<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_15_1224203</id>
	<title>First Black Hole For Light Created On Earth</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1255610520000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"An electromagnetic 'black hole' that <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17980">sucks in surrounding light has been built</a> for the first time. The device, which works at microwave frequencies, may soon be extended to trap visible light, leading to an entirely new way of harvesting solar energy to generate electricity. A theoretical design for a table-top black hole to trap light was proposed in a paper published earlier this year by Evgenii Narimanov and Alexander Kildishev of Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. Their idea was to mimic the properties of a cosmological black hole, whose intense gravity bends the surrounding space-time, causing any nearby matter or radiation to follow the warped space-time and spiral inwards."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " An electromagnetic 'black hole ' that sucks in surrounding light has been built for the first time .
The device , which works at microwave frequencies , may soon be extended to trap visible light , leading to an entirely new way of harvesting solar energy to generate electricity .
A theoretical design for a table-top black hole to trap light was proposed in a paper published earlier this year by Evgenii Narimanov and Alexander Kildishev of Purdue University in West Lafayette , Indiana .
Their idea was to mimic the properties of a cosmological black hole , whose intense gravity bends the surrounding space-time , causing any nearby matter or radiation to follow the warped space-time and spiral inwards .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "An electromagnetic 'black hole' that sucks in surrounding light has been built for the first time.
The device, which works at microwave frequencies, may soon be extended to trap visible light, leading to an entirely new way of harvesting solar energy to generate electricity.
A theoretical design for a table-top black hole to trap light was proposed in a paper published earlier this year by Evgenii Narimanov and Alexander Kildishev of Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana.
Their idea was to mimic the properties of a cosmological black hole, whose intense gravity bends the surrounding space-time, causing any nearby matter or radiation to follow the warped space-time and spiral inwards.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755811</id>
	<title>uhhh... how much energy does it take?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255614720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I do realize this is not a "real" black hole and is just a marketing term, but it would seem to me that the device very likely takes much ore energy to power than it can collect. After all this is not some ACME super vacuum... it can only redirect the light that is actually passing through it's field range. The only way to extend the field would be to increase power consumption, and that's not linear.<br>So... really that's cute... a virtual parabolic mirror, that requires energy. nifty.</p><p>I'm sure there will be a better use for this somewhere, but it won't be for solar energy collection.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do realize this is not a " real " black hole and is just a marketing term , but it would seem to me that the device very likely takes much ore energy to power than it can collect .
After all this is not some ACME super vacuum... it can only redirect the light that is actually passing through it 's field range .
The only way to extend the field would be to increase power consumption , and that 's not linear.So... really that 's cute... a virtual parabolic mirror , that requires energy .
nifty.I 'm sure there will be a better use for this somewhere , but it wo n't be for solar energy collection .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do realize this is not a "real" black hole and is just a marketing term, but it would seem to me that the device very likely takes much ore energy to power than it can collect.
After all this is not some ACME super vacuum... it can only redirect the light that is actually passing through it's field range.
The only way to extend the field would be to increase power consumption, and that's not linear.So... really that's cute... a virtual parabolic mirror, that requires energy.
nifty.I'm sure there will be a better use for this somewhere, but it won't be for solar energy collection.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757021</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1255620300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just direct them to this reassuring website:<br><a href="http://hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/" title="hasthelarg...rldyet.com">http://hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/</a> [hasthelarg...rldyet.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just direct them to this reassuring website : http : //hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/ [ hasthelarg...rldyet.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just direct them to this reassuring website:http://hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/ [hasthelarg...rldyet.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29766833</id>
	<title>DO NOT WANT!!!</title>
	<author>Dr. Hellno</author>
	<datestamp>1255690020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>DO NOT WANT</htmltext>
<tokenext>DO NOT WANT</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DO NOT WANT</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29765723</id>
	<title>Re:First off</title>
	<author>Nyeerrmm</author>
	<datestamp>1255626840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its really all defined by Planck's law (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck's\_law" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck's\_law</a> [wikipedia.org]), where the Sun's temperature is 5700 K.  Of course theres some differences where the atmosphere has absorption bands, but the peak energy is centered around 480 nm, and most of the higher wavelengths (UV) are blocked by the atmosphere.
<br> <br>
The whole reason visible light is visible to us is that its the most energetic, and thus easiest to see.  The fact that the atmosphere blocks is also why UV burns us.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its really all defined by Planck 's law ( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck 's \ _law [ wikipedia.org ] ) , where the Sun 's temperature is 5700 K. Of course theres some differences where the atmosphere has absorption bands , but the peak energy is centered around 480 nm , and most of the higher wavelengths ( UV ) are blocked by the atmosphere .
The whole reason visible light is visible to us is that its the most energetic , and thus easiest to see .
The fact that the atmosphere blocks is also why UV burns us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its really all defined by Planck's law (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck's\_law [wikipedia.org]), where the Sun's temperature is 5700 K.  Of course theres some differences where the atmosphere has absorption bands, but the peak energy is centered around 480 nm, and most of the higher wavelengths (UV) are blocked by the atmosphere.
The whole reason visible light is visible to us is that its the most energetic, and thus easiest to see.
The fact that the atmosphere blocks is also why UV burns us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757773</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1255623360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except they're in on the plot against us. ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except they 're in on the plot against us .
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except they're in on the plot against us.
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29759677</id>
	<title>Re:Very obvious civilian application</title>
	<author>lewiscr</author>
	<datestamp>1255631580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>If none of the radar bounces come back, you must be moving away at at the speed of light.  Definitely over the limit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If none of the radar bounces come back , you must be moving away at at the speed of light .
Definitely over the limit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If none of the radar bounces come back, you must be moving away at at the speed of light.
Definitely over the limit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757515</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755893</id>
	<title>Re:uhhh... how much energy does it take?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255615260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ehhhhm no... It's a passive device. It doesn't use any energy (electric or otherwise) at all. It just sits there and captures photons and redirects them to its center. It is made from the same materials that the "invisibility cloak" that generated a lot of PR a few months ago was made of, and once made doesn't need any energy to run.</p><p>Even though I know this is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... RTFA</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ehhhhm no... It 's a passive device .
It does n't use any energy ( electric or otherwise ) at all .
It just sits there and captures photons and redirects them to its center .
It is made from the same materials that the " invisibility cloak " that generated a lot of PR a few months ago was made of , and once made does n't need any energy to run.Even though I know this is / .
... RTFA</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ehhhhm no... It's a passive device.
It doesn't use any energy (electric or otherwise) at all.
It just sits there and captures photons and redirects them to its center.
It is made from the same materials that the "invisibility cloak" that generated a lot of PR a few months ago was made of, and once made doesn't need any energy to run.Even though I know this is /.
... RTFA</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29761499</id>
	<title>So..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255640160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is it an african american hole then?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is it an african american hole then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is it an african american hole then?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757235</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>bughunter</author>
	<datestamp>1255621020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My thoughts too.  Yet another technical term to be diluted into meaningless by ignorance and avarice.</p><p>Just add it on the pile with <i>artificial intelligence, robotic, virtual reality,</i> and <i>tin foil hat</i>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My thoughts too .
Yet another technical term to be diluted into meaningless by ignorance and avarice.Just add it on the pile with artificial intelligence , robotic , virtual reality , and tin foil hat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My thoughts too.
Yet another technical term to be diluted into meaningless by ignorance and avarice.Just add it on the pile with artificial intelligence, robotic, virtual reality, and tin foil hat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756945</id>
	<title>Black bodies give off radiation</title>
	<author>davidwr</author>
	<datestamp>1255620000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, <a href="http://archive.thehumorlist.com/Site1/Digests/H9701170.php#Joke14" title="thehumorlist.com" rel="nofollow">black bodies give off radiation</a> [thehumorlist.com], black holes give off radiation, what are these called and do they give off radiation?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , black bodies give off radiation [ thehumorlist.com ] , black holes give off radiation , what are these called and do they give off radiation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, black bodies give off radiation [thehumorlist.com], black holes give off radiation, what are these called and do they give off radiation?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758079</id>
	<title>What does it look like?</title>
	<author>'The '.$L3mm1ng</author>
	<datestamp>1255624560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, wait.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , wait .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, wait.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29769979</id>
	<title>This is Metal!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255714620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To put it bluntly to the masses, this, in essence, is a Black thing. It is a Black thing that is SO Black, the Sheer Blackness of it could power our homes in the future.</p><p>Yes, our homes could LITERALLY be powered by Darkness in the future. Rock on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To put it bluntly to the masses , this , in essence , is a Black thing .
It is a Black thing that is SO Black , the Sheer Blackness of it could power our homes in the future.Yes , our homes could LITERALLY be powered by Darkness in the future .
Rock on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To put it bluntly to the masses, this, in essence, is a Black thing.
It is a Black thing that is SO Black, the Sheer Blackness of it could power our homes in the future.Yes, our homes could LITERALLY be powered by Darkness in the future.
Rock on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755745</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>RichardJenkins</author>
	<datestamp>1255614360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This really sucks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This really sucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This really sucks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758471</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255626240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lose their funding? Nah. They just won't be able to use the funding to buy an NFL team.</p><p>"My friends, I'm being discriminated against. Just because I'm on the radio every day acting like a complete racist jackass, does that make me a bad person? Why are people allowed to dislike me just because I'm an ignorant asshole who refuses to keep his racism to himself? Don't we have freedom of speech in this country any more?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lose their funding ?
Nah. They just wo n't be able to use the funding to buy an NFL team .
" My friends , I 'm being discriminated against .
Just because I 'm on the radio every day acting like a complete racist jackass , does that make me a bad person ?
Why are people allowed to dislike me just because I 'm an ignorant asshole who refuses to keep his racism to himself ?
Do n't we have freedom of speech in this country any more ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lose their funding?
Nah. They just won't be able to use the funding to buy an NFL team.
"My friends, I'm being discriminated against.
Just because I'm on the radio every day acting like a complete racist jackass, does that make me a bad person?
Why are people allowed to dislike me just because I'm an ignorant asshole who refuses to keep his racism to himself?
Don't we have freedom of speech in this country any more?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756131</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757759</id>
	<title>Model T all over again</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255623300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does it come in color other than black?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it come in color other than black ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it come in color other than black?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756531</id>
	<title>Re:Plagiarism?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255618200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a quote that starts with "An anonymous reader writes", you dimwit troll</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a quote that starts with " An anonymous reader writes " , you dimwit troll</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a quote that starts with "An anonymous reader writes", you dimwit troll
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757457</id>
	<title>Re:Plagiarism?</title>
	<author>Eevee</author>
	<datestamp>1255621920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, but it's better than the usual Slashdot editor practice of mangling the submission to something almost entirely different in order to get everyone spun up that we're used to seeing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but it 's better than the usual Slashdot editor practice of mangling the submission to something almost entirely different in order to get everyone spun up that we 're used to seeing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but it's better than the usual Slashdot editor practice of mangling the submission to something almost entirely different in order to get everyone spun up that we're used to seeing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756583</id>
	<title>All we need to do now is make it bigger.</title>
	<author>jellomizer</author>
	<datestamp>1255618500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Make tiny black holes with an event horizon of say 1 foot. Then we have the ultimate trashcan.  We can dump nuclear wast in it and nothing will come out except for perhaps according to some theories radiation.  Which we cannot see or feel so there forth it must be harmless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Make tiny black holes with an event horizon of say 1 foot .
Then we have the ultimate trashcan .
We can dump nuclear wast in it and nothing will come out except for perhaps according to some theories radiation .
Which we can not see or feel so there forth it must be harmless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Make tiny black holes with an event horizon of say 1 foot.
Then we have the ultimate trashcan.
We can dump nuclear wast in it and nothing will come out except for perhaps according to some theories radiation.
Which we cannot see or feel so there forth it must be harmless.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755917</id>
	<title>Re:uhhh... how much energy does it take?</title>
	<author>techiemikey</author>
	<datestamp>1255615380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It uses no energy once it's built as far as I can tell.  It takes a series of materials that guides light (or electromagnetic radiation not in visible spectrum yet) and directs it into the center of the device which turns it into...well, currently heat.  In a while when they get the visible light spectrum version working they will probably have the core be a solar panel so they can turn light into electricity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It uses no energy once it 's built as far as I can tell .
It takes a series of materials that guides light ( or electromagnetic radiation not in visible spectrum yet ) and directs it into the center of the device which turns it into...well , currently heat .
In a while when they get the visible light spectrum version working they will probably have the core be a solar panel so they can turn light into electricity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It uses no energy once it's built as far as I can tell.
It takes a series of materials that guides light (or electromagnetic radiation not in visible spectrum yet) and directs it into the center of the device which turns it into...well, currently heat.
In a while when they get the visible light spectrum version working they will probably have the core be a solar panel so they can turn light into electricity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758791</id>
	<title>Works at microwave frequencies...</title>
	<author>Mr\_Miagi</author>
	<datestamp>1255627680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Am I the only one thinking about actual Microwave oven applications? A vast majority of microwave ovens leak radiation at <a href="http://www.radiationtalk.com/info/microwave\_oven.php" title="radiationtalk.com" rel="nofollow">levels that can be dangerous to humans</a> [radiationtalk.com] [www.radiationtalk.com], so why not make a fortune selling 'safe' microwave ovens with doors lined with this meta-material? (Apart from making all that money on destructive applications, of course).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one thinking about actual Microwave oven applications ?
A vast majority of microwave ovens leak radiation at levels that can be dangerous to humans [ radiationtalk.com ] [ www.radiationtalk.com ] , so why not make a fortune selling 'safe ' microwave ovens with doors lined with this meta-material ?
( Apart from making all that money on destructive applications , of course ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one thinking about actual Microwave oven applications?
A vast majority of microwave ovens leak radiation at levels that can be dangerous to humans [radiationtalk.com] [www.radiationtalk.com], so why not make a fortune selling 'safe' microwave ovens with doors lined with this meta-material?
(Apart from making all that money on destructive applications, of course).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755717</id>
	<title>Black hole? On Earth?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255614240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">Already been done</a> [goatse.fr]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Already been done [ goatse.fr ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Already been done [goatse.fr]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757515</id>
	<title>Very obvious civilian application</title>
	<author>Shag</author>
	<datestamp>1255622160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Chinese paper refers to effectiveness at 18GHz, which just so happens to be in the "K" band of radar frequencies.  You know, the one police like to use.</p><p>So all these guys need to do is make a dashboard- or grille-mounted radar <i>absorber</i> to obsolete the radar <i>detector</i> and they'll be so rich they'll forget their ultimate goal of destroying the world or whatever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Chinese paper refers to effectiveness at 18GHz , which just so happens to be in the " K " band of radar frequencies .
You know , the one police like to use.So all these guys need to do is make a dashboard- or grille-mounted radar absorber to obsolete the radar detector and they 'll be so rich they 'll forget their ultimate goal of destroying the world or whatever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Chinese paper refers to effectiveness at 18GHz, which just so happens to be in the "K" band of radar frequencies.
You know, the one police like to use.So all these guys need to do is make a dashboard- or grille-mounted radar absorber to obsolete the radar detector and they'll be so rich they'll forget their ultimate goal of destroying the world or whatever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29767441</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>DRACO-</author>
	<datestamp>1255700100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Absorb? Reflect? Refract? Transform?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Absorb ?
Reflect ? Refract ?
Transform ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Absorb?
Reflect? Refract?
Transform?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756363</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756745</id>
	<title>Could it be used for  Alcubierre drive?</title>
	<author>werfu</author>
	<datestamp>1255619280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If this does bend space-time, then it could be used for Alcubierre drive. I wonder if it can nullify gravity too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If this does bend space-time , then it could be used for Alcubierre drive .
I wonder if it can nullify gravity too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this does bend space-time, then it could be used for Alcubierre drive.
I wonder if it can nullify gravity too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755743</id>
	<title>Gotta say ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255614360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>That sucks<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>That sucks .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That sucks ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756721</id>
	<title>First off</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255619160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Read TFA. Second, does anyone have a link for the wavelengths of EM radiation that reach the surface of the Earth? The article talks about making the black hole sensitive to light (presumably visible), but is that really necessary? Is the intensity of visible light much higher than other wavelengths. Of course this could simply be a case for making the article more layman friendly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Read TFA .
Second , does anyone have a link for the wavelengths of EM radiation that reach the surface of the Earth ?
The article talks about making the black hole sensitive to light ( presumably visible ) , but is that really necessary ?
Is the intensity of visible light much higher than other wavelengths .
Of course this could simply be a case for making the article more layman friendly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Read TFA.
Second, does anyone have a link for the wavelengths of EM radiation that reach the surface of the Earth?
The article talks about making the black hole sensitive to light (presumably visible), but is that really necessary?
Is the intensity of visible light much higher than other wavelengths.
Of course this could simply be a case for making the article more layman friendly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29759061</id>
	<title>still not really that great</title>
	<author>ILuvRamen</author>
	<datestamp>1255628880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So you can funnel in 100\% of photons with it.  You still have to convert them to electricty somehow so really it's just a really good light focuser for solar panels.  The funny thing is, there are already solar panel focusers or light amplifiers or concentrators or whatever they're called that, by area, can do like 3:1 and if this black hole is a square foot of total surface area, it gets a square foot of light at 1:1 and that's it.  You'd actually need to attach a mirror or lense focuser to funnel light into the black hole.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So you can funnel in 100 \ % of photons with it .
You still have to convert them to electricty somehow so really it 's just a really good light focuser for solar panels .
The funny thing is , there are already solar panel focusers or light amplifiers or concentrators or whatever they 're called that , by area , can do like 3 : 1 and if this black hole is a square foot of total surface area , it gets a square foot of light at 1 : 1 and that 's it .
You 'd actually need to attach a mirror or lense focuser to funnel light into the black hole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you can funnel in 100\% of photons with it.
You still have to convert them to electricty somehow so really it's just a really good light focuser for solar panels.
The funny thing is, there are already solar panel focusers or light amplifiers or concentrators or whatever they're called that, by area, can do like 3:1 and if this black hole is a square foot of total surface area, it gets a square foot of light at 1:1 and that's it.
You'd actually need to attach a mirror or lense focuser to funnel light into the black hole.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29759039</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>kgfowler</author>
	<datestamp>1255628760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's an ARC (tm) "Ambient Radiation Crockpot".

Move over George Foreman, this new slow cooker makes chili and stew like your grill never could.  Just put in the ingredients, place it in an open, south-facing window and let the communication satellites do the rest.  "But what will I do for 4-8 hours?" you ask?  Just connect your your satellite TV tuner to the coaxial output and enjoy hours of digital media.

-kf</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's an ARC ( tm ) " Ambient Radiation Crockpot " .
Move over George Foreman , this new slow cooker makes chili and stew like your grill never could .
Just put in the ingredients , place it in an open , south-facing window and let the communication satellites do the rest .
" But what will I do for 4-8 hours ?
" you ask ?
Just connect your your satellite TV tuner to the coaxial output and enjoy hours of digital media .
-kf</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's an ARC (tm) "Ambient Radiation Crockpot".
Move over George Foreman, this new slow cooker makes chili and stew like your grill never could.
Just put in the ingredients, place it in an open, south-facing window and let the communication satellites do the rest.
"But what will I do for 4-8 hours?
" you ask?
Just connect your your satellite TV tuner to the coaxial output and enjoy hours of digital media.
-kf</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755765</id>
	<title>Plagiarism?</title>
	<author>eldavojohn</author>
	<datestamp>1255614480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The summary is word for word the first three paragraphs in the article.  The titles are also the same.  Dangerous ground to tread on, CmdrTaco.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary is word for word the first three paragraphs in the article .
The titles are also the same .
Dangerous ground to tread on , CmdrTaco .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary is word for word the first three paragraphs in the article.
The titles are also the same.
Dangerous ground to tread on, CmdrTaco.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758371</id>
	<title>Optical black hole??</title>
	<author>renoX</author>
	<datestamp>1255625820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As far as I understand, given that there's no invisibility cloaks working for those frequency and that this is a variation on these device, I doubt the experimenter's claim that they'll be able to build an optical black hole soon..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As far as I understand , given that there 's no invisibility cloaks working for those frequency and that this is a variation on these device , I doubt the experimenter 's claim that they 'll be able to build an optical black hole soon. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As far as I understand, given that there's no invisibility cloaks working for those frequency and that this is a variation on these device, I doubt the experimenter's claim that they'll be able to build an optical black hole soon..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755809</id>
	<title>Why are science reporters such ignoramuses?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255614720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Their idea was to mimic the properties of a cosmological black hole, whose<br>&gt; intense gravity bends the surrounding space-time, causing any nearby matter<br>&gt; or radiation to follow the warped space-time and spiral inwards.</p><p>The device sounds interesting but the reporter's notion of gravity is utter nonsense.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Their idea was to mimic the properties of a cosmological black hole , whose &gt; intense gravity bends the surrounding space-time , causing any nearby matter &gt; or radiation to follow the warped space-time and spiral inwards.The device sounds interesting but the reporter 's notion of gravity is utter nonsense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Their idea was to mimic the properties of a cosmological black hole, whose&gt; intense gravity bends the surrounding space-time, causing any nearby matter&gt; or radiation to follow the warped space-time and spiral inwards.The device sounds interesting but the reporter's notion of gravity is utter nonsense.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29759179</id>
	<title>DEDs at last!</title>
	<author>TED Vinson</author>
	<datestamp>1255629360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We are on the verge of having true DEDs (Dark Emitting Diodes)</htmltext>
<tokenext>We are on the verge of having true DEDs ( Dark Emitting Diodes )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are on the verge of having true DEDs (Dark Emitting Diodes)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757451</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>Luyseyal</author>
	<datestamp>1255621920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FTA... <i>In their device, the core converts the absorbed light into heat</i>... So, it is be reradiated out the bottom/top of the cylinder. Just one more reason why you are right to call it a waveguide, albeit a very advanced one.</p><p>-l</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FTA... In their device , the core converts the absorbed light into heat... So , it is be reradiated out the bottom/top of the cylinder .
Just one more reason why you are right to call it a waveguide , albeit a very advanced one.-l</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTA... In their device, the core converts the absorbed light into heat... So, it is be reradiated out the bottom/top of the cylinder.
Just one more reason why you are right to call it a waveguide, albeit a very advanced one.-l</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755971</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255615680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For sure... and it's not a black hole. It's a very well designed waveguide that is able to channel microwaves to an absorbant material without re-radiating any of the incoming energy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For sure... and it 's not a black hole .
It 's a very well designed waveguide that is able to channel microwaves to an absorbant material without re-radiating any of the incoming energy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For sure... and it's not a black hole.
It's a very well designed waveguide that is able to channel microwaves to an absorbant material without re-radiating any of the incoming energy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29760729</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>stanltaaf</author>
	<datestamp>1255636320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Correct, they also might think it has something to do with the shape of space, which it does not have anything to do with the effect of space on matter e.g. gravity.  It's a very fancy inward reflecting fresnel</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Correct , they also might think it has something to do with the shape of space , which it does not have anything to do with the effect of space on matter e.g .
gravity. It 's a very fancy inward reflecting fresnel</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correct, they also might think it has something to do with the shape of space, which it does not have anything to do with the effect of space on matter e.g.
gravity.  It's a very fancy inward reflecting fresnel</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756651</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255618860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First priority: Install one above every street light so we can get our lovely speckled black skies back.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First priority : Install one above every street light so we can get our lovely speckled black skies back .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First priority: Install one above every street light so we can get our lovely speckled black skies back.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29765183</id>
	<title>Been done</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255619580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, I'm a fogy.  I remember a Munsters episode where Grandpa Munster had invented a "black light" which made the room dark when it was turned on.  It was funny; guess you had to be there...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , I 'm a fogy .
I remember a Munsters episode where Grandpa Munster had invented a " black light " which made the room dark when it was turned on .
It was funny ; guess you had to be there.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, I'm a fogy.
I remember a Munsters episode where Grandpa Munster had invented a "black light" which made the room dark when it was turned on.
It was funny; guess you had to be there...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758613</id>
	<title>Radiation Shield</title>
	<author>tog000</author>
	<datestamp>1255626840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Couldn't this be used in space to absorb radiation and protect spaceship or outposts? I would assume i'd be completely dark underneath the device, but the radiation could be reused to generate electricity and power regular lights....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could n't this be used in space to absorb radiation and protect spaceship or outposts ?
I would assume i 'd be completely dark underneath the device , but the radiation could be reused to generate electricity and power regular lights... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Couldn't this be used in space to absorb radiation and protect spaceship or outposts?
I would assume i'd be completely dark underneath the device, but the radiation could be reused to generate electricity and power regular lights....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29771279</id>
	<title>Dark Bulb?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255721100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So it's like a dark bulb right?<br>For when it's too bright out?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So it 's like a dark bulb right ? For when it 's too bright out ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it's like a dark bulb right?For when it's too bright out?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</id>
	<title>First priority.</title>
	<author>HungryHobo</author>
	<datestamp>1255614360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They need to stop calling it a black hole or the ignorant masses will decide it's going to end the world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They need to stop calling it a black hole or the ignorant masses will decide it 's going to end the world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They need to stop calling it a black hole or the ignorant masses will decide it's going to end the world.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29761485</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>ArmyOfAardvarks</author>
	<datestamp>1255640160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's going to end the world!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's going to end the world !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's going to end the world!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756707</id>
	<title>Light? How about a Black Hole for Mosquitos?</title>
	<author>HydraSwitch</author>
	<datestamp>1255619100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I live in Minnesota, and would like to go camping sometimes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in Minnesota , and would like to go camping sometimes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in Minnesota, and would like to go camping sometimes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29761265</id>
	<title>This is years behind...</title>
	<author>VinB</author>
	<datestamp>1255638960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... the first Black Hole for emotions. I know. I dated her back in high school.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... the first Black Hole for emotions .
I know .
I dated her back in high school .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... the first Black Hole for emotions.
I know.
I dated her back in high school.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755741</id>
	<title>asshole?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255614360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i know one black hole that doesnt attrack light</htmltext>
<tokenext>i know one black hole that doesnt attrack light</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i know one black hole that doesnt attrack light</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756057</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255616100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As long as they don't build it as a chair-top black hole... i think we'll be safe from some Balmer chairmaggedon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as they do n't build it as a chair-top black hole... i think we 'll be safe from some Balmer chairmaggedon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as they don't build it as a chair-top black hole... i think we'll be safe from some Balmer chairmaggedon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29815001</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>Thuktun</author>
	<datestamp>1256034780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just issue everyone night-vision goggles and leave the lights turned off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just issue everyone night-vision goggles and leave the lights turned off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just issue everyone night-vision goggles and leave the lights turned off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758041</id>
	<title>This is incredible but....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255624440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if they will ever be able to create more energy than it takes to harvest it. Not an easy task.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if they will ever be able to create more energy than it takes to harvest it .
Not an easy task .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if they will ever be able to create more energy than it takes to harvest it.
Not an easy task.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757003</id>
	<title>My black hole ate my homework</title>
	<author>binaryseraph</author>
	<datestamp>1255620240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hope they make consumer models of this soon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope they make consumer models of this soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope they make consumer models of this soon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29760335</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255634220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>which makes it more immediately useful for increasing the efficiency of wireless power transmission</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>which makes it more immediately useful for increasing the efficiency of wireless power transmission</tokentext>
<sentencetext>which makes it more immediately useful for increasing the efficiency of wireless power transmission</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755971</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756139</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1255616460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>As long as the dolphins are still here, we're safe.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as the dolphins are still here , we 're safe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as the dolphins are still here, we're safe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29760311</id>
	<title>obviously, we need a way to put this in paint</title>
	<author>mikeee</author>
	<datestamp>1255634160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"How much more black could it be?  None.  None more black."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" How much more black could it be ?
None. None more black .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"How much more black could it be?
None.  None more black.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758389</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1255625820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, just call it what it is -- a Light Sucker.</p><p>Which the masses will understand as the long-theorized counterpart to the everyday item, the <a href="http://www.ethereal.net/~tristan/humor/dark-suckers.html" title="ethereal.net">Dark Sucker.</a> [ethereal.net]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , just call it what it is -- a Light Sucker.Which the masses will understand as the long-theorized counterpart to the everyday item , the Dark Sucker .
[ ethereal.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, just call it what it is -- a Light Sucker.Which the masses will understand as the long-theorized counterpart to the everyday item, the Dark Sucker.
[ethereal.net]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756903</id>
	<title>Already been done.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255619880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Red matter, I bet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Red matter , I bet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Red matter, I bet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756363</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>craagz</author>
	<datestamp>1255617360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>drown - water <br>bury - soil <br>suck - air <br>sip - liquid <br>??? - light <br> <br>or does suck work for everything?</htmltext>
<tokenext>drown - water bury - soil suck - air sip - liquid ? ? ?
- light or does suck work for everything ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>drown - water bury - soil suck - air sip - liquid ???
- light  or does suck work for everything?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755745</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29759979</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1255632840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"Welcome to the presentation of our next project, The Nightbringer."</p></div></blockquote><p>Thank you.  I am Nightbringer, as you have surmised.  And I'm glad to be here.  Are you The Food?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Welcome to the presentation of our next project , The Nightbringer .
" Thank you .
I am Nightbringer , as you have surmised .
And I 'm glad to be here .
Are you The Food ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Welcome to the presentation of our next project, The Nightbringer.
"Thank you.
I am Nightbringer, as you have surmised.
And I'm glad to be here.
Are you The Food?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755845</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756227</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255616820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hell no, it is our words and our science.<br>Learn the idiots that it isn't an Earth-eating monster from outer space instead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hell no , it is our words and our science.Learn the idiots that it is n't an Earth-eating monster from outer space instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hell no, it is our words and our science.Learn the idiots that it isn't an Earth-eating monster from outer space instead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29762481</id>
	<title>Re:Gotta say ...</title>
	<author>n0tWorthy</author>
	<datestamp>1255601280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Then it's a fan!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Then it 's a fan !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then it's a fan!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757401</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756523</id>
	<title>Time to get some funding...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255618140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, Military, guess what, this device could be turned in to a light grenade.<br>Yeah, like that thing out of Starga.. okay seriously, i'm beginning to think aliens are involved somehow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , Military , guess what , this device could be turned in to a light grenade.Yeah , like that thing out of Starga.. okay seriously , i 'm beginning to think aliens are involved somehow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, Military, guess what, this device could be turned in to a light grenade.Yeah, like that thing out of Starga.. okay seriously, i'm beginning to think aliens are involved somehow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756279</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>ROMRIX</author>
	<datestamp>1255617060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a black hole in the same way my bedroom is when I shut the door.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a black hole in the same way my bedroom is when I shut the door .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a black hole in the same way my bedroom is when I shut the door.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758063</id>
	<title>Military Application?</title>
	<author>popo</author>
	<datestamp>1255624500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are we looking at the next generation of stealth technology?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are we looking at the next generation of stealth technology ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are we looking at the next generation of stealth technology?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756731</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>metlin</author>
	<datestamp>1255619220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Until the smart dolphins who've already left shake their heads at mankind (and their stupid brethren) that stayed behind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Until the smart dolphins who 've already left shake their heads at mankind ( and their stupid brethren ) that stayed behind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Until the smart dolphins who've already left shake their heads at mankind (and their stupid brethren) that stayed behind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29761351</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>kabloom</author>
	<datestamp>1255639440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If my coffee cup suddenly collapsed into a black hole, I wouldn't feel any difference because outside the event horizon, it's still the same amount of mass generating the same amount of gravity. However, it would suck all of the air out of the room -- as gas molecules fell into the event horizon, the rest of the air in the room would redistribute at a lower pressure, exposing more gas molecules to the danger of falling into the event horizon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If my coffee cup suddenly collapsed into a black hole , I would n't feel any difference because outside the event horizon , it 's still the same amount of mass generating the same amount of gravity .
However , it would suck all of the air out of the room -- as gas molecules fell into the event horizon , the rest of the air in the room would redistribute at a lower pressure , exposing more gas molecules to the danger of falling into the event horizon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If my coffee cup suddenly collapsed into a black hole, I wouldn't feel any difference because outside the event horizon, it's still the same amount of mass generating the same amount of gravity.
However, it would suck all of the air out of the room -- as gas molecules fell into the event horizon, the rest of the air in the room would redistribute at a lower pressure, exposing more gas molecules to the danger of falling into the event horizon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29770085</id>
	<title>Get your own black hole</title>
	<author>Merlin843</author>
	<datestamp>1255715100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Coming soon to a RadioShack near you</htmltext>
<tokenext>Coming soon to a RadioShack near you</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Coming soon to a RadioShack near you</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758511</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1255626420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This really sucks.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
It's just warped, I say! Warped!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This really sucks .
It 's just warped , I say !
Warped !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This really sucks.
It's just warped, I say!
Warped!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755745</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758647</id>
	<title>Where're the jokes?</title>
	<author>imgod2u</author>
	<datestamp>1255627020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm surprised there haven't been any "sounds like my ex-wife" jokes yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm surprised there have n't been any " sounds like my ex-wife " jokes yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm surprised there haven't been any "sounds like my ex-wife" jokes yet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756385</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>sleeponthemic</author>
	<datestamp>1255617420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they stop it's still an elephant in the room. Since this is never going to go away, I think I side with the idea of continual misuse of this term, thus encouraging a public view more akin to the boy who cried wolf.  Once we get there, we can actually make the black hole that destroys earth, in peace.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they stop it 's still an elephant in the room .
Since this is never going to go away , I think I side with the idea of continual misuse of this term , thus encouraging a public view more akin to the boy who cried wolf .
Once we get there , we can actually make the black hole that destroys earth , in peace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they stop it's still an elephant in the room.
Since this is never going to go away, I think I side with the idea of continual misuse of this term, thus encouraging a public view more akin to the boy who cried wolf.
Once we get there, we can actually make the black hole that destroys earth, in peace.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758223</id>
	<title>Re:Gotta say ...</title>
	<author>tritonman</author>
	<datestamp>1255625220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just wait until Al-Qaeda gets a hold of this technology</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just wait until Al-Qaeda gets a hold of this technology</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just wait until Al-Qaeda gets a hold of this technology</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755743</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756497</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>relguj9</author>
	<datestamp>1255618020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes please, my first gut reaction was to say "holy crap, what could possibly go wrong?"  Then I read the article and my reaction was, "holy crap, this is a revolutionary way of capturing electromagnetic waves that."  Seriously, this seems from the super short non-descriptive article, like it could actually be on every solar panel in 10 years.<br> <br>

I completely agree, they need to fix the name lol.  Although it is catchy, something like "light sucker" or something would make more sense.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes please , my first gut reaction was to say " holy crap , what could possibly go wrong ?
" Then I read the article and my reaction was , " holy crap , this is a revolutionary way of capturing electromagnetic waves that .
" Seriously , this seems from the super short non-descriptive article , like it could actually be on every solar panel in 10 years .
I completely agree , they need to fix the name lol .
Although it is catchy , something like " light sucker " or something would make more sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes please, my first gut reaction was to say "holy crap, what could possibly go wrong?
"  Then I read the article and my reaction was, "holy crap, this is a revolutionary way of capturing electromagnetic waves that.
"  Seriously, this seems from the super short non-descriptive article, like it could actually be on every solar panel in 10 years.
I completely agree, they need to fix the name lol.
Although it is catchy, something like "light sucker" or something would make more sense.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756005</id>
	<title>I THINK ITS QUITE OVIOUS</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1255615860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I THINK ITS QUITE OVIOUS that he wasn't trying to pass off those words as his own. Apologies to TFA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I THINK ITS QUITE OVIOUS that he was n't trying to pass off those words as his own .
Apologies to TFA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I THINK ITS QUITE OVIOUS that he wasn't trying to pass off those words as his own.
Apologies to TFA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756455</id>
	<title>Re:Plagiarism?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255617780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The summary is word for word the first three paragraphs in the article.  The titles are also the same.  Dangerous ground to tread on, CmdrTaco.</p></div><p>The "summary" is entirely in quotation marks - moron! Besides the fact it can't be plagiarism if he links to the original article. Get a life.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary is word for word the first three paragraphs in the article .
The titles are also the same .
Dangerous ground to tread on , CmdrTaco.The " summary " is entirely in quotation marks - moron !
Besides the fact it ca n't be plagiarism if he links to the original article .
Get a life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary is word for word the first three paragraphs in the article.
The titles are also the same.
Dangerous ground to tread on, CmdrTaco.The "summary" is entirely in quotation marks - moron!
Besides the fact it can't be plagiarism if he links to the original article.
Get a life.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29764141</id>
	<title>Nukular?</title>
	<author>traffichazard</author>
	<datestamp>1255609560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At least it's not the ultimate NIMBY - a Nuclear Black Hole.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least it 's not the ultimate NIMBY - a Nuclear Black Hole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least it's not the ultimate NIMBY - a Nuclear Black Hole.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29759275</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>countertrolling</author>
	<datestamp>1255629840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.floridahabitat.org/picture-gallery/DarkSkyLightingHarmony.jpg/image\_preview" title="floridahabitat.org" rel="nofollow">Why wait</a> [floridahabitat.org]?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why wait [ floridahabitat.org ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why wait [floridahabitat.org]?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756651</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756875</id>
	<title>too much hunger for fame?</title>
	<author>rgarbacz</author>
	<datestamp>1255619760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> It is pity, that the wish for fame overshadows scientific correctness. Calling this "device" a black hole is like calling a bicycle a space shuttle, because both have wheels. If something is black in certain wavelength, does not mean it is a black-hole.
</p><p> Not that it is not significant, it surely is, but it is more like a black microwave paint discovery.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is pity , that the wish for fame overshadows scientific correctness .
Calling this " device " a black hole is like calling a bicycle a space shuttle , because both have wheels .
If something is black in certain wavelength , does not mean it is a black-hole .
Not that it is not significant , it surely is , but it is more like a black microwave paint discovery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> It is pity, that the wish for fame overshadows scientific correctness.
Calling this "device" a black hole is like calling a bicycle a space shuttle, because both have wheels.
If something is black in certain wavelength, does not mean it is a black-hole.
Not that it is not significant, it surely is, but it is more like a black microwave paint discovery.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757401</id>
	<title>Re:Gotta say ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255621680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't black holes also blow out huge plumes of matter?  If so, does it suck and blow?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't black holes also blow out huge plumes of matter ?
If so , does it suck and blow ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't black holes also blow out huge plumes of matter?
If so, does it suck and blow?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755743</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29759005</id>
	<title>PowerPoint Presentation ...</title>
	<author>517714</author>
	<datestamp>1255628640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>   Doesn't work<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Power is on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... No light from projector<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Oh Shit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't work ... Power is on ... No light from projector ... Oh Shit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>   Doesn't work ... Power is on ... No light from projector ... Oh Shit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29761919</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255599120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So now the world isn't going to end in 2012... I'm confused...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So now the world is n't going to end in 2012... I 'm confused.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So now the world isn't going to end in 2012... I'm confused...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756131</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>RobotRunAmok</author>
	<datestamp>1255616460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>They need to stop calling it a black hole or the ignorant masses will decide it's going to end the world.</i></p><p>In the current uber-politically correct climate, they're more likely to lose their funding after being accused of racism.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They need to stop calling it a black hole or the ignorant masses will decide it 's going to end the world.In the current uber-politically correct climate , they 're more likely to lose their funding after being accused of racism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They need to stop calling it a black hole or the ignorant masses will decide it's going to end the world.In the current uber-politically correct climate, they're more likely to lose their funding after being accused of racism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757227</id>
	<title>entropy</title>
	<author>Cawas</author>
	<datestamp>1255621020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and people thought entropy could never be reversed... how could there be a big bang and no big gnab?</htmltext>
<tokenext>and people thought entropy could never be reversed... how could there be a big bang and no big gnab ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and people thought entropy could never be reversed... how could there be a big bang and no big gnab?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29760277</id>
	<title>Danger Will Robinson, Danger!</title>
	<author>nefus</author>
	<datestamp>1255634040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does anybody think this might eventually be a bad thing?  I mean if it sucks in light whats to stop somebody from sticking their hand in it to see what it feels like.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anybody think this might eventually be a bad thing ?
I mean if it sucks in light whats to stop somebody from sticking their hand in it to see what it feels like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anybody think this might eventually be a bad thing?
I mean if it sucks in light whats to stop somebody from sticking their hand in it to see what it feels like.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755733</id>
	<title>Hello</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255614360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>darkness...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>darkness.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>darkness...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29759111</id>
	<title>Re:Very obvious civilian application</title>
	<author>MarkRose</author>
	<datestamp>1255629060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except that many police forces are using lasers instead of radar to detect speed now.</p><p>And if you want to use something similar to be invisible to a laser, you might just end up being invisible (depending on the laser frequencies you absorb). Which would be pretty darked cool, except when traffic doesn't see you at night.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except that many police forces are using lasers instead of radar to detect speed now.And if you want to use something similar to be invisible to a laser , you might just end up being invisible ( depending on the laser frequencies you absorb ) .
Which would be pretty darked cool , except when traffic does n't see you at night .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except that many police forces are using lasers instead of radar to detect speed now.And if you want to use something similar to be invisible to a laser, you might just end up being invisible (depending on the laser frequencies you absorb).
Which would be pretty darked cool, except when traffic doesn't see you at night.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757515</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757367</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255621560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the ignorant mass:</p><p>it's the end of the world..!!!!....Ruuuuuuunnnn !!!!!!!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the ignorant mass : it 's the end of the world.. ! ! !
! ....Ruuuuuuunnnn ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the ignorant mass:it's the end of the world..!!!
!....Ruuuuuuunnnn !!!!!!!!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758529</id>
	<title>Re:Hello</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1255626480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Charlie Murphy:  Damnit, Rick James, I told you to stop calling me that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Charlie Murphy : Damnit , Rick James , I told you to stop calling me that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Charlie Murphy:  Damnit, Rick James, I told you to stop calling me that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758673</id>
	<title>This is similar to the dark sucker..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255627080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you'll find this interesting..</p><p>Dark Suckers</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Bell Labs Proves Existence of Dark Suckers</p><p>For years it has been believed that electric bulbs emitted light. However,<br>recent information from Bell Labs has proven otherwise. Electric bulbs<br>don't emit light, they suck dark. Thus they now call these bulbs dark<br>suckers. The dark sucker theory, according to a Bell Labs spokesperson,<br>proves the existence of dark, that dark has mass heavier than that of<br>light, and that dark is faster than light.</p><p>The basis of the dark sucker theory is that electric bulbs suck dark. Take<br>for example, the dark suckers in the room where you are. There is less dark<br>right next to them than there is elsewhere. The larger the dark sucker, the<br>greater its capacity to suck dark. Dark suckers in a parking lot have a<br>much greater capacity than the ones in this room. As with all things, dark<br>suckers don't last forever. Once they are full of dark, they can no longer<br>suck. This is proven by the black spot on a full dark sucker. A candle is a<br>primitive dark sucker. lA new candle has a white wick. You will notice that<br>after the first use, the wick turns black, representing all the dark which<br>has been sucked into it. If you hold a pencil next to the wick of an<br>operating candle, the tip will turn black because it got in the path of the<br>dark flowing into the candle.</p><p>Unfortunately, these primitive dark suckers have a very limited range.<br>There are also portable dark suckers. The bulbs in these can't handle all<br>of the dark by themselves, and must be aided by a dark storage unit. When<br>the dark storage unit is full, it must be either emptied or replaced before<br>the portable dark sucker can operate again.</p><p>Dark has mass. When dark goes into a dark sucker, friction from this mass<br>generates heat. Thus it is not wise to touch an operating dark sucker.<br>Candles present a special problem, as the dark must travel in the solid<br>wick instead of through glass. This generates a great amount of heat. Thus<br>it can be very dangerous to touch an operating candle. Dark is also heavier<br>than light. If you swim deeper and deeper, you notice it gets slowly darker<br>and darker. When you reach a depth of approximately fifty feet, you are in<br>total darkness. This is because the heavier dark sinks to the bottom of the<br>lake and the lighter light floats to the top. The immense power of dark can<br>be utilized to mans advantage. We can collect the dark that has settled to<br>the bottom of lakes and push it through turbines, which generate<br>electricity and help push it to the ocean where it may be safely stored.<br>Prior to turbines, it was much more difficult to get dark from the rivers<br>and lakes to the ocean. The Indians recognized this problem, and tried to<br>solve it. When on a river in a canoe travelling in the same direction as<br>the flow of the dark, they paddled slowly, so as not to stop the flow of<br>dark, but when they traveled against the flow of dark, they paddled quickly<br>so as to help push the dark along its way.</p><p>Finally, we must prove that dark is faster than light. If you were to stand<br>in an illuminated room in front of a closed, dark closet, then slowly open<br>the closet door, you would see the light slowly enter the closet, but since<br>the dark is so fast, you would not be able to see the dark leave the<br>closet.</p><p>In conclusion, Bell Labs stated that dark suckers make all our lives much<br>easier. So the next time you look at an electric bulb remember that it is<br>indeed a dark sucker.</p><p>Author Unknown</p><p>https://www.msu.edu/user/dynicrai/physics/dark.htm</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you 'll find this interesting..Dark Suckers                                   Bell Labs Proves Existence of Dark SuckersFor years it has been believed that electric bulbs emitted light .
However,recent information from Bell Labs has proven otherwise .
Electric bulbsdo n't emit light , they suck dark .
Thus they now call these bulbs darksuckers .
The dark sucker theory , according to a Bell Labs spokesperson,proves the existence of dark , that dark has mass heavier than that oflight , and that dark is faster than light.The basis of the dark sucker theory is that electric bulbs suck dark .
Takefor example , the dark suckers in the room where you are .
There is less darkright next to them than there is elsewhere .
The larger the dark sucker , thegreater its capacity to suck dark .
Dark suckers in a parking lot have amuch greater capacity than the ones in this room .
As with all things , darksuckers do n't last forever .
Once they are full of dark , they can no longersuck .
This is proven by the black spot on a full dark sucker .
A candle is aprimitive dark sucker .
lA new candle has a white wick .
You will notice thatafter the first use , the wick turns black , representing all the dark whichhas been sucked into it .
If you hold a pencil next to the wick of anoperating candle , the tip will turn black because it got in the path of thedark flowing into the candle.Unfortunately , these primitive dark suckers have a very limited range.There are also portable dark suckers .
The bulbs in these ca n't handle allof the dark by themselves , and must be aided by a dark storage unit .
Whenthe dark storage unit is full , it must be either emptied or replaced beforethe portable dark sucker can operate again.Dark has mass .
When dark goes into a dark sucker , friction from this massgenerates heat .
Thus it is not wise to touch an operating dark sucker.Candles present a special problem , as the dark must travel in the solidwick instead of through glass .
This generates a great amount of heat .
Thusit can be very dangerous to touch an operating candle .
Dark is also heavierthan light .
If you swim deeper and deeper , you notice it gets slowly darkerand darker .
When you reach a depth of approximately fifty feet , you are intotal darkness .
This is because the heavier dark sinks to the bottom of thelake and the lighter light floats to the top .
The immense power of dark canbe utilized to mans advantage .
We can collect the dark that has settled tothe bottom of lakes and push it through turbines , which generateelectricity and help push it to the ocean where it may be safely stored.Prior to turbines , it was much more difficult to get dark from the riversand lakes to the ocean .
The Indians recognized this problem , and tried tosolve it .
When on a river in a canoe travelling in the same direction asthe flow of the dark , they paddled slowly , so as not to stop the flow ofdark , but when they traveled against the flow of dark , they paddled quicklyso as to help push the dark along its way.Finally , we must prove that dark is faster than light .
If you were to standin an illuminated room in front of a closed , dark closet , then slowly openthe closet door , you would see the light slowly enter the closet , but sincethe dark is so fast , you would not be able to see the dark leave thecloset.In conclusion , Bell Labs stated that dark suckers make all our lives mucheasier .
So the next time you look at an electric bulb remember that it isindeed a dark sucker.Author Unknownhttps : //www.msu.edu/user/dynicrai/physics/dark.htm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you'll find this interesting..Dark Suckers
                                  Bell Labs Proves Existence of Dark SuckersFor years it has been believed that electric bulbs emitted light.
However,recent information from Bell Labs has proven otherwise.
Electric bulbsdon't emit light, they suck dark.
Thus they now call these bulbs darksuckers.
The dark sucker theory, according to a Bell Labs spokesperson,proves the existence of dark, that dark has mass heavier than that oflight, and that dark is faster than light.The basis of the dark sucker theory is that electric bulbs suck dark.
Takefor example, the dark suckers in the room where you are.
There is less darkright next to them than there is elsewhere.
The larger the dark sucker, thegreater its capacity to suck dark.
Dark suckers in a parking lot have amuch greater capacity than the ones in this room.
As with all things, darksuckers don't last forever.
Once they are full of dark, they can no longersuck.
This is proven by the black spot on a full dark sucker.
A candle is aprimitive dark sucker.
lA new candle has a white wick.
You will notice thatafter the first use, the wick turns black, representing all the dark whichhas been sucked into it.
If you hold a pencil next to the wick of anoperating candle, the tip will turn black because it got in the path of thedark flowing into the candle.Unfortunately, these primitive dark suckers have a very limited range.There are also portable dark suckers.
The bulbs in these can't handle allof the dark by themselves, and must be aided by a dark storage unit.
Whenthe dark storage unit is full, it must be either emptied or replaced beforethe portable dark sucker can operate again.Dark has mass.
When dark goes into a dark sucker, friction from this massgenerates heat.
Thus it is not wise to touch an operating dark sucker.Candles present a special problem, as the dark must travel in the solidwick instead of through glass.
This generates a great amount of heat.
Thusit can be very dangerous to touch an operating candle.
Dark is also heavierthan light.
If you swim deeper and deeper, you notice it gets slowly darkerand darker.
When you reach a depth of approximately fifty feet, you are intotal darkness.
This is because the heavier dark sinks to the bottom of thelake and the lighter light floats to the top.
The immense power of dark canbe utilized to mans advantage.
We can collect the dark that has settled tothe bottom of lakes and push it through turbines, which generateelectricity and help push it to the ocean where it may be safely stored.Prior to turbines, it was much more difficult to get dark from the riversand lakes to the ocean.
The Indians recognized this problem, and tried tosolve it.
When on a river in a canoe travelling in the same direction asthe flow of the dark, they paddled slowly, so as not to stop the flow ofdark, but when they traveled against the flow of dark, they paddled quicklyso as to help push the dark along its way.Finally, we must prove that dark is faster than light.
If you were to standin an illuminated room in front of a closed, dark closet, then slowly openthe closet door, you would see the light slowly enter the closet, but sincethe dark is so fast, you would not be able to see the dark leave thecloset.In conclusion, Bell Labs stated that dark suckers make all our lives mucheasier.
So the next time you look at an electric bulb remember that it isindeed a dark sucker.Author Unknownhttps://www.msu.edu/user/dynicrai/physics/dark.htm</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755845</id>
	<title>Re:First priority.</title>
	<author>Thanshin</author>
	<datestamp>1255614900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Welcome to the presentation of our next project, The Nightbringer."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Welcome to the presentation of our next project , The Nightbringer .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Welcome to the presentation of our next project, The Nightbringer.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755923</id>
	<title>How about a Kugelblitz?</title>
	<author>Duodecimal</author>
	<datestamp>1255615440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think HeeChee references are that obscure.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think HeeChee references are that obscure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think HeeChee references are that obscure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755723</id>
	<title>and i thought mooning</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255614240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>had been around for ages...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>had been around for ages.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>had been around for ages...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756897</id>
	<title>Can electricity escape a black hole?</title>
	<author>Umangme</author>
	<datestamp>1255619820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the light will be sucked in completely, then how will the electricity leave the "black-hole"? Won't it be trapped inside it as well?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the light will be sucked in completely , then how will the electricity leave the " black-hole " ?
Wo n't it be trapped inside it as well ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the light will be sucked in completely, then how will the electricity leave the "black-hole"?
Won't it be trapped inside it as well?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756153</id>
	<title>Re:Plagiarism?</title>
	<author>lxs</author>
	<datestamp>1255616580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's even worse is that they start out calling it the first black hole for light and immediately admit that is isn't actually a black hole for light yet.</p><p>In similar news, I just broke the 100m dash world record. Well I walked 100 meters to work, which is almost the same.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's even worse is that they start out calling it the first black hole for light and immediately admit that is is n't actually a black hole for light yet.In similar news , I just broke the 100m dash world record .
Well I walked 100 meters to work , which is almost the same .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's even worse is that they start out calling it the first black hole for light and immediately admit that is isn't actually a black hole for light yet.In similar news, I just broke the 100m dash world record.
Well I walked 100 meters to work, which is almost the same.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755765</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756531
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755765
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29815001
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755765
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758389
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29759979
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29759275
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756651
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755917
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29759111
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757515
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757021
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29764141
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29761919
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29759039
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758529
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756279
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29761485
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29761351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756497
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29767441
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756363
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755745
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757457
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755765
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756153
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755765
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758511
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755745
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29765723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756721
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29761499
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757235
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755811
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29762481
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755743
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756057
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758223
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755743
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29759677
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757515
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757773
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29760335
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756005
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755765
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29760729
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756385
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756227
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_15_1224203_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757451
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_1224203.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755717
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_1224203.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755741
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_1224203.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756721
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29765723
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_1224203.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758063
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_1224203.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755811
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755917
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755893
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_1224203.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757515
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29759677
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29759111
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_1224203.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755733
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758529
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_1224203.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755743
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758223
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757401
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29762481
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_1224203.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757227
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_1224203.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755745
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756363
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29767441
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758511
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_1224203.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755809
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_1224203.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756583
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_1224203.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755751
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756057
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757235
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756131
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29761499
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758471
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29764141
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29761351
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29761919
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756385
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756279
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756497
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29760729
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757367
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757021
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755923
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29761485
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755845
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29759979
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756651
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29815001
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29759275
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756227
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755971
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29760335
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29759039
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757451
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758389
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756139
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756731
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757773
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_1224203.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755723
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_1224203.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29758673
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_1224203.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29761265
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_15_1224203.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29755765
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29757457
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756153
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756455
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756005
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_15_1224203.29756531
</commentlist>
</conversation>
