<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_10_12_1529202</id>
	<title>Eee Keyboard Details Released</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1255374120000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Details on the new <a href='http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/12/eee-keyboard-splayed-detailed-by-fcc/'>Eee keyboard</a>, previously held secret during the FCC filing, have now been made available.  You can now take a look at the innards and a full spec sheet detailing exactly what is being promised.  <i>"Beneath the 5-inch, 800 x 480 pixel touch panel (with stylus) we'll be getting Windows XP Home running on an Intel Atom N270, 945GSE / ICH7-M chipset with Broadcom AV-VD905 video decoder, 1GB of DDR2 memory, either 16GB or 32GB of flash storage, 4-hour battery, Bluetooth, 802.11b/g/n WiFi, gigabit Ethernet, HDMI and VGA outputs, integrated stereo speakers and mic, 3x USB, headphone and mic jacks, and external WiFi / UWB antenna. The Eee Keyboard's on-board Ultra-Wideband (UWB) throws 720p content to your TV within a 5-meter range (10-meters for non-video transmissions) via a UWB receiver packing 2x USB ports, another mini-USB port, audio out, and HDMI."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Details on the new Eee keyboard , previously held secret during the FCC filing , have now been made available .
You can now take a look at the innards and a full spec sheet detailing exactly what is being promised .
" Beneath the 5-inch , 800 x 480 pixel touch panel ( with stylus ) we 'll be getting Windows XP Home running on an Intel Atom N270 , 945GSE / ICH7-M chipset with Broadcom AV-VD905 video decoder , 1GB of DDR2 memory , either 16GB or 32GB of flash storage , 4-hour battery , Bluetooth , 802.11b/g/n WiFi , gigabit Ethernet , HDMI and VGA outputs , integrated stereo speakers and mic , 3x USB , headphone and mic jacks , and external WiFi / UWB antenna .
The Eee Keyboard 's on-board Ultra-Wideband ( UWB ) throws 720p content to your TV within a 5-meter range ( 10-meters for non-video transmissions ) via a UWB receiver packing 2x USB ports , another mini-USB port , audio out , and HDMI .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Details on the new Eee keyboard, previously held secret during the FCC filing, have now been made available.
You can now take a look at the innards and a full spec sheet detailing exactly what is being promised.
"Beneath the 5-inch, 800 x 480 pixel touch panel (with stylus) we'll be getting Windows XP Home running on an Intel Atom N270, 945GSE / ICH7-M chipset with Broadcom AV-VD905 video decoder, 1GB of DDR2 memory, either 16GB or 32GB of flash storage, 4-hour battery, Bluetooth, 802.11b/g/n WiFi, gigabit Ethernet, HDMI and VGA outputs, integrated stereo speakers and mic, 3x USB, headphone and mic jacks, and external WiFi / UWB antenna.
The Eee Keyboard's on-board Ultra-Wideband (UWB) throws 720p content to your TV within a 5-meter range (10-meters for non-video transmissions) via a UWB receiver packing 2x USB ports, another mini-USB port, audio out, and HDMI.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29731549</id>
	<title>Re:Shadowrun</title>
	<author>lobsterGun</author>
	<datestamp>1255447500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>more like a Commodore 64</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>more like a Commodore 64</tokentext>
<sentencetext>more like a Commodore 64</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722617</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722795</id>
	<title>Re:The C64 is back!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255378860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>there already are $15 computers built into a keyboard for kids.<br>Called 'TV computers' or somesuch. Based on a NES.</p><p>http://picasaweb.google.co.in/dereklomas/TVComputer#5256799083697212402</p><p>There was some project a while back to make an OLPC competitor useing them. I don't know how it panned out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>there already are $ 15 computers built into a keyboard for kids.Called 'TV computers ' or somesuch .
Based on a NES.http : //picasaweb.google.co.in/dereklomas/TVComputer # 5256799083697212402There was some project a while back to make an OLPC competitor useing them .
I do n't know how it panned out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there already are $15 computers built into a keyboard for kids.Called 'TV computers' or somesuch.
Based on a NES.http://picasaweb.google.co.in/dereklomas/TVComputer#5256799083697212402There was some project a while back to make an OLPC competitor useing them.
I don't know how it panned out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29731597</id>
	<title>ed hardy dress,hoody For Kid</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255447680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Welcome TO Our Website:  Http://www.tntshoes.com</p><p>Hi friend, we are a prefession online store, you can see more photos and price in our website which is show in the photos<br>we take paypal as payment, . shoes Nike jordan1-23 $28-42 free shiping. hellow our website is see our website in the photos attached, we are a online shopping mall, we have all kinds of brand new shoes,clothing, handbag,sunglasses,hats etc for sale, all of our product is best quality but the price is so cheap. You can find the more photos and the price for our product in our website, if interested please email me by we are selling all brand new handbag,</p><p>OUR WEBSITE:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Http://www.tntshoes.com</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    Welcome TO Our Website : Http : //www.tntshoes.comHi friend , we are a prefession online store , you can see more photos and price in our website which is show in the photoswe take paypal as payment , .
shoes Nike jordan1-23 $ 28-42 free shiping .
hellow our website is see our website in the photos attached , we are a online shopping mall , we have all kinds of brand new shoes,clothing , handbag,sunglasses,hats etc for sale , all of our product is best quality but the price is so cheap .
You can find the more photos and the price for our product in our website , if interested please email me by we are selling all brand new handbag,OUR WEBSITE :                                                             Http : //www.tntshoes.com                                                         YAHOO : shoppertrade @ yahoo.com.cn</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    Welcome TO Our Website:  Http://www.tntshoes.comHi friend, we are a prefession online store, you can see more photos and price in our website which is show in the photoswe take paypal as payment, .
shoes Nike jordan1-23 $28-42 free shiping.
hellow our website is see our website in the photos attached, we are a online shopping mall, we have all kinds of brand new shoes,clothing, handbag,sunglasses,hats etc for sale, all of our product is best quality but the price is so cheap.
You can find the more photos and the price for our product in our website, if interested please email me by we are selling all brand new handbag,OUR WEBSITE:
                                                            Http://www.tntshoes.com
                                                        YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723795</id>
	<title>Re:The C64 is back!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255339920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Python is a fad language. In another couple of years it'll be as dead as BSD and BeOS are.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Python is a fad language .
In another couple of years it 'll be as dead as BSD and BeOS are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Python is a fad language.
In another couple of years it'll be as dead as BSD and BeOS are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723377</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29727231</id>
	<title>This reminds me of....</title>
	<author>ogdenk</author>
	<datestamp>1255357440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Atari 800XL/130XE<br>The Atari ST<br>The Amiga 500<br>The Commodore 64/128<br>The Spectrum<br>etc....etc....</p><p>I actually kinda miss that sort of compact form factor for computers with everything integrated under the keyboard.  It really does make good sense for a machine designed to be unexpandable.  If this takes off I'm going to kick myself for not trying to market my similar hack with a mini-ITX board (no LCD however).</p><p>If it's cheap enough, I'd buy one.  My kids would love it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Atari 800XL/130XEThe Atari STThe Amiga 500The Commodore 64/128The Spectrumetc....etc....I actually kinda miss that sort of compact form factor for computers with everything integrated under the keyboard .
It really does make good sense for a machine designed to be unexpandable .
If this takes off I 'm going to kick myself for not trying to market my similar hack with a mini-ITX board ( no LCD however ) .If it 's cheap enough , I 'd buy one .
My kids would love it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Atari 800XL/130XEThe Atari STThe Amiga 500The Commodore 64/128The Spectrumetc....etc....I actually kinda miss that sort of compact form factor for computers with everything integrated under the keyboard.
It really does make good sense for a machine designed to be unexpandable.
If this takes off I'm going to kick myself for not trying to market my similar hack with a mini-ITX board (no LCD however).If it's cheap enough, I'd buy one.
My kids would love it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29728413</id>
	<title>Re:Why not Linux?</title>
	<author>Arker</author>
	<datestamp>1255367460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree, putting windows on this thing makes it utterly pointless.

The Xandros version that my EeePC came with was rough and needed work. Not a *lot* of work, mostly stuff I could do myself given perhaps a week or two to focus on it, but obviously that isnt really close enough.

Windows isnt much better in that respect, and totally unsuited otherwise. I dont discount the allegations some sort of dirty trick or payoff was involved - with MS that is always a safe bet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , putting windows on this thing makes it utterly pointless .
The Xandros version that my EeePC came with was rough and needed work .
Not a * lot * of work , mostly stuff I could do myself given perhaps a week or two to focus on it , but obviously that isnt really close enough .
Windows isnt much better in that respect , and totally unsuited otherwise .
I dont discount the allegations some sort of dirty trick or payoff was involved - with MS that is always a safe bet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, putting windows on this thing makes it utterly pointless.
The Xandros version that my EeePC came with was rough and needed work.
Not a *lot* of work, mostly stuff I could do myself given perhaps a week or two to focus on it, but obviously that isnt really close enough.
Windows isnt much better in that respect, and totally unsuited otherwise.
I dont discount the allegations some sort of dirty trick or payoff was involved - with MS that is always a safe bet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723147</id>
	<title>Re:The C64 is back!</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1255380420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Probably depends on whether you are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeri\_Ellsworth" title="wikipedia.org">Jeri Ellsworth</a> [wikipedia.org] or not. More broadly, it really depends on whether you actually want "a C64 to teach kids programming" or "to teach kids programming" and whether you insist on building it or not.<br> <br>

There are several modern remakes of the C64, usually sold for gaming, some of which can have a keyboard modded on. Those are probably your cheapest bet and definitely your best bet if you actually want a C64. Second cheapest(at least in the developed world) would be your bog-standard-Wintel-box-circa-5-years-ago free for the taking from whoever is throwing it away today. Third cheapest would be, depending on the day, either the second cheapest option purchased from a refurb vendor, or a netbook on sale.<br> <br>

There is a lot to be said for making things, if one is interested; but as a means of putting programming tools in front of children, it hasn't really been economically sensible in some time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably depends on whether you are Jeri Ellsworth [ wikipedia.org ] or not .
More broadly , it really depends on whether you actually want " a C64 to teach kids programming " or " to teach kids programming " and whether you insist on building it or not .
There are several modern remakes of the C64 , usually sold for gaming , some of which can have a keyboard modded on .
Those are probably your cheapest bet and definitely your best bet if you actually want a C64 .
Second cheapest ( at least in the developed world ) would be your bog-standard-Wintel-box-circa-5-years-ago free for the taking from whoever is throwing it away today .
Third cheapest would be , depending on the day , either the second cheapest option purchased from a refurb vendor , or a netbook on sale .
There is a lot to be said for making things , if one is interested ; but as a means of putting programming tools in front of children , it has n't really been economically sensible in some time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably depends on whether you are Jeri Ellsworth [wikipedia.org] or not.
More broadly, it really depends on whether you actually want "a C64 to teach kids programming" or "to teach kids programming" and whether you insist on building it or not.
There are several modern remakes of the C64, usually sold for gaming, some of which can have a keyboard modded on.
Those are probably your cheapest bet and definitely your best bet if you actually want a C64.
Second cheapest(at least in the developed world) would be your bog-standard-Wintel-box-circa-5-years-ago free for the taking from whoever is throwing it away today.
Third cheapest would be, depending on the day, either the second cheapest option purchased from a refurb vendor, or a netbook on sale.
There is a lot to be said for making things, if one is interested; but as a means of putting programming tools in front of children, it hasn't really been economically sensible in some time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29763631</id>
	<title>Re:Don't bother</title>
	<author>DaVince21</author>
	<datestamp>1255606680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd just like to know how well it will actually work with Linux, especially in regards to it mostly having to control two screens at once, one of which mostly intended for navigation.</p><p>This device actually looks like something I'd want due to its compactness. The Windows thing is a small drawback, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd just like to know how well it will actually work with Linux , especially in regards to it mostly having to control two screens at once , one of which mostly intended for navigation.This device actually looks like something I 'd want due to its compactness .
The Windows thing is a small drawback , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd just like to know how well it will actually work with Linux, especially in regards to it mostly having to control two screens at once, one of which mostly intended for navigation.This device actually looks like something I'd want due to its compactness.
The Windows thing is a small drawback, though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722553</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723497</id>
	<title>Re:10 meters for non-video transmission to a TV?</title>
	<author>ahecht</author>
	<datestamp>1255338960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know it's Slashdot and we don't read the articles, but at least read the first sentence of the summary:</p><blockquote><div><p>Beneath the 5-inch, 800 x 480 pixel touch panel (with stylus)</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know it 's Slashdot and we do n't read the articles , but at least read the first sentence of the summary : Beneath the 5-inch , 800 x 480 pixel touch panel ( with stylus )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know it's Slashdot and we don't read the articles, but at least read the first sentence of the summary:Beneath the 5-inch, 800 x 480 pixel touch panel (with stylus)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722805</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29728749</id>
	<title>Re:Why not Linux?</title>
	<author>damnbunni</author>
	<datestamp>1255371480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The reason most of the netbook companies have cut back on Linux models is simple:</p><p>People weren't buying them.</p><p>At the local Best Buy, when they still carried Linux models the Windows versions were almost always sold out and there were always a few Linux models on the shelf.</p><p>And now they don't stock any Linux models at all.</p><p>From a retailer or manufacturer's point of view it doesn't really matter how good something is if no one's buying it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason most of the netbook companies have cut back on Linux models is simple : People were n't buying them.At the local Best Buy , when they still carried Linux models the Windows versions were almost always sold out and there were always a few Linux models on the shelf.And now they do n't stock any Linux models at all.From a retailer or manufacturer 's point of view it does n't really matter how good something is if no one 's buying it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason most of the netbook companies have cut back on Linux models is simple:People weren't buying them.At the local Best Buy, when they still carried Linux models the Windows versions were almost always sold out and there were always a few Linux models on the shelf.And now they don't stock any Linux models at all.From a retailer or manufacturer's point of view it doesn't really matter how good something is if no one's buying it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722805</id>
	<title>10 meters for non-video transmission to a TV?</title>
	<author>Overzeetop</author>
	<datestamp>1255378920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, if it's not sending a video signal, I presume that I'm getting audio only? And this would be useful how...</p><p>Okay, I just RTFA. Unlike the "cool" option of actually transmitting low power ATSC on an (unused) channel, which would make this potentially useful, it requires a hardwired dongle (UWB receiver) at any TV you want to connect. So the "any TV" just turned into "any TV you decide you want to buy a dongle for and manually wire up to receive the proprietary signal." An, of course, that's where the 10m comes in, since the UWB receiver has USB ports on it (for those who are cool enough to have one of these, and so antiquated that the have a wired printer).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , if it 's not sending a video signal , I presume that I 'm getting audio only ?
And this would be useful how...Okay , I just RTFA .
Unlike the " cool " option of actually transmitting low power ATSC on an ( unused ) channel , which would make this potentially useful , it requires a hardwired dongle ( UWB receiver ) at any TV you want to connect .
So the " any TV " just turned into " any TV you decide you want to buy a dongle for and manually wire up to receive the proprietary signal .
" An , of course , that 's where the 10m comes in , since the UWB receiver has USB ports on it ( for those who are cool enough to have one of these , and so antiquated that the have a wired printer ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, if it's not sending a video signal, I presume that I'm getting audio only?
And this would be useful how...Okay, I just RTFA.
Unlike the "cool" option of actually transmitting low power ATSC on an (unused) channel, which would make this potentially useful, it requires a hardwired dongle (UWB receiver) at any TV you want to connect.
So the "any TV" just turned into "any TV you decide you want to buy a dongle for and manually wire up to receive the proprietary signal.
" An, of course, that's where the 10m comes in, since the UWB receiver has USB ports on it (for those who are cool enough to have one of these, and so antiquated that the have a wired printer).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723569</id>
	<title>Why not Linux?</title>
	<author>Jim Hall</author>
	<datestamp>1255339140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was excited until I read <b>Windows XP Home</b>.</p><p>Look, I know a bunch of people run Windows. But on an Atom CPU, 1GB memory, 16GB (smallest) flash drive, I just don't see Windows being that great. I'm sure Windows will <em>run</em>, but how well?</p><p>Ah well, I suppose I can easily wipe this and put Fedora on it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I just wish Eee put a Linux option on more of their gear, installed out-of-the-box. Even if I wipe whatever Linux they give me and put another distro on it, I'd love to send a message by buying the Linux option.</p><p>To compare, I'm running an older Dell subnotebook with 1GB memory, booting Fedora 11 from an 8GB consumer flash drive. Works great, very fast!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was excited until I read Windows XP Home.Look , I know a bunch of people run Windows .
But on an Atom CPU , 1GB memory , 16GB ( smallest ) flash drive , I just do n't see Windows being that great .
I 'm sure Windows will run , but how well ? Ah well , I suppose I can easily wipe this and put Fedora on it ... I just wish Eee put a Linux option on more of their gear , installed out-of-the-box .
Even if I wipe whatever Linux they give me and put another distro on it , I 'd love to send a message by buying the Linux option.To compare , I 'm running an older Dell subnotebook with 1GB memory , booting Fedora 11 from an 8GB consumer flash drive .
Works great , very fast !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was excited until I read Windows XP Home.Look, I know a bunch of people run Windows.
But on an Atom CPU, 1GB memory, 16GB (smallest) flash drive, I just don't see Windows being that great.
I'm sure Windows will run, but how well?Ah well, I suppose I can easily wipe this and put Fedora on it ... I just wish Eee put a Linux option on more of their gear, installed out-of-the-box.
Even if I wipe whatever Linux they give me and put another distro on it, I'd love to send a message by buying the Linux option.To compare, I'm running an older Dell subnotebook with 1GB memory, booting Fedora 11 from an 8GB consumer flash drive.
Works great, very fast!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29727475</id>
	<title>Re:Major obvious flaw</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255359360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't you hit multiple keys at once when you are using your penis on the keyboard?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't you hit multiple keys at once when you are using your penis on the keyboard ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't you hit multiple keys at once when you are using your penis on the keyboard?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722559</id>
	<title>More "Eee" again</title>
	<author>ickleberry</author>
	<datestamp>1255377840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just when you thought releasing another "Eee" branded product would be like flogging the skeleton of a dead horse</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just when you thought releasing another " Eee " branded product would be like flogging the skeleton of a dead horse</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just when you thought releasing another "Eee" branded product would be like flogging the skeleton of a dead horse</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723623</id>
	<title>Doe it have enough power to be useful?</title>
	<author>Jeremy Erwin</author>
	<datestamp>1255339380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a netbook that has to be plugged in. Atom NT270 + Intel 945G Maybe the broadcom chip  helps things along, but the specs seem a bit underwhelming. Does it struggle to maintain  framerate at 720p?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a netbook that has to be plugged in .
Atom NT270 + Intel 945G Maybe the broadcom chip helps things along , but the specs seem a bit underwhelming .
Does it struggle to maintain framerate at 720p ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a netbook that has to be plugged in.
Atom NT270 + Intel 945G Maybe the broadcom chip  helps things along, but the specs seem a bit underwhelming.
Does it struggle to maintain  framerate at 720p?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29725143</id>
	<title>Oh, we are back to ZX spectrum</title>
	<author>dindi</author>
	<datestamp>1255345620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So we are back in those times where the computer was the keyboard, or the keyboard was the computer? And we can look at it on the TV. I miss my 12'' Junosty brand russian B&amp;W set I used with my ZX Spectrum and Commodore later on.</p><p>There was a break-in a few years ago in a Hungarian computer lab, and the geniuses thought they were in that era by the way. So they stole all the computers<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...  well, that is what they thought while taking all the keyboards instead..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So we are back in those times where the computer was the keyboard , or the keyboard was the computer ?
And we can look at it on the TV .
I miss my 12' ' Junosty brand russian B&amp;W set I used with my ZX Spectrum and Commodore later on.There was a break-in a few years ago in a Hungarian computer lab , and the geniuses thought they were in that era by the way .
So they stole all the computers ... well , that is what they thought while taking all the keyboards instead. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So we are back in those times where the computer was the keyboard, or the keyboard was the computer?
And we can look at it on the TV.
I miss my 12'' Junosty brand russian B&amp;W set I used with my ZX Spectrum and Commodore later on.There was a break-in a few years ago in a Hungarian computer lab, and the geniuses thought they were in that era by the way.
So they stole all the computers ...  well, that is what they thought while taking all the keyboards instead..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722793</id>
	<title>It doesn't really require an HDTV, but...</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1255378860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>My very first computer was a TRS-80 Color Computer 2.  It was basically a computer in a keyboard that I connected to the TV.</p></div><p>Presumably an SDTV, over RF or composite cable.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Now, decades later, I will soon be able to buy a computer built into a keyboard that will display on my TV.</p></div><p>Perhaps your TV is an HDTV and will work with one of the video outputs (VGA, HDMI) on the computer. But a lot of the U.S. market still uses SDTV, and in order to connect the VGA output to an SDTV, you need <a href="http://sewelldirect.com/PC-to-TV-Converter.asp" title="sewelldirect.com">a special $40 cable</a> [sewelldirect.com] that I don't think is included.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My very first computer was a TRS-80 Color Computer 2 .
It was basically a computer in a keyboard that I connected to the TV.Presumably an SDTV , over RF or composite cable.Now , decades later , I will soon be able to buy a computer built into a keyboard that will display on my TV.Perhaps your TV is an HDTV and will work with one of the video outputs ( VGA , HDMI ) on the computer .
But a lot of the U.S. market still uses SDTV , and in order to connect the VGA output to an SDTV , you need a special $ 40 cable [ sewelldirect.com ] that I do n't think is included .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My very first computer was a TRS-80 Color Computer 2.
It was basically a computer in a keyboard that I connected to the TV.Presumably an SDTV, over RF or composite cable.Now, decades later, I will soon be able to buy a computer built into a keyboard that will display on my TV.Perhaps your TV is an HDTV and will work with one of the video outputs (VGA, HDMI) on the computer.
But a lot of the U.S. market still uses SDTV, and in order to connect the VGA output to an SDTV, you need a special $40 cable [sewelldirect.com] that I don't think is included.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722661</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723099</id>
	<title>Re:Mechanica Stress and Spilt Milk?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255380180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's going full circle for design but progressing in performance. Next will be really fast tape drives with &gt;1TB storage instead of optical drives.</p><p>This does make me strangely nostalgic, though, since the first computer I ever used was an Amstrad CPC 464.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's going full circle for design but progressing in performance .
Next will be really fast tape drives with &gt; 1TB storage instead of optical drives.This does make me strangely nostalgic , though , since the first computer I ever used was an Amstrad CPC 464 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's going full circle for design but progressing in performance.
Next will be really fast tape drives with &gt;1TB storage instead of optical drives.This does make me strangely nostalgic, though, since the first computer I ever used was an Amstrad CPC 464.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722643</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29726391</id>
	<title>Re:What would you use this for?</title>
	<author>jtownatpunk.net</author>
	<datestamp>1255351980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, yeah.  Pretty much.  Have you ever hooked your computer up to one of these new-fangled high-definition LCD televisions?  If you set the resolution right (few people do), it's as sharp as any other LCD monitor.  Only HUGE.  I've had a big 1080p panel hooked up to my gaming computer for years and it's awesome.  And it's great for regular tasks, too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , yeah .
Pretty much .
Have you ever hooked your computer up to one of these new-fangled high-definition LCD televisions ?
If you set the resolution right ( few people do ) , it 's as sharp as any other LCD monitor .
Only HUGE .
I 've had a big 1080p panel hooked up to my gaming computer for years and it 's awesome .
And it 's great for regular tasks , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, yeah.
Pretty much.
Have you ever hooked your computer up to one of these new-fangled high-definition LCD televisions?
If you set the resolution right (few people do), it's as sharp as any other LCD monitor.
Only HUGE.
I've had a big 1080p panel hooked up to my gaming computer for years and it's awesome.
And it's great for regular tasks, too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723461</id>
	<title>Just what I want</title>
	<author>Posting=!Working</author>
	<datestamp>1255338780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always wanted an IBM PCjr. keyboard with a touchscreen and a way to hook it up to your TV.</p><p>I mean, I know the 80's retro look is in, but do they have to bring back all the crappy stuff from the 80's too?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always wanted an IBM PCjr .
keyboard with a touchscreen and a way to hook it up to your TV.I mean , I know the 80 's retro look is in , but do they have to bring back all the crappy stuff from the 80 's too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always wanted an IBM PCjr.
keyboard with a touchscreen and a way to hook it up to your TV.I mean, I know the 80's retro look is in, but do they have to bring back all the crappy stuff from the 80's too?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724385</id>
	<title>Re:What would you use this for?</title>
	<author>Bat Country</author>
	<datestamp>1255342260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Educational gaming machine go!</p><p>Let your kid browse the internet in the living room while you read - thus glancing up regularly and supervising to make sure nobody has goatse'd them.</p><p>Show your friends the latest stupid thing you found on Youtube.</p><p>Attached USB + <a href="http://games.slashdot.org/games/04/03/07/0510218.shtml" title="slashdot.org">Controller</a> [slashdot.org] + <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stella\_(emulator)" title="wikipedia.org">Stella</a> [wikipedia.org] = Living room Atari 2600 which can be easily attached and put away when you're done (less easily accomplished in these days of LCD TVs without coax).</p><p>Cheap television + keyboard computer = information kiosk.  Tired of your friends getting drunk and wanting to use Google on your computer to settle disputes on random shit?  Stick one of those in your living room on a pedestal.  Call it "The Last Word."</p><p>Have a little too much money?  Do you like having whiteboards but you consider them lower-class? Buy a large format flat screen television, something cheap which can hack 720p clearance from some home theater "everything must go" sale, stick it on the wall and use this thing on a cheap pedestal table as an art easel.  Encourage people to graffiti on your wall with the stylus on the attached screen.</p><p>Attach a webcam to one and stick it up in your windowsill and take time lapses of the seasons.  Hell, if it's cheap enough, put one in each window.</p><p>Or just use one for the same thing you'd use an EEEpc other than reading on the bus to work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Educational gaming machine go ! Let your kid browse the internet in the living room while you read - thus glancing up regularly and supervising to make sure nobody has goatse 'd them.Show your friends the latest stupid thing you found on Youtube.Attached USB + Controller [ slashdot.org ] + Stella [ wikipedia.org ] = Living room Atari 2600 which can be easily attached and put away when you 're done ( less easily accomplished in these days of LCD TVs without coax ) .Cheap television + keyboard computer = information kiosk .
Tired of your friends getting drunk and wanting to use Google on your computer to settle disputes on random shit ?
Stick one of those in your living room on a pedestal .
Call it " The Last Word .
" Have a little too much money ?
Do you like having whiteboards but you consider them lower-class ?
Buy a large format flat screen television , something cheap which can hack 720p clearance from some home theater " everything must go " sale , stick it on the wall and use this thing on a cheap pedestal table as an art easel .
Encourage people to graffiti on your wall with the stylus on the attached screen.Attach a webcam to one and stick it up in your windowsill and take time lapses of the seasons .
Hell , if it 's cheap enough , put one in each window.Or just use one for the same thing you 'd use an EEEpc other than reading on the bus to work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Educational gaming machine go!Let your kid browse the internet in the living room while you read - thus glancing up regularly and supervising to make sure nobody has goatse'd them.Show your friends the latest stupid thing you found on Youtube.Attached USB + Controller [slashdot.org] + Stella [wikipedia.org] = Living room Atari 2600 which can be easily attached and put away when you're done (less easily accomplished in these days of LCD TVs without coax).Cheap television + keyboard computer = information kiosk.
Tired of your friends getting drunk and wanting to use Google on your computer to settle disputes on random shit?
Stick one of those in your living room on a pedestal.
Call it "The Last Word.
"Have a little too much money?
Do you like having whiteboards but you consider them lower-class?
Buy a large format flat screen television, something cheap which can hack 720p clearance from some home theater "everything must go" sale, stick it on the wall and use this thing on a cheap pedestal table as an art easel.
Encourage people to graffiti on your wall with the stylus on the attached screen.Attach a webcam to one and stick it up in your windowsill and take time lapses of the seasons.
Hell, if it's cheap enough, put one in each window.Or just use one for the same thing you'd use an EEEpc other than reading on the bus to work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723219</id>
	<title>800 x 480?</title>
	<author>sfled</author>
	<datestamp>1255380840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude, if this keeps up, screens will soon have the height and width ratios of freakin' banner ads.</p><p>Just saying.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , if this keeps up , screens will soon have the height and width ratios of freakin ' banner ads.Just saying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, if this keeps up, screens will soon have the height and width ratios of freakin' banner ads.Just saying.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724089</id>
	<title>I'm waiting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255340880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... for the follow-on version with improved artificial intelligence; the AIeee!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... for the follow-on version with improved artificial intelligence ; the AIeee !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... for the follow-on version with improved artificial intelligence; the AIeee!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722715</id>
	<title>Re:The C64 is back!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255378560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just buy any netbook and install IDLE, the official Tk-based editor for Python programs.
<ul> <li>Under Windows: Install <a href="http://www.python.org/download/releases/" title="python.org">Python from Python.org</a> [python.org]; IDLE comes inside.</li><li>Under Ubuntu: <tt>sudo apt-get install idle</tt> </li><li>Under Xandros, the Linux distro that comes on some Eee PC notebooks, you might want to do what I did a week after I bought mine: Wipe the drive, install Ubuntu, and follow the Ubuntu instructions.</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just buy any netbook and install IDLE , the official Tk-based editor for Python programs .
Under Windows : Install Python from Python.org [ python.org ] ; IDLE comes inside.Under Ubuntu : sudo apt-get install idle Under Xandros , the Linux distro that comes on some Eee PC notebooks , you might want to do what I did a week after I bought mine : Wipe the drive , install Ubuntu , and follow the Ubuntu instructions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just buy any netbook and install IDLE, the official Tk-based editor for Python programs.
Under Windows: Install Python from Python.org [python.org]; IDLE comes inside.Under Ubuntu: sudo apt-get install idle Under Xandros, the Linux distro that comes on some Eee PC notebooks, you might want to do what I did a week after I bought mine: Wipe the drive, install Ubuntu, and follow the Ubuntu instructions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724819</id>
	<title>Re:Why not Linux?</title>
	<author>erogenizer</author>
	<datestamp>1255344120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So write the code yourself OSS boy.

Mr. XP</htmltext>
<tokenext>So write the code yourself OSS boy .
Mr. XP</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So write the code yourself OSS boy.
Mr. XP</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723041</id>
	<title>Re:The C64 is back!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255379880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've already got a device with a keyboard and a 1024x600 screen, with an Atom n270, 1GB RAM, 16GB flash, wifi, bluetooth, VGA port, stereo speakers (but only mono mic), 3x USB, a spare SD slot... etc... Mine was on-sale at a big-box stationary chain for $240<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. the only thig it seems to be missing from the specs is the UWB TV hookup... but my TV doesn't have UWB anyways...</p><p>As for the shadowrun similarity... I have a USB serial adapter and console cable and frequently get asked to "jack in" to network routers by remote troubleshooters...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've already got a device with a keyboard and a 1024x600 screen , with an Atom n270 , 1GB RAM , 16GB flash , wifi , bluetooth , VGA port , stereo speakers ( but only mono mic ) , 3x USB , a spare SD slot... etc... Mine was on-sale at a big-box stationary chain for $ 240 .. the only thig it seems to be missing from the specs is the UWB TV hookup... but my TV does n't have UWB anyways...As for the shadowrun similarity... I have a USB serial adapter and console cable and frequently get asked to " jack in " to network routers by remote troubleshooters.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've already got a device with a keyboard and a 1024x600 screen, with an Atom n270, 1GB RAM, 16GB flash, wifi, bluetooth, VGA port, stereo speakers (but only mono mic), 3x USB, a spare SD slot... etc... Mine was on-sale at a big-box stationary chain for $240 .. the only thig it seems to be missing from the specs is the UWB TV hookup... but my TV doesn't have UWB anyways...As for the shadowrun similarity... I have a USB serial adapter and console cable and frequently get asked to "jack in" to network routers by remote troubleshooters...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723167</id>
	<title>Re:Shadowrun</title>
	<author>MoralHazard</author>
	<datestamp>1255380540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't know about that.  But you could certainly start calling yourself "celibate", at that point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't know about that .
But you could certainly start calling yourself " celibate " , at that point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't know about that.
But you could certainly start calling yourself "celibate", at that point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722617</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29728261</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, it's my TRS-80 Color Computer 2!</title>
	<author>Megane</author>
	<datestamp>1255366080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Get off my lawn, you whippersnapper! MY first computer was a Model I (except there was no "model" yet), and this looks much more like one of those. You can even put a logo on the right side of the keyboard to enhance the experience. The only thing missing is an expansion box larger than the main computer, connected by a cranky ribbon cable. And having to turn off the thing whenever the family wanted to watch channel 12 on the TV.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Get off my lawn , you whippersnapper !
MY first computer was a Model I ( except there was no " model " yet ) , and this looks much more like one of those .
You can even put a logo on the right side of the keyboard to enhance the experience .
The only thing missing is an expansion box larger than the main computer , connected by a cranky ribbon cable .
And having to turn off the thing whenever the family wanted to watch channel 12 on the TV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get off my lawn, you whippersnapper!
MY first computer was a Model I (except there was no "model" yet), and this looks much more like one of those.
You can even put a logo on the right side of the keyboard to enhance the experience.
The only thing missing is an expansion box larger than the main computer, connected by a cranky ribbon cable.
And having to turn off the thing whenever the family wanted to watch channel 12 on the TV.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722661</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723135</id>
	<title>WebTV</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255380360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is this different from WebTV?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this different from WebTV ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this different from WebTV?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29729665</id>
	<title>Re:The C64 is back!</title>
	<author>Ant P.</author>
	<datestamp>1255429380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Easy - just convince some company that isn't married to Microsoft like Asus is to build one that's compatible with any OS suitable for teaching kids with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Easy - just convince some company that is n't married to Microsoft like Asus is to build one that 's compatible with any OS suitable for teaching kids with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Easy - just convince some company that isn't married to Microsoft like Asus is to build one that's compatible with any OS suitable for teaching kids with.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723485</id>
	<title>Re:What would you use this for?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255338900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>THIS!<br>The screen is way too small to be of any use.</p><p>I would have preferred a wider screen in the center, splitting the keyboard in half.<br>Also, if you could fold the keyboard down the middle (on either side of the screen), this would have been massively more useful.<br>This is the reason why i won't bother getting it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>THIS ! The screen is way too small to be of any use.I would have preferred a wider screen in the center , splitting the keyboard in half.Also , if you could fold the keyboard down the middle ( on either side of the screen ) , this would have been massively more useful.This is the reason why i wo n't bother getting it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>THIS!The screen is way too small to be of any use.I would have preferred a wider screen in the center, splitting the keyboard in half.Also, if you could fold the keyboard down the middle (on either side of the screen), this would have been massively more useful.This is the reason why i won't bother getting it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722585</id>
	<title>The C64 is back!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255377960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How hard would it be to build a cheaper version to teach kids programming?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How hard would it be to build a cheaper version to teach kids programming ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How hard would it be to build a cheaper version to teach kids programming?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723653</id>
	<title>Really big PDA!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255339440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Compared to some of the PDAs I have owned over the years, this is pretty darn competitive.</p><p>My Zaurus (5500) runs linux, and has a tiny but workable keyboard, but battery life sucks at just over an hour.</p><p>My Sony Clie had better battery life, and a funky keyboard, but was PALM OS, and had SONY own design for connectors.</p><p>My Windows CE PDA taught me that 'just cause it uses the word "Windows" does not mean it works that same or runs anything you have'.</p><p>So this has a good keyboard (not just for thumbs!), runs a real version of Windows. Has a touch screen. Even has connectors you can plug things into you might actually want to anyway. Has 4 hours battery life (umm.. maybe), and can work with your TV.</p><p>This is like the PDA dream come true.</p><p>Heck, they haven't been 'pocket sized' for quite some time. So this ones a little bigger. So?</p><p>Hmmm.. If you can convince your library to setup some wireless HDMI TVs, then all they need is the WIFI network (they probably already setup) and you can bring your own computer!</p><p>Who needs laptops now?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p><p>Also Hmmm... Who will write the first USB slave app that turns this into a real keyboard (HID device) for another computer and lets you do two things at once like a KVM does?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Compared to some of the PDAs I have owned over the years , this is pretty darn competitive.My Zaurus ( 5500 ) runs linux , and has a tiny but workable keyboard , but battery life sucks at just over an hour.My Sony Clie had better battery life , and a funky keyboard , but was PALM OS , and had SONY own design for connectors.My Windows CE PDA taught me that 'just cause it uses the word " Windows " does not mean it works that same or runs anything you have'.So this has a good keyboard ( not just for thumbs !
) , runs a real version of Windows .
Has a touch screen .
Even has connectors you can plug things into you might actually want to anyway .
Has 4 hours battery life ( umm.. maybe ) , and can work with your TV.This is like the PDA dream come true.Heck , they have n't been 'pocket sized ' for quite some time .
So this ones a little bigger .
So ? Hmmm.. If you can convince your library to setup some wireless HDMI TVs , then all they need is the WIFI network ( they probably already setup ) and you can bring your own computer ! Who needs laptops now ?
: - ) Also Hmmm... Who will write the first USB slave app that turns this into a real keyboard ( HID device ) for another computer and lets you do two things at once like a KVM does ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Compared to some of the PDAs I have owned over the years, this is pretty darn competitive.My Zaurus (5500) runs linux, and has a tiny but workable keyboard, but battery life sucks at just over an hour.My Sony Clie had better battery life, and a funky keyboard, but was PALM OS, and had SONY own design for connectors.My Windows CE PDA taught me that 'just cause it uses the word "Windows" does not mean it works that same or runs anything you have'.So this has a good keyboard (not just for thumbs!
), runs a real version of Windows.
Has a touch screen.
Even has connectors you can plug things into you might actually want to anyway.
Has 4 hours battery life (umm.. maybe), and can work with your TV.This is like the PDA dream come true.Heck, they haven't been 'pocket sized' for quite some time.
So this ones a little bigger.
So?Hmmm.. If you can convince your library to setup some wireless HDMI TVs, then all they need is the WIFI network (they probably already setup) and you can bring your own computer!Who needs laptops now?
:-)Also Hmmm... Who will write the first USB slave app that turns this into a real keyboard (HID device) for another computer and lets you do two things at once like a KVM does?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722643</id>
	<title>Mechanica Stress and Spilt Milk?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255378200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thought the days of keyboard integrated computers were long gone, primarily because of how exposed the keyboard is.... But apparently some companies prefer to not learn these lessons. Who is the target market?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thought the days of keyboard integrated computers were long gone , primarily because of how exposed the keyboard is.... But apparently some companies prefer to not learn these lessons .
Who is the target market ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thought the days of keyboard integrated computers were long gone, primarily because of how exposed the keyboard is.... But apparently some companies prefer to not learn these lessons.
Who is the target market?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29739513</id>
	<title>Re:Major obvious flaw</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255440840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least you are honest.....now if I can only get the image out of my head.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least you are honest.....now if I can only get the image out of my head .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least you are honest.....now if I can only get the image out of my head.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29739231</id>
	<title>Re:Major obvious flaw</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255438440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I am right handed, but I mouse on the left, so I can keep my right hand on the keyboard.</p></div></blockquote><p>Wow, I didn't know there was anyone else out there who did this. Why did you start, did you first compute on a lefty's machine like I did?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am right handed , but I mouse on the left , so I can keep my right hand on the keyboard.Wow , I did n't know there was anyone else out there who did this .
Why did you start , did you first compute on a lefty 's machine like I did ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am right handed, but I mouse on the left, so I can keep my right hand on the keyboard.Wow, I didn't know there was anyone else out there who did this.
Why did you start, did you first compute on a lefty's machine like I did?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29728177</id>
	<title>Re:Why not Linux?</title>
	<author>wvmarle</author>
	<datestamp>1255365000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are talking about a system of about 10 years ago on hardware of about 2-3 years ago. It should run, and it should run pretty well and at least be fast. I'd not be too worried about that: this netbook is still way more powerful that even top-line PC's from when Win XP was released.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are talking about a system of about 10 years ago on hardware of about 2-3 years ago .
It should run , and it should run pretty well and at least be fast .
I 'd not be too worried about that : this netbook is still way more powerful that even top-line PC 's from when Win XP was released .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are talking about a system of about 10 years ago on hardware of about 2-3 years ago.
It should run, and it should run pretty well and at least be fast.
I'd not be too worried about that: this netbook is still way more powerful that even top-line PC's from when Win XP was released.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723265</id>
	<title>OH FFS It's an Amiga!</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1255381080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like the idea of the keyboard only form factor PC like 80's boxes wired to TVs, but do you think they could do the Amiga like thing and put in a 1GB kick butt graphics card into it...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like the idea of the keyboard only form factor PC like 80 's boxes wired to TVs , but do you think they could do the Amiga like thing and put in a 1GB kick butt graphics card into it... : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like the idea of the keyboard only form factor PC like 80's boxes wired to TVs, but do you think they could do the Amiga like thing and put in a 1GB kick butt graphics card into it... :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29829917</id>
	<title>As long as it isn't a Logitech keyboard</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1256126220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't buy from Logitech:</p><p><a href="http://www.bbb.org/greater-san-francisco/business-reviews/internet-shopping/spotlife-in-fremont-ca-71823" title="bbb.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbb.org/greater-san-francisco/business-reviews/internet-shopping/spotlife-in-fremont-ca-71823</a> [bbb.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't buy from Logitech : http : //www.bbb.org/greater-san-francisco/business-reviews/internet-shopping/spotlife-in-fremont-ca-71823 [ bbb.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't buy from Logitech:http://www.bbb.org/greater-san-francisco/business-reviews/internet-shopping/spotlife-in-fremont-ca-71823 [bbb.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724795</id>
	<title>uh, why?</title>
	<author>Tom</author>
	<datestamp>1255343940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And I want a 20 pounds keyboard running an 8 year old windos version for what, exactly? So I can watch YouTube on a tiny, cheap screen instead of a good display?</p><p>I dig an OLED keyboard with software-reprogrammable keys. Cool thing - switching to a foreign language or Dvorak in software.</p><p>But a screen in the keyboard just eludes me. Why would I want to look at the keyboard - again, after spending a few years learning to touch-type?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I want a 20 pounds keyboard running an 8 year old windos version for what , exactly ?
So I can watch YouTube on a tiny , cheap screen instead of a good display ? I dig an OLED keyboard with software-reprogrammable keys .
Cool thing - switching to a foreign language or Dvorak in software.But a screen in the keyboard just eludes me .
Why would I want to look at the keyboard - again , after spending a few years learning to touch-type ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I want a 20 pounds keyboard running an 8 year old windos version for what, exactly?
So I can watch YouTube on a tiny, cheap screen instead of a good display?I dig an OLED keyboard with software-reprogrammable keys.
Cool thing - switching to a foreign language or Dvorak in software.But a screen in the keyboard just eludes me.
Why would I want to look at the keyboard - again, after spending a few years learning to touch-type?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724137</id>
	<title>$10 cable</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1255341120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16882339047" title="newegg.com">http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16882339047</a> [newegg.com]</p><p>And it's only that high because I'm too lazy to look at other sources.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx ? Item = N82E16882339047 [ newegg.com ] And it 's only that high because I 'm too lazy to look at other sources .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16882339047 [newegg.com]And it's only that high because I'm too lazy to look at other sources.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722793</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723377</id>
	<title>Re:The C64 is back!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255338300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seconded, contrary to the Anonymous coward, I believe that Python is the best programming language for kids.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seconded , contrary to the Anonymous coward , I believe that Python is the best programming language for kids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seconded, contrary to the Anonymous coward, I believe that Python is the best programming language for kids.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724785</id>
	<title>Is easy.</title>
	<author>Tei</author>
	<datestamp>1255343880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well.. is obvious that will continue pushing XP, since you can't fit Windows 7 in a netbook with 2GB of RAM.  Once netbooks get powerfull and cheap enough to have 4GB and a +2GHz CPU, then will stop pushing XP, let it die, and push very hard Windows 7.</p><p>I have a eepc 701, and I am very happy with my eebuntu. I have tried Windows 7 in my desktop computer trough vmware, and W7 is garbage. Also, my eepc has 4 GB of disk. I don't see how Windows 7 would install on my netbook at all, since seems Windows 7 OS takes 10GB of the hard disk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well.. is obvious that will continue pushing XP , since you ca n't fit Windows 7 in a netbook with 2GB of RAM .
Once netbooks get powerfull and cheap enough to have 4GB and a + 2GHz CPU , then will stop pushing XP , let it die , and push very hard Windows 7.I have a eepc 701 , and I am very happy with my eebuntu .
I have tried Windows 7 in my desktop computer trough vmware , and W7 is garbage .
Also , my eepc has 4 GB of disk .
I do n't see how Windows 7 would install on my netbook at all , since seems Windows 7 OS takes 10GB of the hard disk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well.. is obvious that will continue pushing XP, since you can't fit Windows 7 in a netbook with 2GB of RAM.
Once netbooks get powerfull and cheap enough to have 4GB and a +2GHz CPU, then will stop pushing XP, let it die, and push very hard Windows 7.I have a eepc 701, and I am very happy with my eebuntu.
I have tried Windows 7 in my desktop computer trough vmware, and W7 is garbage.
Also, my eepc has 4 GB of disk.
I don't see how Windows 7 would install on my netbook at all, since seems Windows 7 OS takes 10GB of the hard disk.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722823</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723521</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, it's my TRS-80 Color Computer 2!</title>
	<author>Abreu</author>
	<datestamp>1255339020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had one of those too! (I even pestered my parents for the cassette deck for saving programs!)</p><p>This sounds like a good idea for a "living room" computer, using Mythbuntu or something similar...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had one of those too !
( I even pestered my parents for the cassette deck for saving programs !
) This sounds like a good idea for a " living room " computer , using Mythbuntu or something similar.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had one of those too!
(I even pestered my parents for the cassette deck for saving programs!
)This sounds like a good idea for a "living room" computer, using Mythbuntu or something similar...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722661</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723971</id>
	<title>Re:Why not Linux?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255340460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because they feel that they need to cater to the lowest common denominator, and that is the Windows demographic.</p><p>These people want to use anything that moves to replace the virus-infested hellbox hiding in every room in their house, just so they can do it all again.</p><p>People complain if they can't install their PopCap games.<br>People complain if they can't turn it on and see their 'meadow'.<br>People complain if they can't find their 'Start' button.</p><p>Sad thing is, I'm actually not making those types of complaints up. I've heard them all, at least 5 times each.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because they feel that they need to cater to the lowest common denominator , and that is the Windows demographic.These people want to use anything that moves to replace the virus-infested hellbox hiding in every room in their house , just so they can do it all again.People complain if they ca n't install their PopCap games.People complain if they ca n't turn it on and see their 'meadow'.People complain if they ca n't find their 'Start ' button.Sad thing is , I 'm actually not making those types of complaints up .
I 've heard them all , at least 5 times each .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because they feel that they need to cater to the lowest common denominator, and that is the Windows demographic.These people want to use anything that moves to replace the virus-infested hellbox hiding in every room in their house, just so they can do it all again.People complain if they can't install their PopCap games.People complain if they can't turn it on and see their 'meadow'.People complain if they can't find their 'Start' button.Sad thing is, I'm actually not making those types of complaints up.
I've heard them all, at least 5 times each.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723989</id>
	<title>in combination with a wearable display</title>
	<author>kievit</author>
	<datestamp>1255340520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When you have <a href="http://www.vuzix.com/iwear/products\_wrap920av.html" title="vuzix.com">toy like this</a> [vuzix.com] or somesuch, then you do not need a regular screen. A screenless laptop plus wearable display seems to me a nice solution for mobile computing. Of course the laptop should have a battery life of 8h then. Which should actually be easy, because I would expect those display goggles to use less power than a regular screen.</p><p>As a side note: for tall people like me this would be kind of ideal for computing in an airplane. Unless I'm in an exit row or bulk head seat there is no way I can see my regular laptop screen. With display goggles that problem is completely solved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When you have toy like this [ vuzix.com ] or somesuch , then you do not need a regular screen .
A screenless laptop plus wearable display seems to me a nice solution for mobile computing .
Of course the laptop should have a battery life of 8h then .
Which should actually be easy , because I would expect those display goggles to use less power than a regular screen.As a side note : for tall people like me this would be kind of ideal for computing in an airplane .
Unless I 'm in an exit row or bulk head seat there is no way I can see my regular laptop screen .
With display goggles that problem is completely solved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you have toy like this [vuzix.com] or somesuch, then you do not need a regular screen.
A screenless laptop plus wearable display seems to me a nice solution for mobile computing.
Of course the laptop should have a battery life of 8h then.
Which should actually be easy, because I would expect those display goggles to use less power than a regular screen.As a side note: for tall people like me this would be kind of ideal for computing in an airplane.
Unless I'm in an exit row or bulk head seat there is no way I can see my regular laptop screen.
With display goggles that problem is completely solved.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723707</id>
	<title>1982 called -</title>
	<author>jason.sweet</author>
	<datestamp>1255339620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They want their PC back.

If only it would play Summer Games.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They want their PC back .
If only it would play Summer Games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They want their PC back.
If only it would play Summer Games.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722789</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, it's my TRS-80 Color Computer 2!</title>
	<author>oh2</author>
	<datestamp>1255378860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, I for one think its very cool. I might buy one just because its shiny.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I for one think its very cool .
I might buy one just because its shiny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I for one think its very cool.
I might buy one just because its shiny.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722661</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29728027</id>
	<title>Re:XP?</title>
	<author>wvmarle</author>
	<datestamp>1255363800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pretty much my thought.
</p><p>Shiny new computer, latest hardware, almost decade old software (and by now two generations behind what MS has on offer).
</p><p>Sad, truly sad, from all sides. ASUS for not installing some up-to-date software on it, MS for not being able to write an operating system that runs on anything less than top-of-the-line state of the art hardware.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty much my thought .
Shiny new computer , latest hardware , almost decade old software ( and by now two generations behind what MS has on offer ) .
Sad , truly sad , from all sides .
ASUS for not installing some up-to-date software on it , MS for not being able to write an operating system that runs on anything less than top-of-the-line state of the art hardware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty much my thought.
Shiny new computer, latest hardware, almost decade old software (and by now two generations behind what MS has on offer).
Sad, truly sad, from all sides.
ASUS for not installing some up-to-date software on it, MS for not being able to write an operating system that runs on anything less than top-of-the-line state of the art hardware.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722823</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29727999</id>
	<title>Commodore  64</title>
	<author>EEPROMS</author>
	<datestamp>1255363620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b> "I'm baaaaack!!"</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 'm baaaaack ! !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "I'm baaaaack!!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722965</id>
	<title>Re:What would you use this for?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255379520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Basically yes, use it to play your cartoons or movies of choice, while checking your email.  I'll stick to my mythbox personally though.  Screen is too small to be useful without hooking it up to your TV, and if you are doing that its main advantage is size alone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Basically yes , use it to play your cartoons or movies of choice , while checking your email .
I 'll stick to my mythbox personally though .
Screen is too small to be useful without hooking it up to your TV , and if you are doing that its main advantage is size alone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Basically yes, use it to play your cartoons or movies of choice, while checking your email.
I'll stick to my mythbox personally though.
Screen is too small to be useful without hooking it up to your TV, and if you are doing that its main advantage is size alone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724333</id>
	<title>Traffic Exchange</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255342020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its very helpful for those people who are left hand writer...</p><p>Traffic Exchange - Solo Ads - Email Solo Ads<br>http://www.primerealadstate.com/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its very helpful for those people who are left hand writer...Traffic Exchange - Solo Ads - Email Solo Adshttp : //www.primerealadstate.com/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its very helpful for those people who are left hand writer...Traffic Exchange - Solo Ads - Email Solo Adshttp://www.primerealadstate.com/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722841</id>
	<title>ITS 2009</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255379100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>WHY ARE WE STILL USING KEYBOARDS?!! die die die die die death to all keyboards!</htmltext>
<tokenext>WHY ARE WE STILL USING KEYBOARDS ? ! !
die die die die die death to all keyboards !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WHY ARE WE STILL USING KEYBOARDS?!!
die die die die die death to all keyboards!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29733341</id>
	<title>Re:Major obvious flaw</title>
	<author>ibmjones</author>
	<datestamp>1255455540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where is the mod for TMI?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where is the mod for TMI ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where is the mod for TMI?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723161</id>
	<title>it's got a fan!</title>
	<author>Locutus</author>
	<datestamp>1255380540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>holy cow, they still need a fan on those things?  Can't wait to hear these things rattling around after a couple of years when the bearings start going out. They should release an ARM version IMO.<br><br>LoB</htmltext>
<tokenext>holy cow , they still need a fan on those things ?
Ca n't wait to hear these things rattling around after a couple of years when the bearings start going out .
They should release an ARM version IMO.LoB</tokentext>
<sentencetext>holy cow, they still need a fan on those things?
Can't wait to hear these things rattling around after a couple of years when the bearings start going out.
They should release an ARM version IMO.LoB</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29725625</id>
	<title>My big question is</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255347840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can I use this as a keyboard?</p><p>It would be an awesome input device, I could use the little screen as a tray or notifier or task switcher or extended clipboard or whatever, for the purpose of controlling a *real* computer.</p><p>Somehow I suspect I'd have to hack some kind of VNC or whatever in there instead of the simple expedient of plugging it into a USB port to get the actual keyboard part.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I use this as a keyboard ? It would be an awesome input device , I could use the little screen as a tray or notifier or task switcher or extended clipboard or whatever , for the purpose of controlling a * real * computer.Somehow I suspect I 'd have to hack some kind of VNC or whatever in there instead of the simple expedient of plugging it into a USB port to get the actual keyboard part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I use this as a keyboard?It would be an awesome input device, I could use the little screen as a tray or notifier or task switcher or extended clipboard or whatever, for the purpose of controlling a *real* computer.Somehow I suspect I'd have to hack some kind of VNC or whatever in there instead of the simple expedient of plugging it into a USB port to get the actual keyboard part.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723105</id>
	<title>Good choice going with SSD</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255380180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know about you, but my HTPC's wireless keyboard gets beat around and dropped quite a bit. I wouldn't want to subject an HDD to that.</p><p>My personal feelings... I question the usefulness of this over a dedicated Ion box with a wireless keyboard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about you , but my HTPC 's wireless keyboard gets beat around and dropped quite a bit .
I would n't want to subject an HDD to that.My personal feelings... I question the usefulness of this over a dedicated Ion box with a wireless keyboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about you, but my HTPC's wireless keyboard gets beat around and dropped quite a bit.
I wouldn't want to subject an HDD to that.My personal feelings... I question the usefulness of this over a dedicated Ion box with a wireless keyboard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29726055</id>
	<title>Re:XP?</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1255350120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Microsoft way: Damn if you do, damned if you don't.</p><p>(It's why I use Linux. You aren't damned either way.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Microsoft way : Damn if you do , damned if you do n't .
( It 's why I use Linux .
You are n't damned either way .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Microsoft way: Damn if you do, damned if you don't.
(It's why I use Linux.
You aren't damned either way.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722823</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722823</id>
	<title>XP?</title>
	<author>clang\_jangle</author>
	<datestamp>1255378980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just the other day there was a story about how MS was refusing to patch a vulnerability in XP's ssh implementation (ISTR it was particularly bad for paypal users). Plus we've all heard the crowing about 7 being good to go on netbooks (though as someone who's been testing the RC for work, I do find that one a bit hard to believe -- it's still bloaty and takes more resources than the average netbook can provide). Yet MS is going to continue to push XP for the EEE? I'm confused... Is this their acknowledgement that win7 is not fit for netbooks? Then shouldn't they be patching the problems in XP, if they're going to keep pushing it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just the other day there was a story about how MS was refusing to patch a vulnerability in XP 's ssh implementation ( ISTR it was particularly bad for paypal users ) .
Plus we 've all heard the crowing about 7 being good to go on netbooks ( though as someone who 's been testing the RC for work , I do find that one a bit hard to believe -- it 's still bloaty and takes more resources than the average netbook can provide ) .
Yet MS is going to continue to push XP for the EEE ?
I 'm confused... Is this their acknowledgement that win7 is not fit for netbooks ?
Then should n't they be patching the problems in XP , if they 're going to keep pushing it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just the other day there was a story about how MS was refusing to patch a vulnerability in XP's ssh implementation (ISTR it was particularly bad for paypal users).
Plus we've all heard the crowing about 7 being good to go on netbooks (though as someone who's been testing the RC for work, I do find that one a bit hard to believe -- it's still bloaty and takes more resources than the average netbook can provide).
Yet MS is going to continue to push XP for the EEE?
I'm confused... Is this their acknowledgement that win7 is not fit for netbooks?
Then shouldn't they be patching the problems in XP, if they're going to keep pushing it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723259</id>
	<title>But ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255381020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... does it run Linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... does it run Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... does it run Linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29725063</id>
	<title>Re:Major obvious flaw</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255345260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cheese and rice, just turn the thing around, is that hard for you?!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cheese and rice , just turn the thing around , is that hard for you ? !
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cheese and rice, just turn the thing around, is that hard for you?!
;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723131</id>
	<title>I know it wouldn't quite contain the name, but...</title>
	<author>cupantae</author>
	<datestamp>1255380360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they should have called it the KeeeyPC</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they should have called it the KeeeyPC</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they should have called it the KeeeyPC</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29753077</id>
	<title>Like DRM for your keyboard...</title>
	<author>marciot</author>
	<datestamp>1255537020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is just an evil ploy to sell you a keyboard which doesn't work with the computer *you* want to be able to plug it into.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is just an evil ploy to sell you a keyboard which does n't work with the computer * you * want to be able to plug it into .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is just an evil ploy to sell you a keyboard which doesn't work with the computer *you* want to be able to plug it into.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723249</id>
	<title>Major obvious flaw</title>
	<author>davevt5</author>
	<datestamp>1255380960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is built for people who are right handed. That vast majority of people that matter to me are left-handed.</p><p>Any chance there will be a version sold at the Leftorium?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is built for people who are right handed .
That vast majority of people that matter to me are left-handed.Any chance there will be a version sold at the Leftorium ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is built for people who are right handed.
That vast majority of people that matter to me are left-handed.Any chance there will be a version sold at the Leftorium?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722617</id>
	<title>Shadowrun</title>
	<author>vertinox</author>
	<datestamp>1255378140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does this remind anyone of the Shadowrunner decks?</p><p>Maybe if I get this, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/16/vuzix-wrap-310-video-eyewear-actually-isnt-the-ugliest-thing-of/" title="engadget.com">Vuzix Wrap Eyewear</a> [engadget.com], a neon green mohawk, and leather jacket I can start calling myself a "Decker"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this remind anyone of the Shadowrunner decks ? Maybe if I get this , Vuzix Wrap Eyewear [ engadget.com ] , a neon green mohawk , and leather jacket I can start calling myself a " Decker " ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this remind anyone of the Shadowrunner decks?Maybe if I get this, Vuzix Wrap Eyewear [engadget.com], a neon green mohawk, and leather jacket I can start calling myself a "Decker" ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29726005</id>
	<title>Re:10 meters for non-video transmission to a TV?</title>
	<author>Jeremy Erwin</author>
	<datestamp>1255349880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Unlike the "cool" option of actually transmitting low power ATSC on an (unused) channel</i></p><p>I'm not sure that the FCC would like this very much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unlike the " cool " option of actually transmitting low power ATSC on an ( unused ) channelI 'm not sure that the FCC would like this very much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unlike the "cool" option of actually transmitting low power ATSC on an (unused) channelI'm not sure that the FCC would like this very much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722805</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723225</id>
	<title>Where's my Delorian????</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255380900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm back in the 80's!!!<br><br>http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/radio-shack-trs-80-model-100-mobile-computer.jpg<br><br>http://www.phys.uwosh.edu/mike/calcs/pc1.html<br><br>http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7b/Sharp-PC1500-IMG\_0306.JPG<br><br>All they need with that thing is a thermal printer and someone with frizzy hair!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm back in the 80 's ! !
! http : //www.geekwithlaptop.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/radio-shack-trs-80-model-100-mobile-computer.jpghttp : //www.phys.uwosh.edu/mike/calcs/pc1.htmlhttp : //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7b/Sharp-PC1500-IMG \ _0306.JPGAll they need with that thing is a thermal printer and someone with frizzy hair !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm back in the 80's!!
!http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/radio-shack-trs-80-model-100-mobile-computer.jpghttp://www.phys.uwosh.edu/mike/calcs/pc1.htmlhttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7b/Sharp-PC1500-IMG\_0306.JPGAll they need with that thing is a thermal printer and someone with frizzy hair!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723947</id>
	<title>Re:XP?</title>
	<author>vxvxvxvx</author>
	<datestamp>1255340340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>On the one hand they're claiming XP is obsolete. On the other, they're still pushing it even on yet unreleased devices. My only assumption can be that this Eee keyboard is obsolete and that I should hold out for a linux based one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>On the one hand they 're claiming XP is obsolete .
On the other , they 're still pushing it even on yet unreleased devices .
My only assumption can be that this Eee keyboard is obsolete and that I should hold out for a linux based one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the one hand they're claiming XP is obsolete.
On the other, they're still pushing it even on yet unreleased devices.
My only assumption can be that this Eee keyboard is obsolete and that I should hold out for a linux based one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722823</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29727225</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, it's my TRS-80 Color Computer 2!</title>
	<author>ukemike</author>
	<datestamp>1255357380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun." Ecclesiastes 1:9</p></div><p>This has all happened before and it will all happen again."  Battlestar Galactica.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" What has been will be again , what has been done will be done again ; there is nothing new under the sun .
" Ecclesiastes 1 : 9This has all happened before and it will all happen again .
" Battlestar Galactica .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.
" Ecclesiastes 1:9This has all happened before and it will all happen again.
"  Battlestar Galactica.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722661</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29725683</id>
	<title>sweet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255348200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think my blind geek friend would dig this. I've seen him several times on his laptop, with his screen completely blank, except for backlight, and I'm thinking, if they only made laptops without screens, you could totally save on weight and power. But, I thought, there's no market for blind people, so nobody's going to make a laptop without a screen. Well, this has a small screen, but it still has me excited. Too bad it uses Windows, but he can always install gentoo.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think my blind geek friend would dig this .
I 've seen him several times on his laptop , with his screen completely blank , except for backlight , and I 'm thinking , if they only made laptops without screens , you could totally save on weight and power .
But , I thought , there 's no market for blind people , so nobody 's going to make a laptop without a screen .
Well , this has a small screen , but it still has me excited .
Too bad it uses Windows , but he can always install gentoo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think my blind geek friend would dig this.
I've seen him several times on his laptop, with his screen completely blank, except for backlight, and I'm thinking, if they only made laptops without screens, you could totally save on weight and power.
But, I thought, there's no market for blind people, so nobody's going to make a laptop without a screen.
Well, this has a small screen, but it still has me excited.
Too bad it uses Windows, but he can always install gentoo.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722895</id>
	<title>Re:Mechanica Stress and Spilt Milk?</title>
	<author>Al Dimond</author>
	<datestamp>1255379220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the target is something like the iMac and Mac Mini markets.  As for keyboard-integrated computers, what about laptops, which are practically the only computers sold today?  And, while we're on the subject, I've lately been wondering why so many good laptop technologies have never made it onto desktop machines.  I, for one, would love to have a small battery in my desktop box for when the power went out (I've lived some places that had really crummy power connections) and something like a laptop battery would be smaller, cheaper, and better-integrated with a standard desktop OS than a UPS.  And most of the components don't really need a full-sized case.  Full-sized hard drives and power supplies, by my understanding, are legitimately better than mini hard drives and external power bricks... and video cards, for people that care about graphics.  I really don't, which saves me some space... so why can't I buy, right off the shelf, a small-form-factor desktop PC with quality desktop components where they matter and tiny ones where they don't?  With a laptop-style battery, great ACPI support out of the box, and practically noiseless (unless I'm running a compile job)?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the target is something like the iMac and Mac Mini markets .
As for keyboard-integrated computers , what about laptops , which are practically the only computers sold today ?
And , while we 're on the subject , I 've lately been wondering why so many good laptop technologies have never made it onto desktop machines .
I , for one , would love to have a small battery in my desktop box for when the power went out ( I 've lived some places that had really crummy power connections ) and something like a laptop battery would be smaller , cheaper , and better-integrated with a standard desktop OS than a UPS .
And most of the components do n't really need a full-sized case .
Full-sized hard drives and power supplies , by my understanding , are legitimately better than mini hard drives and external power bricks... and video cards , for people that care about graphics .
I really do n't , which saves me some space... so why ca n't I buy , right off the shelf , a small-form-factor desktop PC with quality desktop components where they matter and tiny ones where they do n't ?
With a laptop-style battery , great ACPI support out of the box , and practically noiseless ( unless I 'm running a compile job ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the target is something like the iMac and Mac Mini markets.
As for keyboard-integrated computers, what about laptops, which are practically the only computers sold today?
And, while we're on the subject, I've lately been wondering why so many good laptop technologies have never made it onto desktop machines.
I, for one, would love to have a small battery in my desktop box for when the power went out (I've lived some places that had really crummy power connections) and something like a laptop battery would be smaller, cheaper, and better-integrated with a standard desktop OS than a UPS.
And most of the components don't really need a full-sized case.
Full-sized hard drives and power supplies, by my understanding, are legitimately better than mini hard drives and external power bricks... and video cards, for people that care about graphics.
I really don't, which saves me some space... so why can't I buy, right off the shelf, a small-form-factor desktop PC with quality desktop components where they matter and tiny ones where they don't?
With a laptop-style battery, great ACPI support out of the box, and practically noiseless (unless I'm running a compile job)?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722643</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724511</id>
	<title>Re:Shadowrun</title>
	<author>Bigbutt</author>
	<datestamp>1255342740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep. Looking forward to nabbing one and taking it apart<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>[John]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep .
Looking forward to nabbing one and taking it apart : ) [ John ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep.
Looking forward to nabbing one and taking it apart :)[John]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722617</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29726979</id>
	<title>Re:Why not Linux?</title>
	<author>dbIII</author>
	<datestamp>1255355520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I just wish Eee put a Linux option on more of their gear</p></div></blockquote><p>Well, there was that trade show where the CEO was singing the praises of the eeepc with linux in the morning, had lunch with some MS people, and then <b>apologised</b>to the audience and press for selling pre-installed linux machines instead of XP.  Whatever happened in that meeting was enough for a CEO to publicly embarrass himself so you can bet that it's a policy handed directly from the top to not have linux on these things for as long as whatever promises, threats or inducements hold.<br>It's a pity because while people complain about the distro (xandros) it was actually set up with a very good interface for people that are not very familiar with computers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just wish Eee put a Linux option on more of their gearWell , there was that trade show where the CEO was singing the praises of the eeepc with linux in the morning , had lunch with some MS people , and then apologisedto the audience and press for selling pre-installed linux machines instead of XP .
Whatever happened in that meeting was enough for a CEO to publicly embarrass himself so you can bet that it 's a policy handed directly from the top to not have linux on these things for as long as whatever promises , threats or inducements hold.It 's a pity because while people complain about the distro ( xandros ) it was actually set up with a very good interface for people that are not very familiar with computers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just wish Eee put a Linux option on more of their gearWell, there was that trade show where the CEO was singing the praises of the eeepc with linux in the morning, had lunch with some MS people, and then apologisedto the audience and press for selling pre-installed linux machines instead of XP.
Whatever happened in that meeting was enough for a CEO to publicly embarrass himself so you can bet that it's a policy handed directly from the top to not have linux on these things for as long as whatever promises, threats or inducements hold.It's a pity because while people complain about the distro (xandros) it was actually set up with a very good interface for people that are not very familiar with computers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722661</id>
	<title>Wow, it's my TRS-80 Color Computer 2!</title>
	<author>ClayJar</author>
	<datestamp>1255378320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My very first computer was a TRS-80 Color Computer 2.  It was basically a computer in a keyboard that I connected to the TV.  Now, decades later, I will soon be able to buy a computer built into a keyboard that will display on my TV.</p><p>"What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun."  Ecclesiastes 1:9 (NIV)</p><p>Of course, if this can handle "HD" YouTube, Netflix streaming, and other online sources, it might actually be worth looking into as an alternative to building my own low-power box for the TV.  At least worth keeping an eye open, I suppose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My very first computer was a TRS-80 Color Computer 2 .
It was basically a computer in a keyboard that I connected to the TV .
Now , decades later , I will soon be able to buy a computer built into a keyboard that will display on my TV .
" What has been will be again , what has been done will be done again ; there is nothing new under the sun .
" Ecclesiastes 1 : 9 ( NIV ) Of course , if this can handle " HD " YouTube , Netflix streaming , and other online sources , it might actually be worth looking into as an alternative to building my own low-power box for the TV .
At least worth keeping an eye open , I suppose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My very first computer was a TRS-80 Color Computer 2.
It was basically a computer in a keyboard that I connected to the TV.
Now, decades later, I will soon be able to buy a computer built into a keyboard that will display on my TV.
"What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.
"  Ecclesiastes 1:9 (NIV)Of course, if this can handle "HD" YouTube, Netflix streaming, and other online sources, it might actually be worth looking into as an alternative to building my own low-power box for the TV.
At least worth keeping an eye open, I suppose.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722875</id>
	<title>Yup</title>
	<author>bigattichouse</author>
	<datestamp>1255379220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No one escapes the commodore amiga/64/128 form factor all in one.</p><p>No one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No one escapes the commodore amiga/64/128 form factor all in one.No one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one escapes the commodore amiga/64/128 form factor all in one.No one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29731271</id>
	<title>Re:800 x 480?</title>
	<author>YourExperiment</author>
	<datestamp>1255445820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The aspect ratio of a 800 x 480 screen is about half-way between WUXGA (1920 x 1200) and full HD (1920 x 1080), which seems to be equally common on monitors these days. So 800 x 480 is hardly an unprecedented step.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The aspect ratio of a 800 x 480 screen is about half-way between WUXGA ( 1920 x 1200 ) and full HD ( 1920 x 1080 ) , which seems to be equally common on monitors these days .
So 800 x 480 is hardly an unprecedented step .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The aspect ratio of a 800 x 480 screen is about half-way between WUXGA (1920 x 1200) and full HD (1920 x 1080), which seems to be equally common on monitors these days.
So 800 x 480 is hardly an unprecedented step.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723783</id>
	<title>Re:Major obvious flaw</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255339860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Correction: this is built for people who use the touchpad with their right hand. (I am right handed, but I mouse on the left, so I can keep my right hand on the keyboard. Or penis, depending on the situation.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Correction : this is built for people who use the touchpad with their right hand .
( I am right handed , but I mouse on the left , so I can keep my right hand on the keyboard .
Or penis , depending on the situation .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correction: this is built for people who use the touchpad with their right hand.
(I am right handed, but I mouse on the left, so I can keep my right hand on the keyboard.
Or penis, depending on the situation.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723391</id>
	<title>Re:10 meters for non-video transmission to a TV?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255338420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it has to do with the strength of the signal.  For rapid screen updates (without horrid latency) you need to be within 16 feet of the TV.  Up to 32 feet away, you can still get a semi-static display, just not watching 60 FPS video.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it has to do with the strength of the signal .
For rapid screen updates ( without horrid latency ) you need to be within 16 feet of the TV .
Up to 32 feet away , you can still get a semi-static display , just not watching 60 FPS video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it has to do with the strength of the signal.
For rapid screen updates (without horrid latency) you need to be within 16 feet of the TV.
Up to 32 feet away, you can still get a semi-static display, just not watching 60 FPS video.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722805</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29725509</id>
	<title>Yesh!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255347240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why, with all that space in the keyboard, do they need a huge wireless antennae adapter to hang out and get broken...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why , with all that space in the keyboard , do they need a huge wireless antennae adapter to hang out and get broken.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why, with all that space in the keyboard, do they need a huge wireless antennae adapter to hang out and get broken...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722553</id>
	<title>Don't bother</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255377840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>There will be no linux driver for it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There will be no linux driver for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There will be no linux driver for it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722753</id>
	<title>What would you use this for?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1255378740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry, my creativity is running a little dry here.  Why would I want this?  Is the idea to keep this by the couch and use it as my living room computer, and run video off it to my TV wirelessly with UWB?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , my creativity is running a little dry here .
Why would I want this ?
Is the idea to keep this by the couch and use it as my living room computer , and run video off it to my TV wirelessly with UWB ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, my creativity is running a little dry here.
Why would I want this?
Is the idea to keep this by the couch and use it as my living room computer, and run video off it to my TV wirelessly with UWB?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724449</id>
	<title>Re:The C64 is back!</title>
	<author>Haxamanish</author>
	<datestamp>1255342500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Also install <a href="http://www.pygame.org/" title="pygame.org" rel="nofollow">Pygame</a> [pygame.org] for them to make it true fun.
<br> <br>
About the indentation remark by the AC above: I expected I would hate Python's indentation rule, but I actually love it. Liberated from BEGIN &amp; END or { &amp; }.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also install Pygame [ pygame.org ] for them to make it true fun .
About the indentation remark by the AC above : I expected I would hate Python 's indentation rule , but I actually love it .
Liberated from BEGIN &amp; END or { &amp; } .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also install Pygame [pygame.org] for them to make it true fun.
About the indentation remark by the AC above: I expected I would hate Python's indentation rule, but I actually love it.
Liberated from BEGIN &amp; END or { &amp; }.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723081</id>
	<title>too many outputs</title>
	<author>viridari</author>
	<datestamp>1255380060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The computer should just be a small non-descript box in the entertainment center rack. The keyboard/touchpad should operate without cables, on commodity AA rechargeable batteries. I know this thing has some wireless capabilities but the ports on there are pretty useless to me. Put the expensive stuff in the rack, and let me have a cheap disposable keyboard/pointer on the table where it's likely to have beer or coffee spilled on it from guests.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The computer should just be a small non-descript box in the entertainment center rack .
The keyboard/touchpad should operate without cables , on commodity AA rechargeable batteries .
I know this thing has some wireless capabilities but the ports on there are pretty useless to me .
Put the expensive stuff in the rack , and let me have a cheap disposable keyboard/pointer on the table where it 's likely to have beer or coffee spilled on it from guests .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The computer should just be a small non-descript box in the entertainment center rack.
The keyboard/touchpad should operate without cables, on commodity AA rechargeable batteries.
I know this thing has some wireless capabilities but the ports on there are pretty useless to me.
Put the expensive stuff in the rack, and let me have a cheap disposable keyboard/pointer on the table where it's likely to have beer or coffee spilled on it from guests.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723611</id>
	<title>Re:10 meters for non-video transmission to a TV?</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1255339320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"the UWB receiver has USB ports on it (for those who are cool enough to have one of these, and so antiquated that the have a wired printer)"<br> <br>

Or, more plausibly, one's interest in having a DVD/blu-ray/big HDD loaded with rips drive is limited when walking around the house; but significant when next to the TV...</htmltext>
<tokenext>" the UWB receiver has USB ports on it ( for those who are cool enough to have one of these , and so antiquated that the have a wired printer ) " Or , more plausibly , one 's interest in having a DVD/blu-ray/big HDD loaded with rips drive is limited when walking around the house ; but significant when next to the TV.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"the UWB receiver has USB ports on it (for those who are cool enough to have one of these, and so antiquated that the have a wired printer)" 

Or, more plausibly, one's interest in having a DVD/blu-ray/big HDD loaded with rips drive is limited when walking around the house; but significant when next to the TV...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722805</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29725169</id>
	<title>Re:too many outputs</title>
	<author>Nerdfest</author>
	<datestamp>1255345740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I keep saying<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... "All computers should be black and rack mount". Curvy cases that you can't stack are pretty on their own, but useless around other equipment. The same goes for routers (Linksys 160N, I'm looking at you). You'd think we'd be at the point where manufacturers would not be charging a premium for rackable equipment. It doesn't even need to be truly rack mount, just a similar form-factor, like audio/video equipment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I keep saying ... " All computers should be black and rack mount " .
Curvy cases that you ca n't stack are pretty on their own , but useless around other equipment .
The same goes for routers ( Linksys 160N , I 'm looking at you ) .
You 'd think we 'd be at the point where manufacturers would not be charging a premium for rackable equipment .
It does n't even need to be truly rack mount , just a similar form-factor , like audio/video equipment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I keep saying ... "All computers should be black and rack mount".
Curvy cases that you can't stack are pretty on their own, but useless around other equipment.
The same goes for routers (Linksys 160N, I'm looking at you).
You'd think we'd be at the point where manufacturers would not be charging a premium for rackable equipment.
It doesn't even need to be truly rack mount, just a similar form-factor, like audio/video equipment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723081</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722893</id>
	<title>Re:Shadowrun</title>
	<author>Steauengeglase</author>
	<datestamp>1255379220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Decker was the first word I thought when I saw it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Decker was the first word I thought when I saw it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Decker was the first word I thought when I saw it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722617</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722915</id>
	<title>Re:Don't bother</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1255379280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>In this application, the UWB interface basically replaces two wires. It goes from the computer to a breakout box with 1 HDMI and a few USB ports. Essentially, one HDMI cable and one USB cable going to a USB hub.<br> <br>

If the whole mass is implemented as a "UWB interface device" linux support would be a real surprise. I'd probably be just like wireless in the bad old days, only worse. However, they could also, in principle, have encapsulated the whole UWB bit behind standard looking interfaces. If all the host computer sees is a USB port and an HDMI port, with the UWB silently replacing the usual wires, then software support should be more or less automatic(although, there probably will be some little pairing interface to be figured out).</htmltext>
<tokenext>In this application , the UWB interface basically replaces two wires .
It goes from the computer to a breakout box with 1 HDMI and a few USB ports .
Essentially , one HDMI cable and one USB cable going to a USB hub .
If the whole mass is implemented as a " UWB interface device " linux support would be a real surprise .
I 'd probably be just like wireless in the bad old days , only worse .
However , they could also , in principle , have encapsulated the whole UWB bit behind standard looking interfaces .
If all the host computer sees is a USB port and an HDMI port , with the UWB silently replacing the usual wires , then software support should be more or less automatic ( although , there probably will be some little pairing interface to be figured out ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In this application, the UWB interface basically replaces two wires.
It goes from the computer to a breakout box with 1 HDMI and a few USB ports.
Essentially, one HDMI cable and one USB cable going to a USB hub.
If the whole mass is implemented as a "UWB interface device" linux support would be a real surprise.
I'd probably be just like wireless in the bad old days, only worse.
However, they could also, in principle, have encapsulated the whole UWB bit behind standard looking interfaces.
If all the host computer sees is a USB port and an HDMI port, with the UWB silently replacing the usual wires, then software support should be more or less automatic(although, there probably will be some little pairing interface to be figured out).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722553</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29725063
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723521
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722661
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723041
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724137
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722793
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722661
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29726055
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722823
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29728027
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722823
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29763631
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722553
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29739513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722617
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722617
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29727225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722661
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722915
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722553
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29728413
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724511
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722617
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29728177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29727475
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724785
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722823
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722643
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723611
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722805
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723147
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29731549
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722617
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29731271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29726979
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723485
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29725169
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723081
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29739231
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722661
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29729665
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29728749
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29726391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29728261
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722661
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724449
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29726005
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722805
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722895
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722643
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723377
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722805
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723947
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722823
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29733341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724385
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722753
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_10_12_1529202_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723497
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722805
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723265
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723225
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723081
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29725169
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723105
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722805
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723391
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29726005
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723497
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723611
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723219
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29731271
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724795
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723249
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29725063
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723783
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29739513
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29739231
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29733341
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29727475
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722585
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29729665
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722795
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723041
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722715
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723377
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723795
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724449
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723147
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722753
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29726391
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724385
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722965
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723485
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29727999
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722841
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723259
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722661
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29728261
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723521
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29727225
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722793
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724137
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722789
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722643
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723099
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722895
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723653
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722553
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722915
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29763631
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723161
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722823
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723947
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29726055
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724785
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29728027
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723569
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723971
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29726979
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29728749
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29728413
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724819
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29728177
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_10_12_1529202.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722617
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29722893
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29724511
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29731549
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_10_12_1529202.29723167
</commentlist>
</conversation>
