<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_19_1938223</id>
	<title>Demo of EU's Planned "INDECT" Hints At Massive Data Mining, Little Privacy</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1255980780000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Ronald Dumsfeld writes <i>"Wikinews puts together some of the <a href="http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Listening\_to\_you\_at\_last:\_EU\_plans\_to\_tap\_cell\_phones">details around the EU's five-year-plan called Project INDECT</a>, and brings attention to a leaked 'sales-pitch' video: 'An unreleased promotional video for INDECT located on YouTube is shown to the right. The simplified example of the system in operation shows a file of documents with a visible INDECT-titled cover stolen from an office and exchanged in a car park. How the police are alerted to the document theft is unclear in the video; as a "threat," it would be the INDECT system's job to predict it. Throughout the video use of CCTV equipment, facial recognition, number plate reading, and aerial surveillance give friend-or-foe information with an overlaid map to authorities. The police proactively use this information to coordinate locating, pursing, and capturing the document recipient. The file of documents is retrieved, and the recipient roughly detained.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ronald Dumsfeld writes " Wikinews puts together some of the details around the EU 's five-year-plan called Project INDECT , and brings attention to a leaked 'sales-pitch ' video : 'An unreleased promotional video for INDECT located on YouTube is shown to the right .
The simplified example of the system in operation shows a file of documents with a visible INDECT-titled cover stolen from an office and exchanged in a car park .
How the police are alerted to the document theft is unclear in the video ; as a " threat , " it would be the INDECT system 's job to predict it .
Throughout the video use of CCTV equipment , facial recognition , number plate reading , and aerial surveillance give friend-or-foe information with an overlaid map to authorities .
The police proactively use this information to coordinate locating , pursing , and capturing the document recipient .
The file of documents is retrieved , and the recipient roughly detained .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ronald Dumsfeld writes "Wikinews puts together some of the details around the EU's five-year-plan called Project INDECT, and brings attention to a leaked 'sales-pitch' video: 'An unreleased promotional video for INDECT located on YouTube is shown to the right.
The simplified example of the system in operation shows a file of documents with a visible INDECT-titled cover stolen from an office and exchanged in a car park.
How the police are alerted to the document theft is unclear in the video; as a "threat," it would be the INDECT system's job to predict it.
Throughout the video use of CCTV equipment, facial recognition, number plate reading, and aerial surveillance give friend-or-foe information with an overlaid map to authorities.
The police proactively use this information to coordinate locating, pursing, and capturing the document recipient.
The file of documents is retrieved, and the recipient roughly detained.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799087</id>
	<title>Warrants or probable cause?</title>
	<author>Broken scope</author>
	<datestamp>1255942800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How do warrants and probable cause work in Europe?</p><p>I mean I realize that the video is just a sales pitch. However it bothers me that they never showed someone reporting something missing. The video gave the impression of "He looks suspicious, lets mobilize the cops to pick him up".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How do warrants and probable cause work in Europe ? I mean I realize that the video is just a sales pitch .
However it bothers me that they never showed someone reporting something missing .
The video gave the impression of " He looks suspicious , lets mobilize the cops to pick him up " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do warrants and probable cause work in Europe?I mean I realize that the video is just a sales pitch.
However it bothers me that they never showed someone reporting something missing.
The video gave the impression of "He looks suspicious, lets mobilize the cops to pick him up".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798855</id>
	<title>EU's Proposed "INDENT" system even worse!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255985220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Their plan of ubiquitous surveillance of all source code would force uniform standards of indentation on all programmers.</p><p>You can keep your Eurotrash socialism, thank you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Their plan of ubiquitous surveillance of all source code would force uniform standards of indentation on all programmers.You can keep your Eurotrash socialism , thank you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their plan of ubiquitous surveillance of all source code would force uniform standards of indentation on all programmers.You can keep your Eurotrash socialism, thank you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29802029</id>
	<title>Re:Who Steals Paper Documents These Days?</title>
	<author>AHuxley</author>
	<datestamp>1255956720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Depends on how they "prevent theft of data".<br>
You get out with your files?<br>
You spread them over the net<br>
Your corp or gov would go over the logs of the names of x people who prepared a doc of interest in your 4gb liberation.<br>
Templates, style, revisions might show more that antiword or catdoc can hide.<br>
Its down to one person and an electronic trail of when the doc was accessed.<br>match up with id tags, cctv ect and they have an idea.<br> Your isp records are pulled<br>
You might get depressed and be found later...<br>
Your IP could be seen in the wild and a search warrant issued.<br>
Your other 4gb flash drive might be packed full of other information for the court<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends on how they " prevent theft of data " .
You get out with your files ?
You spread them over the net Your corp or gov would go over the logs of the names of x people who prepared a doc of interest in your 4gb liberation .
Templates , style , revisions might show more that antiword or catdoc can hide .
Its down to one person and an electronic trail of when the doc was accessed.match up with id tags , cctv ect and they have an idea .
Your isp records are pulled You might get depressed and be found later.. . Your IP could be seen in the wild and a search warrant issued .
Your other 4gb flash drive might be packed full of other information for the court ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends on how they "prevent theft of data".
You get out with your files?
You spread them over the net
Your corp or gov would go over the logs of the names of x people who prepared a doc of interest in your 4gb liberation.
Templates, style, revisions might show more that antiword or catdoc can hide.
Its down to one person and an electronic trail of when the doc was accessed.match up with id tags, cctv ect and they have an idea.
Your isp records are pulled
You might get depressed and be found later...
Your IP could be seen in the wild and a search warrant issued.
Your other 4gb flash drive might be packed full of other information for the court ....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799421</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798881</id>
	<title>Enhance</title>
	<author>slifox</author>
	<datestamp>1255985340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whenever I see facial recognition enhancement, I think of this:
<br> <br>
<a href="http://www.phdcomics.com/comics.php?n=1156" title="phdcomics.com">http://www.phdcomics.com/comics.php?n=1156</a> [phdcomics.com]
<br> <br>
Turns out... it's theoretically impossible!
<br> <br>
Seriously, this video plays like a bad science ficition movie... they say "let us monitor everything and we'll magically know when crimes are committed," without saying exactly *how* they plan on sorting through the incredible amount of data and coming up with "crime X being committed right now" in a timely manner.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whenever I see facial recognition enhancement , I think of this : http : //www.phdcomics.com/comics.php ? n = 1156 [ phdcomics.com ] Turns out... it 's theoretically impossible !
Seriously , this video plays like a bad science ficition movie... they say " let us monitor everything and we 'll magically know when crimes are committed , " without saying exactly * how * they plan on sorting through the incredible amount of data and coming up with " crime X being committed right now " in a timely manner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whenever I see facial recognition enhancement, I think of this:
 
http://www.phdcomics.com/comics.php?n=1156 [phdcomics.com]
 
Turns out... it's theoretically impossible!
Seriously, this video plays like a bad science ficition movie... they say "let us monitor everything and we'll magically know when crimes are committed," without saying exactly *how* they plan on sorting through the incredible amount of data and coming up with "crime X being committed right now" in a timely manner.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799881</id>
	<title>Re:Enhance</title>
	<author>minio</author>
	<datestamp>1255945680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually there are techniques which allows to get relatively high resolution image from low resolution video. Google for "super resolution".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually there are techniques which allows to get relatively high resolution image from low resolution video .
Google for " super resolution " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually there are techniques which allows to get relatively high resolution image from low resolution video.
Google for "super resolution".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29800291</id>
	<title>Back to the old school</title>
	<author>petes\_PoV</author>
	<datestamp>1255947600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So this is supposed to prevent crime by scanning the internet and mobile phones and other electronic stuff.
<p>
Well, I guess in that case the baddies will have to resort to the old fashioned way of doing badness without all these high-tech toys. Just like they successfully managed to do for hundreds of years. Luckily the EU is only planning on spending 15 million euros on this - over 5 years. So it won't matter very much when they discover the money's been wasted as the criminals go back to holding face-to-face meetings, writing letters and leaving handwritten notes for each other.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So this is supposed to prevent crime by scanning the internet and mobile phones and other electronic stuff .
Well , I guess in that case the baddies will have to resort to the old fashioned way of doing badness without all these high-tech toys .
Just like they successfully managed to do for hundreds of years .
Luckily the EU is only planning on spending 15 million euros on this - over 5 years .
So it wo n't matter very much when they discover the money 's been wasted as the criminals go back to holding face-to-face meetings , writing letters and leaving handwritten notes for each other .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So this is supposed to prevent crime by scanning the internet and mobile phones and other electronic stuff.
Well, I guess in that case the baddies will have to resort to the old fashioned way of doing badness without all these high-tech toys.
Just like they successfully managed to do for hundreds of years.
Luckily the EU is only planning on spending 15 million euros on this - over 5 years.
So it won't matter very much when they discover the money's been wasted as the criminals go back to holding face-to-face meetings, writing letters and leaving handwritten notes for each other.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799395</id>
	<title>How did the police find out?</title>
	<author>bl968</author>
	<datestamp>1255943940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As any slashdot reader would already know, the document obviously had a RFID chip in it and that alerted security when it passed through exit to the building.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As any slashdot reader would already know , the document obviously had a RFID chip in it and that alerted security when it passed through exit to the building .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As any slashdot reader would already know, the document obviously had a RFID chip in it and that alerted security when it passed through exit to the building.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799123</id>
	<title>Hate to sound defeatist, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255942920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...should we really even bother trying to prevent this kind of future anymore?</p><p>Wouldn't we be better off solely trying to discuss ways to circumvent it when it does inevitably happen?</p><p>This future will be sold to people on the basis that it "will make them safer."  And who doesn't want to be safer?</p><p>Even the anti-government quasi-anarchist "teabagger" movement in the US, for all their talk of independence, readily approves draconian security procedures, if it helps them sleep better at night.</p><p>Who's going to stop this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...should we really even bother trying to prevent this kind of future anymore ? Would n't we be better off solely trying to discuss ways to circumvent it when it does inevitably happen ? This future will be sold to people on the basis that it " will make them safer .
" And who does n't want to be safer ? Even the anti-government quasi-anarchist " teabagger " movement in the US , for all their talk of independence , readily approves draconian security procedures , if it helps them sleep better at night.Who 's going to stop this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...should we really even bother trying to prevent this kind of future anymore?Wouldn't we be better off solely trying to discuss ways to circumvent it when it does inevitably happen?This future will be sold to people on the basis that it "will make them safer.
"  And who doesn't want to be safer?Even the anti-government quasi-anarchist "teabagger" movement in the US, for all their talk of independence, readily approves draconian security procedures, if it helps them sleep better at night.Who's going to stop this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799151</id>
	<title>For totalitarian government everywhere</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255943040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sure the Peoples Republic of China, North Korea, Cuba, etc, would love this program.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure the Peoples Republic of China , North Korea , Cuba , etc , would love this program .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure the Peoples Republic of China, North Korea, Cuba, etc, would love this program.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799389</id>
	<title>Re:Hate to sound defeatist, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255943880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...should we really even bother trying to prevent this kind of future anymore?</p><p>Wouldn't we be better off solely trying to discuss ways to circumvent it when it does inevitably happen?</p><p>...</p><p>Who's going to stop this?</p></div><p>We are! Slashdot is th&#233; community to do this. We have the brainpower, the knowledge, and lots of time. If we can't do this, who can?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...should we really even bother trying to prevent this kind of future anymore ? Would n't we be better off solely trying to discuss ways to circumvent it when it does inevitably happen ? ...Who 's going to stop this ? We are !
Slashdot is th   community to do this .
We have the brainpower , the knowledge , and lots of time .
If we ca n't do this , who can ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...should we really even bother trying to prevent this kind of future anymore?Wouldn't we be better off solely trying to discuss ways to circumvent it when it does inevitably happen?...Who's going to stop this?We are!
Slashdot is thé community to do this.
We have the brainpower, the knowledge, and lots of time.
If we can't do this, who can?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799123</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799051</id>
	<title>A new standard for proof...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255985880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>An unreleased promotional video for INDECT located on YouTube...</i> <p>
In a press release dated 18 October, 2009, the World Court announced that "'a video on YouTube' has replaced 'an entry in Wikipedia' as the best source of factual evidence for any legal proceeding meeting NWO standards. Film at 11."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An unreleased promotional video for INDECT located on YouTube.. . In a press release dated 18 October , 2009 , the World Court announced that " 'a video on YouTube ' has replaced 'an entry in Wikipedia ' as the best source of factual evidence for any legal proceeding meeting NWO standards .
Film at 11 .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An unreleased promotional video for INDECT located on YouTube... 
In a press release dated 18 October, 2009, the World Court announced that "'a video on YouTube' has replaced 'an entry in Wikipedia' as the best source of factual evidence for any legal proceeding meeting NWO standards.
Film at 11.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799919</id>
	<title>I think this is a great idea!</title>
	<author>The Archon V2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1255945860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This nice young politician, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master\_(Doctor\_Who)#Mister\_Saxon" title="wikipedia.org">Harold Saxon</a> [wikipedia.org], explained to me why it was so important. Said if any terrorists did something horrible, like a UN scientific adviser or a member of a secret government organization went rogue, we could track them and get them before they did something bad.<p>

Nice fellow, that Saxon. I'd vote for him. It's not like he'd use all that power for anything evil, would he?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This nice young politician , Harold Saxon [ wikipedia.org ] , explained to me why it was so important .
Said if any terrorists did something horrible , like a UN scientific adviser or a member of a secret government organization went rogue , we could track them and get them before they did something bad .
Nice fellow , that Saxon .
I 'd vote for him .
It 's not like he 'd use all that power for anything evil , would he ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This nice young politician, Harold Saxon [wikipedia.org], explained to me why it was so important.
Said if any terrorists did something horrible, like a UN scientific adviser or a member of a secret government organization went rogue, we could track them and get them before they did something bad.
Nice fellow, that Saxon.
I'd vote for him.
It's not like he'd use all that power for anything evil, would he?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29810483</id>
	<title>Re:Enhance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256061540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorting through the data is easy. Just let the program gather information for a while, then cross-reference that with a list of all citizens, remove those under 10 or over 60 and finally sort by amount of data collected per individual. The ones with very little or no information are the suspects - they're obviously trying to hide something! Next they allocate their resources to spy on these people and bust them for something illegal, before triumphantly announcing that the system works.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorting through the data is easy .
Just let the program gather information for a while , then cross-reference that with a list of all citizens , remove those under 10 or over 60 and finally sort by amount of data collected per individual .
The ones with very little or no information are the suspects - they 're obviously trying to hide something !
Next they allocate their resources to spy on these people and bust them for something illegal , before triumphantly announcing that the system works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorting through the data is easy.
Just let the program gather information for a while, then cross-reference that with a list of all citizens, remove those under 10 or over 60 and finally sort by amount of data collected per individual.
The ones with very little or no information are the suspects - they're obviously trying to hide something!
Next they allocate their resources to spy on these people and bust them for something illegal, before triumphantly announcing that the system works.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29802993</id>
	<title>Re:A new standard for proof...</title>
	<author>Eightbitgnosis</author>
	<datestamp>1255963260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So you're saying I should make a Wikipedia entry linking to the youtube video?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So you 're saying I should make a Wikipedia entry linking to the youtube video ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you're saying I should make a Wikipedia entry linking to the youtube video?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799425</id>
	<title>I hope they send a swat team</title>
	<author>thewils</author>
	<datestamp>1255944060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When they find the guy who stole my bike.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When they find the guy who stole my bike .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When they find the guy who stole my bike.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29805271</id>
	<title>Re:Ministry of Everything</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1256033340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ugh... Every time I read this bullshit statement, I die a little inside. Come up with some valid, fact-based, well researched arguments or shut up. You achieve nothing by providing an easily contradicted statement ("1984 was a work of fiction. It's allegory. Nobody is going to create Thought Police or torture you with a rat in a cage. Grow up."). All that happens is the guys you are fighting against get an easy target for their spin.<br> <br>Hush now, the adults are talking.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ugh... Every time I read this bullshit statement , I die a little inside .
Come up with some valid , fact-based , well researched arguments or shut up .
You achieve nothing by providing an easily contradicted statement ( " 1984 was a work of fiction .
It 's allegory .
Nobody is going to create Thought Police or torture you with a rat in a cage .
Grow up. " ) .
All that happens is the guys you are fighting against get an easy target for their spin .
Hush now , the adults are talking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ugh... Every time I read this bullshit statement, I die a little inside.
Come up with some valid, fact-based, well researched arguments or shut up.
You achieve nothing by providing an easily contradicted statement ("1984 was a work of fiction.
It's allegory.
Nobody is going to create Thought Police or torture you with a rat in a cage.
Grow up.").
All that happens is the guys you are fighting against get an easy target for their spin.
Hush now, the adults are talking.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798883</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29805025</id>
	<title>Re:Data poisoning</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256029860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You wanna fill the internet with crap? Wouldn't that be like bringing water to the sea ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You wan na fill the internet with crap ?
Would n't that be like bringing water to the sea ^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You wanna fill the internet with crap?
Wouldn't that be like bringing water to the sea ^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29800163</id>
	<title>Re:A new standard for proof...</title>
	<author>nefertitian</author>
	<datestamp>1255947000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and I apparently mis-read it this way...
<br> <br>
<i>An unreleased promotional video for IN <b>C</b> EST located on YouTube</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>and I apparently mis-read it this way.. . An unreleased promotional video for IN C EST located on YouTube</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and I apparently mis-read it this way...
 
An unreleased promotional video for IN C EST located on YouTube</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799163</id>
	<title>If you think that's bad???</title>
	<author>Erythros</author>
	<datestamp>1255943100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdotters should fear the upcoming SPERM program.</p><p>Surveillance<br>Program<br>Encompassing<br>Repetitive<br>Masturbation</p><p>I dread the day Big Brother puts SPERM on everyone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdotters should fear the upcoming SPERM program.SurveillanceProgramEncompassingRepetitiveMasturbationI dread the day Big Brother puts SPERM on everyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdotters should fear the upcoming SPERM program.SurveillanceProgramEncompassingRepetitiveMasturbationI dread the day Big Brother puts SPERM on everyone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29800659</id>
	<title>Try the Google method</title>
	<author>TheDarkener</author>
	<datestamp>1255949220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If this kind of technology were made available to EVERYONE, there'd probably be a lot less resistance to it. It's the fact that these politicians, corporate entities and governments think they are above other people that, at least, tick *me* off the most.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this kind of technology were made available to EVERYONE , there 'd probably be a lot less resistance to it .
It 's the fact that these politicians , corporate entities and governments think they are above other people that , at least , tick * me * off the most .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this kind of technology were made available to EVERYONE, there'd probably be a lot less resistance to it.
It's the fact that these politicians, corporate entities and governments think they are above other people that, at least, tick *me* off the most.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798953</id>
	<title>Has anybody seen Sam Lowry?</title>
	<author>abbynormal brain</author>
	<datestamp>1255985580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There you are, your own number on your very own door. And behind that door, your very own office! Welcome to the team, DZ-015.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There you are , your own number on your very own door .
And behind that door , your very own office !
Welcome to the team , DZ-015 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There you are, your own number on your very own door.
And behind that door, your very own office!
Welcome to the team, DZ-015.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29800743</id>
	<title>Re:A new standard for proof...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255949580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>An unreleased promotional video for INDECT located on YouTube...</i> </p><p>
In a press release dated 18 October, 2009, the World Court announced that "'a video on YouTube' has replaced 'an entry in Wikipedia' as the best source of factual evidence for any legal proceeding meeting NWO standards. Film at 11."</p></div><p>Eddan Katz of the EFF used the video when challenging the EU on the issue. They did not dispute it's authenticity.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>An unreleased promotional video for INDECT located on YouTube.. . In a press release dated 18 October , 2009 , the World Court announced that " 'a video on YouTube ' has replaced 'an entry in Wikipedia ' as the best source of factual evidence for any legal proceeding meeting NWO standards .
Film at 11 .
" Eddan Katz of the EFF used the video when challenging the EU on the issue .
They did not dispute it 's authenticity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> An unreleased promotional video for INDECT located on YouTube... 
In a press release dated 18 October, 2009, the World Court announced that "'a video on YouTube' has replaced 'an entry in Wikipedia' as the best source of factual evidence for any legal proceeding meeting NWO standards.
Film at 11.
"Eddan Katz of the EFF used the video when challenging the EU on the issue.
They did not dispute it's authenticity.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799733</id>
	<title>Hate to sound safe, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255945140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"This future will be sold to people on the basis that it "will make them safer." And who doesn't want to be safer?"</p><p>Safer from what? An out of control financial sector? Corporate malfeasance? Bullying at school? Why isn't anyone trying to protect me from the real dangers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" This future will be sold to people on the basis that it " will make them safer .
" And who does n't want to be safer ?
" Safer from what ?
An out of control financial sector ?
Corporate malfeasance ?
Bullying at school ?
Why is n't anyone trying to protect me from the real dangers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"This future will be sold to people on the basis that it "will make them safer.
" And who doesn't want to be safer?
"Safer from what?
An out of control financial sector?
Corporate malfeasance?
Bullying at school?
Why isn't anyone trying to protect me from the real dangers?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799123</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799223</id>
	<title>Re:Ministry of Everything</title>
	<author>Interoperable</author>
	<datestamp>1255943280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No need to be concerned, it's in the interest of public security. Remember, the police are on our side. Not giving them unrestricted access to monitor everyone continuously would only help the bad guys.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No need to be concerned , it 's in the interest of public security .
Remember , the police are on our side .
Not giving them unrestricted access to monitor everyone continuously would only help the bad guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No need to be concerned, it's in the interest of public security.
Remember, the police are on our side.
Not giving them unrestricted access to monitor everyone continuously would only help the bad guys.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798883</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799783</id>
	<title>I think INDICT is the word they are looking for</title>
	<author>cats-paw</author>
	<datestamp>1255945380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I feel so warm and fuzzy that all of these governments are so concerned about my safety..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel so warm and fuzzy that all of these governments are so concerned about my safety. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel so warm and fuzzy that all of these governments are so concerned about my safety..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29800091</id>
	<title>Re:Enhance</title>
	<author>QuantumRiff</author>
	<datestamp>1255946700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just look at the success of the video surveillance system in London for cutting down on crimes.</p><p>Oh, wait.. I meant solving crimes,</p><p>Err, I meant.. Look how many jobs it created..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just look at the success of the video surveillance system in London for cutting down on crimes.Oh , wait.. I meant solving crimes,Err , I meant.. Look how many jobs it created. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just look at the success of the video surveillance system in London for cutting down on crimes.Oh, wait.. I meant solving crimes,Err, I meant.. Look how many jobs it created..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799975</id>
	<title>Its the EU after all</title>
	<author>Gothmolly</author>
	<datestamp>1255946160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its a group of socialist countries.  What individual rights do you think you have there ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its a group of socialist countries .
What individual rights do you think you have there ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its a group of socialist countries.
What individual rights do you think you have there ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799003</id>
	<title>Re:Ministry of Everything</title>
	<author>mdm-adph</author>
	<datestamp>1255985760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, more like a prediction.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , more like a prediction .
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, more like a prediction.
:(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798883</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799595</id>
	<title>Re:Hate to sound defeatist, but...</title>
	<author>hoggoth</author>
	<datestamp>1255944660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Who's going to stop this?<br>&gt;&gt; We are! Slashdot is th&#233; community to do this. We have the brainpower, the knowledge, and lots of time. If we can't do this, who can?</p><p>No, Anonymous could stop this. Unfortunately, they only care if "they" disrupt the flow of porn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Who 's going to stop this ? &gt; &gt; We are !
Slashdot is th   community to do this .
We have the brainpower , the knowledge , and lots of time .
If we ca n't do this , who can ? No , Anonymous could stop this .
Unfortunately , they only care if " they " disrupt the flow of porn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Who's going to stop this?&gt;&gt; We are!
Slashdot is thé community to do this.
We have the brainpower, the knowledge, and lots of time.
If we can't do this, who can?No, Anonymous could stop this.
Unfortunately, they only care if "they" disrupt the flow of porn.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799389</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799315</id>
	<title>Data poisoning</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1255943580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So the solution here is to alter the statistical thresholds by injecting the database with data designed to catch random people's attentions and subject them to additional scrutiny. Maybe create a worm/bot that emulates a web browser and submits queries for words like bomb, president, allah, or whatever they're searching for. Fill their database with crap, and it'll become useless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So the solution here is to alter the statistical thresholds by injecting the database with data designed to catch random people 's attentions and subject them to additional scrutiny .
Maybe create a worm/bot that emulates a web browser and submits queries for words like bomb , president , allah , or whatever they 're searching for .
Fill their database with crap , and it 'll become useless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the solution here is to alter the statistical thresholds by injecting the database with data designed to catch random people's attentions and subject them to additional scrutiny.
Maybe create a worm/bot that emulates a web browser and submits queries for words like bomb, president, allah, or whatever they're searching for.
Fill their database with crap, and it'll become useless.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799489</id>
	<title>Re:Enhance</title>
	<author>symes</author>
	<datestamp>1255944300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not to mention all those darn kids who'll figure out how the system works. Chat rooms would be full of "if you stand on one leg and wave a small red flag at the camera you'll trigger the bomb squad... rotfl, lmas" and so on. Anyhow - I've done a very tiny bit of work in this area - more simulations than spotting criminal intent - kind of the same thing in reverse. Our simulation, if we wanted to scale it up to a realistic scenario, would have taken 32 years to run on a regular desktop. So I'm guessing that a system like INDECT will likely run on some pretty frugal heuristics to even come close to coping with the mass of data... meaning it'll miss pretty much all but the most stereotyped crime. Now if you start putting any confidence in a system like that then I hope all those misses don't amount to much.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention all those darn kids who 'll figure out how the system works .
Chat rooms would be full of " if you stand on one leg and wave a small red flag at the camera you 'll trigger the bomb squad... rotfl , lmas " and so on .
Anyhow - I 've done a very tiny bit of work in this area - more simulations than spotting criminal intent - kind of the same thing in reverse .
Our simulation , if we wanted to scale it up to a realistic scenario , would have taken 32 years to run on a regular desktop .
So I 'm guessing that a system like INDECT will likely run on some pretty frugal heuristics to even come close to coping with the mass of data... meaning it 'll miss pretty much all but the most stereotyped crime .
Now if you start putting any confidence in a system like that then I hope all those misses do n't amount to much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention all those darn kids who'll figure out how the system works.
Chat rooms would be full of "if you stand on one leg and wave a small red flag at the camera you'll trigger the bomb squad... rotfl, lmas" and so on.
Anyhow - I've done a very tiny bit of work in this area - more simulations than spotting criminal intent - kind of the same thing in reverse.
Our simulation, if we wanted to scale it up to a realistic scenario, would have taken 32 years to run on a regular desktop.
So I'm guessing that a system like INDECT will likely run on some pretty frugal heuristics to even come close to coping with the mass of data... meaning it'll miss pretty much all but the most stereotyped crime.
Now if you start putting any confidence in a system like that then I hope all those misses don't amount to much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29804051</id>
	<title>Re:Ministry of Everything</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255972500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No need to be concerned, it's in the interest of public security. Remember, the police are on our side. Not giving them unrestricted access to monitor everyone continuously would only help the bad guys.</p></div><p>you did read 1984 before replying to this didn't you?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No need to be concerned , it 's in the interest of public security .
Remember , the police are on our side .
Not giving them unrestricted access to monitor everyone continuously would only help the bad guys.you did read 1984 before replying to this did n't you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No need to be concerned, it's in the interest of public security.
Remember, the police are on our side.
Not giving them unrestricted access to monitor everyone continuously would only help the bad guys.you did read 1984 before replying to this didn't you?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799223</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29801631</id>
	<title>The more technology, the fewer people needed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255954380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The more technology, the fewer people needed to help run the place.</p><p>When the few can control the many, you can kiss goodbye to democracy. Welcome these 'advances' at your peril.</p><p>It is happening now. Big business has been eyeing China for a few years now, and business without that pesky democratic nonsense is looking increasingly attractive to many of them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The more technology , the fewer people needed to help run the place.When the few can control the many , you can kiss goodbye to democracy .
Welcome these 'advances ' at your peril.It is happening now .
Big business has been eyeing China for a few years now , and business without that pesky democratic nonsense is looking increasingly attractive to many of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The more technology, the fewer people needed to help run the place.When the few can control the many, you can kiss goodbye to democracy.
Welcome these 'advances' at your peril.It is happening now.
Big business has been eyeing China for a few years now, and business without that pesky democratic nonsense is looking increasingly attractive to many of them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29801473</id>
	<title>Re:Ministry of Everything</title>
	<author>Fulcrum of Evil</author>
	<datestamp>1255953420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>indeed</htmltext>
<tokenext>indeed</tokentext>
<sentencetext>indeed</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799003</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799705</id>
	<title>Sounds like a senseless collission of...</title>
	<author>uuddlrlrab</author>
	<datestamp>1255945020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>...security-technophilia, paranoia, directionless data aggregation, and nanny-state politics. Look, I'm all for security, and I hate terrorists, but you can't just throw millions of cameras at the problem, accrue massive amounts of civilian info without having a reason why, a vague and vaporous set of goals, and, to top it off, let a <i>computer</i> define what is or is not a "threat" instead of giving it solid guidelines and clear directives on what to search for. Yeah, that won't cause <b>any</b> problems. I'm honestly glad Orwell didn't have to live to see his dystopic literary nightmare-world start to take shape, only with the procedural policies on the level of the Underpants Gnomes.<p><div class="quote"><ul>
<li>1. <i> Install tons of cameras to monitor EVERYONE</i> </li><li>2. <i>Aggregate colossal amounts of data from email &amp; internet traffic, mobile phone services, etc, in violation of our citizens' rights</i> </li><li>3. <i>Let a computer do the deciding on what poses an actual danger</i> </li><li>4. <i>Fail to set any guidelines on what your agency is supposed to be doing, not to mention no limitations being set for said org to prevent abuse of power</i> </li><li>5. ???</li><li>6. <i>Profit!</i> </li></ul></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...security-technophilia , paranoia , directionless data aggregation , and nanny-state politics .
Look , I 'm all for security , and I hate terrorists , but you ca n't just throw millions of cameras at the problem , accrue massive amounts of civilian info without having a reason why , a vague and vaporous set of goals , and , to top it off , let a computer define what is or is not a " threat " instead of giving it solid guidelines and clear directives on what to search for .
Yeah , that wo n't cause any problems .
I 'm honestly glad Orwell did n't have to live to see his dystopic literary nightmare-world start to take shape , only with the procedural policies on the level of the Underpants Gnomes .
1. Install tons of cameras to monitor EVERYONE 2 .
Aggregate colossal amounts of data from email &amp; internet traffic , mobile phone services , etc , in violation of our citizens ' rights 3 .
Let a computer do the deciding on what poses an actual danger 4 .
Fail to set any guidelines on what your agency is supposed to be doing , not to mention no limitations being set for said org to prevent abuse of power 5 .
? ? ? 6. Profit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...security-technophilia, paranoia, directionless data aggregation, and nanny-state politics.
Look, I'm all for security, and I hate terrorists, but you can't just throw millions of cameras at the problem, accrue massive amounts of civilian info without having a reason why, a vague and vaporous set of goals, and, to top it off, let a computer define what is or is not a "threat" instead of giving it solid guidelines and clear directives on what to search for.
Yeah, that won't cause any problems.
I'm honestly glad Orwell didn't have to live to see his dystopic literary nightmare-world start to take shape, only with the procedural policies on the level of the Underpants Gnomes.
1.  Install tons of cameras to monitor EVERYONE 2.
Aggregate colossal amounts of data from email &amp; internet traffic, mobile phone services, etc, in violation of our citizens' rights 3.
Let a computer do the deciding on what poses an actual danger 4.
Fail to set any guidelines on what your agency is supposed to be doing, not to mention no limitations being set for said org to prevent abuse of power 5.
???6. Profit! 
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29800077</id>
	<title>So funny...</title>
	<author>Mysticalfruit</author>
	<datestamp>1255946700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For some reason their acronym reads and sounds in my head like "Indecent".</htmltext>
<tokenext>For some reason their acronym reads and sounds in my head like " Indecent " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For some reason their acronym reads and sounds in my head like "Indecent".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799421</id>
	<title>Who Steals Paper Documents These Days?</title>
	<author>Chickan</author>
	<datestamp>1255944000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I worked a Coop with an employer that did government work and every time I'd leave I would have any printed documents I had on me looked over to make sure I wasn't stealing any information, yet my 4gb flash drive in my pocket, that could have held thousands of times more data than the weight of paper I can carry, was never searched.  Even if they saw the flash drive on my key chain I was never questioned.

And if the information in the video was so top secret it effected the security of the common person, why the hell was it sitting on top of a desk in an unlocked, empty room?

Real data theft comes from employees and flash drives if anything, not printed documents and strange visitors with long hair that are allowed to roam free in a company.  These security policies and BS technology videos just make CEO's and cops wet their pants, they don't really help solve any crimes or prevent theft of data.  They especially don't prevent theft of data that could harm the average citizen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I worked a Coop with an employer that did government work and every time I 'd leave I would have any printed documents I had on me looked over to make sure I was n't stealing any information , yet my 4gb flash drive in my pocket , that could have held thousands of times more data than the weight of paper I can carry , was never searched .
Even if they saw the flash drive on my key chain I was never questioned .
And if the information in the video was so top secret it effected the security of the common person , why the hell was it sitting on top of a desk in an unlocked , empty room ?
Real data theft comes from employees and flash drives if anything , not printed documents and strange visitors with long hair that are allowed to roam free in a company .
These security policies and BS technology videos just make CEO 's and cops wet their pants , they do n't really help solve any crimes or prevent theft of data .
They especially do n't prevent theft of data that could harm the average citizen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I worked a Coop with an employer that did government work and every time I'd leave I would have any printed documents I had on me looked over to make sure I wasn't stealing any information, yet my 4gb flash drive in my pocket, that could have held thousands of times more data than the weight of paper I can carry, was never searched.
Even if they saw the flash drive on my key chain I was never questioned.
And if the information in the video was so top secret it effected the security of the common person, why the hell was it sitting on top of a desk in an unlocked, empty room?
Real data theft comes from employees and flash drives if anything, not printed documents and strange visitors with long hair that are allowed to roam free in a company.
These security policies and BS technology videos just make CEO's and cops wet their pants, they don't really help solve any crimes or prevent theft of data.
They especially don't prevent theft of data that could harm the average citizen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798913</id>
	<title>Safe Harbour.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255985460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"A report accidentally published on the Internet provides insight into a secretive European Union surveillance project designed to monitor its citizens, as reported by Wikileaks earlier this month. Project INDECT aims to mine data from television, internet traffic, cellphone conversations, p2p file sharing and a range of other sources for crime prevention and threat prediction. The &euro;14.68 million project began in January, 2009, and is scheduled to continue for five years under its current mandate."</p><p>Decisions, decisions. Stay in the US or move to Europe. At least they have good social benefits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" A report accidentally published on the Internet provides insight into a secretive European Union surveillance project designed to monitor its citizens , as reported by Wikileaks earlier this month .
Project INDECT aims to mine data from television , internet traffic , cellphone conversations , p2p file sharing and a range of other sources for crime prevention and threat prediction .
The    14.68 million project began in January , 2009 , and is scheduled to continue for five years under its current mandate .
" Decisions , decisions .
Stay in the US or move to Europe .
At least they have good social benefits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"A report accidentally published on the Internet provides insight into a secretive European Union surveillance project designed to monitor its citizens, as reported by Wikileaks earlier this month.
Project INDECT aims to mine data from television, internet traffic, cellphone conversations, p2p file sharing and a range of other sources for crime prevention and threat prediction.
The €14.68 million project began in January, 2009, and is scheduled to continue for five years under its current mandate.
"Decisions, decisions.
Stay in the US or move to Europe.
At least they have good social benefits.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29801019</id>
	<title>Re:Who the hell are they trying to catch?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255951080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh look, the idiots run in packs...</p><p><div class="quote"><p> Absolut187:  WTF is this??<br>We know that Osama Bin Laden is in Pakistan, yet we don't have him 8 years later.</p></div><p>Hello? Hello? Anybody home? Huh? Think, McFly.  Think!</p><p>Title says <b>EU</b> not US.  <b>EU not looking for Bin Laden.</b>  EU looking for ungood citizens committing thoughtcrime.  EU looking for ungood citizens not love Big Brother.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>petes\_PoV:  Two possibilities:</p><p>Osama isn't in Pakistan (or Afghanistan) at all - he's disappeared, or died, or retired to Florida to drink pina-coladas all day, or -</p><p>The security forces don't actually <b>WANT</b> to find him<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>Third possibility:  Osama in tribal areas of Pakistan surrounded by people.  People who consider Osama their guest.  People who support him and keep him safe.  People who are clannish and extremely untrusting of outsiders and those not of their tribe.</p><p>Outsiders going in to find Osama not easy.  Not like going to downtown Anybigcity, Normalworld; looking up Osama Bin Laden in white pages, driving over to arrest him.  No.  Not like that.  Not like that at all.  Instead think Deliverance, but with little, brown murderous, raping hillbillies instead of tall, white, murderous, raping hillbillies.  That's where Osama is.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh look , the idiots run in packs... Absolut187 : WTF is this ?
? We know that Osama Bin Laden is in Pakistan , yet we do n't have him 8 years later.Hello ?
Hello ? Anybody home ?
Huh ? Think , McFly .
Think ! Title says EU not US .
EU not looking for Bin Laden .
EU looking for ungood citizens committing thoughtcrime .
EU looking for ungood citizens not love Big Brother.petes \ _PoV : Two possibilities : Osama is n't in Pakistan ( or Afghanistan ) at all - he 's disappeared , or died , or retired to Florida to drink pina-coladas all day , or -The security forces do n't actually WANT to find him ...Third possibility : Osama in tribal areas of Pakistan surrounded by people .
People who consider Osama their guest .
People who support him and keep him safe .
People who are clannish and extremely untrusting of outsiders and those not of their tribe.Outsiders going in to find Osama not easy .
Not like going to downtown Anybigcity , Normalworld ; looking up Osama Bin Laden in white pages , driving over to arrest him .
No. Not like that .
Not like that at all .
Instead think Deliverance , but with little , brown murderous , raping hillbillies instead of tall , white , murderous , raping hillbillies .
That 's where Osama is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh look, the idiots run in packs... Absolut187:  WTF is this?
?We know that Osama Bin Laden is in Pakistan, yet we don't have him 8 years later.Hello?
Hello? Anybody home?
Huh? Think, McFly.
Think!Title says EU not US.
EU not looking for Bin Laden.
EU looking for ungood citizens committing thoughtcrime.
EU looking for ungood citizens not love Big Brother.petes\_PoV:  Two possibilities:Osama isn't in Pakistan (or Afghanistan) at all - he's disappeared, or died, or retired to Florida to drink pina-coladas all day, or -The security forces don't actually WANT to find him ...Third possibility:  Osama in tribal areas of Pakistan surrounded by people.
People who consider Osama their guest.
People who support him and keep him safe.
People who are clannish and extremely untrusting of outsiders and those not of their tribe.Outsiders going in to find Osama not easy.
Not like going to downtown Anybigcity, Normalworld; looking up Osama Bin Laden in white pages, driving over to arrest him.
No.  Not like that.
Not like that at all.
Instead think Deliverance, but with little, brown murderous, raping hillbillies instead of tall, white, murderous, raping hillbillies.
That's where Osama is.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799287</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799287</id>
	<title>Who the hell are they trying to catch?</title>
	<author>Absolut187</author>
	<datestamp>1255943520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF is this??<br>We know that Osama Bin Laden is in Pakistan, yet we don't have him 8 years later.</p><p>Is this system going to track down terrorist training camps somehow??</p><p>I guess the next best thing to actually fighting terrorism (hard, scary) is to stomp on the privacy rights of passive citizens (easy, safe).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF is this ?
? We know that Osama Bin Laden is in Pakistan , yet we do n't have him 8 years later.Is this system going to track down terrorist training camps somehow ?
? I guess the next best thing to actually fighting terrorism ( hard , scary ) is to stomp on the privacy rights of passive citizens ( easy , safe ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF is this?
?We know that Osama Bin Laden is in Pakistan, yet we don't have him 8 years later.Is this system going to track down terrorist training camps somehow?
?I guess the next best thing to actually fighting terrorism (hard, scary) is to stomp on the privacy rights of passive citizens (easy, safe).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799313</id>
	<title>Re:For totalitarian government everywhere</title>
	<author>sopssa</author>
	<datestamp>1255943580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And maybe UK too..</p><p>Oh, they are actually developing this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And maybe UK too..Oh , they are actually developing this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And maybe UK too..Oh, they are actually developing this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799151</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798809</id>
	<title>They like it rough.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255985100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The police proactively use this information to coordinate locating, pursing, and capturing the document recipient. The file of documents is retrieved, and the recipient roughly detained.</p></div><p>
Nice to hear they plan to roughly detain the perp after they purse him.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The police proactively use this information to coordinate locating , pursing , and capturing the document recipient .
The file of documents is retrieved , and the recipient roughly detained .
Nice to hear they plan to roughly detain the perp after they purse him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The police proactively use this information to coordinate locating, pursing, and capturing the document recipient.
The file of documents is retrieved, and the recipient roughly detained.
Nice to hear they plan to roughly detain the perp after they purse him.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799655</id>
	<title>Redundant...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255944840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The police proactively use this information to coordinate locating, pursing, and capturing the document recipient".</p><p>It seems to me that once the recipient has been pursed, capturing them is kind of redundant. Don't you already have them in a relatively small bag?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The police proactively use this information to coordinate locating , pursing , and capturing the document recipient " .It seems to me that once the recipient has been pursed , capturing them is kind of redundant .
Do n't you already have them in a relatively small bag ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The police proactively use this information to coordinate locating, pursing, and capturing the document recipient".It seems to me that once the recipient has been pursed, capturing them is kind of redundant.
Don't you already have them in a relatively small bag?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799467</id>
	<title>Re:Enhance</title>
	<author>TheSpoom</author>
	<datestamp>1255944180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FYI, MythBusters do use controls and multiple data points, at least nowadays.</p><p>Besides, it's understood that the ultimate goal of any episode of MythBusters is one or more large explosions, regardless of the outcome of the myth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FYI , MythBusters do use controls and multiple data points , at least nowadays.Besides , it 's understood that the ultimate goal of any episode of MythBusters is one or more large explosions , regardless of the outcome of the myth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FYI, MythBusters do use controls and multiple data points, at least nowadays.Besides, it's understood that the ultimate goal of any episode of MythBusters is one or more large explosions, regardless of the outcome of the myth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798881</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798833</id>
	<title>Confession: I smell my farts</title>
	<author>alfs boner</author>
	<datestamp>1255985160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>

It's true- I'll waft them up to my face, or fart on something then smell that. I've noticed a difference between smelling farts off my fingers and farting into a towel and smelling that. I prefer the towel. Sometimes, right before I take a shower, I'll wipe my ass with a towel or my underwear to smell my butt-perfume. I frequently pull the covers over my own head when I fart between the sheets. Oh, and I love the smell and frequency of my hangover farts. I love leaving my room for a few minutes and coming back to smell my still-lingering farts hanging in the air. To me its kind of like climing out of the swimming pool, getting in the hot tub for a few minutes, then going back into the pool. If I want to fart without making a lot of noise I'll reach into my pants and hold my buttcheeks apart with my fingers so the gas can leave my asshole unobstructed. it actually makes a very audible "pssssssssssssss" sound. Like if someone was in earshot but they couldn't see me, they would probably be wondering if i was farting with my fingers in my ass.

Sometimes if I'm in public I'll find "discreet" ways to indulge my fart-sniffing penchance. For example I'll try to pass gas as quietly as possible, then discreetly fan my thighs open and closed so the gas is wafted up to my face.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's true- I 'll waft them up to my face , or fart on something then smell that .
I 've noticed a difference between smelling farts off my fingers and farting into a towel and smelling that .
I prefer the towel .
Sometimes , right before I take a shower , I 'll wipe my ass with a towel or my underwear to smell my butt-perfume .
I frequently pull the covers over my own head when I fart between the sheets .
Oh , and I love the smell and frequency of my hangover farts .
I love leaving my room for a few minutes and coming back to smell my still-lingering farts hanging in the air .
To me its kind of like climing out of the swimming pool , getting in the hot tub for a few minutes , then going back into the pool .
If I want to fart without making a lot of noise I 'll reach into my pants and hold my buttcheeks apart with my fingers so the gas can leave my asshole unobstructed .
it actually makes a very audible " pssssssssssssss " sound .
Like if someone was in earshot but they could n't see me , they would probably be wondering if i was farting with my fingers in my ass .
Sometimes if I 'm in public I 'll find " discreet " ways to indulge my fart-sniffing penchance .
For example I 'll try to pass gas as quietly as possible , then discreetly fan my thighs open and closed so the gas is wafted up to my face .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>

It's true- I'll waft them up to my face, or fart on something then smell that.
I've noticed a difference between smelling farts off my fingers and farting into a towel and smelling that.
I prefer the towel.
Sometimes, right before I take a shower, I'll wipe my ass with a towel or my underwear to smell my butt-perfume.
I frequently pull the covers over my own head when I fart between the sheets.
Oh, and I love the smell and frequency of my hangover farts.
I love leaving my room for a few minutes and coming back to smell my still-lingering farts hanging in the air.
To me its kind of like climing out of the swimming pool, getting in the hot tub for a few minutes, then going back into the pool.
If I want to fart without making a lot of noise I'll reach into my pants and hold my buttcheeks apart with my fingers so the gas can leave my asshole unobstructed.
it actually makes a very audible "pssssssssssssss" sound.
Like if someone was in earshot but they couldn't see me, they would probably be wondering if i was farting with my fingers in my ass.
Sometimes if I'm in public I'll find "discreet" ways to indulge my fart-sniffing penchance.
For example I'll try to pass gas as quietly as possible, then discreetly fan my thighs open and closed so the gas is wafted up to my face.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799233</id>
	<title>Paranoid.</title>
	<author>Gudeldar</author>
	<datestamp>1255943340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not one who is usually prone to paranoid thinking but if they can do everything they claim then this is pretty scary.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not one who is usually prone to paranoid thinking but if they can do everything they claim then this is pretty scary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not one who is usually prone to paranoid thinking but if they can do everything they claim then this is pretty scary.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798883</id>
	<title>Ministry of Everything</title>
	<author>bmo</author>
	<datestamp>1255985340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guys....</p><p>The book 1984 was not meant to be a *manual*</p><p>Thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guys....The book 1984 was not meant to be a * manual * Thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guys....The book 1984 was not meant to be a *manual*Thanks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29808115</id>
	<title>YOU</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256053860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Always was you, always will be.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Always was you , always will be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Always was you, always will be.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799287</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798995</id>
	<title>Re:They like it rough.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255985700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A report accidentally published on the Internet provides insight into a secretive European Union surveillance project designed to monitor its citizens, as reported by Wikileaks earlier this month. Project INDECT aims to mine data from television, internet traffic, cellphone conversations, p2p file sharing and a range of other sources for crime prevention and threat prediction.</p></div><p>If this doesn't sound like breaking privacy, I dont know what does. And I bet it's UK that is trying to bring this into all EU countries.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A report accidentally published on the Internet provides insight into a secretive European Union surveillance project designed to monitor its citizens , as reported by Wikileaks earlier this month .
Project INDECT aims to mine data from television , internet traffic , cellphone conversations , p2p file sharing and a range of other sources for crime prevention and threat prediction.If this does n't sound like breaking privacy , I dont know what does .
And I bet it 's UK that is trying to bring this into all EU countries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A report accidentally published on the Internet provides insight into a secretive European Union surveillance project designed to monitor its citizens, as reported by Wikileaks earlier this month.
Project INDECT aims to mine data from television, internet traffic, cellphone conversations, p2p file sharing and a range of other sources for crime prevention and threat prediction.If this doesn't sound like breaking privacy, I dont know what does.
And I bet it's UK that is trying to bring this into all EU countries.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798809</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29803545</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds like a senseless collission of...</title>
	<author>Datamonstar</author>
	<datestamp>1255967520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Greetings, Citizen! THE COMPUTER has determined that you may or may not have read a manual that you may or may not have been granted Clarence to read. Please report to the nearest re-education facility at a time most inconvenient to you for mental re-assessment and conditioning. Remember to fill out enrollment form 245A sections 3, 4, and 7-9 (security clearance Orange and above, only) prior to arriving. Send it off for filing immediately or otherwise, your appearance at the facility may be interpreted as a hostile act. And don't forget, Alpha Complex is a happy place, so be happy! Happiness is mandatory!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Greetings , Citizen !
THE COMPUTER has determined that you may or may not have read a manual that you may or may not have been granted Clarence to read .
Please report to the nearest re-education facility at a time most inconvenient to you for mental re-assessment and conditioning .
Remember to fill out enrollment form 245A sections 3 , 4 , and 7-9 ( security clearance Orange and above , only ) prior to arriving .
Send it off for filing immediately or otherwise , your appearance at the facility may be interpreted as a hostile act .
And do n't forget , Alpha Complex is a happy place , so be happy !
Happiness is mandatory !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Greetings, Citizen!
THE COMPUTER has determined that you may or may not have read a manual that you may or may not have been granted Clarence to read.
Please report to the nearest re-education facility at a time most inconvenient to you for mental re-assessment and conditioning.
Remember to fill out enrollment form 245A sections 3, 4, and 7-9 (security clearance Orange and above, only) prior to arriving.
Send it off for filing immediately or otherwise, your appearance at the facility may be interpreted as a hostile act.
And don't forget, Alpha Complex is a happy place, so be happy!
Happiness is mandatory!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799705</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_1938223_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_1938223_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29801019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799287
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_1938223_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29805025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_1938223_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29810483
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_1938223_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29800091
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_1938223_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799123
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_1938223_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29800163
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_1938223_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29800743
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_1938223_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29805271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798883
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_1938223_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799489
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_1938223_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29802993
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_1938223_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799313
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799151
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_1938223_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29804051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799223
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798883
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_1938223_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798809
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_1938223_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29801473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799003
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798883
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_1938223_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29808115
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799287
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_1938223_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799467
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798881
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_1938223_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799595
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799389
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799123
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_1938223_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29802029
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799421
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_19_1938223_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29803545
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799705
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_1938223.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799123
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799389
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799595
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799733
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_1938223.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799975
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_1938223.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799287
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29808115
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29801019
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_1938223.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799919
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_1938223.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799705
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29803545
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_1938223.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799051
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29802993
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29800163
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29800743
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_1938223.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799395
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_1938223.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799467
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799489
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29810483
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29800091
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_1938223.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798809
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798995
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_1938223.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799421
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29802029
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_1938223.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798833
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_1938223.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798883
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799003
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29801473
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799223
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29804051
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29805271
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_1938223.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798913
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_1938223.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29800291
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_1938223.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29800077
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_1938223.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799151
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799313
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_1938223.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29798953
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_1938223.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799315
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29805025
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_1938223.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29799087
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_19_1938223.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_19_1938223.29800659
</commentlist>
</conversation>
