannot maintain your speed at the posted limit, and have no respect for when a U-Turn is allowed or appropriate, than you are not maintaining "superior control" of your vehicle.
You're just trying to justify your asshattery.
(Yes, we all got that you're talking about youself.
)No, you're confounding skills with ethics here.
A hacker can both be skilled and be a blackhat; by the same token, a driver can be skilled and be an asshat.
(Of course there is not necessarily always a positive correlation - cf.
script-kiddies)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789</id>
	<title>First... define worse...</title>
	<author>jhfry</author>
	<datestamp>1256840100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some of the best drivers I know are the ones who can't obey speed limits, make illegal turns, and ultimately are deemed as "bad" drivers.  However these same folks maintain superior control of their vehicles and never get into accidents unless they are caused by another driver's lack of control.</p><p>So, perhaps this gene is more of a "disrespect for authority" gene?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some of the best drivers I know are the ones who ca n't obey speed limits , make illegal turns , and ultimately are deemed as " bad " drivers .
However these same folks maintain superior control of their vehicles and never get into accidents unless they are caused by another driver 's lack of control.So , perhaps this gene is more of a " disrespect for authority " gene ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some of the best drivers I know are the ones who can't obey speed limits, make illegal turns, and ultimately are deemed as "bad" drivers.
However these same folks maintain superior control of their vehicles and never get into accidents unless they are caused by another driver's lack of control.So, perhaps this gene is more of a "disrespect for authority" gene?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29921643</id>
	<title>That explains what's happening in the Netherlands!</title>
	<author>RichiH</author>
	<datestamp>1256897100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, it does.</p><p>What do they do to Dutch people who fail the driving test at least three times in a row? -- They force them to put yellow licence plates onto their cars!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , it does.What do they do to Dutch people who fail the driving test at least three times in a row ?
-- They force them to put yellow licence plates onto their cars !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, it does.What do they do to Dutch people who fail the driving test at least three times in a row?
-- They force them to put yellow licence plates onto their cars!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915619</id>
	<title>This is amusing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256807880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I lived in Costa Mesa, the nickname going around for UCI was the "University of Chinese Immigrants". All of my vietnamese friends called it that (and all of them eventually wound up attending UCI).</p><p>This study struck me as somewhat appropriate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I lived in Costa Mesa , the nickname going around for UCI was the " University of Chinese Immigrants " .
All of my vietnamese friends called it that ( and all of them eventually wound up attending UCI ) .This study struck me as somewhat appropriate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I lived in Costa Mesa, the nickname going around for UCI was the "University of Chinese Immigrants".
All of my vietnamese friends called it that (and all of them eventually wound up attending UCI).This study struck me as somewhat appropriate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915281</id>
	<title>Re:Chromuhdickosomes?</title>
	<author>Notegg Nornoggin</author>
	<datestamp>1256849940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's always harder to drive a car that you're unfamiliar with (having only stolen it 15 minutes before) especially when you're trying to avoid the poh-lees.  F'shizzle.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's always harder to drive a car that you 're unfamiliar with ( having only stolen it 15 minutes before ) especially when you 're trying to avoid the poh-lees .
F'shizzle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's always harder to drive a car that you're unfamiliar with (having only stolen it 15 minutes before) especially when you're trying to avoid the poh-lees.
F'shizzle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914977</id>
	<title>I firmly believed in the wisdom of "Repo Man"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256848800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The more you drive, the less intelligent you are."</p><p>Now you're telling me there is a genetic basis for driving skill itself?  I'm shocked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The more you drive , the less intelligent you are .
" Now you 're telling me there is a genetic basis for driving skill itself ?
I 'm shocked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The more you drive, the less intelligent you are.
"Now you're telling me there is a genetic basis for driving skill itself?
I'm shocked.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912755</id>
	<title>Chromosomes?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256839920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>"People with a particular gene variant performed more than 20 percent worse on a driving test"
You mean the double-X chromosome?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" People with a particular gene variant performed more than 20 percent worse on a driving test " You mean the double-X chromosome ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"People with a particular gene variant performed more than 20 percent worse on a driving test"
You mean the double-X chromosome?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29917911</id>
	<title>Re:First... define worse...</title>
	<author>gd23ka</author>
	<datestamp>1256816940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're in repeater mode, you're ingesting and pushing out data unfiltered and unreflected.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're in repeater mode , you 're ingesting and pushing out data unfiltered and unreflected .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're in repeater mode, you're ingesting and pushing out data unfiltered and unreflected.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914287</id>
	<title>Re:My daughter is a lousy driver</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256845860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's what I've been saying for years.  Why do we let these people procreate?</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's what I 've been saying for years .
Why do we let these people procreate ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's what I've been saying for years.
Why do we let these people procreate?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912745</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913119</id>
	<title>No surprise here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256841240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I live in an area with an astonishing number of epically bad drivers.  I figured the epically bad drivers were (unfortunately) surviving long enough to have children, who themselves grew up to be epically bad drivers.  A genetic component to epically bad driving doesn't surprise me in the least.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in an area with an astonishing number of epically bad drivers .
I figured the epically bad drivers were ( unfortunately ) surviving long enough to have children , who themselves grew up to be epically bad drivers .
A genetic component to epically bad driving does n't surprise me in the least .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in an area with an astonishing number of epically bad drivers.
I figured the epically bad drivers were (unfortunately) surviving long enough to have children, who themselves grew up to be epically bad drivers.
A genetic component to epically bad driving doesn't surprise me in the least.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913313</id>
	<title>Re:First... define worse...</title>
	<author>jhfry</author>
	<datestamp>1256842200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh... and actually I wasn't talking about myself... though I have my fair share of traffic violations.  I don't think any person can adequately judge their own driving.</p><p>I know someone is a good driver when I let go of the "oh shit" handle and stop pushing the imaginary break.  I know they are a great driver when I can relax enough to sleep or read while they are driving.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh... and actually I was n't talking about myself... though I have my fair share of traffic violations .
I do n't think any person can adequately judge their own driving.I know someone is a good driver when I let go of the " oh shit " handle and stop pushing the imaginary break .
I know they are a great driver when I can relax enough to sleep or read while they are driving .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh... and actually I wasn't talking about myself... though I have my fair share of traffic violations.
I don't think any person can adequately judge their own driving.I know someone is a good driver when I let go of the "oh shit" handle and stop pushing the imaginary break.
I know they are a great driver when I can relax enough to sleep or read while they are driving.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912923</id>
	<title>Re:First... define worse...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256840520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you read TFA, you would see that vehicle control is exactly what was tested, not the ability to follow rules or road signs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you read TFA , you would see that vehicle control is exactly what was tested , not the ability to follow rules or road signs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you read TFA, you would see that vehicle control is exactly what was tested, not the ability to follow rules or road signs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29930995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29918657
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913621
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29918299
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914775
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29931339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914287
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912745
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913751
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29917911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29922015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29919377
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913927
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912921
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29917421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914829
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29925519
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914835
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912745
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916719
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29918879
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913057
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912745
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29921899
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914491
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912745
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915069
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913607
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915793
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29925901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916163
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29918233
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912745
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29921869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912973
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914467
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915657
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915385
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29922363
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914223
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915545
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913361
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913313
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913121
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_1615214_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29917323
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914829
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_1615214.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914257
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_1615214.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912745
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914287
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914835
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29918233
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915401
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915679
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_1615214.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29922073
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_1615214.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29920145
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_1615214.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912761
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913121
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912973
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913033
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915657
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916719
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915189
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914223
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915069
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915545
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_1615214.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912773
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915023
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913927
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29919377
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_1615214.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913239
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_1615214.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912755
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914491
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29918879
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914799
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915281
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916327
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29922363
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29931339
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29930995
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29922015
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29925519
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913583
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29918299
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915793
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_1615214.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914769
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_1615214.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912789
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913057
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914443
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913107
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914467
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29917911
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914507
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914775
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29921869
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916259
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913621
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912923
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29912921
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913143
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913361
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29925901
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913659
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913313
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29916163
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913607
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29921899
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_1615214.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913119
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29915385
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29913751
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29918657
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_1615214.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29914829
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29917323
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_1615214.29917421
</commentlist>
</conversation>
