<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_18_1320259</id>
	<title>MIT Researchers Develop Autonomous Indoor Robocopter</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1255876620000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Researchers at MIT's <a href="http://groups.csail.mit.edu/rrg/">Robust Robotics Group</a> have developed a <a href="http://techtv.mit.edu/videos/4149-indoor-autonomous-helicopter">robotic helicopter capable of autonomously flying inside buildings</a> or other GPS-denied environments. It has an on-board camera and a laser scanner that maps the local environment. The video talks about search-and-rescue and civil engineering applications, but it also brings somewhat scary reminders of <em>Minority Report</em> to my head. How long till I see one of these chasing me down a dark alley? The team's website has more videos showing <a href="http://groups.csail.mit.edu/rrg/videos.html">earlier stages of the project</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Researchers at MIT 's Robust Robotics Group have developed a robotic helicopter capable of autonomously flying inside buildings or other GPS-denied environments .
It has an on-board camera and a laser scanner that maps the local environment .
The video talks about search-and-rescue and civil engineering applications , but it also brings somewhat scary reminders of Minority Report to my head .
How long till I see one of these chasing me down a dark alley ?
The team 's website has more videos showing earlier stages of the project .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Researchers at MIT's Robust Robotics Group have developed a robotic helicopter capable of autonomously flying inside buildings or other GPS-denied environments.
It has an on-board camera and a laser scanner that maps the local environment.
The video talks about search-and-rescue and civil engineering applications, but it also brings somewhat scary reminders of Minority Report to my head.
How long till I see one of these chasing me down a dark alley?
The team's website has more videos showing earlier stages of the project.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784325</id>
	<title>roomba!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255881660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Very cool! Now they can make a roomba that can clean my stairs!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Very cool !
Now they can make a roomba that can clean my stairs !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Very cool!
Now they can make a roomba that can clean my stairs!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29789673</id>
	<title>Re:Two biggest problems</title>
	<author>Laser Dan</author>
	<datestamp>1255884780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually it is electrically powered, and if it is similar to other quadrotors that size, can fly for around 20 mins carrying all it's gear.</p><p>Vehicles like this are waiting for a more dense energy source, with a longer flight time they will really start to become useful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually it is electrically powered , and if it is similar to other quadrotors that size , can fly for around 20 mins carrying all it 's gear.Vehicles like this are waiting for a more dense energy source , with a longer flight time they will really start to become useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually it is electrically powered, and if it is similar to other quadrotors that size, can fly for around 20 mins carrying all it's gear.Vehicles like this are waiting for a more dense energy source, with a longer flight time they will really start to become useful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784385</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29785379</id>
	<title>Pizza delivery</title>
	<author>Tibia1</author>
	<datestamp>1255891800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did no one else see this vital application use?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did no one else see this vital application use ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did no one else see this vital application use?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784269</id>
	<title>Dark alley</title>
	<author>TimeElf1</author>
	<datestamp>1255881120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, if we could just get the MIT team to put some blades on them we can make them into the Manhacks from Half-Life 2. Forget your baseball bat just bring a crowbar.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if we could just get the MIT team to put some blades on them we can make them into the Manhacks from Half-Life 2 .
Forget your baseball bat just bring a crowbar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if we could just get the MIT team to put some blades on them we can make them into the Manhacks from Half-Life 2.
Forget your baseball bat just bring a crowbar.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784651</id>
	<title>How long?</title>
	<author>YourExperiment</author>
	<datestamp>1255884900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How long till I see one of these chasing me down a dark alley?</p></div><p>That depends on what you were planning, citizen.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How long till I see one of these chasing me down a dark alley ? That depends on what you were planning , citizen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long till I see one of these chasing me down a dark alley?That depends on what you were planning, citizen.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784169</id>
	<title>Gentoo??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255880340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use Gentoo; how does this affect me?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use Gentoo ; how does this affect me ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use Gentoo; how does this affect me?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29796173</id>
	<title>I picture someone saying...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255975800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Use your crowbar and smash those drones, Gorden!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Use your crowbar and smash those drones , Gorden !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Use your crowbar and smash those drones, Gorden!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784533</id>
	<title>Nightmare</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1255883760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>"scary reminders of minority report"? What about scary reminder of fast rotating blades at neck altitude? People are in indoors too, and laser mapping or not, inertia and shit happens.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" scary reminders of minority report " ?
What about scary reminder of fast rotating blades at neck altitude ?
People are in indoors too , and laser mapping or not , inertia and shit happens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"scary reminders of minority report"?
What about scary reminder of fast rotating blades at neck altitude?
People are in indoors too, and laser mapping or not, inertia and shit happens.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29785263</id>
	<title>Useless</title>
	<author>bistromath007</author>
	<datestamp>1255890540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why make a robocopter if it is not also a dildocopter?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why make a robocopter if it is not also a dildocopter ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why make a robocopter if it is not also a dildocopter?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29787467</id>
	<title>Silly</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1255864080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why a helicopter when you could use a blimp type device? Million times easier and more stable. And less fragile or dangerous.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why a helicopter when you could use a blimp type device ?
Million times easier and more stable .
And less fragile or dangerous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why a helicopter when you could use a blimp type device?
Million times easier and more stable.
And less fragile or dangerous.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29789693</id>
	<title>Re:Silly</title>
	<author>Laser Dan</author>
	<datestamp>1255884960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why a helicopter when you could use a blimp type device? Million times easier and more stable. And less fragile or dangerous.</p></div><p>Any sort of wind an you're off for a little detour...</p><p>Even air conditioning can make things difficult.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why a helicopter when you could use a blimp type device ?
Million times easier and more stable .
And less fragile or dangerous.Any sort of wind an you 're off for a little detour...Even air conditioning can make things difficult .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why a helicopter when you could use a blimp type device?
Million times easier and more stable.
And less fragile or dangerous.Any sort of wind an you're off for a little detour...Even air conditioning can make things difficult.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29787467</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29785193</id>
	<title>this is goatSex</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255890000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>about bylaws as it is licensed hooby. It was all</htmltext>
<tokenext>about bylaws as it is licensed hooby .
It was all</tokentext>
<sentencetext>about bylaws as it is licensed hooby.
It was all</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784841</id>
	<title>Re:Two biggest problems</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255886820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What makes you think they used gas?  I watched the video and it looked and sounded electric to me.</p><p>It's really slow though.  It requires lots of vertical movement so the laser can scan plus it's just plain slow at moving around.  I await the day when these things can quickly move through an environment.</p><p>I really, really need to go work on one of these projects.  It seems the software developers for most robotics projects are not very skilled at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What makes you think they used gas ?
I watched the video and it looked and sounded electric to me.It 's really slow though .
It requires lots of vertical movement so the laser can scan plus it 's just plain slow at moving around .
I await the day when these things can quickly move through an environment.I really , really need to go work on one of these projects .
It seems the software developers for most robotics projects are not very skilled at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What makes you think they used gas?
I watched the video and it looked and sounded electric to me.It's really slow though.
It requires lots of vertical movement so the laser can scan plus it's just plain slow at moving around.
I await the day when these things can quickly move through an environment.I really, really need to go work on one of these projects.
It seems the software developers for most robotics projects are not very skilled at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784385</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29788841</id>
	<title>Re:Nightmare</title>
	<author>MrEricSir</author>
	<datestamp>1255877940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fast rotating blades at neck altitude sounds less like Minority Report than The Twilight Zone Movie to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fast rotating blades at neck altitude sounds less like Minority Report than The Twilight Zone Movie to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fast rotating blades at neck altitude sounds less like Minority Report than The Twilight Zone Movie to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784533</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784779</id>
	<title>sh1t!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255886160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">survival prospects area. It is the Worthwhile. So I www.anti-sla5h.org fucking confirmed: series of debates</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>survival prospects area .
It is the Worthwhile .
So I www.anti-sla5h.org fucking confirmed : series of debates [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>survival prospects area.
It is the Worthwhile.
So I www.anti-sla5h.org fucking confirmed: series of debates [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784981</id>
	<title>anyone remember defense play?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255888200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Forgot about Minority Report. Does anyone remember Defense Play?</p><p>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094981/</p><p>How many other cheesy 80's movies have come to pass? When's my Johnny 5 come alive?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Forgot about Minority Report .
Does anyone remember Defense Play ? http : //www.imdb.com/title/tt0094981/How many other cheesy 80 's movies have come to pass ?
When 's my Johnny 5 come alive ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forgot about Minority Report.
Does anyone remember Defense Play?http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094981/How many other cheesy 80's movies have come to pass?
When's my Johnny 5 come alive?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784535</id>
	<title>Oh god D:</title>
	<author>shish</author>
	<datestamp>1255883760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am imagining a future where parts are very cheap, and then someone crosses these with <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2008/05/grandmaster-fla/" title="wired.com">these</a> [wired.com] D:</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am imagining a future where parts are very cheap , and then someone crosses these with these [ wired.com ] D :</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am imagining a future where parts are very cheap, and then someone crosses these with these [wired.com] D:</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29785833</id>
	<title>Put this in a movie</title>
	<author>Dachannien</author>
	<datestamp>1255895460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the past 20 years or so, anytime you needed a robocopter chasing someone down a dark alley, computer graphics was the answer.  But how cool would it be to do this as a practical effect with no wires involved?  Of course, people are so used to CG effects that they'd probably think the real thing looked fake.</p><p>P.S. Michael Bay can shove this robocopter up his ass.  And I seriously hope he does.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the past 20 years or so , anytime you needed a robocopter chasing someone down a dark alley , computer graphics was the answer .
But how cool would it be to do this as a practical effect with no wires involved ?
Of course , people are so used to CG effects that they 'd probably think the real thing looked fake.P.S .
Michael Bay can shove this robocopter up his ass .
And I seriously hope he does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the past 20 years or so, anytime you needed a robocopter chasing someone down a dark alley, computer graphics was the answer.
But how cool would it be to do this as a practical effect with no wires involved?
Of course, people are so used to CG effects that they'd probably think the real thing looked fake.P.S.
Michael Bay can shove this robocopter up his ass.
And I seriously hope he does.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784157</id>
	<title>Citizen</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255880280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Article just has some videos, but <a href="http://hl2.gamona.de/images/screenshots/scanner1.jpg" title="gamona.de">here's</a> [gamona.de] a few <a href="http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/half-life/en/images/4/4a/Scanner\_light2.jpg" title="nocookie.net">pictures</a> [nocookie.net] of <a href="http://ui21.gamespot.com/84/halflife\_2.jpg" title="gamespot.com">it</a> [gamespot.com].</p><p>And I suggest a good behaviour when they fly in - otherwise <a href="http://www.visualwalkthroughs.com/halflife2/anticitizenone1/43.jpg" title="visualwalkthroughs.com">these machines will come in</a> [visualwalkthroughs.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Article just has some videos , but here 's [ gamona.de ] a few pictures [ nocookie.net ] of it [ gamespot.com ] .And I suggest a good behaviour when they fly in - otherwise these machines will come in [ visualwalkthroughs.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Article just has some videos, but here's [gamona.de] a few pictures [nocookie.net] of it [gamespot.com].And I suggest a good behaviour when they fly in - otherwise these machines will come in [visualwalkthroughs.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29785153</id>
	<title>Available now for only $24.95. Really.</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1255889760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
That's almost as good as the <a href="http://www.wowwee.com/en/products/toys/flight/flytech/bladestar" title="wowwee.com">Bladestar</a> [wowwee.com], available now for only <a href="http://www.amazon.com/WowWee-FlyTech-Bladestar-Indoor-Aircraft/dp/B001T6Z8YM" title="amazon.com">$24.95</a> [amazon.com]  Yes, an indoor helicopter with radio control and collision avoidance for $24.95. WowWee manages to produce incredible capabilities at very low price points.
</p><p>
The MIT thing is neat, but it's mostly possible because IMU units and laser scanners are finally small enough for this.
</p><p>
The time-of-flight laser scanner thing has been frustrating.  That's what you want in a robot; they're just too expensive for volume or hobbyist use. 3D LIDAR scanners have been around since the 1980s. For a long time, the SICK LMS devices, which worked well but were both bulky and expensive, ($9000), dominated the field.   The DARPA Grand Challenge resulted in the Velodyne scanner, which was 3D (the SICK units are line scanners), but that cost $50,000 - $100,000.
</p><p>
There's no fundamental reason why the things should cost that much, except that they are produced in small volumes.
Back in 2004, I dragged a venture capitalist down to Advanced Scientific Concepts, which has a $100,000 flash laser rangefinder with a custom imaging chip.  That thing should cost under $1000 in quantity, and eventually it should cost like a webcam.  But ASC was selling only to the military, and they weren't thinking in terms of a volume product.  It was too early, though; no volume market was on the horizon.
</p><p>
When robots at the Roomba level get laser rangefinding and a decent IMU, they'll be able to navigate without getting lost or stuck.  An automatic vacuum with enough smarts to do the job right could take over much commercial floor care.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's almost as good as the Bladestar [ wowwee.com ] , available now for only $ 24.95 [ amazon.com ] Yes , an indoor helicopter with radio control and collision avoidance for $ 24.95 .
WowWee manages to produce incredible capabilities at very low price points .
The MIT thing is neat , but it 's mostly possible because IMU units and laser scanners are finally small enough for this .
The time-of-flight laser scanner thing has been frustrating .
That 's what you want in a robot ; they 're just too expensive for volume or hobbyist use .
3D LIDAR scanners have been around since the 1980s .
For a long time , the SICK LMS devices , which worked well but were both bulky and expensive , ( $ 9000 ) , dominated the field .
The DARPA Grand Challenge resulted in the Velodyne scanner , which was 3D ( the SICK units are line scanners ) , but that cost $ 50,000 - $ 100,000 .
There 's no fundamental reason why the things should cost that much , except that they are produced in small volumes .
Back in 2004 , I dragged a venture capitalist down to Advanced Scientific Concepts , which has a $ 100,000 flash laser rangefinder with a custom imaging chip .
That thing should cost under $ 1000 in quantity , and eventually it should cost like a webcam .
But ASC was selling only to the military , and they were n't thinking in terms of a volume product .
It was too early , though ; no volume market was on the horizon .
When robots at the Roomba level get laser rangefinding and a decent IMU , they 'll be able to navigate without getting lost or stuck .
An automatic vacuum with enough smarts to do the job right could take over much commercial floor care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
That's almost as good as the Bladestar [wowwee.com], available now for only $24.95 [amazon.com]  Yes, an indoor helicopter with radio control and collision avoidance for $24.95.
WowWee manages to produce incredible capabilities at very low price points.
The MIT thing is neat, but it's mostly possible because IMU units and laser scanners are finally small enough for this.
The time-of-flight laser scanner thing has been frustrating.
That's what you want in a robot; they're just too expensive for volume or hobbyist use.
3D LIDAR scanners have been around since the 1980s.
For a long time, the SICK LMS devices, which worked well but were both bulky and expensive, ($9000), dominated the field.
The DARPA Grand Challenge resulted in the Velodyne scanner, which was 3D (the SICK units are line scanners), but that cost $50,000 - $100,000.
There's no fundamental reason why the things should cost that much, except that they are produced in small volumes.
Back in 2004, I dragged a venture capitalist down to Advanced Scientific Concepts, which has a $100,000 flash laser rangefinder with a custom imaging chip.
That thing should cost under $1000 in quantity, and eventually it should cost like a webcam.
But ASC was selling only to the military, and they weren't thinking in terms of a volume product.
It was too early, though; no volume market was on the horizon.
When robots at the Roomba level get laser rangefinding and a decent IMU, they'll be able to navigate without getting lost or stuck.
An automatic vacuum with enough smarts to do the job right could take over much commercial floor care.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784577</id>
	<title>How till you see one of these chasing you?</title>
	<author>pedantic bore</author>
	<datestamp>1255884120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
Well, since they are <i>awfully</i> quiet.... <p>

I wouldn't turn around right now, if I were you... </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , since they are awfully quiet... . I would n't turn around right now , if I were you.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Well, since they are awfully quiet.... 

I wouldn't turn around right now, if I were you... </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29795791</id>
	<title>Re:Seems mostly like a vision solution</title>
	<author>CompMD</author>
	<datestamp>1255974000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like the AC who also responded, I've done a lot of work with UAVs.  I did some work on the Yamaha R-MAX.  It can takeoff and land fully autonomously.  Northrop also has the MQ-8B Fire Scout which is capable of fully autonomous flight.  Then you have the Boeing Little Bird, the unmanned demonstrator for that was a full size conventional helicopter...and on and on...this isn't new.  You can build a fully autonomous Raptor 50 helicopter for less than $10,000.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like the AC who also responded , I 've done a lot of work with UAVs .
I did some work on the Yamaha R-MAX .
It can takeoff and land fully autonomously .
Northrop also has the MQ-8B Fire Scout which is capable of fully autonomous flight .
Then you have the Boeing Little Bird , the unmanned demonstrator for that was a full size conventional helicopter...and on and on...this is n't new .
You can build a fully autonomous Raptor 50 helicopter for less than $ 10,000 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like the AC who also responded, I've done a lot of work with UAVs.
I did some work on the Yamaha R-MAX.
It can takeoff and land fully autonomously.
Northrop also has the MQ-8B Fire Scout which is capable of fully autonomous flight.
Then you have the Boeing Little Bird, the unmanned demonstrator for that was a full size conventional helicopter...and on and on...this isn't new.
You can build a fully autonomous Raptor 50 helicopter for less than $10,000.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29785015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29804257</id>
	<title>Re:Nightmare</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255975260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm more afraid of the flying sharks.<br>If they have laser mapping, then those lasers are gonna have to be attached to something!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm more afraid of the flying sharks.If they have laser mapping , then those lasers are gon na have to be attached to something !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm more afraid of the flying sharks.If they have laser mapping, then those lasers are gonna have to be attached to something!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784533</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784187</id>
	<title>Not chasing me down a dark alley</title>
	<author>GrahamCox</author>
	<datestamp>1255880460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Baseball Bat 1, Helicopter 0.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Baseball Bat 1 , Helicopter 0 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Baseball Bat 1, Helicopter 0.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784349</id>
	<title>I'd give it a year</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255881780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>before they strap a Google camera to the things and start taking pictures of every corner of every building that doesn't have:</p><p>User-agent: *<br>
Disallow:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/</p><p> in it's robot.txt file.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>before they strap a Google camera to the things and start taking pictures of every corner of every building that does n't have : User-agent : * Disallow : / in it 's robot.txt file .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>before they strap a Google camera to the things and start taking pictures of every corner of every building that doesn't have:User-agent: *
Disallow: / in it's robot.txt file.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784385</id>
	<title>Two biggest problems</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255882140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Noise and power source are massive problems that aren't likely to go away. The real problem with all non airfoil type hovering vehicles is always going to be a power source dense enough. There are actually a number of ways to propel them if energy wasn't an issue. The robotics are impressive but it'll always be a boat in the basement until these issues are addressed. They used gas as fuel obviously for this test but you have the noise factor. Electric would be quieter but then you have battery weight. Even with Moeller's Skycar I think his 400 mile estimates are very unrealistic. Vertical take offs are always going to take a lot of power as does hovering. Cool stuff but I'll be far more impressed when some one can keep a device this size flying for 6 or 8 hours. 5 minutes with electric and 15 minutes on gas is probably the norm right now so there's a long way to go before we have to worry about Minority Report.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Noise and power source are massive problems that are n't likely to go away .
The real problem with all non airfoil type hovering vehicles is always going to be a power source dense enough .
There are actually a number of ways to propel them if energy was n't an issue .
The robotics are impressive but it 'll always be a boat in the basement until these issues are addressed .
They used gas as fuel obviously for this test but you have the noise factor .
Electric would be quieter but then you have battery weight .
Even with Moeller 's Skycar I think his 400 mile estimates are very unrealistic .
Vertical take offs are always going to take a lot of power as does hovering .
Cool stuff but I 'll be far more impressed when some one can keep a device this size flying for 6 or 8 hours .
5 minutes with electric and 15 minutes on gas is probably the norm right now so there 's a long way to go before we have to worry about Minority Report .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Noise and power source are massive problems that aren't likely to go away.
The real problem with all non airfoil type hovering vehicles is always going to be a power source dense enough.
There are actually a number of ways to propel them if energy wasn't an issue.
The robotics are impressive but it'll always be a boat in the basement until these issues are addressed.
They used gas as fuel obviously for this test but you have the noise factor.
Electric would be quieter but then you have battery weight.
Even with Moeller's Skycar I think his 400 mile estimates are very unrealistic.
Vertical take offs are always going to take a lot of power as does hovering.
Cool stuff but I'll be far more impressed when some one can keep a device this size flying for 6 or 8 hours.
5 minutes with electric and 15 minutes on gas is probably the norm right now so there's a long way to go before we have to worry about Minority Report.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784309</id>
	<title>Tennis racket</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1255881480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; How long till I see one of these chasing me down a dark alley?</p><p>Carry a tennis racket.  Or just throw a rock.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; How long till I see one of these chasing me down a dark alley ? Carry a tennis racket .
Or just throw a rock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; How long till I see one of these chasing me down a dark alley?Carry a tennis racket.
Or just throw a rock.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784249</id>
	<title>Helicopter with laser beams.</title>
	<author>NoYob</author>
	<datestamp>1255881000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's nice and everything but, if the guys at MIT are so frickin smart, why can't they put lasers on the frickin sharks!<p>Now, adding GPS to the sharks IS a great idea, though!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's nice and everything but , if the guys at MIT are so frickin smart , why ca n't they put lasers on the frickin sharks ! Now , adding GPS to the sharks IS a great idea , though !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's nice and everything but, if the guys at MIT are so frickin smart, why can't they put lasers on the frickin sharks!Now, adding GPS to the sharks IS a great idea, though!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29785141</id>
	<title>Re:Not chasing me down a dark alley</title>
	<author>AliasMarlowe</author>
	<datestamp>1255889640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Baseball Bat 1, Helicopter 0.</p></div><p>Chucking some sand at it would probably work better; nothing like sand in the air intake to choke an engine. Also carrying a small bag of sand in your pocket is less conspicuous than carrying a baseball bat all day. While it might work at more than baseball bat range, it would still be limited to a couple of meters.
<br> <br>
A longer range method would be using one of those nice green laser pointers to saturate its visual detectors so it crashes into a wall. The higher powered green lasers from <a href="http://www.wickedlasers.com/" title="wickedlasers.com">http://www.wickedlasers.com/</a> [wickedlasers.com] might even do permanent damage to the detectors. Hell, everyone can carry a laser pointer and claim it's for their job. I carry a green one<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Baseball Bat 1 , Helicopter 0.Chucking some sand at it would probably work better ; nothing like sand in the air intake to choke an engine .
Also carrying a small bag of sand in your pocket is less conspicuous than carrying a baseball bat all day .
While it might work at more than baseball bat range , it would still be limited to a couple of meters .
A longer range method would be using one of those nice green laser pointers to saturate its visual detectors so it crashes into a wall .
The higher powered green lasers from http : //www.wickedlasers.com/ [ wickedlasers.com ] might even do permanent damage to the detectors .
Hell , everyone can carry a laser pointer and claim it 's for their job .
I carry a green one : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Baseball Bat 1, Helicopter 0.Chucking some sand at it would probably work better; nothing like sand in the air intake to choke an engine.
Also carrying a small bag of sand in your pocket is less conspicuous than carrying a baseball bat all day.
While it might work at more than baseball bat range, it would still be limited to a couple of meters.
A longer range method would be using one of those nice green laser pointers to saturate its visual detectors so it crashes into a wall.
The higher powered green lasers from http://www.wickedlasers.com/ [wickedlasers.com] might even do permanent damage to the detectors.
Hell, everyone can carry a laser pointer and claim it's for their job.
I carry a green one :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784187</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784347</id>
	<title>Re:Not chasing me down a dark alley</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255881780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How good is your bat at protecting you from a stun gun or bullets being administered by an object that is hovering ten feet away?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How good is your bat at protecting you from a stun gun or bullets being administered by an object that is hovering ten feet away ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How good is your bat at protecting you from a stun gun or bullets being administered by an object that is hovering ten feet away?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784187</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784701</id>
	<title>Re:Man-Hack Sim Mk. I</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255885320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This would be fantastic for real life infantry if it can scan and maneuver quickly enough and then relay to the soldier's (preferably) hands-free display. Anything that gives an infantryman<br>another chance at life (more or less) will always go down well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This would be fantastic for real life infantry if it can scan and maneuver quickly enough and then relay to the soldier 's ( preferably ) hands-free display .
Anything that gives an infantrymananother chance at life ( more or less ) will always go down well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would be fantastic for real life infantry if it can scan and maneuver quickly enough and then relay to the soldier's (preferably) hands-free display.
Anything that gives an infantrymananother chance at life (more or less) will always go down well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784291</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29785015</id>
	<title>Seems mostly like a vision solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255888620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is interesting, although by using a quad-rotor helicopter, they seem to have mostly solved computer vision problem rather than a control system problem</p><p>Quad rotor and coaxial helicopters are very stable and have gotten pretty popular as entry-level helicopters because they are so easy to fly. The downside is that they don't really have the efficiency characteristics to fly outdoors like collective-pitch (e.g. like real full-size) helicopters.</p><p>Since the focus of the challenge was to fly indoors, using a quad-rotor is the natural choice. I'd like to have understood better how other teams failed and what kind of helicopters they used.</p><p>Collective-pitch helicopters, on the other hand, are extremely difficult to fly. Until the Stanford Autonomous Helicopter (http://heli.stanford.edu/), I believe no autonomous control system has been able to successfully fly one, even for very simple maneuvers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is interesting , although by using a quad-rotor helicopter , they seem to have mostly solved computer vision problem rather than a control system problemQuad rotor and coaxial helicopters are very stable and have gotten pretty popular as entry-level helicopters because they are so easy to fly .
The downside is that they do n't really have the efficiency characteristics to fly outdoors like collective-pitch ( e.g .
like real full-size ) helicopters.Since the focus of the challenge was to fly indoors , using a quad-rotor is the natural choice .
I 'd like to have understood better how other teams failed and what kind of helicopters they used.Collective-pitch helicopters , on the other hand , are extremely difficult to fly .
Until the Stanford Autonomous Helicopter ( http : //heli.stanford.edu/ ) , I believe no autonomous control system has been able to successfully fly one , even for very simple maneuvers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is interesting, although by using a quad-rotor helicopter, they seem to have mostly solved computer vision problem rather than a control system problemQuad rotor and coaxial helicopters are very stable and have gotten pretty popular as entry-level helicopters because they are so easy to fly.
The downside is that they don't really have the efficiency characteristics to fly outdoors like collective-pitch (e.g.
like real full-size) helicopters.Since the focus of the challenge was to fly indoors, using a quad-rotor is the natural choice.
I'd like to have understood better how other teams failed and what kind of helicopters they used.Collective-pitch helicopters, on the other hand, are extremely difficult to fly.
Until the Stanford Autonomous Helicopter (http://heli.stanford.edu/), I believe no autonomous control system has been able to successfully fly one, even for very simple maneuvers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784257</id>
	<title>That will solve the wind issue!</title>
	<author>poofmeisterp</author>
	<datestamp>1255881000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, so that's why my brother is having trouble getting his remote outdoor helicopter to properly maintain position for over a few seconds.</p><p>If he would only do it indoors in a large structure!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...with multiple props..<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/sarcasm<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>I love the length of outdoor shots.  Looks pretty par to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , so that 's why my brother is having trouble getting his remote outdoor helicopter to properly maintain position for over a few seconds.If he would only do it indoors in a large structure !
...with multiple props.. /sarcasm ; ) I love the length of outdoor shots .
Looks pretty par to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, so that's why my brother is having trouble getting his remote outdoor helicopter to properly maintain position for over a few seconds.If he would only do it indoors in a large structure!
...with multiple props.. /sarcasm ;)I love the length of outdoor shots.
Looks pretty par to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784401</id>
	<title>Selling Chanel different style BLaze woman Shoes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255882380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Welcome TO Our Website:  Http://www.tntshoes.com</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; we are a prefession online store, you can see more photos and price in our website which is show in the photos<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; please email me by: www.shopperstrade@hotmail.com<br>lv Handbags , dior, D&amp;G channell coach etc $23-32 free shipping.the name of our website is in the photos blow is our website, hellow we are a online fasion shopping mall"</p><p>
&nbsp; OUR WEBSITE:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Http://www.tntshoes.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>            Welcome TO Our Website : Http : //www.tntshoes.com     we are a prefession online store , you can see more photos and price in our website which is show in the photos         please email me by : www.shopperstrade @ hotmail.comlv Handbags , dior , D&amp;G channell coach etc $ 23-32 free shipping.the name of our website is in the photos blow is our website , hellow we are a online fasion shopping mall "   OUR WEBSITE :                                                         YAHOO : shoppertrade @ yahoo.com.cn                                                                 MSN : shoppertrade @ hotmail.com                                                                       Http : //www.tntshoes.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
            Welcome TO Our Website:  Http://www.tntshoes.com
    we are a prefession online store, you can see more photos and price in our website which is show in the photos
        please email me by: www.shopperstrade@hotmail.comlv Handbags , dior, D&amp;G channell coach etc $23-32 free shipping.the name of our website is in the photos blow is our website, hellow we are a online fasion shopping mall"
  OUR WEBSITE:
                                                        YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn
                                                                MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com
                                                                      Http://www.tntshoes.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29786205</id>
	<title>technology rocks</title>
	<author>Deanalator</author>
	<datestamp>1255898100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"How long till I see one of these chasing me down a dark alley?"</p><p>Don't worry, I'm sure some day some brilliant underground scientist will re-discover the baseball bat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" How long till I see one of these chasing me down a dark alley ?
" Do n't worry , I 'm sure some day some brilliant underground scientist will re-discover the baseball bat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How long till I see one of these chasing me down a dark alley?
"Don't worry, I'm sure some day some brilliant underground scientist will re-discover the baseball bat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29794755</id>
	<title>I can't believe nobody has mentioned...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255969860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.mikrokopter.de/ucwiki/" title="mikrokopter.de" rel="nofollow">Mikrocopter</a> [mikrokopter.de]<br>or  <a href="http://uavp.ch/moin" title="uavp.ch" rel="nofollow">UAVP</a> [uavp.ch]</p><p>Both stuffed full of open source goodness and well within the abilities of most Slashdot tinkerers to build.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mikrocopter [ mikrokopter.de ] or UAVP [ uavp.ch ] Both stuffed full of open source goodness and well within the abilities of most Slashdot tinkerers to build .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mikrocopter [mikrokopter.de]or  UAVP [uavp.ch]Both stuffed full of open source goodness and well within the abilities of most Slashdot tinkerers to build.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29785103</id>
	<title>Would you kindly....</title>
	<author>British</author>
	<datestamp>1255889280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please tell me it uses a small wooden crate for tomatoes for an ammo box.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please tell me it uses a small wooden crate for tomatoes for an ammo box .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please tell me it uses a small wooden crate for tomatoes for an ammo box.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784291</id>
	<title>Man-Hack Sim Mk. I</title>
	<author>hodagacz</author>
	<datestamp>1255881240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All that's needed is the saw blades.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All that 's needed is the saw blades .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All that's needed is the saw blades.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_18_1320259_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_18_1320259_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29795791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29785015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_18_1320259_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29804257
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784533
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_18_1320259_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29785141
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_18_1320259_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29789693
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29787467
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_18_1320259_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784291
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_18_1320259_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784385
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_18_1320259_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29789673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784385
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_18_1320259_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29788841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784533
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_18_1320259.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784651
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_18_1320259.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29785015
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29795791
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_18_1320259.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784385
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29789673
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784841
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_18_1320259.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784187
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784347
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29785141
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_18_1320259.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784169
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_18_1320259.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784291
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784701
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_18_1320259.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784349
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_18_1320259.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784401
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_18_1320259.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29787467
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29789693
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_18_1320259.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784257
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_18_1320259.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29785833
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_18_1320259.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784269
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_18_1320259.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784533
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29788841
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29804257
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_18_1320259.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784157
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_18_1320259.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_18_1320259.29784309
</commentlist>
</conversation>
