<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_17_1824250</id>
	<title>Creativity Potentially Linked To Schizophrenia</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1247824680000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://slashdot.org/~mcgrew/journal" rel="nofollow">mcgrew</a> writes <i>"New Scientist is reporting that <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17474-artistic-tendencies-linked-to-schizophrenia-gene.html">creativity may be linked to schizophrenia</a> via a common gene. Szabolcs K&#233;ri, a researcher at Semmelweis University in Budapest, Hungary, carried a study of creative people. 'K&#233;ri examined a gene involved in brain development called neuregulin 1, which previous studies have linked to a slightly increased risk of schizophrenia. Moreover, a single DNA letter mutation that affects how much of the neuregulin 1 protein is made in the brain has been linked to psychosis, poor memory and sensitivity to criticism. About 50 per cent of healthy Europeans have one copy of this mutation, while 15 per cent possess two copies.  People with two copies of the neuregulin 1 mutation &mdash; about 12 per cent of the study participants &mdash; tended to score notably higher on these measures of creativity, compared with other volunteers with one or no copy of the mutation. Those with one copy were also judged to be more creative, on average, than volunteers without the mutation.'  They hypothesize that people with this gene with high IQs are creative, while those with lower IQs are simply prone to the hallucinations that characterize the disease."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>mcgrew writes " New Scientist is reporting that creativity may be linked to schizophrenia via a common gene .
Szabolcs K   ri , a researcher at Semmelweis University in Budapest , Hungary , carried a study of creative people .
'K   ri examined a gene involved in brain development called neuregulin 1 , which previous studies have linked to a slightly increased risk of schizophrenia .
Moreover , a single DNA letter mutation that affects how much of the neuregulin 1 protein is made in the brain has been linked to psychosis , poor memory and sensitivity to criticism .
About 50 per cent of healthy Europeans have one copy of this mutation , while 15 per cent possess two copies .
People with two copies of the neuregulin 1 mutation    about 12 per cent of the study participants    tended to score notably higher on these measures of creativity , compared with other volunteers with one or no copy of the mutation .
Those with one copy were also judged to be more creative , on average , than volunteers without the mutation .
' They hypothesize that people with this gene with high IQs are creative , while those with lower IQs are simply prone to the hallucinations that characterize the disease .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>mcgrew writes "New Scientist is reporting that creativity may be linked to schizophrenia via a common gene.
Szabolcs Kéri, a researcher at Semmelweis University in Budapest, Hungary, carried a study of creative people.
'Kéri examined a gene involved in brain development called neuregulin 1, which previous studies have linked to a slightly increased risk of schizophrenia.
Moreover, a single DNA letter mutation that affects how much of the neuregulin 1 protein is made in the brain has been linked to psychosis, poor memory and sensitivity to criticism.
About 50 per cent of healthy Europeans have one copy of this mutation, while 15 per cent possess two copies.
People with two copies of the neuregulin 1 mutation — about 12 per cent of the study participants — tended to score notably higher on these measures of creativity, compared with other volunteers with one or no copy of the mutation.
Those with one copy were also judged to be more creative, on average, than volunteers without the mutation.
'  They hypothesize that people with this gene with high IQs are creative, while those with lower IQs are simply prone to the hallucinations that characterize the disease.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735779</id>
	<title>I suspect this is just one such link</title>
	<author>Alan R Light</author>
	<datestamp>1247829960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>. . . and many of us have suspected that there are more such links between conditions which may be pathological at one extreme, and extremely beneficial at another extreme.  The schizophrenia versus creativity duality is one (and long known - we have all heard that "there is a fine line between genius and insanity"), and the whole area surrounding Asperger's Syndrome is likely another.</htmltext>
<tokenext>.
. .
and many of us have suspected that there are more such links between conditions which may be pathological at one extreme , and extremely beneficial at another extreme .
The schizophrenia versus creativity duality is one ( and long known - we have all heard that " there is a fine line between genius and insanity " ) , and the whole area surrounding Asperger 's Syndrome is likely another .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.
. .
and many of us have suspected that there are more such links between conditions which may be pathological at one extreme, and extremely beneficial at another extreme.
The schizophrenia versus creativity duality is one (and long known - we have all heard that "there is a fine line between genius and insanity"), and the whole area surrounding Asperger's Syndrome is likely another.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736937</id>
	<title>Re:So they are saying...</title>
	<author>mevets</author>
	<datestamp>1247837520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that little voice inside my head that keeps asking 'is there room for one more' is really saying 'you are stupid'?  I took a vote on this and 3/4s of me think its the shrinks that are stupid; the other 3/8s are demanding a recount.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that little voice inside my head that keeps asking 'is there room for one more ' is really saying 'you are stupid ' ?
I took a vote on this and 3/4s of me think its the shrinks that are stupid ; the other 3/8s are demanding a recount .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that little voice inside my head that keeps asking 'is there room for one more' is really saying 'you are stupid'?
I took a vote on this and 3/4s of me think its the shrinks that are stupid; the other 3/8s are demanding a recount.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735577</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28739511</id>
	<title>Good for you!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247915820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Went through a period of psychosis in my late teens, but stayed off the anti-psychotics. Took quite a while, but got back on track without the pseudo-science quackery of psychiatry. Now I run my own business and live a pretty balanced life as a respected member of my family and the community.</p></div><p>I've seen a psychosis ruin the life of a few people I know. To overcome that is quite an accomplishment. You have my respect.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Went through a period of psychosis in my late teens , but stayed off the anti-psychotics .
Took quite a while , but got back on track without the pseudo-science quackery of psychiatry .
Now I run my own business and live a pretty balanced life as a respected member of my family and the community.I 've seen a psychosis ruin the life of a few people I know .
To overcome that is quite an accomplishment .
You have my respect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Went through a period of psychosis in my late teens, but stayed off the anti-psychotics.
Took quite a while, but got back on track without the pseudo-science quackery of psychiatry.
Now I run my own business and live a pretty balanced life as a respected member of my family and the community.I've seen a psychosis ruin the life of a few people I know.
To overcome that is quite an accomplishment.
You have my respect.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735815</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737965</id>
	<title>Re:Makes sense of a sort</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247847600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>tell that to the niggers</htmltext>
<tokenext>tell that to the niggers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>tell that to the niggers</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735547</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737801</id>
	<title>Re:Crap soup</title>
	<author>watergeus</author>
	<datestamp>1247845500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you can label it, you can staple it</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you can label it , you can staple it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you can label it, you can staple it</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735695</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738583</id>
	<title>that was not a troll dumbass mods</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247857560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Notice the counters before the quotes?<br>Read the title?<br>Ok. Now mod away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Notice the counters before the quotes ? Read the title ? Ok .
Now mod away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Notice the counters before the quotes?Read the title?Ok.
Now mod away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735763</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737741</id>
	<title>How About</title>
	<author>florescent\_beige</author>
	<datestamp>1247844660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about being an antisocial knob? Does that make me special?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about being an antisocial knob ?
Does that make me special ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about being an antisocial knob?
Does that make me special?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736035</id>
	<title>Not true in my case</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247831580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well,</p><p>1)  I have schizophrenia (paranoid delusional, no visual or auditory hallucinations).<br>2)  I am not creative, at all...in any artistic sense.  Except maybe with words, poetry, scrabble.<br>3)  I have an extremely vivid and active imagination.<br>4)  My nervous system is very sensitive, I have to take meds to 'turn them down' so I'm relaxed.<br>5)  I have an IQ of 133 and an interest in math and science; degrees in physics and computer science.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well,1 ) I have schizophrenia ( paranoid delusional , no visual or auditory hallucinations ) .2 ) I am not creative , at all...in any artistic sense .
Except maybe with words , poetry , scrabble.3 ) I have an extremely vivid and active imagination.4 ) My nervous system is very sensitive , I have to take meds to 'turn them down ' so I 'm relaxed.5 ) I have an IQ of 133 and an interest in math and science ; degrees in physics and computer science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well,1)  I have schizophrenia (paranoid delusional, no visual or auditory hallucinations).2)  I am not creative, at all...in any artistic sense.
Except maybe with words, poetry, scrabble.3)  I have an extremely vivid and active imagination.4)  My nervous system is very sensitive, I have to take meds to 'turn them down' so I'm relaxed.5)  I have an IQ of 133 and an interest in math and science; degrees in physics and computer science.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737709</id>
	<title>Re:That explains it...</title>
	<author>Eternauta3k</author>
	<datestamp>1247844360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think a lot of people have conversations with imaginary personalities in their heads.</p></div><p>Sure do. Not really different personalities, but </p><ul> <li>thinking the way smeagol talks (referring to myself as we) and</li><li>answering my own thoughts: -Hey, she's got the hots for me.. -No! This is nowhere near enough evidence, you're just making stuff up</li></ul></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think a lot of people have conversations with imaginary personalities in their heads.Sure do .
Not really different personalities , but thinking the way smeagol talks ( referring to myself as we ) andanswering my own thoughts : -Hey , she 's got the hots for me.. -No ! This is nowhere near enough evidence , you 're just making stuff up</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think a lot of people have conversations with imaginary personalities in their heads.Sure do.
Not really different personalities, but  thinking the way smeagol talks (referring to myself as we) andanswering my own thoughts: -Hey, she's got the hots for me.. -No! This is nowhere near enough evidence, you're just making stuff up
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736099</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735729</id>
	<title>Paranoid about paranoia</title>
	<author>jeffliott</author>
	<datestamp>1247829660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe I should cease all that "outside the box" thinking my associates always compliment me on, in the interest of sanity.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/wink</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe I should cease all that " outside the box " thinking my associates always compliment me on , in the interest of sanity .
/wink</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe I should cease all that "outside the box" thinking my associates always compliment me on, in the interest of sanity.
/wink</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735543</id>
	<title>Creative comment</title>
	<author>pwnies</author>
	<datestamp>1247828460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ha ha! First post!

Like hell it was, this is my first post!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ha ha !
First post !
Like hell it was , this is my first post !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ha ha!
First post!
Like hell it was, this is my first post!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28739849</id>
	<title>Re:Dead Wrong (not!)</title>
	<author>Dr La</author>
	<datestamp>1247922300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Studies show that in their pre-psychotic phases (i.e. before the onset of the first psychotic signs in late adolescence) schizophrenia patients show significantly more academic abilities. Also, first degree relatives of schizophrenia patients show a significant higher degree of academic scholarship. See e.g. Karlsson, <i>Acta Psychiatrica Scandianavia</i> 104 (2001), 466-468.<br> <br>
Similar studies find similar correlations with artistic capabilities. Both art and academic abilities tap creativity, so that shouldn't surprise.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Studies show that in their pre-psychotic phases ( i.e .
before the onset of the first psychotic signs in late adolescence ) schizophrenia patients show significantly more academic abilities .
Also , first degree relatives of schizophrenia patients show a significant higher degree of academic scholarship .
See e.g .
Karlsson , Acta Psychiatrica Scandianavia 104 ( 2001 ) , 466-468 .
Similar studies find similar correlations with artistic capabilities .
Both art and academic abilities tap creativity , so that should n't surprise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Studies show that in their pre-psychotic phases (i.e.
before the onset of the first psychotic signs in late adolescence) schizophrenia patients show significantly more academic abilities.
Also, first degree relatives of schizophrenia patients show a significant higher degree of academic scholarship.
See e.g.
Karlsson, Acta Psychiatrica Scandianavia 104 (2001), 466-468.
Similar studies find similar correlations with artistic capabilities.
Both art and academic abilities tap creativity, so that shouldn't surprise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737103</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735877</id>
	<title>Obligatory link...</title>
	<author>Misch</author>
	<datestamp>1247830680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obligatory link...</p><p>"<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHUOK6JSoiQ" title="youtube.com">Screwed Up People Make Great Art</a> [youtube.com]" by <a href="http://www.groovelily.com/store/songs/screwed-up-people-make-great-art/" title="groovelily.com">Groovelily</a> [groovelily.com]</p><p>Well, it's obligatory for me at least.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obligatory link... " Screwed Up People Make Great Art [ youtube.com ] " by Groovelily [ groovelily.com ] Well , it 's obligatory for me at least .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obligatory link..."Screwed Up People Make Great Art [youtube.com]" by Groovelily [groovelily.com]Well, it's obligatory for me at least.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737793</id>
	<title>Another Example</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247845260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here is another example of a group jumping to conclusions based on a small insufficiently diverse sample.</p><p>I have paranoid schizophrenia, I have an above average IQ (according to tests at least), I have no sense of artistic creativity, I excel at mathematical and scientific pursuits, I know better than to open my mouth claiming potential scientific discovery without solid scientific data.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is another example of a group jumping to conclusions based on a small insufficiently diverse sample.I have paranoid schizophrenia , I have an above average IQ ( according to tests at least ) , I have no sense of artistic creativity , I excel at mathematical and scientific pursuits , I know better than to open my mouth claiming potential scientific discovery without solid scientific data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is another example of a group jumping to conclusions based on a small insufficiently diverse sample.I have paranoid schizophrenia, I have an above average IQ (according to tests at least), I have no sense of artistic creativity, I excel at mathematical and scientific pursuits, I know better than to open my mouth claiming potential scientific discovery without solid scientific data.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736375</id>
	<title>Re:Geniuses Don't Hallucinate?</title>
	<author>kamakiri</author>
	<datestamp>1247833740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They don't say geniuses don't hallucinate, just that people with lower IQs don't experience any positive insights because they don't have the advantage of an elevated perspective.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They do n't say geniuses do n't hallucinate , just that people with lower IQs do n't experience any positive insights because they do n't have the advantage of an elevated perspective .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They don't say geniuses don't hallucinate, just that people with lower IQs don't experience any positive insights because they don't have the advantage of an elevated perspective.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735599</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735581</id>
	<title>i've always suspected as much.</title>
	<author>Bill, Shooter of Bul</author>
	<datestamp>1247828700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>My sister is diagnosed with Paranoid Schizophrenia, started with a lower iq due to learning disabilities.
I'm pretty creative and intelligent. I always thought there was a link between the two.

Still, its only partially genetic. It needs a stress trigger as well. There are identical twins, with one developing the disorder and the other not.  The odds of one with the syndrome passing it to a direct descendant are also pretty low ~ 1\% chance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My sister is diagnosed with Paranoid Schizophrenia , started with a lower iq due to learning disabilities .
I 'm pretty creative and intelligent .
I always thought there was a link between the two .
Still , its only partially genetic .
It needs a stress trigger as well .
There are identical twins , with one developing the disorder and the other not .
The odds of one with the syndrome passing it to a direct descendant are also pretty low ~ 1 \ % chance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My sister is diagnosed with Paranoid Schizophrenia, started with a lower iq due to learning disabilities.
I'm pretty creative and intelligent.
I always thought there was a link between the two.
Still, its only partially genetic.
It needs a stress trigger as well.
There are identical twins, with one developing the disorder and the other not.
The odds of one with the syndrome passing it to a direct descendant are also pretty low ~ 1\% chance.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736003</id>
	<title>This is news</title>
	<author>dave562</author>
	<datestamp>1247831340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Creative/artistic type people have active imaginations?!  Holy News Flash Batman!  I can't wait for the story about how librarians have a gene that has been tied to OCD.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Creative/artistic type people have active imaginations ? !
Holy News Flash Batman !
I ca n't wait for the story about how librarians have a gene that has been tied to OCD .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Creative/artistic type people have active imaginations?!
Holy News Flash Batman!
I can't wait for the story about how librarians have a gene that has been tied to OCD.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735815</id>
	<title>Re:Crazy Chef Sato</title>
	<author>dov\_0</author>
	<datestamp>1247830200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just tell my friends that I'm half crazy. Whether that means all crazy half the time, or half crazy all the time I leave for them to decide.</p><p>Went through a period of psychosis in my late teens, but stayed off the anti-psychotics. Took quite a while, but got back on track without the pseudo-science quackery of psychiatry. Now I run my own business and live a pretty balanced life as a respected member of my family and the community.</p><p>Interestingly enough, the more 'artistic' (ie music) stuff I do, the more sorta crazy I get, the more I keep the artistic side in check and balanced with other things, the more 'sane' I am. Never really thought about it like that before though...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just tell my friends that I 'm half crazy .
Whether that means all crazy half the time , or half crazy all the time I leave for them to decide.Went through a period of psychosis in my late teens , but stayed off the anti-psychotics .
Took quite a while , but got back on track without the pseudo-science quackery of psychiatry .
Now I run my own business and live a pretty balanced life as a respected member of my family and the community.Interestingly enough , the more 'artistic ' ( ie music ) stuff I do , the more sorta crazy I get , the more I keep the artistic side in check and balanced with other things , the more 'sane ' I am .
Never really thought about it like that before though.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just tell my friends that I'm half crazy.
Whether that means all crazy half the time, or half crazy all the time I leave for them to decide.Went through a period of psychosis in my late teens, but stayed off the anti-psychotics.
Took quite a while, but got back on track without the pseudo-science quackery of psychiatry.
Now I run my own business and live a pretty balanced life as a respected member of my family and the community.Interestingly enough, the more 'artistic' (ie music) stuff I do, the more sorta crazy I get, the more I keep the artistic side in check and balanced with other things, the more 'sane' I am.
Never really thought about it like that before though...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735549</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736211</id>
	<title>Re:Geniuses Don't Hallucinate?</title>
	<author>linzeal</author>
	<datestamp>1247832720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would say that depending on the graduate program there are far more people with severe mental issues than in any undergrad program.  In fact some disciplines seem to have more than their fair share of a specific disease/disorder.  CS of course has their share of aspergers.  For example, I know 3 archaeologists/physical anthropologists that all have severe devastating OCD to the point that when the 2 who are still in college know that when they have to work together their systems of organizing/ritual must come together in a strange synchronization/dance and uneasy trust to work.  One will pick up every single artifact and hold it over their head to examine it when the pass by it in a store room, the other one is into lists that span multiple comp books like a codex to a secret library.  Together they have published 2-3 papers and I would say (IAMNAAOPA) above par for the journals they publish in.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would say that depending on the graduate program there are far more people with severe mental issues than in any undergrad program .
In fact some disciplines seem to have more than their fair share of a specific disease/disorder .
CS of course has their share of aspergers .
For example , I know 3 archaeologists/physical anthropologists that all have severe devastating OCD to the point that when the 2 who are still in college know that when they have to work together their systems of organizing/ritual must come together in a strange synchronization/dance and uneasy trust to work .
One will pick up every single artifact and hold it over their head to examine it when the pass by it in a store room , the other one is into lists that span multiple comp books like a codex to a secret library .
Together they have published 2-3 papers and I would say ( IAMNAAOPA ) above par for the journals they publish in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would say that depending on the graduate program there are far more people with severe mental issues than in any undergrad program.
In fact some disciplines seem to have more than their fair share of a specific disease/disorder.
CS of course has their share of aspergers.
For example, I know 3 archaeologists/physical anthropologists that all have severe devastating OCD to the point that when the 2 who are still in college know that when they have to work together their systems of organizing/ritual must come together in a strange synchronization/dance and uneasy trust to work.
One will pick up every single artifact and hold it over their head to examine it when the pass by it in a store room, the other one is into lists that span multiple comp books like a codex to a secret library.
Together they have published 2-3 papers and I would say (IAMNAAOPA) above par for the journals they publish in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735599</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735679</id>
	<title>Scientists are NOT crazy</title>
	<author>jjoelc</author>
	<datestamp>1247829480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>this study proves it! See... only stupid people are prone to suffer from schizophrenia. Smart guys like us don't have anything to worry about says the smug scientist...

It's the academic version of NIMBY</htmltext>
<tokenext>this study proves it !
See... only stupid people are prone to suffer from schizophrenia .
Smart guys like us do n't have anything to worry about says the smug scientist.. . It 's the academic version of NIMBY</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this study proves it!
See... only stupid people are prone to suffer from schizophrenia.
Smart guys like us don't have anything to worry about says the smug scientist...

It's the academic version of NIMBY</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28746139</id>
	<title>Re:So they are saying...</title>
	<author>blackwater</author>
	<datestamp>1248033960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They might be saying that but it does not tally with my experience. I have met some very intelligent people who believe that the voices that they hear are being produced by an external source. Of course my subjective personal experiences of working with people with mental disorders does not count for much in the grand scheme of things but I have not noticed a general tendency for voice hearers to be markedly less intelligent than 'sane' people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They might be saying that but it does not tally with my experience .
I have met some very intelligent people who believe that the voices that they hear are being produced by an external source .
Of course my subjective personal experiences of working with people with mental disorders does not count for much in the grand scheme of things but I have not noticed a general tendency for voice hearers to be markedly less intelligent than 'sane ' people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They might be saying that but it does not tally with my experience.
I have met some very intelligent people who believe that the voices that they hear are being produced by an external source.
Of course my subjective personal experiences of working with people with mental disorders does not count for much in the grand scheme of things but I have not noticed a general tendency for voice hearers to be markedly less intelligent than 'sane' people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735577</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735571</id>
	<title>I don't know</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247828640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not very creative. <br>
The voices have much better ideas than me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not very creative .
The voices have much better ideas than me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not very creative.
The voices have much better ideas than me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28739395</id>
	<title>Re:Geniuses Don't Hallucinate?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247913720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>They hypothesize that people with this gene with high IQs are creative, while those with lower IQs are simply prone to the hallucinations</p></div><p>Why do they hypothesize that?  There are plenty of geniuses with mental health issues.  Take <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John\_Forbes\_Nash,\_Jr." title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">John Nash</a> [wikipedia.org].</p></div><p>They tend to become rich or friends of rich people, so they are not classified as "crazy" but only as "excentric" folks.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They hypothesize that people with this gene with high IQs are creative , while those with lower IQs are simply prone to the hallucinationsWhy do they hypothesize that ?
There are plenty of geniuses with mental health issues .
Take John Nash [ wikipedia.org ] .They tend to become rich or friends of rich people , so they are not classified as " crazy " but only as " excentric " folks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They hypothesize that people with this gene with high IQs are creative, while those with lower IQs are simply prone to the hallucinationsWhy do they hypothesize that?
There are plenty of geniuses with mental health issues.
Take John Nash [wikipedia.org].They tend to become rich or friends of rich people, so they are not classified as "crazy" but only as "excentric" folks.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735599</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738831</id>
	<title>Re:Not true in my case</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247947620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>2)  I am not creative, at all....<br>3)  I have an extremely vivid and active imagination.</p></div><p>You clearly don't have a clue what you're talking about.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>2 ) I am not creative , at all....3 ) I have an extremely vivid and active imagination.You clearly do n't have a clue what you 're talking about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2)  I am not creative, at all....3)  I have an extremely vivid and active imagination.You clearly don't have a clue what you're talking about.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735623</id>
	<title>That explains it...</title>
	<author>nebaz</author>
	<datestamp>1247829000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm creative because I'm schizophrenic...<br>No I'm not.<br>Yes I am.<br>No I'm not.<br>Yes I am.<br>No I'm not.<br>Yes I am.</p><p>More seriously though, my Japanese teacher said that there was a guy who learned Japanese very fluently without conversing with other people by creating a second personality to converse with.  With my luck, I would just have two people in my head speaking poor Japanese.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm creative because I 'm schizophrenic...No I 'm not.Yes I am.No I 'm not.Yes I am.No I 'm not.Yes I am.More seriously though , my Japanese teacher said that there was a guy who learned Japanese very fluently without conversing with other people by creating a second personality to converse with .
With my luck , I would just have two people in my head speaking poor Japanese .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm creative because I'm schizophrenic...No I'm not.Yes I am.No I'm not.Yes I am.No I'm not.Yes I am.More seriously though, my Japanese teacher said that there was a guy who learned Japanese very fluently without conversing with other people by creating a second personality to converse with.
With my luck, I would just have two people in my head speaking poor Japanese.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735763</id>
	<title>neuregulin mutation count</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1247829960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>0 copies:</p><p><a href="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f4506t.pdf?portlet=3" title="irs.gov">http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f4506t.pdf?portlet=3</a> [irs.gov] </p><blockquote><div><p>Signature and date. Form 4506-T must be<br>signed and dated by the taxpayer listed on<br>line 1a or 2a. If you completed line 5<br>requesting the information be sent to a<br>third party, the IRS must receive Form<br>4506-T within 60 days of the date signed<br>by the taxpayer or it will be rejected.<br>Individuals. Transcripts of jointly filed<br>tax returns may be furnished to either<br>spouse. Only one signature is required.<br>Sign Form 4506-T exactly as your name<br>appeared on the original return. If you<br>changed your name, also sign your current<br>name.<br>Corporations. Generally, Form 4506-T<br>can be signed by: (1) an officer having<br>legal authority to bind the corporation, (2)<br>any person designated by the board of<br>directors or other governing body, or (3)<br>any officer or employee on written request<br>by any principal officer and attested</p></div></blockquote><p>1 copy:</p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/15/opinion/15dowd.html" title="nytimes.com">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/15/opinion/15dowd.html</a> [nytimes.com] </p><blockquote><div><p>But the barbed adjectives didn't match the muted performance on display before the Judiciary Committee. Like the president who picked her, Sotomayor has been a model of professorial rationality. Besides, it's delicious watching Republicans go after Democrats for being too emotional and irrational given the G.O.P. shame spiral.</p><p>W. and Dick Cheney made all their bad decisions about Iraq, W.M.D.'s, domestic surveillance, torture, rendition and secret hit squads from the gut, based on false intuitions, fear, paranoia and revenge.</p><p>Sarah Palin is the definition of irrational, a volatile and scattered country-music queen without the music. Her Republican fans defend her lack of application and intellect, happy to settle for her emotional electricity.</p><p>Senator Graham said Sotomayor would be confirmed unless she had "a meltdown" -- a word applied mostly to women and toddlers until Mark Sanford proudly took ownership of it when he was judged about the wisdom of his Latina woman.</p></div></blockquote><p>2 copies:</p><p><a href="http://pdfoxy.com/8986-excerpt-from-harry-potter-and-the-sorcerers-stone-pdf.html" title="pdfoxy.com">http://pdfoxy.com/8986-excerpt-from-harry-potter-and-the-sorcerers-stone-pdf.html</a> [pdfoxy.com] </p><blockquote><div><p>"Look--" he murmured, holding out his arm to stop Malfoy. Something bright white was gleaming on the ground. They inched closer. It was the unicorn all right, and it was dead. Harry had never seen anything so beautiful and sad. Its long, slender legs were stuck out at odd angles where it had fallen and its mane was spread pearly-white on the dark leaves. Harry had taken one step toward it when a slithering sound made him freeze where he stood. A bush on the edge of the clearing quivered. . . . Then, out of the shadows, a hooded figure came crawling across the ground like some stalking beast. Harry, Malfoy, and Fang stood transfixed. The cloaked figure reached the unicorn, lowered its head over the wound in the animal's side, and began to drink its blood. "AAAAAAAAAAARGH!" Malfoy let out a terrible scream and bolted--so did Fang. The hooded figure raised its head and looked right at Harry--unicorn blood was dribbling down its front. It got to its feet and came swiftly toward Harry--he couldn't move for fear.</p></div></blockquote><p>.<br>.<br>.</p><p>256 copies:</p><p><a href="http://timecube.com/" title="timecube.com">http://timecube.com/</a> [timecube.com] </p><blockquote><div><p>Americans are dumb, educated ONE<br>stupid and they worship ONEism Evil.<br>It is not immoral to kill believers, for the stupid bastards EVOLVE from son<br>or daughter who precedes them. NOT one damn human adult has ever been<br>created - for ONLY babies are CREATED - and every adult has within them the LIFE given by children who DIE to give-up their lives to their parent<br>image - so their mom or Dad can live. Adults are EVIL to deny they evolved from children - and claim their adult EGO image is a god likeness. Such damn evil AMERICANS should have their tongue cut out for the heinous hoax they are perpetrating upon their own children. I know now why the Jews<br>deserved their holocaust - worshipping their own adult EGO image as a damn god whil ignoring and betraying they very children who sacrifice their LIFE<br>so their Moms and Dads could Live. There is nothing godly about stupid<br>and evil adults who betray their own children who gave them Life. I AM<br>WISER THAN ANY DAMN MAN OR GOD WHO EVER EXISTED. IF THE<br>HALF AND HALF CO-CREATED<br>JESUS RETURNS TO EARTH, I WILL PERSONALLY KILL THE BASTARD MYSELF. ALL CREATION OCCURS<br>BETWEEN AND AS OPPOSITES. YOU DUMB-ASS, EARTH, THE UNIVERSE<br>AND EVERY LIVING THING IN IT<br>EXISTS BETWEEN A TOP AND BOTTOM, BETWEEN A FRONT AND BACK, BETWEEN OPPOSITE SIDES,<br>AND INSIDE AND OUTSIDE. A LL YOU DUMB EVIL BASTARDS EARN<br>A HOLOCAUST ANF IT IS NIGH UPON YOU. HIRED SICK TEACHERS<br>ARE PAID TO TEACH YOU EVIL TO<br>ENSLAVE YOU STUPID AND YOU<br>NOW POSSESS AN IDIOT CYCLOPIC<br>MENTALITY. YOU LACK THE BRAINS TO KNOW THAT 4 SIMULTANEOUS DAYS ROTATE IN AN IMAGINARY CUBED EARTH.<br>KEEP IGNORING ME AQND YOU WILL PAY HELL FOR CLAIMING<br>YOUR ADULT IMAGE AS A DAMN GOD WHILE YOU BETRAY YOUR<br>PRIOR SONS AND DAUGHTERS WHO SACRIFICED THEIR LIFE SO YOU COULD LIVE AN EVIL LIE.<br>BIBLE GOD NEV$ER CREATED AV SINGLE DAY - NOT A SINGLE ROTATION - LEFT THE EARTH STANDING STILL. I CREATED 4<br>DAYS IN ON EARTH ROTATION.<br>EVERY HUMAN DESERVES DEATH FOR IGNORING SUCH A SUPERNATURAL TRANSCENDENTAL PRINCIPLE.<br>GREENWICH MEAN TIME IS WRONG AND EVIL, SO  IS 3 DIMENSIONAL MATH. YOU CAN"T KILL ME, FOR I AM 82 + CANCER.<br>CHILDREN - STOP THE EVIL ADULTS BEFORE THEY DESTROY YOUR  LIFE ON EARTH.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>0 copies : http : //www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f4506t.pdf ? portlet = 3 [ irs.gov ] Signature and date .
Form 4506-T must besigned and dated by the taxpayer listed online 1a or 2a .
If you completed line 5requesting the information be sent to athird party , the IRS must receive Form4506-T within 60 days of the date signedby the taxpayer or it will be rejected.Individuals .
Transcripts of jointly filedtax returns may be furnished to eitherspouse .
Only one signature is required.Sign Form 4506-T exactly as your nameappeared on the original return .
If youchanged your name , also sign your currentname.Corporations .
Generally , Form 4506-Tcan be signed by : ( 1 ) an officer havinglegal authority to bind the corporation , ( 2 ) any person designated by the board ofdirectors or other governing body , or ( 3 ) any officer or employee on written requestby any principal officer and attested1 copy : http : //www.nytimes.com/2009/07/15/opinion/15dowd.html [ nytimes.com ] But the barbed adjectives did n't match the muted performance on display before the Judiciary Committee .
Like the president who picked her , Sotomayor has been a model of professorial rationality .
Besides , it 's delicious watching Republicans go after Democrats for being too emotional and irrational given the G.O.P .
shame spiral.W .
and Dick Cheney made all their bad decisions about Iraq , W.M.D .
's , domestic surveillance , torture , rendition and secret hit squads from the gut , based on false intuitions , fear , paranoia and revenge.Sarah Palin is the definition of irrational , a volatile and scattered country-music queen without the music .
Her Republican fans defend her lack of application and intellect , happy to settle for her emotional electricity.Senator Graham said Sotomayor would be confirmed unless she had " a meltdown " -- a word applied mostly to women and toddlers until Mark Sanford proudly took ownership of it when he was judged about the wisdom of his Latina woman.2 copies : http : //pdfoxy.com/8986-excerpt-from-harry-potter-and-the-sorcerers-stone-pdf.html [ pdfoxy.com ] " Look-- " he murmured , holding out his arm to stop Malfoy .
Something bright white was gleaming on the ground .
They inched closer .
It was the unicorn all right , and it was dead .
Harry had never seen anything so beautiful and sad .
Its long , slender legs were stuck out at odd angles where it had fallen and its mane was spread pearly-white on the dark leaves .
Harry had taken one step toward it when a slithering sound made him freeze where he stood .
A bush on the edge of the clearing quivered .
. .
. Then , out of the shadows , a hooded figure came crawling across the ground like some stalking beast .
Harry , Malfoy , and Fang stood transfixed .
The cloaked figure reached the unicorn , lowered its head over the wound in the animal 's side , and began to drink its blood .
" AAAAAAAAAAARGH ! " Malfoy let out a terrible scream and bolted--so did Fang .
The hooded figure raised its head and looked right at Harry--unicorn blood was dribbling down its front .
It got to its feet and came swiftly toward Harry--he could n't move for fear....256 copies : http : //timecube.com/ [ timecube.com ] Americans are dumb , educated ONEstupid and they worship ONEism Evil.It is not immoral to kill believers , for the stupid bastards EVOLVE from sonor daughter who precedes them .
NOT one damn human adult has ever beencreated - for ONLY babies are CREATED - and every adult has within them the LIFE given by children who DIE to give-up their lives to their parentimage - so their mom or Dad can live .
Adults are EVIL to deny they evolved from children - and claim their adult EGO image is a god likeness .
Such damn evil AMERICANS should have their tongue cut out for the heinous hoax they are perpetrating upon their own children .
I know now why the Jewsdeserved their holocaust - worshipping their own adult EGO image as a damn god whil ignoring and betraying they very children who sacrifice their LIFEso their Moms and Dads could Live .
There is nothing godly about stupidand evil adults who betray their own children who gave them Life .
I AMWISER THAN ANY DAMN MAN OR GOD WHO EVER EXISTED .
IF THEHALF AND HALF CO-CREATEDJESUS RETURNS TO EARTH , I WILL PERSONALLY KILL THE BASTARD MYSELF .
ALL CREATION OCCURSBETWEEN AND AS OPPOSITES .
YOU DUMB-ASS , EARTH , THE UNIVERSEAND EVERY LIVING THING IN ITEXISTS BETWEEN A TOP AND BOTTOM , BETWEEN A FRONT AND BACK , BETWEEN OPPOSITE SIDES,AND INSIDE AND OUTSIDE .
A LL YOU DUMB EVIL BASTARDS EARNA HOLOCAUST ANF IT IS NIGH UPON YOU .
HIRED SICK TEACHERSARE PAID TO TEACH YOU EVIL TOENSLAVE YOU STUPID AND YOUNOW POSSESS AN IDIOT CYCLOPICMENTALITY .
YOU LACK THE BRAINS TO KNOW THAT 4 SIMULTANEOUS DAYS ROTATE IN AN IMAGINARY CUBED EARTH.KEEP IGNORING ME AQND YOU WILL PAY HELL FOR CLAIMINGYOUR ADULT IMAGE AS A DAMN GOD WHILE YOU BETRAY YOURPRIOR SONS AND DAUGHTERS WHO SACRIFICED THEIR LIFE SO YOU COULD LIVE AN EVIL LIE.BIBLE GOD NEV $ ER CREATED AV SINGLE DAY - NOT A SINGLE ROTATION - LEFT THE EARTH STANDING STILL .
I CREATED 4DAYS IN ON EARTH ROTATION.EVERY HUMAN DESERVES DEATH FOR IGNORING SUCH A SUPERNATURAL TRANSCENDENTAL PRINCIPLE.GREENWICH MEAN TIME IS WRONG AND EVIL , SO IS 3 DIMENSIONAL MATH .
YOU CAN " T KILL ME , FOR I AM 82 + CANCER.CHILDREN - STOP THE EVIL ADULTS BEFORE THEY DESTROY YOUR LIFE ON EARTH .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>0 copies:http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f4506t.pdf?portlet=3 [irs.gov] Signature and date.
Form 4506-T must besigned and dated by the taxpayer listed online 1a or 2a.
If you completed line 5requesting the information be sent to athird party, the IRS must receive Form4506-T within 60 days of the date signedby the taxpayer or it will be rejected.Individuals.
Transcripts of jointly filedtax returns may be furnished to eitherspouse.
Only one signature is required.Sign Form 4506-T exactly as your nameappeared on the original return.
If youchanged your name, also sign your currentname.Corporations.
Generally, Form 4506-Tcan be signed by: (1) an officer havinglegal authority to bind the corporation, (2)any person designated by the board ofdirectors or other governing body, or (3)any officer or employee on written requestby any principal officer and attested1 copy:http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/15/opinion/15dowd.html [nytimes.com] But the barbed adjectives didn't match the muted performance on display before the Judiciary Committee.
Like the president who picked her, Sotomayor has been a model of professorial rationality.
Besides, it's delicious watching Republicans go after Democrats for being too emotional and irrational given the G.O.P.
shame spiral.W.
and Dick Cheney made all their bad decisions about Iraq, W.M.D.
's, domestic surveillance, torture, rendition and secret hit squads from the gut, based on false intuitions, fear, paranoia and revenge.Sarah Palin is the definition of irrational, a volatile and scattered country-music queen without the music.
Her Republican fans defend her lack of application and intellect, happy to settle for her emotional electricity.Senator Graham said Sotomayor would be confirmed unless she had "a meltdown" -- a word applied mostly to women and toddlers until Mark Sanford proudly took ownership of it when he was judged about the wisdom of his Latina woman.2 copies:http://pdfoxy.com/8986-excerpt-from-harry-potter-and-the-sorcerers-stone-pdf.html [pdfoxy.com] "Look--" he murmured, holding out his arm to stop Malfoy.
Something bright white was gleaming on the ground.
They inched closer.
It was the unicorn all right, and it was dead.
Harry had never seen anything so beautiful and sad.
Its long, slender legs were stuck out at odd angles where it had fallen and its mane was spread pearly-white on the dark leaves.
Harry had taken one step toward it when a slithering sound made him freeze where he stood.
A bush on the edge of the clearing quivered.
. .
. Then, out of the shadows, a hooded figure came crawling across the ground like some stalking beast.
Harry, Malfoy, and Fang stood transfixed.
The cloaked figure reached the unicorn, lowered its head over the wound in the animal's side, and began to drink its blood.
"AAAAAAAAAAARGH!" Malfoy let out a terrible scream and bolted--so did Fang.
The hooded figure raised its head and looked right at Harry--unicorn blood was dribbling down its front.
It got to its feet and came swiftly toward Harry--he couldn't move for fear....256 copies:http://timecube.com/ [timecube.com] Americans are dumb, educated ONEstupid and they worship ONEism Evil.It is not immoral to kill believers, for the stupid bastards EVOLVE from sonor daughter who precedes them.
NOT one damn human adult has ever beencreated - for ONLY babies are CREATED - and every adult has within them the LIFE given by children who DIE to give-up their lives to their parentimage - so their mom or Dad can live.
Adults are EVIL to deny they evolved from children - and claim their adult EGO image is a god likeness.
Such damn evil AMERICANS should have their tongue cut out for the heinous hoax they are perpetrating upon their own children.
I know now why the Jewsdeserved their holocaust - worshipping their own adult EGO image as a damn god whil ignoring and betraying they very children who sacrifice their LIFEso their Moms and Dads could Live.
There is nothing godly about stupidand evil adults who betray their own children who gave them Life.
I AMWISER THAN ANY DAMN MAN OR GOD WHO EVER EXISTED.
IF THEHALF AND HALF CO-CREATEDJESUS RETURNS TO EARTH, I WILL PERSONALLY KILL THE BASTARD MYSELF.
ALL CREATION OCCURSBETWEEN AND AS OPPOSITES.
YOU DUMB-ASS, EARTH, THE UNIVERSEAND EVERY LIVING THING IN ITEXISTS BETWEEN A TOP AND BOTTOM, BETWEEN A FRONT AND BACK, BETWEEN OPPOSITE SIDES,AND INSIDE AND OUTSIDE.
A LL YOU DUMB EVIL BASTARDS EARNA HOLOCAUST ANF IT IS NIGH UPON YOU.
HIRED SICK TEACHERSARE PAID TO TEACH YOU EVIL TOENSLAVE YOU STUPID AND YOUNOW POSSESS AN IDIOT CYCLOPICMENTALITY.
YOU LACK THE BRAINS TO KNOW THAT 4 SIMULTANEOUS DAYS ROTATE IN AN IMAGINARY CUBED EARTH.KEEP IGNORING ME AQND YOU WILL PAY HELL FOR CLAIMINGYOUR ADULT IMAGE AS A DAMN GOD WHILE YOU BETRAY YOURPRIOR SONS AND DAUGHTERS WHO SACRIFICED THEIR LIFE SO YOU COULD LIVE AN EVIL LIE.BIBLE GOD NEV$ER CREATED AV SINGLE DAY - NOT A SINGLE ROTATION - LEFT THE EARTH STANDING STILL.
I CREATED 4DAYS IN ON EARTH ROTATION.EVERY HUMAN DESERVES DEATH FOR IGNORING SUCH A SUPERNATURAL TRANSCENDENTAL PRINCIPLE.GREENWICH MEAN TIME IS WRONG AND EVIL, SO  IS 3 DIMENSIONAL MATH.
YOU CAN"T KILL ME, FOR I AM 82 + CANCER.CHILDREN - STOP THE EVIL ADULTS BEFORE THEY DESTROY YOUR  LIFE ON EARTH.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735703</id>
	<title>Schizo = Success?</title>
	<author>tunapez</author>
	<datestamp>1247829540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Look at what it takes to get ahead in the Corporate World: A huge ego, a shitload of apathy and the never-wavering pursuit of unlimited growth margins(at any cost). Apply that criteria to politics and you can see what a brave new world it really is.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at what it takes to get ahead in the Corporate World : A huge ego , a shitload of apathy and the never-wavering pursuit of unlimited growth margins ( at any cost ) .
Apply that criteria to politics and you can see what a brave new world it really is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at what it takes to get ahead in the Corporate World: A huge ego, a shitload of apathy and the never-wavering pursuit of unlimited growth margins(at any cost).
Apply that criteria to politics and you can see what a brave new world it really is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28742725</id>
	<title>Re:Crap soup</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1247948100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, your psych 101 instructor is either dead or insane?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , your psych 101 instructor is either dead or insane ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, your psych 101 instructor is either dead or insane?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736429</id>
	<title>Re:Not true in my case</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247833980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>words count.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>words count .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>words count.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28739469</id>
	<title>Re:Not true in my case</title>
	<author>nabasu</author>
	<datestamp>1247914980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Creativity doesn't necessarily mean artistic creativity. Programming for instance demands a lot of creativity (and I say this as a visual artist).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Creativity does n't necessarily mean artistic creativity .
Programming for instance demands a lot of creativity ( and I say this as a visual artist ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Creativity doesn't necessarily mean artistic creativity.
Programming for instance demands a lot of creativity (and I say this as a visual artist).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735599</id>
	<title>Geniuses Don't Hallucinate?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247828820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They hypothesize that people with this gene with high IQs are creative, while those with lower IQs are simply prone to the hallucinations</p></div><p>Why do they hypothesize that?  There are plenty of geniuses with mental health issues.  Take <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John\_Forbes\_Nash,\_Jr." title="wikipedia.org">John Nash</a> [wikipedia.org].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They hypothesize that people with this gene with high IQs are creative , while those with lower IQs are simply prone to the hallucinationsWhy do they hypothesize that ?
There are plenty of geniuses with mental health issues .
Take John Nash [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They hypothesize that people with this gene with high IQs are creative, while those with lower IQs are simply prone to the hallucinationsWhy do they hypothesize that?
There are plenty of geniuses with mental health issues.
Take John Nash [wikipedia.org].
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735753</id>
	<title>I am not as creative...</title>
	<author>Phizzle</author>
	<datestamp>1247829840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>...As I think I am!</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>...As I think I am !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...As I think I am!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735531</id>
	<title>I couldn't understand that at all</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247828400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think that means that I have 1 gene.  Or maybe 2.  Or none?</p><p>And I'm an artistic schizo?  No, I know that's not true, I don't have a creative bone in my body.<br>Yes I do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that means that I have 1 gene .
Or maybe 2 .
Or none ? And I 'm an artistic schizo ?
No , I know that 's not true , I do n't have a creative bone in my body.Yes I do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that means that I have 1 gene.
Or maybe 2.
Or none?And I'm an artistic schizo?
No, I know that's not true, I don't have a creative bone in my body.Yes I do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736933</id>
	<title>Re:Not true in my case</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247837460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is not much difference between having an active imagination and being creative.</p><p>Well... actually, as a person who is paid to be creative, I can tell you what that small difference is.</p><p>It is that you put the ideas from your imagination into a physical form that other people can understand.</p><p>That's all there is to it. And it is a lot of work and organisation. Most people just don't think they are creative when really they just don't want to do all the boring bits involved.</p><p>How to sort through your imagination for the bits people will like, or even buy, is another topic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is not much difference between having an active imagination and being creative.Well... actually , as a person who is paid to be creative , I can tell you what that small difference is.It is that you put the ideas from your imagination into a physical form that other people can understand.That 's all there is to it .
And it is a lot of work and organisation .
Most people just do n't think they are creative when really they just do n't want to do all the boring bits involved.How to sort through your imagination for the bits people will like , or even buy , is another topic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is not much difference between having an active imagination and being creative.Well... actually, as a person who is paid to be creative, I can tell you what that small difference is.It is that you put the ideas from your imagination into a physical form that other people can understand.That's all there is to it.
And it is a lot of work and organisation.
Most people just don't think they are creative when really they just don't want to do all the boring bits involved.How to sort through your imagination for the bits people will like, or even buy, is another topic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738235</id>
	<title>Re:So they are saying...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247851260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guilty as charged. Or that is what the voices in my head keep telling me!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guilty as charged .
Or that is what the voices in my head keep telling me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guilty as charged.
Or that is what the voices in my head keep telling me!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735577</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738447</id>
	<title>Of course</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247854800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its easier to solve a problem when you put two people on it. Even if they're both in my head.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its easier to solve a problem when you put two people on it .
Even if they 're both in my head .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its easier to solve a problem when you put two people on it.
Even if they're both in my head.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28740325</id>
	<title>Re:Been known, to a degree, for over 2000 years.</title>
	<author>turing\_m</author>
	<datestamp>1247928180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The further you get to the right of the bell curve, the more blank looks you get when you explain something. The average person doesn't have the intellectual toolkit to distinguish a brilliant idea from a crazy idea. The methods the average person has of distinguishing genius are generally proxy measures - wealth, references by authority figures, an invention that finds common use, art that gains widespread acceptance.
<br> <br>
To find the truly great ideas, you have to conduct an exhaustive search - the low hanging fruit has been found already. You have to ask the stupid questions and you have to thoughtfully answer the rhetorical questions. No assumption can lie unchallenged. You have to risk laughter and ridicule. After you have found a few great ideas this way, you start to relish the process and soon enough you will have collected enough truly unconventional and good ideas that the average person assumes madness, or charitably puts it down to "eccentricity" if you have proven yourself in some way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The further you get to the right of the bell curve , the more blank looks you get when you explain something .
The average person does n't have the intellectual toolkit to distinguish a brilliant idea from a crazy idea .
The methods the average person has of distinguishing genius are generally proxy measures - wealth , references by authority figures , an invention that finds common use , art that gains widespread acceptance .
To find the truly great ideas , you have to conduct an exhaustive search - the low hanging fruit has been found already .
You have to ask the stupid questions and you have to thoughtfully answer the rhetorical questions .
No assumption can lie unchallenged .
You have to risk laughter and ridicule .
After you have found a few great ideas this way , you start to relish the process and soon enough you will have collected enough truly unconventional and good ideas that the average person assumes madness , or charitably puts it down to " eccentricity " if you have proven yourself in some way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The further you get to the right of the bell curve, the more blank looks you get when you explain something.
The average person doesn't have the intellectual toolkit to distinguish a brilliant idea from a crazy idea.
The methods the average person has of distinguishing genius are generally proxy measures - wealth, references by authority figures, an invention that finds common use, art that gains widespread acceptance.
To find the truly great ideas, you have to conduct an exhaustive search - the low hanging fruit has been found already.
You have to ask the stupid questions and you have to thoughtfully answer the rhetorical questions.
No assumption can lie unchallenged.
You have to risk laughter and ridicule.
After you have found a few great ideas this way, you start to relish the process and soon enough you will have collected enough truly unconventional and good ideas that the average person assumes madness, or charitably puts it down to "eccentricity" if you have proven yourself in some way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737377</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735587</id>
	<title>Not sure if I agree...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247828760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a friend who was diagnosed as schizophrenic.  She might also be one of the smartest people I'll ever know, and also extremely creative.  She has the high IQ along with the high creativity AND the hallucinations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a friend who was diagnosed as schizophrenic .
She might also be one of the smartest people I 'll ever know , and also extremely creative .
She has the high IQ along with the high creativity AND the hallucinations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a friend who was diagnosed as schizophrenic.
She might also be one of the smartest people I'll ever know, and also extremely creative.
She has the high IQ along with the high creativity AND the hallucinations.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738039</id>
	<title>Re:Crazy Chef Sato</title>
	<author>TimSSG</author>
	<datestamp>1247848560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I say two out of ten may be crazy; the smart ones are real good at faking sanity. Tim S</htmltext>
<tokenext>I say two out of ten may be crazy ; the smart ones are real good at faking sanity .
Tim S</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I say two out of ten may be crazy; the smart ones are real good at faking sanity.
Tim S</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735549</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735803</id>
	<title>John Forbes Nash, Jr.?</title>
	<author>djKing</author>
	<datestamp>1247830140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John\_Forbes\_Nash" title="wikipedia.org">What about John Forbes Nash Jr.</a> [wikipedia.org]?  [He's the genius they based the movie A Beautiful Mind on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about John Forbes Nash Jr. [ wikipedia.org ] ? [ He 's the genius they based the movie A Beautiful Mind on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about John Forbes Nash Jr. [wikipedia.org]?  [He's the genius they based the movie A Beautiful Mind on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735971</id>
	<title>Re:So they are saying...</title>
	<author>MrHanky</author>
	<datestamp>1247831220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think John Forbes Nash is stupid. Nor Theodore Kaczynski, as a more dangerous example. There might be a link between schizophrenia and intelligence, but it's almost certainly not simple and causal. Perhaps the ability to distinguish between crazy-thoughts and intelligent-thoughts can be considered a special kind of intelligence, and the ability to entertain crazy-thoughts without taking them too seriously is what's needed for creative genius. Many exceptionally uncreative high-IQ people seem to lack this ability as well, and will hold on to the most ridiculous notions just because it's theirs, but they're hardly crazy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think John Forbes Nash is stupid .
Nor Theodore Kaczynski , as a more dangerous example .
There might be a link between schizophrenia and intelligence , but it 's almost certainly not simple and causal .
Perhaps the ability to distinguish between crazy-thoughts and intelligent-thoughts can be considered a special kind of intelligence , and the ability to entertain crazy-thoughts without taking them too seriously is what 's needed for creative genius .
Many exceptionally uncreative high-IQ people seem to lack this ability as well , and will hold on to the most ridiculous notions just because it 's theirs , but they 're hardly crazy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think John Forbes Nash is stupid.
Nor Theodore Kaczynski, as a more dangerous example.
There might be a link between schizophrenia and intelligence, but it's almost certainly not simple and causal.
Perhaps the ability to distinguish between crazy-thoughts and intelligent-thoughts can be considered a special kind of intelligence, and the ability to entertain crazy-thoughts without taking them too seriously is what's needed for creative genius.
Many exceptionally uncreative high-IQ people seem to lack this ability as well, and will hold on to the most ridiculous notions just because it's theirs, but they're hardly crazy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735577</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735577</id>
	<title>So they are saying...</title>
	<author>otopico</author>
	<datestamp>1247828700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Smart people can tell the voices in their head are their own thoughts, while the less intelligent think they are hearing disembodied voices, not their own?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Smart people can tell the voices in their head are their own thoughts , while the less intelligent think they are hearing disembodied voices , not their own ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Smart people can tell the voices in their head are their own thoughts, while the less intelligent think they are hearing disembodied voices, not their own?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735807</id>
	<title>Re:so wait ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247830140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It makes perfect sense.
<br>
<br>
If you are smart enough to know when you have "weird thoughts", you can shrug your shoulders and go on with life, perhaps even putting those "creative notions" to some practical or artistic use.
<br>
<br>
If you are not too bright, you might believe all manner of crazy shit your mind comes up with and act on it. The worst cases might start a religion or live with the pigeons.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It makes perfect sense .
If you are smart enough to know when you have " weird thoughts " , you can shrug your shoulders and go on with life , perhaps even putting those " creative notions " to some practical or artistic use .
If you are not too bright , you might believe all manner of crazy shit your mind comes up with and act on it .
The worst cases might start a religion or live with the pigeons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It makes perfect sense.
If you are smart enough to know when you have "weird thoughts", you can shrug your shoulders and go on with life, perhaps even putting those "creative notions" to some practical or artistic use.
If you are not too bright, you might believe all manner of crazy shit your mind comes up with and act on it.
The worst cases might start a religion or live with the pigeons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735897</id>
	<title>"Divine" Inspiration</title>
	<author>teopatl</author>
	<datestamp>1247830800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I wonder if this a connection, however tenuous, between Inspiration--that is, the phenomenon by which creativity manifests, e.g. hearing that improvised lick, seeing that unpainted painting, the "pop" of a boundary pushing idea--and hearing voices or hallucinating?  "God" is an alteration of reality via an alteration of perception, which is itself a result of genetic mutation.</p><p>How's that for logical leaps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So I wonder if this a connection , however tenuous , between Inspiration--that is , the phenomenon by which creativity manifests , e.g .
hearing that improvised lick , seeing that unpainted painting , the " pop " of a boundary pushing idea--and hearing voices or hallucinating ?
" God " is an alteration of reality via an alteration of perception , which is itself a result of genetic mutation.How 's that for logical leaps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I wonder if this a connection, however tenuous, between Inspiration--that is, the phenomenon by which creativity manifests, e.g.
hearing that improvised lick, seeing that unpainted painting, the "pop" of a boundary pushing idea--and hearing voices or hallucinating?
"God" is an alteration of reality via an alteration of perception, which is itself a result of genetic mutation.How's that for logical leaps.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735933</id>
	<title>One sign of psychosis</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247830920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some psychiatrists look for one troubling sign that their patient may be experiencing psychosis -- a distrust for government. It certainly would be more ethical to check for a gene huh? Too bad people misuse the term "correlation does not mean causation" to the point of absurdity. It seems to boil down to one issue: I don't agree with your data, so it's not causation. As long as it keeps the research open and honest, I don't think it's a bad thing, but some people take it a little too far I'm afraid.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some psychiatrists look for one troubling sign that their patient may be experiencing psychosis -- a distrust for government .
It certainly would be more ethical to check for a gene huh ?
Too bad people misuse the term " correlation does not mean causation " to the point of absurdity .
It seems to boil down to one issue : I do n't agree with your data , so it 's not causation .
As long as it keeps the research open and honest , I do n't think it 's a bad thing , but some people take it a little too far I 'm afraid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some psychiatrists look for one troubling sign that their patient may be experiencing psychosis -- a distrust for government.
It certainly would be more ethical to check for a gene huh?
Too bad people misuse the term "correlation does not mean causation" to the point of absurdity.
It seems to boil down to one issue: I don't agree with your data, so it's not causation.
As long as it keeps the research open and honest, I don't think it's a bad thing, but some people take it a little too far I'm afraid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738759</id>
	<title>Somnombulism == Creativity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247860260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps creativity can simply be derived from our conscious minds' incapacity to censor stuff from our subconscious minds. Something I've often wondered about, anyways.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps creativity can simply be derived from our conscious minds ' incapacity to censor stuff from our subconscious minds .
Something I 've often wondered about , anyways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps creativity can simply be derived from our conscious minds' incapacity to censor stuff from our subconscious minds.
Something I've often wondered about, anyways.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735773</id>
	<title>thought that was known for a long time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247829960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought it was known for a long time that there is a link between creativity and schizophrenia. Seems perfectly natural to me.</p><p>Stephan</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it was known for a long time that there is a link between creativity and schizophrenia .
Seems perfectly natural to me.Stephan</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it was known for a long time that there is a link between creativity and schizophrenia.
Seems perfectly natural to me.Stephan</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735549</id>
	<title>Crazy Chef Sato</title>
	<author>Marxist Hacker 42</author>
	<datestamp>1247828460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This was on the menu of my favorite Restaurant throughout the 1990s in Beaverton, OR (It died when Tektronix scaled back):</p><p>Eight out of ten people are normal<br>One maybe genius,<br>One maybe crazy,<br>I hesitate to call myself genius,<br>That leaves only one choice</p><p>Easily the most creative Japanese/American fusion chef I've ever met.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This was on the menu of my favorite Restaurant throughout the 1990s in Beaverton , OR ( It died when Tektronix scaled back ) : Eight out of ten people are normalOne maybe genius,One maybe crazy,I hesitate to call myself genius,That leaves only one choiceEasily the most creative Japanese/American fusion chef I 've ever met .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was on the menu of my favorite Restaurant throughout the 1990s in Beaverton, OR (It died when Tektronix scaled back):Eight out of ten people are normalOne maybe genius,One maybe crazy,I hesitate to call myself genius,That leaves only one choiceEasily the most creative Japanese/American fusion chef I've ever met.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738135</id>
	<title>Re:Not true in my case</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247850060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But that's the whole point! You don't have to be creative in an artistic sense to be creative, just the ability to look at something from a different perspective is creativity. Most people will continue to try and solve a problem the <i>same</i> way repeatedly until:<br>A) It works<br>B) Someone else solves it for them<br>C) They give up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But that 's the whole point !
You do n't have to be creative in an artistic sense to be creative , just the ability to look at something from a different perspective is creativity .
Most people will continue to try and solve a problem the same way repeatedly until : A ) It worksB ) Someone else solves it for themC ) They give up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But that's the whole point!
You don't have to be creative in an artistic sense to be creative, just the ability to look at something from a different perspective is creativity.
Most people will continue to try and solve a problem the same way repeatedly until:A) It worksB) Someone else solves it for themC) They give up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28747623</id>
	<title>What about both?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1248017700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am both paranoid schizophrenic -- extremely psychotic with visual, tactile and auditory hallucinations when I am not medicated and very creative.  I draw, paint, play drums, write all genres.  My IQ has been tested at average.  The only reason my IQ is that low is because I have difficulty remembering stuff.  I am basically a math whiz and a history dunce.....  I don't think IQ has anything to do with it, really,  IQ tests tend to be biased towards people that can remember stuff well....  I also know many other "crazy" people that are very creative as well.  Some of them are very smart, others are not....</p><p>In other words, the conclusion is nonsense, I think.  The genetic mutation may have some bearing on both creativity and schizophrenia, but IQ has nothing to do with whether someone is one or both!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am both paranoid schizophrenic -- extremely psychotic with visual , tactile and auditory hallucinations when I am not medicated and very creative .
I draw , paint , play drums , write all genres .
My IQ has been tested at average .
The only reason my IQ is that low is because I have difficulty remembering stuff .
I am basically a math whiz and a history dunce..... I do n't think IQ has anything to do with it , really , IQ tests tend to be biased towards people that can remember stuff well.... I also know many other " crazy " people that are very creative as well .
Some of them are very smart , others are not....In other words , the conclusion is nonsense , I think .
The genetic mutation may have some bearing on both creativity and schizophrenia , but IQ has nothing to do with whether someone is one or both !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am both paranoid schizophrenic -- extremely psychotic with visual, tactile and auditory hallucinations when I am not medicated and very creative.
I draw, paint, play drums, write all genres.
My IQ has been tested at average.
The only reason my IQ is that low is because I have difficulty remembering stuff.
I am basically a math whiz and a history dunce.....  I don't think IQ has anything to do with it, really,  IQ tests tend to be biased towards people that can remember stuff well....  I also know many other "crazy" people that are very creative as well.
Some of them are very smart, others are not....In other words, the conclusion is nonsense, I think.
The genetic mutation may have some bearing on both creativity and schizophrenia, but IQ has nothing to do with whether someone is one or both!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735941</id>
	<title>Re:So they are saying...</title>
	<author>DriedClexler</author>
	<datestamp>1247830980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Surprisingly, that's almost exactly how the psychologist Julian Jaynes <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Origin\_of\_Consciousness\_in\_the\_Breakdown\_of\_the\_Bicameral\_Mind#Jaynes.27\_case\_for\_bicameralism" title="wikipedia.org">explained</a> [wikipedia.org] the origin of consciousness: people went from hearing voices, to identifying with that voice enough for it to be their "consciousness".  He also believed that modern schizophrenia is a relapse to that earlier, non-conscious, "bicameral" state.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Surprisingly , that 's almost exactly how the psychologist Julian Jaynes explained [ wikipedia.org ] the origin of consciousness : people went from hearing voices , to identifying with that voice enough for it to be their " consciousness " .
He also believed that modern schizophrenia is a relapse to that earlier , non-conscious , " bicameral " state .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Surprisingly, that's almost exactly how the psychologist Julian Jaynes explained [wikipedia.org] the origin of consciousness: people went from hearing voices, to identifying with that voice enough for it to be their "consciousness".
He also believed that modern schizophrenia is a relapse to that earlier, non-conscious, "bicameral" state.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735577</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735723</id>
	<title>Re:Crazy Chef Sato</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247829660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually I would say that creativity and insanity really ARE the same thing, just the people we call crazy got a little... TOO creative and with things like their interpretation of gravity and who (or what) they think would be a good conversationalist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually I would say that creativity and insanity really ARE the same thing , just the people we call crazy got a little... TOO creative and with things like their interpretation of gravity and who ( or what ) they think would be a good conversationalist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually I would say that creativity and insanity really ARE the same thing, just the people we call crazy got a little... TOO creative and with things like their interpretation of gravity and who (or what) they think would be a good conversationalist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735549</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737277</id>
	<title>Re:Crap soup</title>
	<author>Deliveranc3</author>
	<datestamp>1247840280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Psychology 101, Life IS suffering. By continuing to live you are demonstrating your own insanity, suicides are dangerously close to sane.<br> <br> This is based upon the idea that your stated intention is to "make the world a better place" or "to achieve happiness" the outcome is the same.<br> <br> Shove your normal agenda UP YOUR ASS. Control your jealousy of people who ARE able to accept themselves and express themselves.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Psychology 101 , Life IS suffering .
By continuing to live you are demonstrating your own insanity , suicides are dangerously close to sane .
This is based upon the idea that your stated intention is to " make the world a better place " or " to achieve happiness " the outcome is the same .
Shove your normal agenda UP YOUR ASS .
Control your jealousy of people who ARE able to accept themselves and express themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Psychology 101, Life IS suffering.
By continuing to live you are demonstrating your own insanity, suicides are dangerously close to sane.
This is based upon the idea that your stated intention is to "make the world a better place" or "to achieve happiness" the outcome is the same.
Shove your normal agenda UP YOUR ASS.
Control your jealousy of people who ARE able to accept themselves and express themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735695</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735859</id>
	<title>I think they made that story up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247830500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They made that story up to fool us.
Don't you see?  They want us to link Schizophrenia
to creativity because they know that it will cause
us to support them.  And what's wrong with that?
It's because the they're not real people.  Real people
don't behave that way.  What you call "schizophrenia" is
really the result of behavioral differences among the
class of people who we've come to differentiate as the
Nordic type, as opposed to greys, hairies and the other classes.
They can live nominally among us as they appear generall
to be caucasian.  Some counter that they can't be the Nordics,
and this isn't entirely untrue because they are just as often
offspring between Nordics and humans.  Also, time dilation
effects from the trasnport mechanisms used to transport them
back and forth from Earth to their home worlds cause them to
be smaller.  Thus, they really are the Nordics and would be
tall, blonde and attractive to you; but appear differently due
to an effect akin to Doppler shift in their frame of reference.
So when you see one of these Nordics on the street you just think
they're crazy, but those are actually the social conventions in
their culture and I have to go becaue I've already said too much.
Just don't believe them becauese if you believe them then things
can happen like when I started believing them and then you will
believe them too and it will all happen.  Now do you see?  It's
already happening and it's happening because it's too late and
it's possibly even later than you think because there is a frame
of reference between these Nordic types and the Grays and what you
call schizophrenics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They made that story up to fool us .
Do n't you see ?
They want us to link Schizophrenia to creativity because they know that it will cause us to support them .
And what 's wrong with that ?
It 's because the they 're not real people .
Real people do n't behave that way .
What you call " schizophrenia " is really the result of behavioral differences among the class of people who we 've come to differentiate as the Nordic type , as opposed to greys , hairies and the other classes .
They can live nominally among us as they appear generall to be caucasian .
Some counter that they ca n't be the Nordics , and this is n't entirely untrue because they are just as often offspring between Nordics and humans .
Also , time dilation effects from the trasnport mechanisms used to transport them back and forth from Earth to their home worlds cause them to be smaller .
Thus , they really are the Nordics and would be tall , blonde and attractive to you ; but appear differently due to an effect akin to Doppler shift in their frame of reference .
So when you see one of these Nordics on the street you just think they 're crazy , but those are actually the social conventions in their culture and I have to go becaue I 've already said too much .
Just do n't believe them becauese if you believe them then things can happen like when I started believing them and then you will believe them too and it will all happen .
Now do you see ?
It 's already happening and it 's happening because it 's too late and it 's possibly even later than you think because there is a frame of reference between these Nordic types and the Grays and what you call schizophrenics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They made that story up to fool us.
Don't you see?
They want us to link Schizophrenia
to creativity because they know that it will cause
us to support them.
And what's wrong with that?
It's because the they're not real people.
Real people
don't behave that way.
What you call "schizophrenia" is
really the result of behavioral differences among the
class of people who we've come to differentiate as the
Nordic type, as opposed to greys, hairies and the other classes.
They can live nominally among us as they appear generall
to be caucasian.
Some counter that they can't be the Nordics,
and this isn't entirely untrue because they are just as often
offspring between Nordics and humans.
Also, time dilation
effects from the trasnport mechanisms used to transport them
back and forth from Earth to their home worlds cause them to
be smaller.
Thus, they really are the Nordics and would be
tall, blonde and attractive to you; but appear differently due
to an effect akin to Doppler shift in their frame of reference.
So when you see one of these Nordics on the street you just think
they're crazy, but those are actually the social conventions in
their culture and I have to go becaue I've already said too much.
Just don't believe them becauese if you believe them then things
can happen like when I started believing them and then you will
believe them too and it will all happen.
Now do you see?
It's
already happening and it's happening because it's too late and
it's possibly even later than you think because there is a frame
of reference between these Nordic types and the Grays and what you
call schizophrenics.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735895</id>
	<title>It all makes sense now...</title>
	<author>The Yuckinator</author>
	<datestamp>1247830800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No wonder my designers are crazy!</htmltext>
<tokenext>No wonder my designers are crazy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No wonder my designers are crazy!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736087</id>
	<title>Re:Geniuses Don't Hallucinate?</title>
	<author>Starlon</author>
	<datestamp>1247832000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm diagnosed with schizoeffective disorder. My symptoms grew increasingly the more I studied music, particularly Aural Skills. I never finished college, leaving with just over 100 hours behind me. My psychiatrist never discussed this with me. I know that I've lost interest in music since I started the anti-psychotic. I have a $3k classical guitar I haven't played seriously in over 2 years. With my bad memory, I've all but forgotten the memorized repertoire.
<br> <br>
Furthermore, this article describes me with great accuracy. I have a psychotic disorder, poor memory, and I don't take criticism that well without putting some deep thought into it first -- for example I do better at online discussions rather than live discussions. One reason is I have horrendous verbal skills.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm diagnosed with schizoeffective disorder .
My symptoms grew increasingly the more I studied music , particularly Aural Skills .
I never finished college , leaving with just over 100 hours behind me .
My psychiatrist never discussed this with me .
I know that I 've lost interest in music since I started the anti-psychotic .
I have a $ 3k classical guitar I have n't played seriously in over 2 years .
With my bad memory , I 've all but forgotten the memorized repertoire .
Furthermore , this article describes me with great accuracy .
I have a psychotic disorder , poor memory , and I do n't take criticism that well without putting some deep thought into it first -- for example I do better at online discussions rather than live discussions .
One reason is I have horrendous verbal skills .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm diagnosed with schizoeffective disorder.
My symptoms grew increasingly the more I studied music, particularly Aural Skills.
I never finished college, leaving with just over 100 hours behind me.
My psychiatrist never discussed this with me.
I know that I've lost interest in music since I started the anti-psychotic.
I have a $3k classical guitar I haven't played seriously in over 2 years.
With my bad memory, I've all but forgotten the memorized repertoire.
Furthermore, this article describes me with great accuracy.
I have a psychotic disorder, poor memory, and I don't take criticism that well without putting some deep thought into it first -- for example I do better at online discussions rather than live discussions.
One reason is I have horrendous verbal skills.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735599</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736063</id>
	<title>Re:Crazy Chef Sato</title>
	<author>thearkitex</author>
	<datestamp>1247831820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In bed...?</htmltext>
<tokenext>In bed... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In bed...?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735663</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737629</id>
	<title>Joseph Campbell, Stage 12: Return With The Elixir</title>
	<author>curmudgeon99</author>
	<datestamp>1247843640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Creativity is the only thing that should be rewarded exorbitantly.

Creativity. What the hell is that? The ability to make things that did not exist already. In the software business, it's called innovation. In the artistic fields, it's called authorship.
<br>
Linked is a slippery word. It implies causation. Correlated is more like it, meaning that we judge many people with schizophrenia as being also creative at the same time. What kind of creativity?
<br>
It could be as simple as this: persons with the diagnosis of schizophrenia choose to cope by creating.
<br>
Therefore, it does not imply that you must have schizophrenia to be creative. Creative people see new combinations, new possibilities, what-if mixtures that can change the world.
<br>
Creative people see a device such as the iPhone and come up with <i>the</i> killer app. Their idea was there for any other person to see but they did not.
<br>
So, creativity is not necessarily linked to schizophrenia. Instead, by coincidence, schizophrenic people are often creative.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Creativity is the only thing that should be rewarded exorbitantly .
Creativity. What the hell is that ?
The ability to make things that did not exist already .
In the software business , it 's called innovation .
In the artistic fields , it 's called authorship .
Linked is a slippery word .
It implies causation .
Correlated is more like it , meaning that we judge many people with schizophrenia as being also creative at the same time .
What kind of creativity ?
It could be as simple as this : persons with the diagnosis of schizophrenia choose to cope by creating .
Therefore , it does not imply that you must have schizophrenia to be creative .
Creative people see new combinations , new possibilities , what-if mixtures that can change the world .
Creative people see a device such as the iPhone and come up with the killer app .
Their idea was there for any other person to see but they did not .
So , creativity is not necessarily linked to schizophrenia .
Instead , by coincidence , schizophrenic people are often creative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Creativity is the only thing that should be rewarded exorbitantly.
Creativity. What the hell is that?
The ability to make things that did not exist already.
In the software business, it's called innovation.
In the artistic fields, it's called authorship.
Linked is a slippery word.
It implies causation.
Correlated is more like it, meaning that we judge many people with schizophrenia as being also creative at the same time.
What kind of creativity?
It could be as simple as this: persons with the diagnosis of schizophrenia choose to cope by creating.
Therefore, it does not imply that you must have schizophrenia to be creative.
Creative people see new combinations, new possibilities, what-if mixtures that can change the world.
Creative people see a device such as the iPhone and come up with the killer app.
Their idea was there for any other person to see but they did not.
So, creativity is not necessarily linked to schizophrenia.
Instead, by coincidence, schizophrenic people are often creative.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735849</id>
	<title>Re:So they are saying...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247830440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Smart people can tell the voices in their head are their own thoughts, while the less intelligent think they are hearing disembodied voices, not their own?</p></div><p>I think that even if you hear voices, if you can recognise that they are not actually 'real' you are sane. Once you lose that distinction, you are psychotic. Nothing at all to do with intelligence as psychosis on average seems to occur more in those with higher IQ's.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Smart people can tell the voices in their head are their own thoughts , while the less intelligent think they are hearing disembodied voices , not their own ? I think that even if you hear voices , if you can recognise that they are not actually 'real ' you are sane .
Once you lose that distinction , you are psychotic .
Nothing at all to do with intelligence as psychosis on average seems to occur more in those with higher IQ 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Smart people can tell the voices in their head are their own thoughts, while the less intelligent think they are hearing disembodied voices, not their own?I think that even if you hear voices, if you can recognise that they are not actually 'real' you are sane.
Once you lose that distinction, you are psychotic.
Nothing at all to do with intelligence as psychosis on average seems to occur more in those with higher IQ's.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735577</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738255</id>
	<title>Re:So they are saying...</title>
	<author>hedwards</author>
	<datestamp>1247851440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Trust me, it doesn't make a difference. Well, it does, if you know the voices aren't real, it just takes a lot longer for you to crack and is several times as painful. Trust me if you've got voices that are talking to you constantly and loudly enough that you can't hear other people talking, you're not going to be able to tolerate that for too long without giving in.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Trust me , it does n't make a difference .
Well , it does , if you know the voices are n't real , it just takes a lot longer for you to crack and is several times as painful .
Trust me if you 've got voices that are talking to you constantly and loudly enough that you ca n't hear other people talking , you 're not going to be able to tolerate that for too long without giving in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trust me, it doesn't make a difference.
Well, it does, if you know the voices aren't real, it just takes a lot longer for you to crack and is several times as painful.
Trust me if you've got voices that are talking to you constantly and loudly enough that you can't hear other people talking, you're not going to be able to tolerate that for too long without giving in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735577</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28739727</id>
	<title>Re:Not true in my case</title>
	<author>Dr La</author>
	<datestamp>1247920080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Science is creativity as well. Without a hightened degree of creativity you cannot do innovative science really. In many ways, science is a form of art.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Science is creativity as well .
Without a hightened degree of creativity you can not do innovative science really .
In many ways , science is a form of art .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Science is creativity as well.
Without a hightened degree of creativity you cannot do innovative science really.
In many ways, science is a form of art.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28740155</id>
	<title>Re:neuregulin mutation count</title>
	<author>smallfries</author>
	<datestamp>1247926560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mods have no sense of humour today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mods have no sense of humour today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mods have no sense of humour today.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735763</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736227</id>
	<title>Re:Crazy Chef Sato</title>
	<author>Marxist Hacker 42</author>
	<datestamp>1247832780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That reminds me of a slightly lower functioning autistic (I have Asperger's and I'm into the neurodiversity movement) on youtube as of late- who insists that her behavior MUST be interpreted as communication because she's "communicating" with her environment (water, wind, sunlight, etc).  Apparently nobody ever taught her that communication had to be two way with another sentient mind....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That reminds me of a slightly lower functioning autistic ( I have Asperger 's and I 'm into the neurodiversity movement ) on youtube as of late- who insists that her behavior MUST be interpreted as communication because she 's " communicating " with her environment ( water , wind , sunlight , etc ) .
Apparently nobody ever taught her that communication had to be two way with another sentient mind... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That reminds me of a slightly lower functioning autistic (I have Asperger's and I'm into the neurodiversity movement) on youtube as of late- who insists that her behavior MUST be interpreted as communication because she's "communicating" with her environment (water, wind, sunlight, etc).
Apparently nobody ever taught her that communication had to be two way with another sentient mind....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735723</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735605</id>
	<title>so wait ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247828880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If someone is smart and really creative, there's a decent chance their IQ is keeping them from becoming schizophrenic? There's a decent chance my mom, my brother and I all fall into that category, and that's both a little weird to imagine and a little spooky.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If someone is smart and really creative , there 's a decent chance their IQ is keeping them from becoming schizophrenic ?
There 's a decent chance my mom , my brother and I all fall into that category , and that 's both a little weird to imagine and a little spooky .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If someone is smart and really creative, there's a decent chance their IQ is keeping them from becoming schizophrenic?
There's a decent chance my mom, my brother and I all fall into that category, and that's both a little weird to imagine and a little spooky.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735547</id>
	<title>Makes sense of a sort</title>
	<author>UncleWilly</author>
	<datestamp>1247828460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No one said natural selection was kind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No one said natural selection was kind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one said natural selection was kind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737377</id>
	<title>Been known, to a degree, for over 2000 years.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247841120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"There is no great genius without a mixture of madness" - Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" There is no great genius without a mixture of madness " - Aristotle ( 384 BC - 322 BC )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"There is no great genius without a mixture of madness" - Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735663</id>
	<title>Re:Crazy Chef Sato</title>
	<author>Eli Gottlieb</author>
	<datestamp>1247829360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And here's today's fortune-cookie quote:</p><p><div class="quote"><p> The superior man understands what is right; the inferior man understands what will sell. -- Confucius</p> </div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And here 's today 's fortune-cookie quote : The superior man understands what is right ; the inferior man understands what will sell .
-- Confucius</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And here's today's fortune-cookie quote: The superior man understands what is right; the inferior man understands what will sell.
-- Confucius 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735549</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28739461</id>
	<title>Re:Geniuses Don't Hallucinate?</title>
	<author>Colin Smith</author>
	<datestamp>1247914860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why do they hypothesize that?</p></div><p>Because it's facile. It's simply an indication about the people producing the hypothesis.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do they hypothesize that ? Because it 's facile .
It 's simply an indication about the people producing the hypothesis .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do they hypothesize that?Because it's facile.
It's simply an indication about the people producing the hypothesis.
 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735599</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737515</id>
	<title>Isn't there something you're not telling us?</title>
	<author>littlewink</author>
	<datestamp>1247842500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The subject line says it all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The subject line says it all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The subject line says it all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736035</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738123</id>
	<title>Re:i've always suspected as much.</title>
	<author>evilviper</author>
	<datestamp>1247849640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The odds of one with the syndrome passing it to a direct descendant are also pretty low ~ 1\% chance.</p></div></blockquote><p>Well, gee, you're only completely wrong...</p><p>In fact the heritability is quite high:</p><p><a href="http://hmg.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/12/suppl\_2/R125" title="oxfordjournals.org">http://hmg.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/12/suppl\_2/R125</a> [oxfordjournals.org]</p><p>In fact I've seen numerous cases of schizophrenia passed down through several generations of offspring.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The odds of one with the syndrome passing it to a direct descendant are also pretty low ~ 1 \ % chance.Well , gee , you 're only completely wrong...In fact the heritability is quite high : http : //hmg.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/12/suppl \ _2/R125 [ oxfordjournals.org ] In fact I 've seen numerous cases of schizophrenia passed down through several generations of offspring .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The odds of one with the syndrome passing it to a direct descendant are also pretty low ~ 1\% chance.Well, gee, you're only completely wrong...In fact the heritability is quite high:http://hmg.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/12/suppl\_2/R125 [oxfordjournals.org]In fact I've seen numerous cases of schizophrenia passed down through several generations of offspring.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28739969</id>
	<title>Gregory Bateson</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247924280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Read Gregory Bateson's work on schizophrenia and double bind-theory... He argued there likely to be a connection between creativity and schizophrenia quite a while back...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Read Gregory Bateson 's work on schizophrenia and double bind-theory... He argued there likely to be a connection between creativity and schizophrenia quite a while back.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Read Gregory Bateson's work on schizophrenia and double bind-theory... He argued there likely to be a connection between creativity and schizophrenia quite a while back...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736099</id>
	<title>Re:That explains it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247832000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think a lot of people have conversations with imaginary personalities in their heads. I know I tend to spontaneously test out ideas that way, and I'm not the only one I know who does that. What language the conversation happens to be in depends mostly on what language I've been using recently. It is handy in terms of learning languages, of course, since you quickly run into things you want to say and don't know how to, so you find out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think a lot of people have conversations with imaginary personalities in their heads .
I know I tend to spontaneously test out ideas that way , and I 'm not the only one I know who does that .
What language the conversation happens to be in depends mostly on what language I 've been using recently .
It is handy in terms of learning languages , of course , since you quickly run into things you want to say and do n't know how to , so you find out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think a lot of people have conversations with imaginary personalities in their heads.
I know I tend to spontaneously test out ideas that way, and I'm not the only one I know who does that.
What language the conversation happens to be in depends mostly on what language I've been using recently.
It is handy in terms of learning languages, of course, since you quickly run into things you want to say and don't know how to, so you find out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735623</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735637</id>
	<title>Re:Crazy Chef Sato</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1247829060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too bad about his grammar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too bad about his grammar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too bad about his grammar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735549</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735883</id>
	<title>Creativity Potentially Linked To Schizophrenia</title>
	<author>alxkit</author>
	<datestamp>1247830680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>again?</htmltext>
<tokenext>again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>again?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735683</id>
	<title>All the more reason...</title>
	<author>Starlon</author>
	<datestamp>1247829480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All the more reason to eschew eugenics.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All the more reason to eschew eugenics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the more reason to eschew eugenics.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737103</id>
	<title>Dead Wrong</title>
	<author>FiveDozenWhales</author>
	<datestamp>1247838780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hate to make this claim without being able to cite my sources, but my access to research databases has been cut off since graduating...<br> <br>
But this flies against the past 20 years of research.  Nearly all studies show a strong NEGATIVE correlation between nearly all types of mental illness and creativity (as measured using a variety of scales).  Schizophrenia and depression are the two that leap to mind.  I know there's this popular idea that the crazies are more creative (or vice versa), but it's simply not true...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate to make this claim without being able to cite my sources , but my access to research databases has been cut off since graduating.. . But this flies against the past 20 years of research .
Nearly all studies show a strong NEGATIVE correlation between nearly all types of mental illness and creativity ( as measured using a variety of scales ) .
Schizophrenia and depression are the two that leap to mind .
I know there 's this popular idea that the crazies are more creative ( or vice versa ) , but it 's simply not true.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate to make this claim without being able to cite my sources, but my access to research databases has been cut off since graduating... 
But this flies against the past 20 years of research.
Nearly all studies show a strong NEGATIVE correlation between nearly all types of mental illness and creativity (as measured using a variety of scales).
Schizophrenia and depression are the two that leap to mind.
I know there's this popular idea that the crazies are more creative (or vice versa), but it's simply not true...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737167</id>
	<title>zurna mirc</title>
	<author>edebiyat</author>
	<datestamp>1247839380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.mircsite.com/" title="mircsite.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mircsite.com/</a> [mircsite.com] indir</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.mircsite.com/ [ mircsite.com ] indir</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.mircsite.com/ [mircsite.com] indir</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735549</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738107</id>
	<title>Re:Geniuses Don't Hallucinate?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247849340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That was their whole point. I wrote a lot more explaining this, but deleted it as it is better explained in the above comments or the article itself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That was their whole point .
I wrote a lot more explaining this , but deleted it as it is better explained in the above comments or the article itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was their whole point.
I wrote a lot more explaining this, but deleted it as it is better explained in the above comments or the article itself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735599</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735695</id>
	<title>Crap soup</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1247829540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
IQ, schizophrenia, creativity, all vague concepts linked together with "hard numbers" of primitive statistics.
</p><p>
Interesting information, to be sure, but let's not push that and turn it into another psychobabble.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IQ , schizophrenia , creativity , all vague concepts linked together with " hard numbers " of primitive statistics .
Interesting information , to be sure , but let 's not push that and turn it into another psychobabble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
IQ, schizophrenia, creativity, all vague concepts linked together with "hard numbers" of primitive statistics.
Interesting information, to be sure, but let's not push that and turn it into another psychobabble.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735627</id>
	<title>hi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247829000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>thanx for information</p><p>http://www.husus.net</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>thanx for informationhttp : //www.husus.net</tokentext>
<sentencetext>thanx for informationhttp://www.husus.net</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28753009</id>
	<title>Re:i've always suspected as much.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1248025620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Schizophrenia...<br>The last I read, there was a ten percent concordance rate between first degree relatives, and fifty percent between monozygotic twins. In other words, if your dad/mom has it, 10 percent chance you will. If your identical twin has it, 50 percent chance you will. In these studies, environment was controlled for, so this is a genetic link.<br>Sorry, can't be bothered to look up the data, but it's close to that. The 1 percent is how many have it in the general population, irrespective of genetic links.<br>Nice how people pull numbers out of their asses and get modded up on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.   And no, not so new here<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Schizophrenia...The last I read , there was a ten percent concordance rate between first degree relatives , and fifty percent between monozygotic twins .
In other words , if your dad/mom has it , 10 percent chance you will .
If your identical twin has it , 50 percent chance you will .
In these studies , environment was controlled for , so this is a genetic link.Sorry , ca n't be bothered to look up the data , but it 's close to that .
The 1 percent is how many have it in the general population , irrespective of genetic links.Nice how people pull numbers out of their asses and get modded up on / .
And no , not so new here ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Schizophrenia...The last I read, there was a ten percent concordance rate between first degree relatives, and fifty percent between monozygotic twins.
In other words, if your dad/mom has it, 10 percent chance you will.
If your identical twin has it, 50 percent chance you will.
In these studies, environment was controlled for, so this is a genetic link.Sorry, can't be bothered to look up the data, but it's close to that.
The 1 percent is how many have it in the general population, irrespective of genetic links.Nice how people pull numbers out of their asses and get modded up on /.
And no, not so new here ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735581</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735569</id>
	<title>Ha!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247828640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Moreover, a single DNA letter mutation that affects how much of the neuregulin 1 protein is made in the brain has been linked to psychosis, poor memory and sensitivity to criticism. About 50 per cent of healthy Europeans have one copy of this mutation, while 15 per cent possess two copies."</p><p>This explains perfectly the past 250 years of European history.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Moreover , a single DNA letter mutation that affects how much of the neuregulin 1 protein is made in the brain has been linked to psychosis , poor memory and sensitivity to criticism .
About 50 per cent of healthy Europeans have one copy of this mutation , while 15 per cent possess two copies .
" This explains perfectly the past 250 years of European history .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Moreover, a single DNA letter mutation that affects how much of the neuregulin 1 protein is made in the brain has been linked to psychosis, poor memory and sensitivity to criticism.
About 50 per cent of healthy Europeans have one copy of this mutation, while 15 per cent possess two copies.
"This explains perfectly the past 250 years of European history.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737957</id>
	<title>Hi Tom Cruise.</title>
	<author>citizenr</author>
	<datestamp>1247847420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hi Tom Cruise!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hi Tom Cruise !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hi Tom Cruise!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735815</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735595</id>
	<title>correlationisnotcausation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247828820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>correlationisnotcausation tag, please.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>correlationisnotcausation tag , please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>correlationisnotcausation tag, please.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735977</id>
	<title>Re:I couldn't understand that at all</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247831220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you're dumb as a nigger.  go fuck yourself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you 're dumb as a nigger .
go fuck yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you're dumb as a nigger.
go fuck yourself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735531</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735685</id>
	<title>Creative classes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247829480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So thats why copyright is in such a absurd and insane state. We let the loonies run the show on it. I mean getting royalties when you're dead for something you created sounds pretty crazy to me. And tell me about that forever and 1 day theory crazy man. (Also explains mac sales)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So thats why copyright is in such a absurd and insane state .
We let the loonies run the show on it .
I mean getting royalties when you 're dead for something you created sounds pretty crazy to me .
And tell me about that forever and 1 day theory crazy man .
( Also explains mac sales )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So thats why copyright is in such a absurd and insane state.
We let the loonies run the show on it.
I mean getting royalties when you're dead for something you created sounds pretty crazy to me.
And tell me about that forever and 1 day theory crazy man.
(Also explains mac sales)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738209</id>
	<title>Re:Crazy Chef Sato</title>
	<author>Alarindris</author>
	<datestamp>1247850900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Went through a period of psychosis in my late teens, but stayed off the anti-psychotics. Took quite a while, but got back on track without the pseudo-science quackery of psychiatry. Now I run my own business and live a pretty balanced life as a respected member of my family and the community.<br> <br>

Interestingly enough, the more 'artistic' (ie music) stuff I do, the more sorta crazy I get, the more I keep the artistic side in check and balanced with other things, the more 'sane' I am.</p></div><p>Wow, that is really interesting.  I had the same experience as you, but I'm a musician now.  After playing a show, or recording, or writing for a few hours, I feel pretty disconnected, lots of thoughts and ideas just pouring through my head.  I actually do crosswords, sudoku, or some programming to 'bring myself back.'</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Went through a period of psychosis in my late teens , but stayed off the anti-psychotics .
Took quite a while , but got back on track without the pseudo-science quackery of psychiatry .
Now I run my own business and live a pretty balanced life as a respected member of my family and the community .
Interestingly enough , the more 'artistic ' ( ie music ) stuff I do , the more sorta crazy I get , the more I keep the artistic side in check and balanced with other things , the more 'sane ' I am.Wow , that is really interesting .
I had the same experience as you , but I 'm a musician now .
After playing a show , or recording , or writing for a few hours , I feel pretty disconnected , lots of thoughts and ideas just pouring through my head .
I actually do crosswords , sudoku , or some programming to 'bring myself back .
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Went through a period of psychosis in my late teens, but stayed off the anti-psychotics.
Took quite a while, but got back on track without the pseudo-science quackery of psychiatry.
Now I run my own business and live a pretty balanced life as a respected member of my family and the community.
Interestingly enough, the more 'artistic' (ie music) stuff I do, the more sorta crazy I get, the more I keep the artistic side in check and balanced with other things, the more 'sane' I am.Wow, that is really interesting.
I had the same experience as you, but I'm a musician now.
After playing a show, or recording, or writing for a few hours, I feel pretty disconnected, lots of thoughts and ideas just pouring through my head.
I actually do crosswords, sudoku, or some programming to 'bring myself back.
'
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735815</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28753009
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28740155
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735763
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735577
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28742725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737277
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735695
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735941
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735577
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735547
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736099
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735623
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736375
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735763
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28739461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738039
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28746139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735577
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28739727
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736035
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735849
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735577
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736035
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738235
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735577
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738209
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735815
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735695
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736035
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28739469
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736035
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737957
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735815
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735605
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736035
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28739849
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737103
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736429
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736035
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28740325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737377
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737515
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736035
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28739511
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735815
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736087
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735577
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736063
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735663
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735637
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735971
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735577
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28739395
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735599
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738123
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735581
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_1824250_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736227
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735549
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736003
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735547
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737965
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735679
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735569
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735859
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737741
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735571
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735577
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735941
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738235
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735971
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738255
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736937
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28746139
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735849
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735623
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736099
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737709
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735605
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735807
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735531
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735977
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735773
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735599
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738107
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28739461
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736087
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736211
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28739395
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736375
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735695
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737277
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28742725
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737801
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735581
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28753009
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738123
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735779
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735883
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737103
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28739849
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738447
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735549
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737167
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735815
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738209
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28739511
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737957
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738039
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735637
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735663
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736063
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735723
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736227
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735763
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28740155
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738583
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735703
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737377
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28740325
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28735683
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_1824250.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736035
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28737515
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738135
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736429
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28739727
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28736933
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28739469
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_1824250.28738831
</commentlist>
</conversation>
