<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_14_0458216</id>
	<title>Next Nintendo Handheld To Be Powered By NVIDIA's Tegra Chipset</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1255530840000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Vigile writes <i>"When you sell <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo\_DS#Sales">over 100 million</a> handheld gaming systems, everyone wants to be involved in your success; just ask Nintendo.  As a company with many different <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/10/09/1438204/NVIDIA-To-Exit-Chipset-Business?from=rss">obstacles in its path</a>, NVIDIA could definitely use the boost in revenues that would come from partnering with a company like Nintendo on a handheld system, and it looks like <a href="http://www.pcper.com/comments.php?nid=7876">the Tegra processor will make that happen</a>.  The NVIDIA Tegra processor is an SoC that runs a set of ARM cores, a GeForce-based graphics core and an HD video processor capable of 1080p output that would definitely give the current Nintendo DS/DSi systems a performance boost in line with the Sony PSP.  The 'Nintendo TS,' as it has been dubbed, will apparently be ready for a late winter 2010 release and should put a spark in the mobile gaming market and give Nintendo's developers the power to bring higher quality games to the platform."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Vigile writes " When you sell over 100 million handheld gaming systems , everyone wants to be involved in your success ; just ask Nintendo .
As a company with many different obstacles in its path , NVIDIA could definitely use the boost in revenues that would come from partnering with a company like Nintendo on a handheld system , and it looks like the Tegra processor will make that happen .
The NVIDIA Tegra processor is an SoC that runs a set of ARM cores , a GeForce-based graphics core and an HD video processor capable of 1080p output that would definitely give the current Nintendo DS/DSi systems a performance boost in line with the Sony PSP .
The 'Nintendo TS, ' as it has been dubbed , will apparently be ready for a late winter 2010 release and should put a spark in the mobile gaming market and give Nintendo 's developers the power to bring higher quality games to the platform .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Vigile writes "When you sell over 100 million handheld gaming systems, everyone wants to be involved in your success; just ask Nintendo.
As a company with many different obstacles in its path, NVIDIA could definitely use the boost in revenues that would come from partnering with a company like Nintendo on a handheld system, and it looks like the Tegra processor will make that happen.
The NVIDIA Tegra processor is an SoC that runs a set of ARM cores, a GeForce-based graphics core and an HD video processor capable of 1080p output that would definitely give the current Nintendo DS/DSi systems a performance boost in line with the Sony PSP.
The 'Nintendo TS,' as it has been dubbed, will apparently be ready for a late winter 2010 release and should put a spark in the mobile gaming market and give Nintendo's developers the power to bring higher quality games to the platform.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29750587</id>
	<title>Re:Zelda!</title>
	<author>MemoryDragon</author>
	<datestamp>1255518120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please forgive me of having played Occarina of time in 1200p with an emulator<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please forgive me of having played Occarina of time in 1200p with an emulator ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please forgive me of having played Occarina of time in 1200p with an emulator ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745623</id>
	<title>Re:Wondering about other specs</title>
	<author>mrdoogee</author>
	<datestamp>1255538760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The manufacturing cost for the DS flash carts is undoubtedly much lower than UMD was... I'd assume that unless the market just falls in love with the PSPgo (It won't), Nintendo will play it safe and keep some form of physical media.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The manufacturing cost for the DS flash carts is undoubtedly much lower than UMD was... I 'd assume that unless the market just falls in love with the PSPgo ( It wo n't ) , Nintendo will play it safe and keep some form of physical media .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The manufacturing cost for the DS flash carts is undoubtedly much lower than UMD was... I'd assume that unless the market just falls in love with the PSPgo (It won't), Nintendo will play it safe and keep some form of physical media.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744837</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745317</id>
	<title>Re:But will it run Linux?</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1255537560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Probably not.  Currently the only supported OS for Tegra is Wince.  If you want something else, you probably need an NDA to get the specs required for the drivers.  If it is Linux, it will be locked-down like a TiVo so it's not particularly relevant that it's Linux, but most likely it will be something custom which provides minimal hardware abstraction and nothing else.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably not .
Currently the only supported OS for Tegra is Wince .
If you want something else , you probably need an NDA to get the specs required for the drivers .
If it is Linux , it will be locked-down like a TiVo so it 's not particularly relevant that it 's Linux , but most likely it will be something custom which provides minimal hardware abstraction and nothing else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably not.
Currently the only supported OS for Tegra is Wince.
If you want something else, you probably need an NDA to get the specs required for the drivers.
If it is Linux, it will be locked-down like a TiVo so it's not particularly relevant that it's Linux, but most likely it will be something custom which provides minimal hardware abstraction and nothing else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744645</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746679</id>
	<title>How many more DS's will there be?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255543380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean seriously, how long ago did the DSi come out? Like less than a year?  And they are already talking about a new system?  Do they honestly expect people to continually drop $150+ on a new handheld every two years?  Nintendo needs to slow down and come up with something INNOVATIVE.  DS vs DSi?  I didn't see anything that made me want to spend an additional $170 for it.  The camera isn't that good and the save issues shoot itself in the foot.</p><p>Be patient Nintendo.... Create something wicked cool for us gamers and stop adding a few features to an existing product.  My God man, your starting to look like Microsoft!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean seriously , how long ago did the DSi come out ?
Like less than a year ?
And they are already talking about a new system ?
Do they honestly expect people to continually drop $ 150 + on a new handheld every two years ?
Nintendo needs to slow down and come up with something INNOVATIVE .
DS vs DSi ?
I did n't see anything that made me want to spend an additional $ 170 for it .
The camera is n't that good and the save issues shoot itself in the foot.Be patient Nintendo.... Create something wicked cool for us gamers and stop adding a few features to an existing product .
My God man , your starting to look like Microsoft !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean seriously, how long ago did the DSi come out?
Like less than a year?
And they are already talking about a new system?
Do they honestly expect people to continually drop $150+ on a new handheld every two years?
Nintendo needs to slow down and come up with something INNOVATIVE.
DS vs DSi?
I didn't see anything that made me want to spend an additional $170 for it.
The camera isn't that good and the save issues shoot itself in the foot.Be patient Nintendo.... Create something wicked cool for us gamers and stop adding a few features to an existing product.
My God man, your starting to look like Microsoft!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745885</id>
	<title>Higher quality games</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255539780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Love how higher quality graphics means "higher quality games."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Love how higher quality graphics means " higher quality games .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Love how higher quality graphics means "higher quality games.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745763</id>
	<title>Re:That was fast</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1255539300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nvidia is, in fact, suspending development of further X86 chipsets(since AMD now includes ATI, and Intel is playing hardball with QPI), although they are continuing production of current ones.  Tegra is a totally different product line.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nvidia is , in fact , suspending development of further X86 chipsets ( since AMD now includes ATI , and Intel is playing hardball with QPI ) , although they are continuing production of current ones .
Tegra is a totally different product line .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nvidia is, in fact, suspending development of further X86 chipsets(since AMD now includes ATI, and Intel is playing hardball with QPI), although they are continuing production of current ones.
Tegra is a totally different product line.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744725</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744821</id>
	<title>Cell</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255535460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would be nice if they also made this a GSM unlocked cell phone. So one could use it as a pre-pay cell phone as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would be nice if they also made this a GSM unlocked cell phone .
So one could use it as a pre-pay cell phone as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would be nice if they also made this a GSM unlocked cell phone.
So one could use it as a pre-pay cell phone as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744925</id>
	<title>Re:Zelda!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255535940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nokia internet tablets have 800x480 resolution, which would be nice for games, as long as the screen isn't too small.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nokia internet tablets have 800x480 resolution , which would be nice for games , as long as the screen is n't too small .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nokia internet tablets have 800x480 resolution, which would be nice for games, as long as the screen isn't too small.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29751105</id>
	<title>Retail sales?</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1255521120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So can i buy a box of loose chips so we can build a cheap cluster?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So can i buy a box of loose chips so we can build a cheap cluster ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So can i buy a box of loose chips so we can build a cheap cluster?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746635</id>
	<title>Re:Open it, and make it a phone</title>
	<author>MobyDisk</author>
	<datestamp>1255543140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am part of that homebrew community.  I get it.  But you must understand the level of effort that goes into it, and the reward.</p><p>Hacking the DS was special because the hardware was great, and cheap: you could do 10 times as much with it as Nintendo was actually doing.  That makes it really cool.  But the DS is no longer unique.  What takes considerable effort and reverse-engineering on the DS, can now be done trivially with modern devices.</p><p>You are right that somebody will hack it - probably just to be able to copy games, but it won't be the same since those developers can spend less effort for greater effect on another platform.</p><p>And if Nintendo opens the platform, the entire point becomes moot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am part of that homebrew community .
I get it .
But you must understand the level of effort that goes into it , and the reward.Hacking the DS was special because the hardware was great , and cheap : you could do 10 times as much with it as Nintendo was actually doing .
That makes it really cool .
But the DS is no longer unique .
What takes considerable effort and reverse-engineering on the DS , can now be done trivially with modern devices.You are right that somebody will hack it - probably just to be able to copy games , but it wo n't be the same since those developers can spend less effort for greater effect on another platform.And if Nintendo opens the platform , the entire point becomes moot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am part of that homebrew community.
I get it.
But you must understand the level of effort that goes into it, and the reward.Hacking the DS was special because the hardware was great, and cheap: you could do 10 times as much with it as Nintendo was actually doing.
That makes it really cool.
But the DS is no longer unique.
What takes considerable effort and reverse-engineering on the DS, can now be done trivially with modern devices.You are right that somebody will hack it - probably just to be able to copy games, but it won't be the same since those developers can spend less effort for greater effect on another platform.And if Nintendo opens the platform, the entire point becomes moot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745135</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747877</id>
	<title>Re:Open it, and make it a phone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255548600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Elementary school kids often have cell phones too. There are even special models designed to only allow access to numbers in a phone book or disable text messaging. I haven't seen one that lets you limit the number of text messages that can be sent though. that would be too useful for customers and affect the carrier's profits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Elementary school kids often have cell phones too .
There are even special models designed to only allow access to numbers in a phone book or disable text messaging .
I have n't seen one that lets you limit the number of text messages that can be sent though .
that would be too useful for customers and affect the carrier 's profits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Elementary school kids often have cell phones too.
There are even special models designed to only allow access to numbers in a phone book or disable text messaging.
I haven't seen one that lets you limit the number of text messages that can be sent though.
that would be too useful for customers and affect the carrier's profits.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29751919</id>
	<title>Re:So the next DS will</title>
	<author>BikeHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1255527540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Higher resolution doesn't necessarily more graphics power.</p> </div><p>Right - but in this case it also has more graphics power. And more CPU power. And probably lots more memory.</p><p>Maybe we'll get lucky and Nintendo will bundle an actual OS with it, so game updates and patches can be made easily available?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Higher resolution does n't necessarily more graphics power .
Right - but in this case it also has more graphics power .
And more CPU power .
And probably lots more memory.Maybe we 'll get lucky and Nintendo will bundle an actual OS with it , so game updates and patches can be made easily available ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Higher resolution doesn't necessarily more graphics power.
Right - but in this case it also has more graphics power.
And more CPU power.
And probably lots more memory.Maybe we'll get lucky and Nintendo will bundle an actual OS with it, so game updates and patches can be made easily available?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747657</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746713</id>
	<title>Re:Open it, and make it a phone</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1255543440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Portable game systems are now competing with cell phones.</p></div><p>No, they aren't.<br>They really, really, aren't.<br>Despite the attempt to shoehorn gaming into phones over the last decade and Apple's graphs about the app store.</p><p>Some people really do not understand two basic concepts:</p><p>1:  People who buy games prefer to play them on a dedicated gaming device.  People who buy phones prefer to use them as phones, and now PDAs, media players, etc.  But without standardized hardware, platforms, and form factors, games will not take off on phones.</p><p>2:  400,000 DS games were sold last <b>week</b>.  At an average price of $35.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>We are really seeing hand-held device convergence. I know people who don't carry a watch any longer because they have a cell phone. Nintendo needs to widen their thinking.</p></div><p>Until people are routinely deciding between game x on DS/PSP or game y on their phone, the markets are completely separate.  The economies of the respective markets in relation to games is clear cut.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Portable game systems are now competing with cell phones.No , they are n't.They really , really , are n't.Despite the attempt to shoehorn gaming into phones over the last decade and Apple 's graphs about the app store.Some people really do not understand two basic concepts : 1 : People who buy games prefer to play them on a dedicated gaming device .
People who buy phones prefer to use them as phones , and now PDAs , media players , etc .
But without standardized hardware , platforms , and form factors , games will not take off on phones.2 : 400,000 DS games were sold last week .
At an average price of $ 35.We are really seeing hand-held device convergence .
I know people who do n't carry a watch any longer because they have a cell phone .
Nintendo needs to widen their thinking.Until people are routinely deciding between game x on DS/PSP or game y on their phone , the markets are completely separate .
The economies of the respective markets in relation to games is clear cut .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Portable game systems are now competing with cell phones.No, they aren't.They really, really, aren't.Despite the attempt to shoehorn gaming into phones over the last decade and Apple's graphs about the app store.Some people really do not understand two basic concepts:1:  People who buy games prefer to play them on a dedicated gaming device.
People who buy phones prefer to use them as phones, and now PDAs, media players, etc.
But without standardized hardware, platforms, and form factors, games will not take off on phones.2:  400,000 DS games were sold last week.
At an average price of $35.We are really seeing hand-held device convergence.
I know people who don't carry a watch any longer because they have a cell phone.
Nintendo needs to widen their thinking.Until people are routinely deciding between game x on DS/PSP or game y on their phone, the markets are completely separate.
The economies of the respective markets in relation to games is clear cut.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747085</id>
	<title>Re:Open it, and make it a phone</title>
	<author>Dudeman\_Jones</author>
	<datestamp>1255545240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Portable game systems are now competing with cell phones</p><p>No, they aren't.  Go read an NPD sales chart and try to claim that the DS has seen any loss of market share to the iPhone.  And by the way, who are you to declare that handheld systems only interest 8th graders?  Last I checked I'm 22, I still like my Game Boy Advance, and I want to get a PSP.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Portable game systems are now competing with cell phonesNo , they are n't .
Go read an NPD sales chart and try to claim that the DS has seen any loss of market share to the iPhone .
And by the way , who are you to declare that handheld systems only interest 8th graders ?
Last I checked I 'm 22 , I still like my Game Boy Advance , and I want to get a PSP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Portable game systems are now competing with cell phonesNo, they aren't.
Go read an NPD sales chart and try to claim that the DS has seen any loss of market share to the iPhone.
And by the way, who are you to declare that handheld systems only interest 8th graders?
Last I checked I'm 22, I still like my Game Boy Advance, and I want to get a PSP.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29750955</id>
	<title>Re:What this means for Nintendo DSi owners</title>
	<author>LordVader717</author>
	<datestamp>1255520160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The most interesting DSi games have been over the download store, which seems like a good way of separating the market from standard DS games to avoid confusion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The most interesting DSi games have been over the download store , which seems like a good way of separating the market from standard DS games to avoid confusion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The most interesting DSi games have been over the download store, which seems like a good way of separating the market from standard DS games to avoid confusion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745595</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747657</id>
	<title>Re:So the next DS will</title>
	<author>kalirion</author>
	<datestamp>1255547700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Higher resolution doesn't necessarily more graphics power.  The original NES and the Playstation 2 had the same resolution....</p><p>That said, I really don't see the need for 1080p on a handheld screen - that's like 4320p on a 23" screen, or something like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Higher resolution does n't necessarily more graphics power .
The original NES and the Playstation 2 had the same resolution....That said , I really do n't see the need for 1080p on a handheld screen - that 's like 4320p on a 23 " screen , or something like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Higher resolution doesn't necessarily more graphics power.
The original NES and the Playstation 2 had the same resolution....That said, I really don't see the need for 1080p on a handheld screen - that's like 4320p on a 23" screen, or something like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745161</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745631</id>
	<title>Yeah right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255538760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I call BS.  The DSi just came out not too long ago, people have barely had time to update or even see many custom titles, and you're talking about a new DS by the end of 2010?  No way.</p><p>I think someone's spreading rumors trying to keep Nvidia's stock price up, considering what a slam in the news they've been taking lately as their company continues to crumble.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I call BS .
The DSi just came out not too long ago , people have barely had time to update or even see many custom titles , and you 're talking about a new DS by the end of 2010 ?
No way.I think someone 's spreading rumors trying to keep Nvidia 's stock price up , considering what a slam in the news they 've been taking lately as their company continues to crumble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I call BS.
The DSi just came out not too long ago, people have barely had time to update or even see many custom titles, and you're talking about a new DS by the end of 2010?
No way.I think someone's spreading rumors trying to keep Nvidia's stock price up, considering what a slam in the news they've been taking lately as their company continues to crumble.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29751153</id>
	<title>Re:Will it still have 2 screens?</title>
	<author>AmberBlackCat</author>
	<datestamp>1255521420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know the #1 thing I hate about touchscreens? It's fingerprints. With two screens, you can use one as a touchscreen and watch the widescreen movie on the other with no fingerprints.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know the # 1 thing I hate about touchscreens ?
It 's fingerprints .
With two screens , you can use one as a touchscreen and watch the widescreen movie on the other with no fingerprints .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know the #1 thing I hate about touchscreens?
It's fingerprints.
With two screens, you can use one as a touchscreen and watch the widescreen movie on the other with no fingerprints.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746595</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745595</id>
	<title>What this means for Nintendo DSi owners</title>
	<author>strstr</author>
	<datestamp>1255538640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, Nintendo just released the Nintendo DSi and there hasn't been a single game designed to use it's hardware on the market, and Nintendo is already on the path to replace it next year. This might piss all the guys that bought DSi thinking it would be the next-generation Nintendo portable platform only to be as unsupported as the Sega CD or 32x. Developers won't like this either...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , Nintendo just released the Nintendo DSi and there has n't been a single game designed to use it 's hardware on the market , and Nintendo is already on the path to replace it next year .
This might piss all the guys that bought DSi thinking it would be the next-generation Nintendo portable platform only to be as unsupported as the Sega CD or 32x .
Developers wo n't like this either.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, Nintendo just released the Nintendo DSi and there hasn't been a single game designed to use it's hardware on the market, and Nintendo is already on the path to replace it next year.
This might piss all the guys that bought DSi thinking it would be the next-generation Nintendo portable platform only to be as unsupported as the Sega CD or 32x.
Developers won't like this either...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746425</id>
	<title>Re:Cell</title>
	<author>ProppaT</author>
	<datestamp>1255542120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, look at it this way.  A cell phone, at its core, is very basic.  A PDA is more complicated, but only really requires a stylus.  A web browser requires very little besides a stylus.  A phone just requires the camera components and a viewfinder of sorts.  An MP3 player just requires a basic interface and a headphone jack.  Combination devices such as the iPhone and Android phones have been very successful because each function is very basic.</p><p>No all-in-one device has ever successfully integrated games.  You can argue til your blue in the face that the iPhone has, but it's a terrible platform for anything but point and click adventures, card games, and Monkey ball.  The reason devices fail is that gaming is the single most complex task an all-in-one device needs to cover.</p><p>For me, if Nintendo made a phone version of the DS, I'd be all over it.  I'd know gaming was adequately taken care of.  The rest of the functions I might want are basic and simple to integrate and, in fact, the only one the DS hasn't already touched is the cell phone portion (and I believe there's hacked skype type programs you can use if you want to get nit picky).</p><p>I do agree, I hate it when extra functions are thrown onto a device just to say it can do more than one thing.  I almost always prefer devices that do one thing and one thing perfectly; however, there's really no reason why a DS shouldn't be able to do any other funciton you'd want it to perfectly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , look at it this way .
A cell phone , at its core , is very basic .
A PDA is more complicated , but only really requires a stylus .
A web browser requires very little besides a stylus .
A phone just requires the camera components and a viewfinder of sorts .
An MP3 player just requires a basic interface and a headphone jack .
Combination devices such as the iPhone and Android phones have been very successful because each function is very basic.No all-in-one device has ever successfully integrated games .
You can argue til your blue in the face that the iPhone has , but it 's a terrible platform for anything but point and click adventures , card games , and Monkey ball .
The reason devices fail is that gaming is the single most complex task an all-in-one device needs to cover.For me , if Nintendo made a phone version of the DS , I 'd be all over it .
I 'd know gaming was adequately taken care of .
The rest of the functions I might want are basic and simple to integrate and , in fact , the only one the DS has n't already touched is the cell phone portion ( and I believe there 's hacked skype type programs you can use if you want to get nit picky ) .I do agree , I hate it when extra functions are thrown onto a device just to say it can do more than one thing .
I almost always prefer devices that do one thing and one thing perfectly ; however , there 's really no reason why a DS should n't be able to do any other funciton you 'd want it to perfectly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, look at it this way.
A cell phone, at its core, is very basic.
A PDA is more complicated, but only really requires a stylus.
A web browser requires very little besides a stylus.
A phone just requires the camera components and a viewfinder of sorts.
An MP3 player just requires a basic interface and a headphone jack.
Combination devices such as the iPhone and Android phones have been very successful because each function is very basic.No all-in-one device has ever successfully integrated games.
You can argue til your blue in the face that the iPhone has, but it's a terrible platform for anything but point and click adventures, card games, and Monkey ball.
The reason devices fail is that gaming is the single most complex task an all-in-one device needs to cover.For me, if Nintendo made a phone version of the DS, I'd be all over it.
I'd know gaming was adequately taken care of.
The rest of the functions I might want are basic and simple to integrate and, in fact, the only one the DS hasn't already touched is the cell phone portion (and I believe there's hacked skype type programs you can use if you want to get nit picky).I do agree, I hate it when extra functions are thrown onto a device just to say it can do more than one thing.
I almost always prefer devices that do one thing and one thing perfectly; however, there's really no reason why a DS shouldn't be able to do any other funciton you'd want it to perfectly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745231</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744649</id>
	<title>photo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255534860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>alleged picture of the new Nintendo TS here<br><a href="http://www.nintendo-master.com/fichiers/N-1185275150.jpg" title="nintendo-master.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nintendo-master.com/fichiers/N-1185275150.jpg</a> [nintendo-master.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>alleged picture of the new Nintendo TS herehttp : //www.nintendo-master.com/fichiers/N-1185275150.jpg [ nintendo-master.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>alleged picture of the new Nintendo TS herehttp://www.nintendo-master.com/fichiers/N-1185275150.jpg [nintendo-master.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748115</id>
	<title>Re:What this means for Nintendo DSi owners</title>
	<author>acohen1</author>
	<datestamp>1255549680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You'll see a few games with DSi features released in the US for holidays this season.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'll see a few games with DSi features released in the US for holidays this season .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'll see a few games with DSi features released in the US for holidays this season.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745595</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745047</id>
	<title>To Be Powered By NVIDIA's Tegra Chipset</title>
	<author>Eideteker</author>
	<datestamp>1255536420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>And, you know, batteries.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And , you know , batteries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And, you know, batteries.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746759</id>
	<title>Re:Open it, and make it a phone</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1255543620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Many here may disagree with<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... their focus on expanding the market with ideas like motion control...</p></div><p>Haven't you heard?  MS and Sony both unveiled motion controls, so now they're cool.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Many here may disagree with ... their focus on expanding the market with ideas like motion control...Have n't you heard ?
MS and Sony both unveiled motion controls , so now they 're cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many here may disagree with ... their focus on expanding the market with ideas like motion control...Haven't you heard?
MS and Sony both unveiled motion controls, so now they're cool.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745023</id>
	<title>Re:Zelda!</title>
	<author>VGPowerlord</author>
	<datestamp>1255536300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, the next Zelda DS game is only a month away; much too soon for a system a year out!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , the next Zelda DS game is only a month away ; much too soon for a system a year out !
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, the next Zelda DS game is only a month away; much too soon for a system a year out!
:P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745177</id>
	<title>Re:Open it, and make it a phone</title>
	<author>nlawalker</author>
	<datestamp>1255536960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Convergence is great, but if Nintendo turned their next portable game system into a phone, they would substantially reduce their potential market share by excluding all the people who already have a phone and don't want to switch to another one, or who just want the game system and don't want to pay for the phone components. Plus, Nintendo has proven that they can hold their own against giants from other industries who have attempted to move in on their space by sticking to what they know: games. Having to cooperate with mobile phone providers, subscription plans and the like is not in Nintendo's genes.</p><p>Many here may disagree with their stance on online/social gaming, their underpowered console as compared to their competitors, or their focus on expanding the market with ideas like motion control or promotion of casual gaming as opposed to catering to video game enthusiasts, but the last couple years of sales numbers have shown that Nintendo knows what they are doing and is perfectly comfortable continuing down that path.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Convergence is great , but if Nintendo turned their next portable game system into a phone , they would substantially reduce their potential market share by excluding all the people who already have a phone and do n't want to switch to another one , or who just want the game system and do n't want to pay for the phone components .
Plus , Nintendo has proven that they can hold their own against giants from other industries who have attempted to move in on their space by sticking to what they know : games .
Having to cooperate with mobile phone providers , subscription plans and the like is not in Nintendo 's genes.Many here may disagree with their stance on online/social gaming , their underpowered console as compared to their competitors , or their focus on expanding the market with ideas like motion control or promotion of casual gaming as opposed to catering to video game enthusiasts , but the last couple years of sales numbers have shown that Nintendo knows what they are doing and is perfectly comfortable continuing down that path .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Convergence is great, but if Nintendo turned their next portable game system into a phone, they would substantially reduce their potential market share by excluding all the people who already have a phone and don't want to switch to another one, or who just want the game system and don't want to pay for the phone components.
Plus, Nintendo has proven that they can hold their own against giants from other industries who have attempted to move in on their space by sticking to what they know: games.
Having to cooperate with mobile phone providers, subscription plans and the like is not in Nintendo's genes.Many here may disagree with their stance on online/social gaming, their underpowered console as compared to their competitors, or their focus on expanding the market with ideas like motion control or promotion of casual gaming as opposed to catering to video game enthusiasts, but the last couple years of sales numbers have shown that Nintendo knows what they are doing and is perfectly comfortable continuing down that path.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745453</id>
	<title>Re:Flashcards</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255538040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What he said:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Who cares, I'm waiting to pirate the games. Fuck you nintendo.</p></div><p>What he meant to say:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I HATE YOU SO MUCH I'M GOING TO KEEP PLAYING YOUR SHITTY GAMES.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What he said : Who cares , I 'm waiting to pirate the games .
Fuck you nintendo.What he meant to say : I HATE YOU SO MUCH I 'M GOING TO KEEP PLAYING YOUR SHITTY GAMES .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What he said:Who cares, I'm waiting to pirate the games.
Fuck you nintendo.What he meant to say:I HATE YOU SO MUCH I'M GOING TO KEEP PLAYING YOUR SHITTY GAMES.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744759</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745167</id>
	<title>For the love of the FSM: NO CELL PHONE!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255536900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>UGH. Please, Nintendo... Please let your handheld gaming system be a handheld gaming system. Unlike most people, I have enjoyed my days without a cell phone. No GPS chip tracking my movements and no pesky little device designed to break in just a few years...... I've had my DS longer than any cell phone I've ever owned.

If I wanted to a cell phone that played cartridge games or ROM's or anything for that matter, I would buy one. I am perfectly happy spending $129.99 on a portable system that I can carry into the courthouse, take on an airplane, play in a doctor's wating room, or generally use any place where cell phones are typically prohibited.</htmltext>
<tokenext>UGH .
Please , Nintendo... Please let your handheld gaming system be a handheld gaming system .
Unlike most people , I have enjoyed my days without a cell phone .
No GPS chip tracking my movements and no pesky little device designed to break in just a few years...... I 've had my DS longer than any cell phone I 've ever owned .
If I wanted to a cell phone that played cartridge games or ROM 's or anything for that matter , I would buy one .
I am perfectly happy spending $ 129.99 on a portable system that I can carry into the courthouse , take on an airplane , play in a doctor 's wating room , or generally use any place where cell phones are typically prohibited .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>UGH.
Please, Nintendo... Please let your handheld gaming system be a handheld gaming system.
Unlike most people, I have enjoyed my days without a cell phone.
No GPS chip tracking my movements and no pesky little device designed to break in just a few years...... I've had my DS longer than any cell phone I've ever owned.
If I wanted to a cell phone that played cartridge games or ROM's or anything for that matter, I would buy one.
I am perfectly happy spending $129.99 on a portable system that I can carry into the courthouse, take on an airplane, play in a doctor's wating room, or generally use any place where cell phones are typically prohibited.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744585</id>
	<title>Zelda!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255534560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hell yea next Zelda DS game in 1080p!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hell yea next Zelda DS game in 1080p !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hell yea next Zelda DS game in 1080p!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747113</id>
	<title>Re:So when can we expect 1080p on the Wii?</title>
	<author>relguj9</author>
	<datestamp>1255545360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>
That's the *real* question.  1080p makes a bigger difference when hooked up to a big-screen TV than it will in a tiny hand-held.</p></div><p>haha, kind of sad when their handheld will have better graphics than their console</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the * real * question .
1080p makes a bigger difference when hooked up to a big-screen TV than it will in a tiny hand-held.haha , kind of sad when their handheld will have better graphics than their console</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
That's the *real* question.
1080p makes a bigger difference when hooked up to a big-screen TV than it will in a tiny hand-held.haha, kind of sad when their handheld will have better graphics than their console
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29750665</id>
	<title>Re:Open it, and make it a phone</title>
	<author>LordVader717</author>
	<datestamp>1255518600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you're vastly overestimating the homebrew market and the savviness of consumers. But most customers of DS flash-cards are challenged by copying pirated games over, let alone use homebrew software.</p><p>The cell-phone market is no different. The kids are impressed by bells and whistles. Give them a handful of internet sites they can surf and they won't worry about the locked down handset or the limited internet access.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you 're vastly overestimating the homebrew market and the savviness of consumers .
But most customers of DS flash-cards are challenged by copying pirated games over , let alone use homebrew software.The cell-phone market is no different .
The kids are impressed by bells and whistles .
Give them a handful of internet sites they can surf and they wo n't worry about the locked down handset or the limited internet access .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you're vastly overestimating the homebrew market and the savviness of consumers.
But most customers of DS flash-cards are challenged by copying pirated games over, let alone use homebrew software.The cell-phone market is no different.
The kids are impressed by bells and whistles.
Give them a handful of internet sites they can surf and they won't worry about the locked down handset or the limited internet access.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747831</id>
	<title>Re:Zelda!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255548420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Buzzz..  WRONG!</p><p>Chuck : Pretendo is planning on their next home console to only support 640x480 so why will this be any different?  It is a fact that Microsoft and Sony give you 1080 while pretendo will always give you piss as in piss on you.  Pretendo has never given a fuck about their developers.  Of course you shitdot sheeple will continue to lock to Pretendo even if they repackage their crappy NES.  Gene tell us what this fucktard will receive?</p><p>Gene : A razor, so he not have to search for a razor when he slits his fucking wrists.  All of his fucktarded fudgepacking shitdot sheeple butt buddies will receive one as well.  Back to you chuck.</p><p>Chuck : Only one other thing needs to be said to these fucktards Gene.</p><p>Gene : I know what it is.</p><p>Chuck and Gene : GO AHEAD! FUCKING FLAME AWAY OR WASTE YOUR GODDAMNED MOD POINTS FUCKTARED SHITDOT SHEEPLE!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Buzzz.. WRONG ! Chuck : Pretendo is planning on their next home console to only support 640x480 so why will this be any different ?
It is a fact that Microsoft and Sony give you 1080 while pretendo will always give you piss as in piss on you .
Pretendo has never given a fuck about their developers .
Of course you shitdot sheeple will continue to lock to Pretendo even if they repackage their crappy NES .
Gene tell us what this fucktard will receive ? Gene : A razor , so he not have to search for a razor when he slits his fucking wrists .
All of his fucktarded fudgepacking shitdot sheeple butt buddies will receive one as well .
Back to you chuck.Chuck : Only one other thing needs to be said to these fucktards Gene.Gene : I know what it is.Chuck and Gene : GO AHEAD !
FUCKING FLAME AWAY OR WASTE YOUR GODDAMNED MOD POINTS FUCKTARED SHITDOT SHEEPLE !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Buzzz..  WRONG!Chuck : Pretendo is planning on their next home console to only support 640x480 so why will this be any different?
It is a fact that Microsoft and Sony give you 1080 while pretendo will always give you piss as in piss on you.
Pretendo has never given a fuck about their developers.
Of course you shitdot sheeple will continue to lock to Pretendo even if they repackage their crappy NES.
Gene tell us what this fucktard will receive?Gene : A razor, so he not have to search for a razor when he slits his fucking wrists.
All of his fucktarded fudgepacking shitdot sheeple butt buddies will receive one as well.
Back to you chuck.Chuck : Only one other thing needs to be said to these fucktards Gene.Gene : I know what it is.Chuck and Gene : GO AHEAD!
FUCKING FLAME AWAY OR WASTE YOUR GODDAMNED MOD POINTS FUCKTARED SHITDOT SHEEPLE!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745083</id>
	<title>Zune HD ports anyone?</title>
	<author>kantos</author>
	<datestamp>1255536540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>With the same processor as the Zune HD, I wonder if anyone will port casual games from one to the other? I don't think they would port anything large but at least in theory it could happen....</htmltext>
<tokenext>With the same processor as the Zune HD , I wonder if anyone will port casual games from one to the other ?
I do n't think they would port anything large but at least in theory it could happen... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With the same processor as the Zune HD, I wonder if anyone will port casual games from one to the other?
I don't think they would port anything large but at least in theory it could happen....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746137</id>
	<title>Re:Open it, and make it a phone</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1255540800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unless game compatable Cells come down I don't see it.<br>Nintendo has a great software and customer base.<br>Of course it is possible that if the carriers all select LTE and it is everywhere, and the carriers become dumb pipes, then we could see a new age of devices.<br>You buy your LTE account and then pick a device. Then pick a VOIP company and your set.<br>Imagine the devices we could see and the servies. Prices would fall and service would improve.<br>Just not going to happen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless game compatable Cells come down I do n't see it.Nintendo has a great software and customer base.Of course it is possible that if the carriers all select LTE and it is everywhere , and the carriers become dumb pipes , then we could see a new age of devices.You buy your LTE account and then pick a device .
Then pick a VOIP company and your set.Imagine the devices we could see and the servies .
Prices would fall and service would improve.Just not going to happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless game compatable Cells come down I don't see it.Nintendo has a great software and customer base.Of course it is possible that if the carriers all select LTE and it is everywhere, and the carriers become dumb pipes, then we could see a new age of devices.You buy your LTE account and then pick a device.
Then pick a VOIP company and your set.Imagine the devices we could see and the servies.
Prices would fall and service would improve.Just not going to happen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29752369</id>
	<title>Re:So the next DS will</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255530600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The current one already has more fun games than the Wii.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The current one already has more fun games than the Wii .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The current one already has more fun games than the Wii.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745161</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747077</id>
	<title>Wait, TS?</title>
	<author>Codex\_of\_Wisdom</author>
	<datestamp>1255545240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If DS supposedly stood for "Double Screen" does TS stand for "TRIPLE Screen"? That's a scary thought...</htmltext>
<tokenext>If DS supposedly stood for " Double Screen " does TS stand for " TRIPLE Screen " ?
That 's a scary thought.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If DS supposedly stood for "Double Screen" does TS stand for "TRIPLE Screen"?
That's a scary thought...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745783</id>
	<title>Re:Open it, and make it a phone</title>
	<author>Abcd1234</author>
	<datestamp>1255539420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Portable game systems are now competing with cell phones. Nintendo needs to realize that for their next portable game system or it will be limited to elementary and middle school kids. Beyond that age, they want a PDA / cell phone.</i></p><p>Uhh... no, we don't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Portable game systems are now competing with cell phones .
Nintendo needs to realize that for their next portable game system or it will be limited to elementary and middle school kids .
Beyond that age , they want a PDA / cell phone.Uhh... no , we do n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Portable game systems are now competing with cell phones.
Nintendo needs to realize that for their next portable game system or it will be limited to elementary and middle school kids.
Beyond that age, they want a PDA / cell phone.Uhh... no, we don't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29751985</id>
	<title>Re:Zelda!</title>
	<author>jwilcox154</author>
	<datestamp>1255528020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Buzzz..  WRONG!</p><p>Chuck : Pretendo is planning on their next home console to only support 640x480 so why will this be any different?  It is a fact that Microsoft and Sony give you 1080 while pretendo will always give you piss as in piss on you.  Pretendo has never given a fuck about their developers.  Of course you shitdot sheeple will continue to lock to Pretendo even if they repackage their crappy NES.  Gene tell us what this fucktard will receive?</p><p>Gene : A razor, so he not have to search for a razor when he slits his fucking wrists.  All of his fucktarded fudgepacking shitdot sheeple butt buddies will receive one as well.  Back to you chuck.</p><p>Chuck : Only one other thing needs to be said to these fucktards Gene.</p><p>Gene : I know what it is.</p><p>Chuck and Gene : GO AHEAD! FUCKING FLAME AWAY OR WASTE YOUR GODDAMNED MOD POINTS FUCKTARED SHITDOT SHEEPLE!</p></div><p>Actually, the Nintendo system that is slate for a 2011 release will support 1080p as well as 480p.<br><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5364077/next-generation-wii-coming-with-hd-graphics-and-new-controller-in-2011" title="gizmodo.com">http://gizmodo.com/5364077/next-generation-wii-coming-with-hd-graphics-and-new-controller-in-2011</a> [gizmodo.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Buzzz.. WRONG ! Chuck : Pretendo is planning on their next home console to only support 640x480 so why will this be any different ?
It is a fact that Microsoft and Sony give you 1080 while pretendo will always give you piss as in piss on you .
Pretendo has never given a fuck about their developers .
Of course you shitdot sheeple will continue to lock to Pretendo even if they repackage their crappy NES .
Gene tell us what this fucktard will receive ? Gene : A razor , so he not have to search for a razor when he slits his fucking wrists .
All of his fucktarded fudgepacking shitdot sheeple butt buddies will receive one as well .
Back to you chuck.Chuck : Only one other thing needs to be said to these fucktards Gene.Gene : I know what it is.Chuck and Gene : GO AHEAD !
FUCKING FLAME AWAY OR WASTE YOUR GODDAMNED MOD POINTS FUCKTARED SHITDOT SHEEPLE ! Actually , the Nintendo system that is slate for a 2011 release will support 1080p as well as 480p.http : //gizmodo.com/5364077/next-generation-wii-coming-with-hd-graphics-and-new-controller-in-2011 [ gizmodo.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Buzzz..  WRONG!Chuck : Pretendo is planning on their next home console to only support 640x480 so why will this be any different?
It is a fact that Microsoft and Sony give you 1080 while pretendo will always give you piss as in piss on you.
Pretendo has never given a fuck about their developers.
Of course you shitdot sheeple will continue to lock to Pretendo even if they repackage their crappy NES.
Gene tell us what this fucktard will receive?Gene : A razor, so he not have to search for a razor when he slits his fucking wrists.
All of his fucktarded fudgepacking shitdot sheeple butt buddies will receive one as well.
Back to you chuck.Chuck : Only one other thing needs to be said to these fucktards Gene.Gene : I know what it is.Chuck and Gene : GO AHEAD!
FUCKING FLAME AWAY OR WASTE YOUR GODDAMNED MOD POINTS FUCKTARED SHITDOT SHEEPLE!Actually, the Nintendo system that is slate for a 2011 release will support 1080p as well as 480p.http://gizmodo.com/5364077/next-generation-wii-coming-with-hd-graphics-and-new-controller-in-2011 [gizmodo.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747831</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746067</id>
	<title>Wait, you mean...</title>
	<author>default luser</author>
	<datestamp>1255540500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For once I can play a 3D game on a Nintendo portable and not be limited to 2000 polygons in a scene, and not be limited to shitty point-sample for texture filtering?</p><p>Hurray, we can finally have REAL 3D games on the DS, instead of crappy-looking 2D/3D hybrids!</p><p>The power consumption is also quite reasonable (Zune HD can do 8.5 hours video playback, and that stresses the GPU core and OLED screen), so it sounds plausible for Nintendo to sign-on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For once I can play a 3D game on a Nintendo portable and not be limited to 2000 polygons in a scene , and not be limited to shitty point-sample for texture filtering ? Hurray , we can finally have REAL 3D games on the DS , instead of crappy-looking 2D/3D hybrids ! The power consumption is also quite reasonable ( Zune HD can do 8.5 hours video playback , and that stresses the GPU core and OLED screen ) , so it sounds plausible for Nintendo to sign-on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For once I can play a 3D game on a Nintendo portable and not be limited to 2000 polygons in a scene, and not be limited to shitty point-sample for texture filtering?Hurray, we can finally have REAL 3D games on the DS, instead of crappy-looking 2D/3D hybrids!The power consumption is also quite reasonable (Zune HD can do 8.5 hours video playback, and that stresses the GPU core and OLED screen), so it sounds plausible for Nintendo to sign-on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29890699</id>
	<title>arm is strong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256644140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wise move using arm cores to fit into the portable market. Arm was designed for power efficiency.</p><p>Just compare the iphone's battery life to a laptop or a psp.The pandora console which was kind of popular in home brew circles used an arm based processor with 3d capability that could run from 8 to 10 hours on one battery while playing games. That's more than twice what a psp could do in one sitting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wise move using arm cores to fit into the portable market .
Arm was designed for power efficiency.Just compare the iphone 's battery life to a laptop or a psp.The pandora console which was kind of popular in home brew circles used an arm based processor with 3d capability that could run from 8 to 10 hours on one battery while playing games .
That 's more than twice what a psp could do in one sitting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wise move using arm cores to fit into the portable market.
Arm was designed for power efficiency.Just compare the iphone's battery life to a laptop or a psp.The pandora console which was kind of popular in home brew circles used an arm based processor with 3d capability that could run from 8 to 10 hours on one battery while playing games.
That's more than twice what a psp could do in one sitting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746211</id>
	<title>Never</title>
	<author>mrchaotica</author>
	<datestamp>1255541100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Wii will never have 1080p; Nintendo will make you buy the <em>next</em> console for that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Wii will never have 1080p ; Nintendo will make you buy the next console for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Wii will never have 1080p; Nintendo will make you buy the next console for that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748873</id>
	<title>Every ones into one chip CPU/graphics now.</title>
	<author>physburn</author>
	<datestamp>1255552740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Intels Larabee, AMD Fusion both supposed to be out
in 2010. Guess Nvdia couldn't be left behind. Without
a x86 licence, they've been forced to use ARM. ARM
might not be a bad move, it uses a lot less per per
cycle than the x86 chips, and there is quite a bit
of code for it. For handholds ARM/Tegra might make sense.
Still a Larabee or Fusion system is bound to beat it
software, possibly performance, and definitely in amount
of software. Nintendo probably deliberately want a closed
custom system through, has they sell developer licences
for games, so they can sell systems at loss leader prices.
<p>
---
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/blogs/Nintendo\%20Games/feed.html" title="feeddistiller.com">Nintendo Games</a> [feeddistiller.com] @ <a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/" title="feeddistiller.com">Feed Distiller</a> [feeddistiller.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Intels Larabee , AMD Fusion both supposed to be out in 2010 .
Guess Nvdia could n't be left behind .
Without a x86 licence , they 've been forced to use ARM .
ARM might not be a bad move , it uses a lot less per per cycle than the x86 chips , and there is quite a bit of code for it .
For handholds ARM/Tegra might make sense .
Still a Larabee or Fusion system is bound to beat it software , possibly performance , and definitely in amount of software .
Nintendo probably deliberately want a closed custom system through , has they sell developer licences for games , so they can sell systems at loss leader prices .
--- Nintendo Games [ feeddistiller.com ] @ Feed Distiller [ feeddistiller.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Intels Larabee, AMD Fusion both supposed to be out
in 2010.
Guess Nvdia couldn't be left behind.
Without
a x86 licence, they've been forced to use ARM.
ARM
might not be a bad move, it uses a lot less per per
cycle than the x86 chips, and there is quite a bit
of code for it.
For handholds ARM/Tegra might make sense.
Still a Larabee or Fusion system is bound to beat it
software, possibly performance, and definitely in amount
of software.
Nintendo probably deliberately want a closed
custom system through, has they sell developer licences
for games, so they can sell systems at loss leader prices.
---

Nintendo Games [feeddistiller.com] @ Feed Distiller [feeddistiller.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745107</id>
	<title>Zune HD has the Tegra</title>
	<author>bertoelcon</author>
	<datestamp>1255536600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Zune HD has a Tegra too. NVIDIA wasn't gonna die until the Zune HD got discontinued or got a different chipset.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Zune HD has a Tegra too .
NVIDIA was n't gon na die until the Zune HD got discontinued or got a different chipset .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Zune HD has a Tegra too.
NVIDIA wasn't gonna die until the Zune HD got discontinued or got a different chipset.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745661</id>
	<title>Re:Cell</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255538880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd rather they just have a little expansion bay inside if they ever decide to upgrade it.<br>Why aren't people sticking with expansion bays?  You can get a lot of money from them instead of wasting so much money on features people might not even want to use.</p><p>Take the DS as an example.<br>With a slight increase in the height of one of the cases, the whole width of the device could be split up in to slots which could be used for expansions.<br>In these slots, there could be:<br>wireless hardware<br>webcam hardware, a section could be left hanging out at the bottom<br>cellular hardware<br>memory expansion, the memory cards could be placed in the side of the card, then the card is slide inside and all is done.</p><p>I'd die for hardware designed like this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd rather they just have a little expansion bay inside if they ever decide to upgrade it.Why are n't people sticking with expansion bays ?
You can get a lot of money from them instead of wasting so much money on features people might not even want to use.Take the DS as an example.With a slight increase in the height of one of the cases , the whole width of the device could be split up in to slots which could be used for expansions.In these slots , there could be : wireless hardwarewebcam hardware , a section could be left hanging out at the bottomcellular hardwarememory expansion , the memory cards could be placed in the side of the card , then the card is slide inside and all is done.I 'd die for hardware designed like this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd rather they just have a little expansion bay inside if they ever decide to upgrade it.Why aren't people sticking with expansion bays?
You can get a lot of money from them instead of wasting so much money on features people might not even want to use.Take the DS as an example.With a slight increase in the height of one of the cases, the whole width of the device could be split up in to slots which could be used for expansions.In these slots, there could be:wireless hardwarewebcam hardware, a section could be left hanging out at the bottomcellular hardwarememory expansion, the memory cards could be placed in the side of the card, then the card is slide inside and all is done.I'd die for hardware designed like this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744821</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746201</id>
	<title>Re:Cell</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1255541100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've never met a hooker who didn't know at least the basics of blackjack.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never met a hooker who did n't know at least the basics of blackjack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never met a hooker who didn't know at least the basics of blackjack.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745231</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746995</id>
	<title>Mod down parent!</title>
	<author>Dudeman\_Jones</author>
	<datestamp>1255544820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First of all, there hasn't been any announcement as to the existence of a next-gen handheld, let alone its components.  Secondly, this story is stemming from a rumor that the Tegra chip might be in the currently non-existent handheld.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First of all , there has n't been any announcement as to the existence of a next-gen handheld , let alone its components .
Secondly , this story is stemming from a rumor that the Tegra chip might be in the currently non-existent handheld .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First of all, there hasn't been any announcement as to the existence of a next-gen handheld, let alone its components.
Secondly, this story is stemming from a rumor that the Tegra chip might be in the currently non-existent handheld.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29752621</id>
	<title>Re:Wondering about other specs</title>
	<author>j0nb0y</author>
	<datestamp>1255532880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course!  That's what Nintendo fans want.</p><p><a href="http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2006/9/15/" title="penny-arcade.com">http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2006/9/15/</a> [penny-arcade.com]</p><p>"I can't wait to buy Zelda again."<br>"Which one?"<br>"All of them.  Over and over."</p><p>I'm a huge Nintendo fanboy, and I don't dare count how many copies of Zelda and Metroid I've purchased over the years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course !
That 's what Nintendo fans want.http : //www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2006/9/15/ [ penny-arcade.com ] " I ca n't wait to buy Zelda again .
" " Which one ?
" " All of them .
Over and over .
" I 'm a huge Nintendo fanboy , and I do n't dare count how many copies of Zelda and Metroid I 've purchased over the years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course!
That's what Nintendo fans want.http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2006/9/15/ [penny-arcade.com]"I can't wait to buy Zelda again.
""Which one?
""All of them.
Over and over.
"I'm a huge Nintendo fanboy, and I don't dare count how many copies of Zelda and Metroid I've purchased over the years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744837</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744837</id>
	<title>Wondering about other specs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255535580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if they'll "upgrade" it like the PSP so you can get to repurchase your older games through DLC?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if they 'll " upgrade " it like the PSP so you can get to repurchase your older games through DLC ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if they'll "upgrade" it like the PSP so you can get to repurchase your older games through DLC?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745933</id>
	<title>Not another phone bill</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1255540020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Portable game systems are now competing with cell phones. Nintendo needs to realize that for their next portable game system or it will be limited to elementary and middle school kids. Beyond that age, they want a PDA / cell phone.</p></div><p>Cell phones have a monthly fee, and in the North American region, the kind of data transfer needed for Nintendo WFC play and TSWare downloads won't fit into a bargain-basement $10/mo prepaid plan. PDAs look better for this market, and Nintendo is slowly heading that way (see Opera for DSi), but a real PDA needs the breadth of applications developed by part-time developers, not just day-job developers. With Wii Menu 4.2 that deletes the Homebrew Channel,* Nintendo is showing that it wants to shun part-timers from its platforms.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I doubt that the homebrew community will spend the effort to reverse-engineer the next Nintendo hand-held when they could buy a cheap, open cell phone for the same price.</p></div><p>
For one thing, a cell phone is another phone bill. For another, lots of places ban cell phones and don't trust people to put their devices in "flight mode".
</p><p>
* It's been worked around, but that's beside the point, which is Nintendo's intent.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Portable game systems are now competing with cell phones .
Nintendo needs to realize that for their next portable game system or it will be limited to elementary and middle school kids .
Beyond that age , they want a PDA / cell phone.Cell phones have a monthly fee , and in the North American region , the kind of data transfer needed for Nintendo WFC play and TSWare downloads wo n't fit into a bargain-basement $ 10/mo prepaid plan .
PDAs look better for this market , and Nintendo is slowly heading that way ( see Opera for DSi ) , but a real PDA needs the breadth of applications developed by part-time developers , not just day-job developers .
With Wii Menu 4.2 that deletes the Homebrew Channel , * Nintendo is showing that it wants to shun part-timers from its platforms.I doubt that the homebrew community will spend the effort to reverse-engineer the next Nintendo hand-held when they could buy a cheap , open cell phone for the same price .
For one thing , a cell phone is another phone bill .
For another , lots of places ban cell phones and do n't trust people to put their devices in " flight mode " .
* It 's been worked around , but that 's beside the point , which is Nintendo 's intent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Portable game systems are now competing with cell phones.
Nintendo needs to realize that for their next portable game system or it will be limited to elementary and middle school kids.
Beyond that age, they want a PDA / cell phone.Cell phones have a monthly fee, and in the North American region, the kind of data transfer needed for Nintendo WFC play and TSWare downloads won't fit into a bargain-basement $10/mo prepaid plan.
PDAs look better for this market, and Nintendo is slowly heading that way (see Opera for DSi), but a real PDA needs the breadth of applications developed by part-time developers, not just day-job developers.
With Wii Menu 4.2 that deletes the Homebrew Channel,* Nintendo is showing that it wants to shun part-timers from its platforms.I doubt that the homebrew community will spend the effort to reverse-engineer the next Nintendo hand-held when they could buy a cheap, open cell phone for the same price.
For one thing, a cell phone is another phone bill.
For another, lots of places ban cell phones and don't trust people to put their devices in "flight mode".
* It's been worked around, but that's beside the point, which is Nintendo's intent.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29758735</id>
	<title>Re:To Be Powered By NVIDIA's Tegra Chipset</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255627380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Question is, how many batteries and for how long... especially with a multicore ARM solution...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Question is , how many batteries and for how long... especially with a multicore ARM solution.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Question is, how many batteries and for how long... especially with a multicore ARM solution...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745047</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29750819</id>
	<title>Re:So the next DS will</title>
	<author>LordVader717</author>
	<datestamp>1255519440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, but it's not really surprising. The original GBA's specs leaked in 1996 and were better than the Super Nintendo, but no-one would believe it. When the PSP was released it came very close to the then-current PS2, but no-one thought it possible when they announced the system. Even playing Mario 64 on the DS seemed outlandish at the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but it 's not really surprising .
The original GBA 's specs leaked in 1996 and were better than the Super Nintendo , but no-one would believe it .
When the PSP was released it came very close to the then-current PS2 , but no-one thought it possible when they announced the system .
Even playing Mario 64 on the DS seemed outlandish at the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but it's not really surprising.
The original GBA's specs leaked in 1996 and were better than the Super Nintendo, but no-one would believe it.
When the PSP was released it came very close to the then-current PS2, but no-one thought it possible when they announced the system.
Even playing Mario 64 on the DS seemed outlandish at the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745161</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744813</id>
	<title>So when can we expect 1080p on the Wii?</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1255535400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
That's the *real* question.  1080p makes a bigger difference when hooked up to a big-screen TV than it will in a tiny hand-held.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the * real * question .
1080p makes a bigger difference when hooked up to a big-screen TV than it will in a tiny hand-held .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
That's the *real* question.
1080p makes a bigger difference when hooked up to a big-screen TV than it will in a tiny hand-held.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745231</id>
	<title>Re:Cell</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255537200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because EVERY mobile device needs to be a cell phone, PDA, Alarm Clock, web browser, video game console, computer, hooker, and able to play blackjack.  Just add a kitchen sink and it will be the perfect handheld, where playing 1080p on a tiny screen will make you want to throw up in a kitchen sink, so just add one on it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because EVERY mobile device needs to be a cell phone , PDA , Alarm Clock , web browser , video game console , computer , hooker , and able to play blackjack .
Just add a kitchen sink and it will be the perfect handheld , where playing 1080p on a tiny screen will make you want to throw up in a kitchen sink , so just add one on it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because EVERY mobile device needs to be a cell phone, PDA, Alarm Clock, web browser, video game console, computer, hooker, and able to play blackjack.
Just add a kitchen sink and it will be the perfect handheld, where playing 1080p on a tiny screen will make you want to throw up in a kitchen sink, so just add one on it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744821</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746075</id>
	<title>1080P on a portable machine screen</title>
	<author>Theoboley</author>
	<datestamp>1255540500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, the clarity may be there, but on such a small screen, is it really worth it?<br><br>The difference between 720P and 1080P on my 32" TV is insignificant,  Imagine on a 5" screen...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , the clarity may be there , but on such a small screen , is it really worth it ? The difference between 720P and 1080P on my 32 " TV is insignificant , Imagine on a 5 " screen.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, the clarity may be there, but on such a small screen, is it really worth it?The difference between 720P and 1080P on my 32" TV is insignificant,  Imagine on a 5" screen...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748911</id>
	<title>Re:So when can we expect 1080p on the Wii?</title>
	<author>eharvill</author>
	<datestamp>1255552920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
Wouldn't it be nice if the new hand held had a "mini-hdmi" connector so you could hook it up to a big screen?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't it be nice if the new hand held had a " mini-hdmi " connector so you could hook it up to a big screen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Wouldn't it be nice if the new hand held had a "mini-hdmi" connector so you could hook it up to a big screen?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744645</id>
	<title>But will it run Linux?</title>
	<author>gapagos</author>
	<datestamp>1255534860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...And will we be able to play <a href="http://supertux.lethargik.org/" title="lethargik.org">SuperTux</a> [lethargik.org]?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...And will we be able to play SuperTux [ lethargik.org ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...And will we be able to play SuperTux [lethargik.org]?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29749679</id>
	<title>Re:Open it, and make it a phone</title>
	<author>Toonol</author>
	<datestamp>1255513320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree.  I think Apple has far more to fear from Nintendo than Nintendo does from Apple.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
I think Apple has far more to fear from Nintendo than Nintendo does from Apple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
I think Apple has far more to fear from Nintendo than Nintendo does from Apple.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748365</id>
	<title>Re:Will it still have 2 screens?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255550580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Two screens is terrible, I want one widescreen aspect ratio display. I like the hardware for the PSP Go</p></div><p>How does it feel to be some completely, terribly alone?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Two screens is terrible , I want one widescreen aspect ratio display .
I like the hardware for the PSP GoHow does it feel to be some completely , terribly alone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two screens is terrible, I want one widescreen aspect ratio display.
I like the hardware for the PSP GoHow does it feel to be some completely, terribly alone?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746595</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995</id>
	<title>Open it, and make it a phone</title>
	<author>MobyDisk</author>
	<datestamp>1255536240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Portable game systems are now competing with cell phones.  Nintendo needs to realize that for their next portable game system or it will be limited to elementary and middle school kids.  Beyond that age, they want a PDA / cell phone.</p><p>Granted, there are some big limitations to a cell phone as a gaming platform.  The DS and DSi are much cheaper than the iPhone or even the iPod touch, and they have better control inputs.  But that may change with future phones, especially Android phones.</p><p>The next DS also needs to be open to developers.  That is a huge market that Nintendo missed.  I know kids who have hacked DS's because they not only get games, but they get a scheduler, dictionary, and Wikipedia.  Had Nintendo sold basic PDA functionality then the DS would have widened it's market.  It is amazing how big the homebrew community is.  I doubt that the homebrew community will spend the effort to reverse-engineer the next Nintendo hand-held when they could buy a cheap, open cell phone for the same price.</p><p>We are really seeing hand-held device convergence.  I know people who don't carry a watch any longer because they have a cell phone.  Nintendo needs to widen their thinking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Portable game systems are now competing with cell phones .
Nintendo needs to realize that for their next portable game system or it will be limited to elementary and middle school kids .
Beyond that age , they want a PDA / cell phone.Granted , there are some big limitations to a cell phone as a gaming platform .
The DS and DSi are much cheaper than the iPhone or even the iPod touch , and they have better control inputs .
But that may change with future phones , especially Android phones.The next DS also needs to be open to developers .
That is a huge market that Nintendo missed .
I know kids who have hacked DS 's because they not only get games , but they get a scheduler , dictionary , and Wikipedia .
Had Nintendo sold basic PDA functionality then the DS would have widened it 's market .
It is amazing how big the homebrew community is .
I doubt that the homebrew community will spend the effort to reverse-engineer the next Nintendo hand-held when they could buy a cheap , open cell phone for the same price.We are really seeing hand-held device convergence .
I know people who do n't carry a watch any longer because they have a cell phone .
Nintendo needs to widen their thinking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Portable game systems are now competing with cell phones.
Nintendo needs to realize that for their next portable game system or it will be limited to elementary and middle school kids.
Beyond that age, they want a PDA / cell phone.Granted, there are some big limitations to a cell phone as a gaming platform.
The DS and DSi are much cheaper than the iPhone or even the iPod touch, and they have better control inputs.
But that may change with future phones, especially Android phones.The next DS also needs to be open to developers.
That is a huge market that Nintendo missed.
I know kids who have hacked DS's because they not only get games, but they get a scheduler, dictionary, and Wikipedia.
Had Nintendo sold basic PDA functionality then the DS would have widened it's market.
It is amazing how big the homebrew community is.
I doubt that the homebrew community will spend the effort to reverse-engineer the next Nintendo hand-held when they could buy a cheap, open cell phone for the same price.We are really seeing hand-held device convergence.
I know people who don't carry a watch any longer because they have a cell phone.
Nintendo needs to widen their thinking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744725</id>
	<title>That was fast</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1255535100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nvidia's getting out of the chipset market so fast they're actually releasing new products already.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nvidia 's getting out of the chipset market so fast they 're actually releasing new products already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nvidia's getting out of the chipset market so fast they're actually releasing new products already.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745561</id>
	<title>Re:photo</title>
	<author>Archaemic</author>
	<datestamp>1255538520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Disregard the "Copyright Shogmaster 2007" and you still get a hoax that doesn't look believable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Disregard the " Copyright Shogmaster 2007 " and you still get a hoax that does n't look believable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Disregard the "Copyright Shogmaster 2007" and you still get a hoax that doesn't look believable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29749145</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, TS?</title>
	<author>orsty3001</author>
	<datestamp>1255510860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>or The Single, meaning single screen. Or maybe TS means The S***.</htmltext>
<tokenext>or The Single , meaning single screen .
Or maybe TS means The S * * * .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or The Single, meaning single screen.
Or maybe TS means The S***.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29753841</id>
	<title>awww yyeeeaaahhh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255547340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ditch the dual screens, or at least put them closer together.</p><p>but ideally just forget the two screens, use one big, quality screen and if devs want to break it up, so be it.</p><p>give it wifi and make a proper super smash brothers.</p><p>port goldeneye to it.</p><p>do this, because i cant believe it: the psp actually looks good now. i want the new mgs!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ditch the dual screens , or at least put them closer together.but ideally just forget the two screens , use one big , quality screen and if devs want to break it up , so be it.give it wifi and make a proper super smash brothers.port goldeneye to it.do this , because i cant believe it : the psp actually looks good now .
i want the new mgs !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ditch the dual screens, or at least put them closer together.but ideally just forget the two screens, use one big, quality screen and if devs want to break it up, so be it.give it wifi and make a proper super smash brothers.port goldeneye to it.do this, because i cant believe it: the psp actually looks good now.
i want the new mgs!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746809</id>
	<title>Re:Open it, and make it a phone</title>
	<author>Ogive17</author>
	<datestamp>1255543860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just got back from a trip to Japan, many people there use the DS as a PDA.  I've seen them used as a learning supplement devices as well.<br>
<br>
I'm not sure if these different uses were spearheaded by Nintendo or the developers, but in Japan they seem to use the DS for everything you mentioned in your post.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just got back from a trip to Japan , many people there use the DS as a PDA .
I 've seen them used as a learning supplement devices as well .
I 'm not sure if these different uses were spearheaded by Nintendo or the developers , but in Japan they seem to use the DS for everything you mentioned in your post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just got back from a trip to Japan, many people there use the DS as a PDA.
I've seen them used as a learning supplement devices as well.
I'm not sure if these different uses were spearheaded by Nintendo or the developers, but in Japan they seem to use the DS for everything you mentioned in your post.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746363</id>
	<title>Re:To Be Powered By NVIDIA's Tegra Chipset</title>
	<author>Theoboley</author>
	<datestamp>1255541760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>my initial thought was, this thing is either going run so hot that it'll melt the plastic casing/burst into flames..etc or if they manage to cool it well, it'll be like holding onto an old school game gear x 10 size wise.</htmltext>
<tokenext>my initial thought was , this thing is either going run so hot that it 'll melt the plastic casing/burst into flames..etc or if they manage to cool it well , it 'll be like holding onto an old school game gear x 10 size wise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>my initial thought was, this thing is either going run so hot that it'll melt the plastic casing/burst into flames..etc or if they manage to cool it well, it'll be like holding onto an old school game gear x 10 size wise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745047</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748143</id>
	<title>Re:Graphics and quality are largely unrelated.</title>
	<author>evilWurst</author>
	<datestamp>1255549800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps think of it this way instead: there are additional visual cues that become possible with additional graphical oomph, which might be employed for more creative user interface options. PC games have shied away from trying this because developers can't count on the players having the same hardware - most graphics chips sold are still the weak built-in intel ones, IIRC. MS and Sony have staked their reputation this generation on big budget eye candy, so they haven't really hit their peak of using the new power in interesting ways either.</p><p>But Nintendo? They just might do it. They played around with touchpads and dual screens and motion sensors when the other big players sneered in derision, and they made it work. Give them high resolution and a pile of pixel shaders and we'll see games where things like the presence/absence/color of lighting, or the physical textures of objects, or the faint ripple of heat radiation in the distance, might have actual gameplay significance. It could be a flop or it could be interesting, but I'd rather let Nintendo try it and see. We may actually get games out of it that are more immersive, instead of the current bunch that wash everything out with bloom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps think of it this way instead : there are additional visual cues that become possible with additional graphical oomph , which might be employed for more creative user interface options .
PC games have shied away from trying this because developers ca n't count on the players having the same hardware - most graphics chips sold are still the weak built-in intel ones , IIRC .
MS and Sony have staked their reputation this generation on big budget eye candy , so they have n't really hit their peak of using the new power in interesting ways either.But Nintendo ?
They just might do it .
They played around with touchpads and dual screens and motion sensors when the other big players sneered in derision , and they made it work .
Give them high resolution and a pile of pixel shaders and we 'll see games where things like the presence/absence/color of lighting , or the physical textures of objects , or the faint ripple of heat radiation in the distance , might have actual gameplay significance .
It could be a flop or it could be interesting , but I 'd rather let Nintendo try it and see .
We may actually get games out of it that are more immersive , instead of the current bunch that wash everything out with bloom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps think of it this way instead: there are additional visual cues that become possible with additional graphical oomph, which might be employed for more creative user interface options.
PC games have shied away from trying this because developers can't count on the players having the same hardware - most graphics chips sold are still the weak built-in intel ones, IIRC.
MS and Sony have staked their reputation this generation on big budget eye candy, so they haven't really hit their peak of using the new power in interesting ways either.But Nintendo?
They just might do it.
They played around with touchpads and dual screens and motion sensors when the other big players sneered in derision, and they made it work.
Give them high resolution and a pile of pixel shaders and we'll see games where things like the presence/absence/color of lighting, or the physical textures of objects, or the faint ripple of heat radiation in the distance, might have actual gameplay significance.
It could be a flop or it could be interesting, but I'd rather let Nintendo try it and see.
We may actually get games out of it that are more immersive, instead of the current bunch that wash everything out with bloom.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29753443</id>
	<title>Re:Cell</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255542240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hello, I am John Titor Jr. I come in peace with the Apple iPod Yocto, sold standard with a telepathic control knob and a holographic projector.</p><p>And here are the specs on my shiny new orb: (nobody uses box-shaped hardware anymore)<br>Personal Analogue Assistant (all digital is so 30's, we today use the brains of mutated test subjects from WWIII)<br>Calc.exe 17.5012 (don't worry, it's TI-83 compatible and made by TI's developers, MS bought Texas Instruments 40 years ago when the Z80 stopped being produced)<br>Alarm Clock<br>Heart Rate Monitor<br>Toothbrush<br>Nail Clippers<br>Stool Analyzer<br>Pepper Spray<br>Insulin and Glucose Monitor (for the diabetics)<br>Medicine Dispenser<br>Scissors<br>25 piece Knife Set<br>Time Machine (I believe this was first included with Mac OS X Leopard, but this version also allows physical time travel)<br>Human Teleportation Device (<i>never</i> have another traffic jam)<br>Holographic Interweb 4.0 Browser with Microsoft-Apple-Nintendo-Sony-Google(R) &#220;bersearch<br>Microsoft-Apple-Nintendo-Sony-Google(R) Singularity ENT (Extremely New Technology, still BSODs, or more like Blue Coma of Death, do <i>not</i> use when driving)<br>Microsoft-Apple-Nintendo-Sony-Google(R) Virtual OmniBoy 65536 (65536-bit tech with 800 Giganeuron bio-brain and dedicated 512 YB holographic storage, pretty puny, but OK for a pocket device; allows up to 1 trillion players from anywhere in the galaxy to play at once)<br>Virtual Galaxy of Warcraft, Mobile Edition (it has other 3DVR games too, but who needs 'em)<br>Virtual Neo-Vegas Ultimate (GoW is great, but wow, you should see the hookers <i>and</i> blackjack in this game)<br>Still no kitchen sink, but it does come with a nanobot-powered self-sterilizing vacuum for removing fluids like spit or throw up, which is split into component chemicals to power a biomass generator and feed the wetware, and a water spigot that works by removing moisture from the air at a maximum of 3 gallons/minute (close enough, though, eh?).</p><p>Oh yeah, I wrote this message to send a warning, not to brag about my awesome 1337^1337 iStuff. Though their software be &#252;ber-slick, fear Microsoft-Apple-Nintendo-Sony-Google(R). The CEO is a <a href="http://iml.jou.ufl.edu/projects/STUDENTS/Purdy/Gates\_of\_Borg.jpg" title="ufl.edu" rel="nofollow">cybernetically-enhanced clone of Bill Gates</a> [ufl.edu], and the entire board is made up of B.A.L.L.M.E.R. robots, their meetings littered with cries of "Developers" and throwings of chairs. Their corporate motto is "A thousand nations of the Software Empire descend upon you!" Some fear that they are beginning to sell crushed human remains as "environmentally friendly" food products.</p><p>Alas, my captcha, verily, I kid thee not and so swear upon my life and the lives of all the Galaxy's Earthsent children, is "despair." How apropos.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hello , I am John Titor Jr. I come in peace with the Apple iPod Yocto , sold standard with a telepathic control knob and a holographic projector.And here are the specs on my shiny new orb : ( nobody uses box-shaped hardware anymore ) Personal Analogue Assistant ( all digital is so 30 's , we today use the brains of mutated test subjects from WWIII ) Calc.exe 17.5012 ( do n't worry , it 's TI-83 compatible and made by TI 's developers , MS bought Texas Instruments 40 years ago when the Z80 stopped being produced ) Alarm ClockHeart Rate MonitorToothbrushNail ClippersStool AnalyzerPepper SprayInsulin and Glucose Monitor ( for the diabetics ) Medicine DispenserScissors25 piece Knife SetTime Machine ( I believe this was first included with Mac OS X Leopard , but this version also allows physical time travel ) Human Teleportation Device ( never have another traffic jam ) Holographic Interweb 4.0 Browser with Microsoft-Apple-Nintendo-Sony-Google ( R )   bersearchMicrosoft-Apple-Nintendo-Sony-Google ( R ) Singularity ENT ( Extremely New Technology , still BSODs , or more like Blue Coma of Death , do not use when driving ) Microsoft-Apple-Nintendo-Sony-Google ( R ) Virtual OmniBoy 65536 ( 65536-bit tech with 800 Giganeuron bio-brain and dedicated 512 YB holographic storage , pretty puny , but OK for a pocket device ; allows up to 1 trillion players from anywhere in the galaxy to play at once ) Virtual Galaxy of Warcraft , Mobile Edition ( it has other 3DVR games too , but who needs 'em ) Virtual Neo-Vegas Ultimate ( GoW is great , but wow , you should see the hookers and blackjack in this game ) Still no kitchen sink , but it does come with a nanobot-powered self-sterilizing vacuum for removing fluids like spit or throw up , which is split into component chemicals to power a biomass generator and feed the wetware , and a water spigot that works by removing moisture from the air at a maximum of 3 gallons/minute ( close enough , though , eh ?
) .Oh yeah , I wrote this message to send a warning , not to brag about my awesome 1337 ^ 1337 iStuff .
Though their software be   ber-slick , fear Microsoft-Apple-Nintendo-Sony-Google ( R ) .
The CEO is a cybernetically-enhanced clone of Bill Gates [ ufl.edu ] , and the entire board is made up of B.A.L.L.M.E.R .
robots , their meetings littered with cries of " Developers " and throwings of chairs .
Their corporate motto is " A thousand nations of the Software Empire descend upon you !
" Some fear that they are beginning to sell crushed human remains as " environmentally friendly " food products.Alas , my captcha , verily , I kid thee not and so swear upon my life and the lives of all the Galaxy 's Earthsent children , is " despair .
" How apropos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hello, I am John Titor Jr. I come in peace with the Apple iPod Yocto, sold standard with a telepathic control knob and a holographic projector.And here are the specs on my shiny new orb: (nobody uses box-shaped hardware anymore)Personal Analogue Assistant (all digital is so 30's, we today use the brains of mutated test subjects from WWIII)Calc.exe 17.5012 (don't worry, it's TI-83 compatible and made by TI's developers, MS bought Texas Instruments 40 years ago when the Z80 stopped being produced)Alarm ClockHeart Rate MonitorToothbrushNail ClippersStool AnalyzerPepper SprayInsulin and Glucose Monitor (for the diabetics)Medicine DispenserScissors25 piece Knife SetTime Machine (I believe this was first included with Mac OS X Leopard, but this version also allows physical time travel)Human Teleportation Device (never have another traffic jam)Holographic Interweb 4.0 Browser with Microsoft-Apple-Nintendo-Sony-Google(R) ÜbersearchMicrosoft-Apple-Nintendo-Sony-Google(R) Singularity ENT (Extremely New Technology, still BSODs, or more like Blue Coma of Death, do not use when driving)Microsoft-Apple-Nintendo-Sony-Google(R) Virtual OmniBoy 65536 (65536-bit tech with 800 Giganeuron bio-brain and dedicated 512 YB holographic storage, pretty puny, but OK for a pocket device; allows up to 1 trillion players from anywhere in the galaxy to play at once)Virtual Galaxy of Warcraft, Mobile Edition (it has other 3DVR games too, but who needs 'em)Virtual Neo-Vegas Ultimate (GoW is great, but wow, you should see the hookers and blackjack in this game)Still no kitchen sink, but it does come with a nanobot-powered self-sterilizing vacuum for removing fluids like spit or throw up, which is split into component chemicals to power a biomass generator and feed the wetware, and a water spigot that works by removing moisture from the air at a maximum of 3 gallons/minute (close enough, though, eh?
).Oh yeah, I wrote this message to send a warning, not to brag about my awesome 1337^1337 iStuff.
Though their software be über-slick, fear Microsoft-Apple-Nintendo-Sony-Google(R).
The CEO is a cybernetically-enhanced clone of Bill Gates [ufl.edu], and the entire board is made up of B.A.L.L.M.E.R.
robots, their meetings littered with cries of "Developers" and throwings of chairs.
Their corporate motto is "A thousand nations of the Software Empire descend upon you!
" Some fear that they are beginning to sell crushed human remains as "environmentally friendly" food products.Alas, my captcha, verily, I kid thee not and so swear upon my life and the lives of all the Galaxy's Earthsent children, is "despair.
" How apropos.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745231</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746107</id>
	<title>Re:Open it, and make it a phone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255540620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Portable game systems are now competing with cell phones.  Nintendo needs to realize that for their next portable game system or it will be limited to elementary and middle school kids.  Beyond that age, they want a PDA / cell phone.</p><p>Granted, there are some big limitations to a cell phone as a gaming platform.  The DS and DSi are much cheaper than the iPhone or even the iPod touch, and they have better control inputs.  But that may change with future phones, especially Android phones.</p><p>The next DS also needs to be open to developers.  That is a huge market that Nintendo missed.  I know kids who have hacked DS's because they not only get games, but they get a scheduler, dictionary, and Wikipedia.  Had Nintendo sold basic PDA functionality then the DS would have widened it's market.  It is amazing how big the homebrew community is.  I doubt that the homebrew community will spend the effort to reverse-engineer the next Nintendo hand-held when they could buy a cheap, open cell phone for the same price.</p><p>We are really seeing hand-held device convergence.  I know people who don't carry a watch any longer because they have a cell phone.  Nintendo needs to widen their thinking.</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>Portable game systems are now competing with cell phones.  Nintendo needs to realize that for their next portable game system or it will be limited to elementary and middle school kids.  Beyond that age, they want a PDA / cell phone.</p><p>Granted, there are some big limitations to a cell phone as a gaming platform.  The DS and DSi are much cheaper than the iPhone or even the iPod touch, and they have better control inputs.  But that may change with future phones, especially Android phones.</p><p>The next DS also needs to be open to developers.  That is a huge market that Nintendo missed.  I know kids who have hacked DS's because they not only get games, but they get a scheduler, dictionary, and Wikipedia.  Had Nintendo sold basic PDA functionality then the DS would have widened it's market.  It is amazing how big the homebrew community is.  I doubt that the homebrew community will spend the effort to reverse-engineer the next Nintendo hand-held when they could buy a cheap, open cell phone for the same price.</p><p>We are really seeing hand-held device convergence.  I know people who don't carry a watch any longer because they have a cell phone.  Nintendo needs to widen their thinking.</p></div><p>portable gaming units are not competing with phones. That is the same thing that was said with the computer and the consoles when the computer gaming industry took off....still waiting for that to come to fruition....hard core gamers are hardcore gamers. they will always want a platform that is specific to gaming and gaming alone. there will be some folks that move away from handhelds, but the industry doesn't have to worry about that being a major issue for quite some time. look at the figures before you judge the data.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Portable game systems are now competing with cell phones .
Nintendo needs to realize that for their next portable game system or it will be limited to elementary and middle school kids .
Beyond that age , they want a PDA / cell phone.Granted , there are some big limitations to a cell phone as a gaming platform .
The DS and DSi are much cheaper than the iPhone or even the iPod touch , and they have better control inputs .
But that may change with future phones , especially Android phones.The next DS also needs to be open to developers .
That is a huge market that Nintendo missed .
I know kids who have hacked DS 's because they not only get games , but they get a scheduler , dictionary , and Wikipedia .
Had Nintendo sold basic PDA functionality then the DS would have widened it 's market .
It is amazing how big the homebrew community is .
I doubt that the homebrew community will spend the effort to reverse-engineer the next Nintendo hand-held when they could buy a cheap , open cell phone for the same price.We are really seeing hand-held device convergence .
I know people who do n't carry a watch any longer because they have a cell phone .
Nintendo needs to widen their thinking.Portable game systems are now competing with cell phones .
Nintendo needs to realize that for their next portable game system or it will be limited to elementary and middle school kids .
Beyond that age , they want a PDA / cell phone.Granted , there are some big limitations to a cell phone as a gaming platform .
The DS and DSi are much cheaper than the iPhone or even the iPod touch , and they have better control inputs .
But that may change with future phones , especially Android phones.The next DS also needs to be open to developers .
That is a huge market that Nintendo missed .
I know kids who have hacked DS 's because they not only get games , but they get a scheduler , dictionary , and Wikipedia .
Had Nintendo sold basic PDA functionality then the DS would have widened it 's market .
It is amazing how big the homebrew community is .
I doubt that the homebrew community will spend the effort to reverse-engineer the next Nintendo hand-held when they could buy a cheap , open cell phone for the same price.We are really seeing hand-held device convergence .
I know people who do n't carry a watch any longer because they have a cell phone .
Nintendo needs to widen their thinking.portable gaming units are not competing with phones .
That is the same thing that was said with the computer and the consoles when the computer gaming industry took off....still waiting for that to come to fruition....hard core gamers are hardcore gamers .
they will always want a platform that is specific to gaming and gaming alone .
there will be some folks that move away from handhelds , but the industry does n't have to worry about that being a major issue for quite some time .
look at the figures before you judge the data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Portable game systems are now competing with cell phones.
Nintendo needs to realize that for their next portable game system or it will be limited to elementary and middle school kids.
Beyond that age, they want a PDA / cell phone.Granted, there are some big limitations to a cell phone as a gaming platform.
The DS and DSi are much cheaper than the iPhone or even the iPod touch, and they have better control inputs.
But that may change with future phones, especially Android phones.The next DS also needs to be open to developers.
That is a huge market that Nintendo missed.
I know kids who have hacked DS's because they not only get games, but they get a scheduler, dictionary, and Wikipedia.
Had Nintendo sold basic PDA functionality then the DS would have widened it's market.
It is amazing how big the homebrew community is.
I doubt that the homebrew community will spend the effort to reverse-engineer the next Nintendo hand-held when they could buy a cheap, open cell phone for the same price.We are really seeing hand-held device convergence.
I know people who don't carry a watch any longer because they have a cell phone.
Nintendo needs to widen their thinking.Portable game systems are now competing with cell phones.
Nintendo needs to realize that for their next portable game system or it will be limited to elementary and middle school kids.
Beyond that age, they want a PDA / cell phone.Granted, there are some big limitations to a cell phone as a gaming platform.
The DS and DSi are much cheaper than the iPhone or even the iPod touch, and they have better control inputs.
But that may change with future phones, especially Android phones.The next DS also needs to be open to developers.
That is a huge market that Nintendo missed.
I know kids who have hacked DS's because they not only get games, but they get a scheduler, dictionary, and Wikipedia.
Had Nintendo sold basic PDA functionality then the DS would have widened it's market.
It is amazing how big the homebrew community is.
I doubt that the homebrew community will spend the effort to reverse-engineer the next Nintendo hand-held when they could buy a cheap, open cell phone for the same price.We are really seeing hand-held device convergence.
I know people who don't carry a watch any longer because they have a cell phone.
Nintendo needs to widen their thinking.portable gaming units are not competing with phones.
That is the same thing that was said with the computer and the consoles when the computer gaming industry took off....still waiting for that to come to fruition....hard core gamers are hardcore gamers.
they will always want a platform that is specific to gaming and gaming alone.
there will be some folks that move away from handhelds, but the industry doesn't have to worry about that being a major issue for quite some time.
look at the figures before you judge the data.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29751901</id>
	<title>Re:So when can we expect 1080p on the Wii?</title>
	<author>BikeHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1255527360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Wii will never have 1080p. For one thing, this SoC looks to be more powerful. O\_o</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Wii will never have 1080p .
For one thing , this SoC looks to be more powerful .
O \ _o</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Wii will never have 1080p.
For one thing, this SoC looks to be more powerful.
O\_o</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748795</id>
	<title>Re:Graphics and quality are largely unrelated.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255552440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So... complaining about gameplay being neglected in favor of graphics is instant +5 insightful, even when applied to the one major developer that is dominating the market with two consoles and many, many first-party games that heavily deemphasize graphics?</p><p>This was an insightful criticism once. Not today, and not applied to Nintendo of all people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So... complaining about gameplay being neglected in favor of graphics is instant + 5 insightful , even when applied to the one major developer that is dominating the market with two consoles and many , many first-party games that heavily deemphasize graphics ? This was an insightful criticism once .
Not today , and not applied to Nintendo of all people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So... complaining about gameplay being neglected in favor of graphics is instant +5 insightful, even when applied to the one major developer that is dominating the market with two consoles and many, many first-party games that heavily deemphasize graphics?This was an insightful criticism once.
Not today, and not applied to Nintendo of all people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746595</id>
	<title>Will it still have 2 screens?</title>
	<author>Zaphod-AVA</author>
	<datestamp>1255542960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will it still have two screens?</p><p>I've always hated the DS form factor. Two screens is terrible, I want one widescreen aspect ratio display. I like the hardware for the PSP Go, too bad they shot themselves in the foot about the card slot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it still have two screens ? I 've always hated the DS form factor .
Two screens is terrible , I want one widescreen aspect ratio display .
I like the hardware for the PSP Go , too bad they shot themselves in the foot about the card slot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it still have two screens?I've always hated the DS form factor.
Two screens is terrible, I want one widescreen aspect ratio display.
I like the hardware for the PSP Go, too bad they shot themselves in the foot about the card slot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746703</id>
	<title>Re:Open it, and make it a phone</title>
	<author>MobyDisk</author>
	<datestamp>1255543440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What happens when, in the future, a cell phone is a 50 cent piece of hardware that can be embedded into a wristwatch?  Will people not buy that wristwatch just because it has a cell phone in it?</p><p>I don't like carrying multiple devices.  So I hacked my DS and made it a PDA, browser, etc.  But then I had to carry a phone.  And much like many people, I said the heck with carrying around the DS/PDA since my phone did all that and more.</p><p>I agree that convergence could result in some overlap in purpose.  But I don't think anyone will refuse to buy a device just because it includes a feature they won't use.  And I suspect that in the future you won't have a choice.  Either that: or we will carry around a dumb LCD display, and we will buy tiny little modules for it like a cell phone and a gaming system.  That's gives you the best of both worlds - convergence, without carrying around redundant devices or paying for what you don't need.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What happens when , in the future , a cell phone is a 50 cent piece of hardware that can be embedded into a wristwatch ?
Will people not buy that wristwatch just because it has a cell phone in it ? I do n't like carrying multiple devices .
So I hacked my DS and made it a PDA , browser , etc .
But then I had to carry a phone .
And much like many people , I said the heck with carrying around the DS/PDA since my phone did all that and more.I agree that convergence could result in some overlap in purpose .
But I do n't think anyone will refuse to buy a device just because it includes a feature they wo n't use .
And I suspect that in the future you wo n't have a choice .
Either that : or we will carry around a dumb LCD display , and we will buy tiny little modules for it like a cell phone and a gaming system .
That 's gives you the best of both worlds - convergence , without carrying around redundant devices or paying for what you do n't need .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What happens when, in the future, a cell phone is a 50 cent piece of hardware that can be embedded into a wristwatch?
Will people not buy that wristwatch just because it has a cell phone in it?I don't like carrying multiple devices.
So I hacked my DS and made it a PDA, browser, etc.
But then I had to carry a phone.
And much like many people, I said the heck with carrying around the DS/PDA since my phone did all that and more.I agree that convergence could result in some overlap in purpose.
But I don't think anyone will refuse to buy a device just because it includes a feature they won't use.
And I suspect that in the future you won't have a choice.
Either that: or we will carry around a dumb LCD display, and we will buy tiny little modules for it like a cell phone and a gaming system.
That's gives you the best of both worlds - convergence, without carrying around redundant devices or paying for what you don't need.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745177</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29755621</id>
	<title>Re:I'm not sure I'm happy</title>
	<author>ookaze</author>
	<datestamp>1255613580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eye candy won't distract Nintendo from anything.<br>The OP is just completely wrong:</p><p><div class="quote"><p> The 'Nintendo TS,' as it has been dubbed, will apparently be ready for a late winter 2010 release and should put a spark in the mobile gaming market and give Nintendo's developers the power to bring higher quality games to the platform.</p></div><p>Seems like some people still have learned nothing from this generation of consoles (handheld and home).<br>Power won't bring any quality in games, games do not improve in quality because your hardware is more powerful.<br>If anything, power hinders console developers ability to make quality games, as the budget for the game doesn't improve like the hardware's power, and they are tempted to have higher quality graphics, which takes away money and talent needed to make quality games.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Eye candy wo n't distract Nintendo from anything.The OP is just completely wrong : The 'Nintendo TS, ' as it has been dubbed , will apparently be ready for a late winter 2010 release and should put a spark in the mobile gaming market and give Nintendo 's developers the power to bring higher quality games to the platform.Seems like some people still have learned nothing from this generation of consoles ( handheld and home ) .Power wo n't bring any quality in games , games do not improve in quality because your hardware is more powerful.If anything , power hinders console developers ability to make quality games , as the budget for the game does n't improve like the hardware 's power , and they are tempted to have higher quality graphics , which takes away money and talent needed to make quality games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eye candy won't distract Nintendo from anything.The OP is just completely wrong: The 'Nintendo TS,' as it has been dubbed, will apparently be ready for a late winter 2010 release and should put a spark in the mobile gaming market and give Nintendo's developers the power to bring higher quality games to the platform.Seems like some people still have learned nothing from this generation of consoles (handheld and home).Power won't bring any quality in games, games do not improve in quality because your hardware is more powerful.If anything, power hinders console developers ability to make quality games, as the budget for the game doesn't improve like the hardware's power, and they are tempted to have higher quality graphics, which takes away money and talent needed to make quality games.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745513</id>
	<title>Re:Open it, and make it a phone</title>
	<author>HaZardman27</author>
	<datestamp>1255538340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Nintendo needs to widen their thinking.</i> </p><p>I think the DSi proves that they have already begun to do so.  If any of the three big game companies (Nintendo, Sony &amp; Microsoft) have proven that they can reach the casual/mainstream audience, it's Nintendo.  All they really have left to do is cut out their idiotic fear of the internet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nintendo needs to widen their thinking .
I think the DSi proves that they have already begun to do so .
If any of the three big game companies ( Nintendo , Sony &amp; Microsoft ) have proven that they can reach the casual/mainstream audience , it 's Nintendo .
All they really have left to do is cut out their idiotic fear of the internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Nintendo needs to widen their thinking.
I think the DSi proves that they have already begun to do so.
If any of the three big game companies (Nintendo, Sony &amp; Microsoft) have proven that they can reach the casual/mainstream audience, it's Nintendo.
All they really have left to do is cut out their idiotic fear of the internet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745135</id>
	<title>Re:Open it, and make it a phone</title>
	<author>richy freeway</author>
	<datestamp>1255536780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I doubt that the homebrew community will spend the effort to reverse-engineer the next Nintendo hand-held when they could buy a cheap, open cell phone for the same price.</p></div><p>I think you're REALLY underestimating the homebrew communities. They'll hack it just because they can.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt that the homebrew community will spend the effort to reverse-engineer the next Nintendo hand-held when they could buy a cheap , open cell phone for the same price.I think you 're REALLY underestimating the homebrew communities .
They 'll hack it just because they can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt that the homebrew community will spend the effort to reverse-engineer the next Nintendo hand-held when they could buy a cheap, open cell phone for the same price.I think you're REALLY underestimating the homebrew communities.
They'll hack it just because they can.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746221</id>
	<title>Re:Zune HD has the Tegra</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1255541160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yea I am sure that Zune sales will keep nVidia alive...<br>Actually the ZuneHD is a better media player than the iPod Touch.<br>The problem is that the Touch is a better platform than the ZuneHD.<br>The ZuneHD lacks an appliacation store and the software that is available for it really is nothing to write home about.<br>Too bad since the hardware is better than the iPodTouch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea I am sure that Zune sales will keep nVidia alive...Actually the ZuneHD is a better media player than the iPod Touch.The problem is that the Touch is a better platform than the ZuneHD.The ZuneHD lacks an appliacation store and the software that is available for it really is nothing to write home about.Too bad since the hardware is better than the iPodTouch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea I am sure that Zune sales will keep nVidia alive...Actually the ZuneHD is a better media player than the iPod Touch.The problem is that the Touch is a better platform than the ZuneHD.The ZuneHD lacks an appliacation store and the software that is available for it really is nothing to write home about.Too bad since the hardware is better than the iPodTouch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746361</id>
	<title>Re:photo</title>
	<author>BigHungryJoe</author>
	<datestamp>1255541760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>are those wings on the sides for ultra-absorbency during "heavy flow" days?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>are those wings on the sides for ultra-absorbency during " heavy flow " days ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>are those wings on the sides for ultra-absorbency during "heavy flow" days?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745161</id>
	<title>So the next DS will</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255536900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>have more graphics power than the current Wii?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>have more graphics power than the current Wii ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>have more graphics power than the current Wii?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746791</id>
	<title>Re:What this means for Nintendo DSi owners</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1255543800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd take any date with a barrel of salt.</p><p>The DSi does have a few games that make use of the hardware, and more are on the way.</p><p>Expect lots of full-fledged DSi-only games mid next year after Nintendo sells a billion DSis during the holidays.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd take any date with a barrel of salt.The DSi does have a few games that make use of the hardware , and more are on the way.Expect lots of full-fledged DSi-only games mid next year after Nintendo sells a billion DSis during the holidays .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd take any date with a barrel of salt.The DSi does have a few games that make use of the hardware, and more are on the way.Expect lots of full-fledged DSi-only games mid next year after Nintendo sells a billion DSis during the holidays.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745595</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744615</id>
	<title>TS?</title>
	<author>sleeponthemic</author>
	<datestamp>1255534740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll wait for the screener.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll wait for the screener .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll wait for the screener.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745789</id>
	<title>I'm not sure I'm happy</title>
	<author>obarthelemy</author>
	<datestamp>1255539420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The beauty of the Nintendo stuff up to now has been that the limited CPU+graphics power forced devs to focus on gameplay. I really hope eye candy won't distract them from making fun, as opposed to beautiful or over-graphic'ed, games.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The beauty of the Nintendo stuff up to now has been that the limited CPU + graphics power forced devs to focus on gameplay .
I really hope eye candy wo n't distract them from making fun , as opposed to beautiful or over-graphic'ed , games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The beauty of the Nintendo stuff up to now has been that the limited CPU+graphics power forced devs to focus on gameplay.
I really hope eye candy won't distract them from making fun, as opposed to beautiful or over-graphic'ed, games.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748253</id>
	<title>Re:So when can we expect 1080p on the Wii?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255550220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ouputing 1080p and RENDERing 1080p are two very different things.  Just ask the 360 or the ps3 . . . both of which upscale almost all of their games from a lower resolution.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ouputing 1080p and RENDERing 1080p are two very different things .
Just ask the 360 or the ps3 .
. .
both of which upscale almost all of their games from a lower resolution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ouputing 1080p and RENDERing 1080p are two very different things.
Just ask the 360 or the ps3 .
. .
both of which upscale almost all of their games from a lower resolution.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748403</id>
	<title>Re:Graphics and quality are largely unrelated.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255550700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank you for repeating Slashdot cliche #37475.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you for repeating Slashdot cliche # 37475 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you for repeating Slashdot cliche #37475.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746347</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29752387</id>
	<title>Re:Open it, and make it a phone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255530720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>YES, WE CAN!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>YES , WE CAN !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>YES, WE CAN!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745135</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748879</id>
	<title>Do Not Want</title>
	<author>KDR\_11k</author>
	<datestamp>1255552800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll say BOOOOOO to this. The DS is the last system where developers don't have the bias that 2D is somehow out of style and will actually put significant resources behind a 2D game, if the DS was upgraded so much that it could do current or last gen home console graphics that'd likely be the end of 2D gaming on it and the beginning of more and more repetitive 3D games that we've got enough of on the home consoles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll say BOOOOOO to this .
The DS is the last system where developers do n't have the bias that 2D is somehow out of style and will actually put significant resources behind a 2D game , if the DS was upgraded so much that it could do current or last gen home console graphics that 'd likely be the end of 2D gaming on it and the beginning of more and more repetitive 3D games that we 've got enough of on the home consoles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll say BOOOOOO to this.
The DS is the last system where developers don't have the bias that 2D is somehow out of style and will actually put significant resources behind a 2D game, if the DS was upgraded so much that it could do current or last gen home console graphics that'd likely be the end of 2D gaming on it and the beginning of more and more repetitive 3D games that we've got enough of on the home consoles.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746253</id>
	<title>Re:Open it, and make it a phone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255541280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please stop trying to turn everything into a cell phone. I don't want my game system to also be a cell phone. I don't want to have to upgrade my game system in order to upgrade my cell phone, or buy multiple cell phones because I want both a DS and a PSP.</p><p>And most importantly I don't want to have to pay a monthly bill to play video games.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please stop trying to turn everything into a cell phone .
I do n't want my game system to also be a cell phone .
I do n't want to have to upgrade my game system in order to upgrade my cell phone , or buy multiple cell phones because I want both a DS and a PSP.And most importantly I do n't want to have to pay a monthly bill to play video games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please stop trying to turn everything into a cell phone.
I don't want my game system to also be a cell phone.
I don't want to have to upgrade my game system in order to upgrade my cell phone, or buy multiple cell phones because I want both a DS and a PSP.And most importantly I don't want to have to pay a monthly bill to play video games.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746085</id>
	<title>Re:What this means for Nintendo DSi owners</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1255540560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed, IMHO one of the reason SEGA lost sales is the constant release of new consoles and the few titles that required them.</p><p>The DSi is only a few months old for the north american market, the Nintendo TS should be at least 2-3 years away.</p><p>Unless Nintendo are scared of Sony's PSP Go, for some strange reason...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed , IMHO one of the reason SEGA lost sales is the constant release of new consoles and the few titles that required them.The DSi is only a few months old for the north american market , the Nintendo TS should be at least 2-3 years away.Unless Nintendo are scared of Sony 's PSP Go , for some strange reason.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed, IMHO one of the reason SEGA lost sales is the constant release of new consoles and the few titles that required them.The DSi is only a few months old for the north american market, the Nintendo TS should be at least 2-3 years away.Unless Nintendo are scared of Sony's PSP Go, for some strange reason...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745595</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744927</id>
	<title>The street doesn't believe it</title>
	<author>afidel</author>
	<datestamp>1255535940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>On a day where most of the microchip stocks are up on good Intel earnings NVDA is down.</htmltext>
<tokenext>On a day where most of the microchip stocks are up on good Intel earnings NVDA is down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On a day where most of the microchip stocks are up on good Intel earnings NVDA is down.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744759</id>
	<title>Flashcards</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255535220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who cares, I'm waiting to pirate the games. Fuck you nintendo.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who cares , I 'm waiting to pirate the games .
Fuck you nintendo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who cares, I'm waiting to pirate the games.
Fuck you nintendo.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746347</id>
	<title>Graphics and quality are largely unrelated.</title>
	<author>ChaosDiscord</author>
	<datestamp>1255541700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...and give Nintendo's developers the power to bring higher quality games to the platform."

</p><p>Any developer that thinks the thing stopping them from delivering higher quality games is more powerful graphics hardware has no hope of delivering high quality games.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...and give Nintendo 's developers the power to bring higher quality games to the platform .
" Any developer that thinks the thing stopping them from delivering higher quality games is more powerful graphics hardware has no hope of delivering high quality games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...and give Nintendo's developers the power to bring higher quality games to the platform.
"

Any developer that thinks the thing stopping them from delivering higher quality games is more powerful graphics hardware has no hope of delivering high quality games.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29750587
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29752621
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744837
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746361
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744649
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745231
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744821
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745453
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744759
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29749145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29751919
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747657
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748115
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745595
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29751153
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746595
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746713
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29750955
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745595
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746809
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29751901
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29750665
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745623
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744837
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746363
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745047
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746347
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29758735
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745047
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746425
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745231
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744821
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746703
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744645
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745661
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744821
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748365
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746595
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29751985
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745595
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746137
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29752369
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748253
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745595
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745561
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744649
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29752387
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29755621
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745789
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745763
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744725
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746635
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29749679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746221
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745107
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746253
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29753443
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745231
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744821
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_14_0458216_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29750819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745161
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29750819
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29752369
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747657
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29751919
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745047
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746363
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29758735
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744927
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746361
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745561
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746595
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29751153
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748365
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744585
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29750587
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747831
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29751985
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745023
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744925
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746347
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748795
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748143
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748403
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744821
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745661
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745231
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746201
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746425
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29753443
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744995
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745177
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746703
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746759
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745933
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745783
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745167
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746107
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747085
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29749679
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746713
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745513
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29750665
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745135
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29752387
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746635
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746253
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747877
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746809
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746137
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744837
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29752621
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745623
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744759
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745453
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745595
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746085
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29750955
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746791
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748115
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747077
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29749145
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744813
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29747113
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746211
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29751901
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748911
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748253
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746075
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746067
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744645
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745317
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745107
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29746221
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745789
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29755621
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745083
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29744725
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29745763
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_14_0458216.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_14_0458216.29748879
</commentlist>
</conversation>
