<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_23_197214</id>
	<title>Sparc Sends SparkFun Electronics C&amp;D Letter</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1256284800000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>moogied writes <i>"SparkFun.com, a electronics component provider, has been sent a <a href="http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/news.php?id=300">cease and desist letter by Sparc</a> in response to the lengthy trademark process that SparkFun is participating in.  The letter states 'Because the dominant portion of the SparkFun mark, namely, SPARK, is phonetically identical and nearly visually identical to SI's SPARC mark, and because it is used in connection with identical goods, we believe confusion is likely to occur among the relevant purchasing group.'  SparkFun.com has provided the entire contents of the letter, with a breakdown of points it feels are most relevant."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>moogied writes " SparkFun.com , a electronics component provider , has been sent a cease and desist letter by Sparc in response to the lengthy trademark process that SparkFun is participating in .
The letter states 'Because the dominant portion of the SparkFun mark , namely , SPARK , is phonetically identical and nearly visually identical to SI 's SPARC mark , and because it is used in connection with identical goods , we believe confusion is likely to occur among the relevant purchasing group .
' SparkFun.com has provided the entire contents of the letter , with a breakdown of points it feels are most relevant .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>moogied writes "SparkFun.com, a electronics component provider, has been sent a cease and desist letter by Sparc in response to the lengthy trademark process that SparkFun is participating in.
The letter states 'Because the dominant portion of the SparkFun mark, namely, SPARK, is phonetically identical and nearly visually identical to SI's SPARC mark, and because it is used in connection with identical goods, we believe confusion is likely to occur among the relevant purchasing group.
'  SparkFun.com has provided the entire contents of the letter, with a breakdown of points it feels are most relevant.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851901</id>
	<title>Re:Wait... what?</title>
	<author>Stregano</author>
	<datestamp>1256293620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me know when you do and I will help you make processors and servers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me know when you do and I will help you make processors and servers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me know when you do and I will help you make processors and servers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850869</id>
	<title>I can't wait</title>
	<author>Dunbal</author>
	<datestamp>1256289360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The counter-suit should be interesting. Hey, maybe SPARC would like to hire Darl to take care of that? I hear he's looking for work now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The counter-suit should be interesting .
Hey , maybe SPARC would like to hire Darl to take care of that ?
I hear he 's looking for work now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The counter-suit should be interesting.
Hey, maybe SPARC would like to hire Darl to take care of that?
I hear he's looking for work now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29854961</id>
	<title>Re:Sun should lose</title>
	<author>mpe</author>
	<datestamp>1256377200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>When I was in the USAF they called the electricians "spark chasers".</i> <br> <br>Another common term is "sparkys/sparkies".</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was in the USAF they called the electricians " spark chasers " .
Another common term is " sparkys/sparkies " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was in the USAF they called the electricians "spark chasers".
Another common term is "sparkys/sparkies".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29854409</id>
	<title>Oops?</title>
	<author>Shadyman</author>
	<datestamp>1256321100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm pretty sure I'm not at risk of accidentally buying from SPARC when I meant to buy from SparkFun. Sorry, SPARC.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure I 'm not at risk of accidentally buying from SPARC when I meant to buy from SparkFun .
Sorry , SPARC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure I'm not at risk of accidentally buying from SPARC when I meant to buy from SparkFun.
Sorry, SPARC.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851091</id>
	<title>Other sites with better summaries</title>
	<author>odin84gk</author>
	<datestamp>1256290080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(Removed by user)</p><p>I don't want all of my hacker/maker sites slashdotted at once!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( Removed by user ) I do n't want all of my hacker/maker sites slashdotted at once !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(Removed by user)I don't want all of my hacker/maker sites slashdotted at once!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851521</id>
	<title>Re:Umm</title>
	<author>Bob9113</author>
	<datestamp>1256291700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>How do you protect your trademark without sending out C&amp;Ds?</i></p><p>Contact the very nice folks at SparkFun and ask, "Pardon -- could you put a disclaimer on your 'About' page or 'FAQ' stating that you are not associated with Sparc? That way we have our 'You must defend your trademark' ass covered, but we don't have to be dicks about it."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you protect your trademark without sending out C&amp;Ds ? Contact the very nice folks at SparkFun and ask , " Pardon -- could you put a disclaimer on your 'About ' page or 'FAQ ' stating that you are not associated with Sparc ?
That way we have our 'You must defend your trademark ' ass covered , but we do n't have to be dicks about it .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you protect your trademark without sending out C&amp;Ds?Contact the very nice folks at SparkFun and ask, "Pardon -- could you put a disclaimer on your 'About' page or 'FAQ' stating that you are not associated with Sparc?
That way we have our 'You must defend your trademark' ass covered, but we don't have to be dicks about it.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851135</id>
	<title>Re:Happens all the time</title>
	<author>Moryath</author>
	<datestamp>1256290200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep. All you need is one jumped-up shyster snake...er "lawyer"... and we're off to the races again.</p><p>If SPARC, or their parent corp Sun Microsystems, wants to be good citizens, the lawyer who sent this should lose his job.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep .
All you need is one jumped-up shyster snake...er " lawyer " ... and we 're off to the races again.If SPARC , or their parent corp Sun Microsystems , wants to be good citizens , the lawyer who sent this should lose his job .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep.
All you need is one jumped-up shyster snake...er "lawyer"... and we're off to the races again.If SPARC, or their parent corp Sun Microsystems, wants to be good citizens, the lawyer who sent this should lose his job.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850693</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850719</id>
	<title>I guess if I built a Sparcstation from parts</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256288700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I could buy some of the parts from SparkFun, and perhaps some of the PCBs.  But that's where the "identical goods" argument ends.  Has Sparc ever done a teardown of a Wii controller with analysis of the components?  Do they sell solder stations?  Is Sparc even around anymore?  I must've forgotten about them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I could buy some of the parts from SparkFun , and perhaps some of the PCBs .
But that 's where the " identical goods " argument ends .
Has Sparc ever done a teardown of a Wii controller with analysis of the components ?
Do they sell solder stations ?
Is Sparc even around anymore ?
I must 've forgotten about them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could buy some of the parts from SparkFun, and perhaps some of the PCBs.
But that's where the "identical goods" argument ends.
Has Sparc ever done a teardown of a Wii controller with analysis of the components?
Do they sell solder stations?
Is Sparc even around anymore?
I must've forgotten about them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852753</id>
	<title>Re:And to add to the misery...</title>
	<author>nietsch</author>
	<datestamp>1256299560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had no problem reading their post about this, nor did I have any problem firing off an angry mail to K&amp;L.</p><p>to: christine.redfield@klgates.com, sparcinfo@sparc.org<br>cc: spark@sparkfun.com</p><p>hi Christine,</p><p>your mailbox will probably be clogged, but please lay off you frivolous<br>trademark claims towards Sparkfun, representing Sparc International. You are<br>insulting both their customer base suggesting they would confuse one with the<br>other.  My advise to Sun/Sparc Inc is to cancel your contract, as you<br>obviously have nothing better to do than generating bad publicity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had no problem reading their post about this , nor did I have any problem firing off an angry mail to K&amp;L.to : christine.redfield @ klgates.com , sparcinfo @ sparc.orgcc : spark @ sparkfun.comhi Christine,your mailbox will probably be clogged , but please lay off you frivoloustrademark claims towards Sparkfun , representing Sparc International .
You areinsulting both their customer base suggesting they would confuse one with theother .
My advise to Sun/Sparc Inc is to cancel your contract , as youobviously have nothing better to do than generating bad publicity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had no problem reading their post about this, nor did I have any problem firing off an angry mail to K&amp;L.to: christine.redfield@klgates.com, sparcinfo@sparc.orgcc: spark@sparkfun.comhi Christine,your mailbox will probably be clogged, but please lay off you frivoloustrademark claims towards Sparkfun, representing Sparc International.
You areinsulting both their customer base suggesting they would confuse one with theother.
My advise to Sun/Sparc Inc is to cancel your contract, as youobviously have nothing better to do than generating bad publicity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853579</id>
	<title>The whole point of being "Sparc" is to be diff'rnt</title>
	<author>mykos</author>
	<datestamp>1256308500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sparc distinguishes itself from the myriad businesses that have "Spark" in their name by virtue of their spelling.   Rage...rising...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sparc distinguishes itself from the myriad businesses that have " Spark " in their name by virtue of their spelling .
Rage...rising.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sparc distinguishes itself from the myriad businesses that have "Spark" in their name by virtue of their spelling.
Rage...rising...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850781</id>
	<title>And to add to the misery...</title>
	<author>gandhi\_2</author>
	<datestamp>1256289000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...slashdot readers are bringing SparkFun.com to it's knees as we speak.</p><p>Stand back, SPARC, we'll take care of this!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...slashdot readers are bringing SparkFun.com to it 's knees as we speak.Stand back , SPARC , we 'll take care of this !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...slashdot readers are bringing SparkFun.com to it's knees as we speak.Stand back, SPARC, we'll take care of this!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851111</id>
	<title>Re:well now</title>
	<author>jim\_v2000</author>
	<datestamp>1256290200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wait, don't you mean "Spark" servers?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait , do n't you mean " Spark " servers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait, don't you mean "Spark" servers?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851373</id>
	<title>Re:Sun should lose</title>
	<author>bjourne</author>
	<datestamp>1256291220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The correct analogy is an electronics company called McIntoshFun being sued by Apple Computer Inc. Because it would be ludicrous for a company to lay claim to a common word for an apple variety like that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The correct analogy is an electronics company called McIntoshFun being sued by Apple Computer Inc. Because it would be ludicrous for a company to lay claim to a common word for an apple variety like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The correct analogy is an electronics company called McIntoshFun being sued by Apple Computer Inc. Because it would be ludicrous for a company to lay claim to a common word for an apple variety like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850929</id>
	<title>Next thing you know</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256289540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't wait for IBM to sue BMW because after all, both of them share the letters "BM" and that might confuse a lot of people. Disney could probably have a go at McDonald's because after all, Donald is the name of a famous Disney character....</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Hopefully Sparkfun won't get a retarded judge, and this will be laughed out of court.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't wait for IBM to sue BMW because after all , both of them share the letters " BM " and that might confuse a lot of people .
Disney could probably have a go at McDonald 's because after all , Donald is the name of a famous Disney character... .       Hopefully Sparkfun wo n't get a retarded judge , and this will be laughed out of court .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't wait for IBM to sue BMW because after all, both of them share the letters "BM" and that might confuse a lot of people.
Disney could probably have a go at McDonald's because after all, Donald is the name of a famous Disney character....
      Hopefully Sparkfun won't get a retarded judge, and this will be laughed out of court.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851363</id>
	<title>Re:well now</title>
	<author>Profane MuthaFucka</author>
	<datestamp>1256291160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get your Republican jokes out of here. Only 20\% of the population that still calls themselves Republicans think that crap is funny.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get your Republican jokes out of here .
Only 20 \ % of the population that still calls themselves Republicans think that crap is funny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get your Republican jokes out of here.
Only 20\% of the population that still calls themselves Republicans think that crap is funny.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850895</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850977</id>
	<title>Oh, great...</title>
	<author>kclittle</author>
	<datestamp>1256289720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>First SparkFun get a stupid cease &amp; desist, *then* it gets slashdotted. Some days, it all just goes downhill from the  git-go...</htmltext>
<tokenext>First SparkFun get a stupid cease &amp; desist , * then * it gets slashdotted .
Some days , it all just goes downhill from the git-go.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First SparkFun get a stupid cease &amp; desist, *then* it gets slashdotted.
Some days, it all just goes downhill from the  git-go...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851917</id>
	<title>Re:Next thing you know</title>
	<author>Zantac69</author>
	<datestamp>1256293740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You do know that "BM" also stands for "bowel movement," right?<br> <br>Just checking<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) <br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/snark off</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do know that " BM " also stands for " bowel movement , " right ?
Just checking : ) /snark off</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do know that "BM" also stands for "bowel movement," right?
Just checking :)   /snark off</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850929</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853629</id>
	<title>The ultimate in nitwittery and assholery</title>
	<author>fnj</author>
	<datestamp>1256309220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dear Sparc International a.k.a. Prototypical Stupid Bully: "Identical goods," my evil eye, you asswipe pus-filled scum from Hades!  Eat shit and die.  May your wart grow a truly loathsome hairy sub-wart that dare not be seen in public.  May your corporate bowel be irretrievably blocked.  May your tinnitus have tinnitus and may your Morgellons Syndrome be spectacularly pathological.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear Sparc International a.k.a .
Prototypical Stupid Bully : " Identical goods , " my evil eye , you asswipe pus-filled scum from Hades !
Eat shit and die .
May your wart grow a truly loathsome hairy sub-wart that dare not be seen in public .
May your corporate bowel be irretrievably blocked .
May your tinnitus have tinnitus and may your Morgellons Syndrome be spectacularly pathological .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear Sparc International a.k.a.
Prototypical Stupid Bully: "Identical goods," my evil eye, you asswipe pus-filled scum from Hades!
Eat shit and die.
May your wart grow a truly loathsome hairy sub-wart that dare not be seen in public.
May your corporate bowel be irretrievably blocked.
May your tinnitus have tinnitus and may your Morgellons Syndrome be spectacularly pathological.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852207</id>
	<title>Re:And to add to the misery...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256295600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I say we should similarly "browse" Sparcs website.  &gt;\_&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I say we should similarly " browse " Sparcs website .
&gt; \ _ &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I say we should similarly "browse" Sparcs website.
&gt;\_&gt;</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850875</id>
	<title>Huh....I don't see the resemblance...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256289360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...but then again, I'm really in a hurry here.</p><p>-- Moron</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...but then again , I 'm really in a hurry here.-- Moron</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but then again, I'm really in a hurry here.-- Moron</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29866365</id>
	<title>Nothing to do with Sun</title>
	<author>WebMink</author>
	<datestamp>1256501160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just want to make it clear, on Sun's behalf, that this trademark action was not initiated by Sun and that all the hatred expressed towards Sun on this issue is misplaced. SPARC International is an independent trade association (it has been for a very long time) and makes its own decisions about trademark enforcement. I wouldn't have acted the way they are, and I have asked Sun's representative to SPARC International to investigate the issue, but beyond using its status as one of many licensees and members, I'm not aware of anything more that Sun can do.

</p><p>S.
<br>(speaking officially for once)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just want to make it clear , on Sun 's behalf , that this trademark action was not initiated by Sun and that all the hatred expressed towards Sun on this issue is misplaced .
SPARC International is an independent trade association ( it has been for a very long time ) and makes its own decisions about trademark enforcement .
I would n't have acted the way they are , and I have asked Sun 's representative to SPARC International to investigate the issue , but beyond using its status as one of many licensees and members , I 'm not aware of anything more that Sun can do .
S . ( speaking officially for once )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just want to make it clear, on Sun's behalf, that this trademark action was not initiated by Sun and that all the hatred expressed towards Sun on this issue is misplaced.
SPARC International is an independent trade association (it has been for a very long time) and makes its own decisions about trademark enforcement.
I wouldn't have acted the way they are, and I have asked Sun's representative to SPARC International to investigate the issue, but beyond using its status as one of many licensees and members, I'm not aware of anything more that Sun can do.
S.
(speaking officially for once)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850947</id>
	<title>In after some FUD</title>
	<author>PaintyThePirate</author>
	<datestamp>1256289600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sun has nothing to do with this.  SPARC International owns the trademark, not Sun.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sun has nothing to do with this .
SPARC International owns the trademark , not Sun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sun has nothing to do with this.
SPARC International owns the trademark, not Sun.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850743</id>
	<title>so let me get this straight</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256288820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sun named their product line after a natural phenomenon, a spark, and is now going after any one using the natural phenomenon's namesake? yeesh!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sun named their product line after a natural phenomenon , a spark , and is now going after any one using the natural phenomenon 's namesake ?
yeesh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sun named their product line after a natural phenomenon, a spark, and is now going after any one using the natural phenomenon's namesake?
yeesh!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29863819</id>
	<title>Ut oh</title>
	<author>hellop2</author>
	<datestamp>1256478300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It looks like Darl McBride got a new job.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks like Darl McBride got a new job .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks like Darl McBride got a new job.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29854299</id>
	<title>Has anyone noticed...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256319600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... that SPARC mark is nearly phonetically identical and nearly visually identical to the Spork mark?</p><p>Perhaps someone should inform Plastico Limited?  Wouldn't want anyone to become confused and accidentally order thousands of workstations when they really intended to buy thousands of plastic eating utensils.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... that SPARC mark is nearly phonetically identical and nearly visually identical to the Spork mark ? Perhaps someone should inform Plastico Limited ?
Would n't want anyone to become confused and accidentally order thousands of workstations when they really intended to buy thousands of plastic eating utensils .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... that SPARC mark is nearly phonetically identical and nearly visually identical to the Spork mark?Perhaps someone should inform Plastico Limited?
Wouldn't want anyone to become confused and accidentally order thousands of workstations when they really intended to buy thousands of plastic eating utensils.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851281</id>
	<title>Headlines read...</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1256290800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sparkfun police spoil everything!</p><p>Sparc are no fun!</p><p>Sparks fly at Sparc!</p><p>No more Sparkfun!</p><p>Sparc missing from this relationship!</p><p>Sparkfun fight begins!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sparkfun police spoil everything ! Sparc are no fun ! Sparks fly at Sparc ! No more Sparkfun ! Sparc missing from this relationship ! Sparkfun fight begins !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sparkfun police spoil everything!Sparc are no fun!Sparks fly at Sparc!No more Sparkfun!Sparc missing from this relationship!Sparkfun fight begins!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853053</id>
	<title>Re:well now</title>
	<author>Dogbertius</author>
	<datestamp>1256302920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe this is to make up for the $100M/month they're losing on their shakey acquisition by oracle?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe this is to make up for the $ 100M/month they 're losing on their shakey acquisition by oracle ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe this is to make up for the $100M/month they're losing on their shakey acquisition by oracle?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851295</id>
	<title>Re:Wait... what?</title>
	<author>blind biker</author>
	<datestamp>1256290860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It depends. Do you plan on selling microprocessors?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It depends .
Do you plan on selling microprocessors ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It depends.
Do you plan on selling microprocessors?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851069</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853483</id>
	<title>I, for one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256307300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>oppose this gratuitous sharing of BM.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>oppose this gratuitous sharing of BM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oppose this gratuitous sharing of BM.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850929</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29854847</id>
	<title>trademarks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256416560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it would be good to only allow "trademarks" to start with the TM symbol, so people can still identify a registered brand, but everyone else does not lose the use of normal words.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it would be good to only allow " trademarks " to start with the TM symbol , so people can still identify a registered brand , but everyone else does not lose the use of normal words .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it would be good to only allow "trademarks" to start with the TM symbol, so people can still identify a registered brand, but everyone else does not lose the use of normal words.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850961</id>
	<title>Umm</title>
	<author>mewsenews</author>
	<datestamp>1256289660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IANAL, but Sparc International has a legal obligation to protect its trademark, correct? They may not want to pick on SparkFun but if they don't demonstrably protect their trademark, they can lose it.</p><p>How do you protect your trademark without sending out C&amp;Ds?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IANAL , but Sparc International has a legal obligation to protect its trademark , correct ?
They may not want to pick on SparkFun but if they do n't demonstrably protect their trademark , they can lose it.How do you protect your trademark without sending out C&amp;Ds ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IANAL, but Sparc International has a legal obligation to protect its trademark, correct?
They may not want to pick on SparkFun but if they don't demonstrably protect their trademark, they can lose it.How do you protect your trademark without sending out C&amp;Ds?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29867249</id>
	<title>Re:I've ordered from both companies...</title>
	<author>Smoke2Joints</author>
	<datestamp>1256466660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>thanks to reading about this C&amp;D letter, ive remembered that ive been meaning to order an arduino from sparkfun for some time. consider that done!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>thanks to reading about this C&amp;D letter , ive remembered that ive been meaning to order an arduino from sparkfun for some time .
consider that done !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>thanks to reading about this C&amp;D letter, ive remembered that ive been meaning to order an arduino from sparkfun for some time.
consider that done!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851411</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851623</id>
	<title>Re:Next thing you know</title>
	<author>vitaflo</author>
	<datestamp>1256292120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or better, for PARC to sue SPARC.  At least they're the same industry, "sound similar", use all caps in the name, etc.  But that's right, it's just easier to go after the little guy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or better , for PARC to sue SPARC .
At least they 're the same industry , " sound similar " , use all caps in the name , etc .
But that 's right , it 's just easier to go after the little guy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or better, for PARC to sue SPARC.
At least they're the same industry, "sound similar", use all caps in the name, etc.
But that's right, it's just easier to go after the little guy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850929</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850699</id>
	<title>Ich liebe SparC-fun</title>
	<author>cellurl</author>
	<datestamp>1256288640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I love spark-fun. I bought cheap GPS modules from them. They have a nack for bulk-buying cool stuff that inventors need. They also respond to criticism and suggestions. Heck, I should work for them, don't you think?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I love spark-fun .
I bought cheap GPS modules from them .
They have a nack for bulk-buying cool stuff that inventors need .
They also respond to criticism and suggestions .
Heck , I should work for them , do n't you think ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love spark-fun.
I bought cheap GPS modules from them.
They have a nack for bulk-buying cool stuff that inventors need.
They also respond to criticism and suggestions.
Heck, I should work for them, don't you think?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851075</id>
	<title>When Will Gulag U.S.A. Send China C &amp; D Letter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256290020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Never, because Gulag U.S.A. is owned by <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQeflkQ5DOE&amp;feature=fvw" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">China</a> [youtube.com].</p><p>Yours In Novosibirsk,<br>Kilgore Trout.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Never , because Gulag U.S.A. is owned by China [ youtube.com ] .Yours In Novosibirsk,Kilgore Trout .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never, because Gulag U.S.A. is owned by China [youtube.com].Yours In Novosibirsk,Kilgore Trout.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850911</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851505</id>
	<title>Re:well now</title>
	<author>R2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1256291700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"SPARC is an organization that licenses processor designs (Scalable Processor ARChitecture), "</p><p>So let me get this straight - an organization that chose a name so that it could have an acronym that sounded like the word "spark" is now trying to stop someone else from using the word that they imitated?</p><p>That's like Protron suing Proton.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" SPARC is an organization that licenses processor designs ( Scalable Processor ARChitecture ) , " So let me get this straight - an organization that chose a name so that it could have an acronym that sounded like the word " spark " is now trying to stop someone else from using the word that they imitated ? That 's like Protron suing Proton .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"SPARC is an organization that licenses processor designs (Scalable Processor ARChitecture), "So let me get this straight - an organization that chose a name so that it could have an acronym that sounded like the word "spark" is now trying to stop someone else from using the word that they imitated?That's like Protron suing Proton.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850927</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850829</id>
	<title>"Dominant Portion"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256289180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sun: "Because the dominant portion of the SparkFun mark, namely, SPARK, is phonetically identical and nearly visually identical to SI's SPARC mark, and because it is used in connection with identical goods, we believe confusion is likely to occur among the relevant purchasing group."
<br> <br>
And here I thought that dominant portion of SparkFun was "Fun"!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sun : " Because the dominant portion of the SparkFun mark , namely , SPARK , is phonetically identical and nearly visually identical to SI 's SPARC mark , and because it is used in connection with identical goods , we believe confusion is likely to occur among the relevant purchasing group .
" And here I thought that dominant portion of SparkFun was " Fun " !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sun: "Because the dominant portion of the SparkFun mark, namely, SPARK, is phonetically identical and nearly visually identical to SI's SPARC mark, and because it is used in connection with identical goods, we believe confusion is likely to occur among the relevant purchasing group.
"
 
And here I thought that dominant portion of SparkFun was "Fun"!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851341</id>
	<title>Re:And to add to the misery...</title>
	<author>Concerned Onlooker</author>
	<datestamp>1256291100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps they're running Sparc servers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps they 're running Sparc servers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps they're running Sparc servers?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667</id>
	<title>well now</title>
	<author>poetmatt</author>
	<datestamp>1256288580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>guess who won't be buying any more sparc servers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>guess who wo n't be buying any more sparc servers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>guess who won't be buying any more sparc servers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851119</id>
	<title>This is great advertising</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256290200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>SparkFun should be laughing all the way to the bank, once they get past the lawyerly nuisance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>SparkFun should be laughing all the way to the bank , once they get past the lawyerly nuisance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SparkFun should be laughing all the way to the bank, once they get past the lawyerly nuisance.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852003</id>
	<title>Re:Sun should lose</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1256294160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"When I was in the USAF they called the electricians "spark chasers"."</p><p>They still do, but Sun isn't likely to sue an outfit with Predator UAVs...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" When I was in the USAF they called the electricians " spark chasers " .
" They still do , but Sun is n't likely to sue an outfit with Predator UAVs... : ) "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"When I was in the USAF they called the electricians "spark chasers".
"They still do, but Sun isn't likely to sue an outfit with Predator UAVs... :)"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852395</id>
	<title>Re:FARC</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256296920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...and when is PARC (parc dot com) going to notice that SPARC co-opted their entire name???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and when is PARC ( parc dot com ) going to notice that SPARC co-opted their entire name ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...and when is PARC (parc dot com) going to notice that SPARC co-opted their entire name??
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850911</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851393</id>
	<title>Re:well now</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1256291280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>guess who won't be buying any more sparc servers?</p></div>
</blockquote><p>Good choice. Might I interest you in some SparkFun servers? I know the name looks exactly the same, but it's different if you look closely.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>guess who wo n't be buying any more sparc servers ?
Good choice .
Might I interest you in some SparkFun servers ?
I know the name looks exactly the same , but it 's different if you look closely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>guess who won't be buying any more sparc servers?
Good choice.
Might I interest you in some SparkFun servers?
I know the name looks exactly the same, but it's different if you look closely.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853867</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, great...</title>
	<author>AmericanInKiev</author>
	<datestamp>1256312700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh I think they asked for the Slashdotting.<br>I'm pretty sure they feel every byte is worth it. Their paying customers (me) will come back when the coast is clear - meanwhile they're emailing their congress person's spam filter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh I think they asked for the Slashdotting.I 'm pretty sure they feel every byte is worth it .
Their paying customers ( me ) will come back when the coast is clear - meanwhile they 're emailing their congress person 's spam filter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh I think they asked for the Slashdotting.I'm pretty sure they feel every byte is worth it.
Their paying customers (me) will come back when the coast is clear - meanwhile they're emailing their congress person's spam filter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853507</id>
	<title>In Other News . . .</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256307600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oracle has announced that after their acquisition of Sun, they will be enforcing their copyrights on the word "Sun" including their "special day of the week" and variants including the name for male children.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oracle has announced that after their acquisition of Sun , they will be enforcing their copyrights on the word " Sun " including their " special day of the week " and variants including the name for male children .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oracle has announced that after their acquisition of Sun, they will be enforcing their copyrights on the word "Sun" including their "special day of the week" and variants including the name for male children.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850913</id>
	<title>Re:Sun should lose</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1256289480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I swear that typoo was unintentional...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I swear that typoo was unintentional.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I swear that typoo was unintentional...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853351</id>
	<title>An observation</title>
	<author>kilodelta</author>
	<datestamp>1256305980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I deal with a lot of technically clueless attorneys. They really have no idea about technology other than the fact that the computer is a black box that they use to word process, and email, and occasionally listen to case based audio files.
<br> <br>
In the case of the SPARC v. Sparkfun it's just some attorneys with a hair across their ass.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I deal with a lot of technically clueless attorneys .
They really have no idea about technology other than the fact that the computer is a black box that they use to word process , and email , and occasionally listen to case based audio files .
In the case of the SPARC v. Sparkfun it 's just some attorneys with a hair across their ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I deal with a lot of technically clueless attorneys.
They really have no idea about technology other than the fact that the computer is a black box that they use to word process, and email, and occasionally listen to case based audio files.
In the case of the SPARC v. Sparkfun it's just some attorneys with a hair across their ass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852231</id>
	<title>Re:so let me get this straight</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1256295780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sun is not Sparc but a Sparc compliant company. As a trademark holder I know the US gov makes it very clear that you can lose your trademark for not defending it. I would bet Sparc doesn't care about sparkfun but their lawyers do because Americans do stupid things like vote a load of lawyers into the government who watch over their own and have made it so what Sparc's lawyers are doing is effectively a requirement for having a trademark.
<br> <br>
Lawyers love to make work for their own which is why lawyers should be banned from running for office.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sun is not Sparc but a Sparc compliant company .
As a trademark holder I know the US gov makes it very clear that you can lose your trademark for not defending it .
I would bet Sparc does n't care about sparkfun but their lawyers do because Americans do stupid things like vote a load of lawyers into the government who watch over their own and have made it so what Sparc 's lawyers are doing is effectively a requirement for having a trademark .
Lawyers love to make work for their own which is why lawyers should be banned from running for office .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sun is not Sparc but a Sparc compliant company.
As a trademark holder I know the US gov makes it very clear that you can lose your trademark for not defending it.
I would bet Sparc doesn't care about sparkfun but their lawyers do because Americans do stupid things like vote a load of lawyers into the government who watch over their own and have made it so what Sparc's lawyers are doing is effectively a requirement for having a trademark.
Lawyers love to make work for their own which is why lawyers should be banned from running for office.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850743</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851293</id>
	<title>Completely and utterly...</title>
	<author>ShaunC</author>
	<datestamp>1256290860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>RE/tarded.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>RE/tarded .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RE/tarded.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851239</id>
	<title>Don't confuse the Electronics Company with...</title>
	<author>mujadaddy</author>
	<datestamp>1256290680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...the unrelated but more interesting SpankFun!</htmltext>
<tokenext>...the unrelated but more interesting SpankFun !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...the unrelated but more interesting SpankFun!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29855081</id>
	<title>Zendroid</title>
	<author>TeknoHog</author>
	<datestamp>1256380140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
This reminds me of the case of Zendroid, a Finnish robotics company that was asked to change its name by Google and Lucasfilm. Of course, Lucasfilm doesn't want anyone else to use anything with "droid". As for Google, they didn't exactly invent the word "android", and besides, what does a mobile OS have to do with humanoid robots?
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.zenrobotics.com/?page=news#2008-11-28" title="zenrobotics.com">http://www.zenrobotics.com/?page=news#2008-11-28</a> [zenrobotics.com]
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This reminds me of the case of Zendroid , a Finnish robotics company that was asked to change its name by Google and Lucasfilm .
Of course , Lucasfilm does n't want anyone else to use anything with " droid " .
As for Google , they did n't exactly invent the word " android " , and besides , what does a mobile OS have to do with humanoid robots ?
http : //www.zenrobotics.com/ ? page = news # 2008-11-28 [ zenrobotics.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
This reminds me of the case of Zendroid, a Finnish robotics company that was asked to change its name by Google and Lucasfilm.
Of course, Lucasfilm doesn't want anyone else to use anything with "droid".
As for Google, they didn't exactly invent the word "android", and besides, what does a mobile OS have to do with humanoid robots?
http://www.zenrobotics.com/?page=news#2008-11-28 [zenrobotics.com]
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29867111</id>
	<title>Re:well now</title>
	<author>blueskies</author>
	<datestamp>1256464860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait.  Are you saying sun was too stupid to trademark the name spark and now they are saying they one it too?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait .
Are you saying sun was too stupid to trademark the name spark and now they are saying they one it too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait.
Are you saying sun was too stupid to trademark the name spark and now they are saying they one it too?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851937</id>
	<title>Re:well now</title>
	<author>hrimhari</author>
	<datestamp>1256293800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No need to look that closely. SparkFun products are only a few inches long and I seriously doubt that you'll be able to install an OS in it, even Linux : )</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No need to look that closely .
SparkFun products are only a few inches long and I seriously doubt that you 'll be able to install an OS in it , even Linux : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No need to look that closely.
SparkFun products are only a few inches long and I seriously doubt that you'll be able to install an OS in it, even Linux : )</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851393</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850973</id>
	<title>Re:Sun should lose</title>
	<author>travisb828</author>
	<datestamp>1256289720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An electrician is also called a sparky on a construction site.<br>My grandma had a dog named sparky.<br>The Spark of Hope gives you +100 spirit<br>SparkOfHope.org helps disabled children<br>Sparkles the Clown does birthdays (i hate clowns they should sue him)<br>Jeff Dunham had a comedy central special called Spark Of Insanity - <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epsx2dlQQ6k" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epsx2dlQQ6k</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>I could go on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An electrician is also called a sparky on a construction site.My grandma had a dog named sparky.The Spark of Hope gives you + 100 spiritSparkOfHope.org helps disabled childrenSparkles the Clown does birthdays ( i hate clowns they should sue him ) Jeff Dunham had a comedy central special called Spark Of Insanity - http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = epsx2dlQQ6k [ youtube.com ] I could go on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An electrician is also called a sparky on a construction site.My grandma had a dog named sparky.The Spark of Hope gives you +100 spiritSparkOfHope.org helps disabled childrenSparkles the Clown does birthdays (i hate clowns they should sue him)Jeff Dunham had a comedy central special called Spark Of Insanity - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epsx2dlQQ6k [youtube.com]I could go on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29863755</id>
	<title>In a related story...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256477760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Early today Sun announced it would be serving all Christian Churches with a cease and desist order, in the confusion involving there use of the phrase "Son of God". There legal department concluded the phrase was virtually identical to the phrase "Sun, God of all servers", and should be considered an illegal infringement of the Sun name and trademarks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Early today Sun announced it would be serving all Christian Churches with a cease and desist order , in the confusion involving there use of the phrase " Son of God " .
There legal department concluded the phrase was virtually identical to the phrase " Sun , God of all servers " , and should be considered an illegal infringement of the Sun name and trademarks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Early today Sun announced it would be serving all Christian Churches with a cease and desist order, in the confusion involving there use of the phrase "Son of God".
There legal department concluded the phrase was virtually identical to the phrase "Sun, God of all servers", and should be considered an illegal infringement of the Sun name and trademarks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851073</id>
	<title>So...Much...Chickenshit...</title>
	<author>Simonetta</author>
	<datestamp>1256290020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So SPARC is something like SPARK...</p><p>
&nbsp; And some nitwit company that has seen its stock price fall a huge percentage because it spends far too much on psychotic lawyers than it does on R&amp;D is filing a lawsuit about 'Spark' being close to 'sparc'.  And this idiot lawyers have convinced someone that they 'own' the word 'spark'.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Am I reading this correct?  Please tell me that this is not Sun Microsystems!  Founded by geniuses, creators and leaders in the workstation industry, the true visionary company of the valley.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; You would think that these guys would be too embarrassed to show their faces in the valley again after something as stupid as this.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; These guys have no shame.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Since the world's population is bursting and there is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...so...much....surplus...talent available, why don't we just put all these dumb fucks out of their (and our) misery.  "take out the trash, clean out the crusty, and let them spend the rest of their days walking through the streets of SoHo in the rain."</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; What! There's a law against that too?  Law or no law, sooner or later, it's going to be cheaper just to kill them all.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; It's a shame that with all their education and vested options, they still don't realize this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So SPARC is something like SPARK.. .   And some nitwit company that has seen its stock price fall a huge percentage because it spends far too much on psychotic lawyers than it does on R&amp;D is filing a lawsuit about 'Spark ' being close to 'sparc' .
And this idiot lawyers have convinced someone that they 'own ' the word 'spark' .
    Am I reading this correct ?
Please tell me that this is not Sun Microsystems !
Founded by geniuses , creators and leaders in the workstation industry , the true visionary company of the valley .
    You would think that these guys would be too embarrassed to show their faces in the valley again after something as stupid as this .
    These guys have no shame .
    Since the world 's population is bursting and there is ...so...much....surplus...talent available , why do n't we just put all these dumb fucks out of their ( and our ) misery .
" take out the trash , clean out the crusty , and let them spend the rest of their days walking through the streets of SoHo in the rain .
"     What !
There 's a law against that too ?
Law or no law , sooner or later , it 's going to be cheaper just to kill them all .
    It 's a shame that with all their education and vested options , they still do n't realize this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So SPARC is something like SPARK...
  And some nitwit company that has seen its stock price fall a huge percentage because it spends far too much on psychotic lawyers than it does on R&amp;D is filing a lawsuit about 'Spark' being close to 'sparc'.
And this idiot lawyers have convinced someone that they 'own' the word 'spark'.
    Am I reading this correct?
Please tell me that this is not Sun Microsystems!
Founded by geniuses, creators and leaders in the workstation industry, the true visionary company of the valley.
    You would think that these guys would be too embarrassed to show their faces in the valley again after something as stupid as this.
    These guys have no shame.
    Since the world's population is bursting and there is ...so...much....surplus...talent available, why don't we just put all these dumb fucks out of their (and our) misery.
"take out the trash, clean out the crusty, and let them spend the rest of their days walking through the streets of SoHo in the rain.
"
    What!
There's a law against that too?
Law or no law, sooner or later, it's going to be cheaper just to kill them all.
    It's a shame that with all their education and vested options, they still don't realize this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850895</id>
	<title>Re:well now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256289480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What does it say on the inside of a nigger's lips?  INFLATE TO 30 PSI.
<br> <br>
Just wanted to clear things up for the idiotic mods who thought the parent post was a Troll.  Company makes questionable douchebag action, potential customer decides to stop buying from company.  What the FUCK is trollish about that?  Since you morons seem to have forgotten what a troll post is all about, I thought I'd post a nigger joke for you.  You're welcome.
<br> <br>
P.S., if you are still unclear about why this is a troll post and the parent post is not, then please for the good of humanity be certain that you never reproduce.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What does it say on the inside of a nigger 's lips ?
INFLATE TO 30 PSI .
Just wanted to clear things up for the idiotic mods who thought the parent post was a Troll .
Company makes questionable douchebag action , potential customer decides to stop buying from company .
What the FUCK is trollish about that ?
Since you morons seem to have forgotten what a troll post is all about , I thought I 'd post a nigger joke for you .
You 're welcome .
P.S. , if you are still unclear about why this is a troll post and the parent post is not , then please for the good of humanity be certain that you never reproduce .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What does it say on the inside of a nigger's lips?
INFLATE TO 30 PSI.
Just wanted to clear things up for the idiotic mods who thought the parent post was a Troll.
Company makes questionable douchebag action, potential customer decides to stop buying from company.
What the FUCK is trollish about that?
Since you morons seem to have forgotten what a troll post is all about, I thought I'd post a nigger joke for you.
You're welcome.
P.S., if you are still unclear about why this is a troll post and the parent post is not, then please for the good of humanity be certain that you never reproduce.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850871</id>
	<title>I think it just highlights</title>
	<author>bugs2squash</author>
	<datestamp>1256289360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>That the dominant part of SPARC is not fun.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That the dominant part of SPARC is not fun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That the dominant part of SPARC is not fun.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29891275</id>
	<title>Sun's true involvement</title>
	<author>DavidWeaver</author>
	<datestamp>1256647200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This whole thread reminds me of the wild rumors that we all get, propagated through email<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... you know, the ones that get us righteously(!) riled up on some issue.  We feel totally justified in our indignation -- until we discover that the reality isn't nearly as interesting as the story was depicted, and all the fun goes out of the discussion<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-(.<p>
I don't want to spoil all the good Fun(tm) in this lively discussion, but here are some actual facts to consider:
</p><ol>
<li> Sun Microsystems does *not* own the SPARC trademark.   SPARC International ("SI"), an industry trade organization, has owned the SPARC trademark for *over 20 years*. </li><li> Sun, along with many other companies, pays fees to SPARC International to license its uses of the SPARC trademark.  Sun is a SPARC licensee, it doesn't own the trademark.  Sun has no issue with SparkFun. </li><li> Sun neither owns nor controls SI.  Sun, however, is a member company of SI and Sun does hold one seat on SI's board of directors.  </li><li> Sun did *not* send the C&amp;D letter in question to SparkFun.  It does not own the SPARC trademark so can't send a C&amp;D letter to anyone.  The C&amp;D letter came from SPARC International.    </li><li> Many of us reading this forum are geeks (and proud of it!).  But anyone with business experience knows that if you receive a letter from a lawyer, it can only truly be understood by other lawyers<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-).  A C&amp;D letter like the one SparkFun received isn't nearly as omninous as it sounds -- in fact, it's quite routine (companies like IBM, Intel, and Apple, for example, probably each send out hundreds of C&amp;D letters per year).  When lawyers read a C&amp;D letter, they see right through all the boilerplate and what they read is simply, "We think there may be a conflict; let's talk".  That's it.  And in fact, that's exactly what SI and SparkFun have been doing this week -- while flames were raging on this forum, the two companies have been working on an actual resolution.  All the public drama does not help either SparkFun or SI (and <i>least of all</i> Sun, which is essentially an innocent bystander). </li><li> Parts of Sun have had contact with SparkFun over time, and in fact have had a very favorable impression of it. </li><li>Sun is (understandably now, I hope) totally dumbfounded over the flames directed at it about an issue between two other companies (SparkFun and SI).  </li></ol><p>
I serve as Sun's representative to SPARC Int'l (to whom WebMink referred, above).  As you can imagine, I've been hearing about this issue this week.
</p><p>
My understanding is that a resolution between SI and SparkFun has been in progress (despite the negative chatter that has been going on).  Let's chill out for a few days and wait to hear how that turns out.  There really isn't anything to discuss until the two companies have completed their talks<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... at which time we can either all go home satisfied, or if we want, get all riled up again<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-).
</p><p>
But please don't dump on <strong>Sun</strong> for something between two *other* companies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This whole thread reminds me of the wild rumors that we all get , propagated through email ... you know , the ones that get us righteously ( !
) riled up on some issue .
We feel totally justified in our indignation -- until we discover that the reality is n't nearly as interesting as the story was depicted , and all the fun goes out of the discussion : - ( .
I do n't want to spoil all the good Fun ( tm ) in this lively discussion , but here are some actual facts to consider : Sun Microsystems does * not * own the SPARC trademark .
SPARC International ( " SI " ) , an industry trade organization , has owned the SPARC trademark for * over 20 years * .
Sun , along with many other companies , pays fees to SPARC International to license its uses of the SPARC trademark .
Sun is a SPARC licensee , it does n't own the trademark .
Sun has no issue with SparkFun .
Sun neither owns nor controls SI .
Sun , however , is a member company of SI and Sun does hold one seat on SI 's board of directors .
Sun did * not * send the C&amp;D letter in question to SparkFun .
It does not own the SPARC trademark so ca n't send a C&amp;D letter to anyone .
The C&amp;D letter came from SPARC International .
Many of us reading this forum are geeks ( and proud of it ! ) .
But anyone with business experience knows that if you receive a letter from a lawyer , it can only truly be understood by other lawyers ; - ) .
A C&amp;D letter like the one SparkFun received is n't nearly as omninous as it sounds -- in fact , it 's quite routine ( companies like IBM , Intel , and Apple , for example , probably each send out hundreds of C&amp;D letters per year ) .
When lawyers read a C&amp;D letter , they see right through all the boilerplate and what they read is simply , " We think there may be a conflict ; let 's talk " .
That 's it .
And in fact , that 's exactly what SI and SparkFun have been doing this week -- while flames were raging on this forum , the two companies have been working on an actual resolution .
All the public drama does not help either SparkFun or SI ( and least of all Sun , which is essentially an innocent bystander ) .
Parts of Sun have had contact with SparkFun over time , and in fact have had a very favorable impression of it .
Sun is ( understandably now , I hope ) totally dumbfounded over the flames directed at it about an issue between two other companies ( SparkFun and SI ) .
I serve as Sun 's representative to SPARC Int'l ( to whom WebMink referred , above ) .
As you can imagine , I 've been hearing about this issue this week .
My understanding is that a resolution between SI and SparkFun has been in progress ( despite the negative chatter that has been going on ) .
Let 's chill out for a few days and wait to hear how that turns out .
There really is n't anything to discuss until the two companies have completed their talks ... at which time we can either all go home satisfied , or if we want , get all riled up again ; - ) .
But please do n't dump on Sun for something between two * other * companies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This whole thread reminds me of the wild rumors that we all get, propagated through email ... you know, the ones that get us righteously(!
) riled up on some issue.
We feel totally justified in our indignation -- until we discover that the reality isn't nearly as interesting as the story was depicted, and all the fun goes out of the discussion :-(.
I don't want to spoil all the good Fun(tm) in this lively discussion, but here are some actual facts to consider:

 Sun Microsystems does *not* own the SPARC trademark.
SPARC International ("SI"), an industry trade organization, has owned the SPARC trademark for *over 20 years*.
Sun, along with many other companies, pays fees to SPARC International to license its uses of the SPARC trademark.
Sun is a SPARC licensee, it doesn't own the trademark.
Sun has no issue with SparkFun.
Sun neither owns nor controls SI.
Sun, however, is a member company of SI and Sun does hold one seat on SI's board of directors.
Sun did *not* send the C&amp;D letter in question to SparkFun.
It does not own the SPARC trademark so can't send a C&amp;D letter to anyone.
The C&amp;D letter came from SPARC International.
Many of us reading this forum are geeks (and proud of it!).
But anyone with business experience knows that if you receive a letter from a lawyer, it can only truly be understood by other lawyers ;-).
A C&amp;D letter like the one SparkFun received isn't nearly as omninous as it sounds -- in fact, it's quite routine (companies like IBM, Intel, and Apple, for example, probably each send out hundreds of C&amp;D letters per year).
When lawyers read a C&amp;D letter, they see right through all the boilerplate and what they read is simply, "We think there may be a conflict; let's talk".
That's it.
And in fact, that's exactly what SI and SparkFun have been doing this week -- while flames were raging on this forum, the two companies have been working on an actual resolution.
All the public drama does not help either SparkFun or SI (and least of all Sun, which is essentially an innocent bystander).
Parts of Sun have had contact with SparkFun over time, and in fact have had a very favorable impression of it.
Sun is (understandably now, I hope) totally dumbfounded over the flames directed at it about an issue between two other companies (SparkFun and SI).
I serve as Sun's representative to SPARC Int'l (to whom WebMink referred, above).
As you can imagine, I've been hearing about this issue this week.
My understanding is that a resolution between SI and SparkFun has been in progress (despite the negative chatter that has been going on).
Let's chill out for a few days and wait to hear how that turns out.
There really isn't anything to discuss until the two companies have completed their talks ... at which time we can either all go home satisfied, or if we want, get all riled up again ;-).
But please don't dump on Sun for something between two *other* companies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852865</id>
	<title>Re:well now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256301060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I dare them to go after oracle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dare them to go after oracle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dare them to go after oracle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29877085</id>
	<title>Re:"Dominant Portion"</title>
	<author>zapakh</author>
	<datestamp>1256550300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And here I thought that dominant portion of SparkFun was "Fun"!</p></div><p>...which is nearly phonetically identical to "Sun".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And here I thought that dominant portion of SparkFun was " Fun " ! ...which is nearly phonetically identical to " Sun " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And here I thought that dominant portion of SparkFun was "Fun"!...which is nearly phonetically identical to "Sun".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850829</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851423</id>
	<title>Re:well now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256291400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly- who would consider them now - after pulling this crap. I like sparkfun - just bought my first stuff from them a couple weeks ago. \</p><p>Just say no - to SPARCs</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly- who would consider them now - after pulling this crap .
I like sparkfun - just bought my first stuff from them a couple weeks ago .
\ Just say no - to SPARCs</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly- who would consider them now - after pulling this crap.
I like sparkfun - just bought my first stuff from them a couple weeks ago.
\Just say no - to SPARCs</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29855557</id>
	<title>Nobody has fun with SPARCs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256388420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SPARCFun      that would be ridiculous.</p><p>Think about it;  have you ever heard a sysadmin say "I'm having fun with my SPARC!" ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SPARCFun that would be ridiculous.Think about it ; have you ever heard a sysadmin say " I 'm having fun with my SPARC !
" ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SPARCFun      that would be ridiculous.Think about it;  have you ever heard a sysadmin say "I'm having fun with my SPARC!
" ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29862533</id>
	<title>Unfortunately, lawyers have nothing to lose</title>
	<author>Windcatcher</author>
	<datestamp>1256409960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's something about this, and cases like this, that just stinks. We all know it does, yet sometimes it's hard to put a finger on it. For me, the amorality of the lawyers just rubs me the wrong way. Someone says, "Mr. Lawyer, I'd like to sue X for Y, and I'll pay you handsomely for it." And the lawyer does, because it pays. It doesn't matter if the reason is bogus, it doesn't matter that X has to spend lots of money on a legal defense against something that has no merit. It only matters that the lawyer is being paid.<br>
<br>
Of course, at this point, someone will probably pop off that I'm some sort of Commie or something. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Just because you CAN perform a service (regardless of whether you're being paid for it) doesn't mean you SHOULD. I have numerous skills, and I almost always expect to be compensated for my work, but there are some things that I simply will not build, for any price -- because I would consider it wrong to do so. It seems to me (and perhaps to a lot of people) that there is a dearth of lawyers who would say in the face of a paying potential customer, "No, I won't take your case. You're asking me to do something that's dishonest and immoral. Now get the hell out of my office."<br>
<br>
There's a difference between working for money and working MERELY for money. In that sense I would term the latter type of lawyer as also a mercenary, and there seem to be entirely too many of them.<br>
<br>
How do you deter a mercenary? I invite suggestions, but the only way I know of is through fear. With the collective intelligence of those on this forum, it shouldn't be hard to come up with some creative ideas on how to make a mercenary lawyer think twice about working MERELY for money.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's something about this , and cases like this , that just stinks .
We all know it does , yet sometimes it 's hard to put a finger on it .
For me , the amorality of the lawyers just rubs me the wrong way .
Someone says , " Mr. Lawyer , I 'd like to sue X for Y , and I 'll pay you handsomely for it .
" And the lawyer does , because it pays .
It does n't matter if the reason is bogus , it does n't matter that X has to spend lots of money on a legal defense against something that has no merit .
It only matters that the lawyer is being paid .
Of course , at this point , someone will probably pop off that I 'm some sort of Commie or something .
Nothing could be farther from the truth .
Just because you CAN perform a service ( regardless of whether you 're being paid for it ) does n't mean you SHOULD .
I have numerous skills , and I almost always expect to be compensated for my work , but there are some things that I simply will not build , for any price -- because I would consider it wrong to do so .
It seems to me ( and perhaps to a lot of people ) that there is a dearth of lawyers who would say in the face of a paying potential customer , " No , I wo n't take your case .
You 're asking me to do something that 's dishonest and immoral .
Now get the hell out of my office .
" There 's a difference between working for money and working MERELY for money .
In that sense I would term the latter type of lawyer as also a mercenary , and there seem to be entirely too many of them .
How do you deter a mercenary ?
I invite suggestions , but the only way I know of is through fear .
With the collective intelligence of those on this forum , it should n't be hard to come up with some creative ideas on how to make a mercenary lawyer think twice about working MERELY for money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's something about this, and cases like this, that just stinks.
We all know it does, yet sometimes it's hard to put a finger on it.
For me, the amorality of the lawyers just rubs me the wrong way.
Someone says, "Mr. Lawyer, I'd like to sue X for Y, and I'll pay you handsomely for it.
" And the lawyer does, because it pays.
It doesn't matter if the reason is bogus, it doesn't matter that X has to spend lots of money on a legal defense against something that has no merit.
It only matters that the lawyer is being paid.
Of course, at this point, someone will probably pop off that I'm some sort of Commie or something.
Nothing could be farther from the truth.
Just because you CAN perform a service (regardless of whether you're being paid for it) doesn't mean you SHOULD.
I have numerous skills, and I almost always expect to be compensated for my work, but there are some things that I simply will not build, for any price -- because I would consider it wrong to do so.
It seems to me (and perhaps to a lot of people) that there is a dearth of lawyers who would say in the face of a paying potential customer, "No, I won't take your case.
You're asking me to do something that's dishonest and immoral.
Now get the hell out of my office.
"

There's a difference between working for money and working MERELY for money.
In that sense I would term the latter type of lawyer as also a mercenary, and there seem to be entirely too many of them.
How do you deter a mercenary?
I invite suggestions, but the only way I know of is through fear.
With the collective intelligence of those on this forum, it shouldn't be hard to come up with some creative ideas on how to make a mercenary lawyer think twice about working MERELY for money.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851069</id>
	<title>Wait... what?</title>
	<author>TheJodster</author>
	<datestamp>1256290020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So SPARC now lays claim to http://www.*sparc*.* as well as http://www.*spark*.*</p><p>Does this mean I can't register www.sparccankissmyass.com without getting a C&amp;D letter?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So SPARC now lays claim to http : //www. * sparc * .
* as well as http : //www. * spark * .
* Does this mean I ca n't register www.sparccankissmyass.com without getting a C&amp;D letter ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So SPARC now lays claim to http://www.*sparc*.
* as well as http://www.*spark*.
*Does this mean I can't register www.sparccankissmyass.com without getting a C&amp;D letter?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853845</id>
	<title>Re:Sun should lose</title>
	<author>AmericanInKiev</author>
	<datestamp>1256312340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sparky is the moniker for electricians on any jobsite. If you have a wire hanging out of the ceiling and you want to know if it safe to continue, you can just ask sparky to check it. She knows who she is...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sparky is the moniker for electricians on any jobsite .
If you have a wire hanging out of the ceiling and you want to know if it safe to continue , you can just ask sparky to check it .
She knows who she is.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sparky is the moniker for electricians on any jobsite.
If you have a wire hanging out of the ceiling and you want to know if it safe to continue, you can just ask sparky to check it.
She knows who she is...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29856629</id>
	<title>Sparc receives C&amp;D from Palo Alto Research Cnt</title>
	<author>mnemotronic</author>
	<datestamp>1256399280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sparc has received a Cease and Desist letter from the <a href="http://www.parc.com/" title="parc.com">Palo Alto Research Center</a> [parc.com], also known as PARC, for partial phonetic name infringement.  In turn, PARC has received Cease and Desist letters from Spielberg Entertainment.  Spielberg says PARC has chosen a name phonetically similar to a portion of the name of their blockbuster movie "Raiders of the Lost Ark".  Spielberg has received a Cease &amp; Desist notice from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirate\_Party" title="wikipedia.org">The Pirate Party</a> [wikipedia.org] of Sweden for infringing their trademarked phrase "Arrrrr".<p>(said with "King &amp; I" diction)  <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0049408/quotes#qt0283014" title="imdb.com">Et Cetera, et cetera, et cetera.</a> [imdb.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sparc has received a Cease and Desist letter from the Palo Alto Research Center [ parc.com ] , also known as PARC , for partial phonetic name infringement .
In turn , PARC has received Cease and Desist letters from Spielberg Entertainment .
Spielberg says PARC has chosen a name phonetically similar to a portion of the name of their blockbuster movie " Raiders of the Lost Ark " .
Spielberg has received a Cease &amp; Desist notice from The Pirate Party [ wikipedia.org ] of Sweden for infringing their trademarked phrase " Arrrrr " .
( said with " King &amp; I " diction ) Et Cetera , et cetera , et cetera .
[ imdb.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sparc has received a Cease and Desist letter from the Palo Alto Research Center [parc.com], also known as PARC, for partial phonetic name infringement.
In turn, PARC has received Cease and Desist letters from Spielberg Entertainment.
Spielberg says PARC has chosen a name phonetically similar to a portion of the name of their blockbuster movie "Raiders of the Lost Ark".
Spielberg has received a Cease &amp; Desist notice from The Pirate Party [wikipedia.org] of Sweden for infringing their trademarked phrase "Arrrrr".
(said with "King &amp; I" diction)  Et Cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
[imdb.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851021</id>
	<title>oblig</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256289840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hahahaohwow.jpg</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hahahaohwow.jpg</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hahahaohwow.jpg</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29878269</id>
	<title>Unrelated to Sun</title>
	<author>WebMink</author>
	<datestamp>1256555220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be clear, SPARC International is an independent trade association. You should not be blaming Sun, Hitachi, Fujitsu or any other SPARC licensee for this.</p><p>S.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be clear , SPARC International is an independent trade association .
You should not be blaming Sun , Hitachi , Fujitsu or any other SPARC licensee for this.S .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be clear, SPARC International is an independent trade association.
You should not be blaming Sun, Hitachi, Fujitsu or any other SPARC licensee for this.S.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29854329</id>
	<title>Re:well now</title>
	<author>dave87656</author>
	<datestamp>1256320080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>re: www.space.org</p><p>I just went to the site. Firefox does warn that it is marked as an attack site, but it appears to be a site for open spark with articles about the sparc architecture. Looks like someone doesn't want open sparc to succeed. Dirty tricks?</p><p>BTW, I'm using Linux. Perhaps the site can do damage on a windows box. Proceed at your own risk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>re : www.space.orgI just went to the site .
Firefox does warn that it is marked as an attack site , but it appears to be a site for open spark with articles about the sparc architecture .
Looks like someone does n't want open sparc to succeed .
Dirty tricks ? BTW , I 'm using Linux .
Perhaps the site can do damage on a windows box .
Proceed at your own risk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>re: www.space.orgI just went to the site.
Firefox does warn that it is marked as an attack site, but it appears to be a site for open spark with articles about the sparc architecture.
Looks like someone doesn't want open sparc to succeed.
Dirty tricks?BTW, I'm using Linux.
Perhaps the site can do damage on a windows box.
Proceed at your own risk.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850927</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853591</id>
	<title>Old Sparky</title>
	<author>nsaspook</author>
	<datestamp>1256308740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sparkfun from the good old days.<br><a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/68/Old\_Sparky.jpg" title="wikimedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/68/Old\_Sparky.jpg</a> [wikimedia.org]<br><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/32298/" title="slate.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.slate.com/id/32298/</a> [slate.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sparkfun from the good old days.http : //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/68/Old \ _Sparky.jpg [ wikimedia.org ] http : //www.slate.com/id/32298/ [ slate.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sparkfun from the good old days.http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/68/Old\_Sparky.jpg [wikimedia.org]http://www.slate.com/id/32298/ [slate.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851465</id>
	<title>Re:Umm</title>
	<author>Just Some Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1256291580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How do you protect your trademark without sending out C&amp;Ds?</p></div><p>Dang - I just posted the answer above.  But to recap: you license it.  Sell the "offending" party the right to continue using their name for the minimum dollar amount necessary to create a binding contract (which I think is traditionally $1).  That way they're in the clear, and in the event that someone else infringes in the future, you can prove that you're aware and have dealt with other infringers in the past.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you protect your trademark without sending out C&amp;Ds ? Dang - I just posted the answer above .
But to recap : you license it .
Sell the " offending " party the right to continue using their name for the minimum dollar amount necessary to create a binding contract ( which I think is traditionally $ 1 ) .
That way they 're in the clear , and in the event that someone else infringes in the future , you can prove that you 're aware and have dealt with other infringers in the past .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you protect your trademark without sending out C&amp;Ds?Dang - I just posted the answer above.
But to recap: you license it.
Sell the "offending" party the right to continue using their name for the minimum dollar amount necessary to create a binding contract (which I think is traditionally $1).
That way they're in the clear, and in the event that someone else infringes in the future, you can prove that you're aware and have dealt with other infringers in the past.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850785</id>
	<title>Sun should lose</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1256289000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Come on, now. They have SPARK in the name; they're an electronics company. The name is a playful moniker and nobody would ever confuse them with Sparc.</p><p>When I was in the USAF they called the electricians "spark chasers". ANY electronics company should be able to have "spark" in their name. For Sun to lay claim to a common word that describes the first thing anybody thinks of when they think of electricity (when Sin's is spelled differently) is ludicrous. It's like the ApleFrosting company suing anybody who sells any kind of apple product wit "apple" in the name.</p><p>I lost a lot of my esteem for Sun with this. I wonder if it has anything to do with Oracle?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on , now .
They have SPARK in the name ; they 're an electronics company .
The name is a playful moniker and nobody would ever confuse them with Sparc.When I was in the USAF they called the electricians " spark chasers " .
ANY electronics company should be able to have " spark " in their name .
For Sun to lay claim to a common word that describes the first thing anybody thinks of when they think of electricity ( when Sin 's is spelled differently ) is ludicrous .
It 's like the ApleFrosting company suing anybody who sells any kind of apple product wit " apple " in the name.I lost a lot of my esteem for Sun with this .
I wonder if it has anything to do with Oracle ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on, now.
They have SPARK in the name; they're an electronics company.
The name is a playful moniker and nobody would ever confuse them with Sparc.When I was in the USAF they called the electricians "spark chasers".
ANY electronics company should be able to have "spark" in their name.
For Sun to lay claim to a common word that describes the first thing anybody thinks of when they think of electricity (when Sin's is spelled differently) is ludicrous.
It's like the ApleFrosting company suing anybody who sells any kind of apple product wit "apple" in the name.I lost a lot of my esteem for Sun with this.
I wonder if it has anything to do with Oracle?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853923</id>
	<title>Re:So...Much...Chickenshit...</title>
	<author>kramerd</author>
	<datestamp>1256313900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hate to point this out, but money spent on psychotic lawyers is actually better for a stock price than money spent on R&amp;D.</p><p>Defense of a patent or trademark can be capitalized if successful, therefore, lawyer fees = asset.</p><p>R&amp;D is money spent on the hope that something will become an asset, so its costs are expensed immediately.</p><p>There is no law against spending money on legal fees to pursue an option that may or may not result in success.</p><p>To sum up, there is no way that lawsuits whose sum legal costs are immaterial to the company have had any direct or indirect effect on stock prices (unless they win the lawsuit, in which case it probably helps).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hate to point this out , but money spent on psychotic lawyers is actually better for a stock price than money spent on R&amp;D.Defense of a patent or trademark can be capitalized if successful , therefore , lawyer fees = asset.R&amp;D is money spent on the hope that something will become an asset , so its costs are expensed immediately.There is no law against spending money on legal fees to pursue an option that may or may not result in success.To sum up , there is no way that lawsuits whose sum legal costs are immaterial to the company have had any direct or indirect effect on stock prices ( unless they win the lawsuit , in which case it probably helps ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hate to point this out, but money spent on psychotic lawyers is actually better for a stock price than money spent on R&amp;D.Defense of a patent or trademark can be capitalized if successful, therefore, lawyer fees = asset.R&amp;D is money spent on the hope that something will become an asset, so its costs are expensed immediately.There is no law against spending money on legal fees to pursue an option that may or may not result in success.To sum up, there is no way that lawsuits whose sum legal costs are immaterial to the company have had any direct or indirect effect on stock prices (unless they win the lawsuit, in which case it probably helps).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851073</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29854663</id>
	<title>I guess Fark.com is completely screwed...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256326380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Phonetically and visually just too close...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Phonetically and visually just too close.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Phonetically and visually just too close...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852999</id>
	<title>Okay!  I'll say it!</title>
	<author>FranTaylor</author>
	<datestamp>1256302440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is not Sun Microsystems!</p><p>It is SPARC International.</p><p>There are you happy now?</p><p>Perhaps you are a bit quick on the draw with your unwarranted criticism.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is not Sun Microsystems ! It is SPARC International.There are you happy now ? Perhaps you are a bit quick on the draw with your unwarranted criticism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is not Sun Microsystems!It is SPARC International.There are you happy now?Perhaps you are a bit quick on the draw with your unwarranted criticism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851073</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851721</id>
	<title>Re:"Dominant Portion"</title>
	<author>Mike Rice</author>
	<datestamp>1256292660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its dominant because it comes before 'FUN'.</p><p>"It is used in connection with identical goods"...</p><p>I went to the SPARC International website to see what these 'identical goods' might be.</p><p>Ironically, Googles 'Safe' browsing warned me not to visit the place!... it seems to be hosting "12 trojan(s), 8 exploit(s), 6 scripting exploit(s)"</p><p>I went there anyway and found that they sell...<br>'SPARC Architecture License' and 'Type 5 Keyboard Interface License'<br>And that's it.</p><p>I was so disappointed! Because I thought perhaps the site would be a new source of cool experimenter parts, microcontroller development systems, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Inertial Measuring Units, GPS modules, accelerometers, humidity sensors...</p><p>But all SPARC International sells is... paper. (Sorry, they don't actually SELL anything, they License it).</p><p>In any event, I don't think that any of SPARC Internationals potential customers could possibly confuse it with "SparkFun" and its offerings.</p><p>The word "Spark" is in common usage and has been for what, HUNDREDS of years?<br>The product line is entirely different... FAR from the claim that they are selling "identical goods". Hell they don't even actually SELL ANYTHING!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its dominant because it comes before 'FUN' .
" It is used in connection with identical goods " ...I went to the SPARC International website to see what these 'identical goods ' might be.Ironically , Googles 'Safe ' browsing warned me not to visit the place ! .. .
it seems to be hosting " 12 trojan ( s ) , 8 exploit ( s ) , 6 scripting exploit ( s ) " I went there anyway and found that they sell...'SPARC Architecture License ' and 'Type 5 Keyboard Interface License'And that 's it.I was so disappointed !
Because I thought perhaps the site would be a new source of cool experimenter parts , microcontroller development systems , Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Inertial Measuring Units , GPS modules , accelerometers , humidity sensors...But all SPARC International sells is... paper. ( Sorry , they do n't actually SELL anything , they License it ) .In any event , I do n't think that any of SPARC Internationals potential customers could possibly confuse it with " SparkFun " and its offerings.The word " Spark " is in common usage and has been for what , HUNDREDS of years ? The product line is entirely different... FAR from the claim that they are selling " identical goods " .
Hell they do n't even actually SELL ANYTHING !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its dominant because it comes before 'FUN'.
"It is used in connection with identical goods"...I went to the SPARC International website to see what these 'identical goods' might be.Ironically, Googles 'Safe' browsing warned me not to visit the place!...
it seems to be hosting "12 trojan(s), 8 exploit(s), 6 scripting exploit(s)"I went there anyway and found that they sell...'SPARC Architecture License' and 'Type 5 Keyboard Interface License'And that's it.I was so disappointed!
Because I thought perhaps the site would be a new source of cool experimenter parts, microcontroller development systems, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Inertial Measuring Units, GPS modules, accelerometers, humidity sensors...But all SPARC International sells is... paper. (Sorry, they don't actually SELL anything, they License it).In any event, I don't think that any of SPARC Internationals potential customers could possibly confuse it with "SparkFun" and its offerings.The word "Spark" is in common usage and has been for what, HUNDREDS of years?The product line is entirely different... FAR from the claim that they are selling "identical goods".
Hell they don't even actually SELL ANYTHING!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850829</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851435</id>
	<title>650.798.6705</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256291460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps someone should call the SPARCunfun lawyer, Christine B. Redfield (http://www.klgates.com/professionals/detail.aspx?professional=1665 includes photo) at 650.798.6705 and explain whey this is a mistake and will not cause confusion the part of of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.ers.  Please remember that SPARCunfun is paying by the hour so do not spend too much time talking to her or you will run SPARCunfun's bill up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps someone should call the SPARCunfun lawyer , Christine B. Redfield ( http : //www.klgates.com/professionals/detail.aspx ? professional = 1665 includes photo ) at 650.798.6705 and explain whey this is a mistake and will not cause confusion the part of of /.ers .
Please remember that SPARCunfun is paying by the hour so do not spend too much time talking to her or you will run SPARCunfun 's bill up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps someone should call the SPARCunfun lawyer, Christine B. Redfield (http://www.klgates.com/professionals/detail.aspx?professional=1665 includes photo) at 650.798.6705 and explain whey this is a mistake and will not cause confusion the part of of /.ers.
Please remember that SPARCunfun is paying by the hour so do not spend too much time talking to her or you will run SPARCunfun's bill up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29855605</id>
	<title>SI: Stop harassing SparkFun, it makes you look bad</title>
	<author>mcpublic</author>
	<datestamp>1256388900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dear SPARC International, Inc,

<p>If you want lots of current and future tech professionals to hate you, keep hassling small businesses like SparkFun.  Your trademark case against them borders on frivolous.  It is a battle that you are unlikely to win in court, and that you will certainly lose in the court of public opinion.  Stick with your bread and butter mission:  championing the SPARC architecture.  Leave popular "Davids" alone, unless the goal is to smear your own brand name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear SPARC International , Inc , If you want lots of current and future tech professionals to hate you , keep hassling small businesses like SparkFun .
Your trademark case against them borders on frivolous .
It is a battle that you are unlikely to win in court , and that you will certainly lose in the court of public opinion .
Stick with your bread and butter mission : championing the SPARC architecture .
Leave popular " Davids " alone , unless the goal is to smear your own brand name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear SPARC International, Inc,

If you want lots of current and future tech professionals to hate you, keep hassling small businesses like SparkFun.
Your trademark case against them borders on frivolous.
It is a battle that you are unlikely to win in court, and that you will certainly lose in the court of public opinion.
Stick with your bread and butter mission:  championing the SPARC architecture.
Leave popular "Davids" alone, unless the goal is to smear your own brand name.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851411</id>
	<title>I've ordered from both companies...</title>
	<author>Buckbeak</author>
	<datestamp>1256291340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've ordered from both companies, but not anymore. I will continue to support SparkFun, even if they are forced to change their name. Sun/Oracle can go to hell.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've ordered from both companies , but not anymore .
I will continue to support SparkFun , even if they are forced to change their name .
Sun/Oracle can go to hell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've ordered from both companies, but not anymore.
I will continue to support SparkFun, even if they are forced to change their name.
Sun/Oracle can go to hell.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850911</id>
	<title>FARC</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1256289480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So when is the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary\_Armed\_Forces\_of\_Colombia" title="wikipedia.org">FARC</a> [wikipedia.org] going to send <a href="http://www.fark.com/" title="fark.com">Fark.com</a> [fark.com] a C&amp;D?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So when is the FARC [ wikipedia.org ] going to send Fark.com [ fark.com ] a C&amp;D ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So when is the FARC [wikipedia.org] going to send Fark.com [fark.com] a C&amp;D?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853123</id>
	<title>So much for Good Will</title>
	<author>canatech</author>
	<datestamp>1256303640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seems to me SPARC is playing CRAPS with any good will they have left.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems to me SPARC is playing CRAPS with any good will they have left .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems to me SPARC is playing CRAPS with any good will they have left.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851211</id>
	<title>Re:Umm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256290560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are only required to protect your trademark against genuine abuses or generic uses. As far as I know there is no requirement to send out letters where there is little chance of confusion or "passing off".</p><p>Having said that (and also IANAL), being able to point to a history of absurdly aggressive lawyering against the world &amp; his dog is useful if there ever was a 'proper' trademark case. It would demonstrate that Sparc still considered the word a very valuable trademark and had not abandoned it to generification, even if none of the C&amp;D letters are followed up much further by the legal department.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are only required to protect your trademark against genuine abuses or generic uses .
As far as I know there is no requirement to send out letters where there is little chance of confusion or " passing off " .Having said that ( and also IANAL ) , being able to point to a history of absurdly aggressive lawyering against the world &amp; his dog is useful if there ever was a 'proper ' trademark case .
It would demonstrate that Sparc still considered the word a very valuable trademark and had not abandoned it to generification , even if none of the C&amp;D letters are followed up much further by the legal department .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are only required to protect your trademark against genuine abuses or generic uses.
As far as I know there is no requirement to send out letters where there is little chance of confusion or "passing off".Having said that (and also IANAL), being able to point to a history of absurdly aggressive lawyering against the world &amp; his dog is useful if there ever was a 'proper' trademark case.
It would demonstrate that Sparc still considered the word a very valuable trademark and had not abandoned it to generification, even if none of the C&amp;D letters are followed up much further by the legal department.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850693</id>
	<title>Happens all the time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256288640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In the twisted world of intellectual property. Seems very similar to this ridiculous case involving a <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1094722/Storm-teapot-shop-owner-battles-German-giant-tale-logos.html" title="dailymail.co.uk" rel="nofollow">teapot</a> [dailymail.co.uk].</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the twisted world of intellectual property .
Seems very similar to this ridiculous case involving a teapot [ dailymail.co.uk ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the twisted world of intellectual property.
Seems very similar to this ridiculous case involving a teapot [dailymail.co.uk].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851137</id>
	<title>Re:well now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256290260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>lol. Sure, you post as anonymous coward, but you identify yourself as the parent poster who got modded troll.</p><p>Sounds like you need to heed your own advice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>lol .
Sure , you post as anonymous coward , but you identify yourself as the parent poster who got modded troll.Sounds like you need to heed your own advice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lol.
Sure, you post as anonymous coward, but you identify yourself as the parent poster who got modded troll.Sounds like you need to heed your own advice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850895</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850783</id>
	<title>Got a pussy in my panties</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256289000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>She got a pussy in her panties<br>She wore a pussy thong</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thong</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thong</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850927</id>
	<title>Re:well now</title>
	<author>Animixer</author>
	<datestamp>1256289540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>guess who won't be buying any more sparc servers?</p></div><p>Someone who is not interested in supporting Open Source processors?</p><p>SPARC is an organization that licenses processor designs (Scalable Processor ARChitecture), provides docs, and even licenses a keyboard interface design (this part is low cost).  I'm not sure what they charge, it may be just a fee for making sure your processor conforms to the sparcv9 spec or similar and you can put the SPARC stamp on your box.  I have not heard of them being unreasonable before.  It's an independent body.  Sun and Fujitsu/Siemens happen to be a couple of the companies that use the processor design (modified for thier use).  Probably similar to ARM in this case, but I will freely admit I do not know many details about the subject.  I do know that one can download the designs and source code for the OpenSPARC T1 and T2 series processors from <a href="http://www.opensparc.net./" title="www.opensparc.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.opensparc.net./</a> [www.opensparc.net]</p><p>I hear that someone has a design that runs an OpenSPARC on a FPGA (granted, single core, but still cool).</p><p>So if you care about having an "Open" CPU design in your system, then you'll be missing out by avoiding SPARC.</p><p>Alas I do not have many facts available to back this up.  www.sparc.org has been blocked by firefox or my antivirus somehow...perhaps someone is attacking it out of badwill or they got owned independently.</p><p>Regards</p><p>BTW:  I've run gentoo on 'sun4u' SPARC processors, and hear that the kernel has lots of support for the 'Open' T1/T2 line and hypervisor, etc.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>guess who wo n't be buying any more sparc servers ? Someone who is not interested in supporting Open Source processors ? SPARC is an organization that licenses processor designs ( Scalable Processor ARChitecture ) , provides docs , and even licenses a keyboard interface design ( this part is low cost ) .
I 'm not sure what they charge , it may be just a fee for making sure your processor conforms to the sparcv9 spec or similar and you can put the SPARC stamp on your box .
I have not heard of them being unreasonable before .
It 's an independent body .
Sun and Fujitsu/Siemens happen to be a couple of the companies that use the processor design ( modified for thier use ) .
Probably similar to ARM in this case , but I will freely admit I do not know many details about the subject .
I do know that one can download the designs and source code for the OpenSPARC T1 and T2 series processors from http : //www.opensparc.net./ [ www.opensparc.net ] I hear that someone has a design that runs an OpenSPARC on a FPGA ( granted , single core , but still cool ) .So if you care about having an " Open " CPU design in your system , then you 'll be missing out by avoiding SPARC.Alas I do not have many facts available to back this up .
www.sparc.org has been blocked by firefox or my antivirus somehow...perhaps someone is attacking it out of badwill or they got owned independently.RegardsBTW : I 've run gentoo on 'sun4u ' SPARC processors , and hear that the kernel has lots of support for the 'Open ' T1/T2 line and hypervisor , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>guess who won't be buying any more sparc servers?Someone who is not interested in supporting Open Source processors?SPARC is an organization that licenses processor designs (Scalable Processor ARChitecture), provides docs, and even licenses a keyboard interface design (this part is low cost).
I'm not sure what they charge, it may be just a fee for making sure your processor conforms to the sparcv9 spec or similar and you can put the SPARC stamp on your box.
I have not heard of them being unreasonable before.
It's an independent body.
Sun and Fujitsu/Siemens happen to be a couple of the companies that use the processor design (modified for thier use).
Probably similar to ARM in this case, but I will freely admit I do not know many details about the subject.
I do know that one can download the designs and source code for the OpenSPARC T1 and T2 series processors from http://www.opensparc.net./ [www.opensparc.net]I hear that someone has a design that runs an OpenSPARC on a FPGA (granted, single core, but still cool).So if you care about having an "Open" CPU design in your system, then you'll be missing out by avoiding SPARC.Alas I do not have many facts available to back this up.
www.sparc.org has been blocked by firefox or my antivirus somehow...perhaps someone is attacking it out of badwill or they got owned independently.RegardsBTW:  I've run gentoo on 'sun4u' SPARC processors, and hear that the kernel has lots of support for the 'Open' T1/T2 line and hypervisor, etc.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29860525</id>
	<title>Re:I've ordered from both companies...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256385540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Liar.</p><p>If you knew exactly what SPARC was, with having claimed to deal with them, you'd know that Sun/Oracle aren't involved here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Liar.If you knew exactly what SPARC was , with having claimed to deal with them , you 'd know that Sun/Oracle are n't involved here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Liar.If you knew exactly what SPARC was, with having claimed to deal with them, you'd know that Sun/Oracle aren't involved here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851411</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851299</id>
	<title>Re:Umm</title>
	<author>Pharmboy</author>
	<datestamp>1256290860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><em>How do you protect your trademark without sending out C&amp;Ds?</em></p><p>You can license it, but more importantly, you have to decide what infringes and what doesn't.  If the name of the company was "SparkServ" or similar, then the standard of "is likely to create confusion in the marketplace" applies.  Additionally, if there are other details in the use of "SparkFun" as a trademark that would cause confusion (ie: ripping off the look and feel of the registered mark) then you have a case.</p><p>This is like Darl McBride suing "Scope mouthwash" because the first three letters are "SCO".  Ok, maybe not quite that bad, but we should never resist the urge to compare stupidity with Darl's previous actions.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you protect your trademark without sending out C&amp;Ds ? You can license it , but more importantly , you have to decide what infringes and what does n't .
If the name of the company was " SparkServ " or similar , then the standard of " is likely to create confusion in the marketplace " applies .
Additionally , if there are other details in the use of " SparkFun " as a trademark that would cause confusion ( ie : ripping off the look and feel of the registered mark ) then you have a case.This is like Darl McBride suing " Scope mouthwash " because the first three letters are " SCO " .
Ok , maybe not quite that bad , but we should never resist the urge to compare stupidity with Darl 's previous actions .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you protect your trademark without sending out C&amp;Ds?You can license it, but more importantly, you have to decide what infringes and what doesn't.
If the name of the company was "SparkServ" or similar, then the standard of "is likely to create confusion in the marketplace" applies.
Additionally, if there are other details in the use of "SparkFun" as a trademark that would cause confusion (ie: ripping off the look and feel of the registered mark) then you have a case.This is like Darl McBride suing "Scope mouthwash" because the first three letters are "SCO".
Ok, maybe not quite that bad, but we should never resist the urge to compare stupidity with Darl's previous actions.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853337</id>
	<title>Re:so let me get this straight</title>
	<author>LionMage</author>
	<datestamp>1256305860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know you were labeled Troll, but I'll bite:</p><p>No, Sun didn't name SPARC after a natural phenomenon.  SPARC stands for Scalable Processor ARChitecture, so that makes it an acronym which happens to sound just like the English word "spark."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know you were labeled Troll , but I 'll bite : No , Sun did n't name SPARC after a natural phenomenon .
SPARC stands for Scalable Processor ARChitecture , so that makes it an acronym which happens to sound just like the English word " spark .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know you were labeled Troll, but I'll bite:No, Sun didn't name SPARC after a natural phenomenon.
SPARC stands for Scalable Processor ARChitecture, so that makes it an acronym which happens to sound just like the English word "spark.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850743</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851433</id>
	<title>Re:Umm</title>
	<author>NoYob</author>
	<datestamp>1256291460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>IANAL, but Sparc International has a legal obligation to protect its trademark, correct? They may not want to pick on SparkFun but if they don't demonstrably protect their trademark, they can lose it.</p><p>How do you protect your trademark without sending out C&amp;Ds?</p></div><p>You can't.</p><p>That's why Mattel is so nuts about anyone doing anything with Barbie. Or why McDonald's will sue just about any business that puts 'Mc' in its name. </p><p>I think the most aggressive has to be the International Olympic Committee. When the Olympics come around, the IOC goes around and forces business to remove "Olympic" from their names - even if they've been in business for generations.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>IANAL , but Sparc International has a legal obligation to protect its trademark , correct ?
They may not want to pick on SparkFun but if they do n't demonstrably protect their trademark , they can lose it.How do you protect your trademark without sending out C&amp;Ds ? You ca n't.That 's why Mattel is so nuts about anyone doing anything with Barbie .
Or why McDonald 's will sue just about any business that puts 'Mc ' in its name .
I think the most aggressive has to be the International Olympic Committee .
When the Olympics come around , the IOC goes around and forces business to remove " Olympic " from their names - even if they 've been in business for generations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IANAL, but Sparc International has a legal obligation to protect its trademark, correct?
They may not want to pick on SparkFun but if they don't demonstrably protect their trademark, they can lose it.How do you protect your trademark without sending out C&amp;Ds?You can't.That's why Mattel is so nuts about anyone doing anything with Barbie.
Or why McDonald's will sue just about any business that puts 'Mc' in its name.
I think the most aggressive has to be the International Olympic Committee.
When the Olympics come around, the IOC goes around and forces business to remove "Olympic" from their names - even if they've been in business for generations.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853641</id>
	<title>Re:Umm</title>
	<author>MMC Monster</author>
	<datestamp>1256309340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can give a non-transferable, and potentially revocable, license to anyone for free.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can give a non-transferable , and potentially revocable , license to anyone for free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can give a non-transferable, and potentially revocable, license to anyone for free.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850961</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850693
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850947
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851623
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850929
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852999
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851073
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29854329
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850927
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850829
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850961
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851363
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850895
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850911
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29867249
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851411
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851295
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851069
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850961
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851465
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850961
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851423
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851917
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850929
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850973
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29878269
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850927
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29855557
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851435
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851299
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850961
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29877085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850829
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850911
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851073
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853641
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850961
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851137
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850895
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852231
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850743
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851069
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850743
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852003
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29867111
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852753
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851111
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851521
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850961
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29854961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851373
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853483
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850929
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_197214_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29860525
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851411
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_197214.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850781
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851341
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852207
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852753
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_197214.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850929
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851623
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851917
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853483
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_197214.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850961
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853641
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851211
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851433
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851521
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851465
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851299
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_197214.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850743
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852231
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853337
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_197214.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850829
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851721
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29877085
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_197214.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850699
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_197214.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850693
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851135
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_197214.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851293
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_197214.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850785
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850947
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850913
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29878269
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29854961
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852003
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851373
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850973
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853845
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_197214.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850977
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853867
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_197214.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850667
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852865
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851423
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853053
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851111
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851435
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29855557
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850895
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851363
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851137
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851393
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851937
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29867111
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850927
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29854329
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851505
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851281
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_197214.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29863755
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_197214.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851073
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852999
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29853923
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_197214.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850719
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_197214.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851411
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29860525
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29867249
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_197214.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851119
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_197214.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851069
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851295
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851901
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_197214.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29850911
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29851075
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_197214.29852395
</commentlist>
</conversation>
