<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_19_2332251</id>
	<title>Windows 7 Released Early In UK</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1255947360000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>CNETNate writes <i>"UK customers have been reporting that they <a href="http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49303983,00.htm">received their copies of Windows 7 in the mail today</a>. Currently the British postal service is <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8313623.stm">threatening industrial action over pay</a>, and planned walkouts may result in Windows 7 not being delivered on its release date. It is understood that Microsoft has agreed to let some retailers send out copies early to avoid disappointment, and to make the UK the first country in the world to have Windows 7 in customers' hands."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>CNETNate writes " UK customers have been reporting that they received their copies of Windows 7 in the mail today .
Currently the British postal service is threatening industrial action over pay , and planned walkouts may result in Windows 7 not being delivered on its release date .
It is understood that Microsoft has agreed to let some retailers send out copies early to avoid disappointment , and to make the UK the first country in the world to have Windows 7 in customers ' hands .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CNETNate writes "UK customers have been reporting that they received their copies of Windows 7 in the mail today.
Currently the British postal service is threatening industrial action over pay, and planned walkouts may result in Windows 7 not being delivered on its release date.
It is understood that Microsoft has agreed to let some retailers send out copies early to avoid disappointment, and to make the UK the first country in the world to have Windows 7 in customers' hands.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29809209</id>
	<title>I didn't expect that</title>
	<author>SEWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1256057460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nobody expects the British Windows 7!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody expects the British Windows 7 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody expects the British Windows 7!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29822617</id>
	<title>I got Windows7 several days ago in Pa, USA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256135940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I live in Pennsylvania and received Windows 7 several days ago, so this isn't really news.

Students and Academic programs through MSDNAA have had access to full versions of Windows 7 Pro for over a week now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in Pennsylvania and received Windows 7 several days ago , so this is n't really news .
Students and Academic programs through MSDNAA have had access to full versions of Windows 7 Pro for over a week now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in Pennsylvania and received Windows 7 several days ago, so this isn't really news.
Students and Academic programs through MSDNAA have had access to full versions of Windows 7 Pro for over a week now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29807221</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>Ihmhi</author>
	<datestamp>1256050260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>(free MS software to endingeering students)</p></div><p>None of whom have a minor in English apparently. d:</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( free MS software to endingeering students ) None of whom have a minor in English apparently .
d :</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(free MS software to endingeering students)None of whom have a minor in English apparently.
d:
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806593</id>
	<title>More accurate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256047500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that the postal service is threatening industrial <i> <b>inaction</b> </i> over pay?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't it be more accurate to say that the postal service is threatening industrial inaction over pay ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that the postal service is threatening industrial  inaction  over pay?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805701</id>
	<title>Netherlands was first</title>
	<author>thrakkattack</author>
	<datestamp>1256039400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>There was a release party in the small Dutch village of Zevenhuizen (' Seven houses') , last Saturday:
<a href="http://www.windowszeven.nl/Windows\_7\_nieuws.php?post=76" title="windowszeven.nl" rel="nofollow">http://www.windowszeven.nl/Windows\_7\_nieuws.php?post=76</a> [windowszeven.nl]</htmltext>
<tokenext>There was a release party in the small Dutch village of Zevenhuizen ( ' Seven houses ' ) , last Saturday : http : //www.windowszeven.nl/Windows \ _7 \ _nieuws.php ? post = 76 [ windowszeven.nl ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was a release party in the small Dutch village of Zevenhuizen (' Seven houses') , last Saturday:
http://www.windowszeven.nl/Windows\_7\_nieuws.php?post=76 [windowszeven.nl]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806083</id>
	<title>Shocking!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256043900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>/. actually covers something about Windows and gets it wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>/ .
actually covers something about Windows and gets it wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>/.
actually covers something about Windows and gets it wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805605</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>Finallyjoined!!!</author>
	<datestamp>1256038080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>some kind of benefit to the general public?</p></div></blockquote><p>
Windows 7. Benefit.<br> <br>
How is that a benefit?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>some kind of benefit to the general public ?
Windows 7 .
Benefit . How is that a benefit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>some kind of benefit to the general public?
Windows 7.
Benefit. 
How is that a benefit?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805997</id>
	<title>IN OTHER NEWS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256042760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>UK becomes spyware hotspot of the world!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>UK becomes spyware hotspot of the world !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>UK becomes spyware hotspot of the world!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29809885</id>
	<title>Windows 7 machines available at Walmart last Sat</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1256059740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here in CA I saw Windows 7 desktop machines in Walmart on Saturday. 64-bit with 6MB of RAM for $398, sitting on the shelf ready to be purchased.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here in CA I saw Windows 7 desktop machines in Walmart on Saturday .
64-bit with 6MB of RAM for $ 398 , sitting on the shelf ready to be purchased .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here in CA I saw Windows 7 desktop machines in Walmart on Saturday.
64-bit with 6MB of RAM for $398, sitting on the shelf ready to be purchased.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806103</id>
	<title>The poor poor british</title>
	<author>plague911</author>
	<datestamp>1256044020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I bet they never even saw it coming.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet they never even saw it coming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet they never even saw it coming.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29813441</id>
	<title>Re:It has been released in China as well</title>
	<author>Nithendil</author>
	<datestamp>1256029380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe I'm completely off base, but I would assume that MS has at least a couple dollars of royalty and patent fees for every licensed copy they sell, especially now that the OS comes with DVD codecs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I 'm completely off base , but I would assume that MS has at least a couple dollars of royalty and patent fees for every licensed copy they sell , especially now that the OS comes with DVD codecs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I'm completely off base, but I would assume that MS has at least a couple dollars of royalty and patent fees for every licensed copy they sell, especially now that the OS comes with DVD codecs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805831</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256041080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well duh. In the same way Windows Genuine Advantage is an advantage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well duh .
In the same way Windows Genuine Advantage is an advantage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well duh.
In the same way Windows Genuine Advantage is an advantage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806961</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>amliebsch</author>
	<datestamp>1256049240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> For instance, why would you want your quicklaunch icons to move around all over the taskbar every time you open or close a window?</p></div><p>They move?  I haven't noticed this behavior; I click on an icon to launch a program and its tile changes appearance slightly but doesn't move, then I click it again to use it as a task switcher.  Are you doing something different than the defaults?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For instance , why would you want your quicklaunch icons to move around all over the taskbar every time you open or close a window ? They move ?
I have n't noticed this behavior ; I click on an icon to launch a program and its tile changes appearance slightly but does n't move , then I click it again to use it as a task switcher .
Are you doing something different than the defaults ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> For instance, why would you want your quicklaunch icons to move around all over the taskbar every time you open or close a window?They move?
I haven't noticed this behavior; I click on an icon to launch a program and its tile changes appearance slightly but doesn't move, then I click it again to use it as a task switcher.
Are you doing something different than the defaults?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805767</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>asdf7890</author>
	<datestamp>1256040420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So... why so long before boxes hit shelves? It seems very odd to me.</p></div><p>Basically: getting enough manufactured to cover initial demand and getting those units shipped to retailers. Many retailers might have had boxed copies in their warehouses weeks ago but they will have signed a deal saying they won't make them available until the official release date in order for the public release to be coordinated in all territories.</p><p>As well as accounting for manufacturing processes and regional shipment delays, they will have also allowed extra time for other unexpected extensions to these delays and other issues. There would also be a final test phase of the activation infrastructure to fit in too, to ensure it can cope with the sudden glut of activity on, and shortly after, release day.</p><p>There is also co-ordination with OEMs to consider. They would not be happy with retail copies going out before they had chance to update and test their offerings in time for release date - yes MS has them over a barrel to a certain extent so could tell them to go hang if it wanted to, but this isn't the right climate to be annoying major customers in. There are probably other marketing reasons to pick a coordinated date near, but not at, the end of the year too.</p><p>Releasing to MSDN subscribers is much easier. Most are download-only subscriptions now so just put the ISOs on subscriptions.msdn.microsoft.com and there is no need for physical anything never mind coordinated physical anything. For subscribers who still get disks that is just a plain DVD (and/or ISO files on a plain DVD) with no fancy hologram label and no box or other additional materials. It is not expected that developers have to wait for coordinated retail release, so there are no OEM concerns to worry about (in fact the OEMs would prefer developers to have early access - it will reduce problems and returns at their end of the market if there is less stuff out there with compatibility issues by release day).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So... why so long before boxes hit shelves ?
It seems very odd to me.Basically : getting enough manufactured to cover initial demand and getting those units shipped to retailers .
Many retailers might have had boxed copies in their warehouses weeks ago but they will have signed a deal saying they wo n't make them available until the official release date in order for the public release to be coordinated in all territories.As well as accounting for manufacturing processes and regional shipment delays , they will have also allowed extra time for other unexpected extensions to these delays and other issues .
There would also be a final test phase of the activation infrastructure to fit in too , to ensure it can cope with the sudden glut of activity on , and shortly after , release day.There is also co-ordination with OEMs to consider .
They would not be happy with retail copies going out before they had chance to update and test their offerings in time for release date - yes MS has them over a barrel to a certain extent so could tell them to go hang if it wanted to , but this is n't the right climate to be annoying major customers in .
There are probably other marketing reasons to pick a coordinated date near , but not at , the end of the year too.Releasing to MSDN subscribers is much easier .
Most are download-only subscriptions now so just put the ISOs on subscriptions.msdn.microsoft.com and there is no need for physical anything never mind coordinated physical anything .
For subscribers who still get disks that is just a plain DVD ( and/or ISO files on a plain DVD ) with no fancy hologram label and no box or other additional materials .
It is not expected that developers have to wait for coordinated retail release , so there are no OEM concerns to worry about ( in fact the OEMs would prefer developers to have early access - it will reduce problems and returns at their end of the market if there is less stuff out there with compatibility issues by release day ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So... why so long before boxes hit shelves?
It seems very odd to me.Basically: getting enough manufactured to cover initial demand and getting those units shipped to retailers.
Many retailers might have had boxed copies in their warehouses weeks ago but they will have signed a deal saying they won't make them available until the official release date in order for the public release to be coordinated in all territories.As well as accounting for manufacturing processes and regional shipment delays, they will have also allowed extra time for other unexpected extensions to these delays and other issues.
There would also be a final test phase of the activation infrastructure to fit in too, to ensure it can cope with the sudden glut of activity on, and shortly after, release day.There is also co-ordination with OEMs to consider.
They would not be happy with retail copies going out before they had chance to update and test their offerings in time for release date - yes MS has them over a barrel to a certain extent so could tell them to go hang if it wanted to, but this isn't the right climate to be annoying major customers in.
There are probably other marketing reasons to pick a coordinated date near, but not at, the end of the year too.Releasing to MSDN subscribers is much easier.
Most are download-only subscriptions now so just put the ISOs on subscriptions.msdn.microsoft.com and there is no need for physical anything never mind coordinated physical anything.
For subscribers who still get disks that is just a plain DVD (and/or ISO files on a plain DVD) with no fancy hologram label and no box or other additional materials.
It is not expected that developers have to wait for coordinated retail release, so there are no OEM concerns to worry about (in fact the OEMs would prefer developers to have early access - it will reduce problems and returns at their end of the market if there is less stuff out there with compatibility issues by release day).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806107</id>
	<title>ATTENTION, SELECT CUSTOMERS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256044020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All of you "hurr this has been out on MSDN" freetards need to understand that these are licenses reserved for specific uses, and if you're going to install copies for general use outside what you/your organisation signed up to (with an actual contract signature - not like EULAs) then you might as well just bittorrent.</p><p>The legal general release is around now, not August.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All of you " hurr this has been out on MSDN " freetards need to understand that these are licenses reserved for specific uses , and if you 're going to install copies for general use outside what you/your organisation signed up to ( with an actual contract signature - not like EULAs ) then you might as well just bittorrent.The legal general release is around now , not August .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All of you "hurr this has been out on MSDN" freetards need to understand that these are licenses reserved for specific uses, and if you're going to install copies for general use outside what you/your organisation signed up to (with an actual contract signature - not like EULAs) then you might as well just bittorrent.The legal general release is around now, not August.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29812021</id>
	<title>Re:Hopefully they fixed these things from Vista:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256066820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh please...</p><p>1) Just use the right pointing arrow on the directory in the explorer...or just click on the word of the parent directory...Much better IMHO than a up directory</p><p>2) WTF do you want Windows to do?  GUESS which window that is "not in focus" that it should close on your behalf?  You can also close all windows of the same type by right-clicking on the taskbar the icon and selecting close all.</p><p>3) Windows 7 is "MUCH" better at handling the UAC stuff...at least you only have to tell it once rather than 3 times in some cases in Vista...</p><p>I love Windows 7...I love linux (Suse and Centos specifically)...They all do different things for me...</p><p>Windows 7 - Games, internet browsing and trade shows/training (where I need to use external projectors etc).<br>Suse - Reading my mail, working in eclipse, doing work stuff...<br>Centos - Running my Servers, Oracle, MySQL etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh please...1 ) Just use the right pointing arrow on the directory in the explorer...or just click on the word of the parent directory...Much better IMHO than a up directory2 ) WTF do you want Windows to do ?
GUESS which window that is " not in focus " that it should close on your behalf ?
You can also close all windows of the same type by right-clicking on the taskbar the icon and selecting close all.3 ) Windows 7 is " MUCH " better at handling the UAC stuff...at least you only have to tell it once rather than 3 times in some cases in Vista...I love Windows 7...I love linux ( Suse and Centos specifically ) ...They all do different things for me...Windows 7 - Games , internet browsing and trade shows/training ( where I need to use external projectors etc ) .Suse - Reading my mail , working in eclipse , doing work stuff...Centos - Running my Servers , Oracle , MySQL etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh please...1) Just use the right pointing arrow on the directory in the explorer...or just click on the word of the parent directory...Much better IMHO than a up directory2) WTF do you want Windows to do?
GUESS which window that is "not in focus" that it should close on your behalf?
You can also close all windows of the same type by right-clicking on the taskbar the icon and selecting close all.3) Windows 7 is "MUCH" better at handling the UAC stuff...at least you only have to tell it once rather than 3 times in some cases in Vista...I love Windows 7...I love linux (Suse and Centos specifically)...They all do different things for me...Windows 7 - Games, internet browsing and trade shows/training (where I need to use external projectors etc).Suse - Reading my mail, working in eclipse, doing work stuff...Centos - Running my Servers, Oracle, MySQL etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806771</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29808649</id>
	<title>Re:Pfff....</title>
	<author>Haxzaw</author>
	<datestamp>1256055780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unfortunately Slackware is not ready for the desktop :<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/Ducks/</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately Slackware is not ready for the desktop : /Ducks/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately Slackware is not ready for the desktop : /Ducks/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806685</id>
	<title>Release now...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256047980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Patch later?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Patch later ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Patch later?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806511</id>
	<title>Not about pay</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256047020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Minor correction to the story, the dispute isn't really about pay, it's about changes in working conditions. There are some aspects that cover what counts as overtime so pay is involved, but it's not just "we want more money".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Minor correction to the story , the dispute is n't really about pay , it 's about changes in working conditions .
There are some aspects that cover what counts as overtime so pay is involved , but it 's not just " we want more money " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Minor correction to the story, the dispute isn't really about pay, it's about changes in working conditions.
There are some aspects that cover what counts as overtime so pay is involved, but it's not just "we want more money".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806447</id>
	<title>Rest In Peace *BSD, Mac OS X etc.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256046720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are all so f****ng dead now. Living on your knees since Vista, this will be the final blow to you. No need to to even mention "Linux", as it's been out of the desktop equation since before dinosaurs died.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are all so f * * * * ng dead now .
Living on your knees since Vista , this will be the final blow to you .
No need to to even mention " Linux " , as it 's been out of the desktop equation since before dinosaurs died .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are all so f****ng dead now.
Living on your knees since Vista, this will be the final blow to you.
No need to to even mention "Linux", as it's been out of the desktop equation since before dinosaurs died.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569</id>
	<title>Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256037540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>that this postal strike actually has some kind of benefit to the general public?

And kudos to MS for allowing this to happen, some good PR they got going there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>that this postal strike actually has some kind of benefit to the general public ?
And kudos to MS for allowing this to happen , some good PR they got going there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that this postal strike actually has some kind of benefit to the general public?
And kudos to MS for allowing this to happen, some good PR they got going there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29808027</id>
	<title>Re: They have to wait</title>
	<author>Informative</author>
	<datestamp>1256053560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>until after the parties.</htmltext>
<tokenext>until after the parties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>until after the parties.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805995</id>
	<title>In other news,TPB report expected UK Torrent storm</title>
	<author>phonewebcam</author>
	<datestamp>1256042760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Over the next 3 days</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Over the next 3 days</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Over the next 3 days</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805739</id>
	<title>Not really a big deal if</title>
	<author>fireylord</author>
	<datestamp>1256039820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Doesn't make a huge difference for those of us using the rc with an evaluation license thats valid through q1 2010 (oh and i got my shipment email 40 minutes ago, guess its time to make the planned hardware changes prior to the new install)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't make a huge difference for those of us using the rc with an evaluation license thats valid through q1 2010 ( oh and i got my shipment email 40 minutes ago , guess its time to make the planned hardware changes prior to the new install )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't make a huge difference for those of us using the rc with an evaluation license thats valid through q1 2010 (oh and i got my shipment email 40 minutes ago, guess its time to make the planned hardware changes prior to the new install)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805817</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>zach\_the\_lizard</author>
	<datestamp>1256040960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>We'll get to throw those awesome Windows 7 <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cX4t5-YpHQ" title="youtube.com">launch parties</a> [youtube.com], remember?</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 'll get to throw those awesome Windows 7 launch parties [ youtube.com ] , remember ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We'll get to throw those awesome Windows 7 launch parties [youtube.com], remember?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29807029</id>
	<title>early?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256049540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The place i work has Windows 7 ultimate for sale for the past few weeks!<br>(legal copies)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The place i work has Windows 7 ultimate for sale for the past few weeks !
( legal copies )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The place i work has Windows 7 ultimate for sale for the past few weeks!
(legal copies)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29810811</id>
	<title>They're late.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256062800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I personally don't use Windows much, but a few other students have been busily downloading it yesterday (legally, through some Microsift IT Academy thingy). And that started being possible somewhere last week.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I personally do n't use Windows much , but a few other students have been busily downloading it yesterday ( legally , through some Microsift IT Academy thingy ) .
And that started being possible somewhere last week .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I personally don't use Windows much, but a few other students have been busily downloading it yesterday (legally, through some Microsift IT Academy thingy).
And that started being possible somewhere last week.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29821943</id>
	<title>Re:Hopefully they fixed these things from Vista:</title>
	<author>iainl</author>
	<datestamp>1256131860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just like on Vista, pressing Backspace goes back to the previous directory the window was displaying. If you're drilling down that's the same thing, but if you either type in or use the Explorer pane to shift somewhere completely different then that won't move you up. Instead, what you need to do is click the name of the directory above in the location bar. Best of both worlds, if you ask me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just like on Vista , pressing Backspace goes back to the previous directory the window was displaying .
If you 're drilling down that 's the same thing , but if you either type in or use the Explorer pane to shift somewhere completely different then that wo n't move you up .
Instead , what you need to do is click the name of the directory above in the location bar .
Best of both worlds , if you ask me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just like on Vista, pressing Backspace goes back to the previous directory the window was displaying.
If you're drilling down that's the same thing, but if you either type in or use the Explorer pane to shift somewhere completely different then that won't move you up.
Instead, what you need to do is click the name of the directory above in the location bar.
Best of both worlds, if you ask me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806771</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29818193</id>
	<title>Re:Hopefully they fixed these things from Vista:</title>
	<author>ajlisows</author>
	<datestamp>1256051400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You may not like the location bar, but you can just click the folder above your current folder.  That isn't difficult.  If you've been drilling down, just use the back button.  Can't see how that is so difficult.</p><p>You can turn off user account control.  You can even adjust it so less severe actions don't ask you about it.</p><p>As is pointed out, ALT-F4 from the desktop brings up the shutdown menu.</p><p>Seriously, you are just looking for reasons to hate Windows at this point.  There are more important issues with Windows than the ones you mentioned.  If you don't see any other issues, then I'd say Microsoft did pretty good by you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You may not like the location bar , but you can just click the folder above your current folder .
That is n't difficult .
If you 've been drilling down , just use the back button .
Ca n't see how that is so difficult.You can turn off user account control .
You can even adjust it so less severe actions do n't ask you about it.As is pointed out , ALT-F4 from the desktop brings up the shutdown menu.Seriously , you are just looking for reasons to hate Windows at this point .
There are more important issues with Windows than the ones you mentioned .
If you do n't see any other issues , then I 'd say Microsoft did pretty good by you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You may not like the location bar, but you can just click the folder above your current folder.
That isn't difficult.
If you've been drilling down, just use the back button.
Can't see how that is so difficult.You can turn off user account control.
You can even adjust it so less severe actions don't ask you about it.As is pointed out, ALT-F4 from the desktop brings up the shutdown menu.Seriously, you are just looking for reasons to hate Windows at this point.
There are more important issues with Windows than the ones you mentioned.
If you don't see any other issues, then I'd say Microsoft did pretty good by you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806055</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805751</id>
	<title>The UK isn't a country</title>
	<author>gbridge</author>
	<datestamp>1256040120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The UK isn't a country. It's a sovereign state or (if you really want to bring the word 'country' into it) an island country. Yes... I looked at Wikipedia to find the proper names. Learned a thing or two while I was there!<br> <br>

G.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The UK is n't a country .
It 's a sovereign state or ( if you really want to bring the word 'country ' into it ) an island country .
Yes... I looked at Wikipedia to find the proper names .
Learned a thing or two while I was there !
G .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The UK isn't a country.
It's a sovereign state or (if you really want to bring the word 'country' into it) an island country.
Yes... I looked at Wikipedia to find the proper names.
Learned a thing or two while I was there!
G.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805597</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>cbhacking</author>
	<datestamp>1256038020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll be honest; I'm not sure why there's so much delay before the general release anyhow. The RTM build was signed off on months ago, and went up for MSDN subscribers (a very small portion of the general public, but often people with very little connection to MS) only a few days later. At my school, through the MSDN Academic Alliance program (free MS software to endingeering students) we've been able to get Win7 for some weeks (and via <a href="http://dreamspark.com/" title="dreamspark.com">http://dreamspark.com/</a> [dreamspark.com] all students with a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.edu email address can get Server 2008 R2, the server version of the Win7 release).</p><p>So... why so long before boxes hit shelves? It seems very odd to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll be honest ; I 'm not sure why there 's so much delay before the general release anyhow .
The RTM build was signed off on months ago , and went up for MSDN subscribers ( a very small portion of the general public , but often people with very little connection to MS ) only a few days later .
At my school , through the MSDN Academic Alliance program ( free MS software to endingeering students ) we 've been able to get Win7 for some weeks ( and via http : //dreamspark.com/ [ dreamspark.com ] all students with a .edu email address can get Server 2008 R2 , the server version of the Win7 release ) .So... why so long before boxes hit shelves ?
It seems very odd to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll be honest; I'm not sure why there's so much delay before the general release anyhow.
The RTM build was signed off on months ago, and went up for MSDN subscribers (a very small portion of the general public, but often people with very little connection to MS) only a few days later.
At my school, through the MSDN Academic Alliance program (free MS software to endingeering students) we've been able to get Win7 for some weeks (and via http://dreamspark.com/ [dreamspark.com] all students with a .edu email address can get Server 2008 R2, the server version of the Win7 release).So... why so long before boxes hit shelves?
It seems very odd to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29807475</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>b4dc0d3r</author>
	<datestamp>1256051340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My gf is not technically savvy - she learns quickly, but doesn't go looking up stuff.  She's perfectly happy to move the mouse to something and click and wait, and click something else, and reinstall the application, and reboot, because that's what computers do.  She doesn't understand why I curse at my computer, even when I show her exactly what I find annoying.</p><p>Still, she hates Vista, and doesn't understand why Microsoft made such stupid decisions.  And not just for the reasons I curse about - sh actually likes some of those things.  She has her very own reasons for hating Vista.</p><p>I think my point is, everyone can find something that is so ridiculously poorly thought out and hate on it severely.  Like the way any single-threaded program gets a "(Not Responding)" note in the title bar when it's processing.  That makes me think something's wrong with Vista, when it worked fine under XP.  did Microsoft think it would help people to say that the app was not responding?  Or should it keep the info to itself until either the app finishes or someone clicks on it?  Little things like that, which seem to have been decided upon some hazy hung over Saturday morning two weeks before code freeze.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My gf is not technically savvy - she learns quickly , but does n't go looking up stuff .
She 's perfectly happy to move the mouse to something and click and wait , and click something else , and reinstall the application , and reboot , because that 's what computers do .
She does n't understand why I curse at my computer , even when I show her exactly what I find annoying.Still , she hates Vista , and does n't understand why Microsoft made such stupid decisions .
And not just for the reasons I curse about - sh actually likes some of those things .
She has her very own reasons for hating Vista.I think my point is , everyone can find something that is so ridiculously poorly thought out and hate on it severely .
Like the way any single-threaded program gets a " ( Not Responding ) " note in the title bar when it 's processing .
That makes me think something 's wrong with Vista , when it worked fine under XP .
did Microsoft think it would help people to say that the app was not responding ?
Or should it keep the info to itself until either the app finishes or someone clicks on it ?
Little things like that , which seem to have been decided upon some hazy hung over Saturday morning two weeks before code freeze .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My gf is not technically savvy - she learns quickly, but doesn't go looking up stuff.
She's perfectly happy to move the mouse to something and click and wait, and click something else, and reinstall the application, and reboot, because that's what computers do.
She doesn't understand why I curse at my computer, even when I show her exactly what I find annoying.Still, she hates Vista, and doesn't understand why Microsoft made such stupid decisions.
And not just for the reasons I curse about - sh actually likes some of those things.
She has her very own reasons for hating Vista.I think my point is, everyone can find something that is so ridiculously poorly thought out and hate on it severely.
Like the way any single-threaded program gets a "(Not Responding)" note in the title bar when it's processing.
That makes me think something's wrong with Vista, when it worked fine under XP.
did Microsoft think it would help people to say that the app was not responding?
Or should it keep the info to itself until either the app finishes or someone clicks on it?
Little things like that, which seem to have been decided upon some hazy hung over Saturday morning two weeks before code freeze.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806079</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805951</id>
	<title>Re:Pfff....</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1256042400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>"It would be like 9/11 times 100."<br>"You mean..."<br>"<b>Yes.</b> Ninenty-one thousand, one hundred."<br> <br>Disclaimer: Yes, the geek in me wanted to say 81.812 as well. Don't feel bad.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" It would be like 9/11 times 100 .
" " You mean... " " Yes .
Ninenty-one thousand , one hundred .
" Disclaimer : Yes , the geek in me wanted to say 81.812 as well .
Do n't feel bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It would be like 9/11 times 100.
""You mean...""Yes.
Ninenty-one thousand, one hundred.
" Disclaimer: Yes, the geek in me wanted to say 81.812 as well.
Don't feel bad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29807229</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256050320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, Windows 7 was released last week in the UAE at GITEX. Understandably the show is claiming they were first in the world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , Windows 7 was released last week in the UAE at GITEX .
Understandably the show is claiming they were first in the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, Windows 7 was released last week in the UAE at GITEX.
Understandably the show is claiming they were first in the world.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805929</id>
	<title>Re:The UK isn't a country</title>
	<author>ledow</author>
	<datestamp>1256042160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Depending on your definition:</p><p>The UK is a country.  (The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)<br>Great Britain is a country. (comprising the countries of England, Scotland and Wales)<br>England is a country.</p><p>In fact, a lot of English people (i.e. actually from England) will use all three to mean exactly the same thing (usually the UK).</p><p>There is no set definition, and nobody refers to the UK as a sovereign state unless it's in some formal document somewhere... it's a country.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Depending on your definition : The UK is a country .
( The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ) Great Britain is a country .
( comprising the countries of England , Scotland and Wales ) England is a country.In fact , a lot of English people ( i.e .
actually from England ) will use all three to mean exactly the same thing ( usually the UK ) .There is no set definition , and nobody refers to the UK as a sovereign state unless it 's in some formal document somewhere... it 's a country .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depending on your definition:The UK is a country.
(The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)Great Britain is a country.
(comprising the countries of England, Scotland and Wales)England is a country.In fact, a lot of English people (i.e.
actually from England) will use all three to mean exactly the same thing (usually the UK).There is no set definition, and nobody refers to the UK as a sovereign state unless it's in some formal document somewhere... it's a country.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805719</id>
	<title>disaster movies</title>
	<author>martas</author>
	<datestamp>1256039520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Europe always gets hit first in disaster movies. Case in point - Scotland was first to freeze in The Day After Tomorrow. Though I bet a new ice age would be much less destructive that this...<br> <br>

[Just kidding. Though I will keep Vista on my machine for a while longer, I actually think 7 is a pretty good OS...]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Europe always gets hit first in disaster movies .
Case in point - Scotland was first to freeze in The Day After Tomorrow .
Though I bet a new ice age would be much less destructive that this.. . [ Just kidding .
Though I will keep Vista on my machine for a while longer , I actually think 7 is a pretty good OS... ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Europe always gets hit first in disaster movies.
Case in point - Scotland was first to freeze in The Day After Tomorrow.
Though I bet a new ice age would be much less destructive that this... 

[Just kidding.
Though I will keep Vista on my machine for a while longer, I actually think 7 is a pretty good OS...]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806255</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>drsmithy</author>
	<datestamp>1256045400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>For instance, why would you want your quicklaunch icons to move around all over the taskbar every time you open or close a window?</i>
</p><p>Because they're not meant to be looked at as "quicklaunch icons", they're meant to be looked at as "Taskbar buttons".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For instance , why would you want your quicklaunch icons to move around all over the taskbar every time you open or close a window ?
Because they 're not meant to be looked at as " quicklaunch icons " , they 're meant to be looked at as " Taskbar buttons " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> For instance, why would you want your quicklaunch icons to move around all over the taskbar every time you open or close a window?
Because they're not meant to be looked at as "quicklaunch icons", they're meant to be looked at as "Taskbar buttons".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806145</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806033</id>
	<title>Re:The UK isn't a country</title>
	<author>phonewebcam</author>
	<datestamp>1256043120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>True. In fact being that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereignty" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">sovereignty</a> [wikipedia.org] means it itsn't even a democracy, technically.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>True .
In fact being that sovereignty [ wikipedia.org ] means it its n't even a democracy , technically .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True.
In fact being that sovereignty [wikipedia.org] means it itsn't even a democracy, technically.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806801</id>
	<title>despatched</title>
	<author>Insane\_Homer</author>
	<datestamp>1256048580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just got a despatch Notification from Amazon that my Windows 7 Home Premium is in the Royal Mail... so I'll maybe get it tomorrow, but probably next week if the strike goes ahead.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just got a despatch Notification from Amazon that my Windows 7 Home Premium is in the Royal Mail... so I 'll maybe get it tomorrow , but probably next week if the strike goes ahead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just got a despatch Notification from Amazon that my Windows 7 Home Premium is in the Royal Mail... so I'll maybe get it tomorrow, but probably next week if the strike goes ahead.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29814465</id>
	<title>Re:disaster movies</title>
	<author>node 3</author>
	<datestamp>1256032860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Europe always gets hit first in disaster movies. Case in point - Scotland was first to freeze in The Day After Tomorrow. Though I bet a new ice age would be much less destructive that this...</p></div><p>Whereas in actuality, the day after tomorrow is when <i>rest</i> of the planet gets hit with Windows 7...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Europe always gets hit first in disaster movies .
Case in point - Scotland was first to freeze in The Day After Tomorrow .
Though I bet a new ice age would be much less destructive that this...Whereas in actuality , the day after tomorrow is when rest of the planet gets hit with Windows 7.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Europe always gets hit first in disaster movies.
Case in point - Scotland was first to freeze in The Day After Tomorrow.
Though I bet a new ice age would be much less destructive that this...Whereas in actuality, the day after tomorrow is when rest of the planet gets hit with Windows 7...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805719</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29808035</id>
	<title>Windows 7 Released Early in UK</title>
	<author>Digital Vomit</author>
	<datestamp>1256053620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Windows 7 Released Early in UK.  No word as of yet if the rest of the world has received any further communication from the British Isles."</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Windows 7 Released Early in UK .
No word as of yet if the rest of the world has received any further communication from the British Isles .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Windows 7 Released Early in UK.
No word as of yet if the rest of the world has received any further communication from the British Isles.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805709</id>
	<title>Slashlaw, Article 3.</title>
	<author>geekmux</author>
	<datestamp>1256039460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The reviews are out for months. Anybody who really cared has it already anyway. Students could have it for weeks for free via MSDN AA. Not that I would say that there might still be some people waiting for this, but is this really worth a <b>Slashdot</b> story??</p></div><p>Hey, listen buddy.  It's <b>always</b> worth a Slashdot story when even the hint of Microsoft screwing something up comes to light.  Didn't you read your Slashlaws when you signed up?!?  It's right there in Article 3, plain as day.  Admit it, you don't read EULAs either, do you?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The reviews are out for months .
Anybody who really cared has it already anyway .
Students could have it for weeks for free via MSDN AA .
Not that I would say that there might still be some people waiting for this , but is this really worth a Slashdot story ?
? Hey , listen buddy .
It 's always worth a Slashdot story when even the hint of Microsoft screwing something up comes to light .
Did n't you read your Slashlaws when you signed up ? ! ?
It 's right there in Article 3 , plain as day .
Admit it , you do n't read EULAs either , do you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reviews are out for months.
Anybody who really cared has it already anyway.
Students could have it for weeks for free via MSDN AA.
Not that I would say that there might still be some people waiting for this, but is this really worth a Slashdot story?
?Hey, listen buddy.
It's always worth a Slashdot story when even the hint of Microsoft screwing something up comes to light.
Didn't you read your Slashlaws when you signed up?!?
It's right there in Article 3, plain as day.
Admit it, you don't read EULAs either, do you?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805649</id>
	<title>Pfff....</title>
	<author>ls671</author>
	<datestamp>1256038740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slackware is at version 13 which makes it much more advanced than any version 7 could ever be.</p><p>Read how Slackware got to version 13 so quickly at this link, a quantum leap occurred in 1999:</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slackware" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slackware</a> [wikipedia.org] [wikipedia.org]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)))</p><p>P.S. Yes I use slackware...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slackware is at version 13 which makes it much more advanced than any version 7 could ever be.Read how Slackware got to version 13 so quickly at this link , a quantum leap occurred in 1999 : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slackware [ wikipedia.org ] [ wikipedia.org ] ; - ) ) ) P.S .
Yes I use slackware.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slackware is at version 13 which makes it much more advanced than any version 7 could ever be.Read how Slackware got to version 13 so quickly at this link, a quantum leap occurred in 1999:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slackware [wikipedia.org] [wikipedia.org] ;-)))P.S.
Yes I use slackware...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806771</id>
	<title>Re:Hopefully they fixed these things from Vista:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256048460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>- The absence of a directory up button in the explorer. No I don't want to use alt-up when I'm with my hand on the mouse and don't get me started on the horrifying location bar!</p></div><p>Wait, backspace doesn't work anymore?! (Not using Vista, can't verify.) Yes, the location bar is a pain, but clicking the empty region gets you to the editable path box &ndash; directory structure delimited by backslashes, as you wanted.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>- When there's a number of windows, but none have focus, and one uses alt-f4, one immidiately gets a shutdown dialog. I just want to close my apps dammit!</p></div><p>Jesus Christ, and hitting "Esc" is too much trouble for you? It's not like this is unexpected or new behavior (as the other responder has pointed out).</p><p>You want a close-all hotkey? Never existed. You want it added? That's not a "fix", it's an addition.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>- The absence of a 'Don't ask me for permission to confirm system changes until next session' option in UAC.</p></div><p>That's called "turning UAC off", and while discouraged it's entirely possible.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>- The absence of a directory up button in the explorer .
No I do n't want to use alt-up when I 'm with my hand on the mouse and do n't get me started on the horrifying location bar ! Wait , backspace does n't work anymore ? !
( Not using Vista , ca n't verify .
) Yes , the location bar is a pain , but clicking the empty region gets you to the editable path box    directory structure delimited by backslashes , as you wanted.- When there 's a number of windows , but none have focus , and one uses alt-f4 , one immidiately gets a shutdown dialog .
I just want to close my apps dammit ! Jesus Christ , and hitting " Esc " is too much trouble for you ?
It 's not like this is unexpected or new behavior ( as the other responder has pointed out ) .You want a close-all hotkey ?
Never existed .
You want it added ?
That 's not a " fix " , it 's an addition.- The absence of a 'Do n't ask me for permission to confirm system changes until next session ' option in UAC.That 's called " turning UAC off " , and while discouraged it 's entirely possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>- The absence of a directory up button in the explorer.
No I don't want to use alt-up when I'm with my hand on the mouse and don't get me started on the horrifying location bar!Wait, backspace doesn't work anymore?!
(Not using Vista, can't verify.
) Yes, the location bar is a pain, but clicking the empty region gets you to the editable path box – directory structure delimited by backslashes, as you wanted.- When there's a number of windows, but none have focus, and one uses alt-f4, one immidiately gets a shutdown dialog.
I just want to close my apps dammit!Jesus Christ, and hitting "Esc" is too much trouble for you?
It's not like this is unexpected or new behavior (as the other responder has pointed out).You want a close-all hotkey?
Never existed.
You want it added?
That's not a "fix", it's an addition.- The absence of a 'Don't ask me for permission to confirm system changes until next session' option in UAC.That's called "turning UAC off", and while discouraged it's entirely possible.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806055</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806567</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>jo42</author>
	<datestamp>1256047380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Vista == "Turd"</p><p>Windows 7 == "Polished Vista" == "Polished Turd"</p><p>Benefit? It's "Polished"!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Vista = = " Turd " Windows 7 = = " Polished Vista " = = " Polished Turd " Benefit ?
It 's " Polished " !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Vista == "Turd"Windows 7 == "Polished Vista" == "Polished Turd"Benefit?
It's "Polished"!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805639</id>
	<title>Who cares?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256038560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The reviews are out for months. Anybody who really cared has it already anyway. Students could have it for weeks for free via MSDN AA. Not that I would say that there might still be some people waiting for this, but is this really worth a <b>Slashdot</b> story??</htmltext>
<tokenext>The reviews are out for months .
Anybody who really cared has it already anyway .
Students could have it for weeks for free via MSDN AA .
Not that I would say that there might still be some people waiting for this , but is this really worth a Slashdot story ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reviews are out for months.
Anybody who really cared has it already anyway.
Students could have it for weeks for free via MSDN AA.
Not that I would say that there might still be some people waiting for this, but is this really worth a Slashdot story?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805937</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256042280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"How is that a benefit?"</p><p>I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but some people have to use windows, in spite of the fact that they hate it.  Anyone who has had the misfortune to suffer with Vista will now be rejoicing that windows 7, which pretty much amounts to a bugfix version of vista with the added bonus of a taskbar which almost makes sense, a graphics driver that might actually work, the ability to boot in under 20 minutes, and all in an operating system where the beta version I've been running for the last couple of months was actually more stable than the officially released crock of arse that was vista.</p><p>This all contributes to removing some of the pain from the occasions where I have to select the "other" option in grub.</p><p>That said, I won't be inviting my friends round for a release party.  Sorry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" How is that a benefit ?
" I hate to be the bearer of bad news , but some people have to use windows , in spite of the fact that they hate it .
Anyone who has had the misfortune to suffer with Vista will now be rejoicing that windows 7 , which pretty much amounts to a bugfix version of vista with the added bonus of a taskbar which almost makes sense , a graphics driver that might actually work , the ability to boot in under 20 minutes , and all in an operating system where the beta version I 've been running for the last couple of months was actually more stable than the officially released crock of arse that was vista.This all contributes to removing some of the pain from the occasions where I have to select the " other " option in grub.That said , I wo n't be inviting my friends round for a release party .
Sorry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How is that a benefit?
"I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but some people have to use windows, in spite of the fact that they hate it.
Anyone who has had the misfortune to suffer with Vista will now be rejoicing that windows 7, which pretty much amounts to a bugfix version of vista with the added bonus of a taskbar which almost makes sense, a graphics driver that might actually work, the ability to boot in under 20 minutes, and all in an operating system where the beta version I've been running for the last couple of months was actually more stable than the officially released crock of arse that was vista.This all contributes to removing some of the pain from the occasions where I have to select the "other" option in grub.That said, I won't be inviting my friends round for a release party.
Sorry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805993</id>
	<title>Precedent</title>
	<author>kooky45</author>
	<datestamp>1256042760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wasn't it a member of a political party in the UK who said <p>
"Today is a good day to bury bad news."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't it a member of a political party in the UK who said " Today is a good day to bury bad news .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't it a member of a political party in the UK who said 
"Today is a good day to bury bad news.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806079</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>mlts</author>
	<datestamp>1256043840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I were to hazard a guess, it would be so that any possible show-stopper bugs would be found and hopefully fixed before the public got their hands on the copy and the rumor game started up.</p><p>MS was bitten by this with Vista.  Once Joe Sixpack heard from his friend who is slightly more technical than he was, that Vista sucked (even though the reasons why were not listed), Vista rapidly got a bad reputation that it could not shake even with multiple service packs and several generations of hardware.  With Windows 7, should there be any real nasty issues (and so far, there are not), Microsoft has some lead time to get them pushed to Windows Update before the product faces judgment by the masses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I were to hazard a guess , it would be so that any possible show-stopper bugs would be found and hopefully fixed before the public got their hands on the copy and the rumor game started up.MS was bitten by this with Vista .
Once Joe Sixpack heard from his friend who is slightly more technical than he was , that Vista sucked ( even though the reasons why were not listed ) , Vista rapidly got a bad reputation that it could not shake even with multiple service packs and several generations of hardware .
With Windows 7 , should there be any real nasty issues ( and so far , there are not ) , Microsoft has some lead time to get them pushed to Windows Update before the product faces judgment by the masses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I were to hazard a guess, it would be so that any possible show-stopper bugs would be found and hopefully fixed before the public got their hands on the copy and the rumor game started up.MS was bitten by this with Vista.
Once Joe Sixpack heard from his friend who is slightly more technical than he was, that Vista sucked (even though the reasons why were not listed), Vista rapidly got a bad reputation that it could not shake even with multiple service packs and several generations of hardware.
With Windows 7, should there be any real nasty issues (and so far, there are not), Microsoft has some lead time to get them pushed to Windows Update before the product faces judgment by the masses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806145</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>jonadab</author>
	<datestamp>1256044500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; Windows 7. Benefit.  How is that a benefit?<br><br>It might depend on what you've been using up to this point.  It is *arguable* that if you've been using Windows Vista (perhaps because you bought a new computer that came with it and didn't bother to install anything else yet), Windows 7 might be an improvement.<br><br>I personally am not convinced of this.  I think the gratuitous UI weirdness in 7, and the inability to turn off some of the unwanted new features, makes it worse than Vista.  For instance, why would you want your quicklaunch icons to move around all over the taskbar every time you open or close a window?  To me that's a usability disaster.<br><br>But many people disagree with me.  If you look around on the internet, it's not hard at all to find people claiming that Windows 7 is *vastly* superior to Vista.<br><br>And ultimately it doesn't really matter that much what *I* think about 7, because the chances of my ever switching my main workstation to any version of Windows are negligible anyhow.  I place too much value on the ability to customize my system and get it working exactly the way I like, and Windows has never been any good for that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Windows 7 .
Benefit. How is that a benefit ? It might depend on what you 've been using up to this point .
It is * arguable * that if you 've been using Windows Vista ( perhaps because you bought a new computer that came with it and did n't bother to install anything else yet ) , Windows 7 might be an improvement.I personally am not convinced of this .
I think the gratuitous UI weirdness in 7 , and the inability to turn off some of the unwanted new features , makes it worse than Vista .
For instance , why would you want your quicklaunch icons to move around all over the taskbar every time you open or close a window ?
To me that 's a usability disaster.But many people disagree with me .
If you look around on the internet , it 's not hard at all to find people claiming that Windows 7 is * vastly * superior to Vista.And ultimately it does n't really matter that much what * I * think about 7 , because the chances of my ever switching my main workstation to any version of Windows are negligible anyhow .
I place too much value on the ability to customize my system and get it working exactly the way I like , and Windows has never been any good for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Windows 7.
Benefit.  How is that a benefit?It might depend on what you've been using up to this point.
It is *arguable* that if you've been using Windows Vista (perhaps because you bought a new computer that came with it and didn't bother to install anything else yet), Windows 7 might be an improvement.I personally am not convinced of this.
I think the gratuitous UI weirdness in 7, and the inability to turn off some of the unwanted new features, makes it worse than Vista.
For instance, why would you want your quicklaunch icons to move around all over the taskbar every time you open or close a window?
To me that's a usability disaster.But many people disagree with me.
If you look around on the internet, it's not hard at all to find people claiming that Windows 7 is *vastly* superior to Vista.And ultimately it doesn't really matter that much what *I* think about 7, because the chances of my ever switching my main workstation to any version of Windows are negligible anyhow.
I place too much value on the ability to customize my system and get it working exactly the way I like, and Windows has never been any good for that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806551</id>
	<title>last week</title>
	<author>devobtch</author>
	<datestamp>1256047260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i got my copy last thursday from zipzoomfly
oem version</htmltext>
<tokenext>i got my copy last thursday from zipzoomfly oem version</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i got my copy last thursday from zipzoomfly
oem version</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805973</id>
	<title>released early?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256042520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>all i can say is, "those poor bastards."</htmltext>
<tokenext>all i can say is , " those poor bastards .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>all i can say is, "those poor bastards.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29809131</id>
	<title>Re:Netherlands was first</title>
	<author>CannonballHead</author>
	<datestamp>1256057220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>'Seven houses'</p></div><p>That IS a small village...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>'Seven houses'That IS a small village.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Seven houses'That IS a small village...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29810927</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>DeadboltX</author>
	<datestamp>1256063280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It gives MS more time to catch/fix bugs found by the early adopters before the general public has to pay out cold hard cash for the product.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It gives MS more time to catch/fix bugs found by the early adopters before the general public has to pay out cold hard cash for the product .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It gives MS more time to catch/fix bugs found by the early adopters before the general public has to pay out cold hard cash for the product.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805651</id>
	<title>Bugger</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256038740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This has really taken the shine from my launch party...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This has really taken the shine from my launch party.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has really taken the shine from my launch party...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29808277</id>
	<title>Perplexed...</title>
	<author>malkavian</author>
	<datestamp>1256054520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was most perplexed to get up yesterday, anticipating having a day off work to just unwind and go for a walk, and find Windows 7 arrived in the post...<br>Now in and working, and pottering around with it to see how it handles.. I was part of the pre-order group, so the pro version only cost about &pound;70 or so, which I think is reasonable for an OS..<br>Must say, good PR for MS to allow the early release, rather than have these things stuck in the post (which means probably never arriving)..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was most perplexed to get up yesterday , anticipating having a day off work to just unwind and go for a walk , and find Windows 7 arrived in the post...Now in and working , and pottering around with it to see how it handles.. I was part of the pre-order group , so the pro version only cost about   70 or so , which I think is reasonable for an OS..Must say , good PR for MS to allow the early release , rather than have these things stuck in the post ( which means probably never arriving ) . .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was most perplexed to get up yesterday, anticipating having a day off work to just unwind and go for a walk, and find Windows 7 arrived in the post...Now in and working, and pottering around with it to see how it handles.. I was part of the pre-order group, so the pro version only cost about £70 or so, which I think is reasonable for an OS..Must say, good PR for MS to allow the early release, rather than have these things stuck in the post (which means probably never arriving)..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805787</id>
	<title>Hot damn!</title>
	<author>Rogerborg</author>
	<datestamp>1256040600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I get to throw my <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cX4t5-YpHQ" title="youtube.com">Windows 7 Install Party</a> [youtube.com] early!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I get to throw my Windows 7 Install Party [ youtube.com ] early !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I get to throw my Windows 7 Install Party [youtube.com] early!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806055</id>
	<title>Hopefully they fixed these things from Vista:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256043420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>- The absence of a directory up button in the explorer. No I don't want to use alt-up when I'm with my hand on the mouse and don't get me started on the horrifying location bar!<br>- When there's a number of windows, but none have focus, and one uses alt-f4, one immidiately gets a shutdown dialog. I just want to close my apps dammit!<br>- Programs can't be run off alternative filesystems when UAC is running because of a bug in the api.<br>- The absence of a 'Don't ask me for permission to confirm system changes until next session' option in UAC.<br>- Some other things I can't be bothered to remember right now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>- The absence of a directory up button in the explorer .
No I do n't want to use alt-up when I 'm with my hand on the mouse and do n't get me started on the horrifying location bar ! - When there 's a number of windows , but none have focus , and one uses alt-f4 , one immidiately gets a shutdown dialog .
I just want to close my apps dammit ! - Programs ca n't be run off alternative filesystems when UAC is running because of a bug in the api.- The absence of a 'Do n't ask me for permission to confirm system changes until next session ' option in UAC.- Some other things I ca n't be bothered to remember right now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>- The absence of a directory up button in the explorer.
No I don't want to use alt-up when I'm with my hand on the mouse and don't get me started on the horrifying location bar!- When there's a number of windows, but none have focus, and one uses alt-f4, one immidiately gets a shutdown dialog.
I just want to close my apps dammit!- Programs can't be run off alternative filesystems when UAC is running because of a bug in the api.- The absence of a 'Don't ask me for permission to confirm system changes until next session' option in UAC.- Some other things I can't be bothered to remember right now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29811447</id>
	<title>Re:Hopefully they fixed these things from Vista:</title>
	<author>cbhacking</author>
	<datestamp>1256064960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow seriously, a complaint that he can't find a "Up" button in the same sentence as a complaint about the breadcrumb navigation bar...</p><p>The "Up" button you want is <b>just click on the name of the folder above your current one</b>! Heack, you can even go up THREE folders with one click, if you want to! Seriously, I'll grant you that it's different and therefore a certain portion fo the community will automatically think "bad" but come on, the breadcrumb navigation is FAR better than a single "go up one level" button.</p><p>Also, while Backspace works perfectly well, what it does is go Back, not Up (it's always done this, and consistently does this across everything from IE/Firefox/Whatever to the various wizards and installers that have multiple steps with a Back option). Sometimes going up a directory is not a Back option (if you jumped into the middle of a folder tree) and therefore Backspace won't go where you want. He was also asking for a mouse-based solution.</p><p>Being able to use Alt-F4 on the desktop is a feature; it's an easy way to shut the system down using the keyboard alone, even if you don't have a WinKey (rare today, but there was a time that not many keyboards had one). Believe it or not, you can navigate pretty much the entirety of Windows without a mouse (and if your mouse or mouse drivers ever get whacked, you'll need to).</p><p>If you want to do a bunch of configuration for one session, either turn off UAC temporarily, log in as Administrator (which by default has UAC disabled, although the account itself is also disabled by default), or put up with a handful of confirmation dialogs. It's not like they take that much time to deal with, and I've blocked programs even from reputably good sources (i.e. commercially purchased through retail or Steam) when they wanted to do something as Admin with no good reason.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow seriously , a complaint that he ca n't find a " Up " button in the same sentence as a complaint about the breadcrumb navigation bar...The " Up " button you want is just click on the name of the folder above your current one !
Heack , you can even go up THREE folders with one click , if you want to !
Seriously , I 'll grant you that it 's different and therefore a certain portion fo the community will automatically think " bad " but come on , the breadcrumb navigation is FAR better than a single " go up one level " button.Also , while Backspace works perfectly well , what it does is go Back , not Up ( it 's always done this , and consistently does this across everything from IE/Firefox/Whatever to the various wizards and installers that have multiple steps with a Back option ) .
Sometimes going up a directory is not a Back option ( if you jumped into the middle of a folder tree ) and therefore Backspace wo n't go where you want .
He was also asking for a mouse-based solution.Being able to use Alt-F4 on the desktop is a feature ; it 's an easy way to shut the system down using the keyboard alone , even if you do n't have a WinKey ( rare today , but there was a time that not many keyboards had one ) .
Believe it or not , you can navigate pretty much the entirety of Windows without a mouse ( and if your mouse or mouse drivers ever get whacked , you 'll need to ) .If you want to do a bunch of configuration for one session , either turn off UAC temporarily , log in as Administrator ( which by default has UAC disabled , although the account itself is also disabled by default ) , or put up with a handful of confirmation dialogs .
It 's not like they take that much time to deal with , and I 've blocked programs even from reputably good sources ( i.e .
commercially purchased through retail or Steam ) when they wanted to do something as Admin with no good reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow seriously, a complaint that he can't find a "Up" button in the same sentence as a complaint about the breadcrumb navigation bar...The "Up" button you want is just click on the name of the folder above your current one!
Heack, you can even go up THREE folders with one click, if you want to!
Seriously, I'll grant you that it's different and therefore a certain portion fo the community will automatically think "bad" but come on, the breadcrumb navigation is FAR better than a single "go up one level" button.Also, while Backspace works perfectly well, what it does is go Back, not Up (it's always done this, and consistently does this across everything from IE/Firefox/Whatever to the various wizards and installers that have multiple steps with a Back option).
Sometimes going up a directory is not a Back option (if you jumped into the middle of a folder tree) and therefore Backspace won't go where you want.
He was also asking for a mouse-based solution.Being able to use Alt-F4 on the desktop is a feature; it's an easy way to shut the system down using the keyboard alone, even if you don't have a WinKey (rare today, but there was a time that not many keyboards had one).
Believe it or not, you can navigate pretty much the entirety of Windows without a mouse (and if your mouse or mouse drivers ever get whacked, you'll need to).If you want to do a bunch of configuration for one session, either turn off UAC temporarily, log in as Administrator (which by default has UAC disabled, although the account itself is also disabled by default), or put up with a handful of confirmation dialogs.
It's not like they take that much time to deal with, and I've blocked programs even from reputably good sources (i.e.
commercially purchased through retail or Steam) when they wanted to do something as Admin with no good reason.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806771</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806135</id>
	<title>*I* Care!!</title>
	<author>Mateo\_LeFou</author>
	<datestamp>1256044440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're totally spoiling my launch party! After I spent all day organizing my "Activities" and picking my favorite "Features" to share with everyone! Now they'll all go to someone else's launch party the day before.</p><p>The hell with them, I'm installing FreeBSD then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're totally spoiling my launch party !
After I spent all day organizing my " Activities " and picking my favorite " Features " to share with everyone !
Now they 'll all go to someone else 's launch party the day before.The hell with them , I 'm installing FreeBSD then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're totally spoiling my launch party!
After I spent all day organizing my "Activities" and picking my favorite "Features" to share with everyone!
Now they'll all go to someone else's launch party the day before.The hell with them, I'm installing FreeBSD then.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29809993</id>
	<title>Re:Germany too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256060040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Been in Canada as of yesterday at the OEM shops.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Been in Canada as of yesterday at the OEM shops .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Been in Canada as of yesterday at the OEM shops.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805607</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805903</id>
	<title>Re:Pfff....</title>
	<author>Skater</author>
	<datestamp>1256041980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think Patrick said at the time that he was sick of people asking when he'd upgrade to "Linux 6".  That still makes me chuckle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Patrick said at the time that he was sick of people asking when he 'd upgrade to " Linux 6 " .
That still makes me chuckle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Patrick said at the time that he was sick of people asking when he'd upgrade to "Linux 6".
That still makes me chuckle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29809329</id>
	<title>Re:Already on sale in Israel...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256057820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So has Hamas denounced yet the inhumane acts of Israeli Windows 7?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So has Hamas denounced yet the inhumane acts of Israeli Windows 7 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So has Hamas denounced yet the inhumane acts of Israeli Windows 7?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29807839</id>
	<title>Unfortunately...</title>
	<author>eegad</author>
	<datestamp>1256052720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>their efforts to avoid disappointment were stymied by the release of Windows 7.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>their efforts to avoid disappointment were stymied by the release of Windows 7 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>their efforts to avoid disappointment were stymied by the release of Windows 7.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805575</id>
	<title>Those basdards.</title>
	<author>Higaran</author>
	<datestamp>1256037720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wasn't really running out to go buy one, but I am actually a little jelouse that they got copies before the release date.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was n't really running out to go buy one , but I am actually a little jelouse that they got copies before the release date .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wasn't really running out to go buy one, but I am actually a little jelouse that they got copies before the release date.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29815167</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>broknstrngz</author>
	<datestamp>1256035440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because friends don't let friends use Windows!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because friends do n't let friends use Windows !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because friends don't let friends use Windows!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805937</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805561</id>
	<title>First Post on Windows 7</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256037420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh dear it seems the speed of the little fella isnt enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh dear it seems the speed of the little fella isnt enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh dear it seems the speed of the little fella isnt enough.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29818239</id>
	<title>Re:Hopefully they fixed these things from Vista:</title>
	<author>cbhacking</author>
	<datestamp>1256051640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Several other of your points have been addressed already (seriously, this is the first complaint about the breadcrumb navigation that I've ever seen) but your third one is just WTF? Define "alternate" filesystems, please; I run programs off CDFS (CD), UDF (DVD), and FAT32 (flashdrive) all the time. Granted, those are filesystems that ship with Windows, so maybe that's not what you meant. Ignoring the question of *why* you would have Windows binaries on a non-Windows filesystem, as long as the execute bit was set (or the FS driver reported it to be set - EXT2FS, for example, ignores most of the permissions bits) Windows should be able to execute it. I'm still not getting the "why" part though - most people don't ever connect a device that Windows doesn't ship the filesystem for, and for cross-OS compatibility, the OSS drivers for NTFS are better than the NT drivers for the myriad OSS filesystems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Several other of your points have been addressed already ( seriously , this is the first complaint about the breadcrumb navigation that I 've ever seen ) but your third one is just WTF ?
Define " alternate " filesystems , please ; I run programs off CDFS ( CD ) , UDF ( DVD ) , and FAT32 ( flashdrive ) all the time .
Granted , those are filesystems that ship with Windows , so maybe that 's not what you meant .
Ignoring the question of * why * you would have Windows binaries on a non-Windows filesystem , as long as the execute bit was set ( or the FS driver reported it to be set - EXT2FS , for example , ignores most of the permissions bits ) Windows should be able to execute it .
I 'm still not getting the " why " part though - most people do n't ever connect a device that Windows does n't ship the filesystem for , and for cross-OS compatibility , the OSS drivers for NTFS are better than the NT drivers for the myriad OSS filesystems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Several other of your points have been addressed already (seriously, this is the first complaint about the breadcrumb navigation that I've ever seen) but your third one is just WTF?
Define "alternate" filesystems, please; I run programs off CDFS (CD), UDF (DVD), and FAT32 (flashdrive) all the time.
Granted, those are filesystems that ship with Windows, so maybe that's not what you meant.
Ignoring the question of *why* you would have Windows binaries on a non-Windows filesystem, as long as the execute bit was set (or the FS driver reported it to be set - EXT2FS, for example, ignores most of the permissions bits) Windows should be able to execute it.
I'm still not getting the "why" part though - most people don't ever connect a device that Windows doesn't ship the filesystem for, and for cross-OS compatibility, the OSS drivers for NTFS are better than the NT drivers for the myriad OSS filesystems.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806055</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29809029</id>
	<title>Already released in the US</title>
	<author>gravis777</author>
	<datestamp>1256056920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft has been shipping out the party packs for a while now. My neighbors installed the signature edition this last weekend. And it has been available for months on Microsoft Volume Licensing Sites.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft has been shipping out the party packs for a while now .
My neighbors installed the signature edition this last weekend .
And it has been available for months on Microsoft Volume Licensing Sites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft has been shipping out the party packs for a while now.
My neighbors installed the signature edition this last weekend.
And it has been available for months on Microsoft Volume Licensing Sites.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805847</id>
	<title>Not exactly first...</title>
	<author>slasher999</author>
	<datestamp>1256041260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not exactly first if you include MSDN and TechEd subscribers. I've had the release version from MS for a week or two now, installed it last week over my RC build.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not exactly first if you include MSDN and TechEd subscribers .
I 've had the release version from MS for a week or two now , installed it last week over my RC build .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not exactly first if you include MSDN and TechEd subscribers.
I've had the release version from MS for a week or two now, installed it last week over my RC build.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29807619</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>GeckoAddict</author>
	<datestamp>1256051940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So they release a mildly facelifted version of their failed OS, rely on improved hardware to mask the worst of the sluggishness and hype it to the max.
Profit.</p></div><p>Isn't the business formula for all mature product lines?  <br>
release a mildly facelifted version of their &lt;PRODUCT X&gt;, rely on improved &lt;DEPENDENCY Y&gt; to mask the worst of the &lt;PROBLEM A&gt; and hype it to the max.
Profit.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So they release a mildly facelifted version of their failed OS , rely on improved hardware to mask the worst of the sluggishness and hype it to the max .
Profit.Is n't the business formula for all mature product lines ?
release a mildly facelifted version of their , rely on improved to mask the worst of the and hype it to the max .
Profit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So they release a mildly facelifted version of their failed OS, rely on improved hardware to mask the worst of the sluggishness and hype it to the max.
Profit.Isn't the business formula for all mature product lines?
release a mildly facelifted version of their , rely on improved  to mask the worst of the  and hype it to the max.
Profit.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805991</id>
	<title>"Islam" means "peace"...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256042760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.wptz.com/news/21336430/detail.html" title="wptz.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.wptz.com/news/21336430/detail.html</a> [wptz.com]</p><p>What a surprise!  Another hypocritical Muslim caught drinking and committing acts of violence!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.wptz.com/news/21336430/detail.html [ wptz.com ] What a surprise !
Another hypocritical Muslim caught drinking and committing acts of violence !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.wptz.com/news/21336430/detail.html [wptz.com]What a surprise!
Another hypocritical Muslim caught drinking and committing acts of violence!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29811011</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>MrNemesis</author>
	<datestamp>1256063520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It took MS alot of time to resurrect Michaelangelo, Da Vinci, Holbein and Rembrandt so they could finally contribute to making the Windows 7 Table Centrepiece a truly worthy work of art fit for the launch parties. Man does that thing look sweet! I hear it took Da Vinci three years just to produce the hand-polymerised <i>arbor-cellulose</i> used for it's sculpted form.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It took MS alot of time to resurrect Michaelangelo , Da Vinci , Holbein and Rembrandt so they could finally contribute to making the Windows 7 Table Centrepiece a truly worthy work of art fit for the launch parties .
Man does that thing look sweet !
I hear it took Da Vinci three years just to produce the hand-polymerised arbor-cellulose used for it 's sculpted form .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It took MS alot of time to resurrect Michaelangelo, Da Vinci, Holbein and Rembrandt so they could finally contribute to making the Windows 7 Table Centrepiece a truly worthy work of art fit for the launch parties.
Man does that thing look sweet!
I hear it took Da Vinci three years just to produce the hand-polymerised arbor-cellulose used for it's sculpted form.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806077</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256043840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You left off a very important reason for part of the delay -- a coordinated marketing strategy. The lead time on print ads, billboards, radio/tv spots, etc is often measured in months. So in order to make all the ad buys and have all of the various materials ready, the release date needed to be decided on months ago. Which it was. It so happened that the product was ready to release before that date. But you don't just go and scrap a many-million dollar marketing campaign because the product is ready early. To MS's credit, they did make Win7 available to partners, schools, developers, etc when it actually was ready -- they didn't hold onto it until the marketing release date.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You left off a very important reason for part of the delay -- a coordinated marketing strategy .
The lead time on print ads , billboards , radio/tv spots , etc is often measured in months .
So in order to make all the ad buys and have all of the various materials ready , the release date needed to be decided on months ago .
Which it was .
It so happened that the product was ready to release before that date .
But you do n't just go and scrap a many-million dollar marketing campaign because the product is ready early .
To MS 's credit , they did make Win7 available to partners , schools , developers , etc when it actually was ready -- they did n't hold onto it until the marketing release date .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You left off a very important reason for part of the delay -- a coordinated marketing strategy.
The lead time on print ads, billboards, radio/tv spots, etc is often measured in months.
So in order to make all the ad buys and have all of the various materials ready, the release date needed to be decided on months ago.
Which it was.
It so happened that the product was ready to release before that date.
But you don't just go and scrap a many-million dollar marketing campaign because the product is ready early.
To MS's credit, they did make Win7 available to partners, schools, developers, etc when it actually was ready -- they didn't hold onto it until the marketing release date.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805767</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805785</id>
	<title>It has been released  in China as well</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256040540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE59F1B520091016" title="reuters.com" rel="nofollow">It costs just about 3 USD</a> [reuters.com], probably its fair value...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It costs just about 3 USD [ reuters.com ] , probably its fair value.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It costs just about 3 USD [reuters.com], probably its fair value...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29807417</id>
	<title>This really isn't about the article per se...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256051100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...but would it have been so difficult to say something along the lines of "plan to go on strike" rather than "take industrial action"?  I mean WTF(?!) I had to look at the English postal related article to clarify that the line actually meant what I suspected it to mean.  Do English commonly refer to strikes as "industrial action" or something?  If so it's a new one on me, and I've actually worked with large numbers of English people(fortunately in one case, while the other was, well lets just say that those English lived up to the stereotypes in spades...)  Canadians don't refer to strikes as "industrial action" either.</p><p>Anyways, not too terribly surprised that they're getting Windows 7 already, as it's apparently been finished for a while, and the only likely reason for any further release delay is to match up with marketing lag, although one can't help but wonder that they couldn't've pulled up marketing campaigns, after all it's not nearly as bad as if the OS itself had been late in which case they'd've had to push back all the purchased ad times/pages/etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...but would it have been so difficult to say something along the lines of " plan to go on strike " rather than " take industrial action " ?
I mean WTF ( ? !
) I had to look at the English postal related article to clarify that the line actually meant what I suspected it to mean .
Do English commonly refer to strikes as " industrial action " or something ?
If so it 's a new one on me , and I 've actually worked with large numbers of English people ( fortunately in one case , while the other was , well lets just say that those English lived up to the stereotypes in spades... ) Canadians do n't refer to strikes as " industrial action " either.Anyways , not too terribly surprised that they 're getting Windows 7 already , as it 's apparently been finished for a while , and the only likely reason for any further release delay is to match up with marketing lag , although one ca n't help but wonder that they could n't've pulled up marketing campaigns , after all it 's not nearly as bad as if the OS itself had been late in which case they 'd've had to push back all the purchased ad times/pages/etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but would it have been so difficult to say something along the lines of "plan to go on strike" rather than "take industrial action"?
I mean WTF(?!
) I had to look at the English postal related article to clarify that the line actually meant what I suspected it to mean.
Do English commonly refer to strikes as "industrial action" or something?
If so it's a new one on me, and I've actually worked with large numbers of English people(fortunately in one case, while the other was, well lets just say that those English lived up to the stereotypes in spades...)  Canadians don't refer to strikes as "industrial action" either.Anyways, not too terribly surprised that they're getting Windows 7 already, as it's apparently been finished for a while, and the only likely reason for any further release delay is to match up with marketing lag, although one can't help but wonder that they couldn't've pulled up marketing campaigns, after all it's not nearly as bad as if the OS itself had been late in which case they'd've had to push back all the purchased ad times/pages/etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29807743</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>sunderland56</author>
	<datestamp>1256052420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So... why so long before boxes hit shelves? It seems very odd to me.</p></div><p>
So that there will be working apps available at launch.
<br> <br>
Yes, I've been running the final bits for a long time too. The point is, I can test my app against those final bits, and make sure everything works correctly. If needed, I've got time to make changes, spin a new version, and get updates available <i>before</i> customers start installing Windows 7.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So... why so long before boxes hit shelves ?
It seems very odd to me .
So that there will be working apps available at launch .
Yes , I 've been running the final bits for a long time too .
The point is , I can test my app against those final bits , and make sure everything works correctly .
If needed , I 've got time to make changes , spin a new version , and get updates available before customers start installing Windows 7 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So... why so long before boxes hit shelves?
It seems very odd to me.
So that there will be working apps available at launch.
Yes, I've been running the final bits for a long time too.
The point is, I can test my app against those final bits, and make sure everything works correctly.
If needed, I've got time to make changes, spin a new version, and get updates available before customers start installing Windows 7.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29807501</id>
	<title>Re:Already on sale in Israel...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256051460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and France too...<br>in french : http://www.lepoint.fr/actualites-technologie-internet/2009-10-20/info-lepoint-fr-regardez-windows-7-deja-en-vente-a-paris/1387/0/387266</p><p>translation power by Google :<br>http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&amp;sl=fr&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.lepoint.fr\%2Factualites-technologie-internet\%2F2009-10-20\%2Finfo-lepoint-fr-regardez-windows-7-deja-en-vente-a-paris\%2F1387\%2F0\%2F387266</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and France too...in french : http : //www.lepoint.fr/actualites-technologie-internet/2009-10-20/info-lepoint-fr-regardez-windows-7-deja-en-vente-a-paris/1387/0/387266translation power by Google : http : //translate.google.com/translate ? hl = en&amp;sl = fr&amp;tl = en&amp;u = http \ % 3A \ % 2F \ % 2Fwww.lepoint.fr \ % 2Factualites-technologie-internet \ % 2F2009-10-20 \ % 2Finfo-lepoint-fr-regardez-windows-7-deja-en-vente-a-paris \ % 2F1387 \ % 2F0 \ % 2F387266</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and France too...in french : http://www.lepoint.fr/actualites-technologie-internet/2009-10-20/info-lepoint-fr-regardez-windows-7-deja-en-vente-a-paris/1387/0/387266translation power by Google :http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&amp;sl=fr&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.lepoint.fr\%2Factualites-technologie-internet\%2F2009-10-20\%2Finfo-lepoint-fr-regardez-windows-7-deja-en-vente-a-paris\%2F1387\%2F0\%2F387266</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805583</id>
	<title>I'm One</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256037840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Purchased though Amazon and got an email as soon as i saw this story.</p><p>looks like their not using the post office as they say it's sent via City Link. though this may be because i live in London.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Purchased though Amazon and got an email as soon as i saw this story.looks like their not using the post office as they say it 's sent via City Link .
though this may be because i live in London .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Purchased though Amazon and got an email as soon as i saw this story.looks like their not using the post office as they say it's sent via City Link.
though this may be because i live in London.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29809139</id>
	<title>Re:Netherlands was first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256057280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lovely photos. Get a life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lovely photos .
Get a life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lovely photos.
Get a life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29811215</id>
	<title>Lucky me, I guess...</title>
	<author>kannibul</author>
	<datestamp>1256064000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have access to my corporate portal for Microsoft Select License downloads. Don't worry, I have it on order from newegg and will have it well before the 30 days is up w/o activation<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)

So far I've seen a lot of improvements over Vista, which I moved to recently as well. I didn't find Vista all that annoying except in one minor aspect - you do anything and the search components would go into overload and it'd reindex everything, making the whole system sluggish. 7 is a lot better in that regard.

I've also not noticed a whole lot of other over the top improvements, other than just simple junk like adding a frequent-files/sites/etc to a start menu object, which is kind of neat but it doesn't work with any consistency with something like IE.

One other annoyance that I found was that firewire support isn't "right" - I have a pair of Presonus Firestudio devices that I use with it, and the driver it loaded would not allow them to sync. Changing it to a "legacy" driver (included with OS) resolved the issue there, though, I've not recorded with it yet.

Oh, and my AV software wouldn't work - but i got a free version upgrade since my subscription is current.

Everything else I ran on Vista runs fine on 7.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have access to my corporate portal for Microsoft Select License downloads .
Do n't worry , I have it on order from newegg and will have it well before the 30 days is up w/o activation : ) So far I 've seen a lot of improvements over Vista , which I moved to recently as well .
I did n't find Vista all that annoying except in one minor aspect - you do anything and the search components would go into overload and it 'd reindex everything , making the whole system sluggish .
7 is a lot better in that regard .
I 've also not noticed a whole lot of other over the top improvements , other than just simple junk like adding a frequent-files/sites/etc to a start menu object , which is kind of neat but it does n't work with any consistency with something like IE .
One other annoyance that I found was that firewire support is n't " right " - I have a pair of Presonus Firestudio devices that I use with it , and the driver it loaded would not allow them to sync .
Changing it to a " legacy " driver ( included with OS ) resolved the issue there , though , I 've not recorded with it yet .
Oh , and my AV software would n't work - but i got a free version upgrade since my subscription is current .
Everything else I ran on Vista runs fine on 7 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have access to my corporate portal for Microsoft Select License downloads.
Don't worry, I have it on order from newegg and will have it well before the 30 days is up w/o activation :)

So far I've seen a lot of improvements over Vista, which I moved to recently as well.
I didn't find Vista all that annoying except in one minor aspect - you do anything and the search components would go into overload and it'd reindex everything, making the whole system sluggish.
7 is a lot better in that regard.
I've also not noticed a whole lot of other over the top improvements, other than just simple junk like adding a frequent-files/sites/etc to a start menu object, which is kind of neat but it doesn't work with any consistency with something like IE.
One other annoyance that I found was that firewire support isn't "right" - I have a pair of Presonus Firestudio devices that I use with it, and the driver it loaded would not allow them to sync.
Changing it to a "legacy" driver (included with OS) resolved the issue there, though, I've not recorded with it yet.
Oh, and my AV software wouldn't work - but i got a free version upgrade since my subscription is current.
Everything else I ran on Vista runs fine on 7.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806039</id>
	<title>CRAAAAP!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256043240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The cappies and their plots for world domination... aaaaargh!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The cappies and their plots for world domination... aaaaargh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The cappies and their plots for world domination... aaaaargh!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29810651</id>
	<title>This strike is about more than just pay</title>
	<author>Nick Ives</author>
	<datestamp>1256062140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At my place of work we can receive up to 20,000 items of Royal Mail each day. During the last strikes in '07 the Communication Workers Union message was that the manager's "modernisation" plan was really just a massive cut in service whereas RM management claimed they were just trying to eliminate "Spanish practices".</p><p>Immediately after the imposition of the managers plan the quality of the service we receive decreased substantially. It used to be the case that we'd receive about 80\% of our post by 7:30 with the rest arriving by about 11:00 at the latest. Nowadays we receive anywhere from 1/3 to 2/3 of our post by around 8:00ish (sometimes a little later) with the rest turning up by about noon. This is because RM have stopped people coming in an hour early to help sort the post (for which they received a small bonus) and also cut down or eliminated the overnight shifts in most sorting offices.</p><p>Obviously this makes planning the workflow each day challenging. It used to be the case that we'd have a clear idea of our intake first thing in the morning and so people would know straight away which jobs were going to be busiest and whether or not it'd be possible to use flexi-time to leave early that day; these days we just have to take it as it goes.</p><p>This has knock on effects for <i>our</i> customer as essentially we're dealing with a RM "failure" each day meaning we're not in breach of our contract for failing to supply all the post on time to them. The solution we agreed for that was to treat the late post as having come in the next day which, considering the time-sensitive nature of our work and the effect delays could have on the customers our customer serves, is a pretty poor outcome.</p><p>Most posties take an enormous amount of pride in their work and they're angry at how Adam Crozier and chums are tearing the service apart. I'm sure the problems we get due to the cuts in RM are being experienced elsewhere too at a cost to UK business, so support the CWU in their campaign to save Royal Mail!</p><p>Also, the timing of this strike is the responsibility of RM management. They're the one's who made an unacceptable offer just before Christmas and, because of the way the Trade Union laws in this country work, the CWU had to ballot for strike action now. This is clearly a PR stunt by the RM managers so they can put out a message of "look at the greedy posties trying to ruin Christmas!". It's utterly shameful, don't fall for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At my place of work we can receive up to 20,000 items of Royal Mail each day .
During the last strikes in '07 the Communication Workers Union message was that the manager 's " modernisation " plan was really just a massive cut in service whereas RM management claimed they were just trying to eliminate " Spanish practices " .Immediately after the imposition of the managers plan the quality of the service we receive decreased substantially .
It used to be the case that we 'd receive about 80 \ % of our post by 7 : 30 with the rest arriving by about 11 : 00 at the latest .
Nowadays we receive anywhere from 1/3 to 2/3 of our post by around 8 : 00ish ( sometimes a little later ) with the rest turning up by about noon .
This is because RM have stopped people coming in an hour early to help sort the post ( for which they received a small bonus ) and also cut down or eliminated the overnight shifts in most sorting offices.Obviously this makes planning the workflow each day challenging .
It used to be the case that we 'd have a clear idea of our intake first thing in the morning and so people would know straight away which jobs were going to be busiest and whether or not it 'd be possible to use flexi-time to leave early that day ; these days we just have to take it as it goes.This has knock on effects for our customer as essentially we 're dealing with a RM " failure " each day meaning we 're not in breach of our contract for failing to supply all the post on time to them .
The solution we agreed for that was to treat the late post as having come in the next day which , considering the time-sensitive nature of our work and the effect delays could have on the customers our customer serves , is a pretty poor outcome.Most posties take an enormous amount of pride in their work and they 're angry at how Adam Crozier and chums are tearing the service apart .
I 'm sure the problems we get due to the cuts in RM are being experienced elsewhere too at a cost to UK business , so support the CWU in their campaign to save Royal Mail ! Also , the timing of this strike is the responsibility of RM management .
They 're the one 's who made an unacceptable offer just before Christmas and , because of the way the Trade Union laws in this country work , the CWU had to ballot for strike action now .
This is clearly a PR stunt by the RM managers so they can put out a message of " look at the greedy posties trying to ruin Christmas ! " .
It 's utterly shameful , do n't fall for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At my place of work we can receive up to 20,000 items of Royal Mail each day.
During the last strikes in '07 the Communication Workers Union message was that the manager's "modernisation" plan was really just a massive cut in service whereas RM management claimed they were just trying to eliminate "Spanish practices".Immediately after the imposition of the managers plan the quality of the service we receive decreased substantially.
It used to be the case that we'd receive about 80\% of our post by 7:30 with the rest arriving by about 11:00 at the latest.
Nowadays we receive anywhere from 1/3 to 2/3 of our post by around 8:00ish (sometimes a little later) with the rest turning up by about noon.
This is because RM have stopped people coming in an hour early to help sort the post (for which they received a small bonus) and also cut down or eliminated the overnight shifts in most sorting offices.Obviously this makes planning the workflow each day challenging.
It used to be the case that we'd have a clear idea of our intake first thing in the morning and so people would know straight away which jobs were going to be busiest and whether or not it'd be possible to use flexi-time to leave early that day; these days we just have to take it as it goes.This has knock on effects for our customer as essentially we're dealing with a RM "failure" each day meaning we're not in breach of our contract for failing to supply all the post on time to them.
The solution we agreed for that was to treat the late post as having come in the next day which, considering the time-sensitive nature of our work and the effect delays could have on the customers our customer serves, is a pretty poor outcome.Most posties take an enormous amount of pride in their work and they're angry at how Adam Crozier and chums are tearing the service apart.
I'm sure the problems we get due to the cuts in RM are being experienced elsewhere too at a cost to UK business, so support the CWU in their campaign to save Royal Mail!Also, the timing of this strike is the responsibility of RM management.
They're the one's who made an unacceptable offer just before Christmas and, because of the way the Trade Union laws in this country work, the CWU had to ballot for strike action now.
This is clearly a PR stunt by the RM managers so they can put out a message of "look at the greedy posties trying to ruin Christmas!".
It's utterly shameful, don't fall for it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29830125</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>mongolian</author>
	<datestamp>1256127960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's amazing how cheaply a university can get this for its students that qualify to have it shoved down their throats throughout their studies. At McGill anyways, only electrical (not absolutely sure, haven't asked one), computer, and software engineers as well as CS students have access. Still, it only costs the school a few hundred bucks a year for all of us and there's a lot more than copies of all windows xp-7 pro-extreme+ danger edition available for download.</p><p>As one who hasn't had windows as a primary OS (and consequently hasn't legally owned a version) since windows 98, I was a a bit skeptical when my university dropped a license (through MSDNAA) on my lap. It wasn't until reading this post that I was convinced (either way) that it was the RTM build, though it didn't make much difference to me as, in the worst case, they would provide the final for free when it was released.</p><p>Anyways, I had to try it out in vmware, if nothing else to make use of my newfound legal copy of an operating system a few days ago and was pleasantly surprised. As I only gave it 1GB of RAM, 1 of my not-so-blindingly-fast cores, and no graphics acceleration, I could feel it lagging a bit but *not that badly*. It was an overall pleasant experience, though productivity was hardly a factor in this call. Windows-only FPGA and DSP/embedded development software installed and working, I'm not sure what else I'd want to do on it. I'm sorry to those who feel more passionately about wanting to use Windows 7 and care to use it regularly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's amazing how cheaply a university can get this for its students that qualify to have it shoved down their throats throughout their studies .
At McGill anyways , only electrical ( not absolutely sure , have n't asked one ) , computer , and software engineers as well as CS students have access .
Still , it only costs the school a few hundred bucks a year for all of us and there 's a lot more than copies of all windows xp-7 pro-extreme + danger edition available for download.As one who has n't had windows as a primary OS ( and consequently has n't legally owned a version ) since windows 98 , I was a a bit skeptical when my university dropped a license ( through MSDNAA ) on my lap .
It was n't until reading this post that I was convinced ( either way ) that it was the RTM build , though it did n't make much difference to me as , in the worst case , they would provide the final for free when it was released.Anyways , I had to try it out in vmware , if nothing else to make use of my newfound legal copy of an operating system a few days ago and was pleasantly surprised .
As I only gave it 1GB of RAM , 1 of my not-so-blindingly-fast cores , and no graphics acceleration , I could feel it lagging a bit but * not that badly * .
It was an overall pleasant experience , though productivity was hardly a factor in this call .
Windows-only FPGA and DSP/embedded development software installed and working , I 'm not sure what else I 'd want to do on it .
I 'm sorry to those who feel more passionately about wanting to use Windows 7 and care to use it regularly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's amazing how cheaply a university can get this for its students that qualify to have it shoved down their throats throughout their studies.
At McGill anyways, only electrical (not absolutely sure, haven't asked one), computer, and software engineers as well as CS students have access.
Still, it only costs the school a few hundred bucks a year for all of us and there's a lot more than copies of all windows xp-7 pro-extreme+ danger edition available for download.As one who hasn't had windows as a primary OS (and consequently hasn't legally owned a version) since windows 98, I was a a bit skeptical when my university dropped a license (through MSDNAA) on my lap.
It wasn't until reading this post that I was convinced (either way) that it was the RTM build, though it didn't make much difference to me as, in the worst case, they would provide the final for free when it was released.Anyways, I had to try it out in vmware, if nothing else to make use of my newfound legal copy of an operating system a few days ago and was pleasantly surprised.
As I only gave it 1GB of RAM, 1 of my not-so-blindingly-fast cores, and no graphics acceleration, I could feel it lagging a bit but *not that badly*.
It was an overall pleasant experience, though productivity was hardly a factor in this call.
Windows-only FPGA and DSP/embedded development software installed and working, I'm not sure what else I'd want to do on it.
I'm sorry to those who feel more passionately about wanting to use Windows 7 and care to use it regularly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806155</id>
	<title>Re:Already on sale in Israel...</title>
	<author>secondhand\_Buddah</author>
	<datestamp>1256044620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well it is the year 5770 in Israel.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well it is the year 5770 in Israel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well it is the year 5770 in Israel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805723</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256039640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Strikes are always to the benefit of the general public</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Strikes are always to the benefit of the general public</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Strikes are always to the benefit of the general public</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805713</id>
	<title>OEM Editions sent out in Germany last week</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256039460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Got a pre-ordered OEM edition of Windows 7 Professional in the mail on Friday in Germany. Nice surprise!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Got a pre-ordered OEM edition of Windows 7 Professional in the mail on Friday in Germany .
Nice surprise !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Got a pre-ordered OEM edition of Windows 7 Professional in the mail on Friday in Germany.
Nice surprise!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806095</id>
	<title>Re:Who'd have thought...</title>
	<author>ozmanjusri</author>
	<datestamp>1256043960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I'll be honest; I'm not sure why there's so much delay before the general release anyhow.</i>
<p>
Microsoft is carefully stage-managing the hype.
</p><p>
They are well aware that they need a win, some way to coax computer users off XP without frightening them into jumping off the Windows ship altogether. They can't take a risk by producing an innovative or interesting OS, but they still need to generate some excitement to erase all the bad feeling generated by Vista.
</p><p>
So they release a mildly facelifted version of their failed OS, rely on improved hardware to mask the worst of the sluggishness and hype it to the max.
</p><p>
Profit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll be honest ; I 'm not sure why there 's so much delay before the general release anyhow .
Microsoft is carefully stage-managing the hype .
They are well aware that they need a win , some way to coax computer users off XP without frightening them into jumping off the Windows ship altogether .
They ca n't take a risk by producing an innovative or interesting OS , but they still need to generate some excitement to erase all the bad feeling generated by Vista .
So they release a mildly facelifted version of their failed OS , rely on improved hardware to mask the worst of the sluggishness and hype it to the max .
Profit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll be honest; I'm not sure why there's so much delay before the general release anyhow.
Microsoft is carefully stage-managing the hype.
They are well aware that they need a win, some way to coax computer users off XP without frightening them into jumping off the Windows ship altogether.
They can't take a risk by producing an innovative or interesting OS, but they still need to generate some excitement to erase all the bad feeling generated by Vista.
So they release a mildly facelifted version of their failed OS, rely on improved hardware to mask the worst of the sluggishness and hype it to the max.
Profit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29813687</id>
	<title>Postal ballot?</title>
	<author>Kap'n Koflach</author>
	<datestamp>1256030340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the posties do go out on strike, lets hope they don't elect to have a postal ballot before going back to work...</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the posties do go out on strike , lets hope they do n't elect to have a postal ballot before going back to work.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the posties do go out on strike, lets hope they don't elect to have a postal ballot before going back to work...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806511</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805581</id>
	<title>Already on sale in Israel...</title>
	<author>ZP-Blight</author>
	<datestamp>1256037840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not only the U.K.,<br>Windows 7 is already on sale in Israel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only the U.K.,Windows 7 is already on sale in Israel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only the U.K.,Windows 7 is already on sale in Israel.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806361</id>
	<title>Avoiding the Wikipedia lies</title>
	<author>slack\_justyb</author>
	<datestamp>1256046120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since we know that Wikipedia lies all the time<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)  I've included the link straight to the <a href="http://www.slackware.com/faq/do\_faq.php?faq=general#0" title="slackware.com">FAQ on Slackware.</a> [slackware.com] <br> <br>
I think the next move will be to start making the release versions match up to the date it was released.  Slackware 13.10.04.  However, I'm a big supporter of Hexadecimal release numbers:  Slackware D.A.4 FTW!  However we should make it a point to avoid a 190.11.10-13 release, just too cheesy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since we know that Wikipedia lies all the time : - ) I 've included the link straight to the FAQ on Slackware .
[ slackware.com ] I think the next move will be to start making the release versions match up to the date it was released .
Slackware 13.10.04 .
However , I 'm a big supporter of Hexadecimal release numbers : Slackware D.A.4 FTW !
However we should make it a point to avoid a 190.11.10-13 release , just too cheesy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since we know that Wikipedia lies all the time :-)  I've included the link straight to the FAQ on Slackware.
[slackware.com]  
I think the next move will be to start making the release versions match up to the date it was released.
Slackware 13.10.04.
However, I'm a big supporter of Hexadecimal release numbers:  Slackware D.A.4 FTW!
However we should make it a point to avoid a 190.11.10-13 release, just too cheesy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805607</id>
	<title>Germany too</title>
	<author>DaPhil</author>
	<datestamp>1256038140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Windows 7 has been available through amazon.de for some time now, and is being delivered as well.

Nothing to see here, move along.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Windows 7 has been available through amazon.de for some time now , and is being delivered as well .
Nothing to see here , move along .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Windows 7 has been available through amazon.de for some time now, and is being delivered as well.
Nothing to see here, move along.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29812903</id>
	<title>Re:Hopefully they fixed these things from Vista:</title>
	<author>jonbryce</author>
	<datestamp>1256070120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>- When there's a number of windows, but none have focus, and one uses alt-f4, one immidiately gets a shutdown dialog. I just want to close my apps dammit!</p></div><p>That's not a bug, it's a feature.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>- When there 's a number of windows , but none have focus , and one uses alt-f4 , one immidiately gets a shutdown dialog .
I just want to close my apps dammit ! That 's not a bug , it 's a feature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>- When there's a number of windows, but none have focus, and one uses alt-f4, one immidiately gets a shutdown dialog.
I just want to close my apps dammit!That's not a bug, it's a feature.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806055</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805919</id>
	<title>Does it provide browser poll?</title>
	<author>jkrise</author>
	<datestamp>1256042160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is the most important question, more than general availability.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is the most important question , more than general availability .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is the most important question, more than general availability.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805833</id>
	<title>Re:Who cares?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256041140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Students could have it for weeks for free via MSDN AA.</p></div><p>you are talking apples and oranges here. Software from MSDN AA is clearly licensed only to support development for your education and can't be used as your main operating system (i.e. "consumer use"). What is discussed here is "consumer use".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Students could have it for weeks for free via MSDN AA.you are talking apples and oranges here .
Software from MSDN AA is clearly licensed only to support development for your education and ca n't be used as your main operating system ( i.e .
" consumer use " ) .
What is discussed here is " consumer use " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Students could have it for weeks for free via MSDN AA.you are talking apples and oranges here.
Software from MSDN AA is clearly licensed only to support development for your education and can't be used as your main operating system (i.e.
"consumer use").
What is discussed here is "consumer use".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805639</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29811011
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29807619
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29810651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29811447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806055
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29808027
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29818193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806055
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805639
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29808649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805649
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29813687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806511
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29810927
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29812021
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806055
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806155
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29807743
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29830125
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805903
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805649
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29813441
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29812903
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806055
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29807501
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29809139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805701
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805639
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805639
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805991
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29809329
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805649
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805929
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29809993
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805607
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29807221
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29814465
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805719
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29807475
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806079
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29809131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805701
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29821943
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806055
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29818239
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806055
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806361
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805649
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_2332251_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29815167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2332251.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806593
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2332251.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805973
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2332251.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805639
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805833
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805709
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806135
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2332251.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805583
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2332251.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806685
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2332251.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806511
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29813687
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2332251.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805651
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2332251.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806801
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2332251.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805581
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806155
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29807501
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805607
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29809993
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29809329
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2332251.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806107
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2332251.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806447
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2332251.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805701
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29809139
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29809131
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2332251.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806361
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29808649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805951
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805903
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2332251.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805993
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2332251.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805785
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29813441
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2332251.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805751
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806033
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805929
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2332251.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805569
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29810651
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805597
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29810927
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805767
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806077
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806079
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29807475
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29807221
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29807743
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29830125
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29808027
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29811011
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806095
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29807619
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805723
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805605
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805937
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29815167
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806567
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805817
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805831
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806145
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806255
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806961
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805991
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805997
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2332251.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29805719
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29814465
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_2332251.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806055
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29818193
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29812903
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29818239
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29806771
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29821943
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29812021
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_2332251.29811447
</commentlist>
</conversation>
