<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_21_2158249</id>
	<title>First Public White-Space Network Is Alive</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1256119860000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"The <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/46577">first public white space network officially launched</a> on Wednesday in Claudville, Virginia. It uses sensing technology from Spectrum Bridge with software and Web cams supplied by Microsoft and PCs from by Dell. The project was funded the TDF Foundation. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White\_spaces\_(radio)">White space</a> networks use unlicensed  television spectrum and have been called 'WiFi on steroids.'  They offer more bandwidth, over larger areas, than does WiFi. IT companies duked it out with broadcasters for years to get white spaces approved by the FCC. They finally got the FCC's nod in November, 2008."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " The first public white space network officially launched on Wednesday in Claudville , Virginia .
It uses sensing technology from Spectrum Bridge with software and Web cams supplied by Microsoft and PCs from by Dell .
The project was funded the TDF Foundation .
White space networks use unlicensed television spectrum and have been called 'WiFi on steroids .
' They offer more bandwidth , over larger areas , than does WiFi .
IT companies duked it out with broadcasters for years to get white spaces approved by the FCC .
They finally got the FCC 's nod in November , 2008 .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "The first public white space network officially launched on Wednesday in Claudville, Virginia.
It uses sensing technology from Spectrum Bridge with software and Web cams supplied by Microsoft and PCs from by Dell.
The project was funded the TDF Foundation.
White space networks use unlicensed  television spectrum and have been called 'WiFi on steroids.
'  They offer more bandwidth, over larger areas, than does WiFi.
IT companies duked it out with broadcasters for years to get white spaces approved by the FCC.
They finally got the FCC's nod in November, 2008.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829957</id>
	<title>wif fi, that was invented by...</title>
	<author>MrKaos</author>
	<datestamp>1256126460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWmivumLLLw" title="youtube.com">people at the CSIRO</a> [youtube.com] wasn't it?<p>
enjoy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The people at the CSIRO [ youtube.com ] was n't it ?
enjoy : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The people at the CSIRO [youtube.com] wasn't it?
enjoy :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29836497</id>
	<title>Test</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256232300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Test virginia</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Test virginia</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Test virginia</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29831573</id>
	<title>Possibly stupid questions</title>
	<author>Aokisensei</author>
	<datestamp>1256142060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So this white space is "unlicensed"?  Completely?  What, if any restrictions are there on usage of it?

Is it at all possible in the foreseeable future that there will be consumer-level devices for this type of frequency?  Like routers and other networking equipment, or is this really more for just companies to provide service?

Also, what kind of range can you expect on this band at 'normal' power levels?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So this white space is " unlicensed " ?
Completely ? What , if any restrictions are there on usage of it ?
Is it at all possible in the foreseeable future that there will be consumer-level devices for this type of frequency ?
Like routers and other networking equipment , or is this really more for just companies to provide service ?
Also , what kind of range can you expect on this band at 'normal ' power levels ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So this white space is "unlicensed"?
Completely?  What, if any restrictions are there on usage of it?
Is it at all possible in the foreseeable future that there will be consumer-level devices for this type of frequency?
Like routers and other networking equipment, or is this really more for just companies to provide service?
Also, what kind of range can you expect on this band at 'normal' power levels?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829703</id>
	<title>Is this statement misleading?</title>
	<author>t0qer</author>
	<datestamp>1256124780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>have been called 'WiFi on steroids.' They offer more bandwidth, over larger areas, than does WiFi.</p></div>  </blockquote><p>Someone correct me if I'm mistaken, but doesn't lower frequency (30mhz to 300mhz) mean less bandwidth?  I could see bonding several channels at once to achieve a higher bandwidth, but doesn't this mostly offer greater range?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>have been called 'WiFi on steroids .
' They offer more bandwidth , over larger areas , than does WiFi .
Someone correct me if I 'm mistaken , but does n't lower frequency ( 30mhz to 300mhz ) mean less bandwidth ?
I could see bonding several channels at once to achieve a higher bandwidth , but does n't this mostly offer greater range ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>have been called 'WiFi on steroids.
' They offer more bandwidth, over larger areas, than does WiFi.
Someone correct me if I'm mistaken, but doesn't lower frequency (30mhz to 300mhz) mean less bandwidth?
I could see bonding several channels at once to achieve a higher bandwidth, but doesn't this mostly offer greater range?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29833651</id>
	<title>Re:As a broadcast engineer...</title>
	<author>sosume</author>
	<datestamp>1256215740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems to work well<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. but wait I suddenly have a splitting headache, be right back<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems to work well .. but wait I suddenly have a splitting headache , be right back .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems to work well .. but wait I suddenly have a splitting headache, be right back ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829919</id>
	<title>100mW!?</title>
	<author>mirix</author>
	<datestamp>1256126220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seems rather pathetically low power to me. <br> <br>
I can't see them getting too much range out of that, not to mention that lower freqs = bigger antennas.<br> <br>
But more BW is always nice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems rather pathetically low power to me .
I ca n't see them getting too much range out of that , not to mention that lower freqs = bigger antennas .
But more BW is always nice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems rather pathetically low power to me.
I can't see them getting too much range out of that, not to mention that lower freqs = bigger antennas.
But more BW is always nice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829561</id>
	<title>I welcome any efforts...</title>
	<author>ifwm</author>
	<datestamp>1256123880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I welcome any efforts to improve the woeful state of access in the US.  Hopefully, this will lead to more communities exploring the idea of municipal access, something I've always considered the modern evolution of the library.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I welcome any efforts to improve the woeful state of access in the US .
Hopefully , this will lead to more communities exploring the idea of municipal access , something I 've always considered the modern evolution of the library .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I welcome any efforts to improve the woeful state of access in the US.
Hopefully, this will lead to more communities exploring the idea of municipal access, something I've always considered the modern evolution of the library.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29831151</id>
	<title>Security?</title>
	<author>Necrotica</author>
	<datestamp>1256136900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>White space network, eh? I wonder if the security architect implemented true network segregation?</htmltext>
<tokenext>White space network , eh ?
I wonder if the security architect implemented true network segregation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>White space network, eh?
I wonder if the security architect implemented true network segregation?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829789</id>
	<title>It's Obvious Where This is Heading</title>
	<author>segedunum</author>
	<datestamp>1256125380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interested parties (whose businesses rely and will expand with cheap or free bandwidth) are angling to use it as a means to get around current mobile operators, and it can't come a moment too soon in many ways as far as I'm concerned. However, I can only see this being a recipe for disaster given the state of many wireless devices and all their broken firmware updates today if it's accurate:<blockquote><div><p>Devices must both consult an FCC-mandated database to determine which channels are available for use at a given location, and must also monitor the spectrum locally once every minute to confirm that no legacy wireless microphones, video assist devices or other emitters are present.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interested parties ( whose businesses rely and will expand with cheap or free bandwidth ) are angling to use it as a means to get around current mobile operators , and it ca n't come a moment too soon in many ways as far as I 'm concerned .
However , I can only see this being a recipe for disaster given the state of many wireless devices and all their broken firmware updates today if it 's accurate : Devices must both consult an FCC-mandated database to determine which channels are available for use at a given location , and must also monitor the spectrum locally once every minute to confirm that no legacy wireless microphones , video assist devices or other emitters are present .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interested parties (whose businesses rely and will expand with cheap or free bandwidth) are angling to use it as a means to get around current mobile operators, and it can't come a moment too soon in many ways as far as I'm concerned.
However, I can only see this being a recipe for disaster given the state of many wireless devices and all their broken firmware updates today if it's accurate:Devices must both consult an FCC-mandated database to determine which channels are available for use at a given location, and must also monitor the spectrum locally once every minute to confirm that no legacy wireless microphones, video assist devices or other emitters are present.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829531</id>
	<title>"Stud Dogs" troll wanted</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256123700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Somebody please post the "stud dogs" troll!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somebody please post the " stud dogs " troll !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somebody please post the "stud dogs" troll!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829545</id>
	<title>Using Television Spectrum</title>
	<author>Z34107</author>
	<datestamp>1256123760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What channel is Hulu on?  v.v</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What channel is Hulu on ?
v.v</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What channel is Hulu on?
v.v</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29836319</id>
	<title>Whitespace</title>
	<author>Hazelfield</author>
	<datestamp>1256231400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What? An entire network protocol written in Whitespace? That must have been hard as hell!</htmltext>
<tokenext>What ?
An entire network protocol written in Whitespace ?
That must have been hard as hell !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?
An entire network protocol written in Whitespace?
That must have been hard as hell!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829579</id>
	<title>Re:"Stud Dogs" troll wanted</title>
	<author>SomeJoel</author>
	<datestamp>1256124000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Somebody please post the "stud dogs" troll!</p></div><p>Laziest first post ever.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somebody please post the " stud dogs " troll ! Laziest first post ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somebody please post the "stud dogs" troll!Laziest first post ever.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829531</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29833533</id>
	<title>Re:Why Claudville?</title>
	<author>suso</author>
	<datestamp>1256213820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because Claudville sounds like Baudville. *shrugs*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because Claudville sounds like Baudville .
* shrugs *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because Claudville sounds like Baudville.
*shrugs*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29830001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29830109</id>
	<title>Wifi on STEROIDS!?!!</title>
	<author>Cajun Hell</author>
	<datestamp>1256127840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please, think of the example this is setting for the children. Congress should immediately hold hearings about Wifi cheaters.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please , think of the example this is setting for the children .
Congress should immediately hold hearings about Wifi cheaters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please, think of the example this is setting for the children.
Congress should immediately hold hearings about Wifi cheaters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829895</id>
	<title>Let me guess...</title>
	<author>BigWhiteGuy\_27</author>
	<datestamp>1256126040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...its powered by a bunch of Python scripts?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...its powered by a bunch of Python scripts ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...its powered by a bunch of Python scripts?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829871</id>
	<title>Oh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256125920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought it was some kind of KKK internet...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it was some kind of KKK internet.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it was some kind of KKK internet...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29831293</id>
	<title>Re:Webcams?</title>
	<author>HangingChad</author>
	<datestamp>1256138700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>I'm confused... what do they need webcams for in this project?</i>

</p><p>Live porn.  Hey, you have to fill that broadcast schedule with something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm confused... what do they need webcams for in this project ?
Live porn .
Hey , you have to fill that broadcast schedule with something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I'm confused... what do they need webcams for in this project?
Live porn.
Hey, you have to fill that broadcast schedule with something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29831037</id>
	<title>It's so esoteric</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256135280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What next, a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace\_(programming\_language)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Brainfuck</a> [wikipedia.org] network?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What next , a Brainfuck [ wikipedia.org ] network ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What next, a Brainfuck [wikipedia.org] network?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829795</id>
	<title>Webcams?</title>
	<author>d0rp</author>
	<datestamp>1256125440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm confused... what do they need webcams for in this project? I actually read the article and it didn't mention what they were for either.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm confused... what do they need webcams for in this project ?
I actually read the article and it did n't mention what they were for either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm confused... what do they need webcams for in this project?
I actually read the article and it didn't mention what they were for either.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829673</id>
	<title>White Space</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256124660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How long before the NAACP sues them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How long before the NAACP sues them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long before the NAACP sues them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829707</id>
	<title>As a broadcast engineer...</title>
	<author>jjoelc</author>
	<datestamp>1256124840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>while I am personally glad this finally went through... I can vouch for the potential issues this can cause with existing broadcasts. ATSC is so sensitive to multi-path as it is... (and other forms of interference to boot, but I digress) Throwing out a bunch of unlicensed transmitters, borrowing the space between TV stations is a very scary proposition.</htmltext>
<tokenext>while I am personally glad this finally went through... I can vouch for the potential issues this can cause with existing broadcasts .
ATSC is so sensitive to multi-path as it is... ( and other forms of interference to boot , but I digress ) Throwing out a bunch of unlicensed transmitters , borrowing the space between TV stations is a very scary proposition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>while I am personally glad this finally went through... I can vouch for the potential issues this can cause with existing broadcasts.
ATSC is so sensitive to multi-path as it is... (and other forms of interference to boot, but I digress) Throwing out a bunch of unlicensed transmitters, borrowing the space between TV stations is a very scary proposition.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29835791</id>
	<title>Re:100mW!?</title>
	<author>CompMD</author>
	<datestamp>1256229060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The average wifi card in your laptop has a 30mW transmitter, seems rather pathetically low power to me.</p><p>100mW in VHF with the proper antenna has much better range than a wifi card at the same power with a proper antenna.  For comparison, police walkie-talkies have transmit powers between 1W and 5W usually, and they can cover huge areas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The average wifi card in your laptop has a 30mW transmitter , seems rather pathetically low power to me.100mW in VHF with the proper antenna has much better range than a wifi card at the same power with a proper antenna .
For comparison , police walkie-talkies have transmit powers between 1W and 5W usually , and they can cover huge areas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The average wifi card in your laptop has a 30mW transmitter, seems rather pathetically low power to me.100mW in VHF with the proper antenna has much better range than a wifi card at the same power with a proper antenna.
For comparison, police walkie-talkies have transmit powers between 1W and 5W usually, and they can cover huge areas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829919</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29831011</id>
	<title>Re:Why Claudville?</title>
	<author>plover</author>
	<datestamp>1256134980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Why Claudville?</p></div></blockquote><p>I'm not from Virginia, you insensitive Claud!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why Claudville ? I 'm not from Virginia , you insensitive Claud !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why Claudville?I'm not from Virginia, you insensitive Claud!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29830001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829671</id>
	<title>Awesome</title>
	<author>Linktoreality</author>
	<datestamp>1256124660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, how soon until regular IP companies are put out of business, and we get all of our internet from Whitespace?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , how soon until regular IP companies are put out of business , and we get all of our internet from Whitespace ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, how soon until regular IP companies are put out of business, and we get all of our internet from Whitespace?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829823</id>
	<title>mod dDoWn</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256125680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>live and a job to log on Txhen the</htmltext>
<tokenext>live and a job to log on Txhen the</tokentext>
<sentencetext>live and a job to log on Txhen the</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29831141</id>
	<title>There?</title>
	<author>redneckblues</author>
	<datestamp>1256136720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My Grandma and other realtives live out there and I just did a double take. Would not expect that place to have gotten it first.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My Grandma and other realtives live out there and I just did a double take .
Would not expect that place to have gotten it first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My Grandma and other realtives live out there and I just did a double take.
Would not expect that place to have gotten it first.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29830735</id>
	<title>I don't think that word means what you think it...</title>
	<author>owlnation</author>
	<datestamp>1256132460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>"First Public White-Space Network Is <b>Alive</b>"<br> <br>

I think you mean "<b>live</b>". If it's "alive" we have some real problems ahead of us.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" First Public White-Space Network Is Alive " I think you mean " live " .
If it 's " alive " we have some real problems ahead of us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"First Public White-Space Network Is Alive" 

I think you mean "live".
If it's "alive" we have some real problems ahead of us.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29830081</id>
	<title>Re:100mW!?</title>
	<author>Tiger4</author>
	<datestamp>1256127480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Low power, and small antennas is probably a good thing here.  Small antennas will have poor efficiency, low power will mean short range.  Combined it means the footprint for a given transmitter will be small.  More can be put into a  given community without undue interference.  If anyone wants to put a 5 foot TV aerial on their laptop or Blackberry, they have way more need for this spectrum than the average Joe or Jane.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Low power , and small antennas is probably a good thing here .
Small antennas will have poor efficiency , low power will mean short range .
Combined it means the footprint for a given transmitter will be small .
More can be put into a given community without undue interference .
If anyone wants to put a 5 foot TV aerial on their laptop or Blackberry , they have way more need for this spectrum than the average Joe or Jane .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Low power, and small antennas is probably a good thing here.
Small antennas will have poor efficiency, low power will mean short range.
Combined it means the footprint for a given transmitter will be small.
More can be put into a  given community without undue interference.
If anyone wants to put a 5 foot TV aerial on their laptop or Blackberry, they have way more need for this spectrum than the average Joe or Jane.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829919</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29830001</id>
	<title>Why Claudville?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256126940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why Claudville?  According to the Wikipedia page, there are around 20,000 people in the entire county.  And according to the FCC DTV maps, they can only expect to receive two (!) TV stations, both from the Winston-Salem, North Carolina area.  See here: (enter Claudville, VA)  <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/maps/" title="fcc.gov">http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/maps/</a> [fcc.gov]</p><p>That is perhaps why they are testing it there.  Its not hard to avoid active TV channels if there are only two.. and they are on adjacent RF channels (31 and 32).</p><p>-molo</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why Claudville ?
According to the Wikipedia page , there are around 20,000 people in the entire county .
And according to the FCC DTV maps , they can only expect to receive two ( !
) TV stations , both from the Winston-Salem , North Carolina area .
See here : ( enter Claudville , VA ) http : //www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/maps/ [ fcc.gov ] That is perhaps why they are testing it there .
Its not hard to avoid active TV channels if there are only two.. and they are on adjacent RF channels ( 31 and 32 ) .-molo</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why Claudville?
According to the Wikipedia page, there are around 20,000 people in the entire county.
And according to the FCC DTV maps, they can only expect to receive two (!
) TV stations, both from the Winston-Salem, North Carolina area.
See here: (enter Claudville, VA)  http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/maps/ [fcc.gov]That is perhaps why they are testing it there.
Its not hard to avoid active TV channels if there are only two.. and they are on adjacent RF channels (31 and 32).-molo</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2158249_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29833651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829707
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2158249_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29833533
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29830001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2158249_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29831293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829795
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2158249_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29831011
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29830001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2158249_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29830081
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829919
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2158249_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829579
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_2158249_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29835791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829919
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2158249.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829919
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29830081
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29835791
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2158249.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829707
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29833651
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2158249.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29831573
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2158249.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29830001
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29833533
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29831011
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2158249.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29831151
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2158249.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829703
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2158249.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829545
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2158249.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829531
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829579
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2158249.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829795
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29831293
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2158249.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829671
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_2158249.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_2158249.29829823
</commentlist>
</conversation>
