<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_20_2240207</id>
	<title>Element 114 Verified</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1256047200000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:elliot.ajoure@net" rel="nofollow">ExRex</a> writes <i>"A team at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has <a href="http://blogs.physicstoday.org/update/2009/09/element-114-verified.html">observed the production of  superheavy element 114</a>, confirming the results of researchers at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna, Russia. Those researchers first reported producing element 114 in 1999. Such independent verification is important, particularly given the <a href="//science.slashdot.org/story/02/07/15/1833214/Elements-116-and-118-are-Bogus">evidence of fabricated results</a> for other superheavy elements. If you're a subscriber to <em>Physical Review Letters</em>, you can download the <a href="http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.132502">full article.</a>"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>ExRex writes " A team at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has observed the production of superheavy element 114 , confirming the results of researchers at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna , Russia .
Those researchers first reported producing element 114 in 1999 .
Such independent verification is important , particularly given the evidence of fabricated results for other superheavy elements .
If you 're a subscriber to Physical Review Letters , you can download the full article .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ExRex writes "A team at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has observed the production of  superheavy element 114, confirming the results of researchers at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna, Russia.
Those researchers first reported producing element 114 in 1999.
Such independent verification is important, particularly given the evidence of fabricated results for other superheavy elements.
If you're a subscriber to Physical Review Letters, you can download the full article.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818979</id>
	<title>Naming?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256056380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So now, the original team gets to name it? With President Obama's global popularity right now, what do you think the odds of naming it <b> <i>Obamium</i> </b> are? Of course, I'd bet the Stephen Colbert will be on the show in a week calling for us to send these guys an email asking them to name it <b> <i>Colbertium</i><nobr> <wbr></nobr></b>,... =)<p>&gt; </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So now , the original team gets to name it ?
With President Obama 's global popularity right now , what do you think the odds of naming it Obamium are ?
Of course , I 'd bet the Stephen Colbert will be on the show in a week calling for us to send these guys an email asking them to name it Colbertium ,... = ) &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So now, the original team gets to name it?
With President Obama's global popularity right now, what do you think the odds of naming it  Obamium  are?
Of course, I'd bet the Stephen Colbert will be on the show in a week calling for us to send these guys an email asking them to name it  Colbertium ,... =)&gt; </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818231</id>
	<title>Re:And why is this important?</title>
	<author>JoshuaZ</author>
	<datestamp>1256051640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>A variety of reasons. First of all, because it is interesting and fun. Why do you think people are searching for very large prime numbers? <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/10/15/154227/12M-Digit-Prime-Number-Sets-Record-Nets-100000" title="slashdot.org">http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/10/15/154227/12M-Digit-Prime-Number-Sets-Record-Nets-100000</a> [slashdot.org] Do you think they are all doing this because of possible benefits to abstract areas of number theory any more than people climb Everest for practical reasons? Second, seeing that these elements match up to our predictions help us get a better understanding of physics. Third, there is some reason to suspect that there may be farther ahead islands of stability where the elements become more stable again. While it is unlikely that those areas are stable enough for those elements to live long enough to be of practical use, the chance otherwise is not tiny. So there may be direct practical benefits. But the main reasons are because it is cool and humans are ever curious creatures.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A variety of reasons .
First of all , because it is interesting and fun .
Why do you think people are searching for very large prime numbers ?
http : //science.slashdot.org/story/09/10/15/154227/12M-Digit-Prime-Number-Sets-Record-Nets-100000 [ slashdot.org ] Do you think they are all doing this because of possible benefits to abstract areas of number theory any more than people climb Everest for practical reasons ?
Second , seeing that these elements match up to our predictions help us get a better understanding of physics .
Third , there is some reason to suspect that there may be farther ahead islands of stability where the elements become more stable again .
While it is unlikely that those areas are stable enough for those elements to live long enough to be of practical use , the chance otherwise is not tiny .
So there may be direct practical benefits .
But the main reasons are because it is cool and humans are ever curious creatures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A variety of reasons.
First of all, because it is interesting and fun.
Why do you think people are searching for very large prime numbers?
http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/10/15/154227/12M-Digit-Prime-Number-Sets-Record-Nets-100000 [slashdot.org] Do you think they are all doing this because of possible benefits to abstract areas of number theory any more than people climb Everest for practical reasons?
Second, seeing that these elements match up to our predictions help us get a better understanding of physics.
Third, there is some reason to suspect that there may be farther ahead islands of stability where the elements become more stable again.
While it is unlikely that those areas are stable enough for those elements to live long enough to be of practical use, the chance otherwise is not tiny.
So there may be direct practical benefits.
But the main reasons are because it is cool and humans are ever curious creatures.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818169</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818955</id>
	<title>Re:just great.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256056200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> now i need a new periodic table</p></div><p>FYI, natural elements have remained fairly stable it's the lab produced ones that change with time. Something that tends to last for milli-seconds under lab conditions isn't changing the fundimental nature of the Universe. You aren't going to find an asteroid composed of mainly Element 114. Just get a chart of the "Natural Elements" and be happy. The rest are a curiousity and nothing more. In a sense they should be thought of as "Possible Elements" given the fact they don't show up in nature.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>now i need a new periodic tableFYI , natural elements have remained fairly stable it 's the lab produced ones that change with time .
Something that tends to last for milli-seconds under lab conditions is n't changing the fundimental nature of the Universe .
You are n't going to find an asteroid composed of mainly Element 114 .
Just get a chart of the " Natural Elements " and be happy .
The rest are a curiousity and nothing more .
In a sense they should be thought of as " Possible Elements " given the fact they do n't show up in nature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> now i need a new periodic tableFYI, natural elements have remained fairly stable it's the lab produced ones that change with time.
Something that tends to last for milli-seconds under lab conditions isn't changing the fundimental nature of the Universe.
You aren't going to find an asteroid composed of mainly Element 114.
Just get a chart of the "Natural Elements" and be happy.
The rest are a curiousity and nothing more.
In a sense they should be thought of as "Possible Elements" given the fact they don't show up in nature.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818153</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29828635</id>
	<title>Re:Hey let's put it in the LHC</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256119140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just keep the cheddite away from the LHC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just keep the cheddite away from the LHC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just keep the cheddite away from the LHC.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819195</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818511</id>
	<title>Dear God man, but what does it DO!?</title>
	<author>Narcocide</author>
	<datestamp>1256053320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This could finally be the Bolognium we have all been waiting for!!</p><p>Seriously though... what does it do?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This could finally be the Bolognium we have all been waiting for !
! Seriously though... what does it do ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This could finally be the Bolognium we have all been waiting for!
!Seriously though... what does it do?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818195</id>
	<title>Re:just great.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256051400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...yes, that's why it's called a periodic table: every now and then you need to replace it. Otherwise it would have been called a permanent table.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...yes , that 's why it 's called a periodic table : every now and then you need to replace it .
Otherwise it would have been called a permanent table .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...yes, that's why it's called a periodic table: every now and then you need to replace it.
Otherwise it would have been called a permanent table.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818153</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818689</id>
	<title>Re:And why is this important?</title>
	<author>wvmarle</author>
	<datestamp>1256054520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those "islands of stability" have been predicted long time ago. What I don't understand is why those researchers do not try to make those elements, instead of the intermediate ones.
</p><p>Afaik making those superheavy elements is done by fusing lighter ones. Not by building them up brick-by-brick (or proton/neutron by proton/neutron). So I wonder why not just go for the ones that are predicted to be more stable? Is there something we need to know from slightly-less-heavy elements that we can't predict before making those more stable ones?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those " islands of stability " have been predicted long time ago .
What I do n't understand is why those researchers do not try to make those elements , instead of the intermediate ones .
Afaik making those superheavy elements is done by fusing lighter ones .
Not by building them up brick-by-brick ( or proton/neutron by proton/neutron ) .
So I wonder why not just go for the ones that are predicted to be more stable ?
Is there something we need to know from slightly-less-heavy elements that we ca n't predict before making those more stable ones ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those "islands of stability" have been predicted long time ago.
What I don't understand is why those researchers do not try to make those elements, instead of the intermediate ones.
Afaik making those superheavy elements is done by fusing lighter ones.
Not by building them up brick-by-brick (or proton/neutron by proton/neutron).
So I wonder why not just go for the ones that are predicted to be more stable?
Is there something we need to know from slightly-less-heavy elements that we can't predict before making those more stable ones?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818231</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29820819</id>
	<title>Re:114? Wow man...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256120940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>GREAT SCOTT!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GREAT SCOTT !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GREAT SCOTT!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818095</id>
	<title>Verified?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256050920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe it is certified. Maybe it is Cisco certified! What the hell kind of scientific terminology is that...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it is certified .
Maybe it is Cisco certified !
What the hell kind of scientific terminology is that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it is certified.
Maybe it is Cisco certified!
What the hell kind of scientific terminology is that...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818257</id>
	<title>Why cheat?</title>
	<author>cryfreedomlove</author>
	<datestamp>1256051760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Didn't the team that falsified the info about 114 and 116 come from Lawrence Livermoore</p></div><p>What is the chain of thought that leads researchers to that level of fraud?  Eventual exposure and disgrace is always the most likely outcome.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't the team that falsified the info about 114 and 116 come from Lawrence LivermooreWhat is the chain of thought that leads researchers to that level of fraud ?
Eventual exposure and disgrace is always the most likely outcome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't the team that falsified the info about 114 and 116 come from Lawrence LivermooreWhat is the chain of thought that leads researchers to that level of fraud?
Eventual exposure and disgrace is always the most likely outcome.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818167</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818125</id>
	<title>114?  Wow man...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256051100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's HEAVY.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's HEAVY .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's HEAVY.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29820251</id>
	<title>So, we finally have Oppenheimium!</title>
	<author>teleny</author>
	<datestamp>1256156700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or, what would you like as a name?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , what would you like as a name ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, what would you like as a name?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818533</id>
	<title>Re:But what about Element 115?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256053440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do we have element 115 yet? Then we could test if this guy is right...</p><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob\_Lazar</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do we have element 115 yet ?
Then we could test if this guy is right...http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob \ _Lazar</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do we have element 115 yet?
Then we could test if this guy is right...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob\_Lazar</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818233</id>
	<title>Re:And why is this important?</title>
	<author>tim\_darklighter</author>
	<datestamp>1256051640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, the closer we can get to finding an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island\_of\_stability" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">island of stability</a> [wikipedia.org], the better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , the closer we can get to finding an island of stability [ wikipedia.org ] , the better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, the closer we can get to finding an island of stability [wikipedia.org], the better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818169</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29822425</id>
	<title>Re:Elements Song</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256135040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, that's why he added the last two lines.</p><p>"These are the only ones of which the news has come to Haaverd.<br>And there may be many others but they haven't been discaaverd."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , that 's why he added the last two lines .
" These are the only ones of which the news has come to Haaverd.And there may be many others but they have n't been discaaverd .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, that's why he added the last two lines.
"These are the only ones of which the news has come to Haaverd.And there may be many others but they haven't been discaaverd.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819285</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29823381</id>
	<title>Re:What about</title>
	<author>acohen1</author>
	<datestamp>1256139780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its a reference to the seminal PC game X-COM aka UFO: Enemy Unknown.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its a reference to the seminal PC game X-COM aka UFO : Enemy Unknown .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its a reference to the seminal PC game X-COM aka UFO: Enemy Unknown.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29821989</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819195</id>
	<title>Hey let's put it in the LHC</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256058180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey let's put it in the LHC and see what hap(&amp;(*\%&amp;* NO CARRIER.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey let 's put it in the LHC and see what hap ( &amp; ( * \ % &amp; * NO CARRIER .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey let's put it in the LHC and see what hap(&amp;(*\%&amp;* NO CARRIER.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29825451</id>
	<title>just heard at the LHC</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256149320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>prof 1<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....right Gordon, every things ready<br>prof 2<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....yes, this is the densest sample yet,  I understand they went to quite some lengths to get this element 114<br>prof 1 - so we will bring the LHC up 115\%, a bit of gamble but we need the extra funding<br>prof 2 - just follow standard procedure Gordon, and everything will be fine<br>prof 1 -I don`t know how you can say that, although I do think the chance of another quench event is remote<br>Prof 2 - Gordon doesn`t need to hear this, he`s a highly trained Al-Queda operative<br>Prof 1 - ah! yes!, we have every faith in you Gordon<br>Prof 2 - right! lets let him in now<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>Earth destruction in 164287 seconds and counting<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>GAH! "filter error: Please use fewer "junk" characters, its called "formating text" you dumb computerised period counter, why do I bother!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>prof 1 ....right Gordon , every things readyprof 2 ....yes , this is the densest sample yet , I understand they went to quite some lengths to get this element 114prof 1 - so we will bring the LHC up 115 \ % , a bit of gamble but we need the extra fundingprof 2 - just follow standard procedure Gordon , and everything will be fineprof 1 -I don ` t know how you can say that , although I do think the chance of another quench event is remoteProf 2 - Gordon doesn ` t need to hear this , he ` s a highly trained Al-Queda operativeProf 1 - ah !
yes ! , we have every faith in you GordonProf 2 - right !
lets let him in now ...Earth destruction in 164287 seconds and counting ...GAH !
" filter error : Please use fewer " junk " characters , its called " formating text " you dumb computerised period counter , why do I bother !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>prof 1 ....right Gordon, every things readyprof 2 ....yes, this is the densest sample yet,  I understand they went to quite some lengths to get this element 114prof 1 - so we will bring the LHC up 115\%, a bit of gamble but we need the extra fundingprof 2 - just follow standard procedure Gordon, and everything will be fineprof 1 -I don`t know how you can say that, although I do think the chance of another quench event is remoteProf 2 - Gordon doesn`t need to hear this, he`s a highly trained Al-Queda operativeProf 1 - ah!
yes!, we have every faith in you GordonProf 2 - right!
lets let him in now ...Earth destruction in 164287 seconds and counting ...GAH!
"filter error: Please use fewer "junk" characters, its called "formating text" you dumb computerised period counter, why do I bother!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818169</id>
	<title>And why is this important?</title>
	<author>dmgxmichael</author>
	<datestamp>1256051280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stupid question from a non-physicist -- What is the point in synthesizing elements with half lives measured in seconds if not microseconds?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stupid question from a non-physicist -- What is the point in synthesizing elements with half lives measured in seconds if not microseconds ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stupid question from a non-physicist -- What is the point in synthesizing elements with half lives measured in seconds if not microseconds?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819285</id>
	<title>Elements Song</title>
	<author>Ukab the Great</author>
	<datestamp>1256058840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Upon reading the headline, my first thought was "dammit, now Tom Lehrer's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Elements\_(song)" title="wikipedia.org">Elements Song</a> [wikipedia.org] is even further behind."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Upon reading the headline , my first thought was " dammit , now Tom Lehrer 's Elements Song [ wikipedia.org ] is even further behind .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Upon reading the headline, my first thought was "dammit, now Tom Lehrer's Elements Song [wikipedia.org] is even further behind.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818617</id>
	<title>Re:And why is this important?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256053980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Calculating higher prime numbers allow for better/safer encryption of digital data.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Calculating higher prime numbers allow for better/safer encryption of digital data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Calculating higher prime numbers allow for better/safer encryption of digital data.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818231</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29822069</id>
	<title>in soviet russia</title>
	<author>nimbius</author>
	<datestamp>1256132820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>element discovers you!</htmltext>
<tokenext>element discovers you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>element discovers you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29824345</id>
	<title>Who cares about this... WHAT'S IT CALLED???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256144400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah blah blah scifi, syfy, etc, etc.   What are the ruskies naming this puppy??  (and the next 3 they checked out?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah blah blah scifi , syfy , etc , etc .
What are the ruskies naming this puppy ? ?
( and the next 3 they checked out ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah blah blah scifi, syfy, etc, etc.
What are the ruskies naming this puppy??
(and the next 3 they checked out?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29822131</id>
	<title>Re:And why is this important?</title>
	<author>Sgt. B</author>
	<datestamp>1256133180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately they are working on gaps and consuming higher elements to do so but you are right. Even though I think it's a waste to invest so much time and money to create something that serves no purpose and vanishes in such little time, maybe by accident someone will discover something useful while playing this billion dollar game of marbles.</p><p>If I drew a chart back in school where I omitted things and then had to go back and slip 2 rows of items where there were only 2 spaces, I would have failed. The fact that the periodic table is drawn this way means it is still wrong. There is something else at play that we don't yet understand.</p><p>I like Dr. Peter Plichta's findings. He looks at it from a different perspective. Look up his books on Amazon. They are an interesting read on this subject.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately they are working on gaps and consuming higher elements to do so but you are right .
Even though I think it 's a waste to invest so much time and money to create something that serves no purpose and vanishes in such little time , maybe by accident someone will discover something useful while playing this billion dollar game of marbles.If I drew a chart back in school where I omitted things and then had to go back and slip 2 rows of items where there were only 2 spaces , I would have failed .
The fact that the periodic table is drawn this way means it is still wrong .
There is something else at play that we do n't yet understand.I like Dr. Peter Plichta 's findings .
He looks at it from a different perspective .
Look up his books on Amazon .
They are an interesting read on this subject .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately they are working on gaps and consuming higher elements to do so but you are right.
Even though I think it's a waste to invest so much time and money to create something that serves no purpose and vanishes in such little time, maybe by accident someone will discover something useful while playing this billion dollar game of marbles.If I drew a chart back in school where I omitted things and then had to go back and slip 2 rows of items where there were only 2 spaces, I would have failed.
The fact that the periodic table is drawn this way means it is still wrong.
There is something else at play that we don't yet understand.I like Dr. Peter Plichta's findings.
He looks at it from a different perspective.
Look up his books on Amazon.
They are an interesting read on this subject.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818231</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29832193</id>
	<title>Re:114? Wow man...</title>
	<author>Phoghat</author>
	<datestamp>1256151060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne6ZZTfiQAw" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne6ZZTfiQAw</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = Ne6ZZTfiQAw [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne6ZZTfiQAw [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29822037</id>
	<title>Re:Don't tell the terrorists</title>
	<author>ae1294</author>
	<datestamp>1256132520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I hear element 114 is highly radioactive.</p></div><p>Really? ummm I've been painting my walls with it for years now and nothing bad has happened! makes a great night-light...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear element 114 is highly radioactive.Really ?
ummm I 've been painting my walls with it for years now and nothing bad has happened !
makes a great night-light.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear element 114 is highly radioactive.Really?
ummm I've been painting my walls with it for years now and nothing bad has happened!
makes a great night-light...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818519</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818529</id>
	<title>Re:Why the need to 'discover' the elements?</title>
	<author>4D6963</author>
	<datestamp>1256053440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First of all I'm not sure what you mean by formula, and as for the basic properties, they mostly all come down to the half-life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First of all I 'm not sure what you mean by formula , and as for the basic properties , they mostly all come down to the half-life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First of all I'm not sure what you mean by formula, and as for the basic properties, they mostly all come down to the half-life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818407</id>
	<title>About time! (SF prediction)</title>
	<author>StefanJ</author>
	<datestamp>1256052660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An old Poul Anderson story, <i>Mirkheim</i>, used a stable superheavy element, eka-platinum, as a Maguffin.</p><p>In the novel, the stuff was produced in a supernova. A gas giant planet was walloped by the explosion, blowing away its atmosphere leaving a creamy nougat center very dense rocky core. The heavy elements produced by the supernova were plastered across its surface.</p><p>As I recall, the planet's discovery by the galaxy's great powers caused a political crisis and the threat of war. The stuff was highly valued. The one use I recall was a hull plating used by hydrogen-breathing races.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An old Poul Anderson story , Mirkheim , used a stable superheavy element , eka-platinum , as a Maguffin.In the novel , the stuff was produced in a supernova .
A gas giant planet was walloped by the explosion , blowing away its atmosphere leaving a creamy nougat center very dense rocky core .
The heavy elements produced by the supernova were plastered across its surface.As I recall , the planet 's discovery by the galaxy 's great powers caused a political crisis and the threat of war .
The stuff was highly valued .
The one use I recall was a hull plating used by hydrogen-breathing races .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An old Poul Anderson story, Mirkheim, used a stable superheavy element, eka-platinum, as a Maguffin.In the novel, the stuff was produced in a supernova.
A gas giant planet was walloped by the explosion, blowing away its atmosphere leaving a creamy nougat center very dense rocky core.
The heavy elements produced by the supernova were plastered across its surface.As I recall, the planet's discovery by the galaxy's great powers caused a political crisis and the threat of war.
The stuff was highly valued.
The one use I recall was a hull plating used by hydrogen-breathing races.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819063</id>
	<title>Re:And why is this important?</title>
	<author>physburn</author>
	<datestamp>1256056980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most of the transuranic elements, are super unstable nucleii, that decay in
second. According the nuclear shell theory, certain nucleii with magic
numbers of either protons or neutron or both, would be extra stable, maybe
stable enough to be a useful radioisotope.  Proton numbers
110,114 and 126 are sure magic numbers. So finding element 114 should
help confirm the theory, unfortunately its very hard to make such an
element with enough neutrons, so the isotopes confirmed today are
neutron short and only last a few second, 288 and 288 Uuq 114,  better
than the near by isotopes that only last milliseconds, but to short even
to be chemically analysed. 298 Uuq 114, (ten neutrons more), is the
on that is predicted to be to extra stable.
<p>
---
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/blogs/Nuclear\%20Power/feed.html" title="feeddistiller.com">Nuclear Power</a> [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ <a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/" title="feeddistiller.com">Feed Distiller</a> [feeddistiller.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of the transuranic elements , are super unstable nucleii , that decay in second .
According the nuclear shell theory , certain nucleii with magic numbers of either protons or neutron or both , would be extra stable , maybe stable enough to be a useful radioisotope .
Proton numbers 110,114 and 126 are sure magic numbers .
So finding element 114 should help confirm the theory , unfortunately its very hard to make such an element with enough neutrons , so the isotopes confirmed today are neutron short and only last a few second , 288 and 288 Uuq 114 , better than the near by isotopes that only last milliseconds , but to short even to be chemically analysed .
298 Uuq 114 , ( ten neutrons more ) , is the on that is predicted to be to extra stable .
--- Nuclear Power [ feeddistiller.com ] Feed @ Feed Distiller [ feeddistiller.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of the transuranic elements, are super unstable nucleii, that decay in
second.
According the nuclear shell theory, certain nucleii with magic
numbers of either protons or neutron or both, would be extra stable, maybe
stable enough to be a useful radioisotope.
Proton numbers
110,114 and 126 are sure magic numbers.
So finding element 114 should
help confirm the theory, unfortunately its very hard to make such an
element with enough neutrons, so the isotopes confirmed today are
neutron short and only last a few second, 288 and 288 Uuq 114,  better
than the near by isotopes that only last milliseconds, but to short even
to be chemically analysed.
298 Uuq 114, (ten neutrons more), is the
on that is predicted to be to extra stable.
---

Nuclear Power [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ Feed Distiller [feeddistiller.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818169</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818939</id>
	<title>Re:just great.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256056080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hurrah for strawmen!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hurrah for strawmen !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hurrah for strawmen!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818527</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29823119</id>
	<title>Re:Hey let's put it in the LHC</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256138460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guess the universe didn't like istartedi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guess the universe did n't like istartedi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guess the universe didn't like istartedi.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819195</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818139</id>
	<title>Why the need to 'discover' the elements?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256051160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We already know how many electrons and protons there are gonna be -- why not just publish the formula and the basic properties like Mendeleyev used to do?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We already know how many electrons and protons there are gon na be -- why not just publish the formula and the basic properties like Mendeleyev used to do ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We already know how many electrons and protons there are gonna be -- why not just publish the formula and the basic properties like Mendeleyev used to do?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819391</id>
	<title>126 is Kryptonite</title>
	<author>sanman2</author>
	<datestamp>1256059740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's wait until they discover element 126, formally known as Unbihexium, but labeled by Action Comics as the atomic number for Kryptonite.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's wait until they discover element 126 , formally known as Unbihexium , but labeled by Action Comics as the atomic number for Kryptonite .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's wait until they discover element 126, formally known as Unbihexium, but labeled by Action Comics as the atomic number for Kryptonite.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818105</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818519</id>
	<title>Don't tell the terrorists</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256053380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hear element 114 is <em>highly</em> radioactive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear element 114 is highly radioactive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear element 114 is highly radioactive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29829849</id>
	<title>Re:The Russians found it?</title>
	<author>ndunnuck</author>
	<datestamp>1256125800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sweet!  Only one away from 115!  Anyone else thinking Elerium?  Imagine the technological possibilities.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sweet !
Only one away from 115 !
Anyone else thinking Elerium ?
Imagine the technological possibilities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sweet!
Only one away from 115!
Anyone else thinking Elerium?
Imagine the technological possibilities.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818105</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818281</id>
	<title>mod up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256051940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">users. BSD/OS a change to *BSD but FreeBSD Effort to address recent article put a fact: FreeBSD time I'm done here,</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>users .
BSD/OS a change to * BSD but FreeBSD Effort to address recent article put a fact : FreeBSD time I 'm done here , [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>users.
BSD/OS a change to *BSD but FreeBSD Effort to address recent article put a fact: FreeBSD time I'm done here, [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819193</id>
	<title>Re:just great.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256058180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bet the textbook publishers are excited about this.</p><p>"University Chemistry Seventh Edition - Includes coverage of ELEMENT 114" <i>(i.e. the periodic table on the inside cover has been updated).</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet the textbook publishers are excited about this .
" University Chemistry Seventh Edition - Includes coverage of ELEMENT 114 " ( i.e .
the periodic table on the inside cover has been updated ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet the textbook publishers are excited about this.
"University Chemistry Seventh Edition - Includes coverage of ELEMENT 114" (i.e.
the periodic table on the inside cover has been updated).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818153</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29831959</id>
	<title>Re:just great.</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1256147220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mine goes to 128. So it's still good for some time.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mine goes to 128 .
So it 's still good for some time .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mine goes to 128.
So it's still good for some time.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818153</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818167</id>
	<title>Odd</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256051280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Didn't the team that falsified the info about 114 and 116 come from Lawrence Livermoore</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't the team that falsified the info about 114 and 116 come from Lawrence Livermoore</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't the team that falsified the info about 114 and 116 come from Lawrence Livermoore</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818635</id>
	<title>Re:But what about Element 115?</title>
	<author>Xaositecte</author>
	<datestamp>1256054100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To this day I have nightmares about the Chryssalids.  It's like an Alien Zombie apocalypse rolled into one nightmarish black killing machine.  Science can't save us, nothing can save us, we're doomed, DOOOOOMED!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To this day I have nightmares about the Chryssalids .
It 's like an Alien Zombie apocalypse rolled into one nightmarish black killing machine .
Science ca n't save us , nothing can save us , we 're doomed , DOOOOOMED !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To this day I have nightmares about the Chryssalids.
It's like an Alien Zombie apocalypse rolled into one nightmarish black killing machine.
Science can't save us, nothing can save us, we're doomed, DOOOOOMED!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819605</id>
	<title>Re:just great.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256061660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What the heck? Where's the Stupidity? Einstein said that Stupidity was the most abundant element in the universe!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What the heck ?
Where 's the Stupidity ?
Einstein said that Stupidity was the most abundant element in the universe !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What the heck?
Where's the Stupidity?
Einstein said that Stupidity was the most abundant element in the universe!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818527</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818415</id>
	<title>Elerium</title>
	<author>Kazymyr</author>
	<datestamp>1256052660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One more to go till we get <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elerium-115" title="wikipedia.org">Elerium-115</a> [wikipedia.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One more to go till we get Elerium-115 [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One more to go till we get Elerium-115 [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819555</id>
	<title>Re:Why the need to 'discover' the elements?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256061180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Half-Life? Yes, the G-Man already knows about the basic properties of this element.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Half-Life ?
Yes , the G-Man already knows about the basic properties of this element .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Half-Life?
Yes, the G-Man already knows about the basic properties of this element.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818529</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29820697</id>
	<title>Re:Why the need to 'discover' the elements?</title>
	<author>growse</author>
	<datestamp>1256118960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>You failed chemistry, didn't you?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You failed chemistry , did n't you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You failed chemistry, didn't you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819333</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818527</id>
	<title>Re:just great.</title>
	<author>schon</author>
	<datestamp>1256053380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.cslacker.com/images/funny/signs/posters\_papers/the\_real\_table\_of\_elements/" title="cslacker.com">Here ya go.</a> [cslacker.com]  This one's guaranteed to never need updating.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here ya go .
[ cslacker.com ] This one 's guaranteed to never need updating .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here ya go.
[cslacker.com]  This one's guaranteed to never need updating.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818153</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818405</id>
	<title>Superheavy Element...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256052600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This superheavy element is now called Yourmomium.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This superheavy element is now called Yourmomium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This superheavy element is now called Yourmomium.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818373</id>
	<title>One step closer...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256052480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To Elerium-115!</p><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elerium-115</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To Elerium-115 ! http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elerium-115</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To Elerium-115!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elerium-115</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29820417</id>
	<title>What about elerium-115?</title>
	<author>jurgenaut</author>
	<datestamp>1256158500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Once we find elerium, all the world's energy problems should be solved forever.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Once we find elerium , all the world 's energy problems should be solved forever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once we find elerium, all the world's energy problems should be solved forever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29824123</id>
	<title>Re:just great.</title>
	<author>Convector</author>
	<datestamp>1256143440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You could get an occasional table.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You could get an occasional table .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could get an occasional table.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818153</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29821859</id>
	<title>Re:And why is this important?</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1256131260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What I don't understand is why those researchers do not try to make those elements, instead of the intermediate ones.</p></div> </blockquote><p>Probably never occurred to them.  We should get rid of these so called experts and replace them with random internauts, taxi drivers and old gits in bars.  Thay always have the answers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What I do n't understand is why those researchers do not try to make those elements , instead of the intermediate ones .
Probably never occurred to them .
We should get rid of these so called experts and replace them with random internauts , taxi drivers and old gits in bars .
Thay always have the answers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I don't understand is why those researchers do not try to make those elements, instead of the intermediate ones.
Probably never occurred to them.
We should get rid of these so called experts and replace them with random internauts, taxi drivers and old gits in bars.
Thay always have the answers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818689</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819429</id>
	<title>What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256060040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where's the obligatory mention of the 'Fifth Element'?<br>*sigh*<br>When hot red-headed aliens escape the attention of the<br>nerd/geek fan base, I start to worry that as a whole we<br>are getting old.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where 's the obligatory mention of the 'Fifth Element ' ?
* sigh * When hot red-headed aliens escape the attention of thenerd/geek fan base , I start to worry that as a whole weare getting old .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where's the obligatory mention of the 'Fifth Element'?
*sigh*When hot red-headed aliens escape the attention of thenerd/geek fan base, I start to worry that as a whole weare getting old.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818153</id>
	<title>just great.</title>
	<author>stupidsocialscientis</author>
	<datestamp>1256051220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext> now i need a new periodic table</htmltext>
<tokenext>now i need a new periodic table</tokentext>
<sentencetext> now i need a new periodic table</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29821989</id>
	<title>Re:What about</title>
	<author>Junior Samples</author>
	<datestamp>1256132100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>elerium-115?</p><p>I thought the official name of element 115 was Ununpentium.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ununpentium" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ununpentium</a> [wikipedia.org]<br>It's listed as Uup on a Dept of Navy periodic chart that was issued in the 1990s.</p><p>Robert Lazar discusses applications of Element 115 at his web site: <a href="http://www.boblazar.com/closed/gravity.htm" title="boblazar.com">http://www.boblazar.com/closed/gravity.htm</a> [boblazar.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>elerium-115 ? I thought the official name of element 115 was Ununpentium .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ununpentium [ wikipedia.org ] It 's listed as Uup on a Dept of Navy periodic chart that was issued in the 1990s.Robert Lazar discusses applications of Element 115 at his web site : http : //www.boblazar.com/closed/gravity.htm [ boblazar.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>elerium-115?I thought the official name of element 115 was Ununpentium.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ununpentium [wikipedia.org]It's listed as Uup on a Dept of Navy periodic chart that was issued in the 1990s.Robert Lazar discusses applications of Element 115 at his web site: http://www.boblazar.com/closed/gravity.htm [boblazar.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29820417</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818995</id>
	<title>Element 119</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256056500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What we really need next is <a href="http://memory-beta.wikia.com/wiki/Dilithium" title="wikia.com"> Element 119 </a> [wikia.com]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What we really need next is Element 119 [ wikia.com ] ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What we really need next is  Element 119  [wikia.com] ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819289</id>
	<title>That's what I'm thinking</title>
	<author>NotQuiteReal</author>
	<datestamp>1256058900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have no idea what nothin means 'bout nuthin, but all this theoretical shit means nuthin, until you hit the jackpot.
<br>
<br>
Then, we get the magical stuff to built space elevators, time machines, and whatnot, right?
<br>
<br>
All joking aside, you don't know what weird shit is good for, until you have enough of it to play around with to find out, right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have no idea what nothin means 'bout nuthin , but all this theoretical shit means nuthin , until you hit the jackpot .
Then , we get the magical stuff to built space elevators , time machines , and whatnot , right ?
All joking aside , you do n't know what weird shit is good for , until you have enough of it to play around with to find out , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have no idea what nothin means 'bout nuthin, but all this theoretical shit means nuthin, until you hit the jackpot.
Then, we get the magical stuff to built space elevators, time machines, and whatnot, right?
All joking aside, you don't know what weird shit is good for, until you have enough of it to play around with to find out, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818233</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818159</id>
	<title>But what about Element 115?</title>
	<author>Colonel Sponsz</author>
	<datestamp>1256051220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fine, fine, element 114 has been verified. Now, if they could just get a move on with element 115, we could make our UFO Power Sources work and finally get those Firestorms into the air. We're practically defenseless against the sectoids!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fine , fine , element 114 has been verified .
Now , if they could just get a move on with element 115 , we could make our UFO Power Sources work and finally get those Firestorms into the air .
We 're practically defenseless against the sectoids !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fine, fine, element 114 has been verified.
Now, if they could just get a move on with element 115, we could make our UFO Power Sources work and finally get those Firestorms into the air.
We're practically defenseless against the sectoids!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818215</id>
	<title>Um... fabricated?</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1256051520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Such independent verification is important, particularly given the evidence of fabricated results for other superheavy elements.</i></p><p>Unfortunately, the article that story is pointing to claiming that it was fraud rather than error has expired from Yahoo's site. Do you have a better link?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Such independent verification is important , particularly given the evidence of fabricated results for other superheavy elements.Unfortunately , the article that story is pointing to claiming that it was fraud rather than error has expired from Yahoo 's site .
Do you have a better link ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Such independent verification is important, particularly given the evidence of fabricated results for other superheavy elements.Unfortunately, the article that story is pointing to claiming that it was fraud rather than error has expired from Yahoo's site.
Do you have a better link?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818551</id>
	<title>Element 114 is superheavy...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256053560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But what class of chemical element is it?</p><p>I, for one, am hoping that it is SUPER FUCKING HEAVY METAL! \m/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But what class of chemical element is it ? I , for one , am hoping that it is SUPER FUCKING HEAVY METAL !
\ m/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But what class of chemical element is it?I, for one, am hoping that it is SUPER FUCKING HEAVY METAL!
\m/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29821721</id>
	<title>Re:And why is this important?</title>
	<author>Jarik C-Bol</author>
	<datestamp>1256130240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>because eventually we're going to find one that *is* stable, and the chemistry world will got tits over assholes to learn more about it. At great entertainment value to the rest of the world.</htmltext>
<tokenext>because eventually we 're going to find one that * is * stable , and the chemistry world will got tits over assholes to learn more about it .
At great entertainment value to the rest of the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because eventually we're going to find one that *is* stable, and the chemistry world will got tits over assholes to learn more about it.
At great entertainment value to the rest of the world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818169</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819881</id>
	<title>Re:Why the need to 'discover' the elements?</title>
	<author>setagllib</author>
	<datestamp>1256064960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Leave both in a vacuum and see which one lasts longer. There's a very clear definition of atomic stability that is markedly different from chemical reactivity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Leave both in a vacuum and see which one lasts longer .
There 's a very clear definition of atomic stability that is markedly different from chemical reactivity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Leave both in a vacuum and see which one lasts longer.
There's a very clear definition of atomic stability that is markedly different from chemical reactivity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819333</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29826173</id>
	<title>Re:Why cheat?</title>
	<author>ResidntGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1256151960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Oh my God, NO results? I've been working on this fucking shit for 4 years! How the fuck are there no results? What the shit do I tell the boss??"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Oh my God , NO results ?
I 've been working on this fucking shit for 4 years !
How the fuck are there no results ?
What the shit do I tell the boss ? ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Oh my God, NO results?
I've been working on this fucking shit for 4 years!
How the fuck are there no results?
What the shit do I tell the boss??
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818257</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29823657</id>
	<title>Beware all Scientists....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256141040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...Sapphire and Steel have been assigned.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...Sapphire and Steel have been assigned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Sapphire and Steel have been assigned.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818327</id>
	<title>Finally!</title>
	<author>Kell Bengal</author>
	<datestamp>1256052180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Great!  Only one more to go and we can start researching powersuits and UFO construction.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great !
Only one more to go and we can start researching powersuits and UFO construction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great!
Only one more to go and we can start researching powersuits and UFO construction.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29825229</id>
	<title>Re:just great.</title>
	<author>cheesybagel</author>
	<datestamp>1256148360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Plutonium was actually synthesized before it was found to occur in nature.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Plutonium was actually synthesized before it was found to occur in nature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Plutonium was actually synthesized before it was found to occur in nature.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818955</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818435</id>
	<title>Pics or it didn't happen.</title>
	<author>zish</author>
	<datestamp>1256052840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, um, show us some photos! While you're at it, I wanna see Unnilquadium too!
And if ya' got some time, how about some unobtainium?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , um , show us some photos !
While you 're at it , I wan na see Unnilquadium too !
And if ya ' got some time , how about some unobtainium ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, um, show us some photos!
While you're at it, I wanna see Unnilquadium too!
And if ya' got some time, how about some unobtainium?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819333</id>
	<title>Re:Why the need to 'discover' the elements?</title>
	<author>flyingfsck</author>
	<datestamp>1256059260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The heavy elements generally seem to be unstable, but they are not necessarily so.  For example, Plutonium is more stable than Iron.  Sure, Plutonium radiates a little and has a half life of 25,000 years, but Iron rusts much faster than that!</p><p>So, it possible that we may yet discover a heavy element with very surprising properties.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The heavy elements generally seem to be unstable , but they are not necessarily so .
For example , Plutonium is more stable than Iron .
Sure , Plutonium radiates a little and has a half life of 25,000 years , but Iron rusts much faster than that ! So , it possible that we may yet discover a heavy element with very surprising properties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The heavy elements generally seem to be unstable, but they are not necessarily so.
For example, Plutonium is more stable than Iron.
Sure, Plutonium radiates a little and has a half life of 25,000 years, but Iron rusts much faster than that!So, it possible that we may yet discover a heavy element with very surprising properties.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818621</id>
	<title>This was news 3 weeks ago?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256054040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could of sworn this was up 3 weeks ago on CNN.  Slow news day?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could of sworn this was up 3 weeks ago on CNN .
Slow news day ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could of sworn this was up 3 weeks ago on CNN.
Slow news day?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818993</id>
	<title>A human element (ha!)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256056500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was pleased to read that Heino Nitsche is one of the project's lead researchers. His general chemistry course at Berkeley was very informative and enjoyable (and not just because he has a German accent and glorious <a href="http://heavyelements.lbl.gov/JPEGS/BOSS.JPG" title="lbl.gov" rel="nofollow">mad scientist mustache</a> [lbl.gov]); I've yet to meet someone who can get that excited about chemistry at 9 a.m.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>I still remember a story he told us during the unit on radioactivity and nuclear decay. One of his cats, sick with cancer, was treated with radioactive I-131. After the cat "cooled off" at the vet hospital, Heino took him home, nursed him back to health, and, like a true scientist, measured the cat's radioactivity every morning with a Geiger counter. Sure enough, the measured decay curve strongly matched the predicted one. The cat lived for several more years, too.</p><p>If you want a brief overview of the history of heavy element synthesis, especially as it pertains to Berkeley, check out his <a href="http://webcast.berkeley.edu/course\_details\_new.php?seriesid=2009-B-11006&amp;semesterid=2009-B" title="berkeley.edu" rel="nofollow">lecture (47) on the subject</a> [berkeley.edu].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was pleased to read that Heino Nitsche is one of the project 's lead researchers .
His general chemistry course at Berkeley was very informative and enjoyable ( and not just because he has a German accent and glorious mad scientist mustache [ lbl.gov ] ) ; I 've yet to meet someone who can get that excited about chemistry at 9 a.m. : ) I still remember a story he told us during the unit on radioactivity and nuclear decay .
One of his cats , sick with cancer , was treated with radioactive I-131 .
After the cat " cooled off " at the vet hospital , Heino took him home , nursed him back to health , and , like a true scientist , measured the cat 's radioactivity every morning with a Geiger counter .
Sure enough , the measured decay curve strongly matched the predicted one .
The cat lived for several more years , too.If you want a brief overview of the history of heavy element synthesis , especially as it pertains to Berkeley , check out his lecture ( 47 ) on the subject [ berkeley.edu ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was pleased to read that Heino Nitsche is one of the project's lead researchers.
His general chemistry course at Berkeley was very informative and enjoyable (and not just because he has a German accent and glorious mad scientist mustache [lbl.gov]); I've yet to meet someone who can get that excited about chemistry at 9 a.m. :)I still remember a story he told us during the unit on radioactivity and nuclear decay.
One of his cats, sick with cancer, was treated with radioactive I-131.
After the cat "cooled off" at the vet hospital, Heino took him home, nursed him back to health, and, like a true scientist, measured the cat's radioactivity every morning with a Geiger counter.
Sure enough, the measured decay curve strongly matched the predicted one.
The cat lived for several more years, too.If you want a brief overview of the history of heavy element synthesis, especially as it pertains to Berkeley, check out his lecture (47) on the subject [berkeley.edu].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818447</id>
	<title>The atomic weight of Bolognium....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256052840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...is snacktacular!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...is snacktacular !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...is snacktacular!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818793</id>
	<title>Re:And why is this important?</title>
	<author>4D6963</author>
	<datestamp>1256055180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or the next one :

</p><p> <i>&ldquo;The next island is located very far from the first one,&rdquo; said Oganessian. How far away might that next island be" In terms of numbers on the periodic table, it could lie around atomic number 164, as some theorists predicted, certainly a long way from where researchers are exploring today in hopes of discovering element 120.</i> (from <a href="http://www.physorg.com/news126711994.html" title="physorg.com">here</a> [physorg.com])</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or the next one :    The next island is located very far from the first one ,    said Oganessian .
How far away might that next island be " In terms of numbers on the periodic table , it could lie around atomic number 164 , as some theorists predicted , certainly a long way from where researchers are exploring today in hopes of discovering element 120 .
( from here [ physorg.com ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or the next one :

 “The next island is located very far from the first one,” said Oganessian.
How far away might that next island be" In terms of numbers on the periodic table, it could lie around atomic number 164, as some theorists predicted, certainly a long way from where researchers are exploring today in hopes of discovering element 120.
(from here [physorg.com])</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818233</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818933</id>
	<title>Re:But what about Element 115?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256056020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We already have element 115: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ununpentium" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ununpentium</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>But it was uninteresting.</p><p>Personally, I'm drawn to The 5th Element.</p><p><a href="http://www.sonypictures.com/homevideo/thefifthelement/" title="sonypictures.com">http://www.sonypictures.com/homevideo/thefifthelement/</a> [sonypictures.com]<br>Yes, especially the 5th...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We already have element 115 : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ununpentium [ wikipedia.org ] But it was uninteresting.Personally , I 'm drawn to The 5th Element.http : //www.sonypictures.com/homevideo/thefifthelement/ [ sonypictures.com ] Yes , especially the 5th.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We already have element 115: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ununpentium [wikipedia.org]But it was uninteresting.Personally, I'm drawn to The 5th Element.http://www.sonypictures.com/homevideo/thefifthelement/ [sonypictures.com]Yes, especially the 5th...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818105</id>
	<title>The Russians found it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256050980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mr. President, we cannot allow an Element 114 gap!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mr. President , we can not allow an Element 114 gap !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mr. President, we cannot allow an Element 114 gap!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29823411</id>
	<title>Re:114? Wow man...</title>
	<author>emandres</author>
	<datestamp>1256139960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's an interesting caveat to calling this element heavy.  Just because it has 114 protons doesn't necessarily mean that it's "heavy".  The "heaviest" elements are the densest ones, which tend to fall in the middle of the transition metals.  If I recall correctly, 114 falls on the on the right side of the transition metals, so it might not be all that "heavy".  There are reasons why this happen, something about the f-orbitals actually allowing atoms to get closer to one another, but it's been a long time since college chemistry.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's an interesting caveat to calling this element heavy .
Just because it has 114 protons does n't necessarily mean that it 's " heavy " .
The " heaviest " elements are the densest ones , which tend to fall in the middle of the transition metals .
If I recall correctly , 114 falls on the on the right side of the transition metals , so it might not be all that " heavy " .
There are reasons why this happen , something about the f-orbitals actually allowing atoms to get closer to one another , but it 's been a long time since college chemistry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's an interesting caveat to calling this element heavy.
Just because it has 114 protons doesn't necessarily mean that it's "heavy".
The "heaviest" elements are the densest ones, which tend to fall in the middle of the transition metals.
If I recall correctly, 114 falls on the on the right side of the transition metals, so it might not be all that "heavy".
There are reasons why this happen, something about the f-orbitals actually allowing atoms to get closer to one another, but it's been a long time since college chemistry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818203</id>
	<title>Regrettably, yes.</title>
	<author>WebManWalking</author>
	<datestamp>1256051460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But it is, you know, a sacrifice required for the future of the human race. I hasten to add that since each man will be required to do prodigious... service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But it is , you know , a sacrifice required for the future of the human race .
I hasten to add that since each man will be required to do prodigious... service along these lines , the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it is, you know, a sacrifice required for the future of the human race.
I hasten to add that since each man will be required to do prodigious... service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29822135</id>
	<title>Re:just great.</title>
	<author>necro81</author>
	<datestamp>1256133240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This explains how chemistry textbooks keep coming out with new editions <i>every freakin' year</i> so they can charge you an arm and a leg.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This explains how chemistry textbooks keep coming out with new editions every freakin ' year so they can charge you an arm and a leg .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This explains how chemistry textbooks keep coming out with new editions every freakin' year so they can charge you an arm and a leg.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818195</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818315</id>
	<title>bit late dont you think?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256052060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this guy had time to make a youtube video on the subject</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fX-gqFChAyk" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fX-gqFChAyk</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this guy had time to make a youtube video on the subjecthttp : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = fX-gqFChAyk [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this guy had time to make a youtube video on the subjecthttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fX-gqFChAyk [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818617
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818231
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818169
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818635
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29822037
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818519
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29823119
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819195
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818527
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818153
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29825229
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818955
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818153
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29824123
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818153
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29821721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818169
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818105
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29823381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29821989
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29820417
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29832193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29821859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818689
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818231
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818169
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818153
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818533
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818793
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818233
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818169
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29822131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818231
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818169
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29829849
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818105
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29831959
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818153
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29828635
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819195
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29822135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818195
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818153
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29823411
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818527
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818153
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29820697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29822425
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819285
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819063
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818169
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819555
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818529
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29826173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818257
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818167
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29820819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_2240207_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818233
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818169
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_2240207.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818621
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_2240207.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818167
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818257
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29826173
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_2240207.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819195
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29828635
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29823119
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_2240207.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818125
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29832193
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29823411
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29820819
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_2240207.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818105
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29829849
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819391
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_2240207.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818215
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_2240207.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818519
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29822037
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_2240207.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818993
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_2240207.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818551
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_2240207.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818153
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818195
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29822135
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819193
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29831959
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818527
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818939
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819605
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818955
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29825229
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29824123
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_2240207.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819285
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29822425
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_2240207.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818979
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_2240207.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29820417
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29821989
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29823381
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_2240207.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818435
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_2240207.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818159
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818933
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818995
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818635
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818533
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_2240207.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818169
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819063
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818231
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818617
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29822131
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818689
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29821859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29821721
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818233
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818793
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819289
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_2240207.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818203
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_2240207.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818139
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819333
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29820697
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29818529
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_2240207.29819555
</commentlist>
</conversation>
