<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_13_2113255</id>
	<title>Vegetarian Spider Described</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1255430040000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:smivs@smivsonline.co.uk" rel="nofollow">Smivs</a> writes with word on a <a href="http://features.csmonitor.com/globalnews/2009/10/13/bagheera-kiplingi-a-vegetarian-spider-joins-worlds-jungle-book/">spider, Bagheera kiplingi, that dines almost exclusively on plants</a>. <i>"The recently described species of jumping spider, discovered by researchers from Villanova and Brandeis Universities, dines on the protein rich tips of acacias, the thorny shrubs found in much of Central America. ... The species of acacia... favored by the Bagheera kiplingi has protein-rich leaf tips and nutritious sap to reward its [symbiotic ant] protectors. ... The Bagheera kiplingi has essentially evolved to steal from the mouths of the ants. These agile, inquisitive jumping spiders can leap up to 50 times their own body lengths... Competition for prey in the spider world is fierce. The Bagheera kiplingi's ancestors took the reflexes evolved for hunting and adapted into a creature that uses them for ant evasion."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Smivs writes with word on a spider , Bagheera kiplingi , that dines almost exclusively on plants .
" The recently described species of jumping spider , discovered by researchers from Villanova and Brandeis Universities , dines on the protein rich tips of acacias , the thorny shrubs found in much of Central America .
... The species of acacia... favored by the Bagheera kiplingi has protein-rich leaf tips and nutritious sap to reward its [ symbiotic ant ] protectors .
... The Bagheera kiplingi has essentially evolved to steal from the mouths of the ants .
These agile , inquisitive jumping spiders can leap up to 50 times their own body lengths... Competition for prey in the spider world is fierce .
The Bagheera kiplingi 's ancestors took the reflexes evolved for hunting and adapted into a creature that uses them for ant evasion .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Smivs writes with word on a spider, Bagheera kiplingi, that dines almost exclusively on plants.
"The recently described species of jumping spider, discovered by researchers from Villanova and Brandeis Universities, dines on the protein rich tips of acacias, the thorny shrubs found in much of Central America.
... The species of acacia... favored by the Bagheera kiplingi has protein-rich leaf tips and nutritious sap to reward its [symbiotic ant] protectors.
... The Bagheera kiplingi has essentially evolved to steal from the mouths of the ants.
These agile, inquisitive jumping spiders can leap up to 50 times their own body lengths... Competition for prey in the spider world is fierce.
The Bagheera kiplingi's ancestors took the reflexes evolved for hunting and adapted into a creature that uses them for ant evasion.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29751339</id>
	<title>Re:More evidence that Vegetarianism is emasculatin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255522800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah for politics! That spider is as a good issue canner as any politician is! The next thing we hear is, of course, that the spider likes to drive Prius and takes part some of the antiwar demonstrations, particularly those which don't demand too much effort to withstand the Polician (Police an actual sub-State in some States) backslash.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah for politics !
That spider is as a good issue canner as any politician is !
The next thing we hear is , of course , that the spider likes to drive Prius and takes part some of the antiwar demonstrations , particularly those which do n't demand too much effort to withstand the Polician ( Police an actual sub-State in some States ) backslash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah for politics!
That spider is as a good issue canner as any politician is!
The next thing we hear is, of course, that the spider likes to drive Prius and takes part some of the antiwar demonstrations, particularly those which don't demand too much effort to withstand the Polician (Police an actual sub-State in some States) backslash.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738683</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29748865</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>B Nesson</author>
	<datestamp>1255552680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Life feeds on life and we've evolved to eat meat.</p></div><p>We've evolved to do all kinds of things.  Fortunately, we don't have to do everything we've evolved to be able to do.  The argument that our teeth are evolved to do something, so we're predestined to do that thing is about a half a step away from saying we should eat meat because God wants us to.  We weren't 'meant' to do anything.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Perhaps the meat available to you (at least as far as your body knows) isn't very good, and so your body makes you want to eat vegetables. You think that it's a conscious decision because people like to analyze stuff, but that doesn't mean that you actually made a conscious decision. I'm not saying you didn't, but I argue that it's more likely that you're rationalizing something.</p></div><p>Well, I know it's a conscious choice because I really miss meat (especially chicken), and don't especially like all that many vegetables.  Also, my being a vegetarianism turns every meal into a trial.  I have to figure out where I can go that will have anything I can eat.  I have to figure out what might have meat hidden in it when it's not immediately apparent.  If I'm eating with my wife (who still does eat meat) I have to determine where we can go that will have food we both like and can both eat.</p><p>I usually have to pay more.  I have to consider whether I'm meeting my nutritional needs.  I'll often have to wait longer, since whatever I get will probably be a special order.</p><p>I can think of a lot of easier ways to be smug.</p><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>The other thing that bugs me is how much other people obsess about what i'm NOT eating.</p></div><p>Bullshit, you invite the attention. At least, you did with this comment. It doesn't bug you, it gratifies you. Perhaps you're a vegetarian just to annoy people, and you don't even know it.</p></div><p>Oh, please.  I'd guess that you've met three or four times as many vegetarians as you're aware of, just because most of us don't make a big thing out of it.  I don't know how many people I've met and known for months without them ever realizing I don't eat meat.  Half the time, when they find out, <i>they don't believe me</i>.</p><p>Most of us really just do not give a shit what anyone else eats.  We just want to eat what we want to eat in peace.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Life feeds on life and we 've evolved to eat meat.We 've evolved to do all kinds of things .
Fortunately , we do n't have to do everything we 've evolved to be able to do .
The argument that our teeth are evolved to do something , so we 're predestined to do that thing is about a half a step away from saying we should eat meat because God wants us to .
We were n't 'meant ' to do anything.Perhaps the meat available to you ( at least as far as your body knows ) is n't very good , and so your body makes you want to eat vegetables .
You think that it 's a conscious decision because people like to analyze stuff , but that does n't mean that you actually made a conscious decision .
I 'm not saying you did n't , but I argue that it 's more likely that you 're rationalizing something.Well , I know it 's a conscious choice because I really miss meat ( especially chicken ) , and do n't especially like all that many vegetables .
Also , my being a vegetarianism turns every meal into a trial .
I have to figure out where I can go that will have anything I can eat .
I have to figure out what might have meat hidden in it when it 's not immediately apparent .
If I 'm eating with my wife ( who still does eat meat ) I have to determine where we can go that will have food we both like and can both eat.I usually have to pay more .
I have to consider whether I 'm meeting my nutritional needs .
I 'll often have to wait longer , since whatever I get will probably be a special order.I can think of a lot of easier ways to be smug.The other thing that bugs me is how much other people obsess about what i 'm NOT eating.Bullshit , you invite the attention .
At least , you did with this comment .
It does n't bug you , it gratifies you .
Perhaps you 're a vegetarian just to annoy people , and you do n't even know it.Oh , please .
I 'd guess that you 've met three or four times as many vegetarians as you 're aware of , just because most of us do n't make a big thing out of it .
I do n't know how many people I 've met and known for months without them ever realizing I do n't eat meat .
Half the time , when they find out , they do n't believe me.Most of us really just do not give a shit what anyone else eats .
We just want to eat what we want to eat in peace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Life feeds on life and we've evolved to eat meat.We've evolved to do all kinds of things.
Fortunately, we don't have to do everything we've evolved to be able to do.
The argument that our teeth are evolved to do something, so we're predestined to do that thing is about a half a step away from saying we should eat meat because God wants us to.
We weren't 'meant' to do anything.Perhaps the meat available to you (at least as far as your body knows) isn't very good, and so your body makes you want to eat vegetables.
You think that it's a conscious decision because people like to analyze stuff, but that doesn't mean that you actually made a conscious decision.
I'm not saying you didn't, but I argue that it's more likely that you're rationalizing something.Well, I know it's a conscious choice because I really miss meat (especially chicken), and don't especially like all that many vegetables.
Also, my being a vegetarianism turns every meal into a trial.
I have to figure out where I can go that will have anything I can eat.
I have to figure out what might have meat hidden in it when it's not immediately apparent.
If I'm eating with my wife (who still does eat meat) I have to determine where we can go that will have food we both like and can both eat.I usually have to pay more.
I have to consider whether I'm meeting my nutritional needs.
I'll often have to wait longer, since whatever I get will probably be a special order.I can think of a lot of easier ways to be smug.The other thing that bugs me is how much other people obsess about what i'm NOT eating.Bullshit, you invite the attention.
At least, you did with this comment.
It doesn't bug you, it gratifies you.
Perhaps you're a vegetarian just to annoy people, and you don't even know it.Oh, please.
I'd guess that you've met three or four times as many vegetarians as you're aware of, just because most of us don't make a big thing out of it.
I don't know how many people I've met and known for months without them ever realizing I don't eat meat.
Half the time, when they find out, they don't believe me.Most of us really just do not give a shit what anyone else eats.
We just want to eat what we want to eat in peace.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29742865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29741287</id>
	<title>comedy</title>
	<author>fireball84513</author>
	<datestamp>1255457520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>spider: yoink!
ant: hey, wtf!?!</htmltext>
<tokenext>spider : yoink !
ant : hey , wtf ! ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>spider: yoink!
ant: hey, wtf!?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739439</id>
	<title>OLD NEWS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255440360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This spider is not news... it was last August, but not now...

I mean...anyone that knows anything about spiders has known about it for over a year, it was even covered in major publications. Congrats on being late to the party like most of the internet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This spider is not news... it was last August , but not now.. . I mean...anyone that knows anything about spiders has known about it for over a year , it was even covered in major publications .
Congrats on being late to the party like most of the internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This spider is not news... it was last August, but not now...

I mean...anyone that knows anything about spiders has known about it for over a year, it was even covered in major publications.
Congrats on being late to the party like most of the internet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29741141</id>
	<title>Vegetarian &amp; Lazy</title>
	<author>Mr. Lwanga</author>
	<datestamp>1255455360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its a hippie spider, Cartman save us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its a hippie spider , Cartman save us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its a hippie spider, Cartman save us.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739199</id>
	<title>I Guess 'Omnivore' is Not as Exciting...</title>
	<author>RudeIota</author>
	<datestamp>1255438260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>For example: <br>
<a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/10/091012-vegetarian-spider.html" title="nationalgeographic.com">"Surreal" Vegetarian Spider Found -- A First</a> [nationalgeographic.com]<p><div class="quote"><p>"Though the spider does occasionally snack on ant larvae, the bulk of their diet is plants" -- Meehan said.</p> </div><p>
"Vegetarian Spider" results: <a href="http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&amp;pz=1&amp;cf=all&amp;ned=us&amp;hl=en&amp;q=spider+vegetarian" title="google.com">118</a> [google.com] <br>
"Omnivore Spider" results: <a href="http://news.google.com/news/search?aq=f&amp;pz=1&amp;cf=all&amp;ned=us&amp;hl=en&amp;q=spider+vegetarian" title="google.com">2</a> [google.com] (both unrelated)<br> <br>Are they vegetarian? Absolutely not. But it sounds good.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For example : " Surreal " Vegetarian Spider Found -- A First [ nationalgeographic.com ] " Though the spider does occasionally snack on ant larvae , the bulk of their diet is plants " -- Meehan said .
" Vegetarian Spider " results : 118 [ google.com ] " Omnivore Spider " results : 2 [ google.com ] ( both unrelated ) Are they vegetarian ?
Absolutely not .
But it sounds good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For example: 
"Surreal" Vegetarian Spider Found -- A First [nationalgeographic.com]"Though the spider does occasionally snack on ant larvae, the bulk of their diet is plants" -- Meehan said.
"Vegetarian Spider" results: 118 [google.com] 
"Omnivore Spider" results: 2 [google.com] (both unrelated) Are they vegetarian?
Absolutely not.
But it sounds good.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29747027</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>VIPERsssss</author>
	<datestamp>1255544940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>PETA can go fuck themselves.</htmltext>
<tokenext>PETA can go fuck themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PETA can go fuck themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739405</id>
	<title>Re:Well, plenty of arachnids are vegetarians.</title>
	<author>v1</author>
	<datestamp>1255440000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was going to ask about spidermites here.  Are such mites technically still considered spiders?  Are all mites arachnids?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was going to ask about spidermites here .
Are such mites technically still considered spiders ?
Are all mites arachnids ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was going to ask about spidermites here.
Are such mites technically still considered spiders?
Are all mites arachnids?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738503</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740101</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>AmigaMMC</author>
	<datestamp>1255445520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>PETA: People Eating Tasty Animals?</htmltext>
<tokenext>PETA : People Eating Tasty Animals ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PETA: People Eating Tasty Animals?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740079</id>
	<title>Re:More evidence that Vegetarianism is emasculatin</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1255445280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>" with hints of males helping to care for eggs and young, another behavior that is virtually unknown among spiders. "</i></p><p>Yeah... considering the number of species where the male gets the hell out of dodge as soon as they fertilize the female so they don't <i>get eaten</i>, I'm not so sure a species where the male is confident enough to stick around is a sign of emasculation.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" with hints of males helping to care for eggs and young , another behavior that is virtually unknown among spiders .
" Yeah... considering the number of species where the male gets the hell out of dodge as soon as they fertilize the female so they do n't get eaten , I 'm not so sure a species where the male is confident enough to stick around is a sign of emasculation .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>" with hints of males helping to care for eggs and young, another behavior that is virtually unknown among spiders.
"Yeah... considering the number of species where the male gets the hell out of dodge as soon as they fertilize the female so they don't get eaten, I'm not so sure a species where the male is confident enough to stick around is a sign of emasculation.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738683</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29745851</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1255539660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Excuse me, what is the difference? Perhaps the meat available to you (at least as far as your body knows) isn't very good, and so your body makes you want to eat vegetables. You think that it's a conscious decision because people like to analyze stuff, but that doesn't mean that you actually made a conscious decision. I'm not saying you didn't, but I argue that it's more likely that you're rationalizing something.</i></p><p>There are plenty of vegetarians who <i>like</i> meat, but choose not to eat it for a variety of reasons.  So as you would put it their body "makes them want to eat meat", but they choose not to.</p><p>So unless you're trying to raise the whole Free Will philosophical discussion, the difference is blatantly obvious.</p><p><i>There are no indigenous vegetarians. None. You might reflect on that for a time. Plants have nervous systems and memories. I know a former raw food vegan fascist who had a revelation when she cried over murder of a food plant (I promise you I am not making this up, I think it was a broccoli of all things) and went back to feeding her body what it needed, a complete diet. Life feeds on life and we've evolved to eat meat.</i></p><p>Human beings can survive perfectly fine on a diet of just vegetables as a matter of biology, your opinion.  Being capable of doing so as a matter of practical reality is different, which is why you don't find indigenous peoples who are strictly vegetarian.  Because food scarcity means they have to take whatever food sources they can.  In the modern world, it's a viable choice.  We're not omnivores because we evolved to <i>need</i> meat, we're omnivores because it expanded our potential nutrition sources.</p><p>Oh and yeah, I feel the same way about killing plants for food as I do animals.  They do have far more "consciousness" than most give them credit for.  So I kill things to survive, including tasty animals, and don't feel bad about it. But I don't tell myself that I <i>need</i> to eat animals.  Because I don't, either in a biological sense nor a practical sense.  That would just be a rationalization.</p><p><i>Bullshit, you invite the attention. At least, you did with this comment. It doesn't bug you, it gratifies you. Perhaps you're a vegetarian just to annoy people, and you don't even know it.</i></p><p>I think the conspicuously vegetarian who are doing it for social posturing (regardless of whatever other motivations) are extremely annoying.  But simply talking about it in a discussion of a "vegetarian" spider isn't "inviting" attention in the way you imply anymore than someone saying that they are gay in a discussion of animal sexuality is inviting attention.  It's only inviting your attention because you are annoyed by someone claiming they made a choice.  The question is:  Did you choose to to be annoyed by the concept of free will and thus invite attention to your point of view with these asinine comments, or is it just nature?  I see a pot here calling the kettle black.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Excuse me , what is the difference ?
Perhaps the meat available to you ( at least as far as your body knows ) is n't very good , and so your body makes you want to eat vegetables .
You think that it 's a conscious decision because people like to analyze stuff , but that does n't mean that you actually made a conscious decision .
I 'm not saying you did n't , but I argue that it 's more likely that you 're rationalizing something.There are plenty of vegetarians who like meat , but choose not to eat it for a variety of reasons .
So as you would put it their body " makes them want to eat meat " , but they choose not to.So unless you 're trying to raise the whole Free Will philosophical discussion , the difference is blatantly obvious.There are no indigenous vegetarians .
None. You might reflect on that for a time .
Plants have nervous systems and memories .
I know a former raw food vegan fascist who had a revelation when she cried over murder of a food plant ( I promise you I am not making this up , I think it was a broccoli of all things ) and went back to feeding her body what it needed , a complete diet .
Life feeds on life and we 've evolved to eat meat.Human beings can survive perfectly fine on a diet of just vegetables as a matter of biology , your opinion .
Being capable of doing so as a matter of practical reality is different , which is why you do n't find indigenous peoples who are strictly vegetarian .
Because food scarcity means they have to take whatever food sources they can .
In the modern world , it 's a viable choice .
We 're not omnivores because we evolved to need meat , we 're omnivores because it expanded our potential nutrition sources.Oh and yeah , I feel the same way about killing plants for food as I do animals .
They do have far more " consciousness " than most give them credit for .
So I kill things to survive , including tasty animals , and do n't feel bad about it .
But I do n't tell myself that I need to eat animals .
Because I do n't , either in a biological sense nor a practical sense .
That would just be a rationalization.Bullshit , you invite the attention .
At least , you did with this comment .
It does n't bug you , it gratifies you .
Perhaps you 're a vegetarian just to annoy people , and you do n't even know it.I think the conspicuously vegetarian who are doing it for social posturing ( regardless of whatever other motivations ) are extremely annoying .
But simply talking about it in a discussion of a " vegetarian " spider is n't " inviting " attention in the way you imply anymore than someone saying that they are gay in a discussion of animal sexuality is inviting attention .
It 's only inviting your attention because you are annoyed by someone claiming they made a choice .
The question is : Did you choose to to be annoyed by the concept of free will and thus invite attention to your point of view with these asinine comments , or is it just nature ?
I see a pot here calling the kettle black .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Excuse me, what is the difference?
Perhaps the meat available to you (at least as far as your body knows) isn't very good, and so your body makes you want to eat vegetables.
You think that it's a conscious decision because people like to analyze stuff, but that doesn't mean that you actually made a conscious decision.
I'm not saying you didn't, but I argue that it's more likely that you're rationalizing something.There are plenty of vegetarians who like meat, but choose not to eat it for a variety of reasons.
So as you would put it their body "makes them want to eat meat", but they choose not to.So unless you're trying to raise the whole Free Will philosophical discussion, the difference is blatantly obvious.There are no indigenous vegetarians.
None. You might reflect on that for a time.
Plants have nervous systems and memories.
I know a former raw food vegan fascist who had a revelation when she cried over murder of a food plant (I promise you I am not making this up, I think it was a broccoli of all things) and went back to feeding her body what it needed, a complete diet.
Life feeds on life and we've evolved to eat meat.Human beings can survive perfectly fine on a diet of just vegetables as a matter of biology, your opinion.
Being capable of doing so as a matter of practical reality is different, which is why you don't find indigenous peoples who are strictly vegetarian.
Because food scarcity means they have to take whatever food sources they can.
In the modern world, it's a viable choice.
We're not omnivores because we evolved to need meat, we're omnivores because it expanded our potential nutrition sources.Oh and yeah, I feel the same way about killing plants for food as I do animals.
They do have far more "consciousness" than most give them credit for.
So I kill things to survive, including tasty animals, and don't feel bad about it.
But I don't tell myself that I need to eat animals.
Because I don't, either in a biological sense nor a practical sense.
That would just be a rationalization.Bullshit, you invite the attention.
At least, you did with this comment.
It doesn't bug you, it gratifies you.
Perhaps you're a vegetarian just to annoy people, and you don't even know it.I think the conspicuously vegetarian who are doing it for social posturing (regardless of whatever other motivations) are extremely annoying.
But simply talking about it in a discussion of a "vegetarian" spider isn't "inviting" attention in the way you imply anymore than someone saying that they are gay in a discussion of animal sexuality is inviting attention.
It's only inviting your attention because you are annoyed by someone claiming they made a choice.
The question is:  Did you choose to to be annoyed by the concept of free will and thus invite attention to your point of view with these asinine comments, or is it just nature?
I see a pot here calling the kettle black.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29742865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1255437480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a vegetarian, i find the term flexitarian annoying.  It's like a saying "I'm a virgin because I only do it doggy style".  i'm also annoyed by people who say they are lacto-ovo-pollo-pesci vegetarian.  They just don't eat cows.  No need to label that!  Seems more like they are trying to have a trendy label of their own.  i'm not looking for a label, i generally avoid mentioning it at all.  i just order what i want.</p><p>There's no reason to call this spider vegetarian.  It's a spider that eats mostly plants and the occasional bug.  It would be more accurate to say omnivore.  The term vegetarian couldn't apply to a non-sapient animal.  A dog that eats nothing but veggies isn't vegetarian, it's just eating what is available.  It's not making a *choice* to not eat animals.  These spiders aren't making a choice either.  They're following instinct to find an easier source of food.  It's an evolutionary change in strategy.  For me, it is a choice.  i am an omnivore choosing to not eat other animals.  These spiders aren't troubled over the treatment of factory farm animals, or worried about cholesterol or anything else.  They're just avoiding a crowded field of competition for food.</p><p>Yeah, it's very novel to see a spider nomming on plant matter, but rushing to call it vegetarian is as inane as calling anyone wearing all black goth.  They might just be wearing all black... or they might be a juggalo or Marylin Manson fan... or....</p><p>The other thing that bugs me is how much other people obsess about what i'm NOT eating.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a vegetarian , i find the term flexitarian annoying .
It 's like a saying " I 'm a virgin because I only do it doggy style " .
i 'm also annoyed by people who say they are lacto-ovo-pollo-pesci vegetarian .
They just do n't eat cows .
No need to label that !
Seems more like they are trying to have a trendy label of their own .
i 'm not looking for a label , i generally avoid mentioning it at all .
i just order what i want.There 's no reason to call this spider vegetarian .
It 's a spider that eats mostly plants and the occasional bug .
It would be more accurate to say omnivore .
The term vegetarian could n't apply to a non-sapient animal .
A dog that eats nothing but veggies is n't vegetarian , it 's just eating what is available .
It 's not making a * choice * to not eat animals .
These spiders are n't making a choice either .
They 're following instinct to find an easier source of food .
It 's an evolutionary change in strategy .
For me , it is a choice .
i am an omnivore choosing to not eat other animals .
These spiders are n't troubled over the treatment of factory farm animals , or worried about cholesterol or anything else .
They 're just avoiding a crowded field of competition for food.Yeah , it 's very novel to see a spider nomming on plant matter , but rushing to call it vegetarian is as inane as calling anyone wearing all black goth .
They might just be wearing all black... or they might be a juggalo or Marylin Manson fan... or....The other thing that bugs me is how much other people obsess about what i 'm NOT eating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a vegetarian, i find the term flexitarian annoying.
It's like a saying "I'm a virgin because I only do it doggy style".
i'm also annoyed by people who say they are lacto-ovo-pollo-pesci vegetarian.
They just don't eat cows.
No need to label that!
Seems more like they are trying to have a trendy label of their own.
i'm not looking for a label, i generally avoid mentioning it at all.
i just order what i want.There's no reason to call this spider vegetarian.
It's a spider that eats mostly plants and the occasional bug.
It would be more accurate to say omnivore.
The term vegetarian couldn't apply to a non-sapient animal.
A dog that eats nothing but veggies isn't vegetarian, it's just eating what is available.
It's not making a *choice* to not eat animals.
These spiders aren't making a choice either.
They're following instinct to find an easier source of food.
It's an evolutionary change in strategy.
For me, it is a choice.
i am an omnivore choosing to not eat other animals.
These spiders aren't troubled over the treatment of factory farm animals, or worried about cholesterol or anything else.
They're just avoiding a crowded field of competition for food.Yeah, it's very novel to see a spider nomming on plant matter, but rushing to call it vegetarian is as inane as calling anyone wearing all black goth.
They might just be wearing all black... or they might be a juggalo or Marylin Manson fan... or....The other thing that bugs me is how much other people obsess about what i'm NOT eating.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738643</id>
	<title>Damn, I've been tricked.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255434660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I went to read this thinking "Vegetarian Spider" might be the next Ubuntu code name, only to realize it's really about a vegetarian spider.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I went to read this thinking " Vegetarian Spider " might be the next Ubuntu code name , only to realize it 's really about a vegetarian spider .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I went to read this thinking "Vegetarian Spider" might be the next Ubuntu code name, only to realize it's really about a vegetarian spider.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29744087</id>
	<title>Re:Well, plenty of arachnids are vegetarians.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255532520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, spider mites are not spiders.  They are arachnids like spiders, scorpions and ticks, but they are mites.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , spider mites are not spiders .
They are arachnids like spiders , scorpions and ticks , but they are mites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, spider mites are not spiders.
They are arachnids like spiders, scorpions and ticks, but they are mites.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738503</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29742137</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255512840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Butthurt veggie-head detected.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Butthurt veggie-head detected .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Butthurt veggie-head detected.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29751243</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>laughing rabbit</author>
	<datestamp>1255522080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Vegetables are factory farmed, mono-cropped, and do have a nervous system. They are alive, and if those carrots stared back at you from your plate with big Bambi eyes, would you still eat them?</p><p>Just say that you are an animal chauvinist and be done with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Vegetables are factory farmed , mono-cropped , and do have a nervous system .
They are alive , and if those carrots stared back at you from your plate with big Bambi eyes , would you still eat them ? Just say that you are an animal chauvinist and be done with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Vegetables are factory farmed, mono-cropped, and do have a nervous system.
They are alive, and if those carrots stared back at you from your plate with big Bambi eyes, would you still eat them?Just say that you are an animal chauvinist and be done with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739485</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1255440600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, yeah, but what you got against meat anyway?  Sum wrong with you?  It's cool, I'm judging or anything.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , yeah , but what you got against meat anyway ?
Sum wrong with you ?
It 's cool , I 'm judging or anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, yeah, but what you got against meat anyway?
Sum wrong with you?
It's cool, I'm judging or anything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29747565</id>
	<title>Evolved?</title>
	<author>iso-cop</author>
	<datestamp>1255547280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not only are we throwing the word vegetarian around but also the word evolve.  The blog and the article it references do not give any basis for evolution.  The following concepts are related but far from being the same.
<br> <br>
From dictionary.com: <em>evolution: Biology. change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift.</em>
<br> <br>
From dictionary.com: <em>adaptation: Biology. a. any alteration in the structure or function of an organism or any of its parts that results from natural selection and by which the organism becomes better fitted to survive and multiply in its environment.</em>
<br> <br>
The spider continues to need protein as its primary diet but found a different source.  Other posters recognized similar situations.  For example, if a type of dog lives in an area with lots of rabbits it will probably eat rabbits and still be the same type of dog.  In the same way, it could be squirrels... or even peanuts!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only are we throwing the word vegetarian around but also the word evolve .
The blog and the article it references do not give any basis for evolution .
The following concepts are related but far from being the same .
From dictionary.com : evolution : Biology .
change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation , natural selection , and genetic drift .
From dictionary.com : adaptation : Biology .
a. any alteration in the structure or function of an organism or any of its parts that results from natural selection and by which the organism becomes better fitted to survive and multiply in its environment .
The spider continues to need protein as its primary diet but found a different source .
Other posters recognized similar situations .
For example , if a type of dog lives in an area with lots of rabbits it will probably eat rabbits and still be the same type of dog .
In the same way , it could be squirrels... or even peanuts !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only are we throwing the word vegetarian around but also the word evolve.
The blog and the article it references do not give any basis for evolution.
The following concepts are related but far from being the same.
From dictionary.com: evolution: Biology.
change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift.
From dictionary.com: adaptation: Biology.
a. any alteration in the structure or function of an organism or any of its parts that results from natural selection and by which the organism becomes better fitted to survive and multiply in its environment.
The spider continues to need protein as its primary diet but found a different source.
Other posters recognized similar situations.
For example, if a type of dog lives in an area with lots of rabbits it will probably eat rabbits and still be the same type of dog.
In the same way, it could be squirrels... or even peanuts!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738637</id>
	<title>Keep Reading...</title>
	<author>swanzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1255434660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>FTA:<p><div class="quote"><p>Plesiometa Argyra is a fairly common fly and mosquito catching spider in Costa Rica. Every day of its life it weaves a flimsy circular web to catch its prey - unless it gets stung by a Hymenoepimecis argyraphaga wasp. That&rsquo;s where this spider&rsquo;s life gets, well, very interesting.

The wasp sting briefly paralyzes the spider and eventually turns it into a zombie.</p></div><p>
Unfortunately, one must read about a boring vegetarian spider to find out that there exists something as mind-blowing as a <strong>zombie spider</strong></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTA : Plesiometa Argyra is a fairly common fly and mosquito catching spider in Costa Rica .
Every day of its life it weaves a flimsy circular web to catch its prey - unless it gets stung by a Hymenoepimecis argyraphaga wasp .
That    s where this spider    s life gets , well , very interesting .
The wasp sting briefly paralyzes the spider and eventually turns it into a zombie .
Unfortunately , one must read about a boring vegetarian spider to find out that there exists something as mind-blowing as a zombie spider</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTA:Plesiometa Argyra is a fairly common fly and mosquito catching spider in Costa Rica.
Every day of its life it weaves a flimsy circular web to catch its prey - unless it gets stung by a Hymenoepimecis argyraphaga wasp.
That’s where this spider’s life gets, well, very interesting.
The wasp sting briefly paralyzes the spider and eventually turns it into a zombie.
Unfortunately, one must read about a boring vegetarian spider to find out that there exists something as mind-blowing as a zombie spider
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29743767</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255530960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just as an aside, I didn't know or care about what you ate until you started bloviating about it here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just as an aside , I did n't know or care about what you ate until you started bloviating about it here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just as an aside, I didn't know or care about what you ate until you started bloviating about it here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29745265</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>wastedlife</author>
	<datestamp>1255537260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not a vegetarian myself, but I agree that they should not call this spider vegetarian. When talking about animal diets, there are 3 main categories:</p><p>Hebivores: Consume mainly plants.<br>Carnivores: Consume mainly other animals.<br>Omnivores: Consume a mix of plants and animals.</p><p>Depending on how frequently this spider eats other animals, it would most likely be classified as an herbivore or an omnivore. I believe humans are classified as omnivores, but some make a choice to eat only plants(are there any meatatarians?). As a species, they are still omnivorous, but as a personal choice they are vegetarian.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not a vegetarian myself , but I agree that they should not call this spider vegetarian .
When talking about animal diets , there are 3 main categories : Hebivores : Consume mainly plants.Carnivores : Consume mainly other animals.Omnivores : Consume a mix of plants and animals.Depending on how frequently this spider eats other animals , it would most likely be classified as an herbivore or an omnivore .
I believe humans are classified as omnivores , but some make a choice to eat only plants ( are there any meatatarians ? ) .
As a species , they are still omnivorous , but as a personal choice they are vegetarian .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not a vegetarian myself, but I agree that they should not call this spider vegetarian.
When talking about animal diets, there are 3 main categories:Hebivores: Consume mainly plants.Carnivores: Consume mainly other animals.Omnivores: Consume a mix of plants and animals.Depending on how frequently this spider eats other animals, it would most likely be classified as an herbivore or an omnivore.
I believe humans are classified as omnivores, but some make a choice to eat only plants(are there any meatatarians?).
As a species, they are still omnivorous, but as a personal choice they are vegetarian.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29744339</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>Jason Levine</author>
	<datestamp>1255533600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Besides all that, there's already a perfectly valid term to use to describe a spider that eats only plants (ignoring that "occasional ant attacker or ant larvae" thing for a second): an Herbivore.  That's an animal that eats only plants.  A vegetarian, as you said, is an animal (such as a human) that *can* eat meat but makes a conscious decision to only eat plants.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Besides all that , there 's already a perfectly valid term to use to describe a spider that eats only plants ( ignoring that " occasional ant attacker or ant larvae " thing for a second ) : an Herbivore .
That 's an animal that eats only plants .
A vegetarian , as you said , is an animal ( such as a human ) that * can * eat meat but makes a conscious decision to only eat plants .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Besides all that, there's already a perfectly valid term to use to describe a spider that eats only plants (ignoring that "occasional ant attacker or ant larvae" thing for a second): an Herbivore.
That's an animal that eats only plants.
A vegetarian, as you said, is an animal (such as a human) that *can* eat meat but makes a conscious decision to only eat plants.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740427</id>
	<title>wow that is cool</title>
	<author>Dan667</author>
	<datestamp>1255448280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>it is almost like the spider evolved because of the challenge to be vegetarian (or omnivore) more than vegetarian being an easy food source.</htmltext>
<tokenext>it is almost like the spider evolved because of the challenge to be vegetarian ( or omnivore ) more than vegetarian being an easy food source .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it is almost like the spider evolved because of the challenge to be vegetarian (or omnivore) more than vegetarian being an easy food source.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29744273</id>
	<title>Re:Keep Reading...</title>
	<author>pwfffff</author>
	<datestamp>1255533300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A whole 50mg? Everyone knows the craziest drugs are measured in micrograms.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A whole 50mg ?
Everyone knows the craziest drugs are measured in micrograms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A whole 50mg?
Everyone knows the craziest drugs are measured in micrograms.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739029</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739047</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255437180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because it's a reasonably close approximation and not everyone wants to turn 'what do you eat' into some kind of lengthy debate (only some people do).</p><p>That and 'pescetarian' is a goofy word.</p><p>Most people say that they 'eat meat', rather than "I eat cow, pig, chicken and fish, with a turkey here and there on special occasions. Ditto for lamb. Horse, dog, cat, guinea pigs are off limits. Rabbit maybe, but not raccoon. Crabs, lobsters and shrimp are okay, but insects are not...etc, etc".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because it 's a reasonably close approximation and not everyone wants to turn 'what do you eat ' into some kind of lengthy debate ( only some people do ) .That and 'pescetarian ' is a goofy word.Most people say that they 'eat meat ' , rather than " I eat cow , pig , chicken and fish , with a turkey here and there on special occasions .
Ditto for lamb .
Horse , dog , cat , guinea pigs are off limits .
Rabbit maybe , but not raccoon .
Crabs , lobsters and shrimp are okay , but insects are not...etc , etc " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because it's a reasonably close approximation and not everyone wants to turn 'what do you eat' into some kind of lengthy debate (only some people do).That and 'pescetarian' is a goofy word.Most people say that they 'eat meat', rather than "I eat cow, pig, chicken and fish, with a turkey here and there on special occasions.
Ditto for lamb.
Horse, dog, cat, guinea pigs are off limits.
Rabbit maybe, but not raccoon.
Crabs, lobsters and shrimp are okay, but insects are not...etc, etc".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740205</id>
	<title>Bacon is a vegetable</title>
	<author>Hillgiant</author>
	<datestamp>1255446360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And I resent your insinuation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I resent your insinuation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I resent your insinuation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29747433</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>AugstWest</author>
	<datestamp>1255546740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, that would *sort of* make the name make sense. Bagheera was a black panther in Rudyard Kipling's Jungle Book (read it if you haven't, to yourself or to your kids), who was most definitely carnivorous. I can understand taking your possibly only chance to name a spider to honor (or honour, I guess) Kipling, but it seems odd to name a vegetarian spider after an accomplished hunter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , that would * sort of * make the name make sense .
Bagheera was a black panther in Rudyard Kipling 's Jungle Book ( read it if you have n't , to yourself or to your kids ) , who was most definitely carnivorous .
I can understand taking your possibly only chance to name a spider to honor ( or honour , I guess ) Kipling , but it seems odd to name a vegetarian spider after an accomplished hunter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, that would *sort of* make the name make sense.
Bagheera was a black panther in Rudyard Kipling's Jungle Book (read it if you haven't, to yourself or to your kids), who was most definitely carnivorous.
I can understand taking your possibly only chance to name a spider to honor (or honour, I guess) Kipling, but it seems odd to name a vegetarian spider after an accomplished hunter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29743335</id>
	<title>False</title>
	<author>Snaller</author>
	<datestamp>1255528500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Making a choice is NOT relevant. It's what you eat, not why you eat it that defines 'vegetarian'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Making a choice is NOT relevant .
It 's what you eat , not why you eat it that defines 'vegetarian'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Making a choice is NOT relevant.
It's what you eat, not why you eat it that defines 'vegetarian'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29747097</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>VIPERsssss</author>
	<datestamp>1255545300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>... i generally avoid mentioning it at all.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>And yet, here you are.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)

Seriously, though, thanks for not getting all Preachy McPreacher and telling us what we should or should not be eating.
I can't stand those people.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... i generally avoid mentioning it at all .
...And yet , here you are .
; - ) Seriously , though , thanks for not getting all Preachy McPreacher and telling us what we should or should not be eating .
I ca n't stand those people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... i generally avoid mentioning it at all.
...And yet, here you are.
;-)

Seriously, though, thanks for not getting all Preachy McPreacher and telling us what we should or should not be eating.
I can't stand those people.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739901</id>
	<title>Salad  Food</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255443660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Salad<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:= What Food Eats</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Salad : = What Food Eats</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Salad := What Food Eats</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738557</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>atheistmonk</author>
	<datestamp>1255434180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A lot of pescetarians seem to classify themselves as vegetarians for some reason. I don't think you have an excuse when it comes to a little beef, though.

The real question is do the spiders eat eggs or milk?</htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of pescetarians seem to classify themselves as vegetarians for some reason .
I do n't think you have an excuse when it comes to a little beef , though .
The real question is do the spiders eat eggs or milk ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of pescetarians seem to classify themselves as vegetarians for some reason.
I don't think you have an excuse when it comes to a little beef, though.
The real question is do the spiders eat eggs or milk?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740635</id>
	<title>Since they've discovered a vegetarian spider...</title>
	<author>hyades1</author>
	<datestamp>1255450020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...can a flesh-eating hamster be far behind? </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...can a flesh-eating hamster be far behind ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...can a flesh-eating hamster be far behind? </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29742083</id>
	<title>Albert Einstein was vegetarian</title>
	<author>sarkku</author>
	<datestamp>1255512420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was curious to know why they had put Einstein's photo to the news. After little bit of searching I found the answer, he was a \_vegetarian\_!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was curious to know why they had put Einstein 's photo to the news .
After little bit of searching I found the answer , he was a \ _vegetarian \ _ !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was curious to know why they had put Einstein's photo to the news.
After little bit of searching I found the answer, he was a \_vegetarian\_!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739273</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>dakameleon</author>
	<datestamp>1255438800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They just don't eat cows.  No need to label that! </p></div><p>Err, how about "Hindu"?</p><p>(and before I get the brigade marching in here claiming all manner of insults, I'm Hindu).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They just do n't eat cows .
No need to label that !
Err , how about " Hindu " ?
( and before I get the brigade marching in here claiming all manner of insults , I 'm Hindu ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They just don't eat cows.
No need to label that!
Err, how about "Hindu"?
(and before I get the brigade marching in here claiming all manner of insults, I'm Hindu).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29741455</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255459980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are omnivores as are bears and sharks.  They called the spider flexarian because its diet is still quit limited (leaves AND ants *gasp*) by our bear-like standards.  Save your annoyance for something else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are omnivores as are bears and sharks .
They called the spider flexarian because its diet is still quit limited ( leaves AND ants * gasp * ) by our bear-like standards .
Save your annoyance for something else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are omnivores as are bears and sharks.
They called the spider flexarian because its diet is still quit limited (leaves AND ants *gasp*) by our bear-like standards.
Save your annoyance for something else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738537</id>
	<title>You don't make friends with salad</title>
	<author>atheistmonk</author>
	<datestamp>1255434060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Their go the friendship prospects with the neighbourhood arachnids.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Their go the friendship prospects with the neighbourhood arachnids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their go the friendship prospects with the neighbourhood arachnids.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29743273</id>
	<title>Old News</title>
	<author>boulat</author>
	<datestamp>1255528080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh this is great, over a year old news<br><a href="http://greenupgrader.com/3119/discovery-vegetarian-spiders/" title="greenupgrader.com" rel="nofollow">http://greenupgrader.com/3119/discovery-vegetarian-spiders/</a> [greenupgrader.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh this is great , over a year old newshttp : //greenupgrader.com/3119/discovery-vegetarian-spiders/ [ greenupgrader.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh this is great, over a year old newshttp://greenupgrader.com/3119/discovery-vegetarian-spiders/ [greenupgrader.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29747233</id>
	<title>Re:"Emo" not "Goth"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255545840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Goth" is a sad 90's sub-culture</p></div><p> God, I miss the 90's! The mops where better then. Sniff!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Goth " is a sad 90 's sub-culture God , I miss the 90 's !
The mops where better then .
Sniff !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Goth" is a sad 90's sub-culture God, I miss the 90's!
The mops where better then.
Sniff!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740705</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29741309</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255457940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> For me, it is a choice.  i am an omnivore choosing to not eat <b>other</b> animals.  </p></div><p>So...  what animals do you eat then?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For me , it is a choice .
i am an omnivore choosing to not eat other animals .
So... what animals do you eat then ?
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext> For me, it is a choice.
i am an omnivore choosing to not eat other animals.
So...  what animals do you eat then?
:P
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29741539</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>osu-neko</author>
	<datestamp>1255461240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The term vegetarian couldn't apply to a non-sapient animal.</p></div><p>At least, not without confusing people who lack the intelligence to figure out when people are speaking figuratively.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The term vegetarian could n't apply to a non-sapient animal.At least , not without confusing people who lack the intelligence to figure out when people are speaking figuratively .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The term vegetarian couldn't apply to a non-sapient animal.At least, not without confusing people who lack the intelligence to figure out when people are speaking figuratively.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738503</id>
	<title>Well, plenty of arachnids are vegetarians.</title>
	<author>Rei</author>
	<datestamp>1255433940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For example, spider mites.  Infestations of them are frustratingly difficult to get rid of.  They're so tiny that it stretches the bounds of human vision to spot them -- although their webbing is generally easily visible when infestations are bad.  Their mouthpieces are designed to cut open individual plant cells.  Since they're not insects, many conventional insecticides don't work on them -- for example, acetamiprid.</p><p>Of course, then there are the predatory mites that eat the spider mites...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For example , spider mites .
Infestations of them are frustratingly difficult to get rid of .
They 're so tiny that it stretches the bounds of human vision to spot them -- although their webbing is generally easily visible when infestations are bad .
Their mouthpieces are designed to cut open individual plant cells .
Since they 're not insects , many conventional insecticides do n't work on them -- for example , acetamiprid.Of course , then there are the predatory mites that eat the spider mites.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For example, spider mites.
Infestations of them are frustratingly difficult to get rid of.
They're so tiny that it stretches the bounds of human vision to spot them -- although their webbing is generally easily visible when infestations are bad.
Their mouthpieces are designed to cut open individual plant cells.
Since they're not insects, many conventional insecticides don't work on them -- for example, acetamiprid.Of course, then there are the predatory mites that eat the spider mites...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738579</id>
	<title>writes on a spider</title>
	<author>emeraldemon</author>
	<datestamp>1255434300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Smivs writes with word on a spider..."

My first thought when reading this was "What kind of computer is a spider?"  followed by "Why isn't he using Open Office?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Smivs writes with word on a spider... " My first thought when reading this was " What kind of computer is a spider ?
" followed by " Why is n't he using Open Office ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Smivs writes with word on a spider..."

My first thought when reading this was "What kind of computer is a spider?
"  followed by "Why isn't he using Open Office?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738733</id>
	<title>Re:Well, plenty of arachnids are vegetarians.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255435080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Well, plenty of arachnids are vegetarians"</p><p>Only the trendy ones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Well , plenty of arachnids are vegetarians " Only the trendy ones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Well, plenty of arachnids are vegetarians"Only the trendy ones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738503</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740255</id>
	<title>Re:Keep Reading...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255446840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the wasp that creates zombie cockroaches is more interesting.</p><p>http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2008/06/the\_wasp\_that\_walks\_cockroaches.php</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the wasp that creates zombie cockroaches is more interesting.http : //scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2008/06/the \ _wasp \ _that \ _walks \ _cockroaches.php</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the wasp that creates zombie cockroaches is more interesting.http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2008/06/the\_wasp\_that\_walks\_cockroaches.php</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738637</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29743137</id>
	<title>DG jean man &amp; Chanel Wallet &amp; Dior Sunglas</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255526880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Http://www.tntshoes.com</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; We offer kinds of Newest Style Handbag,Brand Handbag,Fashion Handbags,<br>Ladies' Leather Handbag,Replica Handbag--AmmonOnline<br>We ship to worldwide by EMS,TNT,DHL,UPS.<br>We supply you with smooth and fast services, and do dorp shipping.<br>Welcome to visit our factory.<br>Please visit our Website:www.tntshoes.com  or products Album,</p><p>Contact us now, We can send you more details.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; OUR WEBSITE:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; HTTP://www.tntshoes.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Http : //www.tntshoes.com     We offer kinds of Newest Style Handbag,Brand Handbag,Fashion Handbags,Ladies ' Leather Handbag,Replica Handbag--AmmonOnlineWe ship to worldwide by EMS,TNT,DHL,UPS.We supply you with smooth and fast services , and do dorp shipping.Welcome to visit our factory.Please visit our Website : www.tntshoes.com or products Album,Contact us now , We can send you more details .
      OUR WEBSITE :                                                               YAHOO : shoppertrade @ yahoo.com.cn                                                                 MSN : shoppertrade @ hotmail.com                                                                           HTTP : //www.tntshoes.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Http://www.tntshoes.com
    We offer kinds of Newest Style Handbag,Brand Handbag,Fashion Handbags,Ladies' Leather Handbag,Replica Handbag--AmmonOnlineWe ship to worldwide by EMS,TNT,DHL,UPS.We supply you with smooth and fast services, and do dorp shipping.Welcome to visit our factory.Please visit our Website:www.tntshoes.com  or products Album,Contact us now, We can send you more details.
      OUR WEBSITE:
                                                              YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn
                                                                MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com
                                                                          HTTP://www.tntshoes.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738971</id>
	<title>so this spider has ceased the war on insects</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255436700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and settled down as a benign vegetarian</p><p>give that spider the nobel peace prize</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and settled down as a benign vegetariangive that spider the nobel peace prize</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and settled down as a benign vegetariangive that spider the nobel peace prize</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29746821</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255543920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>whats wrong with being accurate, i think you just dont want the trendiness of your title to be obscured by these other options....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>whats wrong with being accurate , i think you just dont want the trendiness of your title to be obscured by these other options... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>whats wrong with being accurate, i think you just dont want the trendiness of your title to be obscured by these other options....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499</id>
	<title>Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>lyinhart</author>
	<datestamp>1255433940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>From TFA: "The truth is, this spider isn&rsquo;t a complete vegetarian &ndash; more of a flexitarian: it still snacks on the occasional ant attacker or ant larvae." So it's kind of like those people who say they're vegetarian, but "eat a little fish" or "a little beef."<br> <br>

I'm still waiting for <a href="http://www.peta.org/" title="peta.org" rel="nofollow">PETA</a> [peta.org] to release some propaganda relating to this story...</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : " The truth is , this spider isn    t a complete vegetarian    more of a flexitarian : it still snacks on the occasional ant attacker or ant larvae .
" So it 's kind of like those people who say they 're vegetarian , but " eat a little fish " or " a little beef .
" I 'm still waiting for PETA [ peta.org ] to release some propaganda relating to this story.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA: "The truth is, this spider isn’t a complete vegetarian – more of a flexitarian: it still snacks on the occasional ant attacker or ant larvae.
" So it's kind of like those people who say they're vegetarian, but "eat a little fish" or "a little beef.
" 

I'm still waiting for PETA [peta.org] to release some propaganda relating to this story...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29744729</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255535100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right because CHOICE is what defines "vegetarian"... guess someone better tell all the cows.</p><p>and actually by your logic of being an omnivore who chooses to abstain from meat, non-sapient are the MOST likely to have the claim of being vegetarian not the opposite.</p><p>Most hunger starved human "vegetarians" would probably eat meat (especially if it was disguised) if given long enough.. and moreover CAN physically eat the meat; A cow on the other hand with lack of vegetation isn't going to be physically able to sustain itself even if somehow tricked into eating meat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right because CHOICE is what defines " vegetarian " ... guess someone better tell all the cows.and actually by your logic of being an omnivore who chooses to abstain from meat , non-sapient are the MOST likely to have the claim of being vegetarian not the opposite.Most hunger starved human " vegetarians " would probably eat meat ( especially if it was disguised ) if given long enough.. and moreover CAN physically eat the meat ; A cow on the other hand with lack of vegetation is n't going to be physically able to sustain itself even if somehow tricked into eating meat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right because CHOICE is what defines "vegetarian"... guess someone better tell all the cows.and actually by your logic of being an omnivore who chooses to abstain from meat, non-sapient are the MOST likely to have the claim of being vegetarian not the opposite.Most hunger starved human "vegetarians" would probably eat meat (especially if it was disguised) if given long enough.. and moreover CAN physically eat the meat; A cow on the other hand with lack of vegetation isn't going to be physically able to sustain itself even if somehow tricked into eating meat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739029</id>
	<title>Re:Keep Reading...</title>
	<author>BikeHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1255437060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Funny? Informative!</p><p>If we can control a bug with electrodes, it's not unfeasible that an arachnid could be controlled by chemicals from larva.</p><p>Rather scary, actually. It makes me proud to be a big mentally strong human being - which in truth, can get knocked out by about 50mg of some chemicals.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny ?
Informative ! If we can control a bug with electrodes , it 's not unfeasible that an arachnid could be controlled by chemicals from larva.Rather scary , actually .
It makes me proud to be a big mentally strong human being - which in truth , can get knocked out by about 50mg of some chemicals .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny?
Informative!If we can control a bug with electrodes, it's not unfeasible that an arachnid could be controlled by chemicals from larva.Rather scary, actually.
It makes me proud to be a big mentally strong human being - which in truth, can get knocked out by about 50mg of some chemicals.
:P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738637</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740607</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>Trogre</author>
	<datestamp>1255449840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So why should <em>you</em> deserve a label, while others don't?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So why should you deserve a label , while others do n't ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So why should you deserve a label, while others don't?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740705</id>
	<title>"Emo" not "Goth"</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1255450680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Yeah, it's very novel to see a spider nomming on plant matter, but rushing to call it vegetarian is as inane as calling anyone wearing all black goth. They might just be wearing all black...</i></p><p>Aparently it's changed since we were young. "Goth" is a sad 90's sub-culture, but wearing black and mopping around while declaring your hate for everything is "Emo" (which I think is short for emotionally crippled fashion victim).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , it 's very novel to see a spider nomming on plant matter , but rushing to call it vegetarian is as inane as calling anyone wearing all black goth .
They might just be wearing all black...Aparently it 's changed since we were young .
" Goth " is a sad 90 's sub-culture , but wearing black and mopping around while declaring your hate for everything is " Emo " ( which I think is short for emotionally crippled fashion victim ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, it's very novel to see a spider nomming on plant matter, but rushing to call it vegetarian is as inane as calling anyone wearing all black goth.
They might just be wearing all black...Aparently it's changed since we were young.
"Goth" is a sad 90's sub-culture, but wearing black and mopping around while declaring your hate for everything is "Emo" (which I think is short for emotionally crippled fashion victim).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29749517</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255512540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... and went back to feeding her body what it needed, a <em>complete diet</em>. Life feeds on life and we've evolved to eat meat.</p><p>Bullshit, you invite the attention. At least, you did with this comment. It doesn't bug you, it gratifies you. Perhaps you're a vegetarian just to annoy people, and you don't even know it.</p></div><p>No account, so I can't mod you a troll, but I sure can post it. Read a book or two and get back to us on 'complete diets'.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... and went back to feeding her body what it needed , a complete diet .
Life feeds on life and we 've evolved to eat meat.Bullshit , you invite the attention .
At least , you did with this comment .
It does n't bug you , it gratifies you .
Perhaps you 're a vegetarian just to annoy people , and you do n't even know it.No account , so I ca n't mod you a troll , but I sure can post it .
Read a book or two and get back to us on 'complete diets' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... and went back to feeding her body what it needed, a complete diet.
Life feeds on life and we've evolved to eat meat.Bullshit, you invite the attention.
At least, you did with this comment.
It doesn't bug you, it gratifies you.
Perhaps you're a vegetarian just to annoy people, and you don't even know it.No account, so I can't mod you a troll, but I sure can post it.
Read a book or two and get back to us on 'complete diets'.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29742865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29741461</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>PCM2</author>
	<datestamp>1255460100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>For me, it is a choice. i am an omnivore choosing to not eat other animals. These spiders aren't troubled over the treatment of factory farm animals, or worried about cholesterol or anything else.</p> </div><p>Perhaps I'm quibbling, but I hope you see that what is true of the spider is also true of a lot of human vegetarians, as well.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For me , it is a choice .
i am an omnivore choosing to not eat other animals .
These spiders are n't troubled over the treatment of factory farm animals , or worried about cholesterol or anything else .
Perhaps I 'm quibbling , but I hope you see that what is true of the spider is also true of a lot of human vegetarians , as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For me, it is a choice.
i am an omnivore choosing to not eat other animals.
These spiders aren't troubled over the treatment of factory farm animals, or worried about cholesterol or anything else.
Perhaps I'm quibbling, but I hope you see that what is true of the spider is also true of a lot of human vegetarians, as well.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29745621</id>
	<title>Re:OLD NEWS</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1255538760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And how many people here do you honestly believe follow the world of spiders? Do I get to make fun of you now for not knowing the stats of various football players, or anime release times, or some other bullshit you're normally not interested in? This is a story because it was finally published, which means it's cast to a broader audience than just arachnophiles. Get off your high horse.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And how many people here do you honestly believe follow the world of spiders ?
Do I get to make fun of you now for not knowing the stats of various football players , or anime release times , or some other bullshit you 're normally not interested in ?
This is a story because it was finally published , which means it 's cast to a broader audience than just arachnophiles .
Get off your high horse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And how many people here do you honestly believe follow the world of spiders?
Do I get to make fun of you now for not knowing the stats of various football players, or anime release times, or some other bullshit you're normally not interested in?
This is a story because it was finally published, which means it's cast to a broader audience than just arachnophiles.
Get off your high horse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739439</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739737</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1255442520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Yeah, it's very novel to see a spider nomming on plant matter, but rushing to call it vegetarian is as inane as calling anyone wearing all black goth. They might just be wearing all black... or they might be a juggalo or Marylin Manson fan... or....</p></div></blockquote><p>Or as a tribute to the original <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfI9B8e9tW4" title="youtube.com">Man In Black</a> [youtube.com].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , it 's very novel to see a spider nomming on plant matter , but rushing to call it vegetarian is as inane as calling anyone wearing all black goth .
They might just be wearing all black... or they might be a juggalo or Marylin Manson fan... or....Or as a tribute to the original Man In Black [ youtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, it's very novel to see a spider nomming on plant matter, but rushing to call it vegetarian is as inane as calling anyone wearing all black goth.
They might just be wearing all black... or they might be a juggalo or Marylin Manson fan... or....Or as a tribute to the original Man In Black [youtube.com].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738825</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255435620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't think you have an excuse when it comes to a little beef, though.</p></div><p>It's yummy. What more excuses could you possibly need? The case for ant larvae is a little less clear cut, but whatever floats their boat.<br>I wouldn't have a problem with classifying a person who ate meat once or twice a year as "largely vegetarian", and I'll graciously extend my offer to these spiders.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think you have an excuse when it comes to a little beef , though.It 's yummy .
What more excuses could you possibly need ?
The case for ant larvae is a little less clear cut , but whatever floats their boat.I would n't have a problem with classifying a person who ate meat once or twice a year as " largely vegetarian " , and I 'll graciously extend my offer to these spiders .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think you have an excuse when it comes to a little beef, though.It's yummy.
What more excuses could you possibly need?
The case for ant larvae is a little less clear cut, but whatever floats their boat.I wouldn't have a problem with classifying a person who ate meat once or twice a year as "largely vegetarian", and I'll graciously extend my offer to these spiders.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29742865</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255523940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As an omnivore who knows what shape his teeth are (I see them in the mirror every morning, more slashdotters ought to try looking in one occasionally) I find anyone who wants to talk about how vegetarian they are critically annoying, and I was born and "raised" in Santa Cruz which is hippie to the tits. Because it's a college town it's full of young people (I finally get to say that, although I noticed this when I was younger than they were) desperately trying to attach a label to themselves that will make someone think they are cool. <em>It doesn't work</em>, at least after college. Repeatedly and publicly calling yourself a vegetarian is your right, but it's kind of like fraternity/sorority lite. Recognition without commitment.</p><p>There are <em>no</em> indigenous vegetarians. <strong>None</strong>. You might reflect on that for a time. Plants have nervous systems and memories. I know a former raw food vegan fascist who had a revelation when she cried over murder of a food plant (I promise you I am not making this up, I think it was a <em>broccoli</em> of all things) and went back to feeding her body what it needed, a <em>complete diet</em>. Life feeds on life and we've evolved to eat meat.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It's not making a *choice* to not eat animals. These spiders aren't making a choice either. They're following instinct to find an easier source of food. It's an evolutionary change in strategy. For me, it is a choice.</p></div><p>Excuse me, what is the difference? Perhaps the meat available to you (at least as far as your body knows) isn't very good, and so your body makes you want to eat vegetables. You think that it's a conscious decision because people like to analyze stuff, but that doesn't mean that you actually made a conscious decision. I'm not saying you didn't, but I argue that it's more likely that you're rationalizing something.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The other thing that bugs me is how much other people obsess about what i'm NOT eating.</p></div><p>Bullshit, you invite the attention. At least, you did with this comment. It doesn't bug you, it gratifies you. Perhaps you're a vegetarian just to annoy people, and you don't even know it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As an omnivore who knows what shape his teeth are ( I see them in the mirror every morning , more slashdotters ought to try looking in one occasionally ) I find anyone who wants to talk about how vegetarian they are critically annoying , and I was born and " raised " in Santa Cruz which is hippie to the tits .
Because it 's a college town it 's full of young people ( I finally get to say that , although I noticed this when I was younger than they were ) desperately trying to attach a label to themselves that will make someone think they are cool .
It does n't work , at least after college .
Repeatedly and publicly calling yourself a vegetarian is your right , but it 's kind of like fraternity/sorority lite .
Recognition without commitment.There are no indigenous vegetarians .
None. You might reflect on that for a time .
Plants have nervous systems and memories .
I know a former raw food vegan fascist who had a revelation when she cried over murder of a food plant ( I promise you I am not making this up , I think it was a broccoli of all things ) and went back to feeding her body what it needed , a complete diet .
Life feeds on life and we 've evolved to eat meat.It 's not making a * choice * to not eat animals .
These spiders are n't making a choice either .
They 're following instinct to find an easier source of food .
It 's an evolutionary change in strategy .
For me , it is a choice.Excuse me , what is the difference ?
Perhaps the meat available to you ( at least as far as your body knows ) is n't very good , and so your body makes you want to eat vegetables .
You think that it 's a conscious decision because people like to analyze stuff , but that does n't mean that you actually made a conscious decision .
I 'm not saying you did n't , but I argue that it 's more likely that you 're rationalizing something.The other thing that bugs me is how much other people obsess about what i 'm NOT eating.Bullshit , you invite the attention .
At least , you did with this comment .
It does n't bug you , it gratifies you .
Perhaps you 're a vegetarian just to annoy people , and you do n't even know it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an omnivore who knows what shape his teeth are (I see them in the mirror every morning, more slashdotters ought to try looking in one occasionally) I find anyone who wants to talk about how vegetarian they are critically annoying, and I was born and "raised" in Santa Cruz which is hippie to the tits.
Because it's a college town it's full of young people (I finally get to say that, although I noticed this when I was younger than they were) desperately trying to attach a label to themselves that will make someone think they are cool.
It doesn't work, at least after college.
Repeatedly and publicly calling yourself a vegetarian is your right, but it's kind of like fraternity/sorority lite.
Recognition without commitment.There are no indigenous vegetarians.
None. You might reflect on that for a time.
Plants have nervous systems and memories.
I know a former raw food vegan fascist who had a revelation when she cried over murder of a food plant (I promise you I am not making this up, I think it was a broccoli of all things) and went back to feeding her body what it needed, a complete diet.
Life feeds on life and we've evolved to eat meat.It's not making a *choice* to not eat animals.
These spiders aren't making a choice either.
They're following instinct to find an easier source of food.
It's an evolutionary change in strategy.
For me, it is a choice.Excuse me, what is the difference?
Perhaps the meat available to you (at least as far as your body knows) isn't very good, and so your body makes you want to eat vegetables.
You think that it's a conscious decision because people like to analyze stuff, but that doesn't mean that you actually made a conscious decision.
I'm not saying you didn't, but I argue that it's more likely that you're rationalizing something.The other thing that bugs me is how much other people obsess about what i'm NOT eating.Bullshit, you invite the attention.
At least, you did with this comment.
It doesn't bug you, it gratifies you.
Perhaps you're a vegetarian just to annoy people, and you don't even know it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738683</id>
	<title>More evidence that Vegetarianism is emasculating</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255434840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091012121331.htm" title="sciencedaily.com">http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091012121331.htm</a> [sciencedaily.com]</p><p>" with hints of males helping to care for eggs and young, another behavior that is virtually unknown among spiders. "</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091012121331.htm [ sciencedaily.com ] " with hints of males helping to care for eggs and young , another behavior that is virtually unknown among spiders .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091012121331.htm [sciencedaily.com]" with hints of males helping to care for eggs and young, another behavior that is virtually unknown among spiders.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740023</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255444680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is your label (that  you "generally avoid mentioning it at all", but post publicly on the Internet) working out for you?  Stop bringing it up, and people will stop "obsessing" about it, as if anyone but you really cares.  What a self-absorbed twit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is your label ( that you " generally avoid mentioning it at all " , but post publicly on the Internet ) working out for you ?
Stop bringing it up , and people will stop " obsessing " about it , as if anyone but you really cares .
What a self-absorbed twit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is your label (that  you "generally avoid mentioning it at all", but post publicly on the Internet) working out for you?
Stop bringing it up, and people will stop "obsessing" about it, as if anyone but you really cares.
What a self-absorbed twit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29745017</id>
	<title>Re:Well, plenty of arachnids are vegetarians.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255536300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know if all mites are arachnids, but not all arachnids are spiders.  e.g. scorpions.</p><p>Spider mites are not spiders.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know if all mites are arachnids , but not all arachnids are spiders .
e.g. scorpions.Spider mites are not spiders .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know if all mites are arachnids, but not all arachnids are spiders.
e.g. scorpions.Spider mites are not spiders.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740911</id>
	<title>Re:Semi-Vegetarian</title>
	<author>genner</author>
	<datestamp>1255452840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The term vegetarian couldn't apply to a non-sapient animal. </p></div><p>What would you call an animal that eats only vegatables and would starve itself if you gave it only meat?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The term vegetarian could n't apply to a non-sapient animal .
What would you call an animal that eats only vegatables and would starve itself if you gave it only meat ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The term vegetarian couldn't apply to a non-sapient animal.
What would you call an animal that eats only vegatables and would starve itself if you gave it only meat?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29751339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738683
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29746821
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29747233
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740705
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29744339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29745017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739405
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738503
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738557
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29743335
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29745851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29742865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29741461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29741539
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29751243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29745265
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29741455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739273
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738637
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29742137
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29744087
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738503
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29748865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29742865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29747097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738503
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740607
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740079
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738683
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29743767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740205
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29745621
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739439
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29749517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29742865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29744273
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739029
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738637
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29741309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739485
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739047
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738557
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29747433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29744729
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29747027
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_13_2113255_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740101
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_13_2113255.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29747565
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_13_2113255.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738537
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_13_2113255.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738683
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740079
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29751339
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_13_2113255.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739199
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_13_2113255.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738499
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738557
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739047
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738825
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29747027
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739085
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29743767
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740705
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29747233
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29744339
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740607
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29741455
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29742137
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29751243
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29741461
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29742865
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29748865
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29745851
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29749517
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29743335
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739273
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740911
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29744729
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29741539
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29747097
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29746821
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29741309
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739485
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739737
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29745265
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740023
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740205
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740101
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29747433
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_13_2113255.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738503
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739405
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29745017
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738733
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29744087
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_13_2113255.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740635
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_13_2113255.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739439
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29745621
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_13_2113255.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738643
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_13_2113255.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738971
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_13_2113255.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29738637
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29740255
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29739029
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29744273
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_13_2113255.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29742083
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_13_2113255.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_13_2113255.29743137
</commentlist>
</conversation>
