<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_24_1439245</id>
	<title>Android Goes To the Battlefield</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1256401380000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>wiseandroid writes <i>"Google's mobile operating system Android has won plenty of adherents among cellphone makers and gadget manufacturers since its 2007 debut. Now defense contractor Raytheon is preparing it for a more urgent mission: <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/10/19/android-google-military-technology-wireless-raytheon.html">saving lives in places like Afghanistan and Pakistan</a>. Using Android software tools, Raytheon engineers have built a basic application for military personnel that combines maps with a buddy list. Raytheon calls the entire framework the Raytheon Android Tactical System, or RATS for short. Mark Bigham, a vice president of business development in Raytheon's Intelligence and Information Systems unit, says the company selected Android because its open source nature made developing applications easy."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>wiseandroid writes " Google 's mobile operating system Android has won plenty of adherents among cellphone makers and gadget manufacturers since its 2007 debut .
Now defense contractor Raytheon is preparing it for a more urgent mission : saving lives in places like Afghanistan and Pakistan .
Using Android software tools , Raytheon engineers have built a basic application for military personnel that combines maps with a buddy list .
Raytheon calls the entire framework the Raytheon Android Tactical System , or RATS for short .
Mark Bigham , a vice president of business development in Raytheon 's Intelligence and Information Systems unit , says the company selected Android because its open source nature made developing applications easy .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wiseandroid writes "Google's mobile operating system Android has won plenty of adherents among cellphone makers and gadget manufacturers since its 2007 debut.
Now defense contractor Raytheon is preparing it for a more urgent mission: saving lives in places like Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Using Android software tools, Raytheon engineers have built a basic application for military personnel that combines maps with a buddy list.
Raytheon calls the entire framework the Raytheon Android Tactical System, or RATS for short.
Mark Bigham, a vice president of business development in Raytheon's Intelligence and Information Systems unit, says the company selected Android because its open source nature made developing applications easy.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29860463</id>
	<title>Re:acronym</title>
	<author>Runaway1956</author>
	<datestamp>1256384940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uhhh - we are talking about the MILITARY.  RATS is far more appealing than ARTS.  ARTS is something we might expect to find at Berkeley or Oakland.  It sounds gay.  RATS, on the other hand, inspire fear in people everywhere.  RATS are dangerous in a variety of ways.</p><p>You should ask some soldiers, sailors, and veterans what their nicknames are.  I served with guys knows as Scurvey, and Spaz - no one ever got a cute nickname.  If you tried to give him one, he'd break your nose and convince you differently.</p><p>ARTS.  This ain't the girl scouts we are talking about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uhhh - we are talking about the MILITARY .
RATS is far more appealing than ARTS .
ARTS is something we might expect to find at Berkeley or Oakland .
It sounds gay .
RATS , on the other hand , inspire fear in people everywhere .
RATS are dangerous in a variety of ways.You should ask some soldiers , sailors , and veterans what their nicknames are .
I served with guys knows as Scurvey , and Spaz - no one ever got a cute nickname .
If you tried to give him one , he 'd break your nose and convince you differently.ARTS .
This ai n't the girl scouts we are talking about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uhhh - we are talking about the MILITARY.
RATS is far more appealing than ARTS.
ARTS is something we might expect to find at Berkeley or Oakland.
It sounds gay.
RATS, on the other hand, inspire fear in people everywhere.
RATS are dangerous in a variety of ways.You should ask some soldiers, sailors, and veterans what their nicknames are.
I served with guys knows as Scurvey, and Spaz - no one ever got a cute nickname.
If you tried to give him one, he'd break your nose and convince you differently.ARTS.
This ain't the girl scouts we are talking about.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858047</id>
	<title>Does it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256410440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...run Android?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...run Android ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...run Android?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858023</id>
	<title>Linux?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256410320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did Raytheon miss the announcement that linux is open source too?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did Raytheon miss the announcement that linux is open source too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did Raytheon miss the announcement that linux is open source too?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29860365</id>
	<title>Re:Saving lives??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256383980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why do breathless writers always say "saving lives" when they refer to military applications? They're about taking lives. Just taking different ones.</p></div><p>Probably for the same reason it's called the "Department of Defense" rather than the "Department of War"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do breathless writers always say " saving lives " when they refer to military applications ?
They 're about taking lives .
Just taking different ones.Probably for the same reason it 's called the " Department of Defense " rather than the " Department of War "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do breathless writers always say "saving lives" when they refer to military applications?
They're about taking lives.
Just taking different ones.Probably for the same reason it's called the "Department of Defense" rather than the "Department of War"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857599</id>
	<title>Re:Can GPL'd software contributors block this?</title>
	<author>obarthelemy</author>
	<datestamp>1256407200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The US's wars right now are not a very good example, but sometimes wars ARE about saving lives and helping people, not just about mobilizing one's political base, handing money to VP's friends, grabbing oil and avenging daddy's rep.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The US 's wars right now are not a very good example , but sometimes wars ARE about saving lives and helping people , not just about mobilizing one 's political base , handing money to VP 's friends , grabbing oil and avenging daddy 's rep .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The US's wars right now are not a very good example, but sometimes wars ARE about saving lives and helping people, not just about mobilizing one's political base, handing money to VP's friends, grabbing oil and avenging daddy's rep.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857497</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385</id>
	<title>Saving lives??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256405700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why do breathless writers always say "saving lives" when they refer to military applications? They're about taking lives. Just taking different ones.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do breathless writers always say " saving lives " when they refer to military applications ?
They 're about taking lives .
Just taking different ones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do breathless writers always say "saving lives" when they refer to military applications?
They're about taking lives.
Just taking different ones.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857561</id>
	<title>Is Android really robust enough for this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256406840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My concern is that this type of software application is too generally available. There is a reason why governments around the world use custom created software for their major military projects.

Don't get me wrong, if a widely available technology can be used to aid in conflicts then I am all for it but I would suggest that putting trust in software that wasn't designed with a military purpose in mind is a dangerous mindset for people to get in.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My concern is that this type of software application is too generally available .
There is a reason why governments around the world use custom created software for their major military projects .
Do n't get me wrong , if a widely available technology can be used to aid in conflicts then I am all for it but I would suggest that putting trust in software that was n't designed with a military purpose in mind is a dangerous mindset for people to get in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My concern is that this type of software application is too generally available.
There is a reason why governments around the world use custom created software for their major military projects.
Don't get me wrong, if a widely available technology can be used to aid in conflicts then I am all for it but I would suggest that putting trust in software that wasn't designed with a military purpose in mind is a dangerous mindset for people to get in.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857467</id>
	<title>G I JOE</title>
	<author>LoudMusic</author>
	<datestamp>1256406240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once again, Sci-Fi begets reality. This time toys go to the battlefield.</p><p><a href="http://www.toyarchive.com/STAForSale/NEW2001+/GiJoe/MOSC/AFAPacRatMachineGun85a.jpg" title="toyarchive.com">http://www.toyarchive.com/STAForSale/NEW2001+/GiJoe/MOSC/AFAPacRatMachineGun85a.jpg</a> [toyarchive.com]</p><p>I believe there were three, and I had all of them as a kid. Seems like they were super flimsy and basically fell apart without even touching them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once again , Sci-Fi begets reality .
This time toys go to the battlefield.http : //www.toyarchive.com/STAForSale/NEW2001 + /GiJoe/MOSC/AFAPacRatMachineGun85a.jpg [ toyarchive.com ] I believe there were three , and I had all of them as a kid .
Seems like they were super flimsy and basically fell apart without even touching them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once again, Sci-Fi begets reality.
This time toys go to the battlefield.http://www.toyarchive.com/STAForSale/NEW2001+/GiJoe/MOSC/AFAPacRatMachineGun85a.jpg [toyarchive.com]I believe there were three, and I had all of them as a kid.
Seems like they were super flimsy and basically fell apart without even touching them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857443</id>
	<title>Re:Saving lives??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256406060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's more patriotic.  people like feeling good about themselves, and "Killing foreigners" isn't as patriotic of soldiers as "saving lives".</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's more patriotic .
people like feeling good about themselves , and " Killing foreigners " is n't as patriotic of soldiers as " saving lives " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's more patriotic.
people like feeling good about themselves, and "Killing foreigners" isn't as patriotic of soldiers as "saving lives".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857719</id>
	<title>"Saving" lives</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256408160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fuck Ratheon.</p><p>That is all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck Ratheon.That is all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck Ratheon.That is all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858845</id>
	<title>Re:Saving lives??</title>
	<author>orangeyouglad</author>
	<datestamp>1256416140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>For those wondering who spoke what was quoted: He was General George S. Patton.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For those wondering who spoke what was quoted : He was General George S. Patton .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those wondering who spoke what was quoted: He was General George S. Patton.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857921</id>
	<title>Re:I'll wait for the field trials</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256409660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Android is not limited to and does not imply usage of current civilian cell phone tech. Nothing keeps them from designing an android-device that communicates over some military tech. Also, they could build it with strong cache capacity, or somehow have the unit keep all the data and rely on communications only for updates.</p><p>You do have a point: relying on cell networks on the field is not exactly the best idea, since an attack on the cell's tower would compromise your communications. Mesh networks or satellite-based may be better for that purpose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Android is not limited to and does not imply usage of current civilian cell phone tech .
Nothing keeps them from designing an android-device that communicates over some military tech .
Also , they could build it with strong cache capacity , or somehow have the unit keep all the data and rely on communications only for updates.You do have a point : relying on cell networks on the field is not exactly the best idea , since an attack on the cell 's tower would compromise your communications .
Mesh networks or satellite-based may be better for that purpose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Android is not limited to and does not imply usage of current civilian cell phone tech.
Nothing keeps them from designing an android-device that communicates over some military tech.
Also, they could build it with strong cache capacity, or somehow have the unit keep all the data and rely on communications only for updates.You do have a point: relying on cell networks on the field is not exactly the best idea, since an attack on the cell's tower would compromise your communications.
Mesh networks or satellite-based may be better for that purpose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29860765</id>
	<title>Re:Saving lives??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256387820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Same thing as "Secretary of Defense". The title used to be "Secretary of War". It is just a matter of doublespeak. Downsizing and rightsizing fall in the same category.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Same thing as " Secretary of Defense " .
The title used to be " Secretary of War " .
It is just a matter of doublespeak .
Downsizing and rightsizing fall in the same category .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same thing as "Secretary of Defense".
The title used to be "Secretary of War".
It is just a matter of doublespeak.
Downsizing and rightsizing fall in the same category.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857911</id>
	<title>Re:Saving lives??</title>
	<author>muzicman</author>
	<datestamp>1256409600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe they are referring to the lives of the soldiers who are to be using this software. But obviously their lives don't count as they are just soldiers aren't they.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they are referring to the lives of the soldiers who are to be using this software .
But obviously their lives do n't count as they are just soldiers are n't they .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they are referring to the lives of the soldiers who are to be using this software.
But obviously their lives don't count as they are just soldiers aren't they.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858255</id>
	<title>Re:Limited Distribution Benefits</title>
	<author>ducomputergeek</author>
	<datestamp>1256411700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/business/integration/#deploying" title="apple.com">http://www.apple.com/iphone/business/integration/#deploying</a> [apple.com]</p><p>There is the Apple Enterprise Developers program for creating and deploying in house apps.</p><p><a href="http://developer.apple.com/iphone/program/apply.html" title="apple.com">http://developer.apple.com/iphone/program/apply.html</a> [apple.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.apple.com/iphone/business/integration/ # deploying [ apple.com ] There is the Apple Enterprise Developers program for creating and deploying in house apps.http : //developer.apple.com/iphone/program/apply.html [ apple.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.apple.com/iphone/business/integration/#deploying [apple.com]There is the Apple Enterprise Developers program for creating and deploying in house apps.http://developer.apple.com/iphone/program/apply.html [apple.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29867451</id>
	<title>Can't wait...</title>
	<author>iqqmuT</author>
	<datestamp>1256469180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can we see real killer apps now?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we see real killer apps now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we see real killer apps now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857767</id>
	<title>Android Validation</title>
	<author>earlymon</author>
	<datestamp>1256408640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Android's been getting a lot of tech press lately.  I'm not sure who that press impacts - and while we're smarmy about the new Droid ad, I'm not sure who that's impacting either - the existing Android faithful or a new market.</p><p>Now Forbes - the darling of investors and managers - is telling that audience that a major defense contractor with an iconic American name in electronics has selected Android.</p><p>To top it off, the follow-on links given to Forbes readers are:</p><p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/09/10/sanjay-jha-android-technology-wireless-motorola.html" title="forbes.com">Motorola CEO Talks Android</a> [forbes.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/07/22/google-android-homes-technology-wireless-google.html" title="forbes.com">Google's Android To Invade Homes</a> [forbes.com]</p><p>I think that this one story just did a lot to validate Android as mainstream-ready to corporate America - and that it's good for personal use, too (second tagged story alone).</p><p>Anyway - those are just my ideas.  I don't really know what the inflection points for new tech-product demand are - I'm one of those clowns that tends to adopt any new tech as soon as reasonably practical - if not before.</p><p>Maybe I'm romanticizing - but I seem to recall a lot of stories about soldiers getting GPS units from home back in Desert Storm, sent by parents buying them from Radio Shack.  I think that that really raised awareness and GPS units proliferated and prices dropped.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Android 's been getting a lot of tech press lately .
I 'm not sure who that press impacts - and while we 're smarmy about the new Droid ad , I 'm not sure who that 's impacting either - the existing Android faithful or a new market.Now Forbes - the darling of investors and managers - is telling that audience that a major defense contractor with an iconic American name in electronics has selected Android.To top it off , the follow-on links given to Forbes readers are : Motorola CEO Talks Android [ forbes.com ] Google 's Android To Invade Homes [ forbes.com ] I think that this one story just did a lot to validate Android as mainstream-ready to corporate America - and that it 's good for personal use , too ( second tagged story alone ) .Anyway - those are just my ideas .
I do n't really know what the inflection points for new tech-product demand are - I 'm one of those clowns that tends to adopt any new tech as soon as reasonably practical - if not before.Maybe I 'm romanticizing - but I seem to recall a lot of stories about soldiers getting GPS units from home back in Desert Storm , sent by parents buying them from Radio Shack .
I think that that really raised awareness and GPS units proliferated and prices dropped .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Android's been getting a lot of tech press lately.
I'm not sure who that press impacts - and while we're smarmy about the new Droid ad, I'm not sure who that's impacting either - the existing Android faithful or a new market.Now Forbes - the darling of investors and managers - is telling that audience that a major defense contractor with an iconic American name in electronics has selected Android.To top it off, the follow-on links given to Forbes readers are:Motorola CEO Talks Android [forbes.com]Google's Android To Invade Homes [forbes.com]I think that this one story just did a lot to validate Android as mainstream-ready to corporate America - and that it's good for personal use, too (second tagged story alone).Anyway - those are just my ideas.
I don't really know what the inflection points for new tech-product demand are - I'm one of those clowns that tends to adopt any new tech as soon as reasonably practical - if not before.Maybe I'm romanticizing - but I seem to recall a lot of stories about soldiers getting GPS units from home back in Desert Storm, sent by parents buying them from Radio Shack.
I think that that really raised awareness and GPS units proliferated and prices dropped.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29859713</id>
	<title>Re:Saving lives??</title>
	<author>evilviper</author>
	<datestamp>1256379000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."</p></div></blockquote><p>A quote by Gen. George S. Patton.  Likely the most over-hyped military leader in all of US Military History.  The only thing he was particularly good at was PR.  He's a completely mediocre commander otherwise.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country .
He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country .
" A quote by Gen. George S. Patton. Likely the most over-hyped military leader in all of US Military History .
The only thing he was particularly good at was PR .
He 's a completely mediocre commander otherwise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country.
He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country.
"A quote by Gen. George S. Patton.  Likely the most over-hyped military leader in all of US Military History.
The only thing he was particularly good at was PR.
He's a completely mediocre commander otherwise.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857325</id>
	<title>First post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256405160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&lt;insightful comment here&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext></tokentext>
<sentencetext></sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858833</id>
	<title>Re:Saving lives??</title>
	<author>Storchei</author>
	<datestamp>1256416020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH YOU!!

Even if we compare the number of people killed by the US against the number of people (soldiers and others) killed by the so called "evil" countries, the statistics is at least worrying!

To me it seems the US wants to improve the killing of enemy people, make it more efficient (and cheaper) using technology.

No further comments</htmltext>
<tokenext>I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH YOU ! !
Even if we compare the number of people killed by the US against the number of people ( soldiers and others ) killed by the so called " evil " countries , the statistics is at least worrying !
To me it seems the US wants to improve the killing of enemy people , make it more efficient ( and cheaper ) using technology .
No further comments</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH YOU!!
Even if we compare the number of people killed by the US against the number of people (soldiers and others) killed by the so called "evil" countries, the statistics is at least worrying!
To me it seems the US wants to improve the killing of enemy people, make it more efficient (and cheaper) using technology.
No further comments</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857733</id>
	<title>Re:Saving lives??  Better acronym derived from ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256408280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Raytheon Android Tactical Force Urban Command &amp; Kontrol</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Raytheon Android Tactical Force Urban Command &amp; Kontrol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Raytheon Android Tactical Force Urban Command &amp; Kontrol</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857545</id>
	<title>I do not believe this man!</title>
	<author>bogaboga</author>
	<datestamp>1256406720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Mark Bigham, a vice president of business development in Raytheon's Intelligence and Information Systems unit, says the company selected Android because its open-source nature <b>made developing applications easy."</b> (emphasis mine)</p></div><p>If that was the case, then Open Source systems would have more applications than closed source counterparts. But this is hardly the case.</p><p>In addition, I see far more substandard, half-baked software on "open" systems than closed ones. What's going on?</p><p>An example: Open Source OO.o is still as buggy and a pain to use on its Open source native OS (read Linux), though it runs and feels better on closed source Windows. This is after a decade of development. Do not tell me OO.o does not have resources. I just do not understand this argument.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mark Bigham , a vice president of business development in Raytheon 's Intelligence and Information Systems unit , says the company selected Android because its open-source nature made developing applications easy .
" ( emphasis mine ) If that was the case , then Open Source systems would have more applications than closed source counterparts .
But this is hardly the case.In addition , I see far more substandard , half-baked software on " open " systems than closed ones .
What 's going on ? An example : Open Source OO.o is still as buggy and a pain to use on its Open source native OS ( read Linux ) , though it runs and feels better on closed source Windows .
This is after a decade of development .
Do not tell me OO.o does not have resources .
I just do not understand this argument .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mark Bigham, a vice president of business development in Raytheon's Intelligence and Information Systems unit, says the company selected Android because its open-source nature made developing applications easy.
" (emphasis mine)If that was the case, then Open Source systems would have more applications than closed source counterparts.
But this is hardly the case.In addition, I see far more substandard, half-baked software on "open" systems than closed ones.
What's going on?An example: Open Source OO.o is still as buggy and a pain to use on its Open source native OS (read Linux), though it runs and feels better on closed source Windows.
This is after a decade of development.
Do not tell me OO.o does not have resources.
I just do not understand this argument.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29861031</id>
	<title>Re:NorthLockRayGoog</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1256390760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The cost of software freedom is that other people have it too.</p><p>If this bothers you, you are free to write apps to help the side you prefer kill the side you dislike.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The cost of software freedom is that other people have it too.If this bothers you , you are free to write apps to help the side you prefer kill the side you dislike .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The cost of software freedom is that other people have it too.If this bothers you, you are free to write apps to help the side you prefer kill the side you dislike.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858491</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29871363</id>
	<title>as if it were never going</title>
	<author>nimbius</author>
	<datestamp>1256566260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>to the battlefield.  most technology in the United States invariably finds its way into our war machine.  Since we spend the majority of our GDP on war, we have seen everything from tabasco sauce to laptops, go carts and exploding anti-tank dogs, an operating system based almost entirely on the notion of freedom and now an internet enabled cellphone.  <br> <br>
one could argue war as we have waged it in modern times has been a thinly veiled product placement campaign.  We will know when real war appears as it wont involve a new hummer to buy, a new cellphone on the "front lines" or a new iphone app.  It will involve silence, discipline, remorse, depression, and an endless crashing wave of violence and destruction that will not be twittered, vblogged, or podcasted because the soldier at their cracked and bloodied Android hasnt any fingers left with which to hold anything more than his muddied rifle.</htmltext>
<tokenext>to the battlefield .
most technology in the United States invariably finds its way into our war machine .
Since we spend the majority of our GDP on war , we have seen everything from tabasco sauce to laptops , go carts and exploding anti-tank dogs , an operating system based almost entirely on the notion of freedom and now an internet enabled cellphone .
one could argue war as we have waged it in modern times has been a thinly veiled product placement campaign .
We will know when real war appears as it wont involve a new hummer to buy , a new cellphone on the " front lines " or a new iphone app .
It will involve silence , discipline , remorse , depression , and an endless crashing wave of violence and destruction that will not be twittered , vblogged , or podcasted because the soldier at their cracked and bloodied Android hasnt any fingers left with which to hold anything more than his muddied rifle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to the battlefield.
most technology in the United States invariably finds its way into our war machine.
Since we spend the majority of our GDP on war, we have seen everything from tabasco sauce to laptops, go carts and exploding anti-tank dogs, an operating system based almost entirely on the notion of freedom and now an internet enabled cellphone.
one could argue war as we have waged it in modern times has been a thinly veiled product placement campaign.
We will know when real war appears as it wont involve a new hummer to buy, a new cellphone on the "front lines" or a new iphone app.
It will involve silence, discipline, remorse, depression, and an endless crashing wave of violence and destruction that will not be twittered, vblogged, or podcasted because the soldier at their cracked and bloodied Android hasnt any fingers left with which to hold anything more than his muddied rifle.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857497</id>
	<title>Can GPL'd software contributors block this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256406420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is there any way for contributors to the free software movement to block use of their software by military contractors?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there any way for contributors to the free software movement to block use of their software by military contractors ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there any way for contributors to the free software movement to block use of their software by military contractors?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857755</id>
	<title>Re:Is Android really robust enough for this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256408460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No - it is not. The day my life depends on Android is the day I call my wife and kid and tell them Goodbye for the last time. Having been in tactical situations, I can tell you that you'll pick up a stone and throw it if you have to, so no question that any tool that will provide you with information in a void thereof is welcome, and and weapon that will prevent loss of life is welcome (to the extend possible - no intention of starting a political debate here).

But the fact is that Android is too unreliable, and the information and system could be compromised. So if this becomes part of a strategic initiative, and hence a target for the adversary, it's just one more thing I need to carry - which I don't need. This is not an opinion, this is based on lack of certifications like CC or other formal methods.

Why they chose Android is more likely because 1) Marketing (don't kid yourself into thinking that does not happen in the military) 2) The developers and PMs wanted to add it to their resumes and/or 3) They did not want to pay the outrageous per-seat development licenses of the more appropriate systems and go through the longer dev cycle with more expensive engineers (read $$$).</htmltext>
<tokenext>No - it is not .
The day my life depends on Android is the day I call my wife and kid and tell them Goodbye for the last time .
Having been in tactical situations , I can tell you that you 'll pick up a stone and throw it if you have to , so no question that any tool that will provide you with information in a void thereof is welcome , and and weapon that will prevent loss of life is welcome ( to the extend possible - no intention of starting a political debate here ) .
But the fact is that Android is too unreliable , and the information and system could be compromised .
So if this becomes part of a strategic initiative , and hence a target for the adversary , it 's just one more thing I need to carry - which I do n't need .
This is not an opinion , this is based on lack of certifications like CC or other formal methods .
Why they chose Android is more likely because 1 ) Marketing ( do n't kid yourself into thinking that does not happen in the military ) 2 ) The developers and PMs wanted to add it to their resumes and/or 3 ) They did not want to pay the outrageous per-seat development licenses of the more appropriate systems and go through the longer dev cycle with more expensive engineers ( read $ $ $ ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No - it is not.
The day my life depends on Android is the day I call my wife and kid and tell them Goodbye for the last time.
Having been in tactical situations, I can tell you that you'll pick up a stone and throw it if you have to, so no question that any tool that will provide you with information in a void thereof is welcome, and and weapon that will prevent loss of life is welcome (to the extend possible - no intention of starting a political debate here).
But the fact is that Android is too unreliable, and the information and system could be compromised.
So if this becomes part of a strategic initiative, and hence a target for the adversary, it's just one more thing I need to carry - which I don't need.
This is not an opinion, this is based on lack of certifications like CC or other formal methods.
Why they chose Android is more likely because 1) Marketing (don't kid yourself into thinking that does not happen in the military) 2) The developers and PMs wanted to add it to their resumes and/or 3) They did not want to pay the outrageous per-seat development licenses of the more appropriate systems and go through the longer dev cycle with more expensive engineers (read $$$).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857561</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29864925</id>
	<title>Re:Saving lives??</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1256489520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do my mod points always expire just before some idiot posts bullshit like this?</p><p>Grow up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do my mod points always expire just before some idiot posts bullshit like this ? Grow up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do my mod points always expire just before some idiot posts bullshit like this?Grow up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29862999</id>
	<title>Terrorist iPhone App</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256462820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hear the terrorists are working on an iPhone app as well to help them with their roadside bombs... its called iExplode.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear the terrorists are working on an iPhone app as well to help them with their roadside bombs... its called iExplode .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear the terrorists are working on an iPhone app as well to help them with their roadside bombs... its called iExplode.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857535</id>
	<title>I'll wait for the field trials</title>
	<author>iron spartan</author>
	<datestamp>1256406660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It sounds good, but then again so did Land Warrior.</p><p>I can see it being useful in an urban environment, but can see a lot of issues with it in the mountains of Afghanistan.  First being connectivity.  Relying on a cell network in a 3rd world country doesn't seem like all that good of an idea.  Getting a reliable signal in the mountains is hard as it is.  It would be very bad for a unit to get used to using this system, and then get somewhere that it no longer works.</p><p>Second problem is EM signature.  Cell phones broadcast as long as they are on.  In urban areas, with lots of cell phones this isn't all that big of deal.  In areas with very low populations, a cell phone being on can easily give away a platoons position.  Frequency hoping helps with this on regular military radios and cell phones can't do this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It sounds good , but then again so did Land Warrior.I can see it being useful in an urban environment , but can see a lot of issues with it in the mountains of Afghanistan .
First being connectivity .
Relying on a cell network in a 3rd world country does n't seem like all that good of an idea .
Getting a reliable signal in the mountains is hard as it is .
It would be very bad for a unit to get used to using this system , and then get somewhere that it no longer works.Second problem is EM signature .
Cell phones broadcast as long as they are on .
In urban areas , with lots of cell phones this is n't all that big of deal .
In areas with very low populations , a cell phone being on can easily give away a platoons position .
Frequency hoping helps with this on regular military radios and cell phones ca n't do this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It sounds good, but then again so did Land Warrior.I can see it being useful in an urban environment, but can see a lot of issues with it in the mountains of Afghanistan.
First being connectivity.
Relying on a cell network in a 3rd world country doesn't seem like all that good of an idea.
Getting a reliable signal in the mountains is hard as it is.
It would be very bad for a unit to get used to using this system, and then get somewhere that it no longer works.Second problem is EM signature.
Cell phones broadcast as long as they are on.
In urban areas, with lots of cell phones this isn't all that big of deal.
In areas with very low populations, a cell phone being on can easily give away a platoons position.
Frequency hoping helps with this on regular military radios and cell phones can't do this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29860555</id>
	<title>Re:First post</title>
	<author>daninspokane</author>
	<datestamp>1256385900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't read this - I mis-moderated someone &gt;.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't read this - I mis-moderated someone &gt; .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't read this - I mis-moderated someone &gt;.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857325</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857393</id>
	<title>acronym</title>
	<author>igotmybfg</author>
	<datestamp>1256405700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You would think ARTS would be a more psychologically pleasing acronym than RATS, but what do I know, I'm just a code monkey...</htmltext>
<tokenext>You would think ARTS would be a more psychologically pleasing acronym than RATS , but what do I know , I 'm just a code monkey.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You would think ARTS would be a more psychologically pleasing acronym than RATS, but what do I know, I'm just a code monkey...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857983</id>
	<title>Re:Can GPL'd software contributors block this?</title>
	<author>earlymon</author>
	<datestamp>1256410080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is there any way for contributors to the free software movement to block use of their software by military contractors?</p></div><p>OK - so you want to restrict military contractors from using Linux, anything GNU and any other F/OSS?</p><p>Did you just wake up?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there any way for contributors to the free software movement to block use of their software by military contractors ? OK - so you want to restrict military contractors from using Linux , anything GNU and any other F/OSS ? Did you just wake up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there any way for contributors to the free software movement to block use of their software by military contractors?OK - so you want to restrict military contractors from using Linux, anything GNU and any other F/OSS?Did you just wake up?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857497</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29859515</id>
	<title>Re:Limited Distribution Benefits</title>
	<author>evilviper</author>
	<datestamp>1256377800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>They could even distribute an Android OS distro with a crypto key that is bonded to that phone's serial#, which is needed by any app to run or even to decompress/decrypt from the distribution package, so military apps can't be used or inspected outside the military's own phones.</p></div></blockquote><p>If you want to encrypt an app so it can't be opened without the proper key, you can just encrypt it with ANYTHING.  PGP seems the best candidate.  You don't need any special hardware or software configuration.</p><p>If you, instead, expect an application to determine the environment it is running in, and decide whether or not it is a valid device...  That is called DRM, and it is both theoretically and practically impossible.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They could even distribute an Android OS distro with a crypto key that is bonded to that phone 's serial # , which is needed by any app to run or even to decompress/decrypt from the distribution package , so military apps ca n't be used or inspected outside the military 's own phones.If you want to encrypt an app so it ca n't be opened without the proper key , you can just encrypt it with ANYTHING .
PGP seems the best candidate .
You do n't need any special hardware or software configuration.If you , instead , expect an application to determine the environment it is running in , and decide whether or not it is a valid device... That is called DRM , and it is both theoretically and practically impossible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They could even distribute an Android OS distro with a crypto key that is bonded to that phone's serial#, which is needed by any app to run or even to decompress/decrypt from the distribution package, so military apps can't be used or inspected outside the military's own phones.If you want to encrypt an app so it can't be opened without the proper key, you can just encrypt it with ANYTHING.
PGP seems the best candidate.
You don't need any special hardware or software configuration.If you, instead, expect an application to determine the environment it is running in, and decide whether or not it is a valid device...  That is called DRM, and it is both theoretically and practically impossible.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29866593</id>
	<title>Re:Is Android really robust enough for this?</title>
	<author>u38cg</author>
	<datestamp>1256503080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>One of the most commonly used platforms out in the field right now is the iPhone.  Its lack of robustness is more than made up for by its cheapness, ubiquity, and ease of use.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the most commonly used platforms out in the field right now is the iPhone .
Its lack of robustness is more than made up for by its cheapness , ubiquity , and ease of use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the most commonly used platforms out in the field right now is the iPhone.
Its lack of robustness is more than made up for by its cheapness, ubiquity, and ease of use.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857561</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857433</id>
	<title>Limited Distribution Benefits</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256406000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Android apps don't have to pass through a central app store to get widely distributed to a set of Android phones. So the military can limit distribution of the apps. They could even distribute an Android OS distro with a crypto key that is bonded to that phone's serial#, which is needed by any app to run or even to decompress/decrypt from the distribution package, so military apps can't be used or inspected outside the military's own phones.</p><p>Is there any way to do something like that on iPhones? Like at least just developing an app that doesn't get run through Apple at all (signing or uploaded to the App Store), but is just an install package downloadable from a website (perhaps with a password) and installable on a phone, perhaps with an unlock code. AFAICT, that's all locked out by Apple's iPhone architecture. Has anyone figured out how to do "distributed distribution", without needing Apple at the center of all of it? On iPhones that aren't jailbroken, just the stock iPhones that anyone can have?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Android apps do n't have to pass through a central app store to get widely distributed to a set of Android phones .
So the military can limit distribution of the apps .
They could even distribute an Android OS distro with a crypto key that is bonded to that phone 's serial # , which is needed by any app to run or even to decompress/decrypt from the distribution package , so military apps ca n't be used or inspected outside the military 's own phones.Is there any way to do something like that on iPhones ?
Like at least just developing an app that does n't get run through Apple at all ( signing or uploaded to the App Store ) , but is just an install package downloadable from a website ( perhaps with a password ) and installable on a phone , perhaps with an unlock code .
AFAICT , that 's all locked out by Apple 's iPhone architecture .
Has anyone figured out how to do " distributed distribution " , without needing Apple at the center of all of it ?
On iPhones that are n't jailbroken , just the stock iPhones that anyone can have ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Android apps don't have to pass through a central app store to get widely distributed to a set of Android phones.
So the military can limit distribution of the apps.
They could even distribute an Android OS distro with a crypto key that is bonded to that phone's serial#, which is needed by any app to run or even to decompress/decrypt from the distribution package, so military apps can't be used or inspected outside the military's own phones.Is there any way to do something like that on iPhones?
Like at least just developing an app that doesn't get run through Apple at all (signing or uploaded to the App Store), but is just an install package downloadable from a website (perhaps with a password) and installable on a phone, perhaps with an unlock code.
AFAICT, that's all locked out by Apple's iPhone architecture.
Has anyone figured out how to do "distributed distribution", without needing Apple at the center of all of it?
On iPhones that aren't jailbroken, just the stock iPhones that anyone can have?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29859275</id>
	<title>The system backend ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256376060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is known as RATS ARSE.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is known as RATS ARSE .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is known as RATS ARSE.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857401</id>
	<title>Enemies List?</title>
	<author>TheNarrator</author>
	<datestamp>1256405760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if they have an enemies list to complement the buddies list.  Tactical systems are funny like that.  You have users of the application -- the enemy combatants -- who don't really want to be users of your application.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if they have an enemies list to complement the buddies list .
Tactical systems are funny like that .
You have users of the application -- the enemy combatants -- who do n't really want to be users of your application .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if they have an enemies list to complement the buddies list.
Tactical systems are funny like that.
You have users of the application -- the enemy combatants -- who don't really want to be users of your application.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857831</id>
	<title>Re:Limited Distribution Benefits</title>
	<author>earlymon</author>
	<datestamp>1256409240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is there any way to do something like that on iPhones?</p></div><p>Evidently, the iPod touch is already providing popular service to US troops in Iraq.</p><p><a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/194623" title="newsweek.com">http://www.newsweek.com/id/194623</a> [newsweek.com]</p><p>Admittedly - that article's for translation software.  It may not directly answer your question about military / restricted apps for the iPhone - but it seems to lay the foundation in that the DoD is already pretty okey-dokey with the use of these devices by the troops.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there any way to do something like that on iPhones ? Evidently , the iPod touch is already providing popular service to US troops in Iraq.http : //www.newsweek.com/id/194623 [ newsweek.com ] Admittedly - that article 's for translation software .
It may not directly answer your question about military / restricted apps for the iPhone - but it seems to lay the foundation in that the DoD is already pretty okey-dokey with the use of these devices by the troops .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there any way to do something like that on iPhones?Evidently, the iPod touch is already providing popular service to US troops in Iraq.http://www.newsweek.com/id/194623 [newsweek.com]Admittedly - that article's for translation software.
It may not directly answer your question about military / restricted apps for the iPhone - but it seems to lay the foundation in that the DoD is already pretty okey-dokey with the use of these devices by the troops.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857423</id>
	<title>From the Minitruth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256405940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Raytheon is preparing it for a more urgent mission: saving lives in places like Afghanistan and Pakistan.</p> </div><p>That's right, our military are there to SAVE lives, like the red cross. They're not in the business of taking lives like the brutal killers of Eurasia^WEastasia.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Raytheon is preparing it for a more urgent mission : saving lives in places like Afghanistan and Pakistan .
That 's right , our military are there to SAVE lives , like the red cross .
They 're not in the business of taking lives like the brutal killers of Eurasia ^ WEastasia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Raytheon is preparing it for a more urgent mission: saving lives in places like Afghanistan and Pakistan.
That's right, our military are there to SAVE lives, like the red cross.
They're not in the business of taking lives like the brutal killers of Eurasia^WEastasia.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857369</id>
	<title>Finally!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256405520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always wanted to kill with multitouch from anywhere!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always wanted to kill with multitouch from anywhere !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always wanted to kill with multitouch from anywhere!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857621</id>
	<title>Yes and No</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256407380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Use words and modify your license, or write your own license from scratch, all depends on if the code is really yours or not or which license you start out with, etc. Varies widely. It maybe wouldn't block them, but if you found out they took it you could sue them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Use words and modify your license , or write your own license from scratch , all depends on if the code is really yours or not or which license you start out with , etc .
Varies widely .
It maybe would n't block them , but if you found out they took it you could sue them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Use words and modify your license, or write your own license from scratch, all depends on if the code is really yours or not or which license you start out with, etc.
Varies widely.
It maybe wouldn't block them, but if you found out they took it you could sue them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857497</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858001</id>
	<title>"Defense contractor"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256410200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... is marketing bullshit.</p><p>What is a US provider of "defense" doing abroad, instead of defending the US?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... is marketing bullshit.What is a US provider of " defense " doing abroad , instead of defending the US ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... is marketing bullshit.What is a US provider of "defense" doing abroad, instead of defending the US?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858491</id>
	<title>NorthLockRayGoog</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256413320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great, now Google is one step from being a defense contractor.<br>That's the one thing about open source/open architecture; although it's great that anyone can write apps for the android, sometimes "anyone" includes defense contractors and the military...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great , now Google is one step from being a defense contractor.That 's the one thing about open source/open architecture ; although it 's great that anyone can write apps for the android , sometimes " anyone " includes defense contractors and the military.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great, now Google is one step from being a defense contractor.That's the one thing about open source/open architecture; although it's great that anyone can write apps for the android, sometimes "anyone" includes defense contractors and the military...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29860493</id>
	<title>Re:"Defense contractor"</title>
	<author>lordandmaker</author>
	<datestamp>1256385180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Defending american soldiers?
<br> <br>
Exactly why those soldiers need defending (and whether they should) is open to some debate.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Defending american soldiers ?
Exactly why those soldiers need defending ( and whether they should ) is open to some debate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Defending american soldiers?
Exactly why those soldiers need defending (and whether they should) is open to some debate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858191</id>
	<title>Re:Saving lives??</title>
	<author>ducomputergeek</author>
	<datestamp>1256411340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country .
He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country.
He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857951</id>
	<title>Re:Saving lives??</title>
	<author>blind biker</author>
	<datestamp>1256409900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why do breathless writers <b>always</b> say "saving lives" when they refer to military applications?</p></div><p>Honestly, I have not noticed this trend at all. This is the first instance, in fact.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do breathless writers always say " saving lives " when they refer to military applications ? Honestly , I have not noticed this trend at all .
This is the first instance , in fact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do breathless writers always say "saving lives" when they refer to military applications?Honestly, I have not noticed this trend at all.
This is the first instance, in fact.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857699</id>
	<title>But not really.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256408040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is an article based on a Raytheon press release. What hardware does said application run on? Even the article suggested there's no established contract yet.</p><p>I like the idea that open source/free software is getting more traction in this area, but no platform, no contract suggestes this is just fluff. Whether or not your bullshit meter started twitching that they've been working on this for two years is up to you.</p><p>Bonus BS points that they throw in the "Oh, and it could also be a biometric scanner". Feature creep comes early.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is an article based on a Raytheon press release .
What hardware does said application run on ?
Even the article suggested there 's no established contract yet.I like the idea that open source/free software is getting more traction in this area , but no platform , no contract suggestes this is just fluff .
Whether or not your bullshit meter started twitching that they 've been working on this for two years is up to you.Bonus BS points that they throw in the " Oh , and it could also be a biometric scanner " .
Feature creep comes early .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is an article based on a Raytheon press release.
What hardware does said application run on?
Even the article suggested there's no established contract yet.I like the idea that open source/free software is getting more traction in this area, but no platform, no contract suggestes this is just fluff.
Whether or not your bullshit meter started twitching that they've been working on this for two years is up to you.Bonus BS points that they throw in the "Oh, and it could also be a biometric scanner".
Feature creep comes early.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29860765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29860493
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29864925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29860365
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857599
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857497
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29859713
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857561
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857621
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857497
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29859515
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857433
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857433
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29866593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857561
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29861031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858491
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857433
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857921
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857497
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29859275
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29860555
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857325
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_1439245_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29860463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857393
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_1439245.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857385
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29864925
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857443
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29859275
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858191
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29859713
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858845
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857733
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858833
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29860365
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857951
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29860765
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857911
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_1439245.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857545
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_1439245.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857497
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857621
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857983
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857599
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_1439245.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857561
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29866593
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857755
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_1439245.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858001
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29860493
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_1439245.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858023
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_1439245.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858491
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29861031
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_1439245.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857393
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29860463
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_1439245.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857433
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29859515
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857831
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29858255
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_1439245.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857767
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_1439245.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857699
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_1439245.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857535
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857921
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_1439245.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29857325
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_1439245.29860555
</commentlist>
</conversation>
