<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_17_163216</id>
	<title>The Medical Benefits of Carbon Monoxide</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1255800360000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>tugfoigel writes with this excerpt from the Boston Globe:
<i>"For more than a century, carbon monoxide has been known as a deadly toxin. In an 1839 story, Edgar Allan Poe wrote of 'miraculous lustre of the eye' and 'nervous agitation' in what some believe are descriptions of carbon monoxide poisoning, and today, cigarette cartons warn of its health dangers. But a growing body of research, much of it by local scientists, is revealing a paradox: the gas often called a silent killer <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/10/16/poison\_gas\_may\_carry\_a\_medical\_benefit/?page=full">could also be a medical treatment</a>. It seems like a radical contradiction, but animal studies show that in small, extremely controlled doses the gas has benefits in everything from infections to organ transplantation."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>tugfoigel writes with this excerpt from the Boston Globe : " For more than a century , carbon monoxide has been known as a deadly toxin .
In an 1839 story , Edgar Allan Poe wrote of 'miraculous lustre of the eye ' and 'nervous agitation ' in what some believe are descriptions of carbon monoxide poisoning , and today , cigarette cartons warn of its health dangers .
But a growing body of research , much of it by local scientists , is revealing a paradox : the gas often called a silent killer could also be a medical treatment .
It seems like a radical contradiction , but animal studies show that in small , extremely controlled doses the gas has benefits in everything from infections to organ transplantation .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>tugfoigel writes with this excerpt from the Boston Globe:
"For more than a century, carbon monoxide has been known as a deadly toxin.
In an 1839 story, Edgar Allan Poe wrote of 'miraculous lustre of the eye' and 'nervous agitation' in what some believe are descriptions of carbon monoxide poisoning, and today, cigarette cartons warn of its health dangers.
But a growing body of research, much of it by local scientists, is revealing a paradox: the gas often called a silent killer could also be a medical treatment.
It seems like a radical contradiction, but animal studies show that in small, extremely controlled doses the gas has benefits in everything from infections to organ transplantation.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778865</id>
	<title>Rotten eggs and laughing gas</title>
	<author>DaveCDalton</author>
	<datestamp>1255806900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reminds me of the same business with Hydrogen Sulfide and Nitric Oxide...  The former being found to increase the lifespan and health of nematodes and also to prevent organ rejection and cell death after traumatic injury.  The latter was developed into non-inhaled treatments that act on the vascular system... Viagra for instance.

That's a long way from rotten eggs and laughing gas.

<a href="http://www.physorg.com/news115924695.html" title="physorg.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.physorg.com/news115924695.html</a> [physorg.com]

<a href="http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/ars.2009.2882" title="liebertonline.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/ars.2009.2882</a> [liebertonline.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of the same business with Hydrogen Sulfide and Nitric Oxide... The former being found to increase the lifespan and health of nematodes and also to prevent organ rejection and cell death after traumatic injury .
The latter was developed into non-inhaled treatments that act on the vascular system... Viagra for instance .
That 's a long way from rotten eggs and laughing gas .
http : //www.physorg.com/news115924695.html [ physorg.com ] http : //www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/ars.2009.2882 [ liebertonline.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of the same business with Hydrogen Sulfide and Nitric Oxide...  The former being found to increase the lifespan and health of nematodes and also to prevent organ rejection and cell death after traumatic injury.
The latter was developed into non-inhaled treatments that act on the vascular system... Viagra for instance.
That's a long way from rotten eggs and laughing gas.
http://www.physorg.com/news115924695.html [physorg.com]

http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/ars.2009.2882 [liebertonline.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29780633</id>
	<title>Re:Cigarettes</title>
	<author>Gerafix</author>
	<datestamp>1255780680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suppose in less civilized countries. Here in Canada it's no problem.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose in less civilized countries .
Here in Canada it 's no problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose in less civilized countries.
Here in Canada it's no problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779543</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778619</id>
	<title>Radical!</title>
	<author>Daetrin</author>
	<datestamp>1255804620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>SRSLY?? What a totally radical contradiction!</htmltext>
<tokenext>SRSLY ? ?
What a totally radical contradiction !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SRSLY??
What a totally radical contradiction!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29783623</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>CubicleView</author>
	<datestamp>1255874820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You had already surmised that carbon monoxide had beneficial uses in medicine, before reading the summary? I hope to fuck you're not a doctor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You had already surmised that carbon monoxide had beneficial uses in medicine , before reading the summary ?
I hope to fuck you 're not a doctor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You had already surmised that carbon monoxide had beneficial uses in medicine, before reading the summary?
I hope to fuck you're not a doctor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779509</id>
	<title>moderation is the key to everything</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1255770060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Water will kill you if you drink too much of it. So it's not much of a surprise that supposed bad things can be beneficial when used sensibly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Water will kill you if you drink too much of it .
So it 's not much of a surprise that supposed bad things can be beneficial when used sensibly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Water will kill you if you drink too much of it.
So it's not much of a surprise that supposed bad things can be beneficial when used sensibly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779023</id>
	<title>Small enough or a precise amount?</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1255808580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would not be the only <a href="http://xkcd.com/323/" title="xkcd.com">beneficial peak</a> [xkcd.com] around.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would not be the only beneficial peak [ xkcd.com ] around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would not be the only beneficial peak [xkcd.com] around.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29780047</id>
	<title>In the 60's it would keep the kids quiet.</title>
	<author>kurt555gs</author>
	<datestamp>1255775340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A lot of you here are to young to remember the big boat station wagons that parents would pile full of stuff and kids and head off to places like Yellowstone and the like. Many of these had rear facing seats and power rear windows.  The only problem was that if you let the window down a little, the car exhaust would be sucked into the car, especially near the rear facing seats where the kids were. Now many would think this is a problem, but parents of that day, after having to listen to the little brats giggling, and yelling would crack that rear window and let a little CO in to quiet the kids down. It worked, they went to sleep, and the only drawback was a few points off the ACT scores later in High School.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of you here are to young to remember the big boat station wagons that parents would pile full of stuff and kids and head off to places like Yellowstone and the like .
Many of these had rear facing seats and power rear windows .
The only problem was that if you let the window down a little , the car exhaust would be sucked into the car , especially near the rear facing seats where the kids were .
Now many would think this is a problem , but parents of that day , after having to listen to the little brats giggling , and yelling would crack that rear window and let a little CO in to quiet the kids down .
It worked , they went to sleep , and the only drawback was a few points off the ACT scores later in High School .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of you here are to young to remember the big boat station wagons that parents would pile full of stuff and kids and head off to places like Yellowstone and the like.
Many of these had rear facing seats and power rear windows.
The only problem was that if you let the window down a little, the car exhaust would be sucked into the car, especially near the rear facing seats where the kids were.
Now many would think this is a problem, but parents of that day, after having to listen to the little brats giggling, and yelling would crack that rear window and let a little CO in to quiet the kids down.
It worked, they went to sleep, and the only drawback was a few points off the ACT scores later in High School.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779645</id>
	<title>How is that a contradiction?</title>
	<author>nedlohs</author>
	<datestamp>1255771440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Radiation is generally bad for you, but we use it as a medical treatment.</p><p>Pick your favorite medical prescription, now eat 10 lbs of it. Oh look it's bad for you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Radiation is generally bad for you , but we use it as a medical treatment.Pick your favorite medical prescription , now eat 10 lbs of it .
Oh look it 's bad for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Radiation is generally bad for you, but we use it as a medical treatment.Pick your favorite medical prescription, now eat 10 lbs of it.
Oh look it's bad for you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779585</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255770720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>As (arsenic) is also deadly but its also an essential biological trace element. Its about moderation.</i></p><p>That may be true, but there are clearly some very dangerous chemicals like nitroglycerin that couldn't possibly have any medical uses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As ( arsenic ) is also deadly but its also an essential biological trace element .
Its about moderation.That may be true , but there are clearly some very dangerous chemicals like nitroglycerin that could n't possibly have any medical uses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As (arsenic) is also deadly but its also an essential biological trace element.
Its about moderation.That may be true, but there are clearly some very dangerous chemicals like nitroglycerin that couldn't possibly have any medical uses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779061</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255808820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Studies have found that low level exposure to ionizing radiation helps prevent cancer (that is people who work around stuff that nukes them a bit suffer from less cancer statistically). However those who breathe in radioactive materials have higher rates of cancer.</p><p>The theory is that the radiation stimulates our immune system to identify and destroy damaged cells.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Studies have found that low level exposure to ionizing radiation helps prevent cancer ( that is people who work around stuff that nukes them a bit suffer from less cancer statistically ) .
However those who breathe in radioactive materials have higher rates of cancer.The theory is that the radiation stimulates our immune system to identify and destroy damaged cells .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Studies have found that low level exposure to ionizing radiation helps prevent cancer (that is people who work around stuff that nukes them a bit suffer from less cancer statistically).
However those who breathe in radioactive materials have higher rates of cancer.The theory is that the radiation stimulates our immune system to identify and destroy damaged cells.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779599</id>
	<title>Hrmm</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1255770840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFA:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>But given the deeply entrenched fear of carbon monoxide as a toxin, he said it is unlikely that the gas would be directly given as a therapy to many people. Instead, research into the mechanism by which carbon monoxide works could allow scientists to design a drug that could act in the same way.</p></div><p>REALLY? Because CO has a scary reputation we'd rather give patients a new expensive patented drug that we think works just like CO rather than just give them a well controlled dose of a well understood, inexpensive, and easily available gas?</p><p>No wonder nobody can afford health care.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : But given the deeply entrenched fear of carbon monoxide as a toxin , he said it is unlikely that the gas would be directly given as a therapy to many people .
Instead , research into the mechanism by which carbon monoxide works could allow scientists to design a drug that could act in the same way.REALLY ?
Because CO has a scary reputation we 'd rather give patients a new expensive patented drug that we think works just like CO rather than just give them a well controlled dose of a well understood , inexpensive , and easily available gas ? No wonder nobody can afford health care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA:But given the deeply entrenched fear of carbon monoxide as a toxin, he said it is unlikely that the gas would be directly given as a therapy to many people.
Instead, research into the mechanism by which carbon monoxide works could allow scientists to design a drug that could act in the same way.REALLY?
Because CO has a scary reputation we'd rather give patients a new expensive patented drug that we think works just like CO rather than just give them a well controlled dose of a well understood, inexpensive, and easily available gas?No wonder nobody can afford health care.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779987</id>
	<title>And in related news</title>
	<author>rossdee</author>
	<datestamp>1255774920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Small quantities of DiHydrogen Monoxide are also beneficial to health.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Small quantities of DiHydrogen Monoxide are also beneficial to health .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Small quantities of DiHydrogen Monoxide are also beneficial to health.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779229</id>
	<title>Re:I've seen this story before!</title>
	<author>BikeHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1255810380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've seen something similar, too: <a href="http://www.esquire.com/features/best-and-brightest-2008/bringing-back-the-dead-1208" title="esquire.com">http://www.esquire.com/features/best-and-brightest-2008/bringing-back-the-dead-1208</a> [esquire.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen something similar , too : http : //www.esquire.com/features/best-and-brightest-2008/bringing-back-the-dead-1208 [ esquire.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen something similar, too: http://www.esquire.com/features/best-and-brightest-2008/bringing-back-the-dead-1208 [esquire.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778565</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779265</id>
	<title>CO being useful for transplants was already known</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255810740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077355/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">documentary</a> [imdb.com] explains how CO can be used to help obtain organs for transplantation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This documentary [ imdb.com ] explains how CO can be used to help obtain organs for transplantation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This documentary [imdb.com] explains how CO can be used to help obtain organs for transplantation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779733</id>
	<title>I'm convinced</title>
	<author>labnet</author>
	<datestamp>1255772520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally! I don't need to switch my A/C to recycle on the way to work.<br>Just suck in the fumes and feel health benefits baby!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally !
I do n't need to switch my A/C to recycle on the way to work.Just suck in the fumes and feel health benefits baby !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally!
I don't need to switch my A/C to recycle on the way to work.Just suck in the fumes and feel health benefits baby!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778587</id>
	<title>Digitalis, eh?</title>
	<author>CrimsonAvenger</author>
	<datestamp>1255804320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, basically, CO is a bit like digitalis, in that it's a deadly poison that has medical uses?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , basically , CO is a bit like digitalis , in that it 's a deadly poison that has medical uses ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, basically, CO is a bit like digitalis, in that it's a deadly poison that has medical uses?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29780583</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255780260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh come on!  Next thing you will be telling us that drinking a certain liquid is beneficial (necessary even) for life.  Example: you are in the desert, and start crying out "liquid, liquid" and then suddenly find yourself in an ocean, full of this liquid, and the waves of the liquid are too much for you and you die because of it.  A little is vital, too much is no good?  What kind of nonsense is that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh come on !
Next thing you will be telling us that drinking a certain liquid is beneficial ( necessary even ) for life .
Example : you are in the desert , and start crying out " liquid , liquid " and then suddenly find yourself in an ocean , full of this liquid , and the waves of the liquid are too much for you and you die because of it .
A little is vital , too much is no good ?
What kind of nonsense is that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh come on!
Next thing you will be telling us that drinking a certain liquid is beneficial (necessary even) for life.
Example: you are in the desert, and start crying out "liquid, liquid" and then suddenly find yourself in an ocean, full of this liquid, and the waves of the liquid are too much for you and you die because of it.
A little is vital, too much is no good?
What kind of nonsense is that?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29781683</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255796160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because multicellular organisms like homo sapiens can survive a poison that virii or bacteria cannot.  Hasn't that been the basis of a great deal of medicine for over a century now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because multicellular organisms like homo sapiens can survive a poison that virii or bacteria can not .
Has n't that been the basis of a great deal of medicine for over a century now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because multicellular organisms like homo sapiens can survive a poison that virii or bacteria cannot.
Hasn't that been the basis of a great deal of medicine for over a century now?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779435</id>
	<title>Re:Why try to make a drug?</title>
	<author>clandonald</author>
	<datestamp>1255812360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do the Pharma companies own this website? All it takes is to post the words "drug and money" and it is instantly modded down.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do the Pharma companies own this website ?
All it takes is to post the words " drug and money " and it is instantly modded down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do the Pharma companies own this website?
All it takes is to post the words "drug and money" and it is instantly modded down.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778773</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29781651</id>
	<title>Cuckoo for CO CO puffs?</title>
	<author>bobbuck</author>
	<datestamp>1255795680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does this mean I should be cuckoo for CO CO puffs?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean I should be cuckoo for CO CO puffs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean I should be cuckoo for CO CO puffs?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29785357</id>
	<title>Alfred Nobel anyone?</title>
	<author>Creepy Crawler</author>
	<datestamp>1255891620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nobel, after finding nitroglycerine, was proscribed it for his heart condition later in life. He said something along the lines of "Are you trying to blow my heart up??"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobel , after finding nitroglycerine , was proscribed it for his heart condition later in life .
He said something along the lines of " Are you trying to blow my heart up ? ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobel, after finding nitroglycerine, was proscribed it for his heart condition later in life.
He said something along the lines of "Are you trying to blow my heart up??
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29781341</id>
	<title>Hardly surprising, since we produce trace amounts</title>
	<author>smellsofbikes</author>
	<datestamp>1255790040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemoglobin#Degradation\_in\_vertebrate\_animals" title="wikipedia.org">One of the final breakdown products of hemoglobin is carbon monoxide</a> [wikipedia.org], which we produce constantly since red blood cells only live a few days and after they die, their contents are cut up to recover the iron. We only produce one molecule of CO per hemoglobin, so it's very tiny overall quantities.  But, since we make it, it's not too surprising that our systems have optimized to cope with it in those same small quantities.  The other main constituent of the broken-down porphyrin ring, bilirubin, is what makes feces brown.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the final breakdown products of hemoglobin is carbon monoxide [ wikipedia.org ] , which we produce constantly since red blood cells only live a few days and after they die , their contents are cut up to recover the iron .
We only produce one molecule of CO per hemoglobin , so it 's very tiny overall quantities .
But , since we make it , it 's not too surprising that our systems have optimized to cope with it in those same small quantities .
The other main constituent of the broken-down porphyrin ring , bilirubin , is what makes feces brown .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the final breakdown products of hemoglobin is carbon monoxide [wikipedia.org], which we produce constantly since red blood cells only live a few days and after they die, their contents are cut up to recover the iron.
We only produce one molecule of CO per hemoglobin, so it's very tiny overall quantities.
But, since we make it, it's not too surprising that our systems have optimized to cope with it in those same small quantities.
The other main constituent of the broken-down porphyrin ring, bilirubin, is what makes feces brown.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779293</id>
	<title>Re:I've seen this story before!</title>
	<author>davester666</author>
	<datestamp>1255811040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This story describes part of the Democrat's government health insurance plan, which includes mandatory euthanasia for all people over 65.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This story describes part of the Democrat 's government health insurance plan , which includes mandatory euthanasia for all people over 65 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This story describes part of the Democrat's government health insurance plan, which includes mandatory euthanasia for all people over 65.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778565</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779157</id>
	<title>Most all posions</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1255809600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have their medicinal values. Most medicines become poisonous at a certain level too, so there is some symmetry to it all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have their medicinal values .
Most medicines become poisonous at a certain level too , so there is some symmetry to it all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have their medicinal values.
Most medicines become poisonous at a certain level too, so there is some symmetry to it all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779283</id>
	<title>Re:All things are poison...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255810920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you aren't wrong in your current mindset but you are missing the point: a substance which we did not previously thought any small dosage to be helpful in any way is now seen as being potentially helpful!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you are n't wrong in your current mindset but you are missing the point : a substance which we did not previously thought any small dosage to be helpful in any way is now seen as being potentially helpful !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you aren't wrong in your current mindset but you are missing the point: a substance which we did not previously thought any small dosage to be helpful in any way is now seen as being potentially helpful!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778809</id>
	<title>Re:Cigarettes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255806360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, but you should stick a banana in your exhaust pipe to test it.  I don't mean your asshole, I mean the tailpipe of your car.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , but you should stick a banana in your exhaust pipe to test it .
I do n't mean your asshole , I mean the tailpipe of your car .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, but you should stick a banana in your exhaust pipe to test it.
I don't mean your asshole, I mean the tailpipe of your car.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778645</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778655</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255804980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>seriously people this isn't that "paradoxical". Chem 101. As (arsenic) is also deadly but its also an essential biological trace element. Its about moderation. <p> Sometimes i can't believe i still surf this place.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>seriously people this is n't that " paradoxical " .
Chem 101 .
As ( arsenic ) is also deadly but its also an essential biological trace element .
Its about moderation .
Sometimes i ca n't believe i still surf this place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>seriously people this isn't that "paradoxical".
Chem 101.
As (arsenic) is also deadly but its also an essential biological trace element.
Its about moderation.
Sometimes i can't believe i still surf this place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29781437</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255791540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Leave. Seriously, you're above this place, obviously much too intelligent to be slumming it here, and nobody wants to hear your little pissy complaints about how you can't believe you still 'surf' here. So everyone wins. <br> <br>

So please, leave.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Leave .
Seriously , you 're above this place , obviously much too intelligent to be slumming it here , and nobody wants to hear your little pissy complaints about how you ca n't believe you still 'surf ' here .
So everyone wins .
So please , leave .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Leave.
Seriously, you're above this place, obviously much too intelligent to be slumming it here, and nobody wants to hear your little pissy complaints about how you can't believe you still 'surf' here.
So everyone wins.
So please, leave.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778721</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>mbone</author>
	<datestamp>1255805520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"<i>You mean there was no deep fat? No steak or cream pies or... hot fudge?<br>Those were thought to be unhealthy... precisely the opposite of what we now know to be true.<br>Incredible. </i>"</p><p>(Woody Allen, Sleeper, 1973)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" You mean there was no deep fat ?
No steak or cream pies or... hot fudge ? Those were thought to be unhealthy... precisely the opposite of what we now know to be true.Incredible .
" ( Woody Allen , Sleeper , 1973 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"You mean there was no deep fat?
No steak or cream pies or... hot fudge?Those were thought to be unhealthy... precisely the opposite of what we now know to be true.Incredible.
"(Woody Allen, Sleeper, 1973)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778861</id>
	<title>Re:All things are poison...</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1255806780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It wasn't news to us that poisons can have benefits at low concentrations, it was the fact that Carbon Monoxide in particular may have uses beyond the ones we already know about like vaso-dilation and anti-inflammatory effects.  That would certainly be news to us 500 years ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was n't news to us that poisons can have benefits at low concentrations , it was the fact that Carbon Monoxide in particular may have uses beyond the ones we already know about like vaso-dilation and anti-inflammatory effects .
That would certainly be news to us 500 years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It wasn't news to us that poisons can have benefits at low concentrations, it was the fact that Carbon Monoxide in particular may have uses beyond the ones we already know about like vaso-dilation and anti-inflammatory effects.
That would certainly be news to us 500 years ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778925</id>
	<title>Yeah, well</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1255807560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The basic principle of the modern medicine is to modulate the poison to kill the ailment without killing the patient, no?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The basic principle of the modern medicine is to modulate the poison to kill the ailment without killing the patient , no ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The basic principle of the modern medicine is to modulate the poison to kill the ailment without killing the patient, no?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778701</id>
	<title>You also get synergistic benefit if you...</title>
	<author>jeffb (2.718)</author>
	<datestamp>1255805400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...coadminister with tetraethyl lead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...coadminister with tetraethyl lead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...coadminister with tetraethyl lead.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29781489</id>
	<title>Re:not a paradox</title>
	<author>mqduck</author>
	<datestamp>1255792380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was about to remind you that the summary only said it *sounds* like a paradox, until I re-read it. Apparently my brain refused to process the line as written the first time. In Soulskill's defense, this is clearly the first advance in medicine he/she has ever heard of in his/her life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was about to remind you that the summary only said it * sounds * like a paradox , until I re-read it .
Apparently my brain refused to process the line as written the first time .
In Soulskill 's defense , this is clearly the first advance in medicine he/she has ever heard of in his/her life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was about to remind you that the summary only said it *sounds* like a paradox, until I re-read it.
Apparently my brain refused to process the line as written the first time.
In Soulskill's defense, this is clearly the first advance in medicine he/she has ever heard of in his/her life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778897</id>
	<title>Re:All things are poison...</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1255807320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>That is to say, substances often considered toxic can be benign or beneficial in small doses, and conversely an ordinarily benign substance can be deadly if over-consumed. Even water can be deadly if overconsumed.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>Hence my vigilant crusade to educate everyone I encounter about the <a href="http://www.dhmo.org/" title="dhmo.org">dangers of DHMO</a> [dhmo.org], and the carelessness given to its widespread use in virtually everything.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is to say , substances often considered toxic can be benign or beneficial in small doses , and conversely an ordinarily benign substance can be deadly if over-consumed .
Even water can be deadly if overconsumed .
Hence my vigilant crusade to educate everyone I encounter about the dangers of DHMO [ dhmo.org ] , and the carelessness given to its widespread use in virtually everything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is to say, substances often considered toxic can be benign or beneficial in small doses, and conversely an ordinarily benign substance can be deadly if over-consumed.
Even water can be deadly if overconsumed.
Hence my vigilant crusade to educate everyone I encounter about the dangers of DHMO [dhmo.org], and the carelessness given to its widespread use in virtually everything.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778639</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779491</id>
	<title>Re:In a word no</title>
	<author>treat</author>
	<datestamp>1255812900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Can cigarettes be good for you in small doses then?</p></div><p>Cigarettes also contain carcinogens and carcinogens have no real safe levels. </p></div><p>If carcinogens have no real safe levels, what possible definition are you using for "safe"?</p><p>You realize that the word "safe" does not mean 100\% completely impossible of causing any harm, right?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can cigarettes be good for you in small doses then ? Cigarettes also contain carcinogens and carcinogens have no real safe levels .
If carcinogens have no real safe levels , what possible definition are you using for " safe " ? You realize that the word " safe " does not mean 100 \ % completely impossible of causing any harm , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can cigarettes be good for you in small doses then?Cigarettes also contain carcinogens and carcinogens have no real safe levels.
If carcinogens have no real safe levels, what possible definition are you using for "safe"?You realize that the word "safe" does not mean 100\% completely impossible of causing any harm, right?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778763</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779629</id>
	<title>Transplantation?!</title>
	<author>Jason Hildebrand</author>
	<datestamp>1255771200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Transplantation" sounds like a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bushism" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Bushism</a> [wikipedia.org]  to me.  "Transplant" is already a noun, thank you very much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Transplantation " sounds like a Bushism [ wikipedia.org ] to me .
" Transplant " is already a noun , thank you very much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Transplantation" sounds like a Bushism [wikipedia.org]  to me.
"Transplant" is already a noun, thank you very much.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778919</id>
	<title>More proof that Oxygen Kills!</title>
	<author>Jonah Hex</author>
	<datestamp>1255807500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how this gels with the research into the dangers of giving oxygen when resuscitating people from death. I have a feeling we'll be seeing the new standard procedure in what gasses to give change radically over the next few years. HEX</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how this gels with the research into the dangers of giving oxygen when resuscitating people from death .
I have a feeling we 'll be seeing the new standard procedure in what gasses to give change radically over the next few years .
HEX</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how this gels with the research into the dangers of giving oxygen when resuscitating people from death.
I have a feeling we'll be seeing the new standard procedure in what gasses to give change radically over the next few years.
HEX</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29789773</id>
	<title>Re:I've seen this story before!</title>
	<author>x2A</author>
	<datestamp>1255885440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*lol* stop it, some people are actually stupid enough to believe that! At least put a '*lol*' at the end or something or<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-) or something, like every single fox news item should have<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* lol * stop it , some people are actually stupid enough to believe that !
At least put a ' * lol * ' at the end or something or ; - ) or something , like every single fox news item should have : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*lol* stop it, some people are actually stupid enough to believe that!
At least put a '*lol*' at the end or something or ;-) or something, like every single fox news item should have :-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779259</id>
	<title>Re:not a paradox</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255810620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Almost anything is lethal in large doses</p></div><p>Very true, even for substances you wouldn't normally think of. See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water\_intoxication" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Water Intoxication</a> [wikipedia.org] </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Almost anything is lethal in large dosesVery true , even for substances you would n't normally think of .
See Water Intoxication [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Almost anything is lethal in large dosesVery true, even for substances you wouldn't normally think of.
See Water Intoxication [wikipedia.org] 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29781969</id>
	<title>Nitroglycerine</title>
	<author>Michael Woodhams</author>
	<datestamp>1255801320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For example, nitroglycerine is used as a heart medicine, yet if you ingest 100ml of it pure, your life expectency will be greatly reduced.</p><p>(Actually there are gazillions of examples. Most pharmaceuticals are lethal in high doses, even over-the-counter ones like paracetamol or vitamin D.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For example , nitroglycerine is used as a heart medicine , yet if you ingest 100ml of it pure , your life expectency will be greatly reduced .
( Actually there are gazillions of examples .
Most pharmaceuticals are lethal in high doses , even over-the-counter ones like paracetamol or vitamin D. )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For example, nitroglycerine is used as a heart medicine, yet if you ingest 100ml of it pure, your life expectency will be greatly reduced.
(Actually there are gazillions of examples.
Most pharmaceuticals are lethal in high doses, even over-the-counter ones like paracetamol or vitamin D.)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29782641</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255856700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>not true!<br>
<br>
see: http://www.medilexicon.com/drugs/nitrostat.php/&gt;</htmltext>
<tokenext>not true !
see : http : //www.medilexicon.com/drugs/nitrostat.php/ &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not true!
see: http://www.medilexicon.com/drugs/nitrostat.php/&gt;</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778753</id>
	<title>Re:Cigarettes</title>
	<author>nxtw</author>
	<datestamp>1255805760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Can cigarettes be good for you in small doses then?</p></div></blockquote><p>Nicotine is a stimulant.  If you consider a stimulant's effects "good for you" (for example, if they help you perform better on an exam), then cigarettes in small doses could be good for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can cigarettes be good for you in small doses then ? Nicotine is a stimulant .
If you consider a stimulant 's effects " good for you " ( for example , if they help you perform better on an exam ) , then cigarettes in small doses could be good for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can cigarettes be good for you in small doses then?Nicotine is a stimulant.
If you consider a stimulant's effects "good for you" (for example, if they help you perform better on an exam), then cigarettes in small doses could be good for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778645</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29780017</id>
	<title>CO good for you?</title>
	<author>pongo000</author>
	<datestamp>1255775100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077355/" title="imdb.com">Dr. Wheeler would probably beg to differ.</a> [imdb.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dr. Wheeler would probably beg to differ .
[ imdb.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dr. Wheeler would probably beg to differ.
[imdb.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778579</id>
	<title>Consider this...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255804260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Soviet Russia, carbon monoxidizes <i>you</i>....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Soviet Russia , carbon monoxidizes you... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Soviet Russia, carbon monoxidizes you....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29787243</id>
	<title>Glenn Beck</title>
	<author>mrraven</author>
	<datestamp>1255862460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Will someone please tell Glenn Beck the medical benefits are of *large* doses of CO?  Thanks your friend the direct action radical commie, pinko, fascist...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will someone please tell Glenn Beck the medical benefits are of * large * doses of CO ?
Thanks your friend the direct action radical commie , pinko , fascist.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will someone please tell Glenn Beck the medical benefits are of *large* doses of CO?
Thanks your friend the direct action radical commie, pinko, fascist...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779477</id>
	<title>Re:Cigarettes</title>
	<author>treat</author>
	<datestamp>1255812780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Can cigarettes be good for you in small doses then?</p></div><p>"cigarette" is not exactly drug. If you look at the component chemicals, there certainly are drugs in there that have differing effects in small doses. Nicotine has many effects, certainly some of which could have medical relevance.</p><p>It's rare that a drug is "good for you". The criteria is improving one condition without undue risk of causing/worsening others.</p><p>A person who smokes cigarettes for anxiety could easily be coming out on the positive end of things, if the anxiety was so severe as to risk the life of the patient. While there are usually drugs that are more effective, government restrictions on these drugs can be quite a significant influence on patients receiving care.</p><p>If cigarettes cure a person's anxiety, possibly a safer version can be created by extracting the nicotine. But this increases the risk of being arrested and contracting HIV due to repeated prison anal rape.</p><p>All medications are a balance of risk.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can cigarettes be good for you in small doses then ?
" cigarette " is not exactly drug .
If you look at the component chemicals , there certainly are drugs in there that have differing effects in small doses .
Nicotine has many effects , certainly some of which could have medical relevance.It 's rare that a drug is " good for you " .
The criteria is improving one condition without undue risk of causing/worsening others.A person who smokes cigarettes for anxiety could easily be coming out on the positive end of things , if the anxiety was so severe as to risk the life of the patient .
While there are usually drugs that are more effective , government restrictions on these drugs can be quite a significant influence on patients receiving care.If cigarettes cure a person 's anxiety , possibly a safer version can be created by extracting the nicotine .
But this increases the risk of being arrested and contracting HIV due to repeated prison anal rape.All medications are a balance of risk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can cigarettes be good for you in small doses then?
"cigarette" is not exactly drug.
If you look at the component chemicals, there certainly are drugs in there that have differing effects in small doses.
Nicotine has many effects, certainly some of which could have medical relevance.It's rare that a drug is "good for you".
The criteria is improving one condition without undue risk of causing/worsening others.A person who smokes cigarettes for anxiety could easily be coming out on the positive end of things, if the anxiety was so severe as to risk the life of the patient.
While there are usually drugs that are more effective, government restrictions on these drugs can be quite a significant influence on patients receiving care.If cigarettes cure a person's anxiety, possibly a safer version can be created by extracting the nicotine.
But this increases the risk of being arrested and contracting HIV due to repeated prison anal rape.All medications are a balance of risk.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778645</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29780339</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>DiegoBravo</author>
	<datestamp>1255777920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Water in small doses is absolutely needed for humans. Water in high doses get them drowned.</p><p>The same apply to cholesterol and most substances.</p><p>What's new here?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Water in small doses is absolutely needed for humans .
Water in high doses get them drowned.The same apply to cholesterol and most substances.What 's new here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Water in small doses is absolutely needed for humans.
Water in high doses get them drowned.The same apply to cholesterol and most substances.What's new here?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29780619</id>
	<title>apparent paradox</title>
	<author>epine</author>
	<datestamp>1255780620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I failed tribalism 101, so I never get these apparent paradoxes, which seem to be rooted in the us/them, good/evil, they rape/we liberate cognitive homunculus.</p><p>Chlorine is also known as a deadly poison.  That's how Ghandi liberated India: by extracting a deadly poison from the sea water and spreading it throughout the British subway system.  And don't get me started on dihydrogen monoxide.  Can kill someone with as little as one teaspoon, and it's found just about everywhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I failed tribalism 101 , so I never get these apparent paradoxes , which seem to be rooted in the us/them , good/evil , they rape/we liberate cognitive homunculus.Chlorine is also known as a deadly poison .
That 's how Ghandi liberated India : by extracting a deadly poison from the sea water and spreading it throughout the British subway system .
And do n't get me started on dihydrogen monoxide .
Can kill someone with as little as one teaspoon , and it 's found just about everywhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I failed tribalism 101, so I never get these apparent paradoxes, which seem to be rooted in the us/them, good/evil, they rape/we liberate cognitive homunculus.Chlorine is also known as a deadly poison.
That's how Ghandi liberated India: by extracting a deadly poison from the sea water and spreading it throughout the British subway system.
And don't get me started on dihydrogen monoxide.
Can kill someone with as little as one teaspoon, and it's found just about everywhere.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29795739</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255973820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except that nitroglycerine is used as a heart medicine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except that nitroglycerine is used as a heart medicine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except that nitroglycerine is used as a heart medicine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779543</id>
	<title>Re:Cigarettes</title>
	<author>treat</author>
	<datestamp>1255770240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>You can get the nicotine without the cigarette and the smoke etc. It's called an electric cigarette, use your Google-Fu, grasshopper.</p></div><p>Governments often make this difficult to distribute/obtain because the device can be considered a "drug delivery device", while nicotine incidentally contained in tobacco is not always legally considered a drug.</p><p>Still, nicotine is not the sole psychoactive chemical in nicotine, readily apparent if you compare the effects of tobacco to vaporized pure nicotine.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can get the nicotine without the cigarette and the smoke etc .
It 's called an electric cigarette , use your Google-Fu , grasshopper.Governments often make this difficult to distribute/obtain because the device can be considered a " drug delivery device " , while nicotine incidentally contained in tobacco is not always legally considered a drug.Still , nicotine is not the sole psychoactive chemical in nicotine , readily apparent if you compare the effects of tobacco to vaporized pure nicotine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can get the nicotine without the cigarette and the smoke etc.
It's called an electric cigarette, use your Google-Fu, grasshopper.Governments often make this difficult to distribute/obtain because the device can be considered a "drug delivery device", while nicotine incidentally contained in tobacco is not always legally considered a drug.Still, nicotine is not the sole psychoactive chemical in nicotine, readily apparent if you compare the effects of tobacco to vaporized pure nicotine.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778849</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778639</id>
	<title>All things are poison...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255804860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Paracelsus, sometimes called the father of toxicology, wrote:</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; German: Alle Ding' sind Gift, und nichts ohn' Gift; allein die Dosis macht, da&#223; ein Ding kein Gift ist.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; "All things are poison and nothing is without poison, only the dose permits something not to be poisonous."</p><p>That is to say, substances often considered toxic can be benign or beneficial in small doses, and conversely an ordinarily benign substance can be deadly if over-consumed. Even water can be deadly if overconsumed.</p><p>(Ripped right from Wikipedia [ <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracelsus" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracelsus</a> [wikipedia.org] ] )</p><p>So, 500 years ago, this would have been news?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Paracelsus , sometimes called the father of toxicology , wrote :         German : Alle Ding ' sind Gift , und nichts ohn ' Gift ; allein die Dosis macht , da   ein Ding kein Gift ist .
        " All things are poison and nothing is without poison , only the dose permits something not to be poisonous .
" That is to say , substances often considered toxic can be benign or beneficial in small doses , and conversely an ordinarily benign substance can be deadly if over-consumed .
Even water can be deadly if overconsumed .
( Ripped right from Wikipedia [ http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracelsus [ wikipedia.org ] ] ) So , 500 years ago , this would have been news ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Paracelsus, sometimes called the father of toxicology, wrote:
        German: Alle Ding' sind Gift, und nichts ohn' Gift; allein die Dosis macht, daß ein Ding kein Gift ist.
        "All things are poison and nothing is without poison, only the dose permits something not to be poisonous.
"That is to say, substances often considered toxic can be benign or beneficial in small doses, and conversely an ordinarily benign substance can be deadly if over-consumed.
Even water can be deadly if overconsumed.
(Ripped right from Wikipedia [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracelsus [wikipedia.org] ] )So, 500 years ago, this would have been news?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779701</id>
	<title>Carbon monoxide in old ghetto homes</title>
	<author>t3chn0n3rd</author>
	<datestamp>1255772100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just a reccomendation if you live in an older house or apartment.  You might go to the hardware store and buy a CO detector for about 20 dollars.   I think some of the older furnaces have CO in them when you first turn them on.


This may be true even in newer homes and apartments.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just a reccomendation if you live in an older house or apartment .
You might go to the hardware store and buy a CO detector for about 20 dollars .
I think some of the older furnaces have CO in them when you first turn them on .
This may be true even in newer homes and apartments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just a reccomendation if you live in an older house or apartment.
You might go to the hardware store and buy a CO detector for about 20 dollars.
I think some of the older furnaces have CO in them when you first turn them on.
This may be true even in newer homes and apartments.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778565</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29781061</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1255786260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, it's no big surprise. Literally everything is lethal in high enough dosages, including water (it dilutes the electrolytes in the bloodstream and causes death.) I was somewhat puzzled that arsenic is both a known carcinogen and a treatment for some forms of cancer, but at this point it is not difficult to believe the CO can be a double-edged sword.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it 's no big surprise .
Literally everything is lethal in high enough dosages , including water ( it dilutes the electrolytes in the bloodstream and causes death .
) I was somewhat puzzled that arsenic is both a known carcinogen and a treatment for some forms of cancer , but at this point it is not difficult to believe the CO can be a double-edged sword .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it's no big surprise.
Literally everything is lethal in high enough dosages, including water (it dilutes the electrolytes in the bloodstream and causes death.
) I was somewhat puzzled that arsenic is both a known carcinogen and a treatment for some forms of cancer, but at this point it is not difficult to believe the CO can be a double-edged sword.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778707</id>
	<title>all medical treatments have this paradox</title>
	<author>Kevinv</author>
	<datestamp>1255805400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"is revealing a paradox: the gas often called a silent killer could also be a medical treatment."</p><p>Not much of a paradox. Every medical treatment suffers the exact same paradox. Morphine - great pain killer. Too much and it silently kills you.  Anesthesias are the same. Cancer chemo treatments come very close to killing you, a small overdose may do it. Too much tylenol? Liver disease. Too much advil? Kidney problems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" is revealing a paradox : the gas often called a silent killer could also be a medical treatment .
" Not much of a paradox .
Every medical treatment suffers the exact same paradox .
Morphine - great pain killer .
Too much and it silently kills you .
Anesthesias are the same .
Cancer chemo treatments come very close to killing you , a small overdose may do it .
Too much tylenol ?
Liver disease .
Too much advil ?
Kidney problems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"is revealing a paradox: the gas often called a silent killer could also be a medical treatment.
"Not much of a paradox.
Every medical treatment suffers the exact same paradox.
Morphine - great pain killer.
Too much and it silently kills you.
Anesthesias are the same.
Cancer chemo treatments come very close to killing you, a small overdose may do it.
Too much tylenol?
Liver disease.
Too much advil?
Kidney problems.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779323</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255811280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too true. Even DHMO has many benefits if used responsibly.</p><p>(Not an industry shill, just a pragmatist posting anonymously to avoid harassment from anti-DHMO zealots).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too true .
Even DHMO has many benefits if used responsibly .
( Not an industry shill , just a pragmatist posting anonymously to avoid harassment from anti-DHMO zealots ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too true.
Even DHMO has many benefits if used responsibly.
(Not an industry shill, just a pragmatist posting anonymously to avoid harassment from anti-DHMO zealots).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779047</id>
	<title>coffee</title>
	<author>Sam36</author>
	<datestamp>1255808700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>They say coffee is good for you too</htmltext>
<tokenext>They say coffee is good for you too</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They say coffee is good for you too</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778773</id>
	<title>Why try to make a drug?</title>
	<author>clandonald</author>
	<datestamp>1255805940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That will make carbon monoxide in your body when the gas is readily available. Carbon monoxide might be beneficial but why not make a pill that makes nitrous oxide in your blood so the dentist doesn't have to pull out the mask. There is probably a lot more money to make off the pill. A wiff of bottled carbon monoxide won't cost an arm and leg.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That will make carbon monoxide in your body when the gas is readily available .
Carbon monoxide might be beneficial but why not make a pill that makes nitrous oxide in your blood so the dentist does n't have to pull out the mask .
There is probably a lot more money to make off the pill .
A wiff of bottled carbon monoxide wo n't cost an arm and leg .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That will make carbon monoxide in your body when the gas is readily available.
Carbon monoxide might be beneficial but why not make a pill that makes nitrous oxide in your blood so the dentist doesn't have to pull out the mask.
There is probably a lot more money to make off the pill.
A wiff of bottled carbon monoxide won't cost an arm and leg.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779505</id>
	<title>Re:Cigarettes</title>
	<author>treat</author>
	<datestamp>1255813140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Maybe not cigarettes, but  tobacco sure. Heroin also has huge medical benefits, but we can't touch that, can we?</p></div><p>In much of the world, heroin is recognized as being a safe and effective pain killer. It is used regularly in hospitals in the UK.</p><p>The reason heroin is an effective recreational drug is due to its safety compared to other opiates.</p><p>The situation is similar (although much more extreme) with methamphetamine. Enough caffeine to keep you awake for a week would have a high chance of killing you outright.</p><p>Considering the low cost of making heroin from morphine, the use of morphine instead is essentially a deliberate waste in order to satisfy political considerations.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe not cigarettes , but tobacco sure .
Heroin also has huge medical benefits , but we ca n't touch that , can we ? In much of the world , heroin is recognized as being a safe and effective pain killer .
It is used regularly in hospitals in the UK.The reason heroin is an effective recreational drug is due to its safety compared to other opiates.The situation is similar ( although much more extreme ) with methamphetamine .
Enough caffeine to keep you awake for a week would have a high chance of killing you outright.Considering the low cost of making heroin from morphine , the use of morphine instead is essentially a deliberate waste in order to satisfy political considerations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe not cigarettes, but  tobacco sure.
Heroin also has huge medical benefits, but we can't touch that, can we?In much of the world, heroin is recognized as being a safe and effective pain killer.
It is used regularly in hospitals in the UK.The reason heroin is an effective recreational drug is due to its safety compared to other opiates.The situation is similar (although much more extreme) with methamphetamine.
Enough caffeine to keep you awake for a week would have a high chance of killing you outright.Considering the low cost of making heroin from morphine, the use of morphine instead is essentially a deliberate waste in order to satisfy political considerations.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778795</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778591</id>
	<title>not a paradox</title>
	<author>fermion</author>
	<datestamp>1255804380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Almost anything is lethal in large doses, and many things are fatal in even small doses.  Those same things are often of some benefit in very small doses.  For instance, Botulinum toxin.  We use small and weakened versions of virus to immunize ourselves.  Most medicines can kill children who ingest a moderate overdose.  A little alcohol can be antiseptic, which is why many places in the world used to drink with their food, but too much alcohol is lethal.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Almost anything is lethal in large doses , and many things are fatal in even small doses .
Those same things are often of some benefit in very small doses .
For instance , Botulinum toxin .
We use small and weakened versions of virus to immunize ourselves .
Most medicines can kill children who ingest a moderate overdose .
A little alcohol can be antiseptic , which is why many places in the world used to drink with their food , but too much alcohol is lethal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Almost anything is lethal in large doses, and many things are fatal in even small doses.
Those same things are often of some benefit in very small doses.
For instance, Botulinum toxin.
We use small and weakened versions of virus to immunize ourselves.
Most medicines can kill children who ingest a moderate overdose.
A little alcohol can be antiseptic, which is why many places in the world used to drink with their food, but too much alcohol is lethal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778763</id>
	<title>In a word no</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255805820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Can cigarettes be good for you in small doses then?</p></div><p>Cigarettes also contain carcinogens and carcinogens have no real safe levels. They may publish recommended levels but even trace amounts of carcinogens can cause cancers. Even levels considered safe in the environment can cause cancer. Will you get cancer smoking one cigarette a week, probably not. How about one a day may be not. How about one an hour? Probably. The odds are low for one a week and somewhat higher for one a day but they are never zero. The whole point is it worth the risk? I've had friends and family die from lung cancer that were smokers so trust me it's a terrible way to die. We may all die of cancer due to unavoidable effects of modern life but I saw a friend that died from smoking at 43 and it wasn't pretty and he left a young child behind. Some things may be worth some risk but smoking isn't one of them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can cigarettes be good for you in small doses then ? Cigarettes also contain carcinogens and carcinogens have no real safe levels .
They may publish recommended levels but even trace amounts of carcinogens can cause cancers .
Even levels considered safe in the environment can cause cancer .
Will you get cancer smoking one cigarette a week , probably not .
How about one a day may be not .
How about one an hour ?
Probably. The odds are low for one a week and somewhat higher for one a day but they are never zero .
The whole point is it worth the risk ?
I 've had friends and family die from lung cancer that were smokers so trust me it 's a terrible way to die .
We may all die of cancer due to unavoidable effects of modern life but I saw a friend that died from smoking at 43 and it was n't pretty and he left a young child behind .
Some things may be worth some risk but smoking is n't one of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can cigarettes be good for you in small doses then?Cigarettes also contain carcinogens and carcinogens have no real safe levels.
They may publish recommended levels but even trace amounts of carcinogens can cause cancers.
Even levels considered safe in the environment can cause cancer.
Will you get cancer smoking one cigarette a week, probably not.
How about one a day may be not.
How about one an hour?
Probably. The odds are low for one a week and somewhat higher for one a day but they are never zero.
The whole point is it worth the risk?
I've had friends and family die from lung cancer that were smokers so trust me it's a terrible way to die.
We may all die of cancer due to unavoidable effects of modern life but I saw a friend that died from smoking at 43 and it wasn't pretty and he left a young child behind.
Some things may be worth some risk but smoking isn't one of them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778645</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779453</id>
	<title>Toxicology 101</title>
	<author>niko9</author>
	<datestamp>1255812600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As any toxicologist will tell you: Dosage is everything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As any toxicologist will tell you : Dosage is everything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As any toxicologist will tell you: Dosage is everything.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778581</id>
	<title>In other news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255804260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... local scientists discover another paradox - although large doses of aspirin can kill, in small doses it can actually be used as a medicine.</p><p>(Replace aspirin with other drug for preference)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... local scientists discover another paradox - although large doses of aspirin can kill , in small doses it can actually be used as a medicine .
( Replace aspirin with other drug for preference )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... local scientists discover another paradox - although large doses of aspirin can kill, in small doses it can actually be used as a medicine.
(Replace aspirin with other drug for preference)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778893</id>
	<title>Really now?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255807320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do we need all the hype?  Can't we have a story that just explains the details without the OMGWTF slipping in?  Wow, water in huge quantities is dangerous?  Drowning? OMG.  But I can drink it too?  CRAZY.  *sigh*</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do we need all the hype ?
Ca n't we have a story that just explains the details without the OMGWTF slipping in ?
Wow , water in huge quantities is dangerous ?
Drowning ? OMG .
But I can drink it too ?
CRAZY. * sigh *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do we need all the hype?
Can't we have a story that just explains the details without the OMGWTF slipping in?
Wow, water in huge quantities is dangerous?
Drowning? OMG.
But I can drink it too?
CRAZY.  *sigh*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29783201</id>
	<title>Re:How is that a contradiction?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255868820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Radiation is generally bad for you, but we use it as a medical treatment.</p><p>Pick your favorite medical prescription, now eat 10 lbs of it. Oh look it's bad for you.</p></div><p>i pick a placebo.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Radiation is generally bad for you , but we use it as a medical treatment.Pick your favorite medical prescription , now eat 10 lbs of it .
Oh look it 's bad for you.i pick a placebo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Radiation is generally bad for you, but we use it as a medical treatment.Pick your favorite medical prescription, now eat 10 lbs of it.
Oh look it's bad for you.i pick a placebo.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779645</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779079</id>
	<title>kind of a no-brainer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255808880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For pretty much anything, the difference between "medication" and "poison" is dose. How is that surprising? Put someone in a room full of CO and they die? What do you think will happen if you choose any random life-saving pharmaceutical and tell someone to take a whole bottle of it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For pretty much anything , the difference between " medication " and " poison " is dose .
How is that surprising ?
Put someone in a room full of CO and they die ?
What do you think will happen if you choose any random life-saving pharmaceutical and tell someone to take a whole bottle of it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For pretty much anything, the difference between "medication" and "poison" is dose.
How is that surprising?
Put someone in a room full of CO and they die?
What do you think will happen if you choose any random life-saving pharmaceutical and tell someone to take a whole bottle of it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29781411</id>
	<title>So this means...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255791060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>smoking is good for me, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>smoking is good for me , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>smoking is good for me, right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29804251</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>GlenRaphael</author>
	<datestamp>1255975200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or, say, botulism toxin.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , say , botulism toxin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, say, botulism toxin.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778815</id>
	<title>Sweet!</title>
	<author>LockeOnLogic</author>
	<datestamp>1255806360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Take that you health freaks! I chainsmoke like a chimney, so enjoy your tofu and cancer!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Take that you health freaks !
I chainsmoke like a chimney , so enjoy your tofu and cancer !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take that you health freaks!
I chainsmoke like a chimney, so enjoy your tofu and cancer!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29784945</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>Khyber</author>
	<datestamp>1255887720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Next they'll be telling us that exposure to radiation and toxins can help cure cancer"</p><p>Imagine what it must've been like back in the 30s when irradiated water was the big health craze.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Next they 'll be telling us that exposure to radiation and toxins can help cure cancer " Imagine what it must 've been like back in the 30s when irradiated water was the big health craze .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Next they'll be telling us that exposure to radiation and toxins can help cure cancer"Imagine what it must've been like back in the 30s when irradiated water was the big health craze.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29798877</id>
	<title>Re:Cigarettes</title>
	<author>GargamelSpaceman</author>
	<datestamp>1255985280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I forgot why, but in one episode Gregory House prescribed cigarettes to a guy with intestinal issues.  Not sure what the exact issue was.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I forgot why , but in one episode Gregory House prescribed cigarettes to a guy with intestinal issues .
Not sure what the exact issue was .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I forgot why, but in one episode Gregory House prescribed cigarettes to a guy with intestinal issues.
Not sure what the exact issue was.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778645</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29781405</id>
	<title>Oxygen</title>
	<author>arkarumba</author>
	<datestamp>1255790940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;60\% oxygen is lethal, yet lesser amounts are beneficial. a paradox?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; 60 \ % oxygen is lethal , yet lesser amounts are beneficial .
a paradox ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;60\% oxygen is lethal, yet lesser amounts are beneficial.
a paradox?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778795</id>
	<title>Re:Cigarettes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255806180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe not cigarettes, but  tobacco sure. Heroin also has huge medical benefits, but we can't touch that, can we?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe not cigarettes , but tobacco sure .
Heroin also has huge medical benefits , but we ca n't touch that , can we ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe not cigarettes, but  tobacco sure.
Heroin also has huge medical benefits, but we can't touch that, can we?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778645</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29782655</id>
	<title>So are many off-the-shelf medications</title>
	<author>highways</author>
	<datestamp>1255857000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It doesn't surprise me. Whilst many substances are unsafe at any dosage (e.g. mercury), some things are downright deadly in large quantities.</p><p>Like Paracetamol.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracetamol\_toxicity" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracetamol\_toxicity</a> [wikipedia.org] Apparently, it's one of the worst ways to die.</p><p>And warafin, an excellent anti-blood clotting agent is also used as rat poison.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't surprise me .
Whilst many substances are unsafe at any dosage ( e.g .
mercury ) , some things are downright deadly in large quantities.Like Paracetamol .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracetamol \ _toxicity [ wikipedia.org ] Apparently , it 's one of the worst ways to die.And warafin , an excellent anti-blood clotting agent is also used as rat poison .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't surprise me.
Whilst many substances are unsafe at any dosage (e.g.
mercury), some things are downright deadly in large quantities.Like Paracetamol.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracetamol\_toxicity [wikipedia.org] Apparently, it's one of the worst ways to die.And warafin, an excellent anti-blood clotting agent is also used as rat poison.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29780719</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>oldsaint</author>
	<datestamp>1255781460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The concept is called hermesis, and there are a significant number of examples, proven in rigorous tests.  Toxicity starts at a threshold above zero, but there are beneficial effects at  doses below that threshold.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The concept is called hermesis , and there are a significant number of examples , proven in rigorous tests .
Toxicity starts at a threshold above zero , but there are beneficial effects at doses below that threshold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The concept is called hermesis, and there are a significant number of examples, proven in rigorous tests.
Toxicity starts at a threshold above zero, but there are beneficial effects at  doses below that threshold.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575</id>
	<title>Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>mcsnee</author>
	<datestamp>1255804260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Something that is bad for us in high doses may be beneficial in low doses?!  Next they'll be telling us that exposure to radiation and toxins can help cure cancer, or that the same stuff that rusts away unprotected steel and iron is actually necessary for animal life!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Something that is bad for us in high doses may be beneficial in low doses ? !
Next they 'll be telling us that exposure to radiation and toxins can help cure cancer , or that the same stuff that rusts away unprotected steel and iron is actually necessary for animal life !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something that is bad for us in high doses may be beneficial in low doses?!
Next they'll be telling us that exposure to radiation and toxins can help cure cancer, or that the same stuff that rusts away unprotected steel and iron is actually necessary for animal life!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778761</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255805820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't believe you still use the word 'surf'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe you still use the word 'surf' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe you still use the word 'surf'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778565</id>
	<title>I've seen this story before!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255804140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>NO!</htmltext>
<tokenext>NO !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NO!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29788985</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>pyro\_peter\_911</author>
	<datestamp>1255879440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I can't believe you still use the word 'surf'.</p></div></blockquote><p>
You can still use it, but only in moderation.
</p><p>
Pyro</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe you still use the word 'surf' .
You can still use it , but only in moderation .
Pyro</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe you still use the word 'surf'.
You can still use it, but only in moderation.
Pyro
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779087</id>
	<title>Re:Cigarettes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255808940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps; the main problem with cigarettes is keeping the dose small. Forget not that there is therapeutic value in heroin, but it's heavily regulated because the patient will become addicted and seek more, almost inevitably to a point where they exceed their own limits and kick the bucket.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps ; the main problem with cigarettes is keeping the dose small .
Forget not that there is therapeutic value in heroin , but it 's heavily regulated because the patient will become addicted and seek more , almost inevitably to a point where they exceed their own limits and kick the bucket .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps; the main problem with cigarettes is keeping the dose small.
Forget not that there is therapeutic value in heroin, but it's heavily regulated because the patient will become addicted and seek more, almost inevitably to a point where they exceed their own limits and kick the bucket.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778645</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779441</id>
	<title>Re:all medical treatments have this paradox</title>
	<author>treat</author>
	<datestamp>1255812420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"is revealing a paradox: the gas often called a silent killer could also be a medical treatment."</p><p>Not much of a paradox. Every medical treatment suffers the exact same paradox. Morphine - great pain killer. Too much and it silently kills you.  Anesthesias are the same. Cancer chemo treatments come very close to killing you, a small overdose may do it. Too much tylenol? Liver disease. Too much advil? Kidney problems.</p></div><p>Tylenol is in the same ballpark as the chemo drugs, as opposed to morphine. Double a normal (but high) dose of tylenol and you can destroy your liver. Tylenol is actually added to other drugs in the US in order to punish patients who choose to take a higher dosage of the medication actually needed.</p><p>One of the most evil things the US government does is adding a poison to medicines in order to destroy the liver of someone who takes "too much". The "too much" amount is likely to be a perfectly safe amount and could even be prescribed. And patients are not adequately warned what the dangers are of the medications they're given, or that certain components were added solely to have a fatal punitive effect.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" is revealing a paradox : the gas often called a silent killer could also be a medical treatment .
" Not much of a paradox .
Every medical treatment suffers the exact same paradox .
Morphine - great pain killer .
Too much and it silently kills you .
Anesthesias are the same .
Cancer chemo treatments come very close to killing you , a small overdose may do it .
Too much tylenol ?
Liver disease .
Too much advil ?
Kidney problems.Tylenol is in the same ballpark as the chemo drugs , as opposed to morphine .
Double a normal ( but high ) dose of tylenol and you can destroy your liver .
Tylenol is actually added to other drugs in the US in order to punish patients who choose to take a higher dosage of the medication actually needed.One of the most evil things the US government does is adding a poison to medicines in order to destroy the liver of someone who takes " too much " .
The " too much " amount is likely to be a perfectly safe amount and could even be prescribed .
And patients are not adequately warned what the dangers are of the medications they 're given , or that certain components were added solely to have a fatal punitive effect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"is revealing a paradox: the gas often called a silent killer could also be a medical treatment.
"Not much of a paradox.
Every medical treatment suffers the exact same paradox.
Morphine - great pain killer.
Too much and it silently kills you.
Anesthesias are the same.
Cancer chemo treatments come very close to killing you, a small overdose may do it.
Too much tylenol?
Liver disease.
Too much advil?
Kidney problems.Tylenol is in the same ballpark as the chemo drugs, as opposed to morphine.
Double a normal (but high) dose of tylenol and you can destroy your liver.
Tylenol is actually added to other drugs in the US in order to punish patients who choose to take a higher dosage of the medication actually needed.One of the most evil things the US government does is adding a poison to medicines in order to destroy the liver of someone who takes "too much".
The "too much" amount is likely to be a perfectly safe amount and could even be prescribed.
And patients are not adequately warned what the dangers are of the medications they're given, or that certain components were added solely to have a fatal punitive effect.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29782261</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255807140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or how about "minimizing oxidation is sometimes useful".  In other news...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or how about " minimizing oxidation is sometimes useful " .
In other news.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or how about "minimizing oxidation is sometimes useful".
In other news...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778645</id>
	<title>Cigarettes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255804920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can cigarettes be good for you in small doses then?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can cigarettes be good for you in small doses then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can cigarettes be good for you in small doses then?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778849</id>
	<title>Re:Cigarettes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255806660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can get the nicotine without the cigarette and the smoke etc. It's called an electric cigarette, use your Google-Fu, grasshopper.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can get the nicotine without the cigarette and the smoke etc .
It 's called an electric cigarette , use your Google-Fu , grasshopper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can get the nicotine without the cigarette and the smoke etc.
It's called an electric cigarette, use your Google-Fu, grasshopper.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778645</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29780509</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>perlchild</author>
	<datestamp>1255779540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was just thinking you were right... Anyone notice this is exactly the case with botox?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was just thinking you were right... Anyone notice this is exactly the case with botox ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was just thinking you were right... Anyone notice this is exactly the case with botox?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778635</id>
	<title>Spooky!</title>
	<author>BigBadBus</author>
	<datestamp>1255804800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There seems to be some anecdotal evidence that CO exposure may affect the senses to such an extent that people experience
"spooky" or ghostly behaviour. Certainly, this occurred when one family was exposed, and their spooky hallucinations ceased when
CO poisoning was diagnosed, and the source removed. There a little more <a href="http://www.paullee.com/ghosts/sns\_new.html" title="paullee.com">here</a> [paullee.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>There seems to be some anecdotal evidence that CO exposure may affect the senses to such an extent that people experience " spooky " or ghostly behaviour .
Certainly , this occurred when one family was exposed , and their spooky hallucinations ceased when CO poisoning was diagnosed , and the source removed .
There a little more here [ paullee.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There seems to be some anecdotal evidence that CO exposure may affect the senses to such an extent that people experience
"spooky" or ghostly behaviour.
Certainly, this occurred when one family was exposed, and their spooky hallucinations ceased when
CO poisoning was diagnosed, and the source removed.
There a little more here [paullee.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778671</id>
	<title>Re:Gee whiz!</title>
	<author>jhoegl</author>
	<datestamp>1255805100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A senator has already argued the radiation point. It was part of a Nuclear Power initiative he was doing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A senator has already argued the radiation point .
It was part of a Nuclear Power initiative he was doing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A senator has already argued the radiation point.
It was part of a Nuclear Power initiative he was doing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29788985
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778761
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778655
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29780633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779543
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778849
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778645
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29783623
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29780339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778655
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29795739
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778655
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29781969
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778591
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778809
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778645
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29780583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778753
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778645
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779229
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778565
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29781437
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778655
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29789773
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779293
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778565
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779323
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778639
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778591
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29780719
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29783201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779645
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29780509
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779477
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778645
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778565
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29781489
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778591
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29782261
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778655
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29781061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29784945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779087
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778645
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779441
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778707
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779435
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29781683
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778897
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778639
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778619
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778645
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29782641
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778655
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29804251
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778655
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779283
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778639
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779491
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778763
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778645
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_17_163216_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29798877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778645
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_17_163216.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29785357
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_17_163216.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779599
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_17_163216.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778645
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778795
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779505
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778849
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779543
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29780633
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778763
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779491
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778753
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779087
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778809
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29798877
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779477
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_17_163216.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779157
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_17_163216.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29782655
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_17_163216.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778707
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779441
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_17_163216.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29781341
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_17_163216.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778639
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779283
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778897
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778861
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_17_163216.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778919
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_17_163216.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778587
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_17_163216.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778591
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779259
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29781969
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29781489
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_17_163216.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778773
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779435
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_17_163216.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778575
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29783623
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29781683
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779323
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29784945
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779061
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778671
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29780583
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778655
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29780339
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29782261
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29781437
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778761
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29788985
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779585
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29795739
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29782641
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29804251
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29781061
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29780719
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778721
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778619
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29780509
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_17_163216.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779645
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29783201
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_17_163216.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778565
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779293
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29789773
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779229
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29779701
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_17_163216.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29780047
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_17_163216.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778865
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_17_163216.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_17_163216.29778893
</commentlist>
</conversation>
