<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_25_2010236</id>
	<title>Surgeon Performs World's First 4X HD Surgery</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1256459400000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>docinthemachine writes with word of some <i>"research just presented at the <a href="http://www.asrm.org/Professionals/Meetings/annualmeeting.html">65th ASRM</a> on 4K surgery.  Using bleeding-edge Hollywood 4K cameras coupled to laparoscopes, <a href="http://docinthemachine.com/2009/10/22/first4klaparoscop/">surgery was performed in 4K, or 4X the resolution of HD</a>.  Since <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laparoscopy">laparoscopy</a> is performed while viewing on a video monitor, this is a huge advancement of resolution and clarity for the surgeon.  It only took a million dollars of projectors to show it to the audience."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>docinthemachine writes with word of some " research just presented at the 65th ASRM on 4K surgery .
Using bleeding-edge Hollywood 4K cameras coupled to laparoscopes , surgery was performed in 4K , or 4X the resolution of HD .
Since laparoscopy is performed while viewing on a video monitor , this is a huge advancement of resolution and clarity for the surgeon .
It only took a million dollars of projectors to show it to the audience .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>docinthemachine writes with word of some "research just presented at the 65th ASRM on 4K surgery.
Using bleeding-edge Hollywood 4K cameras coupled to laparoscopes, surgery was performed in 4K, or 4X the resolution of HD.
Since laparoscopy is performed while viewing on a video monitor, this is a huge advancement of resolution and clarity for the surgeon.
It only took a million dollars of projectors to show it to the audience.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867535</id>
	<title>Re:price</title>
	<author>im\_thatoneguy</author>
	<datestamp>1256470440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only indeed.  You can buy a Sony 4k Projector for less than $50k.   Depending on the size of the audience they could have used the new sony 4k projector with 20k lumens for I think around $300k.  Someone got overcharged me thinks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only indeed .
You can buy a Sony 4k Projector for less than $ 50k .
Depending on the size of the audience they could have used the new sony 4k projector with 20k lumens for I think around $ 300k .
Someone got overcharged me thinks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only indeed.
You can buy a Sony 4k Projector for less than $50k.
Depending on the size of the audience they could have used the new sony 4k projector with 20k lumens for I think around $300k.
Someone got overcharged me thinks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29870739</id>
	<title>Re:bad title...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256559180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's 4x the number of pixels. For resolution, just look at the root word. It's how much detail you can resolve (in any direction, so here we're talking double).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's 4x the number of pixels .
For resolution , just look at the root word .
It 's how much detail you can resolve ( in any direction , so here we 're talking double ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's 4x the number of pixels.
For resolution, just look at the root word.
It's how much detail you can resolve (in any direction, so here we're talking double).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29868891</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866945</id>
	<title>wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256463120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>nice e-peen.</p><p>720p ought to be enough for just about anybody.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>nice e-peen.720p ought to be enough for just about anybody .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nice e-peen.720p ought to be enough for just about anybody.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867027</id>
	<title>new?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256464080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>4x HD may be new for video imaging, but other medical imaging techniques have used higher resolutions forever. &gt;HD monitors are quite common in medical applications, too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>4x HD may be new for video imaging , but other medical imaging techniques have used higher resolutions forever .
&gt; HD monitors are quite common in medical applications , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4x HD may be new for video imaging, but other medical imaging techniques have used higher resolutions forever.
&gt;HD monitors are quite common in medical applications, too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867607</id>
	<title>Red Camera not really 4K</title>
	<author>chiefscienceofficer</author>
	<datestamp>1256471700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>By their own admission the Red camera is more like 2.8K - They use a 4K Beyer pattern sensor which produces much less resolution than the total number of horizontal elements. Images are at best comparable to those produced by standard video cameras using 2/3 inch prism optics. This has been scientifically proven by Kodak in extensive testing using standard image evaluation methodologies.
The Sony projectors that were used while capable of 4K images only use a portion of the display area to produce HiDef (1920X1080) stereo images. So while portions of the program may have been presented in 4K the images were not by any stretch 4K if they were produced by the Red camera. The 3D portions were in HiDef if they used the Sony 4K projector for that portion of the presentation.
As mentioned elsewhere, the realtime output of the red camera is less than 4K so the surgeon does not see a "4K" image as he is performing the surgery - he has to wait for the relatively lengthy post process to complete in order to see his pictures. Real 4K equipment does exist - they just weren't using it. They might have gotten quicker and higher quality results by using a 35mm film camera to record the operation - processing the film and scanning at 4K. It would have taken about as long as their post process and produced real 4K images.</htmltext>
<tokenext>By their own admission the Red camera is more like 2.8K - They use a 4K Beyer pattern sensor which produces much less resolution than the total number of horizontal elements .
Images are at best comparable to those produced by standard video cameras using 2/3 inch prism optics .
This has been scientifically proven by Kodak in extensive testing using standard image evaluation methodologies .
The Sony projectors that were used while capable of 4K images only use a portion of the display area to produce HiDef ( 1920X1080 ) stereo images .
So while portions of the program may have been presented in 4K the images were not by any stretch 4K if they were produced by the Red camera .
The 3D portions were in HiDef if they used the Sony 4K projector for that portion of the presentation .
As mentioned elsewhere , the realtime output of the red camera is less than 4K so the surgeon does not see a " 4K " image as he is performing the surgery - he has to wait for the relatively lengthy post process to complete in order to see his pictures .
Real 4K equipment does exist - they just were n't using it .
They might have gotten quicker and higher quality results by using a 35mm film camera to record the operation - processing the film and scanning at 4K .
It would have taken about as long as their post process and produced real 4K images .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By their own admission the Red camera is more like 2.8K - They use a 4K Beyer pattern sensor which produces much less resolution than the total number of horizontal elements.
Images are at best comparable to those produced by standard video cameras using 2/3 inch prism optics.
This has been scientifically proven by Kodak in extensive testing using standard image evaluation methodologies.
The Sony projectors that were used while capable of 4K images only use a portion of the display area to produce HiDef (1920X1080) stereo images.
So while portions of the program may have been presented in 4K the images were not by any stretch 4K if they were produced by the Red camera.
The 3D portions were in HiDef if they used the Sony 4K projector for that portion of the presentation.
As mentioned elsewhere, the realtime output of the red camera is less than 4K so the surgeon does not see a "4K" image as he is performing the surgery - he has to wait for the relatively lengthy post process to complete in order to see his pictures.
Real 4K equipment does exist - they just weren't using it.
They might have gotten quicker and higher quality results by using a 35mm film camera to record the operation - processing the film and scanning at 4K.
It would have taken about as long as their post process and produced real 4K images.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29868031</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>TheSync</author>
	<datestamp>1256476740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>720p ought to be enough for just about anybody.</i></p><p>We should ask, why do we have 1080i and 720p?  Because viewing tests showed that at three picture heights, these resolutions pretty much maxed out the human visual resolution.  There was not much to be gained from increased resolution.</p><p>Now if you view closer than three picture heights, higher resolution becomes important...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>720p ought to be enough for just about anybody.We should ask , why do we have 1080i and 720p ?
Because viewing tests showed that at three picture heights , these resolutions pretty much maxed out the human visual resolution .
There was not much to be gained from increased resolution.Now if you view closer than three picture heights , higher resolution becomes important.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>720p ought to be enough for just about anybody.We should ask, why do we have 1080i and 720p?
Because viewing tests showed that at three picture heights, these resolutions pretty much maxed out the human visual resolution.
There was not much to be gained from increased resolution.Now if you view closer than three picture heights, higher resolution becomes important...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29868439</id>
	<title>Re:4K = 4x ?</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1256482620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I was under the impression that 1080p resolution was just a hair lower than 2K resolution. So wouldn't 4K be roughly 2x HD res?</p></div><p>4096 * 2048 = 8388608</p><p>2048 * 1024 = 2097152</p><p>8388608 / 2097152 = 4  (as opposed to 2)</p><p>When you double the number, you double both dimensions.  Double 2 = 4.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was under the impression that 1080p resolution was just a hair lower than 2K resolution .
So would n't 4K be roughly 2x HD res ? 4096 * 2048 = 83886082048 * 1024 = 20971528388608 / 2097152 = 4 ( as opposed to 2 ) When you double the number , you double both dimensions .
Double 2 = 4. : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was under the impression that 1080p resolution was just a hair lower than 2K resolution.
So wouldn't 4K be roughly 2x HD res?4096 * 2048 = 83886082048 * 1024 = 20971528388608 / 2097152 = 4  (as opposed to 2)When you double the number, you double both dimensions.
Double 2 = 4. :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867237</id>
	<title>I am impressed</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1256466600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just checked their screenshots on my 1280x1024 17" LCD and I'm really amazed at the picture quality that 4x HD can provide!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just checked their screenshots on my 1280x1024 17 " LCD and I 'm really amazed at the picture quality that 4x HD can provide !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just checked their screenshots on my 1280x1024 17" LCD and I'm really amazed at the picture quality that 4x HD can provide!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29868891</id>
	<title>Re:bad title...</title>
	<author>ERJ</author>
	<datestamp>1256489040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sure others will note this as well, but if you multiply the width and height by 2x you receive a total of 4x resolution.  (i.e. you could fit 4 1920x1080 screens into one 4k x 2k screen).  Another way to say it is that by multiplying the height and width by 2 you have 4x the number of pixels.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure others will note this as well , but if you multiply the width and height by 2x you receive a total of 4x resolution .
( i.e. you could fit 4 1920x1080 screens into one 4k x 2k screen ) .
Another way to say it is that by multiplying the height and width by 2 you have 4x the number of pixels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure others will note this as well, but if you multiply the width and height by 2x you receive a total of 4x resolution.
(i.e. you could fit 4 1920x1080 screens into one 4k x 2k screen).
Another way to say it is that by multiplying the height and width by 2 you have 4x the number of pixels.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866965</id>
	<title>price</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256463360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"It only took a million dollars of projectors to show it to the audience."</p></div><p>
Only?!?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" It only took a million dollars of projectors to show it to the audience .
" Only ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It only took a million dollars of projectors to show it to the audience.
"
Only?!
?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867287</id>
	<title>Re:new?</title>
	<author>timeOday</author>
	<datestamp>1256467200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>4x HD may be new for video imaging, but other medical imaging techniques have used higher resolutions forever.</p></div></blockquote><p>

So?  1080p is only 2 MP.  Even consumer-level digicams have offered more than than for forever.  30-60 fps is quite a different thing than still imagery.</p><blockquote><div><p>&gt;HD monitors are quite common in medical applications, too.</p></div></blockquote><p>

The video in this article is greater than 8 MP.  Are those common? <a href="http://medicaldisplaysforless.com/" title="medicaldis...orless.com">This vendor</a> [medicaldis...orless.com] doesn't seem to have any at all.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>4x HD may be new for video imaging , but other medical imaging techniques have used higher resolutions forever .
So ? 1080p is only 2 MP .
Even consumer-level digicams have offered more than than for forever .
30-60 fps is quite a different thing than still imagery. &gt; HD monitors are quite common in medical applications , too .
The video in this article is greater than 8 MP .
Are those common ?
This vendor [ medicaldis...orless.com ] does n't seem to have any at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4x HD may be new for video imaging, but other medical imaging techniques have used higher resolutions forever.
So?  1080p is only 2 MP.
Even consumer-level digicams have offered more than than for forever.
30-60 fps is quite a different thing than still imagery.&gt;HD monitors are quite common in medical applications, too.
The video in this article is greater than 8 MP.
Are those common?
This vendor [medicaldis...orless.com] doesn't seem to have any at all.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867027</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867599</id>
	<title>This isn't as big a breakthrough</title>
	<author>imakemusic</author>
	<datestamp>1256471640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This isn't as big a breakthrough as I first thought.<br> <br>

I thought it said "sturgeon".</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't as big a breakthrough as I first thought .
I thought it said " sturgeon " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't as big a breakthrough as I first thought.
I thought it said "sturgeon".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867361</id>
	<title>Re:price</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256468160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But it was the most expensive machine in the whole hospital, think of the administrators!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But it was the most expensive machine in the whole hospital , think of the administrators !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it was the most expensive machine in the whole hospital, think of the administrators!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29873823</id>
	<title>Re:bad title...</title>
	<author>SimonTheSoundMan</author>
	<datestamp>1256578860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"exceptionally sharp sensor combined with Canon's unbeatable lenses"</p><p>I would not say Canon's lenses are 'unbeatable'. Most cinematography lenses are far better.  Take Arri master primes, set you back &pound;15k for each lens, a box of them can run well over &pound;100k.</p><p>My Contax Carl Zeiss lenses beat Canon or Nikkor lenses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" exceptionally sharp sensor combined with Canon 's unbeatable lenses " I would not say Canon 's lenses are 'unbeatable' .
Most cinematography lenses are far better .
Take Arri master primes , set you back   15k for each lens , a box of them can run well over   100k.My Contax Carl Zeiss lenses beat Canon or Nikkor lenses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"exceptionally sharp sensor combined with Canon's unbeatable lenses"I would not say Canon's lenses are 'unbeatable'.
Most cinematography lenses are far better.
Take Arri master primes, set you back £15k for each lens, a box of them can run well over £100k.My Contax Carl Zeiss lenses beat Canon or Nikkor lenses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867033</id>
	<title>4X Surgery</title>
	<author>IorDMUX</author>
	<datestamp>1256464140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Presenting Sid Meyers's and Issac Asmiov's <i>Fantastic Voyage: The Invisible War</i><ul> <li>eXplore dozens of interconnected body systems</li><li>eXpand from cells to organs to systems... to other organisms!</li><li>eXploit body resources and endocrine systems--manipulate amino acids to make new and powerful proteins</li><li>eXterminate the competing infection and bring the body under your command!</li></ul><p>Oh... not that kind of 4X?  In that case, I'll pass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Presenting Sid Meyers 's and Issac Asmiov 's Fantastic Voyage : The Invisible War eXplore dozens of interconnected body systemseXpand from cells to organs to systems... to other organisms ! eXploit body resources and endocrine systems--manipulate amino acids to make new and powerful proteinseXterminate the competing infection and bring the body under your command ! Oh... not that kind of 4X ?
In that case , I 'll pass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Presenting Sid Meyers's and Issac Asmiov's Fantastic Voyage: The Invisible War eXplore dozens of interconnected body systemseXpand from cells to organs to systems... to other organisms!eXploit body resources and endocrine systems--manipulate amino acids to make new and powerful proteinseXterminate the competing infection and bring the body under your command!Oh... not that kind of 4X?
In that case, I'll pass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866963</id>
	<title>4X The resolution of HD?</title>
	<author>not-too-smatr</author>
	<datestamp>1256463360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Must have been more real than seeing it for yourself...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Must have been more real than seeing it for yourself.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Must have been more real than seeing it for yourself...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29870919</id>
	<title>GOOD NEWS, Shipping Selling DC High man shoes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256561940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Our company are specialize in supplying famous name brand shoes,clothes,handbag,hat,etc.All of our goods are 100\% authentic,most of them are overstock goods from the brand owner's factories and shops,we wholesale them at reasonable price,if you are interested,feel free to contact us,we offer dropshipping,all of our products please check out at our website: www.shopperstrade.com,if you have any question you can talk with us on line.Our products list: Shoes--Men's Sizes Nike Air Jordan: nike air jordan 1 nike air jordan 2 nike air jordan 3 nike air jordan 4 nike air jordan 5 nike air jordan 6 nike air jordan 7 nike air jordan 8 nike air jordan 9 nike air jordan 5.5 nike air jordan 11 nike air jordan spiz'ike nike air jordan 12 nike air jordan 13 nike air jordan 15 nike air jordan 16 nike air jordan 23 nike air jordan 18 aj4&amp;af1 fution shoes aj5&amp;af1 fution shoes aj12&amp;af1 fution shoes aj23&amp;af1 fution shoes aj7&amp;af1 fution shoes aj3&amp;af1 fution shoes Nike: nike dunk nike air force one nike air max ltd nike air max 2003 nike shox r3 nike max 360 nike tn nike max 90 nike max 97 nike max 87 nike max 95 nike shox r4 nike shox nz Bape: ape shoes air bape star Adidas: adidas 35th adidas nba adidas adicolor adidas country series adidas cities series adidas samba adidas classic Puma: puma countries series puma cities series puma 1st puma 2nd puma 3rd puma 4th ferrari series puma 3.5 puma others Other: gucci christian audigier (CA) timberland d&amp;g dsquared2 prada Shoes-Women's shoes Nike: nike max 90 nike shox r3 tn nike shox r4 shox nz Nike air jordan: nike air jordan 1 nike air jordan 3 nike air jordan 4 nike air jordan 5 nike air jordan 7 nike air jordan 11 nike air jordan 13 nike air jordan 22 boots: ugg gucci lv Clothes-Men's Clothes Coat: abercrombie fitch (AF) bape hoody bbc hoody coogi lrg clh hoody artful dodger hoody ed hardy hoodies evisu kidrobot gino green global christan audigier (CA) bape jacket T-shirt: abercrombie fitch (AF) polo ed hardy affliction Christian Audigier (CA) armani artful dodger bbc coogi d&amp;g evisu g-star gino green global lacoste smet crown holder t-shirts shirts: abercrombie fitch (AF) Jeans: aka stash house coogi g star shmack diesel ed hardy evisu gino green global rock true religion bape bbc artful dodger rmc lrg crown holder Shorts: abercrombie fitch (AF) bape bbc coogi evisu red monkey Clothes-Women's Clothes Coat: abercrombie fitch (AF) ed hardy juicy Suits: juicy couture baby phat T-shirt: ed hardy primp abercrombie fitch (AF) Jeans: edhardy rock true religion Bag Handbag: louis vuitton (LV) chanel hermes chole gucci burberry coach Hat Hat: christian audigier (CA) new era ed hardy..</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; OUR WEBSITE:</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; HTTP://www.tntshoes.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    Our company are specialize in supplying famous name brand shoes,clothes,handbag,hat,etc.All of our goods are 100 \ % authentic,most of them are overstock goods from the brand owner 's factories and shops,we wholesale them at reasonable price,if you are interested,feel free to contact us,we offer dropshipping,all of our products please check out at our website : www.shopperstrade.com,if you have any question you can talk with us on line.Our products list : Shoes--Men 's Sizes Nike Air Jordan : nike air jordan 1 nike air jordan 2 nike air jordan 3 nike air jordan 4 nike air jordan 5 nike air jordan 6 nike air jordan 7 nike air jordan 8 nike air jordan 9 nike air jordan 5.5 nike air jordan 11 nike air jordan spiz'ike nike air jordan 12 nike air jordan 13 nike air jordan 15 nike air jordan 16 nike air jordan 23 nike air jordan 18 aj4&amp;af1 fution shoes aj5&amp;af1 fution shoes aj12&amp;af1 fution shoes aj23&amp;af1 fution shoes aj7&amp;af1 fution shoes aj3&amp;af1 fution shoes Nike : nike dunk nike air force one nike air max ltd nike air max 2003 nike shox r3 nike max 360 nike tn nike max 90 nike max 97 nike max 87 nike max 95 nike shox r4 nike shox nz Bape : ape shoes air bape star Adidas : adidas 35th adidas nba adidas adicolor adidas country series adidas cities series adidas samba adidas classic Puma : puma countries series puma cities series puma 1st puma 2nd puma 3rd puma 4th ferrari series puma 3.5 puma others Other : gucci christian audigier ( CA ) timberland d&amp;g dsquared2 prada Shoes-Women 's shoes Nike : nike max 90 nike shox r3 tn nike shox r4 shox nz Nike air jordan : nike air jordan 1 nike air jordan 3 nike air jordan 4 nike air jordan 5 nike air jordan 7 nike air jordan 11 nike air jordan 13 nike air jordan 22 boots : ugg gucci lv Clothes-Men 's Clothes Coat : abercrombie fitch ( AF ) bape hoody bbc hoody coogi lrg clh hoody artful dodger hoody ed hardy hoodies evisu kidrobot gino green global christan audigier ( CA ) bape jacket T-shirt : abercrombie fitch ( AF ) polo ed hardy affliction Christian Audigier ( CA ) armani artful dodger bbc coogi d&amp;g evisu g-star gino green global lacoste smet crown holder t-shirts shirts : abercrombie fitch ( AF ) Jeans : aka stash house coogi g star shmack diesel ed hardy evisu gino green global rock true religion bape bbc artful dodger rmc lrg crown holder Shorts : abercrombie fitch ( AF ) bape bbc coogi evisu red monkey Clothes-Women 's Clothes Coat : abercrombie fitch ( AF ) ed hardy juicy Suits : juicy couture baby phat T-shirt : ed hardy primp abercrombie fitch ( AF ) Jeans : edhardy rock true religion Bag Handbag : louis vuitton ( LV ) chanel hermes chole gucci burberry coach Hat Hat : christian audigier ( CA ) new era ed hardy. .           OUR WEBSITE :                                                     YAHOO : shoppertrade @ yahoo.com.cn                                                                 MSN : shoppertrade @ hotmail.com                                                                       HTTP : //www.tntshoes.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    Our company are specialize in supplying famous name brand shoes,clothes,handbag,hat,etc.All of our goods are 100\% authentic,most of them are overstock goods from the brand owner's factories and shops,we wholesale them at reasonable price,if you are interested,feel free to contact us,we offer dropshipping,all of our products please check out at our website: www.shopperstrade.com,if you have any question you can talk with us on line.Our products list: Shoes--Men's Sizes Nike Air Jordan: nike air jordan 1 nike air jordan 2 nike air jordan 3 nike air jordan 4 nike air jordan 5 nike air jordan 6 nike air jordan 7 nike air jordan 8 nike air jordan 9 nike air jordan 5.5 nike air jordan 11 nike air jordan spiz'ike nike air jordan 12 nike air jordan 13 nike air jordan 15 nike air jordan 16 nike air jordan 23 nike air jordan 18 aj4&amp;af1 fution shoes aj5&amp;af1 fution shoes aj12&amp;af1 fution shoes aj23&amp;af1 fution shoes aj7&amp;af1 fution shoes aj3&amp;af1 fution shoes Nike: nike dunk nike air force one nike air max ltd nike air max 2003 nike shox r3 nike max 360 nike tn nike max 90 nike max 97 nike max 87 nike max 95 nike shox r4 nike shox nz Bape: ape shoes air bape star Adidas: adidas 35th adidas nba adidas adicolor adidas country series adidas cities series adidas samba adidas classic Puma: puma countries series puma cities series puma 1st puma 2nd puma 3rd puma 4th ferrari series puma 3.5 puma others Other: gucci christian audigier (CA) timberland d&amp;g dsquared2 prada Shoes-Women's shoes Nike: nike max 90 nike shox r3 tn nike shox r4 shox nz Nike air jordan: nike air jordan 1 nike air jordan 3 nike air jordan 4 nike air jordan 5 nike air jordan 7 nike air jordan 11 nike air jordan 13 nike air jordan 22 boots: ugg gucci lv Clothes-Men's Clothes Coat: abercrombie fitch (AF) bape hoody bbc hoody coogi lrg clh hoody artful dodger hoody ed hardy hoodies evisu kidrobot gino green global christan audigier (CA) bape jacket T-shirt: abercrombie fitch (AF) polo ed hardy affliction Christian Audigier (CA) armani artful dodger bbc coogi d&amp;g evisu g-star gino green global lacoste smet crown holder t-shirts shirts: abercrombie fitch (AF) Jeans: aka stash house coogi g star shmack diesel ed hardy evisu gino green global rock true religion bape bbc artful dodger rmc lrg crown holder Shorts: abercrombie fitch (AF) bape bbc coogi evisu red monkey Clothes-Women's Clothes Coat: abercrombie fitch (AF) ed hardy juicy Suits: juicy couture baby phat T-shirt: ed hardy primp abercrombie fitch (AF) Jeans: edhardy rock true religion Bag Handbag: louis vuitton (LV) chanel hermes chole gucci burberry coach Hat Hat: christian audigier (CA) new era ed hardy..
          OUR WEBSITE:
                                                    YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn
                                                                MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com
                                                                      HTTP://www.tntshoes.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29869051</id>
	<title>Re:I am impressed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256491740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Meh. I'm not interested in 4xHD until I can see ass or titties on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Meh .
I 'm not interested in 4xHD until I can see ass or titties on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meh.
I'm not interested in 4xHD until I can see ass or titties on it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867237</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867573</id>
	<title>Re:4K = 4x ?</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1256471100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are forgetting that area is the square of length.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are forgetting that area is the square of length .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are forgetting that area is the square of length.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867103</id>
	<title>4x HD for $1m</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256464800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why?!?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867185</id>
	<title>Non-story</title>
	<author>One\_Minute\_Too\_Late</author>
	<datestamp>1256465880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The linked article could only have been written by a surgeon with incoherent longings for stardom and filthy lucre. <br> <br>

This technology offers no increased assistance for surgeons. It really doesn't matter when you're that close in a laparoscopy. It's not like the structures you need to see are that small for most laparoscopic procedures. I would have been more impressed if they'd hooked this up for use in neurosurgery, eye surgery, vascular surgery, something where real resolution and delicacy is required. <br> <br>Big MEH.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The linked article could only have been written by a surgeon with incoherent longings for stardom and filthy lucre .
This technology offers no increased assistance for surgeons .
It really does n't matter when you 're that close in a laparoscopy .
It 's not like the structures you need to see are that small for most laparoscopic procedures .
I would have been more impressed if they 'd hooked this up for use in neurosurgery , eye surgery , vascular surgery , something where real resolution and delicacy is required .
Big MEH .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The linked article could only have been written by a surgeon with incoherent longings for stardom and filthy lucre.
This technology offers no increased assistance for surgeons.
It really doesn't matter when you're that close in a laparoscopy.
It's not like the structures you need to see are that small for most laparoscopic procedures.
I would have been more impressed if they'd hooked this up for use in neurosurgery, eye surgery, vascular surgery, something where real resolution and delicacy is required.
Big MEH.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29870819</id>
	<title>Used in engineering</title>
	<author>Necroloth</author>
	<datestamp>1256560740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We use 4xHD projectors at work... we have four of them all projecting on a 3-walled 'room' with a roof. We use it to project CAD images as 3-D images and with some funky Dame Edna glasses, you see a 3D image in front of you and when you move your head, the view changes along with it. So imagine having a car, you can open the door, sit inside it etc<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... really really cool!</htmltext>
<tokenext>We use 4xHD projectors at work... we have four of them all projecting on a 3-walled 'room ' with a roof .
We use it to project CAD images as 3-D images and with some funky Dame Edna glasses , you see a 3D image in front of you and when you move your head , the view changes along with it .
So imagine having a car , you can open the door , sit inside it etc ... really really cool !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We use 4xHD projectors at work... we have four of them all projecting on a 3-walled 'room' with a roof.
We use it to project CAD images as 3-D images and with some funky Dame Edna glasses, you see a 3D image in front of you and when you move your head, the view changes along with it.
So imagine having a car, you can open the door, sit inside it etc ... really really cool!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867293</id>
	<title>4K = 4x ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256467320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was under the impression that 1080p resolution was just a hair lower than 2K resolution. So wouldn't 4K be roughly 2x HD res?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was under the impression that 1080p resolution was just a hair lower than 2K resolution .
So would n't 4K be roughly 2x HD res ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was under the impression that 1080p resolution was just a hair lower than 2K resolution.
So wouldn't 4K be roughly 2x HD res?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29873799</id>
	<title>Re:bad title...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256578740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am glad someone else said this. Many people (I was like this myself at one time) think that HDTV is 1k, as its generally defined as 1080i. However, its closer to 2k, 2k is defined as the width of the picture, not the height. 2k refrence resolution is  2048&#215;1536 and 4k refence resolution is 4096&#215;3072 (I guess this is a 4x3 resolution). The lower resolutions others have stated (4096x2160) are widescreen digital cinema, so you are NOT experiencing the full 4k standard. What would be smart would be for filmakers to use an anamorphic lense (like they do with film) to film at the full resolution of 4096x3072, and use an anamophic lense to play it back, as you would retain more information that way, but most filmmakers and theaters prefer to simply crop the picture.</p><p>That said, most visual effects for films this day and age are only rendered at 2k anyways, and the majority of post is done at 2k, unless the studio really wants to spend high dollar on CGI.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am glad someone else said this .
Many people ( I was like this myself at one time ) think that HDTV is 1k , as its generally defined as 1080i .
However , its closer to 2k , 2k is defined as the width of the picture , not the height .
2k refrence resolution is 2048   1536 and 4k refence resolution is 4096   3072 ( I guess this is a 4x3 resolution ) .
The lower resolutions others have stated ( 4096x2160 ) are widescreen digital cinema , so you are NOT experiencing the full 4k standard .
What would be smart would be for filmakers to use an anamorphic lense ( like they do with film ) to film at the full resolution of 4096x3072 , and use an anamophic lense to play it back , as you would retain more information that way , but most filmmakers and theaters prefer to simply crop the picture.That said , most visual effects for films this day and age are only rendered at 2k anyways , and the majority of post is done at 2k , unless the studio really wants to spend high dollar on CGI .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am glad someone else said this.
Many people (I was like this myself at one time) think that HDTV is 1k, as its generally defined as 1080i.
However, its closer to 2k, 2k is defined as the width of the picture, not the height.
2k refrence resolution is  2048×1536 and 4k refence resolution is 4096×3072 (I guess this is a 4x3 resolution).
The lower resolutions others have stated (4096x2160) are widescreen digital cinema, so you are NOT experiencing the full 4k standard.
What would be smart would be for filmakers to use an anamorphic lense (like they do with film) to film at the full resolution of 4096x3072, and use an anamophic lense to play it back, as you would retain more information that way, but most filmmakers and theaters prefer to simply crop the picture.That said, most visual effects for films this day and age are only rendered at 2k anyways, and the majority of post is done at 2k, unless the studio really wants to spend high dollar on CGI.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867503</id>
	<title>but wait, there's less...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256470020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think they were too eager to talk about the display device actually used during the surgery itself...words that it was a 40" Vizio 720p LCD (affectionately called "1K"), from a pre-Black Friday extreme deal (you got to save where you can).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think they were too eager to talk about the display device actually used during the surgery itself...words that it was a 40 " Vizio 720p LCD ( affectionately called " 1K " ) , from a pre-Black Friday extreme deal ( you got to save where you can ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think they were too eager to talk about the display device actually used during the surgery itself...words that it was a 40" Vizio 720p LCD (affectionately called "1K"), from a pre-Black Friday extreme deal (you got to save where you can).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867183</id>
	<title>Re:wow</title>
	<author>SimonTheSoundMan</author>
	<datestamp>1256465880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Red One only outputs 720p, so they are not going to use the full 4k resolution while previewing.</p><p>I have worked with Red One many times. Somewhat buggy software, camera crashing mid turning over.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Red One only outputs 720p , so they are not going to use the full 4k resolution while previewing.I have worked with Red One many times .
Somewhat buggy software , camera crashing mid turning over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Red One only outputs 720p, so they are not going to use the full 4k resolution while previewing.I have worked with Red One many times.
Somewhat buggy software, camera crashing mid turning over.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866957</id>
	<title>This guy did an IMAX colonoscopy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256463300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The reviews were stinky. Entirely too long and the plot seemingly went in circles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The reviews were stinky .
Entirely too long and the plot seemingly went in circles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reviews were stinky.
Entirely too long and the plot seemingly went in circles.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867305</id>
	<title>Hollywood 4K = horizontal resolution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256467440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With Hollywood, 4K refers to the horizontal resolution.  With HDTVs, 1080p means the vertical resolution of 1920x1080.  Therefore, it is approximately twice the resolution in the X dimension.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With Hollywood , 4K refers to the horizontal resolution .
With HDTVs , 1080p means the vertical resolution of 1920x1080 .
Therefore , it is approximately twice the resolution in the X dimension .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With Hollywood, 4K refers to the horizontal resolution.
With HDTVs, 1080p means the vertical resolution of 1920x1080.
Therefore, it is approximately twice the resolution in the X dimension.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29868819</id>
	<title>Re:4X Surgery</title>
	<author>Keiseth</author>
	<datestamp>1256487540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you're feeling particularly radical, try the new Sins of a Solar Surgeon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're feeling particularly radical , try the new Sins of a Solar Surgeon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're feeling particularly radical, try the new Sins of a Solar Surgeon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29869171</id>
	<title>Re:Hollywood 4K = horizontal resolution</title>
	<author>Casandro</author>
	<datestamp>1256493900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Absolutely. Resolution \_always\_ is one dimension. So at most it's a bit more than twice the resolution. It's about 4 times the number of pixels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Absolutely .
Resolution \ _always \ _ is one dimension .
So at most it 's a bit more than twice the resolution .
It 's about 4 times the number of pixels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Absolutely.
Resolution \_always\_ is one dimension.
So at most it's a bit more than twice the resolution.
It's about 4 times the number of pixels.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867305</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29868451</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256482800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did anyone else here read the article and think another group of programmers was getting together for a demoscene competition?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anyone else here read the article and think another group of programmers was getting together for a demoscene competition ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anyone else here read the article and think another group of programmers was getting together for a demoscene competition?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866947</id>
	<title>"bleeding-edge"</title>
	<author>SigILL</author>
	<datestamp>1256463180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What an unfortunate choice of words.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What an unfortunate choice of words .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What an unfortunate choice of words.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866969</id>
	<title>Google is interested in the technology</title>
	<author>sopssa</author>
	<datestamp>1256463420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I knew the</p><p>User-agent: *<br>Disallow: /</p><p>that is tattooed on my ass would come handy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I knew theUser-agent : * Disallow : /that is tattooed on my ass would come handy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I knew theUser-agent: *Disallow: /that is tattooed on my ass would come handy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867453</id>
	<title>We own a 4x HD monitor</title>
	<author>purduephotog</author>
	<datestamp>1256469180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, actually, it's around 3.5 HD, but it's the thought that counts.</p><p>This baby is awesome.  I get to look at tons of displays for work and this one still takes the cake- it's made by Barco, is incredibly bright, has a built in calibration puck, comes with some decent software (ie, easily 'configured' for our purposes), and all around blows the socks off of everything on the market.</p><p>Don't mind the $16K price tag.</p><p>The diffuser used is so clean you could eat off it- none of that nasty subsurface artifacting that looks like dust on your screen (speckle).  Just pure, rich, saturated colors that are accurately represented with no TFT structure to worry about.</p><p>Now, IBM had the T221 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM\_T220/T221\_LCD\_monitors) which had a native resolution of 3840x2200- at 200ppi- so that your eyes could never make out the substructure of the pixels.  Best of all the monitor had hardware interpolation- it could be used at 1/2x to basically present the user a clean screen with nothing to distract your eyes from.  IBM did this back in 2000!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , actually , it 's around 3.5 HD , but it 's the thought that counts.This baby is awesome .
I get to look at tons of displays for work and this one still takes the cake- it 's made by Barco , is incredibly bright , has a built in calibration puck , comes with some decent software ( ie , easily 'configured ' for our purposes ) , and all around blows the socks off of everything on the market.Do n't mind the $ 16K price tag.The diffuser used is so clean you could eat off it- none of that nasty subsurface artifacting that looks like dust on your screen ( speckle ) .
Just pure , rich , saturated colors that are accurately represented with no TFT structure to worry about.Now , IBM had the T221 ( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM \ _T220/T221 \ _LCD \ _monitors ) which had a native resolution of 3840x2200- at 200ppi- so that your eyes could never make out the substructure of the pixels .
Best of all the monitor had hardware interpolation- it could be used at 1/2x to basically present the user a clean screen with nothing to distract your eyes from .
IBM did this back in 2000 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, actually, it's around 3.5 HD, but it's the thought that counts.This baby is awesome.
I get to look at tons of displays for work and this one still takes the cake- it's made by Barco, is incredibly bright, has a built in calibration puck, comes with some decent software (ie, easily 'configured' for our purposes), and all around blows the socks off of everything on the market.Don't mind the $16K price tag.The diffuser used is so clean you could eat off it- none of that nasty subsurface artifacting that looks like dust on your screen (speckle).
Just pure, rich, saturated colors that are accurately represented with no TFT structure to worry about.Now, IBM had the T221 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM\_T220/T221\_LCD\_monitors) which had a native resolution of 3840x2200- at 200ppi- so that your eyes could never make out the substructure of the pixels.
Best of all the monitor had hardware interpolation- it could be used at 1/2x to basically present the user a clean screen with nothing to distract your eyes from.
IBM did this back in 2000!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29868871</id>
	<title>Finally, we can outsource surgery!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256488440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We can now outsource surgery to India as well? "Oh, hold on, my internet connection got laggy. Oh, sorry, well, ya can't sue for malpractice from another country, can ya! "</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We can now outsource surgery to India as well ?
" Oh , hold on , my internet connection got laggy .
Oh , sorry , well , ya ca n't sue for malpractice from another country , can ya !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We can now outsource surgery to India as well?
"Oh, hold on, my internet connection got laggy.
Oh, sorry, well, ya can't sue for malpractice from another country, can ya!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867087</id>
	<title>Red One cameras are changing video and film</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256464620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Congrads to Red Cameras. The really amazing thing is they have a 28K chip coming out so 4K is fairly low res.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congrads to Red Cameras .
The really amazing thing is they have a 28K chip coming out so 4K is fairly low res .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congrads to Red Cameras.
The really amazing thing is they have a 28K chip coming out so 4K is fairly low res.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29873641</id>
	<title>Re:bad title...</title>
	<author>keytoe</author>
	<datestamp>1256577960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>4K is roughly 4,000 pixels across, not 4X "HD", which is probably assuming HD to be defined as 1920X1080. 4x HD, if you multiply each dimension, would be 7680x4320, a lot higher.</p></div></blockquote><p>Doubling the number of pixels in each dimension (eg, to 3840 x 2160) gives you four times the total pixels in the encompassed area.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>4K is roughly 4,000 pixels across , not 4X " HD " , which is probably assuming HD to be defined as 1920X1080 .
4x HD , if you multiply each dimension , would be 7680x4320 , a lot higher.Doubling the number of pixels in each dimension ( eg , to 3840 x 2160 ) gives you four times the total pixels in the encompassed area .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4K is roughly 4,000 pixels across, not 4X "HD", which is probably assuming HD to be defined as 1920X1080.
4x HD, if you multiply each dimension, would be 7680x4320, a lot higher.Doubling the number of pixels in each dimension (eg, to 3840 x 2160) gives you four times the total pixels in the encompassed area.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29868675</id>
	<title>COACH women shoes,Ankh Royalty tracksuit woman</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256485380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; You can free mix any size any style of you best like, You will find what your like, Don't hesitate to contact us!<br>The shoes We can supply all kinds of shoes with different styles, You will find what your like.<br>Features:<br>1) Size for men US8-12 UK7-11(some US13/UK12)<br>Size for women US5-8/10<br>2) Packing: 1pr/box, 12prs/carton, 12prs/style/color(original box and retro card)<br>3) Many designs and colors available<br>4) Delivery can be prompt shipping<br>5) We accept paypal +++aaa quality .</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; You can free mix any size any style of you best like, You will find what your like,    Hi friend, we are a prefession online store, you can see more photos and price in our website which is show in the photos<br>OUR WEBSITE:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Http://www.tntshoes.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    You can free mix any size any style of you best like , You will find what your like , Do n't hesitate to contact us ! The shoes We can supply all kinds of shoes with different styles , You will find what your like.Features : 1 ) Size for men US8-12 UK7-11 ( some US13/UK12 ) Size for women US5-8/102 ) Packing : 1pr/box , 12prs/carton , 12prs/style/color ( original box and retro card ) 3 ) Many designs and colors available4 ) Delivery can be prompt shipping5 ) We accept paypal + + + aaa quality .
        You can free mix any size any style of you best like , You will find what your like , Hi friend , we are a prefession online store , you can see more photos and price in our website which is show in the photosOUR WEBSITE :                                                         YAHOO : shoppertrade @ yahoo.com.cn                                                                 MSN : shoppertrade @ hotmail.com                                                                             Http : //www.tntshoes.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    You can free mix any size any style of you best like, You will find what your like, Don't hesitate to contact us!The shoes We can supply all kinds of shoes with different styles, You will find what your like.Features:1) Size for men US8-12 UK7-11(some US13/UK12)Size for women US5-8/102) Packing: 1pr/box, 12prs/carton, 12prs/style/color(original box and retro card)3) Many designs and colors available4) Delivery can be prompt shipping5) We accept paypal +++aaa quality .
        You can free mix any size any style of you best like, You will find what your like,    Hi friend, we are a prefession online store, you can see more photos and price in our website which is show in the photosOUR WEBSITE:
                                                        YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn
                                                                MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com
                                                                            Http://www.tntshoes.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29870769</id>
	<title>Re:I am impressed</title>
	<author>BlueParrot</author>
	<datestamp>1256559780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you zoom in 400\% you can tell the image has high resolution even on a low resolution screen. Especially if you compare with a low-res image.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you zoom in 400 \ % you can tell the image has high resolution even on a low resolution screen .
Especially if you compare with a low-res image .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you zoom in 400\% you can tell the image has high resolution even on a low resolution screen.
Especially if you compare with a low-res image.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867237</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867063</id>
	<title>Is it water on the knee...</title>
	<author>swanzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1256464380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This technology has the potential to allow doctors to perform hard operations (writer's cramp, wrenched ankle) with the ease of the anklebone's connected to the knee bone procedure.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This technology has the potential to allow doctors to perform hard operations ( writer 's cramp , wrenched ankle ) with the ease of the anklebone 's connected to the knee bone procedure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This technology has the potential to allow doctors to perform hard operations (writer's cramp, wrenched ankle) with the ease of the anklebone's connected to the knee bone procedure.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867009</id>
	<title>Re:price</title>
	<author>LiquidCoooled</author>
	<datestamp>1256463960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and $5 million in damages to the MPAA for illegally pirating an episode of ER</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and $ 5 million in damages to the MPAA for illegally pirating an episode of ER</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and $5 million in damages to the MPAA for illegally pirating an episode of ER</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867939</id>
	<title>bad title...</title>
	<author>PhantomHarlock</author>
	<datestamp>1256475840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>4K is roughly 4,000 pixels across, not 4X "HD", which is probably assuming HD to be defined as 1920X1080.     4x HD, if you multiply each dimension, would be 7680x4320, a lot higher.   I did see a demo of an 8k system earlier this year at NAB, quite nice on a large screen.   Downsampled to 4k on a smaller screen and it was jawdropping.  now if overall you mean four times the data, then yes, because it's roughly x2 in each dimension in two dimensions.</p><p>We've always used the horizontal pixel resolution to define filmout resolutions for cinema. (2k, 4k, etc.)  Consumer product manufacturers use the retarded "megapixels" number so it sounds larger and more impressive.  (multiply width x height for total pixel count).</p><p>I'm impressed that the camera optics they rigged into the laproscopy procedure had enough fidelity to make a 4k image worthwhile from such a small imaging source.</p><p>The RED system is the current darling of high end 'indie' filmmakers, TV shows and commercial producers everywhere where 4k is desirable, while the Canon 5D Mk. II is being used extensively for 2k owing to its full frame, exceptionally sharp sensor combined with Canon's unbeatable lenses, despite the fact that it is primarily a still camera.   Both were all over the place at NAB this year, and I have the 5D Mk. II myself.  The tools are getting cheaper and better every year and a lot of the old names in broadcasting are fading away...</p><p>--M</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>4K is roughly 4,000 pixels across , not 4X " HD " , which is probably assuming HD to be defined as 1920X1080 .
4x HD , if you multiply each dimension , would be 7680x4320 , a lot higher .
I did see a demo of an 8k system earlier this year at NAB , quite nice on a large screen .
Downsampled to 4k on a smaller screen and it was jawdropping .
now if overall you mean four times the data , then yes , because it 's roughly x2 in each dimension in two dimensions.We 've always used the horizontal pixel resolution to define filmout resolutions for cinema .
( 2k , 4k , etc .
) Consumer product manufacturers use the retarded " megapixels " number so it sounds larger and more impressive .
( multiply width x height for total pixel count ) .I 'm impressed that the camera optics they rigged into the laproscopy procedure had enough fidelity to make a 4k image worthwhile from such a small imaging source.The RED system is the current darling of high end 'indie ' filmmakers , TV shows and commercial producers everywhere where 4k is desirable , while the Canon 5D Mk .
II is being used extensively for 2k owing to its full frame , exceptionally sharp sensor combined with Canon 's unbeatable lenses , despite the fact that it is primarily a still camera .
Both were all over the place at NAB this year , and I have the 5D Mk .
II myself .
The tools are getting cheaper and better every year and a lot of the old names in broadcasting are fading away...--M</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4K is roughly 4,000 pixels across, not 4X "HD", which is probably assuming HD to be defined as 1920X1080.
4x HD, if you multiply each dimension, would be 7680x4320, a lot higher.
I did see a demo of an 8k system earlier this year at NAB, quite nice on a large screen.
Downsampled to 4k on a smaller screen and it was jawdropping.
now if overall you mean four times the data, then yes, because it's roughly x2 in each dimension in two dimensions.We've always used the horizontal pixel resolution to define filmout resolutions for cinema.
(2k, 4k, etc.
)  Consumer product manufacturers use the retarded "megapixels" number so it sounds larger and more impressive.
(multiply width x height for total pixel count).I'm impressed that the camera optics they rigged into the laproscopy procedure had enough fidelity to make a 4k image worthwhile from such a small imaging source.The RED system is the current darling of high end 'indie' filmmakers, TV shows and commercial producers everywhere where 4k is desirable, while the Canon 5D Mk.
II is being used extensively for 2k owing to its full frame, exceptionally sharp sensor combined with Canon's unbeatable lenses, despite the fact that it is primarily a still camera.
Both were all over the place at NAB this year, and I have the 5D Mk.
II myself.
The tools are getting cheaper and better every year and a lot of the old names in broadcasting are fading away...--M</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29870269</id>
	<title>With Sony, pay more for DRM features than picture</title>
	<author>viking80</author>
	<datestamp>1256551980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Sony SRXR220 has a lot of technology to prevent movie copying. The actual projector is only a small part of this.<br>It has:<br>-Enclosure Security System<br>-approved receipt of secured DCP content.<br>-Key security system<br>-remote monitoring allows content to remain secure<br>-Ethernet control to separate PC through secure TLS session<br>-Sony exclusive internal watermark system<br>-Lamp can be changed without having to enter secured area<br>-electronic operator key entry system<br>-multilevel security with operator roles<br>-security management.</p><p>How this is used in a digital movie theatre:<br>The movies are typically delivered on a HDD by a dedicated fleet of trucks operated by Dolby. The trucks have a secured cargo space similar to a bank transport. The Dolby employee carries the HDD to the secure area of the theatre together with the designated operator who opens the key lock to the room. The Dolby employee enters his credentials on the projector, ejects the old HDD, and inserts the new. The projector will print out a receipt of events, and both the movie theater operator and the Dolby employee signs the receipt, and keep a copy each. The truck leaves with the old movie.</p><p>There is no UPS "overnight delivery" or any third party touching this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Sony SRXR220 has a lot of technology to prevent movie copying .
The actual projector is only a small part of this.It has : -Enclosure Security System-approved receipt of secured DCP content.-Key security system-remote monitoring allows content to remain secure-Ethernet control to separate PC through secure TLS session-Sony exclusive internal watermark system-Lamp can be changed without having to enter secured area-electronic operator key entry system-multilevel security with operator roles-security management.How this is used in a digital movie theatre : The movies are typically delivered on a HDD by a dedicated fleet of trucks operated by Dolby .
The trucks have a secured cargo space similar to a bank transport .
The Dolby employee carries the HDD to the secure area of the theatre together with the designated operator who opens the key lock to the room .
The Dolby employee enters his credentials on the projector , ejects the old HDD , and inserts the new .
The projector will print out a receipt of events , and both the movie theater operator and the Dolby employee signs the receipt , and keep a copy each .
The truck leaves with the old movie.There is no UPS " overnight delivery " or any third party touching this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Sony SRXR220 has a lot of technology to prevent movie copying.
The actual projector is only a small part of this.It has:-Enclosure Security System-approved receipt of secured DCP content.-Key security system-remote monitoring allows content to remain secure-Ethernet control to separate PC through secure TLS session-Sony exclusive internal watermark system-Lamp can be changed without having to enter secured area-electronic operator key entry system-multilevel security with operator roles-security management.How this is used in a digital movie theatre:The movies are typically delivered on a HDD by a dedicated fleet of trucks operated by Dolby.
The trucks have a secured cargo space similar to a bank transport.
The Dolby employee carries the HDD to the secure area of the theatre together with the designated operator who opens the key lock to the room.
The Dolby employee enters his credentials on the projector, ejects the old HDD, and inserts the new.
The projector will print out a receipt of events, and both the movie theater operator and the Dolby employee signs the receipt, and keep a copy each.
The truck leaves with the old movie.There is no UPS "overnight delivery" or any third party touching this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_2010236_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29873799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_2010236_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29873641
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_2010236_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29870769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867237
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_2010236_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866965
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_2010236_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29868819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867033
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_2010236_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867009
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866965
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_2010236_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867183
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_2010236_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29868031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_2010236_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867361
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866965
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_2010236_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29870739
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29868891
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_2010236_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29873823
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_2010236_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867573
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_2010236_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29869051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867237
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_2010236_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867287
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867027
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_2010236_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29869171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867305
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_2010236_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29868439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_2010236.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867027
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867287
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_2010236.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866965
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867009
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867361
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867535
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_2010236.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867063
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_2010236.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867939
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29868891
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29870739
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29873641
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29873799
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29873823
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_2010236.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867185
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_2010236.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867607
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_2010236.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867237
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29870769
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29869051
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_2010236.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29870269
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_2010236.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866947
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_2010236.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867453
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_2010236.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866963
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_2010236.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866969
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_2010236.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866945
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29868031
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867183
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_2010236.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867103
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_2010236.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867293
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29868439
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867573
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_2010236.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29866957
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_2010236.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867305
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29869171
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_2010236.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29867033
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_2010236.29868819
</commentlist>
</conversation>
