<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_27_1654239</id>
	<title>Google Voice Now Works WIth Existing Mobile Numbers</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1256662980000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>IP-192.com was one of several readers to note that Google Voice users <a href="http://googlevoiceblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/google-voice-with-your-existing-number.html">can now utilize their existing mobile phone number</a> for collecting voice messages instead of applying for a Google Voice number.  From the post at the Google Voice blog: "Up until now, if you wanted to use Google Voice, you needed to choose a new number. Taking calls through your Google number allows us to offer features like call recording, call screening and getting text messages via email." Not all features (like conference calling) are available to those bringing their own number, but voice messages by email is my favorite feature.</htmltext>
<tokenext>IP-192.com was one of several readers to note that Google Voice users can now utilize their existing mobile phone number for collecting voice messages instead of applying for a Google Voice number .
From the post at the Google Voice blog : " Up until now , if you wanted to use Google Voice , you needed to choose a new number .
Taking calls through your Google number allows us to offer features like call recording , call screening and getting text messages via email .
" Not all features ( like conference calling ) are available to those bringing their own number , but voice messages by email is my favorite feature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IP-192.com was one of several readers to note that Google Voice users can now utilize their existing mobile phone number for collecting voice messages instead of applying for a Google Voice number.
From the post at the Google Voice blog: "Up until now, if you wanted to use Google Voice, you needed to choose a new number.
Taking calls through your Google number allows us to offer features like call recording, call screening and getting text messages via email.
" Not all features (like conference calling) are available to those bringing their own number, but voice messages by email is my favorite feature.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885931</id>
	<title>Google Invites?</title>
	<author>thesaintkhalsa</author>
	<datestamp>1256667720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is there a legitimate way to get GOOGLE invites - not really confident of getting them off Ebay - thanks in advance</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there a legitimate way to get GOOGLE invites - not really confident of getting them off Ebay - thanks in advance</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there a legitimate way to get GOOGLE invites - not really confident of getting them off Ebay - thanks in advance</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886065</id>
	<title>Re:Visual Voicemail</title>
	<author>Hijacked Public</author>
	<datestamp>1256668260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, it is free, so it doesn't need much in the way of value to justify getting it.</p><p>I use it when I am somewhere I can't get a cell signal on my iphone, or where I get the 'visual voicemail is not available' message. Wading through ATT's prompt based voice mail menu system is not something I have the patience for any longer. So I read the GV messages via wifi or the like.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it is free , so it does n't need much in the way of value to justify getting it.I use it when I am somewhere I ca n't get a cell signal on my iphone , or where I get the 'visual voicemail is not available ' message .
Wading through ATT 's prompt based voice mail menu system is not something I have the patience for any longer .
So I read the GV messages via wifi or the like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it is free, so it doesn't need much in the way of value to justify getting it.I use it when I am somewhere I can't get a cell signal on my iphone, or where I get the 'visual voicemail is not available' message.
Wading through ATT's prompt based voice mail menu system is not something I have the patience for any longer.
So I read the GV messages via wifi or the like.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885919</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886705</id>
	<title>Landline?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256671140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, two questions

- What prevents this from working on landlines?

- Do you use minutes on your cell plan when GV handles calls ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , two questions - What prevents this from working on landlines ?
- Do you use minutes on your cell plan when GV handles calls ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, two questions

- What prevents this from working on landlines?
- Do you use minutes on your cell plan when GV handles calls ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29888103</id>
	<title>Tmobile call forwarding blocked!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256676840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tmobile is blocking call forwarding on customers that don't have a contract plan.  If your a flex pay customer your SOL for forwarding to Google voice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tmobile is blocking call forwarding on customers that do n't have a contract plan .
If your a flex pay customer your SOL for forwarding to Google voice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tmobile is blocking call forwarding on customers that don't have a contract plan.
If your a flex pay customer your SOL for forwarding to Google voice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885731</id>
	<title>voicemail forwording?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256666940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://youmail.com/" title="youmail.com" rel="nofollow">google is late</a> [youmail.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>google is late [ youmail.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>google is late [youmail.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887593</id>
	<title>Re:How it works</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256674740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Spiffy, though visual voicemail on the iPhone is a tad better interface, at least until there is another google voice app for the iPhone...</p></div></blockquote><p>Which is exactly why <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579\_3-10297618-37.html" title="cnet.com">Apple won't allow a good Google Voice app on the iPhone</a> [cnet.com].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Spiffy , though visual voicemail on the iPhone is a tad better interface , at least until there is another google voice app for the iPhone...Which is exactly why Apple wo n't allow a good Google Voice app on the iPhone [ cnet.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spiffy, though visual voicemail on the iPhone is a tad better interface, at least until there is another google voice app for the iPhone...Which is exactly why Apple won't allow a good Google Voice app on the iPhone [cnet.com].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885777</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887043</id>
	<title>Since when is call forwarding new?</title>
	<author>eberon</author>
	<datestamp>1256672580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So.. we should be excited because phone numbers (including Google Voice numbers) can receive forwarded calls when configured via your carrier? NO WAI!</htmltext>
<tokenext>So.. we should be excited because phone numbers ( including Google Voice numbers ) can receive forwarded calls when configured via your carrier ?
NO WAI !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So.. we should be excited because phone numbers (including Google Voice numbers) can receive forwarded calls when configured via your carrier?
NO WAI!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885697</id>
	<title>Welcome to your local FEMA Camp!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256666880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will these numbers be tattoed onto our arms like IBM did to the Jews in Nazi Germany?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will these numbers be tattoed onto our arms like IBM did to the Jews in Nazi Germany ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will these numbers be tattoed onto our arms like IBM did to the Jews in Nazi Germany?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29889577</id>
	<title>Re:Been using it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256639460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...I wouldn't want to have it translate "Vicodin" when the doctor said "Viagara" or something...</p></div><p>Man, I don't know, "Viagara" sounds like something that rather than getting it up, would make it <i>fall</i>...</p><p>*crickets*</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...I would n't want to have it translate " Vicodin " when the doctor said " Viagara " or something...Man , I do n't know , " Viagara " sounds like something that rather than getting it up , would make it fall... * crickets *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I wouldn't want to have it translate "Vicodin" when the doctor said "Viagara" or something...Man, I don't know, "Viagara" sounds like something that rather than getting it up, would make it fall...*crickets*
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29888573</id>
	<title>Re:Been using it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256635620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey.</p><p>You're wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey.You 're wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey.You're wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886237</id>
	<title>Re:Missing Features</title>
	<author>herksc</author>
	<datestamp>1256669160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, there is no "port" involved here, really.  This is essentially just setting up your carrier to forward calls on no-answer/busy to your google voicemail.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , there is no " port " involved here , really .
This is essentially just setting up your carrier to forward calls on no-answer/busy to your google voicemail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, there is no "port" involved here, really.
This is essentially just setting up your carrier to forward calls on no-answer/busy to your google voicemail.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887373</id>
	<title>You can almost already do this on most providers</title>
	<author>caseih</author>
	<datestamp>1256673720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On GSM phones, just dial *002*# and all your unanswered calls will go to your google voice account.  Of course Google likely uses this technique, but has some added logic to make it so that Google Voice will not forward back to your cell phone if the call is being forwarded from your cell phone in the first place.  I can't find any details on how Google does it, but it has to be done with the forwarding mechanisms already offered by providers.</p><p>A downside to all this is that forwarding uses up your airtime.  Also it's not available on T-Mobile prepaid (though it is on AT&amp;T GoPhones).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On GSM phones , just dial * 002 * # and all your unanswered calls will go to your google voice account .
Of course Google likely uses this technique , but has some added logic to make it so that Google Voice will not forward back to your cell phone if the call is being forwarded from your cell phone in the first place .
I ca n't find any details on how Google does it , but it has to be done with the forwarding mechanisms already offered by providers.A downside to all this is that forwarding uses up your airtime .
Also it 's not available on T-Mobile prepaid ( though it is on AT&amp;T GoPhones ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On GSM phones, just dial *002*# and all your unanswered calls will go to your google voice account.
Of course Google likely uses this technique, but has some added logic to make it so that Google Voice will not forward back to your cell phone if the call is being forwarded from your cell phone in the first place.
I can't find any details on how Google does it, but it has to be done with the forwarding mechanisms already offered by providers.A downside to all this is that forwarding uses up your airtime.
Also it's not available on T-Mobile prepaid (though it is on AT&amp;T GoPhones).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077</id>
	<title>Missing Features</title>
	<author>dijjnn</author>
	<datestamp>1256668320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFA:<br><i><br>More specifically, if you sign up for Google Voice with your existing number, you'll get:</i></p><p><i>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Online, searchable voicemail<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Free automated voicemail transcription<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Custom voicemail greetings for different callers<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Email and SMS notifications<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Low-priced international calling</i></p><p><i>If you decide to also get a new Google number, you'll get all of the above PLUS:</i></p><p><i>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * One number that reaches you on all your phones<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * SMS via email<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Call screening<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Listen In<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Call recording<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Conference calling<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Call blocking<br></i><br>So, you don't get all the features if you port in an existing number. How<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... lame. Completely killed my interest in this most recent development.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : More specifically , if you sign up for Google Voice with your existing number , you 'll get :         * Online , searchable voicemail         * Free automated voicemail transcription         * Custom voicemail greetings for different callers         * Email and SMS notifications         * Low-priced international callingIf you decide to also get a new Google number , you 'll get all of the above PLUS :         * One number that reaches you on all your phones         * SMS via email         * Call screening         * Listen In         * Call recording         * Conference calling         * Call blockingSo , you do n't get all the features if you port in an existing number .
How ... lame. Completely killed my interest in this most recent development .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA:More specifically, if you sign up for Google Voice with your existing number, you'll get:
        * Online, searchable voicemail
        * Free automated voicemail transcription
        * Custom voicemail greetings for different callers
        * Email and SMS notifications
        * Low-priced international callingIf you decide to also get a new Google number, you'll get all of the above PLUS:
        * One number that reaches you on all your phones
        * SMS via email
        * Call screening
        * Listen In
        * Call recording
        * Conference calling
        * Call blockingSo, you don't get all the features if you port in an existing number.
How ... lame. Completely killed my interest in this most recent development.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885777</id>
	<title>How it works</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256667120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, Google can now be set to be the termination point for your voicemails for your mobile, that is, you configure your mobile phone to call their voicemail gateway instead of your providers.  Spiffy, though visual voicemail on the iPhone is a tad better interface, at least until there is another google voice app for the iPhone...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , Google can now be set to be the termination point for your voicemails for your mobile , that is , you configure your mobile phone to call their voicemail gateway instead of your providers .
Spiffy , though visual voicemail on the iPhone is a tad better interface , at least until there is another google voice app for the iPhone.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, Google can now be set to be the termination point for your voicemails for your mobile, that is, you configure your mobile phone to call their voicemail gateway instead of your providers.
Spiffy, though visual voicemail on the iPhone is a tad better interface, at least until there is another google voice app for the iPhone...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885827</id>
	<title>Oh wow!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256667300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now google allows you to do what the government has been doing for you for the past 5 years! Now your government mobile history is inextricably tied to your online activity!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now google allows you to do what the government has been doing for you for the past 5 years !
Now your government mobile history is inextricably tied to your online activity !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now google allows you to do what the government has been doing for you for the past 5 years!
Now your government mobile history is inextricably tied to your online activity!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887837</id>
	<title>Re:Visual Voicemail</title>
	<author>Yez70</author>
	<datestamp>1256675820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's also great with services like My Circle where you get 10 free phone numbers on your cell plan.  Add your Google Voice number, tell Google Voice to display the Voice Caller ID rather than the caller and have Google Voice forward all calls to your cell.

Unlimited free incoming calls....</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's also great with services like My Circle where you get 10 free phone numbers on your cell plan .
Add your Google Voice number , tell Google Voice to display the Voice Caller ID rather than the caller and have Google Voice forward all calls to your cell .
Unlimited free incoming calls... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's also great with services like My Circle where you get 10 free phone numbers on your cell plan.
Add your Google Voice number, tell Google Voice to display the Voice Caller ID rather than the caller and have Google Voice forward all calls to your cell.
Unlimited free incoming calls....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885799</id>
	<title>I want</title>
	<author>\_PimpDaddy7\_</author>
	<datestamp>1256667180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>617-867-5309</p><p>I'm serious too, HOW DO I GET THIS number?</p><p>Thanks</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>617-867-5309I 'm serious too , HOW DO I GET THIS number ? Thanks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>617-867-5309I'm serious too, HOW DO I GET THIS number?Thanks</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886301</id>
	<title>Re:Visual Voicemail</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256669520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Difference is if you disconnect your phone you can still retain your voicemails infact keep your voicemails for ever. The other feature is transcriptions which I am not so sure is available on other carriers..<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Difference is if you disconnect your phone you can still retain your voicemails infact keep your voicemails for ever .
The other feature is transcriptions which I am not so sure is available on other carriers. .  </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Difference is if you disconnect your phone you can still retain your voicemails infact keep your voicemails for ever.
The other feature is transcriptions which I am not so sure is available on other carriers..
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885919</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886861</id>
	<title>Re:Been using it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256671800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who would have thought that 867-5039 would be a bad idea?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who would have thought that 867-5039 would be a bad idea ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who would have thought that 867-5039 would be a bad idea?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29888747</id>
	<title>Re:Visual Voicemail</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256636160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>freeeeee</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>freeeeee</tokentext>
<sentencetext>freeeeee</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885919</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887883</id>
	<title>Re:Still US-only?</title>
	<author>raju1kabir</author>
	<datestamp>1256676000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I use it outside the US. It's the first service I've found that can give me free incoming SMSes. I have them processed by my mail server to perform certain actions, as well as being forwarded to my non-US phone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I use it outside the US .
It 's the first service I 've found that can give me free incoming SMSes .
I have them processed by my mail server to perform certain actions , as well as being forwarded to my non-US phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use it outside the US.
It's the first service I've found that can give me free incoming SMSes.
I have them processed by my mail server to perform certain actions, as well as being forwarded to my non-US phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29888559</id>
	<title>Re:Been using it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256635620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Doctor Smith and your appointment is tomato at flower dirty</p></div></blockquote><p>Oh man! Talk about embarrassing, my girlfriend once got tomato in her flower dirty (if you know what I mean). But a quick trip to the doctor and some antibiotics cleared that right up.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Doctor Smith and your appointment is tomato at flower dirtyOh man !
Talk about embarrassing , my girlfriend once got tomato in her flower dirty ( if you know what I mean ) .
But a quick trip to the doctor and some antibiotics cleared that right up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doctor Smith and your appointment is tomato at flower dirtyOh man!
Talk about embarrassing, my girlfriend once got tomato in her flower dirty (if you know what I mean).
But a quick trip to the doctor and some antibiotics cleared that right up.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887005</id>
	<title>Re:Still US-only?</title>
	<author>RDW</author>
	<datestamp>1256672400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'Wake me up when Google voice is available outside the US.'</p><p>Well, your messages might be available pretty much everywhere:</p><p><a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/19/random-users-google-voice-mail-is-searchable-by-anyone/" title="boygeniusreport.com">http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/19/random-users-google-voice-mail-is-searchable-by-anyone/</a> [boygeniusreport.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'Wake me up when Google voice is available outside the US .
'Well , your messages might be available pretty much everywhere : http : //www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/19/random-users-google-voice-mail-is-searchable-by-anyone/ [ boygeniusreport.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Wake me up when Google voice is available outside the US.
'Well, your messages might be available pretty much everywhere:http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/10/19/random-users-google-voice-mail-is-searchable-by-anyone/ [boygeniusreport.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886221</id>
	<title>Re:Missing Features</title>
	<author>tjb627</author>
	<datestamp>1256669040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>All this is doing is forwarding your phone call to Google's voicemail instead of your own.  This is nothing new, I've been doing this for weeks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All this is doing is forwarding your phone call to Google 's voicemail instead of your own .
This is nothing new , I 've been doing this for weeks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All this is doing is forwarding your phone call to Google's voicemail instead of your own.
This is nothing new, I've been doing this for weeks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886655</id>
	<title>Replying to myself</title>
	<author>NiteShaed</author>
	<datestamp>1256670900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, I just called Sprint, and the rep says the 20 cent/min forwarding charge is definitely still in effect, and he had no information on it being repealed.  Hopefully they're planning on doing it soon, which is what Google Voice is saying when you activate the service.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I just called Sprint , and the rep says the 20 cent/min forwarding charge is definitely still in effect , and he had no information on it being repealed .
Hopefully they 're planning on doing it soon , which is what Google Voice is saying when you activate the service .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I just called Sprint, and the rep says the 20 cent/min forwarding charge is definitely still in effect, and he had no information on it being repealed.
Hopefully they're planning on doing it soon, which is what Google Voice is saying when you activate the service.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886239</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887475</id>
	<title>Re:No new subscribers</title>
	<author>tonycheese</author>
	<datestamp>1256674140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I signed up for an invite from Google over the summer. It took about a month to get an invite, but I think they tend to move faster and faster with invites to their various services, so if you sign up now you might get an email from them in a week or two.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I signed up for an invite from Google over the summer .
It took about a month to get an invite , but I think they tend to move faster and faster with invites to their various services , so if you sign up now you might get an email from them in a week or two .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I signed up for an invite from Google over the summer.
It took about a month to get an invite, but I think they tend to move faster and faster with invites to their various services, so if you sign up now you might get an email from them in a week or two.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886521</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29888989</id>
	<title>Re:How it works</title>
	<author>dontmakemethink</author>
	<datestamp>1256637060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Though not a cellular service, Vonage has great features like this.  It emails a notification of voicemail, and I have a filter set up to forward the message to my cel phone.  When I'm overseas, I bring my VOIP adapter along, patch it through my laptop as a wi-fi gateway, and I have my home phone with me, including calls to and from North America at no extra charge.</p><p>One place I stayed for a week had no wi-fi, but some nearby moron was kind enough to leave their access point unsecured.  Free overseas calling via unsecured wi-fi is a riot!</p><p>Another time I really freaked out my German friend, telling him I had a short-wave cordless phone with global range.  I showed him my cordless phone, clearly a North American model.  As we sat in a cafe, I told him to call my home phone number, and the cordless phone rings.  I answer, and he absolutely loses it.  "Where can I get one!!"  Then I reveal that I had my laptop, VOIP adapter, and phone base set up in the rental car out front using a power inverter and the cafe's free wi-fi.  He was so punkt.  I so wish I had that on camera!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Though not a cellular service , Vonage has great features like this .
It emails a notification of voicemail , and I have a filter set up to forward the message to my cel phone .
When I 'm overseas , I bring my VOIP adapter along , patch it through my laptop as a wi-fi gateway , and I have my home phone with me , including calls to and from North America at no extra charge.One place I stayed for a week had no wi-fi , but some nearby moron was kind enough to leave their access point unsecured .
Free overseas calling via unsecured wi-fi is a riot ! Another time I really freaked out my German friend , telling him I had a short-wave cordless phone with global range .
I showed him my cordless phone , clearly a North American model .
As we sat in a cafe , I told him to call my home phone number , and the cordless phone rings .
I answer , and he absolutely loses it .
" Where can I get one ! !
" Then I reveal that I had my laptop , VOIP adapter , and phone base set up in the rental car out front using a power inverter and the cafe 's free wi-fi .
He was so punkt .
I so wish I had that on camera !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Though not a cellular service, Vonage has great features like this.
It emails a notification of voicemail, and I have a filter set up to forward the message to my cel phone.
When I'm overseas, I bring my VOIP adapter along, patch it through my laptop as a wi-fi gateway, and I have my home phone with me, including calls to and from North America at no extra charge.One place I stayed for a week had no wi-fi, but some nearby moron was kind enough to leave their access point unsecured.
Free overseas calling via unsecured wi-fi is a riot!Another time I really freaked out my German friend, telling him I had a short-wave cordless phone with global range.
I showed him my cordless phone, clearly a North American model.
As we sat in a cafe, I told him to call my home phone number, and the cordless phone rings.
I answer, and he absolutely loses it.
"Where can I get one!!
"  Then I reveal that I had my laptop, VOIP adapter, and phone base set up in the rental car out front using a power inverter and the cafe's free wi-fi.
He was so punkt.
I so wish I had that on camera!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885777</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886071</id>
	<title>Early adopters lose</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256668320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interesting, I went to change mine to my current number but google wants $10 for that service... serves me right for being an early adopter!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting , I went to change mine to my current number but google wants $ 10 for that service... serves me right for being an early adopter !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting, I went to change mine to my current number but google wants $10 for that service... serves me right for being an early adopter!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887807</id>
	<title>Re:Missing Features</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256675700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The real key is that this saves you from having to notify your entire social network and contact list that you have a mysterious new cellphone number.  It's basically like keeping your old number and using google to add new features to your voicemail and call-waiting.</p><p>There are definitely some nice features for those who get a brand new number, but that just seems like logistics - it's got to be somewhat complex for a free third-party system to intercept calls that would otherwise be routed to a wireless company's handset - you still keep your existing wireless company contract.</p><p>One trick to the way google voice works is that when connecting conference calls and listen-in calls google is actually calling each individual separately and patching them together as a second step.  If your google voice number is the same as the number google is calling to make these connections, it's probably a little like two mirrors pointed at one another.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The real key is that this saves you from having to notify your entire social network and contact list that you have a mysterious new cellphone number .
It 's basically like keeping your old number and using google to add new features to your voicemail and call-waiting.There are definitely some nice features for those who get a brand new number , but that just seems like logistics - it 's got to be somewhat complex for a free third-party system to intercept calls that would otherwise be routed to a wireless company 's handset - you still keep your existing wireless company contract.One trick to the way google voice works is that when connecting conference calls and listen-in calls google is actually calling each individual separately and patching them together as a second step .
If your google voice number is the same as the number google is calling to make these connections , it 's probably a little like two mirrors pointed at one another .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real key is that this saves you from having to notify your entire social network and contact list that you have a mysterious new cellphone number.
It's basically like keeping your old number and using google to add new features to your voicemail and call-waiting.There are definitely some nice features for those who get a brand new number, but that just seems like logistics - it's got to be somewhat complex for a free third-party system to intercept calls that would otherwise be routed to a wireless company's handset - you still keep your existing wireless company contract.One trick to the way google voice works is that when connecting conference calls and listen-in calls google is actually calling each individual separately and patching them together as a second step.
If your google voice number is the same as the number google is calling to make these connections, it's probably a little like two mirrors pointed at one another.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885761</id>
	<title>Still US-only?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256667060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wake me up when Google voice is available outside the US.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wake me up when Google voice is available outside the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wake me up when Google voice is available outside the US.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29888931</id>
	<title>Unwanted calls</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256636880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone else experiencing increased call activity to their cellphones after GoogleVoice?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone else experiencing increased call activity to their cellphones after GoogleVoice ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone else experiencing increased call activity to their cellphones after GoogleVoice?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886883</id>
	<title>Re:Missing Features</title>
	<author>Nerdposeur</author>
	<datestamp>1256671920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So, you don't get all the features if you port in an existing number. How<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... lame. Completely killed my interest in this most recent development.</p></div></blockquote><p>You're missing something. I already have a GV account. If you call my special GV number, I get the full feature list. Now I get that, <b>PLUS</b> I can click to add the "Lite" version to my actual cell number.</p><p>That means that if you call my cell directly, I can still send you to GV voicemail, with the "Lite" feature set.</p><p>As they say:</p><blockquote><div><p>If you already have a Google number, this new feature should also help with the transition to your new number, as <b>you can now forward unanswered calls to your mobile phone to your Google Voice account</b>.  This way, people who still call your old number will reach the same voicemail as people who call your Google Voice number. If you already use Google Voice, you can add Google voicemail to any mobile phone you've linked to your account.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , you do n't get all the features if you port in an existing number .
How ... lame. Completely killed my interest in this most recent development.You 're missing something .
I already have a GV account .
If you call my special GV number , I get the full feature list .
Now I get that , PLUS I can click to add the " Lite " version to my actual cell number.That means that if you call my cell directly , I can still send you to GV voicemail , with the " Lite " feature set.As they say : If you already have a Google number , this new feature should also help with the transition to your new number , as you can now forward unanswered calls to your mobile phone to your Google Voice account .
This way , people who still call your old number will reach the same voicemail as people who call your Google Voice number .
If you already use Google Voice , you can add Google voicemail to any mobile phone you 've linked to your account .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, you don't get all the features if you port in an existing number.
How ... lame. Completely killed my interest in this most recent development.You're missing something.
I already have a GV account.
If you call my special GV number, I get the full feature list.
Now I get that, PLUS I can click to add the "Lite" version to my actual cell number.That means that if you call my cell directly, I can still send you to GV voicemail, with the "Lite" feature set.As they say:If you already have a Google number, this new feature should also help with the transition to your new number, as you can now forward unanswered calls to your mobile phone to your Google Voice account.
This way, people who still call your old number will reach the same voicemail as people who call your Google Voice number.
If you already use Google Voice, you can add Google voicemail to any mobile phone you've linked to your account.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29894057</id>
	<title>Re:Missing Features</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256762340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This isn't 'number porting'. Its 'call forwarding to a google voice number'</p><p>And its a temporary solution, as I'm sure google is working on the regulatory requirements to be able to port numbers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't 'number porting' .
Its 'call forwarding to a google voice number'And its a temporary solution , as I 'm sure google is working on the regulatory requirements to be able to port numbers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't 'number porting'.
Its 'call forwarding to a google voice number'And its a temporary solution, as I'm sure google is working on the regulatory requirements to be able to port numbers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29890013</id>
	<title>Re:Missing Features</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256641080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about the feature where Google mines your telephone calls for their own profiling and advertising purposes? -- Does this require a new Google number, or does it work with your existing number?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about the feature where Google mines your telephone calls for their own profiling and advertising purposes ?
-- Does this require a new Google number , or does it work with your existing number ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about the feature where Google mines your telephone calls for their own profiling and advertising purposes?
-- Does this require a new Google number, or does it work with your existing number?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29893465</id>
	<title>Re:Sprint subscribers beware</title>
	<author>tobiasly</author>
	<datestamp>1256668140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is the warning I got when trying to activate my Sprint phone for this feature: <a href="https://www.google.com/voice/voice/sprint" title="google.com">https://www.google.com/voice/voice/sprint</a> [google.com]

They say Sprint will drop the charge in "mid-November 2009". So, um, real soon now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the warning I got when trying to activate my Sprint phone for this feature : https : //www.google.com/voice/voice/sprint [ google.com ] They say Sprint will drop the charge in " mid-November 2009 " .
So , um , real soon now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the warning I got when trying to activate my Sprint phone for this feature: https://www.google.com/voice/voice/sprint [google.com]

They say Sprint will drop the charge in "mid-November 2009".
So, um, real soon now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886239</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29889593</id>
	<title>Re:Missing Features</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256639520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How would it be possible to provided the added services (save SMS via email) without using a Google number?  Google can't magically redirect your existing number to their servers.</p><p>Anywho, this offering is exactly what I want - keep my current number but get transcribed messages with message metadata.  Listening to messages is painful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How would it be possible to provided the added services ( save SMS via email ) without using a Google number ?
Google ca n't magically redirect your existing number to their servers.Anywho , this offering is exactly what I want - keep my current number but get transcribed messages with message metadata .
Listening to messages is painful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How would it be possible to provided the added services (save SMS via email) without using a Google number?
Google can't magically redirect your existing number to their servers.Anywho, this offering is exactly what I want - keep my current number but get transcribed messages with message metadata.
Listening to messages is painful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887839</id>
	<title>Re:Still US-only?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256675820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Available outside the US?  How about available in the US to more than a select few.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Available outside the US ?
How about available in the US to more than a select few .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Available outside the US?
How about available in the US to more than a select few.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29892873</id>
	<title>Gee Thanks!</title>
	<author>sabre307</author>
	<datestamp>1256659740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, because I am an early adopter of Google Voice (take that you furners!), I have to pay $10 if I want to port my cell number that I've had for the last decade over to them. Then I have to go back and retrain all of the people that I have managed to convince to use my new number to go back to using my old number! WTF! Why is it the people who jump in early on something are always the ones who get the shaft later on?</p><p>Wait a minute... If I can officially port my number over, does that mean that <a href="http://techfragments.com/news/1075/Tech/FCC\_Requests\_Google\_Voice\_Details.html" title="techfragments.com" rel="nofollow">Google is officially a telco</a> [techfragments.com]?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , because I am an early adopter of Google Voice ( take that you furners !
) , I have to pay $ 10 if I want to port my cell number that I 've had for the last decade over to them .
Then I have to go back and retrain all of the people that I have managed to convince to use my new number to go back to using my old number !
WTF ! Why is it the people who jump in early on something are always the ones who get the shaft later on ? Wait a minute... If I can officially port my number over , does that mean that Google is officially a telco [ techfragments.com ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, because I am an early adopter of Google Voice (take that you furners!
), I have to pay $10 if I want to port my cell number that I've had for the last decade over to them.
Then I have to go back and retrain all of the people that I have managed to convince to use my new number to go back to using my old number!
WTF! Why is it the people who jump in early on something are always the ones who get the shaft later on?Wait a minute... If I can officially port my number over, does that mean that Google is officially a telco [techfragments.com]?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886607</id>
	<title>Re:Sprint subscribers beware</title>
	<author>dillpick6</author>
	<datestamp>1256670660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can confirm that Sprint is still charging (at least in the New England area).<br> <br>

A friend turned it on for his phone and sent a test message, successfully made it through, and was transcribed to his email. We did notice that there are an extra few rings before VM picks up because Sprint is forwarding on to the new number. <br> <br>

After a while, the charges did show up in his account on sprints website at 20 cents a pop.<br> <br>

Hope this helps!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can confirm that Sprint is still charging ( at least in the New England area ) .
A friend turned it on for his phone and sent a test message , successfully made it through , and was transcribed to his email .
We did notice that there are an extra few rings before VM picks up because Sprint is forwarding on to the new number .
After a while , the charges did show up in his account on sprints website at 20 cents a pop .
Hope this helps !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can confirm that Sprint is still charging (at least in the New England area).
A friend turned it on for his phone and sent a test message, successfully made it through, and was transcribed to his email.
We did notice that there are an extra few rings before VM picks up because Sprint is forwarding on to the new number.
After a while, the charges did show up in his account on sprints website at 20 cents a pop.
Hope this helps!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886239</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886233</id>
	<title>Re:How it works</title>
	<author>Darth Sdlavrot</author>
	<datestamp>1256669100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Halfway there. Now I need to set gvoice to be the termination point for my landline voicemails and I'll be all set.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Halfway there .
Now I need to set gvoice to be the termination point for my landline voicemails and I 'll be all set .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Halfway there.
Now I need to set gvoice to be the termination point for my landline voicemails and I'll be all set.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885777</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886963</id>
	<title>Re:MWI on a forwarded call</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256672280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can have Google Voice send you a text message when someone leaves a voicemail though which, IMO, is just as good (assuming you're not paying $0.15/message or whatever they're up to now).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can have Google Voice send you a text message when someone leaves a voicemail though which , IMO , is just as good ( assuming you 're not paying $ 0.15/message or whatever they 're up to now ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can have Google Voice send you a text message when someone leaves a voicemail though which, IMO, is just as good (assuming you're not paying $0.15/message or whatever they're up to now).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886417</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29893339</id>
	<title>Re:Still US-only?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256666040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Wake me up when Google voice is available outside the US.</i></p><p>I'm Canadian, living in Canada.  Canadians make the exact same complaint every time an American company releases some cool new product available only in America.</p><p>To which I reply: they're a goddamn <i>American</i> company...what obligations (if any) do they have to us?  Why aren't Canadian companies doing something similar?  Oh right, because Canadian companies are more interested in screwing over their compatriots instead of releasing cool new products.</p><p>Wake me up when a non-US company does something even remotely as cool as what Google does and offers it in the US at the same time as in its home market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wake me up when Google voice is available outside the US.I 'm Canadian , living in Canada .
Canadians make the exact same complaint every time an American company releases some cool new product available only in America.To which I reply : they 're a goddamn American company...what obligations ( if any ) do they have to us ?
Why are n't Canadian companies doing something similar ?
Oh right , because Canadian companies are more interested in screwing over their compatriots instead of releasing cool new products.Wake me up when a non-US company does something even remotely as cool as what Google does and offers it in the US at the same time as in its home market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wake me up when Google voice is available outside the US.I'm Canadian, living in Canada.
Canadians make the exact same complaint every time an American company releases some cool new product available only in America.To which I reply: they're a goddamn American company...what obligations (if any) do they have to us?
Why aren't Canadian companies doing something similar?
Oh right, because Canadian companies are more interested in screwing over their compatriots instead of releasing cool new products.Wake me up when a non-US company does something even remotely as cool as what Google does and offers it in the US at the same time as in its home market.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887307</id>
	<title>Re:Sprint subscribers beware</title>
	<author>tonycheese</author>
	<datestamp>1256673480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It sounds like people who use Sprint get a warning message, and I didn't get a warning message with Verizon, but just in case - does anybody know of other carriers doing this?</htmltext>
<tokenext>It sounds like people who use Sprint get a warning message , and I did n't get a warning message with Verizon , but just in case - does anybody know of other carriers doing this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It sounds like people who use Sprint get a warning message, and I didn't get a warning message with Verizon, but just in case - does anybody know of other carriers doing this?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886239</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886521</id>
	<title>No new subscribers</title>
	<author>MBGMorden</author>
	<datestamp>1256670300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The news sounds exciting, but from everything I'm gathering anybody who's not already using Google Voice can't signup at the moment.  The site says it's only available to Grand Central users, and that doesn't appear to be open for signup right now either.</p><p>As someone who's still using the ancient call the system and keep pressing next to skip messages I want to keep system, I'd happily switch over to this (hell I'd even pay a bit for it - between Gmail, Reader, Picasa, Google Apps, and this, I'd certainly be willing to pay for my Google account - not more than $10-ish per month, but still).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The news sounds exciting , but from everything I 'm gathering anybody who 's not already using Google Voice ca n't signup at the moment .
The site says it 's only available to Grand Central users , and that does n't appear to be open for signup right now either.As someone who 's still using the ancient call the system and keep pressing next to skip messages I want to keep system , I 'd happily switch over to this ( hell I 'd even pay a bit for it - between Gmail , Reader , Picasa , Google Apps , and this , I 'd certainly be willing to pay for my Google account - not more than $ 10-ish per month , but still ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The news sounds exciting, but from everything I'm gathering anybody who's not already using Google Voice can't signup at the moment.
The site says it's only available to Grand Central users, and that doesn't appear to be open for signup right now either.As someone who's still using the ancient call the system and keep pressing next to skip messages I want to keep system, I'd happily switch over to this (hell I'd even pay a bit for it - between Gmail, Reader, Picasa, Google Apps, and this, I'd certainly be willing to pay for my Google account - not more than $10-ish per month, but still).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886499</id>
	<title>Re:Google Invites?</title>
	<author>Endo13</author>
	<datestamp>1256670240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, there's an official signup page:</p><p><a href="https://services.google.com/fb/forms/googlevoiceinvite/" title="google.com">https://services.google.com/fb/forms/googlevoiceinvite/</a> [google.com]</p><p>I used it, and had my invite within a week or two.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , there 's an official signup page : https : //services.google.com/fb/forms/googlevoiceinvite/ [ google.com ] I used it , and had my invite within a week or two .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, there's an official signup page:https://services.google.com/fb/forms/googlevoiceinvite/ [google.com]I used it, and had my invite within a week or two.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885931</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886219</id>
	<title>Re:Been using it...</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1256669040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>$10 to change numbers?  By any standard I've ever seen, that's a steal.</p><p>Seriously, look into doing the same with a local telephone service sometime.  Some years back, the local telco issued me a home phone number that had previously been owned by a company that went Chapter 7.  After a little under 2 weeks of constant phone calls at all hours of day and night (who makes collection calls at 3AM?  Seriously?), I called the telco and asked.  By the time I stopped talking to the rep and said "no, thanks" we were up somewhere north of $175 in fees, surcharges, and "because we're the goddamned phone company and we'll tack this little sucker on too and you'll bend over and like it, biyotch" charges.  For a phone number that THEY had chosen and was in my possession for less than 2 weeks.</p><p>I picked a number not in my area back when Google Voice was GrandCentral and in beta, because no numbers were available here in the Hinterlands.  I gladly paid $10 when a number became available with my correct area code, and if I could port my old Vonage number over I'd happily fork over another $10 and thank them.  Given that I can use my free Gizmo line with an old Linksys PAP I have hanging around as my primary phone line now, I figure Google is saving me about $20 a month from my old 500-minute Vonage line, and loading me up with awesome features Vonage never dreamed of to boot.  If I have to send then $10 every now and again, I'm still seriously ahead.</p><p>And, yeah, I've run into the "Voice Misrecognition Follies" with Google voice.  Fortunately, none of the calls have been urgent, and I can tell that "Hi, versus Doctor Smith and your appointment is tomato at flower dirty" is good enough to save me the time of retrieving and listening to the audio, and make me laugh at the same time.  And I can always listen to the original if they've completely messed it up.  I've also had "Visual Voicemail" from Vonage and several other transcription services I've tried, and "guess what?  It ain't that pretty at all."  None of them do it any better.  The whole technology is not ready for prime time, but it's good enough for me every time so far, and at least Google does it for free.  Vonage charges a quarter per message.</p><p>I suppose if I was a pharmacist taking prescriptions, I wouldn't want to have it translate "Vicodin" when the doctor said "Viagara" or something, but for the kinds of calls I'm likely to get, the text has always allowed me to get the gist of what was being said (and I can always click a button on my Blackberry or on a website to listen to the original audio, but I've never had to).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>$ 10 to change numbers ?
By any standard I 've ever seen , that 's a steal.Seriously , look into doing the same with a local telephone service sometime .
Some years back , the local telco issued me a home phone number that had previously been owned by a company that went Chapter 7 .
After a little under 2 weeks of constant phone calls at all hours of day and night ( who makes collection calls at 3AM ?
Seriously ? ) , I called the telco and asked .
By the time I stopped talking to the rep and said " no , thanks " we were up somewhere north of $ 175 in fees , surcharges , and " because we 're the goddamned phone company and we 'll tack this little sucker on too and you 'll bend over and like it , biyotch " charges .
For a phone number that THEY had chosen and was in my possession for less than 2 weeks.I picked a number not in my area back when Google Voice was GrandCentral and in beta , because no numbers were available here in the Hinterlands .
I gladly paid $ 10 when a number became available with my correct area code , and if I could port my old Vonage number over I 'd happily fork over another $ 10 and thank them .
Given that I can use my free Gizmo line with an old Linksys PAP I have hanging around as my primary phone line now , I figure Google is saving me about $ 20 a month from my old 500-minute Vonage line , and loading me up with awesome features Vonage never dreamed of to boot .
If I have to send then $ 10 every now and again , I 'm still seriously ahead.And , yeah , I 've run into the " Voice Misrecognition Follies " with Google voice .
Fortunately , none of the calls have been urgent , and I can tell that " Hi , versus Doctor Smith and your appointment is tomato at flower dirty " is good enough to save me the time of retrieving and listening to the audio , and make me laugh at the same time .
And I can always listen to the original if they 've completely messed it up .
I 've also had " Visual Voicemail " from Vonage and several other transcription services I 've tried , and " guess what ?
It ai n't that pretty at all .
" None of them do it any better .
The whole technology is not ready for prime time , but it 's good enough for me every time so far , and at least Google does it for free .
Vonage charges a quarter per message.I suppose if I was a pharmacist taking prescriptions , I would n't want to have it translate " Vicodin " when the doctor said " Viagara " or something , but for the kinds of calls I 'm likely to get , the text has always allowed me to get the gist of what was being said ( and I can always click a button on my Blackberry or on a website to listen to the original audio , but I 've never had to ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>$10 to change numbers?
By any standard I've ever seen, that's a steal.Seriously, look into doing the same with a local telephone service sometime.
Some years back, the local telco issued me a home phone number that had previously been owned by a company that went Chapter 7.
After a little under 2 weeks of constant phone calls at all hours of day and night (who makes collection calls at 3AM?
Seriously?), I called the telco and asked.
By the time I stopped talking to the rep and said "no, thanks" we were up somewhere north of $175 in fees, surcharges, and "because we're the goddamned phone company and we'll tack this little sucker on too and you'll bend over and like it, biyotch" charges.
For a phone number that THEY had chosen and was in my possession for less than 2 weeks.I picked a number not in my area back when Google Voice was GrandCentral and in beta, because no numbers were available here in the Hinterlands.
I gladly paid $10 when a number became available with my correct area code, and if I could port my old Vonage number over I'd happily fork over another $10 and thank them.
Given that I can use my free Gizmo line with an old Linksys PAP I have hanging around as my primary phone line now, I figure Google is saving me about $20 a month from my old 500-minute Vonage line, and loading me up with awesome features Vonage never dreamed of to boot.
If I have to send then $10 every now and again, I'm still seriously ahead.And, yeah, I've run into the "Voice Misrecognition Follies" with Google voice.
Fortunately, none of the calls have been urgent, and I can tell that "Hi, versus Doctor Smith and your appointment is tomato at flower dirty" is good enough to save me the time of retrieving and listening to the audio, and make me laugh at the same time.
And I can always listen to the original if they've completely messed it up.
I've also had "Visual Voicemail" from Vonage and several other transcription services I've tried, and "guess what?
It ain't that pretty at all.
"  None of them do it any better.
The whole technology is not ready for prime time, but it's good enough for me every time so far, and at least Google does it for free.
Vonage charges a quarter per message.I suppose if I was a pharmacist taking prescriptions, I wouldn't want to have it translate "Vicodin" when the doctor said "Viagara" or something, but for the kinds of calls I'm likely to get, the text has always allowed me to get the gist of what was being said (and I can always click a button on my Blackberry or on a website to listen to the original audio, but I've never had to).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885841</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885819</id>
	<title>People always forget about Hawaii</title>
	<author>butabozuhi</author>
	<datestamp>1256667300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Available in the US? Still waiting for a number in a Hawaii area code...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Available in the US ?
Still waiting for a number in a Hawaii area code.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Available in the US?
Still waiting for a number in a Hawaii area code...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887331</id>
	<title>Re:Visual Voicemail</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256673600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find Google Voice to be a great service to me. It was a good thing also that when I signed up, I also switched carriers. I was going to give people a new number and it might as well be the Google Voice number. Only about 3 people actually know my real cell phone number and I like to keep it that way. Being able to block phone calls and text messages, being able to jump on the laptop and text people from your number, as well as being able to call from your number on any phone in the country. The latter comes in handy when I am in a bad reception area or I need to a pay phone to call someone. Google voice provides a level of transparency I have definitely gotten use to. If I worried about what I was going to say in terms of Google privacy I would just use my native number.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find Google Voice to be a great service to me .
It was a good thing also that when I signed up , I also switched carriers .
I was going to give people a new number and it might as well be the Google Voice number .
Only about 3 people actually know my real cell phone number and I like to keep it that way .
Being able to block phone calls and text messages , being able to jump on the laptop and text people from your number , as well as being able to call from your number on any phone in the country .
The latter comes in handy when I am in a bad reception area or I need to a pay phone to call someone .
Google voice provides a level of transparency I have definitely gotten use to .
If I worried about what I was going to say in terms of Google privacy I would just use my native number .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find Google Voice to be a great service to me.
It was a good thing also that when I signed up, I also switched carriers.
I was going to give people a new number and it might as well be the Google Voice number.
Only about 3 people actually know my real cell phone number and I like to keep it that way.
Being able to block phone calls and text messages, being able to jump on the laptop and text people from your number, as well as being able to call from your number on any phone in the country.
The latter comes in handy when I am in a bad reception area or I need to a pay phone to call someone.
Google voice provides a level of transparency I have definitely gotten use to.
If I worried about what I was going to say in terms of Google privacy I would just use my native number.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29891927</id>
	<title>and....</title>
	<author>cl0s</author>
	<datestamp>1256651220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's better to get another # anyway and simply set up your cell phone # to forward the voicemail to the Google voice. #440#*then-the-number (or something like that) on t-mobile (google it). Instead of going to your t-mo voicemail it will forward to your google voice for voicemail. I use that on my G1 so I can pay for the lower plan (only 400 texts) and make people text me on my GV# but they can call either # and it all goes to 1 voicemail. I'm planning on switching to Verizon on the 6th when the Droid comes out, I'm not sure if Verizon will allow this though (and I'm hoping Jesus Freke gets one too so I can root it ASAP, lol).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's better to get another # anyway and simply set up your cell phone # to forward the voicemail to the Google voice .
# 440 # * then-the-number ( or something like that ) on t-mobile ( google it ) .
Instead of going to your t-mo voicemail it will forward to your google voice for voicemail .
I use that on my G1 so I can pay for the lower plan ( only 400 texts ) and make people text me on my GV # but they can call either # and it all goes to 1 voicemail .
I 'm planning on switching to Verizon on the 6th when the Droid comes out , I 'm not sure if Verizon will allow this though ( and I 'm hoping Jesus Freke gets one too so I can root it ASAP , lol ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's better to get another # anyway and simply set up your cell phone # to forward the voicemail to the Google voice.
#440#*then-the-number (or something like that) on t-mobile (google it).
Instead of going to your t-mo voicemail it will forward to your google voice for voicemail.
I use that on my G1 so I can pay for the lower plan (only 400 texts) and make people text me on my GV# but they can call either # and it all goes to 1 voicemail.
I'm planning on switching to Verizon on the 6th when the Droid comes out, I'm not sure if Verizon will allow this though (and I'm hoping Jesus Freke gets one too so I can root it ASAP, lol).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887551</id>
	<title>Re:Been using it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256674440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In that awful song it's 867-5309 not 5039</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In that awful song it 's 867-5309 not 5039</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In that awful song it's 867-5309 not 5039</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885821</id>
	<title>I want...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256667300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>617-867-5309</p><p>I'm serious too, HOW DO I GET THIS number?</p><p>Thanks,<br>Jenny</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>617-867-5309I 'm serious too , HOW DO I GET THIS number ? Thanks,Jenny</tokentext>
<sentencetext>617-867-5309I'm serious too, HOW DO I GET THIS number?Thanks,Jenny</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886131</id>
	<title>Re:Visual Voicemail</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256668680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not just visual voicemail (with automatic transciptions - read your voicemail if you want/need to be quiet) - that's just one feature.</p><p>The main feature of Google Voice, IMO, is that your Google Voice number is really YOUR number, not the number of a particular location/device. Via the web you can program what phone(s) - zero or more - ring when someone calls your GV number and you can pick up the call on any device. If you like all your calls can go direct to voicemail and you'll then pick them up either by phone or on the web.</p><p>The use of this is that you don't need to notify anyone if you go on vactation, change job, lose your cell phone, or whatever - they always call you at your GV number, and you choose where to pick the call up (maybe just at an internet cafe via the visual voicemail).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not just visual voicemail ( with automatic transciptions - read your voicemail if you want/need to be quiet ) - that 's just one feature.The main feature of Google Voice , IMO , is that your Google Voice number is really YOUR number , not the number of a particular location/device .
Via the web you can program what phone ( s ) - zero or more - ring when someone calls your GV number and you can pick up the call on any device .
If you like all your calls can go direct to voicemail and you 'll then pick them up either by phone or on the web.The use of this is that you do n't need to notify anyone if you go on vactation , change job , lose your cell phone , or whatever - they always call you at your GV number , and you choose where to pick the call up ( maybe just at an internet cafe via the visual voicemail ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not just visual voicemail (with automatic transciptions - read your voicemail if you want/need to be quiet) - that's just one feature.The main feature of Google Voice, IMO, is that your Google Voice number is really YOUR number, not the number of a particular location/device.
Via the web you can program what phone(s) - zero or more - ring when someone calls your GV number and you can pick up the call on any device.
If you like all your calls can go direct to voicemail and you'll then pick them up either by phone or on the web.The use of this is that you don't need to notify anyone if you go on vactation, change job, lose your cell phone, or whatever - they always call you at your GV number, and you choose where to pick the call up (maybe just at an internet cafe via the visual voicemail).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885919</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886227</id>
	<title>Re:Missing Features</title>
	<author>RanCossack</author>
	<datestamp>1256669040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think it's actual porting so much as just some background forwarding of voicemail messages; at least, I had a "new Google number", and the changes allowed me to set up my normal cell number like that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think it 's actual porting so much as just some background forwarding of voicemail messages ; at least , I had a " new Google number " , and the changes allowed me to set up my normal cell number like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think it's actual porting so much as just some background forwarding of voicemail messages; at least, I had a "new Google number", and the changes allowed me to set up my normal cell number like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886623</id>
	<title>Re:Missing Features</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256670720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I signed up with Google Voice about a month ago and got a new number for it. As expected, no one uses my new GV number.</p><p>Today I logged in and was able to turn on GV for my mobile phone's voicemail by entering a code into my phone. If/when I want to switch back to my carrier's voicemail, I can just click the 'deactivate' button in GV.</p><p>Of course, I can't speak for joining without creating a new number...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I signed up with Google Voice about a month ago and got a new number for it .
As expected , no one uses my new GV number.Today I logged in and was able to turn on GV for my mobile phone 's voicemail by entering a code into my phone .
If/when I want to switch back to my carrier 's voicemail , I can just click the 'deactivate ' button in GV.Of course , I ca n't speak for joining without creating a new number.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I signed up with Google Voice about a month ago and got a new number for it.
As expected, no one uses my new GV number.Today I logged in and was able to turn on GV for my mobile phone's voicemail by entering a code into my phone.
If/when I want to switch back to my carrier's voicemail, I can just click the 'deactivate' button in GV.Of course, I can't speak for joining without creating a new number...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885841</id>
	<title>Been using it...</title>
	<author>Muckluck</author>
	<datestamp>1256667420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>and I am not thrilled with it.  I picked a number that is frequently misdialed (admittedly - my mistake) and they want $10 to change numbers.  I am using the do not disturb feature to send most calls to VM.  The translation software is about 80\% correct on guessing what my messages actually say.  The other 20\% are often more fun to read due to the humor of the translation.  They have a way to go before this will be a reliable "ready for prime time" service.</htmltext>
<tokenext>and I am not thrilled with it .
I picked a number that is frequently misdialed ( admittedly - my mistake ) and they want $ 10 to change numbers .
I am using the do not disturb feature to send most calls to VM .
The translation software is about 80 \ % correct on guessing what my messages actually say .
The other 20 \ % are often more fun to read due to the humor of the translation .
They have a way to go before this will be a reliable " ready for prime time " service .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and I am not thrilled with it.
I picked a number that is frequently misdialed (admittedly - my mistake) and they want $10 to change numbers.
I am using the do not disturb feature to send most calls to VM.
The translation software is about 80\% correct on guessing what my messages actually say.
The other 20\% are often more fun to read due to the humor of the translation.
They have a way to go before this will be a reliable "ready for prime time" service.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886417</id>
	<title>MWI on a forwarded call</title>
	<author>oh-dark-thirty</author>
	<datestamp>1256670000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>One possible drawback is that if you have your mobile's VM forwarded to Google's VM, your mobile phone will only show a missed call and not a new VM.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One possible drawback is that if you have your mobile 's VM forwarded to Google 's VM , your mobile phone will only show a missed call and not a new VM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One possible drawback is that if you have your mobile's VM forwarded to Google's VM, your mobile phone will only show a missed call and not a new VM.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887547</id>
	<title>GV secret~</title>
	<author>dUN82</author>
	<datestamp>1256674380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>dont tell them i told you , but you can send int'l sms for free already, at least from my account...</htmltext>
<tokenext>dont tell them i told you , but you can send int'l sms for free already , at least from my account.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>dont tell them i told you , but you can send int'l sms for free already, at least from my account...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886717</id>
	<title>T-mo prepaid not working</title>
	<author>intiha</author>
	<datestamp>1256671200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Doesnt work with T-Mobile prepaid FYI. Google FAQ mentions that "conditional voicemail forwarding" is not enabled by some carriers. Tmobile is one I guess!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Doesnt work with T-Mobile prepaid FYI .
Google FAQ mentions that " conditional voicemail forwarding " is not enabled by some carriers .
Tmobile is one I guess !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesnt work with T-Mobile prepaid FYI.
Google FAQ mentions that "conditional voicemail forwarding" is not enabled by some carriers.
Tmobile is one I guess!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29892883</id>
	<title>Re:Been using it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256659800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Phonetag isn't free, but offers a voice mail to email gateway service that is much more accurate than Google Voice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Phonetag is n't free , but offers a voice mail to email gateway service that is much more accurate than Google Voice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Phonetag isn't free, but offers a voice mail to email gateway service that is much more accurate than Google Voice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887303</id>
	<title>How is this new?</title>
	<author>Fnord</author>
	<datestamp>1256673480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It effectively already did this, at least on any handset/provider that lets you specify the forward number for unanswered calls.  I put my GV number in as that number, and configured GV to go straight to voicemail.  Combined with the GV app for android, I get a nice visual voicemail like interface along with transcription.</p><p>How is what google is promoting at all new?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It effectively already did this , at least on any handset/provider that lets you specify the forward number for unanswered calls .
I put my GV number in as that number , and configured GV to go straight to voicemail .
Combined with the GV app for android , I get a nice visual voicemail like interface along with transcription.How is what google is promoting at all new ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It effectively already did this, at least on any handset/provider that lets you specify the forward number for unanswered calls.
I put my GV number in as that number, and configured GV to go straight to voicemail.
Combined with the GV app for android, I get a nice visual voicemail like interface along with transcription.How is what google is promoting at all new?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885919</id>
	<title>Visual Voicemail</title>
	<author>Bodero</author>
	<datestamp>1256667660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would have been all over this but for the fact that my Blackberry Tour now has Visual Voicemail much like many Blackberries these days as well as the iPhone.</p><p>Does anyone with an iPhone or visual voicemail-enabled phone see value in this? I like the transcription feature but it's not a game changer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would have been all over this but for the fact that my Blackberry Tour now has Visual Voicemail much like many Blackberries these days as well as the iPhone.Does anyone with an iPhone or visual voicemail-enabled phone see value in this ?
I like the transcription feature but it 's not a game changer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would have been all over this but for the fact that my Blackberry Tour now has Visual Voicemail much like many Blackberries these days as well as the iPhone.Does anyone with an iPhone or visual voicemail-enabled phone see value in this?
I like the transcription feature but it's not a game changer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886711</id>
	<title>Don't wake me until Google Voice supports porting</title>
	<author>ericrhall</author>
	<datestamp>1256671140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heck, I would even pay a small monthly fee, maybe a buck or two a month to port my existing cell phone number.  This is a number I have had since cell phones became popular.  I would gladly port it, cancel my current Verizon phone, and then shop for the best plan out there regardless of carrier.  Google voice would free me to have a device and plan morph with the changes in my lifestyle over time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heck , I would even pay a small monthly fee , maybe a buck or two a month to port my existing cell phone number .
This is a number I have had since cell phones became popular .
I would gladly port it , cancel my current Verizon phone , and then shop for the best plan out there regardless of carrier .
Google voice would free me to have a device and plan morph with the changes in my lifestyle over time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heck, I would even pay a small monthly fee, maybe a buck or two a month to port my existing cell phone number.
This is a number I have had since cell phones became popular.
I would gladly port it, cancel my current Verizon phone, and then shop for the best plan out there regardless of carrier.
Google voice would free me to have a device and plan morph with the changes in my lifestyle over time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886239</id>
	<title>Sprint subscribers beware</title>
	<author>NiteShaed</author>
	<datestamp>1256669160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was pretty excited when I saw this, but then with a little more digging it looks like if you're on Sprint, you'll get a minimum 20 cent charge per voicemail (<a href="http://www1.sprintpcs.com/explore/ueContent.jsp?scTopic=callForwarding" title="sprintpcs.com">20 cents per minute call forwarding</a> [sprintpcs.com]).  Some people are saying Sprint has or is about to do away with this fee, but I haven't seen anything definite.</p><p>If I'm mistaken PLEASE correct me (and supply a link showing that the fee isn't around anymore), but for now I guess I'll be passing on this<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was pretty excited when I saw this , but then with a little more digging it looks like if you 're on Sprint , you 'll get a minimum 20 cent charge per voicemail ( 20 cents per minute call forwarding [ sprintpcs.com ] ) .
Some people are saying Sprint has or is about to do away with this fee , but I have n't seen anything definite.If I 'm mistaken PLEASE correct me ( and supply a link showing that the fee is n't around anymore ) , but for now I guess I 'll be passing on this : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was pretty excited when I saw this, but then with a little more digging it looks like if you're on Sprint, you'll get a minimum 20 cent charge per voicemail (20 cents per minute call forwarding [sprintpcs.com]).
Some people are saying Sprint has or is about to do away with this fee, but I haven't seen anything definite.If I'm mistaken PLEASE correct me (and supply a link showing that the fee isn't around anymore), but for now I guess I'll be passing on this :(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886247</id>
	<title>Re:Missing Features</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256669220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's basically just voicemail (like youmail) if you use your current number.<br>The bigger thing here is that if even if you use a new number, but have some relatives that don't call you on your google voice number, you can still get their voicemail in the same way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's basically just voicemail ( like youmail ) if you use your current number.The bigger thing here is that if even if you use a new number , but have some relatives that do n't call you on your google voice number , you can still get their voicemail in the same way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's basically just voicemail (like youmail) if you use your current number.The bigger thing here is that if even if you use a new number, but have some relatives that don't call you on your google voice number, you can still get their voicemail in the same way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29890013
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886065
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885919
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29889577
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886219
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886655
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886239
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29894057
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885777
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886221
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886237
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29888747
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885919
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29893465
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886239
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29888989
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885777
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886607
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886239
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887307
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886239
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29892883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886219
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29888559
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886219
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885919
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886247
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886227
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887331
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885919
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29893339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29888573
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885841
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886417
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886623
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887839
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887005
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885919
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886233
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885777
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29889593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886499
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885931
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_27_1654239_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887475
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886521
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885841
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886219
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29888559
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29889577
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29892883
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886861
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29888573
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887551
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885919
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886065
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29888747
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886301
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886131
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887837
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887331
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887373
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886071
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885697
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885931
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886499
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885819
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886417
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886963
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29888931
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886711
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885731
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885821
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885761
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887839
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887883
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29893339
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887005
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887547
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886521
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887475
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887303
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885777
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886233
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887593
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29888989
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886239
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887307
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29893465
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886607
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886655
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886077
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886237
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886227
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886883
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29894057
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886623
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29889593
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29890013
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886247
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29887807
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29886221
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29885799
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_27_1654239.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_27_1654239.29892873
</commentlist>
</conversation>
