<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_21_1535217</id>
	<title>Colorado Newspaper Looking for Marijuana Reviewer<span class="vballoon-marquee rd\_5"><span>Comments:</span><a href="#">171</a></span></title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1256142360000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Westword, an "alternative" newspaper in Denver, has placed an ad for a <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6397715/Colorado-newspaper-Westword-advertises-for-marijuana-reviewer.html">medicinal marijuana reviewer</a>. The paper has been running reviews by a staff writer, but the writer "wanted to return to the day job," opening up the position. Applicants must write a short essay on "What Marijuana Means To Me," and a MacGyver-like ability to make a bong out of common household objects is a plus.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Westword , an " alternative " newspaper in Denver , has placed an ad for a medicinal marijuana reviewer .
The paper has been running reviews by a staff writer , but the writer " wanted to return to the day job , " opening up the position .
Applicants must write a short essay on " What Marijuana Means To Me , " and a MacGyver-like ability to make a bong out of common household objects is a plus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Westword, an "alternative" newspaper in Denver, has placed an ad for a medicinal marijuana reviewer.
The paper has been running reviews by a staff writer, but the writer "wanted to return to the day job," opening up the position.
Applicants must write a short essay on "What Marijuana Means To Me," and a MacGyver-like ability to make a bong out of common household objects is a plus.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29852389</id>
	<title>Good God you 4-digit Methuselah!!!</title>
	<author>Xaedalus</author>
	<datestamp>1256296860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is the fifth time today I've seen you posting today. What awful purpose could possibly have driven you out from your dark hoary crypt? The stars aren't even right yet!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the fifth time today I 've seen you posting today .
What awful purpose could possibly have driven you out from your dark hoary crypt ?
The stars are n't even right yet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the fifth time today I've seen you posting today.
What awful purpose could possibly have driven you out from your dark hoary crypt?
The stars aren't even right yet!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825005</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825091</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like a great job</title>
	<author>spun</author>
	<datestamp>1256147820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I did computer security for a major San Francisco medical marijuana club, a very well respected non-profit group that was instrumental in working with the city health department to craft guidelines and city card procedures, and with the police in sensitivity training. After a long day of product testing, I relaxed with some more product testing.</p><p>All in all, you'd be surprised by the high quality of work that got done. And so would I, as I can't remember any of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did computer security for a major San Francisco medical marijuana club , a very well respected non-profit group that was instrumental in working with the city health department to craft guidelines and city card procedures , and with the police in sensitivity training .
After a long day of product testing , I relaxed with some more product testing.All in all , you 'd be surprised by the high quality of work that got done .
And so would I , as I ca n't remember any of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I did computer security for a major San Francisco medical marijuana club, a very well respected non-profit group that was instrumental in working with the city health department to craft guidelines and city card procedures, and with the police in sensitivity training.
After a long day of product testing, I relaxed with some more product testing.All in all, you'd be surprised by the high quality of work that got done.
And so would I, as I can't remember any of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825685</id>
	<title>And this is why medical pot has a hard time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256150100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This article pretty much covers why medical pot is having such a hard time.  The cause has been co-opted by people trying to use it as a backdoor to get pot legalized.  California is having a lot of problems and people are turning against medical pot because it is being abused so much.  A lot of the prescriptions are handed out without an real medical exam for generic things like "chronic pain".  Chronic pain is a real condition, but it is being used as an excuse for people to legally get pot.</p><p>I'm all for medical pot, but it should be handled like any other medicine.  It should be prescribed by a doctor for a legit condition and filled by a pharmacy, not by guys growing it in their back yard.  If a doctor is prescribing it needless, he should be prosecuted the same as if he was handing out Ritalin or some other drug to people who don't need it.  Unfortunately, many people are more interested in getting high than actually helping people who actually need ti for medicinal purposes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This article pretty much covers why medical pot is having such a hard time .
The cause has been co-opted by people trying to use it as a backdoor to get pot legalized .
California is having a lot of problems and people are turning against medical pot because it is being abused so much .
A lot of the prescriptions are handed out without an real medical exam for generic things like " chronic pain " .
Chronic pain is a real condition , but it is being used as an excuse for people to legally get pot.I 'm all for medical pot , but it should be handled like any other medicine .
It should be prescribed by a doctor for a legit condition and filled by a pharmacy , not by guys growing it in their back yard .
If a doctor is prescribing it needless , he should be prosecuted the same as if he was handing out Ritalin or some other drug to people who do n't need it .
Unfortunately , many people are more interested in getting high than actually helping people who actually need ti for medicinal purposes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This article pretty much covers why medical pot is having such a hard time.
The cause has been co-opted by people trying to use it as a backdoor to get pot legalized.
California is having a lot of problems and people are turning against medical pot because it is being abused so much.
A lot of the prescriptions are handed out without an real medical exam for generic things like "chronic pain".
Chronic pain is a real condition, but it is being used as an excuse for people to legally get pot.I'm all for medical pot, but it should be handled like any other medicine.
It should be prescribed by a doctor for a legit condition and filled by a pharmacy, not by guys growing it in their back yard.
If a doctor is prescribing it needless, he should be prosecuted the same as if he was handing out Ritalin or some other drug to people who don't need it.
Unfortunately, many people are more interested in getting high than actually helping people who actually need ti for medicinal purposes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29832101</id>
	<title>Re:Does that mean</title>
	<author>Afghanica</author>
	<datestamp>1256149440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course not!</p><p>Staff meetings end at 4:19</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course not ! Staff meetings end at 4 : 19</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course not!Staff meetings end at 4:19</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825305</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825311</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1256148840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All this time, my parents were after me saying I'd never get a good job and be successful if I did drugs.  Then I find out about this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All this time , my parents were after me saying I 'd never get a good job and be successful if I did drugs .
Then I find out about this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All this time, my parents were after me saying I'd never get a good job and be successful if I did drugs.
Then I find out about this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29826893</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why medical pot has a hard time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256154720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Co-opted or not, it <b>should</b> be legalized. It should have never been prohibited in the first place, just like alcohol should have never been prohibited in the 20s. It was a very large, costly, and deadly mistake. Everybody loses, except the architects of prohibition at the top of the power pyramid who cash in big time.</p><p>The US now has the highest incarceration rate in the <i>entire world</i> -- even higher than totalitarian regimes such as china -- and this is largely the result of drug prohibition. A very large percentage of those inmates were convicted on non-violent marijuana-related offenses. To lock these people in a cage like animals isn't just inhumane, it's orwellian and reeks of self-interest, rather than community interest (which government claims to serve).</p><p>And let's not turn a blind eye to the violent crime, widespread corruption of law enforcement, and giant misuse of public funding that is a direct result of prohibition.</p><p>If medical marijuana provides the stepping stone to legalization, all the better. To think that you deserve a say in who has the right to use marijuana and who doesn't is just immature and self-centered beyond belief.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Co-opted or not , it should be legalized .
It should have never been prohibited in the first place , just like alcohol should have never been prohibited in the 20s .
It was a very large , costly , and deadly mistake .
Everybody loses , except the architects of prohibition at the top of the power pyramid who cash in big time.The US now has the highest incarceration rate in the entire world -- even higher than totalitarian regimes such as china -- and this is largely the result of drug prohibition .
A very large percentage of those inmates were convicted on non-violent marijuana-related offenses .
To lock these people in a cage like animals is n't just inhumane , it 's orwellian and reeks of self-interest , rather than community interest ( which government claims to serve ) .And let 's not turn a blind eye to the violent crime , widespread corruption of law enforcement , and giant misuse of public funding that is a direct result of prohibition.If medical marijuana provides the stepping stone to legalization , all the better .
To think that you deserve a say in who has the right to use marijuana and who does n't is just immature and self-centered beyond belief .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Co-opted or not, it should be legalized.
It should have never been prohibited in the first place, just like alcohol should have never been prohibited in the 20s.
It was a very large, costly, and deadly mistake.
Everybody loses, except the architects of prohibition at the top of the power pyramid who cash in big time.The US now has the highest incarceration rate in the entire world -- even higher than totalitarian regimes such as china -- and this is largely the result of drug prohibition.
A very large percentage of those inmates were convicted on non-violent marijuana-related offenses.
To lock these people in a cage like animals isn't just inhumane, it's orwellian and reeks of self-interest, rather than community interest (which government claims to serve).And let's not turn a blind eye to the violent crime, widespread corruption of law enforcement, and giant misuse of public funding that is a direct result of prohibition.If medical marijuana provides the stepping stone to legalization, all the better.
To think that you deserve a say in who has the right to use marijuana and who doesn't is just immature and self-centered beyond belief.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825685</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29836599</id>
	<title>California Cannabis Initiative dot ORG</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256232660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you are a registered california voter or are able to register as a voter in California.... PLEASE head on over to http://californiacannabisinitiative.org so you can download, print and sign the petition and mail it in.</p><p>If you can.... PLEASE VOLUNTEER as this initiative will offer the most freedoms but doesn't have the funding the wrong initiatives do.  This initiative will release cannabis prisoners and create new jobs and industries around hemp/cannabis.</p><p>By the way..... If you're in any way negative about cannabis or hemp you need to check your facts.  Chances are you'll find you don't have any to back up your opinions.  Please do the research on a subject before 'talking' about it to other people or 'forming an opinion' on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you are a registered california voter or are able to register as a voter in California.... PLEASE head on over to http : //californiacannabisinitiative.org so you can download , print and sign the petition and mail it in.If you can.... PLEASE VOLUNTEER as this initiative will offer the most freedoms but does n't have the funding the wrong initiatives do .
This initiative will release cannabis prisoners and create new jobs and industries around hemp/cannabis.By the way..... If you 're in any way negative about cannabis or hemp you need to check your facts .
Chances are you 'll find you do n't have any to back up your opinions .
Please do the research on a subject before 'talking ' about it to other people or 'forming an opinion ' on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you are a registered california voter or are able to register as a voter in California.... PLEASE head on over to http://californiacannabisinitiative.org so you can download, print and sign the petition and mail it in.If you can.... PLEASE VOLUNTEER as this initiative will offer the most freedoms but doesn't have the funding the wrong initiatives do.
This initiative will release cannabis prisoners and create new jobs and industries around hemp/cannabis.By the way..... If you're in any way negative about cannabis or hemp you need to check your facts.
Chances are you'll find you don't have any to back up your opinions.
Please do the research on a subject before 'talking' about it to other people or 'forming an opinion' on it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825661</id>
	<title>Re:Bong?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256150040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This involves heating the plant material just enough to vaporize the active ingredients, but not enough to ignite it and cause smoke/ash.</p></div><p>The temperature range for vaporizing cannabis Is 180 - 200 C (356 - 392 F).

Now maybe someone can post in here how to build your own vaporizer?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This involves heating the plant material just enough to vaporize the active ingredients , but not enough to ignite it and cause smoke/ash.The temperature range for vaporizing cannabis Is 180 - 200 C ( 356 - 392 F ) .
Now maybe someone can post in here how to build your own vaporizer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This involves heating the plant material just enough to vaporize the active ingredients, but not enough to ignite it and cause smoke/ash.The temperature range for vaporizing cannabis Is 180 - 200 C (356 - 392 F).
Now maybe someone can post in here how to build your own vaporizer?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29826183</id>
	<title>Re:Actually</title>
	<author>MillionthMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1256152020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why don't you just blow it toward a window fan, so it stinks up the outside for the neighbors?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't you just blow it toward a window fan , so it stinks up the outside for the neighbors ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't you just blow it toward a window fan, so it stinks up the outside for the neighbors?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825181</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29830867</id>
	<title>Introducing the programme in the UK</title>
	<author>thestjohn</author>
	<datestamp>1256133780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm UK based, and our only medical marijuana programme is the use of the synthetic variants such as Marinol, which doesn't do anywhere near as good a job of relieving pain. It's a Class-B drug here, so it's not technically illegal to prescibe it as a doctor as it does have medicinal value, but I imagine there are other regulatory roadblocks to doing that. Which is a shame, because I know people who have tried Marinol for their pain and found it wanting, but when introduced to a vaporiser and some good bud they can get a few hours relief. When you can see a cancer patient smile because they've attenuated their pain without having to reach for the opiates, it just beggars belief that the UK government won't try something like the approach they use in some US states. Hell, the UK government even admits they grow some good shit for research purposes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm UK based , and our only medical marijuana programme is the use of the synthetic variants such as Marinol , which does n't do anywhere near as good a job of relieving pain .
It 's a Class-B drug here , so it 's not technically illegal to prescibe it as a doctor as it does have medicinal value , but I imagine there are other regulatory roadblocks to doing that .
Which is a shame , because I know people who have tried Marinol for their pain and found it wanting , but when introduced to a vaporiser and some good bud they can get a few hours relief .
When you can see a cancer patient smile because they 've attenuated their pain without having to reach for the opiates , it just beggars belief that the UK government wo n't try something like the approach they use in some US states .
Hell , the UK government even admits they grow some good shit for research purposes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm UK based, and our only medical marijuana programme is the use of the synthetic variants such as Marinol, which doesn't do anywhere near as good a job of relieving pain.
It's a Class-B drug here, so it's not technically illegal to prescibe it as a doctor as it does have medicinal value, but I imagine there are other regulatory roadblocks to doing that.
Which is a shame, because I know people who have tried Marinol for their pain and found it wanting, but when introduced to a vaporiser and some good bud they can get a few hours relief.
When you can see a cancer patient smile because they've attenuated their pain without having to reach for the opiates, it just beggars belief that the UK government won't try something like the approach they use in some US states.
Hell, the UK government even admits they grow some good shit for research purposes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29842703</id>
	<title>Re:Sigh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256230440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The fact that xanax, vicodin, and perkaset don't get their own reviews is testiment to why they shouldn't even be medicines. Herb for everyone, that what I always say.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The fact that xanax , vicodin , and perkaset do n't get their own reviews is testiment to why they should n't even be medicines .
Herb for everyone , that what I always say .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fact that xanax, vicodin, and perkaset don't get their own reviews is testiment to why they shouldn't even be medicines.
Herb for everyone, that what I always say.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29830395</id>
	<title>Re:Actually</title>
	<author>Conditioner</author>
	<datestamp>1256129820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Build a spoofer, a cardboard roll with a few fabric softener cloths in it. when you exhale do it through the spoofer out a window. Doesn't kill all the smell but it get rid of a large amount of it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Build a spoofer , a cardboard roll with a few fabric softener cloths in it .
when you exhale do it through the spoofer out a window .
Does n't kill all the smell but it get rid of a large amount of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Build a spoofer, a cardboard roll with a few fabric softener cloths in it.
when you exhale do it through the spoofer out a window.
Doesn't kill all the smell but it get rid of a large amount of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825181</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825773</id>
	<title>Ghetto bong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256150460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A bong made out of household items (such as water bottle and makeshift bowlpiece), or "ghetto bong" can create unwanted smoke that could be bad for you and is unnecessary in getting high. My friend once smoked a ghetto bong with a foil bowl piece and got thick yellow smoke, which after inhaling resulted in vomiting and probably other bad things. Therefore it is not recommended to use ghetto bongs unless in dire circumstances. Sure, my friend was laughing through his tears he was so baked, but I don't think it was very good for him.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A bong made out of household items ( such as water bottle and makeshift bowlpiece ) , or " ghetto bong " can create unwanted smoke that could be bad for you and is unnecessary in getting high .
My friend once smoked a ghetto bong with a foil bowl piece and got thick yellow smoke , which after inhaling resulted in vomiting and probably other bad things .
Therefore it is not recommended to use ghetto bongs unless in dire circumstances .
Sure , my friend was laughing through his tears he was so baked , but I do n't think it was very good for him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A bong made out of household items (such as water bottle and makeshift bowlpiece), or "ghetto bong" can create unwanted smoke that could be bad for you and is unnecessary in getting high.
My friend once smoked a ghetto bong with a foil bowl piece and got thick yellow smoke, which after inhaling resulted in vomiting and probably other bad things.
Therefore it is not recommended to use ghetto bongs unless in dire circumstances.
Sure, my friend was laughing through his tears he was so baked, but I don't think it was very good for him.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29827451</id>
	<title>Hi I wanted to apply for...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256157300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... the hookers and blow Reviewer position.</p><p>Heres my essay :<br>What hookers and blow mean to me and how they changed my life.</p><p>I just wanna party, which naturally only works with blow and women. Since hookers are not considered human I can have sex with em in front of a mirror and try to hunt 'em down with a chainsaw.</p><p>So In conclusion I have to say that I love hookers and blow.</p><p>I do not know how to build bongs BUT i can make lines on any surface.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... the hookers and blow Reviewer position.Heres my essay : What hookers and blow mean to me and how they changed my life.I just wan na party , which naturally only works with blow and women .
Since hookers are not considered human I can have sex with em in front of a mirror and try to hunt 'em down with a chainsaw.So In conclusion I have to say that I love hookers and blow.I do not know how to build bongs BUT i can make lines on any surface .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... the hookers and blow Reviewer position.Heres my essay :What hookers and blow mean to me and how they changed my life.I just wanna party, which naturally only works with blow and women.
Since hookers are not considered human I can have sex with em in front of a mirror and try to hunt 'em down with a chainsaw.So In conclusion I have to say that I love hookers and blow.I do not know how to build bongs BUT i can make lines on any surface.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29827541</id>
	<title>Re:Bong?</title>
	<author>adisakp</author>
	<datestamp>1256157720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interesting tidbit: <a href="http://www.alinea-restaurant.com/" title="alinea-restaurant.com">Alinea</a> [alinea-restaurant.com] provided <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5346578/what-is-this" title="gizmodo.com">a "legal" reason to allow herbal vaporizers to be imported into the US</a> [gizmodo.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting tidbit : Alinea [ alinea-restaurant.com ] provided a " legal " reason to allow herbal vaporizers to be imported into the US [ gizmodo.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting tidbit: Alinea [alinea-restaurant.com] provided a "legal" reason to allow herbal vaporizers to be imported into the US [gizmodo.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825859</id>
	<title>Re:Sigh...</title>
	<author>xanadu113</author>
	<datestamp>1256150820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Do you review xanax?  Vicodin?  Perkaset?</p></div><p>They only make one kind of each of those medicines... cannabis has hundreds of strains..</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you review xanax ?
Vicodin ? Perkaset ? They only make one kind of each of those medicines... cannabis has hundreds of strains. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you review xanax?
Vicodin?  Perkaset?They only make one kind of each of those medicines... cannabis has hundreds of strains..
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733</id>
	<title>Bong?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256146380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just a FYI, the medical marijuana community normally encourages the use of vaporizers instead of smoking. This involves heating the plant material just enough to vaporize the active ingredients, but not enough to ignite it and cause smoke/ash. The result is a smoother, easier administration of your medicine (or recreational drug) without the tar and carcinigans associated with smoking. It also doesn't stink up the house.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just a FYI , the medical marijuana community normally encourages the use of vaporizers instead of smoking .
This involves heating the plant material just enough to vaporize the active ingredients , but not enough to ignite it and cause smoke/ash .
The result is a smoother , easier administration of your medicine ( or recreational drug ) without the tar and carcinigans associated with smoking .
It also does n't stink up the house .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just a FYI, the medical marijuana community normally encourages the use of vaporizers instead of smoking.
This involves heating the plant material just enough to vaporize the active ingredients, but not enough to ignite it and cause smoke/ash.
The result is a smoother, easier administration of your medicine (or recreational drug) without the tar and carcinigans associated with smoking.
It also doesn't stink up the house.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29830617</id>
	<title>Re:Ironic use of a fertility idol...</title>
	<author>DigiShaman</author>
	<datestamp>1256131320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It doesn't cause shrinkage (that I know of at least). However, it has been proven to reduce sperm count. Then again, quite a few man-made drugs cause side effects with reproductive systems too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't cause shrinkage ( that I know of at least ) .
However , it has been proven to reduce sperm count .
Then again , quite a few man-made drugs cause side effects with reproductive systems too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't cause shrinkage (that I know of at least).
However, it has been proven to reduce sperm count.
Then again, quite a few man-made drugs cause side effects with reproductive systems too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824863</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824863</id>
	<title>Ironic use of a fertility idol...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256146860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Am I the only one who thought the fertility idol icon was funny, considering cannabis is thought to cause...er...shrinkage.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one who thought the fertility idol icon was funny , considering cannabis is thought to cause...er...shrinkage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one who thought the fertility idol icon was funny, considering cannabis is thought to cause...er...shrinkage.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824803</id>
	<title>Sign me up!</title>
	<author>FoolishBluntman</author>
	<datestamp>1256146620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey!, I'll volunteer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey ! , I 'll volunteer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey!, I'll volunteer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29829001</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why medical pot has a hard time</title>
	<author>P0ltergeist333</author>
	<datestamp>1256120880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone ever stop to consider that there might be many more people with chronic pain than anyone realized? Or that many of those people don't go to the doctor for their pain because they know they're going to get an opiate, which does more harm than good? Since pot was decriminalized and made legal for medical purposes in my area, there has been ONE case of someone doing stupid things (and he likely had other issues). On the other hand, EVERY DAY you can look at the police notes in the paper and see idiots doing stupid things while under the influence of alcohol. History has proven that prohibition of widely popular substances does not work. As long as they are not giving cards to juveniles without good reason, (most of whom have not lived long enough to experience the type or amount of injuries that can create a state of chronic pain, which largely limits MM to those that are undergoing chemo or have some other chronic or fatal condition) who cares?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone ever stop to consider that there might be many more people with chronic pain than anyone realized ?
Or that many of those people do n't go to the doctor for their pain because they know they 're going to get an opiate , which does more harm than good ?
Since pot was decriminalized and made legal for medical purposes in my area , there has been ONE case of someone doing stupid things ( and he likely had other issues ) .
On the other hand , EVERY DAY you can look at the police notes in the paper and see idiots doing stupid things while under the influence of alcohol .
History has proven that prohibition of widely popular substances does not work .
As long as they are not giving cards to juveniles without good reason , ( most of whom have not lived long enough to experience the type or amount of injuries that can create a state of chronic pain , which largely limits MM to those that are undergoing chemo or have some other chronic or fatal condition ) who cares ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone ever stop to consider that there might be many more people with chronic pain than anyone realized?
Or that many of those people don't go to the doctor for their pain because they know they're going to get an opiate, which does more harm than good?
Since pot was decriminalized and made legal for medical purposes in my area, there has been ONE case of someone doing stupid things (and he likely had other issues).
On the other hand, EVERY DAY you can look at the police notes in the paper and see idiots doing stupid things while under the influence of alcohol.
History has proven that prohibition of widely popular substances does not work.
As long as they are not giving cards to juveniles without good reason, (most of whom have not lived long enough to experience the type or amount of injuries that can create a state of chronic pain, which largely limits MM to those that are undergoing chemo or have some other chronic or fatal condition) who cares?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825685</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29826625</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why medical pot has a hard time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256153700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This article pretty much covers why medical pot is having such a hard time.  The cause has been co-opted by people trying to use it as a backdoor to get pot legalized.... It should be prescribed by a doctor for a legit condition and filled by a pharmacy, not by guys growing it in their back yard....</p></div><p>You have the dynamic exactly backwards. The medical cannabis has had a hard time because the law enforcement-prison industrial complex has refused to treat it according to law and science, seeking to keep it classified as the most dangerous drug in existence (more so that cocaine and heroin!) as a way to maintain criminalization for all uses.</p><p>If federal law and its own regulations were actually followed by the DEA cannabis would be listed as a Schedule V drug (the least restrictive category) rather than Schedule I (the most restrictive) since a commercial preparation of pure THC (Marinol) is listed at only Schedule III. This error in logic, science and law has not, by the way, yet been corrected by the Obama Administration.</p><p>A system of regulated access to cannabis could have been set up 35 years ago, treating it like any other pharmaceutical. But the hide-bound opposition of the happy drug warriors prevented that, leaving grass-root state-by-state initiatives the only option for gaining access. As a side effect of this process, overall acceptance of cannabis use has actually increased and resistance to legalization has decreased as more people have been exposed to this issue, as well as broadly disseminating cannabis cultivation experience among the population.</p><p>The press coverage usually does not acknowledge, by the way, the degree to which the drug enforcement sector of the economy has attempted to circumvent the state initiatives. Despite very misleading claims the cannabis is "almost legal" in California, the fact is state and local prosecutors, and drug police at every level of government have spent years trying to pretend Prop. 215 never passed: declaring that acquiring cannabis according to the law did not protect you from arrest and confiscation of property (you just got to use it as a defense once on trial), arresting people of federal charges as if they were DEA agents, numerous counties refusing to issue the required ID cards etc., etc.</p><p>The net effect of this unrelenting (and self-serving) war on medical cannabis has been to persuade a growing number to people that the only effective protection from harassment by lawless police forces and prosecutors is to go for outright legalization. The drug warriors have left no choice.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This article pretty much covers why medical pot is having such a hard time .
The cause has been co-opted by people trying to use it as a backdoor to get pot legalized.... It should be prescribed by a doctor for a legit condition and filled by a pharmacy , not by guys growing it in their back yard....You have the dynamic exactly backwards .
The medical cannabis has had a hard time because the law enforcement-prison industrial complex has refused to treat it according to law and science , seeking to keep it classified as the most dangerous drug in existence ( more so that cocaine and heroin !
) as a way to maintain criminalization for all uses.If federal law and its own regulations were actually followed by the DEA cannabis would be listed as a Schedule V drug ( the least restrictive category ) rather than Schedule I ( the most restrictive ) since a commercial preparation of pure THC ( Marinol ) is listed at only Schedule III .
This error in logic , science and law has not , by the way , yet been corrected by the Obama Administration.A system of regulated access to cannabis could have been set up 35 years ago , treating it like any other pharmaceutical .
But the hide-bound opposition of the happy drug warriors prevented that , leaving grass-root state-by-state initiatives the only option for gaining access .
As a side effect of this process , overall acceptance of cannabis use has actually increased and resistance to legalization has decreased as more people have been exposed to this issue , as well as broadly disseminating cannabis cultivation experience among the population.The press coverage usually does not acknowledge , by the way , the degree to which the drug enforcement sector of the economy has attempted to circumvent the state initiatives .
Despite very misleading claims the cannabis is " almost legal " in California , the fact is state and local prosecutors , and drug police at every level of government have spent years trying to pretend Prop .
215 never passed : declaring that acquiring cannabis according to the law did not protect you from arrest and confiscation of property ( you just got to use it as a defense once on trial ) , arresting people of federal charges as if they were DEA agents , numerous counties refusing to issue the required ID cards etc. , etc.The net effect of this unrelenting ( and self-serving ) war on medical cannabis has been to persuade a growing number to people that the only effective protection from harassment by lawless police forces and prosecutors is to go for outright legalization .
The drug warriors have left no choice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This article pretty much covers why medical pot is having such a hard time.
The cause has been co-opted by people trying to use it as a backdoor to get pot legalized.... It should be prescribed by a doctor for a legit condition and filled by a pharmacy, not by guys growing it in their back yard....You have the dynamic exactly backwards.
The medical cannabis has had a hard time because the law enforcement-prison industrial complex has refused to treat it according to law and science, seeking to keep it classified as the most dangerous drug in existence (more so that cocaine and heroin!
) as a way to maintain criminalization for all uses.If federal law and its own regulations were actually followed by the DEA cannabis would be listed as a Schedule V drug (the least restrictive category) rather than Schedule I (the most restrictive) since a commercial preparation of pure THC (Marinol) is listed at only Schedule III.
This error in logic, science and law has not, by the way, yet been corrected by the Obama Administration.A system of regulated access to cannabis could have been set up 35 years ago, treating it like any other pharmaceutical.
But the hide-bound opposition of the happy drug warriors prevented that, leaving grass-root state-by-state initiatives the only option for gaining access.
As a side effect of this process, overall acceptance of cannabis use has actually increased and resistance to legalization has decreased as more people have been exposed to this issue, as well as broadly disseminating cannabis cultivation experience among the population.The press coverage usually does not acknowledge, by the way, the degree to which the drug enforcement sector of the economy has attempted to circumvent the state initiatives.
Despite very misleading claims the cannabis is "almost legal" in California, the fact is state and local prosecutors, and drug police at every level of government have spent years trying to pretend Prop.
215 never passed: declaring that acquiring cannabis according to the law did not protect you from arrest and confiscation of property (you just got to use it as a defense once on trial), arresting people of federal charges as if they were DEA agents, numerous counties refusing to issue the required ID cards etc., etc.The net effect of this unrelenting (and self-serving) war on medical cannabis has been to persuade a growing number to people that the only effective protection from harassment by lawless police forces and prosecutors is to go for outright legalization.
The drug warriors have left no choice.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825685</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825799</id>
	<title>Re:Bong?</title>
	<author>King Coopa</author>
	<datestamp>1256150580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you want to try the effects of a vaporizer without having to throw down the money, try looking up "knife hits"</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want to try the effects of a vaporizer without having to throw down the money , try looking up " knife hits "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want to try the effects of a vaporizer without having to throw down the money, try looking up "knife hits"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29827089</id>
	<title>Re:Actually</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256155680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you're doing it wrong</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you 're doing it wrong</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you're doing it wrong</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825181</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825911</id>
	<title>Re:Sigh...</title>
	<author>anarchyboy</author>
	<datestamp>1256151000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If it was just a placebo effect then why bother with the pot at all there would be much easier ways to administer it so really if it's being perscribed its almost certainly doing better than placebo in trials.<br> <br>

As for reviewing it medicinal pot unlike a pill like vicodin is not allways going to be the same, it will come in different strengths, taste different, give different highs (side effects I guess) and this can not and is not tested and controlled in the same way that every vicodin pill is exactly the same. So in that respect reviewing is useful.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it was just a placebo effect then why bother with the pot at all there would be much easier ways to administer it so really if it 's being perscribed its almost certainly doing better than placebo in trials .
As for reviewing it medicinal pot unlike a pill like vicodin is not allways going to be the same , it will come in different strengths , taste different , give different highs ( side effects I guess ) and this can not and is not tested and controlled in the same way that every vicodin pill is exactly the same .
So in that respect reviewing is useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it was just a placebo effect then why bother with the pot at all there would be much easier ways to administer it so really if it's being perscribed its almost certainly doing better than placebo in trials.
As for reviewing it medicinal pot unlike a pill like vicodin is not allways going to be the same, it will come in different strengths, taste different, give different highs (side effects I guess) and this can not and is not tested and controlled in the same way that every vicodin pill is exactly the same.
So in that respect reviewing is useful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29831531</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>Alpha830RulZ</author>
	<datestamp>1256141640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I wonder if you have to pass a drug test.</p></div><p>You do, but its pretty simple: "Can you roll a tight one?"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if you have to pass a drug test.You do , but its pretty simple : " Can you roll a tight one ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if you have to pass a drug test.You do, but its pretty simple: "Can you roll a tight one?
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29827141</id>
	<title>Re:Sigh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256155920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Another major frown to this idiotic newspaper.  Do you realize what you're doing?  You're playing exactly into the fears that the people who oppose this drug have; that it's just a bunch of potheads that want it.  Do you review xanax?  Vicodin?  Perkaset?  No?  Well then fuck off.</p></div><p>The westword is an alternative Denver magazine. It certainly is NOT a mainstream paper like the Denver Post. So I don't know what you're getting all excited about. Anyone who takes half the crap in the westword seriously is deluding themselves.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Another major frown to this idiotic newspaper .
Do you realize what you 're doing ?
You 're playing exactly into the fears that the people who oppose this drug have ; that it 's just a bunch of potheads that want it .
Do you review xanax ?
Vicodin ? Perkaset ?
No ? Well then fuck off.The westword is an alternative Denver magazine .
It certainly is NOT a mainstream paper like the Denver Post .
So I do n't know what you 're getting all excited about .
Anyone who takes half the crap in the westword seriously is deluding themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another major frown to this idiotic newspaper.
Do you realize what you're doing?
You're playing exactly into the fears that the people who oppose this drug have; that it's just a bunch of potheads that want it.
Do you review xanax?
Vicodin?  Perkaset?
No?  Well then fuck off.The westword is an alternative Denver magazine.
It certainly is NOT a mainstream paper like the Denver Post.
So I don't know what you're getting all excited about.
Anyone who takes half the crap in the westword seriously is deluding themselves.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29836301</id>
	<title>Re:Sigh...</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1256231280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it si a placebo, the  it shouldn't be prescribed due to ethics concerns.</p><p>"(although recent research suggests that placebos can produce physical results"<br>No, it doesn't, but I'd like to see your citation.</p><p>What few actually studies there are of marijuana do indicate a real effect, and it's plain wrong that it can't be prescribed without a major fit.</p><p>What this paper is doing is a good thing; they are making people aware that medical marijuana is out there, and what it's good for.<br>It's just more religious right crap being shoved down our throats, and it's embarrassing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it si a placebo , the it should n't be prescribed due to ethics concerns .
" ( although recent research suggests that placebos can produce physical results " No , it does n't , but I 'd like to see your citation.What few actually studies there are of marijuana do indicate a real effect , and it 's plain wrong that it ca n't be prescribed without a major fit.What this paper is doing is a good thing ; they are making people aware that medical marijuana is out there , and what it 's good for.It 's just more religious right crap being shoved down our throats , and it 's embarrassing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it si a placebo, the  it shouldn't be prescribed due to ethics concerns.
"(although recent research suggests that placebos can produce physical results"No, it doesn't, but I'd like to see your citation.What few actually studies there are of marijuana do indicate a real effect, and it's plain wrong that it can't be prescribed without a major fit.What this paper is doing is a good thing; they are making people aware that medical marijuana is out there, and what it's good for.It's just more religious right crap being shoved down our throats, and it's embarrassing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29828381</id>
	<title>Drugs are bad, mmkay?</title>
	<author>Golddess</author>
	<datestamp>1256117940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone else (of the few who don't use adblock or the likes) happen to see an anti-drug ad just below the story?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone else ( of the few who do n't use adblock or the likes ) happen to see an anti-drug ad just below the story ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone else (of the few who don't use adblock or the likes) happen to see an anti-drug ad just below the story?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29841657</id>
	<title>Re:Schedule 1 Status</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256215860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love marijuana, even though I've been forced to take extremely harmful anti-psychotic drugs by the government for years because I used to smoke it.  I dream of the day I can get high without being condemned by family and friends and abused by government institutions.  I live in Australia.  I read on www.reuters.com that if things keep going the way they are it will be legal in 10 years in the US.  I can only hope and pray!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love marijuana , even though I 've been forced to take extremely harmful anti-psychotic drugs by the government for years because I used to smoke it .
I dream of the day I can get high without being condemned by family and friends and abused by government institutions .
I live in Australia .
I read on www.reuters.com that if things keep going the way they are it will be legal in 10 years in the US .
I can only hope and pray !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love marijuana, even though I've been forced to take extremely harmful anti-psychotic drugs by the government for years because I used to smoke it.
I dream of the day I can get high without being condemned by family and friends and abused by government institutions.
I live in Australia.
I read on www.reuters.com that if things keep going the way they are it will be legal in 10 years in the US.
I can only hope and pray!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29828091</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825659</id>
	<title>Re:Bong?</title>
	<author>smilnrt</author>
	<datestamp>1256149980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like you are qualified for this position!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:o)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like you are qualified for this position !
: o )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like you are qualified for this position!
:o)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29829491</id>
	<title>Re:Sigh...</title>
	<author>Just Some Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1256123400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You're playing exactly into the fears that the people who oppose this drug have; that it's just a bunch of potheads that want it.</p></div><p>For every chronic pain or nausea victim, there are 20 stoners saying, "right on, dude!"  Know what?  More power to 'em.  If you can go out and get staggering drunk legally, you should be able to go out and get staggeringly stoned legally.  I'm not a stoner, but I believe in your right to be one.  So stocking caps off to Westword for admitting what everyone else already knows: a big chung of the legalization movement consists of normal, otherwise law-abiding people who want to get stoned.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're playing exactly into the fears that the people who oppose this drug have ; that it 's just a bunch of potheads that want it.For every chronic pain or nausea victim , there are 20 stoners saying , " right on , dude !
" Know what ?
More power to 'em .
If you can go out and get staggering drunk legally , you should be able to go out and get staggeringly stoned legally .
I 'm not a stoner , but I believe in your right to be one .
So stocking caps off to Westword for admitting what everyone else already knows : a big chung of the legalization movement consists of normal , otherwise law-abiding people who want to get stoned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're playing exactly into the fears that the people who oppose this drug have; that it's just a bunch of potheads that want it.For every chronic pain or nausea victim, there are 20 stoners saying, "right on, dude!
"  Know what?
More power to 'em.
If you can go out and get staggering drunk legally, you should be able to go out and get staggeringly stoned legally.
I'm not a stoner, but I believe in your right to be one.
So stocking caps off to Westword for admitting what everyone else already knows: a big chung of the legalization movement consists of normal, otherwise law-abiding people who want to get stoned.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29828147</id>
	<title>yeah, right</title>
	<author>aepervius</author>
	<datestamp>1256116980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>exactly like other legal drug, ethanol and nicotine are administrated ? <br> <br> The simple matter of fact is that THC is as dangerous as the other aforementionned poison. But it is culturally OK to poison yourself with alcohol (a bit less accepted for smoking) but less  or downright not culturally accepted to smoke pot. There is NO REASON whatsoever to have one prescribed and the other free for sale in supermarket. <br> <br>That said, I do not consume either of those 3. But I dislike the hypocrysis people show when they want to forbid one but allow the others.</htmltext>
<tokenext>exactly like other legal drug , ethanol and nicotine are administrated ?
The simple matter of fact is that THC is as dangerous as the other aforementionned poison .
But it is culturally OK to poison yourself with alcohol ( a bit less accepted for smoking ) but less or downright not culturally accepted to smoke pot .
There is NO REASON whatsoever to have one prescribed and the other free for sale in supermarket .
That said , I do not consume either of those 3 .
But I dislike the hypocrysis people show when they want to forbid one but allow the others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>exactly like other legal drug, ethanol and nicotine are administrated ?
The simple matter of fact is that THC is as dangerous as the other aforementionned poison.
But it is culturally OK to poison yourself with alcohol (a bit less accepted for smoking) but less  or downright not culturally accepted to smoke pot.
There is NO REASON whatsoever to have one prescribed and the other free for sale in supermarket.
That said, I do not consume either of those 3.
But I dislike the hypocrysis people show when they want to forbid one but allow the others.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825685</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29831657</id>
	<title>The need for reviews</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256143140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This user works at a medical cannabis dispensary in California.
I understand how it may seem ridiculous that cannabis needs "reviewers", considering what we already all know about recreational use. The fact is however, that the types of cannabis vary immensely, and the effects of the different strains vary as well. It becomes a big deal when you're working with patients to target and relieve a specific symptom, while providing them the maximum functionality of their normal lives, a minimum of unwanted side effects.
The technical knowledge of the plant goes pretty deep too, and new crosses are created every day so its something you have to keep up with. The plant varies genetically and chemically, with quite significant differences. The effects of cannabis are due to not one, but hundreds of different compounds called cannabinoids, and some are found only in one plant or another, in varying quantities, and these change the effects.
For example, the genetic type sativa is of a stimulating nature, rarely provides significant pain relief, stimulates rather than sedates, and can cause anxiety in people prone to it (and it can get severe- panic attacks etc). Pain/insomnia/anxiety patients avoid sativas, depression/fibromyalgia/add/social disorder patients find help from sativas.
The Indica genetic type is generally more potent than sativa, usually provides strong pain relief, is sedative- this is the couchlock stoned stuff, a sativa smoker who smokes at work/during the day (yeah people smoke at work, its quite common, you probably have stoned coworkers you dont notice) could not focus and would feel sleepy with an indica.
On top of that, each patient is affected slightly differently and has their own preferences and dislikes, and the same strain can vary in potency, taste, and slight differences in effect depending on how it was grown.
Thats touching lightly on the differences. Combine that with the fact that most patients dont know these things, and your average dispensary stocks 20+ different types with undescriptive names, and you have a real need for people to test these and inform the patients about them before they buy and are dissapointed.
I dont condone putting out ads in the paper for things like this though- we like to be discreet, it avoids problems in the long run, and ensures the real sick patients still have access to what helps them. The cannabis community has established very effective ways of getting that help online, where its not in the middle of what Joe the plumber is reading over breakfast.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This user works at a medical cannabis dispensary in California .
I understand how it may seem ridiculous that cannabis needs " reviewers " , considering what we already all know about recreational use .
The fact is however , that the types of cannabis vary immensely , and the effects of the different strains vary as well .
It becomes a big deal when you 're working with patients to target and relieve a specific symptom , while providing them the maximum functionality of their normal lives , a minimum of unwanted side effects .
The technical knowledge of the plant goes pretty deep too , and new crosses are created every day so its something you have to keep up with .
The plant varies genetically and chemically , with quite significant differences .
The effects of cannabis are due to not one , but hundreds of different compounds called cannabinoids , and some are found only in one plant or another , in varying quantities , and these change the effects .
For example , the genetic type sativa is of a stimulating nature , rarely provides significant pain relief , stimulates rather than sedates , and can cause anxiety in people prone to it ( and it can get severe- panic attacks etc ) .
Pain/insomnia/anxiety patients avoid sativas , depression/fibromyalgia/add/social disorder patients find help from sativas .
The Indica genetic type is generally more potent than sativa , usually provides strong pain relief , is sedative- this is the couchlock stoned stuff , a sativa smoker who smokes at work/during the day ( yeah people smoke at work , its quite common , you probably have stoned coworkers you dont notice ) could not focus and would feel sleepy with an indica .
On top of that , each patient is affected slightly differently and has their own preferences and dislikes , and the same strain can vary in potency , taste , and slight differences in effect depending on how it was grown .
Thats touching lightly on the differences .
Combine that with the fact that most patients dont know these things , and your average dispensary stocks 20 + different types with undescriptive names , and you have a real need for people to test these and inform the patients about them before they buy and are dissapointed .
I dont condone putting out ads in the paper for things like this though- we like to be discreet , it avoids problems in the long run , and ensures the real sick patients still have access to what helps them .
The cannabis community has established very effective ways of getting that help online , where its not in the middle of what Joe the plumber is reading over breakfast .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This user works at a medical cannabis dispensary in California.
I understand how it may seem ridiculous that cannabis needs "reviewers", considering what we already all know about recreational use.
The fact is however, that the types of cannabis vary immensely, and the effects of the different strains vary as well.
It becomes a big deal when you're working with patients to target and relieve a specific symptom, while providing them the maximum functionality of their normal lives, a minimum of unwanted side effects.
The technical knowledge of the plant goes pretty deep too, and new crosses are created every day so its something you have to keep up with.
The plant varies genetically and chemically, with quite significant differences.
The effects of cannabis are due to not one, but hundreds of different compounds called cannabinoids, and some are found only in one plant or another, in varying quantities, and these change the effects.
For example, the genetic type sativa is of a stimulating nature, rarely provides significant pain relief, stimulates rather than sedates, and can cause anxiety in people prone to it (and it can get severe- panic attacks etc).
Pain/insomnia/anxiety patients avoid sativas, depression/fibromyalgia/add/social disorder patients find help from sativas.
The Indica genetic type is generally more potent than sativa, usually provides strong pain relief, is sedative- this is the couchlock stoned stuff, a sativa smoker who smokes at work/during the day (yeah people smoke at work, its quite common, you probably have stoned coworkers you dont notice) could not focus and would feel sleepy with an indica.
On top of that, each patient is affected slightly differently and has their own preferences and dislikes, and the same strain can vary in potency, taste, and slight differences in effect depending on how it was grown.
Thats touching lightly on the differences.
Combine that with the fact that most patients dont know these things, and your average dispensary stocks 20+ different types with undescriptive names, and you have a real need for people to test these and inform the patients about them before they buy and are dissapointed.
I dont condone putting out ads in the paper for things like this though- we like to be discreet, it avoids problems in the long run, and ensures the real sick patients still have access to what helps them.
The cannabis community has established very effective ways of getting that help online, where its not in the middle of what Joe the plumber is reading over breakfast.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29826857</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why medical pot has a hard time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256154600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Medical pot has a hard time because it doesnt need to be prefixed with medical in the first place.  Nobody says "medical alcohol."  But you can bet your ass when I need a painkiller im not going to walk into walmart and get the tylenol - I'm going for a bottle of crown.  All the OTC pain killers say "for minor aches and pains."  wtf?  If my pain was MINOR I wouldnt be in the drugstore looking for pain killers.  I'd just deal with my scraped knee or bee sting or headache or whatever..</p><p>Even for people who have chronic pain - there are better alternatives than pot (including alcohol) They go for the pot cuz it has the added benefit of making them feel good and relaxed, which I would argue IS a medical purpose - and everyone that needs to relax *should* be smoking it.  Sorry but I'm naturally high strung and I'm at work all day, its fast paced and stressful, then when I get home its time to relax but my brain wont let me - it stays "in work mode."  and just will not shut off.  My mind races and races. The only thing that keeps me going all day is the fact I know when I get home I am gonna pack my peice and inhale instant relief. Yes, I could go see a doctor about it, but he cant do anything other than write a script for something thats going to cost me a fortune (no insurance)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.and chances are whatever he gives me will be worse than the bud I was smoking already anyway and will possibly be less effective.</p><p>Cigarettes otoh should be illegal.  And better pain killers / muscle relaxers / stress releivers should be made available OTC.  I'm in the states and lots of things otc in other places you cant get here.  ghb/xanax/opiate-based pain killers to name a few.  What would be the harm in having OTC hydrocodone?  Because people might abuse it?  What do you think people are doing with cough syrup RIGHT NOW?  Also, if you wanted to abuse hydrocodone - you could attempt to but they intentionally put this poison in it called tylenol.  the tylenol in it will KILL YOU before you ever come close to OD'ing on the hydrocodone itself.  btw, google cold water extraction for simple way to remove said poison.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Medical pot has a hard time because it doesnt need to be prefixed with medical in the first place .
Nobody says " medical alcohol .
" But you can bet your ass when I need a painkiller im not going to walk into walmart and get the tylenol - I 'm going for a bottle of crown .
All the OTC pain killers say " for minor aches and pains .
" wtf ?
If my pain was MINOR I wouldnt be in the drugstore looking for pain killers .
I 'd just deal with my scraped knee or bee sting or headache or whatever..Even for people who have chronic pain - there are better alternatives than pot ( including alcohol ) They go for the pot cuz it has the added benefit of making them feel good and relaxed , which I would argue IS a medical purpose - and everyone that needs to relax * should * be smoking it .
Sorry but I 'm naturally high strung and I 'm at work all day , its fast paced and stressful , then when I get home its time to relax but my brain wont let me - it stays " in work mode .
" and just will not shut off .
My mind races and races .
The only thing that keeps me going all day is the fact I know when I get home I am gon na pack my peice and inhale instant relief .
Yes , I could go see a doctor about it , but he cant do anything other than write a script for something thats going to cost me a fortune ( no insurance ) .. .and chances are whatever he gives me will be worse than the bud I was smoking already anyway and will possibly be less effective.Cigarettes otoh should be illegal .
And better pain killers / muscle relaxers / stress releivers should be made available OTC .
I 'm in the states and lots of things otc in other places you cant get here .
ghb/xanax/opiate-based pain killers to name a few .
What would be the harm in having OTC hydrocodone ?
Because people might abuse it ?
What do you think people are doing with cough syrup RIGHT NOW ?
Also , if you wanted to abuse hydrocodone - you could attempt to but they intentionally put this poison in it called tylenol .
the tylenol in it will KILL YOU before you ever come close to OD'ing on the hydrocodone itself .
btw , google cold water extraction for simple way to remove said poison .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Medical pot has a hard time because it doesnt need to be prefixed with medical in the first place.
Nobody says "medical alcohol.
"  But you can bet your ass when I need a painkiller im not going to walk into walmart and get the tylenol - I'm going for a bottle of crown.
All the OTC pain killers say "for minor aches and pains.
"  wtf?
If my pain was MINOR I wouldnt be in the drugstore looking for pain killers.
I'd just deal with my scraped knee or bee sting or headache or whatever..Even for people who have chronic pain - there are better alternatives than pot (including alcohol) They go for the pot cuz it has the added benefit of making them feel good and relaxed, which I would argue IS a medical purpose - and everyone that needs to relax *should* be smoking it.
Sorry but I'm naturally high strung and I'm at work all day, its fast paced and stressful, then when I get home its time to relax but my brain wont let me - it stays "in work mode.
"  and just will not shut off.
My mind races and races.
The only thing that keeps me going all day is the fact I know when I get home I am gonna pack my peice and inhale instant relief.
Yes, I could go see a doctor about it, but he cant do anything other than write a script for something thats going to cost me a fortune (no insurance) .. .and chances are whatever he gives me will be worse than the bud I was smoking already anyway and will possibly be less effective.Cigarettes otoh should be illegal.
And better pain killers / muscle relaxers / stress releivers should be made available OTC.
I'm in the states and lots of things otc in other places you cant get here.
ghb/xanax/opiate-based pain killers to name a few.
What would be the harm in having OTC hydrocodone?
Because people might abuse it?
What do you think people are doing with cough syrup RIGHT NOW?
Also, if you wanted to abuse hydrocodone - you could attempt to but they intentionally put this poison in it called tylenol.
the tylenol in it will KILL YOU before you ever come close to OD'ing on the hydrocodone itself.
btw, google cold water extraction for simple way to remove said poison.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825685</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29835853</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why medical pot has a hard time</title>
	<author>unwastaken</author>
	<datestamp>1256229420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Co-opted or not, it <b>should</b> be legalized. It should have never been prohibited in the first place, just like alcohol should have never been prohibited in the 20s. It was a very large, costly, and deadly mistake...</p></div><p>Speaking of alcohol prohibition.  Can anyone give a response as to why alcohol prohibition required an amendment, and pot (or any other drug, available by prescription or not) can be prohibited with a simple law?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Co-opted or not , it should be legalized .
It should have never been prohibited in the first place , just like alcohol should have never been prohibited in the 20s .
It was a very large , costly , and deadly mistake...Speaking of alcohol prohibition .
Can anyone give a response as to why alcohol prohibition required an amendment , and pot ( or any other drug , available by prescription or not ) can be prohibited with a simple law ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Co-opted or not, it should be legalized.
It should have never been prohibited in the first place, just like alcohol should have never been prohibited in the 20s.
It was a very large, costly, and deadly mistake...Speaking of alcohol prohibition.
Can anyone give a response as to why alcohol prohibition required an amendment, and pot (or any other drug, available by prescription or not) can be prohibited with a simple law?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29826893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29826623</id>
	<title>Re:Bong?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256153700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem with edibles is that it takes upwards of six times the amount you'd normally combust to get the same effect.</p><p>Edibles don't even work on me for some reason. I can eat a whole pan of brownies and don't feel anything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with edibles is that it takes upwards of six times the amount you 'd normally combust to get the same effect.Edibles do n't even work on me for some reason .
I can eat a whole pan of brownies and do n't feel anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with edibles is that it takes upwards of six times the amount you'd normally combust to get the same effect.Edibles don't even work on me for some reason.
I can eat a whole pan of brownies and don't feel anything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825005</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824717</id>
	<title>Macgyver-like ability to make a bong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256146260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Macgyver would have built a vaporizer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Macgyver would have built a vaporizer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Macgyver would have built a vaporizer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825005</id>
	<title>Re:Bong?</title>
	<author>spun</author>
	<datestamp>1256147520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The medical marijuana community encourages the use of techniques including vaporizing, tinctures, hash oil and other concentrates, pot goodies like brownies, and other methods of reducing harm. People with severe HIV or cancer often can't even use a vaporizer, so edibles or tinctures are called for. People using marijuana as replacement therapy for harder drugs sometimes don't have the money for a vaporizer, and need a longer lasting high, so they are encouraged to try edibles.</p><p>Remember, pipes and joints and even vaporizers spread hepatitis. Use a chillum when sharing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The medical marijuana community encourages the use of techniques including vaporizing , tinctures , hash oil and other concentrates , pot goodies like brownies , and other methods of reducing harm .
People with severe HIV or cancer often ca n't even use a vaporizer , so edibles or tinctures are called for .
People using marijuana as replacement therapy for harder drugs sometimes do n't have the money for a vaporizer , and need a longer lasting high , so they are encouraged to try edibles.Remember , pipes and joints and even vaporizers spread hepatitis .
Use a chillum when sharing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The medical marijuana community encourages the use of techniques including vaporizing, tinctures, hash oil and other concentrates, pot goodies like brownies, and other methods of reducing harm.
People with severe HIV or cancer often can't even use a vaporizer, so edibles or tinctures are called for.
People using marijuana as replacement therapy for harder drugs sometimes don't have the money for a vaporizer, and need a longer lasting high, so they are encouraged to try edibles.Remember, pipes and joints and even vaporizers spread hepatitis.
Use a chillum when sharing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29829363</id>
	<title>Learn how to distill</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256122740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do a search and just spend the $50 for a properly designed vaporizer where the stuff stays at room temperature until right before it's in your lungs, as you inhale heated air through it at the business end of 3 foot tube with a knob to modulate current. Basically the setup should be a tube, with a heating element at the intake, just below the green stuff, which is at the bottom of the part of the tube (the whip) that you briefly connect. Required current varies by strain, somewhat annoying.... well not really.... come to think of it.
<br> <br>
A light bulb would be useful only if you could break the glass and inhale air directly heated by the filament to draw out your *ahem* distillate. Maybe a tungsten filament can survive operating at a steady state temp far above 200 C with an occasional blast of 20\% oxygen cooling it down; but it would have to at least be visibly glowing a bit. Usually the air is heated by hot ceramic. Don't make the mistake of baking the stuff, and collecting it onto a cooler surface as a brown gooey mess. That film of goo should have gone straight into your lungs.... well not really.... come to think of it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do a search and just spend the $ 50 for a properly designed vaporizer where the stuff stays at room temperature until right before it 's in your lungs , as you inhale heated air through it at the business end of 3 foot tube with a knob to modulate current .
Basically the setup should be a tube , with a heating element at the intake , just below the green stuff , which is at the bottom of the part of the tube ( the whip ) that you briefly connect .
Required current varies by strain , somewhat annoying.... well not really.... come to think of it .
A light bulb would be useful only if you could break the glass and inhale air directly heated by the filament to draw out your * ahem * distillate .
Maybe a tungsten filament can survive operating at a steady state temp far above 200 C with an occasional blast of 20 \ % oxygen cooling it down ; but it would have to at least be visibly glowing a bit .
Usually the air is heated by hot ceramic .
Do n't make the mistake of baking the stuff , and collecting it onto a cooler surface as a brown gooey mess .
That film of goo should have gone straight into your lungs.... well not really.... come to think of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do a search and just spend the $50 for a properly designed vaporizer where the stuff stays at room temperature until right before it's in your lungs, as you inhale heated air through it at the business end of 3 foot tube with a knob to modulate current.
Basically the setup should be a tube, with a heating element at the intake, just below the green stuff, which is at the bottom of the part of the tube (the whip) that you briefly connect.
Required current varies by strain, somewhat annoying.... well not really.... come to think of it.
A light bulb would be useful only if you could break the glass and inhale air directly heated by the filament to draw out your *ahem* distillate.
Maybe a tungsten filament can survive operating at a steady state temp far above 200 C with an occasional blast of 20\% oxygen cooling it down; but it would have to at least be visibly glowing a bit.
Usually the air is heated by hot ceramic.
Don't make the mistake of baking the stuff, and collecting it onto a cooler surface as a brown gooey mess.
That film of goo should have gone straight into your lungs.... well not really.... come to think of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825661</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825601</id>
	<title>Sigh...</title>
	<author>blhack</author>
	<datestamp>1256149800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am a HUGE advocate for medical marijuana.  It find it absurd that I have a bottle of hydrocodone (which is an opioid [like heroin or morphine]) in my cabinet and can take it whenever I need to, but if a doctor wanted to prescribe me marijuana, she couldn't.</p><p>Guys, even if it's a placebo, even if it is really doing *NOTHING* to help people physically and it is all mental (although recent research suggests that placebos can produce physical results), it's still helping; it is still making somebody who might be in pain be able to feel just a little bit better.</p><p>A major frown to those who oppose the idea of giving medicine to sick people</p><p>Another major frown to this idiotic newspaper.  Do you realize what you're doing?  You're playing exactly into the fears that the people who oppose this drug have; that it's just a bunch of potheads that want it.  Do you review xanax?  Vicodin?  Perkaset?  No?  Well then fuck off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am a HUGE advocate for medical marijuana .
It find it absurd that I have a bottle of hydrocodone ( which is an opioid [ like heroin or morphine ] ) in my cabinet and can take it whenever I need to , but if a doctor wanted to prescribe me marijuana , she could n't.Guys , even if it 's a placebo , even if it is really doing * NOTHING * to help people physically and it is all mental ( although recent research suggests that placebos can produce physical results ) , it 's still helping ; it is still making somebody who might be in pain be able to feel just a little bit better.A major frown to those who oppose the idea of giving medicine to sick peopleAnother major frown to this idiotic newspaper .
Do you realize what you 're doing ?
You 're playing exactly into the fears that the people who oppose this drug have ; that it 's just a bunch of potheads that want it .
Do you review xanax ?
Vicodin ? Perkaset ?
No ? Well then fuck off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am a HUGE advocate for medical marijuana.
It find it absurd that I have a bottle of hydrocodone (which is an opioid [like heroin or morphine]) in my cabinet and can take it whenever I need to, but if a doctor wanted to prescribe me marijuana, she couldn't.Guys, even if it's a placebo, even if it is really doing *NOTHING* to help people physically and it is all mental (although recent research suggests that placebos can produce physical results), it's still helping; it is still making somebody who might be in pain be able to feel just a little bit better.A major frown to those who oppose the idea of giving medicine to sick peopleAnother major frown to this idiotic newspaper.
Do you realize what you're doing?
You're playing exactly into the fears that the people who oppose this drug have; that it's just a bunch of potheads that want it.
Do you review xanax?
Vicodin?  Perkaset?
No?  Well then fuck off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824683</id>
	<title>If you're going to have idle...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256146080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>please post something that hasn't been posted all over the internet for weeks now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>please post something that has n't been posted all over the internet for weeks now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>please post something that hasn't been posted all over the internet for weeks now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825291</id>
	<title>Perks?</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1256148780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does the position include free munchies?</p><p>I can imagine the first review.</p><p>So, dude, like, I'm totally snarfed up on this good shiznet, and, oh, God there's a whole universe in my thumbnail man.  Anyway.  Just got back from scarfing another 5 pounds of free munchies.  Wow, the cheetos are amazing.  It's like life, in a little foil wrapper.  You know I could make a few hats out of these, but hats are a sign of The Man.  Oh, no, speaking of - there's The Man coming in and nattering something about deadlines on a review or something.  Gotta go, he's asking me to submit it or something.  Whatever.  Anyway, corner of West Third and Ninth, see "Frank", rating: Excellente'.  Time for some munchiesssss...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does the position include free munchies ? I can imagine the first review.So , dude , like , I 'm totally snarfed up on this good shiznet , and , oh , God there 's a whole universe in my thumbnail man .
Anyway. Just got back from scarfing another 5 pounds of free munchies .
Wow , the cheetos are amazing .
It 's like life , in a little foil wrapper .
You know I could make a few hats out of these , but hats are a sign of The Man .
Oh , no , speaking of - there 's The Man coming in and nattering something about deadlines on a review or something .
Got ta go , he 's asking me to submit it or something .
Whatever. Anyway , corner of West Third and Ninth , see " Frank " , rating : Excellente' .
Time for some munchiesssss.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does the position include free munchies?I can imagine the first review.So, dude, like, I'm totally snarfed up on this good shiznet, and, oh, God there's a whole universe in my thumbnail man.
Anyway.  Just got back from scarfing another 5 pounds of free munchies.
Wow, the cheetos are amazing.
It's like life, in a little foil wrapper.
You know I could make a few hats out of these, but hats are a sign of The Man.
Oh, no, speaking of - there's The Man coming in and nattering something about deadlines on a review or something.
Gotta go, he's asking me to submit it or something.
Whatever.  Anyway, corner of West Third and Ninth, see "Frank", rating: Excellente'.
Time for some munchiesssss...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29826753</id>
	<title>Missing an opportunity for synergy...</title>
	<author>MiniMike</author>
	<datestamp>1256154180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should also make this person the restaurant critic!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should also make this person the restaurant critic !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should also make this person the restaurant critic!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29832303</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why medical pot has a hard time</title>
	<author>ajlisows</author>
	<datestamp>1256152620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As opposed to the amount of Opiods being handed out without a real medical exam for generic things like "Chronic Pain"?  Prescription Painkiller abuse is really rampant right now.  Hydrocodone/APAP is by far the most prescribed drug in America right now, and I imagine that a great deal of those <a href="http://www.imshealth.com/deployedfiles/imshealth/Global/Content/StaticFile/Top\_Line\_Data/2008\_Top\_15\_Products\_by\_U.S.\_RXs.pdf" title="imshealth.com">127 Million Scripts</a> [imshealth.com] are not being taken as directed.  Oxycodone is also on the list at #20.  Hydrocodone is more popular because it is only schedule 3 and refills can be written, but there is still a ton of Percocet out there.   I'd much rather see people abusing medical marijuana.  Maybe it is possible to get addicted to Marijuana.  Maybe there are some mild withdrawal symptoms, but they are nothing compared to withdrawal from Opiate derivitives.  And safety?  If you aren't getting the really strong stuff like Oxycontin, you are getting a mixture of opioid goodness and toxic acetominophen.  A pretty common blend of Hydrocodone/APAP is 7.5mg/750mg.  Six of those in a day puts a person over the maximum daily recommended dose of 4000mg of APAP.  Constant dosing can be very hard on the liver......and that is the "Safer" part of the Vicodin tablet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As opposed to the amount of Opiods being handed out without a real medical exam for generic things like " Chronic Pain " ?
Prescription Painkiller abuse is really rampant right now .
Hydrocodone/APAP is by far the most prescribed drug in America right now , and I imagine that a great deal of those 127 Million Scripts [ imshealth.com ] are not being taken as directed .
Oxycodone is also on the list at # 20 .
Hydrocodone is more popular because it is only schedule 3 and refills can be written , but there is still a ton of Percocet out there .
I 'd much rather see people abusing medical marijuana .
Maybe it is possible to get addicted to Marijuana .
Maybe there are some mild withdrawal symptoms , but they are nothing compared to withdrawal from Opiate derivitives .
And safety ?
If you are n't getting the really strong stuff like Oxycontin , you are getting a mixture of opioid goodness and toxic acetominophen .
A pretty common blend of Hydrocodone/APAP is 7.5mg/750mg .
Six of those in a day puts a person over the maximum daily recommended dose of 4000mg of APAP .
Constant dosing can be very hard on the liver......and that is the " Safer " part of the Vicodin tablet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As opposed to the amount of Opiods being handed out without a real medical exam for generic things like "Chronic Pain"?
Prescription Painkiller abuse is really rampant right now.
Hydrocodone/APAP is by far the most prescribed drug in America right now, and I imagine that a great deal of those 127 Million Scripts [imshealth.com] are not being taken as directed.
Oxycodone is also on the list at #20.
Hydrocodone is more popular because it is only schedule 3 and refills can be written, but there is still a ton of Percocet out there.
I'd much rather see people abusing medical marijuana.
Maybe it is possible to get addicted to Marijuana.
Maybe there are some mild withdrawal symptoms, but they are nothing compared to withdrawal from Opiate derivitives.
And safety?
If you aren't getting the really strong stuff like Oxycontin, you are getting a mixture of opioid goodness and toxic acetominophen.
A pretty common blend of Hydrocodone/APAP is 7.5mg/750mg.
Six of those in a day puts a person over the maximum daily recommended dose of 4000mg of APAP.
Constant dosing can be very hard on the liver......and that is the "Safer" part of the Vicodin tablet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825685</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825737</id>
	<title>Re:Weeding out the candidates</title>
	<author>dr\_dank</author>
	<datestamp>1256150340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you don't apply soon, this opportunity will go up in smoke.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you do n't apply soon , this opportunity will go up in smoke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you don't apply soon, this opportunity will go up in smoke.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824947</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824961</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like a great job</title>
	<author>amliebsch</author>
	<datestamp>1256147280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Coffee?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Coffee ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Coffee?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825305</id>
	<title>Does that mean</title>
	<author>zannox</author>
	<datestamp>1256148840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Staff meetings will be held at 4:20?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Staff meetings will be held at 4 : 20 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Staff meetings will be held at 4:20?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824845</id>
	<title>Sounds like a great job</title>
	<author>u4ya</author>
	<datestamp>1256146800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>But what would you do to relax after a long day's work?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But what would you do to relax after a long day 's work ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But what would you do to relax after a long day's work?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29827339</id>
	<title>agreed,with an addendum</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1256156760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>there's nothing placebo going on with marijuana's proven ability to stimluate appetite. for many wasting diseases, such as cancer, this is a godsend. and of course marijuana relieves stress, which is an issue for anyone facing a major disease</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>there 's nothing placebo going on with marijuana 's proven ability to stimluate appetite .
for many wasting diseases , such as cancer , this is a godsend .
and of course marijuana relieves stress , which is an issue for anyone facing a major disease</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there's nothing placebo going on with marijuana's proven ability to stimluate appetite.
for many wasting diseases, such as cancer, this is a godsend.
and of course marijuana relieves stress, which is an issue for anyone facing a major disease</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825709</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>xanadu113</author>
	<datestamp>1256150160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The bad news is, you tested positive for marijuana metabolites.<br>
<br>
The good news, you've got the job.<br>
<br>
Can you start tomorrow at 4:20?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The bad news is , you tested positive for marijuana metabolites .
The good news , you 've got the job .
Can you start tomorrow at 4 : 20 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The bad news is, you tested positive for marijuana metabolites.
The good news, you've got the job.
Can you start tomorrow at 4:20?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29835873</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why medical pot has a hard time</title>
	<author>Shihar</author>
	<datestamp>1256229480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, it should be handled like alcohol.  It is laughably absurd that a drug like alcohol can be bought anywhere in the US, but pot is illegal.  There is no one who can, with a straight face, claim that alcohol is a safer drug than pot.  People don't OD on pot, but they sure as shit do in alcohol.  Pot does not induce violent rage, but alcohol certainly can.  The amount of alcohol it takes to incapacitate a persons judgement is trivial.  The physical damage alcohol inflicts upon the body is high.  If you do very long term studies on pot,  you might find some marginal, slightly elevated, non-lethal health risk.  The damage alcohol inflicts on the other hand can be extreme and completely lethal.</p><p>It is absurd beyond all reason that we, as a society, give thumbs up to alcohol consumption, but have to fight a war over pot, which is a clearly lesser drug.  All this is coming from a guy who smokes no pot, but certainly enjoys alcohol.  You don't have to be a pot head to realize that our estimations of risk are completely fucked up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it should be handled like alcohol .
It is laughably absurd that a drug like alcohol can be bought anywhere in the US , but pot is illegal .
There is no one who can , with a straight face , claim that alcohol is a safer drug than pot .
People do n't OD on pot , but they sure as shit do in alcohol .
Pot does not induce violent rage , but alcohol certainly can .
The amount of alcohol it takes to incapacitate a persons judgement is trivial .
The physical damage alcohol inflicts upon the body is high .
If you do very long term studies on pot , you might find some marginal , slightly elevated , non-lethal health risk .
The damage alcohol inflicts on the other hand can be extreme and completely lethal.It is absurd beyond all reason that we , as a society , give thumbs up to alcohol consumption , but have to fight a war over pot , which is a clearly lesser drug .
All this is coming from a guy who smokes no pot , but certainly enjoys alcohol .
You do n't have to be a pot head to realize that our estimations of risk are completely fucked up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it should be handled like alcohol.
It is laughably absurd that a drug like alcohol can be bought anywhere in the US, but pot is illegal.
There is no one who can, with a straight face, claim that alcohol is a safer drug than pot.
People don't OD on pot, but they sure as shit do in alcohol.
Pot does not induce violent rage, but alcohol certainly can.
The amount of alcohol it takes to incapacitate a persons judgement is trivial.
The physical damage alcohol inflicts upon the body is high.
If you do very long term studies on pot,  you might find some marginal, slightly elevated, non-lethal health risk.
The damage alcohol inflicts on the other hand can be extreme and completely lethal.It is absurd beyond all reason that we, as a society, give thumbs up to alcohol consumption, but have to fight a war over pot, which is a clearly lesser drug.
All this is coming from a guy who smokes no pot, but certainly enjoys alcohol.
You don't have to be a pot head to realize that our estimations of risk are completely fucked up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825685</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824947</id>
	<title>Weeding out the candidates</title>
	<author>smitty777</author>
	<datestamp>1256147220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a tough job, so let's get rolling.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a tough job , so let 's get rolling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a tough job, so let's get rolling.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29828677</id>
	<title>Re:Sigh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256119380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>mabey someone should review them, that way it can shed more light on the legalized drug cartel.</p><p>housewives of OC?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>mabey someone should review them , that way it can shed more light on the legalized drug cartel.housewives of OC ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>mabey someone should review them, that way it can shed more light on the legalized drug cartel.housewives of OC?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29832559</id>
	<title>Re:Bong?</title>
	<author>Ozlanthos</author>
	<datestamp>1256243520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Vaporizors work alright, but I have always found that it kind of kills the uniqueness found in each strain. As many dispensaries prescribe specific strains for specific maladies, I would think that either water bongs or a straight glass piece would work just fine. I believe that vaporisors are like a security blanket for those who still believe you can get lung cancer from smoking weed. Bongs cut down a bit of the heavy stuff, making them ideal for those wanting a cleaner high, while not losing the "flavor".
<br>
<br>
-Oz</htmltext>
<tokenext>Vaporizors work alright , but I have always found that it kind of kills the uniqueness found in each strain .
As many dispensaries prescribe specific strains for specific maladies , I would think that either water bongs or a straight glass piece would work just fine .
I believe that vaporisors are like a security blanket for those who still believe you can get lung cancer from smoking weed .
Bongs cut down a bit of the heavy stuff , making them ideal for those wanting a cleaner high , while not losing the " flavor " .
-Oz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Vaporizors work alright, but I have always found that it kind of kills the uniqueness found in each strain.
As many dispensaries prescribe specific strains for specific maladies, I would think that either water bongs or a straight glass piece would work just fine.
I believe that vaporisors are like a security blanket for those who still believe you can get lung cancer from smoking weed.
Bongs cut down a bit of the heavy stuff, making them ideal for those wanting a cleaner high, while not losing the "flavor".
-Oz</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825169</id>
	<title>Why did the old reviewer quit?</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1256148120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did he run out of new and interesting ways to say, "This is some good shit!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did he run out of new and interesting ways to say , " This is some good shit !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did he run out of new and interesting ways to say, "This is some good shit!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825277</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like a great job</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256148660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Go to Pizza Hut.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Go to Pizza Hut .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go to Pizza Hut.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824881</id>
	<title>I wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256146920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if you have to pass a drug test.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if you have to pass a drug test .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if you have to pass a drug test.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825217</id>
	<title>How to Get This Job</title>
	<author>jayspec462</author>
	<datestamp>1256148360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The first person who both desires this job and a) has a resume, b) manages to find the motivation to print a copy of the resume, put it in an envelope, and send it to the HR department, and c) remembers to attend the interview gets the job automatically.</p><p>I suspect the position will go unfilled for some time...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The first person who both desires this job and a ) has a resume , b ) manages to find the motivation to print a copy of the resume , put it in an envelope , and send it to the HR department , and c ) remembers to attend the interview gets the job automatically.I suspect the position will go unfilled for some time.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first person who both desires this job and a) has a resume, b) manages to find the motivation to print a copy of the resume, put it in an envelope, and send it to the HR department, and c) remembers to attend the interview gets the job automatically.I suspect the position will go unfilled for some time...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29829337</id>
	<title>Re:Sigh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256122560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Do you review xanax?  Vicodin?  Perkaset?</p>  </div><p>Wait, Rush Limbaugh quit too?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you review xanax ?
Vicodin ? Perkaset ?
Wait , Rush Limbaugh quit too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Do you review xanax?
Vicodin?  Perkaset?
Wait, Rush Limbaugh quit too?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825181</id>
	<title>Actually</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256148120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It DOES still stink up the house.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It DOES still stink up the house .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It DOES still stink up the house.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29827201</id>
	<title>Re:Bong?</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1256156220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Just a FYI, the medical marijuana community normally encourages the use of vaporizers instead of smoking.</p> </div><p>Who is "the medical marijuana community"?  Sure, there are many folks who advocate vaporizers, but there are also many fully satisfied with joints and bong hits, and the dispensaries will certainly dispense the medicine in any form.  I'd bet that the overwhelming majority of medical pot is smoked in the usual ways, not vaporized or consumed in brownies.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just a FYI , the medical marijuana community normally encourages the use of vaporizers instead of smoking .
Who is " the medical marijuana community " ?
Sure , there are many folks who advocate vaporizers , but there are also many fully satisfied with joints and bong hits , and the dispensaries will certainly dispense the medicine in any form .
I 'd bet that the overwhelming majority of medical pot is smoked in the usual ways , not vaporized or consumed in brownies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just a FYI, the medical marijuana community normally encourages the use of vaporizers instead of smoking.
Who is "the medical marijuana community"?
Sure, there are many folks who advocate vaporizers, but there are also many fully satisfied with joints and bong hits, and the dispensaries will certainly dispense the medicine in any form.
I'd bet that the overwhelming majority of medical pot is smoked in the usual ways, not vaporized or consumed in brownies.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825389</id>
	<title>Re:Bong?</title>
	<author>AliasMarlowe</author>
	<datestamp>1256149140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Use a chillum when sharing.</p></div><p>Is the one in Maryland suitable for this? <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chillum,\_Maryland" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chillum,\_Maryland</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Use a chillum when sharing.Is the one in Maryland suitable for this ?
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chillum , \ _Maryland [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Use a chillum when sharing.Is the one in Maryland suitable for this?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chillum,\_Maryland [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825005</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29827701</id>
	<title>Re:Bong?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256158380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Remember, pipes and joints and even vaporizers spread hepatitis. Use a chillum when sharing.</i> </p><p>Better yet, don't smoke out with scumbags. You're much less likely to get disgusting, life-threatening diseases when you refuse to socialize with human sewage. A person with HIV is little more than a petri dish full of God's wrath.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember , pipes and joints and even vaporizers spread hepatitis .
Use a chillum when sharing .
Better yet , do n't smoke out with scumbags .
You 're much less likely to get disgusting , life-threatening diseases when you refuse to socialize with human sewage .
A person with HIV is little more than a petri dish full of God 's wrath .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember, pipes and joints and even vaporizers spread hepatitis.
Use a chillum when sharing.
Better yet, don't smoke out with scumbags.
You're much less likely to get disgusting, life-threatening diseases when you refuse to socialize with human sewage.
A person with HIV is little more than a petri dish full of God's wrath.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825005</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29828091</id>
	<title>Schedule 1 Status</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256116800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The root of the problem is that pot is still a schedule 1 drug.</p><p>This means it is "highly addictive with no medicinal value".</p><p>Until you get it reclassified, nothing can be done on the federal level in the US.</p><p>The British removed it from their equivalent scale last year.</p><p>Mexico recently changed their possession laws to match those of Amsterdam.</p><p>Bet you didn't hear that on the 6 O'clock news.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The root of the problem is that pot is still a schedule 1 drug.This means it is " highly addictive with no medicinal value " .Until you get it reclassified , nothing can be done on the federal level in the US.The British removed it from their equivalent scale last year.Mexico recently changed their possession laws to match those of Amsterdam.Bet you did n't hear that on the 6 O'clock news .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The root of the problem is that pot is still a schedule 1 drug.This means it is "highly addictive with no medicinal value".Until you get it reclassified, nothing can be done on the federal level in the US.The British removed it from their equivalent scale last year.Mexico recently changed their possession laws to match those of Amsterdam.Bet you didn't hear that on the 6 O'clock news.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825621</id>
	<title>Re:Bong?</title>
	<author>FiloEleven</author>
	<datestamp>1256149920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Remember, pipes and joints and even vaporizers spread hepatitis. Use a chillum when sharing.</p></div><p>How does using a chillum differ from using a pipe?  Perhaps "chillum" means something different to you and me--I hear the term in reference to a straight pipe; that is, the bowl is not at all angled and is directly opposite the mouthpiece.</p><p>I would think a bong (properly used) would be the safest method of sharing, as at no point is any part of the piece in your mouth.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember , pipes and joints and even vaporizers spread hepatitis .
Use a chillum when sharing.How does using a chillum differ from using a pipe ?
Perhaps " chillum " means something different to you and me--I hear the term in reference to a straight pipe ; that is , the bowl is not at all angled and is directly opposite the mouthpiece.I would think a bong ( properly used ) would be the safest method of sharing , as at no point is any part of the piece in your mouth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember, pipes and joints and even vaporizers spread hepatitis.
Use a chillum when sharing.How does using a chillum differ from using a pipe?
Perhaps "chillum" means something different to you and me--I hear the term in reference to a straight pipe; that is, the bowl is not at all angled and is directly opposite the mouthpiece.I would think a bong (properly used) would be the safest method of sharing, as at no point is any part of the piece in your mouth.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825005</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29829445</id>
	<title>Obligatory...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256123160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Dave's not here, man."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Dave 's not here , man .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Dave's not here, man.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29830295</id>
	<title>Entrapment!?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256129100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In other news, the FBI recently caught thousands of potheads in a fake job posting for the same job.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In other news , the FBI recently caught thousands of potheads in a fake job posting for the same job .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other news, the FBI recently caught thousands of potheads in a fake job posting for the same job.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29828359</id>
	<title>Re:Bong?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256117820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I personally take a lighter to the edge mouth piece of friends bong, hopefully that burns off the germs and than I wipe it with my shirt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I personally take a lighter to the edge mouth piece of friends bong , hopefully that burns off the germs and than I wipe it with my shirt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I personally take a lighter to the edge mouth piece of friends bong, hopefully that burns off the germs and than I wipe it with my shirt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825005</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29828517</id>
	<title>Re:And this is why medical pot has a hard time</title>
	<author>sponga</author>
	<datestamp>1256118540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep that is 100\% correct and I can contest to that.</p><p>Even during our senior year in high school all of us seemed to have our medical marijuana cards even though we couldn't even buy alcohol/cigarettes. Although fake ID's were a lot easier to get back than before 9/11.</p><p>It is bad in Los Angeles County in some areas, you have all these gangsters who see these places as a huge lottery if they get in there. Not only do you get the weed but also lots of cash moving through these places, guys showing up drunk to these places and just general abuse. Far cry from when they first opened and everything was not behind bars like it is these days with the security guard strapped as soon as you walk in.</p><p>I contest I pulled the old *chronic back pain* to get mine, but I didn't renew my card after seeing how much abuse was going on and the real marijuana patients were still getting harassed by the feds.</p><p>If you live in L.A., we are currently at the epicenter(get it?) of the Marijuana controversy. You see the state of California is at odds with the Feds and the District Attorney of Los Angeles, they have been hounding to shut these places down. Well Obama just told the Feds to "cool it" on cracking down on the dispenseries and to respect *STATE LAWS*, the L.A. D.A. still has not cooled off and is trying to take this through the courts.</p><p>Additionally I can get just as good stuff as the dispenseries with 30\% less tax on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep that is 100 \ % correct and I can contest to that.Even during our senior year in high school all of us seemed to have our medical marijuana cards even though we could n't even buy alcohol/cigarettes .
Although fake ID 's were a lot easier to get back than before 9/11.It is bad in Los Angeles County in some areas , you have all these gangsters who see these places as a huge lottery if they get in there .
Not only do you get the weed but also lots of cash moving through these places , guys showing up drunk to these places and just general abuse .
Far cry from when they first opened and everything was not behind bars like it is these days with the security guard strapped as soon as you walk in.I contest I pulled the old * chronic back pain * to get mine , but I did n't renew my card after seeing how much abuse was going on and the real marijuana patients were still getting harassed by the feds.If you live in L.A. , we are currently at the epicenter ( get it ?
) of the Marijuana controversy .
You see the state of California is at odds with the Feds and the District Attorney of Los Angeles , they have been hounding to shut these places down .
Well Obama just told the Feds to " cool it " on cracking down on the dispenseries and to respect * STATE LAWS * , the L.A. D.A. still has not cooled off and is trying to take this through the courts.Additionally I can get just as good stuff as the dispenseries with 30 \ % less tax on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep that is 100\% correct and I can contest to that.Even during our senior year in high school all of us seemed to have our medical marijuana cards even though we couldn't even buy alcohol/cigarettes.
Although fake ID's were a lot easier to get back than before 9/11.It is bad in Los Angeles County in some areas, you have all these gangsters who see these places as a huge lottery if they get in there.
Not only do you get the weed but also lots of cash moving through these places, guys showing up drunk to these places and just general abuse.
Far cry from when they first opened and everything was not behind bars like it is these days with the security guard strapped as soon as you walk in.I contest I pulled the old *chronic back pain* to get mine, but I didn't renew my card after seeing how much abuse was going on and the real marijuana patients were still getting harassed by the feds.If you live in L.A., we are currently at the epicenter(get it?
) of the Marijuana controversy.
You see the state of California is at odds with the Feds and the District Attorney of Los Angeles, they have been hounding to shut these places down.
Well Obama just told the Feds to "cool it" on cracking down on the dispenseries and to respect *STATE LAWS*, the L.A. D.A. still has not cooled off and is trying to take this through the courts.Additionally I can get just as good stuff as the dispenseries with 30\% less tax on it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825685</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29831747</id>
	<title>Re:How to Get This Job</title>
	<author>Afghanica</author>
	<datestamp>1256144340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You evidently have met very few cannabis users, and are still stuck on the old stereotype that all cannabis users are lazy and unmotivated.<br>Its understandable, since these lies have been drilled into the heads of school kids all over the world since the 1930s.</p><p>I know you're joking, but the joke is old, and for someone who works with medical marijuana users all day, from all walks of life, whose lives are threatened by the laws in our country that result from ignorance like this, its tough to hear.</p><p>I know more cannabis users that cant get a job because they ALL drug test, than users who aren't looking for work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You evidently have met very few cannabis users , and are still stuck on the old stereotype that all cannabis users are lazy and unmotivated.Its understandable , since these lies have been drilled into the heads of school kids all over the world since the 1930s.I know you 're joking , but the joke is old , and for someone who works with medical marijuana users all day , from all walks of life , whose lives are threatened by the laws in our country that result from ignorance like this , its tough to hear.I know more cannabis users that cant get a job because they ALL drug test , than users who are n't looking for work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You evidently have met very few cannabis users, and are still stuck on the old stereotype that all cannabis users are lazy and unmotivated.Its understandable, since these lies have been drilled into the heads of school kids all over the world since the 1930s.I know you're joking, but the joke is old, and for someone who works with medical marijuana users all day, from all walks of life, whose lives are threatened by the laws in our country that result from ignorance like this, its tough to hear.I know more cannabis users that cant get a job because they ALL drug test, than users who aren't looking for work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824809</id>
	<title>How is this a FRONT PAGE story?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256146680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>C'mon Slashdot, you can do better than that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>C'mon Slashdot , you can do better than that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>C'mon Slashdot, you can do better than that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29827541
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29826857
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29827201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29829491
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825601
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29835853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29826893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825601
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29842703
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825601
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29831531
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825601
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29841657
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29828091
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29852389
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825005
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825091
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824845
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29828517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825277
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824845
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825621
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825005
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29827701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825005
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29832101
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825305
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29828147
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29832303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29829001
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29830617
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29830395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825181
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29831747
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825217
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29827141
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825601
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29827089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825181
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29832559
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29829363
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825661
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29826183
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825181
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29826625
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29828359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825005
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29836301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825601
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29827339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825601
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29829337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825601
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29826623
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825005
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29835873
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825685
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824845
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825389
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825005
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_1535217_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29828677
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825601
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_1535217.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825685
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29832303
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29828147
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29826625
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29828517
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29826857
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29829001
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29826893
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29835853
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29835873
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_1535217.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825217
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29831747
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_1535217.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824863
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29830617
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_1535217.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825601
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29828677
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29829337
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29827141
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29836301
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29842703
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825911
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29829491
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29827339
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_1535217.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825291
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_1535217.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29831531
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825709
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_1535217.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824809
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_1535217.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824733
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825181
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29827089
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29830395
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29826183
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29832559
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825661
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29829363
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29827541
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825799
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29827201
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825005
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825621
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825389
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29826623
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29852389
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29828359
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29827701
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825659
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_1535217.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825305
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29832101
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_1535217.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825169
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_1535217.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824803
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_1535217.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824717
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_1535217.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824845
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825277
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824961
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825091
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_1535217.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29831657
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_1535217.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29828091
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29841657
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_1535217.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29826753
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_1535217.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825773
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_1535217.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29824947
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_1535217.29825737
</commentlist>
</conversation>
