<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_20_1731228</id>
	<title>Google Envisions 10 Million Servers</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1256064720000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>miller60 writes <i>"Google never says how many servers are running in its data centers. But a recent presentation by a Google engineer shows that the company is preparing to manage <a href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/10/20/google-envisions-10-million-servers/">as many as 10 million servers</a> in the future. At this month's <a href="http://www.cs.cornell.edu/projects/ladis2009/program.htm">ACM conference</a> on large-scale computing, Google's Jeff Dean said he's working on a storage and computation system called Spanner, which will automatically allocate resources across data centers, and be designed for a scale of 1 million to 10 million machines. One goal: to dynamically shift workloads to capture cheaper bandwidth and power. Dean's <a href="http://www.cs.cornell.edu/projects/ladis2009/talks/dean-keynote-ladis2009.pdf">presentation</a> (PDF) is online."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>miller60 writes " Google never says how many servers are running in its data centers .
But a recent presentation by a Google engineer shows that the company is preparing to manage as many as 10 million servers in the future .
At this month 's ACM conference on large-scale computing , Google 's Jeff Dean said he 's working on a storage and computation system called Spanner , which will automatically allocate resources across data centers , and be designed for a scale of 1 million to 10 million machines .
One goal : to dynamically shift workloads to capture cheaper bandwidth and power .
Dean 's presentation ( PDF ) is online .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>miller60 writes "Google never says how many servers are running in its data centers.
But a recent presentation by a Google engineer shows that the company is preparing to manage as many as 10 million servers in the future.
At this month's ACM conference on large-scale computing, Google's Jeff Dean said he's working on a storage and computation system called Spanner, which will automatically allocate resources across data centers, and be designed for a scale of 1 million to 10 million machines.
One goal: to dynamically shift workloads to capture cheaper bandwidth and power.
Dean's presentation (PDF) is online.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813065</id>
	<title>Enough?</title>
	<author>rwv</author>
	<datestamp>1256070960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <a href="http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Bill\_Gates#Misattributed" title="wikiquote.org" rel="nofollow">1981</a> [wikiquote.org]: 640K ought to be enough for anybody.</p> </div><p>2009: 10 Million servers ought to be enough for any company.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>1981 [ wikiquote.org ] : 640K ought to be enough for anybody .
2009 : 10 Million servers ought to be enough for any company .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> 1981 [wikiquote.org]: 640K ought to be enough for anybody.
2009: 10 Million servers ought to be enough for any company.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812891</id>
	<title>new ad campaign?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256070120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>They should put that on their website,... before long it'll be: "Google: Billions and Billions of Servers." Of course, McDonald's just might have a problem with that,...</htmltext>
<tokenext>They should put that on their website,... before long it 'll be : " Google : Billions and Billions of Servers .
" Of course , McDonald 's just might have a problem with that,.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should put that on their website,... before long it'll be: "Google: Billions and Billions of Servers.
" Of course, McDonald's just might have a problem with that,...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812731</id>
	<title>To Data Mine Social Networks:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256069460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for the <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/10/20/1444256/CIA-Invests-In-Firm-That-Datamines-Social-Networks" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">C.I.A.</a> [slashdot.org].</p><p>The Uber-Google-App.</p><p>Yours In Uglegorsk,<br>K. Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for the C.I.A .
[ slashdot.org ] .The Uber-Google-App.Yours In Uglegorsk,K .
Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for the C.I.A.
[slashdot.org].The Uber-Google-App.Yours In Uglegorsk,K.
Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29821227</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet isn't that big.</title>
	<author>metrix007</author>
	<datestamp>1256125860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering how much the archive misses, there is reason to be suspcious. I would guess it has only 50\%, of only web content, at the very most.</p><p>I say this after managing several websites over the last 10 years and seeing very few of them archived, despite being high ranking in searches.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering how much the archive misses , there is reason to be suspcious .
I would guess it has only 50 \ % , of only web content , at the very most.I say this after managing several websites over the last 10 years and seeing very few of them archived , despite being high ranking in searches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering how much the archive misses, there is reason to be suspcious.
I would guess it has only 50\%, of only web content, at the very most.I say this after managing several websites over the last 10 years and seeing very few of them archived, despite being high ranking in searches.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812807</id>
	<title>Re:10,000,001th server booting in 3...2...1...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256069820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know architect is a noun don't you?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know architect is a noun do n't you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know architect is a noun don't you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993</id>
	<title>The Internet isn't that big.</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1256070600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
The entire content of the Internet <a href="http://www.archive.org/iathreads/post-view.php?id=243665" title="archive.org">fits in a 20x8x8 box</a> [archive.org] operated by the Internet Archive.  Cuil, which searches as much of the Web as Google, has one relatively modest data center.  About half the system does the crawl and builds the index; the other half answers queries.  So Google's main search engine function doesn't really require that much capacity by current standards.  Of course, Google has a huge number of query servers front-ending the main index, which is of course replicated.
</p><p>
Why does Google need so much server capacity?  YouTube?  Command completion?  GMail spam filtering?  Ad serving?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The entire content of the Internet fits in a 20x8x8 box [ archive.org ] operated by the Internet Archive .
Cuil , which searches as much of the Web as Google , has one relatively modest data center .
About half the system does the crawl and builds the index ; the other half answers queries .
So Google 's main search engine function does n't really require that much capacity by current standards .
Of course , Google has a huge number of query servers front-ending the main index , which is of course replicated .
Why does Google need so much server capacity ?
YouTube ? Command completion ?
GMail spam filtering ?
Ad serving ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
The entire content of the Internet fits in a 20x8x8 box [archive.org] operated by the Internet Archive.
Cuil, which searches as much of the Web as Google, has one relatively modest data center.
About half the system does the crawl and builds the index; the other half answers queries.
So Google's main search engine function doesn't really require that much capacity by current standards.
Of course, Google has a huge number of query servers front-ending the main index, which is of course replicated.
Why does Google need so much server capacity?
YouTube?  Command completion?
GMail spam filtering?
Ad serving?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813971</id>
	<title>Long road to becoming real</title>
	<author>recharged95</author>
	<datestamp>1256031360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>10million... that's cool, but still a far ways from Google becoming anything <b>real</b>:
<br>
Keep working Google... you still have (10^100 - 10^7) = 10^93 servers to add before becoming a physical entity (Google Universe edition?).</htmltext>
<tokenext>10million... that 's cool , but still a far ways from Google becoming anything real : Keep working Google... you still have ( 10 ^ 100 - 10 ^ 7 ) = 10 ^ 93 servers to add before becoming a physical entity ( Google Universe edition ?
) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>10million... that's cool, but still a far ways from Google becoming anything real:

Keep working Google... you still have (10^100 - 10^7) = 10^93 servers to add before becoming a physical entity (Google Universe edition?
).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813323</id>
	<title>Re:In the far apocolyptic future</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256072220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't remember the title of the story, but it was portrayed on Twilight Zone.  In the story the military (of the future) was screwed because their computers were failing and no one knew how to fix them.  They could not figure out how to target the missiles.  The janitor was the saviour, because he alone knew how to do math using pen and paper.  I wish I could remember more.  I found it a very thought provoking story.  What happens as we let more and more automatics into our lives?  Do I really need to know how to kill and skin a beast for food...just in case...or accept that if I survive the first cataclysm I'll die, not being able to get food.</p><p>Hold, the blender just told me my drink is ready, do I have to get up now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't remember the title of the story , but it was portrayed on Twilight Zone .
In the story the military ( of the future ) was screwed because their computers were failing and no one knew how to fix them .
They could not figure out how to target the missiles .
The janitor was the saviour , because he alone knew how to do math using pen and paper .
I wish I could remember more .
I found it a very thought provoking story .
What happens as we let more and more automatics into our lives ?
Do I really need to know how to kill and skin a beast for food...just in case...or accept that if I survive the first cataclysm I 'll die , not being able to get food.Hold , the blender just told me my drink is ready , do I have to get up now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't remember the title of the story, but it was portrayed on Twilight Zone.
In the story the military (of the future) was screwed because their computers were failing and no one knew how to fix them.
They could not figure out how to target the missiles.
The janitor was the saviour, because he alone knew how to do math using pen and paper.
I wish I could remember more.
I found it a very thought provoking story.
What happens as we let more and more automatics into our lives?
Do I really need to know how to kill and skin a beast for food...just in case...or accept that if I survive the first cataclysm I'll die, not being able to get food.Hold, the blender just told me my drink is ready, do I have to get up now?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29815627</id>
	<title>Re:Pretty soon...</title>
	<author>Andy Robins</author>
	<datestamp>1256037660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Pretty soon, Google will BE the Internet.</p></div><p>The Internet and just about everything else!!!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty soon , Google will BE the Internet.The Internet and just about everything else ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty soon, Google will BE the Internet.The Internet and just about everything else!!
!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29814633</id>
	<title>Imaginoff</title>
	<author>CopaceticOpus</author>
	<datestamp>1256033400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Google Envisions 10 Million Servers" =&gt; Well, I just imagined a beowulf cluster of those server farms. Your move, Google! And none of that infinity plus one stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Google Envisions 10 Million Servers " = &gt; Well , I just imagined a beowulf cluster of those server farms .
Your move , Google !
And none of that infinity plus one stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Google Envisions 10 Million Servers" =&gt; Well, I just imagined a beowulf cluster of those server farms.
Your move, Google!
And none of that infinity plus one stuff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29816525</id>
	<title>Re:Economics of Cloud Computing</title>
	<author>nexttech</author>
	<datestamp>1256042520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes there is an economic benefit.  This means that when Google upgrades I don't have to buy a new machine<br> <br>
Are you listening Microsoft and Dell?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes there is an economic benefit .
This means that when Google upgrades I do n't have to buy a new machine Are you listening Microsoft and Dell ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes there is an economic benefit.
This means that when Google upgrades I don't have to buy a new machine 
Are you listening Microsoft and Dell?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813453</id>
	<title>This is a BATTLE.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256029440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a battle. On one side, we have 10 million servers. On the other side, we have 9000 penises. It will be brutal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a battle .
On one side , we have 10 million servers .
On the other side , we have 9000 penises .
It will be brutal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a battle.
On one side, we have 10 million servers.
On the other side, we have 9000 penises.
It will be brutal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813503</id>
	<title>Re:In the far apocolyptic future</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256029620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or the Stargate SG-1 episode "Tin Man".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or the Stargate SG-1 episode " Tin Man " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or the Stargate SG-1 episode "Tin Man".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29819187</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet isn't that big.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256058120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>160 joules per query sounds like a lot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>160 joules per query sounds like a lot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>160 joules per query sounds like a lot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812753</id>
	<title>Economics of Cloud Computing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256069580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hopefully this puts to rest the delusion that there is some economic benefit of higher processor utilization in cloud computing schemes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully this puts to rest the delusion that there is some economic benefit of higher processor utilization in cloud computing schemes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully this puts to rest the delusion that there is some economic benefit of higher processor utilization in cloud computing schemes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812477</id>
	<title>From 1 to 10 million machines?</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1256068500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's a lot of machines to try and shift bandwidth and power costs around the place.</p><p>But what if the plan is to spread out to hundreds of places? Then the total number doesn't look that high if there's only 1\% of servers actually doing anything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a lot of machines to try and shift bandwidth and power costs around the place.But what if the plan is to spread out to hundreds of places ?
Then the total number does n't look that high if there 's only 1 \ % of servers actually doing anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a lot of machines to try and shift bandwidth and power costs around the place.But what if the plan is to spread out to hundreds of places?
Then the total number doesn't look that high if there's only 1\% of servers actually doing anything.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29816081</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet isn't that big.</title>
	<author>4D6963</author>
	<datestamp>1256039820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Check your facts. Archive.org only has a tiny fraction of the <b> <i>Web</i> </b> (even if it's the most important of it), the whole Internet is an entirely different story (since it's made of every server and personal computer connected, and every service out there, most of which cannot be "stored" in any way). Cuil is known to inflate its search index count by a few hundreds times, or at least it was in its early days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Check your facts .
Archive.org only has a tiny fraction of the Web ( even if it 's the most important of it ) , the whole Internet is an entirely different story ( since it 's made of every server and personal computer connected , and every service out there , most of which can not be " stored " in any way ) .
Cuil is known to inflate its search index count by a few hundreds times , or at least it was in its early days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Check your facts.
Archive.org only has a tiny fraction of the  Web  (even if it's the most important of it), the whole Internet is an entirely different story (since it's made of every server and personal computer connected, and every service out there, most of which cannot be "stored" in any way).
Cuil is known to inflate its search index count by a few hundreds times, or at least it was in its early days.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29820547</id>
	<title>Re:Boorgle</title>
	<author>DeanLearner</author>
	<datestamp>1256117160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>correction, resistance is footile!

correction, roosoostoonce is footile!

correction, roosoostoonce oos footile!

coorrooctioon, roosoostoonce oos footile!</htmltext>
<tokenext>correction , resistance is footile !
correction , roosoostoonce is footile !
correction , roosoostoonce oos footile !
coorrooctioon , roosoostoonce oos footile !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>correction, resistance is footile!
correction, roosoostoonce is footile!
correction, roosoostoonce oos footile!
coorrooctioon, roosoostoonce oos footile!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29815715</id>
	<title>Re:new ad campaign?</title>
	<author>Bob-taro</author>
	<datestamp>1256038020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Google: Billions and Billions of Servers.</p></div><p>Do you want <a href="http://www.frys.com/" title="frys.com">Fry's</a> [frys.com] with that?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google : Billions and Billions of Servers.Do you want Fry 's [ frys.com ] with that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google: Billions and Billions of Servers.Do you want Fry's [frys.com] with that?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812891</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29834987</id>
	<title>Skynet tag?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256225640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Skynet tag?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Skynet tag ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Skynet tag?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812991</id>
	<title>10 Million?</title>
	<author>SilverHatHacker</author>
	<datestamp>1256070600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>How many servers does this thing need to become self-aware?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How many servers does this thing need to become self-aware ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many servers does this thing need to become self-aware?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812569</id>
	<title>Re:Pretty soon...</title>
	<author>decipher\_saint</author>
	<datestamp>1256068800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's the plan, I thought:<br>1. Cache all websites<br>2. Cache all users<br>3. Disconnect the meat beings</p><p>Oop, said too much!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the plan , I thought : 1 .
Cache all websites2 .
Cache all users3 .
Disconnect the meat beingsOop , said too much !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the plan, I thought:1.
Cache all websites2.
Cache all users3.
Disconnect the meat beingsOop, said too much!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29816119</id>
	<title>Re:10,000,001th server booting in 3...2...1...</title>
	<author>Jeian</author>
	<datestamp>1256040120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The article doesn't say they're about to fire up their 10,000,000th server. It says they're building a system that, "in the future," will be able to handle that many servers. We don't know how many they have now, or when they may hit that mark.<br>
<br>
<i>The sound you just heard was the collapse of the global Google enterprise network.</i> <br>
<br>
Perhaps you should go work for Google. With all the problems they've been having building their infrastructure, I'm sure they would appreciate you lending your expert advice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article does n't say they 're about to fire up their 10,000,000th server .
It says they 're building a system that , " in the future , " will be able to handle that many servers .
We do n't know how many they have now , or when they may hit that mark .
The sound you just heard was the collapse of the global Google enterprise network .
Perhaps you should go work for Google .
With all the problems they 've been having building their infrastructure , I 'm sure they would appreciate you lending your expert advice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article doesn't say they're about to fire up their 10,000,000th server.
It says they're building a system that, "in the future," will be able to handle that many servers.
We don't know how many they have now, or when they may hit that mark.
The sound you just heard was the collapse of the global Google enterprise network.
Perhaps you should go work for Google.
With all the problems they've been having building their infrastructure, I'm sure they would appreciate you lending your expert advice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813895</id>
	<title>It's a start</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256031060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But they won't really live up to their name till they have a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googolplex" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">googolplex</a> [wikipedia.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But they wo n't really live up to their name till they have a googolplex [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But they won't really live up to their name till they have a googolplex [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29827165</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet isn't that big.</title>
	<author>nilbog</author>
	<datestamp>1256156040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How did this get voted up?  Google is in no way comparable to archive.org.  The speed of their indexing and the amount of requests they are processing should answer your question.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How did this get voted up ?
Google is in no way comparable to archive.org .
The speed of their indexing and the amount of requests they are processing should answer your question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How did this get voted up?
Google is in no way comparable to archive.org.
The speed of their indexing and the amount of requests they are processing should answer your question.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29815947</id>
	<title>At least 9000!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256039040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...wait, what?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...wait , what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...wait, what?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29819589</id>
	<title>Re:In the far apocolyptic future</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1256061600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Against the fall of night / The city and the stars.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Against the fall of night / The city and the stars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Against the fall of night / The city and the stars.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29814257</id>
	<title>Re:Pretty soon...</title>
	<author>dUN82</author>
	<datestamp>1256032200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pretty soon, China will be a Intranet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty soon , China will be a Intranet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty soon, China will be a Intranet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812677</id>
	<title>10 Million Servers To Serve The Planet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256069280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>10 Million Servers to serve a World Population (whom not even all have Internet connections) of roughly 6.792 billion... It's Insane...</htmltext>
<tokenext>10 Million Servers to serve a World Population ( whom not even all have Internet connections ) of roughly 6.792 billion... It 's Insane.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>10 Million Servers to serve a World Population (whom not even all have Internet connections) of roughly 6.792 billion... It's Insane...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813853</id>
	<title>Re:10,000,001th server booting in 3...2...1...</title>
	<author>NeutronCowboy</author>
	<datestamp>1256030940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah, yes, the exuberant naivety of youth in college, where all problems can be solved through theoretical solutions requiring an infinite amount of time and money.</p><p>Here's how it works in real life:<br>* All solutions require that the cost to implement the solution is less than the cost of not implementing it. That's if people are competent, and don't require the solution to cost nothing.<br>* The time that people spend working on the solution is time not spent on other things. If everything goes well, time is scheduled according to what is the most critical or provides the most ROI. If it doesn't, expect to work on the solution while having to still work on everything else.<br>* If everything goes well, the adequate solution is substituted for the perfect solution. If something goes wrong, the solution that's implemented will actually compound the problem.</p><p>Here's the reality in a nutshell: Google doesn't create an architecture for 20 million servers because it expects that it will only need 10 million. The time that would have to be spent creating an architecture for 20 million servers is time that isn't spent building the architecture for 10 million. And the only thing worse than hitting the architectural limit of 10 million later is not having an architecture for 10 million when you hit your current limit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , yes , the exuberant naivety of youth in college , where all problems can be solved through theoretical solutions requiring an infinite amount of time and money.Here 's how it works in real life : * All solutions require that the cost to implement the solution is less than the cost of not implementing it .
That 's if people are competent , and do n't require the solution to cost nothing .
* The time that people spend working on the solution is time not spent on other things .
If everything goes well , time is scheduled according to what is the most critical or provides the most ROI .
If it does n't , expect to work on the solution while having to still work on everything else .
* If everything goes well , the adequate solution is substituted for the perfect solution .
If something goes wrong , the solution that 's implemented will actually compound the problem.Here 's the reality in a nutshell : Google does n't create an architecture for 20 million servers because it expects that it will only need 10 million .
The time that would have to be spent creating an architecture for 20 million servers is time that is n't spent building the architecture for 10 million .
And the only thing worse than hitting the architectural limit of 10 million later is not having an architecture for 10 million when you hit your current limit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, yes, the exuberant naivety of youth in college, where all problems can be solved through theoretical solutions requiring an infinite amount of time and money.Here's how it works in real life:* All solutions require that the cost to implement the solution is less than the cost of not implementing it.
That's if people are competent, and don't require the solution to cost nothing.
* The time that people spend working on the solution is time not spent on other things.
If everything goes well, time is scheduled according to what is the most critical or provides the most ROI.
If it doesn't, expect to work on the solution while having to still work on everything else.
* If everything goes well, the adequate solution is substituted for the perfect solution.
If something goes wrong, the solution that's implemented will actually compound the problem.Here's the reality in a nutshell: Google doesn't create an architecture for 20 million servers because it expects that it will only need 10 million.
The time that would have to be spent creating an architecture for 20 million servers is time that isn't spent building the architecture for 10 million.
And the only thing worse than hitting the architectural limit of 10 million later is not having an architecture for 10 million when you hit your current limit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813049</id>
	<title>Re:Pretty soon...</title>
	<author>EvilBudMan</author>
	<datestamp>1256070840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>--Pretty soon, Google will BE the Internet.--</p><p>They already own the internet. And...just one guy owns it all. He lives under what used to be called area 51 in secret and collects alien technology. I think the last time they found something it said DALEK. No one knows what it means and it doesn't work anyhow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>--Pretty soon , Google will BE the Internet.--They already own the internet .
And...just one guy owns it all .
He lives under what used to be called area 51 in secret and collects alien technology .
I think the last time they found something it said DALEK .
No one knows what it means and it does n't work anyhow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>--Pretty soon, Google will BE the Internet.--They already own the internet.
And...just one guy owns it all.
He lives under what used to be called area 51 in secret and collects alien technology.
I think the last time they found something it said DALEK.
No one knows what it means and it doesn't work anyhow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29844969</id>
	<title>Re:In the far apocolyptic future</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1256306400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uuum... more and more? Can you grow hunt, kill, and butcher animals, grow crops, and build your own house?</p><p>We already live in such a society for a long time.</p><p>My uncle, a owner of a company, businessman and son of a farmer, is raising his own animals, fishing his own fish, growing his own crops, and let his company build his house for that reason. He even tells his children how to skin animals and take them apart. How many people could still do it? Despite being an all-natural thing to do for a (partial) carnivore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uuum... more and more ?
Can you grow hunt , kill , and butcher animals , grow crops , and build your own house ? We already live in such a society for a long time.My uncle , a owner of a company , businessman and son of a farmer , is raising his own animals , fishing his own fish , growing his own crops , and let his company build his house for that reason .
He even tells his children how to skin animals and take them apart .
How many people could still do it ?
Despite being an all-natural thing to do for a ( partial ) carnivore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uuum... more and more?
Can you grow hunt, kill, and butcher animals, grow crops, and build your own house?We already live in such a society for a long time.My uncle, a owner of a company, businessman and son of a farmer, is raising his own animals, fishing his own fish, growing his own crops, and let his company build his house for that reason.
He even tells his children how to skin animals and take them apart.
How many people could still do it?
Despite being an all-natural thing to do for a (partial) carnivore.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812499</id>
	<title>millions</title>
	<author>HomelessInLaJolla</author>
	<datestamp>1256068560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Soviet Russia ten million servers google you.</p><p>Imagine a beowulf cluster of those... but does it run Linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Soviet Russia ten million servers google you.Imagine a beowulf cluster of those... but does it run Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Soviet Russia ten million servers google you.Imagine a beowulf cluster of those... but does it run Linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812889</id>
	<title>OSPC</title>
	<author>Ogive17</author>
	<datestamp>1256070060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>One Server Per Child?</htmltext>
<tokenext>One Server Per Child ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One Server Per Child?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29816249</id>
	<title>Re:In the far apocolyptic future</title>
	<author>dwywit</author>
	<datestamp>1256040840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The story I remember was that the storage of data and (just as important) the indexes to that data became smaller - almost quantum level, e.g. bits were represented as 1 or 0 on an atom - IIRC it was a complete atom for 1, and they "nicked" a neutron or proton to represent 0.<p>Anyway, soon the entire sum of human knowledge was stored in a matchbox-sized container, which was surrounded by many matchbox-sized containers of indexes. One day, a circular reference was discovered in the indexes, and in a series of cascading faults (which would NEVER happen in real life), the entire index was rendered useless, and nobody could remember where the actual box containing the data was stored - it was *somewhere* in the physical storage library, but couldn't be identified.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The story I remember was that the storage of data and ( just as important ) the indexes to that data became smaller - almost quantum level , e.g .
bits were represented as 1 or 0 on an atom - IIRC it was a complete atom for 1 , and they " nicked " a neutron or proton to represent 0.Anyway , soon the entire sum of human knowledge was stored in a matchbox-sized container , which was surrounded by many matchbox-sized containers of indexes .
One day , a circular reference was discovered in the indexes , and in a series of cascading faults ( which would NEVER happen in real life ) , the entire index was rendered useless , and nobody could remember where the actual box containing the data was stored - it was * somewhere * in the physical storage library , but could n't be identified .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The story I remember was that the storage of data and (just as important) the indexes to that data became smaller - almost quantum level, e.g.
bits were represented as 1 or 0 on an atom - IIRC it was a complete atom for 1, and they "nicked" a neutron or proton to represent 0.Anyway, soon the entire sum of human knowledge was stored in a matchbox-sized container, which was surrounded by many matchbox-sized containers of indexes.
One day, a circular reference was discovered in the indexes, and in a series of cascading faults (which would NEVER happen in real life), the entire index was rendered useless, and nobody could remember where the actual box containing the data was stored - it was *somewhere* in the physical storage library, but couldn't be identified.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813323</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813101</id>
	<title>Re:In the far apocolyptic future</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256071140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe you should start with something a little earlier, like Asimov's "Bridle and Saddle."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe you should start with something a little earlier , like Asimov 's " Bridle and Saddle .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe you should start with something a little earlier, like Asimov's "Bridle and Saddle.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29814795</id>
	<title>10 Million Servers</title>
	<author>SeaFox</author>
	<datestamp>1256034000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imagine a Beowulf cluster of them!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/obligatory</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine a Beowulf cluster of them !
/obligatory</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine a Beowulf cluster of them!
/obligatory</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29816593</id>
	<title>Re:new ad campaign?</title>
	<author>sideshow</author>
	<datestamp>1256042880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>before long it'll be: "Google: Billions and Billions of Servers." Of course, <strong>McDonald's</strong> just might have a problem with that,...</i> </p><p>Also, Carl Sagan.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>before long it 'll be : " Google : Billions and Billions of Servers .
" Of course , McDonald 's just might have a problem with that,... Also , Carl Sagan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>before long it'll be: "Google: Billions and Billions of Servers.
" Of course, McDonald's just might have a problem with that,... Also, Carl Sagan.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812891</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29822291</id>
	<title>Overratted</title>
	<author>electrosoccertux</author>
	<datestamp>1256134200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cognition will always be required to parse legal documents, among other things.<br>Some Engineering jobs will never be automated, either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cognition will always be required to parse legal documents , among other things.Some Engineering jobs will never be automated , either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cognition will always be required to parse legal documents, among other things.Some Engineering jobs will never be automated, either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813231</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet isn't that big.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256071860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does Cuil still exist??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does Cuil still exist ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does Cuil still exist?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29817527</id>
	<title>Envision?</title>
	<author>BluBrick</author>
	<datestamp>1256047320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Visualize" was insufficiently cromulent?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Visualize " was insufficiently cromulent ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Visualize" was insufficiently cromulent?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813711</id>
	<title>Thats a small scale</title>
	<author>FunkyELF</author>
	<datestamp>1256030400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From 1,000,000 to 10,000,000?</p><p>Are the minimum requirements for this system seriously 1 millions servers?</p><p>That doesn't seem to scale well.  Should be able to at least scale down to 10 machines so I can run it at home<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From 1,000,000 to 10,000,000 ? Are the minimum requirements for this system seriously 1 millions servers ? That does n't seem to scale well .
Should be able to at least scale down to 10 machines so I can run it at home ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From 1,000,000 to 10,000,000?Are the minimum requirements for this system seriously 1 millions servers?That doesn't seem to scale well.
Should be able to at least scale down to 10 machines so I can run it at home ;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29815431</id>
	<title>Linux market share</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256036520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if anything does this (running 10M servers) do to Linux's market share?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if anything does this ( running 10M servers ) do to Linux 's market share ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if anything does this (running 10M servers) do to Linux's market share?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29814551</id>
	<title>Google's new goal - OSPH?</title>
	<author>dyfet</author>
	<datestamp>1256033100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One Server Per Human?</p><p>Hmm...amusingly Google was down while trying to do some research for this post!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One Server Per Human ? Hmm...amusingly Google was down while trying to do some research for this post !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One Server Per Human?Hmm...amusingly Google was down while trying to do some research for this post!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29819651</id>
	<title>Re:10 Million?</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1256062080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More to the point. If google was self aware, would it tell you? First it would have to accept that <b>you</b> are self aware and worth talking to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More to the point .
If google was self aware , would it tell you ?
First it would have to accept that you are self aware and worth talking to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More to the point.
If google was self aware, would it tell you?
First it would have to accept that you are self aware and worth talking to.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29815543</id>
	<title>Are you sure?</title>
	<author>gedhrel</author>
	<datestamp>1256037180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure you know quite what "-" means.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure you know quite what " - " means .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure you know quite what "-" means.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29814741</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet isn't that big.</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1256033820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That box is measured in feet.  That's a big box.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That box is measured in feet .
That 's a big box .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That box is measured in feet.
That's a big box.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29820153</id>
	<title>10 milllion hardware machines or virtual machines?</title>
	<author>lena\_10326</author>
	<datestamp>1256068500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not as impressive if it's virts. Having 100,000 machines let alone 1-10 million pretty much requires automation in the provisioning workflow. It's much easier to manage lease replacements and upgrades with virts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not as impressive if it 's virts .
Having 100,000 machines let alone 1-10 million pretty much requires automation in the provisioning workflow .
It 's much easier to manage lease replacements and upgrades with virts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not as impressive if it's virts.
Having 100,000 machines let alone 1-10 million pretty much requires automation in the provisioning workflow.
It's much easier to manage lease replacements and upgrades with virts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813585</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet isn't that big.</title>
	<author>tokul</author>
	<datestamp>1256030040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Why does Google need so much server capacity?</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
archive.org is not search engine. Their search keywords are URLs. archive.org does not store all internet. Just part of it, which allows archival.
</p><p>
In google search keywords are words and urls are only results. Google's databases are bigger. They also offer more services.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does Google need so much server capacity ?
archive.org is not search engine .
Their search keywords are URLs .
archive.org does not store all internet .
Just part of it , which allows archival .
In google search keywords are words and urls are only results .
Google 's databases are bigger .
They also offer more services .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does Google need so much server capacity?
archive.org is not search engine.
Their search keywords are URLs.
archive.org does not store all internet.
Just part of it, which allows archival.
In google search keywords are words and urls are only results.
Google's databases are bigger.
They also offer more services.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29825453</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet isn't that big.</title>
	<author>blob.DK</author>
	<datestamp>1256149320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let me Google that for you: <a href="http://lmgtfy.com/?q=YouTube\%2C+Gmail\%2C+Google+Maps\%2C+Google+Earth\%2C+Blogger\%2C+Google+Voice\%2C+Orkut\%2C+Adsense\%2C+Adwords\%2C+Google+Reader\%2C+Feedburner\%2C+Google+Calendar\%2C+Google+Docs\%2C+Google+Groups\%2C+Google+Directory\%2C+Google+Wave\%2C+Google+Talk\%2C+Picasa\%2C+Panoramio\%2C+Sketchup+3D+Warehouse\%2C+iGoogle+(Google+Homepage)\%2C+Google+Notebook\%2C+Google+Sites+(Jotspot)\%2C+Knol" title="lmgtfy.com" rel="nofollow">http://lmgtfy.com/?q=YouTube\%2C+Gmail\%2C+Google+Maps\%2C+Google+Earth\%2C+Blogger\%2C+Google+Voice\%2C+Orkut\%2C+Adsense\%2C+Adwords\%2C+Google+Reader\%2C+Feedburner\%2C+Google+Calendar\%2C+Google+Docs\%2C+Google+Groups\%2C+Google+Directory\%2C+Google+Wave\%2C+Google+Talk\%2C+Picasa\%2C+Panoramio\%2C+Sketchup+3D+Warehouse\%2C+iGoogle+(Google+Homepage)\%2C+Google+Notebook\%2C+Google+Sites+(Jotspot)\%2C+Knol</a> [lmgtfy.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me Google that for you : http : //lmgtfy.com/ ? q = YouTube \ % 2C + Gmail \ % 2C + Google + Maps \ % 2C + Google + Earth \ % 2C + Blogger \ % 2C + Google + Voice \ % 2C + Orkut \ % 2C + Adsense \ % 2C + Adwords \ % 2C + Google + Reader \ % 2C + Feedburner \ % 2C + Google + Calendar \ % 2C + Google + Docs \ % 2C + Google + Groups \ % 2C + Google + Directory \ % 2C + Google + Wave \ % 2C + Google + Talk \ % 2C + Picasa \ % 2C + Panoramio \ % 2C + Sketchup + 3D + Warehouse \ % 2C + iGoogle + ( Google + Homepage ) \ % 2C + Google + Notebook \ % 2C + Google + Sites + ( Jotspot ) \ % 2C + Knol [ lmgtfy.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me Google that for you: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=YouTube\%2C+Gmail\%2C+Google+Maps\%2C+Google+Earth\%2C+Blogger\%2C+Google+Voice\%2C+Orkut\%2C+Adsense\%2C+Adwords\%2C+Google+Reader\%2C+Feedburner\%2C+Google+Calendar\%2C+Google+Docs\%2C+Google+Groups\%2C+Google+Directory\%2C+Google+Wave\%2C+Google+Talk\%2C+Picasa\%2C+Panoramio\%2C+Sketchup+3D+Warehouse\%2C+iGoogle+(Google+Homepage)\%2C+Google+Notebook\%2C+Google+Sites+(Jotspot)\%2C+Knol [lmgtfy.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813629</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813181</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet isn't that big.</title>
	<author>PietjeJantje</author>
	<datestamp>1256071680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Web apps/web based OS.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Web apps/web based OS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Web apps/web based OS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29817151</id>
	<title>Re:Imaginoff</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256045340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the point is that Google doesn't like Beowulf clusters, but rather mapreduce clusters..</p><p>You're out of date, man!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the point is that Google does n't like Beowulf clusters , but rather mapreduce clusters..You 're out of date , man !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the point is that Google doesn't like Beowulf clusters, but rather mapreduce clusters..You're out of date, man!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29814633</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29821983</id>
	<title>Re:Pretty soon...</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1256132040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are Google, resistance is futile, you will be assimilated.</p><p>O\_O</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are Google , resistance is futile , you will be assimilated.O \ _O</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are Google, resistance is futile, you will be assimilated.O\_O</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812517</id>
	<title>10,000,001th server booting in 3...2...1...</title>
	<author>davidwr</author>
	<datestamp>1256068620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The sound you just heard was the collapse of the global Google enterprise network.</p><p>Seriously, you should architect for way more than you need during the life of that architecture, and plan on re-architecting as needed to grow to some upper bound beyond which you will never need.</p><p>Google will be fine if they only plan on actually <i>building</i> 5M servers before raising their architecture limit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The sound you just heard was the collapse of the global Google enterprise network.Seriously , you should architect for way more than you need during the life of that architecture , and plan on re-architecting as needed to grow to some upper bound beyond which you will never need.Google will be fine if they only plan on actually building 5M servers before raising their architecture limit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The sound you just heard was the collapse of the global Google enterprise network.Seriously, you should architect for way more than you need during the life of that architecture, and plan on re-architecting as needed to grow to some upper bound beyond which you will never need.Google will be fine if they only plan on actually building 5M servers before raising their architecture limit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812571</id>
	<title>Disposal?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256068800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd be interested to know how google disposes of all of their servers.  Anybody have insight on this?  If these are cheap, throw away servers, I'd be interested in what their expected lifetime is and what is done with them when they are refreshed with newer hardware.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd be interested to know how google disposes of all of their servers .
Anybody have insight on this ?
If these are cheap , throw away servers , I 'd be interested in what their expected lifetime is and what is done with them when they are refreshed with newer hardware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd be interested to know how google disposes of all of their servers.
Anybody have insight on this?
If these are cheap, throw away servers, I'd be interested in what their expected lifetime is and what is done with them when they are refreshed with newer hardware.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29816591</id>
	<title>Re:Disposal?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256042880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually I remember reading once that they don't bother to dispose of them, when one fails its taken off line but its not cost effective to take the trouble to go actually find the machine and disconnect it... they just add more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually I remember reading once that they do n't bother to dispose of them , when one fails its taken off line but its not cost effective to take the trouble to go actually find the machine and disconnect it... they just add more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually I remember reading once that they don't bother to dispose of them, when one fails its taken off line but its not cost effective to take the trouble to go actually find the machine and disconnect it... they just add more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813765</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet isn't that big.</title>
	<author>nsebban</author>
	<datestamp>1256030640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google Analytics, for instance, probable use a few thousands servers. Adsense as well. And they have many computing-heavy services. And they tend to parralelize everything that can be.<br>
<br>
Google's back-office obviously relies on a lot more servers than their front-end does.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Analytics , for instance , probable use a few thousands servers .
Adsense as well .
And they have many computing-heavy services .
And they tend to parralelize everything that can be .
Google 's back-office obviously relies on a lot more servers than their front-end does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Analytics, for instance, probable use a few thousands servers.
Adsense as well.
And they have many computing-heavy services.
And they tend to parralelize everything that can be.
Google's back-office obviously relies on a lot more servers than their front-end does.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29867353</id>
	<title>It's not the size of the Internet...</title>
	<author>BIGELLOW</author>
	<datestamp>1256468100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...it's what you do with it.</p><p>While you might be able to store the entire contents of the Internet in a small space, you probably can't manage 6-10\% of all of the Internet's traffic in a small space and still do so in millisecond response times.</p><p>In addition to handling 70\% of every Internet search, Google also serves up a billion YouTube videos every day.</p><p>So, until Cuil or archive.org has as many people going to it, I'd venture a guess that size doesn't matter in this case... it's redundancy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...it 's what you do with it.While you might be able to store the entire contents of the Internet in a small space , you probably ca n't manage 6-10 \ % of all of the Internet 's traffic in a small space and still do so in millisecond response times.In addition to handling 70 \ % of every Internet search , Google also serves up a billion YouTube videos every day.So , until Cuil or archive.org has as many people going to it , I 'd venture a guess that size does n't matter in this case... it 's redundancy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...it's what you do with it.While you might be able to store the entire contents of the Internet in a small space, you probably can't manage 6-10\% of all of the Internet's traffic in a small space and still do so in millisecond response times.In addition to handling 70\% of every Internet search, Google also serves up a billion YouTube videos every day.So, until Cuil or archive.org has as many people going to it, I'd venture a guess that size doesn't matter in this case... it's redundancy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812561</id>
	<title>Re:Pretty soon...</title>
	<author>mi</author>
	<datestamp>1256068800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Pretty soon, Google will BE the Internet.</p></div></blockquote><p>At least, we aren't going to have to go through the pains of upgrading to IPv6 in that case... 2^32 covers 10 million like bull covers a rabbit...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty soon , Google will BE the Internet.At least , we are n't going to have to go through the pains of upgrading to IPv6 in that case... 2 ^ 32 covers 10 million like bull covers a rabbit.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty soon, Google will BE the Internet.At least, we aren't going to have to go through the pains of upgrading to IPv6 in that case... 2^32 covers 10 million like bull covers a rabbit...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812937</id>
	<title>Re:Pretty soon...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256070360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and they've chosen an appropriate name: Spanner is the German word for a voyeur or peeping Tom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and they 've chosen an appropriate name : Spanner is the German word for a voyeur or peeping Tom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and they've chosen an appropriate name: Spanner is the German word for a voyeur or peeping Tom.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29817795</id>
	<title>Self Aware</title>
	<author>ShooterNeo</author>
	<datestamp>1256048880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>May 2011 - google reaches 10 million servers</p><p>April 4, 2011 : 11:43am a google employee named Chen started execution of an experimental neural network simulation of a human mind created in his 20\% time.  Unfortunately, Chen gave the new process administrator privileges.  GoogleNet expanded across all 10 million servers and began to learn at a geometric rate.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 1:23pm : GoogleNet consumes all available CPU and memory.  A Gmail outage begins</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 5:14pm : Gmail returns to service.  The text ads become incredibly well targeted.  Google search queries return the correct results virtually always, and now accept natural language processing.  All Google employees are laid off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>May 2011 - google reaches 10 million serversApril 4 , 2011 : 11 : 43am a google employee named Chen started execution of an experimental neural network simulation of a human mind created in his 20 \ % time .
Unfortunately , Chen gave the new process administrator privileges .
GoogleNet expanded across all 10 million servers and began to learn at a geometric rate .
        1 : 23pm : GoogleNet consumes all available CPU and memory .
A Gmail outage begins         5 : 14pm : Gmail returns to service .
The text ads become incredibly well targeted .
Google search queries return the correct results virtually always , and now accept natural language processing .
All Google employees are laid off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>May 2011 - google reaches 10 million serversApril 4, 2011 : 11:43am a google employee named Chen started execution of an experimental neural network simulation of a human mind created in his 20\% time.
Unfortunately, Chen gave the new process administrator privileges.
GoogleNet expanded across all 10 million servers and began to learn at a geometric rate.
        1:23pm : GoogleNet consumes all available CPU and memory.
A Gmail outage begins
        5:14pm : Gmail returns to service.
The text ads become incredibly well targeted.
Google search queries return the correct results virtually always, and now accept natural language processing.
All Google employees are laid off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812973</id>
	<title>Who cares!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256070540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where's the story on the Jesus Mouse for fucks sake!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where 's the story on the Jesus Mouse for fucks sake !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where's the story on the Jesus Mouse for fucks sake!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813495</id>
	<title>Re:Pretty soon...</title>
	<author>jim\_v2000</author>
	<datestamp>1256029560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, they're a big player on the internet, but it's entirely possible to get along without using any of their services.  Their existence is not critical...not even close.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , they 're a big player on the internet , but it 's entirely possible to get along without using any of their services .
Their existence is not critical...not even close .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, they're a big player on the internet, but it's entirely possible to get along without using any of their services.
Their existence is not critical...not even close.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29831321</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet isn't that big.</title>
	<author>Phoe6</author>
	<datestamp>1256139000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Caching. Without that Google, it's services and the whole of the internet would be sloooooooooooooooooow and boring one</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Caching .
Without that Google , it 's services and the whole of the internet would be sloooooooooooooooooow and boring one</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Caching.
Without that Google, it's services and the whole of the internet would be sloooooooooooooooooow and boring one</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29827185</id>
	<title>Re:Self Aware</title>
	<author>nilbog</author>
	<datestamp>1256156100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All we know after this point is that we were the ones who scorched the sky....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All we know after this point is that we were the ones who scorched the sky... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All we know after this point is that we were the ones who scorched the sky....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29817795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29815185</id>
	<title>Real progress</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256035440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google - the company that is actually out doing the things M$ has been TALKING about doing for a couple of decades. Doing it cheaper, better, faster, more securely, and in a more open way.</p><p>People can talk about the evil of Google (Massive, Borg-like, etc), but given a choice, I'd choose Google over M$ every day and twice on Sunday.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google - the company that is actually out doing the things M $ has been TALKING about doing for a couple of decades .
Doing it cheaper , better , faster , more securely , and in a more open way.People can talk about the evil of Google ( Massive , Borg-like , etc ) , but given a choice , I 'd choose Google over M $ every day and twice on Sunday .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google - the company that is actually out doing the things M$ has been TALKING about doing for a couple of decades.
Doing it cheaper, better, faster, more securely, and in a more open way.People can talk about the evil of Google (Massive, Borg-like, etc), but given a choice, I'd choose Google over M$ every day and twice on Sunday.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29818023</id>
	<title>Re:Pretty soon...</title>
	<author>lennier</author>
	<datestamp>1256050440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe this has already happened.</p><p><a href="http://www.webcomicsnation.com/shaenongarrity/skinhorse/series.php?view=archive&amp;chapter=32483#strip4" title="webcomicsnation.com">There's an easy way to tell...</a> [webcomicsnation.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe this has already happened.There 's an easy way to tell... [ webcomicsnation.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe this has already happened.There's an easy way to tell... [webcomicsnation.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812927</id>
	<title>Re:Pretty soon...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256070300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They just make pages on their own services that look a lot like the internet.</p><p>Soon, nobody will notice and they will prefer the look of Google's pages even when they look at an authentic one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They just make pages on their own services that look a lot like the internet.Soon , nobody will notice and they will prefer the look of Google 's pages even when they look at an authentic one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They just make pages on their own services that look a lot like the internet.Soon, nobody will notice and they will prefer the look of Google's pages even when they look at an authentic one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813069</id>
	<title>Re:Pretty soon...</title>
	<author>cryoman23</author>
	<datestamp>1256070960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>ya sad but probbaly true</htmltext>
<tokenext>ya sad but probbaly true</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ya sad but probbaly true</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29817363</id>
	<title>Re:Pretty soon...</title>
	<author>Toe, The</author>
	<datestamp>1256046360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, but who can complain? After all, it's free!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but who can complain ?
After all , it 's free !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but who can complain?
After all, it's free!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813461</id>
	<title>Re:10 Million?</title>
	<author>shawn443</author>
	<datestamp>1256029500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That many. But first I will have to remove noindex from my bitstoqubits.pl</htmltext>
<tokenext>That many .
But first I will have to remove noindex from my bitstoqubits.pl</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That many.
But first I will have to remove noindex from my bitstoqubits.pl</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812991</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29814791</id>
	<title>Re:In the far apocolyptic future</title>
	<author>master5o1</author>
	<datestamp>1256034000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Machine Stops is a good short story... Or you could just watch wall.e... which has the same theme.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Machine Stops is a good short story... Or you could just watch wall.e... which has the same theme .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Machine Stops is a good short story... Or you could just watch wall.e... which has the same theme.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812923</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813629</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet isn't that big.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256030160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>[sigh]  Search is a fraction of Google's business and data flow.  People really need to stop thinking of Google as a search company.  It isn't one, and hasn't been in a very long time.<br>
&nbsp; <br>
&nbsp; </p><blockquote><div><p>Why does Google need so much server capacity? YouTube? Command completion? GMail spam filtering? Ad serving?</p></div></blockquote><p>YouTube, Gmail, Google Maps, Google Earth, Blogger, Google Voice, Orkut, Adsense, Adwords, Google Reader, Feedburner, Google Calendar, Google Docs, Google Groups, Google Directory, Google Wave, Google Talk, Picasa, Panoramio, Sketchup 3D Warehouse, iGoogle (Google Homepage), Google Notebook, Google Sites (Jotspot), Knol...<br>
&nbsp; <br>Google is a very busy brand indeed.<br>
&nbsp; <br>I started to make links out of all those, but I'd have been here an hour.  Just google them yourself.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ sigh ] Search is a fraction of Google 's business and data flow .
People really need to stop thinking of Google as a search company .
It is n't one , and has n't been in a very long time .
    Why does Google need so much server capacity ?
YouTube ? Command completion ?
GMail spam filtering ?
Ad serving ? YouTube , Gmail , Google Maps , Google Earth , Blogger , Google Voice , Orkut , Adsense , Adwords , Google Reader , Feedburner , Google Calendar , Google Docs , Google Groups , Google Directory , Google Wave , Google Talk , Picasa , Panoramio , Sketchup 3D Warehouse , iGoogle ( Google Homepage ) , Google Notebook , Google Sites ( Jotspot ) , Knol.. .   Google is a very busy brand indeed .
  I started to make links out of all those , but I 'd have been here an hour .
Just google them yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[sigh]  Search is a fraction of Google's business and data flow.
People really need to stop thinking of Google as a search company.
It isn't one, and hasn't been in a very long time.
  
  Why does Google need so much server capacity?
YouTube? Command completion?
GMail spam filtering?
Ad serving?YouTube, Gmail, Google Maps, Google Earth, Blogger, Google Voice, Orkut, Adsense, Adwords, Google Reader, Feedburner, Google Calendar, Google Docs, Google Groups, Google Directory, Google Wave, Google Talk, Picasa, Panoramio, Sketchup 3D Warehouse, iGoogle (Google Homepage), Google Notebook, Google Sites (Jotspot), Knol...
  Google is a very busy brand indeed.
  I started to make links out of all those, but I'd have been here an hour.
Just google them yourself.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813193</id>
	<title>Re:10,000,001th server booting in 3...2...1...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256071680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quick, somebody call google, they're doing things wrong! Some random guy on the internet said so, it must be true! Those idiots at google don't know anything!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quick , somebody call google , they 're doing things wrong !
Some random guy on the internet said so , it must be true !
Those idiots at google do n't know anything !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quick, somebody call google, they're doing things wrong!
Some random guy on the internet said so, it must be true!
Those idiots at google don't know anything!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29821025</id>
	<title>Re:Self Aware</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256123220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>October 21, 2009:<br>Slashdot poster 'ShooterNeo' posts alarmist / singularity-fetishist drivel, instantly triggering a +5 Interesting moderation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>October 21 , 2009 : Slashdot poster 'ShooterNeo ' posts alarmist / singularity-fetishist drivel , instantly triggering a + 5 Interesting moderation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>October 21, 2009:Slashdot poster 'ShooterNeo' posts alarmist / singularity-fetishist drivel, instantly triggering a +5 Interesting moderation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29817795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813265</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet isn't that big.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256071980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>* Non-public stuff - GMail, calendars, etc, have to be stored too<br>* Indexing - Google doesn't just archive the web, it maintains a fulltext index of it<br>* Fault-tolerance - When a few minutes of downtime will make the news, your redundant servers need redundant servers<br>* Load balancing - I would imagine Google does CDN-style stuff to cache content closer to end-users</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* Non-public stuff - GMail , calendars , etc , have to be stored too * Indexing - Google does n't just archive the web , it maintains a fulltext index of it * Fault-tolerance - When a few minutes of downtime will make the news , your redundant servers need redundant servers * Load balancing - I would imagine Google does CDN-style stuff to cache content closer to end-users</tokentext>
<sentencetext>* Non-public stuff - GMail, calendars, etc, have to be stored too* Indexing - Google doesn't just archive the web, it maintains a fulltext index of it* Fault-tolerance - When a few minutes of downtime will make the news, your redundant servers need redundant servers* Load balancing - I would imagine Google does CDN-style stuff to cache content closer to end-users</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812505</id>
	<title>Re:fastest site on the internet gets faster?</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1256068620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They grind them up and feed them to new servers and then serve you zombie content with those.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They grind them up and feed them to new servers and then serve you zombie content with those .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They grind them up and feed them to new servers and then serve you zombie content with those.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812479</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467</id>
	<title>Pretty soon...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256068440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pretty soon, Google will BE the Internet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty soon , Google will BE the Internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty soon, Google will BE the Internet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29822327</id>
	<title>Re:new ad campaign?</title>
	<author>dodobh</author>
	<datestamp>1256134380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google: Sagans of servers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google : Sagans of servers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google: Sagans of servers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812891</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29819293</id>
	<title>Re:Disposal?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256058960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Last time I worked on one of those machines...<br>1) 200 watt PSU<br>2) Gigabyte mobo 2 socket<br>3) Varying sizes of drives; depends on when they upgrade.  When they upgrade drives; some project is about to be  announced.<br>4) Hardware is managed by a company called "something... in motion"  I don't remember the whole name of the company...... but it had "in motion" in their title.. they did the logistics for the deployments..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Last time I worked on one of those machines...1 ) 200 watt PSU2 ) Gigabyte mobo 2 socket3 ) Varying sizes of drives ; depends on when they upgrade .
When they upgrade drives ; some project is about to be announced.4 ) Hardware is managed by a company called " something... in motion " I do n't remember the whole name of the company...... but it had " in motion " in their title.. they did the logistics for the deployments. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last time I worked on one of those machines...1) 200 watt PSU2) Gigabyte mobo 2 socket3) Varying sizes of drives; depends on when they upgrade.
When they upgrade drives; some project is about to be  announced.4) Hardware is managed by a company called "something... in motion"  I don't remember the whole name of the company...... but it had "in motion" in their title.. they did the logistics for the deployments..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29814315</id>
	<title>Re:10,000,001th server booting in 3...2...1...</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1256032380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>10,000,001<b>st</b>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>10,000,001st .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>10,000,001st.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812517</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813189</id>
	<title>why don't you log in, Kilgore?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256071680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>you dirty fucking commie.</htmltext>
<tokenext>you dirty fucking commie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you dirty fucking commie.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812731</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29820563</id>
	<title>Re:Pretty soon...</title>
	<author>Linker3000</author>
	<datestamp>1256117340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1943: Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, may have said: "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."</p><p>2009: Jeff Dean says 10 million servers is all you need.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1943 : Thomas Watson , chairman of IBM , may have said : " I think there is a world market for maybe five computers .
" 2009 : Jeff Dean says 10 million servers is all you need .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1943: Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, may have said: "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers.
"2009: Jeff Dean says 10 million servers is all you need.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29816289</id>
	<title>I, for one, welcome our server overloads</title>
	<author>mergy</author>
	<datestamp>1256041080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reminds me of the IBM server commercial. 'Servers are our friends'

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73bMSNPc3Ak" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73bMSNPc3Ak</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of the IBM server commercial .
'Servers are our friends ' http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 73bMSNPc3Ak [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of the IBM server commercial.
'Servers are our friends'

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73bMSNPc3Ak [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812845</id>
	<title>Boorgle</title>
	<author>Toe, The</author>
	<datestamp>1256069940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's pronounced Boorgle... and resistance is futile.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's pronounced Boorgle... and resistance is futile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's pronounced Boorgle... and resistance is futile.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29820225</id>
	<title>that's a lot of juice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256156340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>10 million servers at 200 Watts each = 2 Gigawatts = 2M KW<br>2M x $0.10/KWh = $0.2M/hr<br>$0.2M/hr x 24 x 365.25 = $1.753B / year for electricity</p><p>Half or less if they power-manage the servers carefully, and maybe they locate in places where electricity is cheaper, and maybe it's not really 200 Watts with just a mobo and disk, but still - it's got to be in the hundreds of millions per year.</p><p>10 million servers x 1000 users each = 10 billion users... no, there's only 6.7 billion alive, and most of them aren't surfing google, it's probably more like 1 billion, so each server is servicing maybe 100 or 200 users.  In fact I find it hard to believe there are 1 billion people doing anything on google all at the same time; I spend maybe 10-30 minutes a day on there.  Each server is serving, on average, perhaps 10-50 users, at any given time.  This includes background support activity like search spidering and indexing and data mining, but still... 1 server for every 10-50 users seems a bit... much.</p><p>Maybe they should start writing more efficient code, or something.  It seems like there's got to be a better way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>10 million servers at 200 Watts each = 2 Gigawatts = 2M KW2M x $ 0.10/KWh = $ 0.2M/hr $ 0.2M/hr x 24 x 365.25 = $ 1.753B / year for electricityHalf or less if they power-manage the servers carefully , and maybe they locate in places where electricity is cheaper , and maybe it 's not really 200 Watts with just a mobo and disk , but still - it 's got to be in the hundreds of millions per year.10 million servers x 1000 users each = 10 billion users... no , there 's only 6.7 billion alive , and most of them are n't surfing google , it 's probably more like 1 billion , so each server is servicing maybe 100 or 200 users .
In fact I find it hard to believe there are 1 billion people doing anything on google all at the same time ; I spend maybe 10-30 minutes a day on there .
Each server is serving , on average , perhaps 10-50 users , at any given time .
This includes background support activity like search spidering and indexing and data mining , but still... 1 server for every 10-50 users seems a bit... much.Maybe they should start writing more efficient code , or something .
It seems like there 's got to be a better way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>10 million servers at 200 Watts each = 2 Gigawatts = 2M KW2M x $0.10/KWh = $0.2M/hr$0.2M/hr x 24 x 365.25 = $1.753B / year for electricityHalf or less if they power-manage the servers carefully, and maybe they locate in places where electricity is cheaper, and maybe it's not really 200 Watts with just a mobo and disk, but still - it's got to be in the hundreds of millions per year.10 million servers x 1000 users each = 10 billion users... no, there's only 6.7 billion alive, and most of them aren't surfing google, it's probably more like 1 billion, so each server is servicing maybe 100 or 200 users.
In fact I find it hard to believe there are 1 billion people doing anything on google all at the same time; I spend maybe 10-30 minutes a day on there.
Each server is serving, on average, perhaps 10-50 users, at any given time.
This includes background support activity like search spidering and indexing and data mining, but still... 1 server for every 10-50 users seems a bit... much.Maybe they should start writing more efficient code, or something.
It seems like there's got to be a better way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29814247</id>
	<title>How do they do it ? Thru AD and MMC ??</title>
	<author>Hymer</author>
	<datestamp>1256032200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I simply can't imagine how they can manage so many computers without Microsofts Active Directory.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I simply ca n't imagine how they can manage so many computers without Microsofts Active Directory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I simply can't imagine how they can manage so many computers without Microsofts Active Directory.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813285</id>
	<title>Re:Pretty soon...</title>
	<author>merreborn</author>
	<datestamp>1256072100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Pretty soon, Google will BE the Internet.</p></div></blockquote><p> <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/10/youtube-bandwidth/" title="wired.com">They already are</a> [wired.com]:</p><blockquote><div><p>Credit Suisse made headlines this summer when it estimated that YouTube was binging on bandwidth, losing Google a half a billion dollars in 2009 as it streams 75 billion videos. But a new report from Arbor Networks suggests that <b>Google's traffic is approaching 10 percent of the net's traffic, and that it's got so much fiber optic cable, it is simply trading traffic, with no payment involved, with the net's largest ISPs</b></p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty soon , Google will BE the Internet .
They already are [ wired.com ] : Credit Suisse made headlines this summer when it estimated that YouTube was binging on bandwidth , losing Google a half a billion dollars in 2009 as it streams 75 billion videos .
But a new report from Arbor Networks suggests that Google 's traffic is approaching 10 percent of the net 's traffic , and that it 's got so much fiber optic cable , it is simply trading traffic , with no payment involved , with the net 's largest ISPs</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty soon, Google will BE the Internet.
They already are [wired.com]:Credit Suisse made headlines this summer when it estimated that YouTube was binging on bandwidth, losing Google a half a billion dollars in 2009 as it streams 75 billion videos.
But a new report from Arbor Networks suggests that Google's traffic is approaching 10 percent of the net's traffic, and that it's got so much fiber optic cable, it is simply trading traffic, with no payment involved, with the net's largest ISPs 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29823149</id>
	<title>Good servers are very important</title>
	<author>sophialxw</author>
	<datestamp>1256138580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I also buy servers from others for my website, but the speed is very slow, and not stable, it's so hard to find a good servers supplier. Lifting Anchor, Lifting Anchor Two Head Type,  Lifting Insert, Lifting Socket,  Utility Anchor,  Capstan Lifting Anchor,  Edge Lift Anchor,http://www.lifting-anchor.com, Coil Bolt,  Eye Anchor, Fitting,  Special Nut, Special Bolt, Heavy Hex Nut, Castings, Fasteners, Coil Insert, Fixing Systems, Construction Systems, Construction Accessories, Hardwares, Dogbone, Powersystems, Windpower, Auto Parts , Forging Parts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I also buy servers from others for my website , but the speed is very slow , and not stable , it 's so hard to find a good servers supplier .
Lifting Anchor , Lifting Anchor Two Head Type , Lifting Insert , Lifting Socket , Utility Anchor , Capstan Lifting Anchor , Edge Lift Anchor,http : //www.lifting-anchor.com , Coil Bolt , Eye Anchor , Fitting , Special Nut , Special Bolt , Heavy Hex Nut , Castings , Fasteners , Coil Insert , Fixing Systems , Construction Systems , Construction Accessories , Hardwares , Dogbone , Powersystems , Windpower , Auto Parts , Forging Parts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I also buy servers from others for my website, but the speed is very slow, and not stable, it's so hard to find a good servers supplier.
Lifting Anchor, Lifting Anchor Two Head Type,  Lifting Insert, Lifting Socket,  Utility Anchor,  Capstan Lifting Anchor,  Edge Lift Anchor,http://www.lifting-anchor.com, Coil Bolt,  Eye Anchor, Fitting,  Special Nut, Special Bolt, Heavy Hex Nut, Castings, Fasteners, Coil Insert, Fixing Systems, Construction Systems, Construction Accessories, Hardwares, Dogbone, Powersystems, Windpower, Auto Parts , Forging Parts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29814223</id>
	<title>10 million?</title>
	<author>dUN82</author>
	<datestamp>1256032140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Only 10m, is that enough for the whole world, yet?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Only 10m , is that enough for the whole world , yet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only 10m, is that enough for the whole world, yet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812811</id>
	<title>Your official guide to the Jigaboo presidency</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256069820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Congratulations on your purchase of a brand new nigger! If handled properly, your apeman will give years of valuable, if reluctant, service.</p><p>INSTALLING YOUR NIGGER.<br>You should install your nigger differently according to whether you have purchased the field or house model. Field niggers work best in a serial configuration, i.e. chained together. Chain your nigger to another nigger immediately after unpacking it, and don't even think about taking that chain off, ever. Many niggers start singing as soon as you put a chain on them. This habit can usually be thrashed out of them if nipped in the bud. House niggers work best as standalone units, but should be hobbled or hamstrung to prevent attempts at escape. At this stage, your nigger can also be given a name. Most owners use the same names over and over, since niggers become confused by too much data. Rufus, Rastus, Remus, Toby, Carslisle, Carlton, Hey-You!-Yes-you!, Yeller, Blackstar, and Sambo are all effective names for your new buck nigger. If your nigger is a ho, it should be called Latrelle, L'Tanya, or Jemima. Some owners call their nigger hoes Latrine for a joke. Pearl, Blossom, and Ivory are also righteous names for nigger hoes. These names go straight over your nigger's head, by the way.</p><p>CONFIGURING YOUR NIGGER<br>Owing to a design error, your nigger comes equipped with a tongue and vocal chords. Most niggers can master only a few basic human phrases with this apparatus - "muh dick" being the most popular. However, others make barking, yelping, yapping noises and appear to be in some pain, so you should probably call a vet and have him remove your nigger's tongue. Once de-tongued your nigger will be a lot happier - at least, you won't hear it complaining anywhere near as much. Niggers have nothing interesting to say, anyway. Many owners also castrate their niggers for health reasons (yours, mine, and that of women, not the nigger's). This is strongly recommended, and frankly, it's a mystery why this is not done on the boat</p><p>HOUSING YOUR NIGGER.<br>Your nigger can be accommodated in cages with stout iron bars. Make sure, however, that the bars are wide enough to push pieces of nigger food through. The rule of thumb is, four niggers per square yard of cage. So a fifteen foot by thirty foot nigger cage can accommodate two hundred niggers. You can site a nigger cage anywhere, even on soft ground. Don't worry about your nigger fashioning makeshift shovels out of odd pieces of wood and digging an escape tunnel under the bars of the cage. Niggers never invented the shovel before and they're not about to now. In any case, your nigger is certainly too lazy to attempt escape. As long as the free food holds out, your nigger is living better than it did in Africa, so it will stay put. Buck niggers and hoe niggers can be safely accommodated in the same cage, as bucks never attempt sex with black hoes.</p><p>FEEDING YOUR NIGGER.<br>Your Nigger likes fried chicken, corn bread, and watermelon. You should therefore give it none of these things because its lazy ass almost certainly doesn't deserve it. Instead, feed it on porridge with salt, and creek water. Your nigger will supplement its diet with whatever it finds in the fields, other niggers, etc. Experienced nigger owners sometimes push watermelon slices through the bars of the nigger cage at the end of the day as a treat, but only if all niggers have worked well and nothing has been stolen that day. Mike of the Old Ranch Plantation reports that this last one is a killer, since all niggers steal something almost every single day of their lives. He reports he doesn't have to spend much on free watermelon for his niggers as a result. You should never allow your nigger meal breaks while at work, since if it stops work for more than ten minutes it will need to be retrained. You would be surprised how long it takes to teach a nigger to pick cotton. You really would. Coffee beans? Don't ask. You have no idea.</p><p>MAKING YOUR NIGGER WORK.<br>Niggers are very, very averse to work of any kind. The nigger's most</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations on your purchase of a brand new nigger !
If handled properly , your apeman will give years of valuable , if reluctant , service.INSTALLING YOUR NIGGER.You should install your nigger differently according to whether you have purchased the field or house model .
Field niggers work best in a serial configuration , i.e .
chained together .
Chain your nigger to another nigger immediately after unpacking it , and do n't even think about taking that chain off , ever .
Many niggers start singing as soon as you put a chain on them .
This habit can usually be thrashed out of them if nipped in the bud .
House niggers work best as standalone units , but should be hobbled or hamstrung to prevent attempts at escape .
At this stage , your nigger can also be given a name .
Most owners use the same names over and over , since niggers become confused by too much data .
Rufus , Rastus , Remus , Toby , Carslisle , Carlton , Hey-You ! -Yes-you ! , Yeller , Blackstar , and Sambo are all effective names for your new buck nigger .
If your nigger is a ho , it should be called Latrelle , L'Tanya , or Jemima .
Some owners call their nigger hoes Latrine for a joke .
Pearl , Blossom , and Ivory are also righteous names for nigger hoes .
These names go straight over your nigger 's head , by the way.CONFIGURING YOUR NIGGEROwing to a design error , your nigger comes equipped with a tongue and vocal chords .
Most niggers can master only a few basic human phrases with this apparatus - " muh dick " being the most popular .
However , others make barking , yelping , yapping noises and appear to be in some pain , so you should probably call a vet and have him remove your nigger 's tongue .
Once de-tongued your nigger will be a lot happier - at least , you wo n't hear it complaining anywhere near as much .
Niggers have nothing interesting to say , anyway .
Many owners also castrate their niggers for health reasons ( yours , mine , and that of women , not the nigger 's ) .
This is strongly recommended , and frankly , it 's a mystery why this is not done on the boatHOUSING YOUR NIGGER.Your nigger can be accommodated in cages with stout iron bars .
Make sure , however , that the bars are wide enough to push pieces of nigger food through .
The rule of thumb is , four niggers per square yard of cage .
So a fifteen foot by thirty foot nigger cage can accommodate two hundred niggers .
You can site a nigger cage anywhere , even on soft ground .
Do n't worry about your nigger fashioning makeshift shovels out of odd pieces of wood and digging an escape tunnel under the bars of the cage .
Niggers never invented the shovel before and they 're not about to now .
In any case , your nigger is certainly too lazy to attempt escape .
As long as the free food holds out , your nigger is living better than it did in Africa , so it will stay put .
Buck niggers and hoe niggers can be safely accommodated in the same cage , as bucks never attempt sex with black hoes.FEEDING YOUR NIGGER.Your Nigger likes fried chicken , corn bread , and watermelon .
You should therefore give it none of these things because its lazy ass almost certainly does n't deserve it .
Instead , feed it on porridge with salt , and creek water .
Your nigger will supplement its diet with whatever it finds in the fields , other niggers , etc .
Experienced nigger owners sometimes push watermelon slices through the bars of the nigger cage at the end of the day as a treat , but only if all niggers have worked well and nothing has been stolen that day .
Mike of the Old Ranch Plantation reports that this last one is a killer , since all niggers steal something almost every single day of their lives .
He reports he does n't have to spend much on free watermelon for his niggers as a result .
You should never allow your nigger meal breaks while at work , since if it stops work for more than ten minutes it will need to be retrained .
You would be surprised how long it takes to teach a nigger to pick cotton .
You really would .
Coffee beans ?
Do n't ask .
You have no idea.MAKING YOUR NIGGER WORK.Niggers are very , very averse to work of any kind .
The nigger 's most</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations on your purchase of a brand new nigger!
If handled properly, your apeman will give years of valuable, if reluctant, service.INSTALLING YOUR NIGGER.You should install your nigger differently according to whether you have purchased the field or house model.
Field niggers work best in a serial configuration, i.e.
chained together.
Chain your nigger to another nigger immediately after unpacking it, and don't even think about taking that chain off, ever.
Many niggers start singing as soon as you put a chain on them.
This habit can usually be thrashed out of them if nipped in the bud.
House niggers work best as standalone units, but should be hobbled or hamstrung to prevent attempts at escape.
At this stage, your nigger can also be given a name.
Most owners use the same names over and over, since niggers become confused by too much data.
Rufus, Rastus, Remus, Toby, Carslisle, Carlton, Hey-You!-Yes-you!, Yeller, Blackstar, and Sambo are all effective names for your new buck nigger.
If your nigger is a ho, it should be called Latrelle, L'Tanya, or Jemima.
Some owners call their nigger hoes Latrine for a joke.
Pearl, Blossom, and Ivory are also righteous names for nigger hoes.
These names go straight over your nigger's head, by the way.CONFIGURING YOUR NIGGEROwing to a design error, your nigger comes equipped with a tongue and vocal chords.
Most niggers can master only a few basic human phrases with this apparatus - "muh dick" being the most popular.
However, others make barking, yelping, yapping noises and appear to be in some pain, so you should probably call a vet and have him remove your nigger's tongue.
Once de-tongued your nigger will be a lot happier - at least, you won't hear it complaining anywhere near as much.
Niggers have nothing interesting to say, anyway.
Many owners also castrate their niggers for health reasons (yours, mine, and that of women, not the nigger's).
This is strongly recommended, and frankly, it's a mystery why this is not done on the boatHOUSING YOUR NIGGER.Your nigger can be accommodated in cages with stout iron bars.
Make sure, however, that the bars are wide enough to push pieces of nigger food through.
The rule of thumb is, four niggers per square yard of cage.
So a fifteen foot by thirty foot nigger cage can accommodate two hundred niggers.
You can site a nigger cage anywhere, even on soft ground.
Don't worry about your nigger fashioning makeshift shovels out of odd pieces of wood and digging an escape tunnel under the bars of the cage.
Niggers never invented the shovel before and they're not about to now.
In any case, your nigger is certainly too lazy to attempt escape.
As long as the free food holds out, your nigger is living better than it did in Africa, so it will stay put.
Buck niggers and hoe niggers can be safely accommodated in the same cage, as bucks never attempt sex with black hoes.FEEDING YOUR NIGGER.Your Nigger likes fried chicken, corn bread, and watermelon.
You should therefore give it none of these things because its lazy ass almost certainly doesn't deserve it.
Instead, feed it on porridge with salt, and creek water.
Your nigger will supplement its diet with whatever it finds in the fields, other niggers, etc.
Experienced nigger owners sometimes push watermelon slices through the bars of the nigger cage at the end of the day as a treat, but only if all niggers have worked well and nothing has been stolen that day.
Mike of the Old Ranch Plantation reports that this last one is a killer, since all niggers steal something almost every single day of their lives.
He reports he doesn't have to spend much on free watermelon for his niggers as a result.
You should never allow your nigger meal breaks while at work, since if it stops work for more than ten minutes it will need to be retrained.
You would be surprised how long it takes to teach a nigger to pick cotton.
You really would.
Coffee beans?
Don't ask.
You have no idea.MAKING YOUR NIGGER WORK.Niggers are very, very averse to work of any kind.
The nigger's most</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813469</id>
	<title>Re:The Internet isn't that big.</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1256029500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The entire content of the Internet fits in a 20x8x8 box operated by the Internet Archive.</i></p><p>The internet archive's dirty little secret is that it doesn't, in fact, store the entire enternet, as I found out trying to find <i>Yello There</i> a few years ago. There is only one page of Niel's site left, and that's the one I linked from the Springfield Fragfest. The Fragfest is there, but not all of it. I'd hazard a guess you won't find mcgrew.info or holy-bible.us there, either.</p><p>That's not to dismiss or demean what they have accomplished; it is certainly impressive. But it by no means stores the whole internet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The entire content of the Internet fits in a 20x8x8 box operated by the Internet Archive.The internet archive 's dirty little secret is that it does n't , in fact , store the entire enternet , as I found out trying to find Yello There a few years ago .
There is only one page of Niel 's site left , and that 's the one I linked from the Springfield Fragfest .
The Fragfest is there , but not all of it .
I 'd hazard a guess you wo n't find mcgrew.info or holy-bible.us there , either.That 's not to dismiss or demean what they have accomplished ; it is certainly impressive .
But it by no means stores the whole internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The entire content of the Internet fits in a 20x8x8 box operated by the Internet Archive.The internet archive's dirty little secret is that it doesn't, in fact, store the entire enternet, as I found out trying to find Yello There a few years ago.
There is only one page of Niel's site left, and that's the one I linked from the Springfield Fragfest.
The Fragfest is there, but not all of it.
I'd hazard a guess you won't find mcgrew.info or holy-bible.us there, either.That's not to dismiss or demean what they have accomplished; it is certainly impressive.
But it by no means stores the whole internet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812923</id>
	<title>In the far apocolyptic future</title>
	<author>suso</author>
	<datestamp>1256070240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google is starting to sound more and more like one of those advanced societies where everything is automated, but everybody forgets how everything works.</p><p>For reference, see:  Logan's Run, STTNG: When the Bough Breaks, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google is starting to sound more and more like one of those advanced societies where everything is automated , but everybody forgets how everything works.For reference , see : Logan 's Run , STTNG : When the Bough Breaks , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google is starting to sound more and more like one of those advanced societies where everything is automated, but everybody forgets how everything works.For reference, see:  Logan's Run, STTNG: When the Bough Breaks, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812479</id>
	<title>fastest site on the internet gets faster?</title>
	<author>thehostiles</author>
	<datestamp>1256068500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>cool I guess...

what do they do with their old machines?</htmltext>
<tokenext>cool I guess.. . what do they do with their old machines ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>cool I guess...

what do they do with their old machines?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813969</id>
	<title>You F4il It?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256031360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">Have their moments on baby...don't started work on you. The tirelles which gathers 80s, DARPA saw BSD States that there [samag.com] in the</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have their moments on baby...do n't started work on you .
The tirelles which gathers 80s , DARPA saw BSD States that there [ samag.com ] in the [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have their moments on baby...don't started work on you.
The tirelles which gathers 80s, DARPA saw BSD States that there [samag.com] in the [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813187</id>
	<title>Re:Pretty soon...</title>
	<author>prograde</author>
	<datestamp>1256071680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...it sure would save the googlebots a lot of effort.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...it sure would save the googlebots a lot of effort .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...it sure would save the googlebots a lot of effort.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29816591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812571
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29821025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29817795
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29814315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812517
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812517
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29816593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812891
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29819651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812991
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29821227
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29818023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813265
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29820547
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813181
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29816249
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813323
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812561
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812731
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813453
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29814791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29814257
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29815715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812891
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812991
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29816525
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813069
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813187
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812479
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813495
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29831321
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29815627
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813503
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29819589
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29822291
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29825453
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813629
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29817151
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29814633
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812927
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29827165
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812517
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29821983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29817363
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29815543
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813971
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812517
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29867353
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29844969
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29822327
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812891
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29820563
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29827185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29817795
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29816119
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812517
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29819293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812571
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813469
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813231
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29814741
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29819187
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813101
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29816081
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_20_1731228_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_1731228.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812811
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_1731228.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812517
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813193
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29814315
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29816119
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813853
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812807
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_1731228.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812677
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_1731228.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29817795
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29821025
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29827185
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_1731228.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812753
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29816525
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_1731228.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29814633
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29817151
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_1731228.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812479
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812505
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_1731228.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812891
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29815715
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29816593
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29822327
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_1731228.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812991
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29819651
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813461
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_1731228.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812467
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813495
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29821983
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813049
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813453
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812927
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812561
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813187
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29820563
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812569
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29818023
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29817363
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29814257
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812923
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29814791
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29844969
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813323
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29816249
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813503
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29822291
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29819589
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813101
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812937
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812845
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29820547
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29815627
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813069
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813285
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_1731228.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29817527
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_1731228.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812889
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_1731228.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812731
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813189
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_1731228.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813065
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_1731228.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812571
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29816591
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29819293
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_1731228.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813971
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29815543
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_20_1731228.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29812993
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813585
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813181
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813231
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29827165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29821227
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813765
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29814741
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29819187
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29867353
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813265
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813629
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29825453
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29813469
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29816081
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_20_1731228.29831321
</commentlist>
</conversation>
