<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_23_009244</id>
	<title>Nigerian "Scam Police" Shut Down 800 Web Sites</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1256307720000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:sooner.boomr@gmail.com" rel="nofollow">Sooner Boomer</a> writes <i>"Nigerian police, in what is named Operation 'Eagle Claw,' have shut down 800 scam web sites and arrested members of 18 syndicates behind the fraudulent scam sites. <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.6a8cc43eefe7559c839cd6f85e74e8f8.731&amp;show\_article=1">Reports on Breitbart.com</a> <a href="http://www.pointblanknews.com/os2334.html">and Pointblank</a> give details on the busts.  The investigation was done in cooperation with Microsoft to help develop smart technology software capable of detecting fraudulent emails.  From Breitbart: 'When operating at full capacity, within the next six months, the scheme, dubbed "Eagle Claw," should be able to forewarn around a quarter of million potential victims.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sooner Boomer writes " Nigerian police , in what is named Operation 'Eagle Claw, ' have shut down 800 scam web sites and arrested members of 18 syndicates behind the fraudulent scam sites .
Reports on Breitbart.com and Pointblank give details on the busts .
The investigation was done in cooperation with Microsoft to help develop smart technology software capable of detecting fraudulent emails .
From Breitbart : 'When operating at full capacity , within the next six months , the scheme , dubbed " Eagle Claw , " should be able to forewarn around a quarter of million potential victims .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sooner Boomer writes "Nigerian police, in what is named Operation 'Eagle Claw,' have shut down 800 scam web sites and arrested members of 18 syndicates behind the fraudulent scam sites.
Reports on Breitbart.com and Pointblank give details on the busts.
The investigation was done in cooperation with Microsoft to help develop smart technology software capable of detecting fraudulent emails.
From Breitbart: 'When operating at full capacity, within the next six months, the scheme, dubbed "Eagle Claw," should be able to forewarn around a quarter of million potential victims.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842739</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>supernova\_hq</author>
	<datestamp>1256230860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dirt</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dirt</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dirt</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842443</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29879003</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>lennier</author>
	<datestamp>1256560080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Money is the only tool we have to express value in something. "</p><p>And that in itself might be a problem if money does not in fact accurately reflect the actual value of things.</p><p>"If everything has the same value, then it is worthless."</p><p>Not necessarily. It might just be not able to be valued. Subtle distinction until you lose, say, drinkable water from the biosphere and realise that it was actually worth a very large sum of money, just that it happened to not be accounted for in any transactions.</p><p>Some things, money is not a good measure of. The evil comes in when we start aggressively optimising our lifestyle to increase an inaccurate measure of worth.</p><p>tl;dr: Money's fine as long as you realise it's as useful an indicator of true worth as high school popularity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Money is the only tool we have to express value in something .
" And that in itself might be a problem if money does not in fact accurately reflect the actual value of things .
" If everything has the same value , then it is worthless .
" Not necessarily .
It might just be not able to be valued .
Subtle distinction until you lose , say , drinkable water from the biosphere and realise that it was actually worth a very large sum of money , just that it happened to not be accounted for in any transactions.Some things , money is not a good measure of .
The evil comes in when we start aggressively optimising our lifestyle to increase an inaccurate measure of worth.tl ; dr : Money 's fine as long as you realise it 's as useful an indicator of true worth as high school popularity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Money is the only tool we have to express value in something.
"And that in itself might be a problem if money does not in fact accurately reflect the actual value of things.
"If everything has the same value, then it is worthless.
"Not necessarily.
It might just be not able to be valued.
Subtle distinction until you lose, say, drinkable water from the biosphere and realise that it was actually worth a very large sum of money, just that it happened to not be accounted for in any transactions.Some things, money is not a good measure of.
The evil comes in when we start aggressively optimising our lifestyle to increase an inaccurate measure of worth.tl;dr: Money's fine as long as you realise it's as useful an indicator of true worth as high school popularity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842935</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842819</id>
	<title>Re:Love those letters</title>
	<author>LifesABeach</author>
	<datestamp>1256232180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Classic, just classic.  I got one those emails a week ago, and immediately junked it, (I think I'll go fishing in the Junk folder).  I think I'm going to enjoy having Nigerian Princes paying my utilities, and bank loans.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Classic , just classic .
I got one those emails a week ago , and immediately junked it , ( I think I 'll go fishing in the Junk folder ) .
I think I 'm going to enjoy having Nigerian Princes paying my utilities , and bank loans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Classic, just classic.
I got one those emails a week ago, and immediately junked it, (I think I'll go fishing in the Junk folder).
I think I'm going to enjoy having Nigerian Princes paying my utilities, and bank loans.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842353</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29845957</id>
	<title>Re:I'm a nigerian prince</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256312160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm a Nigerian policeman. We caught a bunch of spammers and think you may have fallen victim to one of them. Can you provide your banking details so we can verify you are not affected? Thanks!$$</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a Nigerian policeman .
We caught a bunch of spammers and think you may have fallen victim to one of them .
Can you provide your banking details so we can verify you are not affected ?
Thanks ! $ $</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a Nigerian policeman.
We caught a bunch of spammers and think you may have fallen victim to one of them.
Can you provide your banking details so we can verify you are not affected?
Thanks!$$</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842855</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>ammorais</author>
	<datestamp>1256233020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Unfortunately, humans are quite stupid.</p></div><p>Compared to?  Cats?  An alien race you know of but the rest of us don't?  A cherrypicked group of humans?</p></div><p>I bet he's talking about cats.<br>My cat will never fall for Nigerian scams.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , humans are quite stupid.Compared to ?
Cats ? An alien race you know of but the rest of us do n't ?
A cherrypicked group of humans ? I bet he 's talking about cats.My cat will never fall for Nigerian scams .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, humans are quite stupid.Compared to?
Cats?  An alien race you know of but the rest of us don't?
A cherrypicked group of humans?I bet he's talking about cats.My cat will never fall for Nigerian scams.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842443</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844061</id>
	<title>Re:Love those letters</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256297340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you would fit in well with this group: <a href="http://www.419eater.com/" title="419eater.com">http://www.419eater.com/</a> [419eater.com] ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you would fit in well with this group : http : //www.419eater.com/ [ 419eater.com ] ^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you would fit in well with this group: http://www.419eater.com/ [419eater.com] ^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842353</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29845729</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>kalirion</author>
	<datestamp>1256311080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>He had to stick his claw in that specific hole, and *bam* - there goes an hour of work. </i></p><p>You mean some people still haven't figured out that it's a good idea to save their work every 5 minutes?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He had to stick his claw in that specific hole , and * bam * - there goes an hour of work .
You mean some people still have n't figured out that it 's a good idea to save their work every 5 minutes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He had to stick his claw in that specific hole, and *bam* - there goes an hour of work.
You mean some people still haven't figured out that it's a good idea to save their work every 5 minutes?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842353</id>
	<title>Love those letters</title>
	<author>EdIII</author>
	<datestamp>1256225460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I rather enjoy getting those letters.  The last one I replied that I was extremely interested but that I had recently had a dispute with my Internet Service Provider and my access to email would be shut down soon.  I would be more than willing to help them if they could send $98.43 to Time Warner Cable referencing account number ################.</p><p>There are other variations.  Such as I can help them get the money out of the country but I need more money to pay my lawyer to settle some estate disputes.  Buy me a ticket to Nigeria and I will come there personally.  My rich family members think this is a joke and I have been cut off from the family money but I can show them if I can just get to Nigeria and show them that this is real.</p><p>My record so far is stringing these guys along for 2 weeks.  They finally give up frustrated.  I actually had one of them write me back asking to be left alone and stop sending him emails.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I rather enjoy getting those letters .
The last one I replied that I was extremely interested but that I had recently had a dispute with my Internet Service Provider and my access to email would be shut down soon .
I would be more than willing to help them if they could send $ 98.43 to Time Warner Cable referencing account number # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # .There are other variations .
Such as I can help them get the money out of the country but I need more money to pay my lawyer to settle some estate disputes .
Buy me a ticket to Nigeria and I will come there personally .
My rich family members think this is a joke and I have been cut off from the family money but I can show them if I can just get to Nigeria and show them that this is real.My record so far is stringing these guys along for 2 weeks .
They finally give up frustrated .
I actually had one of them write me back asking to be left alone and stop sending him emails .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I rather enjoy getting those letters.
The last one I replied that I was extremely interested but that I had recently had a dispute with my Internet Service Provider and my access to email would be shut down soon.
I would be more than willing to help them if they could send $98.43 to Time Warner Cable referencing account number ################.There are other variations.
Such as I can help them get the money out of the country but I need more money to pay my lawyer to settle some estate disputes.
Buy me a ticket to Nigeria and I will come there personally.
My rich family members think this is a joke and I have been cut off from the family money but I can show them if I can just get to Nigeria and show them that this is real.My record so far is stringing these guys along for 2 weeks.
They finally give up frustrated.
I actually had one of them write me back asking to be left alone and stop sending him emails.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29851647</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>joocemann</author>
	<datestamp>1256292240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He should have tried "sudo effort +imagination +education"</p><p>It isn't hard to truly imagine what potentials and possibilities we can achieve. But you have to make an effort instead of doing what he did by using selective reasoning to come up with excuses that are obviously not fact or absolute in any way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He should have tried " sudo effort + imagination + education " It is n't hard to truly imagine what potentials and possibilities we can achieve .
But you have to make an effort instead of doing what he did by using selective reasoning to come up with excuses that are obviously not fact or absolute in any way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He should have tried "sudo effort +imagination +education"It isn't hard to truly imagine what potentials and possibilities we can achieve.
But you have to make an effort instead of doing what he did by using selective reasoning to come up with excuses that are obviously not fact or absolute in any way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842743</id>
	<title>Re:What are the odds?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256230980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>grep -R "$100000" *</htmltext>
<tokenext>grep -R " $ 100000 " *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>grep -R "$100000" *</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842341</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29851089</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>psithurism</author>
	<datestamp>1256290080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Many of the scams we see do rely on greed, but also consider there are a large number of scams out there relying on philanthropy. I have had friends (not close ones mind you) who solicited for fake or semi functional charities. Similarly are the scams that involve posing as authority figures, etc.<br> <br>I've known many old people especially, who write large and frequent checks they can barely afford to people who need the money to cure cancer (or SARS). You can't blame greed all the time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Many of the scams we see do rely on greed , but also consider there are a large number of scams out there relying on philanthropy .
I have had friends ( not close ones mind you ) who solicited for fake or semi functional charities .
Similarly are the scams that involve posing as authority figures , etc .
I 've known many old people especially , who write large and frequent checks they can barely afford to people who need the money to cure cancer ( or SARS ) .
You ca n't blame greed all the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many of the scams we see do rely on greed, but also consider there are a large number of scams out there relying on philanthropy.
I have had friends (not close ones mind you) who solicited for fake or semi functional charities.
Similarly are the scams that involve posing as authority figures, etc.
I've known many old people especially, who write large and frequent checks they can barely afford to people who need the money to cure cancer (or SARS).
You can't blame greed all the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842935</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842401</id>
	<title>Ok....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256225940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Technology cannot eliminate human stupidity. What person doesn't know not to go double clicking on random EXEs, install random Active X controls, etc. yet the number of virus infested Windows boxes shows that most people don't follow that advice. Seriously, how many people think they can make millions by following the directions in these e-mails? <br> <br>

The success of these e-mails is a testament to human stupidity in and of itself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Technology can not eliminate human stupidity .
What person does n't know not to go double clicking on random EXEs , install random Active X controls , etc .
yet the number of virus infested Windows boxes shows that most people do n't follow that advice .
Seriously , how many people think they can make millions by following the directions in these e-mails ?
The success of these e-mails is a testament to human stupidity in and of itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Technology cannot eliminate human stupidity.
What person doesn't know not to go double clicking on random EXEs, install random Active X controls, etc.
yet the number of virus infested Windows boxes shows that most people don't follow that advice.
Seriously, how many people think they can make millions by following the directions in these e-mails?
The success of these e-mails is a testament to human stupidity in and of itself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843777</id>
	<title>Re:Finally! It's about time!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256292660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Heck, I would accept help from Satan himself, if it reduce the spam and online crime.</p></div><p>Allow me to introduce myself, being Dr. Faustus a business associate of Mr. Satan who as you know is an excellent Prince of Darkness and Spam, resident in many parts of Nigeria. I am sure we can come to an amicable arrangement whereby Mr. Satan's spam services are directed to others instead of yourself. Some anticipated administrative expenses needing to be circumvented, please be replying with your credit card and banking details, and numerous photographs of naked women.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Heck , I would accept help from Satan himself , if it reduce the spam and online crime.Allow me to introduce myself , being Dr. Faustus a business associate of Mr. Satan who as you know is an excellent Prince of Darkness and Spam , resident in many parts of Nigeria .
I am sure we can come to an amicable arrangement whereby Mr. Satan 's spam services are directed to others instead of yourself .
Some anticipated administrative expenses needing to be circumvented , please be replying with your credit card and banking details , and numerous photographs of naked women .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heck, I would accept help from Satan himself, if it reduce the spam and online crime.Allow me to introduce myself, being Dr. Faustus a business associate of Mr. Satan who as you know is an excellent Prince of Darkness and Spam, resident in many parts of Nigeria.
I am sure we can come to an amicable arrangement whereby Mr. Satan's spam services are directed to others instead of yourself.
Some anticipated administrative expenses needing to be circumvented, please be replying with your credit card and banking details, and numerous photographs of naked women.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842335</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843223</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>CodeBuster</author>
	<datestamp>1256239260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That's the difference between knowledge and wisdom.</p></div><p>There's got to be a D&amp;D joke in there somewhere.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the difference between knowledge and wisdom.There 's got to be a D&amp;D joke in there somewhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the difference between knowledge and wisdom.There's got to be a D&amp;D joke in there somewhere.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842497</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29854769</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256414640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Did you try "sudo create ham"?</p><p>I don't have God's password<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Did you try " sudo create ham " ? I do n't have God 's password : - (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Did you try "sudo create ham"?I don't have God's password :-(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842737</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1256230860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Scams have always been around, and they have nothing to do with 'stupidity'. This is a conceit of our modern age, where we are desperately anxious to call other people stupid so as to relieve our anxiety that we might not be smart by comparison.  Rather, it has to do with scammers who have made a study of human nature (the profession is ancient and goes back to the dawn of time).  Calling people who fall for scams 'stupid' is not correct, calling them 'greedy and trying to screw the conman' is much more correct.  Consider how many people in the current 'intelligent' audience would fall for the following:<p>
You take an ordinary pack of 52 playing cards, spread them face up on the table, and offer to bet your victim that you can beat him at a game of draw poker, nothing wild, in which you both draw your cards from a face-up deck, taking any cards you wish. The game will be played according to standard rules except that you and he can help yourselves to any cards in the face-up deck both in putting together your initial hand and on the draw. You claim that your opponent will be unable to beat or even tie you even though each of you sees what the other man holds and even though you will allow him to go last. </p><p>
The procedure, you explain, will be as follows: You will draw five cards from the face-up deck for your hand. Your opponent will then draw any five cards he wishes from the remainder of the deck to form his hand. You will then discard any cards you wish and draw cards from the remainder of the deck to complete your hand. Your opponent may then discard nay or all of his cards. He may take any cards remaining in the face-up deck to fill his hand. If he beats you, he wins the bet. Even if he only succeeds in tying your hand, he still wins. In order for you to win the bet, you must end up with a better hand than his. </p><p>
Since your opponent gets to go last both on the deal and the draw, it would seem a sure thing for him to at least tie. After all, the best you can end up with is a royal flush, and he can tie that by taking another royal flush in a different suit. (Remember suits have no rank in poker.)</p><p>
Actually, you have a mortal lock on this one if you employ the following strategy: In selecting your initial hand, take the four tens plus any other card. Your opponent will either give himself a higher four of a kind  jacks, queens, kings, or aces  or he will take a straight flush. (Note that the highest straight flush he can make is a five through nine of one suit. Your four tens preclude his building a royal flush or a straight flush higher than a nine.) Either way, he has you beat  for the moment.</p><p>
You now discard three of the tens and your odd card. Use that one ten to build the highest straight flush you can. For example, if he holds four aces, you give yourself a king-high straight flush. If your opponent holds a straight flush, you build a royal flush around the ten you hold. Now its his turn to draw, but there is no way he can make a straight flush as high as yours because you have killed the other three tens among the discards. Of course, your strategy will work just as well if, for some unaccountable reason, your opponent initially draws some other hand than the ones suggested above.</p><p>
Letting your opponent go last, which seems to guarantee a tie for him, actually robs him of any chance of winning the bet. Take out a deck of cards and experiment for a couple of minutes and youll see that all your adversary can do is come in second best.</p><p>
In my younger, more adventurous days, I often used this scam on a mark I had badly beaten at poker, if he still had any money left. As soon as he started bemoaning his bad luck, I would say, What do you mean luck? Youre the worst poker player Ive ever seen in my life. Its a wonder your mother lets you out of the house without a note pinned to your chest. You couldnt beat me at poker if I let you run through the deck and pick out your own hand. I would then pause as if suddenly getting an inspiration, and say, As a matter of fact, I bet you reall</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Scams have always been around , and they have nothing to do with 'stupidity' .
This is a conceit of our modern age , where we are desperately anxious to call other people stupid so as to relieve our anxiety that we might not be smart by comparison .
Rather , it has to do with scammers who have made a study of human nature ( the profession is ancient and goes back to the dawn of time ) .
Calling people who fall for scams 'stupid ' is not correct , calling them 'greedy and trying to screw the conman ' is much more correct .
Consider how many people in the current 'intelligent ' audience would fall for the following : You take an ordinary pack of 52 playing cards , spread them face up on the table , and offer to bet your victim that you can beat him at a game of draw poker , nothing wild , in which you both draw your cards from a face-up deck , taking any cards you wish .
The game will be played according to standard rules except that you and he can help yourselves to any cards in the face-up deck both in putting together your initial hand and on the draw .
You claim that your opponent will be unable to beat or even tie you even though each of you sees what the other man holds and even though you will allow him to go last .
The procedure , you explain , will be as follows : You will draw five cards from the face-up deck for your hand .
Your opponent will then draw any five cards he wishes from the remainder of the deck to form his hand .
You will then discard any cards you wish and draw cards from the remainder of the deck to complete your hand .
Your opponent may then discard nay or all of his cards .
He may take any cards remaining in the face-up deck to fill his hand .
If he beats you , he wins the bet .
Even if he only succeeds in tying your hand , he still wins .
In order for you to win the bet , you must end up with a better hand than his .
Since your opponent gets to go last both on the deal and the draw , it would seem a sure thing for him to at least tie .
After all , the best you can end up with is a royal flush , and he can tie that by taking another royal flush in a different suit .
( Remember suits have no rank in poker .
) Actually , you have a mortal lock on this one if you employ the following strategy : In selecting your initial hand , take the four tens plus any other card .
Your opponent will either give himself a higher four of a kind jacks , queens , kings , or aces or he will take a straight flush .
( Note that the highest straight flush he can make is a five through nine of one suit .
Your four tens preclude his building a royal flush or a straight flush higher than a nine .
) Either way , he has you beat for the moment .
You now discard three of the tens and your odd card .
Use that one ten to build the highest straight flush you can .
For example , if he holds four aces , you give yourself a king-high straight flush .
If your opponent holds a straight flush , you build a royal flush around the ten you hold .
Now its his turn to draw , but there is no way he can make a straight flush as high as yours because you have killed the other three tens among the discards .
Of course , your strategy will work just as well if , for some unaccountable reason , your opponent initially draws some other hand than the ones suggested above .
Letting your opponent go last , which seems to guarantee a tie for him , actually robs him of any chance of winning the bet .
Take out a deck of cards and experiment for a couple of minutes and youll see that all your adversary can do is come in second best .
In my younger , more adventurous days , I often used this scam on a mark I had badly beaten at poker , if he still had any money left .
As soon as he started bemoaning his bad luck , I would say , What do you mean luck ?
Youre the worst poker player Ive ever seen in my life .
Its a wonder your mother lets you out of the house without a note pinned to your chest .
You couldnt beat me at poker if I let you run through the deck and pick out your own hand .
I would then pause as if suddenly getting an inspiration , and say , As a matter of fact , I bet you reall</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scams have always been around, and they have nothing to do with 'stupidity'.
This is a conceit of our modern age, where we are desperately anxious to call other people stupid so as to relieve our anxiety that we might not be smart by comparison.
Rather, it has to do with scammers who have made a study of human nature (the profession is ancient and goes back to the dawn of time).
Calling people who fall for scams 'stupid' is not correct, calling them 'greedy and trying to screw the conman' is much more correct.
Consider how many people in the current 'intelligent' audience would fall for the following:
You take an ordinary pack of 52 playing cards, spread them face up on the table, and offer to bet your victim that you can beat him at a game of draw poker, nothing wild, in which you both draw your cards from a face-up deck, taking any cards you wish.
The game will be played according to standard rules except that you and he can help yourselves to any cards in the face-up deck both in putting together your initial hand and on the draw.
You claim that your opponent will be unable to beat or even tie you even though each of you sees what the other man holds and even though you will allow him to go last.
The procedure, you explain, will be as follows: You will draw five cards from the face-up deck for your hand.
Your opponent will then draw any five cards he wishes from the remainder of the deck to form his hand.
You will then discard any cards you wish and draw cards from the remainder of the deck to complete your hand.
Your opponent may then discard nay or all of his cards.
He may take any cards remaining in the face-up deck to fill his hand.
If he beats you, he wins the bet.
Even if he only succeeds in tying your hand, he still wins.
In order for you to win the bet, you must end up with a better hand than his.
Since your opponent gets to go last both on the deal and the draw, it would seem a sure thing for him to at least tie.
After all, the best you can end up with is a royal flush, and he can tie that by taking another royal flush in a different suit.
(Remember suits have no rank in poker.
)
Actually, you have a mortal lock on this one if you employ the following strategy: In selecting your initial hand, take the four tens plus any other card.
Your opponent will either give himself a higher four of a kind  jacks, queens, kings, or aces  or he will take a straight flush.
(Note that the highest straight flush he can make is a five through nine of one suit.
Your four tens preclude his building a royal flush or a straight flush higher than a nine.
) Either way, he has you beat  for the moment.
You now discard three of the tens and your odd card.
Use that one ten to build the highest straight flush you can.
For example, if he holds four aces, you give yourself a king-high straight flush.
If your opponent holds a straight flush, you build a royal flush around the ten you hold.
Now its his turn to draw, but there is no way he can make a straight flush as high as yours because you have killed the other three tens among the discards.
Of course, your strategy will work just as well if, for some unaccountable reason, your opponent initially draws some other hand than the ones suggested above.
Letting your opponent go last, which seems to guarantee a tie for him, actually robs him of any chance of winning the bet.
Take out a deck of cards and experiment for a couple of minutes and youll see that all your adversary can do is come in second best.
In my younger, more adventurous days, I often used this scam on a mark I had badly beaten at poker, if he still had any money left.
As soon as he started bemoaning his bad luck, I would say, What do you mean luck?
Youre the worst poker player Ive ever seen in my life.
Its a wonder your mother lets you out of the house without a note pinned to your chest.
You couldnt beat me at poker if I let you run through the deck and pick out your own hand.
I would then pause as if suddenly getting an inspiration, and say, As a matter of fact, I bet you reall</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339</id>
	<title>This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>JoshuaZ</author>
	<datestamp>1256225340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unfortunately, humans are quite stupid. Even smart people are often stupid outside their area of expertise. I know someone professor at a major university who almost fell for one of these scams. It is hard to draw the line between ignorance and stupidity but as long as ignorant or stupid people exist unethical will try to take advantage of them. And they'll just find new ways of doing it. More education is probably the key. But even then, they'll just modify the scams accordingly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , humans are quite stupid .
Even smart people are often stupid outside their area of expertise .
I know someone professor at a major university who almost fell for one of these scams .
It is hard to draw the line between ignorance and stupidity but as long as ignorant or stupid people exist unethical will try to take advantage of them .
And they 'll just find new ways of doing it .
More education is probably the key .
But even then , they 'll just modify the scams accordingly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, humans are quite stupid.
Even smart people are often stupid outside their area of expertise.
I know someone professor at a major university who almost fell for one of these scams.
It is hard to draw the line between ignorance and stupidity but as long as ignorant or stupid people exist unethical will try to take advantage of them.
And they'll just find new ways of doing it.
More education is probably the key.
But even then, they'll just modify the scams accordingly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29849225</id>
	<title>Re:Finally! It's about time!</title>
	<author>GameboyRMH</author>
	<datestamp>1256326140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Heck, I would accept help from Satan himself, if it reduce the spam and online crime.</p></div><p>But would you accept help from Microsoft?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Heck , I would accept help from Satan himself , if it reduce the spam and online crime.But would you accept help from Microsoft ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heck, I would accept help from Satan himself, if it reduce the spam and online crime.But would you accept help from Microsoft?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842335</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843087</id>
	<title>Re:I'm a nigerian prince</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256237100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please send me plenty of spam, especially ones of nude women. Ive never seen a naked woman before so it would be nice <br> <br>

Kind Regards, <br>
Jack Thompson <br>
amendmantone@comcast.net</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please send me plenty of spam , especially ones of nude women .
Ive never seen a naked woman before so it would be nice Kind Regards , Jack Thompson amendmantone @ comcast.net</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please send me plenty of spam, especially ones of nude women.
Ive never seen a naked woman before so it would be nice  

Kind Regards, 
Jack Thompson 
amendmantone@comcast.net</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842315</id>
	<title>In other news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256225040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In other news, Americans now falling victim to fraudulent spam emails from individuals claiming to be members of the Royal Family of the Ivory Coast.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In other news , Americans now falling victim to fraudulent spam emails from individuals claiming to be members of the Royal Family of the Ivory Coast .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other news, Americans now falling victim to fraudulent spam emails from individuals claiming to be members of the Royal Family of the Ivory Coast.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29846279</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>joocemann</author>
	<datestamp>1256314020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, you're not even trying to think outside of the box that was built around you.</p><p>Species of apes not very genetically distant from us exist in much more communal and peaceful ways.  Fathers raise all of their clan's children as their own, aunts raise all of their sister's children as their own.  Your assumptions about nature are limited and exclusive of reality.</p><p>By jealousy, I mean the cultural phenomenon wherein your girlfriend wants more guys than just you, not the example your ego dug up as a convenient counterargument.</p><p>If you don't know how to get a ham without money, your mind is closed and your character is poisoned with a specific direction of self worth and ability.  Nevertheless, you should know that more is possible.</p><p>Your response serves as a great example as to how difficult the issue of undoing cultural influence can be; thank you for your demonstration of this fact.  There is an old term called 'think outside the box', though I doubt you've got the vision to truly do so in this case.  I'm sorry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , you 're not even trying to think outside of the box that was built around you.Species of apes not very genetically distant from us exist in much more communal and peaceful ways .
Fathers raise all of their clan 's children as their own , aunts raise all of their sister 's children as their own .
Your assumptions about nature are limited and exclusive of reality.By jealousy , I mean the cultural phenomenon wherein your girlfriend wants more guys than just you , not the example your ego dug up as a convenient counterargument.If you do n't know how to get a ham without money , your mind is closed and your character is poisoned with a specific direction of self worth and ability .
Nevertheless , you should know that more is possible.Your response serves as a great example as to how difficult the issue of undoing cultural influence can be ; thank you for your demonstration of this fact .
There is an old term called 'think outside the box ' , though I doubt you 've got the vision to truly do so in this case .
I 'm sorry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, you're not even trying to think outside of the box that was built around you.Species of apes not very genetically distant from us exist in much more communal and peaceful ways.
Fathers raise all of their clan's children as their own, aunts raise all of their sister's children as their own.
Your assumptions about nature are limited and exclusive of reality.By jealousy, I mean the cultural phenomenon wherein your girlfriend wants more guys than just you, not the example your ego dug up as a convenient counterargument.If you don't know how to get a ham without money, your mind is closed and your character is poisoned with a specific direction of self worth and ability.
Nevertheless, you should know that more is possible.Your response serves as a great example as to how difficult the issue of undoing cultural influence can be; thank you for your demonstration of this fact.
There is an old term called 'think outside the box', though I doubt you've got the vision to truly do so in this case.
I'm sorry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842849</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843019</id>
	<title>Re:I'm a nigerian prince</title>
	<author>davester666</author>
	<datestamp>1256235900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I presume you are giving a significant portion of any money you 'earn' to the Nigerian police, in exchange for being left out of Operation "Eagle Claw"...right?</p><p>I just want to make sure my money will be with somebody who will be there six months from now, sending me more promises of "yup, the money is just about to go through, any day now".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I presume you are giving a significant portion of any money you 'earn ' to the Nigerian police , in exchange for being left out of Operation " Eagle Claw " ...right ? I just want to make sure my money will be with somebody who will be there six months from now , sending me more promises of " yup , the money is just about to go through , any day now " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I presume you are giving a significant portion of any money you 'earn' to the Nigerian police, in exchange for being left out of Operation "Eagle Claw"...right?I just want to make sure my money will be with somebody who will be there six months from now, sending me more promises of "yup, the money is just about to go through, any day now".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844035</id>
	<title>Re:Finally! It's about time!</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1256297040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you actually <em>wished</em> for the retards of the world to have more power? Because that's <em>exactly</em> what they have now. Because they now have more money.<br>Wait for them spending it on the things you hate the most. Making TV, politics, and the whole country... just a little bit worse.</p><p>Oh thank you so very much!<br>Because I don't have to live in your country. So now I will have an advantage over all of your country. Including you.</p><p>But hmmm... I could do even better... Hey, I have a REALLY nice spam filtering system on my servers. With graylisting, spamasassin, amavis, 3 anti-spam networks, SPF, etc. I offer it at the price of only one soul! How's that? The butt-rapings are only daily! Buy now!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you actually wished for the retards of the world to have more power ?
Because that 's exactly what they have now .
Because they now have more money.Wait for them spending it on the things you hate the most .
Making TV , politics , and the whole country... just a little bit worse.Oh thank you so very much ! Because I do n't have to live in your country .
So now I will have an advantage over all of your country .
Including you.But hmmm... I could do even better... Hey , I have a REALLY nice spam filtering system on my servers .
With graylisting , spamasassin , amavis , 3 anti-spam networks , SPF , etc .
I offer it at the price of only one soul !
How 's that ?
The butt-rapings are only daily !
Buy now !
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you actually wished for the retards of the world to have more power?
Because that's exactly what they have now.
Because they now have more money.Wait for them spending it on the things you hate the most.
Making TV, politics, and the whole country... just a little bit worse.Oh thank you so very much!Because I don't have to live in your country.
So now I will have an advantage over all of your country.
Including you.But hmmm... I could do even better... Hey, I have a REALLY nice spam filtering system on my servers.
With graylisting, spamasassin, amavis, 3 anti-spam networks, SPF, etc.
I offer it at the price of only one soul!
How's that?
The butt-rapings are only daily!
Buy now!
:P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842335</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842991</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>timmarhy</author>
	<datestamp>1256235240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>omg it's not a silver bullet, so let's just throw our hands in the air and do nothing!
i hope your not in charge of anything more important then washing jock straps.</htmltext>
<tokenext>omg it 's not a silver bullet , so let 's just throw our hands in the air and do nothing !
i hope your not in charge of anything more important then washing jock straps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>omg it's not a silver bullet, so let's just throw our hands in the air and do nothing!
i hope your not in charge of anything more important then washing jock straps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842545</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>joocemann</author>
	<datestamp>1256227800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Unfortunately, humans are quite stupid. Even smart people are often stupid outside their area of expertise. I know someone professor at a major university who almost fell for one of these scams. It is hard to draw the line between ignorance and stupidity but as long as ignorant or stupid people exist unethical will try to take advantage of them. And they'll just find new ways of doing it. More education is probably the key. But even then, they'll just modify the scams accordingly.</p></div><p>As long as our cultures pit our people against each other in competition for money, people will be 'unethical' and exploit each other.</p><p>I suggest we look to the roots and foundations of 'evil' and how we can circumvent its expressions in life; most cases indicate that 'money' should be destroyed and new cultures and ways of existence need arise.</p><p>You know it is your culture that taught you to be jealous of polygamy. It is your culture that taught you to put common man at opposition.  It is your culture that prioritizes the individual over community.  Very little in what is wrong with humans can be attributed to nature: nurture is where we go wrong.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , humans are quite stupid .
Even smart people are often stupid outside their area of expertise .
I know someone professor at a major university who almost fell for one of these scams .
It is hard to draw the line between ignorance and stupidity but as long as ignorant or stupid people exist unethical will try to take advantage of them .
And they 'll just find new ways of doing it .
More education is probably the key .
But even then , they 'll just modify the scams accordingly.As long as our cultures pit our people against each other in competition for money , people will be 'unethical ' and exploit each other.I suggest we look to the roots and foundations of 'evil ' and how we can circumvent its expressions in life ; most cases indicate that 'money ' should be destroyed and new cultures and ways of existence need arise.You know it is your culture that taught you to be jealous of polygamy .
It is your culture that taught you to put common man at opposition .
It is your culture that prioritizes the individual over community .
Very little in what is wrong with humans can be attributed to nature : nurture is where we go wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, humans are quite stupid.
Even smart people are often stupid outside their area of expertise.
I know someone professor at a major university who almost fell for one of these scams.
It is hard to draw the line between ignorance and stupidity but as long as ignorant or stupid people exist unethical will try to take advantage of them.
And they'll just find new ways of doing it.
More education is probably the key.
But even then, they'll just modify the scams accordingly.As long as our cultures pit our people against each other in competition for money, people will be 'unethical' and exploit each other.I suggest we look to the roots and foundations of 'evil' and how we can circumvent its expressions in life; most cases indicate that 'money' should be destroyed and new cultures and ways of existence need arise.You know it is your culture that taught you to be jealous of polygamy.
It is your culture that taught you to put common man at opposition.
It is your culture that prioritizes the individual over community.
Very little in what is wrong with humans can be attributed to nature: nurture is where we go wrong.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843653</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256290980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pshh<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... my cats writes my papers for me in exchange for tuna.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pshh ... my cats writes my papers for me in exchange for tuna .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pshh ... my cats writes my papers for me in exchange for tuna.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843707</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>Xanj</author>
	<datestamp>1256291820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>not to be a troll or anything but dont you mean thats the difference between knowledge and intelligence, wisdom and knowledge are the same thing they are using the facts to solve the problem where intelligence is solving the problem without knowing the facts therefor discovering the facts</htmltext>
<tokenext>not to be a troll or anything but dont you mean thats the difference between knowledge and intelligence , wisdom and knowledge are the same thing they are using the facts to solve the problem where intelligence is solving the problem without knowing the facts therefor discovering the facts</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not to be a troll or anything but dont you mean thats the difference between knowledge and intelligence, wisdom and knowledge are the same thing they are using the facts to solve the problem where intelligence is solving the problem without knowing the facts therefor discovering the facts</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842497</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842497</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>causality</author>
	<datestamp>1256227140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Even smart people are often stupid outside their area of expertise.</p></div></blockquote><p>
That's the difference between knowledge and wisdom.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even smart people are often stupid outside their area of expertise .
That 's the difference between knowledge and wisdom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even smart people are often stupid outside their area of expertise.
That's the difference between knowledge and wisdom.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844751</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>jonadab</author>
	<datestamp>1256304900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; Even smart people are often stupid outside their area of expertise.<br><br>It is my considered opinion that people who only have one area of expertise aren't very smart, no matter how detailed their knowledge may be in that one area.<br><br>Granted, everybody has weak subjects here and there.  But smart people *know* what their weak subjects are and don't risk much on being right about anything in those subjects.  I would never put any money into sports, for instance, because I just plain don't know that much about sports.  I wouldn't try to own or manage a sports team, or a stadium, or anything sports related.  I wouldn't bet money on the outcome of a sporting event.  I wouldn't invest money in sports-related merchandise (even *famous* sports-related merchandise like a Honus Wagner card, because how would I know if it even *resembles* the real thing, much less evaluate its actual authenticity?).  And I certainly wouldn't enter into a sports-related business transaction with someone I've never met who contacts me out of the blue.<br><br>It takes an incredibly foolish man to reason from "I'm an expert on the appreciation of Serif fonts in Saxon table doilies in the year 1058" through "so obviously I'm smart" and arrive at "so even though I don't know anything about African royalty or high finance or business, I can trust my judgment about these people who have contacted me, whom I've never met, and go ahead and start a financial business relationship with them, without seeking any advice from an expert on the subject."<br><br>A smart person wouldn't reason like that.  A smart person knows his own limitations and compensates for them when necessary.  A smart person would say to himself, "You know, I don't know anything about African royalty, so I should do some checking and inform myself before I deal with these people.  There might be some important piece of basic information I should have."  A smart person would say, "I don't know that much about business, so I should at least get my colleague from the business department to look over this proposal before I do anything."  A smart person would say, "I don't know that much about high finance and transferring millions of dollars overseas, so I should seek advice from someone who does, a banker maybe, before getting involved in such a venture."</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Even smart people are often stupid outside their area of expertise.It is my considered opinion that people who only have one area of expertise are n't very smart , no matter how detailed their knowledge may be in that one area.Granted , everybody has weak subjects here and there .
But smart people * know * what their weak subjects are and do n't risk much on being right about anything in those subjects .
I would never put any money into sports , for instance , because I just plain do n't know that much about sports .
I would n't try to own or manage a sports team , or a stadium , or anything sports related .
I would n't bet money on the outcome of a sporting event .
I would n't invest money in sports-related merchandise ( even * famous * sports-related merchandise like a Honus Wagner card , because how would I know if it even * resembles * the real thing , much less evaluate its actual authenticity ? ) .
And I certainly would n't enter into a sports-related business transaction with someone I 've never met who contacts me out of the blue.It takes an incredibly foolish man to reason from " I 'm an expert on the appreciation of Serif fonts in Saxon table doilies in the year 1058 " through " so obviously I 'm smart " and arrive at " so even though I do n't know anything about African royalty or high finance or business , I can trust my judgment about these people who have contacted me , whom I 've never met , and go ahead and start a financial business relationship with them , without seeking any advice from an expert on the subject .
" A smart person would n't reason like that .
A smart person knows his own limitations and compensates for them when necessary .
A smart person would say to himself , " You know , I do n't know anything about African royalty , so I should do some checking and inform myself before I deal with these people .
There might be some important piece of basic information I should have .
" A smart person would say , " I do n't know that much about business , so I should at least get my colleague from the business department to look over this proposal before I do anything .
" A smart person would say , " I do n't know that much about high finance and transferring millions of dollars overseas , so I should seek advice from someone who does , a banker maybe , before getting involved in such a venture .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Even smart people are often stupid outside their area of expertise.It is my considered opinion that people who only have one area of expertise aren't very smart, no matter how detailed their knowledge may be in that one area.Granted, everybody has weak subjects here and there.
But smart people *know* what their weak subjects are and don't risk much on being right about anything in those subjects.
I would never put any money into sports, for instance, because I just plain don't know that much about sports.
I wouldn't try to own or manage a sports team, or a stadium, or anything sports related.
I wouldn't bet money on the outcome of a sporting event.
I wouldn't invest money in sports-related merchandise (even *famous* sports-related merchandise like a Honus Wagner card, because how would I know if it even *resembles* the real thing, much less evaluate its actual authenticity?).
And I certainly wouldn't enter into a sports-related business transaction with someone I've never met who contacts me out of the blue.It takes an incredibly foolish man to reason from "I'm an expert on the appreciation of Serif fonts in Saxon table doilies in the year 1058" through "so obviously I'm smart" and arrive at "so even though I don't know anything about African royalty or high finance or business, I can trust my judgment about these people who have contacted me, whom I've never met, and go ahead and start a financial business relationship with them, without seeking any advice from an expert on the subject.
"A smart person wouldn't reason like that.
A smart person knows his own limitations and compensates for them when necessary.
A smart person would say to himself, "You know, I don't know anything about African royalty, so I should do some checking and inform myself before I deal with these people.
There might be some important piece of basic information I should have.
"  A smart person would say, "I don't know that much about business, so I should at least get my colleague from the business department to look over this proposal before I do anything.
"  A smart person would say, "I don't know that much about high finance and transferring millions of dollars overseas, so I should seek advice from someone who does, a banker maybe, before getting involved in such a venture.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843137</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1256238120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A fool and his money are soon parted.  The question is how they got together.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A fool and his money are soon parted .
The question is how they got together .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A fool and his money are soon parted.
The question is how they got together.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842437</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843215</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1256239200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You think that's bad, my cats got an e-mail from a nigerian scammer promising a cheeseburger, they mailed my credit card, social security card, passport, and library card to him.</p><p>(They were hoping the library card would get them pickles.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You think that 's bad , my cats got an e-mail from a nigerian scammer promising a cheeseburger , they mailed my credit card , social security card , passport , and library card to him .
( They were hoping the library card would get them pickles .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You think that's bad, my cats got an e-mail from a nigerian scammer promising a cheeseburger, they mailed my credit card, social security card, passport, and library card to him.
(They were hoping the library card would get them pickles.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842391</id>
	<title>Somebody mod me up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256225880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><b>Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither.</b></p><p>Did I do it right? Will I get more mod points if it's in bold?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither.Did I do it right ?
Will I get more mod points if it 's in bold ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither.Did I do it right?
Will I get more mod points if it's in bold?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29845139</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256307540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"and *bam* - there goes an hour of work."</p><p>From the sound of that, it doesn't seem hard to impress you at all.  Do you happen to watch the washing machine while it works?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/me nods.  Yes yes... tell me more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" and * bam * - there goes an hour of work .
" From the sound of that , it does n't seem hard to impress you at all .
Do you happen to watch the washing machine while it works ?
/me nods .
Yes yes... tell me more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"and *bam* - there goes an hour of work.
"From the sound of that, it doesn't seem hard to impress you at all.
Do you happen to watch the washing machine while it works?
/me nods.
Yes yes... tell me more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842477</id>
	<title>WHICH OF YOU SLAGS WANTS A LOAD OF HOT JIZZ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256226900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>blasted all up on your grill?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>blasted all up on your grill ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>blasted all up on your grill?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843995</id>
	<title>Re:I'm a nigerian prince</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1256296500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I already have <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/3e/Zimbabwe\_\%24100\_trillion\_2009\_Obverse.jpg" title="wikimedia.org">one hundred trillions</a> [wikimedia.org]. But thank you. Here's <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/33/Zimbabwe\_1c\_2006\_Obverse.gif" title="wikimedia.org">your tip</a> [wikimedia.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I already have one hundred trillions [ wikimedia.org ] .
But thank you .
Here 's your tip [ wikimedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I already have one hundred trillions [wikimedia.org].
But thank you.
Here's your tip [wikimedia.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844649</id>
	<title>Re:Finally! It's about time!</title>
	<author>Gravitron 5000</author>
	<datestamp>1256304180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Kudos to Microsoft for helping.  Heck, I would accept help from Satan himself, if it reduce the spam and online crime.</p></div><p>Dealing with Satan has a rather high cost.  Ask Faust all about it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kudos to Microsoft for helping .
Heck , I would accept help from Satan himself , if it reduce the spam and online crime.Dealing with Satan has a rather high cost .
Ask Faust all about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kudos to Microsoft for helping.
Heck, I would accept help from Satan himself, if it reduce the spam and online crime.Dealing with Satan has a rather high cost.
Ask Faust all about it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842335</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843477</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>rainierburger</author>
	<datestamp>1256330700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You make several good points, but the idea that we humans have more leisure time now than we did in our 'natural' state is bunk.  Food collection required significantly less time than your average 'civilized' citizen works today.  For example, studies of the hunter-gathering <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/\%C7\%83Kung\_people" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">!Kung tribe</a> [wikipedia.org] have shown that they have more leisure time than industrialized people.  Of course with this extra work we buy a significantly improved quality of life...</htmltext>
<tokenext>You make several good points , but the idea that we humans have more leisure time now than we did in our 'natural ' state is bunk .
Food collection required significantly less time than your average 'civilized ' citizen works today .
For example , studies of the hunter-gathering ! Kung tribe [ wikipedia.org ] have shown that they have more leisure time than industrialized people .
Of course with this extra work we buy a significantly improved quality of life.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You make several good points, but the idea that we humans have more leisure time now than we did in our 'natural' state is bunk.
Food collection required significantly less time than your average 'civilized' citizen works today.
For example, studies of the hunter-gathering !Kung tribe [wikipedia.org] have shown that they have more leisure time than industrialized people.
Of course with this extra work we buy a significantly improved quality of life...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842849</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842443</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256226600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Unfortunately, humans are quite stupid.</p></div><p>Compared to?  Cats?  An alien race you know of but the rest of us don't?  A cherrypicked group of humans?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , humans are quite stupid.Compared to ?
Cats ? An alien race you know of but the rest of us do n't ?
A cherrypicked group of humans ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, humans are quite stupid.Compared to?
Cats?  An alien race you know of but the rest of us don't?
A cherrypicked group of humans?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844077</id>
	<title>Re:In other words....</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1256297520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In fact they did care. As this is/was the third largest industry. And so is/was likely, to feed him and his children too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In fact they did care .
As this is/was the third largest industry .
And so is/was likely , to feed him and his children too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In fact they did care.
As this is/was the third largest industry.
And so is/was likely, to feed him and his children too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842381</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842369</id>
	<title>Noooo....</title>
	<author>u4ya</author>
	<datestamp>1256225640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some king just died and his cousin needed my help and promised to repay me half a million dollars for my bank account information, which I sent of course, because I'm not an idiot.

But just how the hell am I supposed to contact him now?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some king just died and his cousin needed my help and promised to repay me half a million dollars for my bank account information , which I sent of course , because I 'm not an idiot .
But just how the hell am I supposed to contact him now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some king just died and his cousin needed my help and promised to repay me half a million dollars for my bank account information, which I sent of course, because I'm not an idiot.
But just how the hell am I supposed to contact him now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842309</id>
	<title>I'm a nigerian prince</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256224980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would you like to help me transfer millions of nira to me? You will be well paid!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would you like to help me transfer millions of nira to me ?
You will be well paid !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would you like to help me transfer millions of nira to me?
You will be well paid!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29845111</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>ArsenneLupin</author>
	<datestamp>1256307360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A friend of mine had a cat (Billy) who became incontinent due to its age.<p>
He would still feel the urge, but if too far away from the litter box, he wouldn't quite make it in time...</p><p>
So, once he was upstairs near my friend's bedroom/home office, the litter box was downstairs, and then came that sudden urge. Billy knew full well that there'd be no way that he'd make it downstairs in time. So, quick thinking as he was, he picked the next best spot: a Micro$oft Word manual, carelessly lying on the floor...</p><p>
Smart cat!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A friend of mine had a cat ( Billy ) who became incontinent due to its age .
He would still feel the urge , but if too far away from the litter box , he would n't quite make it in time.. . So , once he was upstairs near my friend 's bedroom/home office , the litter box was downstairs , and then came that sudden urge .
Billy knew full well that there 'd be no way that he 'd make it downstairs in time .
So , quick thinking as he was , he picked the next best spot : a Micro $ oft Word manual , carelessly lying on the floor.. . Smart cat !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A friend of mine had a cat (Billy) who became incontinent due to its age.
He would still feel the urge, but if too far away from the litter box, he wouldn't quite make it in time...
So, once he was upstairs near my friend's bedroom/home office, the litter box was downstairs, and then came that sudden urge.
Billy knew full well that there'd be no way that he'd make it downstairs in time.
So, quick thinking as he was, he picked the next best spot: a Micro$oft Word manual, carelessly lying on the floor...
Smart cat!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843567</id>
	<title>Re:Ok....</title>
	<author>Suicyco</author>
	<datestamp>1256289300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They aren't stupid, they simply don't know any better. Most people barely understand the concept of things like "executable file" and "activex control" if at all. They just click away, because thats always worked for them in the past. Its not the user that is at fault for everything that happens, even they are the cause. You can't expect everybody to understand what a trojan is just because you do. Some of the malware is very clever, I recently cleaned a slew of corporate computers infected with tons of crap from some users clicking on what appeared to be legitimate security warnings  from windows. These popups can easily fool most people. I took care of it by installing good antivirus and antimalware but a lot of small businesses simply have no clue. They buy a computer, it comes with norton for 60 days, they plug away and don't think twice. Two years later they are infected to all hell and have no idea why. I don't fault them, what about Dell and the likes putting trialware of CRITICAL components onto these new systems? They should have bullet proof antivirus on the system for like, as part of the purchase price. The entire PC market is messed up in that regard. In the long run, it helps sales, because people will buy new computers once their old one becomes slow and worn out, like they are tires or something.</p><p>People aren't "stupid" just because they don't have your level of computer expertise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are n't stupid , they simply do n't know any better .
Most people barely understand the concept of things like " executable file " and " activex control " if at all .
They just click away , because thats always worked for them in the past .
Its not the user that is at fault for everything that happens , even they are the cause .
You ca n't expect everybody to understand what a trojan is just because you do .
Some of the malware is very clever , I recently cleaned a slew of corporate computers infected with tons of crap from some users clicking on what appeared to be legitimate security warnings from windows .
These popups can easily fool most people .
I took care of it by installing good antivirus and antimalware but a lot of small businesses simply have no clue .
They buy a computer , it comes with norton for 60 days , they plug away and do n't think twice .
Two years later they are infected to all hell and have no idea why .
I do n't fault them , what about Dell and the likes putting trialware of CRITICAL components onto these new systems ?
They should have bullet proof antivirus on the system for like , as part of the purchase price .
The entire PC market is messed up in that regard .
In the long run , it helps sales , because people will buy new computers once their old one becomes slow and worn out , like they are tires or something.People are n't " stupid " just because they do n't have your level of computer expertise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They aren't stupid, they simply don't know any better.
Most people barely understand the concept of things like "executable file" and "activex control" if at all.
They just click away, because thats always worked for them in the past.
Its not the user that is at fault for everything that happens, even they are the cause.
You can't expect everybody to understand what a trojan is just because you do.
Some of the malware is very clever, I recently cleaned a slew of corporate computers infected with tons of crap from some users clicking on what appeared to be legitimate security warnings  from windows.
These popups can easily fool most people.
I took care of it by installing good antivirus and antimalware but a lot of small businesses simply have no clue.
They buy a computer, it comes with norton for 60 days, they plug away and don't think twice.
Two years later they are infected to all hell and have no idea why.
I don't fault them, what about Dell and the likes putting trialware of CRITICAL components onto these new systems?
They should have bullet proof antivirus on the system for like, as part of the purchase price.
The entire PC market is messed up in that regard.
In the long run, it helps sales, because people will buy new computers once their old one becomes slow and worn out, like they are tires or something.People aren't "stupid" just because they don't have your level of computer expertise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842401</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842485</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>countertrolling</author>
	<datestamp>1256227020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You seem to forget the role greed plays here. It, like ideology, usually trumps intellect and facts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You seem to forget the role greed plays here .
It , like ideology , usually trumps intellect and facts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You seem to forget the role greed plays here.
It, like ideology, usually trumps intellect and facts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842335</id>
	<title>Finally!  It's about time!</title>
	<author>ad454</author>
	<datestamp>1256225280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally!  It's about time that international police and anti-crime resources put the same effort in stopping online cross border crime that they do for offline!</p><p>Kudos to Microsoft for helping.  Heck, I would accept help from Satan himself, if it reduce the spam and online crime.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally !
It 's about time that international police and anti-crime resources put the same effort in stopping online cross border crime that they do for offline ! Kudos to Microsoft for helping .
Heck , I would accept help from Satan himself , if it reduce the spam and online crime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally!
It's about time that international police and anti-crime resources put the same effort in stopping online cross border crime that they do for offline!Kudos to Microsoft for helping.
Heck, I would accept help from Satan himself, if it reduce the spam and online crime.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842749</id>
	<title>Re:Ok....</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1256231040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In that case<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. should run a 401 scam email drive to soak up any stupidity money before it goes to waste to real crooks. There shouldn't be a problem- we'll be doing them a service by putting their money to good use stimulating the economy where otherwise it would go down the drain.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In that case / .
should run a 401 scam email drive to soak up any stupidity money before it goes to waste to real crooks .
There should n't be a problem- we 'll be doing them a service by putting their money to good use stimulating the economy where otherwise it would go down the drain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In that case /.
should run a 401 scam email drive to soak up any stupidity money before it goes to waste to real crooks.
There shouldn't be a problem- we'll be doing them a service by putting their money to good use stimulating the economy where otherwise it would go down the drain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842401</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843083</id>
	<title>Re:I'm a nigerian prince</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256237040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wherever there are <a href="http://forum.419eater.com/forum/album\_showpage.php?pic\_id=188" title="419eater.com" rel="nofollow">niggers</a> [419eater.com], there is crime.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wherever there are niggers [ 419eater.com ] , there is crime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wherever there are niggers [419eater.com], there is crime.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843377</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256329080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>He might fit in here at Slashdot<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</i><br>Meow</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He might fit in here at Slashdot ; ) Meow</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He might fit in here at Slashdot ;)Meow</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843131</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>abarrieris5eV</author>
	<datestamp>1256237940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ok, so how are we supposed to do that? In 2009 we still have finite supplies of everything, if I want a ham sandwich I can't magically produce ham by speaking "create ham", it isn't even digital where if you have one piece of ham you can make almost infinite copies without damaging the original ham or using any other parts.</p></div><p>Did you try "sudo create ham"?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , so how are we supposed to do that ?
In 2009 we still have finite supplies of everything , if I want a ham sandwich I ca n't magically produce ham by speaking " create ham " , it is n't even digital where if you have one piece of ham you can make almost infinite copies without damaging the original ham or using any other parts.Did you try " sudo create ham " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, so how are we supposed to do that?
In 2009 we still have finite supplies of everything, if I want a ham sandwich I can't magically produce ham by speaking "create ham", it isn't even digital where if you have one piece of ham you can make almost infinite copies without damaging the original ham or using any other parts.Did you try "sudo create ham"?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842849</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29845815</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>kalirion</author>
	<datestamp>1256311560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The only time people are exploited in cases like this, is when GREED overcomes LOGIC and REASON</i></p><p>Why couldn't a GREEDY individual use LOGIC and REASON to get what he or she wants?  Or are you saying that all greedy people are raving lunatics?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only time people are exploited in cases like this , is when GREED overcomes LOGIC and REASONWhy could n't a GREEDY individual use LOGIC and REASON to get what he or she wants ?
Or are you saying that all greedy people are raving lunatics ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only time people are exploited in cases like this, is when GREED overcomes LOGIC and REASONWhy couldn't a GREEDY individual use LOGIC and REASON to get what he or she wants?
Or are you saying that all greedy people are raving lunatics?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842935</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842881</id>
	<title>Re:Love those letters</title>
	<author>Nyder</author>
	<datestamp>1256233440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I rather enjoy getting those letters.  The last one I replied that I was extremely interested but that I had recently had a dispute with my Internet Service Provider and my access to email would be shut down soon.  I would be more than willing to help them if they could send $98.43 to Time Warner Cable referencing account number ################.</p><p>There are other variations.  Such as I can help them get the money out of the country but I need more money to pay my lawyer to settle some estate disputes.  Buy me a ticket to Nigeria and I will come there personally.  My rich family members think this is a joke and I have been cut off from the family money but I can show them if I can just get to Nigeria and show them that this is real.</p><p>My record so far is stringing these guys along for 2 weeks.  They finally give up frustrated.  I actually had one of them write me back asking to be left alone and stop sending him emails.</p></div><p>screenshots or it didn't happen.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I rather enjoy getting those letters .
The last one I replied that I was extremely interested but that I had recently had a dispute with my Internet Service Provider and my access to email would be shut down soon .
I would be more than willing to help them if they could send $ 98.43 to Time Warner Cable referencing account number # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # .There are other variations .
Such as I can help them get the money out of the country but I need more money to pay my lawyer to settle some estate disputes .
Buy me a ticket to Nigeria and I will come there personally .
My rich family members think this is a joke and I have been cut off from the family money but I can show them if I can just get to Nigeria and show them that this is real.My record so far is stringing these guys along for 2 weeks .
They finally give up frustrated .
I actually had one of them write me back asking to be left alone and stop sending him emails.screenshots or it did n't happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I rather enjoy getting those letters.
The last one I replied that I was extremely interested but that I had recently had a dispute with my Internet Service Provider and my access to email would be shut down soon.
I would be more than willing to help them if they could send $98.43 to Time Warner Cable referencing account number ################.There are other variations.
Such as I can help them get the money out of the country but I need more money to pay my lawyer to settle some estate disputes.
Buy me a ticket to Nigeria and I will come there personally.
My rich family members think this is a joke and I have been cut off from the family money but I can show them if I can just get to Nigeria and show them that this is real.My record so far is stringing these guys along for 2 weeks.
They finally give up frustrated.
I actually had one of them write me back asking to be left alone and stop sending him emails.screenshots or it didn't happen.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842353</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29845183</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>jonadab</author>
	<datestamp>1256307900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; As long as our cultures pit our people against each other in<br>&gt; competition for money, people will be 'unethical' and exploit each other.<br><br>"Lie to a liar, for lies are his trade.  Steal from a thief, for that is easy.  Beware an honest man." -- Mat Kerbouchard in \_The Walking Drum\_<br><br>It's hard to scam an honest man out of his money, because the usual hooks (personality traits that a scammer uses to manipulate people) are missing.  (Exception:  a senile person can be scammed out of money even if he's honest, by exploiting his senility.  What, you don't remember the deal we made to fix your roof?  You owe me sixteen thousand dollars, you old coot, cough it up.  But that's a different kind of scam.)<br><br>You send a 419 pitch to an honest man, for instance, and all kinds of ethical alarm bells go off.  Is this legal?  Why is this man so eager to transfer money out of his country secretly?  Is he a criminal?  If it's stolen money, it would be wrong for me to help him.  Should I even talk to him?  Maybe I should check with the police and see what they say.  If he's stolen that much money, I should definitely talk to the police.  On the other hand, if he's for real, wouldn't it be unethical for me to exploit his desperation for personal gain?  Even if I help him, I shouldn't accept any money for it or, at least, not more than is warranted for the actual assistance I provide.<br><br>Worse (for the scammer), honest people don't feel any need to keep things secret.  If I'm not looking to get rich, the motivation to act alone and be the only one in on the deal is gone, or more likely never existed in the first place.  Thus, I can freely talk to my friends about it, and the police, and maybe I should even get the local newspaper and radio station involved:  if this man's terrible plight is real, people should hear about it...  and if he's a criminal, the police in his country need to know what he's doing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; As long as our cultures pit our people against each other in &gt; competition for money , people will be 'unethical ' and exploit each other .
" Lie to a liar , for lies are his trade .
Steal from a thief , for that is easy .
Beware an honest man .
" -- Mat Kerbouchard in \ _The Walking Drum \ _It 's hard to scam an honest man out of his money , because the usual hooks ( personality traits that a scammer uses to manipulate people ) are missing .
( Exception : a senile person can be scammed out of money even if he 's honest , by exploiting his senility .
What , you do n't remember the deal we made to fix your roof ?
You owe me sixteen thousand dollars , you old coot , cough it up .
But that 's a different kind of scam .
) You send a 419 pitch to an honest man , for instance , and all kinds of ethical alarm bells go off .
Is this legal ?
Why is this man so eager to transfer money out of his country secretly ?
Is he a criminal ?
If it 's stolen money , it would be wrong for me to help him .
Should I even talk to him ?
Maybe I should check with the police and see what they say .
If he 's stolen that much money , I should definitely talk to the police .
On the other hand , if he 's for real , would n't it be unethical for me to exploit his desperation for personal gain ?
Even if I help him , I should n't accept any money for it or , at least , not more than is warranted for the actual assistance I provide.Worse ( for the scammer ) , honest people do n't feel any need to keep things secret .
If I 'm not looking to get rich , the motivation to act alone and be the only one in on the deal is gone , or more likely never existed in the first place .
Thus , I can freely talk to my friends about it , and the police , and maybe I should even get the local newspaper and radio station involved : if this man 's terrible plight is real , people should hear about it... and if he 's a criminal , the police in his country need to know what he 's doing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; As long as our cultures pit our people against each other in&gt; competition for money, people will be 'unethical' and exploit each other.
"Lie to a liar, for lies are his trade.
Steal from a thief, for that is easy.
Beware an honest man.
" -- Mat Kerbouchard in \_The Walking Drum\_It's hard to scam an honest man out of his money, because the usual hooks (personality traits that a scammer uses to manipulate people) are missing.
(Exception:  a senile person can be scammed out of money even if he's honest, by exploiting his senility.
What, you don't remember the deal we made to fix your roof?
You owe me sixteen thousand dollars, you old coot, cough it up.
But that's a different kind of scam.
)You send a 419 pitch to an honest man, for instance, and all kinds of ethical alarm bells go off.
Is this legal?
Why is this man so eager to transfer money out of his country secretly?
Is he a criminal?
If it's stolen money, it would be wrong for me to help him.
Should I even talk to him?
Maybe I should check with the police and see what they say.
If he's stolen that much money, I should definitely talk to the police.
On the other hand, if he's for real, wouldn't it be unethical for me to exploit his desperation for personal gain?
Even if I help him, I shouldn't accept any money for it or, at least, not more than is warranted for the actual assistance I provide.Worse (for the scammer), honest people don't feel any need to keep things secret.
If I'm not looking to get rich, the motivation to act alone and be the only one in on the deal is gone, or more likely never existed in the first place.
Thus, I can freely talk to my friends about it, and the police, and maybe I should even get the local newspaper and radio station involved:  if this man's terrible plight is real, people should hear about it...  and if he's a criminal, the police in his country need to know what he's doing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842545</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842849</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1256232840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> I suggest we look to the roots and foundations of 'evil' and how we can circumvent its expressions in life; most cases indicate that 'money' should be destroyed and new cultures and ways of existence need arise.</p> </div><p>

Ok, so how are we supposed to do that? In 2009 we still have finite supplies of everything, if I want a ham sandwich I can't magically produce ham by speaking "create ham", it isn't even digital where if you have one piece of ham you can make almost infinite copies without damaging the original ham or using any other parts.</p><p><div class="quote"><p> You know it is your culture that taught you to be jealous of polygamy.</p> </div><p>

Um, I don't see how I'm "jealous" of polygamy, its hard enough work keeping one woman happy, let alone three or four.</p><p><div class="quote"><p> It is your culture that taught you to put common man at opposition.</p> </div><p>

What are you on? In case you haven't looked at the natural world (as I'm assuming you are basically saying you think humans are nothing more than evolved animals) every animal wants to dominate all the other animals. We as humans at least can do it civilly without much bloodshed and still maintain a society where just about everyone can live without fear of hunger or their safety. Sure, we can't all afford 50 inch plasmas, a Ferrari and 5 Core i7 boxes, but in general most everyone in at least a semi-free society will know they are going to be able to eat tomorrow.</p><p><div class="quote"><p> It is your culture that prioritizes the individual over community.</p> </div><p>

Yeah, and look at how well the cultures that prioritized the community over the individual. You know governments such as fascism like Nazi Germany where they felt they needed to kill a few "individual" Jews for the sake of the "community" and don't even try bringing in "modern science" because that is what they manipulated to get the German public to at least tolerate it.  Other governments such as communism that end up being corrupt to the core, breed dictators like Joesph Stalin, people who don't care if their people starve like Kim Jung-Il, Which country would you rather live in? North Korea where the "community" comes first, or in the US which is "individualistic" where I can be pretty sure I'll have food to eat tomorrow, the day after that and the day after that and I can be confident I can have medical treatment whenever I need it (even if I might have to pay for it later), and I can at least have a few freedoms (though they are being taken away day after day by the government).</p><p><div class="quote"><p> Very little in what is wrong with humans can be attributed to nature: nurture is where we go wrong.</p> </div><p>

Are you just a troll or have you not seen nature? In nature life is brutal, short and in general not much fun. While we have leisure time to think, to ponder and to have fun, in nature you always have to be perpetually looking out against predators, gathering food, and making sure that the members of your own species don't decide to kill you. If you have a sickness no one cares, you just die in pain. You mean to say that the "natural" way of doing things is "better" because we don't have this "evil"? I'd prefer to be sent these spam e-mails than to spend every day fighting to survive.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suggest we look to the roots and foundations of 'evil ' and how we can circumvent its expressions in life ; most cases indicate that 'money ' should be destroyed and new cultures and ways of existence need arise .
Ok , so how are we supposed to do that ?
In 2009 we still have finite supplies of everything , if I want a ham sandwich I ca n't magically produce ham by speaking " create ham " , it is n't even digital where if you have one piece of ham you can make almost infinite copies without damaging the original ham or using any other parts .
You know it is your culture that taught you to be jealous of polygamy .
Um , I do n't see how I 'm " jealous " of polygamy , its hard enough work keeping one woman happy , let alone three or four .
It is your culture that taught you to put common man at opposition .
What are you on ?
In case you have n't looked at the natural world ( as I 'm assuming you are basically saying you think humans are nothing more than evolved animals ) every animal wants to dominate all the other animals .
We as humans at least can do it civilly without much bloodshed and still maintain a society where just about everyone can live without fear of hunger or their safety .
Sure , we ca n't all afford 50 inch plasmas , a Ferrari and 5 Core i7 boxes , but in general most everyone in at least a semi-free society will know they are going to be able to eat tomorrow .
It is your culture that prioritizes the individual over community .
Yeah , and look at how well the cultures that prioritized the community over the individual .
You know governments such as fascism like Nazi Germany where they felt they needed to kill a few " individual " Jews for the sake of the " community " and do n't even try bringing in " modern science " because that is what they manipulated to get the German public to at least tolerate it .
Other governments such as communism that end up being corrupt to the core , breed dictators like Joesph Stalin , people who do n't care if their people starve like Kim Jung-Il , Which country would you rather live in ?
North Korea where the " community " comes first , or in the US which is " individualistic " where I can be pretty sure I 'll have food to eat tomorrow , the day after that and the day after that and I can be confident I can have medical treatment whenever I need it ( even if I might have to pay for it later ) , and I can at least have a few freedoms ( though they are being taken away day after day by the government ) .
Very little in what is wrong with humans can be attributed to nature : nurture is where we go wrong .
Are you just a troll or have you not seen nature ?
In nature life is brutal , short and in general not much fun .
While we have leisure time to think , to ponder and to have fun , in nature you always have to be perpetually looking out against predators , gathering food , and making sure that the members of your own species do n't decide to kill you .
If you have a sickness no one cares , you just die in pain .
You mean to say that the " natural " way of doing things is " better " because we do n't have this " evil " ?
I 'd prefer to be sent these spam e-mails than to spend every day fighting to survive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I suggest we look to the roots and foundations of 'evil' and how we can circumvent its expressions in life; most cases indicate that 'money' should be destroyed and new cultures and ways of existence need arise.
Ok, so how are we supposed to do that?
In 2009 we still have finite supplies of everything, if I want a ham sandwich I can't magically produce ham by speaking "create ham", it isn't even digital where if you have one piece of ham you can make almost infinite copies without damaging the original ham or using any other parts.
You know it is your culture that taught you to be jealous of polygamy.
Um, I don't see how I'm "jealous" of polygamy, its hard enough work keeping one woman happy, let alone three or four.
It is your culture that taught you to put common man at opposition.
What are you on?
In case you haven't looked at the natural world (as I'm assuming you are basically saying you think humans are nothing more than evolved animals) every animal wants to dominate all the other animals.
We as humans at least can do it civilly without much bloodshed and still maintain a society where just about everyone can live without fear of hunger or their safety.
Sure, we can't all afford 50 inch plasmas, a Ferrari and 5 Core i7 boxes, but in general most everyone in at least a semi-free society will know they are going to be able to eat tomorrow.
It is your culture that prioritizes the individual over community.
Yeah, and look at how well the cultures that prioritized the community over the individual.
You know governments such as fascism like Nazi Germany where they felt they needed to kill a few "individual" Jews for the sake of the "community" and don't even try bringing in "modern science" because that is what they manipulated to get the German public to at least tolerate it.
Other governments such as communism that end up being corrupt to the core, breed dictators like Joesph Stalin, people who don't care if their people starve like Kim Jung-Il, Which country would you rather live in?
North Korea where the "community" comes first, or in the US which is "individualistic" where I can be pretty sure I'll have food to eat tomorrow, the day after that and the day after that and I can be confident I can have medical treatment whenever I need it (even if I might have to pay for it later), and I can at least have a few freedoms (though they are being taken away day after day by the government).
Very little in what is wrong with humans can be attributed to nature: nurture is where we go wrong.
Are you just a troll or have you not seen nature?
In nature life is brutal, short and in general not much fun.
While we have leisure time to think, to ponder and to have fun, in nature you always have to be perpetually looking out against predators, gathering food, and making sure that the members of your own species don't decide to kill you.
If you have a sickness no one cares, you just die in pain.
You mean to say that the "natural" way of doing things is "better" because we don't have this "evil"?
I'd prefer to be sent these spam e-mails than to spend every day fighting to survive.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842545</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844865</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>paragon1</author>
	<datestamp>1256305680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>He seemed to think that without that pesky English paper on my screen, I'd have more time to pay attention to him.  He got a lot more attention than he bargained for that day...</p></div><p>Did you happen to name the cat Schr&#246;dinger?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He seemed to think that without that pesky English paper on my screen , I 'd have more time to pay attention to him .
He got a lot more attention than he bargained for that day...Did you happen to name the cat Schr   dinger ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He seemed to think that without that pesky English paper on my screen, I'd have more time to pay attention to him.
He got a lot more attention than he bargained for that day...Did you happen to name the cat Schrödinger?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842333</id>
	<title>But but but!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256225220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I didn't get my money from the Prince yet!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't get my money from the Prince yet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't get my money from the Prince yet!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843333</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>Jeff DeMaagd</author>
	<datestamp>1256241420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not even necessarily outside their expertise, I thought I read somewhere that people in the finance industry fell for the Nigerian scams at a disproportionate level, or at least, a lot more than you'd think.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not even necessarily outside their expertise , I thought I read somewhere that people in the finance industry fell for the Nigerian scams at a disproportionate level , or at least , a lot more than you 'd think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not even necessarily outside their expertise, I thought I read somewhere that people in the finance industry fell for the Nigerian scams at a disproportionate level, or at least, a lot more than you'd think.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29847807</id>
	<title>Are ANY Nigerians in US prisons for fraud?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256321280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is an international criminal conspiracy that has stolen millions of dollars from citizens of foreign country through fraud, deliberately and repeatedly.<br>If the persons responsible are not arrested and prosecuted in their home country by the local authorities, after repeated requests from the victimized country, then an act of war has been committed.<br>
&nbsp; What we have basically is about 50-100 high-level con artists paying off the local fraud squad to look the other way in a corrupt backward third-world country that has a lot of oil and far far too many people.  The Americans should threaten to block financial transfers to the Nigerian 'government' and block internet access (if possible) until all of the stolen money is returned.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is an international criminal conspiracy that has stolen millions of dollars from citizens of foreign country through fraud , deliberately and repeatedly.If the persons responsible are not arrested and prosecuted in their home country by the local authorities , after repeated requests from the victimized country , then an act of war has been committed .
  What we have basically is about 50-100 high-level con artists paying off the local fraud squad to look the other way in a corrupt backward third-world country that has a lot of oil and far far too many people .
The Americans should threaten to block financial transfers to the Nigerian 'government ' and block internet access ( if possible ) until all of the stolen money is returned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is an international criminal conspiracy that has stolen millions of dollars from citizens of foreign country through fraud, deliberately and repeatedly.If the persons responsible are not arrested and prosecuted in their home country by the local authorities, after repeated requests from the victimized country, then an act of war has been committed.
  What we have basically is about 50-100 high-level con artists paying off the local fraud squad to look the other way in a corrupt backward third-world country that has a lot of oil and far far too many people.
The Americans should threaten to block financial transfers to the Nigerian 'government' and block internet access (if possible) until all of the stolen money is returned.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842437</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256226540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course scams won't go away.  But even if we accept that, should we just allow scams to continue unchecked?  At least arresting scammers helps raise the "price" of the operation...</p><p>Also, for what it's worth, being scammed isn't about stupidity.  The (Ponzi) scams that have been in the news tricked people whose sole area of expertise was investing, and they did it quite well (they had the millions to put in to these after all).  Granted, dumb/ignorant people are easier targets, but they also don't generally yield as much per person (see pervious).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course scams wo n't go away .
But even if we accept that , should we just allow scams to continue unchecked ?
At least arresting scammers helps raise the " price " of the operation...Also , for what it 's worth , being scammed is n't about stupidity .
The ( Ponzi ) scams that have been in the news tricked people whose sole area of expertise was investing , and they did it quite well ( they had the millions to put in to these after all ) .
Granted , dumb/ignorant people are easier targets , but they also do n't generally yield as much per person ( see pervious ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course scams won't go away.
But even if we accept that, should we just allow scams to continue unchecked?
At least arresting scammers helps raise the "price" of the operation...Also, for what it's worth, being scammed isn't about stupidity.
The (Ponzi) scams that have been in the news tricked people whose sole area of expertise was investing, and they did it quite well (they had the millions to put in to these after all).
Granted, dumb/ignorant people are easier targets, but they also don't generally yield as much per person (see pervious).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842861</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>Joren</author>
	<datestamp>1256233080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Unfortunately, humans are quite stupid.</p></div><p>Compared to?  Cats?  An alien race you know of but the rest of us don't?  A cherrypicked group of humans?</p></div><p>Just <i>try</i> getting between a cat and a plate of tuna.  They are fiendishly inventive... I have a cat that, while not necessarily <i>socially</i> intelligent, was quite clever at solving problems.  He might fit in here at Slashdot<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)  - One day when I was in my last year of high school, the cat, while wondering why in the world he was not getting petted and catered to, decided it was time to take matters into his own paws.  Having carefully observed me using the computer over a long period of time, he figured out how to reset my computer - never mind the fact that the front panel had been completely removed and the reset "switch" consisted of a button deeply recessed into a 7mm opening in the grating, of which there were dozens to choose from.  He had to stick his claw in that specific hole, and *bam* - there goes an hour of work.  He seemed to think that without that pesky English paper on my screen, I'd have more time to pay attention to him.  He got a lot more attention than he bargained for that day...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , humans are quite stupid.Compared to ?
Cats ? An alien race you know of but the rest of us do n't ?
A cherrypicked group of humans ? Just try getting between a cat and a plate of tuna .
They are fiendishly inventive... I have a cat that , while not necessarily socially intelligent , was quite clever at solving problems .
He might fit in here at Slashdot ; ) - One day when I was in my last year of high school , the cat , while wondering why in the world he was not getting petted and catered to , decided it was time to take matters into his own paws .
Having carefully observed me using the computer over a long period of time , he figured out how to reset my computer - never mind the fact that the front panel had been completely removed and the reset " switch " consisted of a button deeply recessed into a 7mm opening in the grating , of which there were dozens to choose from .
He had to stick his claw in that specific hole , and * bam * - there goes an hour of work .
He seemed to think that without that pesky English paper on my screen , I 'd have more time to pay attention to him .
He got a lot more attention than he bargained for that day.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, humans are quite stupid.Compared to?
Cats?  An alien race you know of but the rest of us don't?
A cherrypicked group of humans?Just try getting between a cat and a plate of tuna.
They are fiendishly inventive... I have a cat that, while not necessarily socially intelligent, was quite clever at solving problems.
He might fit in here at Slashdot ;)  - One day when I was in my last year of high school, the cat, while wondering why in the world he was not getting petted and catered to, decided it was time to take matters into his own paws.
Having carefully observed me using the computer over a long period of time, he figured out how to reset my computer - never mind the fact that the front panel had been completely removed and the reset "switch" consisted of a button deeply recessed into a 7mm opening in the grating, of which there were dozens to choose from.
He had to stick his claw in that specific hole, and *bam* - there goes an hour of work.
He seemed to think that without that pesky English paper on my screen, I'd have more time to pay attention to him.
He got a lot more attention than he bargained for that day...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842443</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844743</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>metrix007</author>
	<datestamp>1256304900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or.....</p><p>It was a coincidence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or.....It was a coincidence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or.....It was a coincidence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29847541</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>thePowerOfGrayskull</author>
	<datestamp>1256320260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Unfortunately, humans are quite stupid.</p></div><p>Compared to?  Cats?  An alien race you know of but the rest of us don't?  A cherrypicked group of humans?</p></div><p>Well, will a dog or cat bring you its food in order that it might get a larger quantity of food? After getting no return at all, time and time again?
</p><p>
In terms of "doing needlessly stupid things", my untrained eye tells me that humans take the cake.  Other species are concerned with survival, and tend to behave accordingly. They might make a stupid mistake - and if they live through it, they'll almost assuredly not repeat it.
p.
 This is the down-side of having advanced cognitive skills -- we can think our way into trouble as well as out of it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , humans are quite stupid.Compared to ?
Cats ? An alien race you know of but the rest of us do n't ?
A cherrypicked group of humans ? Well , will a dog or cat bring you its food in order that it might get a larger quantity of food ?
After getting no return at all , time and time again ?
In terms of " doing needlessly stupid things " , my untrained eye tells me that humans take the cake .
Other species are concerned with survival , and tend to behave accordingly .
They might make a stupid mistake - and if they live through it , they 'll almost assuredly not repeat it .
p . This is the down-side of having advanced cognitive skills -- we can think our way into trouble as well as out of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately, humans are quite stupid.Compared to?
Cats?  An alien race you know of but the rest of us don't?
A cherrypicked group of humans?Well, will a dog or cat bring you its food in order that it might get a larger quantity of food?
After getting no return at all, time and time again?
In terms of "doing needlessly stupid things", my untrained eye tells me that humans take the cake.
Other species are concerned with survival, and tend to behave accordingly.
They might make a stupid mistake - and if they live through it, they'll almost assuredly not repeat it.
p.
 This is the down-side of having advanced cognitive skills -- we can think our way into trouble as well as out of it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842443</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844305</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256300700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The reason these scams, and any scams for that matter, work is that you can convince people of anything if they *want to believe*.</p><p>All of us are probably guilty at one time or another of thinking the unreasonable might have a chance....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason these scams , and any scams for that matter , work is that you can convince people of anything if they * want to believe * .All of us are probably guilty at one time or another of thinking the unreasonable might have a chance... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason these scams, and any scams for that matter, work is that you can convince people of anything if they *want to believe*.All of us are probably guilty at one time or another of thinking the unreasonable might have a chance....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842553</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256228040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's been said already but it's not just stupidity but greed combined with stupidity. I think both deserve a little punishment now and again. I feel worse for the people who get scammed 40 bucks for rogue antivirus, they just lack computer-savvy, as opposed to being part of a pretend bankrobbing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's been said already but it 's not just stupidity but greed combined with stupidity .
I think both deserve a little punishment now and again .
I feel worse for the people who get scammed 40 bucks for rogue antivirus , they just lack computer-savvy , as opposed to being part of a pretend bankrobbing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's been said already but it's not just stupidity but greed combined with stupidity.
I think both deserve a little punishment now and again.
I feel worse for the people who get scammed 40 bucks for rogue antivirus, they just lack computer-savvy, as opposed to being part of a pretend bankrobbing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842341</id>
	<title>What are the odds?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256225340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So what are the odds the "smart technology software capable of detecting fraudulent emails" is just spamassassin ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what are the odds the " smart technology software capable of detecting fraudulent emails " is just spamassassin ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what are the odds the "smart technology software capable of detecting fraudulent emails" is just spamassassin ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842769</id>
	<title>Re:Love those letters</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256231280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So in other words, they now have your name, the name of your ISP, and your account number with that ISP. A little social engineering (and these guys have had the practice at that), and I wonder what other details about you they could glean...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So in other words , they now have your name , the name of your ISP , and your account number with that ISP .
A little social engineering ( and these guys have had the practice at that ) , and I wonder what other details about you they could glean.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So in other words, they now have your name, the name of your ISP, and your account number with that ISP.
A little social engineering (and these guys have had the practice at that), and I wonder what other details about you they could glean...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842353</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842381</id>
	<title>In other words....</title>
	<author>Rod Beauvex</author>
	<datestamp>1256225700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>In an effort to make their products look good, Microsoft paid off a bunch of Nigerian police who have known about these people for years and didn't really care.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In an effort to make their products look good , Microsoft paid off a bunch of Nigerian police who have known about these people for years and did n't really care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In an effort to make their products look good, Microsoft paid off a bunch of Nigerian police who have known about these people for years and didn't really care.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842331</id>
	<title>smart technology software...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256225220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>using the same smart technology software they used to track the rewards for all those Microsoft Giveways email forwards...<br>http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/nothing/microsoft-aol.asp</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>using the same smart technology software they used to track the rewards for all those Microsoft Giveways email forwards...http : //www.snopes.com/inboxer/nothing/microsoft-aol.asp</tokentext>
<sentencetext>using the same smart technology software they used to track the rewards for all those Microsoft Giveways email forwards...http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/nothing/microsoft-aol.asp</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843231</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1256239500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's just see how stupid you are shall we?</p><p><i>I have a cat</i></p><p>That's strike one.</p><p><i>Having carefully observed me using the computer over a long period of time, he figured out how to reset my computer</i></p><p>Very doubtful. I think you're anthropomorphising - strike two.</p><p><i>He had to stick his claw in that specific hole, and *bam* - there goes an hour of work</i></p><p>Went an hour without saving work. Strike three.....you're outta here!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's just see how stupid you are shall we ? I have a catThat 's strike one.Having carefully observed me using the computer over a long period of time , he figured out how to reset my computerVery doubtful .
I think you 're anthropomorphising - strike two.He had to stick his claw in that specific hole , and * bam * - there goes an hour of workWent an hour without saving work .
Strike three.....you 're outta here !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's just see how stupid you are shall we?I have a catThat's strike one.Having carefully observed me using the computer over a long period of time, he figured out how to reset my computerVery doubtful.
I think you're anthropomorphising - strike two.He had to stick his claw in that specific hole, and *bam* - there goes an hour of workWent an hour without saving work.
Strike three.....you're outta here!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842935</id>
	<title>Re:This isn't going to help</title>
	<author>Archangel Michael</author>
	<datestamp>1256234220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Money is not good, nor evil. Money is just a tool to exchange goods and services. Goods are limited, and so are your services. Money is the only tool we have to express value in something. If everything has the same value, then it is worthless.</p><p>The only time people are exploited in cases like this, is when GREED overcomes LOGIC and REASON, i.e. MONEY FOR NOTHING (and chicks for free).</p><p>People who are scammed like this deserve it. It is a cost of stupidity. Stupid should hurt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Money is not good , nor evil .
Money is just a tool to exchange goods and services .
Goods are limited , and so are your services .
Money is the only tool we have to express value in something .
If everything has the same value , then it is worthless.The only time people are exploited in cases like this , is when GREED overcomes LOGIC and REASON , i.e .
MONEY FOR NOTHING ( and chicks for free ) .People who are scammed like this deserve it .
It is a cost of stupidity .
Stupid should hurt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Money is not good, nor evil.
Money is just a tool to exchange goods and services.
Goods are limited, and so are your services.
Money is the only tool we have to express value in something.
If everything has the same value, then it is worthless.The only time people are exploited in cases like this, is when GREED overcomes LOGIC and REASON, i.e.
MONEY FOR NOTHING (and chicks for free).People who are scammed like this deserve it.
It is a cost of stupidity.
Stupid should hurt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842545</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843215
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29851089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842935
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842545
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29849225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842335
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842749
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842401
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842477
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842335
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842855
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29845957
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842309
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29847541
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844035
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842335
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29847807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842309
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843083
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842309
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29846279
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842849
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842545
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843231
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843223
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842497
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842497
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842485
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844743
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842401
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844751
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844305
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842309
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843137
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842437
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842739
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29845111
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29845183
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842545
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29845815
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842935
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842545
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842309
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29879003
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842935
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842545
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29854769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842849
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842545
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842743
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842341
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29851647
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842849
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842545
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843377
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843777
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842335
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843087
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842309
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842381
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843653
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842553
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29845729
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29845139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842991
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_23_009244_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843477
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842849
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842545
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_009244.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842315
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_009244.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842401
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843567
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842749
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_009244.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842339
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842485
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844305
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842477
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842443
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842855
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842739
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842861
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29845729
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843653
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843377
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29845139
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844865
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29845111
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843215
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843231
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844743
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29847541
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842545
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842935
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29845815
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29879003
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29851089
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29845183
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842849
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843131
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29854769
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29851647
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29846279
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843477
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844751
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843333
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842497
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843223
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843707
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842437
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843137
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842553
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842737
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842991
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_009244.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842353
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842819
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844061
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842769
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842881
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_009244.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842335
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843777
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29849225
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844035
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_009244.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842309
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843083
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29845957
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29847807
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843087
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843019
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29843995
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_009244.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842381
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29844077
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_23_009244.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842341
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_23_009244.29842743
</commentlist>
</conversation>
