<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_17_0510258</id>
	<title>Firefox 3.5.1 Released</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1247853060000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.komar.org/" rel="nofollow">alek</a> writes <i>"A day after Slashdot reports about a <a href="//slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/07/16/1346243&amp;tid=366">self-inflicted vulnerability in Firefox 3.5</a>, Mozilla <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/devnews/index.php/2009/07/16/firefox-3-5-1-update-is-now-available-for-download/">releases 3.5.1</a>. It addresses that <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox35.html#firefox3.5.1">security issue</a>, but also <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=501605">fixes</a> the <a href="https://support.mozilla.com/tiki-view\_forum\_thread.php?forumId=1&amp;comments\_threshold=0&amp;comments\_parentId=381674&amp;comments\_offset=0&amp;comments\_per\_page=20&amp;thread\_style=commentStyle\_plain">annoying slow-startup on Windows</a>. Bummer the UNIX wars have subsided, because apparently they also had to fix a problem where <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=502584">Firefox on a Sparc platform would crash when visiting www.hp.com!</a>"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>alek writes " A day after Slashdot reports about a self-inflicted vulnerability in Firefox 3.5 , Mozilla releases 3.5.1 .
It addresses that security issue , but also fixes the annoying slow-startup on Windows .
Bummer the UNIX wars have subsided , because apparently they also had to fix a problem where Firefox on a Sparc platform would crash when visiting www.hp.com !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>alek writes "A day after Slashdot reports about a self-inflicted vulnerability in Firefox 3.5, Mozilla releases 3.5.1.
It addresses that security issue, but also fixes the annoying slow-startup on Windows.
Bummer the UNIX wars have subsided, because apparently they also had to fix a problem where Firefox on a Sparc platform would crash when visiting www.hp.com!
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727955</id>
	<title>mod DowN</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247835900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>fly...3on't fear where it belongs, not anymore. It's from the OpenBSD consider worthwhile</htmltext>
<tokenext>fly...3o n't fear where it belongs , not anymore .
It 's from the OpenBSD consider worthwhile</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fly...3on't fear where it belongs, not anymore.
It's from the OpenBSD consider worthwhile</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727661</id>
	<title>Firefox 3.5.1 released</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247832300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so can anyone tell me why Firefox felt like it had to scan my hard drive in the first place?  i had it set to delete history on exit.  why then did it feel like it had to go looking in *other* programs' folders for history files?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so can anyone tell me why Firefox felt like it had to scan my hard drive in the first place ?
i had it set to delete history on exit .
why then did it feel like it had to go looking in * other * programs ' folders for history files ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so can anyone tell me why Firefox felt like it had to scan my hard drive in the first place?
i had it set to delete history on exit.
why then did it feel like it had to go looking in *other* programs' folders for history files?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28731227</id>
	<title>Mozilla.com still has 3.5, not 3.5.1...</title>
	<author>mengel</author>
	<datestamp>1247851260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So why does the main Mozilla.com page still list 3.5 and not 3.5.1?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So why does the main Mozilla.com page still list 3.5 and not 3.5.1 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So why does the main Mozilla.com page still list 3.5 and not 3.5.1?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727429</id>
	<title>Re:Someone tell it to Canonical.</title>
	<author>Rhapsody Scarlet</author>
	<datestamp>1247829060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Scroll down to firefox-3.5. Stupidly, this package doesn't overwrite the firefox package, meaning that applications will still use 3.0 to open links. Even if you remove the firefox package, firefox-3.5 is still not used.</p></div><p>In Jaunty, this is because Firefox 3.0 remains the default version of Firefox (and the firefox package always points towards the default version of Firefox for that release). In Karmic, this is because the developers haven't switched the default from 3.0 to 3.5 yet, <a href="http://www.asoftsite.org/s9y/archives/161-FAQ-Why-is-my-firefox-3.5-still-called-Shiretoko.html" title="asoftsite.org">though they will soon</a> [asoftsite.org].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Scroll down to firefox-3.5 .
Stupidly , this package does n't overwrite the firefox package , meaning that applications will still use 3.0 to open links .
Even if you remove the firefox package , firefox-3.5 is still not used.In Jaunty , this is because Firefox 3.0 remains the default version of Firefox ( and the firefox package always points towards the default version of Firefox for that release ) .
In Karmic , this is because the developers have n't switched the default from 3.0 to 3.5 yet , though they will soon [ asoftsite.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scroll down to firefox-3.5.
Stupidly, this package doesn't overwrite the firefox package, meaning that applications will still use 3.0 to open links.
Even if you remove the firefox package, firefox-3.5 is still not used.In Jaunty, this is because Firefox 3.0 remains the default version of Firefox (and the firefox package always points towards the default version of Firefox for that release).
In Karmic, this is because the developers haven't switched the default from 3.0 to 3.5 yet, though they will soon [asoftsite.org].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28737415</id>
	<title>Re:I'd fix bugs and contribute quality code</title>
	<author>427\_ci\_505</author>
	<datestamp>1247841420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Presumably you'd need to at least be capable of building software before the maintainers would trust your bugfixed code...</p><p>For example, the linux kernel is a lot easier to compile than contribute to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Presumably you 'd need to at least be capable of building software before the maintainers would trust your bugfixed code...For example , the linux kernel is a lot easier to compile than contribute to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Presumably you'd need to at least be capable of building software before the maintainers would trust your bugfixed code...For example, the linux kernel is a lot easier to compile than contribute to.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726539</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28734147</id>
	<title>Re:Does it finally have paste and go?</title>
	<author>TheSunborn</author>
	<datestamp>1247821260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's wrong with the way it scale text? (You do know that the zoom menu have a "zoom text only" which sound exactly like what you want.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's wrong with the way it scale text ?
( You do know that the zoom menu have a " zoom text only " which sound exactly like what you want .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's wrong with the way it scale text?
(You do know that the zoom menu have a "zoom text only" which sound exactly like what you want.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28730427</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726545</id>
	<title>So fast!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247771640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With that decrease in load time, I was able to get first post!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With that decrease in load time , I was able to get first post !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With that decrease in load time, I was able to get first post!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729975</id>
	<title>Other than OS X and Linux...</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1247846160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Other then OS X all the other Unixes are in heavy competition against Linux and Windows for its survival.</i></p><p>Linux is UNIX too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Other then OS X all the other Unixes are in heavy competition against Linux and Windows for its survival.Linux is UNIX too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Other then OS X all the other Unixes are in heavy competition against Linux and Windows for its survival.Linux is UNIX too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727691</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726603</id>
	<title>Re:I'd fix bugs and contribute quality code</title>
	<author>koreaman</author>
	<datestamp>1247772600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You should try fixing some bugs in Sunbird, if Mozilla interests you but the hugeness of Firefox is intimidating. I was able to contribute code (granted, only two lines) to Sunbird that fixed a real live bug, and I was in high school at the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You should try fixing some bugs in Sunbird , if Mozilla interests you but the hugeness of Firefox is intimidating .
I was able to contribute code ( granted , only two lines ) to Sunbird that fixed a real live bug , and I was in high school at the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should try fixing some bugs in Sunbird, if Mozilla interests you but the hugeness of Firefox is intimidating.
I was able to contribute code (granted, only two lines) to Sunbird that fixed a real live bug, and I was in high school at the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726539</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726649</id>
	<title>Re:slow start for \_some\_</title>
	<author>cratermoon</author>
	<datestamp>1247773200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>No less a personage than Brendan Eich says the whole issue with slow startup in the NSS module is snake oil that does nothing but "waste users' time at startup pretending to scrape entropy off the filesystem."</htmltext>
<tokenext>No less a personage than Brendan Eich says the whole issue with slow startup in the NSS module is snake oil that does nothing but " waste users ' time at startup pretending to scrape entropy off the filesystem .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No less a personage than Brendan Eich says the whole issue with slow startup in the NSS module is snake oil that does nothing but "waste users' time at startup pretending to scrape entropy off the filesystem.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729489</id>
	<title>Re:slow start for \_some\_</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247844120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's always had a sluggish start up. At least, any release for the past few years.</p><p>Second I log into my machine, I open up Firefox, putty, and whatever else, let's say Visual Studio.</p><p>I can have a project loaded and be ssh'd into my server before the damn thing even starts up. Ridiculous.</p><p>Happens on every machine I use, which suggests that it's "something I'm doing wrong" or "add-ons" or whatever other excuse people seem to give other than "there's actually something wrong with this thing", but I assure you it's Firefox.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's always had a sluggish start up .
At least , any release for the past few years.Second I log into my machine , I open up Firefox , putty , and whatever else , let 's say Visual Studio.I can have a project loaded and be ssh 'd into my server before the damn thing even starts up .
Ridiculous.Happens on every machine I use , which suggests that it 's " something I 'm doing wrong " or " add-ons " or whatever other excuse people seem to give other than " there 's actually something wrong with this thing " , but I assure you it 's Firefox .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's always had a sluggish start up.
At least, any release for the past few years.Second I log into my machine, I open up Firefox, putty, and whatever else, let's say Visual Studio.I can have a project loaded and be ssh'd into my server before the damn thing even starts up.
Ridiculous.Happens on every machine I use, which suggests that it's "something I'm doing wrong" or "add-ons" or whatever other excuse people seem to give other than "there's actually something wrong with this thing", but I assure you it's Firefox.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727815</id>
	<title>gpg: Note: This key has expired!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247834520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>gpg --verify "Firefox Setup 3.5.1.exe.asc"<br>gpg: Signature made 07/15/09 19:56:19 using DSA key ID 17785FE8<br>gpg: Good signature from "Mozilla Software Releases &lt;releases@mozilla.org&gt;"<br>gpg: Note: This key has expired!<br>Primary key fingerprint: 8D6F 1BA4 A340 4DDB 3F2F&nbsp; D080 7447 4499 8123 47DD<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Subkey fingerprint: 3338 E6BA FF10 3B3D A6A9&nbsp; E424 B57B 5484 1778 5FE8<br></tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>gpg --verify " Firefox Setup 3.5.1.exe.asc " gpg : Signature made 07/15/09 19 : 56 : 19 using DSA key ID 17785FE8gpg : Good signature from " Mozilla Software Releases " gpg : Note : This key has expired ! Primary key fingerprint : 8D6F 1BA4 A340 4DDB 3F2F   D080 7447 4499 8123 47DD       Subkey fingerprint : 3338 E6BA FF10 3B3D A6A9   E424 B57B 5484 1778 5FE8</tokentext>
<sentencetext>gpg --verify "Firefox Setup 3.5.1.exe.asc"gpg: Signature made 07/15/09 19:56:19 using DSA key ID 17785FE8gpg: Good signature from "Mozilla Software Releases "gpg: Note: This key has expired!Primary key fingerprint: 8D6F 1BA4 A340 4DDB 3F2F  D080 7447 4499 8123 47DD     Subkey fingerprint: 3338 E6BA FF10 3B3D A6A9  E424 B57B 5484 1778 5FE8</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28730093</id>
	<title>Still 7 to go</title>
	<author>CodeShark</author>
	<datestamp>1247846700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>on the <a href="http://acid3.acidtests.org/" title="acidtests.org">Acid3</a> [acidtests.org] test, lagging both Opera and Safari which have reached 100\% on this fun benchmark.  About 50\% faster on avg when I "thumb in the air" tested it (ran 10X and wrote down the times, then averaged them than Firefox was as little as six months ago, so this release is definitely one to pick up in terms of browser security and performance, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>on the Acid3 [ acidtests.org ] test , lagging both Opera and Safari which have reached 100 \ % on this fun benchmark .
About 50 \ % faster on avg when I " thumb in the air " tested it ( ran 10X and wrote down the times , then averaged them than Firefox was as little as six months ago , so this release is definitely one to pick up in terms of browser security and performance , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>on the Acid3 [acidtests.org] test, lagging both Opera and Safari which have reached 100\% on this fun benchmark.
About 50\% faster on avg when I "thumb in the air" tested it (ran 10X and wrote down the times, then averaged them than Firefox was as little as six months ago, so this release is definitely one to pick up in terms of browser security and performance, though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726715</id>
	<title>Re:I'd fix bugs and contribute quality code</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247860920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you need build instructions, and you don't know how to search for them, then you shouldn't be building anything, stupid.  Just download the binary and RUN IT.  If you can't do that, then your Mama is probably gonna spank you for messing with her computer anyway.  Walk away from the machine NOW, before you are caught.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you need build instructions , and you do n't know how to search for them , then you should n't be building anything , stupid .
Just download the binary and RUN IT .
If you ca n't do that , then your Mama is probably gon na spank you for messing with her computer anyway .
Walk away from the machine NOW , before you are caught .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you need build instructions, and you don't know how to search for them, then you shouldn't be building anything, stupid.
Just download the binary and RUN IT.
If you can't do that, then your Mama is probably gonna spank you for messing with her computer anyway.
Walk away from the machine NOW, before you are caught.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726539</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727179</id>
	<title>version numbers</title>
	<author>mdew</author>
	<datestamp>1247825880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Going by previous versions of firefox, shouldn't it be 3.5.0.1 rather than 3.5.1?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Going by previous versions of firefox , should n't it be 3.5.0.1 rather than 3.5.1 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Going by previous versions of firefox, shouldn't it be 3.5.0.1 rather than 3.5.1?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726639</id>
	<title>Re:slow start for \_some\_</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247773140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And what should he have written instead of "It addresses that security issue"? "It contains the security fix that already existed but wasn't until now ready for a release to users"? Ugh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And what should he have written instead of " It addresses that security issue " ?
" It contains the security fix that already existed but was n't until now ready for a release to users " ?
Ugh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And what should he have written instead of "It addresses that security issue"?
"It contains the security fix that already existed but wasn't until now ready for a release to users"?
Ugh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726591</id>
	<title>Someone tell it to Canonical.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247772420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>FF 3.5 Hasn't yet been compiled for any of the versions of Ubuntu yet <a href="http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=default&amp;section=all&amp;arch=any&amp;searchon=names&amp;keywords=FIREFOX" title="ubuntu.com" rel="nofollow">http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=default&amp;section=all&amp;arch=any&amp;searchon=names&amp;keywords=FIREFOX</a> [ubuntu.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>FF 3.5 Has n't yet been compiled for any of the versions of Ubuntu yet http : //packages.ubuntu.com/search ? suite = default&amp;section = all&amp;arch = any&amp;searchon = names&amp;keywords = FIREFOX [ ubuntu.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FF 3.5 Hasn't yet been compiled for any of the versions of Ubuntu yet http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=default&amp;section=all&amp;arch=any&amp;searchon=names&amp;keywords=FIREFOX [ubuntu.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726787</id>
	<title>Re:slow start for \_some\_</title>
	<author>TheSeer2</author>
	<datestamp>1247862180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was user situation dependent. Firefox was reading all of a user's temp files to seed its RNG or something along those lines so if you had a lot of large temp files your startup time would be quite large.</p><p>Regardless, it still takes 5x Chrome's startup time with the fix so... peh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was user situation dependent .
Firefox was reading all of a user 's temp files to seed its RNG or something along those lines so if you had a lot of large temp files your startup time would be quite large.Regardless , it still takes 5x Chrome 's startup time with the fix so... peh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was user situation dependent.
Firefox was reading all of a user's temp files to seed its RNG or something along those lines so if you had a lot of large temp files your startup time would be quite large.Regardless, it still takes 5x Chrome's startup time with the fix so... peh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726589</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726569</id>
	<title>Good.</title>
	<author>xlotlu</author>
	<datestamp>1247772120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now I can re-enable TraceMonkey and slashdot will be fast again... sorta.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now I can re-enable TraceMonkey and slashdot will be fast again... sorta .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now I can re-enable TraceMonkey and slashdot will be fast again... sorta.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28733833</id>
	<title>Re:slow start for \_some\_</title>
	<author>klui</author>
	<datestamp>1247863020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Several seconds is not a problem; I never ran into this because my temp directories and stuff are cleaned up often and the issue seems to occur only after a cold boot (I may be mistaken about this latter part). So my startup times are 5 secs or so since I hardly turn off my machine.</p><p>But others were waiting for minutes, 1-4 minutes for some. Pretty annoying if I were hit with those times. I think these individuals had hundreds of MB for their IE cache and their temp folders were large as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Several seconds is not a problem ; I never ran into this because my temp directories and stuff are cleaned up often and the issue seems to occur only after a cold boot ( I may be mistaken about this latter part ) .
So my startup times are 5 secs or so since I hardly turn off my machine.But others were waiting for minutes , 1-4 minutes for some .
Pretty annoying if I were hit with those times .
I think these individuals had hundreds of MB for their IE cache and their temp folders were large as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Several seconds is not a problem; I never ran into this because my temp directories and stuff are cleaned up often and the issue seems to occur only after a cold boot (I may be mistaken about this latter part).
So my startup times are 5 secs or so since I hardly turn off my machine.But others were waiting for minutes, 1-4 minutes for some.
Pretty annoying if I were hit with those times.
I think these individuals had hundreds of MB for their IE cache and their temp folders were large as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28734097</id>
	<title>Something's wrong here...</title>
	<author>stalky14</author>
	<datestamp>1247864220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>3.5.1... really?! That's not Mozilla-style at all. It should be 3.5.0.0.0.0.0.2467!</htmltext>
<tokenext>3.5.1.. .
really ? ! That 's not Mozilla-style at all .
It should be 3.5.0.0.0.0.0.2467 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>3.5.1...
really?! That's not Mozilla-style at all.
It should be 3.5.0.0.0.0.0.2467!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729061</id>
	<title>Re:I'd fix bugs and contribute quality code</title>
	<author>RiotingPacifist</author>
	<datestamp>1247842320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="https://litmus.mozilla.org/" title="mozilla.org">litmus</a> [mozilla.org]<br><a href="http://quality.mozilla.org/" title="mozilla.org">mozilla qa</a> [mozilla.org]<br>Both seams simple but time consuming but i don't think they need to be done in one sitting (unless you are on the nighties), unfortunately Linux x86\_64 only has nighties.</p><p>p.s does anybody know a good way to update firefox (mozilla builds) as launching it as root isn't great and the idea of installing a webbrowser somewhere it can update itself is retarded.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>litmus [ mozilla.org ] mozilla qa [ mozilla.org ] Both seams simple but time consuming but i do n't think they need to be done in one sitting ( unless you are on the nighties ) , unfortunately Linux x86 \ _64 only has nighties.p.s does anybody know a good way to update firefox ( mozilla builds ) as launching it as root is n't great and the idea of installing a webbrowser somewhere it can update itself is retarded .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>litmus [mozilla.org]mozilla qa [mozilla.org]Both seams simple but time consuming but i don't think they need to be done in one sitting (unless you are on the nighties), unfortunately Linux x86\_64 only has nighties.p.s does anybody know a good way to update firefox (mozilla builds) as launching it as root isn't great and the idea of installing a webbrowser somewhere it can update itself is retarded.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726539</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28733465</id>
	<title>Re:What about freezes on long pages w/many links?</title>
	<author>Zan Lynx</author>
	<datestamp>1247861460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I see that too on my Macbook Pro. I think it is an odd interaction between SQLite and those continuous backup programs that want to be like Time Machine. I'm using one (Memeo Lifeagent) that came with my Seagate external HD.  If I put the backup software into "pause" mode Firefox gets a lot more responsive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see that too on my Macbook Pro .
I think it is an odd interaction between SQLite and those continuous backup programs that want to be like Time Machine .
I 'm using one ( Memeo Lifeagent ) that came with my Seagate external HD .
If I put the backup software into " pause " mode Firefox gets a lot more responsive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see that too on my Macbook Pro.
I think it is an odd interaction between SQLite and those continuous backup programs that want to be like Time Machine.
I'm using one (Memeo Lifeagent) that came with my Seagate external HD.
If I put the backup software into "pause" mode Firefox gets a lot more responsive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729615</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727691</id>
	<title>Ummm...</title>
	<author>jellomizer</author>
	<datestamp>1247832780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What Unix war? There is the normal bantering from people saying their version of Unix is better then the rest (Which for the most part is normally the version of Unix they know the best) but a Unix war.  I haven't heard anything about it. Other then OS X all the other Unixes are in heavy competition against Linux and Windows for its survival.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What Unix war ?
There is the normal bantering from people saying their version of Unix is better then the rest ( Which for the most part is normally the version of Unix they know the best ) but a Unix war .
I have n't heard anything about it .
Other then OS X all the other Unixes are in heavy competition against Linux and Windows for its survival .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What Unix war?
There is the normal bantering from people saying their version of Unix is better then the rest (Which for the most part is normally the version of Unix they know the best) but a Unix war.
I haven't heard anything about it.
Other then OS X all the other Unixes are in heavy competition against Linux and Windows for its survival.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28728259</id>
	<title>Re:Google Gears disabled again?!</title>
	<author>Threni</author>
	<datestamp>1247838360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps their time machine isn't working and they couldn't check that future releases worked, and decided it was safer to only support version of Firefox they're sure about.  You can always wait, if it's important for you, or upgrade then downgrade again if you didn't want to check first and have to have it working for you.   It's better than the alternative - Google allowing what is essentially an untested upgrade.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps their time machine is n't working and they could n't check that future releases worked , and decided it was safer to only support version of Firefox they 're sure about .
You can always wait , if it 's important for you , or upgrade then downgrade again if you did n't want to check first and have to have it working for you .
It 's better than the alternative - Google allowing what is essentially an untested upgrade .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps their time machine isn't working and they couldn't check that future releases worked, and decided it was safer to only support version of Firefox they're sure about.
You can always wait, if it's important for you, or upgrade then downgrade again if you didn't want to check first and have to have it working for you.
It's better than the alternative - Google allowing what is essentially an untested upgrade.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726749</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28728489</id>
	<title>Re:Google Gears disabled again?!</title>
	<author>Will Work For Joules</author>
	<datestamp>1247839680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know, but at this rate, Google Gears is completely useless for me. I've just begun to use a local mail and calendar client (which I guess is better practice anyway).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know , but at this rate , Google Gears is completely useless for me .
I 've just begun to use a local mail and calendar client ( which I guess is better practice anyway ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know, but at this rate, Google Gears is completely useless for me.
I've just begun to use a local mail and calendar client (which I guess is better practice anyway).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726749</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726749</id>
	<title>Google Gears disabled again?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247861640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kind of offtopic, but by upgrading to FF 3.5.1, Google Gears is again disabled. Why did Google allowed it to be compatible with only 3.5.0?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kind of offtopic , but by upgrading to FF 3.5.1 , Google Gears is again disabled .
Why did Google allowed it to be compatible with only 3.5.0 ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kind of offtopic, but by upgrading to FF 3.5.1, Google Gears is again disabled.
Why did Google allowed it to be compatible with only 3.5.0?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726539</id>
	<title>I'd fix bugs and contribute quality code</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247771520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>But I need build instructions and test instructions and possibly a youtube video, written/made for a student, not for a programmer that already knows a number of things about firefox.  That is the way I feel about most open-source projects. I don't want to contribute in huge quantities, but only bugfixes, in any area and not limited to any particular technology.  Sadly, I see such build-instructions missing or the build-instructions are too complicated in major open-source projects that could use bug-fixers early in the cycle.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But I need build instructions and test instructions and possibly a youtube video , written/made for a student , not for a programmer that already knows a number of things about firefox .
That is the way I feel about most open-source projects .
I do n't want to contribute in huge quantities , but only bugfixes , in any area and not limited to any particular technology .
Sadly , I see such build-instructions missing or the build-instructions are too complicated in major open-source projects that could use bug-fixers early in the cycle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I need build instructions and test instructions and possibly a youtube video, written/made for a student, not for a programmer that already knows a number of things about firefox.
That is the way I feel about most open-source projects.
I don't want to contribute in huge quantities, but only bugfixes, in any area and not limited to any particular technology.
Sadly, I see such build-instructions missing or the build-instructions are too complicated in major open-source projects that could use bug-fixers early in the cycle.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729779</id>
	<title>Re:Google Gears disabled again?!</title>
	<author>flydpnkrtn</author>
	<datestamp>1247845320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can unzip the xpi and edit the actual "version identifier" to bump it to 3.5.1 if you're impatient<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)
<br> <br>
Nice article on how to do this <a href="http://kb.mozillazine.org/Editing\_an\_add-on\_to\_change\_its\_compatibility" title="mozillazine.org">here</a> [mozillazine.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can unzip the xpi and edit the actual " version identifier " to bump it to 3.5.1 if you 're impatient : ) Nice article on how to do this here [ mozillazine.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can unzip the xpi and edit the actual "version identifier" to bump it to 3.5.1 if you're impatient :)
 
Nice article on how to do this here [mozillazine.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726749</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28730427</id>
	<title>Does it finally have paste and go?</title>
	<author>Snaller</author>
	<datestamp>1247847960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean, I've given up on scaling fonts lager on the fly (as opposed to zoom), but how about 'paste and go' for urls - like opera has had for years (and now chrome)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , I 've given up on scaling fonts lager on the fly ( as opposed to zoom ) , but how about 'paste and go ' for urls - like opera has had for years ( and now chrome )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, I've given up on scaling fonts lager on the fly (as opposed to zoom), but how about 'paste and go' for urls - like opera has had for years (and now chrome)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28736199</id>
	<title>Re:What about freezes on long pages w/many links?</title>
	<author>RockMFR</author>
	<datestamp>1247832660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=477564" title="mozilla.org">bug 477564</a> [mozilla.org]. Try the workaround in the first comment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like bug 477564 [ mozilla.org ] .
Try the workaround in the first comment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like bug 477564 [mozilla.org].
Try the workaround in the first comment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729615</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726645</id>
	<title>Re:I'd fix bugs and contribute quality code</title>
	<author>EsbenMoseHansen</author>
	<datestamp>1247773140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here, let me click on the top link for "firefox build instructions" in google: <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Simple\_Firefox\_build" title="mozilla.org">simple firefox build</a> [mozilla.org]. Looks pretty standard to me. Tests, if there are any, are usually automated or findable by a similar exercise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here , let me click on the top link for " firefox build instructions " in google : simple firefox build [ mozilla.org ] .
Looks pretty standard to me .
Tests , if there are any , are usually automated or findable by a similar exercise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here, let me click on the top link for "firefox build instructions" in google: simple firefox build [mozilla.org].
Looks pretty standard to me.
Tests, if there are any, are usually automated or findable by a similar exercise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726539</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726681</id>
	<title>Re:Someone tell it to Canonical.</title>
	<author>Eighty7</author>
	<datestamp>1247773920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="https://launchpad.net/~fta/+archive/ppa" title="launchpad.net">https://launchpad.net/~fta/+archive/ppa</a> [launchpad.net] <br> <br>

Just add the fta repository &amp; install "firefox-3.5". They even link to a mozilla daily build repository if that's your thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>https : //launchpad.net/ ~ fta/ + archive/ppa [ launchpad.net ] Just add the fta repository &amp; install " firefox-3.5 " .
They even link to a mozilla daily build repository if that 's your thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>https://launchpad.net/~fta/+archive/ppa [launchpad.net]  

Just add the fta repository &amp; install "firefox-3.5".
They even link to a mozilla daily build repository if that's your thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726959</id>
	<title>And from Unix wars...</title>
	<author>Fotograf</author>
	<datestamp>1247821920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>will obviously rise the new Desktop OS, the Unix peace will mark year of BSD on desktop!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>will obviously rise the new Desktop OS , the Unix peace will mark year of BSD on desktop !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>will obviously rise the new Desktop OS, the Unix peace will mark year of BSD on desktop!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726757</id>
	<title>Re:Someone tell it to Canonical.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247861760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Scroll down to firefox-3.5. Stupidly, this package doesn't overwrite the firefox package, meaning that applications will still use 3.0 to open links. Even if you remove the firefox package, firefox-3.5 is still not used. Changing the webbrowser in preferred applications seems to work on some applications...</p><p>Anyway, in the end I just simlinked like so: <i>ln -s<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/usr/bin/firefox-3.5<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/usr/bin/firefox</i>, and everything worked great.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Scroll down to firefox-3.5 .
Stupidly , this package does n't overwrite the firefox package , meaning that applications will still use 3.0 to open links .
Even if you remove the firefox package , firefox-3.5 is still not used .
Changing the webbrowser in preferred applications seems to work on some applications...Anyway , in the end I just simlinked like so : ln -s /usr/bin/firefox-3.5 /usr/bin/firefox , and everything worked great .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scroll down to firefox-3.5.
Stupidly, this package doesn't overwrite the firefox package, meaning that applications will still use 3.0 to open links.
Even if you remove the firefox package, firefox-3.5 is still not used.
Changing the webbrowser in preferred applications seems to work on some applications...Anyway, in the end I just simlinked like so: ln -s /usr/bin/firefox-3.5 /usr/bin/firefox, and everything worked great.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726635</id>
	<title>Re:slow start for \_some\_</title>
	<author>Toonol</author>
	<datestamp>1247773080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the link, it appears that files (probably having an excessive amount of files) in the IE cache was slowing down Firefox cache?  Isn't the Firefox cache entirely separate?  Does it look in the IE cache to try to be friendly and helpful, and if so, can that behavior be turned off?</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the link , it appears that files ( probably having an excessive amount of files ) in the IE cache was slowing down Firefox cache ?
Is n't the Firefox cache entirely separate ?
Does it look in the IE cache to try to be friendly and helpful , and if so , can that behavior be turned off ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the link, it appears that files (probably having an excessive amount of files) in the IE cache was slowing down Firefox cache?
Isn't the Firefox cache entirely separate?
Does it look in the IE cache to try to be friendly and helpful, and if so, can that behavior be turned off?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729615</id>
	<title>What about freezes on long pages w/many links?</title>
	<author>King\_TJ</author>
	<datestamp>1247844720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been using the OS X version of Firefox 3.5 on a Mac Pro and I've experienced a problem where the browser freezes (spinning beach-ball icon) every time I log onto my EasyNews account and do a search or request a list of content in a newsgroup that has a large number of results.</p><p>Typically, it will quickly display the first page full of results, then freeze a second or two after that.  If I wait long enough (several minutes or more) and come back to the browser, then sometimes I find it's no longer frozen and I can scroll on down to the bottom of the page.  Other times, it seemed to be permanently frozen (but I honestly never tried waiting HOURS or anything to see if it ever un-froze).</p><p>I anxiously applied the 3.51 update, hoping it addressed this problem<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... but nope.  Exact same issue.</p><p>Oddly enough, my friend using a 24" iMac says he can't replicate my problem in Firefox at all, though we're both on the same version of OS X and both have EasyNews accounts.</p><p>I already tried the usual "Mac troubleshooting"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... running a "repair permissions" in Disk Utility, deleting all the "prefs" files related to Firefox, etc.  No luck.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been using the OS X version of Firefox 3.5 on a Mac Pro and I 've experienced a problem where the browser freezes ( spinning beach-ball icon ) every time I log onto my EasyNews account and do a search or request a list of content in a newsgroup that has a large number of results.Typically , it will quickly display the first page full of results , then freeze a second or two after that .
If I wait long enough ( several minutes or more ) and come back to the browser , then sometimes I find it 's no longer frozen and I can scroll on down to the bottom of the page .
Other times , it seemed to be permanently frozen ( but I honestly never tried waiting HOURS or anything to see if it ever un-froze ) .I anxiously applied the 3.51 update , hoping it addressed this problem ... but nope .
Exact same issue.Oddly enough , my friend using a 24 " iMac says he ca n't replicate my problem in Firefox at all , though we 're both on the same version of OS X and both have EasyNews accounts.I already tried the usual " Mac troubleshooting " ... running a " repair permissions " in Disk Utility , deleting all the " prefs " files related to Firefox , etc .
No luck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been using the OS X version of Firefox 3.5 on a Mac Pro and I've experienced a problem where the browser freezes (spinning beach-ball icon) every time I log onto my EasyNews account and do a search or request a list of content in a newsgroup that has a large number of results.Typically, it will quickly display the first page full of results, then freeze a second or two after that.
If I wait long enough (several minutes or more) and come back to the browser, then sometimes I find it's no longer frozen and I can scroll on down to the bottom of the page.
Other times, it seemed to be permanently frozen (but I honestly never tried waiting HOURS or anything to see if it ever un-froze).I anxiously applied the 3.51 update, hoping it addressed this problem ... but nope.
Exact same issue.Oddly enough, my friend using a 24" iMac says he can't replicate my problem in Firefox at all, though we're both on the same version of OS X and both have EasyNews accounts.I already tried the usual "Mac troubleshooting" ... running a "repair permissions" in Disk Utility, deleting all the "prefs" files related to Firefox, etc.
No luck.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726981</id>
	<title>Great...</title>
	<author>VulpesFoxnik</author>
	<datestamp>1247822280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great. Iceweasel 3.5 just entered Debian Experimental... I'll likely have to continue to run with jit off for another month.</p><p>[/ half joking ]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great .
Iceweasel 3.5 just entered Debian Experimental... I 'll likely have to continue to run with jit off for another month .
[ / half joking ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great.
Iceweasel 3.5 just entered Debian Experimental... I'll likely have to continue to run with jit off for another month.
[/ half joking ]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726589</id>
	<title>Re:slow start for \_some\_</title>
	<author>Clay Pigeon -TPF-VS-</author>
	<datestamp>1247772300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Was it OS dependent, or hardware dependent?</p><p>I had the issue in winxp 32bit sp3.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was it OS dependent , or hardware dependent ? I had the issue in winxp 32bit sp3 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was it OS dependent, or hardware dependent?I had the issue in winxp 32bit sp3.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727643</id>
	<title>Oh yeah?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247832000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now fix the terrible bug with Flash that has suddenly shown its ugly head since FF3+ (2 was perfectly fine!)</p><p>I work with Flash files, sad thing, yes, but i do.<br>I actually use the context menu for Flash while using it.<br>The Flash menu takes AGES to open.  Hell, it even slows down opening the context menu from the titlebar!</p><p>This shit will not do.  I hate Flash as much as most people, and would rather see video/canvas take off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now fix the terrible bug with Flash that has suddenly shown its ugly head since FF3 + ( 2 was perfectly fine !
) I work with Flash files , sad thing , yes , but i do.I actually use the context menu for Flash while using it.The Flash menu takes AGES to open .
Hell , it even slows down opening the context menu from the titlebar ! This shit will not do .
I hate Flash as much as most people , and would rather see video/canvas take off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now fix the terrible bug with Flash that has suddenly shown its ugly head since FF3+ (2 was perfectly fine!
)I work with Flash files, sad thing, yes, but i do.I actually use the context menu for Flash while using it.The Flash menu takes AGES to open.
Hell, it even slows down opening the context menu from the titlebar!This shit will not do.
I hate Flash as much as most people, and would rather see video/canvas take off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729017</id>
	<title>Re:slow start for \_some\_</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247842080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have never understood why people make such a big deal over Firefox startup times. It's a few seconds. On my two-year-old laptop, Firefox 3.5.1 starts in two seconds. Granted, Chrome starts in less than one second, but in absolute difference it's about a second.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have never understood why people make such a big deal over Firefox startup times .
It 's a few seconds .
On my two-year-old laptop , Firefox 3.5.1 starts in two seconds .
Granted , Chrome starts in less than one second , but in absolute difference it 's about a second .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have never understood why people make such a big deal over Firefox startup times.
It's a few seconds.
On my two-year-old laptop, Firefox 3.5.1 starts in two seconds.
Granted, Chrome starts in less than one second, but in absolute difference it's about a second.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726787</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729943</id>
	<title>Re:slow start for \_some\_</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247846040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Plus.... 2 seconds, 1 second, 5 minutes who cares.  As long as it eventually starts and I can get my porn.  I'm cool.</p><p>Wow... what a non-issue. (start time I mean.  not getting my porn - now that would mean heads would have to roll (pun intended).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Plus.... 2 seconds , 1 second , 5 minutes who cares .
As long as it eventually starts and I can get my porn .
I 'm cool.Wow... what a non-issue .
( start time I mean .
not getting my porn - now that would mean heads would have to roll ( pun intended ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Plus.... 2 seconds, 1 second, 5 minutes who cares.
As long as it eventually starts and I can get my porn.
I'm cool.Wow... what a non-issue.
(start time I mean.
not getting my porn - now that would mean heads would have to roll (pun intended).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727035</id>
	<title>problem?</title>
	<author>shacky003</author>
	<datestamp>1247823480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>"...fix a problem where Firefox on a Sparc platform would crash when visiting www.hp.com!"

Much like the memory leak to nowhere, It wasn't a problem - it was a feature!</htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...fix a problem where Firefox on a Sparc platform would crash when visiting www.hp.com !
" Much like the memory leak to nowhere , It was n't a problem - it was a feature !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...fix a problem where Firefox on a Sparc platform would crash when visiting www.hp.com!
"

Much like the memory leak to nowhere, It wasn't a problem - it was a feature!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727559</id>
	<title>Re:FROSTY PISS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247830620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Fuck this open source shit! This just proves that your precious bullshit has vulnerabilities as well.<br>Slashdot is the haven for FOSS fags.</p></div><p>Jeez Bill, it's really easy to tell when you haven't had *your* coffee in the morning.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck this open source shit !
This just proves that your precious bullshit has vulnerabilities as well.Slashdot is the haven for FOSS fags.Jeez Bill , it 's really easy to tell when you have n't had * your * coffee in the morning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck this open source shit!
This just proves that your precious bullshit has vulnerabilities as well.Slashdot is the haven for FOSS fags.Jeez Bill, it's really easy to tell when you haven't had *your* coffee in the morning.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726495</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726723</id>
	<title>HP.com</title>
	<author>Tubal-Cain</author>
	<datestamp>1247861040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>they also had to fix a problem where Firefox on a Sparc platform would crash when visiting www.hp.com!"</p></div><p>Anyone that sees a downside to not accessing hp.com must not use NoScript.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>they also had to fix a problem where Firefox on a Sparc platform would crash when visiting www.hp.com !
" Anyone that sees a downside to not accessing hp.com must not use NoScript .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they also had to fix a problem where Firefox on a Sparc platform would crash when visiting www.hp.com!
"Anyone that sees a downside to not accessing hp.com must not use NoScript.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726947</id>
	<title>Swiss Cheese</title>
	<author>Zoidbot</author>
	<datestamp>1247821680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now I might be wrong, but neither Chrome, Opera, Safari or even IE has needed updates are frequently as Firefix does...</p><p>More holes than swiss cheese...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now I might be wrong , but neither Chrome , Opera , Safari or even IE has needed updates are frequently as Firefix does...More holes than swiss cheese.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now I might be wrong, but neither Chrome, Opera, Safari or even IE has needed updates are frequently as Firefix does...More holes than swiss cheese...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28739095</id>
	<title>Re:slow start for \_some\_</title>
	<author>ion.simon.c</author>
	<datestamp>1247908800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I can have a project loaded and be ssh'd into my server before the damn thing even starts up. Ridiculous.</p></div><p>You must have tiny-ass projects. Or maybe you're using VS 6.0. My anectotal experience does not match yours.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can have a project loaded and be ssh 'd into my server before the damn thing even starts up .
Ridiculous.You must have tiny-ass projects .
Or maybe you 're using VS 6.0 .
My anectotal experience does not match yours .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can have a project loaded and be ssh'd into my server before the damn thing even starts up.
Ridiculous.You must have tiny-ass projects.
Or maybe you're using VS 6.0.
My anectotal experience does not match yours.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729489</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726899</id>
	<title>Re:slow start for \_some\_</title>
	<author>klui</author>
	<datestamp>1247863740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>OS dependent. They coded for the case where Windows CE/2000 did not have a certain call and they wanted to get good entropy for their RNG in NSS. <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=501605" title="mozilla.org">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=501605</a> [mozilla.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>OS dependent .
They coded for the case where Windows CE/2000 did not have a certain call and they wanted to get good entropy for their RNG in NSS .
https : //bugzilla.mozilla.org/show \ _bug.cgi ? id = 501605 [ mozilla.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OS dependent.
They coded for the case where Windows CE/2000 did not have a certain call and they wanted to get good entropy for their RNG in NSS.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=501605 [mozilla.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726589</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28731501</id>
	<title>Re:Google Gears disabled again?!</title>
	<author>BZ</author>
	<datestamp>1247852640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Becuase Gears uses low-level binary hooks (e.g. completely replacing the Firefox HTTP cache with its own) and presumably doesn't want to worry about your browser crashing due to a code change on the Firefox end?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Becuase Gears uses low-level binary hooks ( e.g .
completely replacing the Firefox HTTP cache with its own ) and presumably does n't want to worry about your browser crashing due to a code change on the Firefox end ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Becuase Gears uses low-level binary hooks (e.g.
completely replacing the Firefox HTTP cache with its own) and presumably doesn't want to worry about your browser crashing due to a code change on the Firefox end?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726749</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726731</id>
	<title>Re:Someone tell it to Canonical.</title>
	<author>Tubal-Cain</author>
	<datestamp>1247861160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=default&amp;section=all&amp;arch=any&amp;searchon=names&amp;keywords=firefox-3.5" title="ubuntu.com">Ahem</a> [ubuntu.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahem [ ubuntu.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahem [ubuntu.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726591</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28728007</id>
	<title>Re:Someone tell it to Canonical.</title>
	<author>tbi</author>
	<datestamp>1247836440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Although you've already found a solution, for anybody else having this problem, there is an arguably easier way to upgrade Firefox on Ubuntu short of using the 'Shiretoko' branded version.
Just download the 'Ubuntuzilla.py' script ( <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/ubuntuzilla/files/" title="sourceforge.net" rel="nofollow">http://sourceforge.net/projects/ubuntuzilla/files/</a> [sourceforge.net] ) and then at the command line run 'ubuntuzilla.py -a install -p firefox' and follow any prompts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Although you 've already found a solution , for anybody else having this problem , there is an arguably easier way to upgrade Firefox on Ubuntu short of using the 'Shiretoko ' branded version .
Just download the 'Ubuntuzilla.py ' script ( http : //sourceforge.net/projects/ubuntuzilla/files/ [ sourceforge.net ] ) and then at the command line run 'ubuntuzilla.py -a install -p firefox ' and follow any prompts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although you've already found a solution, for anybody else having this problem, there is an arguably easier way to upgrade Firefox on Ubuntu short of using the 'Shiretoko' branded version.
Just download the 'Ubuntuzilla.py' script ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/ubuntuzilla/files/ [sourceforge.net] ) and then at the command line run 'ubuntuzilla.py -a install -p firefox' and follow any prompts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726557</id>
	<title>slow start for \_some\_</title>
	<author>asa</author>
	<datestamp>1247771940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your post says "but also fixes the annoying slow-startup on Windows." which suggests that all Windows users were experiencing slow starts. That's not the case at all. It was only a small fraction of users affected by the now fixed issue.

And for the record, the security flaw was already fixed, even before it was lifted from our bug database and turned into a public exploit. It just takes a few days to get everything in order for a release to users.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your post says " but also fixes the annoying slow-startup on Windows .
" which suggests that all Windows users were experiencing slow starts .
That 's not the case at all .
It was only a small fraction of users affected by the now fixed issue .
And for the record , the security flaw was already fixed , even before it was lifted from our bug database and turned into a public exploit .
It just takes a few days to get everything in order for a release to users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your post says "but also fixes the annoying slow-startup on Windows.
" which suggests that all Windows users were experiencing slow starts.
That's not the case at all.
It was only a small fraction of users affected by the now fixed issue.
And for the record, the security flaw was already fixed, even before it was lifted from our bug database and turned into a public exploit.
It just takes a few days to get everything in order for a release to users.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28728473</id>
	<title>In case you can't find it...</title>
	<author>wembley fraggle</author>
	<datestamp>1247839560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the macintosh version at least, the 'check for updates' menu item is in the Help menu. Because that's <b>clearly</b> where it belongs. I only found it because I was just about to search the help for advice on where to find it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the macintosh version at least , the 'check for updates ' menu item is in the Help menu .
Because that 's clearly where it belongs .
I only found it because I was just about to search the help for advice on where to find it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the macintosh version at least, the 'check for updates' menu item is in the Help menu.
Because that's clearly where it belongs.
I only found it because I was just about to search the help for advice on where to find it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28728983</id>
	<title>Re:HP.com</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1247841960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have an HP laptop, and I need to visit HP for drivers and such. Luckily, HP's website mostly works without JS most of the time. Some features, however, absolutely require it (like live chat.) Getting HP support through chat is marginally less frustrating than having to do it on the phone in most cases.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an HP laptop , and I need to visit HP for drivers and such .
Luckily , HP 's website mostly works without JS most of the time .
Some features , however , absolutely require it ( like live chat .
) Getting HP support through chat is marginally less frustrating than having to do it on the phone in most cases .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an HP laptop, and I need to visit HP for drivers and such.
Luckily, HP's website mostly works without JS most of the time.
Some features, however, absolutely require it (like live chat.
) Getting HP support through chat is marginally less frustrating than having to do it on the phone in most cases.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726723</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726605</id>
	<title>Re:slow start for \_some\_</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247772600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope they added some compatibility code as I've been to several sites since downloading 3.5 that have had issues with forms. Including papajohns.com and outlook webmail installations amongst others.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope they added some compatibility code as I 've been to several sites since downloading 3.5 that have had issues with forms .
Including papajohns.com and outlook webmail installations amongst others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope they added some compatibility code as I've been to several sites since downloading 3.5 that have had issues with forms.
Including papajohns.com and outlook webmail installations amongst others.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726801</id>
	<title>Re:I'd fix bugs and contribute quality code</title>
	<author>clarkkent09</author>
	<datestamp>1247862360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reiser is that you? I didn't know they let you have internet access now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reiser is that you ?
I did n't know they let you have internet access now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reiser is that you?
I didn't know they let you have internet access now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727221</id>
	<title>Yet more links to IE</title>
	<author>dugeen</author>
	<datestamp>1247826420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>First Firefox starts depending on the IE security settings, now this - has it started using the IE temporary internet files as well? I'm starting to wonder if Mozilla are being paid by MS to promote their line that IE and the OS's networking model are one and the same thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>First Firefox starts depending on the IE security settings , now this - has it started using the IE temporary internet files as well ?
I 'm starting to wonder if Mozilla are being paid by MS to promote their line that IE and the OS 's networking model are one and the same thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First Firefox starts depending on the IE security settings, now this - has it started using the IE temporary internet files as well?
I'm starting to wonder if Mozilla are being paid by MS to promote their line that IE and the OS's networking model are one and the same thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28750775</id>
	<title>I'd fix bugs and contribute quality code</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1248003000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Was it OS dependent, or hardware dependent?I had the issue in winxp 32bit sp3.</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was it OS dependent , or hardware dependent ? I had the issue in winxp 32bit sp3 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was it OS dependent, or hardware dependent?I had the issue in winxp 32bit sp3.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726495</id>
	<title>FROSTY PISS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247770740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fuck this open source shit! This just proves that your precious bullshit has vulnerabilities as well.
<br> <br>

Slashdot is the haven for FOSS fags.
<br> <br> <br> <br>



That is all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck this open source shit !
This just proves that your precious bullshit has vulnerabilities as well .
Slashdot is the haven for FOSS fags .
That is all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck this open source shit!
This just proves that your precious bullshit has vulnerabilities as well.
Slashdot is the haven for FOSS fags.
That is all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28728529</id>
	<title>Re:Yet more links to IE</title>
	<author>thejynxed</author>
	<datestamp>1247839860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you think that is bad enough, just use Process Explorer and click on Firefox.exe in the process list. You'll be extremely saddened by all the IE-specific nonsense that Firefox apparently is now reliant on.</p><p>Firefox even decides to load driver files (.dll files and others) for Windows services I specifically have disabled.</p><p>Firefox, do you honestly need to start winspool.drv, dnsapi.dll, rasadhlp.dll, rasapi32.dll, ieframe.dll, ieframe.dll.mui, etc? Really? Even with the associated services disabled? When the associated hardware is not installed (printer, 56k modem)?</p><p>Note: I've checked the process threads of Opera and other browsers, and they don't load half of the shit that Firefox.exe does.</p><p>We won't even go into why Firefox would load sound drivers. A second time. After the OS already has them loaded.</p><p>And people wonder why Firefox has memory leaks from hell.</p><p>Still, this is my browser of choice, because Opera is just horribly hideous to look at and doesn't work on half of the websites I visit. IE8 at least is a serious improvement over any previous version of IE. Chrome is just...let us just say I don't need Google recording every single link I click on and selling the information or providing me with targeted advertising 24/7. It's bad enough I use GMail (at least for unimportant things).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you think that is bad enough , just use Process Explorer and click on Firefox.exe in the process list .
You 'll be extremely saddened by all the IE-specific nonsense that Firefox apparently is now reliant on.Firefox even decides to load driver files ( .dll files and others ) for Windows services I specifically have disabled.Firefox , do you honestly need to start winspool.drv , dnsapi.dll , rasadhlp.dll , rasapi32.dll , ieframe.dll , ieframe.dll.mui , etc ?
Really ? Even with the associated services disabled ?
When the associated hardware is not installed ( printer , 56k modem ) ? Note : I 've checked the process threads of Opera and other browsers , and they do n't load half of the shit that Firefox.exe does.We wo n't even go into why Firefox would load sound drivers .
A second time .
After the OS already has them loaded.And people wonder why Firefox has memory leaks from hell.Still , this is my browser of choice , because Opera is just horribly hideous to look at and does n't work on half of the websites I visit .
IE8 at least is a serious improvement over any previous version of IE .
Chrome is just...let us just say I do n't need Google recording every single link I click on and selling the information or providing me with targeted advertising 24/7 .
It 's bad enough I use GMail ( at least for unimportant things ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you think that is bad enough, just use Process Explorer and click on Firefox.exe in the process list.
You'll be extremely saddened by all the IE-specific nonsense that Firefox apparently is now reliant on.Firefox even decides to load driver files (.dll files and others) for Windows services I specifically have disabled.Firefox, do you honestly need to start winspool.drv, dnsapi.dll, rasadhlp.dll, rasapi32.dll, ieframe.dll, ieframe.dll.mui, etc?
Really? Even with the associated services disabled?
When the associated hardware is not installed (printer, 56k modem)?Note: I've checked the process threads of Opera and other browsers, and they don't load half of the shit that Firefox.exe does.We won't even go into why Firefox would load sound drivers.
A second time.
After the OS already has them loaded.And people wonder why Firefox has memory leaks from hell.Still, this is my browser of choice, because Opera is just horribly hideous to look at and doesn't work on half of the websites I visit.
IE8 at least is a serious improvement over any previous version of IE.
Chrome is just...let us just say I don't need Google recording every single link I click on and selling the information or providing me with targeted advertising 24/7.
It's bad enough I use GMail (at least for unimportant things).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727221</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726617</id>
	<title>Re:slow start for \_some\_</title>
	<author>0ld\_d0g</author>
	<datestamp>1247772720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Irrelevant. I bet when you patched the vulnerability, it might have also affected 'some' people. Its enough that the potential was there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Irrelevant .
I bet when you patched the vulnerability , it might have also affected 'some ' people .
Its enough that the potential was there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Irrelevant.
I bet when you patched the vulnerability, it might have also affected 'some' people.
Its enough that the potential was there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726557</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726617
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726557
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726557
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726539
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726899
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726589
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726557
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28731501
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726749
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28733465
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729615
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726557
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28728259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726749
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726557
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726539
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729943
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726787
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726589
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726557
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727559
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726495
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726591
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28736199
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729615
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28737415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726539
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28728529
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727221
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727691
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726681
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726591
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28728983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726723
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726645
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726539
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727429
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726591
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28733833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726787
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726589
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726557
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28739095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729489
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726557
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726749
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726603
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726539
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28728007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726591
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28728489
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726749
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726635
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726557
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0510258_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28734147
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28730427
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0510258.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726591
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726757
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727429
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28728007
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726731
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726681
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0510258.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726749
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28728259
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729779
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28728489
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28731501
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0510258.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727691
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729975
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0510258.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28730427
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28734147
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0510258.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28728473
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0510258.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727643
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0510258.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726539
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729061
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726645
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28737415
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726603
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726715
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726801
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0510258.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726545
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0510258.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726959
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0510258.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726723
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28728983
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0510258.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729615
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28733465
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28736199
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0510258.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726569
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0510258.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727221
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28728529
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0510258.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727661
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0510258.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726557
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726639
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726635
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729489
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28739095
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726589
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726899
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726787
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729017
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28733833
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28729943
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726605
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726649
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726617
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0510258.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28726495
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727559
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0510258.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0510258.28727179
</commentlist>
</conversation>
