<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_24_0122223</id>
	<title>MySpace Trying To Regain Lost Ground With Games and Music</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1256404200000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Over the past several years, MySpace has lost a significant amount of the social networking market to competitors like Facebook. Now, MySpace is trying to recapture lost interest by <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/174181/news\_corps\_jon\_miller\_myspace\_stopped\_innovating.html">increasing the site's focus on games and music</a>, as well as keeping an eye out for new technologies that would directly benefit their users.
<i>"[News Corp.'s Jonathan Miller] said he is 'obsessed' with real-time technology, such as the one Twitter has exploited in its social networking and microblogging service, and he wants to see MySpace incorporate it. He also said MySpace is lagging by having a platform that has been 'too closed' to external developers, something that he wants to see changed, especially for the sake of MySpace's gaming offerings. In addition, he wants to see MySpace push ahead in mobile."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Over the past several years , MySpace has lost a significant amount of the social networking market to competitors like Facebook .
Now , MySpace is trying to recapture lost interest by increasing the site 's focus on games and music , as well as keeping an eye out for new technologies that would directly benefit their users .
" [ News Corp. 's Jonathan Miller ] said he is 'obsessed ' with real-time technology , such as the one Twitter has exploited in its social networking and microblogging service , and he wants to see MySpace incorporate it .
He also said MySpace is lagging by having a platform that has been 'too closed ' to external developers , something that he wants to see changed , especially for the sake of MySpace 's gaming offerings .
In addition , he wants to see MySpace push ahead in mobile .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Over the past several years, MySpace has lost a significant amount of the social networking market to competitors like Facebook.
Now, MySpace is trying to recapture lost interest by increasing the site's focus on games and music, as well as keeping an eye out for new technologies that would directly benefit their users.
"[News Corp.'s Jonathan Miller] said he is 'obsessed' with real-time technology, such as the one Twitter has exploited in its social networking and microblogging service, and he wants to see MySpace incorporate it.
He also said MySpace is lagging by having a platform that has been 'too closed' to external developers, something that he wants to see changed, especially for the sake of MySpace's gaming offerings.
In addition, he wants to see MySpace push ahead in mobile.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854773</id>
	<title>Re:Too little, too late</title>
	<author>roguetrick</author>
	<datestamp>1256414700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>they have no idea what it takes to make money on the Internet</p></div><p>Compared to who, twitter?  Also, the WSJ subscription service seems to actually be working and paying off from what I've heard.  This success makes it hard to dismiss News Corp.'s ability to turn a profit off the net.  I feel dirty defending them, however, so let me end this by saying Rupert Murdoch is an asshole.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>they have no idea what it takes to make money on the InternetCompared to who , twitter ?
Also , the WSJ subscription service seems to actually be working and paying off from what I 've heard .
This success makes it hard to dismiss News Corp. 's ability to turn a profit off the net .
I feel dirty defending them , however , so let me end this by saying Rupert Murdoch is an asshole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they have no idea what it takes to make money on the InternetCompared to who, twitter?
Also, the WSJ subscription service seems to actually be working and paying off from what I've heard.
This success makes it hard to dismiss News Corp.'s ability to turn a profit off the net.
I feel dirty defending them, however, so let me end this by saying Rupert Murdoch is an asshole.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855025</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, make it more like Facebook</title>
	<author>Sarten-X</author>
	<datestamp>1256379180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not so concerned about privacy, but I agree:</p><p>I have basically quit using Facebook, because it got too annoying to spend thirty seconds daily clicking all the buttons to reject the little mini-games. I'm not impressed that they want to duplicate this idiocy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not so concerned about privacy , but I agree : I have basically quit using Facebook , because it got too annoying to spend thirty seconds daily clicking all the buttons to reject the little mini-games .
I 'm not impressed that they want to duplicate this idiocy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not so concerned about privacy, but I agree:I have basically quit using Facebook, because it got too annoying to spend thirty seconds daily clicking all the buttons to reject the little mini-games.
I'm not impressed that they want to duplicate this idiocy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854599</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854619</id>
	<title>News Corp's New Plan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256325720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why not "charge" for MySpace like good ol' Rupert wants to for all his other garbage? That will ensure success!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not " charge " for MySpace like good ol ' Rupert wants to for all his other garbage ?
That will ensure success !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not "charge" for MySpace like good ol' Rupert wants to for all his other garbage?
That will ensure success!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855309</id>
	<title>My Murdock</title>
	<author>myspace-cn</author>
	<datestamp>1256384340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More power to MYSPACE, although I hope Murdock realizes the endgame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More power to MYSPACE , although I hope Murdock realizes the endgame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More power to MYSPACE, although I hope Murdock realizes the endgame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29856989</id>
	<title>Re:Too little, too late</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256402340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MySpace is just a form of adware now. Facebook is clean, simple, no extravegant overbearing html multimedia backgrounds and is about the friends you have (or have not).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MySpace is just a form of adware now .
Facebook is clean , simple , no extravegant overbearing html multimedia backgrounds and is about the friends you have ( or have not ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MySpace is just a form of adware now.
Facebook is clean, simple, no extravegant overbearing html multimedia backgrounds and is about the friends you have (or have not).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29857363</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, make it more like Facebook</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1256405520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MrCrassic likes this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MrCrassic likes this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MrCrassic likes this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854599</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854785</id>
	<title>Re:none of that will matter</title>
	<author>roguetrick</author>
	<datestamp>1256414940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So nobody has to look up what the hell hes talking about: Incest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So nobody has to look up what the hell hes talking about : Incest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So nobody has to look up what the hell hes talking about: Incest.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29858217</id>
	<title>Re:none of that will matter</title>
	<author>MaraDNS</author>
	<datestamp>1256411520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not to confuse this discussion with facts, but about two years ago MySpace introduced MySpace 2.0, which uses a lot of CSS and allows MySpace pages to be quite attractive.  I actually find my MySpace page more attractive than my Facebook page, but I have a thing for earth tones.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to confuse this discussion with facts , but about two years ago MySpace introduced MySpace 2.0 , which uses a lot of CSS and allows MySpace pages to be quite attractive .
I actually find my MySpace page more attractive than my Facebook page , but I have a thing for earth tones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to confuse this discussion with facts, but about two years ago MySpace introduced MySpace 2.0, which uses a lot of CSS and allows MySpace pages to be quite attractive.
I actually find my MySpace page more attractive than my Facebook page, but I have a thing for earth tones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854525</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854725</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, make it more like Facebook</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256327460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You bring up a good point on not wanting the apps to have your data, but if you wanted it private then don't put it up at all. As of right now there really is no middle ground on accessibility or your info once its up there. I personally prefer to have a relevant ad if I am going to have any ads at all and if they aren't using my data for nefarious means then its fine. If I don't want some third party knowing something but I want my friends to know it I tell then to their face or in a more private mode of communication like a call or a text.<p>tl;dr version: I disagree but YMMV.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You bring up a good point on not wanting the apps to have your data , but if you wanted it private then do n't put it up at all .
As of right now there really is no middle ground on accessibility or your info once its up there .
I personally prefer to have a relevant ad if I am going to have any ads at all and if they are n't using my data for nefarious means then its fine .
If I do n't want some third party knowing something but I want my friends to know it I tell then to their face or in a more private mode of communication like a call or a text.tl ; dr version : I disagree but YMMV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You bring up a good point on not wanting the apps to have your data, but if you wanted it private then don't put it up at all.
As of right now there really is no middle ground on accessibility or your info once its up there.
I personally prefer to have a relevant ad if I am going to have any ads at all and if they aren't using my data for nefarious means then its fine.
If I don't want some third party knowing something but I want my friends to know it I tell then to their face or in a more private mode of communication like a call or a text.tl;dr version: I disagree but YMMV.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854599</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29863619</id>
	<title>I have four words for MySpace..</title>
	<author>kevingolding2001</author>
	<datestamp>1256476200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A Girl Like You.
<br>
One of my favourite songs, and recently they <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/10/07/1517239" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">shut it down.</a> [slashdot.org]
<br>
Burn in hell, wankers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A Girl Like You .
One of my favourite songs , and recently they shut it down .
[ slashdot.org ] Burn in hell , wankers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A Girl Like You.
One of my favourite songs, and recently they shut it down.
[slashdot.org]

Burn in hell, wankers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855573</id>
	<title>ask why</title>
	<author>Tom</author>
	<datestamp>1256388660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Frankly, I never understood why MySpace got anywhere at all. I've yet to see a <b>single</b> page on it where I don't think about slapping the author with a lawsuit for emotional damages.</p><p>It is but-ugly, unfriendly and loud (both visually and with all the crappy background music). In short, it's the hip-hop of the web. Uh wait. I think I just answered my question.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Frankly , I never understood why MySpace got anywhere at all .
I 've yet to see a single page on it where I do n't think about slapping the author with a lawsuit for emotional damages.It is but-ugly , unfriendly and loud ( both visually and with all the crappy background music ) .
In short , it 's the hip-hop of the web .
Uh wait .
I think I just answered my question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frankly, I never understood why MySpace got anywhere at all.
I've yet to see a single page on it where I don't think about slapping the author with a lawsuit for emotional damages.It is but-ugly, unfriendly and loud (both visually and with all the crappy background music).
In short, it's the hip-hop of the web.
Uh wait.
I think I just answered my question.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854627</id>
	<title>Relevant to you: how?</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1256326020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Myspace is still vaguely relevant to my life because small bands always have a myspace page.  Other than that, I never travel to myspace links.  And since the local dump of a live house closed down last year, I haven't even done that.<p>Does Myspace have any actual relevance to anyone here?  Or has it just become yet another fossilizing internet community like friendster or orkut?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Myspace is still vaguely relevant to my life because small bands always have a myspace page .
Other than that , I never travel to myspace links .
And since the local dump of a live house closed down last year , I have n't even done that.Does Myspace have any actual relevance to anyone here ?
Or has it just become yet another fossilizing internet community like friendster or orkut ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Myspace is still vaguely relevant to my life because small bands always have a myspace page.
Other than that, I never travel to myspace links.
And since the local dump of a live house closed down last year, I haven't even done that.Does Myspace have any actual relevance to anyone here?
Or has it just become yet another fossilizing internet community like friendster or orkut?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29856843</id>
	<title>Re:Leaders in "eye bleed" technology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256401380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>myspace, now has a myspace lite feature that allows you to turn off all of that content that you don't like.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>myspace , now has a myspace lite feature that allows you to turn off all of that content that you do n't like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>myspace, now has a myspace lite feature that allows you to turn off all of that content that you don't like.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29857751</id>
	<title>Re:Too little, too late</title>
	<author>TheWizardTim</author>
	<datestamp>1256408460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People make money from what they read in WSJ. It is more then just informational news, it is money making informational news. It is why they can charge for it. A lot of the information can't be found in other sources.</p><p>Detailed stories about how a company is doing = worth paying for.<br>Detailed stores about the latest hoax or car chase = not worth paying for.</p><p>You hear that other newspapers wanting to charge for information? If it will not make a person money, or is easily accessed from other sources, people will not pay for it, other then having ads placed on the page.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People make money from what they read in WSJ .
It is more then just informational news , it is money making informational news .
It is why they can charge for it .
A lot of the information ca n't be found in other sources.Detailed stories about how a company is doing = worth paying for.Detailed stores about the latest hoax or car chase = not worth paying for.You hear that other newspapers wanting to charge for information ?
If it will not make a person money , or is easily accessed from other sources , people will not pay for it , other then having ads placed on the page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People make money from what they read in WSJ.
It is more then just informational news, it is money making informational news.
It is why they can charge for it.
A lot of the information can't be found in other sources.Detailed stories about how a company is doing = worth paying for.Detailed stores about the latest hoax or car chase = not worth paying for.You hear that other newspapers wanting to charge for information?
If it will not make a person money, or is easily accessed from other sources, people will not pay for it, other then having ads placed on the page.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854773</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854599</id>
	<title>Yes, make it more like Facebook</title>
	<author>AnotherUsername</author>
	<datestamp>1256325420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, make it like Facebook, put applications in it whose main purpose is to data mine, while using a game-like interface to make the people who use it happy while they freely give out theirs and their friends' information.  Yes, it is true.  On Facebook, even if you don't use an application, if you don't specifically say don't use my information, your friends using the application will enable your information to be used.
<br> <br>
Personally, I think the whole mini-application craze the web is going through is getting old.  I do have Facebook, and I am so sick and tired of everyone wanting me to install an 'app' so they can level up or whatever.  No, I will not give my information up so that you can get another fucking flower in your garden.  I will not give my identity to a faceless corporation so that your mafia gang will get more powerful.  I will not let some company use my life to earn more money for themselves just so I can see the results for some compatibility test you took and thought everyone on your friends list should take, just so you can see how compatible your are with all your friends.  Guess what, if they are actually your friends, you already should have a basic understanding of your compatibility(true compatibility, not which cartoon character are you compatibility) with them.
<br> <br>
I don't want to enhance my sex life, nor am I looking for hot singles on the web in my area.  I don't need viagra, and I don't have wrinkles that need hiding.  I will not change my status every time I eat a meal, and I will not put pictures of what I wore today.  I will not comply with this state of mind that says I have to be open with my life, that I must post everything I do to my Twitter account(which I refuse to make) and that I must make blog posts about Britney Spears and my dog.  If I want someone to know what I am doing, and I feel they will care, I will call them or meet them in person and carry on a conversation with them until we each feel that what we have to say is finished.  I will not live my life through Facebook.
<br> <br>
Stay out of my life, Mark Zuckerberg.  May you lose your billions as quickly as you made them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , make it like Facebook , put applications in it whose main purpose is to data mine , while using a game-like interface to make the people who use it happy while they freely give out theirs and their friends ' information .
Yes , it is true .
On Facebook , even if you do n't use an application , if you do n't specifically say do n't use my information , your friends using the application will enable your information to be used .
Personally , I think the whole mini-application craze the web is going through is getting old .
I do have Facebook , and I am so sick and tired of everyone wanting me to install an 'app ' so they can level up or whatever .
No , I will not give my information up so that you can get another fucking flower in your garden .
I will not give my identity to a faceless corporation so that your mafia gang will get more powerful .
I will not let some company use my life to earn more money for themselves just so I can see the results for some compatibility test you took and thought everyone on your friends list should take , just so you can see how compatible your are with all your friends .
Guess what , if they are actually your friends , you already should have a basic understanding of your compatibility ( true compatibility , not which cartoon character are you compatibility ) with them .
I do n't want to enhance my sex life , nor am I looking for hot singles on the web in my area .
I do n't need viagra , and I do n't have wrinkles that need hiding .
I will not change my status every time I eat a meal , and I will not put pictures of what I wore today .
I will not comply with this state of mind that says I have to be open with my life , that I must post everything I do to my Twitter account ( which I refuse to make ) and that I must make blog posts about Britney Spears and my dog .
If I want someone to know what I am doing , and I feel they will care , I will call them or meet them in person and carry on a conversation with them until we each feel that what we have to say is finished .
I will not live my life through Facebook .
Stay out of my life , Mark Zuckerberg .
May you lose your billions as quickly as you made them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, make it like Facebook, put applications in it whose main purpose is to data mine, while using a game-like interface to make the people who use it happy while they freely give out theirs and their friends' information.
Yes, it is true.
On Facebook, even if you don't use an application, if you don't specifically say don't use my information, your friends using the application will enable your information to be used.
Personally, I think the whole mini-application craze the web is going through is getting old.
I do have Facebook, and I am so sick and tired of everyone wanting me to install an 'app' so they can level up or whatever.
No, I will not give my information up so that you can get another fucking flower in your garden.
I will not give my identity to a faceless corporation so that your mafia gang will get more powerful.
I will not let some company use my life to earn more money for themselves just so I can see the results for some compatibility test you took and thought everyone on your friends list should take, just so you can see how compatible your are with all your friends.
Guess what, if they are actually your friends, you already should have a basic understanding of your compatibility(true compatibility, not which cartoon character are you compatibility) with them.
I don't want to enhance my sex life, nor am I looking for hot singles on the web in my area.
I don't need viagra, and I don't have wrinkles that need hiding.
I will not change my status every time I eat a meal, and I will not put pictures of what I wore today.
I will not comply with this state of mind that says I have to be open with my life, that I must post everything I do to my Twitter account(which I refuse to make) and that I must make blog posts about Britney Spears and my dog.
If I want someone to know what I am doing, and I feel they will care, I will call them or meet them in person and carry on a conversation with them until we each feel that what we have to say is finished.
I will not live my life through Facebook.
Stay out of my life, Mark Zuckerberg.
May you lose your billions as quickly as you made them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855979</id>
	<title>Re:ask why</title>
	<author>meyekul</author>
	<datestamp>1256393280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>... its Geocities 2.0!</htmltext>
<tokenext>... its Geocities 2.0 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... its Geocities 2.0!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29856037</id>
	<title>It's just painful</title>
	<author>quibus</author>
	<datestamp>1256393760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In my humble opinion, MySpace is just too painful to be true:</p><p>1) it tells me to install Flash, while I have it installed and working fine on other sites (using even proprietary Flash 10 on my Debian  amd64 box)<br>2) it doesn't have a single way to give feedback to the administrators of MySpace (e.g. for issue 1)<br>3) it's a pain to the eyes to see most MySpace pages. Things are messed up, bad color schemes, hardly any well-thought about layout.</p><p>Who needs MySpace?</p><p>Unfortunately, many music composers seem to like it...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In my humble opinion , MySpace is just too painful to be true : 1 ) it tells me to install Flash , while I have it installed and working fine on other sites ( using even proprietary Flash 10 on my Debian amd64 box ) 2 ) it does n't have a single way to give feedback to the administrators of MySpace ( e.g .
for issue 1 ) 3 ) it 's a pain to the eyes to see most MySpace pages .
Things are messed up , bad color schemes , hardly any well-thought about layout.Who needs MySpace ? Unfortunately , many music composers seem to like it... : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In my humble opinion, MySpace is just too painful to be true:1) it tells me to install Flash, while I have it installed and working fine on other sites (using even proprietary Flash 10 on my Debian  amd64 box)2) it doesn't have a single way to give feedback to the administrators of MySpace (e.g.
for issue 1)3) it's a pain to the eyes to see most MySpace pages.
Things are messed up, bad color schemes, hardly any well-thought about layout.Who needs MySpace?Unfortunately, many music composers seem to like it... :(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854551</id>
	<title>user-friendliness needed too</title>
	<author>MoFoQ</author>
	<datestamp>1256324460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>one of the biggest gripes I have with MySpace aside from the spam and difficulties in managing (or lack thereof) messages is the inability to keep myself logged in like Facebook and Twitter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>one of the biggest gripes I have with MySpace aside from the spam and difficulties in managing ( or lack thereof ) messages is the inability to keep myself logged in like Facebook and Twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>one of the biggest gripes I have with MySpace aside from the spam and difficulties in managing (or lack thereof) messages is the inability to keep myself logged in like Facebook and Twitter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855919</id>
	<title>Re:none of that will matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256392680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>oh you must be speaking of facebook... With all their ajax errors and sorry can't complete this request errors lately.<br>Myspace might have turned into the trailer park of social site but it works way better than facebook probably ever will.</p><p>Myspace ugly? well I don't think facebook wins any beauty contests myself and at least with myspace you can kind of configure it to how you wish it to look. Can't do that with facebook from what I see..</p><p>I can't believe it sounds like I'm defending myspace because I'm not.<br>I'm just so sick of all this facebook love it's making me sick and I don't see how everyone is in love<br>with such a ugly broken piece of shit site..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>oh you must be speaking of facebook... With all their ajax errors and sorry ca n't complete this request errors lately.Myspace might have turned into the trailer park of social site but it works way better than facebook probably ever will.Myspace ugly ?
well I do n't think facebook wins any beauty contests myself and at least with myspace you can kind of configure it to how you wish it to look .
Ca n't do that with facebook from what I see..I ca n't believe it sounds like I 'm defending myspace because I 'm not.I 'm just so sick of all this facebook love it 's making me sick and I do n't see how everyone is in lovewith such a ugly broken piece of shit site. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oh you must be speaking of facebook... With all their ajax errors and sorry can't complete this request errors lately.Myspace might have turned into the trailer park of social site but it works way better than facebook probably ever will.Myspace ugly?
well I don't think facebook wins any beauty contests myself and at least with myspace you can kind of configure it to how you wish it to look.
Can't do that with facebook from what I see..I can't believe it sounds like I'm defending myspace because I'm not.I'm just so sick of all this facebook love it's making me sick and I don't see how everyone is in lovewith such a ugly broken piece of shit site..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854525</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29859729</id>
	<title>Erm.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256379120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe they should focus on porn-bots and idiots first.  Well, that would make them lose most of their user count.  Always a catch 22.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they should focus on porn-bots and idiots first .
Well , that would make them lose most of their user count .
Always a catch 22 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they should focus on porn-bots and idiots first.
Well, that would make them lose most of their user count.
Always a catch 22.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854783</id>
	<title>Invoking Godwin's Law</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256414880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Nazis thought it best to put the old and infirm out of their misery.</p><p>Your post proves they were right.  Please crawl into a hole and die.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Nazis thought it best to put the old and infirm out of their misery.Your post proves they were right .
Please crawl into a hole and die .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Nazis thought it best to put the old and infirm out of their misery.Your post proves they were right.
Please crawl into a hole and die.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854895</id>
	<title>Re:Leaders in "eye bleed" technology</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1256374800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>my head explode and my browser crash</p></div></blockquote><p>To be hip and "with-it" on the web, you have work with beta stuff that crashes. <b>As soon as it stabilizes, it's out of fashion</b>. Remember the crashy early Java applets? Sure, Java's more stable now, but nobody uses it except big unhip corporations making tax table input apps.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>my head explode and my browser crashTo be hip and " with-it " on the web , you have work with beta stuff that crashes .
As soon as it stabilizes , it 's out of fashion .
Remember the crashy early Java applets ?
Sure , Java 's more stable now , but nobody uses it except big unhip corporations making tax table input apps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>my head explode and my browser crashTo be hip and "with-it" on the web, you have work with beta stuff that crashes.
As soon as it stabilizes, it's out of fashion.
Remember the crashy early Java applets?
Sure, Java's more stable now, but nobody uses it except big unhip corporations making tax table input apps.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854967</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, make it more like Facebook</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256377380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then don't put personal "data" on facebook dipshit. Why would you put anything "confidential" on there? Its a stupid website for stupid people to do stupid things, DUH. You obviously know all about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then do n't put personal " data " on facebook dipshit .
Why would you put anything " confidential " on there ?
Its a stupid website for stupid people to do stupid things , DUH .
You obviously know all about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then don't put personal "data" on facebook dipshit.
Why would you put anything "confidential" on there?
Its a stupid website for stupid people to do stupid things, DUH.
You obviously know all about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854599</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854719</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, make it more like Facebook</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256327400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>On Facebook, even if you don't use an application, if you don't specifically say don't use my information, your friends using the application will enable your information to be used.</p> </div><p>Do you have a source for that?  I've NEVER heard that before.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>On Facebook , even if you do n't use an application , if you do n't specifically say do n't use my information , your friends using the application will enable your information to be used .
Do you have a source for that ?
I 've NEVER heard that before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On Facebook, even if you don't use an application, if you don't specifically say don't use my information, your friends using the application will enable your information to be used.
Do you have a source for that?
I've NEVER heard that before.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854599</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854755</id>
	<title>Seen this before</title>
	<author>loudmax</author>
	<datestamp>1256327820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I worked for America Online when Jonathan Miller came on as CEO.  It was pretty encouraging to have someone who seemed clueful about the internet making decisions for a change.  There was a big push to get the company thinking in terms of Web 2.0.  During one of the company all-hands in 2006 or 2007 or so he even brought in Tim O'Reilly for an interview.  For a company whose culture was just getting around to realizing that the AOL dial-up client was a dead-end product, this was a big change.  Eventually Jonathan Miller was pushed out from AOL and a former NBC executive was brought in, and the company went back to trying to understand the internet in terms of television.</p><p>As it was with AOL, I suspect MySpace's reawakening is too late.  There isn't any likelihood MySpace is going to challenge Facebook or Twitter, but there may still be some value left.  MySpace was popular among kids at one point, maybe they can make something of that.  Based on what I saw at AOL, Miller has good a chance of salvaging MySpace as anyone.  The biggest danger that I can see is that the company is ultimately owned by Rupert Murdoch who isn't exactly a friend to progress.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I worked for America Online when Jonathan Miller came on as CEO .
It was pretty encouraging to have someone who seemed clueful about the internet making decisions for a change .
There was a big push to get the company thinking in terms of Web 2.0 .
During one of the company all-hands in 2006 or 2007 or so he even brought in Tim O'Reilly for an interview .
For a company whose culture was just getting around to realizing that the AOL dial-up client was a dead-end product , this was a big change .
Eventually Jonathan Miller was pushed out from AOL and a former NBC executive was brought in , and the company went back to trying to understand the internet in terms of television.As it was with AOL , I suspect MySpace 's reawakening is too late .
There is n't any likelihood MySpace is going to challenge Facebook or Twitter , but there may still be some value left .
MySpace was popular among kids at one point , maybe they can make something of that .
Based on what I saw at AOL , Miller has good a chance of salvaging MySpace as anyone .
The biggest danger that I can see is that the company is ultimately owned by Rupert Murdoch who is n't exactly a friend to progress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I worked for America Online when Jonathan Miller came on as CEO.
It was pretty encouraging to have someone who seemed clueful about the internet making decisions for a change.
There was a big push to get the company thinking in terms of Web 2.0.
During one of the company all-hands in 2006 or 2007 or so he even brought in Tim O'Reilly for an interview.
For a company whose culture was just getting around to realizing that the AOL dial-up client was a dead-end product, this was a big change.
Eventually Jonathan Miller was pushed out from AOL and a former NBC executive was brought in, and the company went back to trying to understand the internet in terms of television.As it was with AOL, I suspect MySpace's reawakening is too late.
There isn't any likelihood MySpace is going to challenge Facebook or Twitter, but there may still be some value left.
MySpace was popular among kids at one point, maybe they can make something of that.
Based on what I saw at AOL, Miller has good a chance of salvaging MySpace as anyone.
The biggest danger that I can see is that the company is ultimately owned by Rupert Murdoch who isn't exactly a friend to progress.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854525</id>
	<title>none of that will matter</title>
	<author>Ralph Spoilsport</author>
	<datestamp>1256323620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>if the page still takes a minute to load, and when it does, it's as ugly as home-made sin.</htmltext>
<tokenext>if the page still takes a minute to load , and when it does , it 's as ugly as home-made sin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if the page still takes a minute to load, and when it does, it's as ugly as home-made sin.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29876755</id>
	<title>Another message from a stupid local BAND!</title>
	<author>Tragedy4u</author>
	<datestamp>1256549100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Even with the damn checkbox "I don't want to receive messages from bands" checked, you still get band spam.  Myspace started out moderately fun, then became way too bloated, slow and flashy.  Facebook is starting to turn out similarly, started out lean and mean and people fled there from myspace...now it's starting to get way too bloated, slow and flashy (but still nowhere near as bad as Myspace).  History will repeat itself again once the new MyBook.com (or whatever it's called) comes along that is fast, light and easy.  Myspace will then die and Facebook will be in the same boat as Myspace is in now....and no it won't be Twitter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even with the damn checkbox " I do n't want to receive messages from bands " checked , you still get band spam .
Myspace started out moderately fun , then became way too bloated , slow and flashy .
Facebook is starting to turn out similarly , started out lean and mean and people fled there from myspace...now it 's starting to get way too bloated , slow and flashy ( but still nowhere near as bad as Myspace ) .
History will repeat itself again once the new MyBook.com ( or whatever it 's called ) comes along that is fast , light and easy .
Myspace will then die and Facebook will be in the same boat as Myspace is in now....and no it wo n't be Twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even with the damn checkbox "I don't want to receive messages from bands" checked, you still get band spam.
Myspace started out moderately fun, then became way too bloated, slow and flashy.
Facebook is starting to turn out similarly, started out lean and mean and people fled there from myspace...now it's starting to get way too bloated, slow and flashy (but still nowhere near as bad as Myspace).
History will repeat itself again once the new MyBook.com (or whatever it's called) comes along that is fast, light and easy.
Myspace will then die and Facebook will be in the same boat as Myspace is in now....and no it won't be Twitter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29881097</id>
	<title>Re:ask why</title>
	<author>lidocaineus</author>
	<datestamp>1256583900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MySpace may suck, but please don't pigeon-hole hip-hop into the same generalization.  Just like any other genre there's plenty of crap and plenty of good stuff that has nothing to do with being loud, unfriendly, or unintelligent; generalizations just reflect badly on the poster.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MySpace may suck , but please do n't pigeon-hole hip-hop into the same generalization .
Just like any other genre there 's plenty of crap and plenty of good stuff that has nothing to do with being loud , unfriendly , or unintelligent ; generalizations just reflect badly on the poster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MySpace may suck, but please don't pigeon-hole hip-hop into the same generalization.
Just like any other genre there's plenty of crap and plenty of good stuff that has nothing to do with being loud, unfriendly, or unintelligent; generalizations just reflect badly on the poster.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854549</id>
	<title>Create  a Framework Like Zembly</title>
	<author>mattwrock</author>
	<datestamp>1256324460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I use Zembly to create apps on Facebook. If they join Zembly, or make a framework that is easy for developers I give it a go. I haven't been to MySpace in months.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I use Zembly to create apps on Facebook .
If they join Zembly , or make a framework that is easy for developers I give it a go .
I have n't been to MySpace in months .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use Zembly to create apps on Facebook.
If they join Zembly, or make a framework that is easy for developers I give it a go.
I haven't been to MySpace in months.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855485</id>
	<title>Re:Too little, too late</title>
	<author>Threni</author>
	<datestamp>1256387460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think Murdoch hopes that all the other companies will see the extra money he makes from charging, and copy him so that 1) he can be seen as the person who understands how to make a lot of money selling stuff on the internet and 2) the others copy him and charge so that advertisers don't abandon him and instead flock to the free sites.</p><p>If he gets another people paying then perhaps he can do away with advertising altogether and use that as something to attack the others on ("no vested interests to satisfy").</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Murdoch hopes that all the other companies will see the extra money he makes from charging , and copy him so that 1 ) he can be seen as the person who understands how to make a lot of money selling stuff on the internet and 2 ) the others copy him and charge so that advertisers do n't abandon him and instead flock to the free sites.If he gets another people paying then perhaps he can do away with advertising altogether and use that as something to attack the others on ( " no vested interests to satisfy " ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Murdoch hopes that all the other companies will see the extra money he makes from charging, and copy him so that 1) he can be seen as the person who understands how to make a lot of money selling stuff on the internet and 2) the others copy him and charge so that advertisers don't abandon him and instead flock to the free sites.If he gets another people paying then perhaps he can do away with advertising altogether and use that as something to attack the others on ("no vested interests to satisfy").</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854773</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854585</id>
	<title>Re:none of that will matter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256325300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow.  I think I may have said something that could possibly be taken out of context in my previous reply.  Having been unaware of the originations and meaning of that particular southern saying, which I just recently became educated about... I would like to retract my statement.</p><p>You see I thought you were referring to Sin you make at home.. when you know.. nobody else is around.  Just yourself.</p><p>Umm yeah.....  I think I am going to look up sayings before I reply to posts now....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow .
I think I may have said something that could possibly be taken out of context in my previous reply .
Having been unaware of the originations and meaning of that particular southern saying , which I just recently became educated about... I would like to retract my statement.You see I thought you were referring to Sin you make at home.. when you know.. nobody else is around .
Just yourself.Umm yeah..... I think I am going to look up sayings before I reply to posts now... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow.
I think I may have said something that could possibly be taken out of context in my previous reply.
Having been unaware of the originations and meaning of that particular southern saying, which I just recently became educated about... I would like to retract my statement.You see I thought you were referring to Sin you make at home.. when you know.. nobody else is around.
Just yourself.Umm yeah.....  I think I am going to look up sayings before I reply to posts now....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854525</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854889</id>
	<title>Not going to work.</title>
	<author>MindlessAutomata</author>
	<datestamp>1256417880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since Myspace can't seem to even manage bug fixing I have big doubts over their ability to do anything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since Myspace ca n't seem to even manage bug fixing I have big doubts over their ability to do anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since Myspace can't seem to even manage bug fixing I have big doubts over their ability to do anything.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29857337</id>
	<title>No, that's not it.</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1256405280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The real problems I've found with MySpace every time I tried going back to it are:</p><ul><li>It's mostly beridden with emo teenagers with nothing to offer and sexually frustrated adult stalkers looking for them.</li><li>The "spaces" of said teenagers are akin to their messy, horribly disorganized rooms; full of useless CRAP. Videos, songs, pictures, pictures, pictures, GAMES and, ironically, very, very little text.</li><li>If you thought Facebook had serious downtime, wait until you get a MySpace account. You'll understand what "downtime" really means...</li><li>Their search engine sucks incredibly.</li><li>Holy shit, THEIR ADS!!</li></ul><p>Facebook resolved these issues by offering completely clean interfaces and a very simple, non-intrusive experience for its users. Personally, I didn't mind them opening the experience to high school students; there were no easy ways for them to trash their page, and they wouldn't learn how to anyway. I minded more when they switched to an AJAX-y layout, since it kind of broke the simplicity they always carried.</p><p>You know its bad when the founder of MySpace (I think?) is proclaiming to add MORE of what they already have. MySpace Games and Music are well established. They're done for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The real problems I 've found with MySpace every time I tried going back to it are : It 's mostly beridden with emo teenagers with nothing to offer and sexually frustrated adult stalkers looking for them.The " spaces " of said teenagers are akin to their messy , horribly disorganized rooms ; full of useless CRAP .
Videos , songs , pictures , pictures , pictures , GAMES and , ironically , very , very little text.If you thought Facebook had serious downtime , wait until you get a MySpace account .
You 'll understand what " downtime " really means...Their search engine sucks incredibly.Holy shit , THEIR ADS !
! Facebook resolved these issues by offering completely clean interfaces and a very simple , non-intrusive experience for its users .
Personally , I did n't mind them opening the experience to high school students ; there were no easy ways for them to trash their page , and they would n't learn how to anyway .
I minded more when they switched to an AJAX-y layout , since it kind of broke the simplicity they always carried.You know its bad when the founder of MySpace ( I think ?
) is proclaiming to add MORE of what they already have .
MySpace Games and Music are well established .
They 're done for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real problems I've found with MySpace every time I tried going back to it are:It's mostly beridden with emo teenagers with nothing to offer and sexually frustrated adult stalkers looking for them.The "spaces" of said teenagers are akin to their messy, horribly disorganized rooms; full of useless CRAP.
Videos, songs, pictures, pictures, pictures, GAMES and, ironically, very, very little text.If you thought Facebook had serious downtime, wait until you get a MySpace account.
You'll understand what "downtime" really means...Their search engine sucks incredibly.Holy shit, THEIR ADS!
!Facebook resolved these issues by offering completely clean interfaces and a very simple, non-intrusive experience for its users.
Personally, I didn't mind them opening the experience to high school students; there were no easy ways for them to trash their page, and they wouldn't learn how to anyway.
I minded more when they switched to an AJAX-y layout, since it kind of broke the simplicity they always carried.You know its bad when the founder of MySpace (I think?
) is proclaiming to add MORE of what they already have.
MySpace Games and Music are well established.
They're done for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29857381</id>
	<title>Re:Relevant to you: how?</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1256405640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, one of my ex-girlfriends strongly OPPOSED getting a Facebook account in favor of keeping her MySpace one. I had one that I used, very shamefully, to find women in my area way before I met her. (Yes, I'm aware of how stupid that was.) Thus, I kept it to be linked up to her.</p><p>I closed it just a week or two ago. Served no purpose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , one of my ex-girlfriends strongly OPPOSED getting a Facebook account in favor of keeping her MySpace one .
I had one that I used , very shamefully , to find women in my area way before I met her .
( Yes , I 'm aware of how stupid that was .
) Thus , I kept it to be linked up to her.I closed it just a week or two ago .
Served no purpose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, one of my ex-girlfriends strongly OPPOSED getting a Facebook account in favor of keeping her MySpace one.
I had one that I used, very shamefully, to find women in my area way before I met her.
(Yes, I'm aware of how stupid that was.
) Thus, I kept it to be linked up to her.I closed it just a week or two ago.
Served no purpose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854627</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29859959</id>
	<title>Re:Too little, too late</title>
	<author>antdude</author>
	<datestamp>1256380680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FaceBook will be next, then whoever is next, etc.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P I got tired of switching social networks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FaceBook will be next , then whoever is next , etc .
: P I got tired of switching social networks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FaceBook will be next, then whoever is next, etc.
:P I got tired of switching social networks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29863491</id>
	<title>MyFace, Spacebook, Twitster</title>
	<author>uassholes</author>
	<datestamp>1256473560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Playgrounds for the kids.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Playgrounds for the kids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Playgrounds for the kids.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854463</id>
	<title>Leaders in "eye bleed" technology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256322120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Myspace makes my eyes bleed, I'm old, get off my lawn, etc, I don't participate in facebook, I think twitter is largely inane and stupid, it's an internet distribution list for stupid OMFG LOOK AT THIS LOL! posts from idiots...

However, Twitter and Facebook, while I find them inane and largely irrelevant to my aged lifestyle do not make my eyes bleed, my head explode and my browser crash, as I'm assuming myspace would, if I'd ever look at it with IE, or with javascript turned on etc... blech...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Myspace makes my eyes bleed , I 'm old , get off my lawn , etc , I do n't participate in facebook , I think twitter is largely inane and stupid , it 's an internet distribution list for stupid OMFG LOOK AT THIS LOL !
posts from idiots.. . However , Twitter and Facebook , while I find them inane and largely irrelevant to my aged lifestyle do not make my eyes bleed , my head explode and my browser crash , as I 'm assuming myspace would , if I 'd ever look at it with IE , or with javascript turned on etc... blech.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Myspace makes my eyes bleed, I'm old, get off my lawn, etc, I don't participate in facebook, I think twitter is largely inane and stupid, it's an internet distribution list for stupid OMFG LOOK AT THIS LOL!
posts from idiots...

However, Twitter and Facebook, while I find them inane and largely irrelevant to my aged lifestyle do not make my eyes bleed, my head explode and my browser crash, as I'm assuming myspace would, if I'd ever look at it with IE, or with javascript turned on etc... blech...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29856897</id>
	<title>When you think about it...</title>
	<author>xactuary</author>
	<datestamp>1256401800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That Goatse fellow was the first person to show the world his "My Space". And it's been downhill ever since.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That Goatse fellow was the first person to show the world his " My Space " .
And it 's been downhill ever since .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That Goatse fellow was the first person to show the world his "My Space".
And it's been downhill ever since.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29856031</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, make it more like Facebook</title>
	<author>lptport1</author>
	<datestamp>1256393760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are actually apps that demonstrate this, too. I sadly cannot recall any of their names, but fortunately there are privacy options affecting friends' applications at <a href="http://www.facebook.com/privacy/?view=platform&amp;tab=other" title="facebook.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/privacy/?view=platform&amp;tab=other</a> [facebook.com]<br>Found via: Settings | Privacy Settings | Application Settings | Settings.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are actually apps that demonstrate this , too .
I sadly can not recall any of their names , but fortunately there are privacy options affecting friends ' applications at http : //www.facebook.com/privacy/ ? view = platform&amp;tab = other [ facebook.com ] Found via : Settings | Privacy Settings | Application Settings | Settings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are actually apps that demonstrate this, too.
I sadly cannot recall any of their names, but fortunately there are privacy options affecting friends' applications at http://www.facebook.com/privacy/?view=platform&amp;tab=other [facebook.com]Found via: Settings | Privacy Settings | Application Settings | Settings.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854719</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855913</id>
	<title>Free Shipping And Paypal Accept, Selling DG skirt,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256392680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Http://www.tntshoes.com<br>1. Made in top materials<br>2. With advanced technology and exquisite workmanship<br>3. 100\% anthentic and original packaging<br>4. Hundreds and thousands styles<br>5. Price with in shipping fee.<br>6. Shipping time: 5-7 days<br>7. Also accept drop shipping<br>8. Shipping delivery<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:EMS,DHL,TNT<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,and so on ,<br>9. The more you order<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,the more cheaper  price you will get .</p><p>OUR WEBSITE:</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; HTTP://www.tntshoes.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Http : //www.tntshoes.com1 .
Made in top materials2 .
With advanced technology and exquisite workmanship3 .
100 \ % anthentic and original packaging4 .
Hundreds and thousands styles5 .
Price with in shipping fee.6 .
Shipping time : 5-7 days7 .
Also accept drop shipping8 .
Shipping delivery : EMS,DHL,TNT ,and so on ,9 .
The more you order ,the more cheaper price you will get .OUR WEBSITE :                                                         YAHOO : shoppertrade @ yahoo.com.cn                                                               MSN : shoppertrade @ hotmail.com                                                                     HTTP : //www.tntshoes.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Http://www.tntshoes.com1.
Made in top materials2.
With advanced technology and exquisite workmanship3.
100\% anthentic and original packaging4.
Hundreds and thousands styles5.
Price with in shipping fee.6.
Shipping time: 5-7 days7.
Also accept drop shipping8.
Shipping delivery :EMS,DHL,TNT ,and so on ,9.
The more you order ,the more cheaper  price you will get .OUR WEBSITE:
                                                        YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn
                                                              MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com
                                                                    HTTP://www.tntshoes.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29865051</id>
	<title>Re:Leaders in "eye bleed" technology</title>
	<author>Fred\_A</author>
	<datestamp>1256490840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>To be hip and "with-it" on the web, you have work with beta stuff that crashes.</p></div><p>MySpace must have been super hip for a while then. It still looks like a beta from 1998.<br>Some of the photographers I know work on concerts and point me to their MySpace page (for some reason, anything that has to do with music here apparently *has* to have a MySpace page) but those things are just too atrocious.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>To be hip and " with-it " on the web , you have work with beta stuff that crashes.MySpace must have been super hip for a while then .
It still looks like a beta from 1998.Some of the photographers I know work on concerts and point me to their MySpace page ( for some reason , anything that has to do with music here apparently * has * to have a MySpace page ) but those things are just too atrocious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be hip and "with-it" on the web, you have work with beta stuff that crashes.MySpace must have been super hip for a while then.
It still looks like a beta from 1998.Some of the photographers I know work on concerts and point me to their MySpace page (for some reason, anything that has to do with music here apparently *has* to have a MySpace page) but those things are just too atrocious.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854895</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854449</id>
	<title>Oh goodie games I gt to play with no one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256321940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>90\% of my friends have migrated away from myspace they play games on facebook and yahoo. So who are these people going to play with on Myspace? The lower class degenerates? As the popular media likes to refer to them as.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>90 \ % of my friends have migrated away from myspace they play games on facebook and yahoo .
So who are these people going to play with on Myspace ?
The lower class degenerates ?
As the popular media likes to refer to them as .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>90\% of my friends have migrated away from myspace they play games on facebook and yahoo.
So who are these people going to play with on Myspace?
The lower class degenerates?
As the popular media likes to refer to them as.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854471</id>
	<title>Too little, too late</title>
	<author>eln</author>
	<datestamp>1256322240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>MySpace is the Detroit of social networking...once vibrant and full of life, it's not a much smaller and more depressing version of its former self.  Adding things that are already widely available all over the Internet isn't going to change anything.
<br> <br>
News Corp. wildly overspent for a turkey when they bought MySpace because, as has been proven over and over again by Mr. Murdoch himself, they have no understanding at all of how the Internet works, they have no idea what it takes to make money on the Internet, and they have no idea what anything on the Internet is actually worth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>MySpace is the Detroit of social networking...once vibrant and full of life , it 's not a much smaller and more depressing version of its former self .
Adding things that are already widely available all over the Internet is n't going to change anything .
News Corp. wildly overspent for a turkey when they bought MySpace because , as has been proven over and over again by Mr. Murdoch himself , they have no understanding at all of how the Internet works , they have no idea what it takes to make money on the Internet , and they have no idea what anything on the Internet is actually worth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MySpace is the Detroit of social networking...once vibrant and full of life, it's not a much smaller and more depressing version of its former self.
Adding things that are already widely available all over the Internet isn't going to change anything.
News Corp. wildly overspent for a turkey when they bought MySpace because, as has been proven over and over again by Mr. Murdoch himself, they have no understanding at all of how the Internet works, they have no idea what it takes to make money on the Internet, and they have no idea what anything on the Internet is actually worth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29861233</id>
	<title>Fashion DG Sunglasses ,Louboutin high  BOOT shoes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256393160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; Welcome TO Our Website:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Http://www.tntshoes.com</p><p>Hi friend, we are a prefession online store, you can see more photos and price in our website which is show in the photos<br>if you are interested please email me by , hellow we have run a online shiping mall for many years, our website is pls see our website in the photos attached attached, we have all kinds brand new shoes,clothing, handbag,sunglasses,hats etc for sale, 6000000\% best quality with the amazing price. our website is pls see our website in the photos attached attached, You will find more pictures and the price for our product in our website, please see below of the nike shoes we have, we take paypal as payment, . shoes SB dunk $28-42 free shiping.</p><p>
&nbsp; OUR WEBSITE:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Http://www.tntshoes.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>  Welcome TO Our Website :         Http : //www.tntshoes.comHi friend , we are a prefession online store , you can see more photos and price in our website which is show in the photosif you are interested please email me by , hellow we have run a online shiping mall for many years , our website is pls see our website in the photos attached attached , we have all kinds brand new shoes,clothing , handbag,sunglasses,hats etc for sale , 6000000 \ % best quality with the amazing price .
our website is pls see our website in the photos attached attached , You will find more pictures and the price for our product in our website , please see below of the nike shoes we have , we take paypal as payment , .
shoes SB dunk $ 28-42 free shiping .
  OUR WEBSITE :                                                         YAHOO : shoppertrade @ yahoo.com.cn                                                                 MSN : shoppertrade @ hotmail.com                                                                           Http : //www.tntshoes.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
  Welcome TO Our Website:
        Http://www.tntshoes.comHi friend, we are a prefession online store, you can see more photos and price in our website which is show in the photosif you are interested please email me by , hellow we have run a online shiping mall for many years, our website is pls see our website in the photos attached attached, we have all kinds brand new shoes,clothing, handbag,sunglasses,hats etc for sale, 6000000\% best quality with the amazing price.
our website is pls see our website in the photos attached attached, You will find more pictures and the price for our product in our website, please see below of the nike shoes we have, we take paypal as payment, .
shoes SB dunk $28-42 free shiping.
  OUR WEBSITE:
                                                        YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn
                                                                MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com
                                                                          Http://www.tntshoes.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854461</id>
	<title>funny</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256322120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>LOL "social" networking. you'd have to be a complete fucking loser to create an account at any of those sites.</htmltext>
<tokenext>LOL " social " networking .
you 'd have to be a complete fucking loser to create an account at any of those sites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOL "social" networking.
you'd have to be a complete fucking loser to create an account at any of those sites.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29858313</id>
	<title>Re:ask why</title>
	<author>MaraDNS</author>
	<datestamp>1256412060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Again, not to confuse this discussion with facts, but MySpace 2.0 is quite attractive and has a nice Web 2.0 CSS look to it.  The problem is that users have to opt-in to MySpace 2.0, and a lot of users still have pages with a MySpace 1.0 (tables, no CSS, Netscape 4 compatible, dot-com era website design) look to it.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Again , not to confuse this discussion with facts , but MySpace 2.0 is quite attractive and has a nice Web 2.0 CSS look to it .
The problem is that users have to opt-in to MySpace 2.0 , and a lot of users still have pages with a MySpace 1.0 ( tables , no CSS , Netscape 4 compatible , dot-com era website design ) look to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Again, not to confuse this discussion with facts, but MySpace 2.0 is quite attractive and has a nice Web 2.0 CSS look to it.
The problem is that users have to opt-in to MySpace 2.0, and a lot of users still have pages with a MySpace 1.0 (tables, no CSS, Netscape 4 compatible, dot-com era website design) look to it.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854493</id>
	<title>Reminds me of AOL...</title>
	<author>reverendbeer</author>
	<datestamp>1256322780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>...after dial-up began to become irrelevant.

"Hey, look! Bells AND whistles! You don't want that nasty DSL stuff...it sounds like a STD!"

Same thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...after dial-up began to become irrelevant .
" Hey , look !
Bells AND whistles !
You do n't want that nasty DSL stuff...it sounds like a STD !
" Same thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...after dial-up began to become irrelevant.
"Hey, look!
Bells AND whistles!
You don't want that nasty DSL stuff...it sounds like a STD!
"

Same thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29856225</id>
	<title>First-to-Market Advantage</title>
	<author>S77IM</author>
	<datestamp>1256395560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait, you mean to say that being the first-to-market, creating a new "space," acquiring mind-share, and all that other business-type-crap ISN'T a sure-fire magical path to success?  Things like quality, usability, and continuous innovation actually matter?  Who knew!</p><p>
&nbsp; -- 77IM, world-view shattered, let's schedule a meeting to discuss a new paradigm</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait , you mean to say that being the first-to-market , creating a new " space , " acquiring mind-share , and all that other business-type-crap IS N'T a sure-fire magical path to success ?
Things like quality , usability , and continuous innovation actually matter ?
Who knew !
  -- 77IM , world-view shattered , let 's schedule a meeting to discuss a new paradigm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait, you mean to say that being the first-to-market, creating a new "space," acquiring mind-share, and all that other business-type-crap ISN'T a sure-fire magical path to success?
Things like quality, usability, and continuous innovation actually matter?
Who knew!
  -- 77IM, world-view shattered, let's schedule a meeting to discuss a new paradigm</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_0122223_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29857363
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_0122223_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29859959
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854471
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_0122223_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29856031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854719
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_0122223_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_0122223_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29881097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_0122223_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29856989
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854471
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_0122223_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854785
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854525
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_0122223_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_0122223_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_0122223_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855919
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854525
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_0122223_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29857381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854627
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_0122223_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29857751
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854773
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854471
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_0122223_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854463
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_0122223_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29865051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854895
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854463
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_0122223_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29858313
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_0122223_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29856843
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854463
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_0122223_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29858217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854525
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_0122223_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855979
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_24_0122223_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855485
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854773
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854471
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_0122223.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854525
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29858217
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855919
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854585
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854785
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_0122223.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854627
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29857381
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_0122223.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855573
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29881097
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855979
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29858313
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_0122223.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854449
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_0122223.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854463
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854895
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29865051
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854783
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29856843
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_0122223.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854471
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29859959
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854773
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855485
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29857751
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29856989
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_0122223.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854599
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29855025
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854967
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29857363
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854719
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29856031
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854725
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_0122223.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854619
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_24_0122223.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_24_0122223.29854461
</commentlist>
</conversation>
