<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_17_189208</id>
	<title>Court Appoints Pro Bono Counsel For RIAA Defendant</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1247821920000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">NewYorkCountryLawyer</a> writes <i>"In what could be a turning point in the RIAA's litigation campaign, a Michigan judge has <a href="http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/#5693904318713768058">decided to appoint pro bono counsel</a> to represent college student Brittany Kruger, who is being sued by the RIAA in <a href="http://beckermanlegal.com/pdf/?file=/Documents.htm&amp;s=SONY\_v\_Kruger">SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Kruger</a>. As <a href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/25367">this article points out</a>, 'if other judges follow suit, things will change dramatically.' That is because the RIAA's entire litigation campaign is based upon economic inequality of the litigants: almost none of those sued by the RIAA can afford legal representation, and the RIAA has a huge economic incentive to fight cases to the death, while the defendants have no economic incentive greater than the 'settlement' amount, which they often pay even when entirely innocent. If the courts follow the lead of <a href="http://beckermanlegal.com/pdf/?file=/Lawyer\_Copyright\_Internet\_Law/sony\_kruger\_090713OrderRefMagisApptProBonoCounsel.pdf">District Judge Timothy P. Greeley</a> [PDF], and appoint pro bono legal counsel, the RIAA will no longer be able to achieve the easy pickings default judgments and 'settlements' it's routinely obtained in the past."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>NewYorkCountryLawyer writes " In what could be a turning point in the RIAA 's litigation campaign , a Michigan judge has decided to appoint pro bono counsel to represent college student Brittany Kruger , who is being sued by the RIAA in SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Kruger. As this article points out , 'if other judges follow suit , things will change dramatically .
' That is because the RIAA 's entire litigation campaign is based upon economic inequality of the litigants : almost none of those sued by the RIAA can afford legal representation , and the RIAA has a huge economic incentive to fight cases to the death , while the defendants have no economic incentive greater than the 'settlement ' amount , which they often pay even when entirely innocent .
If the courts follow the lead of District Judge Timothy P. Greeley [ PDF ] , and appoint pro bono legal counsel , the RIAA will no longer be able to achieve the easy pickings default judgments and 'settlements ' it 's routinely obtained in the past .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "In what could be a turning point in the RIAA's litigation campaign, a Michigan judge has decided to appoint pro bono counsel to represent college student Brittany Kruger, who is being sued by the RIAA in SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Kruger. As this article points out, 'if other judges follow suit, things will change dramatically.
' That is because the RIAA's entire litigation campaign is based upon economic inequality of the litigants: almost none of those sued by the RIAA can afford legal representation, and the RIAA has a huge economic incentive to fight cases to the death, while the defendants have no economic incentive greater than the 'settlement' amount, which they often pay even when entirely innocent.
If the courts follow the lead of District Judge Timothy P. Greeley [PDF], and appoint pro bono legal counsel, the RIAA will no longer be able to achieve the easy pickings default judgments and 'settlements' it's routinely obtained in the past.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28744117</id>
	<title>Re:Idea and better; BAIT the RIAA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247918460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've wondered why someone hasn't baited the RIAA into a faulty lawsuit with a hard drive loaded with non-membership music. One of the provisions rejected was that the RIAA didn't have to qualify which recordings belonged to their membership before filing a lawsuit - expecting Congress to agree that all mp3's were illegal. If you look at the cases, out of tens of thousands of recordings found on the hard drives, only a handful of songs are included in the lawsuits - eventually. The initial charges are filed before they discover which songs to sue for. Baiting the RIAA with songs they don't represent would waste a lot of their resources. As it is, NONE of the money collected from all the settlements reimburse musicians. The RIAA also collects money for independent musicians if a song goes commercial - TV show, movie or ad. They don't reimburse them either. All recordable media - DVD and CD's included are taxed to defray the lost income from copyright infringement and yet individual artists never recover that either. Plain and simple, the RIAA and MPA are TRADE ORGANIZATIONS with corporations for membership. They have created NO content and don't represent or reimburse individuals. I'd like to see them being called on this bluff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've wondered why someone has n't baited the RIAA into a faulty lawsuit with a hard drive loaded with non-membership music .
One of the provisions rejected was that the RIAA did n't have to qualify which recordings belonged to their membership before filing a lawsuit - expecting Congress to agree that all mp3 's were illegal .
If you look at the cases , out of tens of thousands of recordings found on the hard drives , only a handful of songs are included in the lawsuits - eventually .
The initial charges are filed before they discover which songs to sue for .
Baiting the RIAA with songs they do n't represent would waste a lot of their resources .
As it is , NONE of the money collected from all the settlements reimburse musicians .
The RIAA also collects money for independent musicians if a song goes commercial - TV show , movie or ad .
They do n't reimburse them either .
All recordable media - DVD and CD 's included are taxed to defray the lost income from copyright infringement and yet individual artists never recover that either .
Plain and simple , the RIAA and MPA are TRADE ORGANIZATIONS with corporations for membership .
They have created NO content and do n't represent or reimburse individuals .
I 'd like to see them being called on this bluff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've wondered why someone hasn't baited the RIAA into a faulty lawsuit with a hard drive loaded with non-membership music.
One of the provisions rejected was that the RIAA didn't have to qualify which recordings belonged to their membership before filing a lawsuit - expecting Congress to agree that all mp3's were illegal.
If you look at the cases, out of tens of thousands of recordings found on the hard drives, only a handful of songs are included in the lawsuits - eventually.
The initial charges are filed before they discover which songs to sue for.
Baiting the RIAA with songs they don't represent would waste a lot of their resources.
As it is, NONE of the money collected from all the settlements reimburse musicians.
The RIAA also collects money for independent musicians if a song goes commercial - TV show, movie or ad.
They don't reimburse them either.
All recordable media - DVD and CD's included are taxed to defray the lost income from copyright infringement and yet individual artists never recover that either.
Plain and simple, the RIAA and MPA are TRADE ORGANIZATIONS with corporations for membership.
They have created NO content and don't represent or reimburse individuals.
I'd like to see them being called on this bluff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28739195</id>
	<title>Re:Idea</title>
	<author>cliffski</author>
	<datestamp>1247910480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what if we actually paid for music?<br>Just an idea</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what if we actually paid for music ? Just an idea</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what if we actually paid for music?Just an idea</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735709</id>
	<title>Re:sigh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247829600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ya know, I have to believe that people that advocate only patronizing free bands and such, just don't much get why there is a music industry in the first place and in not getting it they have missed a complete cultural experience that the rest of the population share in.  I'm sure that these independent free bands are just fine and have great music but the usual reason for a band publishing itself is that they suck too much for the biggies to offer them a contract.  The other reason of course is what the recent spate of indy bands have done and that is rebel against the labels.   However we have created a culture and while it is changing I admit there is still a large amount of talent being found and publicized  by the majors.  The culture is also still there and being counter culture while briefly exciting is very lonely in the end.  So maybe we should just keep nudging the industry in the right direction, keep fighting these fights and maybe just maybe we can have our culture and the free stuff too?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ya know , I have to believe that people that advocate only patronizing free bands and such , just do n't much get why there is a music industry in the first place and in not getting it they have missed a complete cultural experience that the rest of the population share in .
I 'm sure that these independent free bands are just fine and have great music but the usual reason for a band publishing itself is that they suck too much for the biggies to offer them a contract .
The other reason of course is what the recent spate of indy bands have done and that is rebel against the labels .
However we have created a culture and while it is changing I admit there is still a large amount of talent being found and publicized by the majors .
The culture is also still there and being counter culture while briefly exciting is very lonely in the end .
So maybe we should just keep nudging the industry in the right direction , keep fighting these fights and maybe just maybe we can have our culture and the free stuff too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ya know, I have to believe that people that advocate only patronizing free bands and such, just don't much get why there is a music industry in the first place and in not getting it they have missed a complete cultural experience that the rest of the population share in.
I'm sure that these independent free bands are just fine and have great music but the usual reason for a band publishing itself is that they suck too much for the biggies to offer them a contract.
The other reason of course is what the recent spate of indy bands have done and that is rebel against the labels.
However we have created a culture and while it is changing I admit there is still a large amount of talent being found and publicized  by the majors.
The culture is also still there and being counter culture while briefly exciting is very lonely in the end.
So maybe we should just keep nudging the industry in the right direction, keep fighting these fights and maybe just maybe we can have our culture and the free stuff too?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735491</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28736955</id>
	<title>lawl</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247837580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>She said she'll take the case pro boner.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She said she 'll take the case pro boner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She said she'll take the case pro boner.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28736435</id>
	<title>Bono</title>
	<author>Carra</author>
	<datestamp>1247834040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was wondering if U2 went bankrupt if Bono needs a to have his lawyer appointed by the court.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was wondering if U2 went bankrupt if Bono needs a to have his lawyer appointed by the court .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was wondering if U2 went bankrupt if Bono needs a to have his lawyer appointed by the court.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28736011</id>
	<title>Re:sigh...</title>
	<author>garcia</author>
	<datestamp>1247831460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These bands do have labels, many are RIAA (The Grateful Dead), but they also allow their shows to trade freely. Apparently I didn't make myself clear, hope that helps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These bands do have labels , many are RIAA ( The Grateful Dead ) , but they also allow their shows to trade freely .
Apparently I did n't make myself clear , hope that helps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These bands do have labels, many are RIAA (The Grateful Dead), but they also allow their shows to trade freely.
Apparently I didn't make myself clear, hope that helps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207</id>
	<title>Idea</title>
	<author>immakiku</author>
	<datestamp>1247826120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What if we created a union of RIAA suit defendants? So we'd all pre-emptively buy in to a reasonable number - say enough money to go to court against RIAA if they sued 5\% of everyone in the union. So say there's 1000 members, they'd contribute enough to the pool so that if 50 of the members get sued, they should have enough resources to go to court. Every time a case is lost against the RIAA the defendant will have to reimburse the pool.</p><p>I think this would level the playing field too. The idea is that everyone who is sued and is in this union is able to defend, instead of succumbing to debt. And the pool is only losing money proportional to how much the RIAA is losing. And if the RIAA legitimately have a case, the pool doesn't get diminished.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What if we created a union of RIAA suit defendants ?
So we 'd all pre-emptively buy in to a reasonable number - say enough money to go to court against RIAA if they sued 5 \ % of everyone in the union .
So say there 's 1000 members , they 'd contribute enough to the pool so that if 50 of the members get sued , they should have enough resources to go to court .
Every time a case is lost against the RIAA the defendant will have to reimburse the pool.I think this would level the playing field too .
The idea is that everyone who is sued and is in this union is able to defend , instead of succumbing to debt .
And the pool is only losing money proportional to how much the RIAA is losing .
And if the RIAA legitimately have a case , the pool does n't get diminished .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if we created a union of RIAA suit defendants?
So we'd all pre-emptively buy in to a reasonable number - say enough money to go to court against RIAA if they sued 5\% of everyone in the union.
So say there's 1000 members, they'd contribute enough to the pool so that if 50 of the members get sued, they should have enough resources to go to court.
Every time a case is lost against the RIAA the defendant will have to reimburse the pool.I think this would level the playing field too.
The idea is that everyone who is sued and is in this union is able to defend, instead of succumbing to debt.
And the pool is only losing money proportional to how much the RIAA is losing.
And if the RIAA legitimately have a case, the pool doesn't get diminished.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735165</id>
	<title>sigh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247825880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know I shouldn't feel this way, but I just don't care any more.  The RIAA has worn me out.  I hate all music now.  I never want to buy any of their crap again.</p><p>I'll just eat the magical fruit and toot myself to death.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know I should n't feel this way , but I just do n't care any more .
The RIAA has worn me out .
I hate all music now .
I never want to buy any of their crap again.I 'll just eat the magical fruit and toot myself to death .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know I shouldn't feel this way, but I just don't care any more.
The RIAA has worn me out.
I hate all music now.
I never want to buy any of their crap again.I'll just eat the magical fruit and toot myself to death.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735593</id>
	<title>Re:sigh...</title>
	<author>Estragib</author>
	<datestamp>1247828820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know how you feel. And I know how <em>they</em> feel:</p><p>Plenty more where you came from.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know how you feel .
And I know how they feel : Plenty more where you came from .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know how you feel.
And I know how they feel:Plenty more where you came from.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735165</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735187</id>
	<title>check http://riaaradar.com too</title>
	<author>Dan667</author>
	<datestamp>1247826000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>When you buy music, make sure to check <a href="http://riaaradar.com/" title="riaaradar.com">http://riaaradar.com/</a> [riaaradar.com] to see if the album is from a company that funds the RIAA.  If they do, don't buy it and stick it to them a couple dollars of lost earnings at a time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When you buy music , make sure to check http : //riaaradar.com/ [ riaaradar.com ] to see if the album is from a company that funds the RIAA .
If they do , do n't buy it and stick it to them a couple dollars of lost earnings at a time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you buy music, make sure to check http://riaaradar.com/ [riaaradar.com] to see if the album is from a company that funds the RIAA.
If they do, don't buy it and stick it to them a couple dollars of lost earnings at a time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735827</id>
	<title>Re:Idea</title>
	<author>sbeckstead</author>
	<datestamp>1247830320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ask the guys that run the "Comic book legal defense fund"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ask the guys that run the " Comic book legal defense fund "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ask the guys that run the "Comic book legal defense fund"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735411</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28741875</id>
	<title>Re:check http://riaaradar.com too</title>
	<author>SvnLyrBrto</author>
	<datestamp>1247941260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They also provide a list of their members on their own website:</p><p><a href="http://www.riaa.com/aboutus.php?content\_selector=aboutus\_members" title="riaa.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.riaa.com/aboutus.php?content\_selector=aboutus\_members</a> [riaa.com]</p><p>And wow, that list has grown over the years.  It used to be able to be printed on both sides of one piece of paper.  I'd leave a copy in my car.  And when the ocasion hit me to go music shopping, I'd bring it with me and if the label was on the list, I'd only buy the CD if it was available used.</p><p>Used CDs have three big advantages.  They're cheaper to guy, obviously.  The profit margin for the store is higher; and music stores that sell used CDs tend to be locally-owned independent stores, not the big chains.  And, best of all, the RIAA doesn' see a penny from used sales.  You get to have your cake and eat it too.</p><p>These days, I don't even bother with the list.  I simply ONLY buy used unless Im buying directly from the band or DJ.  That both simplifies and cheapens things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They also provide a list of their members on their own website : http : //www.riaa.com/aboutus.php ? content \ _selector = aboutus \ _members [ riaa.com ] And wow , that list has grown over the years .
It used to be able to be printed on both sides of one piece of paper .
I 'd leave a copy in my car .
And when the ocasion hit me to go music shopping , I 'd bring it with me and if the label was on the list , I 'd only buy the CD if it was available used.Used CDs have three big advantages .
They 're cheaper to guy , obviously .
The profit margin for the store is higher ; and music stores that sell used CDs tend to be locally-owned independent stores , not the big chains .
And , best of all , the RIAA doesn ' see a penny from used sales .
You get to have your cake and eat it too.These days , I do n't even bother with the list .
I simply ONLY buy used unless Im buying directly from the band or DJ .
That both simplifies and cheapens things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They also provide a list of their members on their own website:http://www.riaa.com/aboutus.php?content\_selector=aboutus\_members [riaa.com]And wow, that list has grown over the years.
It used to be able to be printed on both sides of one piece of paper.
I'd leave a copy in my car.
And when the ocasion hit me to go music shopping, I'd bring it with me and if the label was on the list, I'd only buy the CD if it was available used.Used CDs have three big advantages.
They're cheaper to guy, obviously.
The profit margin for the store is higher; and music stores that sell used CDs tend to be locally-owned independent stores, not the big chains.
And, best of all, the RIAA doesn' see a penny from used sales.
You get to have your cake and eat it too.These days, I don't even bother with the list.
I simply ONLY buy used unless Im buying directly from the band or DJ.
That both simplifies and cheapens things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735187</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28738699</id>
	<title>Yes, Ray</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247859600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because EVERYONE is innocent, aren't they? I mean, just because their wired internet connection was used to download copyrighted materials, they have these materials on their personal computer, and the same computer was then used to upload said materials to thousands of other people, they couldn't possibly be guilty of anything. It must have been somebody else who broke into their house and used their computer to download music.<br>I'm curious as to what's going to happen when you keep claiming "it MUST have been SOMEBODY ELSE! (tm)", the RIAA/MPAA keep suing, and soon you run out of "somebody else"'s to blame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because EVERYONE is innocent , are n't they ?
I mean , just because their wired internet connection was used to download copyrighted materials , they have these materials on their personal computer , and the same computer was then used to upload said materials to thousands of other people , they could n't possibly be guilty of anything .
It must have been somebody else who broke into their house and used their computer to download music.I 'm curious as to what 's going to happen when you keep claiming " it MUST have been SOMEBODY ELSE !
( tm ) " , the RIAA/MPAA keep suing , and soon you run out of " somebody else " 's to blame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because EVERYONE is innocent, aren't they?
I mean, just because their wired internet connection was used to download copyrighted materials, they have these materials on their personal computer, and the same computer was then used to upload said materials to thousands of other people, they couldn't possibly be guilty of anything.
It must have been somebody else who broke into their house and used their computer to download music.I'm curious as to what's going to happen when you keep claiming "it MUST have been SOMEBODY ELSE!
(tm)", the RIAA/MPAA keep suing, and soon you run out of "somebody else"'s to blame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735411</id>
	<title>Re:Idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247827380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But how exactly would you set the limit of how much someone could pull out of the fund to defend themselves? There has to be a limit, since you're basically setting up a collective credit line. Maybe Defendant #1 can pay back $100k in 5 years, but Defendant #2 can only pay back $10k over 5 years, but #2 claims that he can pay more....what are you going to do? Audit all the people that join the pool? After all, if you let the wrong guy in and he loses his case, maybe he won't be able to reimburse the fund.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But how exactly would you set the limit of how much someone could pull out of the fund to defend themselves ?
There has to be a limit , since you 're basically setting up a collective credit line .
Maybe Defendant # 1 can pay back $ 100k in 5 years , but Defendant # 2 can only pay back $ 10k over 5 years , but # 2 claims that he can pay more....what are you going to do ?
Audit all the people that join the pool ?
After all , if you let the wrong guy in and he loses his case , maybe he wo n't be able to reimburse the fund .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But how exactly would you set the limit of how much someone could pull out of the fund to defend themselves?
There has to be a limit, since you're basically setting up a collective credit line.
Maybe Defendant #1 can pay back $100k in 5 years, but Defendant #2 can only pay back $10k over 5 years, but #2 claims that he can pay more....what are you going to do?
Audit all the people that join the pool?
After all, if you let the wrong guy in and he loses his case, maybe he won't be able to reimburse the fund.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735461</id>
	<title>Fair's Fair</title>
	<author>FrankDrebin</author>
	<datestamp>1247827860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pro bono for the defense.  Sonny Bono for the plaintiff.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pro bono for the defense .
Sonny Bono for the plaintiff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pro bono for the defense.
Sonny Bono for the plaintiff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735565</id>
	<title>Re:Idea</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1247828640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i like the idea.  Almost like insurance.  Making it work would be tricky.  Seems a bit like hiring an army to protect us from the mafia.  Paying a shark to protect us from the other sharks.</p><p>i'd rather see a class action suit to shut down RIAA or reimburse their victims for abusing our legal system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i like the idea .
Almost like insurance .
Making it work would be tricky .
Seems a bit like hiring an army to protect us from the mafia .
Paying a shark to protect us from the other sharks.i 'd rather see a class action suit to shut down RIAA or reimburse their victims for abusing our legal system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i like the idea.
Almost like insurance.
Making it work would be tricky.
Seems a bit like hiring an army to protect us from the mafia.
Paying a shark to protect us from the other sharks.i'd rather see a class action suit to shut down RIAA or reimburse their victims for abusing our legal system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735495</id>
	<title>Re:check http://riaaradar.com too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247828100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>&lt;quote&gt;When you buy music, make sure to check &lt;a href="http://riaaradar.com/"&gt;http://riaaradar.com/&lt;/a&gt; to see if the album is from a company that funds the RIAA.&nbsp; If they do, don't buy it and stick it to them a couple dollars of lost earnings at a time.&lt;/quote&gt;<br><br>That was depressing... Most of the albums I own were released by members of the RIAA. </tt></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When you buy music , make sure to check http : //riaaradar.com/ to see if the album is from a company that funds the RIAA.   If they do , do n't buy it and stick it to them a couple dollars of lost earnings at a time.That was depressing... Most of the albums I own were released by members of the RIAA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you buy music, make sure to check http://riaaradar.com/ to see if the album is from a company that funds the RIAA.  If they do, don't buy it and stick it to them a couple dollars of lost earnings at a time.That was depressing... Most of the albums I own were released by members of the RIAA. 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735187</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28738483</id>
	<title>U2 or not U2 that is the question</title>
	<author>algoa456</author>
	<datestamp>1247855520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You may be pro Bono and that is your choice. I, however, think he is a meddlesome turd.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You may be pro Bono and that is your choice .
I , however , think he is a meddlesome turd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You may be pro Bono and that is your choice.
I, however, think he is a meddlesome turd.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735775</id>
	<title>Re:check http://riaaradar.com too</title>
	<author>91degrees</author>
	<datestamp>1247829960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Trouble is, you need a critical mass of people for a boycott to work and you simply don't have it.  People either don't care enough about this, or think that the boycott will just be put down to piracy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Trouble is , you need a critical mass of people for a boycott to work and you simply do n't have it .
People either do n't care enough about this , or think that the boycott will just be put down to piracy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trouble is, you need a critical mass of people for a boycott to work and you simply don't have it.
People either don't care enough about this, or think that the boycott will just be put down to piracy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735187</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28736029</id>
	<title>Re:sigh...</title>
	<author>ozbird</author>
	<datestamp>1247831520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I have been saying for *YEARS* (long before the RIAA was pulling the bullshit they are now) that you should be listening to free music.</p></div></blockquote><p>Free as in beer, or free as in speech?</p><blockquote><div><p>There are plenty of bands that allow the release of their live stuff on the web and no, we're not talking about crappy Indy artists that you've never heard about before.</p></div></blockquote><p>You should get out more often.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)  You've probably never heard of them because they <b>are</b> independent - or not American.  Nor does that make them "crappy".  My favourite band of all time, <a href="http://www.gathering.nl/" title="gathering.nl">The Gathering</a> [gathering.nl] is unknown in Australia; if it wasn't for the Internet and a lot of digging, I would never have known they existed.  Most of the bands I've bought CDs etc. from recently are from The Netherlands and Finland - whatever they're doing over there, they're doing it right.</p><blockquote><div><p>We're talking real bands that care more about their fans and who actually tour rather than live off the royalties of overprocessed studio shit.</p></div></blockquote><p> <b>Real</b> bands care about their music first, and everything else a distant second.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have been saying for * YEARS * ( long before the RIAA was pulling the bullshit they are now ) that you should be listening to free music.Free as in beer , or free as in speech ? There are plenty of bands that allow the release of their live stuff on the web and no , we 're not talking about crappy Indy artists that you 've never heard about before.You should get out more often .
; - ) You 've probably never heard of them because they are independent - or not American .
Nor does that make them " crappy " .
My favourite band of all time , The Gathering [ gathering.nl ] is unknown in Australia ; if it was n't for the Internet and a lot of digging , I would never have known they existed .
Most of the bands I 've bought CDs etc .
from recently are from The Netherlands and Finland - whatever they 're doing over there , they 're doing it right.We 're talking real bands that care more about their fans and who actually tour rather than live off the royalties of overprocessed studio shit .
Real bands care about their music first , and everything else a distant second .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have been saying for *YEARS* (long before the RIAA was pulling the bullshit they are now) that you should be listening to free music.Free as in beer, or free as in speech?There are plenty of bands that allow the release of their live stuff on the web and no, we're not talking about crappy Indy artists that you've never heard about before.You should get out more often.
;-)  You've probably never heard of them because they are independent - or not American.
Nor does that make them "crappy".
My favourite band of all time, The Gathering [gathering.nl] is unknown in Australia; if it wasn't for the Internet and a lot of digging, I would never have known they existed.
Most of the bands I've bought CDs etc.
from recently are from The Netherlands and Finland - whatever they're doing over there, they're doing it right.We're talking real bands that care more about their fans and who actually tour rather than live off the royalties of overprocessed studio shit.
Real bands care about their music first, and everything else a distant second.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735491</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735905</id>
	<title>Re:Idea</title>
	<author>michaelhood</author>
	<datestamp>1247830860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could give way to an interesting class action [counter-] suit of sorts. IANAL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could give way to an interesting class action [ counter- ] suit of sorts .
IANAL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could give way to an interesting class action [counter-] suit of sorts.
IANAL</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28736997</id>
	<title>Re:sigh...</title>
	<author>segfault7375</author>
	<datestamp>1247837820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree it's frustrating, and that's a very good thing.  The more and more people like you that decide you are done with the RIAA's shit, the less revenue they will have to pay their lawyers.  And with judges (hopefully) beginning to see what the RIAA is up to and giving the defendant a better means to defend himself (the pro bono help), it's only going to speed up the downward spiral.  I haven't bought (or downloaded) any music in years and I'm enjoying watching them flail a bit<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree it 's frustrating , and that 's a very good thing .
The more and more people like you that decide you are done with the RIAA 's shit , the less revenue they will have to pay their lawyers .
And with judges ( hopefully ) beginning to see what the RIAA is up to and giving the defendant a better means to defend himself ( the pro bono help ) , it 's only going to speed up the downward spiral .
I have n't bought ( or downloaded ) any music in years and I 'm enjoying watching them flail a bit : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree it's frustrating, and that's a very good thing.
The more and more people like you that decide you are done with the RIAA's shit, the less revenue they will have to pay their lawyers.
And with judges (hopefully) beginning to see what the RIAA is up to and giving the defendant a better means to defend himself (the pro bono help), it's only going to speed up the downward spiral.
I haven't bought (or downloaded) any music in years and I'm enjoying watching them flail a bit :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735165</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735653</id>
	<title>Re:Idea</title>
	<author>DMUTPeregrine</author>
	<datestamp>1247829240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You have just invented insurance. Congratulations.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You have just invented insurance .
Congratulations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have just invented insurance.
Congratulations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735867</id>
	<title>Re:Idea</title>
	<author>c</author>
	<datestamp>1247830560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; What if we created a union of RIAA suit defendants?</p><p>Because it would probably be cheaper to just buy music?</p><p>c.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; What if we created a union of RIAA suit defendants ? Because it would probably be cheaper to just buy music ? c .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; What if we created a union of RIAA suit defendants?Because it would probably be cheaper to just buy music?c.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735689</id>
	<title>Re:sigh...</title>
	<author>Nethead</author>
	<datestamp>1247829480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bill: Any listening suggestions for an old deadhead?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bill : Any listening suggestions for an old deadhead ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bill: Any listening suggestions for an old deadhead?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735491</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735395</id>
	<title>Defendent cat says</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247827320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I has already filed 'in forma pauperis" documentation with the court."</p><p>Well played.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I has already filed 'in forma pauperis " documentation with the court .
" Well played .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I has already filed 'in forma pauperis" documentation with the court.
"Well played.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735307</id>
	<title>Original Motion</title>
	<author>HaeMaker</author>
	<datestamp>1247826780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The original motion is quite <a href="http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/#5693904318713768058" title="blogspot.com">well written</a> [blogspot.com].  I especially like this part:

<p> <i>"Additionally, because criminal behavior on the part of the Plaintiffs may have occurred, I require assistance for qualified counsel appointed by the Courts."</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The original motion is quite well written [ blogspot.com ] .
I especially like this part : " Additionally , because criminal behavior on the part of the Plaintiffs may have occurred , I require assistance for qualified counsel appointed by the Courts .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The original motion is quite well written [blogspot.com].
I especially like this part:

 "Additionally, because criminal behavior on the part of the Plaintiffs may have occurred, I require assistance for qualified counsel appointed by the Courts.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28748387</id>
	<title>Re:Faulty assumption?</title>
	<author>torkus</author>
	<datestamp>1248025980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually I don't think it's as important as you think.</p><p>If you're faced with $bazillions in 'potential' fines and offered a settlement of $buy-a-car instead of paying a lawyer $buy-a-new-mercedes<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... well we know which way many people have gone.</p><p>Instead if you offer even mediocre legal counsel the person is much more likely to try for the newly available fourth choice of $nah-nah.</p><p>Having to go to trial on even 20\% of the extortion threats (oh, sorry, pre-trial settlement offers) would suddenly make the whole prospect much less promising for the MAFIAA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually I do n't think it 's as important as you think.If you 're faced with $ bazillions in 'potential ' fines and offered a settlement of $ buy-a-car instead of paying a lawyer $ buy-a-new-mercedes ... well we know which way many people have gone.Instead if you offer even mediocre legal counsel the person is much more likely to try for the newly available fourth choice of $ nah-nah.Having to go to trial on even 20 \ % of the extortion threats ( oh , sorry , pre-trial settlement offers ) would suddenly make the whole prospect much less promising for the MAFIAA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually I don't think it's as important as you think.If you're faced with $bazillions in 'potential' fines and offered a settlement of $buy-a-car instead of paying a lawyer $buy-a-new-mercedes ... well we know which way many people have gone.Instead if you offer even mediocre legal counsel the person is much more likely to try for the newly available fourth choice of $nah-nah.Having to go to trial on even 20\% of the extortion threats (oh, sorry, pre-trial settlement offers) would suddenly make the whole prospect much less promising for the MAFIAA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735455</id>
	<title>Re:Faulty assumption?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247827860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"This assumes the appointed pro-bono counsel is competent and interested in the welfare of his/her client, which may or may not be the case."</p><p>It's a hard thing to prove, but if you can prove it, the attorney can be disbarred and/or fined (and even jailed) for contempt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" This assumes the appointed pro-bono counsel is competent and interested in the welfare of his/her client , which may or may not be the case .
" It 's a hard thing to prove , but if you can prove it , the attorney can be disbarred and/or fined ( and even jailed ) for contempt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"This assumes the appointed pro-bono counsel is competent and interested in the welfare of his/her client, which may or may not be the case.
"It's a hard thing to prove, but if you can prove it, the attorney can be disbarred and/or fined (and even jailed) for contempt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735727</id>
	<title>Re:Idea</title>
	<author>hamburgler007</author>
	<datestamp>1247829660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a nice idea, but it would never work.  You would have to find enough people to buy into it to make it sustainable, and I don't think you would find anywhere close to the number of necessary people.  In the event of a successful defense, unless their is a counterclaim you are losing money.  In the event of an unsuccessful defense, considering what the judgments handed down have been, the defendant ain't going to be able to reimburse anyone in any timely fashion.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a nice idea , but it would never work .
You would have to find enough people to buy into it to make it sustainable , and I do n't think you would find anywhere close to the number of necessary people .
In the event of a successful defense , unless their is a counterclaim you are losing money .
In the event of an unsuccessful defense , considering what the judgments handed down have been , the defendant ai n't going to be able to reimburse anyone in any timely fashion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a nice idea, but it would never work.
You would have to find enough people to buy into it to make it sustainable, and I don't think you would find anywhere close to the number of necessary people.
In the event of a successful defense, unless their is a counterclaim you are losing money.
In the event of an unsuccessful defense, considering what the judgments handed down have been, the defendant ain't going to be able to reimburse anyone in any timely fashion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28737545</id>
	<title>Re:Faulty assumption?</title>
	<author>darkmeridian</author>
	<datestamp>1247842860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Outstanding lawyers may choose to take on these cases pro bono, especially at the beginning, for the publicity. But even if you get a retarded lawyer, it's probably better than the average college student strolling into court without a clue. I mean, most lawyers will go on Westlaw or Lexis and crib off of the successful RIAA cases. Soon, they'll probably all trot out the same arguments regarding making available =/= distributing and the Media Sentry stuff. I can imagine RIAA just lowering their settlement demands once a student gets a pro bono lawyers because let's face it: RIAA's lawyers aren't THAT stupid, and they're not really after money away. They want the stat that says, "99\% of the people we sue settle or lose, so our campaign is just." They can make that claim no matter how small the settlement is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Outstanding lawyers may choose to take on these cases pro bono , especially at the beginning , for the publicity .
But even if you get a retarded lawyer , it 's probably better than the average college student strolling into court without a clue .
I mean , most lawyers will go on Westlaw or Lexis and crib off of the successful RIAA cases .
Soon , they 'll probably all trot out the same arguments regarding making available = / = distributing and the Media Sentry stuff .
I can imagine RIAA just lowering their settlement demands once a student gets a pro bono lawyers because let 's face it : RIAA 's lawyers are n't THAT stupid , and they 're not really after money away .
They want the stat that says , " 99 \ % of the people we sue settle or lose , so our campaign is just .
" They can make that claim no matter how small the settlement is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Outstanding lawyers may choose to take on these cases pro bono, especially at the beginning, for the publicity.
But even if you get a retarded lawyer, it's probably better than the average college student strolling into court without a clue.
I mean, most lawyers will go on Westlaw or Lexis and crib off of the successful RIAA cases.
Soon, they'll probably all trot out the same arguments regarding making available =/= distributing and the Media Sentry stuff.
I can imagine RIAA just lowering their settlement demands once a student gets a pro bono lawyers because let's face it: RIAA's lawyers aren't THAT stupid, and they're not really after money away.
They want the stat that says, "99\% of the people we sue settle or lose, so our campaign is just.
" They can make that claim no matter how small the settlement is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28736987</id>
	<title>Pro Bono is good?</title>
	<author>zaivala</author>
	<datestamp>1247837820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In my area, I have yet to see a pro bono lawyer or public defender put up a good case.  I hope Brittany wins this one, but am not encouraged.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In my area , I have yet to see a pro bono lawyer or public defender put up a good case .
I hope Brittany wins this one , but am not encouraged .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In my area, I have yet to see a pro bono lawyer or public defender put up a good case.
I hope Brittany wins this one, but am not encouraged.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28737067</id>
	<title>Can't she just ask her uncle Freddy...?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1247838480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...to, you know, "haunt" the RIAA a bit?</p><p>Or is Freddy friends with other demons from "deeeep down under"? ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...to , you know , " haunt " the RIAA a bit ? Or is Freddy friends with other demons from " deeeep down under " ?
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...to, you know, "haunt" the RIAA a bit?Or is Freddy friends with other demons from "deeeep down under"?
^^</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735839</id>
	<title>Re:Idea</title>
	<author>MaskedSlacker</author>
	<datestamp>1247830380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Congratulations, you invented legal insurance.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal\_Expenses\_Insurance" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal\_Expenses\_Insurance</a> [wikipedia.org]  Want a cookie?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations , you invented legal insurance .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal \ _Expenses \ _Insurance [ wikipedia.org ] Want a cookie ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations, you invented legal insurance.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal\_Expenses\_Insurance [wikipedia.org]  Want a cookie?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735717</id>
	<title>Re:sigh...</title>
	<author>d4nowar</author>
	<datestamp>1247829660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We should just listen to some <a href="http://www.pdinfo.com/listPDsongs/PDPopularSongs.htm/" title="pdinfo.com" rel="nofollow">public domain music!</a> [pdinfo.com]

<br>If anyone needs me, I'll be listening to "Are You From Dixie, 'Cause I'm From Dixie Too" and "Be My Little Baby Bumblebee" until the cows come home.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We should just listen to some public domain music !
[ pdinfo.com ] If anyone needs me , I 'll be listening to " Are You From Dixie , 'Cause I 'm From Dixie Too " and " Be My Little Baby Bumblebee " until the cows come home .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We should just listen to some public domain music!
[pdinfo.com]

If anyone needs me, I'll be listening to "Are You From Dixie, 'Cause I'm From Dixie Too" and "Be My Little Baby Bumblebee" until the cows come home.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735165</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735421</id>
	<title>Re:Faulty assumption?</title>
	<author>markov\_chain</author>
	<datestamp>1247827500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course not, he is pro Bono.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course not , he is pro Bono .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course not, he is pro Bono.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28738531</id>
	<title>I hope this happens</title>
	<author>gubers33</author>
	<datestamp>1247856660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hate the greedy RIAA, it is about time someone turned the tables on them. They go after people who can barely pay the settlement nevertheless for counsel. If this starts happening around the country, the RIAA will have no easy targets and greater lose the power of fear.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate the greedy RIAA , it is about time someone turned the tables on them .
They go after people who can barely pay the settlement nevertheless for counsel .
If this starts happening around the country , the RIAA will have no easy targets and greater lose the power of fear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate the greedy RIAA, it is about time someone turned the tables on them.
They go after people who can barely pay the settlement nevertheless for counsel.
If this starts happening around the country, the RIAA will have no easy targets and greater lose the power of fear.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735529</id>
	<title>Meh</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1247828400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>U2 is overrated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>U2 is overrated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>U2 is overrated.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735491</id>
	<title>Re:sigh...</title>
	<author>garcia</author>
	<datestamp>1247828040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The RIAA has worn me out. I hate all music now. I never want to buy any of their crap again.</i></p><p>I have been saying for *YEARS* (long before the RIAA was pulling the bullshit they are now) that you should be listening to free music. There are plenty of bands that allow the release of their live stuff on the web and no, we're not talking about crappy Indy artists that you've never heard about before. We're talking real bands that care more about their fans and who actually tour rather than live off the royalties of overprocessed studio shit.</p><p>I suggest supporting those bands by buying their records and/or going to their shows instead of paying for music that sucks and that has no chance of expanding what is freely available out there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The RIAA has worn me out .
I hate all music now .
I never want to buy any of their crap again.I have been saying for * YEARS * ( long before the RIAA was pulling the bullshit they are now ) that you should be listening to free music .
There are plenty of bands that allow the release of their live stuff on the web and no , we 're not talking about crappy Indy artists that you 've never heard about before .
We 're talking real bands that care more about their fans and who actually tour rather than live off the royalties of overprocessed studio shit.I suggest supporting those bands by buying their records and/or going to their shows instead of paying for music that sucks and that has no chance of expanding what is freely available out there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The RIAA has worn me out.
I hate all music now.
I never want to buy any of their crap again.I have been saying for *YEARS* (long before the RIAA was pulling the bullshit they are now) that you should be listening to free music.
There are plenty of bands that allow the release of their live stuff on the web and no, we're not talking about crappy Indy artists that you've never heard about before.
We're talking real bands that care more about their fans and who actually tour rather than live off the royalties of overprocessed studio shit.I suggest supporting those bands by buying their records and/or going to their shows instead of paying for music that sucks and that has no chance of expanding what is freely available out there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735165</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735181</id>
	<title>Re:Faulty assumption?</title>
	<author>The Grim Reefer2</author>
	<datestamp>1247826000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This assumes the appointed pro-bono counsel is competent and interested in the welfare of his/her client, which may or may not be the case.</p></div><p>Assuming they are competent, all I can say is that It's about time.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This assumes the appointed pro-bono counsel is competent and interested in the welfare of his/her client , which may or may not be the case.Assuming they are competent , all I can say is that It 's about time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This assumes the appointed pro-bono counsel is competent and interested in the welfare of his/her client, which may or may not be the case.Assuming they are competent, all I can say is that It's about time.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28743957</id>
	<title>Re:check http://riaaradar.com too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247916600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A better idea might be to send the RIAA associated band a $1 (the same as if the music were gotten from iTunes) to enlighten them that people are willing to pay for non-label associated music. The problem with just not contributing to RIAA's cartel is that they are then able to blame "pirates" and ignore any sales of music outside their corporate membership ("90\% of all LEGITIMATE music sales in the US" per RIAA's website). The truth is non-RIAA label music industry has never been healthier.</p><p>There are millions of sites talking about independent music online from all over the world - you just won't hear independent music on commercial radio and have to seek it out instead. The difference is quality and variety is 'taste-changing'. After hearing some of the music from Poland, Swiss, Norway (in addition to UK and Germany), I have little tolerance for the blandness coming from the US markets - and there are exceptions of course. Several high quality bands post entire albums online for download free and continue to make money off higher quality digital downloads. Importing physical CD's is still prohibitively expensive.</p><p>Just the fact that NIN nails posted their album for free download and then went on to become Amazon's best seller for physical CD's should prove RIAA's arguments are in the dust. There are multiple rigorous studies from many countries proving the "sampling effect" is a valid source of promotion (Japan, Canada, UK, Sweden) and P2P is helping the industry make sales.</p><p>But for some reason all of that escapes Congress.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A better idea might be to send the RIAA associated band a $ 1 ( the same as if the music were gotten from iTunes ) to enlighten them that people are willing to pay for non-label associated music .
The problem with just not contributing to RIAA 's cartel is that they are then able to blame " pirates " and ignore any sales of music outside their corporate membership ( " 90 \ % of all LEGITIMATE music sales in the US " per RIAA 's website ) .
The truth is non-RIAA label music industry has never been healthier.There are millions of sites talking about independent music online from all over the world - you just wo n't hear independent music on commercial radio and have to seek it out instead .
The difference is quality and variety is 'taste-changing' .
After hearing some of the music from Poland , Swiss , Norway ( in addition to UK and Germany ) , I have little tolerance for the blandness coming from the US markets - and there are exceptions of course .
Several high quality bands post entire albums online for download free and continue to make money off higher quality digital downloads .
Importing physical CD 's is still prohibitively expensive.Just the fact that NIN nails posted their album for free download and then went on to become Amazon 's best seller for physical CD 's should prove RIAA 's arguments are in the dust .
There are multiple rigorous studies from many countries proving the " sampling effect " is a valid source of promotion ( Japan , Canada , UK , Sweden ) and P2P is helping the industry make sales.But for some reason all of that escapes Congress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A better idea might be to send the RIAA associated band a $1 (the same as if the music were gotten from iTunes) to enlighten them that people are willing to pay for non-label associated music.
The problem with just not contributing to RIAA's cartel is that they are then able to blame "pirates" and ignore any sales of music outside their corporate membership ("90\% of all LEGITIMATE music sales in the US" per RIAA's website).
The truth is non-RIAA label music industry has never been healthier.There are millions of sites talking about independent music online from all over the world - you just won't hear independent music on commercial radio and have to seek it out instead.
The difference is quality and variety is 'taste-changing'.
After hearing some of the music from Poland, Swiss, Norway (in addition to UK and Germany), I have little tolerance for the blandness coming from the US markets - and there are exceptions of course.
Several high quality bands post entire albums online for download free and continue to make money off higher quality digital downloads.
Importing physical CD's is still prohibitively expensive.Just the fact that NIN nails posted their album for free download and then went on to become Amazon's best seller for physical CD's should prove RIAA's arguments are in the dust.
There are multiple rigorous studies from many countries proving the "sampling effect" is a valid source of promotion (Japan, Canada, UK, Sweden) and P2P is helping the industry make sales.But for some reason all of that escapes Congress.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735187</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735481</id>
	<title>Re:Idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247828040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem is that will be at least one asshole who is doing everything up to running his own torrent site with five solid terabytes of copyrighted material... and he's going to join. "Me? No, I'm just a normal concerned user."</p><p>Then the RIAA fingers him...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is that will be at least one asshole who is doing everything up to running his own torrent site with five solid terabytes of copyrighted material... and he 's going to join .
" Me ? No , I 'm just a normal concerned user .
" Then the RIAA fingers him.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is that will be at least one asshole who is doing everything up to running his own torrent site with five solid terabytes of copyrighted material... and he's going to join.
"Me? No, I'm just a normal concerned user.
"Then the RIAA fingers him...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28738437</id>
	<title>Say, does NYCL work pro bono?</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1247854500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have I got a case for you!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have I got a case for you !
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have I got a case for you!
:-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28743105</id>
	<title>Extend right to counsel to civil cases</title>
	<author>jhylkema</author>
	<datestamp>1247908740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The RIAA's campaign of litigation terrorism is exactly why.  Also, the RIAA should be entitled to actual damages only.  In other words, they should be required to prove up exactly how many sales were lost to file sharing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The RIAA 's campaign of litigation terrorism is exactly why .
Also , the RIAA should be entitled to actual damages only .
In other words , they should be required to prove up exactly how many sales were lost to file sharing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The RIAA's campaign of litigation terrorism is exactly why.
Also, the RIAA should be entitled to actual damages only.
In other words, they should be required to prove up exactly how many sales were lost to file sharing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28736929</id>
	<title>Re:sigh...</title>
	<author>mmaniaci</author>
	<datestamp>1247837460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Weird, my consumption of music has gone way up.</p><p>$40 a year for Pandora and I get a high quality, on demand, just random enough stream of music 8+ hours a day, 7 days a week. The amount of new music I listen to boggles my mind... I hate the *IAA as much as the next, but you have to admit that our options for purchasing music have opened up recently. Digital downloads from Amazon and iTunes along with streaming services like Pandora and Last.fm are starting to grab hold. People are fed up with the music industry, everybody knows it, and things are starting to change. In 5-10 years we'll look back and think of this as an overnight music medium revolution, so long as *IAA gets whats coming to them.</p><p>If you're honestly fed up with shallow, carbon-copy pop music, look for new music and don't let new music be served to you. Local record shops still exist and they are chock full of people that love music, and love spreading that love. And most of all, use the internet! Wikipedia does bands decently well, and can be a great place to start spiderwebbing out into new genres.  Don't let the RIAA ruin one of the few truly human things we humans have left.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Weird , my consumption of music has gone way up. $ 40 a year for Pandora and I get a high quality , on demand , just random enough stream of music 8 + hours a day , 7 days a week .
The amount of new music I listen to boggles my mind... I hate the * IAA as much as the next , but you have to admit that our options for purchasing music have opened up recently .
Digital downloads from Amazon and iTunes along with streaming services like Pandora and Last.fm are starting to grab hold .
People are fed up with the music industry , everybody knows it , and things are starting to change .
In 5-10 years we 'll look back and think of this as an overnight music medium revolution , so long as * IAA gets whats coming to them.If you 're honestly fed up with shallow , carbon-copy pop music , look for new music and do n't let new music be served to you .
Local record shops still exist and they are chock full of people that love music , and love spreading that love .
And most of all , use the internet !
Wikipedia does bands decently well , and can be a great place to start spiderwebbing out into new genres .
Do n't let the RIAA ruin one of the few truly human things we humans have left .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weird, my consumption of music has gone way up.$40 a year for Pandora and I get a high quality, on demand, just random enough stream of music 8+ hours a day, 7 days a week.
The amount of new music I listen to boggles my mind... I hate the *IAA as much as the next, but you have to admit that our options for purchasing music have opened up recently.
Digital downloads from Amazon and iTunes along with streaming services like Pandora and Last.fm are starting to grab hold.
People are fed up with the music industry, everybody knows it, and things are starting to change.
In 5-10 years we'll look back and think of this as an overnight music medium revolution, so long as *IAA gets whats coming to them.If you're honestly fed up with shallow, carbon-copy pop music, look for new music and don't let new music be served to you.
Local record shops still exist and they are chock full of people that love music, and love spreading that love.
And most of all, use the internet!
Wikipedia does bands decently well, and can be a great place to start spiderwebbing out into new genres.
Don't let the RIAA ruin one of the few truly human things we humans have left.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735165</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735505</id>
	<title>Re:Faulty assumption?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247828220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are required by the rules of ethics to provide zealous representation to their client, even if the client is a pro bono client.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are required by the rules of ethics to provide zealous representation to their client , even if the client is a pro bono client .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are required by the rules of ethics to provide zealous representation to their client, even if the client is a pro bono client.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735537</id>
	<title>i'm sorry</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247828400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>magical fruit tooting is copyright material under the protection of the recording industry association of america. unless you cease and desist infringing via magical fruit toots we will be forced to bring you to litigation</p><p>sincerely,<br>Magical Fruit and the Toots, Inc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>magical fruit tooting is copyright material under the protection of the recording industry association of america .
unless you cease and desist infringing via magical fruit toots we will be forced to bring you to litigationsincerely,Magical Fruit and the Toots , Inc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>magical fruit tooting is copyright material under the protection of the recording industry association of america.
unless you cease and desist infringing via magical fruit toots we will be forced to bring you to litigationsincerely,Magical Fruit and the Toots, Inc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735165</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28736543</id>
	<title>Re:check http://riaaradar.com too</title>
	<author>ThatsNotPudding</author>
	<datestamp>1247834640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And if possible, contact the band / musician via Twitter, Facebook, official website, etc., point to their entry on the RIAARadar website and state: "This is why I will never buy any music you create".</htmltext>
<tokenext>And if possible , contact the band / musician via Twitter , Facebook , official website , etc. , point to their entry on the RIAARadar website and state : " This is why I will never buy any music you create " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if possible, contact the band / musician via Twitter, Facebook, official website, etc., point to their entry on the RIAARadar website and state: "This is why I will never buy any music you create".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735187</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28736047</id>
	<title>Still trying to figure out the "Bono" part</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247831640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Had a parse issue at first glance and suddenly found myself wondering what a "Pro Bono" (like the U2 frontman) and if there were amateurs out there<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Had a parse issue at first glance and suddenly found myself wondering what a " Pro Bono " ( like the U2 frontman ) and if there were amateurs out there ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Had a parse issue at first glance and suddenly found myself wondering what a "Pro Bono" (like the U2 frontman) and if there were amateurs out there ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735209</id>
	<title>Easy pickings default judgments and 'settlements'</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247826120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't that happening with pro bono counsel every day?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't that happening with pro bono counsel every day ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't that happening with pro bono counsel every day?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735143</id>
	<title>Faulty assumption?</title>
	<author>Lead Butthead</author>
	<datestamp>1247825820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This assumes the appointed pro-bono counsel is competent and interested in the welfare of his/her client, which may or may not be the case.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This assumes the appointed pro-bono counsel is competent and interested in the welfare of his/her client , which may or may not be the case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This assumes the appointed pro-bono counsel is competent and interested in the welfare of his/her client, which may or may not be the case.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735189</id>
	<title>Excellent news</title>
	<author>JustNiz</author>
	<datestamp>1247826060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>its great news, but doesn't fix the problem.<br>I guess now all the RIAA will do is shift their efforts to people that earn too much to get Pro Bono, but still dont earn enough to be able to defend themselves against being hounded with litigation. In fact this is probably most of us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>its great news , but does n't fix the problem.I guess now all the RIAA will do is shift their efforts to people that earn too much to get Pro Bono , but still dont earn enough to be able to defend themselves against being hounded with litigation .
In fact this is probably most of us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>its great news, but doesn't fix the problem.I guess now all the RIAA will do is shift their efforts to people that earn too much to get Pro Bono, but still dont earn enough to be able to defend themselves against being hounded with litigation.
In fact this is probably most of us.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28743165</id>
	<title>U2 man U2</title>
	<author>algoa456</author>
	<datestamp>1247909160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am talking about a different Bono - U2 is the clue</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am talking about a different Bono - U2 is the clue</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am talking about a different Bono - U2 is the clue</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735181
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735143
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735495
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735143
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28736997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28743957
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28744117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735717
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28736011
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735491
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28736543
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28748387
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735143
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735143
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735143
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735537
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735411
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28736029
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735491
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735593
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735839
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735775
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735653
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28736929
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735481
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28739195
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28737545
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735143
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735727
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28741875
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735187
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735565
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_189208_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735689
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735491
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735165
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_189208.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735187
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735775
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28736543
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735495
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28743957
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28741875
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_189208.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28738699
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_189208.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735143
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735181
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735421
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735455
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28748387
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28737545
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735505
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_189208.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735207
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735411
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735827
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735565
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735867
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28739195
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735727
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735839
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735905
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735481
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735653
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28744117
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_189208.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735537
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735491
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735689
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28736029
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735709
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28736011
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735717
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735593
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28736929
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28736997
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_189208.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735461
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_189208.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735307
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_189208.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28738483
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_189208.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_189208.28735189
</commentlist>
</conversation>
