<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_28_1524257</id>
	<title>Android 2.0 SDK Released, Google Maps Navigation Announced</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1256746980000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:bittercode@gmail" rel="nofollow">stoolpigeon</a> writes <i>"The <a href="http://htcpedia.com/news/android-2-release-1.html?l\_page=1&amp;p\_page=1">Android 2.0 SDK is now available</a> from Google.  This puts to bed <a href="http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/10/the-quest-for-a-truly-open-smartphone-can-it-be-done.ars?utm\_source=rss&amp;utm\_medium=rss&amp;utm\_campaign=rss">concerns about Google not releasing the SDK</a> or perhaps being in some kind of exclusivity deal with Verizon around 2.0.  The <a href="http://developer.android.com/sdk/android-2.0.html">release notes</a> give a nice overview of what is there.  Those who already have the SDK can grab the updated tools as SDK components; everyone else will pick up everything when downloading the new SDK."</i>
Relatedly, reader riffzifnab reports that Google has also announced <a href="http://googlemobile.blogspot.com/2009/10/announcing-google-maps-navigation-for.html">Google Maps Navigation, a GPS application for Android 2.0</a> that takes voice input and integrates with internet searches and Street View.</htmltext>
<tokenext>stoolpigeon writes " The Android 2.0 SDK is now available from Google .
This puts to bed concerns about Google not releasing the SDK or perhaps being in some kind of exclusivity deal with Verizon around 2.0 .
The release notes give a nice overview of what is there .
Those who already have the SDK can grab the updated tools as SDK components ; everyone else will pick up everything when downloading the new SDK .
" Relatedly , reader riffzifnab reports that Google has also announced Google Maps Navigation , a GPS application for Android 2.0 that takes voice input and integrates with internet searches and Street View .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>stoolpigeon writes "The Android 2.0 SDK is now available from Google.
This puts to bed concerns about Google not releasing the SDK or perhaps being in some kind of exclusivity deal with Verizon around 2.0.
The release notes give a nice overview of what is there.
Those who already have the SDK can grab the updated tools as SDK components; everyone else will pick up everything when downloading the new SDK.
"
Relatedly, reader riffzifnab reports that Google has also announced Google Maps Navigation, a GPS application for Android 2.0 that takes voice input and integrates with internet searches and Street View.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899597</id>
	<title>G1 owners left out in the cold</title>
	<author>Jonboy X</author>
	<datestamp>1256754300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's a lot of speculation that <a href="http://androidandme.com/2009/10/news/g1-owners-could-miss-out-on-android-2-0" title="androidandme.com">T-Mobile G1 owners might not get the update</a> [androidandme.com], which would suck.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a lot of speculation that T-Mobile G1 owners might not get the update [ androidandme.com ] , which would suck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a lot of speculation that T-Mobile G1 owners might not get the update [androidandme.com], which would suck.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901041</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-touch for developers but not for end user</title>
	<author>pwfffff</author>
	<datestamp>1256760060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"So, those of us hoping to impress our acquaintances by zooming web pages in and out iPhone-style will probably have to wait until 2.1..."</p><p>Or you could find some custom firmware that doesn't suck<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Been pinch-zooming since like the month after I got my phone thanks to the JF images.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" So , those of us hoping to impress our acquaintances by zooming web pages in and out iPhone-style will probably have to wait until 2.1... " Or you could find some custom firmware that does n't suck : ) Been pinch-zooming since like the month after I got my phone thanks to the JF images .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"So, those of us hoping to impress our acquaintances by zooming web pages in and out iPhone-style will probably have to wait until 2.1..."Or you could find some custom firmware that doesn't suck :)Been pinch-zooming since like the month after I got my phone thanks to the JF images.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899429</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899429</id>
	<title>Multi-touch for developers but not for end users</title>
	<author>Martin Soto</author>
	<datestamp>1256753760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The good news are that they seem to finally have added the long-awaited support for multi-touch. As listed in their <a href="http://developer.android.com/sdk/android-2.0.html#api" title="android.com" rel="nofollow">relese notes</a> [android.com]:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>MotionEvent can now report simultaneous-touch information for devices that support it. Up to three pointers can be tracked simultaneously.</p></div><p>The bad news are that, apart from some improvements to the on-screen keyboard, the GUI doesn't seem to be making use of it at all. So, those of us hoping to impress our acquaintances by zooming  web pages in and out iPhone-style will probably have to wait until 2.1...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The good news are that they seem to finally have added the long-awaited support for multi-touch .
As listed in their relese notes [ android.com ] : MotionEvent can now report simultaneous-touch information for devices that support it .
Up to three pointers can be tracked simultaneously.The bad news are that , apart from some improvements to the on-screen keyboard , the GUI does n't seem to be making use of it at all .
So , those of us hoping to impress our acquaintances by zooming web pages in and out iPhone-style will probably have to wait until 2.1.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The good news are that they seem to finally have added the long-awaited support for multi-touch.
As listed in their relese notes [android.com]:MotionEvent can now report simultaneous-touch information for devices that support it.
Up to three pointers can be tracked simultaneously.The bad news are that, apart from some improvements to the on-screen keyboard, the GUI doesn't seem to be making use of it at all.
So, those of us hoping to impress our acquaintances by zooming  web pages in and out iPhone-style will probably have to wait until 2.1...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901541</id>
	<title>Re:Search on your route is a great feature</title>
	<author>six11</author>
	<datestamp>1256762400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another nice thing about GPS (well, potentially big-brotherish) is that it might be able to learn patterns in where people go and factor that in to route-based search.</p><p>I live in North Bergen county, across the Hudson from NYC. When I search for something near where I live, "local" search engines give me tons of hits in Manhattan (radius, as you say), which might be near as the crow flies, but the problem is that I'm not a crow. It would be better if it gave me results that are closer from a travel-time perspective. They should be able to glean that by observing paths people actually take.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another nice thing about GPS ( well , potentially big-brotherish ) is that it might be able to learn patterns in where people go and factor that in to route-based search.I live in North Bergen county , across the Hudson from NYC .
When I search for something near where I live , " local " search engines give me tons of hits in Manhattan ( radius , as you say ) , which might be near as the crow flies , but the problem is that I 'm not a crow .
It would be better if it gave me results that are closer from a travel-time perspective .
They should be able to glean that by observing paths people actually take .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another nice thing about GPS (well, potentially big-brotherish) is that it might be able to learn patterns in where people go and factor that in to route-based search.I live in North Bergen county, across the Hudson from NYC.
When I search for something near where I live, "local" search engines give me tons of hits in Manhattan (radius, as you say), which might be near as the crow flies, but the problem is that I'm not a crow.
It would be better if it gave me results that are closer from a travel-time perspective.
They should be able to glean that by observing paths people actually take.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898773</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898773</id>
	<title>Search on your route is a great feature</title>
	<author>elcid73</author>
	<datestamp>1256750880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Search on your radius and end point destinations are not very useful- on your route is great feature to have (gas stations, rest stops etc)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Search on your radius and end point destinations are not very useful- on your route is great feature to have ( gas stations , rest stops etc )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Search on your radius and end point destinations are not very useful- on your route is great feature to have (gas stations, rest stops etc)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901991</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-touch for developers but not for end user</title>
	<author>EnglishTim</author>
	<datestamp>1256721240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I imagine someone will add it into one of the third-party browser apps out there. I already have it on the browser app they supply on the HTC Hero - now that the multitouch support comes as standard (rather than a HTC extension), it'll probably appear in quite a lot of apps very quickly.</p><p>However, although multitouch is nice 'n all, Android can run on phones with resistive screens so app writers shouldn't rely on it being there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I imagine someone will add it into one of the third-party browser apps out there .
I already have it on the browser app they supply on the HTC Hero - now that the multitouch support comes as standard ( rather than a HTC extension ) , it 'll probably appear in quite a lot of apps very quickly.However , although multitouch is nice 'n all , Android can run on phones with resistive screens so app writers should n't rely on it being there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I imagine someone will add it into one of the third-party browser apps out there.
I already have it on the browser app they supply on the HTC Hero - now that the multitouch support comes as standard (rather than a HTC extension), it'll probably appear in quite a lot of apps very quickly.However, although multitouch is nice 'n all, Android can run on phones with resistive screens so app writers shouldn't rely on it being there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899429</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899063</id>
	<title>Hardware requirements for 2.0</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1256752140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how well 2.0 will run on say a G1, HTC Hero,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,Moto Clik or the Samsung Moment.<br>And will updates be made available?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how well 2.0 will run on say a G1 , HTC Hero , ,Moto Clik or the Samsung Moment.And will updates be made available ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how well 2.0 will run on say a G1, HTC Hero, ,Moto Clik or the Samsung Moment.And will updates be made available?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899905</id>
	<title>Bad news for Garmin</title>
	<author>perltooc</author>
	<datestamp>1256755440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=garmin" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/finance?q=garmin</a> [google.com]

<p>But good news for consumers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.google.com/finance ? q = garmin [ google.com ] But good news for consumers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.google.com/finance?q=garmin [google.com]

But good news for consumers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898791</id>
	<title>Looks like a great platform to develop for</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256750940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Many years ago, I did to J2ME projects for customers. I have played with the iPhone dev tools, but don't really like the platform or the constraints of the AppStore.</p><p>The Android plugins for Eclipse really make this a nice "coders platform." I expect to see more web portals to provide customized rich clients (perhaps for free) to make for easier mobile access. ANyway, getting more into the Android platform has been on my short list for a while.</p><p>BTW, a little off topic, but the rumors are that Google is going to open an app store for Google Wave plugins. Nice addition to an app store for Android aps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Many years ago , I did to J2ME projects for customers .
I have played with the iPhone dev tools , but do n't really like the platform or the constraints of the AppStore.The Android plugins for Eclipse really make this a nice " coders platform .
" I expect to see more web portals to provide customized rich clients ( perhaps for free ) to make for easier mobile access .
ANyway , getting more into the Android platform has been on my short list for a while.BTW , a little off topic , but the rumors are that Google is going to open an app store for Google Wave plugins .
Nice addition to an app store for Android aps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many years ago, I did to J2ME projects for customers.
I have played with the iPhone dev tools, but don't really like the platform or the constraints of the AppStore.The Android plugins for Eclipse really make this a nice "coders platform.
" I expect to see more web portals to provide customized rich clients (perhaps for free) to make for easier mobile access.
ANyway, getting more into the Android platform has been on my short list for a while.BTW, a little off topic, but the rumors are that Google is going to open an app store for Google Wave plugins.
Nice addition to an app store for Android aps.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899131</id>
	<title>Re:droid will be mine</title>
	<author>Hadlock</author>
	<datestamp>1256752380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once you've used google maps (not even the full Navigation app) on your cell phone, it's hard to justify $100+ for a stand alone unit. Google street view being integrated into google maps is invaluable in the urban core area of cities, where you're trying to find a tiny shop tucked away on a street. I think the standalone GPS market is about to implode as all this gets ported to cell phones which have roughly the same sized screens. You'd have to get a data plan for your GPS unit to compete with what you already get for free on cell phones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once you 've used google maps ( not even the full Navigation app ) on your cell phone , it 's hard to justify $ 100 + for a stand alone unit .
Google street view being integrated into google maps is invaluable in the urban core area of cities , where you 're trying to find a tiny shop tucked away on a street .
I think the standalone GPS market is about to implode as all this gets ported to cell phones which have roughly the same sized screens .
You 'd have to get a data plan for your GPS unit to compete with what you already get for free on cell phones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once you've used google maps (not even the full Navigation app) on your cell phone, it's hard to justify $100+ for a stand alone unit.
Google street view being integrated into google maps is invaluable in the urban core area of cities, where you're trying to find a tiny shop tucked away on a street.
I think the standalone GPS market is about to implode as all this gets ported to cell phones which have roughly the same sized screens.
You'd have to get a data plan for your GPS unit to compete with what you already get for free on cell phones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898935</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899225</id>
	<title>Potential!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256752860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Google has also announced Google Maps Navigation, a GPS application for Android 2.0 that takes voice input and integrates with internet searches and Street View.</p></div><p>Since the SDK is released I can see alot of custom apps that basically listen to everything you say in a conversation.<br>Imagine the phone just sitting there listening to you and your buddy's converse<br>Me: "Hey man, are you hungry?"<br>Friend: "Yeah totally. Haven't eaten all day."<br>Me: "In the mood for sushi?"<br>Android: "I know a great Sushi restaurant 3km East of here"</p><p>And whenever you say "I'm bored" it can point you in the direction of the red light district!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google has also announced Google Maps Navigation , a GPS application for Android 2.0 that takes voice input and integrates with internet searches and Street View.Since the SDK is released I can see alot of custom apps that basically listen to everything you say in a conversation.Imagine the phone just sitting there listening to you and your buddy 's converseMe : " Hey man , are you hungry ?
" Friend : " Yeah totally .
Have n't eaten all day .
" Me : " In the mood for sushi ?
" Android : " I know a great Sushi restaurant 3km East of here " And whenever you say " I 'm bored " it can point you in the direction of the red light district !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google has also announced Google Maps Navigation, a GPS application for Android 2.0 that takes voice input and integrates with internet searches and Street View.Since the SDK is released I can see alot of custom apps that basically listen to everything you say in a conversation.Imagine the phone just sitting there listening to you and your buddy's converseMe: "Hey man, are you hungry?
"Friend: "Yeah totally.
Haven't eaten all day.
"Me: "In the mood for sushi?
"Android: "I know a great Sushi restaurant 3km East of here"And whenever you say "I'm bored" it can point you in the direction of the red light district!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900099</id>
	<title>Obligatory Star Wars comment</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256756160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the droid im looking for and w/ google maps on the droid ill be able to find them alot easier</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the droid im looking for and w/ google maps on the droid ill be able to find them alot easier</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the droid im looking for and w/ google maps on the droid ill be able to find them alot easier</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899049</id>
	<title>Not releasing?</title>
	<author>Aladrin</author>
	<datestamp>1256752080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"This puts to bed concerns about Google not releasing the SDK" - There should be a warning on this link:  Warning, text does not refer to linked information.</p><p>Seriously.  The 'concerns' were that Google hadn't released it -yet-, not that they weren't going to release it.  There is only a month until some of the new devices come out with SDK 2.0 and devs were concerned they wouldn't have enough time to fix any bugs in their apps.  Since other SDKs have come out -way- ahead of time, I'm sure Google was doing their best here and just had some issues.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" This puts to bed concerns about Google not releasing the SDK " - There should be a warning on this link : Warning , text does not refer to linked information.Seriously .
The 'concerns ' were that Google had n't released it -yet- , not that they were n't going to release it .
There is only a month until some of the new devices come out with SDK 2.0 and devs were concerned they would n't have enough time to fix any bugs in their apps .
Since other SDKs have come out -way- ahead of time , I 'm sure Google was doing their best here and just had some issues .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"This puts to bed concerns about Google not releasing the SDK" - There should be a warning on this link:  Warning, text does not refer to linked information.Seriously.
The 'concerns' were that Google hadn't released it -yet-, not that they weren't going to release it.
There is only a month until some of the new devices come out with SDK 2.0 and devs were concerned they wouldn't have enough time to fix any bugs in their apps.
Since other SDKs have come out -way- ahead of time, I'm sure Google was doing their best here and just had some issues.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899039</id>
	<title>Re:droid will be mine</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1256752020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it requires a data network then that is how a stand-alone GPS unit beats it.<br>Every cell phone has dead areas or areas where you will be on roaming or where you may not get data. When you do you don't get navigation anymore and that sucks.<br>I love my cell phone navigation system but I keep a $99 Nuvi in the car as a backup.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it requires a data network then that is how a stand-alone GPS unit beats it.Every cell phone has dead areas or areas where you will be on roaming or where you may not get data .
When you do you do n't get navigation anymore and that sucks.I love my cell phone navigation system but I keep a $ 99 Nuvi in the car as a backup .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it requires a data network then that is how a stand-alone GPS unit beats it.Every cell phone has dead areas or areas where you will be on roaming or where you may not get data.
When you do you don't get navigation anymore and that sucks.I love my cell phone navigation system but I keep a $99 Nuvi in the car as a backup.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898935</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29902329</id>
	<title>Re:iPhone</title>
	<author>Smurf</author>
	<datestamp>1256722860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>So no google maps navigation for the iPhone?</i></p> </div><p>From <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684\_3-10384544-265.html" title="cnet.com">this CNET article:</a> [cnet.com] </p><blockquote><div><p>However, Google is working with Apple on bringing it to the iPhone, and it's not ruling out licensing the software to makers of portable navigation devices used in cars throughout the world, said Gundotra, vice president of engineering at Google for mobile and developers. The process involving Apple is slightly different from the usual App Store submission process, because Maps is a built-in iPhone application, he said.</p></div></blockquote><p>So yes, this will come out for the iPhone, but it's not ready yet.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So no google maps navigation for the iPhone ?
From this CNET article : [ cnet.com ] However , Google is working with Apple on bringing it to the iPhone , and it 's not ruling out licensing the software to makers of portable navigation devices used in cars throughout the world , said Gundotra , vice president of engineering at Google for mobile and developers .
The process involving Apple is slightly different from the usual App Store submission process , because Maps is a built-in iPhone application , he said.So yes , this will come out for the iPhone , but it 's not ready yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> So no google maps navigation for the iPhone?
From this CNET article: [cnet.com] However, Google is working with Apple on bringing it to the iPhone, and it's not ruling out licensing the software to makers of portable navigation devices used in cars throughout the world, said Gundotra, vice president of engineering at Google for mobile and developers.
The process involving Apple is slightly different from the usual App Store submission process, because Maps is a built-in iPhone application, he said.So yes, this will come out for the iPhone, but it's not ready yet.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899915</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901469</id>
	<title>Re:droid will be mine</title>
	<author>oakgrove</author>
	<datestamp>1256762100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This isn't a solution for everyone but, honestly, just root the phone and install any compatible firmware you want.  I have been running CyanogenMod on my G1 and not only is the phone faster but I'm not limited on how many apps I can install by the phone's puny onboard flash as all of my apps now install onto the SD card, I now have wi-fi tethering so any wi-fi enabled device within reach can piggyback off of my phone's internet connection, if I do a hard reset on the phone, all of my apps are still there as they are on the SD card now, and when 2.0 comes out, contrary to what Google, T-Mobile or anyone else may think, I'll be able to put it on my phone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't a solution for everyone but , honestly , just root the phone and install any compatible firmware you want .
I have been running CyanogenMod on my G1 and not only is the phone faster but I 'm not limited on how many apps I can install by the phone 's puny onboard flash as all of my apps now install onto the SD card , I now have wi-fi tethering so any wi-fi enabled device within reach can piggyback off of my phone 's internet connection , if I do a hard reset on the phone , all of my apps are still there as they are on the SD card now , and when 2.0 comes out , contrary to what Google , T-Mobile or anyone else may think , I 'll be able to put it on my phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't a solution for everyone but, honestly, just root the phone and install any compatible firmware you want.
I have been running CyanogenMod on my G1 and not only is the phone faster but I'm not limited on how many apps I can install by the phone's puny onboard flash as all of my apps now install onto the SD card, I now have wi-fi tethering so any wi-fi enabled device within reach can piggyback off of my phone's internet connection, if I do a hard reset on the phone, all of my apps are still there as they are on the SD card now, and when 2.0 comes out, contrary to what Google, T-Mobile or anyone else may think, I'll be able to put it on my phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29904875</id>
	<title>But in Europe</title>
	<author>donstenk</author>
	<datestamp>1256737260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it is still outrageously expensive to use data when roaming in another country and this happens to be the case you need a portable GPS the most hence I think there will be a different development in the US and EU.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it is still outrageously expensive to use data when roaming in another country and this happens to be the case you need a portable GPS the most hence I think there will be a different development in the US and EU .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it is still outrageously expensive to use data when roaming in another country and this happens to be the case you need a portable GPS the most hence I think there will be a different development in the US and EU.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900831</id>
	<title>Re:Send route from computer to phone?</title>
	<author>virtualXTC</author>
	<datestamp>1256759100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is available via <a href="http://www.andnav.org/" title="andnav.org">AndNav</a> [andnav.org] and <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/" title="openstreetmap.org">OpenStreet Maps</a> [openstreetmap.org] via <a href="http://www.openrouteservice.org/" title="openrouteservice.org">Open Route Service</a> [openrouteservice.org].  Sadly, development for USA navigation has been slow or non-existent despite my donation to the project.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is available via AndNav [ andnav.org ] and OpenStreet Maps [ openstreetmap.org ] via Open Route Service [ openrouteservice.org ] .
Sadly , development for USA navigation has been slow or non-existent despite my donation to the project .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is available via AndNav [andnav.org] and OpenStreet Maps [openstreetmap.org] via Open Route Service [openrouteservice.org].
Sadly, development for USA navigation has been slow or non-existent despite my donation to the project.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898935</id>
	<title>droid will be mine</title>
	<author>SoupGuru</author>
	<datestamp>1256751540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can use my new-every-two starting tomorrow.  I've been eying the Droid for a while now and I think I can wait another week to get it.<br><br>It's looking like a mighty nice phone.<br><br>This GPS stuff is really cool and I'm wondering how a $300 stand-alone GPS unit can compete with it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can use my new-every-two starting tomorrow .
I 've been eying the Droid for a while now and I think I can wait another week to get it.It 's looking like a mighty nice phone.This GPS stuff is really cool and I 'm wondering how a $ 300 stand-alone GPS unit can compete with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can use my new-every-two starting tomorrow.
I've been eying the Droid for a while now and I think I can wait another week to get it.It's looking like a mighty nice phone.This GPS stuff is really cool and I'm wondering how a $300 stand-alone GPS unit can compete with it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899211</id>
	<title>Re:droid will be mine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256752800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait a few weeks. So far Everyone I've talked to with an HTC Dream (G1), myself included, has been absolutely HOSED by the 1.6 update. Most common is:</p><p>-Not Recieving Phone Calls<br>-Not Recieving E-mails/Messages in a timely fashion (I have full bars and 3g but don't get e-mail till an hour later, yet with my phone in the exact same spot I can stream 96k radio no problem?)<br>-Randomly repeatedly failing on sending Messages (Both IM and Text.)<br>-Hanging all over the place in general (Even just changing songs in media player)</p><p>None of these things happened to our phones with 1.5. It's bad enough that my wife is sticking with her Instinct (which she HATES) because it at least WORKS the way it's supposed to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait a few weeks .
So far Everyone I 've talked to with an HTC Dream ( G1 ) , myself included , has been absolutely HOSED by the 1.6 update .
Most common is : -Not Recieving Phone Calls-Not Recieving E-mails/Messages in a timely fashion ( I have full bars and 3g but do n't get e-mail till an hour later , yet with my phone in the exact same spot I can stream 96k radio no problem ?
) -Randomly repeatedly failing on sending Messages ( Both IM and Text .
) -Hanging all over the place in general ( Even just changing songs in media player ) None of these things happened to our phones with 1.5 .
It 's bad enough that my wife is sticking with her Instinct ( which she HATES ) because it at least WORKS the way it 's supposed to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait a few weeks.
So far Everyone I've talked to with an HTC Dream (G1), myself included, has been absolutely HOSED by the 1.6 update.
Most common is:-Not Recieving Phone Calls-Not Recieving E-mails/Messages in a timely fashion (I have full bars and 3g but don't get e-mail till an hour later, yet with my phone in the exact same spot I can stream 96k radio no problem?
)-Randomly repeatedly failing on sending Messages (Both IM and Text.
)-Hanging all over the place in general (Even just changing songs in media player)None of these things happened to our phones with 1.5.
It's bad enough that my wife is sticking with her Instinct (which she HATES) because it at least WORKS the way it's supposed to.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898935</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29907209</id>
	<title>Re:Garmin and TomTom stock just took a dive too..</title>
	<author>dbcad7</author>
	<datestamp>1256758140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>See it in operation.. <a href="http://phandroid.com/2009/10/28/google-navigation-in-car-video-preview/" title="phandroid.com">http://phandroid.com/2009/10/28/google-navigation-in-car-video-preview/</a> [phandroid.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>See it in operation.. http : //phandroid.com/2009/10/28/google-navigation-in-car-video-preview/ [ phandroid.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See it in operation.. http://phandroid.com/2009/10/28/google-navigation-in-car-video-preview/ [phandroid.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901765</id>
	<title>Re:droid will be mine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256763420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Standalone devices have pretty acurate results for points of interest.  I'm not sure how well Google will integrate that with their service, and how the information will be audited or updated in the future.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Standalone devices have pretty acurate results for points of interest .
I 'm not sure how well Google will integrate that with their service , and how the information will be audited or updated in the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Standalone devices have pretty acurate results for points of interest.
I'm not sure how well Google will integrate that with their service, and how the information will be audited or updated in the future.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898935</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900073</id>
	<title>Re:G1 owners left out in the cold</title>
	<author>wampus</author>
	<datestamp>1256756040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There was the same speculation about 1.6.  I won't believe it until I read it on XDA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There was the same speculation about 1.6 .
I wo n't believe it until I read it on XDA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was the same speculation about 1.6.
I won't believe it until I read it on XDA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899755</id>
	<title>Re:Send route from computer to phone?</title>
	<author>Alascom</author>
	<datestamp>1256754900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now you can just use google maps as your GPS device to plan your trip.<br>Its awesome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now you can just use google maps as your GPS device to plan your trip.Its awesome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now you can just use google maps as your GPS device to plan your trip.Its awesome.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899453</id>
	<title>Re:droid will be mine</title>
	<author>alen</author>
	<datestamp>1256753880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the iphone GPS apps are 1.2GB of data that gets installed to your iphone. they install all the maps and other data in case you lose your signal while driving</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the iphone GPS apps are 1.2GB of data that gets installed to your iphone .
they install all the maps and other data in case you lose your signal while driving</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the iphone GPS apps are 1.2GB of data that gets installed to your iphone.
they install all the maps and other data in case you lose your signal while driving</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898935</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899589</id>
	<title>I wanted the Nokia N900</title>
	<author>InlawBiker</author>
	<datestamp>1256754300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And was willing to pay the premium of what, $600 USD for it unlocked. But now with so much momentum behind Android I may be looking for an Android device. Only a few months ago there was a lonely little G1 in the corner going "Look at me!"  Now Android seem to be exploding. Maemo is probably more flexible and powerful but Android is beginning to amass an iPhone like library of applications.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And was willing to pay the premium of what , $ 600 USD for it unlocked .
But now with so much momentum behind Android I may be looking for an Android device .
Only a few months ago there was a lonely little G1 in the corner going " Look at me !
" Now Android seem to be exploding .
Maemo is probably more flexible and powerful but Android is beginning to amass an iPhone like library of applications .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And was willing to pay the premium of what, $600 USD for it unlocked.
But now with so much momentum behind Android I may be looking for an Android device.
Only a few months ago there was a lonely little G1 in the corner going "Look at me!
"  Now Android seem to be exploding.
Maemo is probably more flexible and powerful but Android is beginning to amass an iPhone like library of applications.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900443</id>
	<title>Re:Send route from computer to phone?</title>
	<author>DavidD\_CA</author>
	<datestamp>1256757600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It looks like they're headed that way.  In the latest update to Google Mobile Maps, you can turn on "layers".  If you provide GMM with your Google login, it can pull down any layers that you've created on your PC.</p><p>A Layer is really just a collection of places that you've identified and saved on the map.  You can give each place a description, URL, etc.</p><p>But it probably won't be long until they expand that to routes, too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks like they 're headed that way .
In the latest update to Google Mobile Maps , you can turn on " layers " .
If you provide GMM with your Google login , it can pull down any layers that you 've created on your PC.A Layer is really just a collection of places that you 've identified and saved on the map .
You can give each place a description , URL , etc.But it probably wo n't be long until they expand that to routes , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks like they're headed that way.
In the latest update to Google Mobile Maps, you can turn on "layers".
If you provide GMM with your Google login, it can pull down any layers that you've created on your PC.A Layer is really just a collection of places that you've identified and saved on the map.
You can give each place a description, URL, etc.But it probably won't be long until they expand that to routes, too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901015</id>
	<title>Re:droid will be mine</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1256759940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am hopping that Google will open up all there mapping data. They should have a large amount of data from their Street View project so let us hope they make available to everyone.<br>I would love to see a good FOSS GPS nav program so I can build a good Linux Car Computer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am hopping that Google will open up all there mapping data .
They should have a large amount of data from their Street View project so let us hope they make available to everyone.I would love to see a good FOSS GPS nav program so I can build a good Linux Car Computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am hopping that Google will open up all there mapping data.
They should have a large amount of data from their Street View project so let us hope they make available to everyone.I would love to see a good FOSS GPS nav program so I can build a good Linux Car Computer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899039</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900709</id>
	<title>Re:Send route from computer to phone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256758620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The feature I've always wanted from a GPS is the ability to go to google maps on my computer, come up with a route on there, and then send it to the device. This looks like it could easily offer that ability but curiously it's not mentioned in any of the blurbs that I've seen. Anyone know if it's supported?</p></div></blockquote><p>

I've been doing this for a long time.<br>
The "device" is my printer.<br>
But that probably wasn't the answer you wanted.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The feature I 've always wanted from a GPS is the ability to go to google maps on my computer , come up with a route on there , and then send it to the device .
This looks like it could easily offer that ability but curiously it 's not mentioned in any of the blurbs that I 've seen .
Anyone know if it 's supported ?
I 've been doing this for a long time .
The " device " is my printer .
But that probably was n't the answer you wanted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The feature I've always wanted from a GPS is the ability to go to google maps on my computer, come up with a route on there, and then send it to the device.
This looks like it could easily offer that ability but curiously it's not mentioned in any of the blurbs that I've seen.
Anyone know if it's supported?
I've been doing this for a long time.
The "device" is my printer.
But that probably wasn't the answer you wanted.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899789</id>
	<title>Garmin and TomTom stock just took a dive too..</title>
	<author>bleh-of-the-huns</author>
	<datestamp>1256754960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>However, I suspect thats just the initial reaction to the press release by Google.</p><p>While the navigation might be great, I do not think it will be able to compete at this point in time with stand alone devices.  Google navigation will still require network connectivity, and while most places have it, some do not, also, google maps on my iphone and windows mobile phones was so slow (HTC Tytn II) sometimes it said to turn right after I passed the street (for that matter the TomTom software on the winmo phone did the same thing depending on my speed.</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?chdnp=1&amp;chdd=1&amp;chds=1&amp;chdv=1&amp;chvs=maximized&amp;chdeh=0&amp;chdet=1256760000000&amp;chddm=30&amp;chls=IntervalBasedLine&amp;cmpto=AMS:TOM2;NASDAQ:GOOG&amp;cmptdms=1;0&amp;q=NASDAQ:GRMN&amp;ntsp=0" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/finance?chdnp=1&amp;chdd=1&amp;chds=1&amp;chdv=1&amp;chvs=maximized&amp;chdeh=0&amp;chdet=1256760000000&amp;chddm=30&amp;chls=IntervalBasedLine&amp;cmpto=AMS:TOM2;NASDAQ:GOOG&amp;cmptdms=1;0&amp;q=NASDAQ:GRMN&amp;ntsp=0</a> [google.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>However , I suspect thats just the initial reaction to the press release by Google.While the navigation might be great , I do not think it will be able to compete at this point in time with stand alone devices .
Google navigation will still require network connectivity , and while most places have it , some do not , also , google maps on my iphone and windows mobile phones was so slow ( HTC Tytn II ) sometimes it said to turn right after I passed the street ( for that matter the TomTom software on the winmo phone did the same thing depending on my speed.http : //www.google.com/finance ? chdnp = 1&amp;chdd = 1&amp;chds = 1&amp;chdv = 1&amp;chvs = maximized&amp;chdeh = 0&amp;chdet = 1256760000000&amp;chddm = 30&amp;chls = IntervalBasedLine&amp;cmpto = AMS : TOM2 ; NASDAQ : GOOG&amp;cmptdms = 1 ; 0&amp;q = NASDAQ : GRMN&amp;ntsp = 0 [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>However, I suspect thats just the initial reaction to the press release by Google.While the navigation might be great, I do not think it will be able to compete at this point in time with stand alone devices.
Google navigation will still require network connectivity, and while most places have it, some do not, also, google maps on my iphone and windows mobile phones was so slow (HTC Tytn II) sometimes it said to turn right after I passed the street (for that matter the TomTom software on the winmo phone did the same thing depending on my speed.http://www.google.com/finance?chdnp=1&amp;chdd=1&amp;chds=1&amp;chdv=1&amp;chvs=maximized&amp;chdeh=0&amp;chdet=1256760000000&amp;chddm=30&amp;chls=IntervalBasedLine&amp;cmpto=AMS:TOM2;NASDAQ:GOOG&amp;cmptdms=1;0&amp;q=NASDAQ:GRMN&amp;ntsp=0 [google.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900001</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-touch for developers but not for end user</title>
	<author>BiggoronSword</author>
	<datestamp>1256755800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you build it, they will come.  The API comes first, then the implementation.  You'll be sure to see more developers, including Google apps (i.e. Maps), taking advantage of this API now that it's here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you build it , they will come .
The API comes first , then the implementation .
You 'll be sure to see more developers , including Google apps ( i.e .
Maps ) , taking advantage of this API now that it 's here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you build it, they will come.
The API comes first, then the implementation.
You'll be sure to see more developers, including Google apps (i.e.
Maps), taking advantage of this API now that it's here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899429</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899915</id>
	<title>iPhone</title>
	<author>scorp1us</author>
	<datestamp>1256755500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So no google maps navigation for the iPhone?</p><p>Pardon me, but part of the appeal of the iPhone is it was best-of-breed Apple and Google. With the recent split, and if this continues, I see my next phone will be an Android device, and on the superior Verizon network.</p><p>I've been an iPhone fan boy for about 3 years, but I see a lot of delicious crow coming my way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So no google maps navigation for the iPhone ? Pardon me , but part of the appeal of the iPhone is it was best-of-breed Apple and Google .
With the recent split , and if this continues , I see my next phone will be an Android device , and on the superior Verizon network.I 've been an iPhone fan boy for about 3 years , but I see a lot of delicious crow coming my way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So no google maps navigation for the iPhone?Pardon me, but part of the appeal of the iPhone is it was best-of-breed Apple and Google.
With the recent split, and if this continues, I see my next phone will be an Android device, and on the superior Verizon network.I've been an iPhone fan boy for about 3 years, but I see a lot of delicious crow coming my way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899069</id>
	<title>Send route from computer to phone?</title>
	<author>sab39</author>
	<datestamp>1256752200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The feature I've always wanted from a GPS is the ability to go to google maps on my computer, come up with a route on there, and then send it to the device. This looks like it could easily offer that ability but curiously it's not mentioned in any of the blurbs that I've seen. Anyone know if it's supported?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The feature I 've always wanted from a GPS is the ability to go to google maps on my computer , come up with a route on there , and then send it to the device .
This looks like it could easily offer that ability but curiously it 's not mentioned in any of the blurbs that I 've seen .
Anyone know if it 's supported ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The feature I've always wanted from a GPS is the ability to go to google maps on my computer, come up with a route on there, and then send it to the device.
This looks like it could easily offer that ability but curiously it's not mentioned in any of the blurbs that I've seen.
Anyone know if it's supported?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900727</id>
	<title>Re:G1 owners left out in the cold</title>
	<author>Tumbleweed</author>
	<datestamp>1256758680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>There's a lot of speculation that T-Mobile G1 owners might not get the update, which would suck.</i></p><p>Well, they're \_already\_ T-Mo customers - they must be used to suckage by now, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a lot of speculation that T-Mobile G1 owners might not get the update , which would suck.Well , they 're \ _already \ _ T-Mo customers - they must be used to suckage by now , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a lot of speculation that T-Mobile G1 owners might not get the update, which would suck.Well, they're \_already\_ T-Mo customers - they must be used to suckage by now, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29904929</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-touch for developers but not for end user</title>
	<author>aaardwark</author>
	<datestamp>1256737500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The multi-touch is enabled by default. Pinch to zoom is a patent issue. I've heard some select HTC devices will license it. Don't blame google for US patent system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The multi-touch is enabled by default .
Pinch to zoom is a patent issue .
I 've heard some select HTC devices will license it .
Do n't blame google for US patent system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The multi-touch is enabled by default.
Pinch to zoom is a patent issue.
I've heard some select HTC devices will license it.
Don't blame google for US patent system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899429</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29906393</id>
	<title>Re:Hardware requirements for 2.0</title>
	<author>Rennt</author>
	<datestamp>1256749020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I wonder how well 2.0 will run on say a G1, HTC Hero,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,Moto Clik or the Samsung Moment.</p></div><p>Me too, everything indicates better performance than 1.6, but we don't really know yet. </p><p><div class="quote"><p>And will updates be made available?</p></div><p>The freaking SOURCE CODE is made available, you don't have to wait for updates from the networks. I had 1.5 and 1.6 on my G1 before any phones running them were released - I don't expect 2.0 will be different.</p><p>Mad props go out to Cyanogen BTW - Android's first rockstar!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how well 2.0 will run on say a G1 , HTC Hero , ,Moto Clik or the Samsung Moment.Me too , everything indicates better performance than 1.6 , but we do n't really know yet .
And will updates be made available ? The freaking SOURCE CODE is made available , you do n't have to wait for updates from the networks .
I had 1.5 and 1.6 on my G1 before any phones running them were released - I do n't expect 2.0 will be different.Mad props go out to Cyanogen BTW - Android 's first rockstar !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how well 2.0 will run on say a G1, HTC Hero, ,Moto Clik or the Samsung Moment.Me too, everything indicates better performance than 1.6, but we don't really know yet.
And will updates be made available?The freaking SOURCE CODE is made available, you don't have to wait for updates from the networks.
I had 1.5 and 1.6 on my G1 before any phones running them were released - I don't expect 2.0 will be different.Mad props go out to Cyanogen BTW - Android's first rockstar!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899063</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899137</id>
	<title>Can I get the emulator without the SDK?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256752440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd like to "try before I buy", but I can't find any links to just the emulator.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to " try before I buy " , but I ca n't find any links to just the emulator .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like to "try before I buy", but I can't find any links to just the emulator.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29905041</id>
	<title>Re:Open Handset Alliance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256738280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am pretty sure the Maps application is closed-source and not part of Android proper.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am pretty sure the Maps application is closed-source and not part of Android proper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am pretty sure the Maps application is closed-source and not part of Android proper.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900695</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29904237</id>
	<title>Re:G1 owners left out in the cold</title>
	<author>soundguy</author>
	<datestamp>1256733540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's a lot of speculation that <a href="http://androidandme.com/2009/10/news/g1-owners-could-miss-out-on-android-2-0" title="androidandme.com" rel="nofollow">T-Mobile G1 owners might not get the update</a> [androidandme.com], which would suck.</p></div><p>What I find irritating is that the G1 even HAS a "system partition" that turned out to be too small. I have dozens of CentOS 5.x server installations that have precisely THREE hard partitions - boot, swap, and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. Phones are single-user, single-boot, SOLID STATE MEMORY devices. The various reasons and excuses for multiple partition schemes mostly ceased to be relevant a long time ago and are especially pointless on this type of platform.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a lot of speculation that T-Mobile G1 owners might not get the update [ androidandme.com ] , which would suck.What I find irritating is that the G1 even HAS a " system partition " that turned out to be too small .
I have dozens of CentOS 5.x server installations that have precisely THREE hard partitions - boot , swap , and / .
Phones are single-user , single-boot , SOLID STATE MEMORY devices .
The various reasons and excuses for multiple partition schemes mostly ceased to be relevant a long time ago and are especially pointless on this type of platform .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a lot of speculation that T-Mobile G1 owners might not get the update [androidandme.com], which would suck.What I find irritating is that the G1 even HAS a "system partition" that turned out to be too small.
I have dozens of CentOS 5.x server installations that have precisely THREE hard partitions - boot, swap, and /.
Phones are single-user, single-boot, SOLID STATE MEMORY devices.
The various reasons and excuses for multiple partition schemes mostly ceased to be relevant a long time ago and are especially pointless on this type of platform.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29903697</id>
	<title>Re:Bluetooth?</title>
	<author>Dave Emami</author>
	<datestamp>1256730060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Will it finally be able to send/receive files over Bluetooth?</p></div><p>I don't know about natively, but there's already an app on Marketplace for that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it finally be able to send/receive files over Bluetooth ? I do n't know about natively , but there 's already an app on Marketplace for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it finally be able to send/receive files over Bluetooth?I don't know about natively, but there's already an app on Marketplace for that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901425</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900511</id>
	<title>Re:droid will be mine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256757780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>look at Tom Tom and Garmin stock for your answer!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>look at Tom Tom and Garmin stock for your answer !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>look at Tom Tom and Garmin stock for your answer!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898935</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901897</id>
	<title>Re:Send route from computer to phone?</title>
	<author>akadruid</author>
	<datestamp>1256720820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This already exists in Google Maps.  Just plan your route, click the Send To button at the top left, and select GPS.  There are half a dozen supported manufacturers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This already exists in Google Maps .
Just plan your route , click the Send To button at the top left , and select GPS .
There are half a dozen supported manufacturers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This already exists in Google Maps.
Just plan your route, click the Send To button at the top left, and select GPS.
There are half a dozen supported manufacturers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899599</id>
	<title>Bad for Garmin and TomTom</title>
	<author>ICLKennyG</author>
	<datestamp>1256754300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Tough day to be Garmin or TomTom, Wall Street is surely impressed with Droid's free GPS functionality.  Garmin and TomTom are each down 15\%+ today! <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/28/the-game-has-changed/" title="engadget.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/28/the-game-has-changed/</a> [engadget.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tough day to be Garmin or TomTom , Wall Street is surely impressed with Droid 's free GPS functionality .
Garmin and TomTom are each down 15 \ % + today !
http : //www.engadget.com/2009/10/28/the-game-has-changed/ [ engadget.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tough day to be Garmin or TomTom, Wall Street is surely impressed with Droid's free GPS functionality.
Garmin and TomTom are each down 15\%+ today!
http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/28/the-game-has-changed/ [engadget.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29907549</id>
	<title>SDK 2.0 is not android 2.0!</title>
	<author>VincenzoRomano</author>
	<datestamp>1256848980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But it makes a huge hype, anyway!</htmltext>
<tokenext>But it makes a huge hype , anyway !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it makes a huge hype, anyway!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29902373</id>
	<title>Still no decent sound APIs!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256723040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lots of stuff to be pleased with in the new SDK, but lack of half-decent audio/midi APIs still makes me angry.  There was a perfectly functional javax.sound implementation back in m5 builds circa version 0.9 but Google pulled them for no apparent reason.  What the hell...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lots of stuff to be pleased with in the new SDK , but lack of half-decent audio/midi APIs still makes me angry .
There was a perfectly functional javax.sound implementation back in m5 builds circa version 0.9 but Google pulled them for no apparent reason .
What the hell.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lots of stuff to be pleased with in the new SDK, but lack of half-decent audio/midi APIs still makes me angry.
There was a perfectly functional javax.sound implementation back in m5 builds circa version 0.9 but Google pulled them for no apparent reason.
What the hell...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29903197</id>
	<title>Re:droid will be mine</title>
	<author>BlackCreek</author>
	<datestamp>1256727420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a "rooted G1 turned into ADP".</p><p>Currently running Cyanogen's 1.6 mod, and it is remarkably stable.</p><p>The problem I have with my G1 is its low ringing volume, and the weak trill function. I mis calls all the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a " rooted G1 turned into ADP " .Currently running Cyanogen 's 1.6 mod , and it is remarkably stable.The problem I have with my G1 is its low ringing volume , and the weak trill function .
I mis calls all the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a "rooted G1 turned into ADP".Currently running Cyanogen's 1.6 mod, and it is remarkably stable.The problem I have with my G1 is its low ringing volume, and the weak trill function.
I mis calls all the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901895</id>
	<title>Re:Bad for Garmin and TomTom</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256720760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it sad that when I saw the words "Wall Street" in your post,
they looked kind of funny sitting together like that?  Almost like
Wall was spelled wrong or something?  Then it hit me, I'm so conditioned
to the word Walmart that that's why what you had looked strange
for a second.  I feel pathetic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it sad that when I saw the words " Wall Street " in your post , they looked kind of funny sitting together like that ?
Almost like Wall was spelled wrong or something ?
Then it hit me , I 'm so conditioned to the word Walmart that that 's why what you had looked strange for a second .
I feel pathetic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it sad that when I saw the words "Wall Street" in your post,
they looked kind of funny sitting together like that?
Almost like
Wall was spelled wrong or something?
Then it hit me, I'm so conditioned
to the word Walmart that that's why what you had looked strange
for a second.
I feel pathetic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899599</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29904865</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-touch for developers but not for end user</title>
	<author>seer</author>
	<datestamp>1256737260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The video that Verizon released shows the guy using multi-touch to zoom in on a web page.  here: <a href="http://verizonwireless.mediaseed.tv/Story.aspx?story=37115" title="mediaseed.tv" rel="nofollow">http://verizonwireless.mediaseed.tv/Story.aspx?story=37115</a> [mediaseed.tv]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The video that Verizon released shows the guy using multi-touch to zoom in on a web page .
here : http : //verizonwireless.mediaseed.tv/Story.aspx ? story = 37115 [ mediaseed.tv ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The video that Verizon released shows the guy using multi-touch to zoom in on a web page.
here: http://verizonwireless.mediaseed.tv/Story.aspx?story=37115 [mediaseed.tv]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899429</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900659</id>
	<title>No but they have TomTom...</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1256758320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The iPhone may not have this Google maps feature (which does sound really nice) but they do have TomTom - the best thing about that, potentially, is the specific dock you plug into which offers better GPS reception than the device has.  No mobile device is going to have as strong a GPS receiver as a fixed powered device, and the TomTom data is all offline that you can get even in the wilds.  (Not sure when the dock is due to be released, but soon).</p><p>One of the strengths of the iPhone platform is the hardware integrations, which we are only just starting to see come up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The iPhone may not have this Google maps feature ( which does sound really nice ) but they do have TomTom - the best thing about that , potentially , is the specific dock you plug into which offers better GPS reception than the device has .
No mobile device is going to have as strong a GPS receiver as a fixed powered device , and the TomTom data is all offline that you can get even in the wilds .
( Not sure when the dock is due to be released , but soon ) .One of the strengths of the iPhone platform is the hardware integrations , which we are only just starting to see come up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The iPhone may not have this Google maps feature (which does sound really nice) but they do have TomTom - the best thing about that, potentially, is the specific dock you plug into which offers better GPS reception than the device has.
No mobile device is going to have as strong a GPS receiver as a fixed powered device, and the TomTom data is all offline that you can get even in the wilds.
(Not sure when the dock is due to be released, but soon).One of the strengths of the iPhone platform is the hardware integrations, which we are only just starting to see come up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899915</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900695</id>
	<title>Open Handset Alliance</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1256758560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google does not control Android. Google can't singularly hold back an Android release. Google can't sign an exclusive deal where only one carrier gets an Android release.</p><p>Android is FOSS that is owned by the Open Handset Alliance.</p><p>Google offers various versions of Android to carriers with differing levels of Google branding, but given that the entire trunk is open to developers, AT&amp;T has the same capability of obtaining Android code as Verizon, or any theoretical carrier.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google does not control Android .
Google ca n't singularly hold back an Android release .
Google ca n't sign an exclusive deal where only one carrier gets an Android release.Android is FOSS that is owned by the Open Handset Alliance.Google offers various versions of Android to carriers with differing levels of Google branding , but given that the entire trunk is open to developers , AT&amp;T has the same capability of obtaining Android code as Verizon , or any theoretical carrier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google does not control Android.
Google can't singularly hold back an Android release.
Google can't sign an exclusive deal where only one carrier gets an Android release.Android is FOSS that is owned by the Open Handset Alliance.Google offers various versions of Android to carriers with differing levels of Google branding, but given that the entire trunk is open to developers, AT&amp;T has the same capability of obtaining Android code as Verizon, or any theoretical carrier.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898895</id>
	<title>Can you FIND me now?</title>
	<author>Jedi74</author>
	<datestamp>1256751360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A game of hide-and-go-seek will never be the same =)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A game of hide-and-go-seek will never be the same = )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A game of hide-and-go-seek will never be the same =)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29903019</id>
	<title>Re:Bad for Garmin and TomTom</title>
	<author>FallinWithStyle</author>
	<datestamp>1256726520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While I don't think the need for dedicated GPS units will disappear anytime soon, it is obviously troublesome for both companies. With that said, it does appear that Garmin is at least attempting to transition more into the <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/garmin-android-devices-coming-second-half-of-2009-2227361/" title="slashgear.com" rel="nofollow">cell phone market.</a> [slashgear.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I do n't think the need for dedicated GPS units will disappear anytime soon , it is obviously troublesome for both companies .
With that said , it does appear that Garmin is at least attempting to transition more into the cell phone market .
[ slashgear.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I don't think the need for dedicated GPS units will disappear anytime soon, it is obviously troublesome for both companies.
With that said, it does appear that Garmin is at least attempting to transition more into the cell phone market.
[slashgear.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899599</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901425</id>
	<title>Bluetooth?</title>
	<author>amon</author>
	<datestamp>1256761860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will it finally be able to send/receive files over Bluetooth?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it finally be able to send/receive files over Bluetooth ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it finally be able to send/receive files over Bluetooth?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29903019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29902329
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899915
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901541
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899915
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29904929
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899429
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900073
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899597
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899069
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29903697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901425
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29904237
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899597
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901897
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899069
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29904865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899429
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899453
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901895
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29907209
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29904875
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899069
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901991
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899429
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900511
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900001
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899429
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899069
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29905041
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900695
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901469
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29903197
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900727
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899597
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901041
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899429
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29906393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899063
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899039
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_28_1524257_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899069
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_28_1524257.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899137
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_28_1524257.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901425
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29903697
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_28_1524257.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899915
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900659
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29902329
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_28_1524257.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899063
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29906393
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_28_1524257.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29902373
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_28_1524257.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898935
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901765
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899039
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901015
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899453
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900511
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899211
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29903197
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901469
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899131
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29904875
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_28_1524257.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898791
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_28_1524257.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899225
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_28_1524257.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29898773
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901541
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_28_1524257.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899597
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900073
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29904237
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900727
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_28_1524257.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899429
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29904929
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901991
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29904865
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900001
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901041
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_28_1524257.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899049
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_28_1524257.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899069
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900709
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900831
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899755
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901897
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900443
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_28_1524257.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899589
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_28_1524257.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29900695
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29905041
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_28_1524257.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899599
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29901895
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29903019
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_28_1524257.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29899789
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_28_1524257.29907209
</commentlist>
</conversation>
