<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_14_1739214</id>
	<title>First Look At Acer's 3D Laptop</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1255543380000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Barence writes <i>"Acer today revealed the <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/10/14/acer-3d-laptop-review-first-look/">world&rsquo;s first 3D laptop</a>, the Acer Aspire 5738PG, which will launch alongside Windows 7 on October 22. It uses a combination of software and specially coated glass on the 15.4in screen, along with a standard set of polarised glasses. Initial impressions were a bit iffy, and whether anyone actually needs a 3D laptop is another question entirely, but we'll find out this month."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Barence writes " Acer today revealed the world    s first 3D laptop , the Acer Aspire 5738PG , which will launch alongside Windows 7 on October 22 .
It uses a combination of software and specially coated glass on the 15.4in screen , along with a standard set of polarised glasses .
Initial impressions were a bit iffy , and whether anyone actually needs a 3D laptop is another question entirely , but we 'll find out this month .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Barence writes "Acer today revealed the world’s first 3D laptop, the Acer Aspire 5738PG, which will launch alongside Windows 7 on October 22.
It uses a combination of software and specially coated glass on the 15.4in screen, along with a standard set of polarised glasses.
Initial impressions were a bit iffy, and whether anyone actually needs a 3D laptop is another question entirely, but we'll find out this month.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748363</id>
	<title>Re:Better Idea on a Desktop</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255550580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... you don't have to RTFA, but could you at least look at the pictures?</p><p>The glasses just look like sunglasses. Yeah. Sorry, but there's no Power Glove nerd points for using this tech. I mean you could argue that it's kinda nerdy to be using tinted glasses with a laptop in public, inside, but by then I think you've got to admit it's pretty nerdy to be using a laptop in public.</p><p>glasses<br><a href="http://photos.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/DSC01079.jpg" title="pcpro.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://photos.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/DSC01079.jpg</a> [pcpro.co.uk]<br>powerglove<br><a href="http://www.productwiki.com/upload/images/power\_glove.jpg" title="productwiki.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.productwiki.com/upload/images/power\_glove.jpg</a> [productwiki.com]<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYBzKFm-rd0" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYBzKFm-rd0</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... you do n't have to RTFA , but could you at least look at the pictures ? The glasses just look like sunglasses .
Yeah. Sorry , but there 's no Power Glove nerd points for using this tech .
I mean you could argue that it 's kinda nerdy to be using tinted glasses with a laptop in public , inside , but by then I think you 've got to admit it 's pretty nerdy to be using a laptop in public.glasseshttp : //photos.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/DSC01079.jpg [ pcpro.co.uk ] powerglovehttp : //www.productwiki.com/upload/images/power \ _glove.jpg [ productwiki.com ] http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = WYBzKFm-rd0 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... you don't have to RTFA, but could you at least look at the pictures?The glasses just look like sunglasses.
Yeah. Sorry, but there's no Power Glove nerd points for using this tech.
I mean you could argue that it's kinda nerdy to be using tinted glasses with a laptop in public, inside, but by then I think you've got to admit it's pretty nerdy to be using a laptop in public.glasseshttp://photos.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/DSC01079.jpg [pcpro.co.uk]powerglovehttp://www.productwiki.com/upload/images/power\_glove.jpg [productwiki.com]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYBzKFm-rd0 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749003</id>
	<title>A non 3D laptop?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255553400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I for one am pretty satisfied with my 2D laptop which I bought in flatland, along with my 2D wife and 2D kids.
<p>
3D laptop != a laptop with a 3D display option.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one am pretty satisfied with my 2D laptop which I bought in flatland , along with my 2D wife and 2D kids .
3D laptop ! = a laptop with a 3D display option .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one am pretty satisfied with my 2D laptop which I bought in flatland, along with my 2D wife and 2D kids.
3D laptop != a laptop with a 3D display option.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29754083</id>
	<title>Semantics...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255637400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, there seems to be a lot of interchangeable use of 2D and 3D here.</p><p>To sum up:</p><p>On almost every screen (except the one on this laptop - and some others I will get to) you are looking at a 2D screen. The Mona Lisa is 2D, "Casablanca" is 2D, Call of Duty is 2D and so on. However, in those cases you are looking at a 2D projection of a 3D world. However, if both eyes are seeing the same image, it's 2D. The fact that it's a representation of a 3D world does not make it 3D, or every movie ever made could be called 3D.</p><p>In some software (like AfterEffects, Combustion, or sprite based games like "Duke Nukem") you are looking at 2D sprites, or sheets, projected into a 3D space, and finally viewed (like above) in 2D. This is sometimes called "two-and-a-half-D"</p><p>Finally, If you are viewing a volumetric scene or objects where your left eye and right eye views differ to create a true 3D impression (like real life, Viewmasters, shuttered LCDs, HMDs, holography, red-blue anaglyph, L/R polarized frames, etc.) that is called Stereo (because of the two images)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...and that seems to be what this laptop provides.</p><p>What can be confusing in the game world is that "3D" is used to differentiate some games from the early 2D games (Like Pacman) where it was a purely 2D representation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , there seems to be a lot of interchangeable use of 2D and 3D here.To sum up : On almost every screen ( except the one on this laptop - and some others I will get to ) you are looking at a 2D screen .
The Mona Lisa is 2D , " Casablanca " is 2D , Call of Duty is 2D and so on .
However , in those cases you are looking at a 2D projection of a 3D world .
However , if both eyes are seeing the same image , it 's 2D .
The fact that it 's a representation of a 3D world does not make it 3D , or every movie ever made could be called 3D.In some software ( like AfterEffects , Combustion , or sprite based games like " Duke Nukem " ) you are looking at 2D sprites , or sheets , projected into a 3D space , and finally viewed ( like above ) in 2D .
This is sometimes called " two-and-a-half-D " Finally , If you are viewing a volumetric scene or objects where your left eye and right eye views differ to create a true 3D impression ( like real life , Viewmasters , shuttered LCDs , HMDs , holography , red-blue anaglyph , L/R polarized frames , etc .
) that is called Stereo ( because of the two images ) ...and that seems to be what this laptop provides.What can be confusing in the game world is that " 3D " is used to differentiate some games from the early 2D games ( Like Pacman ) where it was a purely 2D representation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, there seems to be a lot of interchangeable use of 2D and 3D here.To sum up:On almost every screen (except the one on this laptop - and some others I will get to) you are looking at a 2D screen.
The Mona Lisa is 2D, "Casablanca" is 2D, Call of Duty is 2D and so on.
However, in those cases you are looking at a 2D projection of a 3D world.
However, if both eyes are seeing the same image, it's 2D.
The fact that it's a representation of a 3D world does not make it 3D, or every movie ever made could be called 3D.In some software (like AfterEffects, Combustion, or sprite based games like "Duke Nukem") you are looking at 2D sprites, or sheets, projected into a 3D space, and finally viewed (like above) in 2D.
This is sometimes called "two-and-a-half-D"Finally, If you are viewing a volumetric scene or objects where your left eye and right eye views differ to create a true 3D impression (like real life, Viewmasters, shuttered LCDs, HMDs, holography, red-blue anaglyph, L/R polarized frames, etc.
) that is called Stereo (because of the two images) ...and that seems to be what this laptop provides.What can be confusing in the game world is that "3D" is used to differentiate some games from the early 2D games (Like Pacman) where it was a purely 2D representation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29759181</id>
	<title>Re:Pointless and stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255629360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The most current Nvidia drivers DO support 3d and sli at the same time.  Runing dual gtx280's in sli with the Misubishi 3d tv here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The most current Nvidia drivers DO support 3d and sli at the same time .
Runing dual gtx280 's in sli with the Misubishi 3d tv here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The most current Nvidia drivers DO support 3d and sli at the same time.
Runing dual gtx280's in sli with the Misubishi 3d tv here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747481</id>
	<title>Games</title>
	<author>sopssa</author>
	<datestamp>1255546980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder whats the use for 3D laptop, and if this works better than the existing tech?</p><p><a href="http://www.nvidia.com/object/3D\_Vision\_Overview.html" title="nvidia.com">NVIDIA 3D Vision</a> [nvidia.com] is great with some games, but laptops aren't usually used for that and you would probably want atleast 17" screen if you'd get it for gaming. So whats the use?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder whats the use for 3D laptop , and if this works better than the existing tech ? NVIDIA 3D Vision [ nvidia.com ] is great with some games , but laptops are n't usually used for that and you would probably want atleast 17 " screen if you 'd get it for gaming .
So whats the use ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder whats the use for 3D laptop, and if this works better than the existing tech?NVIDIA 3D Vision [nvidia.com] is great with some games, but laptops aren't usually used for that and you would probably want atleast 17" screen if you'd get it for gaming.
So whats the use?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29752741</id>
	<title>Priorities, priorities..</title>
	<author>Madsy</author>
	<datestamp>1255534140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I rather want a laptop with touch-screen than support stereoscopic imaging. The former is convenient, the latter is a gimmick.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I rather want a laptop with touch-screen than support stereoscopic imaging .
The former is convenient , the latter is a gimmick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I rather want a laptop with touch-screen than support stereoscopic imaging.
The former is convenient, the latter is a gimmick.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747979</id>
	<title>Stupid Me, Here I Was Thinking...</title>
	<author>lbalbalba</author>
	<datestamp>1255549020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>... That computers had been in 3D all along, and now it turns out that I have been using 2D computers all along and that only the Acer Aspire 5738PG is in 3D ! Go Figure....</htmltext>
<tokenext>... That computers had been in 3D all along , and now it turns out that I have been using 2D computers all along and that only the Acer Aspire 5738PG is in 3D !
Go Figure... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... That computers had been in 3D all along, and now it turns out that I have been using 2D computers all along and that only the Acer Aspire 5738PG is in 3D !
Go Figure....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748755</id>
	<title>Re:Better Idea on a Desktop</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1255552320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed; it would be great for watching 3D movies.</p><p>When do we get holographic displays?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed ; it would be great for watching 3D movies.When do we get holographic displays ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed; it would be great for watching 3D movies.When do we get holographic displays?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749921</id>
	<title>Re:Better Idea on a Desktop</title>
	<author>b4dc0d3r</author>
	<datestamp>1255514460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most people aren't thinking about you, they are too busy wondering what you think about them.</p><p>To think otherwise shows an incredible ego, thinking that everyone's focus is on you, what you look like or are doing.  Others might find your glasses amusing for a minute, but quickly move to another subject.</p><p>I'd use it and expect people to ask me about it, but they won't cos the glasses are like sunglasses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most people are n't thinking about you , they are too busy wondering what you think about them.To think otherwise shows an incredible ego , thinking that everyone 's focus is on you , what you look like or are doing .
Others might find your glasses amusing for a minute , but quickly move to another subject.I 'd use it and expect people to ask me about it , but they wo n't cos the glasses are like sunglasses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most people aren't thinking about you, they are too busy wondering what you think about them.To think otherwise shows an incredible ego, thinking that everyone's focus is on you, what you look like or are doing.
Others might find your glasses amusing for a minute, but quickly move to another subject.I'd use it and expect people to ask me about it, but they won't cos the glasses are like sunglasses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747721</id>
	<title>Re:If you already have to wear special glasses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255548000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why do you need a laptop? Put a CPU several times more powerful than iPhone in glasses themselves and use a webcam/microphone to let you "type" on any flat surface or give voice commands. Sounds like another case of trying to glue in a new technology without thinking how to integrate it.</p></div><p>You're right. Your solution really <i>does</i> sound like trying to glue in a technology without thinking how to integrate it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do you need a laptop ?
Put a CPU several times more powerful than iPhone in glasses themselves and use a webcam/microphone to let you " type " on any flat surface or give voice commands .
Sounds like another case of trying to glue in a new technology without thinking how to integrate it.You 're right .
Your solution really does sound like trying to glue in a technology without thinking how to integrate it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do you need a laptop?
Put a CPU several times more powerful than iPhone in glasses themselves and use a webcam/microphone to let you "type" on any flat surface or give voice commands.
Sounds like another case of trying to glue in a new technology without thinking how to integrate it.You're right.
Your solution really does sound like trying to glue in a technology without thinking how to integrate it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748745</id>
	<title>Spam, Porn, and Violence</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255552260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's make the horror of the internet 3D enabled!</p><p>Never before have genuine imitation rolexes looked so bold!</p><p>Amaze your friends with 3-dimensional lesbian foursomes!</p><p>Watch that Fox News car chase, those bullets fly right through your screen!</p><p>My god!  Is that Goatse?!?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's make the horror of the internet 3D enabled ! Never before have genuine imitation rolexes looked so bold ! Amaze your friends with 3-dimensional lesbian foursomes ! Watch that Fox News car chase , those bullets fly right through your screen ! My god !
Is that Goatse ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's make the horror of the internet 3D enabled!Never before have genuine imitation rolexes looked so bold!Amaze your friends with 3-dimensional lesbian foursomes!Watch that Fox News car chase, those bullets fly right through your screen!My god!
Is that Goatse?!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29750117</id>
	<title>Re:First 3D?</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1255515360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...If you want to talk about a stereoscopic display call it what it is....this is not the first laptop to have a screen capable of <b>3D</b>. Sharp had one before IIRC.</p></div><p>Hypocrisy much?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...If you want to talk about a stereoscopic display call it what it is....this is not the first laptop to have a screen capable of 3D .
Sharp had one before IIRC.Hypocrisy much ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...If you want to talk about a stereoscopic display call it what it is....this is not the first laptop to have a screen capable of 3D.
Sharp had one before IIRC.Hypocrisy much?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748543</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748781</id>
	<title>Wolfenstein3D</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1255552380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Compared with the average FPS of today, that game was basically 2D, was a flat map where everything (except the perspective to give a hint on how far or close were things) basically happened in a plane (i.e. you couldnt aim up or down, as far i remember). Was nice to see (compared with other games of that date) but didnt added the whole promise of something 3D.<br>Actual display technology, even the ones provided by this kind of laptops, fall into that category. Will be have to wait still several years to see "real" 3D in portable mainstream computers?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Compared with the average FPS of today , that game was basically 2D , was a flat map where everything ( except the perspective to give a hint on how far or close were things ) basically happened in a plane ( i.e .
you couldnt aim up or down , as far i remember ) .
Was nice to see ( compared with other games of that date ) but didnt added the whole promise of something 3D.Actual display technology , even the ones provided by this kind of laptops , fall into that category .
Will be have to wait still several years to see " real " 3D in portable mainstream computers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Compared with the average FPS of today, that game was basically 2D, was a flat map where everything (except the perspective to give a hint on how far or close were things) basically happened in a plane (i.e.
you couldnt aim up or down, as far i remember).
Was nice to see (compared with other games of that date) but didnt added the whole promise of something 3D.Actual display technology, even the ones provided by this kind of laptops, fall into that category.
Will be have to wait still several years to see "real" 3D in portable mainstream computers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747671</id>
	<title>If you already have to wear special glasses</title>
	<author>iamacat</author>
	<datestamp>1255547760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do you need a laptop? Put a CPU several times more powerful than iPhone in glasses themselves and use a webcam/microphone to let you "type" on any flat surface or give voice commands. Sounds like another case of trying to glue in a new technology without thinking how to integrate it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do you need a laptop ?
Put a CPU several times more powerful than iPhone in glasses themselves and use a webcam/microphone to let you " type " on any flat surface or give voice commands .
Sounds like another case of trying to glue in a new technology without thinking how to integrate it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do you need a laptop?
Put a CPU several times more powerful than iPhone in glasses themselves and use a webcam/microphone to let you "type" on any flat surface or give voice commands.
Sounds like another case of trying to glue in a new technology without thinking how to integrate it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748087</id>
	<title>Everything is a Novelty at first.</title>
	<author>SOdhner</author>
	<datestamp>1255549560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>With the big increase in 3D movies and the obvious potential for games, I think there's real promise here.<br> <br>

The problem (as always) is that until more is done with these laptops in mind it's just a novelty - and until it's no longer a novelty more won't be done for these laptops.<br> <br>

That means the question is which side will blink first.  So long as the functionality is relatively cheap and is optional (nobody wants to be wearing the glasses all the time) I think it has a good chance of catching on.<br> <br>

Of course, I didn't read TFA (blocked from work) so I don't know what kind of price increase this brings or if they are partnered with anyone to make software.</htmltext>
<tokenext>With the big increase in 3D movies and the obvious potential for games , I think there 's real promise here .
The problem ( as always ) is that until more is done with these laptops in mind it 's just a novelty - and until it 's no longer a novelty more wo n't be done for these laptops .
That means the question is which side will blink first .
So long as the functionality is relatively cheap and is optional ( nobody wants to be wearing the glasses all the time ) I think it has a good chance of catching on .
Of course , I did n't read TFA ( blocked from work ) so I do n't know what kind of price increase this brings or if they are partnered with anyone to make software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With the big increase in 3D movies and the obvious potential for games, I think there's real promise here.
The problem (as always) is that until more is done with these laptops in mind it's just a novelty - and until it's no longer a novelty more won't be done for these laptops.
That means the question is which side will blink first.
So long as the functionality is relatively cheap and is optional (nobody wants to be wearing the glasses all the time) I think it has a good chance of catching on.
Of course, I didn't read TFA (blocked from work) so I don't know what kind of price increase this brings or if they are partnered with anyone to make software.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749827</id>
	<title>Re:Games</title>
	<author>cjb-nc</author>
	<datestamp>1255513980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps if it worked with your new <a href="http://www.shopfujifilm.com/detail/FUJ+15976357" title="shopfujifilm.com" rel="nofollow">FinePix REAL 3D W1 Digital Camera</a> [shopfujifilm.com] it would be useful for sorting those photos. On the other hand, the FinePix is doing something with interlacing left and right eye views so I suspect it's using some sort of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenticular\_printing" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">lenticular</a> [wikipedia.org] screen rather than the cross-polarized stereo that Acer is touting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps if it worked with your new FinePix REAL 3D W1 Digital Camera [ shopfujifilm.com ] it would be useful for sorting those photos .
On the other hand , the FinePix is doing something with interlacing left and right eye views so I suspect it 's using some sort of lenticular [ wikipedia.org ] screen rather than the cross-polarized stereo that Acer is touting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps if it worked with your new FinePix REAL 3D W1 Digital Camera [shopfujifilm.com] it would be useful for sorting those photos.
On the other hand, the FinePix is doing something with interlacing left and right eye views so I suspect it's using some sort of lenticular [wikipedia.org] screen rather than the cross-polarized stereo that Acer is touting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747481</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29751331</id>
	<title>Model in post has the multi-touch screen not 3D</title>
	<author>t35t0r</author>
	<datestamp>1255522740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The post couldn't even get the model number correct. The <a href="http://us.acer.com/acer/productv.do?LanguageISOCtxParam=en&amp;kcond61e.c2att101=56746&amp;sp=page16e&amp;ctx2.c2att1=25&amp;link=ln438e&amp;CountryISOCtxParam=US&amp;ctx1g.c2att92=447&amp;ctx1.att21k=1&amp;CRC=1856145400" title="acer.com">link to the actual product on Acer's page</a> [acer.com] mentions that the PG model has a multi-touch screen and the DG model is the polarized version which allows for 3D.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The post could n't even get the model number correct .
The link to the actual product on Acer 's page [ acer.com ] mentions that the PG model has a multi-touch screen and the DG model is the polarized version which allows for 3D .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The post couldn't even get the model number correct.
The link to the actual product on Acer's page [acer.com] mentions that the PG model has a multi-touch screen and the DG model is the polarized version which allows for 3D.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749533</id>
	<title>Re:Better Idea on a Desktop</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1255512660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This would be a better idea for a desktop system since laptops are supposed to be portable. You'd have to be a pretty big nerd (even by Slashdot standards) to wear special 3D computing glasses in public.</p><p>Using 3D glasses in the privacy of your own home (on your desktop PC) makes far more sense.</p></div><p>Yeah because laptops are only used for taking to Starbucks to write your screenplay.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This would be a better idea for a desktop system since laptops are supposed to be portable .
You 'd have to be a pretty big nerd ( even by Slashdot standards ) to wear special 3D computing glasses in public.Using 3D glasses in the privacy of your own home ( on your desktop PC ) makes far more sense.Yeah because laptops are only used for taking to Starbucks to write your screenplay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would be a better idea for a desktop system since laptops are supposed to be portable.
You'd have to be a pretty big nerd (even by Slashdot standards) to wear special 3D computing glasses in public.Using 3D glasses in the privacy of your own home (on your desktop PC) makes far more sense.Yeah because laptops are only used for taking to Starbucks to write your screenplay.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748063</id>
	<title>Forget 3D</title>
	<author>lbalbalba</author>
	<datestamp>1255549440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But Im holding out for the first fully holographic laptop myself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But Im holding out for the first fully holographic laptop myself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But Im holding out for the first fully holographic laptop myself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29750009</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Applekid</author>
	<datestamp>1255514760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I've never had an issue with an Acer laptop except of my own doing.</p></div><p>I had someone bring me an Acer netbook where they hosed the whole hard drive. Didn't come with recovery disks and the recovery partition was dead, so, I ordered the recovery disks (on their tab). Turns out the disks they sent don't even work, but you don't known until after you spend the 3 hours copying all this stuff to the hard drive. (you'd think it was doing it bit-by-bit.)</p><p>They've taken quite a fall downhill, IMHO, after getting into bed with the likes of Gateway and eMachines.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never had an issue with an Acer laptop except of my own doing.I had someone bring me an Acer netbook where they hosed the whole hard drive .
Did n't come with recovery disks and the recovery partition was dead , so , I ordered the recovery disks ( on their tab ) .
Turns out the disks they sent do n't even work , but you do n't known until after you spend the 3 hours copying all this stuff to the hard drive .
( you 'd think it was doing it bit-by-bit .
) They 've taken quite a fall downhill , IMHO , after getting into bed with the likes of Gateway and eMachines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never had an issue with an Acer laptop except of my own doing.I had someone bring me an Acer netbook where they hosed the whole hard drive.
Didn't come with recovery disks and the recovery partition was dead, so, I ordered the recovery disks (on their tab).
Turns out the disks they sent don't even work, but you don't known until after you spend the 3 hours copying all this stuff to the hard drive.
(you'd think it was doing it bit-by-bit.
)They've taken quite a fall downhill, IMHO, after getting into bed with the likes of Gateway and eMachines.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748225</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748535</id>
	<title>Re:Better Idea on a Desktop</title>
	<author>eric-x</author>
	<datestamp>1255551420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The glasses look pretty normal.</p><p>Your point about using it in the privacy of your own home makes more sense, it's just a matter of time before the emergence of 3d p0rn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The glasses look pretty normal.Your point about using it in the privacy of your own home makes more sense , it 's just a matter of time before the emergence of 3d p0rn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The glasses look pretty normal.Your point about using it in the privacy of your own home makes more sense, it's just a matter of time before the emergence of 3d p0rn.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747655</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749355</id>
	<title>I want one</title>
	<author>strangeattraction</author>
	<datestamp>1255511880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm tired of 2D, 3D here I come. I'll be able to watch YouTube 3D and instead having a 2D desktop I'll be able to get a 3D one just like the real thing. I can't wait for the 3D porn. 3D  will give the old "in out" an entirely new perspective. What a beautiful world it will be, what a glorious  time to be free..</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm tired of 2D , 3D here I come .
I 'll be able to watch YouTube 3D and instead having a 2D desktop I 'll be able to get a 3D one just like the real thing .
I ca n't wait for the 3D porn .
3D will give the old " in out " an entirely new perspective .
What a beautiful world it will be , what a glorious time to be free. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm tired of 2D, 3D here I come.
I'll be able to watch YouTube 3D and instead having a 2D desktop I'll be able to get a 3D one just like the real thing.
I can't wait for the 3D porn.
3D  will give the old "in out" an entirely new perspective.
What a beautiful world it will be, what a glorious  time to be free..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748043</id>
	<title>Pointless and stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255549380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is pointless and stupid : here's why.</p><p>First of all, 3d gaming requires some serious tinkering.  It's still a very immature, rare technology that works best with better displays than you can fit into a laptop.  Right now, the DLP HDTVs that support 3d are the best available display with the least amount of ghosting.</p><p>Second, rendering 2 viewpoints puts far more load on the GPU than rendering just one.  You need the fastest available single GPU nvidia graphics card in order to play recent games.  It has to be single GPU because so far nvidia drivers don't support 3d and SLI at the same time.  It has to be nvidia because only nvidia currently offers 3d drivers.  There's a way to get 3d on an ATI card but it's limited.</p><p>Gaming on a laptop is already a bad bargain, 3d gaming is even worse.</p><p>Without all that said : I think 3d gaming is freakin' awesome.  I even built myself a custom planar display a couple years ago in order to play games in 3d.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is pointless and stupid : here 's why.First of all , 3d gaming requires some serious tinkering .
It 's still a very immature , rare technology that works best with better displays than you can fit into a laptop .
Right now , the DLP HDTVs that support 3d are the best available display with the least amount of ghosting.Second , rendering 2 viewpoints puts far more load on the GPU than rendering just one .
You need the fastest available single GPU nvidia graphics card in order to play recent games .
It has to be single GPU because so far nvidia drivers do n't support 3d and SLI at the same time .
It has to be nvidia because only nvidia currently offers 3d drivers .
There 's a way to get 3d on an ATI card but it 's limited.Gaming on a laptop is already a bad bargain , 3d gaming is even worse.Without all that said : I think 3d gaming is freakin ' awesome .
I even built myself a custom planar display a couple years ago in order to play games in 3d .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is pointless and stupid : here's why.First of all, 3d gaming requires some serious tinkering.
It's still a very immature, rare technology that works best with better displays than you can fit into a laptop.
Right now, the DLP HDTVs that support 3d are the best available display with the least amount of ghosting.Second, rendering 2 viewpoints puts far more load on the GPU than rendering just one.
You need the fastest available single GPU nvidia graphics card in order to play recent games.
It has to be single GPU because so far nvidia drivers don't support 3d and SLI at the same time.
It has to be nvidia because only nvidia currently offers 3d drivers.
There's a way to get 3d on an ATI card but it's limited.Gaming on a laptop is already a bad bargain, 3d gaming is even worse.Without all that said : I think 3d gaming is freakin' awesome.
I even built myself a custom planar display a couple years ago in order to play games in 3d.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747611</id>
	<title>Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255547460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Acer = Crappy WalMart Computer<br>
Stereoscopic 3D = Novelty Technology<br>
Windows 7 = Vista++<br> <br>

I think I'll pass on this one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Acer = Crappy WalMart Computer Stereoscopic 3D = Novelty Technology Windows 7 = Vista + + I think I 'll pass on this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Acer = Crappy WalMart Computer
Stereoscopic 3D = Novelty Technology
Windows 7 = Vista++ 

I think I'll pass on this one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749873</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds fine, but not for me.</title>
	<author>sgerdt</author>
	<datestamp>1255514220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I also bought my aspire 3003NWLMi in 2005 and it is still my only computing device at home. It runs hot like an oven but hasn't burned itself yet with almost daily use since I bought it. And for gaming it's super, runs nethack vanilla super fast! I usually go to work while it compiles anything big, though..</p><p>Sami</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I also bought my aspire 3003NWLMi in 2005 and it is still my only computing device at home .
It runs hot like an oven but has n't burned itself yet with almost daily use since I bought it .
And for gaming it 's super , runs nethack vanilla super fast !
I usually go to work while it compiles anything big , though..Sami</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I also bought my aspire 3003NWLMi in 2005 and it is still my only computing device at home.
It runs hot like an oven but hasn't burned itself yet with almost daily use since I bought it.
And for gaming it's super, runs nethack vanilla super fast!
I usually go to work while it compiles anything big, though..Sami</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747689</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749447</id>
	<title>Re:Games</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1255512180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I wonder whats the use for 3D laptop, and if this works better than the existing tech?</p><p> <a href="http://www.nvidia.com/object/3D\_Vision\_Overview.html" title="nvidia.com">NVIDIA 3D Vision</a> [nvidia.com] is great with some games, but laptops aren't usually used for that and you would probably want atleast 17" screen if you'd get it for gaming. So whats the use?</p></div><p>In the last year I've worked on two different movies that were filmed stereoscopically.  There were times where being able to play back a stereoscopic<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.mov would have been awesome.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder whats the use for 3D laptop , and if this works better than the existing tech ?
NVIDIA 3D Vision [ nvidia.com ] is great with some games , but laptops are n't usually used for that and you would probably want atleast 17 " screen if you 'd get it for gaming .
So whats the use ? In the last year I 've worked on two different movies that were filmed stereoscopically .
There were times where being able to play back a stereoscopic .mov would have been awesome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder whats the use for 3D laptop, and if this works better than the existing tech?
NVIDIA 3D Vision [nvidia.com] is great with some games, but laptops aren't usually used for that and you would probably want atleast 17" screen if you'd get it for gaming.
So whats the use?In the last year I've worked on two different movies that were filmed stereoscopically.
There were times where being able to play back a stereoscopic .mov would have been awesome.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747481</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747791</id>
	<title>Re:If you already have to wear special glasses</title>
	<author>Onymous Coward</author>
	<datestamp>1255548240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, you have the right general idea, but we're a ways off on the glasses tech.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , you have the right general idea , but we 're a ways off on the glasses tech .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, you have the right general idea, but we're a ways off on the glasses tech.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748085</id>
	<title>Potentially interesting but needs more.</title>
	<author>91degrees</author>
	<datestamp>1255549560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Basic depth perception has its uses.  Mainly this is for perceiving depth.  But binocular vision is just one of the clues the brain uses.  We get a certain amount of depth perception just from perspective. <br> <br>
Add head tracking.  It would allow the user to look around 3D windows.  Items could actually float within the screen (and even in front to an extent).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Basic depth perception has its uses .
Mainly this is for perceiving depth .
But binocular vision is just one of the clues the brain uses .
We get a certain amount of depth perception just from perspective .
Add head tracking .
It would allow the user to look around 3D windows .
Items could actually float within the screen ( and even in front to an extent ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Basic depth perception has its uses.
Mainly this is for perceiving depth.
But binocular vision is just one of the clues the brain uses.
We get a certain amount of depth perception just from perspective.
Add head tracking.
It would allow the user to look around 3D windows.
Items could actually float within the screen (and even in front to an extent).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748117</id>
	<title>Linux has had this for years.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255549680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's called compiz. And no, you don't need "specially coated glasses".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's called compiz .
And no , you do n't need " specially coated glasses " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's called compiz.
And no, you don't need "specially coated glasses".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748099</id>
	<title>Re:tomax7</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255549620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...I can hardly wait for the holographic laptops like in the movie Paycheque.</p></div><p>I searched IMDB for the movie "Paycheque" but it got no hits.  Were you referring to the move Payche<b>ck</b>?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...I can hardly wait for the holographic laptops like in the movie Paycheque.I searched IMDB for the movie " Paycheque " but it got no hits .
Were you referring to the move Paycheck ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...I can hardly wait for the holographic laptops like in the movie Paycheque.I searched IMDB for the movie "Paycheque" but it got no hits.
Were you referring to the move Paycheck?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748481</id>
	<title>Why didn't anyone tell me?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255551180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm into 3D gaming aswell... and I must say I'm getting quite good at it. Still it can be a bit confusing and my vertigo kicks in if my character jumps/falls etc.<br>You really feel like you're there, you know! It's amazing.</p><p>I don't know why no-one told me about this before (I only learned of it recently after reading about it in a magazine).<br>It's hard to believe that a virtual world like this can be computed with real-world accuracy. Well I'm just getting excited thinking about it, I'm off to play some more<br>Wolfenstein 3D (I know I shouldn't advertise *wink*).</p><p>-chao</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm into 3D gaming aswell... and I must say I 'm getting quite good at it .
Still it can be a bit confusing and my vertigo kicks in if my character jumps/falls etc.You really feel like you 're there , you know !
It 's amazing.I do n't know why no-one told me about this before ( I only learned of it recently after reading about it in a magazine ) .It 's hard to believe that a virtual world like this can be computed with real-world accuracy .
Well I 'm just getting excited thinking about it , I 'm off to play some moreWolfenstein 3D ( I know I should n't advertise * wink * ) .-chao</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm into 3D gaming aswell... and I must say I'm getting quite good at it.
Still it can be a bit confusing and my vertigo kicks in if my character jumps/falls etc.You really feel like you're there, you know!
It's amazing.I don't know why no-one told me about this before (I only learned of it recently after reading about it in a magazine).It's hard to believe that a virtual world like this can be computed with real-world accuracy.
Well I'm just getting excited thinking about it, I'm off to play some moreWolfenstein 3D (I know I shouldn't advertise *wink*).-chao</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747655</id>
	<title>Better Idea on a Desktop</title>
	<author>royallthefourth</author>
	<datestamp>1255547700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This would be a better idea for a desktop system since laptops are supposed to be portable. You'd have to be a pretty big nerd (even by Slashdot standards) to wear special 3D computing glasses in public.
<br> <br>
Using 3D glasses in the privacy of your own home (on your desktop PC) makes far more sense.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This would be a better idea for a desktop system since laptops are supposed to be portable .
You 'd have to be a pretty big nerd ( even by Slashdot standards ) to wear special 3D computing glasses in public .
Using 3D glasses in the privacy of your own home ( on your desktop PC ) makes far more sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would be a better idea for a desktop system since laptops are supposed to be portable.
You'd have to be a pretty big nerd (even by Slashdot standards) to wear special 3D computing glasses in public.
Using 3D glasses in the privacy of your own home (on your desktop PC) makes far more sense.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748863</id>
	<title>Re:Games</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1255552680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My first laptop, an NEC versa, was 3D. I mean, it had length, width, and depth. A REAL innovation would be a 2D laptop! Give me a foldable thin sheet with the power of an i7, with &gt;4GB of RAM and 500GB of storage and THAT will be an innovation!</p><p>OK seriously though,. There are plenty of uses for 3D: 3D movies, gaming, architects' showing clients 3D models of their proposals, MRIs, "virtual" surgeries, etc. You'd want a 17" laptop for serious graphics work, but when/where portability is key, along with decent runtime (battery), a 15"-16" notebook is vastly superior.</p><p>*I* want a 17" notebook. My priority is ultimate performance with occasional portability (I also want a notebook for portability for diagnostics, etc.). I can't think of a single client who would want to lug around a 17" notebook; it'd be overkill for word processing, light CAD work, and so forth.</p><p>There needs to be a better solution though: it shouldn't be limited to wearing glasses all the time, sitting exactly on-axis with the screen, and so forth. It's better than the shutter glasses though, since it won't be limited to just one person.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My first laptop , an NEC versa , was 3D .
I mean , it had length , width , and depth .
A REAL innovation would be a 2D laptop !
Give me a foldable thin sheet with the power of an i7 , with &gt; 4GB of RAM and 500GB of storage and THAT will be an innovation ! OK seriously though, .
There are plenty of uses for 3D : 3D movies , gaming , architects ' showing clients 3D models of their proposals , MRIs , " virtual " surgeries , etc .
You 'd want a 17 " laptop for serious graphics work , but when/where portability is key , along with decent runtime ( battery ) , a 15 " -16 " notebook is vastly superior .
* I * want a 17 " notebook .
My priority is ultimate performance with occasional portability ( I also want a notebook for portability for diagnostics , etc. ) .
I ca n't think of a single client who would want to lug around a 17 " notebook ; it 'd be overkill for word processing , light CAD work , and so forth.There needs to be a better solution though : it should n't be limited to wearing glasses all the time , sitting exactly on-axis with the screen , and so forth .
It 's better than the shutter glasses though , since it wo n't be limited to just one person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My first laptop, an NEC versa, was 3D.
I mean, it had length, width, and depth.
A REAL innovation would be a 2D laptop!
Give me a foldable thin sheet with the power of an i7, with &gt;4GB of RAM and 500GB of storage and THAT will be an innovation!OK seriously though,.
There are plenty of uses for 3D: 3D movies, gaming, architects' showing clients 3D models of their proposals, MRIs, "virtual" surgeries, etc.
You'd want a 17" laptop for serious graphics work, but when/where portability is key, along with decent runtime (battery), a 15"-16" notebook is vastly superior.
*I* want a 17" notebook.
My priority is ultimate performance with occasional portability (I also want a notebook for portability for diagnostics, etc.).
I can't think of a single client who would want to lug around a 17" notebook; it'd be overkill for word processing, light CAD work, and so forth.There needs to be a better solution though: it shouldn't be limited to wearing glasses all the time, sitting exactly on-axis with the screen, and so forth.
It's better than the shutter glasses though, since it won't be limited to just one person.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747481</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748381</id>
	<title>Not Pointless nor stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255550640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's still a very immature, rare technology...</p></div><p>And yet, without putting it into such things as this laptop, the technology will never hit the public, never become widely used, and therefor never mature and become common. It all has to start somewhere, and I would think that putting it in the most limited tool would serve all the more to emphasize how important it is that this tech be improved.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's still a very immature , rare technology...And yet , without putting it into such things as this laptop , the technology will never hit the public , never become widely used , and therefor never mature and become common .
It all has to start somewhere , and I would think that putting it in the most limited tool would serve all the more to emphasize how important it is that this tech be improved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's still a very immature, rare technology...And yet, without putting it into such things as this laptop, the technology will never hit the public, never become widely used, and therefor never mature and become common.
It all has to start somewhere, and I would think that putting it in the most limited tool would serve all the more to emphasize how important it is that this tech be improved.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749721</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255513500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have been using an Acer Aspire 8930 laptop for a year now without any problems. In fact I would go as far to say that I haven't used a more stable and trouble-free laptop since my old Dell Latitude back in 2001.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have been using an Acer Aspire 8930 laptop for a year now without any problems .
In fact I would go as far to say that I have n't used a more stable and trouble-free laptop since my old Dell Latitude back in 2001 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have been using an Acer Aspire 8930 laptop for a year now without any problems.
In fact I would go as far to say that I haven't used a more stable and trouble-free laptop since my old Dell Latitude back in 2001.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747611</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29753967</id>
	<title>3D games... etc.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255549080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the Nvidia, you could load the drivers and make most ANY game 3D (I have a stereo HMD) but some games 'cheat' in their displays that kind of messes up the effect.</p><p>Like if they have an aiming reticule that is infinitely 'close' to you you wind up cross-eyed, aiming between the 'two' reticules.</p><p>Best are game that use iron sights, because you are looking down a 'real' 3D in-game object.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the Nvidia , you could load the drivers and make most ANY game 3D ( I have a stereo HMD ) but some games 'cheat ' in their displays that kind of messes up the effect.Like if they have an aiming reticule that is infinitely 'close ' to you you wind up cross-eyed , aiming between the 'two ' reticules.Best are game that use iron sights , because you are looking down a 'real ' 3D in-game object .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the Nvidia, you could load the drivers and make most ANY game 3D (I have a stereo HMD) but some games 'cheat' in their displays that kind of messes up the effect.Like if they have an aiming reticule that is infinitely 'close' to you you wind up cross-eyed, aiming between the 'two' reticules.Best are game that use iron sights, because you are looking down a 'real' 3D in-game object.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748901</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748901</id>
	<title>Re:Pointless and stupid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255552920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There have been 3D games out for years. Magic Carpet had red/blue 3D modes, and I think there were 3D builds of Descent as well. Those games date back to the days of DOS/Win98 in real mode.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There have been 3D games out for years .
Magic Carpet had red/blue 3D modes , and I think there were 3D builds of Descent as well .
Those games date back to the days of DOS/Win98 in real mode .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There have been 3D games out for years.
Magic Carpet had red/blue 3D modes, and I think there were 3D builds of Descent as well.
Those games date back to the days of DOS/Win98 in real mode.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747973</id>
	<title>I'll be the first to say...</title>
	<author>TheSpoom</author>
	<datestamp>1255549020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I need a 3D laptop.</p><p>Someone buy it for me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I need a 3D laptop.Someone buy it for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I need a 3D laptop.Someone buy it for me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29750377</id>
	<title>Re:Games</title>
	<author>Bat Country</author>
	<datestamp>1255516680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I could see this being useful for geological data. Obviously it wouldn't be necessary for just viewing a simple elevation map, but it could prove very handy for exploring ground-penetrating radar and seismograph data onsite.</p><p>Bathymetric data might also be a good use for it.</p><p>Barring those two applications, the only other logical use would be gaming and 3d movies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I could see this being useful for geological data .
Obviously it would n't be necessary for just viewing a simple elevation map , but it could prove very handy for exploring ground-penetrating radar and seismograph data onsite.Bathymetric data might also be a good use for it.Barring those two applications , the only other logical use would be gaming and 3d movies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could see this being useful for geological data.
Obviously it wouldn't be necessary for just viewing a simple elevation map, but it could prove very handy for exploring ground-penetrating radar and seismograph data onsite.Bathymetric data might also be a good use for it.Barring those two applications, the only other logical use would be gaming and 3d movies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747481</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748927</id>
	<title>3D porn?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255552980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>First thing that came to mind.</htmltext>
<tokenext>First thing that came to mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First thing that came to mind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748105</id>
	<title>World first 1D and 2D computer</title>
	<author>dvh.tosomja</author>
	<datestamp>1255549620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>World's first <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6e/Sliderule.PickettN902T.agr.jpg" title="wikimedia.org" rel="nofollow">1D</a> [wikimedia.org] and <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ea/Boulier1.JPG" title="wikimedia.org" rel="nofollow">2D</a> [wikimedia.org] computer</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>World 's first 1D [ wikimedia.org ] and 2D [ wikimedia.org ] computer</tokentext>
<sentencetext>World's first 1D [wikimedia.org] and 2D [wikimedia.org] computer</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749893</id>
	<title>Re:Games</title>
	<author>rolfwind</author>
	<datestamp>1255514280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder whatever happened to this, circa 2002:<br><a href="http://news.cnet.com/2100-1040-978499.html" title="cnet.com">http://news.cnet.com/2100-1040-978499.html</a> [cnet.com]</p><p>No glasses required.  I think some other big company did the same thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder whatever happened to this , circa 2002 : http : //news.cnet.com/2100-1040-978499.html [ cnet.com ] No glasses required .
I think some other big company did the same thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder whatever happened to this, circa 2002:http://news.cnet.com/2100-1040-978499.html [cnet.com]No glasses required.
I think some other big company did the same thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747481</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29750735</id>
	<title>Re:Pointless and stupid</title>
	<author>Trogre</author>
	<datestamp>1255519080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Second, rendering 2 viewpoints puts far more load on the GPU than rendering just one. You need the fastest available single GPU nvidia graphics card in order to play recent games. </i></p><p>Only twice the processing load at worst.  Simply dropping the resolution from 1600x1200 to 1024x768 will more than compensate for any fill-rate issues, and geometry issues are at least in part still tied to this.  As for memory, you'd still only need to store your textures once, and the extra screen buffers and geometry caches for stereo rendering shouldn't be all that hungry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Second , rendering 2 viewpoints puts far more load on the GPU than rendering just one .
You need the fastest available single GPU nvidia graphics card in order to play recent games .
Only twice the processing load at worst .
Simply dropping the resolution from 1600x1200 to 1024x768 will more than compensate for any fill-rate issues , and geometry issues are at least in part still tied to this .
As for memory , you 'd still only need to store your textures once , and the extra screen buffers and geometry caches for stereo rendering should n't be all that hungry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Second, rendering 2 viewpoints puts far more load on the GPU than rendering just one.
You need the fastest available single GPU nvidia graphics card in order to play recent games.
Only twice the processing load at worst.
Simply dropping the resolution from 1600x1200 to 1024x768 will more than compensate for any fill-rate issues, and geometry issues are at least in part still tied to this.
As for memory, you'd still only need to store your textures once, and the extra screen buffers and geometry caches for stereo rendering shouldn't be all that hungry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29751137</id>
	<title>Finally 3D!</title>
	<author>kybur</author>
	<datestamp>1255521360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm so tired of these ridiculously thin 2D laptops that always slip silently down behind the desk and disappear.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm so tired of these ridiculously thin 2D laptops that always slip silently down behind the desk and disappear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm so tired of these ridiculously thin 2D laptops that always slip silently down behind the desk and disappear.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29753253</id>
	<title>depth?</title>
	<author>binarybum</author>
	<datestamp>1255539480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've heard that the depth is not enough to accommodate Jenna Jameson's rack at full screen, but works well for most natural sets.  I just hope this thing comes with a windshield wiper built onto the screen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've heard that the depth is not enough to accommodate Jenna Jameson 's rack at full screen , but works well for most natural sets .
I just hope this thing comes with a windshield wiper built onto the screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've heard that the depth is not enough to accommodate Jenna Jameson's rack at full screen, but works well for most natural sets.
I just hope this thing comes with a windshield wiper built onto the screen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748081</id>
	<title>But,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255549500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does it run Linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it run Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it run Linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748203</id>
	<title>Duh ! -- 3D porn</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255549980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its inevitable -- porn will drive this technology just like so many computer innovations in the past.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its inevitable -- porn will drive this technology just like so many computer innovations in the past .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its inevitable -- porn will drive this technology just like so many computer innovations in the past.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29751567</id>
	<title>3D is the future of workspace</title>
	<author>garyebickford</author>
	<datestamp>1255525020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IM not-so HO, I have thought for a long time that 3D workspace UI will be as revolutionary as the original desktop metaphor in 1975, possible more so.  (Don't forget that the same 3D workspace can work on a screen, in an immersion environment, or with head-up display goggles)  I presently use Compiz on my desktop, with four separate workspaces floating in space.  It's a start...</p><p>I am getting due for a new laptop, and so I have two questions:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; - How bright is the screen?  My new HP netbook is much brighter than my old Thinkpad z61m, and I would like to be able to work in something approximating the outdoors.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; - And, of course, when will it work with Linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IM not-so HO , I have thought for a long time that 3D workspace UI will be as revolutionary as the original desktop metaphor in 1975 , possible more so .
( Do n't forget that the same 3D workspace can work on a screen , in an immersion environment , or with head-up display goggles ) I presently use Compiz on my desktop , with four separate workspaces floating in space .
It 's a start...I am getting due for a new laptop , and so I have two questions :     - How bright is the screen ?
My new HP netbook is much brighter than my old Thinkpad z61m , and I would like to be able to work in something approximating the outdoors .
    - And , of course , when will it work with Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IM not-so HO, I have thought for a long time that 3D workspace UI will be as revolutionary as the original desktop metaphor in 1975, possible more so.
(Don't forget that the same 3D workspace can work on a screen, in an immersion environment, or with head-up display goggles)  I presently use Compiz on my desktop, with four separate workspaces floating in space.
It's a start...I am getting due for a new laptop, and so I have two questions:
    - How bright is the screen?
My new HP netbook is much brighter than my old Thinkpad z61m, and I would like to be able to work in something approximating the outdoors.
    - And, of course, when will it work with Linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748543</id>
	<title>First 3D?</title>
	<author>Tellarin</author>
	<datestamp>1255551420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF!? Every laptop is 3D. Every tool we handle is 3D.</p><p>I really hate when people dumb down and say stuff like this. If you want to talk about a stereoscopic display call it what it is.</p><p>It's like the cyber this, virtual that....</p><p>And they even mention the "3D laptod" stupidity in the FA. Why do they insist in using the term? Aaaahhhh</p><p>ps: And the summary is wrong, this is not the first laptop to have a screen capable of 3D. Sharp had one before IIRC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF ! ?
Every laptop is 3D .
Every tool we handle is 3D.I really hate when people dumb down and say stuff like this .
If you want to talk about a stereoscopic display call it what it is.It 's like the cyber this , virtual that....And they even mention the " 3D laptod " stupidity in the FA .
Why do they insist in using the term ?
Aaaahhhhps : And the summary is wrong , this is not the first laptop to have a screen capable of 3D .
Sharp had one before IIRC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF!?
Every laptop is 3D.
Every tool we handle is 3D.I really hate when people dumb down and say stuff like this.
If you want to talk about a stereoscopic display call it what it is.It's like the cyber this, virtual that....And they even mention the "3D laptod" stupidity in the FA.
Why do they insist in using the term?
Aaaahhhhps: And the summary is wrong, this is not the first laptop to have a screen capable of 3D.
Sharp had one before IIRC.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748225</id>
	<title>Re:Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255550040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>1) Acer machines are what they are which is solid affordable machines. I've never had an issue with an Acer laptop except of my own doing.

2) Stereoscopic 3D is a novelty, especially on a laptop. I can see the attraction in a high spec system but not in a laptop where 3D is generally underpowered to start with.

3) Windows 7 is Vista done right. It works, it works extremely well in fact and I see no reason to be upset about it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) Acer machines are what they are which is solid affordable machines .
I 've never had an issue with an Acer laptop except of my own doing .
2 ) Stereoscopic 3D is a novelty , especially on a laptop .
I can see the attraction in a high spec system but not in a laptop where 3D is generally underpowered to start with .
3 ) Windows 7 is Vista done right .
It works , it works extremely well in fact and I see no reason to be upset about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) Acer machines are what they are which is solid affordable machines.
I've never had an issue with an Acer laptop except of my own doing.
2) Stereoscopic 3D is a novelty, especially on a laptop.
I can see the attraction in a high spec system but not in a laptop where 3D is generally underpowered to start with.
3) Windows 7 is Vista done right.
It works, it works extremely well in fact and I see no reason to be upset about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747611</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747715</id>
	<title>tomax7</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255547940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...I can hardly wait for the holographic laptops like in the movie Paycheque.</p><p>Then I'd be impressed.</p><p>Oh BTW, Acer isn't the first with a 3D laptop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...I can hardly wait for the holographic laptops like in the movie Paycheque.Then I 'd be impressed.Oh BTW , Acer is n't the first with a 3D laptop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...I can hardly wait for the holographic laptops like in the movie Paycheque.Then I'd be impressed.Oh BTW, Acer isn't the first with a 3D laptop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747689</id>
	<title>Sounds fine, but not for me.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255547820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm on my third Acer laptop in 4 years (one for work, one for personal use, and a spare). I do not by any means consider myself an Acer fanboi -- they just keep coming up with the features I want at a good price point, and they seem to last a good long while (yes, I still sometimes use the one I bought in 2005).</p><p>This 'feature', however, is not likely to be among them. Might be cool for gamers and/or designers, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm on my third Acer laptop in 4 years ( one for work , one for personal use , and a spare ) .
I do not by any means consider myself an Acer fanboi -- they just keep coming up with the features I want at a good price point , and they seem to last a good long while ( yes , I still sometimes use the one I bought in 2005 ) .This 'feature ' , however , is not likely to be among them .
Might be cool for gamers and/or designers , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm on my third Acer laptop in 4 years (one for work, one for personal use, and a spare).
I do not by any means consider myself an Acer fanboi -- they just keep coming up with the features I want at a good price point, and they seem to last a good long while (yes, I still sometimes use the one I bought in 2005).This 'feature', however, is not likely to be among them.
Might be cool for gamers and/or designers, though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29752005</id>
	<title>Re:Games</title>
	<author>poetmatt</author>
	<datestamp>1255528260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>nvidia's 3d vision is no doubt what has been behind the push.  Nvidia can't win on performance so they're trying to sell people into dorky 3d headsets.</p><p>No worries, this fake 3d crap will all be over when we get back to holographic graphics. Those aren't that far off.</p><p>no form of 3d involving glasses is anything other than inconvenient for a large portion of it's intended audience.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>nvidia 's 3d vision is no doubt what has been behind the push .
Nvidia ca n't win on performance so they 're trying to sell people into dorky 3d headsets.No worries , this fake 3d crap will all be over when we get back to holographic graphics .
Those are n't that far off.no form of 3d involving glasses is anything other than inconvenient for a large portion of it 's intended audience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nvidia's 3d vision is no doubt what has been behind the push.
Nvidia can't win on performance so they're trying to sell people into dorky 3d headsets.No worries, this fake 3d crap will all be over when we get back to holographic graphics.
Those aren't that far off.no form of 3d involving glasses is anything other than inconvenient for a large portion of it's intended audience.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747481</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29750905</id>
	<title>weird...</title>
	<author>ailnlv</author>
	<datestamp>1255519860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I didn't know Acer made 2D laptops before it discovered the mysterious Z axis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't know Acer made 2D laptops before it discovered the mysterious Z axis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't know Acer made 2D laptops before it discovered the mysterious Z axis.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748019</id>
	<title>Indeed!</title>
	<author>denzacar</author>
	<datestamp>1255549200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And have the Li-Ion battery to power all that in the form of a hat.<br>It will be great in the upcoming winter months. Not so great in the summer when it explodes and catches fire on top of your head.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And have the Li-Ion battery to power all that in the form of a hat.It will be great in the upcoming winter months .
Not so great in the summer when it explodes and catches fire on top of your head .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And have the Li-Ion battery to power all that in the form of a hat.It will be great in the upcoming winter months.
Not so great in the summer when it explodes and catches fire on top of your head.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747671</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29750781</id>
	<title>whether anyone actually needs a 3D laptop...</title>
	<author>Interoperable</author>
	<datestamp>1255519200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;"whether anyone actually needs a 3D laptop is another question entirely"</p><p>A question I can answer: no. You can, however, buy one and use it and the 3D glasses it comes with to replace the bulky, neon "NERD" sign that you've become tired of hauling around. For that purpose though, I prefer to strap a Wii-mote to my head and use that VR plug-in that was developed for use with Compiz.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; " whether anyone actually needs a 3D laptop is another question entirely " A question I can answer : no .
You can , however , buy one and use it and the 3D glasses it comes with to replace the bulky , neon " NERD " sign that you 've become tired of hauling around .
For that purpose though , I prefer to strap a Wii-mote to my head and use that VR plug-in that was developed for use with Compiz .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;"whether anyone actually needs a 3D laptop is another question entirely"A question I can answer: no.
You can, however, buy one and use it and the 3D glasses it comes with to replace the bulky, neon "NERD" sign that you've become tired of hauling around.
For that purpose though, I prefer to strap a Wii-mote to my head and use that VR plug-in that was developed for use with Compiz.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748067</id>
	<title>why would anyone need a 3d laptop?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255549440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.law.indiana.edu/fclj/pubs/v49/no1/johnson.html" title="indiana.edu">Ahem.</a> [indiana.edu]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahem .
[ indiana.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahem.
[indiana.edu]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749135</id>
	<title>Acer is garbage</title>
	<author>Degro</author>
	<datestamp>1255510800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why all the Acer slashvertising lately?  Acer produces the biggest piles of shit in the industry...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why all the Acer slashvertising lately ?
Acer produces the biggest piles of shit in the industry.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why all the Acer slashvertising lately?
Acer produces the biggest piles of shit in the industry...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749843</id>
	<title>About time!</title>
	<author>Nerdposeur</author>
	<datestamp>1255514040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am so tired of laptops with zero height. I mean besides the lousy ergonomics, the screen is totally unusable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am so tired of laptops with zero height .
I mean besides the lousy ergonomics , the screen is totally unusable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am so tired of laptops with zero height.
I mean besides the lousy ergonomics, the screen is totally unusable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749101</id>
	<title>But it's not the first.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255553820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sharps' Actius RD3D was the first, back in 2004. http://www.pcworld.com/article/115348/sharps\_3d\_notebook.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sharps ' Actius RD3D was the first , back in 2004. http : //www.pcworld.com/article/115348/sharps \ _3d \ _notebook.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sharps' Actius RD3D was the first, back in 2004. http://www.pcworld.com/article/115348/sharps\_3d\_notebook.html</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748149</id>
	<title>Seems misleading...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255549800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I looked at the article, all the screen shots I saw still looked 2D.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I looked at the article , all the screen shots I saw still looked 2D .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I looked at the article, all the screen shots I saw still looked 2D.
:P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747615</id>
	<title>3D laptop?</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1255547520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aren't all laptops already in 3D?</p><blockquote><div><p>(And before any pedants jump in to point out to me that, actually, all laptops are 3D &ndash; yes, I know.)</p></div></blockquote><p>Oups, sorry.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are n't all laptops already in 3D ?
( And before any pedants jump in to point out to me that , actually , all laptops are 3D    yes , I know .
) Oups , sorry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aren't all laptops already in 3D?
(And before any pedants jump in to point out to me that, actually, all laptops are 3D – yes, I know.
)Oups, sorry.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748125</id>
	<title>Not the world's first--misleading summary</title>
	<author>bipbop</author>
	<datestamp>1255549740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The article links to <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/laptops/56393/sharp-actius-rd3d" title="pcpro.co.uk">the Sharp Actius RD3D</a> [pcpro.co.uk], a 5-year-old failed 3D laptop.  But, the summary calls this new one the "world's first".  I suppose the article submitter didn't RTFA, and neither did the poster?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article links to the Sharp Actius RD3D [ pcpro.co.uk ] , a 5-year-old failed 3D laptop .
But , the summary calls this new one the " world 's first " .
I suppose the article submitter did n't RTFA , and neither did the poster ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article links to the Sharp Actius RD3D [pcpro.co.uk], a 5-year-old failed 3D laptop.
But, the summary calls this new one the "world's first".
I suppose the article submitter didn't RTFA, and neither did the poster?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29750009
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29753967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748043
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748863
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748481
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748043
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29750735
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748043
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749533
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29750377
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749921
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748043
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749873
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747689
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747671
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29750117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748543
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748363
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747655
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29752005
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29759181
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748043
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_1739214_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_1739214.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747689
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749873
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_1739214.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747611
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749721
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748225
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29750009
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_1739214.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748543
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29750117
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_1739214.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748043
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29759181
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748381
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29750735
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748481
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748901
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29753967
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_1739214.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748067
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_1739214.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747481
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749827
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29750377
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748863
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29752005
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749893
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_1739214.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747655
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748363
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748755
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748535
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749533
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29749921
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_1739214.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747615
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_1739214.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748125
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_1739214.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748087
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_1739214.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29750781
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_1739214.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747715
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748099
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_1739214.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747671
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747791
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748019
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29747721
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_1739214.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_1739214.29748927
</commentlist>
</conversation>
