<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_15_2121214</id>
	<title>Sonar Software Detects Laptop User Presence</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1255598520000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://stevetarzia.com/" rel="nofollow">Steve Tarzia</a> writes <i>"A <a href="http://empathicsystems.org/">research group</a> at Northwestern University and University of Michigan has released open-source display power-management software that uses a <a href="http://www.mccormick.northwestern.edu/news/articles/589">new user presence detection technique</a>.  The goal is to shut off the display immediately when the user leaves the computer rather than using slow and error-prone mouse/keyboard activity timeouts.  Surprisingly, the mic and speakers of many laptop computers are sensitive to ultrasonic frequencies.  Those frequencies can be used to silently probe the laptop's physical environment.  This software is based on research published at the <a href="http://www.ubicomp.org/ubicomp2009/programsPaper.shtml">UbiComp2009</a> conference.  A Windows binary and source code for Windows and Linux are <a href="http://stevetarzia.com/sonar">available for download</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Steve Tarzia writes " A research group at Northwestern University and University of Michigan has released open-source display power-management software that uses a new user presence detection technique .
The goal is to shut off the display immediately when the user leaves the computer rather than using slow and error-prone mouse/keyboard activity timeouts .
Surprisingly , the mic and speakers of many laptop computers are sensitive to ultrasonic frequencies .
Those frequencies can be used to silently probe the laptop 's physical environment .
This software is based on research published at the UbiComp2009 conference .
A Windows binary and source code for Windows and Linux are available for download .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Steve Tarzia writes "A research group at Northwestern University and University of Michigan has released open-source display power-management software that uses a new user presence detection technique.
The goal is to shut off the display immediately when the user leaves the computer rather than using slow and error-prone mouse/keyboard activity timeouts.
Surprisingly, the mic and speakers of many laptop computers are sensitive to ultrasonic frequencies.
Those frequencies can be used to silently probe the laptop's physical environment.
This software is based on research published at the UbiComp2009 conference.
A Windows binary and source code for Windows and Linux are available for download.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762907</id>
	<title>I wonder how...</title>
	<author>Whorhay</author>
	<datestamp>1255602840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder how fine of a resolution is possible with a setup like this with generic microphones and speakers. Maybe it would be possible to use this as a biometric lock on a computer system. It could function as a facial recognition check using the ultrasound picture or series of pictures of your face. Lighting wouldn't affect it and someone couldn't simply use a picture of you to try and fool the camera. Even a bust of your face wouldn't work the same unless it accurately simulated your bone structure and flesh.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how fine of a resolution is possible with a setup like this with generic microphones and speakers .
Maybe it would be possible to use this as a biometric lock on a computer system .
It could function as a facial recognition check using the ultrasound picture or series of pictures of your face .
Lighting would n't affect it and someone could n't simply use a picture of you to try and fool the camera .
Even a bust of your face would n't work the same unless it accurately simulated your bone structure and flesh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how fine of a resolution is possible with a setup like this with generic microphones and speakers.
Maybe it would be possible to use this as a biometric lock on a computer system.
It could function as a facial recognition check using the ultrasound picture or series of pictures of your face.
Lighting wouldn't affect it and someone couldn't simply use a picture of you to try and fool the camera.
Even a bust of your face wouldn't work the same unless it accurately simulated your bone structure and flesh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29767597</id>
	<title>Poor dogs</title>
	<author>imgod2u</author>
	<datestamp>1255701480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can see so many of them freaking out cause of this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can see so many of them freaking out cause of this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can see so many of them freaking out cause of this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763187</id>
	<title>Re:Activity</title>
	<author>Fluffeh</author>
	<datestamp>1255604040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But it seems we're heading in to this "everyone, and every machine, knows where you are" every day. Thank god I'm already old and not born in to this shit.</p></div><p>It's okay, just make friends with your new laptopian overlord and you two should get on just fine.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But it seems we 're heading in to this " everyone , and every machine , knows where you are " every day .
Thank god I 'm already old and not born in to this shit.It 's okay , just make friends with your new laptopian overlord and you two should get on just fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it seems we're heading in to this "everyone, and every machine, knows where you are" every day.
Thank god I'm already old and not born in to this shit.It's okay, just make friends with your new laptopian overlord and you two should get on just fine.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764161</id>
	<title>Re:Activity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255609860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But this is good for the future of Skynet, now it can locate the pesky meatbags much easier</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But this is good for the future of Skynet , now it can locate the pesky meatbags much easier</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But this is good for the future of Skynet, now it can locate the pesky meatbags much easier</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764811</id>
	<title>Defeats the purpose</title>
	<author>cadeon</author>
	<datestamp>1255615560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The idea behind turning off a monitor is to save power- but constantly polling an environment with active sonar uses power.</p><p>Polling is bad. Events are good. I say leave it like it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The idea behind turning off a monitor is to save power- but constantly polling an environment with active sonar uses power.Polling is bad .
Events are good .
I say leave it like it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The idea behind turning off a monitor is to save power- but constantly polling an environment with active sonar uses power.Polling is bad.
Events are good.
I say leave it like it is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764143</id>
	<title>Re:Takes Care of one of my pet peeves</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255609620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You make fun of it, some of us only really read the internet for the articles!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You make fun of it , some of us only really read the internet for the articles !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You make fun of it, some of us only really read the internet for the articles!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765651</id>
	<title>Re:Activity</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1255625580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can you?  My IM runs on my phone.  So it basically just says I'm always available.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you ?
My IM runs on my phone .
So it basically just says I 'm always available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you?
My IM runs on my phone.
So it basically just says I'm always available.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763051</id>
	<title>I'm one of those people that hears CRT Monitors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255603500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>And dimmer switches, cordless drill battery charges, and even a really annoying slice of whatever frequency god damn <em>bats</em> chatter at.  In short, my super power is above average HF hearing.  Hooray for me...
<br> <br>
Now, I like this idea, it's neat, I just really hope it operates well over 18khz so my head does not explode all Scanners style when I walk into a room full of laptops.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And dimmer switches , cordless drill battery charges , and even a really annoying slice of whatever frequency god damn bats chatter at .
In short , my super power is above average HF hearing .
Hooray for me.. . Now , I like this idea , it 's neat , I just really hope it operates well over 18khz so my head does not explode all Scanners style when I walk into a room full of laptops .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And dimmer switches, cordless drill battery charges, and even a really annoying slice of whatever frequency god damn bats chatter at.
In short, my super power is above average HF hearing.
Hooray for me...
 
Now, I like this idea, it's neat, I just really hope it operates well over 18khz so my head does not explode all Scanners style when I walk into a room full of laptops.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762811</id>
	<title>I saw this movie already.</title>
	<author>SOdhner</author>
	<datestamp>1255602420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looks like someone has been watching The Dark Knight.
<br> <br>
Hooray, Batman science!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like someone has been watching The Dark Knight .
Hooray , Batman science !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like someone has been watching The Dark Knight.
Hooray, Batman science!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763925</id>
	<title>So the device in Dark Knight</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1255608480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could be built. Interesting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could be built .
Interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could be built.
Interesting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765451</id>
	<title>Re:Activity</title>
	<author>Sparr0</author>
	<datestamp>1255623000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know numerous people who have bluetooth phones linked to their macs, and iChat sets their here/away status based on the state of the BT connection.  This is particularly annoying when someone walks PAST their desk during the work day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know numerous people who have bluetooth phones linked to their macs , and iChat sets their here/away status based on the state of the BT connection .
This is particularly annoying when someone walks PAST their desk during the work day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know numerous people who have bluetooth phones linked to their macs, and iChat sets their here/away status based on the state of the BT connection.
This is particularly annoying when someone walks PAST their desk during the work day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29766171</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder how...</title>
	<author>CAIMLAS</author>
	<datestamp>1255634760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think the 'generic' functionality of the speakers or microphone would make much difference. They are all of at least acceptable quality these days, even on laptops (albeit, usually very small).</p><p>I'd think this technology would be quite limited in a desktop, actually - unless the speakers and microphone are built into the LCD, at least. There'd be a great deal of sensitivity to ambient noise, machine noise, and the positioning of the speakers/microphone to each other; if they're not able to effectively -reflect- back to each other, you might have some problems.</p><p>I'd imagine that the technology uses triangulation more so than sonar, which is why I make this guess.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think the 'generic ' functionality of the speakers or microphone would make much difference .
They are all of at least acceptable quality these days , even on laptops ( albeit , usually very small ) .I 'd think this technology would be quite limited in a desktop , actually - unless the speakers and microphone are built into the LCD , at least .
There 'd be a great deal of sensitivity to ambient noise , machine noise , and the positioning of the speakers/microphone to each other ; if they 're not able to effectively -reflect- back to each other , you might have some problems.I 'd imagine that the technology uses triangulation more so than sonar , which is why I make this guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think the 'generic' functionality of the speakers or microphone would make much difference.
They are all of at least acceptable quality these days, even on laptops (albeit, usually very small).I'd think this technology would be quite limited in a desktop, actually - unless the speakers and microphone are built into the LCD, at least.
There'd be a great deal of sensitivity to ambient noise, machine noise, and the positioning of the speakers/microphone to each other; if they're not able to effectively -reflect- back to each other, you might have some problems.I'd imagine that the technology uses triangulation more so than sonar, which is why I make this guess.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762907</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762787</id>
	<title>Safe?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255602300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Damn, now PETA is going to bitch about what happens when dolphins use these laptops.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn , now PETA is going to bitch about what happens when dolphins use these laptops .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn, now PETA is going to bitch about what happens when dolphins use these laptops.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764077</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder how...</title>
	<author>flibbajobber</author>
	<datestamp>1255609260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It could do a reasonable scan across the plane in which the speakers are located. A properly-phased stereo signal played across the two speakers would effectively 'scan' horizontally, behaving as a basic phased array. Some proper deconvolution and you could probably get x-resolution to within a few wavelengths - perhaps an inch or so with ultrasonic frequencies.<br> <br>

That's probably sufficient to combine with the webcam to do 'proper' facial recognition, while using the ultrasonic scan to do a quick check on whether it's a flat surface (i.e. photograph) or vaguely head-shaped.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It could do a reasonable scan across the plane in which the speakers are located .
A properly-phased stereo signal played across the two speakers would effectively 'scan ' horizontally , behaving as a basic phased array .
Some proper deconvolution and you could probably get x-resolution to within a few wavelengths - perhaps an inch or so with ultrasonic frequencies .
That 's probably sufficient to combine with the webcam to do 'proper ' facial recognition , while using the ultrasonic scan to do a quick check on whether it 's a flat surface ( i.e .
photograph ) or vaguely head-shaped .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It could do a reasonable scan across the plane in which the speakers are located.
A properly-phased stereo signal played across the two speakers would effectively 'scan' horizontally, behaving as a basic phased array.
Some proper deconvolution and you could probably get x-resolution to within a few wavelengths - perhaps an inch or so with ultrasonic frequencies.
That's probably sufficient to combine with the webcam to do 'proper' facial recognition, while using the ultrasonic scan to do a quick check on whether it's a flat surface (i.e.
photograph) or vaguely head-shaped.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762907</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763231</id>
	<title>How about a license ; how about saying Linux(tm)</title>
	<author>rtfa-troll</author>
	<datestamp>1255604340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It would be nice if they would make the software license clear.  Even if just to say that "this is government sponsored and so available for copying with no restrictions".  Also at the bottom of the page they say '"Windows" is a registered trademark of the Microsoft Corporation.' but forget to mention that Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be nice if they would make the software license clear .
Even if just to say that " this is government sponsored and so available for copying with no restrictions " .
Also at the bottom of the page they say ' " Windows " is a registered trademark of the Microsoft Corporation .
' but forget to mention that Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be nice if they would make the software license clear.
Even if just to say that "this is government sponsored and so available for copying with no restrictions".
Also at the bottom of the page they say '"Windows" is a registered trademark of the Microsoft Corporation.
' but forget to mention that Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763921</id>
	<title>Could be Costly...</title>
	<author>jamesivie</author>
	<datestamp>1255608480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ultrasonic...sounds like a good way to have your dog pee all over your laptop.  No thanks!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ultrasonic...sounds like a good way to have your dog pee all over your laptop .
No thanks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ultrasonic...sounds like a good way to have your dog pee all over your laptop.
No thanks!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763967</id>
	<title>Re:Activity</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1255608720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're  a paranoid idiot.</p><p>Impractical and unrealistic in the extreme .</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're a paranoid idiot.Impractical and unrealistic in the extreme .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're  a paranoid idiot.Impractical and unrealistic in the extreme .</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763761</id>
	<title>Re:Activity</title>
	<author>Sam36</author>
	<datestamp>1255607520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is hilarious and I agree, unfortunately I am only in my 20's</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is hilarious and I agree , unfortunately I am only in my 20 's</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is hilarious and I agree, unfortunately I am only in my 20's</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29766221</id>
	<title>Re:I'm one of those people that hears CRT Monitors</title>
	<author>CAIMLAS</author>
	<datestamp>1255635780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Huh. You mean that isn't normal? I can hear all of those things, and I've always been highly agitated by high-pitched sounds as well. The bats drive me crazy during summer nights, and I've been tickled pink since LCDs have replaced CRTs wholesale. The one that irritates me the most, though, are power supplies on brown power, or just poor quality power supplies, and anything that's performing PWM with a high wattage. I HATE cooking on an electric stove and using the microwave.</p><p>I haven't had my hearing tested since probably early grade school, but I don't recall anything special. But it'd be interesting if I could, indeed, hear a much higher frequency than most people. (Interestingly, my wife can't hear a lot of the things that irritate me which I can't identify - "Hey, you hear that? Help me find it!" -&gt; "I can't hear anything!"</p><p>Damn high pitch sounds. While they might be good for echolocation, they are absolutely impossible to track down at times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Huh .
You mean that is n't normal ?
I can hear all of those things , and I 've always been highly agitated by high-pitched sounds as well .
The bats drive me crazy during summer nights , and I 've been tickled pink since LCDs have replaced CRTs wholesale .
The one that irritates me the most , though , are power supplies on brown power , or just poor quality power supplies , and anything that 's performing PWM with a high wattage .
I HATE cooking on an electric stove and using the microwave.I have n't had my hearing tested since probably early grade school , but I do n't recall anything special .
But it 'd be interesting if I could , indeed , hear a much higher frequency than most people .
( Interestingly , my wife ca n't hear a lot of the things that irritate me which I ca n't identify - " Hey , you hear that ?
Help me find it !
" - &gt; " I ca n't hear anything !
" Damn high pitch sounds .
While they might be good for echolocation , they are absolutely impossible to track down at times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Huh.
You mean that isn't normal?
I can hear all of those things, and I've always been highly agitated by high-pitched sounds as well.
The bats drive me crazy during summer nights, and I've been tickled pink since LCDs have replaced CRTs wholesale.
The one that irritates me the most, though, are power supplies on brown power, or just poor quality power supplies, and anything that's performing PWM with a high wattage.
I HATE cooking on an electric stove and using the microwave.I haven't had my hearing tested since probably early grade school, but I don't recall anything special.
But it'd be interesting if I could, indeed, hear a much higher frequency than most people.
(Interestingly, my wife can't hear a lot of the things that irritate me which I can't identify - "Hey, you hear that?
Help me find it!
" -&gt; "I can't hear anything!
"Damn high pitch sounds.
While they might be good for echolocation, they are absolutely impossible to track down at times.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762983</id>
	<title>Re:Takes Care of one of my pet peeves</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255603140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Something like this has been available for KDE for ages, only it uses Bluetooth.</p><p>You tell it to listen for your phone - when you leave your desk (presumably with the phone in your pocket/holster/etc.) the screen lock kicks in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Something like this has been available for KDE for ages , only it uses Bluetooth.You tell it to listen for your phone - when you leave your desk ( presumably with the phone in your pocket/holster/etc .
) the screen lock kicks in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something like this has been available for KDE for ages, only it uses Bluetooth.You tell it to listen for your phone - when you leave your desk (presumably with the phone in your pocket/holster/etc.
) the screen lock kicks in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762793</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762865</id>
	<title>I'm still here!</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1255602600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm just asleep, you insensitive clod! (or does it detect snoring?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm just asleep , you insensitive clod !
( or does it detect snoring ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm just asleep, you insensitive clod!
(or does it detect snoring?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763923</id>
	<title>Dog ears</title>
	<author>mikem170</author>
	<datestamp>1255608480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
I wonder if this will be like a dog whistle, and end up being something that will drive Fido crazy?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if this will be like a dog whistle , and end up being something that will drive Fido crazy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I wonder if this will be like a dog whistle, and end up being something that will drive Fido crazy?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29766133</id>
	<title>Reverse that</title>
	<author>skastrik</author>
	<datestamp>1255634340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Before leaving the computer I just press WinKey+L.<p>
Now, having to log in -again- when I return is slow and error-prone, especially while sipping coffee. The solution is obviously to use the same software to auto-login a soon as it detects the presence of a user.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Before leaving the computer I just press WinKey + L .
Now , having to log in -again- when I return is slow and error-prone , especially while sipping coffee .
The solution is obviously to use the same software to auto-login a soon as it detects the presence of a user .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Before leaving the computer I just press WinKey+L.
Now, having to log in -again- when I return is slow and error-prone, especially while sipping coffee.
The solution is obviously to use the same software to auto-login a soon as it detects the presence of a user.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765217</id>
	<title>authentic cheap discount wholesale women or men  A</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255620000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Welcome to our website:   Http://www.tntshoes.com<br>We offer grade AAA shoes here with wholesale price! Our shoes have some advantages as following:<br>1) Grade AAA shoes,handbags,t-shirts,belts,sunglass,caps.boots,etc!<br>2) The wholesale price!<br>3) 100\% safe, the best delivery terms!<br>4) No mini order here!<br>5) The best service!<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; OUR WEBSITE:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Http://www.tntshoes.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    Welcome to our website : Http : //www.tntshoes.comWe offer grade AAA shoes here with wholesale price !
Our shoes have some advantages as following : 1 ) Grade AAA shoes,handbags,t-shirts,belts,sunglass,caps.boots,etc ! 2 ) The wholesale price ! 3 ) 100 \ % safe , the best delivery terms ! 4 ) No mini order here ! 5 ) The best service !
    OUR WEBSITE :                                                         YAHOO : shoppertrade @ yahoo.com.cn                                                                 MSN : shoppertrade @ hotmail.com                                                                 Http : //www.tntshoes.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    Welcome to our website:   Http://www.tntshoes.comWe offer grade AAA shoes here with wholesale price!
Our shoes have some advantages as following:1) Grade AAA shoes,handbags,t-shirts,belts,sunglass,caps.boots,etc!2) The wholesale price!3) 100\% safe, the best delivery terms!4) No mini order here!5) The best service!
    OUR WEBSITE:
                                                        YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn
                                                                MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com
                                                                Http://www.tntshoes.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29766651</id>
	<title>My Dog</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255687200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So that's why my dog keeps barking / biting my laptop!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So that 's why my dog keeps barking / biting my laptop !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So that's why my dog keeps barking / biting my laptop!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763653</id>
	<title>Re:Takes Care of one of my pet peeves</title>
	<author>jmerlin</author>
	<datestamp>1255606800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You actually read the articles?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You actually read the articles ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You actually read the articles?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763217</id>
	<title>Re:Activity</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1255604280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Your instant messenger will know when your available or not.<br>Your phone system could direct your calls to you mobile if your away from the desk.</p></div></blockquote><p>I think this is EXACTLY what he is concerned with.  Do you realize how much information you tell others in the world about you with JUST your IM status?  Do you realize how easy it is to use this simple bit of information already to plot crimes?  Give me a week of watching little more than the IM status of active IMs and twitterers and I can pretty much tell you where you are at during any point in your day if your using a regular schedule.</p><p>He cares and is concerned about this potential problem.</p><p>You haven't even realized how big of a problem it is.</p><p>Roughly speaking, IM status is nearly as good as hang a sign on your home that automatically says 'No One Home!' when you leave.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your instant messenger will know when your available or not.Your phone system could direct your calls to you mobile if your away from the desk.I think this is EXACTLY what he is concerned with .
Do you realize how much information you tell others in the world about you with JUST your IM status ?
Do you realize how easy it is to use this simple bit of information already to plot crimes ?
Give me a week of watching little more than the IM status of active IMs and twitterers and I can pretty much tell you where you are at during any point in your day if your using a regular schedule.He cares and is concerned about this potential problem.You have n't even realized how big of a problem it is.Roughly speaking , IM status is nearly as good as hang a sign on your home that automatically says 'No One Home !
' when you leave .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your instant messenger will know when your available or not.Your phone system could direct your calls to you mobile if your away from the desk.I think this is EXACTLY what he is concerned with.
Do you realize how much information you tell others in the world about you with JUST your IM status?
Do you realize how easy it is to use this simple bit of information already to plot crimes?
Give me a week of watching little more than the IM status of active IMs and twitterers and I can pretty much tell you where you are at during any point in your day if your using a regular schedule.He cares and is concerned about this potential problem.You haven't even realized how big of a problem it is.Roughly speaking, IM status is nearly as good as hang a sign on your home that automatically says 'No One Home!
' when you leave.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762995</id>
	<title>Re:Takes Care of one of my pet peeves</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255603260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't time your screensaver so aggressively. Turning the screen off after just a few minutes is useless and just puts unnecessary strain on the backlight (which takes only a limited number of power cycles, unless it is LED).</p><p>I use Ampsoft's <a href="http://www.ampsoft.net/" title="ampsoft.net" rel="nofollow">Screen Saver Control</a> [ampsoft.net] to manually put the screen into power saving mode with Win+P (and the standard Win+L to lock the screen, if I think that's necessary). I have set the power saving mode to kick in after 2 hours of inactivity otherwise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't time your screensaver so aggressively .
Turning the screen off after just a few minutes is useless and just puts unnecessary strain on the backlight ( which takes only a limited number of power cycles , unless it is LED ) .I use Ampsoft 's Screen Saver Control [ ampsoft.net ] to manually put the screen into power saving mode with Win + P ( and the standard Win + L to lock the screen , if I think that 's necessary ) .
I have set the power saving mode to kick in after 2 hours of inactivity otherwise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't time your screensaver so aggressively.
Turning the screen off after just a few minutes is useless and just puts unnecessary strain on the backlight (which takes only a limited number of power cycles, unless it is LED).I use Ampsoft's Screen Saver Control [ampsoft.net] to manually put the screen into power saving mode with Win+P (and the standard Win+L to lock the screen, if I think that's necessary).
I have set the power saving mode to kick in after 2 hours of inactivity otherwise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762793</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764243</id>
	<title>Re:Headphones</title>
	<author>Miner Willy</author>
	<datestamp>1255610460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...how cool would it be to turn on a computer by putting on the headphones?</p></div><p>Meh.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...how cool would it be to turn on a computer by putting on the headphones ? Meh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...how cool would it be to turn on a computer by putting on the headphones?Meh.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763661</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29767649</id>
	<title>What about pets?</title>
	<author>justthinkit</author>
	<datestamp>1255701960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This was my first thought -- would all that high frequency sound annoy pets?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This was my first thought -- would all that high frequency sound annoy pets ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was my first thought -- would all that high frequency sound annoy pets?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762787</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29774193</id>
	<title>Re:How about a license ; how about saying Linux(tm</title>
	<author>rtfa-troll</author>
	<datestamp>1255695720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Note that they seem to have added this information (addendum 10/16/09) after my comment; before there was nothing saying that it was "available for copying with no restrictions".  All I can say is thanks.  That was nice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Note that they seem to have added this information ( addendum 10/16/09 ) after my comment ; before there was nothing saying that it was " available for copying with no restrictions " .
All I can say is thanks .
That was nice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Note that they seem to have added this information (addendum 10/16/09) after my comment; before there was nothing saying that it was "available for copying with no restrictions".
All I can say is thanks.
That was nice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29769867</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762897</id>
	<title>Sounds like an accused rapist to me...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255602780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But she wanted it....  Really...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But she wanted it.... Really.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But she wanted it....  Really...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29767011</id>
	<title>Save megatonnes of CO2 with this - &amp; more!</title>
	<author>a-zA-Z0-9$\_.+!*'(),x</author>
	<datestamp>1255693440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cool idea! You could save megatonnes of CO2 with this.</p><p>Suggestions:<br>1.  Allow configuration of "absent time" before darkening screen<br>2.  Provide link to OS Power settings<br>3.  Allow configuring (auto/manual) of Hz of sound, from 16khz to system max<br>-   to avoid any interference from other noise sources<br>-   for kid/pet preference (BTW, my dog didn't notice - standard poodle)<br>4.  Provide totals by day/week/... of different activity states.<br>5.  Show timeline along display box<br>5.  Allow stretching of display box and scaling of time line</p><p>Ideasfor further investigation:<br>a.  use stereo speakers to determine how centred the echos are. Consider "absent from<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; computer" (vs absent from room) if not both centred and close. You could allow a<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; configuration setting for this too - "how centred / how close", e.g., a slider on the<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; display screen, to compare with the graphs.<br>b.  Use different frequencies within speaker/microphone ranges to "fingerprint"a room<br>c.  Use "fingerprinting" to come to conclusions about what kind of room, e.g., bath stall,<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; outdoors, small, large, busy, empty, dimensions- what can you discover<br>d.  Use 2-speaker sonar to create a crude touch screen.  (No 3d mouse since you need a<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; plane to localise a point in 3D with only 2 speakers.) Could calibrate like on an old<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; palm - push here, showing a X in various places.</p><p>You must have hit the beta-tester jackpot with a Slashdot reference!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cool idea !
You could save megatonnes of CO2 with this.Suggestions : 1 .
Allow configuration of " absent time " before darkening screen2 .
Provide link to OS Power settings3 .
Allow configuring ( auto/manual ) of Hz of sound , from 16khz to system max- to avoid any interference from other noise sources- for kid/pet preference ( BTW , my dog did n't notice - standard poodle ) 4 .
Provide totals by day/week/... of different activity states.5 .
Show timeline along display box5 .
Allow stretching of display box and scaling of time lineIdeasfor further investigation : a. use stereo speakers to determine how centred the echos are .
Consider " absent from         computer " ( vs absent from room ) if not both centred and close .
You could allow a         configuration setting for this too - " how centred / how close " , e.g. , a slider on the         display screen , to compare with the graphs.b .
Use different frequencies within speaker/microphone ranges to " fingerprint " a roomc .
Use " fingerprinting " to come to conclusions about what kind of room , e.g. , bath stall ,         outdoors , small , large , busy , empty , dimensions- what can you discoverd .
Use 2-speaker sonar to create a crude touch screen .
( No 3d mouse since you need a         plane to localise a point in 3D with only 2 speakers .
) Could calibrate like on an old         palm - push here , showing a X in various places.You must have hit the beta-tester jackpot with a Slashdot reference !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cool idea!
You could save megatonnes of CO2 with this.Suggestions:1.
Allow configuration of "absent time" before darkening screen2.
Provide link to OS Power settings3.
Allow configuring (auto/manual) of Hz of sound, from 16khz to system max-   to avoid any interference from other noise sources-   for kid/pet preference (BTW, my dog didn't notice - standard poodle)4.
Provide totals by day/week/... of different activity states.5.
Show timeline along display box5.
Allow stretching of display box and scaling of time lineIdeasfor further investigation:a.  use stereo speakers to determine how centred the echos are.
Consider "absent from
        computer" (vs absent from room) if not both centred and close.
You could allow a
        configuration setting for this too - "how centred / how close", e.g., a slider on the
        display screen, to compare with the graphs.b.
Use different frequencies within speaker/microphone ranges to "fingerprint"a roomc.
Use "fingerprinting" to come to conclusions about what kind of room, e.g., bath stall,
        outdoors, small, large, busy, empty, dimensions- what can you discoverd.
Use 2-speaker sonar to create a crude touch screen.
(No 3d mouse since you need a
        plane to localise a point in 3D with only 2 speakers.
) Could calibrate like on an old
        palm - push here, showing a X in various places.You must have hit the beta-tester jackpot with a Slashdot reference!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765659</id>
	<title>Re:Activity</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1255625640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right, because it's much worse for the computer to know there's something in front of it as opposed to just knowing there's someone typing or moving the mouse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right , because it 's much worse for the computer to know there 's something in front of it as opposed to just knowing there 's someone typing or moving the mouse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right, because it's much worse for the computer to know there's something in front of it as opposed to just knowing there's someone typing or moving the mouse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29766249</id>
	<title>What's surprising about it?</title>
	<author>Gordonjcp</author>
	<datestamp>1255636440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Surprisingly, the mic and speakers of many laptop computers are sensitive to ultrasonic frequencies. </i> </p><p>For anyone who actually knows about how microphones and speakers work, it's not particularly surprising at all. Timothy needs to go to school, and learn a little bit of physics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Surprisingly , the mic and speakers of many laptop computers are sensitive to ultrasonic frequencies .
For anyone who actually knows about how microphones and speakers work , it 's not particularly surprising at all .
Timothy needs to go to school , and learn a little bit of physics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Surprisingly, the mic and speakers of many laptop computers are sensitive to ultrasonic frequencies.
For anyone who actually knows about how microphones and speakers work, it's not particularly surprising at all.
Timothy needs to go to school, and learn a little bit of physics.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763269</id>
	<title>Re:Activity</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1255604640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
The computer as a whole doesn't have to know you're there or not.   The program running the sonar just has to know you weren't there at one point, to trigger the locking.
</p><p>
By the way,  if this <b>one program</b>, can figure it out,  then any program would've been able to figure it out all along, using the same technique...
</p><p>
This isn't a security issue that would be "patched"..  there's just a workaround of  not having a mic, or use a headset instead,  or physically mute/disconnect your mic when not in use.
</p><p>
Heck, you could even use the 'mute' switch as a way to quickly lock the computer.  Detect background noise instead  of doing fancy schmancy sonar.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The computer as a whole does n't have to know you 're there or not .
The program running the sonar just has to know you were n't there at one point , to trigger the locking .
By the way , if this one program , can figure it out , then any program would 've been able to figure it out all along , using the same technique.. . This is n't a security issue that would be " patched " .. there 's just a workaround of not having a mic , or use a headset instead , or physically mute/disconnect your mic when not in use .
Heck , you could even use the 'mute ' switch as a way to quickly lock the computer .
Detect background noise instead of doing fancy schmancy sonar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
The computer as a whole doesn't have to know you're there or not.
The program running the sonar just has to know you weren't there at one point, to trigger the locking.
By the way,  if this one program, can figure it out,  then any program would've been able to figure it out all along, using the same technique...

This isn't a security issue that would be "patched"..  there's just a workaround of  not having a mic, or use a headset instead,  or physically mute/disconnect your mic when not in use.
Heck, you could even use the 'mute' switch as a way to quickly lock the computer.
Detect background noise instead  of doing fancy schmancy sonar.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763113</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder how...</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1255603740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, because your generic PC speakers and mics which are in different configurations on every model of laptop out there are made to produce images.</p><p>What this will give you is 'there is something large near me, approximately X far away from this computer.  Where X is somewhere near about  the average distance between the user and the speakers and the user and the mic.</p><p>If someone ACTUALLY wanted to implement this tech, they'd just stop putting the IR unit on laptops in weird places such as the front edge or the side and put it on the top of the display, right next to the web cam that almost every laptop now days has that is more than capable of doing the same thing, and certainly FAR FAR more capable doing it than the speakers and mic.</p><p>Wait, that is where my IR unit is!  A slight firmware mod and its now capable of doing exactly the same thing, but actually not sucking as at it.</p><p>Of course that was just my first thought.  The idea of trying to shoehorn a cheapo speaker/mic combo (and all laptops have shitty sound systems, regardless of how much extra you paid for them) into an imaging device is just silly.  There are at least 5 better ways to do it that would be more cost effective and require far less modification.</p><p>As far as the webcam not working when its dark<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... they aren't human eyes, they don't see the same way we do, even if what they do see is translated into roughly the same thing you would see.  They are more than capable of seeing infrared as soon as you remove the IR filter present on most of them.  No backlight needed, you provide it with your own body heat.  And its actually CHEAPER as you are removing components from the build.</p><p>Sonar gets used when every other far better method we have won't work due to cost in most cases, it rates only slightly higher than 'can we feel it with our hands' as far as imaging, unless of course you're on a nuclear powered sub with millions and millions of dollars worth of equipment and sensors listening to the ocean (different medium than air) around you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , because your generic PC speakers and mics which are in different configurations on every model of laptop out there are made to produce images.What this will give you is 'there is something large near me , approximately X far away from this computer .
Where X is somewhere near about the average distance between the user and the speakers and the user and the mic.If someone ACTUALLY wanted to implement this tech , they 'd just stop putting the IR unit on laptops in weird places such as the front edge or the side and put it on the top of the display , right next to the web cam that almost every laptop now days has that is more than capable of doing the same thing , and certainly FAR FAR more capable doing it than the speakers and mic.Wait , that is where my IR unit is !
A slight firmware mod and its now capable of doing exactly the same thing , but actually not sucking as at it.Of course that was just my first thought .
The idea of trying to shoehorn a cheapo speaker/mic combo ( and all laptops have shitty sound systems , regardless of how much extra you paid for them ) into an imaging device is just silly .
There are at least 5 better ways to do it that would be more cost effective and require far less modification.As far as the webcam not working when its dark ... they are n't human eyes , they do n't see the same way we do , even if what they do see is translated into roughly the same thing you would see .
They are more than capable of seeing infrared as soon as you remove the IR filter present on most of them .
No backlight needed , you provide it with your own body heat .
And its actually CHEAPER as you are removing components from the build.Sonar gets used when every other far better method we have wo n't work due to cost in most cases , it rates only slightly higher than 'can we feel it with our hands ' as far as imaging , unless of course you 're on a nuclear powered sub with millions and millions of dollars worth of equipment and sensors listening to the ocean ( different medium than air ) around you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, because your generic PC speakers and mics which are in different configurations on every model of laptop out there are made to produce images.What this will give you is 'there is something large near me, approximately X far away from this computer.
Where X is somewhere near about  the average distance between the user and the speakers and the user and the mic.If someone ACTUALLY wanted to implement this tech, they'd just stop putting the IR unit on laptops in weird places such as the front edge or the side and put it on the top of the display, right next to the web cam that almost every laptop now days has that is more than capable of doing the same thing, and certainly FAR FAR more capable doing it than the speakers and mic.Wait, that is where my IR unit is!
A slight firmware mod and its now capable of doing exactly the same thing, but actually not sucking as at it.Of course that was just my first thought.
The idea of trying to shoehorn a cheapo speaker/mic combo (and all laptops have shitty sound systems, regardless of how much extra you paid for them) into an imaging device is just silly.
There are at least 5 better ways to do it that would be more cost effective and require far less modification.As far as the webcam not working when its dark ... they aren't human eyes, they don't see the same way we do, even if what they do see is translated into roughly the same thing you would see.
They are more than capable of seeing infrared as soon as you remove the IR filter present on most of them.
No backlight needed, you provide it with your own body heat.
And its actually CHEAPER as you are removing components from the build.Sonar gets used when every other far better method we have won't work due to cost in most cases, it rates only slightly higher than 'can we feel it with our hands' as far as imaging, unless of course you're on a nuclear powered sub with millions and millions of dollars worth of equipment and sensors listening to the ocean (different medium than air) around you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762907</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29769939</id>
	<title>Re:will it work underwater?</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1255714440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No.  The air/plastic/water interface will just reflect almost all of the sound.  You'd need an underwater transducer specifically designed to couple well with water.  You also won't be making pictures of your wife/daughter/sister/friend's unborn baby.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
The air/plastic/water interface will just reflect almost all of the sound .
You 'd need an underwater transducer specifically designed to couple well with water .
You also wo n't be making pictures of your wife/daughter/sister/friend 's unborn baby .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
The air/plastic/water interface will just reflect almost all of the sound.
You'd need an underwater transducer specifically designed to couple well with water.
You also won't be making pictures of your wife/daughter/sister/friend's unborn baby.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765353</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764275</id>
	<title>Alarm clock</title>
	<author>Verdatum</author>
	<datestamp>1255610760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the mechanism could be tweaked properly such that it can hear the difference between soft breathing and fan harmonics, this would be a great module for an alarm clock.  It wouldn't bother sounding off when you're out of town, and it would automatically turn back on if you were there originally but haven't left for work yet.  (too lazy to find the link to the guy who did the same general thing, instead by detecting his body weight added to the bed.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the mechanism could be tweaked properly such that it can hear the difference between soft breathing and fan harmonics , this would be a great module for an alarm clock .
It would n't bother sounding off when you 're out of town , and it would automatically turn back on if you were there originally but have n't left for work yet .
( too lazy to find the link to the guy who did the same general thing , instead by detecting his body weight added to the bed .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the mechanism could be tweaked properly such that it can hear the difference between soft breathing and fan harmonics, this would be a great module for an alarm clock.
It wouldn't bother sounding off when you're out of town, and it would automatically turn back on if you were there originally but haven't left for work yet.
(too lazy to find the link to the guy who did the same general thing, instead by detecting his body weight added to the bed.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763093</id>
	<title>Re:Activity</title>
	<author>Jurily</author>
	<datestamp>1255603680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Mouse/keyboard activity timeout works nicely for that.</p></div><p>Actually, it doesn't. What if I'm watching a movie with mplayer from the bed? (Yes, Vista starts up indexing and screen savers based on keyboard and mouse input. It sucks.)</p><p>Of course, ultrasonic won't solve this. Who the fuck said I can only use my computer if I'm sitting in front of it? So now if I'm running an overnight batch job, the CPU and I/O are up for grabs?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Thank god I'm already old and not born in to this shit.</p></div><p>Me too. I'm 23.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mouse/keyboard activity timeout works nicely for that.Actually , it does n't .
What if I 'm watching a movie with mplayer from the bed ?
( Yes , Vista starts up indexing and screen savers based on keyboard and mouse input .
It sucks .
) Of course , ultrasonic wo n't solve this .
Who the fuck said I can only use my computer if I 'm sitting in front of it ?
So now if I 'm running an overnight batch job , the CPU and I/O are up for grabs ? Thank god I 'm already old and not born in to this shit.Me too .
I 'm 23 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mouse/keyboard activity timeout works nicely for that.Actually, it doesn't.
What if I'm watching a movie with mplayer from the bed?
(Yes, Vista starts up indexing and screen savers based on keyboard and mouse input.
It sucks.
)Of course, ultrasonic won't solve this.
Who the fuck said I can only use my computer if I'm sitting in front of it?
So now if I'm running an overnight batch job, the CPU and I/O are up for grabs?Thank god I'm already old and not born in to this shit.Me too.
I'm 23.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762845</id>
	<title>Re:Takes Care of one of my pet peeves</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255602540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I, too, often find myself looking at a screen for extended periods of time without touching the mouse or keyboard, while I, ah... read the articles. Nothing ruins a good article more than having the screen saver start up right as you are about to finish.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I , too , often find myself looking at a screen for extended periods of time without touching the mouse or keyboard , while I , ah... read the articles .
Nothing ruins a good article more than having the screen saver start up right as you are about to finish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, too, often find myself looking at a screen for extended periods of time without touching the mouse or keyboard, while I, ah... read the articles.
Nothing ruins a good article more than having the screen saver start up right as you are about to finish.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762793</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763661</id>
	<title>Re:Headphones</title>
	<author>d4nowar</author>
	<datestamp>1255606860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have the headphones detect if they are on someone's head using the same sonar technique. If not, sleep.</p><p>Bad if you have headphones plugged in but don't use them. But how cool would it be to turn on a computer by putting on the headphones?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have the headphones detect if they are on someone 's head using the same sonar technique .
If not , sleep.Bad if you have headphones plugged in but do n't use them .
But how cool would it be to turn on a computer by putting on the headphones ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have the headphones detect if they are on someone's head using the same sonar technique.
If not, sleep.Bad if you have headphones plugged in but don't use them.
But how cool would it be to turn on a computer by putting on the headphones?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764451</id>
	<title>Re:I'm one of those people that hears CRT Monitors</title>
	<author>Jay L</author>
	<datestamp>1255612200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Likewise.  I'm 38, and I think my upper limit's dropped to below 17KHz, but still above the CRT flyback frequency (15.6?).  Worse.. I seem to recall that exposure to high-frequency noise is what -causes- the loss of high-frequency hearing as we age (the hair cells become brittle and eventually snap, or something like that).</p><p>If I'm right, this "high-frequency" sonar could actually cause hearing problems.  Bad.  The white paper says they're using 20KHz tones.  I wonder if the average laptop speaker/mic/OS can deal with stuff closer to 30-40KHz; that might be safer, even if there's a drop-off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Likewise .
I 'm 38 , and I think my upper limit 's dropped to below 17KHz , but still above the CRT flyback frequency ( 15.6 ? ) .
Worse.. I seem to recall that exposure to high-frequency noise is what -causes- the loss of high-frequency hearing as we age ( the hair cells become brittle and eventually snap , or something like that ) .If I 'm right , this " high-frequency " sonar could actually cause hearing problems .
Bad. The white paper says they 're using 20KHz tones .
I wonder if the average laptop speaker/mic/OS can deal with stuff closer to 30-40KHz ; that might be safer , even if there 's a drop-off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Likewise.
I'm 38, and I think my upper limit's dropped to below 17KHz, but still above the CRT flyback frequency (15.6?).
Worse.. I seem to recall that exposure to high-frequency noise is what -causes- the loss of high-frequency hearing as we age (the hair cells become brittle and eventually snap, or something like that).If I'm right, this "high-frequency" sonar could actually cause hearing problems.
Bad.  The white paper says they're using 20KHz tones.
I wonder if the average laptop speaker/mic/OS can deal with stuff closer to 30-40KHz; that might be safer, even if there's a drop-off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765351</id>
	<title>Re:How about a license ; how about saying Linux(tm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255621680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like they addressed those concerns; see the "Source code README addendum (10/15/09)" at the bottom of the download page.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like they addressed those concerns ; see the " Source code README addendum ( 10/15/09 ) " at the bottom of the download page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like they addressed those concerns; see the "Source code README addendum (10/15/09)" at the bottom of the download page.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763231</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764743</id>
	<title>Re:I'm one of those people that hears CRT Monitors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255615020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>add motion detectors, really old TV remotes, neon signs, flourescent ballasts, so on. Please no!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>add motion detectors , really old TV remotes , neon signs , flourescent ballasts , so on .
Please no !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>add motion detectors, really old TV remotes, neon signs, flourescent ballasts, so on.
Please no!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763997</id>
	<title>Re:How about a license ; how about saying Linux(tm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255608840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're right.  Not including a license text was an oversight.  The source code is made available without any restriction.  I updated the download page now says this.<br>-Steve</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're right .
Not including a license text was an oversight .
The source code is made available without any restriction .
I updated the download page now says this.-Steve</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're right.
Not including a license text was an oversight.
The source code is made available without any restriction.
I updated the download page now says this.-Steve</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763231</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765223</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder how...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255620060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Even a bust of your face wouldn't work the same unless it accurately simulated your bone structure and flesh.</p></div><p>Yeah, that's the problem with the artistically-inclined intruders these days, they care enough to carry a bust to the target site but are just too damn lazy to get the right level of detail on the cheekbones for proper authentication.</p><p>Well, at least they can use it for a smash 'n grab.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even a bust of your face would n't work the same unless it accurately simulated your bone structure and flesh.Yeah , that 's the problem with the artistically-inclined intruders these days , they care enough to carry a bust to the target site but are just too damn lazy to get the right level of detail on the cheekbones for proper authentication.Well , at least they can use it for a smash 'n grab .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even a bust of your face wouldn't work the same unless it accurately simulated your bone structure and flesh.Yeah, that's the problem with the artistically-inclined intruders these days, they care enough to carry a bust to the target site but are just too damn lazy to get the right level of detail on the cheekbones for proper authentication.Well, at least they can use it for a smash 'n grab.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762907</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763179</id>
	<title>Re:Activity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255604040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So what do you do about the period of time between when you stop typing and walk away, and when the computer times out and locks the system down.</p><p>Too short of a time out and it annoys the piss out of you everytime it locks the machine while you compose a thought in your head, which means you get distracted, lose the thought and have to start over.</p><p>Too long of a time out and when you walk away, I walk up and own you.</p><p>For most people, the longer timeout isn't a big concern, they aren't really doing anything THAT important that it matters, which is why those people also tend to leave purses on the desk, with unlocked drawers and all sorts of other items laying on them.</p><p>But if you work somewhere that security is a high priority, and you trust no one around you, the ball game is a little different and you want to do your best to not depend on 'fallback' methods such as timeouts, which are really just a pathetic last ditch attempt at security.  I'm not saying to stop using it, but for people to whom this stuff ACTUALLY MATTERS, its a piss poor solution.</p><p>You and I?  Its more than adequate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what do you do about the period of time between when you stop typing and walk away , and when the computer times out and locks the system down.Too short of a time out and it annoys the piss out of you everytime it locks the machine while you compose a thought in your head , which means you get distracted , lose the thought and have to start over.Too long of a time out and when you walk away , I walk up and own you.For most people , the longer timeout is n't a big concern , they are n't really doing anything THAT important that it matters , which is why those people also tend to leave purses on the desk , with unlocked drawers and all sorts of other items laying on them.But if you work somewhere that security is a high priority , and you trust no one around you , the ball game is a little different and you want to do your best to not depend on 'fallback ' methods such as timeouts , which are really just a pathetic last ditch attempt at security .
I 'm not saying to stop using it , but for people to whom this stuff ACTUALLY MATTERS , its a piss poor solution.You and I ?
Its more than adequate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what do you do about the period of time between when you stop typing and walk away, and when the computer times out and locks the system down.Too short of a time out and it annoys the piss out of you everytime it locks the machine while you compose a thought in your head, which means you get distracted, lose the thought and have to start over.Too long of a time out and when you walk away, I walk up and own you.For most people, the longer timeout isn't a big concern, they aren't really doing anything THAT important that it matters, which is why those people also tend to leave purses on the desk, with unlocked drawers and all sorts of other items laying on them.But if you work somewhere that security is a high priority, and you trust no one around you, the ball game is a little different and you want to do your best to not depend on 'fallback' methods such as timeouts, which are really just a pathetic last ditch attempt at security.
I'm not saying to stop using it, but for people to whom this stuff ACTUALLY MATTERS, its a piss poor solution.You and I?
Its more than adequate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29767693</id>
	<title>Re:Takes Care of one of my pet peeves</title>
	<author>puregen1us</author>
	<datestamp>1255702380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, and I had it running on OSX about 5 years ago too as part of Salling Clicker.</p><p>It's just remote control software, but one of the functions was to detect the presence of the phone.</p><p>Alernatively you can turn up the volume as you walk away too, or pause music, video, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , and I had it running on OSX about 5 years ago too as part of Salling Clicker.It 's just remote control software , but one of the functions was to detect the presence of the phone.Alernatively you can turn up the volume as you walk away too , or pause music , video , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, and I had it running on OSX about 5 years ago too as part of Salling Clicker.It's just remote control software, but one of the functions was to detect the presence of the phone.Alernatively you can turn up the volume as you walk away too, or pause music, video, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762983</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762939</id>
	<title>Headphones</title>
	<author>quantumphaze</author>
	<datestamp>1255602960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This wouldn't work with headphones plugged into the computer unless you can get the laptop's built in speakers working independantly (it can do it, old Ubuntu 7.10 had them on separate mixer controls on my laptop). But desktop users usually have their powered speakers off when using headphones.</p><p>Does anyone have an idea on how to solve that? You could put out ultrasonic sound through the headphones that get blocked when used, but it could damage your hearing depending on how loud it needs to be to get picked up by the microphone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This would n't work with headphones plugged into the computer unless you can get the laptop 's built in speakers working independantly ( it can do it , old Ubuntu 7.10 had them on separate mixer controls on my laptop ) .
But desktop users usually have their powered speakers off when using headphones.Does anyone have an idea on how to solve that ?
You could put out ultrasonic sound through the headphones that get blocked when used , but it could damage your hearing depending on how loud it needs to be to get picked up by the microphone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This wouldn't work with headphones plugged into the computer unless you can get the laptop's built in speakers working independantly (it can do it, old Ubuntu 7.10 had them on separate mixer controls on my laptop).
But desktop users usually have their powered speakers off when using headphones.Does anyone have an idea on how to solve that?
You could put out ultrasonic sound through the headphones that get blocked when used, but it could damage your hearing depending on how loud it needs to be to get picked up by the microphone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762901</id>
	<title>A new means for laptop theft protection?</title>
	<author>wehe</author>
	<datestamp>1255602780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can this tool be used as a <a href="http://tuxmobil.org/stolen\_laptops.html" title="tuxmobil.org">means for laptop theft and loss protection</a> [tuxmobil.org]?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can this tool be used as a means for laptop theft and loss protection [ tuxmobil.org ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can this tool be used as a means for laptop theft and loss protection [tuxmobil.org]?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763769</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder how...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255607520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Click the link http://stevetarzia.com/sonar<br>It just detects a really noisy amplitude. It takes the average of that and when it falls below half of normal, turns off the monitor.</p><p>A webcam with facial recognition would be better at what you are describing. You would need two cameras to get topography and be sure someone isn't holding up a photo.</p><p>Then if you're hacked people can wait until you leave and have a handy photo to go with their fake IDs with your name.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Click the link http : //stevetarzia.com/sonarIt just detects a really noisy amplitude .
It takes the average of that and when it falls below half of normal , turns off the monitor.A webcam with facial recognition would be better at what you are describing .
You would need two cameras to get topography and be sure someone is n't holding up a photo.Then if you 're hacked people can wait until you leave and have a handy photo to go with their fake IDs with your name .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Click the link http://stevetarzia.com/sonarIt just detects a really noisy amplitude.
It takes the average of that and when it falls below half of normal, turns off the monitor.A webcam with facial recognition would be better at what you are describing.
You would need two cameras to get topography and be sure someone isn't holding up a photo.Then if you're hacked people can wait until you leave and have a handy photo to go with their fake IDs with your name.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762907</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764581</id>
	<title>mod dowN</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255613280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>shower Don't just to you by Penisbird If you answered ffel an obligation Are there? Let's Theo de RRadt, one</htmltext>
<tokenext>shower Do n't just to you by Penisbird If you answered ffel an obligation Are there ?
Let 's Theo de RRadt , one</tokentext>
<sentencetext>shower Don't just to you by Penisbird If you answered ffel an obligation Are there?
Let's Theo de RRadt, one</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29775509</id>
	<title>Auto flushing toilets</title>
	<author>Leebert</author>
	<datestamp>1255711860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe they could use this technology on auto flushing toilets so that they don't flush suddenly without warning when I'm sitting on it but happen to lean forward.  That's such an incredibly nasty occurrence... ugh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they could use this technology on auto flushing toilets so that they do n't flush suddenly without warning when I 'm sitting on it but happen to lean forward .
That 's such an incredibly nasty occurrence... ugh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they could use this technology on auto flushing toilets so that they don't flush suddenly without warning when I'm sitting on it but happen to lean forward.
That's such an incredibly nasty occurrence... ugh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765353</id>
	<title>will it work underwater?</title>
	<author>FragHARD</author>
	<datestamp>1255621680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does anyone think this will work underwater, if I am to put the laptop in ziplock bag for undersea research?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone think this will work underwater , if I am to put the laptop in ziplock bag for undersea research ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone think this will work underwater, if I am to put the laptop in ziplock bag for undersea research?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765961</id>
	<title>Re:Takes Care of one of my pet peeves</title>
	<author>dlgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1255630440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, I know this was intended as a humorous remark, and yes I get the joke (please refrain from any "woosh" comments), but in all seriousness, this actually is an issue for X11 based systems.<br>
<br>
Due to a poor design choice in X11, applications can see when the mouse moves but can not see button press events in other applications. One result of this is that screensavers can't detect a mouse wheel. Thus, if you're scrolling through a long article, the mouse wheel events aren't seen, the screensaver considers you idle, and will lock the screen even as you're scrolling.<br>
<br>
It's actually quite annoying...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , I know this was intended as a humorous remark , and yes I get the joke ( please refrain from any " woosh " comments ) , but in all seriousness , this actually is an issue for X11 based systems .
Due to a poor design choice in X11 , applications can see when the mouse moves but can not see button press events in other applications .
One result of this is that screensavers ca n't detect a mouse wheel .
Thus , if you 're scrolling through a long article , the mouse wheel events are n't seen , the screensaver considers you idle , and will lock the screen even as you 're scrolling .
It 's actually quite annoying.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, I know this was intended as a humorous remark, and yes I get the joke (please refrain from any "woosh" comments), but in all seriousness, this actually is an issue for X11 based systems.
Due to a poor design choice in X11, applications can see when the mouse moves but can not see button press events in other applications.
One result of this is that screensavers can't detect a mouse wheel.
Thus, if you're scrolling through a long article, the mouse wheel events aren't seen, the screensaver considers you idle, and will lock the screen even as you're scrolling.
It's actually quite annoying...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764193</id>
	<title>Re:Takes Care of one of my pet peeves</title>
	<author>amicusNYCL</author>
	<datestamp>1255610160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I, too, often find myself looking at a screen for extended periods of time without touching the mouse or keyboard, while I, ah... read the articles. Nothing ruins a good article more than having the screen saver start up right as you are about to finish.</p></div><p>That's funny, the exact same thing happens to me when I'm watching porn.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I , too , often find myself looking at a screen for extended periods of time without touching the mouse or keyboard , while I , ah... read the articles .
Nothing ruins a good article more than having the screen saver start up right as you are about to finish.That 's funny , the exact same thing happens to me when I 'm watching porn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I, too, often find myself looking at a screen for extended periods of time without touching the mouse or keyboard, while I, ah... read the articles.
Nothing ruins a good article more than having the screen saver start up right as you are about to finish.That's funny, the exact same thing happens to me when I'm watching porn.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765705</id>
	<title>wow... no soviet russia references....</title>
	<author>mark-t</author>
	<datestamp>1255626600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought for sure I'd have seen a remark by now that said something to the effect of computer pings YOU!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought for sure I 'd have seen a remark by now that said something to the effect of computer pings YOU !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought for sure I'd have seen a remark by now that said something to the effect of computer pings YOU!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765433</id>
	<title>simple solution!</title>
	<author>garyebickford</author>
	<datestamp>1255622640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a simple solution to that problem.  I used to have similar problems (though not as bad) - the 15KHz whistle of the old color TVs used to bug me.  But during my misspent youth I spent several years listening to lots of loud music - 10 feet from the speakers at rock concerts, etc.  Now, other than a constant ringing in my ears, I'm fine!  And I no longer hear HF audio, so no more annoying whistles for me<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D  Try it, soon you'll be as deaf as Pete Townsend!</p><p>(FYI, the last band I was in used in-ear monitors - <a href="http://www.healthyhearing.com/articles/7882-musicians-going-deaf-for" title="healthyhearing.com">Story about deaf musicians and using in-ear monitors</a> [healthyhearing.com].  It wasn't even a loud band, but it was nice being able to mix our own levels without worrying about the house levels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a simple solution to that problem .
I used to have similar problems ( though not as bad ) - the 15KHz whistle of the old color TVs used to bug me .
But during my misspent youth I spent several years listening to lots of loud music - 10 feet from the speakers at rock concerts , etc .
Now , other than a constant ringing in my ears , I 'm fine !
And I no longer hear HF audio , so no more annoying whistles for me : D Try it , soon you 'll be as deaf as Pete Townsend !
( FYI , the last band I was in used in-ear monitors - Story about deaf musicians and using in-ear monitors [ healthyhearing.com ] .
It was n't even a loud band , but it was nice being able to mix our own levels without worrying about the house levels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a simple solution to that problem.
I used to have similar problems (though not as bad) - the 15KHz whistle of the old color TVs used to bug me.
But during my misspent youth I spent several years listening to lots of loud music - 10 feet from the speakers at rock concerts, etc.
Now, other than a constant ringing in my ears, I'm fine!
And I no longer hear HF audio, so no more annoying whistles for me :D  Try it, soon you'll be as deaf as Pete Townsend!
(FYI, the last band I was in used in-ear monitors - Story about deaf musicians and using in-ear monitors [healthyhearing.com].
It wasn't even a loud band, but it was nice being able to mix our own levels without worrying about the house levels.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764947</id>
	<title>Re:Takes Care of one of my pet peeves</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255616880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, You have a job?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , You have a job ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, You have a job?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762793</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763091</id>
	<title>Re:Headphones</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255603680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>try putting down your headphones next to your mic when you leave the computer seemed to work for me;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>try putting down your headphones next to your mic when you leave the computer seemed to work for me ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>try putting down your headphones next to your mic when you leave the computer seemed to work for me;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764705</id>
	<title>Re:I'm one of those people that hears CRT Monitors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255614420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dimmer switches buzz at 50/60Hz (with lots of metallic-sounding harmonics). Everyone hears those. Better designed ones make less noise. Battery chargers and power adapters in general (of any kind) either buzz at 50/60Hz (transformer based) or at a higher frequency (switching type). Poorly designed switching converters might operate in the audible range - I have a few that can definitely be heard. Most good ones are well above 20Khz. CRT TVs operate at ~15Khz; I hear those too. CRT monitors operate well above 20Khz; ~30Khz for 640x480 VGA (horizontal frequency). I doubt you can hear those. Maybe some specific monitor that produces noise at a division of the frequency?</p><p>I tried this on my laptop and I couldn't hear anything (other than some clicks when it is enabled/disabled, due to poor switching). The debug log says it's generating 22Khz pulses. It didn't work too well on my machine though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dimmer switches buzz at 50/60Hz ( with lots of metallic-sounding harmonics ) .
Everyone hears those .
Better designed ones make less noise .
Battery chargers and power adapters in general ( of any kind ) either buzz at 50/60Hz ( transformer based ) or at a higher frequency ( switching type ) .
Poorly designed switching converters might operate in the audible range - I have a few that can definitely be heard .
Most good ones are well above 20Khz .
CRT TVs operate at ~ 15Khz ; I hear those too .
CRT monitors operate well above 20Khz ; ~ 30Khz for 640x480 VGA ( horizontal frequency ) .
I doubt you can hear those .
Maybe some specific monitor that produces noise at a division of the frequency ? I tried this on my laptop and I could n't hear anything ( other than some clicks when it is enabled/disabled , due to poor switching ) .
The debug log says it 's generating 22Khz pulses .
It did n't work too well on my machine though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dimmer switches buzz at 50/60Hz (with lots of metallic-sounding harmonics).
Everyone hears those.
Better designed ones make less noise.
Battery chargers and power adapters in general (of any kind) either buzz at 50/60Hz (transformer based) or at a higher frequency (switching type).
Poorly designed switching converters might operate in the audible range - I have a few that can definitely be heard.
Most good ones are well above 20Khz.
CRT TVs operate at ~15Khz; I hear those too.
CRT monitors operate well above 20Khz; ~30Khz for 640x480 VGA (horizontal frequency).
I doubt you can hear those.
Maybe some specific monitor that produces noise at a division of the frequency?I tried this on my laptop and I couldn't hear anything (other than some clicks when it is enabled/disabled, due to poor switching).
The debug log says it's generating 22Khz pulses.
It didn't work too well on my machine though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763565</id>
	<title>I'm just a slave to the machine...</title>
	<author>Kazoo the Clown</author>
	<datestamp>1255606380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just tell me where I put the postit note or soda bottle to fake it out so it thinks I'm there all the time...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just tell me where I put the postit note or soda bottle to fake it out so it thinks I 'm there all the time.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just tell me where I put the postit note or soda bottle to fake it out so it thinks I'm there all the time...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29769867</id>
	<title>Re:How about a license ; how about saying Linux(tm</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1255714020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"so available for copying with no restrictions".  Why does everything need a license?  If that's all they say then there is no license.  It's public domain.  Do what you want.</p><p>Licenses exist for one reason only - to restrict what you can do with something.  If there is no license, you can do whatever you want.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" so available for copying with no restrictions " .
Why does everything need a license ?
If that 's all they say then there is no license .
It 's public domain .
Do what you want.Licenses exist for one reason only - to restrict what you can do with something .
If there is no license , you can do whatever you want .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"so available for copying with no restrictions".
Why does everything need a license?
If that's all they say then there is no license.
It's public domain.
Do what you want.Licenses exist for one reason only - to restrict what you can do with something.
If there is no license, you can do whatever you want.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763231</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764787</id>
	<title>Re:Activity</title>
	<author>wealthychef</author>
	<datestamp>1255615380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Thank god I'm already old and not born in to this shit.</i> </p><p>
Spoken like a truly old person.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank god I 'm already old and not born in to this shit .
Spoken like a truly old person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Thank god I'm already old and not born in to this shit.
Spoken like a truly old person.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29766811</id>
	<title>Re:I'm one of those people that hears CRT Monitors</title>
	<author>Fred\_A</author>
	<datestamp>1255689660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Likewise.  I'm 38, and I think my upper limit's dropped to below 17KHz, but still above the CRT flyback frequency (15.6?).  Worse.. I seem to recall that exposure to high-frequency noise is what -causes- the loss of high-frequency hearing as we age (the hair cells become brittle and eventually snap, or something like that).</p></div><p> Here you go then, the problem elegantly solves itself.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Likewise .
I 'm 38 , and I think my upper limit 's dropped to below 17KHz , but still above the CRT flyback frequency ( 15.6 ? ) .
Worse.. I seem to recall that exposure to high-frequency noise is what -causes- the loss of high-frequency hearing as we age ( the hair cells become brittle and eventually snap , or something like that ) .
Here you go then , the problem elegantly solves itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Likewise.
I'm 38, and I think my upper limit's dropped to below 17KHz, but still above the CRT flyback frequency (15.6?).
Worse.. I seem to recall that exposure to high-frequency noise is what -causes- the loss of high-frequency hearing as we age (the hair cells become brittle and eventually snap, or something like that).
Here you go then, the problem elegantly solves itself.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764451</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781</id>
	<title>Activity</title>
	<author>sopssa</author>
	<datestamp>1255602300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mouse/keyboard activity timeout works nicely for that. I rather don't have the computer know if I'm walking near it or not. But it seems we're heading in to this "everyone, and every machine, knows where you are" every day. Thank god I'm already old and not born in to this shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mouse/keyboard activity timeout works nicely for that .
I rather do n't have the computer know if I 'm walking near it or not .
But it seems we 're heading in to this " everyone , and every machine , knows where you are " every day .
Thank god I 'm already old and not born in to this shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mouse/keyboard activity timeout works nicely for that.
I rather don't have the computer know if I'm walking near it or not.
But it seems we're heading in to this "everyone, and every machine, knows where you are" every day.
Thank god I'm already old and not born in to this shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763489</id>
	<title>Why ?</title>
	<author>smoker2</author>
	<datestamp>1255605900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's wrong with a keyboard shortcut key or assigning a function key ? It's a laptop, you probably don't just walk away frequently and leave it unattended. Not anywhere I know anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's wrong with a keyboard shortcut key or assigning a function key ?
It 's a laptop , you probably do n't just walk away frequently and leave it unattended .
Not anywhere I know anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's wrong with a keyboard shortcut key or assigning a function key ?
It's a laptop, you probably don't just walk away frequently and leave it unattended.
Not anywhere I know anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764333</id>
	<title>Re:I'm one of those people that hears CRT Monitors</title>
	<author>Verdatum</author>
	<datestamp>1255611120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Damnit, good point.  At my last hearing test, I maxed out the tone generator.  It's got me curious enough to try it out to see how irratating the tone is.  One could do plenty of fun hacks with this if it actually works as well as one would like.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Damnit , good point .
At my last hearing test , I maxed out the tone generator .
It 's got me curious enough to try it out to see how irratating the tone is .
One could do plenty of fun hacks with this if it actually works as well as one would like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damnit, good point.
At my last hearing test, I maxed out the tone generator.
It's got me curious enough to try it out to see how irratating the tone is.
One could do plenty of fun hacks with this if it actually works as well as one would like.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763045</id>
	<title>Re:Activity</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1255603500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Mouse/keyboard activity timeout works nicely for that.</i></p><p>Er not really.  You need to set it to long enough that it doesn't time out every time you read a page of text (unless you just like idly dragging the mouse around while reading... i don't).  Yet you want it short enough that it provides power savings.  The LCD screen is a big power hog in a laptop.  Being able to turn it off instantly as soon as you walk away, and turn back on when you sit back down, would be the best of both worlds of power savings and convenience.</p><p><i>I rather don't have the computer know if I'm walking near it or not. But it seems we're heading in to this "everyone, and every machine, knows where you are" every day.</i></p><p>Yeah I'd be more worried about the fact that your computer knows <b>every single thing you type, and every single thing you read</b>.  ZOMG!</p><p>But seriously.  It knows whether you are in front of your laptop or not.  Are you often running your laptop when you aren't around at all, such that the assumption that your laptop being on and connected to the network is generally accurate?  Like it's a big danger that the laptop knows you aren't there anymore when you get up for a quick piss break.  Not that it knows you went to the bathroom!</p><p>Besides, it's open source.  If you're that worried that it's going to report your location to The Man, check the source code.</p><p>And hey, if you're <i>really</i> worried about realistic ways for The Man to find you, take the battery out of your cellphone.  Seriously, that's a real way in which the phone company/police can locate you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mouse/keyboard activity timeout works nicely for that.Er not really .
You need to set it to long enough that it does n't time out every time you read a page of text ( unless you just like idly dragging the mouse around while reading... i do n't ) .
Yet you want it short enough that it provides power savings .
The LCD screen is a big power hog in a laptop .
Being able to turn it off instantly as soon as you walk away , and turn back on when you sit back down , would be the best of both worlds of power savings and convenience.I rather do n't have the computer know if I 'm walking near it or not .
But it seems we 're heading in to this " everyone , and every machine , knows where you are " every day.Yeah I 'd be more worried about the fact that your computer knows every single thing you type , and every single thing you read .
ZOMG ! But seriously .
It knows whether you are in front of your laptop or not .
Are you often running your laptop when you are n't around at all , such that the assumption that your laptop being on and connected to the network is generally accurate ?
Like it 's a big danger that the laptop knows you are n't there anymore when you get up for a quick piss break .
Not that it knows you went to the bathroom ! Besides , it 's open source .
If you 're that worried that it 's going to report your location to The Man , check the source code.And hey , if you 're really worried about realistic ways for The Man to find you , take the battery out of your cellphone .
Seriously , that 's a real way in which the phone company/police can locate you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mouse/keyboard activity timeout works nicely for that.Er not really.
You need to set it to long enough that it doesn't time out every time you read a page of text (unless you just like idly dragging the mouse around while reading... i don't).
Yet you want it short enough that it provides power savings.
The LCD screen is a big power hog in a laptop.
Being able to turn it off instantly as soon as you walk away, and turn back on when you sit back down, would be the best of both worlds of power savings and convenience.I rather don't have the computer know if I'm walking near it or not.
But it seems we're heading in to this "everyone, and every machine, knows where you are" every day.Yeah I'd be more worried about the fact that your computer knows every single thing you type, and every single thing you read.
ZOMG!But seriously.
It knows whether you are in front of your laptop or not.
Are you often running your laptop when you aren't around at all, such that the assumption that your laptop being on and connected to the network is generally accurate?
Like it's a big danger that the laptop knows you aren't there anymore when you get up for a quick piss break.
Not that it knows you went to the bathroom!Besides, it's open source.
If you're that worried that it's going to report your location to The Man, check the source code.And hey, if you're really worried about realistic ways for The Man to find you, take the battery out of your cellphone.
Seriously, that's a real way in which the phone company/police can locate you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765209</id>
	<title>Re:I'm one of those people that hears CRT Monitors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255619820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So can I. I can also hear transformers, fluorescent lights, and my Nintendo 64. I'm not sure if I would want this on my laptop if it plays this frequency constantly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So can I. I can also hear transformers , fluorescent lights , and my Nintendo 64 .
I 'm not sure if I would want this on my laptop if it plays this frequency constantly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So can I. I can also hear transformers, fluorescent lights, and my Nintendo 64.
I'm not sure if I would want this on my laptop if it plays this frequency constantly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29768263</id>
	<title>Re:Activity</title>
	<author>markov\_chain</author>
	<datestamp>1255705980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Thank god I'm already old and not born in to this shit.</p></div><p>Another benefit of being old is that you won't hear the annoying ultrasonic chirps like us young people do<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank god I 'm already old and not born in to this shit.Another benefit of being old is that you wo n't hear the annoying ultrasonic chirps like us young people do : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank god I'm already old and not born in to this shit.Another benefit of being old is that you won't hear the annoying ultrasonic chirps like us young people do :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762945</id>
	<title>Re:Activity</title>
	<author>jhfry</author>
	<datestamp>1255602960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your privacy concerns are valid... however think of the applications for this tech.</p><p>Your instant messenger will know when your available or not.<br>Your phone system could direct your calls to you mobile if your away from the desk.</p><p>Proximity may also be important break for the future of voice activated computing.  If the computer knows your there, it can listen, and when you leave it ignores any sounds.</p><p>I think there will be applications for this tech far beyond pc's, especially once it becomes common.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your privacy concerns are valid... however think of the applications for this tech.Your instant messenger will know when your available or not.Your phone system could direct your calls to you mobile if your away from the desk.Proximity may also be important break for the future of voice activated computing .
If the computer knows your there , it can listen , and when you leave it ignores any sounds.I think there will be applications for this tech far beyond pc 's , especially once it becomes common .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your privacy concerns are valid... however think of the applications for this tech.Your instant messenger will know when your available or not.Your phone system could direct your calls to you mobile if your away from the desk.Proximity may also be important break for the future of voice activated computing.
If the computer knows your there, it can listen, and when you leave it ignores any sounds.I think there will be applications for this tech far beyond pc's, especially once it becomes common.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763563</id>
	<title>Re:Takes Care of one of my pet peeves</title>
	<author>aztracker1</author>
	<datestamp>1255606320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Happens to me a lot more often when I watch a web video that's more than 2 minutes long...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Happens to me a lot more often when I watch a web video that 's more than 2 minutes long.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Happens to me a lot more often when I watch a web video that's more than 2 minutes long...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763571</id>
	<title>Re:Takes Care of one of my pet peeves</title>
	<author>NotQuiteReal</author>
	<datestamp>1255606380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>Hi! I'm Clippy. I see you're trying to think, but nothing is happening!</b>
<br>
<br>
<i>credit to one of the three stooges who had that line; "I keep trying to think, but nothing happens."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hi !
I 'm Clippy .
I see you 're trying to think , but nothing is happening !
credit to one of the three stooges who had that line ; " I keep trying to think , but nothing happens .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hi!
I'm Clippy.
I see you're trying to think, but nothing is happening!
credit to one of the three stooges who had that line; "I keep trying to think, but nothing happens.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762793</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763199</id>
	<title>Easy solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255604160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or just us a key combination (like in windows) to lock the system (and start the power saving).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or just us a key combination ( like in windows ) to lock the system ( and start the power saving ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or just us a key combination (like in windows) to lock the system (and start the power saving).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763585</id>
	<title>Re:Takes Care of one of my pet peeves</title>
	<author>aztracker1</author>
	<datestamp>1255606440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course if you happen to charge your phone near your computer, you're screwed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course if you happen to charge your phone near your computer , you 're screwed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course if you happen to charge your phone near your computer, you're screwed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762983</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762793</id>
	<title>Takes Care of one of my pet peeves</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255602300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't know if I type slow, think slow, or both, but one of my pet annoyances is when the screen saver kicks-in as I'm staring at the screen in thought (sure I know how to set it, but I am not always in front of my own PC, and oft away and then back a lot through the day).<br> <br>
If this will simply tell the OS, hold on, he's sitting there doing something, I'd find it a pretty neat idea.<br> <br>
Greg</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't know if I type slow , think slow , or both , but one of my pet annoyances is when the screen saver kicks-in as I 'm staring at the screen in thought ( sure I know how to set it , but I am not always in front of my own PC , and oft away and then back a lot through the day ) .
If this will simply tell the OS , hold on , he 's sitting there doing something , I 'd find it a pretty neat idea .
Greg</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't know if I type slow, think slow, or both, but one of my pet annoyances is when the screen saver kicks-in as I'm staring at the screen in thought (sure I know how to set it, but I am not always in front of my own PC, and oft away and then back a lot through the day).
If this will simply tell the OS, hold on, he's sitting there doing something, I'd find it a pretty neat idea.
Greg</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763165</id>
	<title>How will this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255603980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How will this benefit the general user though? There are many times that I get up but still want my laptop to be running for example, I can leave a music player on, hook up my laptop to a projector to play a movie, or a load of other things that this would prevent from happening.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How will this benefit the general user though ?
There are many times that I get up but still want my laptop to be running for example , I can leave a music player on , hook up my laptop to a projector to play a movie , or a load of other things that this would prevent from happening .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How will this benefit the general user though?
There are many times that I get up but still want my laptop to be running for example, I can leave a music player on, hook up my laptop to a projector to play a movie, or a load of other things that this would prevent from happening.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764841</id>
	<title>Re:I'm one of those people that hears CRT Monitors</title>
	<author>Khith</author>
	<datestamp>1255615800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can hear at least up to 20kHz (as high as my speakers' frequency response goes, so I can't test any higher) and it really IS a pain sometimes.  The most useful thing I've been able to do is remind them that they left the TV on in the other room. "But I turned off the power and the screen is black.."  No, you turned off the power to the cable box which cut out the image and sound on the TV, but I can still hear the flyback transformer.  Of course this doesn't work on LCD TVs, though they sometimes just hum or buzz quietly anyway.</p><p>I'm 31 years old.  I thought that people around my age weren't supposed to hear such things?  Is it all related to one's environment?  I don't listen to loud music, avoid loud places, etc, but I still thought that hearing was supposed to diminish.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can hear at least up to 20kHz ( as high as my speakers ' frequency response goes , so I ca n't test any higher ) and it really IS a pain sometimes .
The most useful thing I 've been able to do is remind them that they left the TV on in the other room .
" But I turned off the power and the screen is black.. " No , you turned off the power to the cable box which cut out the image and sound on the TV , but I can still hear the flyback transformer .
Of course this does n't work on LCD TVs , though they sometimes just hum or buzz quietly anyway.I 'm 31 years old .
I thought that people around my age were n't supposed to hear such things ?
Is it all related to one 's environment ?
I do n't listen to loud music , avoid loud places , etc , but I still thought that hearing was supposed to diminish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can hear at least up to 20kHz (as high as my speakers' frequency response goes, so I can't test any higher) and it really IS a pain sometimes.
The most useful thing I've been able to do is remind them that they left the TV on in the other room.
"But I turned off the power and the screen is black.."  No, you turned off the power to the cable box which cut out the image and sound on the TV, but I can still hear the flyback transformer.
Of course this doesn't work on LCD TVs, though they sometimes just hum or buzz quietly anyway.I'm 31 years old.
I thought that people around my age weren't supposed to hear such things?
Is it all related to one's environment?
I don't listen to loud music, avoid loud places, etc, but I still thought that hearing was supposed to diminish.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763109</id>
	<title>This sounds great but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255603740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't this cruel to the dolphin?  I don't even know how they squeeze it into the laptop, but somebody needs to tell PETA about this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this cruel to the dolphin ?
I do n't even know how they squeeze it into the laptop , but somebody needs to tell PETA about this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this cruel to the dolphin?
I don't even know how they squeeze it into the laptop, but somebody needs to tell PETA about this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763099</id>
	<title>We are entering a whole new world of ultrasonic...</title>
	<author>stillpixel</author>
	<datestamp>1255603680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>pranks that we can play on those nearby once this becomes active.

Randomly shutting off peoples screens.. waking them randomly without even being near them. : )</htmltext>
<tokenext>pranks that we can play on those nearby once this becomes active .
Randomly shutting off peoples screens.. waking them randomly without even being near them .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>pranks that we can play on those nearby once this becomes active.
Randomly shutting off peoples screens.. waking them randomly without even being near them.
: )</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763341</id>
	<title>A better solution might be to...</title>
	<author>dave562</author>
	<datestamp>1255605060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...tie power savings to the manual screen lock feature.  In Windows, the WindowsKey+L locks the workstation.  It would be great if a second or two after the workstation is locked, the monitor turns off and the drives spin down.  That would provide good power savings and avoid the problem of having to determine whether or not the user really wants their workstation to conserve energy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...tie power savings to the manual screen lock feature .
In Windows , the WindowsKey + L locks the workstation .
It would be great if a second or two after the workstation is locked , the monitor turns off and the drives spin down .
That would provide good power savings and avoid the problem of having to determine whether or not the user really wants their workstation to conserve energy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...tie power savings to the manual screen lock feature.
In Windows, the WindowsKey+L locks the workstation.
It would be great if a second or two after the workstation is locked, the monitor turns off and the drives spin down.
That would provide good power savings and avoid the problem of having to determine whether or not the user really wants their workstation to conserve energy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765041</id>
	<title>Re:Activity</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1255617600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Thank god I'm already old and not born in to this shit."</p><p>I'm old, there is no god, and I would be fine with "being born into this shit" because "shit" now is MUCH more interesting than it was in 1959 when I was born. (Note to self, "avoid lawn")</p><p>Youngsters, don't believe the lies. The only things about the "good old days" that were worth a damn were that good drugs were cheap and HIV hadn't arrived yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Thank god I 'm already old and not born in to this shit .
" I 'm old , there is no god , and I would be fine with " being born into this shit " because " shit " now is MUCH more interesting than it was in 1959 when I was born .
( Note to self , " avoid lawn " ) Youngsters , do n't believe the lies .
The only things about the " good old days " that were worth a damn were that good drugs were cheap and HIV had n't arrived yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Thank god I'm already old and not born in to this shit.
"I'm old, there is no god, and I would be fine with "being born into this shit" because "shit" now is MUCH more interesting than it was in 1959 when I was born.
(Note to self, "avoid lawn")Youngsters, don't believe the lies.
The only things about the "good old days" that were worth a damn were that good drugs were cheap and HIV hadn't arrived yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29770757</id>
	<title>Re:I'm one of those people that hears CRT Monitors</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1255718400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i><br>Now, I like this idea, it's neat, I just really hope it operates well over 18khz so my head does not explode all Scanners style when I walk into a room full of laptops.</i></p><p>Yeah, me too.  For us and anybody who ones a dog:</p><p>
&nbsp; yum install blueproximity</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , I like this idea , it 's neat , I just really hope it operates well over 18khz so my head does not explode all Scanners style when I walk into a room full of laptops.Yeah , me too .
For us and anybody who ones a dog :   yum install blueproximity</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, I like this idea, it's neat, I just really hope it operates well over 18khz so my head does not explode all Scanners style when I walk into a room full of laptops.Yeah, me too.
For us and anybody who ones a dog:
  yum install blueproximity</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763657</id>
	<title>Re:Activity</title>
	<author>sqrt(2)</author>
	<datestamp>1255606800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can set your client to block anyone you don't have on your list from contacting you or seeing your status. The only people on my IM list are people I know and trust not to rob me...well some of them do like to come over and mooch off my food and beer, but that's a different matter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can set your client to block anyone you do n't have on your list from contacting you or seeing your status .
The only people on my IM list are people I know and trust not to rob me...well some of them do like to come over and mooch off my food and beer , but that 's a different matter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can set your client to block anyone you don't have on your list from contacting you or seeing your status.
The only people on my IM list are people I know and trust not to rob me...well some of them do like to come over and mooch off my food and beer, but that's a different matter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29766087</id>
	<title>Perfect Targeted Bomb Trigger</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255633380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's Saves Power!
</p><p>It's Cool Tech!
</p><p>It's a Perfect Targeted Bomb Trigger.
</p><p>Even with multiple users, it would be easy to "target" a certain person when at the computer.
</p><p>Think of the possibilities.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's Saves Power !
It 's Cool Tech !
It 's a Perfect Targeted Bomb Trigger .
Even with multiple users , it would be easy to " target " a certain person when at the computer .
Think of the possibilities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's Saves Power!
It's Cool Tech!
It's a Perfect Targeted Bomb Trigger.
Even with multiple users, it would be easy to "target" a certain person when at the computer.
Think of the possibilities.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29770757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763187
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764787
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765041
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29766221
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29766811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764451
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763179
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763093
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763761
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29767693
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29766171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762907
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764743
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763091
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762907
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763657
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29768263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763231
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29767649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762787
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764947
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763585
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762907
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763563
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29769939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763231
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763661
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762907
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763269
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764161
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764705
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765223
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762907
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29774193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29769867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763231
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765451
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765209
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763051
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_2121214_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763653
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2121214.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762781
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765041
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764161
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764787
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763761
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29768263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765659
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765451
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763269
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763179
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763187
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763093
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762945
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763217
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763657
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763967
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765651
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763045
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2121214.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765353
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29769939
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2121214.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762811
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2121214.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29766133
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2121214.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763231
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763997
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29769867
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29774193
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765351
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2121214.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764811
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2121214.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762907
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764077
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765223
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763769
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763113
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29766171
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2121214.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762793
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763571
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762845
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765961
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763653
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763563
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764193
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764143
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762995
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762983
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29767693
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763585
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764947
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2121214.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762939
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763661
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764243
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763091
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2121214.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763051
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764705
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764451
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29766811
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764841
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29766221
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765209
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29770757
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764743
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29764333
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29765433
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2121214.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763923
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2121214.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29762787
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29767649
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2121214.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763165
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_2121214.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_2121214.29763489
</commentlist>
</conversation>
