<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_23_1628237</id>
	<title>Android / Windows 7 Dual Boot Netbook Disappoints</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1256322540000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Barence writes <i>"PC Pro has got its hands on Acer's Aspire One D250 with both Windows 7 and Google Android installed. Anyone who's played with an Android phone had better get ready for a let-down: <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/laptops/352702/acer-aspire-one-d250">Android is far from ready for netbooks</a>. The review laments the lack of a proper Marketplace, the poor implementation of both the inbuilt browser and Firefox, and the general pointlessness of it all in its current incarnation as a quick-boot alternative. Yes, it will get better, but at the moment it's hardly going to lure people away from even Windows 7."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Barence writes " PC Pro has got its hands on Acer 's Aspire One D250 with both Windows 7 and Google Android installed .
Anyone who 's played with an Android phone had better get ready for a let-down : Android is far from ready for netbooks .
The review laments the lack of a proper Marketplace , the poor implementation of both the inbuilt browser and Firefox , and the general pointlessness of it all in its current incarnation as a quick-boot alternative .
Yes , it will get better , but at the moment it 's hardly going to lure people away from even Windows 7 .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Barence writes "PC Pro has got its hands on Acer's Aspire One D250 with both Windows 7 and Google Android installed.
Anyone who's played with an Android phone had better get ready for a let-down: Android is far from ready for netbooks.
The review laments the lack of a proper Marketplace, the poor implementation of both the inbuilt browser and Firefox, and the general pointlessness of it all in its current incarnation as a quick-boot alternative.
Yes, it will get better, but at the moment it's hardly going to lure people away from even Windows 7.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850387</id>
	<title>Obligatory...</title>
	<author>jDeepbeep</author>
	<datestamp>1256330700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps Linux just isn't ready for the desktop.  I'm sticking with Microsoft.
<br>:P</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps Linux just is n't ready for the desktop .
I 'm sticking with Microsoft .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps Linux just isn't ready for the desktop.
I'm sticking with Microsoft.
:P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851319</id>
	<title>Re:"even Windows 7" - no need to be snarky about W</title>
	<author>heffrey</author>
	<datestamp>1256290980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why don't you just run those command line tools on Windows?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't you just run those command line tools on Windows ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't you just run those command line tools on Windows?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849347</id>
	<title>I'm completely shocked.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256326620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who would have expected that a slipshod port of a system designed for one human interface mechanism would fail on another? They even left out important features, what could possibly have gone wrong? Does this mean that my plan to port Bash to my wristwatch will be unpopular in the marketplace?<br> <br>

Seriously, though, this seems like completely unsurprising news. Just slapping dead-stock android on something(without even bothering to include features that are standard on smartphones, like the app mechanism), while giving no thought at all to the differences between a touchscreen and a touchpad, seems like an invitation to failure.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who would have expected that a slipshod port of a system designed for one human interface mechanism would fail on another ?
They even left out important features , what could possibly have gone wrong ?
Does this mean that my plan to port Bash to my wristwatch will be unpopular in the marketplace ?
Seriously , though , this seems like completely unsurprising news .
Just slapping dead-stock android on something ( without even bothering to include features that are standard on smartphones , like the app mechanism ) , while giving no thought at all to the differences between a touchscreen and a touchpad , seems like an invitation to failure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who would have expected that a slipshod port of a system designed for one human interface mechanism would fail on another?
They even left out important features, what could possibly have gone wrong?
Does this mean that my plan to port Bash to my wristwatch will be unpopular in the marketplace?
Seriously, though, this seems like completely unsurprising news.
Just slapping dead-stock android on something(without even bothering to include features that are standard on smartphones, like the app mechanism), while giving no thought at all to the differences between a touchscreen and a touchpad, seems like an invitation to failure.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850619</id>
	<title>Nah, Nah, Nah. I can't hear you....</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1256331540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Isn't this the same old story we keep hearing? This F/OSS OS isn't ready for primetime, etc, no better than Win xxxx<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Seriously, can't we do better as a whole? So what if one "analyst" at a tech website says it sucks?</i> </p><p>First impressions matter.</p><p>Android as the "fast booting" Linux mini-OS had little to offer when compared directly to Win 7 <b>Starter Edition</b> installed on a mediocre entry level netbook.<br>\_\_\_\_\_\_</p><p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Windows-Premium-Upgrade-Family/dp/B002MV2MG0" title="amazon.com">Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Family Pack (3-User)</a> [amazon.com] $150 I believe this is a first for Microsoft.</p><p>Upgrade <b>from XP or Vista.</b> 32 and 64 bit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this the same old story we keep hearing ?
This F/OSS OS is n't ready for primetime , etc , no better than Win xxxx ... Seriously , ca n't we do better as a whole ?
So what if one " analyst " at a tech website says it sucks ?
First impressions matter.Android as the " fast booting " Linux mini-OS had little to offer when compared directly to Win 7 Starter Edition installed on a mediocre entry level netbook. \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Family Pack ( 3-User ) [ amazon.com ] $ 150 I believe this is a first for Microsoft.Upgrade from XP or Vista .
32 and 64 bit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this the same old story we keep hearing?
This F/OSS OS isn't ready for primetime, etc, no better than Win xxxx ... Seriously, can't we do better as a whole?
So what if one "analyst" at a tech website says it sucks?
First impressions matter.Android as the "fast booting" Linux mini-OS had little to offer when compared directly to Win 7 Starter Edition installed on a mediocre entry level netbook.\_\_\_\_\_\_Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade Family Pack (3-User) [amazon.com] $150 I believe this is a first for Microsoft.Upgrade from XP or Vista.
32 and 64 bit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849497</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851131</id>
	<title>Re:People rarely try twice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256290200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>True, an OS that takes many attempts and several years to get it right will never make it in the marketplace.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>True , an OS that takes many attempts and several years to get it right will never make it in the marketplace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True, an OS that takes many attempts and several years to get it right will never make it in the marketplace.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849503</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851659</id>
	<title>For people used to desktop OS functionality</title>
	<author>alizard</author>
	<datestamp>1256292300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't really see any reason not to go with a conventional Linux desktop any more than netbook manufacturers see any reason to go with anything but a conventional XP or Win7-lite install for their netbooks. Give me conventional desktop icons and a normal taskbar and the normal selection of Open Source apps, not giant icons to programs that don't do much and a handful of programs from a company repository that prepare the netbook for websurfing and not much else.
<br> <br>The only important consideration is that the hardware drivers are available, just like on any other Linux installation.
<br> <br>
I blew off my "easy, fun" dumbed down Xandros desktop for Kubuntu on my Eee PC900 at the first possible opportunity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't really see any reason not to go with a conventional Linux desktop any more than netbook manufacturers see any reason to go with anything but a conventional XP or Win7-lite install for their netbooks .
Give me conventional desktop icons and a normal taskbar and the normal selection of Open Source apps , not giant icons to programs that do n't do much and a handful of programs from a company repository that prepare the netbook for websurfing and not much else .
The only important consideration is that the hardware drivers are available , just like on any other Linux installation .
I blew off my " easy , fun " dumbed down Xandros desktop for Kubuntu on my Eee PC900 at the first possible opportunity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't really see any reason not to go with a conventional Linux desktop any more than netbook manufacturers see any reason to go with anything but a conventional XP or Win7-lite install for their netbooks.
Give me conventional desktop icons and a normal taskbar and the normal selection of Open Source apps, not giant icons to programs that don't do much and a handful of programs from a company repository that prepare the netbook for websurfing and not much else.
The only important consideration is that the hardware drivers are available, just like on any other Linux installation.
I blew off my "easy, fun" dumbed down Xandros desktop for Kubuntu on my Eee PC900 at the first possible opportunity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851693</id>
	<title>Re:People rarely try twice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256292480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Heck, Apple switched to a Unix core for their OS almost a decade ago and I still talk with people who think Mac OS 9 when they hear about Macs.</p></div><p>yes, and even here on Slashdot, the image many people have and portray of Windows is based on decade old Win9x. Sadly, people are set in their ways.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Heck , Apple switched to a Unix core for their OS almost a decade ago and I still talk with people who think Mac OS 9 when they hear about Macs.yes , and even here on Slashdot , the image many people have and portray of Windows is based on decade old Win9x .
Sadly , people are set in their ways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heck, Apple switched to a Unix core for their OS almost a decade ago and I still talk with people who think Mac OS 9 when they hear about Macs.yes, and even here on Slashdot, the image many people have and portray of Windows is based on decade old Win9x.
Sadly, people are set in their ways.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849289</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849419</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>rumith</author>
	<datestamp>1256326860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I doubt that Google had netbooks in mind when they released Android. Keep in mind that they have announced ChromeOS to be their operating system for netbooks (and possibly over time more powerful machines as well), and it should be pretty clear that Acer's experiment had very low chances to succeed anyway. However, if ChromeOS and Android somehow use compatible app markets, that might be interesting...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt that Google had netbooks in mind when they released Android .
Keep in mind that they have announced ChromeOS to be their operating system for netbooks ( and possibly over time more powerful machines as well ) , and it should be pretty clear that Acer 's experiment had very low chances to succeed anyway .
However , if ChromeOS and Android somehow use compatible app markets , that might be interesting.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt that Google had netbooks in mind when they released Android.
Keep in mind that they have announced ChromeOS to be their operating system for netbooks (and possibly over time more powerful machines as well), and it should be pretty clear that Acer's experiment had very low chances to succeed anyway.
However, if ChromeOS and Android somehow use compatible app markets, that might be interesting...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850353</id>
	<title>Re:no touch screen</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256330580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm going to be modded to oblivion for saying this, but IMHO a large part of this is that Android is a open platform and Google doesn't restrict the use of the trademark.</p><p>Android is a great mobile phone platform, but it's a crappy notebook platform.  That's fine - the GUI which works on a cell phone doesn't work on a notebook - everyone (except maybe Microsoft who seems to insist that mobile phones should have a start menu) has figured that out.</p><p>But because Android is an open source platform and because Google isn't restricting the use of the Android brand, vendors are putting Android on machines that are inappropriate.</p><p>And that in turn really hurts the Android brand (and unfortunately Linux as well since it reinforces the idea that Linux isn't ready for prime time).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm going to be modded to oblivion for saying this , but IMHO a large part of this is that Android is a open platform and Google does n't restrict the use of the trademark.Android is a great mobile phone platform , but it 's a crappy notebook platform .
That 's fine - the GUI which works on a cell phone does n't work on a notebook - everyone ( except maybe Microsoft who seems to insist that mobile phones should have a start menu ) has figured that out.But because Android is an open source platform and because Google is n't restricting the use of the Android brand , vendors are putting Android on machines that are inappropriate.And that in turn really hurts the Android brand ( and unfortunately Linux as well since it reinforces the idea that Linux is n't ready for prime time ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm going to be modded to oblivion for saying this, but IMHO a large part of this is that Android is a open platform and Google doesn't restrict the use of the trademark.Android is a great mobile phone platform, but it's a crappy notebook platform.
That's fine - the GUI which works on a cell phone doesn't work on a notebook - everyone (except maybe Microsoft who seems to insist that mobile phones should have a start menu) has figured that out.But because Android is an open source platform and because Google isn't restricting the use of the Android brand, vendors are putting Android on machines that are inappropriate.And that in turn really hurts the Android brand (and unfortunately Linux as well since it reinforces the idea that Linux isn't ready for prime time).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849459</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29855027</id>
	<title>Fucking horseshit - counterintuitive</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256379240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's not counterintuitive - that's EXACTLY what I figured out when I borrowed a friend's iPod touch, without ever handling one before.<br>I touched the music button, just like a left-mouse click to me, and when I wanted to scroll, I "pushed" the content up out of the way so that new content would be visible below.</p><p>This is EXACTLY the same behaviour as when you view PDF documents and want to scroll using the mouse - you "touch" (with the little hand) on the screen and "push" (slide upwards) to move the page in front of you.</p><p>What kind of fucking dork reviews Android's browser and hasn't EVER scrolled through a PDF document ?</p><p>This doesn't say anything about marketing folks or Android or anything else, except that the reviewer is biased or a complete ignoramus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not counterintuitive - that 's EXACTLY what I figured out when I borrowed a friend 's iPod touch , without ever handling one before.I touched the music button , just like a left-mouse click to me , and when I wanted to scroll , I " pushed " the content up out of the way so that new content would be visible below.This is EXACTLY the same behaviour as when you view PDF documents and want to scroll using the mouse - you " touch " ( with the little hand ) on the screen and " push " ( slide upwards ) to move the page in front of you.What kind of fucking dork reviews Android 's browser and has n't EVER scrolled through a PDF document ? This does n't say anything about marketing folks or Android or anything else , except that the reviewer is biased or a complete ignoramus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not counterintuitive - that's EXACTLY what I figured out when I borrowed a friend's iPod touch, without ever handling one before.I touched the music button, just like a left-mouse click to me, and when I wanted to scroll, I "pushed" the content up out of the way so that new content would be visible below.This is EXACTLY the same behaviour as when you view PDF documents and want to scroll using the mouse - you "touch" (with the little hand) on the screen and "push" (slide upwards) to move the page in front of you.What kind of fucking dork reviews Android's browser and hasn't EVER scrolled through a PDF document ?This doesn't say anything about marketing folks or Android or anything else, except that the reviewer is biased or a complete ignoramus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849459</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29854047</id>
	<title>Re:What I don't get</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1256316000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What I don't get is the choice of BOTH OSes on this thing. If you read the specs this thing is maxed out at 1Gb,</p></div><p>it is claimed that it is the same hardware as the D250 (which I have) which means it is expandable to 4GB using the new 4GB DDR2 SODIMMs. Tested and working on D250. I'm hoping that the AOD250 software loads on my D250, which I put some low-latency DDR2 into (it's got 2GB, which it what it came with.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What I do n't get is the choice of BOTH OSes on this thing .
If you read the specs this thing is maxed out at 1Gb,it is claimed that it is the same hardware as the D250 ( which I have ) which means it is expandable to 4GB using the new 4GB DDR2 SODIMMs .
Tested and working on D250 .
I 'm hoping that the AOD250 software loads on my D250 , which I put some low-latency DDR2 into ( it 's got 2GB , which it what it came with .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I don't get is the choice of BOTH OSes on this thing.
If you read the specs this thing is maxed out at 1Gb,it is claimed that it is the same hardware as the D250 (which I have) which means it is expandable to 4GB using the new 4GB DDR2 SODIMMs.
Tested and working on D250.
I'm hoping that the AOD250 software loads on my D250, which I put some low-latency DDR2 into (it's got 2GB, which it what it came with.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29854419</id>
	<title>Re:I'm completely shocked.</title>
	<author>hitmark</author>
	<datestamp>1256321280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iirc, google do not allow the android app marketplace, or their services app, one a android device that they have not certified.</p><p>yep i know, it reeks of cupertino, but then the android head is a former employee of that place...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iirc , google do not allow the android app marketplace , or their services app , one a android device that they have not certified.yep i know , it reeks of cupertino , but then the android head is a former employee of that place.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iirc, google do not allow the android app marketplace, or their services app, one a android device that they have not certified.yep i know, it reeks of cupertino, but then the android head is a former employee of that place...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849453</id>
	<title>Awesome review!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256326980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the best review of Windows 7 so far! "Windows 7: It sucks less than Android"</p><p>p.s. I upgraded from Vista (which I actually like and have been using since its release) last night<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... so far so good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the best review of Windows 7 so far !
" Windows 7 : It sucks less than Android " p.s .
I upgraded from Vista ( which I actually like and have been using since its release ) last night ... so far so good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the best review of Windows 7 so far!
"Windows 7: It sucks less than Android"p.s.
I upgraded from Vista (which I actually like and have been using since its release) last night ... so far so good.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850925</id>
	<title>Re:People rarely try twice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256289540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Android needs to get their act in gear quickly</p></div><p>This doesn't have a damn thing to do with Android.  Android was not made for laptop computers.  Properly implemented on a cell phone, MID, or PMP,  Android runs exceptionally well, is intuitive, powerful, and fun.  Acer is the problem here.  I don't understand why companies take something like Android or Linux and implement it so poorly as to be practically worthless.  Seriously, if you're going to do it, do it right. </p><p>Look at Apple, they took BSD and made it into something beautiful (not that it wasn't beautiful before).  The implementation job they are doing is awesome.  There is no reason at all why some other company can't do the same thing other than either gross incompetence or just not giving a shit.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Android needs to get their act in gear quicklyThis does n't have a damn thing to do with Android .
Android was not made for laptop computers .
Properly implemented on a cell phone , MID , or PMP , Android runs exceptionally well , is intuitive , powerful , and fun .
Acer is the problem here .
I do n't understand why companies take something like Android or Linux and implement it so poorly as to be practically worthless .
Seriously , if you 're going to do it , do it right .
Look at Apple , they took BSD and made it into something beautiful ( not that it was n't beautiful before ) .
The implementation job they are doing is awesome .
There is no reason at all why some other company ca n't do the same thing other than either gross incompetence or just not giving a shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Android needs to get their act in gear quicklyThis doesn't have a damn thing to do with Android.
Android was not made for laptop computers.
Properly implemented on a cell phone, MID, or PMP,  Android runs exceptionally well, is intuitive, powerful, and fun.
Acer is the problem here.
I don't understand why companies take something like Android or Linux and implement it so poorly as to be practically worthless.
Seriously, if you're going to do it, do it right.
Look at Apple, they took BSD and made it into something beautiful (not that it wasn't beautiful before).
The implementation job they are doing is awesome.
There is no reason at all why some other company can't do the same thing other than either gross incompetence or just not giving a shit.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849503</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849309</id>
	<title>Editorializing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256326500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nice editorializing - "Even Windows 7?" Cheap shot - you can do better than that, Slashdot</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice editorializing - " Even Windows 7 ?
" Cheap shot - you can do better than that , Slashdot</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice editorializing - "Even Windows 7?
" Cheap shot - you can do better than that, Slashdot</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851007</id>
	<title>Name doesn't make any sense anyway...</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1256289840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Android: An android is a robot or synthetic organism designed to look and act like a human.</p><p>I suppose it is supposed to infer a humanistic or human centric intuitive interface.</p><p>However it: Doesn't look like a human. Doesn't act like a human. Isn't a robot.</p><p>At least Ubuntu is a philosophy and Windows can count and describes a feature.</p><p>Of course what the hell do apples or Macintosh's have to do with anything I do not know.<br>Of course they have they have the best name of the bunch (ignoring leopards and tigers etc)...<br>I mean OS 9, OS X nothing more simple than "Operating System" + "Operating System" + 1</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Android : An android is a robot or synthetic organism designed to look and act like a human.I suppose it is supposed to infer a humanistic or human centric intuitive interface.However it : Does n't look like a human .
Does n't act like a human .
Is n't a robot.At least Ubuntu is a philosophy and Windows can count and describes a feature.Of course what the hell do apples or Macintosh 's have to do with anything I do not know.Of course they have they have the best name of the bunch ( ignoring leopards and tigers etc ) ...I mean OS 9 , OS X nothing more simple than " Operating System " + " Operating System " + 1</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Android: An android is a robot or synthetic organism designed to look and act like a human.I suppose it is supposed to infer a humanistic or human centric intuitive interface.However it: Doesn't look like a human.
Doesn't act like a human.
Isn't a robot.At least Ubuntu is a philosophy and Windows can count and describes a feature.Of course what the hell do apples or Macintosh's have to do with anything I do not know.Of course they have they have the best name of the bunch (ignoring leopards and tigers etc)...I mean OS 9, OS X nothing more simple than "Operating System" + "Operating System" + 1</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29852137</id>
	<title>Re:People rarely try twice</title>
	<author>SchroedingersCat</author>
	<datestamp>1256295120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Android was designed for touch screen interface - finger-friendly touch screen to be exact. No wonder it feels "clunky" using a pointer device like mouse/touchpad.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Android was designed for touch screen interface - finger-friendly touch screen to be exact .
No wonder it feels " clunky " using a pointer device like mouse/touchpad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Android was designed for touch screen interface - finger-friendly touch screen to be exact.
No wonder it feels "clunky" using a pointer device like mouse/touchpad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850925</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29853597</id>
	<title>Re:Name doesn't make any sense anyway...</title>
	<author>sowth</author>
	<datestamp>1256308800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A Macintosh is a juicy delicious Apple. And no, juicy and delicious are not homosexual adjectives.

</p><p>(Sex) Android is what the Google executive asked for, but he only had software engineers, so a mobile OS was the best they could do.

</p><p>Windows on the other hand, is a generic name of an OS construct--depending upon if you count the GUI components and the browser as part of the OS. It is like naming a car "Steering Wheel" or an airplane "Wing" or naming a company after the CEO's penis. It's just silly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A Macintosh is a juicy delicious Apple .
And no , juicy and delicious are not homosexual adjectives .
( Sex ) Android is what the Google executive asked for , but he only had software engineers , so a mobile OS was the best they could do .
Windows on the other hand , is a generic name of an OS construct--depending upon if you count the GUI components and the browser as part of the OS .
It is like naming a car " Steering Wheel " or an airplane " Wing " or naming a company after the CEO 's penis .
It 's just silly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A Macintosh is a juicy delicious Apple.
And no, juicy and delicious are not homosexual adjectives.
(Sex) Android is what the Google executive asked for, but he only had software engineers, so a mobile OS was the best they could do.
Windows on the other hand, is a generic name of an OS construct--depending upon if you count the GUI components and the browser as part of the OS.
It is like naming a car "Steering Wheel" or an airplane "Wing" or naming a company after the CEO's penis.
It's just silly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851007</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850463</id>
	<title>Re:no touch screen</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256330940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Gosh, they took an OS designed for a touchscreen and tried a simplistic hack to make it work with a touchpad... and this isn't easy to use? Well, duh. This says nothing about Android and everything about the marketing folks that messed up.</p></div><p>Wait...I thought Android was also designed for keyboards (you know the reason people hate the iPhone).  Bunch of phones are coming out with physical keyboards (even the mysterious Droid...ooooh).<br> <br>
So what is the excuse for scrolling being messed up...or is Android only so-so for keyboard devices.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gosh , they took an OS designed for a touchscreen and tried a simplistic hack to make it work with a touchpad... and this is n't easy to use ?
Well , duh .
This says nothing about Android and everything about the marketing folks that messed up.Wait...I thought Android was also designed for keyboards ( you know the reason people hate the iPhone ) .
Bunch of phones are coming out with physical keyboards ( even the mysterious Droid...ooooh ) .
So what is the excuse for scrolling being messed up...or is Android only so-so for keyboard devices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gosh, they took an OS designed for a touchscreen and tried a simplistic hack to make it work with a touchpad... and this isn't easy to use?
Well, duh.
This says nothing about Android and everything about the marketing folks that messed up.Wait...I thought Android was also designed for keyboards (you know the reason people hate the iPhone).
Bunch of phones are coming out with physical keyboards (even the mysterious Droid...ooooh).
So what is the excuse for scrolling being messed up...or is Android only so-so for keyboard devices.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849459</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849909</id>
	<title>Re:People rarely try twice</title>
	<author>poetmatt</author>
	<datestamp>1256328900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lets see.</p><p>From the complaint that's there, it sounds like simply fixing the market (aka enabling) will take care of 90\% of the problems. this of course assumes customer firmware can make nice flavors of android for this purpose.</p><p>meanwhile, I thought google was making their own chromeOS anyway, which wasn't a smartphone OS (as below).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lets see.From the complaint that 's there , it sounds like simply fixing the market ( aka enabling ) will take care of 90 \ % of the problems .
this of course assumes customer firmware can make nice flavors of android for this purpose.meanwhile , I thought google was making their own chromeOS anyway , which was n't a smartphone OS ( as below ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lets see.From the complaint that's there, it sounds like simply fixing the market (aka enabling) will take care of 90\% of the problems.
this of course assumes customer firmware can make nice flavors of android for this purpose.meanwhile, I thought google was making their own chromeOS anyway, which wasn't a smartphone OS (as below).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849289</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849785</id>
	<title>Re:Holy vague summary batman</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256328300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i> <b>the lack of a proper Marketplace,</b> </i> <p>

<i>Do you mean you can't connect to ebay, craigslist, or google shopping? What is a marketplace in relation to an operating system on a computer?</i> </p><p>

It's kind of like the functionality provided by apt-get, but only you have to pay for everything. And it's shiny.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the lack of a proper Marketplace , Do you mean you ca n't connect to ebay , craigslist , or google shopping ?
What is a marketplace in relation to an operating system on a computer ?
It 's kind of like the functionality provided by apt-get , but only you have to pay for everything .
And it 's shiny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> the lack of a proper Marketplace,  

Do you mean you can't connect to ebay, craigslist, or google shopping?
What is a marketplace in relation to an operating system on a computer?
It's kind of like the functionality provided by apt-get, but only you have to pay for everything.
And it's shiny.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849761</id>
	<title>Re:People rarely try twice</title>
	<author>LarryRiedel</author>
	<datestamp>1256328180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So which mobile phone OS (not Moblin or Chrome OS) will they be running on their netbook as an alternative?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So which mobile phone OS ( not Moblin or Chrome OS ) will they be running on their netbook as an alternative ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So which mobile phone OS (not Moblin or Chrome OS) will they be running on their netbook as an alternative?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849289</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29852907</id>
	<title>lol</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256301420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It looks like Windows 3.1.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks like Windows 3.1 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks like Windows 3.1.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850951</id>
	<title>Re:I'm completely shocked.</title>
	<author>myrdos2</author>
	<datestamp>1256289600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does this mean that my plan to port Bash to my wristwatch will be unpopular in the marketplace?<br>
<br>
I'd like to pre-order twelve, please. They'll be the perfect interface to my servers. <a href="http://static.hackitlinux.com/hackitlinux.com/imgname--server\_in\_your\_pocket---50226711--images--PicoLinux.jpg" title="hackitlinux.com">http://static.hackitlinux.com/hackitlinux.com/imgname--server\_in\_your\_pocket---50226711--images--PicoLinux.jpg</a> [hackitlinux.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean that my plan to port Bash to my wristwatch will be unpopular in the marketplace ?
I 'd like to pre-order twelve , please .
They 'll be the perfect interface to my servers .
http : //static.hackitlinux.com/hackitlinux.com/imgname--server \ _in \ _your \ _pocket---50226711--images--PicoLinux.jpg [ hackitlinux.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean that my plan to port Bash to my wristwatch will be unpopular in the marketplace?
I'd like to pre-order twelve, please.
They'll be the perfect interface to my servers.
http://static.hackitlinux.com/hackitlinux.com/imgname--server\_in\_your\_pocket---50226711--images--PicoLinux.jpg [hackitlinux.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849293</id>
	<title>whatever</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256326440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can I put Ubuntu on this Acer machine?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I put Ubuntu on this Acer machine ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I put Ubuntu on this Acer machine?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849827</id>
	<title>Get out of town!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256328540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"at the moment it's hardly going to lure people away from even Windows 7."</i> <br>
<br>
This fledgling OS won't lure people away from even the the latest, greatest incarnation of the most popular operating system of all time? Really?? Time to throw in the towel, Google.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" at the moment it 's hardly going to lure people away from even Windows 7 .
" This fledgling OS wo n't lure people away from even the the latest , greatest incarnation of the most popular operating system of all time ?
Really ? ? Time to throw in the towel , Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"at the moment it's hardly going to lure people away from even Windows 7.
" 

This fledgling OS won't lure people away from even the the latest, greatest incarnation of the most popular operating system of all time?
Really?? Time to throw in the towel, Google.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849497</id>
	<title>Here we go again...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256327160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't this the same old story we keep hearing?  This F/OSS OS isn't ready for primetime, etc, no better than Win xxxx<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...

Seriously, can't we do better as a whole?

So what if one "analyst" at a tech website says it sucks.  Everyone jumps on board... maybe try it out for yourselves, and exercise some independent thought for once?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this the same old story we keep hearing ?
This F/OSS OS is n't ready for primetime , etc , no better than Win xxxx .. . Seriously , ca n't we do better as a whole ?
So what if one " analyst " at a tech website says it sucks .
Everyone jumps on board... maybe try it out for yourselves , and exercise some independent thought for once ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this the same old story we keep hearing?
This F/OSS OS isn't ready for primetime, etc, no better than Win xxxx ...

Seriously, can't we do better as a whole?
So what if one "analyst" at a tech website says it sucks.
Everyone jumps on board... maybe try it out for yourselves, and exercise some independent thought for once?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849437</id>
	<title>This is caused by too much software</title>
	<author>For a Free Internet</author>
	<datestamp>1256326920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It has too many bits. If there were fewer bits for the central processing unit to process, the CPU would process them faster and the users of the computer would be happier. But these days it's all about bits and how much money you pay for the bits and bytes etc. I liked it better back in the old days when my dick was a mile long.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It has too many bits .
If there were fewer bits for the central processing unit to process , the CPU would process them faster and the users of the computer would be happier .
But these days it 's all about bits and how much money you pay for the bits and bytes etc .
I liked it better back in the old days when my dick was a mile long .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has too many bits.
If there were fewer bits for the central processing unit to process, the CPU would process them faster and the users of the computer would be happier.
But these days it's all about bits and how much money you pay for the bits and bytes etc.
I liked it better back in the old days when my dick was a mile long.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849503</id>
	<title>Re:People rarely try twice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256327160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>This makes me very sad. It seems lately with all of the press of Android that's being aimed at the "typical" (read: non-geek) crowd (especially that Droid commercial against iPhones), usability like this is extremely bad. My wife, a total non-geek, knows what Droid and the Android OS is because she found the commercial interesting. If she tried Android out on a Netbook and had a bad experience she wouldn't ever try it again.
<br> <br>
I've had a hard enough time getting her to use an iPod touch and now she loves it, but believe it or not she is doing INCREDIBLE with Windows 7 with little to no help from me, right off the bat. She actually said it was intuitive, and she is not a computer person in the least.
<br> <br>
Android needs to get their act in gear quickly, especially if they are going after main-stream, non-geek people, as these people won't be coming back anytime soon, no matter how much their geek husbands beg.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This makes me very sad .
It seems lately with all of the press of Android that 's being aimed at the " typical " ( read : non-geek ) crowd ( especially that Droid commercial against iPhones ) , usability like this is extremely bad .
My wife , a total non-geek , knows what Droid and the Android OS is because she found the commercial interesting .
If she tried Android out on a Netbook and had a bad experience she would n't ever try it again .
I 've had a hard enough time getting her to use an iPod touch and now she loves it , but believe it or not she is doing INCREDIBLE with Windows 7 with little to no help from me , right off the bat .
She actually said it was intuitive , and she is not a computer person in the least .
Android needs to get their act in gear quickly , especially if they are going after main-stream , non-geek people , as these people wo n't be coming back anytime soon , no matter how much their geek husbands beg .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This makes me very sad.
It seems lately with all of the press of Android that's being aimed at the "typical" (read: non-geek) crowd (especially that Droid commercial against iPhones), usability like this is extremely bad.
My wife, a total non-geek, knows what Droid and the Android OS is because she found the commercial interesting.
If she tried Android out on a Netbook and had a bad experience she wouldn't ever try it again.
I've had a hard enough time getting her to use an iPod touch and now she loves it, but believe it or not she is doing INCREDIBLE with Windows 7 with little to no help from me, right off the bat.
She actually said it was intuitive, and she is not a computer person in the least.
Android needs to get their act in gear quickly, especially if they are going after main-stream, non-geek people, as these people won't be coming back anytime soon, no matter how much their geek husbands beg.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849289</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29854697</id>
	<title>Re:I'm completely shocked.</title>
	<author>kjart</author>
	<datestamp>1256326680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly. Windows Mobile has been widely criticized by forcing the desktop UI/OS model on a phone/handheld device, and rightly so. It doesn't take a genius to realize that forcing things the other way around wouldn't be a smooth experience either.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
Windows Mobile has been widely criticized by forcing the desktop UI/OS model on a phone/handheld device , and rightly so .
It does n't take a genius to realize that forcing things the other way around would n't be a smooth experience either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
Windows Mobile has been widely criticized by forcing the desktop UI/OS model on a phone/handheld device, and rightly so.
It doesn't take a genius to realize that forcing things the other way around wouldn't be a smooth experience either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29853315</id>
	<title>Re:What I don't get</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256305620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm running windows 7 x64 ultimate on my gateway LT31 netbook right now. I dual boot it with windows xp pro. Windows 7 is much snappier, and was much easier to install from a flash drive. My $.02</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm running windows 7 x64 ultimate on my gateway LT31 netbook right now .
I dual boot it with windows xp pro .
Windows 7 is much snappier , and was much easier to install from a flash drive .
My $ .02</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm running windows 7 x64 ultimate on my gateway LT31 netbook right now.
I dual boot it with windows xp pro.
Windows 7 is much snappier, and was much easier to install from a flash drive.
My $.02</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29852513</id>
	<title>Re:What I don't get</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1256297880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>What I don't get is the choice of BOTH OSes on this thing. If you read the specs this thing is maxed out at 1Gb, which makes it a poor choice for Windows 7, which most reviews I've seen set 2Gb as the "sweet spot" for that OS to really perform, and Android? WTF?</i> </p><p>The install is Windows 7 Starter Edition. Two steps down from Home Premium.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I do n't get is the choice of BOTH OSes on this thing .
If you read the specs this thing is maxed out at 1Gb , which makes it a poor choice for Windows 7 , which most reviews I 've seen set 2Gb as the " sweet spot " for that OS to really perform , and Android ?
WTF ? The install is Windows 7 Starter Edition .
Two steps down from Home Premium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I don't get is the choice of BOTH OSes on this thing.
If you read the specs this thing is maxed out at 1Gb, which makes it a poor choice for Windows 7, which most reviews I've seen set 2Gb as the "sweet spot" for that OS to really perform, and Android?
WTF? The install is Windows 7 Starter Edition.
Two steps down from Home Premium.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850979</id>
	<title>It'll be news when a netbook doesn't disappoint</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1256289720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Granted, the software on my G1 phone still isn't ready for prime time, but I believe anybody that is used to a real computer would be disappointed working on a netbook. They generally combine the limited battery life of a notebook with lack of screen real estate and optical drive of a PDA.<br> <br>
Android really is effectively beta software. (Still haven't added Bluetooth Stereo profile?!?) The amazing thing is that they are charging people lots of money for phones based on this work-in-progress. By the time it has as much work put into it as, say, iPhone OS has now, it should be a much more satisfying experience.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Granted , the software on my G1 phone still is n't ready for prime time , but I believe anybody that is used to a real computer would be disappointed working on a netbook .
They generally combine the limited battery life of a notebook with lack of screen real estate and optical drive of a PDA .
Android really is effectively beta software .
( Still have n't added Bluetooth Stereo profile ? ! ?
) The amazing thing is that they are charging people lots of money for phones based on this work-in-progress .
By the time it has as much work put into it as , say , iPhone OS has now , it should be a much more satisfying experience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Granted, the software on my G1 phone still isn't ready for prime time, but I believe anybody that is used to a real computer would be disappointed working on a netbook.
They generally combine the limited battery life of a notebook with lack of screen real estate and optical drive of a PDA.
Android really is effectively beta software.
(Still haven't added Bluetooth Stereo profile?!?
) The amazing thing is that they are charging people lots of money for phones based on this work-in-progress.
By the time it has as much work put into it as, say, iPhone OS has now, it should be a much more satisfying experience.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850041</id>
	<title>Re:Editorializing</title>
	<author>Churla</author>
	<datestamp>1256329380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I openly dare you to substitute "Fox News" for "slashdot" and e-mail this to Rham Emanuel.  Just to see how many watch lists you end up on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I openly dare you to substitute " Fox News " for " slashdot " and e-mail this to Rham Emanuel .
Just to see how many watch lists you end up on ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I openly dare you to substitute "Fox News" for "slashdot" and e-mail this to Rham Emanuel.
Just to see how many watch lists you end up on ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849705</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850105</id>
	<title>Acer tradition?</title>
	<author>recharged95</author>
	<datestamp>1256329560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I call conspiracy as Acer is a traditional MS whore (builts hardware specifically for Windows, drivers suck on Linux, etc...).
<br>
I would not be surprised if they did this Android exercise to show how great Windows 7 is as well as knock Android down a notch before WinMo6.5 (and Zune) comes out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I call conspiracy as Acer is a traditional MS whore ( builts hardware specifically for Windows , drivers suck on Linux , etc... ) .
I would not be surprised if they did this Android exercise to show how great Windows 7 is as well as knock Android down a notch before WinMo6.5 ( and Zune ) comes out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I call conspiracy as Acer is a traditional MS whore (builts hardware specifically for Windows, drivers suck on Linux, etc...).
I would not be surprised if they did this Android exercise to show how great Windows 7 is as well as knock Android down a notch before WinMo6.5 (and Zune) comes out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851789</id>
	<title>Re:People rarely try twice</title>
	<author>skgrey</author>
	<datestamp>1256293020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I probably should have clarified a bit so it made a little more sense, I wanted to keep my post fairly short and concise but I can see that I didn't get my point across very well as I re-read it and see the responses.
<br> <br>
Most of my friends (and some of hers) are geeks, and many of them talk about technology and have Netbooks. I should have specified that if she heard from geeky people that Android wasn't great, or tried one of their laptops, it wouldn't be a good thing at all. The old adage that there's no bad press doesn't apply in this situation, and my example was a microcosm of community and the way bad tech press travels in many circles, especially with Android advertising so heavily in the mainstream. And don't even get me started on how other companies could twist this around and use this to give Android a black eye.
<br> <br>
When I talked about Android getting their act in gear it was twofold; if they are going to try and be viable on a laptop now's not the time to start that unless they can do it right immediately (not sure if this is even on their roadmap), and it was also about squashing this kind of bullshit that Acer is doing! This is not the time!
<br> <br>
Android is in a very precarious situation right now - the last thing they need as they hit the mainstream is a black eye. I'm all for Android and Google. Great products and strong competition advance products and makes things better for all of us! Please, please make an iPhone killer; it will either make my next iPhone that much better or I will have an Android phone next.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I probably should have clarified a bit so it made a little more sense , I wanted to keep my post fairly short and concise but I can see that I did n't get my point across very well as I re-read it and see the responses .
Most of my friends ( and some of hers ) are geeks , and many of them talk about technology and have Netbooks .
I should have specified that if she heard from geeky people that Android was n't great , or tried one of their laptops , it would n't be a good thing at all .
The old adage that there 's no bad press does n't apply in this situation , and my example was a microcosm of community and the way bad tech press travels in many circles , especially with Android advertising so heavily in the mainstream .
And do n't even get me started on how other companies could twist this around and use this to give Android a black eye .
When I talked about Android getting their act in gear it was twofold ; if they are going to try and be viable on a laptop now 's not the time to start that unless they can do it right immediately ( not sure if this is even on their roadmap ) , and it was also about squashing this kind of bullshit that Acer is doing !
This is not the time !
Android is in a very precarious situation right now - the last thing they need as they hit the mainstream is a black eye .
I 'm all for Android and Google .
Great products and strong competition advance products and makes things better for all of us !
Please , please make an iPhone killer ; it will either make my next iPhone that much better or I will have an Android phone next .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I probably should have clarified a bit so it made a little more sense, I wanted to keep my post fairly short and concise but I can see that I didn't get my point across very well as I re-read it and see the responses.
Most of my friends (and some of hers) are geeks, and many of them talk about technology and have Netbooks.
I should have specified that if she heard from geeky people that Android wasn't great, or tried one of their laptops, it wouldn't be a good thing at all.
The old adage that there's no bad press doesn't apply in this situation, and my example was a microcosm of community and the way bad tech press travels in many circles, especially with Android advertising so heavily in the mainstream.
And don't even get me started on how other companies could twist this around and use this to give Android a black eye.
When I talked about Android getting their act in gear it was twofold; if they are going to try and be viable on a laptop now's not the time to start that unless they can do it right immediately (not sure if this is even on their roadmap), and it was also about squashing this kind of bullshit that Acer is doing!
This is not the time!
Android is in a very precarious situation right now - the last thing they need as they hit the mainstream is a black eye.
I'm all for Android and Google.
Great products and strong competition advance products and makes things better for all of us!
Please, please make an iPhone killer; it will either make my next iPhone that much better or I will have an Android phone next.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850925</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849721</id>
	<title>Re:Editorializing</title>
	<author>megamerican</author>
	<datestamp>1256328000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Nice editorializing - "Even Windows 7?" Cheap shot - you can do better than that, Slashdot</p></div><p>I don't think the editors of Slashdot can do any better.</p><p>Just the other day they made it sound like Windows 7 was uninstalling google toolbar and iTunes but it turned out that Windows 7 reinstalled it after the update. The person who made that comment in the story said it was the best Windows upgrade he had ever gone through.</p><p>If you had just read the title and/or summary it would seem like Microsoft was purposefully uninstalling competitors software when it wasn't even remotely the case.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice editorializing - " Even Windows 7 ?
" Cheap shot - you can do better than that , SlashdotI do n't think the editors of Slashdot can do any better.Just the other day they made it sound like Windows 7 was uninstalling google toolbar and iTunes but it turned out that Windows 7 reinstalled it after the update .
The person who made that comment in the story said it was the best Windows upgrade he had ever gone through.If you had just read the title and/or summary it would seem like Microsoft was purposefully uninstalling competitors software when it was n't even remotely the case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice editorializing - "Even Windows 7?
" Cheap shot - you can do better than that, SlashdotI don't think the editors of Slashdot can do any better.Just the other day they made it sound like Windows 7 was uninstalling google toolbar and iTunes but it turned out that Windows 7 reinstalled it after the update.
The person who made that comment in the story said it was the best Windows upgrade he had ever gone through.If you had just read the title and/or summary it would seem like Microsoft was purposefully uninstalling competitors software when it wasn't even remotely the case.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849459</id>
	<title>no touch screen</title>
	<author>czmax</author>
	<datestamp>1256327040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the article:<br>"Indeed, where Android's browser makes sense on a smartphone's touchscreen, it just doesn't translate here. The process of clicking and holding the left mouse button, while pushing up to scroll the page down, seems clunky and counter-intuitive,"</p><p>Gosh, they took an OS designed for a touchscreen and tried a simplistic hack to make it work with a touchpad... and this isn't easy to use? Well, duh. This says nothing about Android and everything about the marketing folks that messed up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article : " Indeed , where Android 's browser makes sense on a smartphone 's touchscreen , it just does n't translate here .
The process of clicking and holding the left mouse button , while pushing up to scroll the page down , seems clunky and counter-intuitive , " Gosh , they took an OS designed for a touchscreen and tried a simplistic hack to make it work with a touchpad... and this is n't easy to use ?
Well , duh .
This says nothing about Android and everything about the marketing folks that messed up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article:"Indeed, where Android's browser makes sense on a smartphone's touchscreen, it just doesn't translate here.
The process of clicking and holding the left mouse button, while pushing up to scroll the page down, seems clunky and counter-intuitive,"Gosh, they took an OS designed for a touchscreen and tried a simplistic hack to make it work with a touchpad... and this isn't easy to use?
Well, duh.
This says nothing about Android and everything about the marketing folks that messed up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29855385</id>
	<title>MS astroturfing on Slash</title>
	<author>cenc</author>
	<datestamp>1256385660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you guys not see the massive MS astroturfing going on in this topic, not to mention the original article?</p><p>People please?</p><p>Is slash getting a paycheck for this one?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you guys not see the massive MS astroturfing going on in this topic , not to mention the original article ? People please ? Is slash getting a paycheck for this one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you guys not see the massive MS astroturfing going on in this topic, not to mention the original article?People please?Is slash getting a paycheck for this one?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849717</id>
	<title>Re:Holy vague summary batman</title>
	<author>Tubal-Cain</author>
	<datestamp>1256328000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>
Do you mean you can't connect to ebay, craigslist, or google shopping?  What is a marketplace in relation to an operating system on a computer?</p></div><p>App Store, I presume.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you mean you ca n't connect to ebay , craigslist , or google shopping ?
What is a marketplace in relation to an operating system on a computer ? App Store , I presume .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Do you mean you can't connect to ebay, craigslist, or google shopping?
What is a marketplace in relation to an operating system on a computer?App Store, I presume.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29859457</id>
	<title>Re:People rarely try twice</title>
	<author>sowth</author>
	<datestamp>1256377320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, MS DOS and MS Windows were such flops.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , MS DOS and MS Windows were such flops .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, MS DOS and MS Windows were such flops.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850085</id>
	<title>"even Windows 7" - no need to be snarky about Win7</title>
	<author>DoctorSVD</author>
	<datestamp>1256329500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry, but I think your "even Windows 7" swipe is silly. As much as I love *nix and like to poke fun at Microsoft (I grew up on SunOS, HP-UX, IRIX, and Linux), I find Windows 7 to be a delight to work with (I run RC1 at home on two systems, an old P4 system and a newer Core 2 Duo). I would love to see a good desktop version of Linux, but Gnome,  KDE etc. are just not polished enough (yeah, yeah, Ubuntu is pretty nice and all, but the desktop is still klunky). As a developer I miss the power of the command line tools in the Linux development environment, but as a casual user (and casual gamer) I am really liking Win7.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , but I think your " even Windows 7 " swipe is silly .
As much as I love * nix and like to poke fun at Microsoft ( I grew up on SunOS , HP-UX , IRIX , and Linux ) , I find Windows 7 to be a delight to work with ( I run RC1 at home on two systems , an old P4 system and a newer Core 2 Duo ) .
I would love to see a good desktop version of Linux , but Gnome , KDE etc .
are just not polished enough ( yeah , yeah , Ubuntu is pretty nice and all , but the desktop is still klunky ) .
As a developer I miss the power of the command line tools in the Linux development environment , but as a casual user ( and casual gamer ) I am really liking Win7 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, but I think your "even Windows 7" swipe is silly.
As much as I love *nix and like to poke fun at Microsoft (I grew up on SunOS, HP-UX, IRIX, and Linux), I find Windows 7 to be a delight to work with (I run RC1 at home on two systems, an old P4 system and a newer Core 2 Duo).
I would love to see a good desktop version of Linux, but Gnome,  KDE etc.
are just not polished enough (yeah, yeah, Ubuntu is pretty nice and all, but the desktop is still klunky).
As a developer I miss the power of the command line tools in the Linux development environment, but as a casual user (and casual gamer) I am really liking Win7.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849823</id>
	<title>Re:People rarely try twice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256328540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lure away from a product that is not released yet?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lure away from a product that is not released yet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lure away from a product that is not released yet?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849289</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849379</id>
	<title>Serial-Killing Pedophile/Windows 7 Disappoints</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256326740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That guy who killed those little kids, eat their organs, and stuffed their bodies is a real disappointment. Also Windows 7 is not so cool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That guy who killed those little kids , eat their organs , and stuffed their bodies is a real disappointment .
Also Windows 7 is not so cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That guy who killed those little kids, eat their organs, and stuffed their bodies is a real disappointment.
Also Windows 7 is not so cool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849547</id>
	<title>Re:People rarely try twice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256327400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.ratemyeverything.net//ImageDatabase/PostImages/11658/Large/Linux\_Windows\_Mac.jpg" title="ratemyeverything.net" rel="nofollow">Hey macfag,</a> [ratemyeverything.net]</p><p><a href="http://420.thrashbarg.net/windows\_linux\_mac\_choose\_your\_weapon.jpg" title="thrashbarg.net" rel="nofollow">you're a fag</a> [thrashbarg.net]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey macfag , [ ratemyeverything.net ] you 're a fag [ thrashbarg.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey macfag, [ratemyeverything.net]you're a fag [thrashbarg.net]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849289</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851995</id>
	<title>Re:whatever</title>
	<author>ChrisMaple</author>
	<datestamp>1256294040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes. I used "wubi" to load kubuntu and install it. I can't recommend it, my guess is that straight Ubuntu would be better. My efforts to install a Linux from a USB stick were unsuccessful; the image wouldn't boot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
I used " wubi " to load kubuntu and install it .
I ca n't recommend it , my guess is that straight Ubuntu would be better .
My efforts to install a Linux from a USB stick were unsuccessful ; the image would n't boot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
I used "wubi" to load kubuntu and install it.
I can't recommend it, my guess is that straight Ubuntu would be better.
My efforts to install a Linux from a USB stick were unsuccessful; the image wouldn't boot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29852941</id>
	<title>Re:Editorializing</title>
	<author>Jesus\_666</author>
	<datestamp>1256301780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe the submitter is an Android fanboy. "Android on this netbook is so un-perfect that buyers might decide to switch back to what's probably the best operating system they've ever seen before it." Yeah. Harsh criticism alright.<br>
<br>
Note: I'm not implying that Win7 is the best OS out there; it's just the best OS most people actually get to use on a general-purpose computer... with the compatition being earlier versions of Windows, Splashtop and now Android.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe the submitter is an Android fanboy .
" Android on this netbook is so un-perfect that buyers might decide to switch back to what 's probably the best operating system they 've ever seen before it .
" Yeah .
Harsh criticism alright .
Note : I 'm not implying that Win7 is the best OS out there ; it 's just the best OS most people actually get to use on a general-purpose computer... with the compatition being earlier versions of Windows , Splashtop and now Android .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe the submitter is an Android fanboy.
"Android on this netbook is so un-perfect that buyers might decide to switch back to what's probably the best operating system they've ever seen before it.
" Yeah.
Harsh criticism alright.
Note: I'm not implying that Win7 is the best OS out there; it's just the best OS most people actually get to use on a general-purpose computer... with the compatition being earlier versions of Windows, Splashtop and now Android.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29852199</id>
	<title>Once again...</title>
	<author>Alex Belits</author>
	<datestamp>1256295540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...a Windows PC company tarnishes Linux reputation by pre-installing something that is not Ubuntu on a consumer device.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...a Windows PC company tarnishes Linux reputation by pre-installing something that is not Ubuntu on a consumer device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...a Windows PC company tarnishes Linux reputation by pre-installing something that is not Ubuntu on a consumer device.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849663</id>
	<title>I know we're supposed to be anti-MS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256327880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But can we at least *pretend* like we don't have biased noses sticking up in the air?</p><p>"Yes, it will get better, but at the moment it's hardly going to lure people away from even Windows 7."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But can we at least * pretend * like we do n't have biased noses sticking up in the air ?
" Yes , it will get better , but at the moment it 's hardly going to lure people away from even Windows 7 .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But can we at least *pretend* like we don't have biased noses sticking up in the air?
"Yes, it will get better, but at the moment it's hardly going to lure people away from even Windows 7.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849581</id>
	<title>Holy vague summary batman</title>
	<author>damn\_registrars</author>
	<datestamp>1256327520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not really sure what the writer is trying to say with things like<p><div class="quote"><p>the lack of a proper Marketplace,</p></div><p>
Do you mean you can't connect to ebay, craigslist, or google shopping?  What is a marketplace in relation to an operating system on a computer?</p><p><div class="quote"><p> the poor implementation of both the inbuilt browser and Firefox</p></div><p>
I presume this means built-in browser?</p><p><div class="quote"><p> and the general pointlessness of it all</p></div><p>
When did things need to have a point to be featured on slashdot?  It wasn't that long ago there was a front page story here about running linux on the kindle.  Though if you want a point in the general sense, try:</p><p><div class="quote"><p> in its current incarnation as a quick-boot alternative</p></div><p>
Because that is probably all the more point a lot of people need from it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not really sure what the writer is trying to say with things likethe lack of a proper Marketplace , Do you mean you ca n't connect to ebay , craigslist , or google shopping ?
What is a marketplace in relation to an operating system on a computer ?
the poor implementation of both the inbuilt browser and Firefox I presume this means built-in browser ?
and the general pointlessness of it all When did things need to have a point to be featured on slashdot ?
It was n't that long ago there was a front page story here about running linux on the kindle .
Though if you want a point in the general sense , try : in its current incarnation as a quick-boot alternative Because that is probably all the more point a lot of people need from it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not really sure what the writer is trying to say with things likethe lack of a proper Marketplace,
Do you mean you can't connect to ebay, craigslist, or google shopping?
What is a marketplace in relation to an operating system on a computer?
the poor implementation of both the inbuilt browser and Firefox
I presume this means built-in browser?
and the general pointlessness of it all
When did things need to have a point to be featured on slashdot?
It wasn't that long ago there was a front page story here about running linux on the kindle.
Though if you want a point in the general sense, try: in its current incarnation as a quick-boot alternative
Because that is probably all the more point a lot of people need from it.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849285</id>
	<title>future</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256326380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's always hope for the future.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's always hope for the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's always hope for the future.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850411</id>
	<title>Re:no touch screen</title>
	<author>BlackSnake112</author>
	<datestamp>1256330820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should have used a touch screen in the netbook. There are touch screen netbooks out there (dell latitude 2100 for one. There are touch screen replacement screens for other models if you wanted to hard hack a touch screen in). Acer should have just made a model with the touch screen as the display for the android netbook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should have used a touch screen in the netbook .
There are touch screen netbooks out there ( dell latitude 2100 for one .
There are touch screen replacement screens for other models if you wanted to hard hack a touch screen in ) .
Acer should have just made a model with the touch screen as the display for the android netbook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should have used a touch screen in the netbook.
There are touch screen netbooks out there (dell latitude 2100 for one.
There are touch screen replacement screens for other models if you wanted to hard hack a touch screen in).
Acer should have just made a model with the touch screen as the display for the android netbook.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849459</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29852757</id>
	<title>Re:"even Windows 7" - no need to be snarky about W</title>
	<author>jtownatpunk.net</author>
	<datestamp>1256299620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Try OS X.  Apple managed to put a solid GUI on a *nix base a LONG time ago.  you can pop open a terminal window and "bash" away any time you want.  When I first saw OS X, I thought it would be the catalyst that provided inspiration to the Linux community, leading to a golden age of Linux interface design.  Turned out, not so much.  There have been improvements, of course, but progress is slow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try OS X. Apple managed to put a solid GUI on a * nix base a LONG time ago .
you can pop open a terminal window and " bash " away any time you want .
When I first saw OS X , I thought it would be the catalyst that provided inspiration to the Linux community , leading to a golden age of Linux interface design .
Turned out , not so much .
There have been improvements , of course , but progress is slow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try OS X.  Apple managed to put a solid GUI on a *nix base a LONG time ago.
you can pop open a terminal window and "bash" away any time you want.
When I first saw OS X, I thought it would be the catalyst that provided inspiration to the Linux community, leading to a golden age of Linux interface design.
Turned out, not so much.
There have been improvements, of course, but progress is slow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849729</id>
	<title>Re:Holy vague summary batman</title>
	<author>mypalmike</author>
	<datestamp>1256328000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt; the lack of a proper Marketplace,</p><p>&gt; Do you mean you can't connect to ebay, craigslist, or google shopping? What is a marketplace in relation to an operating system on a computer?</p><p>The capital "M" means it's a proper noun.  It's referring to Android Marketplace.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; the lack of a proper Marketplace , &gt; Do you mean you ca n't connect to ebay , craigslist , or google shopping ?
What is a marketplace in relation to an operating system on a computer ? The capital " M " means it 's a proper noun .
It 's referring to Android Marketplace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt; the lack of a proper Marketplace,&gt; Do you mean you can't connect to ebay, craigslist, or google shopping?
What is a marketplace in relation to an operating system on a computer?The capital "M" means it's a proper noun.
It's referring to Android Marketplace.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849699</id>
	<title>The burning question is...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256327940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>but at the moment it's hardly going to lure people away <b>from even</b> Windows 7</i> </p><p>From the reviewer's POV Win 7 Starter Edition looks pretty damn good.</p><p><i>The burning question, though, is why anyone would opt against booting into Windows 7 in the first place. Cold booting does admittedly take about three times as long as Android...but waking from hibernation takes a mere 20 seconds, just five seconds longer than the quick OS.</i></p><p><i><br>Windows 7 might feel a touch more sluggish than XP Home...but its refinement and ease of use come as ample reward, and importantly it suffers none of the aggravating limitations of its Google-powered rival.</i></p><p><i><br>As it stands, novelty merely serves as a brief distraction from the D250's competent, but unremarkable charms. We still hope future updates will reinstate the marketplace and make more of Android's obvious potential, but there are much better netbooks available for less.</i></p><p><i><br>The Verdict:</i></p><p><i><br>Google's Android OS provides a disappointing distraction from an otherwise average netbook</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but at the moment it 's hardly going to lure people away from even Windows 7 From the reviewer 's POV Win 7 Starter Edition looks pretty damn good.The burning question , though , is why anyone would opt against booting into Windows 7 in the first place .
Cold booting does admittedly take about three times as long as Android...but waking from hibernation takes a mere 20 seconds , just five seconds longer than the quick OS.Windows 7 might feel a touch more sluggish than XP Home...but its refinement and ease of use come as ample reward , and importantly it suffers none of the aggravating limitations of its Google-powered rival.As it stands , novelty merely serves as a brief distraction from the D250 's competent , but unremarkable charms .
We still hope future updates will reinstate the marketplace and make more of Android 's obvious potential , but there are much better netbooks available for less.The Verdict : Google 's Android OS provides a disappointing distraction from an otherwise average netbook</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but at the moment it's hardly going to lure people away from even Windows 7 From the reviewer's POV Win 7 Starter Edition looks pretty damn good.The burning question, though, is why anyone would opt against booting into Windows 7 in the first place.
Cold booting does admittedly take about three times as long as Android...but waking from hibernation takes a mere 20 seconds, just five seconds longer than the quick OS.Windows 7 might feel a touch more sluggish than XP Home...but its refinement and ease of use come as ample reward, and importantly it suffers none of the aggravating limitations of its Google-powered rival.As it stands, novelty merely serves as a brief distraction from the D250's competent, but unremarkable charms.
We still hope future updates will reinstate the marketplace and make more of Android's obvious potential, but there are much better netbooks available for less.The Verdict:Google's Android OS provides a disappointing distraction from an otherwise average netbook</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849289</id>
	<title>People rarely try twice</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1256326380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>[...] at the moment it's hardly going to lure people away from even Windows 7.</p></div></blockquote><p>Not only that, but it will give Android a bad reputation. And given that people usually stick with what they know and rarely (if ever) check alternatives, it might be a long time before they try Android again.</p><p>Heck, Apple switched to a Unix core for their OS almost a decade ago and I still talk with people who think Mac OS 9 when they hear about Macs.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ ... ] at the moment it 's hardly going to lure people away from even Windows 7.Not only that , but it will give Android a bad reputation .
And given that people usually stick with what they know and rarely ( if ever ) check alternatives , it might be a long time before they try Android again.Heck , Apple switched to a Unix core for their OS almost a decade ago and I still talk with people who think Mac OS 9 when they hear about Macs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[...] at the moment it's hardly going to lure people away from even Windows 7.Not only that, but it will give Android a bad reputation.
And given that people usually stick with what they know and rarely (if ever) check alternatives, it might be a long time before they try Android again.Heck, Apple switched to a Unix core for their OS almost a decade ago and I still talk with people who think Mac OS 9 when they hear about Macs.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29852797</id>
	<title>Re:Well...</title>
	<author>sporkme</author>
	<datestamp>1256300100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google Blog announcing Chrome OS<br>

<a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html" title="blogspot.com">http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html</a> [blogspot.com] <br>

Paragraph 5:<blockquote><div><p>Android was designed from the beginning to work across a variety of devices from phones to set-top boxes to <b>netbooks</b>.</p></div> </blockquote><p>

It is arguable that this was included as a hat tip to the Acer deal.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Blog announcing Chrome OS http : //googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html [ blogspot.com ] Paragraph 5 : Android was designed from the beginning to work across a variety of devices from phones to set-top boxes to netbooks .
It is arguable that this was included as a hat tip to the Acer deal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Blog announcing Chrome OS

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html [blogspot.com] 

Paragraph 5:Android was designed from the beginning to work across a variety of devices from phones to set-top boxes to netbooks.
It is arguable that this was included as a hat tip to the Acer deal.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849419</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849705</id>
	<title>Re:Editorializing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256327940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Slashdot community doesn't pretend to be unbiased, and why should it? The important thing is that you, as a reader, be able to interpret and understand what others say.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Slashdot community does n't pretend to be unbiased , and why should it ?
The important thing is that you , as a reader , be able to interpret and understand what others say .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Slashdot community doesn't pretend to be unbiased, and why should it?
The important thing is that you, as a reader, be able to interpret and understand what others say.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29855975</id>
	<title>Off topic</title>
	<author>smoker2</author>
	<datestamp>1256393220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Offtopic but interesting to me was an ad on the tv last night for a new laptop with windows 7 on it. Apparently the next big thing is being able to tile windows vertically. They called it "snap" or something stupid. Is this what we can expect from a new operating system ? A new name for an old concept that works quite well on every windows OS since 3.1 ? Maybe they should advertise "minimise" as a new way to rapidly expose your desktop - they could call it expose - no wait...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Offtopic but interesting to me was an ad on the tv last night for a new laptop with windows 7 on it .
Apparently the next big thing is being able to tile windows vertically .
They called it " snap " or something stupid .
Is this what we can expect from a new operating system ?
A new name for an old concept that works quite well on every windows OS since 3.1 ?
Maybe they should advertise " minimise " as a new way to rapidly expose your desktop - they could call it expose - no wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Offtopic but interesting to me was an ad on the tv last night for a new laptop with windows 7 on it.
Apparently the next big thing is being able to tile windows vertically.
They called it "snap" or something stupid.
Is this what we can expect from a new operating system ?
A new name for an old concept that works quite well on every windows OS since 3.1 ?
Maybe they should advertise "minimise" as a new way to rapidly expose your desktop - they could call it expose - no wait...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850015</id>
	<title>What I don't get</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256329200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I don't get is the choice of BOTH OSes on this thing. If you read the <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/laptops/352702/acer-aspire-one-d250/specifications" title="pcpro.co.uk">specs</a> [pcpro.co.uk] this thing is maxed out at 1Gb, which makes it a poor choice for Windows 7, which most reviews I've seen set 2Gb as the "sweet spot" for that OS to really perform, and Android? WTF? A mobile phone OS? Neither choice makes any sense at all. If they wanted a "quick boot" like we see in certain motherboards they should have put an embedded Linux in a ROM and went that way. </p><p>

So to me this whole thing makes no sense whatsoever. Windows is being starved for RAM, and the Linux based OS is running on a platform it was never designed for, and which they apparently didn't bother to really tweak it for, although I doubt all the tweaks in the world will turn a phone OS into a Netbook OS. The only thing I can figure is some marketing genius got caught up in the buzz behind both OSes and said "Hey, if Android and Win7 have buzz, we can put out a Netbook with BOTH and get double plus buzz!" but as we have seen time and time again playing buzzword bingo usually ends up a giant can o' fail, as we can see here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I do n't get is the choice of BOTH OSes on this thing .
If you read the specs [ pcpro.co.uk ] this thing is maxed out at 1Gb , which makes it a poor choice for Windows 7 , which most reviews I 've seen set 2Gb as the " sweet spot " for that OS to really perform , and Android ?
WTF ? A mobile phone OS ?
Neither choice makes any sense at all .
If they wanted a " quick boot " like we see in certain motherboards they should have put an embedded Linux in a ROM and went that way .
So to me this whole thing makes no sense whatsoever .
Windows is being starved for RAM , and the Linux based OS is running on a platform it was never designed for , and which they apparently did n't bother to really tweak it for , although I doubt all the tweaks in the world will turn a phone OS into a Netbook OS .
The only thing I can figure is some marketing genius got caught up in the buzz behind both OSes and said " Hey , if Android and Win7 have buzz , we can put out a Netbook with BOTH and get double plus buzz !
" but as we have seen time and time again playing buzzword bingo usually ends up a giant can o ' fail , as we can see here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I don't get is the choice of BOTH OSes on this thing.
If you read the specs [pcpro.co.uk] this thing is maxed out at 1Gb, which makes it a poor choice for Windows 7, which most reviews I've seen set 2Gb as the "sweet spot" for that OS to really perform, and Android?
WTF? A mobile phone OS?
Neither choice makes any sense at all.
If they wanted a "quick boot" like we see in certain motherboards they should have put an embedded Linux in a ROM and went that way.
So to me this whole thing makes no sense whatsoever.
Windows is being starved for RAM, and the Linux based OS is running on a platform it was never designed for, and which they apparently didn't bother to really tweak it for, although I doubt all the tweaks in the world will turn a phone OS into a Netbook OS.
The only thing I can figure is some marketing genius got caught up in the buzz behind both OSes and said "Hey, if Android and Win7 have buzz, we can put out a Netbook with BOTH and get double plus buzz!
" but as we have seen time and time again playing buzzword bingo usually ends up a giant can o' fail, as we can see here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849859</id>
	<title>Re:People rarely try twice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256328660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People tend to talk. Stuff usually lasts your generation + some of the next.</p><p>Look at diesel engines. GM so farked up their implementation that everyone thinks they're slow, smokey, smell and can't start it the winter. Meanwhile Europe has 50+\% diesel adoption.</p><p>I STILL get people (and young people that don't even remember the 70s) that tell me diesels can't start in the winter. I ask them how they like my 1998 TDI that is sitting out in the parking lot and they're floored. I tell them that my previous car was a 19<b>86</b> diesel. Anemic as shit with no turbo but I was getting 50 MPG before Toyota even thought of a hybrid. Not to mention I can run it on any heavy oil from JP-1 to the shit that comes out of your deep fryer.</p><p>Anyone that has tried Linux in the past and found it too difficult has passed that knowledge on to their friends. "Linux doesn't do X" even though X was solved 3 years ago. <b>Android</b> has given a good name to Linux such that they don't know that it is. If Android screws up then someone big (as big as Google) is going to have to come up with another name for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People tend to talk .
Stuff usually lasts your generation + some of the next.Look at diesel engines .
GM so farked up their implementation that everyone thinks they 're slow , smokey , smell and ca n't start it the winter .
Meanwhile Europe has 50 + \ % diesel adoption.I STILL get people ( and young people that do n't even remember the 70s ) that tell me diesels ca n't start in the winter .
I ask them how they like my 1998 TDI that is sitting out in the parking lot and they 're floored .
I tell them that my previous car was a 1986 diesel .
Anemic as shit with no turbo but I was getting 50 MPG before Toyota even thought of a hybrid .
Not to mention I can run it on any heavy oil from JP-1 to the shit that comes out of your deep fryer.Anyone that has tried Linux in the past and found it too difficult has passed that knowledge on to their friends .
" Linux does n't do X " even though X was solved 3 years ago .
Android has given a good name to Linux such that they do n't know that it is .
If Android screws up then someone big ( as big as Google ) is going to have to come up with another name for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People tend to talk.
Stuff usually lasts your generation + some of the next.Look at diesel engines.
GM so farked up their implementation that everyone thinks they're slow, smokey, smell and can't start it the winter.
Meanwhile Europe has 50+\% diesel adoption.I STILL get people (and young people that don't even remember the 70s) that tell me diesels can't start in the winter.
I ask them how they like my 1998 TDI that is sitting out in the parking lot and they're floored.
I tell them that my previous car was a 1986 diesel.
Anemic as shit with no turbo but I was getting 50 MPG before Toyota even thought of a hybrid.
Not to mention I can run it on any heavy oil from JP-1 to the shit that comes out of your deep fryer.Anyone that has tried Linux in the past and found it too difficult has passed that knowledge on to their friends.
"Linux doesn't do X" even though X was solved 3 years ago.
Android has given a good name to Linux such that they don't know that it is.
If Android screws up then someone big (as big as Google) is going to have to come up with another name for it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849289</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850233</id>
	<title>Re:Holy vague summary batman</title>
	<author>immortalpob</author>
	<datestamp>1256330160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I presume this means built-in browser?</p></div><p>No they meant "inbuilt browser", note the co.uk domain... not everyone speaks English like we do in America. Grammar nazi fail.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I presume this means built-in browser ? No they meant " inbuilt browser " , note the co.uk domain... not everyone speaks English like we do in America .
Grammar nazi fail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I presume this means built-in browser?No they meant "inbuilt browser", note the co.uk domain... not everyone speaks English like we do in America.
Grammar nazi fail.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849581</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29852941
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849309
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29859457
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849503
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849761
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29854697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29852797
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849419
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849503
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851319
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850085
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850353
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849459
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29854419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29853597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851007
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849729
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849909
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29852513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849785
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849717
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29852757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850085
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29854047
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849547
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849309
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850041
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849705
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849309
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849459
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29853315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851693
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850619
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849497
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850411
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849459
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29855027
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849459
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29852137
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849503
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849823
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_1628237_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850233
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_1628237.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849309
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849705
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850041
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29852941
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849721
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_1628237.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29852199
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_1628237.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849663
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_1628237.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850015
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29853315
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29854047
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29852513
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_1628237.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849699
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_1628237.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849347
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29854419
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850951
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29854697
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_1628237.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850387
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_1628237.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849379
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_1628237.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851007
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29853597
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_1628237.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849497
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850619
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_1628237.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849289
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849823
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849503
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850925
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851789
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29852137
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851131
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29859457
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849909
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849761
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851693
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849547
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_1628237.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849285
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_1628237.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850105
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_1628237.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849459
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850353
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850463
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850411
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29855027
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_1628237.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849581
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849785
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849729
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850233
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849717
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_1628237.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849293
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851995
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_1628237.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29849419
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29852797
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_1628237.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29850085
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29851319
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_1628237.29852757
</commentlist>
</conversation>
