<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_25_183205</id>
	<title>Amazon Expands Kindle To the PC</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1256494680000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Windows users will be able to use a <a href="http://www.pcauthority.com.au/News/158901,amazon-expands-kindle-to-the-pc.aspx">new Kindle Books application</a> to purchase, download and read e-book titles from Amazon's Kindle Store service. The PC application will be offered as a free download and will support Windows 7, Vista and XP systems. The news comes as Amazon is suddenly finding itself with a fresh crop of competitors in the e-book reader market. Earlier this week hardware vendor Spring Design entered the market with its Alex device, while publisher/retailer Barnes and Noble presented an even more serious challenge to Kindle when it unveiled its Nook reader device."</i> Worth noting, if you're in the market for any such device: the base Kindle's price is now down to $259.</htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Windows users will be able to use a new Kindle Books application to purchase , download and read e-book titles from Amazon 's Kindle Store service .
The PC application will be offered as a free download and will support Windows 7 , Vista and XP systems .
The news comes as Amazon is suddenly finding itself with a fresh crop of competitors in the e-book reader market .
Earlier this week hardware vendor Spring Design entered the market with its Alex device , while publisher/retailer Barnes and Noble presented an even more serious challenge to Kindle when it unveiled its Nook reader device .
" Worth noting , if you 're in the market for any such device : the base Kindle 's price is now down to $ 259 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Windows users will be able to use a new Kindle Books application to purchase, download and read e-book titles from Amazon's Kindle Store service.
The PC application will be offered as a free download and will support Windows 7, Vista and XP systems.
The news comes as Amazon is suddenly finding itself with a fresh crop of competitors in the e-book reader market.
Earlier this week hardware vendor Spring Design entered the market with its Alex device, while publisher/retailer Barnes and Noble presented an even more serious challenge to Kindle when it unveiled its Nook reader device.
" Worth noting, if you're in the market for any such device: the base Kindle's price is now down to $259.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29873583</id>
	<title>Re:MMmmmm... my head will explode.</title>
	<author>Dare nMc</author>
	<datestamp>1256577660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>$$$$<br>I think Amazons use of DRM will help/was designed to break the overhead, where as Apples, and Sonys is clearly to prop up the failed models longer.<br>Amazon has a reasonable, we'll publish your book directly for a flat percentage, no matter what price you want ($.99 - $200)  Very easy, very cost affective.<br>Granted Apple kinda sorta, stepped into this, but never gave the same efforts to independents. And never for the kinda price/format flexibility that amazon is going for with their <a href="http://amazon.com/dtp" title="amazon.com">Digital Text Platform</a> [amazon.com]<br>(also it doesn't hurt that amazons DRM is fairly easy to crack.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>$ $ $ $ I think Amazons use of DRM will help/was designed to break the overhead , where as Apples , and Sonys is clearly to prop up the failed models longer.Amazon has a reasonable , we 'll publish your book directly for a flat percentage , no matter what price you want ( $ .99 - $ 200 ) Very easy , very cost affective.Granted Apple kinda sorta , stepped into this , but never gave the same efforts to independents .
And never for the kinda price/format flexibility that amazon is going for with their Digital Text Platform [ amazon.com ] ( also it does n't hurt that amazons DRM is fairly easy to crack .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>$$$$I think Amazons use of DRM will help/was designed to break the overhead, where as Apples, and Sonys is clearly to prop up the failed models longer.Amazon has a reasonable, we'll publish your book directly for a flat percentage, no matter what price you want ($.99 - $200)  Very easy, very cost affective.Granted Apple kinda sorta, stepped into this, but never gave the same efforts to independents.
And never for the kinda price/format flexibility that amazon is going for with their Digital Text Platform [amazon.com](also it doesn't hurt that amazons DRM is fairly easy to crack.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866025</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29868409</id>
	<title>Why e-books are bad for you.</title>
	<author>Tristfardd</author>
	<datestamp>1256482260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's pretty simple.  Books are manufactured items.  Due to their nature, bulk and production cost, it isn't really practical to print a book run overseas and ship them here by air or by sea.  Maybe for a few books with very large printing; those are a tiny fraction of books sold.  So the books you buy in the store are created through local (US) jobs.  Will the world come to an end if everybody switches to e-books?  Of course not.  Will more jobs be lost?  Yes.  Would these jobs be lost anyway?  If people chose to live in such a manner, then yes.  Would staying with books present a great hardship for people?  No, that is the way people live now.  It is through decisions such as this that people change the world and when they make many such decisions without thinking they can end up with a world they find less attractive, such as one with higher unemployment than they would like.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's pretty simple .
Books are manufactured items .
Due to their nature , bulk and production cost , it is n't really practical to print a book run overseas and ship them here by air or by sea .
Maybe for a few books with very large printing ; those are a tiny fraction of books sold .
So the books you buy in the store are created through local ( US ) jobs .
Will the world come to an end if everybody switches to e-books ?
Of course not .
Will more jobs be lost ?
Yes. Would these jobs be lost anyway ?
If people chose to live in such a manner , then yes .
Would staying with books present a great hardship for people ?
No , that is the way people live now .
It is through decisions such as this that people change the world and when they make many such decisions without thinking they can end up with a world they find less attractive , such as one with higher unemployment than they would like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's pretty simple.
Books are manufactured items.
Due to their nature, bulk and production cost, it isn't really practical to print a book run overseas and ship them here by air or by sea.
Maybe for a few books with very large printing; those are a tiny fraction of books sold.
So the books you buy in the store are created through local (US) jobs.
Will the world come to an end if everybody switches to e-books?
Of course not.
Will more jobs be lost?
Yes.  Would these jobs be lost anyway?
If people chose to live in such a manner, then yes.
Would staying with books present a great hardship for people?
No, that is the way people live now.
It is through decisions such as this that people change the world and when they make many such decisions without thinking they can end up with a world they find less attractive, such as one with higher unemployment than they would like.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866259</id>
	<title>It's About Time</title>
	<author>Nom du Keyboard</author>
	<datestamp>1256500140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's certainly more than past time for this if Amazon is trying to expand their market.  Unless the Kindle is total profit (not likely), you want to be selling to as many markets as possible.  Besides, for people who read a lot, they'll probably buy a Kindle anyway since it's a lot easier to carry and use for reading than a PC.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's certainly more than past time for this if Amazon is trying to expand their market .
Unless the Kindle is total profit ( not likely ) , you want to be selling to as many markets as possible .
Besides , for people who read a lot , they 'll probably buy a Kindle anyway since it 's a lot easier to carry and use for reading than a PC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's certainly more than past time for this if Amazon is trying to expand their market.
Unless the Kindle is total profit (not likely), you want to be selling to as many markets as possible.
Besides, for people who read a lot, they'll probably buy a Kindle anyway since it's a lot easier to carry and use for reading than a PC.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29871725</id>
	<title>Re:Why e-books are bad for you.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256568480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, same end result for far less amounts of work. Jobs are lost everytime it happens.</p><p>The real problem is that while society as a whole benefits from these cost reductions, the disposed workers don't see any benefit and we abandon them somehow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , same end result for far less amounts of work .
Jobs are lost everytime it happens.The real problem is that while society as a whole benefits from these cost reductions , the disposed workers do n't see any benefit and we abandon them somehow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, same end result for far less amounts of work.
Jobs are lost everytime it happens.The real problem is that while society as a whole benefits from these cost reductions, the disposed workers don't see any benefit and we abandon them somehow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29868409</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866227</id>
	<title>And the race begins</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256499960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Major geek cred for the first person to write a script that automatically pages through the book and takes a screenshot of each page, crops out the non-text, and runs OCR on it.  No reason to even bother removing the DRM on this one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Major geek cred for the first person to write a script that automatically pages through the book and takes a screenshot of each page , crops out the non-text , and runs OCR on it .
No reason to even bother removing the DRM on this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Major geek cred for the first person to write a script that automatically pages through the book and takes a screenshot of each page, crops out the non-text, and runs OCR on it.
No reason to even bother removing the DRM on this one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866285</id>
	<title>Re:Why Windows XP?</title>
	<author>Nom du Keyboard</author>
	<datestamp>1256500320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>As a MacOS and Linux user, I feel really left out put off by this move, why support only Vista and XP...?</p></div> </blockquote><p>
If you're a Mac user then you're supposed to already be using the free Kindle reader on your iPhone/iTouch.<br> <br>
What??? You don't have one of those???  Don't you know that you are supposed to own at least one of every toy that Steve Jobs sells.  Just what kind of Mac user are you anyway???</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a MacOS and Linux user , I feel really left out put off by this move , why support only Vista and XP... ?
If you 're a Mac user then you 're supposed to already be using the free Kindle reader on your iPhone/iTouch .
What ? ? ? You do n't have one of those ? ? ?
Do n't you know that you are supposed to own at least one of every toy that Steve Jobs sells .
Just what kind of Mac user are you anyway ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a MacOS and Linux user, I feel really left out put off by this move, why support only Vista and XP...?
If you're a Mac user then you're supposed to already be using the free Kindle reader on your iPhone/iTouch.
What??? You don't have one of those???
Don't you know that you are supposed to own at least one of every toy that Steve Jobs sells.
Just what kind of Mac user are you anyway??
?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866231</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866373</id>
	<title>Re:Shame about the kindle</title>
	<author>rolfwind</author>
	<datestamp>1256501280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is an international version with 3g connectivity:<br><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Wireless-Reading-Display-International-Generation/dp/B0015T963C" title="amazon.com">http://www.amazon.com/Wireless-Reading-Display-International-Generation/dp/B0015T963C</a> [amazon.com]</p><p>But believe me, I owned a kindle 2 roughly six months ago - there is no overlap with a netbook yet.  Other than wikipedia (where the 6" screen sucked worse than an iPhone, now, I can't speak for the DX with a 9.7" screen size), you don't want to begin to browse with this, it is painful, even on wifi.  The browser is primitive and nearly useless.</p><p>It can purchase and read books.  That is it for the core competencies.  I'm not saying this is bad, it's great if that is what you need it for.  But don't buy it for the browser.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is an international version with 3g connectivity : http : //www.amazon.com/Wireless-Reading-Display-International-Generation/dp/B0015T963C [ amazon.com ] But believe me , I owned a kindle 2 roughly six months ago - there is no overlap with a netbook yet .
Other than wikipedia ( where the 6 " screen sucked worse than an iPhone , now , I ca n't speak for the DX with a 9.7 " screen size ) , you do n't want to begin to browse with this , it is painful , even on wifi .
The browser is primitive and nearly useless.It can purchase and read books .
That is it for the core competencies .
I 'm not saying this is bad , it 's great if that is what you need it for .
But do n't buy it for the browser .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is an international version with 3g connectivity:http://www.amazon.com/Wireless-Reading-Display-International-Generation/dp/B0015T963C [amazon.com]But believe me, I owned a kindle 2 roughly six months ago - there is no overlap with a netbook yet.
Other than wikipedia (where the 6" screen sucked worse than an iPhone, now, I can't speak for the DX with a 9.7" screen size), you don't want to begin to browse with this, it is painful, even on wifi.
The browser is primitive and nearly useless.It can purchase and read books.
That is it for the core competencies.
I'm not saying this is bad, it's great if that is what you need it for.
But don't buy it for the browser.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866027</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866041</id>
	<title>Cross platform?</title>
	<author>wiredlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1256498820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would it have killed them to use a cross platform library and provide support for OS X and Linux as well? It's not like this is a legacy app or anything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would it have killed them to use a cross platform library and provide support for OS X and Linux as well ?
It 's not like this is a legacy app or anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would it have killed them to use a cross platform library and provide support for OS X and Linux as well?
It's not like this is a legacy app or anything.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866547</id>
	<title>Re:Why Windows XP?</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1256502720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd guess they figure the Apple crowd overlaps the gadget crowd sufficiently that most potential users have/will buy a Kindle, while the Linux crowd is unlikely to buy [as many] eBooks (but may buy their device since it runs Linux and has hack value.) Whether those are accurate assumptions or not, they seem like the kind of things you might make a decision like this on. Or perhaps the fact that Windows has the vast majority of the market share. One wonders if it will run under Wine...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd guess they figure the Apple crowd overlaps the gadget crowd sufficiently that most potential users have/will buy a Kindle , while the Linux crowd is unlikely to buy [ as many ] eBooks ( but may buy their device since it runs Linux and has hack value .
) Whether those are accurate assumptions or not , they seem like the kind of things you might make a decision like this on .
Or perhaps the fact that Windows has the vast majority of the market share .
One wonders if it will run under Wine.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd guess they figure the Apple crowd overlaps the gadget crowd sufficiently that most potential users have/will buy a Kindle, while the Linux crowd is unlikely to buy [as many] eBooks (but may buy their device since it runs Linux and has hack value.
) Whether those are accurate assumptions or not, they seem like the kind of things you might make a decision like this on.
Or perhaps the fact that Windows has the vast majority of the market share.
One wonders if it will run under Wine...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866231</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866107</id>
	<title>link to Amazon's page</title>
	<author>bigbigbison</author>
	<datestamp>1256499240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html?docId=1000426311" title="amazon.com">http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html?docId=1000426311</a> [amazon.com]
Not much there but there is an official mention of it unlike the article slashdot links to</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html ? docId = 1000426311 [ amazon.com ] Not much there but there is an official mention of it unlike the article slashdot links to</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html?docId=1000426311 [amazon.com]
Not much there but there is an official mention of it unlike the article slashdot links to</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866527</id>
	<title>do it yourself</title>
	<author>idji</author>
	<datestamp>1256502480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>you can even find the required<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NET source code on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft\_Office\_Document\_Imaging" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia</a> [wikipedia.org] if you have MS Office</htmltext>
<tokenext>you can even find the required .NET source code on Wikipedia [ wikipedia.org ] if you have MS Office</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you can even find the required .NET source code on Wikipedia [wikipedia.org] if you have MS Office</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866227</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866467</id>
	<title>Re:Cross platform?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256501940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately Linux is going to be increasingly marginalized going forward as more and more protected content is only available for the Windows platform.</p><p>Netflix streaming movies, Kindle e-books, etc.  There may be ups and downs along the way, but the final destination is a world where computing is no longer open.  Just compare today's world to personal computing 25 years ago to see the trend.  In 25 more years, nothing that's not a "trusted platform" will be marginalized into near uselessness.</p><p>It'll happen because (almost) no one cares.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately Linux is going to be increasingly marginalized going forward as more and more protected content is only available for the Windows platform.Netflix streaming movies , Kindle e-books , etc .
There may be ups and downs along the way , but the final destination is a world where computing is no longer open .
Just compare today 's world to personal computing 25 years ago to see the trend .
In 25 more years , nothing that 's not a " trusted platform " will be marginalized into near uselessness.It 'll happen because ( almost ) no one cares .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately Linux is going to be increasingly marginalized going forward as more and more protected content is only available for the Windows platform.Netflix streaming movies, Kindle e-books, etc.
There may be ups and downs along the way, but the final destination is a world where computing is no longer open.
Just compare today's world to personal computing 25 years ago to see the trend.
In 25 more years, nothing that's not a "trusted platform" will be marginalized into near uselessness.It'll happen because (almost) no one cares.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866041</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866027</id>
	<title>Shame about the kindle</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1256498760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Worth noting, if you're in the market for any such device: the base Kindle's price is now down to $259.</p></div></blockquote><p>If it had internet access like it apparently does in the states, I'd seriously consider it. As it is, a netbook will ultimately be the better investment.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Worth noting , if you 're in the market for any such device : the base Kindle 's price is now down to $ 259.If it had internet access like it apparently does in the states , I 'd seriously consider it .
As it is , a netbook will ultimately be the better investment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Worth noting, if you're in the market for any such device: the base Kindle's price is now down to $259.If it had internet access like it apparently does in the states, I'd seriously consider it.
As it is, a netbook will ultimately be the better investment.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866317</id>
	<title>Wonder if they'll offer full color?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256500680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's one of the downsides on the eBook readers. Also obviously the price. I love ePaper but they'll only get attractive when you can sell them for less than an iPod Touch which does radically more it's just not as comfortable to read. Get the price down to $150 or better yet a $100 and I'd grab a Nook in a heartbeat. It's still enough to make me pause and say no. Getting full color books on my desktop would be very attractive. Now we just need an eBook tablet that you plug in to round it out. Not portable but it has to be possible to sell ePaper screens the size of a paperback that plugs into my computer, hopefully through USB. How about an ePaper screen that tethers to an iPod? There's a lot of duplicated function when things like iPhones and Touch do most of the functions they just have hard to read power hungry screens. Sell a $100 ePaper screen that will work with an iTouch when the screen is in sleep mode and I'm in heaven.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's one of the downsides on the eBook readers .
Also obviously the price .
I love ePaper but they 'll only get attractive when you can sell them for less than an iPod Touch which does radically more it 's just not as comfortable to read .
Get the price down to $ 150 or better yet a $ 100 and I 'd grab a Nook in a heartbeat .
It 's still enough to make me pause and say no .
Getting full color books on my desktop would be very attractive .
Now we just need an eBook tablet that you plug in to round it out .
Not portable but it has to be possible to sell ePaper screens the size of a paperback that plugs into my computer , hopefully through USB .
How about an ePaper screen that tethers to an iPod ?
There 's a lot of duplicated function when things like iPhones and Touch do most of the functions they just have hard to read power hungry screens .
Sell a $ 100 ePaper screen that will work with an iTouch when the screen is in sleep mode and I 'm in heaven .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's one of the downsides on the eBook readers.
Also obviously the price.
I love ePaper but they'll only get attractive when you can sell them for less than an iPod Touch which does radically more it's just not as comfortable to read.
Get the price down to $150 or better yet a $100 and I'd grab a Nook in a heartbeat.
It's still enough to make me pause and say no.
Getting full color books on my desktop would be very attractive.
Now we just need an eBook tablet that you plug in to round it out.
Not portable but it has to be possible to sell ePaper screens the size of a paperback that plugs into my computer, hopefully through USB.
How about an ePaper screen that tethers to an iPod?
There's a lot of duplicated function when things like iPhones and Touch do most of the functions they just have hard to read power hungry screens.
Sell a $100 ePaper screen that will work with an iTouch when the screen is in sleep mode and I'm in heaven.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29868901</id>
	<title>Re:PDF's?</title>
	<author>ErikZ</author>
	<datestamp>1256489040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A good LCD screen doesn't stand up to sunlight and uses too much power.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A good LCD screen does n't stand up to sunlight and uses too much power .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A good LCD screen doesn't stand up to sunlight and uses too much power.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29867471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29873657</id>
	<title>Mobile Devices - Linux &amp; Android</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256578020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They just about HAVE to be thinking about Linux, even if they haven't released anything yet. A lot of the small, low-cost mobile devices are coming with Linux. When the devices are designed so that it doesn't require any Linux expertise, the primary users won't be the purists who demand open source and/or GPL.</p><p>Android is another likely possibility. Since it is a specific Java-based environment and can't use c++ like most linux apps, that could make development a lot of work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They just about HAVE to be thinking about Linux , even if they have n't released anything yet .
A lot of the small , low-cost mobile devices are coming with Linux .
When the devices are designed so that it does n't require any Linux expertise , the primary users wo n't be the purists who demand open source and/or GPL.Android is another likely possibility .
Since it is a specific Java-based environment and ca n't use c + + like most linux apps , that could make development a lot of work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They just about HAVE to be thinking about Linux, even if they haven't released anything yet.
A lot of the small, low-cost mobile devices are coming with Linux.
When the devices are designed so that it doesn't require any Linux expertise, the primary users won't be the purists who demand open source and/or GPL.Android is another likely possibility.
Since it is a specific Java-based environment and can't use c++ like most linux apps, that could make development a lot of work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29867161</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29867141</id>
	<title>Re:Why Windows XP?</title>
	<author>jisatsusha</author>
	<datestamp>1256465220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Kindle iPhone app is still only available in the US, despite being able to buy books internationally now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Kindle iPhone app is still only available in the US , despite being able to buy books internationally now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Kindle iPhone app is still only available in the US, despite being able to buy books internationally now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866285</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29868573</id>
	<title>What i really want</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256484060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What i really want its some cheap ebook Reader with only the eInk display and tochpad like surface in the borders for gestual control... just the basics: index, bookmark, previus/next (file,chapter,bookmark,page)</p><p>Not this expensive iphone envy death brained devices</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What i really want its some cheap ebook Reader with only the eInk display and tochpad like surface in the borders for gestual control... just the basics : index , bookmark , previus/next ( file,chapter,bookmark,page ) Not this expensive iphone envy death brained devices</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What i really want its some cheap ebook Reader with only the eInk display and tochpad like surface in the borders for gestual control... just the basics: index, bookmark, previus/next (file,chapter,bookmark,page)Not this expensive iphone envy death brained devices</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866745</id>
	<title>Re:Cross platform?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256461260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nobody cares about lunix.  Lunix market share is a rounding error.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody cares about lunix .
Lunix market share is a rounding error .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody cares about lunix.
Lunix market share is a rounding error.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866041</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866369</id>
	<title>eBook readers</title>
	<author>SkOink</author>
	<datestamp>1256501220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are there any eBook readers that are good with 8.5"x11" PDFs yet? I'd love having something to read scientific papers on, but I don't think a full page of 10-pt font would be very legible when reduced by a factor of two for a Kindle screen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are there any eBook readers that are good with 8.5 " x11 " PDFs yet ?
I 'd love having something to read scientific papers on , but I do n't think a full page of 10-pt font would be very legible when reduced by a factor of two for a Kindle screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are there any eBook readers that are good with 8.5"x11" PDFs yet?
I'd love having something to read scientific papers on, but I don't think a full page of 10-pt font would be very legible when reduced by a factor of two for a Kindle screen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29871857</id>
	<title>Re:Why Windows XP?</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1256569140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, why not AmigaOS? Or BeOS?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , why not AmigaOS ?
Or BeOS ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, why not AmigaOS?
Or BeOS?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866231</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866423</id>
	<title>MIsleading</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256501640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not for the PC. It's for Windows only. I don't see any other OSes there.</p><p>Also, I already have a better "Kindle" on my PC. It's called a "PDF reader". ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not for the PC .
It 's for Windows only .
I do n't see any other OSes there.Also , I already have a better " Kindle " on my PC .
It 's called a " PDF reader " .
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not for the PC.
It's for Windows only.
I don't see any other OSes there.Also, I already have a better "Kindle" on my PC.
It's called a "PDF reader".
^^</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866713</id>
	<title>Re:PDF's?</title>
	<author>TDyl</author>
	<datestamp>1256504160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Um, how hard is it to set your zoom level and use a wheel-mouse or similar to move from top to bottom of a page and from page to page? Those with sight related-problems already have screen readers and other forms of software of that ilk.

Disclaimer: I have both eyes that still work, I appreciate the PDF format and the thought of paying hundreds for an e-book reader is an anathema to me - I'd much rather have the books themselves, but if Captain Beatty is going to burn all my books then I guess I will have no choice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , how hard is it to set your zoom level and use a wheel-mouse or similar to move from top to bottom of a page and from page to page ?
Those with sight related-problems already have screen readers and other forms of software of that ilk .
Disclaimer : I have both eyes that still work , I appreciate the PDF format and the thought of paying hundreds for an e-book reader is an anathema to me - I 'd much rather have the books themselves , but if Captain Beatty is going to burn all my books then I guess I will have no choice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, how hard is it to set your zoom level and use a wheel-mouse or similar to move from top to bottom of a page and from page to page?
Those with sight related-problems already have screen readers and other forms of software of that ilk.
Disclaimer: I have both eyes that still work, I appreciate the PDF format and the thought of paying hundreds for an e-book reader is an anathema to me - I'd much rather have the books themselves, but if Captain Beatty is going to burn all my books then I guess I will have no choice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29868081</id>
	<title>Linux is a whore...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256477400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Kindle runs Linux but does Linux get this app? No. How many Sansa players run Linux, but have only Windows software to manage them? All these corporations want to use Linux, but don't care about Linux.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Kindle runs Linux but does Linux get this app ?
No. How many Sansa players run Linux , but have only Windows software to manage them ?
All these corporations want to use Linux , but do n't care about Linux .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Kindle runs Linux but does Linux get this app?
No. How many Sansa players run Linux, but have only Windows software to manage them?
All these corporations want to use Linux, but don't care about Linux.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866231</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866119</id>
	<title>PDF's?</title>
	<author>TDyl</author>
	<datestamp>1256499300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why can't PC users just have access to PDF's? We already have a damn good reader/creator (Foxit) that has a much smaller footprint than any Adobe product.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ca n't PC users just have access to PDF 's ?
We already have a damn good reader/creator ( Foxit ) that has a much smaller footprint than any Adobe product .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why can't PC users just have access to PDF's?
We already have a damn good reader/creator (Foxit) that has a much smaller footprint than any Adobe product.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29867233</id>
	<title>Re:Cross platform?</title>
	<author>rssrss</author>
	<datestamp>1256466540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, the thing they are most worried about is Apple. They don't want an opening to that world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , the thing they are most worried about is Apple .
They do n't want an opening to that world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, the thing they are most worried about is Apple.
They don't want an opening to that world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866041</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866025</id>
	<title>MMmmmm... my head will explode.</title>
	<author>rinoid</author>
	<datestamp>1256498760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now you can use your DRM-laden "books" from Amazon on your Windows computer!</p><p>Why do so many fawn over Kindle and other like devices with DRM in text, IN TEXT!@, after spending years railing (often against the wrong targets) against DRM in music?
</p><p>
-- maybe this will mean a more useful crack for said DRM --</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now you can use your DRM-laden " books " from Amazon on your Windows computer ! Why do so many fawn over Kindle and other like devices with DRM in text , IN TEXT !
@ , after spending years railing ( often against the wrong targets ) against DRM in music ?
-- maybe this will mean a more useful crack for said DRM --</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now you can use your DRM-laden "books" from Amazon on your Windows computer!Why do so many fawn over Kindle and other like devices with DRM in text, IN TEXT!
@, after spending years railing (often against the wrong targets) against DRM in music?
-- maybe this will mean a more useful crack for said DRM --</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866231</id>
	<title>Why Windows XP?</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1256500020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
As a MacOS and Linux user, I feel really left out put off by this move,  why support only Vista and XP...?
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a MacOS and Linux user , I feel really left out put off by this move , why support only Vista and XP... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
As a MacOS and Linux user, I feel really left out put off by this move,  why support only Vista and XP...?
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29869191</id>
	<title>oh sure</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256494560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm all over this opportunity to collect a bunch of books that I don't really own my copies of and can be deleted without my consent. &gt;g</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm all over this opportunity to collect a bunch of books that I do n't really own my copies of and can be deleted without my consent .
&gt; g</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm all over this opportunity to collect a bunch of books that I don't really own my copies of and can be deleted without my consent.
&gt;g</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866829</id>
	<title>Re:Shame about the kindle</title>
	<author>fafaforza</author>
	<datestamp>1256462040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So which netbook fits in the back pocket of a pair of jeans, weights nothing, and lasts for weeks between charges?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So which netbook fits in the back pocket of a pair of jeans , weights nothing , and lasts for weeks between charges ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So which netbook fits in the back pocket of a pair of jeans, weights nothing, and lasts for weeks between charges?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866027</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866473</id>
	<title>Re:Cross platform?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256502000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Coming for Mac -- http://www.tuaw.com/2009/10/24/kindle-software-coming-to-mac-os-x/ -- Maybe the Windows version will run on Wine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Coming for Mac -- http : //www.tuaw.com/2009/10/24/kindle-software-coming-to-mac-os-x/ -- Maybe the Windows version will run on Wine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Coming for Mac -- http://www.tuaw.com/2009/10/24/kindle-software-coming-to-mac-os-x/ -- Maybe the Windows version will run on Wine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866041</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866243</id>
	<title>Re:PDF's?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256500080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>PDF is an awful ebook format (a big problem is that it specifies exact layout, meaning that users who choose to use a large font will have to deal with scrolling each page instead of flipping pages or scrolling a river, and so forth).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>PDF is an awful ebook format ( a big problem is that it specifies exact layout , meaning that users who choose to use a large font will have to deal with scrolling each page instead of flipping pages or scrolling a river , and so forth ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PDF is an awful ebook format (a big problem is that it specifies exact layout, meaning that users who choose to use a large font will have to deal with scrolling each page instead of flipping pages or scrolling a river, and so forth).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29868641</id>
	<title>Re:MIsleading</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256484780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It's not for the PC. It's for Windows only. I don't see any other OSes there.
</p><p>
Also, I already have a better "Kindle" on my PC. It's called a "PDF reader". ^^</p></div></blockquote><p>
Blame Apple's now ubiquitous "I'm a Mac and I'm a PC" commercials for the results of this oversimplification.  Those ads were intended to position Apple as the only provider of alternatives to "PCs" with the assumption writ large all PCs are Microsoft machines.  Now that they've succeeded beyond their wildest dreams Apple will be forced to wear "Mac" clothes for the next few decades and in this case being a "Mac" means not having a Kindle viewer for the time being.<br>
<br>It's a case of <b>bed.  make.  lie.</b> <br>
<br>
What bothers me is now Linux distributors or any other providers of alternatives to either Apple's "Mac" or Microsoft's "PC" will have that much more difficulty in explaining who and what they are in the future...  Maybe Novell wasn't all that far off the mark with their "...And I'm Linux" parody ads?  While it is certainly suboptimal to comment on a competitor's advertising if using it as a framework makes it easier to get your point across to the willfully computer illiterate, why not?<br>
<br>--bornagainpenguin</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not for the PC .
It 's for Windows only .
I do n't see any other OSes there .
Also , I already have a better " Kindle " on my PC .
It 's called a " PDF reader " .
^ ^ Blame Apple 's now ubiquitous " I 'm a Mac and I 'm a PC " commercials for the results of this oversimplification .
Those ads were intended to position Apple as the only provider of alternatives to " PCs " with the assumption writ large all PCs are Microsoft machines .
Now that they 've succeeded beyond their wildest dreams Apple will be forced to wear " Mac " clothes for the next few decades and in this case being a " Mac " means not having a Kindle viewer for the time being .
It 's a case of bed .
make. lie .
What bothers me is now Linux distributors or any other providers of alternatives to either Apple 's " Mac " or Microsoft 's " PC " will have that much more difficulty in explaining who and what they are in the future... Maybe Novell was n't all that far off the mark with their " ...And I 'm Linux " parody ads ?
While it is certainly suboptimal to comment on a competitor 's advertising if using it as a framework makes it easier to get your point across to the willfully computer illiterate , why not ?
--bornagainpenguin</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not for the PC.
It's for Windows only.
I don't see any other OSes there.
Also, I already have a better "Kindle" on my PC.
It's called a "PDF reader".
^^
Blame Apple's now ubiquitous "I'm a Mac and I'm a PC" commercials for the results of this oversimplification.
Those ads were intended to position Apple as the only provider of alternatives to "PCs" with the assumption writ large all PCs are Microsoft machines.
Now that they've succeeded beyond their wildest dreams Apple will be forced to wear "Mac" clothes for the next few decades and in this case being a "Mac" means not having a Kindle viewer for the time being.
It's a case of bed.
make.  lie.
What bothers me is now Linux distributors or any other providers of alternatives to either Apple's "Mac" or Microsoft's "PC" will have that much more difficulty in explaining who and what they are in the future...  Maybe Novell wasn't all that far off the mark with their "...And I'm Linux" parody ads?
While it is certainly suboptimal to comment on a competitor's advertising if using it as a framework makes it easier to get your point across to the willfully computer illiterate, why not?
--bornagainpenguin
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866423</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866513</id>
	<title>Re:Shame about the kindle</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1256502300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> As it is, a netbook will ultimately be the better investment.</p> </div><p>

Not sure if that is true. A Kindle will continue to read books for quite a while, while a netbook will go obsolete pretty quickly whenever Intel/AMD come out with a CPU that is more power efficient and a lot faster. Sure, when they make color E-ink screens the appeal of a last-gen Kindle will go away, but chances are you can continue to read new books on it, while netbook remixes of different OSes will eventually be so slow as to be unusable on your hardware and security risks prevent you from using older versions.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As it is , a netbook will ultimately be the better investment .
Not sure if that is true .
A Kindle will continue to read books for quite a while , while a netbook will go obsolete pretty quickly whenever Intel/AMD come out with a CPU that is more power efficient and a lot faster .
Sure , when they make color E-ink screens the appeal of a last-gen Kindle will go away , but chances are you can continue to read new books on it , while netbook remixes of different OSes will eventually be so slow as to be unusable on your hardware and security risks prevent you from using older versions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> As it is, a netbook will ultimately be the better investment.
Not sure if that is true.
A Kindle will continue to read books for quite a while, while a netbook will go obsolete pretty quickly whenever Intel/AMD come out with a CPU that is more power efficient and a lot faster.
Sure, when they make color E-ink screens the appeal of a last-gen Kindle will go away, but chances are you can continue to read new books on it, while netbook remixes of different OSes will eventually be so slow as to be unusable on your hardware and security risks prevent you from using older versions.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866027</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29867161</id>
	<title>They're working on a Mac OS X version</title>
	<author>donutello</author>
	<datestamp>1256465460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to an <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/chris-dannen/techwatch/when-will-kindle-become-open" title="fastcompany.com">Amazon spokesperson</a> [fastcompany.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to an Amazon spokesperson [ fastcompany.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to an Amazon spokesperson [fastcompany.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866041</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866837</id>
	<title>Re:PDF's?</title>
	<author>fafaforza</author>
	<datestamp>1256462160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's already a secure PDF format which publishers could use.  Why you'd want to read a book on an LCD or CRT I have no idea, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's already a secure PDF format which publishers could use .
Why you 'd want to read a book on an LCD or CRT I have no idea , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's already a secure PDF format which publishers could use.
Why you'd want to read a book on an LCD or CRT I have no idea, though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866555</id>
	<title>Kindle is slavery</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256502780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't burn the books, burn the Kindle.</p><p>Fuck Amazon and fuck Kindle for setting back the distribution of knowledge 3000 years.</p><p>You hear me, Jeff Bezos? You're nothing but a greedy, grasping, self-aggrandizing cocksucker.</p><p>Light your Kindle on fire and cram it up your ass.</p><p>Signed,<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Johannes Gutenberg</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't burn the books , burn the Kindle.Fuck Amazon and fuck Kindle for setting back the distribution of knowledge 3000 years.You hear me , Jeff Bezos ?
You 're nothing but a greedy , grasping , self-aggrandizing cocksucker.Light your Kindle on fire and cram it up your ass.Signed ,     Johannes Gutenberg</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't burn the books, burn the Kindle.Fuck Amazon and fuck Kindle for setting back the distribution of knowledge 3000 years.You hear me, Jeff Bezos?
You're nothing but a greedy, grasping, self-aggrandizing cocksucker.Light your Kindle on fire and cram it up your ass.Signed,
    Johannes Gutenberg</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29869517</id>
	<title>Re:Why Windows XP?</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1256498400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <em>If you're a Mac user then you're supposed to already be using the free Kindle reader on your iPhone/iTouch.</em> </p><p>
Nope.  I have just a Mac mini, no iPhone/iTouch,  the latter two are too bloddy expensive.
</p><p>
And ATT's G3 coverage currently sux.  Stick with Verizon/Sprint,  and  the iPhone actually isn't even available.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're a Mac user then you 're supposed to already be using the free Kindle reader on your iPhone/iTouch .
Nope. I have just a Mac mini , no iPhone/iTouch , the latter two are too bloddy expensive .
And ATT 's G3 coverage currently sux .
Stick with Verizon/Sprint , and the iPhone actually is n't even available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> If you're a Mac user then you're supposed to already be using the free Kindle reader on your iPhone/iTouch.
Nope.  I have just a Mac mini, no iPhone/iTouch,  the latter two are too bloddy expensive.
And ATT's G3 coverage currently sux.
Stick with Verizon/Sprint,  and  the iPhone actually isn't even available.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866285</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29865983</id>
	<title>Current /. Poll</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256498460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find this post interesting considering the current slashdot poll is about linear footage of shelved books in your home.</p><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/pollBooth.pl?qid=1871&amp;aid=-1" title="slashdot.org">http://slashdot.org/pollBooth.pl?qid=1871&amp;aid=-1</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p>And another article discussing the loss of available "internet"</p><p><a href="http://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/09/10/24/2347248/What-If-They-Turned-Off-the-Internet?art\_pos=11" title="slashdot.org">http://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/09/10/24/2347248/What-If-They-Turned-Off-the-Internet?art\_pos=11</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find this post interesting considering the current slashdot poll is about linear footage of shelved books in your home.http : //slashdot.org/pollBooth.pl ? qid = 1871&amp;aid = -1 [ slashdot.org ] And another article discussing the loss of available " internet " http : //entertainment.slashdot.org/story/09/10/24/2347248/What-If-They-Turned-Off-the-Internet ? art \ _pos = 11 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find this post interesting considering the current slashdot poll is about linear footage of shelved books in your home.http://slashdot.org/pollBooth.pl?qid=1871&amp;aid=-1 [slashdot.org]And another article discussing the loss of available "internet"http://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/09/10/24/2347248/What-If-They-Turned-Off-the-Internet?art\_pos=11 [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29874981</id>
	<title>Re:PDF's?</title>
	<author>AndersOSU</author>
	<datestamp>1256584080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't have a huge problem with reading from LCDs, but it is easier on the eyes to use reflected light than back light.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't have a huge problem with reading from LCDs , but it is easier on the eyes to use reflected light than back light .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't have a huge problem with reading from LCDs, but it is easier on the eyes to use reflected light than back light.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29867471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866143</id>
	<title>Will it disable the</title>
	<author>future assassin</author>
	<datestamp>1256499480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>print screen button or copy and paste?</htmltext>
<tokenext>print screen button or copy and paste ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>print screen button or copy and paste?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29879575</id>
	<title>wholesale cheap bape air force ones male shoes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256564280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; Welcome TO Our Website:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Http://www.tntshoes.com</p><p>Hi friend, we are a prefession online store, you can</p><p>see more photos and price in our website which is</p><p>show in the photos<br>if you are interested please email me by , hellow we</p><p>have run a online shiping mall for many years, our</p><p>website is pls see our website in the photos attached</p><p>attached, we have all kinds brand new shoes,clothing,</p><p>handbag,sunglasses,hats etc for sale, 6000000\% best</p><p>quality with the amazing price. our website is pls see</p><p>our website in the photos attached attached, You will</p><p>find more pictures and the price for our product in our</p><p>website, please see below of the nike shoes we have,</p><p>we take paypal as payment, . shoes SB dunk $28-42</p><p>free shiping.</p><p>
&nbsp; OUR WEBSITE:</p><p>YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn</p><p>MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>  Welcome TO Our Website :         Http : //www.tntshoes.comHi friend , we are a prefession online store , you cansee more photos and price in our website which isshow in the photosif you are interested please email me by , hellow wehave run a online shiping mall for many years , ourwebsite is pls see our website in the photos attachedattached , we have all kinds brand new shoes,clothing,handbag,sunglasses,hats etc for sale , 6000000 \ % bestquality with the amazing price .
our website is pls seeour website in the photos attached attached , You willfind more pictures and the price for our product in ourwebsite , please see below of the nike shoes we have,we take paypal as payment , .
shoes SB dunk $ 28-42free shiping .
  OUR WEBSITE : YAHOO : shoppertrade @ yahoo.com.cnMSN : shoppertrade @ hotmail.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
  Welcome TO Our Website:
        Http://www.tntshoes.comHi friend, we are a prefession online store, you cansee more photos and price in our website which isshow in the photosif you are interested please email me by , hellow wehave run a online shiping mall for many years, ourwebsite is pls see our website in the photos attachedattached, we have all kinds brand new shoes,clothing,handbag,sunglasses,hats etc for sale, 6000000\% bestquality with the amazing price.
our website is pls seeour website in the photos attached attached, You willfind more pictures and the price for our product in ourwebsite, please see below of the nike shoes we have,we take paypal as payment, .
shoes SB dunk $28-42free shiping.
  OUR WEBSITE:YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cnMSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866215</id>
	<title>Re:MMmmmm... my head will explode.</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1256499900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Part of it is that there is a rather wide demographic (meaning that it probably isn't the same people doing it).</p><p>Another part of it is that many sane people are not offended by hardware the supports DRM, even though they never purchase media encumbered by said DRM.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Part of it is that there is a rather wide demographic ( meaning that it probably is n't the same people doing it ) .Another part of it is that many sane people are not offended by hardware the supports DRM , even though they never purchase media encumbered by said DRM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Part of it is that there is a rather wide demographic (meaning that it probably isn't the same people doing it).Another part of it is that many sane people are not offended by hardware the supports DRM, even though they never purchase media encumbered by said DRM.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866025</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29865979</id>
	<title>There's an App for that</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256498460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or just download it for free to your iPhone / iPod Touch and put your $200+ towards the cost of that device.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or just download it for free to your iPhone / iPod Touch and put your $ 200 + towards the cost of that device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or just download it for free to your iPhone / iPod Touch and put your $200+ towards the cost of that device.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29867471</id>
	<title>Re:PDF's?</title>
	<author>causality</author>
	<datestamp>1256469660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's already a secure PDF format which publishers could use.  Why you'd want to read a book on an LCD or CRT I have no idea, though.</p></div><p>Real question:  what's so terrible about a good LCD screen?  I frequently hear people complain about the idea of reading books on an LCD screen, yet I have done this myself and didn't think it was bad at all.
<br> <br>
The CRTs I think I can understand.  I'm one of those people who can detect the flicker even at reasonably high refresh rates, so they will eventually tire my eyes if I don't make it a point to look away from the screen from time to time.  Even at the very best refresh rates, the scanned CRT is not regarded by the eyes as a solid image like a wall or a sheet of paper and they have to do a little extra work to give the illusion of a steady image.
<br> <br>
I believe LCDs don't have this problem because they can independently and simultaneously control each pixel, and lighting one pixel doesn't cause the previous one to stop being lit so there is no concept of continuously scanning lines.  However, I make no claims of having any expertise in this area, so please correct me if I am wrong about that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's already a secure PDF format which publishers could use .
Why you 'd want to read a book on an LCD or CRT I have no idea , though.Real question : what 's so terrible about a good LCD screen ?
I frequently hear people complain about the idea of reading books on an LCD screen , yet I have done this myself and did n't think it was bad at all .
The CRTs I think I can understand .
I 'm one of those people who can detect the flicker even at reasonably high refresh rates , so they will eventually tire my eyes if I do n't make it a point to look away from the screen from time to time .
Even at the very best refresh rates , the scanned CRT is not regarded by the eyes as a solid image like a wall or a sheet of paper and they have to do a little extra work to give the illusion of a steady image .
I believe LCDs do n't have this problem because they can independently and simultaneously control each pixel , and lighting one pixel does n't cause the previous one to stop being lit so there is no concept of continuously scanning lines .
However , I make no claims of having any expertise in this area , so please correct me if I am wrong about that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's already a secure PDF format which publishers could use.
Why you'd want to read a book on an LCD or CRT I have no idea, though.Real question:  what's so terrible about a good LCD screen?
I frequently hear people complain about the idea of reading books on an LCD screen, yet I have done this myself and didn't think it was bad at all.
The CRTs I think I can understand.
I'm one of those people who can detect the flicker even at reasonably high refresh rates, so they will eventually tire my eyes if I don't make it a point to look away from the screen from time to time.
Even at the very best refresh rates, the scanned CRT is not regarded by the eyes as a solid image like a wall or a sheet of paper and they have to do a little extra work to give the illusion of a steady image.
I believe LCDs don't have this problem because they can independently and simultaneously control each pixel, and lighting one pixel doesn't cause the previous one to stop being lit so there is no concept of continuously scanning lines.
However, I make no claims of having any expertise in this area, so please correct me if I am wrong about that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866837</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866825</id>
	<title>Re:MMmmmm... my head will explode.</title>
	<author>Nyeerrmm</author>
	<datestamp>1256462040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As someone who never bought a DRM-laden piece of music, but buys plenty of stuff for my Kindle (but was never one to rant much about it), the reason is simply one of practicality.</p><p>I'm in grad school, have a small room, move a lot, and tend to fulfill some of those 'digital nomad' stereotypes, so the benefits of e-books are pretty strong for me -- however, there is no way to purchase DRM-free e-books without extremely limiting my choices. I figure that by purchasing and using the device, as its useful for me and I feel informed what the DRM implies, I can help to show that there is a market, and that more competition will force more openness, as it did in the music industry.</p><p>Music had two critical differences to me. One was that I could purchase a CD and rip it with little effort (I still prefer to purchase music by album, so single-serve songs meant little to me) -- this made it easy to get most of the benefits without the DRM (plus ripping to FLAC).  The second is repeatability and cost/length: buying a new copy of an album every year just to relisten to is absurd, while if I were to decide to reread a book 5 years from now, it doesn't seem as ridiculous to rebuy it, thus making the DRM-associated risk less.</p><p>That said, first DRM-free e-book store that appears with a comparable selection, I'll jump to immediately, just as I started using the Amazon MP3 store as soon as it appeared.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As someone who never bought a DRM-laden piece of music , but buys plenty of stuff for my Kindle ( but was never one to rant much about it ) , the reason is simply one of practicality.I 'm in grad school , have a small room , move a lot , and tend to fulfill some of those 'digital nomad ' stereotypes , so the benefits of e-books are pretty strong for me -- however , there is no way to purchase DRM-free e-books without extremely limiting my choices .
I figure that by purchasing and using the device , as its useful for me and I feel informed what the DRM implies , I can help to show that there is a market , and that more competition will force more openness , as it did in the music industry.Music had two critical differences to me .
One was that I could purchase a CD and rip it with little effort ( I still prefer to purchase music by album , so single-serve songs meant little to me ) -- this made it easy to get most of the benefits without the DRM ( plus ripping to FLAC ) .
The second is repeatability and cost/length : buying a new copy of an album every year just to relisten to is absurd , while if I were to decide to reread a book 5 years from now , it does n't seem as ridiculous to rebuy it , thus making the DRM-associated risk less.That said , first DRM-free e-book store that appears with a comparable selection , I 'll jump to immediately , just as I started using the Amazon MP3 store as soon as it appeared .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As someone who never bought a DRM-laden piece of music, but buys plenty of stuff for my Kindle (but was never one to rant much about it), the reason is simply one of practicality.I'm in grad school, have a small room, move a lot, and tend to fulfill some of those 'digital nomad' stereotypes, so the benefits of e-books are pretty strong for me -- however, there is no way to purchase DRM-free e-books without extremely limiting my choices.
I figure that by purchasing and using the device, as its useful for me and I feel informed what the DRM implies, I can help to show that there is a market, and that more competition will force more openness, as it did in the music industry.Music had two critical differences to me.
One was that I could purchase a CD and rip it with little effort (I still prefer to purchase music by album, so single-serve songs meant little to me) -- this made it easy to get most of the benefits without the DRM (plus ripping to FLAC).
The second is repeatability and cost/length: buying a new copy of an album every year just to relisten to is absurd, while if I were to decide to reread a book 5 years from now, it doesn't seem as ridiculous to rebuy it, thus making the DRM-associated risk less.That said, first DRM-free e-book store that appears with a comparable selection, I'll jump to immediately, just as I started using the Amazon MP3 store as soon as it appeared.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866025</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29906993</id>
	<title>good</title>
	<author>yesreplica</author>
	<datestamp>1256755560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>very very good!

from yesreplica</htmltext>
<tokenext>very very good !
from yesreplica</tokentext>
<sentencetext>very very good!
from yesreplica</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866007</id>
	<title>I'll take the B&amp;N Android reader instead</title>
	<author>symbolset</author>
	<datestamp>1256498700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't care for the DRM.  I could really use a book reader though, and the Android version once liberated may have interesting other applications.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't care for the DRM .
I could really use a book reader though , and the Android version once liberated may have interesting other applications .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't care for the DRM.
I could really use a book reader though, and the Android version once liberated may have interesting other applications.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866025
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29874981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29867471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866527
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866227
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29868081
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866231
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866215
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866025
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29867233
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866041
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866745
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866041
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29871725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29868409
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29868901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29867471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866713
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29873583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866025
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866041
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29868641
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866423
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866467
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866041
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866829
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866027
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29871857
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866231
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29869517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866231
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29873657
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29867161
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866041
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29867141
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866231
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866373
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866027
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866027
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_183205_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866547
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866231
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_183205.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866119
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866837
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29867471
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29874981
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29868901
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866243
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866713
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_183205.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29865979
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_183205.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866027
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866829
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866513
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866373
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_183205.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866423
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29868641
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_183205.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866025
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866215
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866825
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29873583
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_183205.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866231
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866285
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29867141
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29869517
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866547
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29868081
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29871857
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_183205.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866041
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29867233
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866745
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866467
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866473
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29867161
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29873657
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_183205.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29868409
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29871725
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_183205.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866007
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_183205.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866369
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_183205.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866227
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29866527
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_183205.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_183205.29865983
</commentlist>
</conversation>
