<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_26_2013241</id>
	<title>Netflix Coming To Sony PS3</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1256555760000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>itwbennett writes <i>"'Microsoft has always seemed rather enthusiastic when it comes to throwing around the word 'exclusive,' and here is another case in point,' says blogger Peter Smith. Netflix and Sony have announced that <a href="http://www.itworld.com/personal-tech/82327/netflix-coming-sony-ps3-despite-microsofts-exclusive-claims">Netflix streaming is coming to the Sony PlayStation 3</a> as early as next month. Back in August, when Microsoft was rolling out its new dashboard update, one of the features it was talking up was Netflix streaming, says Smith, and it said, 'This <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/08/11/xbox-officially-the-only-console-able-to-stream-netflix-sorry/">exclusive partnership</a> offers you the ability to instantly stream movies and TV episodes from Netflix to the television via Xbox 360. Xbox 360 will be the only game console to offer this movie-watching experience...' Apparently, in Microsoft parlance, 'exclusive partnership' means 'we launched it first' and not 'we inked a deal with Netflix preventing this feature from appearing on the competition's hardware.' All this is good news for PS3 owners who can now <a href="http://www.netflix.com/NRDInfo/PS3">sign up to be notified</a> of Netflix availability for their system."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>itwbennett writes " 'Microsoft has always seemed rather enthusiastic when it comes to throwing around the word 'exclusive, ' and here is another case in point, ' says blogger Peter Smith .
Netflix and Sony have announced that Netflix streaming is coming to the Sony PlayStation 3 as early as next month .
Back in August , when Microsoft was rolling out its new dashboard update , one of the features it was talking up was Netflix streaming , says Smith , and it said , 'This exclusive partnership offers you the ability to instantly stream movies and TV episodes from Netflix to the television via Xbox 360 .
Xbox 360 will be the only game console to offer this movie-watching experience... ' Apparently , in Microsoft parlance , 'exclusive partnership ' means 'we launched it first ' and not 'we inked a deal with Netflix preventing this feature from appearing on the competition 's hardware .
' All this is good news for PS3 owners who can now sign up to be notified of Netflix availability for their system .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>itwbennett writes "'Microsoft has always seemed rather enthusiastic when it comes to throwing around the word 'exclusive,' and here is another case in point,' says blogger Peter Smith.
Netflix and Sony have announced that Netflix streaming is coming to the Sony PlayStation 3 as early as next month.
Back in August, when Microsoft was rolling out its new dashboard update, one of the features it was talking up was Netflix streaming, says Smith, and it said, 'This exclusive partnership offers you the ability to instantly stream movies and TV episodes from Netflix to the television via Xbox 360.
Xbox 360 will be the only game console to offer this movie-watching experience...' Apparently, in Microsoft parlance, 'exclusive partnership' means 'we launched it first' and not 'we inked a deal with Netflix preventing this feature from appearing on the competition's hardware.
' All this is good news for PS3 owners who can now sign up to be notified of Netflix availability for their system.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879735</id>
	<title>Disk required to use</title>
	<author>onnel</author>
	<datestamp>1256565660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You'll have to have a special "netflix" blueray in for it to work, this is how they're getting around the 360-exclusive.  apparently a WII solution is coming next year and etflix will also be coming to the PS3 desktop at that point (I assume that is because the 360 exclusive will be ending at that time).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'll have to have a special " netflix " blueray in for it to work , this is how they 're getting around the 360-exclusive .
apparently a WII solution is coming next year and etflix will also be coming to the PS3 desktop at that point ( I assume that is because the 360 exclusive will be ending at that time ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'll have to have a special "netflix" blueray in for it to work, this is how they're getting around the 360-exclusive.
apparently a WII solution is coming next year and etflix will also be coming to the PS3 desktop at that point (I assume that is because the 360 exclusive will be ending at that time).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879495</id>
	<title>Re:Inclusive</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256563620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hmmm, to my knowledge this is available strictly in the US of A. International customers should care because............. Include some means of using a proxy without modding the damned console and we're talking.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmmm , to my knowledge this is available strictly in the US of A. International customers should care because............. Include some means of using a proxy without modding the damned console and we 're talking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmmm, to my knowledge this is available strictly in the US of A. International customers should care because............. Include some means of using a proxy without modding the damned console and we're talking.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29883169</id>
	<title>Re:Disk required to use</title>
	<author>CastrTroy</author>
	<datestamp>1256655060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can't wait until this comes out for the Wii.  Sadly, they don't operate outside the US.  I wonder if they could make it work in Canada.  Ever since Nintendo came out with the "Nintendo Channel" I've been thinking that a lot of other people need to start streaming video to consoles.  At lot harder for people to hack and steal the streams, and a lot easier for people to integrate with their regular entertainment system.  I would gladly pay a few bucks for a YouTube channel that works well (it sucks through the Wii internet browser), as well as many other channels.  Apple could reach a lot more people if they had a movie trailer channel on consoles that you could watch the trailers on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't wait until this comes out for the Wii .
Sadly , they do n't operate outside the US .
I wonder if they could make it work in Canada .
Ever since Nintendo came out with the " Nintendo Channel " I 've been thinking that a lot of other people need to start streaming video to consoles .
At lot harder for people to hack and steal the streams , and a lot easier for people to integrate with their regular entertainment system .
I would gladly pay a few bucks for a YouTube channel that works well ( it sucks through the Wii internet browser ) , as well as many other channels .
Apple could reach a lot more people if they had a movie trailer channel on consoles that you could watch the trailers on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't wait until this comes out for the Wii.
Sadly, they don't operate outside the US.
I wonder if they could make it work in Canada.
Ever since Nintendo came out with the "Nintendo Channel" I've been thinking that a lot of other people need to start streaming video to consoles.
At lot harder for people to hack and steal the streams, and a lot easier for people to integrate with their regular entertainment system.
I would gladly pay a few bucks for a YouTube channel that works well (it sucks through the Wii internet browser), as well as many other channels.
Apple could reach a lot more people if they had a movie trailer channel on consoles that you could watch the trailers on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879735</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880769</id>
	<title>Re:More (Not in Canada)</title>
	<author>bmatt17</author>
	<datestamp>1256578320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if this is one way the RIAA/MPAA are trying to force their copyright laws onto Canada? Not allowing online streaming services like this until they adopt the US DMCA type law.<br>

Isn't Canada on the US list of countries that doesn't have good enough copyright laws? It works both ways though. Defying Gravity is not airing in the US but is in Canada. I can't access any of the Canadian sites that are streaming the remaining episodes from the US.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if this is one way the RIAA/MPAA are trying to force their copyright laws onto Canada ?
Not allowing online streaming services like this until they adopt the US DMCA type law .
Is n't Canada on the US list of countries that does n't have good enough copyright laws ?
It works both ways though .
Defying Gravity is not airing in the US but is in Canada .
I ca n't access any of the Canadian sites that are streaming the remaining episodes from the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if this is one way the RIAA/MPAA are trying to force their copyright laws onto Canada?
Not allowing online streaming services like this until they adopt the US DMCA type law.
Isn't Canada on the US list of countries that doesn't have good enough copyright laws?
It works both ways though.
Defying Gravity is not airing in the US but is in Canada.
I can't access any of the Canadian sites that are streaming the remaining episodes from the US.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879409</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879899</id>
	<title>Goodbye cursed Silverlight</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256567160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I installed Silverlight on my media PC (a Mac mini) only because of Netflix streaming, and that with great reluctance.  I'll be more than happy to ditch it and just use the PS3 for streaming.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I installed Silverlight on my media PC ( a Mac mini ) only because of Netflix streaming , and that with great reluctance .
I 'll be more than happy to ditch it and just use the PS3 for streaming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I installed Silverlight on my media PC (a Mac mini) only because of Netflix streaming, and that with great reluctance.
I'll be more than happy to ditch it and just use the PS3 for streaming.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879321</id>
	<title>What about the UK</title>
	<author>reashlin</author>
	<datestamp>1256562360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is only news to me if Netflix can and will start working in the UK and beyond.  If the service can make a profit in the USA why not the rest of the world?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is only news to me if Netflix can and will start working in the UK and beyond .
If the service can make a profit in the USA why not the rest of the world ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is only news to me if Netflix can and will start working in the UK and beyond.
If the service can make a profit in the USA why not the rest of the world?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879589</id>
	<title>Re:Handy for some, less so for others</title>
	<author>Lije Baley</author>
	<datestamp>1256564340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Old movies and TV shows are the most suitable material for the relatively poor quality of streamed video - unless of course you are watching it on a small screen (or a big one from far away) or pulling it in through a very big pipe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Old movies and TV shows are the most suitable material for the relatively poor quality of streamed video - unless of course you are watching it on a small screen ( or a big one from far away ) or pulling it in through a very big pipe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Old movies and TV shows are the most suitable material for the relatively poor quality of streamed video - unless of course you are watching it on a small screen (or a big one from far away) or pulling it in through a very big pipe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878993</id>
	<title>It was</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256560020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is a non-story, it was exclusive to the X360 at the time.  There is no difference than the umpteen movies (some of which Sony is undoubtedly behind) which exclaim 'only in theatres!' in their trailers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a non-story , it was exclusive to the X360 at the time .
There is no difference than the umpteen movies ( some of which Sony is undoubtedly behind ) which exclaim 'only in theatres !
' in their trailers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a non-story, it was exclusive to the X360 at the time.
There is no difference than the umpteen movies (some of which Sony is undoubtedly behind) which exclaim 'only in theatres!
' in their trailers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29905353</id>
	<title>New Brand:BAPE Hoody,Diesel Jean,DG shoes Goods</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256740980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.tntshoes.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.tntshoes.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.tntshoes.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879125</id>
	<title>oh god, not OLD movies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256560980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Old like Bladerunner and Alien ONE and Taxi Driver?</p><p>Those movies sucked!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Old like Bladerunner and Alien ONE and Taxi Driver ? Those movies sucked !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Old like Bladerunner and Alien ONE and Taxi Driver?Those movies sucked!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879409</id>
	<title>Re:More (Not in Canada)</title>
	<author>corychristison</author>
	<datestamp>1256563020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not coming to Canada... unfortunately. *sigh* <a href="http://www.eontarionow.com/national/2009/10/26/no-netflix-ps3-deal-for-canada/" title="eontarionow.com">Linky</a> [eontarionow.com].</p><p>I don't understand the statement "The service will not be available in Canada due to licensing agreements and other legal issues."<br>We can buy/rent most (all?) of the media coming out of the states off the shelves, no questions asked.</p><p>Perhaps someone like Walmart will have to come out with a streaming service, and bring it to Canada to open the floodgates. As much as I'm not fond of the huge Megacorps they tend to lead the way in for things such as this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not coming to Canada... unfortunately. * sigh * Linky [ eontarionow.com ] .I do n't understand the statement " The service will not be available in Canada due to licensing agreements and other legal issues .
" We can buy/rent most ( all ?
) of the media coming out of the states off the shelves , no questions asked.Perhaps someone like Walmart will have to come out with a streaming service , and bring it to Canada to open the floodgates .
As much as I 'm not fond of the huge Megacorps they tend to lead the way in for things such as this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not coming to Canada... unfortunately. *sigh* Linky [eontarionow.com].I don't understand the statement "The service will not be available in Canada due to licensing agreements and other legal issues.
"We can buy/rent most (all?
) of the media coming out of the states off the shelves, no questions asked.Perhaps someone like Walmart will have to come out with a streaming service, and bring it to Canada to open the floodgates.
As much as I'm not fond of the huge Megacorps they tend to lead the way in for things such as this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880195</id>
	<title>Re:Using BD-Live is the real story</title>
	<author>Unequivocal</author>
	<datestamp>1256570700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I do. And I find your comment so much more interesting than the flamebait and trolls preceding you arguing about what "exclusive" means. Thanks for posting something meaningful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do .
And I find your comment so much more interesting than the flamebait and trolls preceding you arguing about what " exclusive " means .
Thanks for posting something meaningful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do.
And I find your comment so much more interesting than the flamebait and trolls preceding you arguing about what "exclusive" means.
Thanks for posting something meaningful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880741</id>
	<title>Re:ok, so I'll get one then.</title>
	<author>P. Legba</author>
	<datestamp>1256577840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hear ya. I'm a 40-year-old married man, and I just picked up a PS3 on eBay for less than 200 bucks (with a 10\% off coupon I had sitting around in my e-mail).</p><p>I play one game: the latest NCAA football from EA with my redneck buddies. My wife is happy now, because I don't have to always go sit with them across town to play them now.</p><p>But hey, it can stream all the stuff on my Mac from the other room, and now it can stream Netflix, too.</p><p>It's more than a game console, and always has been...it's about providing a mass interface to the cloud or whatever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear ya .
I 'm a 40-year-old married man , and I just picked up a PS3 on eBay for less than 200 bucks ( with a 10 \ % off coupon I had sitting around in my e-mail ) .I play one game : the latest NCAA football from EA with my redneck buddies .
My wife is happy now , because I do n't have to always go sit with them across town to play them now.But hey , it can stream all the stuff on my Mac from the other room , and now it can stream Netflix , too.It 's more than a game console , and always has been...it 's about providing a mass interface to the cloud or whatever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear ya.
I'm a 40-year-old married man, and I just picked up a PS3 on eBay for less than 200 bucks (with a 10\% off coupon I had sitting around in my e-mail).I play one game: the latest NCAA football from EA with my redneck buddies.
My wife is happy now, because I don't have to always go sit with them across town to play them now.But hey, it can stream all the stuff on my Mac from the other room, and now it can stream Netflix, too.It's more than a game console, and always has been...it's about providing a mass interface to the cloud or whatever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29885099</id>
	<title>Summary is wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256664300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except that it came out last Fall, not in August.  I've been streaming Netflix on my 360 for literally a year now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except that it came out last Fall , not in August .
I 've been streaming Netflix on my 360 for literally a year now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except that it came out last Fall, not in August.
I've been streaming Netflix on my 360 for literally a year now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878927</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879177</id>
	<title>BD Live?</title>
	<author>Nunavut</author>
	<datestamp>1256561220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if the "PS3" blu-ray disc which is connects to streaming movies via BD-Live would work on regular Blu-ray players?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if the " PS3 " blu-ray disc which is connects to streaming movies via BD-Live would work on regular Blu-ray players ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if the "PS3" blu-ray disc which is connects to streaming movies via BD-Live would work on regular Blu-ray players?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29881711</id>
	<title>Re:Europe availability?</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1256638380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, media companies refusing to license the movies to places like Netflix for use outside the US, companies like Universal, Sony, Warner etc. are the problem with that.</p><p>I think it generally comes down to the issue that movie companies want to charge more in Europe as most companies do for most other things, but that would make the service prohibitively high for for the consumer such that companies like Netflix would get zero profits from it as they'd have to pay it all to the media companies, or the cost would have to be so high the consumer simply wouldn't pay for it and it'd flop. Historically these companies have also released films later in places like Europe than the US, sometimes films come out as much as 6 to 12 months in Europe after they do in the US and companies like Netflix generally wont want to deal with this either, particularly when there's no logical reason for it in this day and age.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , media companies refusing to license the movies to places like Netflix for use outside the US , companies like Universal , Sony , Warner etc .
are the problem with that.I think it generally comes down to the issue that movie companies want to charge more in Europe as most companies do for most other things , but that would make the service prohibitively high for for the consumer such that companies like Netflix would get zero profits from it as they 'd have to pay it all to the media companies , or the cost would have to be so high the consumer simply would n't pay for it and it 'd flop .
Historically these companies have also released films later in places like Europe than the US , sometimes films come out as much as 6 to 12 months in Europe after they do in the US and companies like Netflix generally wont want to deal with this either , particularly when there 's no logical reason for it in this day and age .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, media companies refusing to license the movies to places like Netflix for use outside the US, companies like Universal, Sony, Warner etc.
are the problem with that.I think it generally comes down to the issue that movie companies want to charge more in Europe as most companies do for most other things, but that would make the service prohibitively high for for the consumer such that companies like Netflix would get zero profits from it as they'd have to pay it all to the media companies, or the cost would have to be so high the consumer simply wouldn't pay for it and it'd flop.
Historically these companies have also released films later in places like Europe than the US, sometimes films come out as much as 6 to 12 months in Europe after they do in the US and companies like Netflix generally wont want to deal with this either, particularly when there's no logical reason for it in this day and age.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29881393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29881393</id>
	<title>Europe availability?</title>
	<author>DrKnark</author>
	<datestamp>1256675400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry if I'm being ignorant, but is there a chance this will be available in Europe? I understand the regular netflix service of mailing DVDs to you is only available in the US, but are there any obstacles to making the streaming service available elsewhere?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry if I 'm being ignorant , but is there a chance this will be available in Europe ?
I understand the regular netflix service of mailing DVDs to you is only available in the US , but are there any obstacles to making the streaming service available elsewhere ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry if I'm being ignorant, but is there a chance this will be available in Europe?
I understand the regular netflix service of mailing DVDs to you is only available in the US, but are there any obstacles to making the streaming service available elsewhere?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882595</id>
	<title>Re:exclusive partnership</title>
	<author>soup4you2</author>
	<datestamp>1256651700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You were able to stream content from Netflix on Tivo units far before Xbox users were even allowed to.

Now it seems Tivo allows users to stream Blockbuster, I'm wondering how long until m$ gets exclusive rights to stream that as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You were able to stream content from Netflix on Tivo units far before Xbox users were even allowed to .
Now it seems Tivo allows users to stream Blockbuster , I 'm wondering how long until m $ gets exclusive rights to stream that as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You were able to stream content from Netflix on Tivo units far before Xbox users were even allowed to.
Now it seems Tivo allows users to stream Blockbuster, I'm wondering how long until m$ gets exclusive rights to stream that as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878927</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29883411</id>
	<title>Re:Using BD-Live is the real story</title>
	<author>CronoCloud</author>
	<datestamp>1256656320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If that's right, then it means that any fully featured BluRay player could do it.</p></div></blockquote><p>If it is BD-Live, then yes.  But.... It might not work as well on other players since the PS3 is very very good, (meaning fast and responsive) with BD-Live/BD-J content, compared with some players.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If that 's right , then it means that any fully featured BluRay player could do it.If it is BD-Live , then yes .
But.... It might not work as well on other players since the PS3 is very very good , ( meaning fast and responsive ) with BD-Live/BD-J content , compared with some players .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If that's right, then it means that any fully featured BluRay player could do it.If it is BD-Live, then yes.
But.... It might not work as well on other players since the PS3 is very very good, (meaning fast and responsive) with BD-Live/BD-J content, compared with some players.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880319</id>
	<title>Roku</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256572380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or spend $99 and watch Netflix streams from a Roku box. Or, just watch it off your laptop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or spend $ 99 and watch Netflix streams from a Roku box .
Or , just watch it off your laptop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or spend $99 and watch Netflix streams from a Roku box.
Or, just watch it off your laptop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29884361</id>
	<title>Re:Handy for some, less so for others</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256660880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If he was going for proper spelling, wouldn't it be "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Djinn" title="wikipedia.org">djinn</a> [wikipedia.org]", and not "genii"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If he was going for proper spelling , would n't it be " djinn [ wikipedia.org ] " , and not " genii " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If he was going for proper spelling, wouldn't it be "djinn [wikipedia.org]", and not "genii"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882239</id>
	<title>Re:Been doing this for months...</title>
	<author>Rude Turnip</author>
	<datestamp>1256648220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't worry, the average<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.'er is a closet Windows user.  I'm a huge fan of PlayOn and actually bought two licenses for my house and the GF's house (streaming to a 360 in both cases).  There's a site called PlayOnPlugins that gives you even more content for PlayOn, including Adult Swim and PBS.  PlayOn is simply a DLNA server, so you can serve up content to any DLNA client, including the 360, PS3, Popcorn Hour, XBMC, Boxee et al.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry , the average / .
'er is a closet Windows user .
I 'm a huge fan of PlayOn and actually bought two licenses for my house and the GF 's house ( streaming to a 360 in both cases ) .
There 's a site called PlayOnPlugins that gives you even more content for PlayOn , including Adult Swim and PBS .
PlayOn is simply a DLNA server , so you can serve up content to any DLNA client , including the 360 , PS3 , Popcorn Hour , XBMC , Boxee et al .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry, the average /.
'er is a closet Windows user.
I'm a huge fan of PlayOn and actually bought two licenses for my house and the GF's house (streaming to a 360 in both cases).
There's a site called PlayOnPlugins that gives you even more content for PlayOn, including Adult Swim and PBS.
PlayOn is simply a DLNA server, so you can serve up content to any DLNA client, including the 360, PS3, Popcorn Hour, XBMC, Boxee et al.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880531</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879541</id>
	<title>ok, so I'll get one then.</title>
	<author>dAzED1</author>
	<datestamp>1256563980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A few weeks ago I decided I was going to get a ps3 - this settles it then.  Now, if only I wasn't one of the countless senior level people cut during downsizing, and actually had a job!</p><p>In all seriousness, I haven't had a "console" since my old Atari that I had in the early 80s or whenever that was.  I don't know who won in all this - I know I like the wii on some levels, the games seem more social and less serious pro-gamer (which suits me).  However, I also know that no matter what I get, the console will generally sit unused.</p><p>I don't have a blueray player yet.  I know, what year is it?  And my good old, reliable dvd player, though it was (is?) quite a nice component-level appliance with all the happiness stuff, but it skips a lot now, and there was always that place where it paused between layers, about an hour in to a movie.  I've had 2 dvds that won't work on it at all - and not for regional reasons, but instead - from what I've been told - for reasons having to do with the dual-layer format changing somewhat.  Bryan Wilson's "The Rocker" is an example of such a dvd - won't play at all.  Works fine on my computer.  And yes, it's a legit dvd.</p><p>So who wins?  After all this time, still the ps3 - because it's still the only one with blue-ray.  Though, by the time I actually go buy one...maybe blueray will have been replaced?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A few weeks ago I decided I was going to get a ps3 - this settles it then .
Now , if only I was n't one of the countless senior level people cut during downsizing , and actually had a job ! In all seriousness , I have n't had a " console " since my old Atari that I had in the early 80s or whenever that was .
I do n't know who won in all this - I know I like the wii on some levels , the games seem more social and less serious pro-gamer ( which suits me ) .
However , I also know that no matter what I get , the console will generally sit unused.I do n't have a blueray player yet .
I know , what year is it ?
And my good old , reliable dvd player , though it was ( is ?
) quite a nice component-level appliance with all the happiness stuff , but it skips a lot now , and there was always that place where it paused between layers , about an hour in to a movie .
I 've had 2 dvds that wo n't work on it at all - and not for regional reasons , but instead - from what I 've been told - for reasons having to do with the dual-layer format changing somewhat .
Bryan Wilson 's " The Rocker " is an example of such a dvd - wo n't play at all .
Works fine on my computer .
And yes , it 's a legit dvd.So who wins ?
After all this time , still the ps3 - because it 's still the only one with blue-ray .
Though , by the time I actually go buy one...maybe blueray will have been replaced ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A few weeks ago I decided I was going to get a ps3 - this settles it then.
Now, if only I wasn't one of the countless senior level people cut during downsizing, and actually had a job!In all seriousness, I haven't had a "console" since my old Atari that I had in the early 80s or whenever that was.
I don't know who won in all this - I know I like the wii on some levels, the games seem more social and less serious pro-gamer (which suits me).
However, I also know that no matter what I get, the console will generally sit unused.I don't have a blueray player yet.
I know, what year is it?
And my good old, reliable dvd player, though it was (is?
) quite a nice component-level appliance with all the happiness stuff, but it skips a lot now, and there was always that place where it paused between layers, about an hour in to a movie.
I've had 2 dvds that won't work on it at all - and not for regional reasons, but instead - from what I've been told - for reasons having to do with the dual-layer format changing somewhat.
Bryan Wilson's "The Rocker" is an example of such a dvd - won't play at all.
Works fine on my computer.
And yes, it's a legit dvd.So who wins?
After all this time, still the ps3 - because it's still the only one with blue-ray.
Though, by the time I actually go buy one...maybe blueray will have been replaced?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880441</id>
	<title>Re:Handy for some, less so for others</title>
	<author>ZipK</author>
	<datestamp>1256573460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Enjoy it while you can, as Netflix's streaming service appears to be based on a partnership with Starz that in turn depends on a loophole in Starz's contract with the film studios. That loophole is likely to be closed when Starz's contract is renewed/renegotiated, and Netflix will then need to convince the studios to allow the all-you-can-eat stream to continue.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Enjoy it while you can , as Netflix 's streaming service appears to be based on a partnership with Starz that in turn depends on a loophole in Starz 's contract with the film studios .
That loophole is likely to be closed when Starz 's contract is renewed/renegotiated , and Netflix will then need to convince the studios to allow the all-you-can-eat stream to continue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Enjoy it while you can, as Netflix's streaming service appears to be based on a partnership with Starz that in turn depends on a loophole in Starz's contract with the film studios.
That loophole is likely to be closed when Starz's contract is renewed/renegotiated, and Netflix will then need to convince the studios to allow the all-you-can-eat stream to continue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880531</id>
	<title>Been doing this for months...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256574660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>using a product called PlayOn from <a href="http://www.themediamall.com./" title="www.themediamall.com">http://www.themediamall.com./</a> [www.themediamall.com]

Yes, PlayOn does cost money, one time fee of $20-$30, but then I can also stream Hulu, CBS, CNN, etc. to my PS3, Wii or my DirecTV DVR or a bunch of other things as well.

There is a trial version available.

The only downside, it's a Windows app.</htmltext>
<tokenext>using a product called PlayOn from http : //www.themediamall.com./ [ www.themediamall.com ] Yes , PlayOn does cost money , one time fee of $ 20- $ 30 , but then I can also stream Hulu , CBS , CNN , etc .
to my PS3 , Wii or my DirecTV DVR or a bunch of other things as well .
There is a trial version available .
The only downside , it 's a Windows app .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>using a product called PlayOn from http://www.themediamall.com./ [www.themediamall.com]

Yes, PlayOn does cost money, one time fee of $20-$30, but then I can also stream Hulu, CBS, CNN, etc.
to my PS3, Wii or my DirecTV DVR or a bunch of other things as well.
There is a trial version available.
The only downside, it's a Windows app.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882679</id>
	<title>Re:More (Not in Canada)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256652300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, that means it \_is\_ exclusive.  Exclusive to the United States that is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , that means it \ _is \ _ exclusive .
Exclusive to the United States that is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, that means it \_is\_ exclusive.
Exclusive to the United States that is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879409</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29881207</id>
	<title>but no sign for Linux...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256585700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It might be coming to the PS3, but there's a absolutely no sign of a Linux version.</p><p>Aren't we in 2009, almost 2010?  And by now people should be writing cross platform portable softwares?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It might be coming to the PS3 , but there 's a absolutely no sign of a Linux version.Are n't we in 2009 , almost 2010 ?
And by now people should be writing cross platform portable softwares ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It might be coming to the PS3, but there's a absolutely no sign of a Linux version.Aren't we in 2009, almost 2010?
And by now people should be writing cross platform portable softwares?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880525</id>
	<title>Re:More (Not in Canada)</title>
	<author>kuzb</author>
	<datestamp>1256574540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sadly, it's worthless to the majority of the world.  What a non-story.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly , it 's worthless to the majority of the world .
What a non-story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly, it's worthless to the majority of the world.
What a non-story.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879409</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880987</id>
	<title>Re:Handy for some, less so for others</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256581500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>There's a special circle of hell for people who talk at the movies and those who do what you just did.</p></div></blockquote><p>
You might try actually <a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/genie" title="merriam-webster.com">looking it up</a> [merriam-webster.com] before you <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercorrection" title="wikipedia.org">hypercorrect</a> [wikipedia.org] someone...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a special circle of hell for people who talk at the movies and those who do what you just did .
You might try actually looking it up [ merriam-webster.com ] before you hypercorrect [ wikipedia.org ] someone.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a special circle of hell for people who talk at the movies and those who do what you just did.
You might try actually looking it up [merriam-webster.com] before you hypercorrect [wikipedia.org] someone...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880501</id>
	<title>Re:More (Not in Canada)</title>
	<author>biryokumaru</author>
	<datestamp>1256574180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unfortunately, the right to distribute via the internet is not the same as the right to distribute physical copies. It is a much larger legal hurdle than physical one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , the right to distribute via the internet is not the same as the right to distribute physical copies .
It is a much larger legal hurdle than physical one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, the right to distribute via the internet is not the same as the right to distribute physical copies.
It is a much larger legal hurdle than physical one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879409</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879341</id>
	<title>Re:Handy for some, less so for others</title>
	<author>Eternauta3k</author>
	<datestamp>1256562540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>insist that the <b>genii</b> will fit back in that darn bottle</p></div><p>There's a special circle of hell for people who talk at the movies and those who do what you just did.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>insist that the genii will fit back in that darn bottleThere 's a special circle of hell for people who talk at the movies and those who do what you just did .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>insist that the genii will fit back in that darn bottleThere's a special circle of hell for people who talk at the movies and those who do what you just did.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879243</id>
	<title>Using BD-Live is the real story</title>
	<author>RalphBNumbers</author>
	<datestamp>1256561700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/media/news/2009/10/netflix-streaming-coming-to-ps3-but-via-blu-ray-disc.ars" title="arstechnica.com">The report on this this that I saw at ars technica</a> [arstechnica.com] said this is implemented using BD-Live.  If that's right, then it means that any fully featured BluRay player could do it.</p><p>So Netflix will have effectively co-opted the next generation physical media installed base for their online distribution system.  I think that's a pretty big deal compared semi-supporting one more console, don't you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The report on this this that I saw at ars technica [ arstechnica.com ] said this is implemented using BD-Live .
If that 's right , then it means that any fully featured BluRay player could do it.So Netflix will have effectively co-opted the next generation physical media installed base for their online distribution system .
I think that 's a pretty big deal compared semi-supporting one more console , do n't you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The report on this this that I saw at ars technica [arstechnica.com] said this is implemented using BD-Live.
If that's right, then it means that any fully featured BluRay player could do it.So Netflix will have effectively co-opted the next generation physical media installed base for their online distribution system.
I think that's a pretty big deal compared semi-supporting one more console, don't you?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880179</id>
	<title>Re:Inclusive</title>
	<author>nilbog</author>
	<datestamp>1256570400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TFA says "Xbox 360 will be the only game console to offer this movie-watching experience..."</p><p>Seems to me that they are defining the time period as any point in the future and making that statement that Xbox will continue to be the only game console to offer netflix.  Key words "will be the only."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA says " Xbox 360 will be the only game console to offer this movie-watching experience... " Seems to me that they are defining the time period as any point in the future and making that statement that Xbox will continue to be the only game console to offer netflix .
Key words " will be the only .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA says "Xbox 360 will be the only game console to offer this movie-watching experience..."Seems to me that they are defining the time period as any point in the future and making that statement that Xbox will continue to be the only game console to offer netflix.
Key words "will be the only.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29885437</id>
	<title>Re:Joystiq has a Q&amp;A with Netflix</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256665740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wrong, I frequently play 1080p H.264 video files downloaded off bittorrent.  There is no lockdown.</p><p>I have a theory, too -- that you shouldn't talk about things you clearly know nothing about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wrong , I frequently play 1080p H.264 video files downloaded off bittorrent .
There is no lockdown.I have a theory , too -- that you should n't talk about things you clearly know nothing about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wrong, I frequently play 1080p H.264 video files downloaded off bittorrent.
There is no lockdown.I have a theory, too -- that you shouldn't talk about things you clearly know nothing about.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880191</id>
	<title>Re:Joystiq has a Q&amp;A with Netflix</title>
	<author>ErikZ</author>
	<datestamp>1256570640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Huh, that's odd. I have a theory...</p><p>The PS3 is locked down so tight, it can't even play 1080p without a blueray disk?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Huh , that 's odd .
I have a theory...The PS3 is locked down so tight , it ca n't even play 1080p without a blueray disk ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Huh, that's odd.
I have a theory...The PS3 is locked down so tight, it can't even play 1080p without a blueray disk?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879501</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879033</id>
	<title>Inclusive</title>
	<author>StikyPad</author>
	<datestamp>1256560260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Apparently, in Microsoft parlance, 'exclusive partnership' means 'we launched it first' and not 'we inked a deal with Netflix preventing this feature from appearing on the competition's hardware.</i></p><p>Isn't that what exclusive usually means?  It makes a statement about the present, not the future.  Exclusive interviews, for example, are seldom exclusive for very long.  iPhones are exclusive to AT&amp;T (in the US, for now).  Some vehicle has exclusive feature X, until next year when they all do.  Etc., etc...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently , in Microsoft parlance , 'exclusive partnership ' means 'we launched it first ' and not 'we inked a deal with Netflix preventing this feature from appearing on the competition 's hardware.Is n't that what exclusive usually means ?
It makes a statement about the present , not the future .
Exclusive interviews , for example , are seldom exclusive for very long .
iPhones are exclusive to AT&amp;T ( in the US , for now ) .
Some vehicle has exclusive feature X , until next year when they all do .
Etc. , etc.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently, in Microsoft parlance, 'exclusive partnership' means 'we launched it first' and not 'we inked a deal with Netflix preventing this feature from appearing on the competition's hardware.Isn't that what exclusive usually means?
It makes a statement about the present, not the future.
Exclusive interviews, for example, are seldom exclusive for very long.
iPhones are exclusive to AT&amp;T (in the US, for now).
Some vehicle has exclusive feature X, until next year when they all do.
Etc., etc...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29884301</id>
	<title>Fills an important gap</title>
	<author>tgibbs</author>
	<datestamp>1256660580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even though the implementation, with the need to insert a disk, is slightly awkward, this fills in the only major weakness of the PS3 as a media station. Compared to the XBox 360, the PS3 has a (much) better user interface, better upscaling playback of conventional DVDs, built-in WiFi, more reliable UPnP client (at least in my hands), Blu-ray playback, rechargeable wireless controller, user upgradable hard drive, and now Netflix with no additional fee to Sony. What's more, the PS3 includes a web browser, so you don't even need a PC to manage your Netflix queue.  At this point, I'd judge the games libraries to be about equal--although the PS3 to get (if you are a gamer) is still the older 60 GB model (CECHAxx) that included hardware PS2 emulation. So the PS3 is now the console to get. Main disadvantage is still the lack of an IR sensor, which means that an add-on is required if you want to use a universal remote instead of Sony's (extra cost) RF remote. I've registered with Netflix to receive the enabling disk. I'll be interested to see how it compares to Netflix on TiVo and 360. I wonder if it will take advantage of the PS3's superior upscaling? (my guess is no).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even though the implementation , with the need to insert a disk , is slightly awkward , this fills in the only major weakness of the PS3 as a media station .
Compared to the XBox 360 , the PS3 has a ( much ) better user interface , better upscaling playback of conventional DVDs , built-in WiFi , more reliable UPnP client ( at least in my hands ) , Blu-ray playback , rechargeable wireless controller , user upgradable hard drive , and now Netflix with no additional fee to Sony .
What 's more , the PS3 includes a web browser , so you do n't even need a PC to manage your Netflix queue .
At this point , I 'd judge the games libraries to be about equal--although the PS3 to get ( if you are a gamer ) is still the older 60 GB model ( CECHAxx ) that included hardware PS2 emulation .
So the PS3 is now the console to get .
Main disadvantage is still the lack of an IR sensor , which means that an add-on is required if you want to use a universal remote instead of Sony 's ( extra cost ) RF remote .
I 've registered with Netflix to receive the enabling disk .
I 'll be interested to see how it compares to Netflix on TiVo and 360 .
I wonder if it will take advantage of the PS3 's superior upscaling ?
( my guess is no ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even though the implementation, with the need to insert a disk, is slightly awkward, this fills in the only major weakness of the PS3 as a media station.
Compared to the XBox 360, the PS3 has a (much) better user interface, better upscaling playback of conventional DVDs, built-in WiFi, more reliable UPnP client (at least in my hands), Blu-ray playback, rechargeable wireless controller, user upgradable hard drive, and now Netflix with no additional fee to Sony.
What's more, the PS3 includes a web browser, so you don't even need a PC to manage your Netflix queue.
At this point, I'd judge the games libraries to be about equal--although the PS3 to get (if you are a gamer) is still the older 60 GB model (CECHAxx) that included hardware PS2 emulation.
So the PS3 is now the console to get.
Main disadvantage is still the lack of an IR sensor, which means that an add-on is required if you want to use a universal remote instead of Sony's (extra cost) RF remote.
I've registered with Netflix to receive the enabling disk.
I'll be interested to see how it compares to Netflix on TiVo and 360.
I wonder if it will take advantage of the PS3's superior upscaling?
(my guess is no).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29887117</id>
	<title>Re:ok, so I'll get one then.</title>
	<author>Anonymous McCartneyf</author>
	<datestamp>1256672820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>BluRay players <em>will</em> become more common, regardless of how PS3s do.  BluRay won the HD war.  Stores are stocking BluRay discs, right down to the Walmart and Costco level.  Disney is selling kits containing both BluRays and normal DVDs.  And they are being advertised heavily.<br>
A PS3 is just a convenient way to get a BluRay player, especially if you already have a game you want to play as well.  (The game controller makes an awkward BluRay remote, though.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>BluRay players will become more common , regardless of how PS3s do .
BluRay won the HD war .
Stores are stocking BluRay discs , right down to the Walmart and Costco level .
Disney is selling kits containing both BluRays and normal DVDs .
And they are being advertised heavily .
A PS3 is just a convenient way to get a BluRay player , especially if you already have a game you want to play as well .
( The game controller makes an awkward BluRay remote , though .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BluRay players will become more common, regardless of how PS3s do.
BluRay won the HD war.
Stores are stocking BluRay discs, right down to the Walmart and Costco level.
Disney is selling kits containing both BluRays and normal DVDs.
And they are being advertised heavily.
A PS3 is just a convenient way to get a BluRay player, especially if you already have a game you want to play as well.
(The game controller makes an awkward BluRay remote, though.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880427</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882073</id>
	<title>Re:More</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1256644920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you're in the UK, LoveFilm has a similar service.  They currently only have about 1,700 things available for streaming, but it's included for free with their DVD rental service (a few things are stupidly overpriced pay per view).  I've been using it to watch old science fiction shows and a few films.  From what I can tell, their service is more or less equivalent to Netflix.  Oh, and they use Flash for streaming and works nicely on non-Windows systems.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're in the UK , LoveFilm has a similar service .
They currently only have about 1,700 things available for streaming , but it 's included for free with their DVD rental service ( a few things are stupidly overpriced pay per view ) .
I 've been using it to watch old science fiction shows and a few films .
From what I can tell , their service is more or less equivalent to Netflix .
Oh , and they use Flash for streaming and works nicely on non-Windows systems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're in the UK, LoveFilm has a similar service.
They currently only have about 1,700 things available for streaming, but it's included for free with their DVD rental service (a few things are stupidly overpriced pay per view).
I've been using it to watch old science fiction shows and a few films.
From what I can tell, their service is more or less equivalent to Netflix.
Oh, and they use Flash for streaming and works nicely on non-Windows systems.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29886747</id>
	<title>Re:Using BD-Live is the real story</title>
	<author>Scroatzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1256671320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I totally agree with this-- the whole "format" battle was really goofy and useless. I've been using a Roku box to stream Netflix movies-- the experience is flawless.</p><p>It seems almost barbaric to buy a disc, or to have to wait for one to come in the mail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I totally agree with this-- the whole " format " battle was really goofy and useless .
I 've been using a Roku box to stream Netflix movies-- the experience is flawless.It seems almost barbaric to buy a disc , or to have to wait for one to come in the mail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I totally agree with this-- the whole "format" battle was really goofy and useless.
I've been using a Roku box to stream Netflix movies-- the experience is flawless.It seems almost barbaric to buy a disc, or to have to wait for one to come in the mail.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880261</id>
	<title>Well, duh!</title>
	<author>slapout</author>
	<datestamp>1256571480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The PS3's not a game system. It's a Blu-ray player.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The PS3 's not a game system .
It 's a Blu-ray player .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The PS3's not a game system.
It's a Blu-ray player.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879299</id>
	<title>In Canada, Movies come in Bags</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256562180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or at the very least NOT on consoles. It's a safe bet that Canadian PS3 / XBOX owners will not have streaming movies before 2011.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or at the very least NOT on consoles .
It 's a safe bet that Canadian PS3 / XBOX owners will not have streaming movies before 2011 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or at the very least NOT on consoles.
It's a safe bet that Canadian PS3 / XBOX owners will not have streaming movies before 2011.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879501</id>
	<title>Joystiq has a Q&amp;A with Netflix</title>
	<author>moniker</author>
	<datestamp>1256563740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>from <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/10/26/netflix-ps3-disc-must-remain-in-system-until-2010-update/" title="joystiq.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.joystiq.com/2009/10/26/netflix-ps3-disc-must-remain-in-system-until-2010-update/</a> [joystiq.com]</p><p><b>Joystiq: Was the PS3 application developed internally by Netflix?</b></p><p>Netflix: Yes, with the help of the Sony team.</p><p><b>Can the Netflix application be installed to the PS3 hard dive from the disc? Or must the disc be inserted every time a user wants to access Netflix?</b></p><p>Yes, the Netflix disc has to be inserted every time to access the Netflix service.</p><p><b>Why not distribute the application via PSN download or firmware update, and then embed it into the XMB?</b></p><p>Again, the instant streaming disc represented the fastest and easiest way to let PS3 enthusiasts get Netflix on the PS3. Late next year we expect to have an embedded solution available for PS3s via a system software update slated for release through the PlayStation Network.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>from http : //www.joystiq.com/2009/10/26/netflix-ps3-disc-must-remain-in-system-until-2010-update/ [ joystiq.com ] Joystiq : Was the PS3 application developed internally by Netflix ? Netflix : Yes , with the help of the Sony team.Can the Netflix application be installed to the PS3 hard dive from the disc ?
Or must the disc be inserted every time a user wants to access Netflix ? Yes , the Netflix disc has to be inserted every time to access the Netflix service.Why not distribute the application via PSN download or firmware update , and then embed it into the XMB ? Again , the instant streaming disc represented the fastest and easiest way to let PS3 enthusiasts get Netflix on the PS3 .
Late next year we expect to have an embedded solution available for PS3s via a system software update slated for release through the PlayStation Network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>from http://www.joystiq.com/2009/10/26/netflix-ps3-disc-must-remain-in-system-until-2010-update/ [joystiq.com]Joystiq: Was the PS3 application developed internally by Netflix?Netflix: Yes, with the help of the Sony team.Can the Netflix application be installed to the PS3 hard dive from the disc?
Or must the disc be inserted every time a user wants to access Netflix?Yes, the Netflix disc has to be inserted every time to access the Netflix service.Why not distribute the application via PSN download or firmware update, and then embed it into the XMB?Again, the instant streaming disc represented the fastest and easiest way to let PS3 enthusiasts get Netflix on the PS3.
Late next year we expect to have an embedded solution available for PS3s via a system software update slated for release through the PlayStation Network.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29884183</id>
	<title>Re:exclusive partnership</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256660040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>about 3 months</p></div><p>It has been a lot longer than that, Netflix came with the NXE update last Fall.  The more recent update only added a couple of new features to it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>about 3 monthsIt has been a lot longer than that , Netflix came with the NXE update last Fall .
The more recent update only added a couple of new features to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>about 3 monthsIt has been a lot longer than that, Netflix came with the NXE update last Fall.
The more recent update only added a couple of new features to it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878927</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29883443</id>
	<title>I don't understand what the big deal is ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256656440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This isn't even the first Blu-Ray player to support Netflix. Insignia has one that is $99.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't even the first Blu-Ray player to support Netflix .
Insignia has one that is $ 99 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't even the first Blu-Ray player to support Netflix.
Insignia has one that is $99.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878979</id>
	<title>Re:exclusive partnership</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256559960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>try about a year.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>try about a year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>try about a year.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878927</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29881237</id>
	<title>Re:Handy for some, less so for others</title>
	<author>Toonol</author>
	<datestamp>1256586180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Old, obscure, and foreign movies are the only reasons I would subscribe to Netflix.  None of my local rental stores have "The Thin Man."  Can you believe that?  They have all the SAW movies...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Old , obscure , and foreign movies are the only reasons I would subscribe to Netflix .
None of my local rental stores have " The Thin Man .
" Can you believe that ?
They have all the SAW movies.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Old, obscure, and foreign movies are the only reasons I would subscribe to Netflix.
None of my local rental stores have "The Thin Man.
"  Can you believe that?
They have all the SAW movies...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882965</id>
	<title>Re:Handy for some, less so for others</title>
	<author>Mooga</author>
	<datestamp>1256653920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It really hit and miss.  In my case while there are several hits, most of the movies are very very aged.  However they do have a wide range of younger content.  I know you can watch enough Hannah Montana to want to hang yourself...</p><p>I bought the family a Roku box a while back now and it's got the heaviest use from the younger ones.</p><p>Also a side note:  I hope MS makes netflix FREE.  I can pay monthly to get their gold package (which is only needed for those who play nothing but CoD and Halo for hours on end) in order to use netflix.  Why spend the money when I can spend $100 and get a Roku box without having to worry about fees?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It really hit and miss .
In my case while there are several hits , most of the movies are very very aged .
However they do have a wide range of younger content .
I know you can watch enough Hannah Montana to want to hang yourself...I bought the family a Roku box a while back now and it 's got the heaviest use from the younger ones.Also a side note : I hope MS makes netflix FREE .
I can pay monthly to get their gold package ( which is only needed for those who play nothing but CoD and Halo for hours on end ) in order to use netflix .
Why spend the money when I can spend $ 100 and get a Roku box without having to worry about fees ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It really hit and miss.
In my case while there are several hits, most of the movies are very very aged.
However they do have a wide range of younger content.
I know you can watch enough Hannah Montana to want to hang yourself...I bought the family a Roku box a while back now and it's got the heaviest use from the younger ones.Also a side note:  I hope MS makes netflix FREE.
I can pay monthly to get their gold package (which is only needed for those who play nothing but CoD and Halo for hours on end) in order to use netflix.
Why spend the money when I can spend $100 and get a Roku box without having to worry about fees?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29881649</id>
	<title>Re:Inclusive</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1256637120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Isn't that what exclusive usually means?"</p><p>In the normal world yes, but the mistake you've made is that we're talking Slashdot parlance here where anything pre-fixed or post-fixed with "Microsoft" must automatically have a negative connotation to it. For example:</p><p>"Microsoft employee is first to crash scene and helps save small child"</p><p>On Slashdot this means:</p><p>"Microsoft rapes small children"</p><p>Long term accepted real world definition and understanding of words goes out the window if it contradicts the negative Microsoft rule on Slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Is n't that what exclusive usually means ?
" In the normal world yes , but the mistake you 've made is that we 're talking Slashdot parlance here where anything pre-fixed or post-fixed with " Microsoft " must automatically have a negative connotation to it .
For example : " Microsoft employee is first to crash scene and helps save small child " On Slashdot this means : " Microsoft rapes small children " Long term accepted real world definition and understanding of words goes out the window if it contradicts the negative Microsoft rule on Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Isn't that what exclusive usually means?
"In the normal world yes, but the mistake you've made is that we're talking Slashdot parlance here where anything pre-fixed or post-fixed with "Microsoft" must automatically have a negative connotation to it.
For example:"Microsoft employee is first to crash scene and helps save small child"On Slashdot this means:"Microsoft rapes small children"Long term accepted real world definition and understanding of words goes out the window if it contradicts the negative Microsoft rule on Slashdot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29887443</id>
	<title>Re:Europe availability?</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1256674020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>International distribution agreements for movies and other media are a goddamn mess--legal relics that still assume every movie will be on VHS/DVD and be sold in a brick-and-mortar shop somewhere. Even if Netflix does plow through this mess and establish some international service, odds are that they won't be able to offer the same selection they do in the U.S. (since an agreement from a media company for distribution rights for a particularly property in the U.S. probably won't apply to that same property in a different country).</htmltext>
<tokenext>International distribution agreements for movies and other media are a goddamn mess--legal relics that still assume every movie will be on VHS/DVD and be sold in a brick-and-mortar shop somewhere .
Even if Netflix does plow through this mess and establish some international service , odds are that they wo n't be able to offer the same selection they do in the U.S. ( since an agreement from a media company for distribution rights for a particularly property in the U.S. probably wo n't apply to that same property in a different country ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>International distribution agreements for movies and other media are a goddamn mess--legal relics that still assume every movie will be on VHS/DVD and be sold in a brick-and-mortar shop somewhere.
Even if Netflix does plow through this mess and establish some international service, odds are that they won't be able to offer the same selection they do in the U.S. (since an agreement from a media company for distribution rights for a particularly property in the U.S. probably won't apply to that same property in a different country).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29881393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880309</id>
	<title>Re:Joystiq has a Q&amp;A with Netflix</title>
	<author>tiks</author>
	<datestamp>1256572260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sony has a competing video rental service with Play-station network. I'd bet Sony has been fighting this tooth and nail till netflix decided to give em the finger and do it the BD-Live route.</p><p>But you see in the end nflx will come out as winner as with this solution they have covered much larger (future) install base than just the ps3s.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sony has a competing video rental service with Play-station network .
I 'd bet Sony has been fighting this tooth and nail till netflix decided to give em the finger and do it the BD-Live route.But you see in the end nflx will come out as winner as with this solution they have covered much larger ( future ) install base than just the ps3s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sony has a competing video rental service with Play-station network.
I'd bet Sony has been fighting this tooth and nail till netflix decided to give em the finger and do it the BD-Live route.But you see in the end nflx will come out as winner as with this solution they have covered much larger (future) install base than just the ps3s.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879501</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879159</id>
	<title>Timed Exclusive</title>
	<author>Schnoogs</author>
	<datestamp>1256561160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The concept of Timed Exclusives is clearly lost on the article writer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The concept of Timed Exclusives is clearly lost on the article writer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The concept of Timed Exclusives is clearly lost on the article writer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879139</id>
	<title>Re:exclusive partnership</title>
	<author>schon</author>
	<datestamp>1256561040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Methinks you don't understand what "exclusive" means.</p><p>It doesn't mean "nobody else is doing it".</p><p>It means "nobody else is is *allowed* to do it"  (examine the root "<a href="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/exclude" title="wiktionary.org">exclude</a> [wiktionary.org]")</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Methinks you do n't understand what " exclusive " means.It does n't mean " nobody else is doing it " .It means " nobody else is is * allowed * to do it " ( examine the root " exclude [ wiktionary.org ] " )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Methinks you don't understand what "exclusive" means.It doesn't mean "nobody else is doing it".It means "nobody else is is *allowed* to do it"  (examine the root "exclude [wiktionary.org]")</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878927</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879961</id>
	<title>Re:Handy for some, less so for others</title>
	<author>poormanjoe</author>
	<datestamp>1256567940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But if you're not a fan of old movies and TV shows, it's probably of very little interest to you.</p></div><p>I, as most Netflix subcribers are a fan of entertainment.  When a movie was created does not dictate weather the movie is entertaining or not.  Take <a href="http://connect.afi.com/site/PageNavigator/micro\_take\_tour2" title="afi.com" rel="nofollow">Citizen Kane</a> [afi.com] that was shot in 1941 and is still hailed as the greatest movie ever by the <a href="http://www.afi.com/" title="afi.com" rel="nofollow">American Film Institute</a> [afi.com], and probably by most people who have watched it.   Netflix does making finding new releases hard to find by not posting them on the main page, but at the age of 26 I don't think of them as "old movies," but simply great movies I missed.  Let's not forget the lack of commercials, that really helps make up for many of the 3 star movies/shows that are streaming.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But if you 're not a fan of old movies and TV shows , it 's probably of very little interest to you.I , as most Netflix subcribers are a fan of entertainment .
When a movie was created does not dictate weather the movie is entertaining or not .
Take Citizen Kane [ afi.com ] that was shot in 1941 and is still hailed as the greatest movie ever by the American Film Institute [ afi.com ] , and probably by most people who have watched it .
Netflix does making finding new releases hard to find by not posting them on the main page , but at the age of 26 I do n't think of them as " old movies , " but simply great movies I missed .
Let 's not forget the lack of commercials , that really helps make up for many of the 3 star movies/shows that are streaming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But if you're not a fan of old movies and TV shows, it's probably of very little interest to you.I, as most Netflix subcribers are a fan of entertainment.
When a movie was created does not dictate weather the movie is entertaining or not.
Take Citizen Kane [afi.com] that was shot in 1941 and is still hailed as the greatest movie ever by the American Film Institute [afi.com], and probably by most people who have watched it.
Netflix does making finding new releases hard to find by not posting them on the main page, but at the age of 26 I don't think of them as "old movies," but simply great movies I missed.
Let's not forget the lack of commercials, that really helps make up for many of the 3 star movies/shows that are streaming.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29887745</id>
	<title>Xbox 360 is still "exclusive"</title>
	<author>skamunisM</author>
	<datestamp>1256675400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The BD-Live implementation, rather than a proper PS3 installed option, may have been chosen to circumvent the 360 exclusivity agreement, which would remain technically intact.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The BD-Live implementation , rather than a proper PS3 installed option , may have been chosen to circumvent the 360 exclusivity agreement , which would remain technically intact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The BD-Live implementation, rather than a proper PS3 installed option, may have been chosen to circumvent the 360 exclusivity agreement, which would remain technically intact.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29881305</id>
	<title>This was always Microsoft's shtick</title>
	<author>Werthless5</author>
	<datestamp>1256673780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Countless "exclusive" 360 games are released on the PC a few months later.  It's a marketing gimmick to get consumers to believe that their system is the only one to offer service X or game Y when those same products will be available shortly on another system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Countless " exclusive " 360 games are released on the PC a few months later .
It 's a marketing gimmick to get consumers to believe that their system is the only one to offer service X or game Y when those same products will be available shortly on another system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Countless "exclusive" 360 games are released on the PC a few months later.
It's a marketing gimmick to get consumers to believe that their system is the only one to offer service X or game Y when those same products will be available shortly on another system.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880415</id>
	<title>Surprised...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256573280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No one's bothered to ponder if this means MS will finally stop requiring a Live! subscription in order to use this feature in the future.  I bought my 360 when I heard this was coming (and to use as an extender) I'm not a hardcore console gamer  (I'm a pc gamer) and have NO need for live. I felt ripped off to find out they wanted to charge me 50$ a year for the software update that as I understand it doesn't use the MS network for anything other than to validate that my account is linked to this xbox. I always swore I'd never buy a PS3 but if this is true and at no additional cost, then I may buy one instead of another xbox.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No one 's bothered to ponder if this means MS will finally stop requiring a Live !
subscription in order to use this feature in the future .
I bought my 360 when I heard this was coming ( and to use as an extender ) I 'm not a hardcore console gamer ( I 'm a pc gamer ) and have NO need for live .
I felt ripped off to find out they wanted to charge me 50 $ a year for the software update that as I understand it does n't use the MS network for anything other than to validate that my account is linked to this xbox .
I always swore I 'd never buy a PS3 but if this is true and at no additional cost , then I may buy one instead of another xbox .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one's bothered to ponder if this means MS will finally stop requiring a Live!
subscription in order to use this feature in the future.
I bought my 360 when I heard this was coming (and to use as an extender) I'm not a hardcore console gamer  (I'm a pc gamer) and have NO need for live.
I felt ripped off to find out they wanted to charge me 50$ a year for the software update that as I understand it doesn't use the MS network for anything other than to validate that my account is linked to this xbox.
I always swore I'd never buy a PS3 but if this is true and at no additional cost, then I may buy one instead of another xbox.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878927</id>
	<title>exclusive partnership</title>
	<author>DesertBlade</author>
	<datestamp>1256559600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>They did have an exclusive partnership for about 3 months.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They did have an exclusive partnership for about 3 months .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They did have an exclusive partnership for about 3 months.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880427</id>
	<title>Re:ok, so I'll get one then.</title>
	<author>crasher35</author>
	<datestamp>1256573340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>...and there was always that place where it paused between layers, about an hour in to a movie.</i>
<br>I have yet to see a DVD player that doesn't pause when going between layers.  Just a fault in the technology itself.  I wouldn't be surprised if the PS3 still did this with the dual layer DVDs that you own.
<br> <br>
<i>"I don't have a blueray player yet. I know, what year is it?"</i>
<br>Well, it's 2009 and nobody I know has a Blu-ray player.  It's just not getting adopted at a fast rate, so don't feel bad.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and there was always that place where it paused between layers , about an hour in to a movie .
I have yet to see a DVD player that does n't pause when going between layers .
Just a fault in the technology itself .
I would n't be surprised if the PS3 still did this with the dual layer DVDs that you own .
" I do n't have a blueray player yet .
I know , what year is it ?
" Well , it 's 2009 and nobody I know has a Blu-ray player .
It 's just not getting adopted at a fast rate , so do n't feel bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and there was always that place where it paused between layers, about an hour in to a movie.
I have yet to see a DVD player that doesn't pause when going between layers.
Just a fault in the technology itself.
I wouldn't be surprised if the PS3 still did this with the dual layer DVDs that you own.
"I don't have a blueray player yet.
I know, what year is it?
"
Well, it's 2009 and nobody I know has a Blu-ray player.
It's just not getting adopted at a fast rate, so don't feel bad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879263</id>
	<title>Re:Inclusive</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256561880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An 'exclusive partnership' normally indicates a contract done between two parties where the one party is guaranteed the only access to something. See AT&amp;T and the iPhone in the U.S., for example, or the NFL's deal with DirectTV.</p><p>It's quite a different animal from a newspaper 'exclusive' or an 'exclusive interview', where a contract is not involved.</p><p>Now, it could be that they did have a one-year deal that is about to or has expired, in which case you would be entirely correct. However, such contracts are usually longer term, and if Microsoft is throwing around the term 'exclusive partnership' without having a contract, then they're giving a heck of a lot of people the idea that they will be the only ones that will have that capability for a long, long time when that is not actually the case.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An 'exclusive partnership ' normally indicates a contract done between two parties where the one party is guaranteed the only access to something .
See AT&amp;T and the iPhone in the U.S. , for example , or the NFL 's deal with DirectTV.It 's quite a different animal from a newspaper 'exclusive ' or an 'exclusive interview ' , where a contract is not involved.Now , it could be that they did have a one-year deal that is about to or has expired , in which case you would be entirely correct .
However , such contracts are usually longer term , and if Microsoft is throwing around the term 'exclusive partnership ' without having a contract , then they 're giving a heck of a lot of people the idea that they will be the only ones that will have that capability for a long , long time when that is not actually the case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An 'exclusive partnership' normally indicates a contract done between two parties where the one party is guaranteed the only access to something.
See AT&amp;T and the iPhone in the U.S., for example, or the NFL's deal with DirectTV.It's quite a different animal from a newspaper 'exclusive' or an 'exclusive interview', where a contract is not involved.Now, it could be that they did have a one-year deal that is about to or has expired, in which case you would be entirely correct.
However, such contracts are usually longer term, and if Microsoft is throwing around the term 'exclusive partnership' without having a contract, then they're giving a heck of a lot of people the idea that they will be the only ones that will have that capability for a long, long time when that is not actually the case.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880667</id>
	<title>Re:Handy for some, less so for others</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1256576760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seems to appear in the <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/3435" title="gutenberg.org">canonical text</a> [gutenberg.org]...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems to appear in the canonical text [ gutenberg.org ] .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems to appear in the canonical text [gutenberg.org]...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879853</id>
	<title>Re:Using BD-Live is the real story</title>
	<author>moniker</author>
	<datestamp>1256566800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's why I don't think this is the case. <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/10/26/netflix-ps3-disc-must-remain-in-system-until-2010-update/" title="joystiq.com" rel="nofollow">Netflix has said</a> [joystiq.com] that they had help from Sony, so I think it is more likely a PS3 application and not a BD-Live Java application.</p><p>According to <a href="http://www.betanews.com/article/PS3-Netflix-The-best-use-of-BDLive-yet/1256581201" title="betanews.com" rel="nofollow">this article</a> [betanews.com], it was an analyst who believed that the implementation was BD-Live, rather than citing some inside source. I'm still hoping for some <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/31/ps3-homebrew-hack-found-hello-world/" title="engadget.com" rel="nofollow">more interesting BD-Live Java homebrew....</a> [engadget.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's why I do n't think this is the case .
Netflix has said [ joystiq.com ] that they had help from Sony , so I think it is more likely a PS3 application and not a BD-Live Java application.According to this article [ betanews.com ] , it was an analyst who believed that the implementation was BD-Live , rather than citing some inside source .
I 'm still hoping for some more interesting BD-Live Java homebrew.... [ engadget.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's why I don't think this is the case.
Netflix has said [joystiq.com] that they had help from Sony, so I think it is more likely a PS3 application and not a BD-Live Java application.According to this article [betanews.com], it was an analyst who believed that the implementation was BD-Live, rather than citing some inside source.
I'm still hoping for some more interesting BD-Live Java homebrew.... [engadget.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882381</id>
	<title>Stream Netflix through PS3 Right NOW!</title>
	<author>Dhalmo</author>
	<datestamp>1256650020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is not a new capability. I've been able to get Netflix streaming to my PS3 using a upnp server (MeidaMall PlayOn) running on my PC. Not only does it stream Netflix, it streams Adultswim, Cartoon Network, YouTube, HGTV, NBA, NFL, Hulu, Spike and many internationl channels. It even streams Pron sites like YouPron and RedTube. This has been out for two years so this is not a new capability. Additionally, I've been able to run all of these web streamers through the Ubuntu install on my OtherOS boot on PS3, including Divx. No big deal and I won't be using a disc just to watch a low quality stream.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is not a new capability .
I 've been able to get Netflix streaming to my PS3 using a upnp server ( MeidaMall PlayOn ) running on my PC .
Not only does it stream Netflix , it streams Adultswim , Cartoon Network , YouTube , HGTV , NBA , NFL , Hulu , Spike and many internationl channels .
It even streams Pron sites like YouPron and RedTube .
This has been out for two years so this is not a new capability .
Additionally , I 've been able to run all of these web streamers through the Ubuntu install on my OtherOS boot on PS3 , including Divx .
No big deal and I wo n't be using a disc just to watch a low quality stream .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is not a new capability.
I've been able to get Netflix streaming to my PS3 using a upnp server (MeidaMall PlayOn) running on my PC.
Not only does it stream Netflix, it streams Adultswim, Cartoon Network, YouTube, HGTV, NBA, NFL, Hulu, Spike and many internationl channels.
It even streams Pron sites like YouPron and RedTube.
This has been out for two years so this is not a new capability.
Additionally, I've been able to run all of these web streamers through the Ubuntu install on my OtherOS boot on PS3, including Divx.
No big deal and I won't be using a disc just to watch a low quality stream.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882629</id>
	<title>Re:Europe availability?</title>
	<author>Scyber</author>
	<datestamp>1256651880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Netflix plans to start offering its streaming service internationally in the 2nd half of 2010.   They plan to start in one test market, then expand to other countries.  All of this was stated by the CEO in the latest earnings call:
<p>
<a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-netflix-to-take-its-streaming-business-international-next-year/" title="paidcontent.org">http://paidcontent.org/article/419-netflix-to-take-its-streaming-business-international-next-year/</a> [paidcontent.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Netflix plans to start offering its streaming service internationally in the 2nd half of 2010 .
They plan to start in one test market , then expand to other countries .
All of this was stated by the CEO in the latest earnings call : http : //paidcontent.org/article/419-netflix-to-take-its-streaming-business-international-next-year/ [ paidcontent.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Netflix plans to start offering its streaming service internationally in the 2nd half of 2010.
They plan to start in one test market, then expand to other countries.
All of this was stated by the CEO in the latest earnings call:

http://paidcontent.org/article/419-netflix-to-take-its-streaming-business-international-next-year/ [paidcontent.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29881393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29885281</id>
	<title>Re:Joystiq has a Q&amp;A with Netflix</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256665020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nah...you can play off the memory stick just fine.</p><p>One rumor is that the "exclusive" deal with Microsoft was for inclusion on the dashboard.  By offering this as a "game", it gets around the contract.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nah...you can play off the memory stick just fine.One rumor is that the " exclusive " deal with Microsoft was for inclusion on the dashboard .
By offering this as a " game " , it gets around the contract .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nah...you can play off the memory stick just fine.One rumor is that the "exclusive" deal with Microsoft was for inclusion on the dashboard.
By offering this as a "game", it gets around the contract.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29892449</id>
	<title>Looking Caps:ED,Hunting,http://www.tntshoes.com</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256656200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Welcome to our website:   Http://www.tntshoes.com<br>We offer grade AAA shoes here with wholesale price! Our shoes have some advantages as following:<br>1) Grade AAA shoes,handbags,t-shirts,belts,sunglass,caps.boots,etc!<br>2) The wholesale price!<br>3) 100\% safe, the best delivery terms!<br>4) No mini order here!<br>5) The best service!<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; OUR WEBSITE:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    Welcome to our website : Http : //www.tntshoes.comWe offer grade AAA shoes here with wholesale price !
Our shoes have some advantages as following : 1 ) Grade AAA shoes,handbags,t-shirts,belts,sunglass,caps.boots,etc ! 2 ) The wholesale price ! 3 ) 100 \ % safe , the best delivery terms ! 4 ) No mini order here ! 5 ) The best service !
    OUR WEBSITE :                                                         YAHOO : shoppertrade @ yahoo.com.cn                                                                 MSN : shoppertrade @ hotmail.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    Welcome to our website:   Http://www.tntshoes.comWe offer grade AAA shoes here with wholesale price!
Our shoes have some advantages as following:1) Grade AAA shoes,handbags,t-shirts,belts,sunglass,caps.boots,etc!2) The wholesale price!3) 100\% safe, the best delivery terms!4) No mini order here!5) The best service!
    OUR WEBSITE:
                                                        YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn
                                                                MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879127</id>
	<title>I signed up!</title>
	<author>Gizzmonic</author>
	<datestamp>1256560980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This will be more convenient than hooking up my laptop every time I wanna watch a Netflix movie.  My delightful fat PS3 is always connected to the TV, just like Sony is always connected to the pulse of the American consumer!  I want to go bobbing for Apples with Sony, and now I can, with a BD-Live implementation of Netflix screaming!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This will be more convenient than hooking up my laptop every time I wan na watch a Netflix movie .
My delightful fat PS3 is always connected to the TV , just like Sony is always connected to the pulse of the American consumer !
I want to go bobbing for Apples with Sony , and now I can , with a BD-Live implementation of Netflix screaming !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will be more convenient than hooking up my laptop every time I wanna watch a Netflix movie.
My delightful fat PS3 is always connected to the TV, just like Sony is always connected to the pulse of the American consumer!
I want to go bobbing for Apples with Sony, and now I can, with a BD-Live implementation of Netflix screaming!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878971</id>
	<title>Handy for some, less so for others</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1256559900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm a fan of Netflix streaming (to my Tivo HD), warts and all. But if you're not a fan of old movies and TV shows, it's probably of very little interest to you. Not all that much new stuff is available for streaming, and what is there seems to get cycled randomly in and out at the whim of the content owners.</p><p>The shortcomings aren't Netflix's fault, I don't believe - it's squarely due to the MPAA dinosaurs that continue to insist that the genii will fit back in that darn bottle if they just push harder...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a fan of Netflix streaming ( to my Tivo HD ) , warts and all .
But if you 're not a fan of old movies and TV shows , it 's probably of very little interest to you .
Not all that much new stuff is available for streaming , and what is there seems to get cycled randomly in and out at the whim of the content owners.The shortcomings are n't Netflix 's fault , I do n't believe - it 's squarely due to the MPAA dinosaurs that continue to insist that the genii will fit back in that darn bottle if they just push harder.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a fan of Netflix streaming (to my Tivo HD), warts and all.
But if you're not a fan of old movies and TV shows, it's probably of very little interest to you.
Not all that much new stuff is available for streaming, and what is there seems to get cycled randomly in and out at the whim of the content owners.The shortcomings aren't Netflix's fault, I don't believe - it's squarely due to the MPAA dinosaurs that continue to insist that the genii will fit back in that darn bottle if they just push harder...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882741</id>
	<title>My understanding...</title>
	<author>(arg!)Styopa</author>
	<datestamp>1256652540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everyone is comparing the PS3 to the XBox360 streaming as if they're equal.<br>They aren't.  According to my understanding they both require a Netflix subscription (naturally), but the XBOX version ALSO requires that you have one of their $50/year Gold Live access.  PS3 = free.</p><p>That's a very non-trivial difference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone is comparing the PS3 to the XBox360 streaming as if they 're equal.They are n't .
According to my understanding they both require a Netflix subscription ( naturally ) , but the XBOX version ALSO requires that you have one of their $ 50/year Gold Live access .
PS3 = free.That 's a very non-trivial difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone is comparing the PS3 to the XBox360 streaming as if they're equal.They aren't.
According to my understanding they both require a Netflix subscription (naturally), but the XBOX version ALSO requires that you have one of their $50/year Gold Live access.
PS3 = free.That's a very non-trivial difference.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879447</id>
	<title>Re:Handy for some, less so for others</title>
	<author>timeOday</author>
	<datestamp>1256563260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>On the other hand, mass adoption of Netflix streaming is absolutely key to getting more titles available through it.  So this announcement is good news even for those of us who don't own a gaming console.</htmltext>
<tokenext>On the other hand , mass adoption of Netflix streaming is absolutely key to getting more titles available through it .
So this announcement is good news even for those of us who do n't own a gaming console .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the other hand, mass adoption of Netflix streaming is absolutely key to getting more titles available through it.
So this announcement is good news even for those of us who don't own a gaming console.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879707</id>
	<title>Re:exclusive partnership</title>
	<author>DesertBlade</author>
	<datestamp>1256565420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Methinks the term exclusive can have more than one meaning.  <a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exclusive" title="merriam-webster.com">http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exclusive</a> [merriam-webster.com] <br>

b : limiting or limited to possession, control, or use by a single individual or group <br> <br>

or from <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/exclusive" title="reference.com">http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/exclusive</a> [reference.com] <br>
single or sole<br> <br>

So the netflix was limited to one console (XBOX 360) whether by contract or just first entry.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Methinks the term exclusive can have more than one meaning .
http : //www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exclusive [ merriam-webster.com ] b : limiting or limited to possession , control , or use by a single individual or group or from http : //dictionary.reference.com/browse/exclusive [ reference.com ] single or sole So the netflix was limited to one console ( XBOX 360 ) whether by contract or just first entry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Methinks the term exclusive can have more than one meaning.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exclusive [merriam-webster.com] 

b : limiting or limited to possession, control, or use by a single individual or group  

or from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/exclusive [reference.com] 
single or sole 

So the netflix was limited to one console (XBOX 360) whether by contract or just first entry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878939</id>
	<title>More</title>
	<author>elsJake</author>
	<datestamp>1256559660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Power to the people!
Is it an international feature at least ? I Have yet to see a video streaming service that works for non-US folk.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Power to the people !
Is it an international feature at least ?
I Have yet to see a video streaming service that works for non-US folk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Power to the people!
Is it an international feature at least ?
I Have yet to see a video streaming service that works for non-US folk.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29884251</id>
	<title>Re:It was</title>
	<author>Golddess</author>
	<datestamp>1256660340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not disagreeing that this is a non-story, but it is a little different than the "only in theaters" line (which I do abhor).<br>
<br>
Usually (always?), there is a date attached to that line, so they have the excuse "oh, we merely meant that on this date, it is only in theaters.  After that, we're free to do as we please."  Really pissed me off when the first movie I noticed that line on came out on VHS several months later.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not disagreeing that this is a non-story , but it is a little different than the " only in theaters " line ( which I do abhor ) .
Usually ( always ?
) , there is a date attached to that line , so they have the excuse " oh , we merely meant that on this date , it is only in theaters .
After that , we 're free to do as we please .
" Really pissed me off when the first movie I noticed that line on came out on VHS several months later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not disagreeing that this is a non-story, but it is a little different than the "only in theaters" line (which I do abhor).
Usually (always?
), there is a date attached to that line, so they have the excuse "oh, we merely meant that on this date, it is only in theaters.
After that, we're free to do as we please.
"  Really pissed me off when the first movie I noticed that line on came out on VHS several months later.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878993</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879495
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879033
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29886747
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878971
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879125
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878971
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879409
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29881711
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29881393
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29883411
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29887443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29881393
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880179
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879033
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29885099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878927
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29881237
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878971
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880525
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879409
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29885437
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879501
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880195
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878927
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880501
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879409
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880741
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879589
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878971
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878971
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29885281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879501
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878979
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878927
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882629
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29881393
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879501
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880441
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878971
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29887117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880427
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880987
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878971
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880667
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878971
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879033
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879409
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29884251
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29883169
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879735
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29881649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879033
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29884361
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878971
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29884183
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878927
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878971
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882595
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878927
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882073
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_26_2013241_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882239
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_2013241.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879243
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29886747
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880195
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29883411
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879853
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_2013241.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878927
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882595
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29884183
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878979
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29885099
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879139
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879707
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_2013241.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882381
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_2013241.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878939
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882073
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879409
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880501
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882679
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880769
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880525
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_2013241.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879321
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_2013241.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878971
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879589
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879961
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879341
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880667
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29884361
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880987
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29881237
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880441
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879125
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882965
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_2013241.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879899
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_2013241.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879501
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880309
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880191
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29885281
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29885437
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_2013241.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882741
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_2013241.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29881393
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29887443
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29881711
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882629
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_2013241.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879033
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29881649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879495
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880179
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_2013241.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879735
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29883169
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_2013241.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879541
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880741
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880427
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29887117
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_2013241.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29879177
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_2013241.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29878993
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29884251
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_26_2013241.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29880531
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_26_2013241.29882239
</commentlist>
</conversation>
