<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_21_2235200</id>
	<title>Light Helps Injured Mice Walk Again</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1256132580000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Mantrid42 writes <i>"Researchers have been able to <a href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2009/10/mf\_optigenetics/all/1">affect the brains of lab mice using light</a>. Working in a new field called Optogenetics (optical stimulation plus genetic engineering), scientists injected lab mice with genes that can stimulate or inhibit neural activity based on the color of the light they're exposed to, and can be targeted to infect only on certain cell types. Additionally, another gene has been added to make neurons glow green when firing, allowing two-way communication between a brain and a machine."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mantrid42 writes " Researchers have been able to affect the brains of lab mice using light .
Working in a new field called Optogenetics ( optical stimulation plus genetic engineering ) , scientists injected lab mice with genes that can stimulate or inhibit neural activity based on the color of the light they 're exposed to , and can be targeted to infect only on certain cell types .
Additionally , another gene has been added to make neurons glow green when firing , allowing two-way communication between a brain and a machine .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mantrid42 writes "Researchers have been able to affect the brains of lab mice using light.
Working in a new field called Optogenetics (optical stimulation plus genetic engineering), scientists injected lab mice with genes that can stimulate or inhibit neural activity based on the color of the light they're exposed to, and can be targeted to infect only on certain cell types.
Additionally, another gene has been added to make neurons glow green when firing, allowing two-way communication between a brain and a machine.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831209</id>
	<title>Re:What a neat idea</title>
	<author>TheCouchPotatoFamine</author>
	<datestamp>1256137740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>...and all the recent micro-fluidic lab-on-a-chip research could be the substrate that keeps the neurons alive. a Neuron Cube Computer. What is really neat is that it is the *computer* that can by reading the firing of one level, provide inputs to the next, completely controlling propagation of learning. Just thought i'd post that bit of dreaming too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and all the recent micro-fluidic lab-on-a-chip research could be the substrate that keeps the neurons alive .
a Neuron Cube Computer .
What is really neat is that it is the * computer * that can by reading the firing of one level , provide inputs to the next , completely controlling propagation of learning .
Just thought i 'd post that bit of dreaming too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and all the recent micro-fluidic lab-on-a-chip research could be the substrate that keeps the neurons alive.
a Neuron Cube Computer.
What is really neat is that it is the *computer* that can by reading the firing of one level, provide inputs to the next, completely controlling propagation of learning.
Just thought i'd post that bit of dreaming too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831249</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>Velorium</author>
	<datestamp>1256138280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Could this then actually lead to the 'chip in the brain' concept and create a human/robot hybrid? This is getting into some scary territory...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could this then actually lead to the 'chip in the brain ' concept and create a human/robot hybrid ?
This is getting into some scary territory.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could this then actually lead to the 'chip in the brain' concept and create a human/robot hybrid?
This is getting into some scary territory...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29836299</id>
	<title>Re::O</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1256231280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wireless green optical mice</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wireless green optical mice</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wireless green optical mice</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29834731</id>
	<title>This mouse cage is clean</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1256224020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Step into the light, little mouse. What? No wait!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Step into the light , little mouse .
What ? No wait !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Step into the light, little mouse.
What? No wait!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29854743</id>
	<title>Call me paranoid...</title>
	<author>mldi</author>
	<datestamp>1256327640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...but I'm not looking forward to the day when a few light pulses can alter human behavior. Just think about that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...but I 'm not looking forward to the day when a few light pulses can alter human behavior .
Just think about that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but I'm not looking forward to the day when a few light pulses can alter human behavior.
Just think about that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832227</id>
	<title>Light</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256151600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can they make my eyes to glow red when I am angry?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can they make my eyes to glow red when I am angry ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can they make my eyes to glow red when I am angry?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29837055</id>
	<title>At last</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1256234460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Christopher Reeve will finally be able to walk again. He should be good in the new remakes of several popular films, such as "The Night of the Living Dead".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Christopher Reeve will finally be able to walk again .
He should be good in the new remakes of several popular films , such as " The Night of the Living Dead " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Christopher Reeve will finally be able to walk again.
He should be good in the new remakes of several popular films, such as "The Night of the Living Dead".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29834323</id>
	<title>Just in time for Holloween.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256221020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's alive!  He's alive!!!  He's alive!!!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's alive !
He 's alive ! ! !
He 's alive ! ! ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's alive!
He's alive!!!
He's alive!!!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831661</id>
	<title>nooooo</title>
	<author>Ojuice</author>
	<datestamp>1256143200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>oh noes, now doctors will say WALK TOWARDS THE LIGHT!</htmltext>
<tokenext>oh noes , now doctors will say WALK TOWARDS THE LIGHT !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oh noes, now doctors will say WALK TOWARDS THE LIGHT!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831563</id>
	<title>Re:Retrofit</title>
	<author>QuantumG</author>
	<datestamp>1256142060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you'd bother to read the article you'd discover that's exactly what they're doing.</p><p>I recommend it, it's a good read.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 'd bother to read the article you 'd discover that 's exactly what they 're doing.I recommend it , it 's a good read .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you'd bother to read the article you'd discover that's exactly what they're doing.I recommend it, it's a good read.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831173</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831125</id>
	<title>:O</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256136540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does that make them..... Optical Mice?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does that make them..... Optical Mice ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does that make them..... Optical Mice?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831783</id>
	<title>I am sure I have seen this movie.</title>
	<author>warp\_kez</author>
	<datestamp>1256144820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or was it a TV show?</p><p>Which ever it was, humanity was almost assimilated into a collective.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or was it a TV show ? Which ever it was , humanity was almost assimilated into a collective .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or was it a TV show?Which ever it was, humanity was almost assimilated into a collective.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29834361</id>
	<title>Re:For anyone who read the article</title>
	<author>Linker3000</author>
	<datestamp>1256221200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...aaaand we're in Clippy land...</p><p>"Hi - it seems you are thinking naughty thoughts of sexy ladies. Do you want me to..."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...aaaand we 're in Clippy land... " Hi - it seems you are thinking naughty thoughts of sexy ladies .
Do you want me to... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...aaaand we're in Clippy land..."Hi - it seems you are thinking naughty thoughts of sexy ladies.
Do you want me to..."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831343</id>
	<title>Health Care Reform NOW!</title>
	<author>bXTr</author>
	<datestamp>1256139240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Damn, these mice get better health care than us.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn , these mice get better health care than us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn, these mice get better health care than us.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29836175</id>
	<title>Re::O</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256230740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or at least a green-glowing hole<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:O</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or at least a green-glowing hole : O</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or at least a green-glowing hole :O</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831221</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29835265</id>
	<title>Re::O</title>
	<author>SleazyRidr</author>
	<datestamp>1256226960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And hey, they're wireless too!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And hey , they 're wireless too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And hey, they're wireless too!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29844105</id>
	<title>Re:For anyone who read the article</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1256298060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the oldest surgical procedure in the world!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the oldest surgical procedure in the world !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the oldest surgical procedure in the world!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29835747</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832421</id>
	<title>Of All the Meddling</title>
	<author>PingPongBoy</author>
	<datestamp>1256154420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The blind mice ran after the farmer's wife and got their tails cut off with a carving knife.</p><p>So we have mice that can see but can't run<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... that is just the way things should be. What do they do? They get them running, and you know how this ends.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The blind mice ran after the farmer 's wife and got their tails cut off with a carving knife.So we have mice that can see but ca n't run ... that is just the way things should be .
What do they do ?
They get them running , and you know how this ends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The blind mice ran after the farmer's wife and got their tails cut off with a carving knife.So we have mice that can see but can't run ... that is just the way things should be.
What do they do?
They get them running, and you know how this ends.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831625</id>
	<title>Re:Retrofit</title>
	<author>British</author>
	<datestamp>1256142600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So scientists just invented the mouse version of Green Lantern?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So scientists just invented the mouse version of Green Lantern ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So scientists just invented the mouse version of Green Lantern?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831173</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29833959</id>
	<title>It's only a matter of time...</title>
	<author>Benson Arizona</author>
	<datestamp>1256218500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>..... Corp announces its latest TV screen technology. The screens, driven by photon emitting mouse brains have higher contrast and a greater viewing angle than existing OLED or OLEP screens. Furthermore, the new screens are environmentally friendly being powered only by cheese and 100\% biodegradable. Dead mice are replaced easily and cheaply. The new <em>NeuroVision</em> screens are expected to hit the market as soon as problems with the Cat Repulsion Technology (CRT) have been ironed out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>..... Corp announces its latest TV screen technology .
The screens , driven by photon emitting mouse brains have higher contrast and a greater viewing angle than existing OLED or OLEP screens .
Furthermore , the new screens are environmentally friendly being powered only by cheese and 100 \ % biodegradable .
Dead mice are replaced easily and cheaply .
The new NeuroVision screens are expected to hit the market as soon as problems with the Cat Repulsion Technology ( CRT ) have been ironed out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..... Corp announces its latest TV screen technology.
The screens, driven by photon emitting mouse brains have higher contrast and a greater viewing angle than existing OLED or OLEP screens.
Furthermore, the new screens are environmentally friendly being powered only by cheese and 100\% biodegradable.
Dead mice are replaced easily and cheaply.
The new NeuroVision screens are expected to hit the market as soon as problems with the Cat Repulsion Technology (CRT) have been ironed out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832089</id>
	<title>Re:For anyone who read the article</title>
	<author>Max Littlemore</author>
	<datestamp>1256149140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>we could see this technology in new kinds of: cochlear implants for the deaf, vision implants for the blind, artificial limb control and feeling for amputees..</p></div></blockquote><p>Yeah, but only \_after\_ it's available for interactive porn.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>we could see this technology in new kinds of : cochlear implants for the deaf , vision implants for the blind , artificial limb control and feeling for amputees..Yeah , but only \ _after \ _ it 's available for interactive porn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we could see this technology in new kinds of: cochlear implants for the deaf, vision implants for the blind, artificial limb control and feeling for amputees..Yeah, but only \_after\_ it's available for interactive porn.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832611</id>
	<title>Re:READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE</title>
	<author>prionic6</author>
	<datestamp>1256244300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks for the heads up, amazing read.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for the heads up , amazing read .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for the heads up, amazing read.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831221</id>
	<title>Re::O</title>
	<author>Solder Fumes</author>
	<datestamp>1256137800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They may be optical, but if you grab one and look underneath you might still find a ball or two.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They may be optical , but if you grab one and look underneath you might still find a ball or two .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They may be optical, but if you grab one and look underneath you might still find a ball or two.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831207</id>
	<title>Re::O</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1256137680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Awesome.</p><p>I was just sitting here, bored, opened a browser to take a look at slashdot to see if anything interesting had popped up since I last checked 10 minutes ago, and I see this story with only a few comments and figure, 7?  Theres got to be something funny in there by now.</p><p>And here it is.  Priceless, just freaking priceless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Awesome.I was just sitting here , bored , opened a browser to take a look at slashdot to see if anything interesting had popped up since I last checked 10 minutes ago , and I see this story with only a few comments and figure , 7 ?
Theres got to be something funny in there by now.And here it is .
Priceless , just freaking priceless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Awesome.I was just sitting here, bored, opened a browser to take a look at slashdot to see if anything interesting had popped up since I last checked 10 minutes ago, and I see this story with only a few comments and figure, 7?
Theres got to be something funny in there by now.And here it is.
Priceless, just freaking priceless.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29836831</id>
	<title>What about free will?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256233620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While the breakthrough is absolutely fantastic, the possible avenues for further research comes in direct conflict with free will.</p><p>If shining light on a person's brain can do a lot more things than the person brain is actually capable of, what does free will mean exactly?</p><p>What prevents a mad scientist from creating an army of human killing machines, all under the influence of light?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While the breakthrough is absolutely fantastic , the possible avenues for further research comes in direct conflict with free will.If shining light on a person 's brain can do a lot more things than the person brain is actually capable of , what does free will mean exactly ? What prevents a mad scientist from creating an army of human killing machines , all under the influence of light ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While the breakthrough is absolutely fantastic, the possible avenues for further research comes in direct conflict with free will.If shining light on a person's brain can do a lot more things than the person brain is actually capable of, what does free will mean exactly?What prevents a mad scientist from creating an army of human killing machines, all under the influence of light?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831155</id>
	<title>Side Effects</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256136960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The operation is a real breakthrough for crippled mice everywhere, but they have to avoid kaleidoscopes for the rest of their lives...</htmltext>
<tokenext>The operation is a real breakthrough for crippled mice everywhere , but they have to avoid kaleidoscopes for the rest of their lives.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The operation is a real breakthrough for crippled mice everywhere, but they have to avoid kaleidoscopes for the rest of their lives...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832179</id>
	<title>Re:For anyone who read the article</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1256150820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think that moved was called 'The Matrix',  I'll pass, the ending sucked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that moved was called 'The Matrix ' , I 'll pass , the ending sucked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that moved was called 'The Matrix',  I'll pass, the ending sucked.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831365</id>
	<title>Re::O</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256139420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>give them lasers and they'll be laser mices!</htmltext>
<tokenext>give them lasers and they 'll be laser mices !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>give them lasers and they'll be laser mices!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831177</id>
	<title>I'm waiting for...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256137320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Laser Mice...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Laser Mice.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Laser Mice...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831449</id>
	<title>Re:Retrofit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256140560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, most forms of gene therapy don't require growing cells to work.  If you use a virus to carry the genes of interest into the cell, your cell will read the inserted DNA just as if it were your own.  There are two routes you can go with viral vectors. You can use a retrovirus, which will actually insert genes into your permanent genome, which will cause those genes to be copied and passed on if the infected cells divide.  Or you can use adenoviruses or adeno-associated viruses, which can give genes to infected cells, but those genes will not be passed on.  The retroviral approach carries added risks of inserting genes in the wrong places (causing some cases of leukemia in clinical trials), and having genes pass to dividing cells is of little benefit if you want to infect the neurons of an adult brain.
<br> <br>
Of course, adeno-type viruses (either a weakened or non-pathogenic strain is used) are not without risk, particularly if you're planning to use them to infect your brain- meningitis seems like it'd be a real concern here.  Right now, viral vector gene therapy is at the level of being an early experimental treatment for conditions like cancers and inherited immunodeficiencies- making your thoughts produce light would be a very off-label use.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , most forms of gene therapy do n't require growing cells to work .
If you use a virus to carry the genes of interest into the cell , your cell will read the inserted DNA just as if it were your own .
There are two routes you can go with viral vectors .
You can use a retrovirus , which will actually insert genes into your permanent genome , which will cause those genes to be copied and passed on if the infected cells divide .
Or you can use adenoviruses or adeno-associated viruses , which can give genes to infected cells , but those genes will not be passed on .
The retroviral approach carries added risks of inserting genes in the wrong places ( causing some cases of leukemia in clinical trials ) , and having genes pass to dividing cells is of little benefit if you want to infect the neurons of an adult brain .
Of course , adeno-type viruses ( either a weakened or non-pathogenic strain is used ) are not without risk , particularly if you 're planning to use them to infect your brain- meningitis seems like it 'd be a real concern here .
Right now , viral vector gene therapy is at the level of being an early experimental treatment for conditions like cancers and inherited immunodeficiencies- making your thoughts produce light would be a very off-label use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, most forms of gene therapy don't require growing cells to work.
If you use a virus to carry the genes of interest into the cell, your cell will read the inserted DNA just as if it were your own.
There are two routes you can go with viral vectors.
You can use a retrovirus, which will actually insert genes into your permanent genome, which will cause those genes to be copied and passed on if the infected cells divide.
Or you can use adenoviruses or adeno-associated viruses, which can give genes to infected cells, but those genes will not be passed on.
The retroviral approach carries added risks of inserting genes in the wrong places (causing some cases of leukemia in clinical trials), and having genes pass to dividing cells is of little benefit if you want to infect the neurons of an adult brain.
Of course, adeno-type viruses (either a weakened or non-pathogenic strain is used) are not without risk, particularly if you're planning to use them to infect your brain- meningitis seems like it'd be a real concern here.
Right now, viral vector gene therapy is at the level of being an early experimental treatment for conditions like cancers and inherited immunodeficiencies- making your thoughts produce light would be a very off-label use.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831173</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29834381</id>
	<title>Mice overlord</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256221380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I, for one, welcome our new optical mice overlord</htmltext>
<tokenext>I , for one , welcome our new optical mice overlord</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, for one, welcome our new optical mice overlord</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831243</id>
	<title>Makes sense</title>
	<author>shadowblaster</author>
	<datestamp>1256138220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This puts a lot of sense into the phrase "he is a bright person". Literally when you do a lot of thinking, your brain will shine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This puts a lot of sense into the phrase " he is a bright person " .
Literally when you do a lot of thinking , your brain will shine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This puts a lot of sense into the phrase "he is a bright person".
Literally when you do a lot of thinking, your brain will shine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29834503</id>
	<title>Re:What a neat idea</title>
	<author>Wargames</author>
	<datestamp>1256222220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now if we can get these lights to emit coherent low-divergence beams and infect sharks' heads...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now if we can get these lights to emit coherent low-divergence beams and infect sharks ' heads.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now if we can get these lights to emit coherent low-divergence beams and infect sharks' heads...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831173</id>
	<title>Retrofit</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1256137200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Additionally, another gene has been added to make neurons glow green when firing, allowing two-way communication between a brain and a machine."</p></div><p>I know that changes to genes generally have to go into the cells when they are growing, but I wonder if the mechanism which does this could be manually installed in the nervous system (so to speak) so that living organisms (me) could export their brain activity as pulses of green light.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Additionally , another gene has been added to make neurons glow green when firing , allowing two-way communication between a brain and a machine .
" I know that changes to genes generally have to go into the cells when they are growing , but I wonder if the mechanism which does this could be manually installed in the nervous system ( so to speak ) so that living organisms ( me ) could export their brain activity as pulses of green light .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Additionally, another gene has been added to make neurons glow green when firing, allowing two-way communication between a brain and a machine.
"I know that changes to genes generally have to go into the cells when they are growing, but I wonder if the mechanism which does this could be manually installed in the nervous system (so to speak) so that living organisms (me) could export their brain activity as pulses of green light.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29835747</id>
	<title>Re:For anyone who read the article</title>
	<author>amplt1337</author>
	<datestamp>1256228880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um, I'll wait until the "pop open your skull" part has been engineered away.</p><p>Really, there's no "just" about that process.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , I 'll wait until the " pop open your skull " part has been engineered away.Really , there 's no " just " about that process .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, I'll wait until the "pop open your skull" part has been engineered away.Really, there's no "just" about that process.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831985</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense</title>
	<author>mikael</author>
	<datestamp>1256147640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It will make some pretty funky disco lights - and perhaps it could solve the mystery of the <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2009/09/dead-salmon-responds-to-portra.html" title="newscientist.com">Deceased Salmon responds to portraits of people</a> [newscientist.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It will make some pretty funky disco lights - and perhaps it could solve the mystery of the Deceased Salmon responds to portraits of people [ newscientist.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will make some pretty funky disco lights - and perhaps it could solve the mystery of the Deceased Salmon responds to portraits of people [newscientist.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29842751</id>
	<title>Re::O</title>
	<author>Meski</author>
	<datestamp>1256231040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the injury was Burns, then you'd get</p><p>Wee, sleeket, cowran, tim'rous beastie</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the injury was Burns , then you 'd getWee , sleeket , cowran , tim'rous beastie</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the injury was Burns, then you'd getWee, sleeket, cowran, tim'rous beastie</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831185</id>
	<title>What a neat idea</title>
	<author>TheCouchPotatoFamine</author>
	<datestamp>1256137440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>what a neat idea

this and a laser at the right wavelengths(s) could manipulate a transparent surface of connected neurons very nicely, and like multi layer dvd technology, they could probably stack the layers. never heard of anything like this before.</htmltext>
<tokenext>what a neat idea this and a laser at the right wavelengths ( s ) could manipulate a transparent surface of connected neurons very nicely , and like multi layer dvd technology , they could probably stack the layers .
never heard of anything like this before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what a neat idea

this and a laser at the right wavelengths(s) could manipulate a transparent surface of connected neurons very nicely, and like multi layer dvd technology, they could probably stack the layers.
never heard of anything like this before.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831175</id>
	<title>Re::O</title>
	<author>Clandestine\_Blaze</author>
	<datestamp>1256137200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bravo - that was actually a good first post.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bravo - that was actually a good first post .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bravo - that was actually a good first post.
:-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831143</id>
	<title>See Me, Feel Me, Touch Me, Heal Me - I Can WALK !!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256136720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>See Me<br>Feel Me<br>Touch Me<br>Heal Me</p><p>See Me<br>Feel Me<br>Touch Me<br>Heal Me</p><p>See Me Feel Me<br>Touch Me<br>Heal Me</p><p>Listening to you, I get the music<br>Gazing at you, I get the heat<br>Following you, I climb the mountain<br>I get excitement at your feet</p><p>Right behind you, I see the millions<br>On you, I see the glory<br>From you, I get opinion<br>From you, I get the story</p><p>Listening to you, I get the music<br>Gazing at you, I get the heat<br>Following you, I climb the mountain<br>I get excitement at your feet</p><p>Right behind you, I see the millions<br>On you, I see the glory<br>From you, I get opinion<br>From you, I get the story</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>See MeFeel MeTouch MeHeal MeSee MeFeel MeTouch MeHeal MeSee Me Feel MeTouch MeHeal MeListening to you , I get the musicGazing at you , I get the heatFollowing you , I climb the mountainI get excitement at your feetRight behind you , I see the millionsOn you , I see the gloryFrom you , I get opinionFrom you , I get the storyListening to you , I get the musicGazing at you , I get the heatFollowing you , I climb the mountainI get excitement at your feetRight behind you , I see the millionsOn you , I see the gloryFrom you , I get opinionFrom you , I get the story</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See MeFeel MeTouch MeHeal MeSee MeFeel MeTouch MeHeal MeSee Me Feel MeTouch MeHeal MeListening to you, I get the musicGazing at you, I get the heatFollowing you, I climb the mountainI get excitement at your feetRight behind you, I see the millionsOn you, I see the gloryFrom you, I get opinionFrom you, I get the storyListening to you, I get the musicGazing at you, I get the heatFollowing you, I climb the mountainI get excitement at your feetRight behind you, I see the millionsOn you, I see the gloryFrom you, I get opinionFrom you, I get the story</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29836913</id>
	<title>Crosstalk in two way links?</title>
	<author>yanko22</author>
	<datestamp>1256233920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A potential issue I didn't see addressed in the article - crosstalk. What happens when an outbound signal, neuronal activity triggering a light pulse, is produced at the same wavelength (color) as another is tweaked to "listen" for? Would the brain be able to compensate and filter out such signals, as this essentially creates a form of an artificial permanent link between the two? Or maybe this isn't an issue beyond, say a few hundred microns, because the energy of the outgoing photons is below the sensitivity threshold of the listening ones? Otherwise, it might not be very practical to have to deal with your left knee bending every time you think of the letter "P".</p><p>Also, in theory, how many wavelengths could different molecules be produced to fluoresce (if this is even the right term) at? Same thing for the light-sensitive ones. How wide is the sensitivity waveband? IOW, how large a bandwidth can we expect to command, in each direction? Or put in even simpler terms, how many different things can this technology be employed for, simultaneously?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A potential issue I did n't see addressed in the article - crosstalk .
What happens when an outbound signal , neuronal activity triggering a light pulse , is produced at the same wavelength ( color ) as another is tweaked to " listen " for ?
Would the brain be able to compensate and filter out such signals , as this essentially creates a form of an artificial permanent link between the two ?
Or maybe this is n't an issue beyond , say a few hundred microns , because the energy of the outgoing photons is below the sensitivity threshold of the listening ones ?
Otherwise , it might not be very practical to have to deal with your left knee bending every time you think of the letter " P " .Also , in theory , how many wavelengths could different molecules be produced to fluoresce ( if this is even the right term ) at ?
Same thing for the light-sensitive ones .
How wide is the sensitivity waveband ?
IOW , how large a bandwidth can we expect to command , in each direction ?
Or put in even simpler terms , how many different things can this technology be employed for , simultaneously ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A potential issue I didn't see addressed in the article - crosstalk.
What happens when an outbound signal, neuronal activity triggering a light pulse, is produced at the same wavelength (color) as another is tweaked to "listen" for?
Would the brain be able to compensate and filter out such signals, as this essentially creates a form of an artificial permanent link between the two?
Or maybe this isn't an issue beyond, say a few hundred microns, because the energy of the outgoing photons is below the sensitivity threshold of the listening ones?
Otherwise, it might not be very practical to have to deal with your left knee bending every time you think of the letter "P".Also, in theory, how many wavelengths could different molecules be produced to fluoresce (if this is even the right term) at?
Same thing for the light-sensitive ones.
How wide is the sensitivity waveband?
IOW, how large a bandwidth can we expect to command, in each direction?
Or put in even simpler terms, how many different things can this technology be employed for, simultaneously?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831609</id>
	<title>It's hard to walk around in the dark</title>
	<author>Kohath</author>
	<datestamp>1256142420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>when you're injured.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>when you 're injured .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>when you're injured.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832045</id>
	<title>Re:READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256148660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>indeed it is ridiculously cool and mind blowing in terms of possibilities!</p><p>I couldn't help but spread it on my facebook<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>indeed it is ridiculously cool and mind blowing in terms of possibilities ! I could n't help but spread it on my facebook : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>indeed it is ridiculously cool and mind blowing in terms of possibilities!I couldn't help but spread it on my facebook :P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831993</id>
	<title>Re::O</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256147700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, but exposure to the light of our yellow sun may render them Super-mice! I pray to Kirby that our nation has a good stockpile of mouse-sized kryptonite for the coming crisis.</p><p>And hey, how come this story isn't tagged "superman" anyway? Not enough comic book nerds here to notice the "genes triggered by exposure to certain colors of light" bit and tag appropriately?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , but exposure to the light of our yellow sun may render them Super-mice !
I pray to Kirby that our nation has a good stockpile of mouse-sized kryptonite for the coming crisis.And hey , how come this story is n't tagged " superman " anyway ?
Not enough comic book nerds here to notice the " genes triggered by exposure to certain colors of light " bit and tag appropriately ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, but exposure to the light of our yellow sun may render them Super-mice!
I pray to Kirby that our nation has a good stockpile of mouse-sized kryptonite for the coming crisis.And hey, how come this story isn't tagged "superman" anyway?
Not enough comic book nerds here to notice the "genes triggered by exposure to certain colors of light" bit and tag appropriately?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831553</id>
	<title>Re::O</title>
	<author>Narpak</author>
	<datestamp>1256141880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The most disturbing thing about the article linked is that it end with the phrase <b>"And it all began with pond scum."</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>The most disturbing thing about the article linked is that it end with the phrase " And it all began with pond scum .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The most disturbing thing about the article linked is that it end with the phrase "And it all began with pond scum.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832289</id>
	<title>Typo in TFA</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1256152320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Typo in tfa url and in the summary. Opt<b>i</b>genetics?? wth is that supposed to mean? I must be blind I'll go see an optimitrist ~\_~</htmltext>
<tokenext>Typo in tfa url and in the summary .
Optigenetics ? ? wth is that supposed to mean ?
I must be blind I 'll go see an optimitrist ~ \ _ ~</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Typo in tfa url and in the summary.
Optigenetics?? wth is that supposed to mean?
I must be blind I'll go see an optimitrist ~\_~</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831521</id>
	<title>what happens if Schrodinger's cat...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256141520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>encounters some of these mentally enhanced Stanford mice?</p><p>Clearly more research funding is needed (grad students: file for NSF grant).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>encounters some of these mentally enhanced Stanford mice ? Clearly more research funding is needed ( grad students : file for NSF grant ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>encounters some of these mentally enhanced Stanford mice?Clearly more research funding is needed (grad students: file for NSF grant).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832491</id>
	<title>Old news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256242080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Holy paladins already knew about the curative powers of the Light<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Holy paladins already knew about the curative powers of the Light : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Holy paladins already knew about the curative powers of the Light :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831679</id>
	<title>READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1256143560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most amazing piece I've read on science in a long time. This makes the genome projects look like stepping stones. If you read the whole thing and can't see the amazing power of this field you will hopefully be one of the early benefactors because you need it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most amazing piece I 've read on science in a long time .
This makes the genome projects look like stepping stones .
If you read the whole thing and ca n't see the amazing power of this field you will hopefully be one of the early benefactors because you need it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most amazing piece I've read on science in a long time.
This makes the genome projects look like stepping stones.
If you read the whole thing and can't see the amazing power of this field you will hopefully be one of the early benefactors because you need it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29841981</id>
	<title>Re:So...</title>
	<author>keatonguy</author>
	<datestamp>1256220180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's so frightening about a mind-machine interface? I've dreamed of breakthroughs like this most of my life!</p><p>To be able to replace parts of my body just as easily as I can swap out a part on a car or a computer, the power to build a better <i>human</i>... Just imagine if they could develop this effectively enough that you could literally link your mind to another, or to a machine, to the net! Both the practical applications and the philosophical implications are staggering.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's so frightening about a mind-machine interface ?
I 've dreamed of breakthroughs like this most of my life ! To be able to replace parts of my body just as easily as I can swap out a part on a car or a computer , the power to build a better human... Just imagine if they could develop this effectively enough that you could literally link your mind to another , or to a machine , to the net !
Both the practical applications and the philosophical implications are staggering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's so frightening about a mind-machine interface?
I've dreamed of breakthroughs like this most of my life!To be able to replace parts of my body just as easily as I can swap out a part on a car or a computer, the power to build a better human... Just imagine if they could develop this effectively enough that you could literally link your mind to another, or to a machine, to the net!
Both the practical applications and the philosophical implications are staggering.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831129</id>
	<title>I got a pussy in my panties</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256136600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>She got a pussy in her panties<br>She wore a pussy thong<br>She got a pussy in her panties<br>She wore a pussy thong</p><p>I got a pussy in my panties<br>I got a pussy in my panties<br>I got a pussy in my panties<br>I got a pus- I got a pus- I got a pussy pussy pussy</p><p>Got a pussy in my panties<br>Im just right<br>Got a clam in my cloth<br>It's a curious sight<br>I got a pussy in my panties<br>Wet and tight<br>Wrap my thong around your dick<br>And put your dick in my eye.</p><p>She got a pussy in her panties<br>She wore a pussy thong<br>She got a pussy in her panties<br>She wore a pussy thong</p><p>She got a pussy in her panties<br>She wore a pussy thong<br>She got a pussy in her panties<br>She wore a pussy thong</p><p>I got a pussy in my panties<br>Wet and dank<br>The nasty secretions<br>Make my underwear stank<br>I got a pussy in my panties<br>Soft and pink<br>Put your head between my legs<br>And have yourself a drink.</p><p>She got a pussy in her panties<br>She wore a pussy thong<br>She got a pussy in her panties<br>She wore a pussy thong</p><p>She got a pussy in her panties<br>She wore a pussy thong<br>She got a pussy in her panties<br>She wore a pussy thong</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thongShe got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thongI got a pussy in my pantiesI got a pussy in my pantiesI got a pussy in my pantiesI got a pus- I got a pus- I got a pussy pussy pussyGot a pussy in my pantiesIm just rightGot a clam in my clothIt 's a curious sightI got a pussy in my pantiesWet and tightWrap my thong around your dickAnd put your dick in my eye.She got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thongShe got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thongShe got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thongShe got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thongI got a pussy in my pantiesWet and dankThe nasty secretionsMake my underwear stankI got a pussy in my pantiesSoft and pinkPut your head between my legsAnd have yourself a drink.She got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thongShe got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thongShe got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thongShe got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thong</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thongShe got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thongI got a pussy in my pantiesI got a pussy in my pantiesI got a pussy in my pantiesI got a pus- I got a pus- I got a pussy pussy pussyGot a pussy in my pantiesIm just rightGot a clam in my clothIt's a curious sightI got a pussy in my pantiesWet and tightWrap my thong around your dickAnd put your dick in my eye.She got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thongShe got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thongShe got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thongShe got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thongI got a pussy in my pantiesWet and dankThe nasty secretionsMake my underwear stankI got a pussy in my pantiesSoft and pinkPut your head between my legsAnd have yourself a drink.She got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thongShe got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thongShe got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thongShe got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thong</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832751</id>
	<title>Re:READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE</title>
	<author>pinkushun</author>
	<datestamp>1256203200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read the article, it's very well written, and what an *amazing* breakthrough! It's interesting how many major scientific breakthroughs were also very clever plot devices in science fiction in the past few decades.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read the article , it 's very well written , and what an * amazing * breakthrough !
It 's interesting how many major scientific breakthroughs were also very clever plot devices in science fiction in the past few decades .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read the article, it's very well written, and what an *amazing* breakthrough!
It's interesting how many major scientific breakthroughs were also very clever plot devices in science fiction in the past few decades.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831445</id>
	<title>For anyone who read the article</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256140500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the DNI we've been waiting for... The surgeon pops open your skull, injects some strategic locations with some gene altering viruses and installs some flashing lights.  Now you can do two-way communication with a computer.  What you experience depends on which cells were modified, and what program you're running.  With sufficient funding for targeted research, we could see this technology in new kinds of:  cochlear implants for the deaf, vision implants for the blind, artificial limb control <i>and feeling</i> for amputees.. and the continued improvement of those technologies will eventually lead to full sensation virtual reality immersion for anyone who can afford it.  And we haven't even gotten into the gritty details of what we can <i>learn</i> about the brain using this technology.. reverse engineering is so much easier when you can poke as well as peek.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the DNI we 've been waiting for... The surgeon pops open your skull , injects some strategic locations with some gene altering viruses and installs some flashing lights .
Now you can do two-way communication with a computer .
What you experience depends on which cells were modified , and what program you 're running .
With sufficient funding for targeted research , we could see this technology in new kinds of : cochlear implants for the deaf , vision implants for the blind , artificial limb control and feeling for amputees.. and the continued improvement of those technologies will eventually lead to full sensation virtual reality immersion for anyone who can afford it .
And we have n't even gotten into the gritty details of what we can learn about the brain using this technology.. reverse engineering is so much easier when you can poke as well as peek .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the DNI we've been waiting for... The surgeon pops open your skull, injects some strategic locations with some gene altering viruses and installs some flashing lights.
Now you can do two-way communication with a computer.
What you experience depends on which cells were modified, and what program you're running.
With sufficient funding for targeted research, we could see this technology in new kinds of:  cochlear implants for the deaf, vision implants for the blind, artificial limb control and feeling for amputees.. and the continued improvement of those technologies will eventually lead to full sensation virtual reality immersion for anyone who can afford it.
And we haven't even gotten into the gritty details of what we can learn about the brain using this technology.. reverse engineering is so much easier when you can poke as well as peek.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29834121</id>
	<title>Re:Retrofit</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1256219520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If what the mouse is seeing shows as a surface in the brain, then we have a green screen.</p><p>Would dreaming show as mouse cartoons?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If what the mouse is seeing shows as a surface in the brain , then we have a green screen.Would dreaming show as mouse cartoons ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If what the mouse is seeing shows as a surface in the brain, then we have a green screen.Would dreaming show as mouse cartoons?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831173</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831575</id>
	<title>reading much harder than stimulating</title>
	<author>capideas</author>
	<datestamp>1256142180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mostly love this article, but it kinda glosses over how much more difficult it is to read out information out optically than it is to stimulate neurons with light.  When you stimulate neurons you just need any ole photon, doesn't matter how many times it bounced around, or where it came from.. which is good because the brain isn't so much transparent, its kinda a milky haze.  However, when you want to record optically from them you have to make an image of the neurons (unless you want all the neurons signals to get mixed together) and so you care about where all the photons came from.

In order to take really effective pictures in the brain you need a fancy two photon microscope, and although some people are playing around with making tiny ones that one could potentially carry around on ones head.. they aren't really going to every be practically chronic implants for anyone, for many reasons.. but first of all you need to hook them up to a large, expensive infrared laser to make it work.

That's not to say all this optical reading isn't really awesome, because scientists can make use of it to learn things about brains in more constrained situations.. i just wouldn't look to it to be the missing link in brain machine interfaces anytime soon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mostly love this article , but it kinda glosses over how much more difficult it is to read out information out optically than it is to stimulate neurons with light .
When you stimulate neurons you just need any ole photon , does n't matter how many times it bounced around , or where it came from.. which is good because the brain is n't so much transparent , its kinda a milky haze .
However , when you want to record optically from them you have to make an image of the neurons ( unless you want all the neurons signals to get mixed together ) and so you care about where all the photons came from .
In order to take really effective pictures in the brain you need a fancy two photon microscope , and although some people are playing around with making tiny ones that one could potentially carry around on ones head.. they are n't really going to every be practically chronic implants for anyone , for many reasons.. but first of all you need to hook them up to a large , expensive infrared laser to make it work .
That 's not to say all this optical reading is n't really awesome , because scientists can make use of it to learn things about brains in more constrained situations.. i just would n't look to it to be the missing link in brain machine interfaces anytime soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mostly love this article, but it kinda glosses over how much more difficult it is to read out information out optically than it is to stimulate neurons with light.
When you stimulate neurons you just need any ole photon, doesn't matter how many times it bounced around, or where it came from.. which is good because the brain isn't so much transparent, its kinda a milky haze.
However, when you want to record optically from them you have to make an image of the neurons (unless you want all the neurons signals to get mixed together) and so you care about where all the photons came from.
In order to take really effective pictures in the brain you need a fancy two photon microscope, and although some people are playing around with making tiny ones that one could potentially carry around on ones head.. they aren't really going to every be practically chronic implants for anyone, for many reasons.. but first of all you need to hook them up to a large, expensive infrared laser to make it work.
That's not to say all this optical reading isn't really awesome, because scientists can make use of it to learn things about brains in more constrained situations.. i just wouldn't look to it to be the missing link in brain machine interfaces anytime soon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831411</id>
	<title>Welcome to the Dollhouse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256140020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any other dollhouse watchers out there see the connection. Whats next? Freeze rays?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any other dollhouse watchers out there see the connection .
Whats next ?
Freeze rays ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any other dollhouse watchers out there see the connection.
Whats next?
Freeze rays?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832263</id>
	<title>Re:For anyone who read the article</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1256152020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>One thing<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... with regular electro-stimulation than you have to have your skull popped open. With this you only need a hole drilled into your skull. That is when the device is made by lab techs. I believe we can shrink this device (for emitting the light) to something similar to an rfid chip. If the light is intense enough it could be injected. Making it much much less invasive. Some wireless power system would be necessary that's about it. Hell inject it trough the nose and have a plug dangling out for charging.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One thing ... with regular electro-stimulation than you have to have your skull popped open .
With this you only need a hole drilled into your skull .
That is when the device is made by lab techs .
I believe we can shrink this device ( for emitting the light ) to something similar to an rfid chip .
If the light is intense enough it could be injected .
Making it much much less invasive .
Some wireless power system would be necessary that 's about it .
Hell inject it trough the nose and have a plug dangling out for charging .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One thing ... with regular electro-stimulation than you have to have your skull popped open.
With this you only need a hole drilled into your skull.
That is when the device is made by lab techs.
I believe we can shrink this device (for emitting the light) to something similar to an rfid chip.
If the light is intense enough it could be injected.
Making it much much less invasive.
Some wireless power system would be necessary that's about it.
Hell inject it trough the nose and have a plug dangling out for charging.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831445</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29844105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29835747
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831175
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29841981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831209
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831185
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831993
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29834503
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831185
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29834121
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831173
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831207
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29835265
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831365
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831679
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29836175
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831221
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831563
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831173
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29836299
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832611
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831679
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831625
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831173
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832751
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831679
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831985
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831449
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831173
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29834361
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831553
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832179
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2235200_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29842751
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2235200.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831445
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832089
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29835747
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29844105
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832179
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29834361
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2235200.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831249
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29841981
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2235200.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831155
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2235200.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29836831
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2235200.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831125
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29842751
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29836299
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29835265
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831207
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831993
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831221
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29836175
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831175
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831553
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831365
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2235200.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831243
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831985
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2235200.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832289
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2235200.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831185
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831209
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29834503
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2235200.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831173
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29834121
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831625
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831563
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831449
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2235200.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832421
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2235200.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831679
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832611
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832751
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29832045
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2235200.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29836913
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2235200.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2235200.29831783
</commentlist>
</conversation>
