<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_21_0033216</id>
	<title>Doing Internet Searches Boosts Older Brains</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1256127180000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hughpickens.com/" rel="nofollow">Hugh Pickens</a> writes <i>"Medical News Daily reports that researchers have <a href="http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/167958.php">found signs of enhanced neural stimulation</a> in parts of the brain that control decision-making and reasoning when they scanned the brains of middle-aged and older first-time Internet users after only seven days of performing Internet searches. 'We found that for older people with minimal experience, performing Internet searches for even a relatively short period of time can change brain activity patterns and enhance function,' says Dr Gary Small, a professor of psychiatry at the Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA. At the start of the study, the participants performed Internet searches while the researchers took fMRI scans of their brains to track changes in blood flow in the brain and record subtle changes in neural activity. After practicing searching the Internet for 7 days over 2 weeks at home, the brains of the Internet novices showed activity in the same regions as before, but this time there was new activity in the middle frontal gyrus and inferior frontal gyrus, the parts of the brain that are important for working memory and decision-making. 'You can exercise your mind by using the Internet, but it depends on how it's used,' adds Small. 'If you get hooked on gambling or eBay shopping, <a href="http://health.usnews.com/articles/health/healthday/2009/10/19/web-surf-to-save-your-aging-brain.html">that may not be positive</a>.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hugh Pickens writes " Medical News Daily reports that researchers have found signs of enhanced neural stimulation in parts of the brain that control decision-making and reasoning when they scanned the brains of middle-aged and older first-time Internet users after only seven days of performing Internet searches .
'We found that for older people with minimal experience , performing Internet searches for even a relatively short period of time can change brain activity patterns and enhance function, ' says Dr Gary Small , a professor of psychiatry at the Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA .
At the start of the study , the participants performed Internet searches while the researchers took fMRI scans of their brains to track changes in blood flow in the brain and record subtle changes in neural activity .
After practicing searching the Internet for 7 days over 2 weeks at home , the brains of the Internet novices showed activity in the same regions as before , but this time there was new activity in the middle frontal gyrus and inferior frontal gyrus , the parts of the brain that are important for working memory and decision-making .
'You can exercise your mind by using the Internet , but it depends on how it 's used, ' adds Small .
'If you get hooked on gambling or eBay shopping , that may not be positive .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hugh Pickens writes "Medical News Daily reports that researchers have found signs of enhanced neural stimulation in parts of the brain that control decision-making and reasoning when they scanned the brains of middle-aged and older first-time Internet users after only seven days of performing Internet searches.
'We found that for older people with minimal experience, performing Internet searches for even a relatively short period of time can change brain activity patterns and enhance function,' says Dr Gary Small, a professor of psychiatry at the Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA.
At the start of the study, the participants performed Internet searches while the researchers took fMRI scans of their brains to track changes in blood flow in the brain and record subtle changes in neural activity.
After practicing searching the Internet for 7 days over 2 weeks at home, the brains of the Internet novices showed activity in the same regions as before, but this time there was new activity in the middle frontal gyrus and inferior frontal gyrus, the parts of the brain that are important for working memory and decision-making.
'You can exercise your mind by using the Internet, but it depends on how it's used,' adds Small.
'If you get hooked on gambling or eBay shopping, that may not be positive.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821911</id>
	<title>If searching stimulates brain activity....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256131680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>If searching stimulates brain activity, then I ought to have found all the zeros to the Riemann zeta function, cured cancer and AIDS, and devised a way to travel to Mars for 50 cents.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If searching stimulates brain activity , then I ought to have found all the zeros to the Riemann zeta function , cured cancer and AIDS , and devised a way to travel to Mars for 50 cents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If searching stimulates brain activity, then I ought to have found all the zeros to the Riemann zeta function, cured cancer and AIDS, and devised a way to travel to Mars for 50 cents.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29822605</id>
	<title>In other words...</title>
	<author>babboo65</author>
	<datestamp>1256135880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quaero ergo cogito?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quaero ergo cogito ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quaero ergo cogito?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29825149</id>
	<title>Re:No control condition?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256148060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to TFA, there was a control group: similarly aged people who had experience with the internet. The interesting part of this study was that after only two weeks of internet use, the brains of of the internet novices began to look like the brains of the experienced internet users.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to TFA , there was a control group : similarly aged people who had experience with the internet .
The interesting part of this study was that after only two weeks of internet use , the brains of of the internet novices began to look like the brains of the experienced internet users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to TFA, there was a control group: similarly aged people who had experience with the internet.
The interesting part of this study was that after only two weeks of internet use, the brains of of the internet novices began to look like the brains of the experienced internet users.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821921</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29823633</id>
	<title>Re:If searching stimulates brain activity....</title>
	<author>OutputLogic</author>
	<datestamp>1256140980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about reading Slashdot. Does it stimulate brain activity?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about reading Slashdot .
Does it stimulate brain activity ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about reading Slashdot.
Does it stimulate brain activity?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821911</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29824025</id>
	<title>In other news, dead salmon</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1256143080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The neural activity measured in several dead salmon shows a clear reaction to human faces. This proves beyond a doubt the accuracy of studies based on mass EEG tests.</p><p><a href="http://sciencestage.com/resources/dead-salmon-responds-portraits-people" title="sciencestage.com">http://sciencestage.com/resources/dead-salmon-responds-portraits-people</a> [sciencestage.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The neural activity measured in several dead salmon shows a clear reaction to human faces .
This proves beyond a doubt the accuracy of studies based on mass EEG tests.http : //sciencestage.com/resources/dead-salmon-responds-portraits-people [ sciencestage.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The neural activity measured in several dead salmon shows a clear reaction to human faces.
This proves beyond a doubt the accuracy of studies based on mass EEG tests.http://sciencestage.com/resources/dead-salmon-responds-portraits-people [sciencestage.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29849049</id>
	<title>Re:If you make people think...</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1256325480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>E A \_ \_ \_ = E A R T H</p></div><p>No, it's E A T E N you turkey. And swiss. On rye. With mustard! Mmm.</p><p>Yes, I'm hungry. I'm always hungry, can you tell?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>E A \ _ \ _ \ _ = E A R T HNo , it 's E A T E N you turkey .
And swiss .
On rye .
With mustard !
Mmm.Yes , I 'm hungry .
I 'm always hungry , can you tell ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>E A \_ \_ \_ = E A R T HNo, it's E A T E N you turkey.
And swiss.
On rye.
With mustard!
Mmm.Yes, I'm hungry.
I'm always hungry, can you tell?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29823163</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29826889</id>
	<title>Re:It doesn't seem so hard</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1256154660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's supposed to stimulate activity in the thinker head, not the other one...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's supposed to stimulate activity in the thinker head , not the other one.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's supposed to stimulate activity in the thinker head, not the other one...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821955</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821979</id>
	<title>Well, they do need to find innovative ways</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256132040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>to get those damn kids off their lawn, and the internet can help!</htmltext>
<tokenext>to get those damn kids off their lawn , and the internet can help !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to get those damn kids off their lawn, and the internet can help!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821955</id>
	<title>It doesn't seem so hard</title>
	<author>Thanshin</author>
	<datestamp>1256131920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1 - Click browser's search box.<br>2 - Type 'P', 'O', 'R', 'N'.<br>3 - Press 'Enter'.</p><p>I can't imagine a scenario where a search stimulates brain acti... Ohhh, ok. I get it now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 - Click browser 's search box.2 - Type 'P ' , 'O ' , 'R ' , 'N'.3 - Press 'Enter'.I ca n't imagine a scenario where a search stimulates brain acti... Ohhh , ok. I get it now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1 - Click browser's search box.2 - Type 'P', 'O', 'R', 'N'.3 - Press 'Enter'.I can't imagine a scenario where a search stimulates brain acti... Ohhh, ok. I get it now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29822321</id>
	<title>Of course...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256134380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course decision making is going to skyrocket. They've never had so much porn to choose from!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course decision making is going to skyrocket .
They 've never had so much porn to choose from !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course decision making is going to skyrocket.
They've never had so much porn to choose from!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821921</id>
	<title>No control condition?</title>
	<author>beatsme</author>
	<datestamp>1256131680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Without control, it's hard to say whether or not this is just a case of the Hawthorne effect.
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne\_effect" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne\_effect</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Without control , it 's hard to say whether or not this is just a case of the Hawthorne effect .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne \ _effect [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Without control, it's hard to say whether or not this is just a case of the Hawthorne effect.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne\_effect [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29822831</id>
	<title>Not Internet Related</title>
	<author>shock1970</author>
	<datestamp>1256137020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Performing any new activity creates stress, because the brain wants to follow its existing neural pathways to accomplish a set of behavior.  This is where the phrase "you can't teach an old dog a new trick" expression comes from.  After a short time of performing the repetitive behavior, as a way to overcome the stress, the brain will start to create new neural pathways which strengthen with additional repetition.  This behavior is not unique to internet searches and it surprises me that it is news-worthy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Performing any new activity creates stress , because the brain wants to follow its existing neural pathways to accomplish a set of behavior .
This is where the phrase " you ca n't teach an old dog a new trick " expression comes from .
After a short time of performing the repetitive behavior , as a way to overcome the stress , the brain will start to create new neural pathways which strengthen with additional repetition .
This behavior is not unique to internet searches and it surprises me that it is news-worthy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Performing any new activity creates stress, because the brain wants to follow its existing neural pathways to accomplish a set of behavior.
This is where the phrase "you can't teach an old dog a new trick" expression comes from.
After a short time of performing the repetitive behavior, as a way to overcome the stress, the brain will start to create new neural pathways which strengthen with additional repetition.
This behavior is not unique to internet searches and it surprises me that it is news-worthy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29826499</id>
	<title>Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256153160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How does the author jump to the conclusion that gambling or shopping detriment cognitive thinking? What scientific method did he use to figure that out?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How does the author jump to the conclusion that gambling or shopping detriment cognitive thinking ?
What scientific method did he use to figure that out ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does the author jump to the conclusion that gambling or shopping detriment cognitive thinking?
What scientific method did he use to figure that out?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29833659</id>
	<title>In related news</title>
	<author>AniVisual</author>
	<datestamp>1256215800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> Web surfers have found a significant increase in half-decayed jelly-like substances in the cloud. Forensics reveal that these jelly-like substances were once ancient living organisms which died from traumatic acceleration. "Something must have boosted these jellies," says Cloud Detective Henry Dave, "it appears that the older these organisms get, the more suspect they become to being forcibly accelerated away from their shells while doing Internet searches." </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Web surfers have found a significant increase in half-decayed jelly-like substances in the cloud .
Forensics reveal that these jelly-like substances were once ancient living organisms which died from traumatic acceleration .
" Something must have boosted these jellies , " says Cloud Detective Henry Dave , " it appears that the older these organisms get , the more suspect they become to being forcibly accelerated away from their shells while doing Internet searches .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Web surfers have found a significant increase in half-decayed jelly-like substances in the cloud.
Forensics reveal that these jelly-like substances were once ancient living organisms which died from traumatic acceleration.
"Something must have boosted these jellies," says Cloud Detective Henry Dave, "it appears that the older these organisms get, the more suspect they become to being forcibly accelerated away from their shells while doing Internet searches.
" </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29824849</id>
	<title>first-time Internet users</title>
	<author>vlm</author>
	<datestamp>1256146860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>first-time Internet users</p></div><p>That must be a strange population, very distinct from normal society.  I'm not sure their brain data is relevant to ours.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>first-time Internet usersThat must be a strange population , very distinct from normal society .
I 'm not sure their brain data is relevant to ours .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>first-time Internet usersThat must be a strange population, very distinct from normal society.
I'm not sure their brain data is relevant to ours.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821813</id>
	<title>First thought.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256130900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>First Thought!</htmltext>
<tokenext>First Thought !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First Thought!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29839677</id>
	<title>Re:In other news, dead salmon</title>
	<author>stillnotelf</author>
	<datestamp>1256203500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the salmon study deserved an igNobel.  Maybe if they get it in print...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the salmon study deserved an igNobel .
Maybe if they get it in print.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the salmon study deserved an igNobel.
Maybe if they get it in print...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29824025</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821953</id>
	<title>BREAKING NEWS...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256131920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Performing or learning uncommon or new tasks stimulates brain activity.</p><p>Up next, how IMPORTANT SCIENCE TYPE PEOPLE claim that thinking causes increased brain activity.</p><p>More at eleven...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Performing or learning uncommon or new tasks stimulates brain activity.Up next , how IMPORTANT SCIENCE TYPE PEOPLE claim that thinking causes increased brain activity.More at eleven.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Performing or learning uncommon or new tasks stimulates brain activity.Up next, how IMPORTANT SCIENCE TYPE PEOPLE claim that thinking causes increased brain activity.More at eleven...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29823043</id>
	<title>mod 0p</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256138040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">to <die. I w1ll jam that *BSD 0wned. [idge.net] However I don't</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>to [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to  [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29822787</id>
	<title>catch22</title>
	<author>muckracer</author>
	<datestamp>1256136780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was gonna improve my brain 'n all but I can' remember what I was gonna search for...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was gon na improve my brain 'n all but I can ' remember what I was gon na search for... : -/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was gonna improve my brain 'n all but I can' remember what I was gonna search for... :-/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29822339</id>
	<title>It's all part of the plan</title>
	<author>DigiShaman</author>
	<datestamp>1256134500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mushy mush!! Hmmm</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mushy mush ! !
Hmmm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mushy mush!!
Hmmm</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29825861</id>
	<title>Re:No control condition?</title>
	<author>Tibia1</author>
	<datestamp>1256150820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Old man: OMG I'm being studied!
Scientist: Did you see that spike in brain activity?
Old man: Now what the hell is this google thing? I dont get it...
Scientist: Wait, no, its dropping off again...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Old man : OMG I 'm being studied !
Scientist : Did you see that spike in brain activity ?
Old man : Now what the hell is this google thing ?
I dont get it.. . Scientist : Wait , no , its dropping off again.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Old man: OMG I'm being studied!
Scientist: Did you see that spike in brain activity?
Old man: Now what the hell is this google thing?
I dont get it...
Scientist: Wait, no, its dropping off again...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821921</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821821</id>
	<title>yES BUT WHO NEEDS BRAINS</title>
	<author>For a Free Internet</author>
	<datestamp>1256130960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I deny that I am am zomby because I love t o the ladies and their vagjinas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I deny that I am am zomby because I love t o the ladies and their vagjinas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I deny that I am am zomby because I love t o the ladies and their vagjinas.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821975</id>
	<title>i'm not screwing around, boss, honest!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256132040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All these google searches I am doing on stuff like "Hot Anime Chicks" and "Spongebob Squarepants" are making me smarter and more productive!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All these google searches I am doing on stuff like " Hot Anime Chicks " and " Spongebob Squarepants " are making me smarter and more productive !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All these google searches I am doing on stuff like "Hot Anime Chicks" and "Spongebob Squarepants" are making me smarter and more productive!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29822401</id>
	<title>Obligatory reference</title>
	<author>HangingChad</author>
	<datestamp>1256134860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is your old brain, this is your old brain on internet searches.  Any questions, grandpa?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is your old brain , this is your old brain on internet searches .
Any questions , grandpa ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is your old brain, this is your old brain on internet searches.
Any questions, grandpa?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29826189</id>
	<title>Medicine Porn Story</title>
	<author>GPLDAN</author>
	<datestamp>1256152080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Those are the keywords for this article. <br> <br>

It sounds like somebody speaking Engrish on the streets of Hong Kong, hawking pirated DVDs of "Hot Nurses 4". "You there, you want Medicine Porn Story!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those are the keywords for this article .
It sounds like somebody speaking Engrish on the streets of Hong Kong , hawking pirated DVDs of " Hot Nurses 4 " .
" You there , you want Medicine Porn Story !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those are the keywords for this article.
It sounds like somebody speaking Engrish on the streets of Hong Kong, hawking pirated DVDs of "Hot Nurses 4".
"You there, you want Medicine Porn Story!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29822195</id>
	<title>New stuff</title>
	<author>Cro Magnon</author>
	<datestamp>1256133540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suspect the boost is simply that they're doing something new to them.  I doubt that old people who have been online for years would get the same "boost" from just searching.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect the boost is simply that they 're doing something new to them .
I doubt that old people who have been online for years would get the same " boost " from just searching .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect the boost is simply that they're doing something new to them.
I doubt that old people who have been online for years would get the same "boost" from just searching.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29822171</id>
	<title>Doing searches</title>
	<author>zoomshorts</author>
	<datestamp>1256133420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>provides older people the best way to phrase a search, it forces them to come up with<br>things that are related to their questions. Simple.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>provides older people the best way to phrase a search , it forces them to come up withthings that are related to their questions .
Simple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>provides older people the best way to phrase a search, it forces them to come up withthings that are related to their questions.
Simple.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821877</id>
	<title>Pron</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256131440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about searching for pron? Or reading 4chan? What does that do to your brain?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about searching for pron ?
Or reading 4chan ?
What does that do to your brain ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about searching for pron?
Or reading 4chan?
What does that do to your brain?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29823555</id>
	<title>Re:No control condition?</title>
	<author>jellomizer</author>
	<datestamp>1256140620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>However I think internet searching may be more effective then just learning a new skill. When you search threw the stuff you find a lot of stuff that you have never though about based on that topic... For example I just did a google search for well.  Thinking of a Well for water where Little Timmy can fall in.  Then the first search result was for Wells Fargo then there are a bunch of site for wellness and there is a result for digging a well. So for that search result I was exposed 3 different idea at once.  My brain needed to do what a computer cant and process the information for relevancy for the search.  So I saw Wells Fargo, I went well that is a Bank (Or the traditional shipping carrier of the old days) So my brain processed all that information and heck even the tune from the Music Man.  Then there is wellness my brain scolded me for having a sandwich at McDonalds today saying I need to eat healthier.  Then finally I see information about Well.  So that was a lot or processing for my brain. Much more if I was just trying to learn a new skill.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>However I think internet searching may be more effective then just learning a new skill .
When you search threw the stuff you find a lot of stuff that you have never though about based on that topic... For example I just did a google search for well .
Thinking of a Well for water where Little Timmy can fall in .
Then the first search result was for Wells Fargo then there are a bunch of site for wellness and there is a result for digging a well .
So for that search result I was exposed 3 different idea at once .
My brain needed to do what a computer cant and process the information for relevancy for the search .
So I saw Wells Fargo , I went well that is a Bank ( Or the traditional shipping carrier of the old days ) So my brain processed all that information and heck even the tune from the Music Man .
Then there is wellness my brain scolded me for having a sandwich at McDonalds today saying I need to eat healthier .
Then finally I see information about Well .
So that was a lot or processing for my brain .
Much more if I was just trying to learn a new skill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>However I think internet searching may be more effective then just learning a new skill.
When you search threw the stuff you find a lot of stuff that you have never though about based on that topic... For example I just did a google search for well.
Thinking of a Well for water where Little Timmy can fall in.
Then the first search result was for Wells Fargo then there are a bunch of site for wellness and there is a result for digging a well.
So for that search result I was exposed 3 different idea at once.
My brain needed to do what a computer cant and process the information for relevancy for the search.
So I saw Wells Fargo, I went well that is a Bank (Or the traditional shipping carrier of the old days) So my brain processed all that information and heck even the tune from the Music Man.
Then there is wellness my brain scolded me for having a sandwich at McDonalds today saying I need to eat healthier.
Then finally I see information about Well.
So that was a lot or processing for my brain.
Much more if I was just trying to learn a new skill.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29822057</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29823115</id>
	<title>Too much of a good thing?</title>
	<author>DJGrahamJ</author>
	<datestamp>1256138400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If some computer-related activities can (apparently) change the way the brain works, I wonder if too much of it can have adverse effects. For example I've been using computers for about 30 years now and it's pretty apparent that my brain works quite differently than people who don't. Has this left me at a disadvantage WRT social interaction? I wonder if anyone has done research on that. *searches Google for it* d'oh!</htmltext>
<tokenext>If some computer-related activities can ( apparently ) change the way the brain works , I wonder if too much of it can have adverse effects .
For example I 've been using computers for about 30 years now and it 's pretty apparent that my brain works quite differently than people who do n't .
Has this left me at a disadvantage WRT social interaction ?
I wonder if anyone has done research on that .
* searches Google for it * d'oh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If some computer-related activities can (apparently) change the way the brain works, I wonder if too much of it can have adverse effects.
For example I've been using computers for about 30 years now and it's pretty apparent that my brain works quite differently than people who don't.
Has this left me at a disadvantage WRT social interaction?
I wonder if anyone has done research on that.
*searches Google for it* d'oh!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29822027</id>
	<title>First.... oh hell</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1256132460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would have gotten first post but I had to Google to find what a <a href="http://www.annandave.org/Fence\%20post.jpg" title="annandave.org">"post"</a> [annandave.org] was. I think I found one.</p><p>Now get off my.... uh, what was I talking about again?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would have gotten first post but I had to Google to find what a " post " [ annandave.org ] was .
I think I found one.Now get off my.... uh , what was I talking about again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would have gotten first post but I had to Google to find what a "post" [annandave.org] was.
I think I found one.Now get off my.... uh, what was I talking about again?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29822205</id>
	<title>It's all part of the "plan"</title>
	<author>cashman73</author>
	<datestamp>1256133600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or, as some would call it, Google Healthcare Initiative,...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , as some would call it , Google Healthcare Initiative,... ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, as some would call it, Google Healthcare Initiative,... ;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29824971</id>
	<title>Re:It doesn't seem so hard</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1256147340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it doesn't seem hard, you're not searching for the good stuff.</p><p>(at least for men)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it does n't seem hard , you 're not searching for the good stuff .
( at least for men )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it doesn't seem hard, you're not searching for the good stuff.
(at least for men)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821955</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29824015</id>
	<title>Re:If searching stimulates brain activity....</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1256143020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Trouble is, if you do a search for the Riemann zeta function, all you'll get is 1,000,000,000 hits for a particularly attractive actress.  And that'll stimulate activity, but for the wrong brain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Trouble is , if you do a search for the Riemann zeta function , all you 'll get is 1,000,000,000 hits for a particularly attractive actress .
And that 'll stimulate activity , but for the wrong brain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trouble is, if you do a search for the Riemann zeta function, all you'll get is 1,000,000,000 hits for a particularly attractive actress.
And that'll stimulate activity, but for the wrong brain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821911</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29822827</id>
	<title>Whew! I just took a giant Obama!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256136960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stinky!  I just did to my toilet bowl what Obama is doing to the dollar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stinky !
I just did to my toilet bowl what Obama is doing to the dollar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stinky!
I just did to my toilet bowl what Obama is doing to the dollar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821921</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29822581</id>
	<title>yro /. censorship</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256135760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>robbIE deleted a post with this reference moments ago. what a cad.</p><p>http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/10/21/new.york.subway.ads/index.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>robbIE deleted a post with this reference moments ago .
what a cad.http : //www.cnn.com/2009/US/10/21/new.york.subway.ads/index.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>robbIE deleted a post with this reference moments ago.
what a cad.http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/10/21/new.york.subway.ads/index.html</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29823645</id>
	<title>Re:If searching stimulates brain activity....</title>
	<author>Tsu Dho Nimh</author>
	<datestamp>1256141040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>If searching stimulates brain activity, then I ought to have found all the zeros to the Riemann zeta function, cured cancer and AIDS, and devised a way to travel to Mars for 50 cents.</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>Searching for pr0n doesn't count. However, your visual cortex has enlarged enough that your eyes are going to asplode.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If searching stimulates brain activity , then I ought to have found all the zeros to the Riemann zeta function , cured cancer and AIDS , and devised a way to travel to Mars for 50 cents .
Searching for pr0n does n't count .
However , your visual cortex has enlarged enough that your eyes are going to asplode .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> If searching stimulates brain activity, then I ought to have found all the zeros to the Riemann zeta function, cured cancer and AIDS, and devised a way to travel to Mars for 50 cents.
Searching for pr0n doesn't count.
However, your visual cortex has enlarged enough that your eyes are going to asplode.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821911</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29823163</id>
	<title>If you make people think...</title>
	<author>DynaSoar</author>
	<datestamp>1256138640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... their brain works more.</p><p>That's all there is to it. Age, searching, internet, none of that is relevant other than being conditions under which it can happen. Identical results can be had with kids doing stem completion tasks (E A \_ \_ \_ = E A R T H), college students doing a Stroop task (words naming colors, in that color or a different one), and any brain you can get to sit still and problem solve while stuck inside a tube with horrible noises going on.</p><p>TFA is a prime example of someone doing a far too specific test on a general principle and either thinking or pretending to have discovered something. I'm going to go with "pretending" since the new results after practice were seen in the middle and interior frontal gyri, and he claims these results are due to two specific processing tasks, but neglects to mention that the two regions make up more than half the frontal lobes in which there are obviously a great number of things going on, many of which would be occurring during the task, their design is completely incapable of telling the difference between excitatory and inhibitory activation, and there is no word on whether the 'enhanced' neural activity correlated with improved ability to search and/or answer relevant questions, without which one could just as easily make a case that the increased activation was a sign of boredom for having to do the same damn stuff again that they've been doing the past two weeks at home.</p><p>Someone needs to do a study and see whether asking hard questions about this stuff of researchers giving talks on it when they clearly don't know enough about what they're doing makes their brains light up in the right places, because if you make people think, their brain works harder. Wouldn't have happened here, because they wouldn't have been forced to answer the questions -- this was just a poster. Anyone can get any poster into one of these conferences as long as it says fMRI on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... their brain works more.That 's all there is to it .
Age , searching , internet , none of that is relevant other than being conditions under which it can happen .
Identical results can be had with kids doing stem completion tasks ( E A \ _ \ _ \ _ = E A R T H ) , college students doing a Stroop task ( words naming colors , in that color or a different one ) , and any brain you can get to sit still and problem solve while stuck inside a tube with horrible noises going on.TFA is a prime example of someone doing a far too specific test on a general principle and either thinking or pretending to have discovered something .
I 'm going to go with " pretending " since the new results after practice were seen in the middle and interior frontal gyri , and he claims these results are due to two specific processing tasks , but neglects to mention that the two regions make up more than half the frontal lobes in which there are obviously a great number of things going on , many of which would be occurring during the task , their design is completely incapable of telling the difference between excitatory and inhibitory activation , and there is no word on whether the 'enhanced ' neural activity correlated with improved ability to search and/or answer relevant questions , without which one could just as easily make a case that the increased activation was a sign of boredom for having to do the same damn stuff again that they 've been doing the past two weeks at home.Someone needs to do a study and see whether asking hard questions about this stuff of researchers giving talks on it when they clearly do n't know enough about what they 're doing makes their brains light up in the right places , because if you make people think , their brain works harder .
Would n't have happened here , because they would n't have been forced to answer the questions -- this was just a poster .
Anyone can get any poster into one of these conferences as long as it says fMRI on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... their brain works more.That's all there is to it.
Age, searching, internet, none of that is relevant other than being conditions under which it can happen.
Identical results can be had with kids doing stem completion tasks (E A \_ \_ \_ = E A R T H), college students doing a Stroop task (words naming colors, in that color or a different one), and any brain you can get to sit still and problem solve while stuck inside a tube with horrible noises going on.TFA is a prime example of someone doing a far too specific test on a general principle and either thinking or pretending to have discovered something.
I'm going to go with "pretending" since the new results after practice were seen in the middle and interior frontal gyri, and he claims these results are due to two specific processing tasks, but neglects to mention that the two regions make up more than half the frontal lobes in which there are obviously a great number of things going on, many of which would be occurring during the task, their design is completely incapable of telling the difference between excitatory and inhibitory activation, and there is no word on whether the 'enhanced' neural activity correlated with improved ability to search and/or answer relevant questions, without which one could just as easily make a case that the increased activation was a sign of boredom for having to do the same damn stuff again that they've been doing the past two weeks at home.Someone needs to do a study and see whether asking hard questions about this stuff of researchers giving talks on it when they clearly don't know enough about what they're doing makes their brains light up in the right places, because if you make people think, their brain works harder.
Wouldn't have happened here, because they wouldn't have been forced to answer the questions -- this was just a poster.
Anyone can get any poster into one of these conferences as long as it says fMRI on it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821897</id>
	<title>Re:First thought.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256131560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait until they exercise their lower brains.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait until they exercise their lower brains .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait until they exercise their lower brains.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29822057</id>
	<title>Re:No control condition?</title>
	<author>Shrike82</author>
	<datestamp>1256132700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was thinking along similar lines, but I'm more inclined to attribute it to the fact that they're first-time Internet users, and that learning how to use a search engine and formulate a good search for the first time is bound to show brain development and "enhanced neural stimulation". Replace "Internet searching" with anything else and introduce it to people who have never done it before and I bet you'll find new brain development and enhanced neural stimulation. It's called "learning" and, shockingly, when people learn new things their brain structure changes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was thinking along similar lines , but I 'm more inclined to attribute it to the fact that they 're first-time Internet users , and that learning how to use a search engine and formulate a good search for the first time is bound to show brain development and " enhanced neural stimulation " .
Replace " Internet searching " with anything else and introduce it to people who have never done it before and I bet you 'll find new brain development and enhanced neural stimulation .
It 's called " learning " and , shockingly , when people learn new things their brain structure changes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was thinking along similar lines, but I'm more inclined to attribute it to the fact that they're first-time Internet users, and that learning how to use a search engine and formulate a good search for the first time is bound to show brain development and "enhanced neural stimulation".
Replace "Internet searching" with anything else and introduce it to people who have never done it before and I bet you'll find new brain development and enhanced neural stimulation.
It's called "learning" and, shockingly, when people learn new things their brain structure changes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821921</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_0033216_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29839677
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29824025
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_0033216_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29825861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_0033216_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29823633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821911
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_0033216_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29822827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_0033216_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29823645
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821911
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_0033216_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29826889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821955
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_0033216_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29825149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_0033216_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29849049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29823163
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_0033216_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29824971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821955
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_0033216_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29823555
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29822057
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821921
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_0033216_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29824015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821911
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_21_0033216_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821897
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_0033216.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821813
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821897
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_0033216.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29822195
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_0033216.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29824025
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29839677
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_0033216.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821955
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29824971
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29826889
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_0033216.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821911
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29823633
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29823645
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29824015
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_0033216.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821921
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29825861
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29822057
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29823555
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29822827
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29825149
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_0033216.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821953
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_0033216.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29822171
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_0033216.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29823163
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29849049
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_21_0033216.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_21_0033216.29821877
</commentlist>
</conversation>
