<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_25_0050256</id>
	<title>Elder-Assist Robotic Suits, From the Real Cyberdyne</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1256457720000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Tasha26 writes <i>"No, not the one which will end up building terminator robots. <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/click\_online/">BBC's Click</a> brings news of a Japanese company, <a href="http://www.cyberdyne.jp/English/">Cyberdyne</a>, which is in the process of building different <a href="http://www.cyberdyne.jp/English/robotsuithal/index.html">robotic suits to assist the elderly</a> in accomplishing simple body tasks such as walking and lifting. Even though still in R&amp;D, this <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/click\_online/8322790.stm">video (@3m15s)</a> shows a pretty promising future for the elderly."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tasha26 writes " No , not the one which will end up building terminator robots .
BBC 's Click brings news of a Japanese company , Cyberdyne , which is in the process of building different robotic suits to assist the elderly in accomplishing simple body tasks such as walking and lifting .
Even though still in R&amp;D , this video ( @ 3m15s ) shows a pretty promising future for the elderly .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tasha26 writes "No, not the one which will end up building terminator robots.
BBC's Click brings news of a Japanese company, Cyberdyne, which is in the process of building different robotic suits to assist the elderly in accomplishing simple body tasks such as walking and lifting.
Even though still in R&amp;D, this video (@3m15s) shows a pretty promising future for the elderly.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29872663</id>
	<title>People in the USA vs. Japan</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1256573040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the USA we just load our old folks into a "Rascal" and they go to physical therapy twice a week.</p><p>In japan they get physical therapy all of the time by means of a mobile power assist suit.</p><p>We pretty much suck....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the USA we just load our old folks into a " Rascal " and they go to physical therapy twice a week.In japan they get physical therapy all of the time by means of a mobile power assist suit.We pretty much suck... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the USA we just load our old folks into a "Rascal" and they go to physical therapy twice a week.In japan they get physical therapy all of the time by means of a mobile power assist suit.We pretty much suck....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29874885</id>
	<title>Just an FYI</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256583600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When spouting made-up bullshit, it's generally better <i>not</i> to include a link to a website that directly refutes said bullshit.  You might think you're adding credibility to your claim by having a reference while counting on reader laziness to prevent them from clicking the link.  But what you've really done is just lower the bar for the hordes of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.ers just waiting to prove someone wrong.</p><p>In case you're actually dumb and not just trolling, your link says LSD is Schedule I and anabolic steroids are Schedule III.  That's <i>very</i> different legally.</p><p>Oh and doctors prescribe steroids all the time, the social stigma against bodybuilders using them has no effect on them.  Get a clue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When spouting made-up bullshit , it 's generally better not to include a link to a website that directly refutes said bullshit .
You might think you 're adding credibility to your claim by having a reference while counting on reader laziness to prevent them from clicking the link .
But what you 've really done is just lower the bar for the hordes of /.ers just waiting to prove someone wrong.In case you 're actually dumb and not just trolling , your link says LSD is Schedule I and anabolic steroids are Schedule III .
That 's very different legally.Oh and doctors prescribe steroids all the time , the social stigma against bodybuilders using them has no effect on them .
Get a clue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When spouting made-up bullshit, it's generally better not to include a link to a website that directly refutes said bullshit.
You might think you're adding credibility to your claim by having a reference while counting on reader laziness to prevent them from clicking the link.
But what you've really done is just lower the bar for the hordes of /.ers just waiting to prove someone wrong.In case you're actually dumb and not just trolling, your link says LSD is Schedule I and anabolic steroids are Schedule III.
That's very different legally.Oh and doctors prescribe steroids all the time, the social stigma against bodybuilders using them has no effect on them.
Get a clue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863265</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863345</id>
	<title>Re:Darn it, I'm being serious again...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256470260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Weight training is boring and a tremendous waste of human time and effort. Millions of hours of human effort are squandered every day in the gym for no appreciable gain to society whatsoever.</p><p>To hell with weight training. Bring on the terminator suits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Weight training is boring and a tremendous waste of human time and effort .
Millions of hours of human effort are squandered every day in the gym for no appreciable gain to society whatsoever.To hell with weight training .
Bring on the terminator suits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weight training is boring and a tremendous waste of human time and effort.
Millions of hours of human effort are squandered every day in the gym for no appreciable gain to society whatsoever.To hell with weight training.
Bring on the terminator suits.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863035</id>
	<title>Battery life</title>
	<author>cjfs</author>
	<datestamp>1256463480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... Prof. Sankai and his team specially designed "HAL" for climbing mountains and "HAL" can even work even in the snow at 4000 meters height.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...
The latest battery runs for 5 hours under normal activities.</p></div><p>I think I'll hold off on the mountain climbing for now.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... Prof. Sankai and his team specially designed " HAL " for climbing mountains and " HAL " can even work even in the snow at 4000 meters height .
.. . The latest battery runs for 5 hours under normal activities.I think I 'll hold off on the mountain climbing for now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... Prof. Sankai and his team specially designed "HAL" for climbing mountains and "HAL" can even work even in the snow at 4000 meters height.
...
The latest battery runs for 5 hours under normal activities.I think I'll hold off on the mountain climbing for now.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863101</id>
	<title>Auto walk</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256464920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Computer, deliver me to checkpoint D. And wake me up when we're there."</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Computer , deliver me to checkpoint D. And wake me up when we 're there .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Computer, deliver me to checkpoint D. And wake me up when we're there.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863147</id>
	<title>This company's main building...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256465700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...is actually just down the road from my apartment. Kind of freaky walking past a place with "CYBERDYNE" plastered all over it every morning.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...is actually just down the road from my apartment .
Kind of freaky walking past a place with " CYBERDYNE " plastered all over it every morning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...is actually just down the road from my apartment.
Kind of freaky walking past a place with "CYBERDYNE" plastered all over it every morning.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29866481</id>
	<title>And when they grab you with their metal claws ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256502060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... you can't break free, because they're made of metal, and robots are strong.</p><p>http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/clips/old-glory-insurance/229049/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... you ca n't break free , because they 're made of metal , and robots are strong.http : //www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/clips/old-glory-insurance/229049/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... you can't break free, because they're made of metal, and robots are strong.http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/clips/old-glory-insurance/229049/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863219</id>
	<title>Hardly new tech</title>
	<author>falconcy</author>
	<datestamp>1256467500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This has been around and in production for quite a while:

<a href="http://www.rslsteeper.com/orthotics/orthotic-products/argo" title="rslsteeper.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.rslsteeper.com/orthotics/orthotic-products/argo</a> [rslsteeper.com]

The website only shows a half body setup, I understand they also do a full body suit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This has been around and in production for quite a while : http : //www.rslsteeper.com/orthotics/orthotic-products/argo [ rslsteeper.com ] The website only shows a half body setup , I understand they also do a full body suit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has been around and in production for quite a while:

http://www.rslsteeper.com/orthotics/orthotic-products/argo [rslsteeper.com]

The website only shows a half body setup, I understand they also do a full body suit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863073</id>
	<title>Yeah right</title>
	<author>Zouden</author>
	<datestamp>1256464500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"No, not the one which will end up building terminator robots."</p><p>How can you be so sure? Are you from the future?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" No , not the one which will end up building terminator robots .
" How can you be so sure ?
Are you from the future ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"No, not the one which will end up building terminator robots.
"How can you be so sure?
Are you from the future?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865333</id>
	<title>Re:Darn it, I'm being serious again...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256493660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That only helps DELAY the loss in muscle mass.  It's sort of like playing WII games and solving quantum physics problems.  It won't stop you from getting Alzheimer's, but with luck, it'll slow it down enough that you'll still have some marbles when you die.</p><p>Even Arnold will have to use a wheel chair or one of these things at some point -- assuming he doesn't already have one, that is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That only helps DELAY the loss in muscle mass .
It 's sort of like playing WII games and solving quantum physics problems .
It wo n't stop you from getting Alzheimer 's , but with luck , it 'll slow it down enough that you 'll still have some marbles when you die.Even Arnold will have to use a wheel chair or one of these things at some point -- assuming he does n't already have one , that is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That only helps DELAY the loss in muscle mass.
It's sort of like playing WII games and solving quantum physics problems.
It won't stop you from getting Alzheimer's, but with luck, it'll slow it down enough that you'll still have some marbles when you die.Even Arnold will have to use a wheel chair or one of these things at some point -- assuming he doesn't already have one, that is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865099</id>
	<title>Missing the irony?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256491260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it is ironic that this brit is worried about a fictional catastrophe from a unimportant robot company in Japan making a ridiculous suit when the UK already has created the big brother state in 1984 to spec in reality. LOL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it is ironic that this brit is worried about a fictional catastrophe from a unimportant robot company in Japan making a ridiculous suit when the UK already has created the big brother state in 1984 to spec in reality .
LOL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it is ironic that this brit is worried about a fictional catastrophe from a unimportant robot company in Japan making a ridiculous suit when the UK already has created the big brother state in 1984 to spec in reality.
LOL</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863563</id>
	<title>Oh, this is going to be great.</title>
	<author>DieByWire</author>
	<datestamp>1256475480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now I can chase those kids off my lawn.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now I can chase those kids off my lawn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now I can chase those kids off my lawn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29872369</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on now!</title>
	<author>Phoghat</author>
	<datestamp>1256571660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eleoJabi2os" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eleoJabi2os</a> [youtube.com]
<p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2FQ56q80Pc
</p><p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WObT3Go3CUo
</p><p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kfoqyxJT4o
</p><p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-0SETQIsPI

</p><p> Ad infinitum, Ad Nauseam</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = eleoJabi2os [ youtube.com ] http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = y2FQ56q80Pc http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = WObT3Go3CUo http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 2kfoqyxJT4o http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = r-0SETQIsPI Ad infinitum , Ad Nauseam</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eleoJabi2os [youtube.com]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2FQ56q80Pc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WObT3Go3CUo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kfoqyxJT4o
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-0SETQIsPI

 Ad infinitum, Ad Nauseam</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862947</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863525</id>
	<title>Just what I need</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256474580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just imagine iif my dad, who turns 77 today, were to receive this kind of contraption as a present.  My cranky dad controlling a mech?  Run for the hills!</p><p>My dad has a master's degree in electrical engineering and likes to modify stuff (electrical and non-) to suit his needs.</p><p>Oh, did I mention my dad got a black belt in Shotokan karate back in the '80s?  I swear I am not making this up.</p><p>Right, I should mention something basic about Dad: he is a collector of militaria and weapons, especially edged weapons, but he has a sizable number of firearms too.</p><p>I, for one, would <b>not</b> welcome our heavily armed, flak jacketed, cybernetically enhanced, grumpy old black belt overlord.</p><p>Happy birthday, Dad!</p><p>No, he won't actually read this, but it seemed appropriate to say.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just imagine iif my dad , who turns 77 today , were to receive this kind of contraption as a present .
My cranky dad controlling a mech ?
Run for the hills ! My dad has a master 's degree in electrical engineering and likes to modify stuff ( electrical and non- ) to suit his needs.Oh , did I mention my dad got a black belt in Shotokan karate back in the '80s ?
I swear I am not making this up.Right , I should mention something basic about Dad : he is a collector of militaria and weapons , especially edged weapons , but he has a sizable number of firearms too.I , for one , would not welcome our heavily armed , flak jacketed , cybernetically enhanced , grumpy old black belt overlord.Happy birthday , Dad ! No , he wo n't actually read this , but it seemed appropriate to say .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just imagine iif my dad, who turns 77 today, were to receive this kind of contraption as a present.
My cranky dad controlling a mech?
Run for the hills!My dad has a master's degree in electrical engineering and likes to modify stuff (electrical and non-) to suit his needs.Oh, did I mention my dad got a black belt in Shotokan karate back in the '80s?
I swear I am not making this up.Right, I should mention something basic about Dad: he is a collector of militaria and weapons, especially edged weapons, but he has a sizable number of firearms too.I, for one, would not welcome our heavily armed, flak jacketed, cybernetically enhanced, grumpy old black belt overlord.Happy birthday, Dad!No, he won't actually read this, but it seemed appropriate to say.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29876401</id>
	<title>Re:Darn it, I'm being serious again...</title>
	<author>alexo</author>
	<datestamp>1256547660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Weight training is boring and a tremendous waste of human time and effort. Millions of hours of human effort are squandered every day in the gym for no appreciable gain to society whatsoever.</p></div></blockquote><p>Connect the machines to dynamos.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Weight training is boring and a tremendous waste of human time and effort .
Millions of hours of human effort are squandered every day in the gym for no appreciable gain to society whatsoever.Connect the machines to dynamos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weight training is boring and a tremendous waste of human time and effort.
Millions of hours of human effort are squandered every day in the gym for no appreciable gain to society whatsoever.Connect the machines to dynamos.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865351</id>
	<title>Re:actually, it's the same Cyberdyne</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1256493780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Making old people weak is nature's way of protecting the young."</p><p>That and death, which assures species survival by removing useless members while rerolling the genetic dice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Making old people weak is nature 's way of protecting the young .
" That and death , which assures species survival by removing useless members while rerolling the genetic dice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Making old people weak is nature's way of protecting the young.
"That and death, which assures species survival by removing useless members while rerolling the genetic dice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863173</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29864173</id>
	<title>Humanity's greatest enemy...is itself</title>
	<author>nastro</author>
	<datestamp>1256481960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And we here at Old Glory Insurance offer coverage for you.  For when your retirement community neighbor grabs hold of you, and you can't get away - because they're metal, and robot suits are strong.  Old Glory.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And we here at Old Glory Insurance offer coverage for you .
For when your retirement community neighbor grabs hold of you , and you ca n't get away - because they 're metal , and robot suits are strong .
Old Glory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And we here at Old Glory Insurance offer coverage for you.
For when your retirement community neighbor grabs hold of you, and you can't get away - because they're metal, and robot suits are strong.
Old Glory.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862967</id>
	<title>I am the pusher robot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256462040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>As long as they don't start asking if we've got stairs in our houses, I think we're fine.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as they do n't start asking if we 've got stairs in our houses , I think we 're fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as they don't start asking if we've got stairs in our houses, I think we're fine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863023</id>
	<title>No, dont do it!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256463240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can already see it "Get off my lawn before I fire some missiles up your ass, you damn noisy kids!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can already see it " Get off my lawn before I fire some missiles up your ass , you damn noisy kids !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can already see it "Get off my lawn before I fire some missiles up your ass, you damn noisy kids!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865285</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on now!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256493180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When he and his mom come to kill everybody and blow up the building, just know that you all had it coming.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When he and his mom come to kill everybody and blow up the building , just know that you all had it coming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When he and his mom come to kill everybody and blow up the building, just know that you all had it coming.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862947</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29870753</id>
	<title>Roujin Z</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256559600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't believe nobody has mentioned <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roujin\_Z" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Roujin Z</a> [wikipedia.org] yet... it's an Anime from the guy who made Akira about an automated hospital robot taking care of an old man that -- gasp -- turns out to secretly be a testbed for combat robot components, which leads to full-on geriatric mecha combat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe nobody has mentioned Roujin Z [ wikipedia.org ] yet... it 's an Anime from the guy who made Akira about an automated hospital robot taking care of an old man that -- gasp -- turns out to secretly be a testbed for combat robot components , which leads to full-on geriatric mecha combat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe nobody has mentioned Roujin Z [wikipedia.org] yet... it's an Anime from the guy who made Akira about an automated hospital robot taking care of an old man that -- gasp -- turns out to secretly be a testbed for combat robot components, which leads to full-on geriatric mecha combat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862947</id>
	<title>Oh come on now!</title>
	<author>skornenicholas</author>
	<datestamp>1256461800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>They named their company Cyberdyne and later realized their mistake did they? I highly doubt this, clever marketing though. On the other hand I have a coworker who IS actually named John Conner, poor man we covered his office in tin foil while he was on vacation, left him a nice note explaining that we are trying to hide him from satellite surveillance. Did lead to one of the greatest owned moments I have ever seen, our boss from NJ was handing out our new Blackberry Tours, everyone on the IT team got one but John, Jay says "I just thought in the interest of personal safety....these things have GPS tracking you know." He did actually get one of course, but not before we set his ringtone to say "Come with me if you want to live." and play the theme.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They named their company Cyberdyne and later realized their mistake did they ?
I highly doubt this , clever marketing though .
On the other hand I have a coworker who IS actually named John Conner , poor man we covered his office in tin foil while he was on vacation , left him a nice note explaining that we are trying to hide him from satellite surveillance .
Did lead to one of the greatest owned moments I have ever seen , our boss from NJ was handing out our new Blackberry Tours , everyone on the IT team got one but John , Jay says " I just thought in the interest of personal safety....these things have GPS tracking you know .
" He did actually get one of course , but not before we set his ringtone to say " Come with me if you want to live .
" and play the theme .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They named their company Cyberdyne and later realized their mistake did they?
I highly doubt this, clever marketing though.
On the other hand I have a coworker who IS actually named John Conner, poor man we covered his office in tin foil while he was on vacation, left him a nice note explaining that we are trying to hide him from satellite surveillance.
Did lead to one of the greatest owned moments I have ever seen, our boss from NJ was handing out our new Blackberry Tours, everyone on the IT team got one but John, Jay says "I just thought in the interest of personal safety....these things have GPS tracking you know.
" He did actually get one of course, but not before we set his ringtone to say "Come with me if you want to live.
" and play the theme.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863329</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on now!</title>
	<author>stjobe</author>
	<datestamp>1256469900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I have a coworker who IS actually named John Conner</p></div><p>Too bad the character in the movie is called John Connor, not Conner.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a coworker who IS actually named John ConnerToo bad the character in the movie is called John Connor , not Conner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a coworker who IS actually named John ConnerToo bad the character in the movie is called John Connor, not Conner.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862947</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29864807</id>
	<title>this FP fo8 GNAA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256488380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">invited back 4gain.</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>invited back 4gain .
[ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>invited back 4gain.
[goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29870155</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256550540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>How can you be so sure? Are you from the future?</i></p><p>They are not an American company! Both the menace and saviour must be American, haven't you watched any movies?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How can you be so sure ?
Are you from the future ? They are not an American company !
Both the menace and saviour must be American , have n't you watched any movies ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can you be so sure?
Are you from the future?They are not an American company!
Both the menace and saviour must be American, haven't you watched any movies?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863073</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863265</id>
	<title>I love robotics, but so much biochem hate...</title>
	<author>Talisman</author>
	<datestamp>1256468640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have nothing against advancing robotics, whatsoever.</p><p>But, many of the problems with the elderly being physically infirm can be treated with steroids.  Society has this bizarre view of steroids of being a horrible drug causing anything from cancer to rage to psychotic episodes.  The DEA has it listed as a Schedule III drug, which carries a worse fine for possession than Xanax, Rohypnol, Valium and Halcion.  Anabolic steroids are on the same DEA classification as LSD.  From a legal standpoint, they view as equal what is essentially a drug that increases the rate at which proteins fold to the most powerful hallucinogen known to man.</p><p>Give the elderly steroids, and let their doctors monitor them.  Keep going with robotics, but steroids are here now.</p><p>If you're curious where your drug of choice lands on the DEA schedule, here's a link:</p><p><a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/scheduling.html" title="usdoj.gov">http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/scheduling.html</a> [usdoj.gov]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have nothing against advancing robotics , whatsoever.But , many of the problems with the elderly being physically infirm can be treated with steroids .
Society has this bizarre view of steroids of being a horrible drug causing anything from cancer to rage to psychotic episodes .
The DEA has it listed as a Schedule III drug , which carries a worse fine for possession than Xanax , Rohypnol , Valium and Halcion .
Anabolic steroids are on the same DEA classification as LSD .
From a legal standpoint , they view as equal what is essentially a drug that increases the rate at which proteins fold to the most powerful hallucinogen known to man.Give the elderly steroids , and let their doctors monitor them .
Keep going with robotics , but steroids are here now.If you 're curious where your drug of choice lands on the DEA schedule , here 's a link : http : //www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/scheduling.html [ usdoj.gov ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have nothing against advancing robotics, whatsoever.But, many of the problems with the elderly being physically infirm can be treated with steroids.
Society has this bizarre view of steroids of being a horrible drug causing anything from cancer to rage to psychotic episodes.
The DEA has it listed as a Schedule III drug, which carries a worse fine for possession than Xanax, Rohypnol, Valium and Halcion.
Anabolic steroids are on the same DEA classification as LSD.
From a legal standpoint, they view as equal what is essentially a drug that increases the rate at which proteins fold to the most powerful hallucinogen known to man.Give the elderly steroids, and let their doctors monitor them.
Keep going with robotics, but steroids are here now.If you're curious where your drug of choice lands on the DEA schedule, here's a link:http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/scheduling.html [usdoj.gov]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29873029</id>
	<title>Re:Darn it, I'm being serious again...</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1256575080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>If you don't want to need a Cyberdyne 2000 to help you walk around when you're older, do weight training</i></p><p>Old people don't need help moving around because of physical weakness. Yes, there are some conditions that cause physical weakness (i.e., MS) but weight training won't stave off MS (which isn't normally a geezer disease anyway). What makes it hard for old people to get around is PAIN. Most people get arthritis when they get old. When your joints wear out you're going to have trouble getting around, and guess what? It's caused by overworking (and especially injuring) those joints when you're young.</p><p>If you're a runner, you're almost certain to need a walker when you're 75, especially if you're female. Weights aren't as bad, as they're low impact, but swimming and sex are better exersise, but exersise won't keep you out of one of these exoskeletons and if you're doing high impact sports (running, jumping, etc) you're going to make it worse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you do n't want to need a Cyberdyne 2000 to help you walk around when you 're older , do weight trainingOld people do n't need help moving around because of physical weakness .
Yes , there are some conditions that cause physical weakness ( i.e. , MS ) but weight training wo n't stave off MS ( which is n't normally a geezer disease anyway ) .
What makes it hard for old people to get around is PAIN .
Most people get arthritis when they get old .
When your joints wear out you 're going to have trouble getting around , and guess what ?
It 's caused by overworking ( and especially injuring ) those joints when you 're young.If you 're a runner , you 're almost certain to need a walker when you 're 75 , especially if you 're female .
Weights are n't as bad , as they 're low impact , but swimming and sex are better exersise , but exersise wo n't keep you out of one of these exoskeletons and if you 're doing high impact sports ( running , jumping , etc ) you 're going to make it worse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you don't want to need a Cyberdyne 2000 to help you walk around when you're older, do weight trainingOld people don't need help moving around because of physical weakness.
Yes, there are some conditions that cause physical weakness (i.e., MS) but weight training won't stave off MS (which isn't normally a geezer disease anyway).
What makes it hard for old people to get around is PAIN.
Most people get arthritis when they get old.
When your joints wear out you're going to have trouble getting around, and guess what?
It's caused by overworking (and especially injuring) those joints when you're young.If you're a runner, you're almost certain to need a walker when you're 75, especially if you're female.
Weights aren't as bad, as they're low impact, but swimming and sex are better exersise, but exersise won't keep you out of one of these exoskeletons and if you're doing high impact sports (running, jumping, etc) you're going to make it worse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863551</id>
	<title>Re:Darn it, I'm being serious again...</title>
	<author>Genda</author>
	<datestamp>1256475240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With the advent of recent breakthroughs in genetic therapies (they're not killing people by accident any more), there is a real likelihood that if you have decent health insurance, you'll be able to get injections which will stimulate the genes capable of providing the kind of muscle mass a person of let's say "20" might expect. With a healthy muscle mass, the loss of physical strength normally associated with aging ceases to be an issue, and many of the other problem also associated with aging (circulation, bone density, and sleep habits) can be dramatically improved.</p><p>The need for a Cyberdyne suit will hopefully be a stopgap for real life enhancement at the hands of doctors and biologists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With the advent of recent breakthroughs in genetic therapies ( they 're not killing people by accident any more ) , there is a real likelihood that if you have decent health insurance , you 'll be able to get injections which will stimulate the genes capable of providing the kind of muscle mass a person of let 's say " 20 " might expect .
With a healthy muscle mass , the loss of physical strength normally associated with aging ceases to be an issue , and many of the other problem also associated with aging ( circulation , bone density , and sleep habits ) can be dramatically improved.The need for a Cyberdyne suit will hopefully be a stopgap for real life enhancement at the hands of doctors and biologists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With the advent of recent breakthroughs in genetic therapies (they're not killing people by accident any more), there is a real likelihood that if you have decent health insurance, you'll be able to get injections which will stimulate the genes capable of providing the kind of muscle mass a person of let's say "20" might expect.
With a healthy muscle mass, the loss of physical strength normally associated with aging ceases to be an issue, and many of the other problem also associated with aging (circulation, bone density, and sleep habits) can be dramatically improved.The need for a Cyberdyne suit will hopefully be a stopgap for real life enhancement at the hands of doctors and biologists.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863401</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah right</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1256471760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you suggesting that Tasha26 is really John Titor?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you suggesting that Tasha26 is really John Titor ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you suggesting that Tasha26 is really John Titor?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863073</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863241</id>
	<title>Darn it, I'm being serious again...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256468220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I shouldn't do this, but here goes:

If you don't want to need a Cyberdyne 2000 to help you walk around when you're older, do weight training.  It helps the aging retain muscle mass.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I should n't do this , but here goes : If you do n't want to need a Cyberdyne 2000 to help you walk around when you 're older , do weight training .
It helps the aging retain muscle mass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I shouldn't do this, but here goes:

If you don't want to need a Cyberdyne 2000 to help you walk around when you're older, do weight training.
It helps the aging retain muscle mass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865993</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on now!</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1256498580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did you notice the actual suit is called HAL? hehe</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you notice the actual suit is called HAL ?
hehe</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you notice the actual suit is called HAL?
hehe</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862947</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29867643</id>
	<title>Meh,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256472060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wake me up when they start building Cyclones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wake me up when they start building Cyclones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wake me up when they start building Cyclones.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29873505</id>
	<title>Re:I love robotics, but so much biochem hate...</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1256577180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Society has this bizarre view of steroids of being a horrible drug causing anything from cancer to rage to psychotic episodes.</i></p><p>And that's not all that's wrong with them; thay can also <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1997/07/03/us/inhaled-steroids-for-asthma-may-cause-cataracts-study-hints.html" title="nytimes.com">cause</a> [nytimes.com] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cataract" title="wikipedia.org">cataracts</a> [wikipedia.org], even in young people, as I found out <a href="http://slashdot.org/~sm62704/journal/141778" title="slashdot.org">after I was prescribed steroid eyedrops for an infection</a> [slashdot.org].</p><p><i>From a legal standpoint, they view as equal what is essentially a drug that increases the rate at which proteins fold to the most powerful hallucinogen known to man.</i></p><p>The legality has nothing to do with a drug's actual danger. LSD has no effect whatever except for its psychedelic properties, and it dialates the eyes. Marijuana is just as illegal as heroin. Alcohol and tobacco are completely legal, yet both are addictive and dangerous. You can die from alcohol overdose, you can die from alcohol withdrawal.</p><p>There is no correlation between a drug's safety and its legality.</p><p>And many geezers do get steroids, as they're used for arthritis. Doctors can and do prescribe steroids.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Society has this bizarre view of steroids of being a horrible drug causing anything from cancer to rage to psychotic episodes.And that 's not all that 's wrong with them ; thay can also cause [ nytimes.com ] cataracts [ wikipedia.org ] , even in young people , as I found out after I was prescribed steroid eyedrops for an infection [ slashdot.org ] .From a legal standpoint , they view as equal what is essentially a drug that increases the rate at which proteins fold to the most powerful hallucinogen known to man.The legality has nothing to do with a drug 's actual danger .
LSD has no effect whatever except for its psychedelic properties , and it dialates the eyes .
Marijuana is just as illegal as heroin .
Alcohol and tobacco are completely legal , yet both are addictive and dangerous .
You can die from alcohol overdose , you can die from alcohol withdrawal.There is no correlation between a drug 's safety and its legality.And many geezers do get steroids , as they 're used for arthritis .
Doctors can and do prescribe steroids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Society has this bizarre view of steroids of being a horrible drug causing anything from cancer to rage to psychotic episodes.And that's not all that's wrong with them; thay can also cause [nytimes.com] cataracts [wikipedia.org], even in young people, as I found out after I was prescribed steroid eyedrops for an infection [slashdot.org].From a legal standpoint, they view as equal what is essentially a drug that increases the rate at which proteins fold to the most powerful hallucinogen known to man.The legality has nothing to do with a drug's actual danger.
LSD has no effect whatever except for its psychedelic properties, and it dialates the eyes.
Marijuana is just as illegal as heroin.
Alcohol and tobacco are completely legal, yet both are addictive and dangerous.
You can die from alcohol overdose, you can die from alcohol withdrawal.There is no correlation between a drug's safety and its legality.And many geezers do get steroids, as they're used for arthritis.
Doctors can and do prescribe steroids.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863265</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863471</id>
	<title>Robot suit vs. Law suit</title>
	<author>ljwest</author>
	<datestamp>1256473140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Control unit on back" - sounds like an accident waiting to happen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Control unit on back " - sounds like an accident waiting to happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Control unit on back" - sounds like an accident waiting to happen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863597</id>
	<title>Re:Darn it, I'm being serious again...</title>
	<author>rpillala</author>
	<datestamp>1256475900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And bone density, no?</htmltext>
<tokenext>And bone density , no ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And bone density, no?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29870177</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>shentino</author>
	<datestamp>1256550840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Round round get around, I get around...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Round round get around , I get around.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Round round get around, I get around...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862937</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29864781</id>
	<title>HAL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256488140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As i recall there was an earlier Mentioning of this product made by Cyberdyne, and it was Called HAL (Human Assistive Limb)</p><p>http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/06/09/008203&amp;tid=216</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As i recall there was an earlier Mentioning of this product made by Cyberdyne , and it was Called HAL ( Human Assistive Limb ) http : //hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 05/06/09/008203&amp;tid = 216</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As i recall there was an earlier Mentioning of this product made by Cyberdyne, and it was Called HAL (Human Assistive Limb)http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/06/09/008203&amp;tid=216</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863303</id>
	<title>Welcome</title>
	<author>jassuncao</author>
	<datestamp>1256469480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I, for one, welcome our new elder overlords</htmltext>
<tokenext>I , for one , welcome our new elder overlords</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, for one, welcome our new elder overlords</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863263</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on now!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256468520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not only is the company called Cyberdyne, the robot they make is called the Hybrid Assistive Limb, or HAL for short....</p><p>We're all going to die.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only is the company called Cyberdyne , the robot they make is called the Hybrid Assistive Limb , or HAL for short....We 're all going to die .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only is the company called Cyberdyne, the robot they make is called the Hybrid Assistive Limb, or HAL for short....We're all going to die.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862947</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29871497</id>
	<title>Re:Just what I need</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256566980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cool story bro.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cool story bro .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cool story bro.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863525</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862963</id>
	<title>cheap timberland boot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256461980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Happy  <a href="http://www.officialtimberland.com/timberland-classic-c-9.html" title="officialtimberland.com" rel="nofollow">timberland   classic</a> [officialtimberland.com] families are all alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own <a href="http://www.officialtimberland.com/" title="officialtimberland.com" rel="nofollow">buy cheap timberland</a> [officialtimberland.com] way. The  safety of the people is the highest <a href="http://www.officialtimberland.com/timberland-mens-custom-c-6.html" title="officialtimberland.com" rel="nofollow">timberland   men's custom</a> [officialtimberland.com] aw. High <a href="http://www.officialtimberland.com/" title="officialtimberland.com" rel="nofollow">cheap timberland boots</a> [officialtimberland.com] expectations are the key to every  <a href="http://www.officialtimberland.com/timberland-mens-6-inch-c-1.html" title="officialtimberland.com" rel="nofollow">timberland   men's 6 inch</a> [officialtimberland.com] thing. If you wait, all that happens is that <a href="http://www.officialtimberland.com/" title="officialtimberland.com" rel="nofollow">cheap timberland boots</a> [officialtimberland.com] you get older.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Happy timberland classic [ officialtimberland.com ] families are all alike ; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own buy cheap timberland [ officialtimberland.com ] way .
The safety of the people is the highest timberland men 's custom [ officialtimberland.com ] aw .
High cheap timberland boots [ officialtimberland.com ] expectations are the key to every timberland men 's 6 inch [ officialtimberland.com ] thing .
If you wait , all that happens is that cheap timberland boots [ officialtimberland.com ] you get older .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Happy  timberland   classic [officialtimberland.com] families are all alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own buy cheap timberland [officialtimberland.com] way.
The  safety of the people is the highest timberland   men's custom [officialtimberland.com] aw.
High cheap timberland boots [officialtimberland.com] expectations are the key to every  timberland   men's 6 inch [officialtimberland.com] thing.
If you wait, all that happens is that cheap timberland boots [officialtimberland.com] you get older.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863675</id>
	<title>Who needs Viagra?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256477040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>....I've fallen down and I can't get.... er... the clap!</htmltext>
<tokenext>....I 've fallen down and I ca n't get.... er... the clap !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>....I've fallen down and I can't get.... er... the clap!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865319</id>
	<title>Problem in the Making</title>
	<author>arthurpaliden</author>
	<datestamp>1256493420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am sorry but you are just too old to drive saftely any more.  You have to surender your licence.  Not to worry though here is your robotic suit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am sorry but you are just too old to drive saftely any more .
You have to surender your licence .
Not to worry though here is your robotic suit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am sorry but you are just too old to drive saftely any more.
You have to surender your licence.
Not to worry though here is your robotic suit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863291</id>
	<title>This is how it begins</title>
	<author>SeaFox</author>
	<datestamp>1256469180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Terminators are made of people!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Terminators are made of people !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Terminators are made of people!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863259</id>
	<title>I'm sorry Cyberdyne,</title>
	<author>Muskstick</author>
	<datestamp>1256468520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Im afraid you can't do that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Im afraid you ca n't do that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Im afraid you can't do that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865011</id>
	<title>Re:I love robotics, but so much biochem hate...</title>
	<author>ColdWetDog</author>
	<datestamp>1256490360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You really need to read the links you're espousing.  'Anabolic Steroids" are Schedule III.  The other drugs you mention are Schedule III or IV (Schedule I being the "most dangerous").<br> <br>
We <i>do</i> give anabolic steroids to some people.  However, like most drugs, they have effects and side effects.  And, like most drugs, they aren't panaceas.  While there is a tendency to broad brush steroids with the dark wash of something horrible (which, I believe, is the point you're trying to make), in the real world it is not such a big deal.<br> <br>
And no, DEA drug schedules aren't scientific, they're legal creations.  They don't have to make any real sense. Lay off the weed and drink more coffee - that is the road to true chemical enlightenment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You really need to read the links you 're espousing .
'Anabolic Steroids " are Schedule III .
The other drugs you mention are Schedule III or IV ( Schedule I being the " most dangerous " ) .
We do give anabolic steroids to some people .
However , like most drugs , they have effects and side effects .
And , like most drugs , they are n't panaceas .
While there is a tendency to broad brush steroids with the dark wash of something horrible ( which , I believe , is the point you 're trying to make ) , in the real world it is not such a big deal .
And no , DEA drug schedules are n't scientific , they 're legal creations .
They do n't have to make any real sense .
Lay off the weed and drink more coffee - that is the road to true chemical enlightenment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You really need to read the links you're espousing.
'Anabolic Steroids" are Schedule III.
The other drugs you mention are Schedule III or IV (Schedule I being the "most dangerous").
We do give anabolic steroids to some people.
However, like most drugs, they have effects and side effects.
And, like most drugs, they aren't panaceas.
While there is a tendency to broad brush steroids with the dark wash of something horrible (which, I believe, is the point you're trying to make), in the real world it is not such a big deal.
And no, DEA drug schedules aren't scientific, they're legal creations.
They don't have to make any real sense.
Lay off the weed and drink more coffee - that is the road to true chemical enlightenment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863265</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29872597</id>
	<title>Solution, or new problem?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256572620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This technology is a Good Thing iff the elderly people wearing the exoskeletons are healthier as a result.  Moving around and bearing (your own) weight is good, so if it makes the elderly patient more likely to ambulate, there could be a big net benefit.  If their muscles get weaker because they had a machine helper, it's a step backward.  I'd be interested to see actual experimental results with real infirm elderly rather than theoretical, marketing-imagined elderly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This technology is a Good Thing iff the elderly people wearing the exoskeletons are healthier as a result .
Moving around and bearing ( your own ) weight is good , so if it makes the elderly patient more likely to ambulate , there could be a big net benefit .
If their muscles get weaker because they had a machine helper , it 's a step backward .
I 'd be interested to see actual experimental results with real infirm elderly rather than theoretical , marketing-imagined elderly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This technology is a Good Thing iff the elderly people wearing the exoskeletons are healthier as a result.
Moving around and bearing (your own) weight is good, so if it makes the elderly patient more likely to ambulate, there could be a big net benefit.
If their muscles get weaker because they had a machine helper, it's a step backward.
I'd be interested to see actual experimental results with real infirm elderly rather than theoretical, marketing-imagined elderly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865435</id>
	<title>Re:Darn it, I'm being serious again...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256494560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>they're not killing people by accident any more</p></div><p>Well, that's a relief.  If someone kills me, I want it to be on purpose.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>they 're not killing people by accident any moreWell , that 's a relief .
If someone kills me , I want it to be on purpose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they're not killing people by accident any moreWell, that's a relief.
If someone kills me, I want it to be on purpose.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863551</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863361</id>
	<title>Already thought up 20 years ago..</title>
	<author>plasmacutter</author>
	<datestamp>1256470680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roujin\_Z" title="wikipedia.org">by these guys</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>Hopefully with the same results, it'd be nice to have some REAL news for a change.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>by these guys [ wikipedia.org ] Hopefully with the same results , it 'd be nice to have some REAL news for a change .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>by these guys [wikipedia.org]Hopefully with the same results, it'd be nice to have some REAL news for a change.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863339</id>
	<title>Re:Darn it, I'm being serious again...</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1256470080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its an interesting question. I am 44 years old, which is about half way to certain death. I would like to think that if I keep up the bike riding and other activities I could live forever. Unfortunately that approach hasn't worked for anybody else. I will stay as active as possible for as long as possible, but if I avoid heart failure and cancer I will probably spend my last years unable to move around under my own steam.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its an interesting question .
I am 44 years old , which is about half way to certain death .
I would like to think that if I keep up the bike riding and other activities I could live forever .
Unfortunately that approach has n't worked for anybody else .
I will stay as active as possible for as long as possible , but if I avoid heart failure and cancer I will probably spend my last years unable to move around under my own steam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its an interesting question.
I am 44 years old, which is about half way to certain death.
I would like to think that if I keep up the bike riding and other activities I could live forever.
Unfortunately that approach hasn't worked for anybody else.
I will stay as active as possible for as long as possible, but if I avoid heart failure and cancer I will probably spend my last years unable to move around under my own steam.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29868169</id>
	<title>Re:I am the pusher robot</title>
	<author>thunderclap</author>
	<datestamp>1256478360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and if they do, what then?</htmltext>
<tokenext>and if they do , what then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and if they do, what then?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863173</id>
	<title>actually, it's the same Cyberdyne</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256466360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where do you think the organic components of the Terminator come from?  Why do you think the Terminator has such a crotchety disposition?  It's made from old people!</p><p>Combine a century or more of experience and decades of having young people mess up their lawns with power and speed and it spells trouble.  Even worse than the Terminator is the next step, purely biological exoskeletons for old people.  I mean, what do you think Aliens are other than bio-enhanced old people with exoskeletons and acid for blood?</p><p>Making old people weak is nature's way of protecting the young.</p><p>Don't mess with mother nature.</p><p>(For the humor impaired:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where do you think the organic components of the Terminator come from ?
Why do you think the Terminator has such a crotchety disposition ?
It 's made from old people ! Combine a century or more of experience and decades of having young people mess up their lawns with power and speed and it spells trouble .
Even worse than the Terminator is the next step , purely biological exoskeletons for old people .
I mean , what do you think Aliens are other than bio-enhanced old people with exoskeletons and acid for blood ? Making old people weak is nature 's way of protecting the young.Do n't mess with mother nature .
( For the humor impaired : : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where do you think the organic components of the Terminator come from?
Why do you think the Terminator has such a crotchety disposition?
It's made from old people!Combine a century or more of experience and decades of having young people mess up their lawns with power and speed and it spells trouble.
Even worse than the Terminator is the next step, purely biological exoskeletons for old people.
I mean, what do you think Aliens are other than bio-enhanced old people with exoskeletons and acid for blood?Making old people weak is nature's way of protecting the young.Don't mess with mother nature.
(For the humor impaired: :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865005</id>
	<title>Re:Oh come on now!</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1256490300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given your office's penchant for the obvious, it's a good thing you guys don't work with anyone with a last name of 'Punchmyballs'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given your office 's penchant for the obvious , it 's a good thing you guys do n't work with anyone with a last name of 'Punchmyballs' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given your office's penchant for the obvious, it's a good thing you guys don't work with anyone with a last name of 'Punchmyballs'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862947</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29874577</id>
	<title>What was it Nightowl said about his power suit?</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1256582280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And elderly bones are even more brittle.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...like peanut brittle.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And elderly bones are even more brittle .
...like peanut brittle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And elderly bones are even more brittle.
...like peanut brittle.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863153</id>
	<title>"I'll be back"...to post.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256465820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Even though still in R&amp;D, this video (@3m15s) shows a pretty promising future for the elderly."</p><p>Well once Slashdot get's all the Terminator references out of their system and focuses on the video. What's interesting is twofold. One how well the systems actually work, and just how compact they really are. I also suspect that Tokyo would be most geeks wet dream.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Even though still in R&amp;D , this video ( @ 3m15s ) shows a pretty promising future for the elderly .
" Well once Slashdot get 's all the Terminator references out of their system and focuses on the video .
What 's interesting is twofold .
One how well the systems actually work , and just how compact they really are .
I also suspect that Tokyo would be most geeks wet dream .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Even though still in R&amp;D, this video (@3m15s) shows a pretty promising future for the elderly.
"Well once Slashdot get's all the Terminator references out of their system and focuses on the video.
What's interesting is twofold.
One how well the systems actually work, and just how compact they really are.
I also suspect that Tokyo would be most geeks wet dream.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863347</id>
	<title>Re:Ironically</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256470320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>at least it's better than a robotic "Reach Around"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>at least it 's better than a robotic " Reach Around "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>at least it's better than a robotic "Reach Around"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862937</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863557</id>
	<title>Will it help you type?</title>
	<author>ickleberry</author>
	<datestamp>1256475420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because you know, email is the preferred method of communication among the elderly in Korea</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because you know , email is the preferred method of communication among the elderly in Korea</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because you know, email is the preferred method of communication among the elderly in Korea</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863391</id>
	<title>I for one...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256471520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I for one welcome our new elderly robotic overlords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one welcome our new elderly robotic overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one welcome our new elderly robotic overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29864129</id>
	<title>Elderly?</title>
	<author>jklovanc</author>
	<datestamp>1256481600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This system purports to be able to be use to increase mobility of the elderly; why are all the people in the demos young?</p><p>I think it is because it still needs quite a bit of strength and balance to use. Walking and balance are very complex. Look at the joints. They are all single plane actuators. You can not duplicate the complex movements of the hip with that. In the plane of the actuator you get a power boost but it does not help in other directions.</p><p>Take a look at the foot. A big part of balance is the big toe. It that is not strong enough it does not matter if the ankle is strong you will still fall.</p><p>What about the elderly where their inner ear is not functioning correctly. If the input to the system is incorrect the person will fall.</p><p>As a strength enhancer possible; as an elderly mobility device probably not</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This system purports to be able to be use to increase mobility of the elderly ; why are all the people in the demos young ? I think it is because it still needs quite a bit of strength and balance to use .
Walking and balance are very complex .
Look at the joints .
They are all single plane actuators .
You can not duplicate the complex movements of the hip with that .
In the plane of the actuator you get a power boost but it does not help in other directions.Take a look at the foot .
A big part of balance is the big toe .
It that is not strong enough it does not matter if the ankle is strong you will still fall.What about the elderly where their inner ear is not functioning correctly .
If the input to the system is incorrect the person will fall.As a strength enhancer possible ; as an elderly mobility device probably not</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This system purports to be able to be use to increase mobility of the elderly; why are all the people in the demos young?I think it is because it still needs quite a bit of strength and balance to use.
Walking and balance are very complex.
Look at the joints.
They are all single plane actuators.
You can not duplicate the complex movements of the hip with that.
In the plane of the actuator you get a power boost but it does not help in other directions.Take a look at the foot.
A big part of balance is the big toe.
It that is not strong enough it does not matter if the ankle is strong you will still fall.What about the elderly where their inner ear is not functioning correctly.
If the input to the system is incorrect the person will fall.As a strength enhancer possible; as an elderly mobility device probably not</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863973</id>
	<title>Sounds like a farce</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256480100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I'm a cybernetic organism; old, living tissue under metal exoskeleton. My CPU is not working correctly. Maybe my grandson can help me with my learning computer. I think it's the modem."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 'm a cybernetic organism ; old , living tissue under metal exoskeleton .
My CPU is not working correctly .
Maybe my grandson can help me with my learning computer .
I think it 's the modem .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I'm a cybernetic organism; old, living tissue under metal exoskeleton.
My CPU is not working correctly.
Maybe my grandson can help me with my learning computer.
I think it's the modem.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29868225</id>
	<title>Re:Darn it, I'm being serious again...</title>
	<author>tmosley</author>
	<datestamp>1256479500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or it helps build highly muscular cyborgs from the future.<br> <br>

The only REAL solution here is NO exercise.  None at all.  Better that we end up with Terminators that look like the humans from Wall-E than Austrian supermen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or it helps build highly muscular cyborgs from the future .
The only REAL solution here is NO exercise .
None at all .
Better that we end up with Terminators that look like the humans from Wall-E than Austrian supermen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or it helps build highly muscular cyborgs from the future.
The only REAL solution here is NO exercise.
None at all.
Better that we end up with Terminators that look like the humans from Wall-E than Austrian supermen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863313</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah right</title>
	<author>falken0905</author>
	<datestamp>1256469540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Doh.  He came back from the future to warn us and prevent the creation of terminators.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Doh .
He came back from the future to warn us and prevent the creation of terminators .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doh.
He came back from the future to warn us and prevent the creation of terminators.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863073</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862937</id>
	<title>Ironically</title>
	<author>allknowingfrog</author>
	<datestamp>1256461560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Walk-around" actually sounds <i>less</i> advanced than "Hoverround."</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Walk-around " actually sounds less advanced than " Hoverround .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Walk-around" actually sounds less advanced than "Hoverround.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863075</id>
	<title>I, for one...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256464560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...welcome our new eldery overloads!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...welcome our new eldery overloads !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...welcome our new eldery overloads!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863003</id>
	<title>Cyberdyne building a HAL suit?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256462820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What an <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/05/10/09/0139244/Exoskeletons-in-IEEE-Spectrum" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">unprecedented</a> [slashdot.org] <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/08/10/10/0034205/Robotic-Suit-For-Rent-In-Japan" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">and</a> [slashdot.org] <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/04/10/0233237/Robot-Body-Suit-To-Be-Marketed-In-Japan" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">exciting</a> [slashdot.org] <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/09/08/2227228/Exoskeletons-For-Rent-In-Japan" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">development.</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What an unprecedented [ slashdot.org ] and [ slashdot.org ] exciting [ slashdot.org ] development .
[ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What an unprecedented [slashdot.org] and [slashdot.org] exciting [slashdot.org] development.
[slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863241
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862937
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863241
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29872369
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865005
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29868225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863241
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865993
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29874885
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863265
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865011
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863265
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29876401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863241
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865435
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863241
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863241
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29870177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862937
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29873505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863265
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863329
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29870155
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863073
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863073
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29871497
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863525
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29873029
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863241
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863313
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863073
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863173
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_25_0050256_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29868169
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862967
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_0050256.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863265
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29873505
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865011
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29874885
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_0050256.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863075
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_0050256.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863073
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863401
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863313
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29870155
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_0050256.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863471
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_0050256.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863101
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_0050256.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863303
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_0050256.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863241
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29868225
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863597
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863551
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865435
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865333
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863339
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863345
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29876401
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29873029
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_0050256.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862967
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29868169
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_0050256.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863023
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_0050256.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862947
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865993
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865285
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29872369
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863329
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865005
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_0050256.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863525
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29871497
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_0050256.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863391
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_0050256.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863173
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29865351
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_0050256.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29870753
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_0050256.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863291
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_0050256.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29862937
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29870177
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863347
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_0050256.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863147
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_25_0050256.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_25_0050256.29863675
</commentlist>
</conversation>
