<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_29_0225250</id>
	<title>Physics Rebel Aims To Shake Up the Video Game World</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1256804220000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>waderoush writes <i>"Physicist Shahriar Afshar is famous as the designer of the '<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afshar\_experiment">Afshar Experiment</a>,' a study first described in 2004 that called into question Neils Bohr's observation that it's impossible to observe light's wave-like properties and its particle-like properties at the same time. Not surprisingly, the idea met with widespread resistance in the physics community. While he waits for the controversy to settle down, Afshar himself is taking a detour into the video game world. He's now the president and CTO of Immerz, a Cambridge, MA-based startup building an 'acousto-haptic' interface that drapes over a gamer's shoulders and <a href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2009/10/27/a-physics-rebel-shakes-up-the-video-game-world-literally/?single\_page=true">turns video game sound into (literally) chest-pounding vibrations</a>. Xconomy was allowed to test the device, and has the full story behind Afshar's unusual journey and the company's hopes for enhancing PC and console gamers' experience of action/adventure/first-person-shooter titles."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>waderoush writes " Physicist Shahriar Afshar is famous as the designer of the 'Afshar Experiment, ' a study first described in 2004 that called into question Neils Bohr 's observation that it 's impossible to observe light 's wave-like properties and its particle-like properties at the same time .
Not surprisingly , the idea met with widespread resistance in the physics community .
While he waits for the controversy to settle down , Afshar himself is taking a detour into the video game world .
He 's now the president and CTO of Immerz , a Cambridge , MA-based startup building an 'acousto-haptic ' interface that drapes over a gamer 's shoulders and turns video game sound into ( literally ) chest-pounding vibrations .
Xconomy was allowed to test the device , and has the full story behind Afshar 's unusual journey and the company 's hopes for enhancing PC and console gamers ' experience of action/adventure/first-person-shooter titles .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>waderoush writes "Physicist Shahriar Afshar is famous as the designer of the 'Afshar Experiment,' a study first described in 2004 that called into question Neils Bohr's observation that it's impossible to observe light's wave-like properties and its particle-like properties at the same time.
Not surprisingly, the idea met with widespread resistance in the physics community.
While he waits for the controversy to settle down, Afshar himself is taking a detour into the video game world.
He's now the president and CTO of Immerz, a Cambridge, MA-based startup building an 'acousto-haptic' interface that drapes over a gamer's shoulders and turns video game sound into (literally) chest-pounding vibrations.
Xconomy was allowed to test the device, and has the full story behind Afshar's unusual journey and the company's hopes for enhancing PC and console gamers' experience of action/adventure/first-person-shooter titles.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29909715</id>
	<title>Re:!Controvrsy</title>
	<author>Interoperable</author>
	<datestamp>1256828700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not quite as bad as most crackpots. I looked it up on Wikipedia and it looks like his big mistake is writing a blog about it. That's the difference between a controversial (or perhaps flat out incorrect) theory and a crackpot theory; the blog about it. His paper has sparked much debate over it's validity which makes it a valuable contribution. Even if it's incorrect, it has enough merit to provoke criticism, not dismissal.</p><p>You're allowed to be wrong in science; being wrong is still more useful than saying nothing. Just don't blog about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not quite as bad as most crackpots .
I looked it up on Wikipedia and it looks like his big mistake is writing a blog about it .
That 's the difference between a controversial ( or perhaps flat out incorrect ) theory and a crackpot theory ; the blog about it .
His paper has sparked much debate over it 's validity which makes it a valuable contribution .
Even if it 's incorrect , it has enough merit to provoke criticism , not dismissal.You 're allowed to be wrong in science ; being wrong is still more useful than saying nothing .
Just do n't blog about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not quite as bad as most crackpots.
I looked it up on Wikipedia and it looks like his big mistake is writing a blog about it.
That's the difference between a controversial (or perhaps flat out incorrect) theory and a crackpot theory; the blog about it.
His paper has sparked much debate over it's validity which makes it a valuable contribution.
Even if it's incorrect, it has enough merit to provoke criticism, not dismissal.You're allowed to be wrong in science; being wrong is still more useful than saying nothing.
Just don't blog about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907747</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29914965</id>
	<title>Physics rebel</title>
	<author>apiwat2010</author>
	<datestamp>1256848740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>thank</htmltext>
<tokenext>thank</tokentext>
<sentencetext>thank</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29910571</id>
	<title>Aura Interactor?</title>
	<author>Acapulco</author>
	<datestamp>1256832060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds impressively similar to the <a href="http://www.avsim.com/pages/0604/aura/aura\_interactor.htm" title="avsim.com" rel="nofollow">Aura</a> [avsim.com]  <a href="http://www.fsplanet.com/reviews50.htm" title="fsplanet.com" rel="nofollow">Interactor</a> [fsplanet.com] which by the way is *very* old.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds impressively similar to the Aura [ avsim.com ] Interactor [ fsplanet.com ] which by the way is * very * old .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds impressively similar to the Aura [avsim.com]  Interactor [fsplanet.com] which by the way is *very* old.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29909187</id>
	<title>Re:It's "Niels"</title>
	<author>TeknoHog</author>
	<datestamp>1256826180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Poll: which of these is the correct spelling of Bohr's first name?
</p><ul>
<li>Neils</li><li>Niels</li><li>CowboyNeils</li><li>CowboyNiels</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>Poll : which of these is the correct spelling of Bohr 's first name ?
NeilsNielsCowboyNeilsCowboyNiels</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Poll: which of these is the correct spelling of Bohr's first name?
NeilsNielsCowboyNeilsCowboyNiels</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908401</id>
	<title>early adopters :)</title>
	<author>rs232</author>
	<datestamp>1256819340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>'<i>unless it has application in the porn industry, it's dead in the water</i>'<br> <br>

They were always early adopters of the 'new' technology<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)<br>
-------<br> <br>

Making (microsoft) ACPI not work with Linux<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. <br> <br>

"<i>Foxconn<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. have several different tables, a group for Windws XP and Vista, a group for 2000, a group for NT, Me, 95, 98, etc. that just errors out, and one for <a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=869249" title="ubuntuforums.org">LINUX</a> [ubuntuforums.org].<br> <br>

The one for Linux points to a <strong>badly written table</strong> that does not correspond to the board's ACPI implementation, causing weird kernel errors, strange system freezing, no suspend or hibernate, and other problems"<br> <br>

'You are incorrect in that the motherboard is not ACPI complaint. If it were not, then it would not have received Microsoft Certification for WHQL', Foxconn</i> <br> <br>

'<i>One thing I find myself wondering about is whether we shouldn't try and <a href="http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/3000/PX03020.pdf" title="slated.org">make the "ACPI" extensions somehow Windows specific</a> [slated.org] </i>', billg Jan 1999</htmltext>
<tokenext>'unless it has application in the porn industry , it 's dead in the water ' They were always early adopters of the 'new ' technology .. : ) ------- Making ( microsoft ) ACPI not work with Linux . . " Foxconn .. have several different tables , a group for Windws XP and Vista , a group for 2000 , a group for NT , Me , 95 , 98 , etc .
that just errors out , and one for LINUX [ ubuntuforums.org ] .
The one for Linux points to a badly written table that does not correspond to the board 's ACPI implementation , causing weird kernel errors , strange system freezing , no suspend or hibernate , and other problems " 'You are incorrect in that the motherboard is not ACPI complaint .
If it were not , then it would not have received Microsoft Certification for WHQL ' , Foxconn 'One thing I find myself wondering about is whether we should n't try and make the " ACPI " extensions somehow Windows specific [ slated.org ] ' , billg Jan 1999</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'unless it has application in the porn industry, it's dead in the water' 

They were always early adopters of the 'new' technology .. :)
------- 

Making (microsoft) ACPI not work with Linux ..  

"Foxconn .. have several different tables, a group for Windws XP and Vista, a group for 2000, a group for NT, Me, 95, 98, etc.
that just errors out, and one for LINUX [ubuntuforums.org].
The one for Linux points to a badly written table that does not correspond to the board's ACPI implementation, causing weird kernel errors, strange system freezing, no suspend or hibernate, and other problems" 

'You are incorrect in that the motherboard is not ACPI complaint.
If it were not, then it would not have received Microsoft Certification for WHQL', Foxconn  

'One thing I find myself wondering about is whether we shouldn't try and make the "ACPI" extensions somehow Windows specific [slated.org] ', billg Jan 1999</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907681</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29914369</id>
	<title>Re:!Controvrsy</title>
	<author>coolmoose25</author>
	<datestamp>1256846220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is interesting that they tagged it as BS and invalidated the experiment by using the single photon results... but these "major physicist" all disagree as to exactly WHY it's invalided... some say that there is no which-way information, others say there is but that it fails for other reasons... I don't really understand all the implications of the experiment, but I found his approach novel and insightful, and the stir it caused very amusing.  And I still leave room for the possibility that Copenhagen may in fact be wrong.  It wouldn't be the first time that "settled science" has been turned upside down.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is interesting that they tagged it as BS and invalidated the experiment by using the single photon results... but these " major physicist " all disagree as to exactly WHY it 's invalided... some say that there is no which-way information , others say there is but that it fails for other reasons... I do n't really understand all the implications of the experiment , but I found his approach novel and insightful , and the stir it caused very amusing .
And I still leave room for the possibility that Copenhagen may in fact be wrong .
It would n't be the first time that " settled science " has been turned upside down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is interesting that they tagged it as BS and invalidated the experiment by using the single photon results... but these "major physicist" all disagree as to exactly WHY it's invalided... some say that there is no which-way information, others say there is but that it fails for other reasons... I don't really understand all the implications of the experiment, but I found his approach novel and insightful, and the stir it caused very amusing.
And I still leave room for the possibility that Copenhagen may in fact be wrong.
It wouldn't be the first time that "settled science" has been turned upside down.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908483</id>
	<title>Re:!Controvrsy</title>
	<author>CharlyFoxtrot</author>
	<datestamp>1256820180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yup, the experiment didn't work with a single photon when they wanted to verify the results. The Copenhagen interpretation still remains intact.</p></div><p>I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of cats cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup , the experiment did n't work with a single photon when they wanted to verify the results .
The Copenhagen interpretation still remains intact.I felt a great disturbance in the Force , as if millions of cats cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup, the experiment didn't work with a single photon when they wanted to verify the results.
The Copenhagen interpretation still remains intact.I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of cats cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908505</id>
	<title>Re:It's "Niels"</title>
	<author>ozbird</author>
	<datestamp>1256820360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Q: Why did Albert Einstein cross the road?<br>
A: To get away from Niels Bohr.  But when he got to the other side, Bohr was there too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Q : Why did Albert Einstein cross the road ?
A : To get away from Niels Bohr .
But when he got to the other side , Bohr was there too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Q: Why did Albert Einstein cross the road?
A: To get away from Niels Bohr.
But when he got to the other side, Bohr was there too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29911559</id>
	<title>Re:!Controvrsy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256835720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Half a million cats, surely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Half a million cats , surely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Half a million cats, surely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907911</id>
	<title>Re:It's "Niels"</title>
	<author>srussia</author>
	<datestamp>1256811900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"HogFarmer Niels" has a nice ring to it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" HogFarmer Niels " has a nice ring to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"HogFarmer Niels" has a nice ring to it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907925</id>
	<title>Re:It's "Niels"</title>
	<author>cjfs</author>
	<datestamp>1256812080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Niels Henrik David Bohr. Seriously, people...</p></div><p>You spelled Henry wrong<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Niels Henrik David Bohr .
Seriously , people...You spelled Henry wrong ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Niels Henrik David Bohr.
Seriously, people...You spelled Henry wrong ;-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907737</id>
	<title>Chest pounding vibrations...</title>
	<author>reverendbeer</author>
	<datestamp>1256808900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>...and unfit, overweight gamers. In the words of Jeremy Clarkson, what could possibly go wrong?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and unfit , overweight gamers .
In the words of Jeremy Clarkson , what could possibly go wrong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and unfit, overweight gamers.
In the words of Jeremy Clarkson, what could possibly go wrong?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907681</id>
	<title>porn</title>
	<author>timmarhy</author>
	<datestamp>1256808060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>unless it has application in the porn industry, it's dead in the water.</htmltext>
<tokenext>unless it has application in the porn industry , it 's dead in the water .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>unless it has application in the porn industry, it's dead in the water.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907803</id>
	<title>Re:!Controvrsy</title>
	<author>noundi</author>
	<datestamp>1256810040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Controversy" already settled by being tagged "BS" by major physicists.</p></div><p>Yup, the experiment didn't work with a single photon when they wanted to verify the results. The Copenhagen interpretation still remains intact.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Controversy " already settled by being tagged " BS " by major physicists.Yup , the experiment did n't work with a single photon when they wanted to verify the results .
The Copenhagen interpretation still remains intact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Controversy" already settled by being tagged "BS" by major physicists.Yup, the experiment didn't work with a single photon when they wanted to verify the results.
The Copenhagen interpretation still remains intact.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907747</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29909599</id>
	<title>Lawsuits in 3..2...1..</title>
	<author>SilverJets</author>
	<datestamp>1256828280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can see it now, someone goes on a 24 hour gaming bender and their insides get liquified due to this thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can see it now , someone goes on a 24 hour gaming bender and their insides get liquified due to this thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can see it now, someone goes on a 24 hour gaming bender and their insides get liquified due to this thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29948006</id>
	<title>Re:Chest pounding vibrations...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1257105060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's call it... uuum... natural selection!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's call it... uuum... natural selection !
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's call it... uuum... natural selection!
:P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907737</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29932593</id>
	<title>Re:!Controvrsy</title>
	<author>ScottyFPS</author>
	<datestamp>1256931600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nonsense! You have not even bothered taking a look at his web-page have you? It actually says the "Single photon experiment was a success" and published a peer-reviewed paper on it.

The fact that "major physicists" are involved in taking sides in this, is itself a sign of the significance of the experiment, otherwise, they would have simply ignored it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nonsense !
You have not even bothered taking a look at his web-page have you ?
It actually says the " Single photon experiment was a success " and published a peer-reviewed paper on it .
The fact that " major physicists " are involved in taking sides in this , is itself a sign of the significance of the experiment , otherwise , they would have simply ignored it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nonsense!
You have not even bothered taking a look at his web-page have you?
It actually says the "Single photon experiment was a success" and published a peer-reviewed paper on it.
The fact that "major physicists" are involved in taking sides in this, is itself a sign of the significance of the experiment, otherwise, they would have simply ignored it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908507</id>
	<title>Prior Art</title>
	<author>meyekul</author>
	<datestamp>1256820420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"turns video game sound into (literally) chest-pounding vibrations."


I think normal speakers already do this.  Granted you have to turn them up pretty high to do much chest pounding, but I'm pretty sure all sounds are indeed vibrations.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" turns video game sound into ( literally ) chest-pounding vibrations .
" I think normal speakers already do this .
Granted you have to turn them up pretty high to do much chest pounding , but I 'm pretty sure all sounds are indeed vibrations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"turns video game sound into (literally) chest-pounding vibrations.
"


I think normal speakers already do this.
Granted you have to turn them up pretty high to do much chest pounding, but I'm pretty sure all sounds are indeed vibrations.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908305</id>
	<title>Warning Label</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256817900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Note to self: do not play Fist of the NorthStar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Note to self : do not play Fist of the NorthStar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Note to self: do not play Fist of the NorthStar.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907731</id>
	<title>i guess immerZ wil lead to...</title>
	<author>NaughtyNimitz</author>
	<datestamp>1256808840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...eXistenZ.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...eXistenZ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...eXistenZ.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29922387</id>
	<title>Re:!Controvrsy</title>
	<author>consonant</author>
	<datestamp>1256908980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>[..] has sparked much debate over it's validity which makes it a valuable contribution. Even if it's incorrect, it has enough merit to provoke criticism, not dismissal.</p></div></blockquote><p>You mean, like Intelligent Design..?<br> <br>
Anyone can put up anything in these times we live in, and have it accessible to a reasonable audience in terms of numbers with the right kind of 'marketing'. Some of them deserve stinging criticism <i>followed</i> by a dismissal.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ .. ] has sparked much debate over it 's validity which makes it a valuable contribution .
Even if it 's incorrect , it has enough merit to provoke criticism , not dismissal.You mean , like Intelligent Design.. ?
Anyone can put up anything in these times we live in , and have it accessible to a reasonable audience in terms of numbers with the right kind of 'marketing' .
Some of them deserve stinging criticism followed by a dismissal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[..] has sparked much debate over it's validity which makes it a valuable contribution.
Even if it's incorrect, it has enough merit to provoke criticism, not dismissal.You mean, like Intelligent Design..?
Anyone can put up anything in these times we live in, and have it accessible to a reasonable audience in terms of numbers with the right kind of 'marketing'.
Some of them deserve stinging criticism followed by a dismissal.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29909715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908809</id>
	<title>sounds (bone)phony to me....</title>
	<author>marxz</author>
	<datestamp>1256823840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>so... basically he's found an old BonePhone and plugged it in to a PS3?
right?

wow, everything old really is new again...</htmltext>
<tokenext>so... basically he 's found an old BonePhone and plugged it in to a PS3 ?
right ? wow , everything old really is new again.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so... basically he's found an old BonePhone and plugged it in to a PS3?
right?

wow, everything old really is new again...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907711</id>
	<title>Sounds dangerous</title>
	<author>cjfs</author>
	<datestamp>1256808600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Immerz&rsquo;s product, called Kor-fx<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>So anytime you get shot in game, Kor hits you with a bat'leth?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Immerz    s product , called Kor-fx ...So anytime you get shot in game , Kor hits you with a bat'leth ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Immerz’s product, called Kor-fx ...So anytime you get shot in game, Kor hits you with a bat'leth?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29910827</id>
	<title>Re:It's "Niels"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256833020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There is no "Neil" in Bohr. He's Danish: His Name is Niels Bohr, Niels Henrik David Bohr. Seriously, people...</p></div><p>i think you forgot to cite wikipedia.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no " Neil " in Bohr .
He 's Danish : His Name is Niels Bohr , Niels Henrik David Bohr .
Seriously , people...i think you forgot to cite wikipedia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no "Neil" in Bohr.
He's Danish: His Name is Niels Bohr, Niels Henrik David Bohr.
Seriously, people...i think you forgot to cite wikipedia.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907945</id>
	<title>For a physics rebel</title>
	<author>sleeponthemic</author>
	<datestamp>1256812380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is fairly tame.  I remember picking up a full aura bass cushion set for about $5 from a retailer, after they tanked.   Geographically locating it on the shoulders isn't going to save it from being a bit of novelty nonsense.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is fairly tame .
I remember picking up a full aura bass cushion set for about $ 5 from a retailer , after they tanked .
Geographically locating it on the shoulders is n't going to save it from being a bit of novelty nonsense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is fairly tame.
I remember picking up a full aura bass cushion set for about $5 from a retailer, after they tanked.
Geographically locating it on the shoulders isn't going to save it from being a bit of novelty nonsense.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29909259</id>
	<title>Re:Physics rebel?</title>
	<author>radtea</author>
	<datestamp>1256826600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>If Afshar's theory/experiment contradicts the mainstream physics</i></p><p>The funny thing is that it doesn't even do that:  it is an attempt to find an experiment that distinguishes between different interpretations of QM, which no one has ever been able to do.  Everyone agrees, phenomenologically, what the results of the experiment should be, and the results of the experiment are consistent with the results predicted by QM.</p><p>The question that got people arguing is whether or not this proves or disproves the Copenhagen Interpretation.  My own view is that since the Copenhagen Interpretation is barely coherent (pun intended) it is very hard to "disprove".  And the very fact that physicists have got along with Copenhagen for decades shows how little interpretation matters when it comes to QM:  any old thing will do, so long as it provides a reasonable guide to calculation.</p><p>Because Copenhagen insists that we only compute things in the context of the experiments actually being performed, it does this quite well.  This has practical implications when taking integrals in calculations of angular correlations in gamma-ray spectroscopy, for example:  you integrate over the things you aren't measuring because Copenhagen tells you they have no objective meaning.  I'm sure other interpretations could do the same thing, but there is no experimental basis to choose between them, so it's just a parlor game to talk about them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If Afshar 's theory/experiment contradicts the mainstream physicsThe funny thing is that it does n't even do that : it is an attempt to find an experiment that distinguishes between different interpretations of QM , which no one has ever been able to do .
Everyone agrees , phenomenologically , what the results of the experiment should be , and the results of the experiment are consistent with the results predicted by QM.The question that got people arguing is whether or not this proves or disproves the Copenhagen Interpretation .
My own view is that since the Copenhagen Interpretation is barely coherent ( pun intended ) it is very hard to " disprove " .
And the very fact that physicists have got along with Copenhagen for decades shows how little interpretation matters when it comes to QM : any old thing will do , so long as it provides a reasonable guide to calculation.Because Copenhagen insists that we only compute things in the context of the experiments actually being performed , it does this quite well .
This has practical implications when taking integrals in calculations of angular correlations in gamma-ray spectroscopy , for example : you integrate over the things you are n't measuring because Copenhagen tells you they have no objective meaning .
I 'm sure other interpretations could do the same thing , but there is no experimental basis to choose between them , so it 's just a parlor game to talk about them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Afshar's theory/experiment contradicts the mainstream physicsThe funny thing is that it doesn't even do that:  it is an attempt to find an experiment that distinguishes between different interpretations of QM, which no one has ever been able to do.
Everyone agrees, phenomenologically, what the results of the experiment should be, and the results of the experiment are consistent with the results predicted by QM.The question that got people arguing is whether or not this proves or disproves the Copenhagen Interpretation.
My own view is that since the Copenhagen Interpretation is barely coherent (pun intended) it is very hard to "disprove".
And the very fact that physicists have got along with Copenhagen for decades shows how little interpretation matters when it comes to QM:  any old thing will do, so long as it provides a reasonable guide to calculation.Because Copenhagen insists that we only compute things in the context of the experiments actually being performed, it does this quite well.
This has practical implications when taking integrals in calculations of angular correlations in gamma-ray spectroscopy, for example:  you integrate over the things you aren't measuring because Copenhagen tells you they have no objective meaning.
I'm sure other interpretations could do the same thing, but there is no experimental basis to choose between them, so it's just a parlor game to talk about them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907767</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908159</id>
	<title>Physics rebel</title>
	<author>fenring</author>
	<datestamp>1256815920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ten years ago, a crack commando unit was sent to prison by a science court for a crime they didn't commit. These men promptly escaped from a maximum security stockade to the Los Angeles underground. Today, still wanted by the government, they survive as soldiers of fortune, physics rebels, if you will. If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire...Shahriar Afshar</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ten years ago , a crack commando unit was sent to prison by a science court for a crime they did n't commit .
These men promptly escaped from a maximum security stockade to the Los Angeles underground .
Today , still wanted by the government , they survive as soldiers of fortune , physics rebels , if you will .
If you have a problem , if no one else can help , and if you can find them , maybe you can hire...Shahriar Afshar</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ten years ago, a crack commando unit was sent to prison by a science court for a crime they didn't commit.
These men promptly escaped from a maximum security stockade to the Los Angeles underground.
Today, still wanted by the government, they survive as soldiers of fortune, physics rebels, if you will.
If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire...Shahriar Afshar</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907767</id>
	<title>Physics rebel?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256809380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hate when media makes up "impressive" headlines out of nothing.<br>The article may be worth from a point of view of a new controller but using terms such as "physics rebel" to make the controller sound like it will change the world (just like the "physics rebel" did) just pisses me off.</p><p>If Afshar's theory/experiment contradicts the mainstream physics, does this makes him headline-worth "physics rebel"? If yes, there are millions of wackos around the world with their crazy theories.<br>Foundations of Physics (where he published the last) may be a peer reviewed journal but its impact factor is very low (i.e. it is not a highly regarded journal) and it is known for publishing crazy (or should I call them rebellious) claims.</p><p>And they can't even spell Niels Bohr's name correctly...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate when media makes up " impressive " headlines out of nothing.The article may be worth from a point of view of a new controller but using terms such as " physics rebel " to make the controller sound like it will change the world ( just like the " physics rebel " did ) just pisses me off.If Afshar 's theory/experiment contradicts the mainstream physics , does this makes him headline-worth " physics rebel " ?
If yes , there are millions of wackos around the world with their crazy theories.Foundations of Physics ( where he published the last ) may be a peer reviewed journal but its impact factor is very low ( i.e .
it is not a highly regarded journal ) and it is known for publishing crazy ( or should I call them rebellious ) claims.And they ca n't even spell Niels Bohr 's name correctly.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate when media makes up "impressive" headlines out of nothing.The article may be worth from a point of view of a new controller but using terms such as "physics rebel" to make the controller sound like it will change the world (just like the "physics rebel" did) just pisses me off.If Afshar's theory/experiment contradicts the mainstream physics, does this makes him headline-worth "physics rebel"?
If yes, there are millions of wackos around the world with their crazy theories.Foundations of Physics (where he published the last) may be a peer reviewed journal but its impact factor is very low (i.e.
it is not a highly regarded journal) and it is known for publishing crazy (or should I call them rebellious) claims.And they can't even spell Niels Bohr's name correctly...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29910195</id>
	<title>A bit of background on duality</title>
	<author>Interoperable</author>
	<datestamp>1256830800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For those who care: some background. The experiment discusses the "duality of light" (light/particle nature). However, the question isn't "does light behave as a wave or a particle?" That's not really a question that needs asking, various theories of the propagation of light are well established and understood. Geometric optics treats light as a particle and is valid within the constraint that you're dealing with structures that are large compared with the wavelength of the light. The electromagnetic wave approach covers, more or less, all propagation of light and treats light as a wave. Finally, quantum optics is used to explore the interaction of light with matter. Here's where duality becomes interesting: working with the electromagnetic field as a <i>quantum</i> field, the notion of a photon as a quantum particle arises. The propagation of the photon is well described by considering it as a classical electromagnetic wave but the picture of a photon is useful when discussing it's interaction with matter (for example, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoelectric\_effect" title="wikipedia.org">the photoelectric effect</a> [wikipedia.org]).</p><p>In the case of the double-slit experiment, which is the basis for Afshar's experiment, the propagation of light can be described classically by treating it as an electromagnetic wave. However, double slit experiments work with single photons as well. Single photons are only described by quantum optics and when the experiment is done with prepared single photons, the interference fringes (viewed in the Fourier plane) can be considered a measurement of the momentum of the photon as it passes through one of the slits (where it ends up on the screen depends on what direction it was travelling in when it passed through the slit). Which slit it passes through is a measurement of the position. Position and momentum are complementary variables in quantum mechanics and cannot be measured simultaneously with perfect accuracy.</p><p>Afshar proposed an experiment to do exactly that, measure both. The key criticism, however, is that the interference fringes (momentum measurement) aren't observed, they're inferred, which doesn't really constitute a measurement. His thought experiment was analyzed quantitatively as well as was found not to violate the complementarity of the position and momentum variables. The issue is further obscured by the fact that the measurements are related to the spatial mode of the photon and it's propagation vector, which is related, but not quite identical, to a position-momentum measurement for a more classical particle. In any case, Afshar's work is interesting, but doesn't really tread the revolutionary/crackpot line, it can be analyzed well within the existing body of knowledge of quantum optics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For those who care : some background .
The experiment discusses the " duality of light " ( light/particle nature ) .
However , the question is n't " does light behave as a wave or a particle ?
" That 's not really a question that needs asking , various theories of the propagation of light are well established and understood .
Geometric optics treats light as a particle and is valid within the constraint that you 're dealing with structures that are large compared with the wavelength of the light .
The electromagnetic wave approach covers , more or less , all propagation of light and treats light as a wave .
Finally , quantum optics is used to explore the interaction of light with matter .
Here 's where duality becomes interesting : working with the electromagnetic field as a quantum field , the notion of a photon as a quantum particle arises .
The propagation of the photon is well described by considering it as a classical electromagnetic wave but the picture of a photon is useful when discussing it 's interaction with matter ( for example , the photoelectric effect [ wikipedia.org ] ) .In the case of the double-slit experiment , which is the basis for Afshar 's experiment , the propagation of light can be described classically by treating it as an electromagnetic wave .
However , double slit experiments work with single photons as well .
Single photons are only described by quantum optics and when the experiment is done with prepared single photons , the interference fringes ( viewed in the Fourier plane ) can be considered a measurement of the momentum of the photon as it passes through one of the slits ( where it ends up on the screen depends on what direction it was travelling in when it passed through the slit ) .
Which slit it passes through is a measurement of the position .
Position and momentum are complementary variables in quantum mechanics and can not be measured simultaneously with perfect accuracy.Afshar proposed an experiment to do exactly that , measure both .
The key criticism , however , is that the interference fringes ( momentum measurement ) are n't observed , they 're inferred , which does n't really constitute a measurement .
His thought experiment was analyzed quantitatively as well as was found not to violate the complementarity of the position and momentum variables .
The issue is further obscured by the fact that the measurements are related to the spatial mode of the photon and it 's propagation vector , which is related , but not quite identical , to a position-momentum measurement for a more classical particle .
In any case , Afshar 's work is interesting , but does n't really tread the revolutionary/crackpot line , it can be analyzed well within the existing body of knowledge of quantum optics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those who care: some background.
The experiment discusses the "duality of light" (light/particle nature).
However, the question isn't "does light behave as a wave or a particle?
" That's not really a question that needs asking, various theories of the propagation of light are well established and understood.
Geometric optics treats light as a particle and is valid within the constraint that you're dealing with structures that are large compared with the wavelength of the light.
The electromagnetic wave approach covers, more or less, all propagation of light and treats light as a wave.
Finally, quantum optics is used to explore the interaction of light with matter.
Here's where duality becomes interesting: working with the electromagnetic field as a quantum field, the notion of a photon as a quantum particle arises.
The propagation of the photon is well described by considering it as a classical electromagnetic wave but the picture of a photon is useful when discussing it's interaction with matter (for example, the photoelectric effect [wikipedia.org]).In the case of the double-slit experiment, which is the basis for Afshar's experiment, the propagation of light can be described classically by treating it as an electromagnetic wave.
However, double slit experiments work with single photons as well.
Single photons are only described by quantum optics and when the experiment is done with prepared single photons, the interference fringes (viewed in the Fourier plane) can be considered a measurement of the momentum of the photon as it passes through one of the slits (where it ends up on the screen depends on what direction it was travelling in when it passed through the slit).
Which slit it passes through is a measurement of the position.
Position and momentum are complementary variables in quantum mechanics and cannot be measured simultaneously with perfect accuracy.Afshar proposed an experiment to do exactly that, measure both.
The key criticism, however, is that the interference fringes (momentum measurement) aren't observed, they're inferred, which doesn't really constitute a measurement.
His thought experiment was analyzed quantitatively as well as was found not to violate the complementarity of the position and momentum variables.
The issue is further obscured by the fact that the measurements are related to the spatial mode of the photon and it's propagation vector, which is related, but not quite identical, to a position-momentum measurement for a more classical particle.
In any case, Afshar's work is interesting, but doesn't really tread the revolutionary/crackpot line, it can be analyzed well within the existing body of knowledge of quantum optics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29932657</id>
	<title>Re:!Controvrsy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257019500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is BS. You have not even bothered taking a look at his web-page have you? It actually says the "Single photon experiment was a success" and published a peer-reviewed paper on it. The fact that "major physicists" are involved in taking sides in this, is itself a sign of the significance of the experiment, otherwise, they would have simply ignored it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is BS .
You have not even bothered taking a look at his web-page have you ?
It actually says the " Single photon experiment was a success " and published a peer-reviewed paper on it .
The fact that " major physicists " are involved in taking sides in this , is itself a sign of the significance of the experiment , otherwise , they would have simply ignored it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is BS.
You have not even bothered taking a look at his web-page have you?
It actually says the "Single photon experiment was a success" and published a peer-reviewed paper on it.
The fact that "major physicists" are involved in taking sides in this, is itself a sign of the significance of the experiment, otherwise, they would have simply ignored it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907733</id>
	<title>It's "Niels"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256808840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>There is no "Neil" in Bohr. He's Danish: His Name is Niels Bohr, Niels Henrik David Bohr. Seriously, people...</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no " Neil " in Bohr .
He 's Danish : His Name is Niels Bohr , Niels Henrik David Bohr .
Seriously , people.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no "Neil" in Bohr.
He's Danish: His Name is Niels Bohr, Niels Henrik David Bohr.
Seriously, people...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908247</id>
	<title>minus 3, Tr0ll)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256817120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">Of 0ser base for so that you don't fly They looked Theo de RRadt, one</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of 0ser base for so that you do n't fly They looked Theo de RRadt , one [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of 0ser base for so that you don't fly They looked Theo de RRadt, one [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29911343</id>
	<title>Re:It's "Niels"</title>
	<author>dontmakemethink</author>
	<datestamp>1256834940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Afflict us not with your Bohring details...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Afflict us not with your Bohring details.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Afflict us not with your Bohring details...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907747</id>
	<title>!Controvrsy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256809200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Controversy" already settled by being tagged "BS" by major physicists.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Controversy " already settled by being tagged " BS " by major physicists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Controversy" already settled by being tagged "BS" by major physicists.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29909731</id>
	<title>Re:!Controvrsy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256828760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was actually only half a million cats...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was actually only half a million cats.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was actually only half a million cats...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908483</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908441</id>
	<title>It's been done before</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256819880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I recall there was a force-feedback vest back in the 16-bit console days, which I think was also based on audio (bass, which most gamers' TV rarely reproduced anyway). It wasn't a huge success, in spite (or because) of its USP: a game based on flatulence in which you played ambulant snot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I recall there was a force-feedback vest back in the 16-bit console days , which I think was also based on audio ( bass , which most gamers ' TV rarely reproduced anyway ) .
It was n't a huge success , in spite ( or because ) of its USP : a game based on flatulence in which you played ambulant snot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I recall there was a force-feedback vest back in the 16-bit console days, which I think was also based on audio (bass, which most gamers' TV rarely reproduced anyway).
It wasn't a huge success, in spite (or because) of its USP: a game based on flatulence in which you played ambulant snot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908523</id>
	<title>Re:Physics rebel?</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1256820540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If Afshar's theory/experiment contradicts the mainstream physics, does this makes him headline-worth "physics rebel"? If yes, there are millions of wackos around the world with their crazy theories.</p></div><p>Please don't conflate the two like that.  An experiment that contradicts existing theories is headline worthy and interesting.  Theories that contradict existing theories are ten a penny.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If Afshar 's theory/experiment contradicts the mainstream physics , does this makes him headline-worth " physics rebel " ?
If yes , there are millions of wackos around the world with their crazy theories.Please do n't conflate the two like that .
An experiment that contradicts existing theories is headline worthy and interesting .
Theories that contradict existing theories are ten a penny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Afshar's theory/experiment contradicts the mainstream physics, does this makes him headline-worth "physics rebel"?
If yes, there are millions of wackos around the world with their crazy theories.Please don't conflate the two like that.
An experiment that contradicts existing theories is headline worthy and interesting.
Theories that contradict existing theories are ten a penny.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907767</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908859</id>
	<title>It's the Bone Phone</title>
	<author>tomhath</author>
	<datestamp>1256824140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The same idea was marketed 30 years ago as the "Bone Phone". Might've done better if they had thought about that name some more.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The same idea was marketed 30 years ago as the " Bone Phone " .
Might 've done better if they had thought about that name some more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The same idea was marketed 30 years ago as the "Bone Phone".
Might've done better if they had thought about that name some more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907975</id>
	<title>Short-lived Technology</title>
	<author>Linker3000</author>
	<datestamp>1256812800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Draped over the shoulder...? Pah!</p><p>I see from another article that Xerox are making great strides with printable electronics so die-hard gamers will have their haptic transducers tattooed all over their body and will live the experience 24/7.</p><p>Imagine the possibilities - without the need to leave Mom's basement, you could load up 'MyRealWorld' and get mugged, roughed up by the local bully, groped on the subway (or grope someone else!), knocked in the shin by a supermarket trolley, bitten by a yappy dog in the park or simulate the jostle of a commuter ride to a real workplace without leaving your comfort zone. Couple this with retinal projectors, lie on the floor, arm outstretched and you're free-fall parachuting. Let's see what happens if you don't bother to pull that cord....</p><p>With fewer bodies out in the open, maybe we could slow down the effects of global warming.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Draped over the shoulder... ?
Pah ! I see from another article that Xerox are making great strides with printable electronics so die-hard gamers will have their haptic transducers tattooed all over their body and will live the experience 24/7.Imagine the possibilities - without the need to leave Mom 's basement , you could load up 'MyRealWorld ' and get mugged , roughed up by the local bully , groped on the subway ( or grope someone else !
) , knocked in the shin by a supermarket trolley , bitten by a yappy dog in the park or simulate the jostle of a commuter ride to a real workplace without leaving your comfort zone .
Couple this with retinal projectors , lie on the floor , arm outstretched and you 're free-fall parachuting .
Let 's see what happens if you do n't bother to pull that cord....With fewer bodies out in the open , maybe we could slow down the effects of global warming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Draped over the shoulder...?
Pah!I see from another article that Xerox are making great strides with printable electronics so die-hard gamers will have their haptic transducers tattooed all over their body and will live the experience 24/7.Imagine the possibilities - without the need to leave Mom's basement, you could load up 'MyRealWorld' and get mugged, roughed up by the local bully, groped on the subway (or grope someone else!
), knocked in the shin by a supermarket trolley, bitten by a yappy dog in the park or simulate the jostle of a commuter ride to a real workplace without leaving your comfort zone.
Couple this with retinal projectors, lie on the floor, arm outstretched and you're free-fall parachuting.
Let's see what happens if you don't bother to pull that cord....With fewer bodies out in the open, maybe we could slow down the effects of global warming.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29922275</id>
	<title>Re:It's "Niels"</title>
	<author>danieltdp</author>
	<datestamp>1256907420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I got an urge to make a pun with Cowboy Neal, but I will skip it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I got an urge to make a pun with Cowboy Neal , but I will skip it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got an urge to make a pun with Cowboy Neal, but I will skip it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908385</id>
	<title>Re:!Controvrsy</title>
	<author>somersault</author>
	<datestamp>1256819160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Controversy" already settled by being tagged "BS" by major physicists</p></div><p>Indeed - any self respecting Physicist should have at least an MSc.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Controversy " already settled by being tagged " BS " by major physicistsIndeed - any self respecting Physicist should have at least an MSc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Controversy" already settled by being tagged "BS" by major physicistsIndeed - any self respecting Physicist should have at least an MSc.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907747</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29909185</id>
	<title>His first video game project</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256826180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He was working on a virtual cat in the box game. Unfortunately the game was deemed pointless because every time you observed the particle the cat got shot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He was working on a virtual cat in the box game .
Unfortunately the game was deemed pointless because every time you observed the particle the cat got shot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He was working on a virtual cat in the box game.
Unfortunately the game was deemed pointless because every time you observed the particle the cat got shot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29909841</id>
	<title>Prior Art...</title>
	<author>rnturn</author>
	<datestamp>1256829300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... if he's considering patenting this thing:  The Bone Fone.

</p><p>I got one back in the '80s from DAK. Still have it and it still works. Just add a jack for a sound card to plug into and I think you pretty much have the same game interface. There's not a <i>lot</i> of bass response -- certainly nothing one could call "chest thumping" -- but making it bigger would help in that area.  (Comfort might be questionable, though.)  So, exactly how radical an idea is this really?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... if he 's considering patenting this thing : The Bone Fone .
I got one back in the '80s from DAK .
Still have it and it still works .
Just add a jack for a sound card to plug into and I think you pretty much have the same game interface .
There 's not a lot of bass response -- certainly nothing one could call " chest thumping " -- but making it bigger would help in that area .
( Comfort might be questionable , though .
) So , exactly how radical an idea is this really ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... if he's considering patenting this thing:  The Bone Fone.
I got one back in the '80s from DAK.
Still have it and it still works.
Just add a jack for a sound card to plug into and I think you pretty much have the same game interface.
There's not a lot of bass response -- certainly nothing one could call "chest thumping" -- but making it bigger would help in that area.
(Comfort might be questionable, though.
)  So, exactly how radical an idea is this really?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29932627</id>
	<title>Re:!Controvrsy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256932320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually the single photon experiment DID work. Look at his web page.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually the single photon experiment DID work .
Look at his web page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually the single photon experiment DID work.
Look at his web page.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907803</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908277</id>
	<title>Perry Bible Fellowship comic...</title>
	<author>VinylRecords</author>
	<datestamp>1256817480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.pbfcomics.com/?cid=PBF134-Game\_System.gif" title="pbfcomics.com">http://www.pbfcomics.com/?cid=PBF134-Game\_System.gif</a> [pbfcomics.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.pbfcomics.com/ ? cid = PBF134-Game \ _System.gif [ pbfcomics.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.pbfcomics.com/?cid=PBF134-Game\_System.gif [pbfcomics.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_0225250_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29909187
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_0225250_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29932657
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908483
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907803
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_0225250_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_0225250_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29911343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_0225250_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29948006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907737
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_0225250_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_0225250_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29914369
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907803
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_0225250_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29932627
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907803
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_0225250_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29910195
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907803
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_0225250_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29922387
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29909715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_0225250_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_0225250_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29909259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907767
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_0225250_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29922275
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_0225250_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908385
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_0225250_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29910827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_0225250_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907681
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_0225250_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29911559
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908483
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907803
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_0225250_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29932593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907803
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_0225250_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29909731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908483
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907803
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907747
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_29_0225250_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907767
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_0225250.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907711
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_0225250.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908441
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_0225250.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907975
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_0225250.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907681
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908401
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_0225250.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908159
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_0225250.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907733
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907925
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29909187
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29910827
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908505
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29922275
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29911343
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907911
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_0225250.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29909841
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_0225250.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907767
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908523
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29909259
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_0225250.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907747
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29909715
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29922387
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908385
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907803
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29908483
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29909731
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29932657
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29911559
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29914369
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29932627
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29932593
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29910195
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_29_0225250.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29907737
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_29_0225250.29948006
</commentlist>
</conversation>
