<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_17_0142253</id>
	<title>Australian Website Bans ... Australians</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1247841600000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Nazlfrag writes <i>"Earlier this month the blog and discussion forum <a href="http://www.zgeek.com/">ZGeek</a> was <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/online-forum-trolls-cost-me-millions-filmmaker-20090715-dl4t.html?page=-1">sued for $42 million AUD</a> over a user's comment. The plaintiffs are aspiring movie producers who claim to have lost a movie deal due to a 9/11 conspiracy discussion thread. Even though the <a href="http://www.efa.org.au/2009/07/15/zgeek-defamation-lawsuit-struck-out/">initial lawsuit has been thrown out</a>, and the company complied with lawyers' demands by taking down the offending posts, it is believed the plaintiffs will file suit again. In addition to suing the forum, in an Australian first they have been granted an  <a href="http://www.screenhub.com.au/news/shownewsarticleG.asp?newsID=28062">injunction to force the ISPs to disclose the IP addresses</a> of the two posters involved. Due to the risk of incurring even greater legal costs the <a href="http://www.zgeek.com/forum/f60/update-in-the-zgeek-legal-battle-t84864/">company is closing its doors in Australia</a>, and will ban their fellow countrymen from posting there again."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nazlfrag writes " Earlier this month the blog and discussion forum ZGeek was sued for $ 42 million AUD over a user 's comment .
The plaintiffs are aspiring movie producers who claim to have lost a movie deal due to a 9/11 conspiracy discussion thread .
Even though the initial lawsuit has been thrown out , and the company complied with lawyers ' demands by taking down the offending posts , it is believed the plaintiffs will file suit again .
In addition to suing the forum , in an Australian first they have been granted an injunction to force the ISPs to disclose the IP addresses of the two posters involved .
Due to the risk of incurring even greater legal costs the company is closing its doors in Australia , and will ban their fellow countrymen from posting there again .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nazlfrag writes "Earlier this month the blog and discussion forum ZGeek was sued for $42 million AUD over a user's comment.
The plaintiffs are aspiring movie producers who claim to have lost a movie deal due to a 9/11 conspiracy discussion thread.
Even though the initial lawsuit has been thrown out, and the company complied with lawyers' demands by taking down the offending posts, it is believed the plaintiffs will file suit again.
In addition to suing the forum, in an Australian first they have been granted an  injunction to force the ISPs to disclose the IP addresses of the two posters involved.
Due to the risk of incurring even greater legal costs the company is closing its doors in Australia, and will ban their fellow countrymen from posting there again.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725683</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247760120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why does everyone keep treating them like a bunch of criminals?</p></div><p>Oh come on... we can't be dicks to a penile colony?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does everyone keep treating them like a bunch of criminals ? Oh come on... we ca n't be dicks to a penile colony ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does everyone keep treating them like a bunch of criminals?Oh come on... we can't be dicks to a penile colony?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727093</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>Lloyd\_Bryant</author>
	<datestamp>1247824800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Consider this: The Ten Commandments contain 297 words, the Bill of Rights 463 words, and Lincoln's Gettysburg Address 266 words. A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.</p></div><p>I'm shocked nobody has called bullshit on this one yet. Damn, dude. Check snopes.<br><a href="http://www.snopes.com/language/document/cabbage.asp" title="snopes.com">http://www.snopes.com/language/document/cabbage.asp</a> [snopes.com]</p><p>Unless of course you also read this on snopes and decided it was a good time to perpetrate an urban legend. *shrugs*</p></div><p>What's truly silly about this urban legend is that there are plenty of *real* examples of excessively long government documents.  Google for "military brownie specification" for an example ("wc" tells me it's only 9660 words, but I'm sure there are some others that can equal or exceed the 26,911 number).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Consider this : The Ten Commandments contain 297 words , the Bill of Rights 463 words , and Lincoln 's Gettysburg Address 266 words .
A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.I 'm shocked nobody has called bullshit on this one yet .
Damn , dude .
Check snopes.http : //www.snopes.com/language/document/cabbage.asp [ snopes.com ] Unless of course you also read this on snopes and decided it was a good time to perpetrate an urban legend .
* shrugs * What 's truly silly about this urban legend is that there are plenty of * real * examples of excessively long government documents .
Google for " military brownie specification " for an example ( " wc " tells me it 's only 9660 words , but I 'm sure there are some others that can equal or exceed the 26,911 number ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Consider this: The Ten Commandments contain 297 words, the Bill of Rights 463 words, and Lincoln's Gettysburg Address 266 words.
A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.I'm shocked nobody has called bullshit on this one yet.
Damn, dude.
Check snopes.http://www.snopes.com/language/document/cabbage.asp [snopes.com]Unless of course you also read this on snopes and decided it was a good time to perpetrate an urban legend.
*shrugs*What's truly silly about this urban legend is that there are plenty of *real* examples of excessively long government documents.
Google for "military brownie specification" for an example ("wc" tells me it's only 9660 words, but I'm sure there are some others that can equal or exceed the 26,911 number).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725799</id>
	<title>Re:Australia is a little jumpy right now</title>
	<author>Mr\_Plattz</author>
	<datestamp>1247761260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>what with Sasha Baron Cohen making a contentious movie about a flamboyant gay Australian</p><p>and their favorite Australian son, Arnold Schwarzenegger, is having major troubles in Caleefornya</p><p>but Australians will always have the Sound of Music, Mozart, the Tyrolean Alps, and Hitler</p></div><p>Congratulation, you have been awarded "BIGGEST DUMBASS ON SLASHDOT" award for posting the dumbest comment I have ever read on here.

Do you *honestly* not know the difference between Austria and Australia?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>what with Sasha Baron Cohen making a contentious movie about a flamboyant gay Australianand their favorite Australian son , Arnold Schwarzenegger , is having major troubles in Caleefornyabut Australians will always have the Sound of Music , Mozart , the Tyrolean Alps , and HitlerCongratulation , you have been awarded " BIGGEST DUMBASS ON SLASHDOT " award for posting the dumbest comment I have ever read on here .
Do you * honestly * not know the difference between Austria and Australia ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what with Sasha Baron Cohen making a contentious movie about a flamboyant gay Australianand their favorite Australian son, Arnold Schwarzenegger, is having major troubles in Caleefornyabut Australians will always have the Sound of Music, Mozart, the Tyrolean Alps, and HitlerCongratulation, you have been awarded "BIGGEST DUMBASS ON SLASHDOT" award for posting the dumbest comment I have ever read on here.
Do you *honestly* not know the difference between Austria and Australia?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725607</id>
	<title>First post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247758980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First post</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First post</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First post</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726881</id>
	<title>Too Anglocentric, it's not just us Brits</title>
	<author>Kupfernigk</author>
	<datestamp>1247863500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nine other European democracies also have "Royal families" and put their heads on their notes. The reason for this is simple (and it applies to Australia and NZ too.) So long as we have the Battenbergs notionally in power, there is no risk of a member of the Bush or Murdoch families ever becoming British (or Head of State. We have a powerless monarchy (and in the UK case the prospect of a tree hugging left wing eco-friendly King) precisely because we've seen how Presidential systems work, and we want nothing of it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nine other European democracies also have " Royal families " and put their heads on their notes .
The reason for this is simple ( and it applies to Australia and NZ too .
) So long as we have the Battenbergs notionally in power , there is no risk of a member of the Bush or Murdoch families ever becoming British ( or Head of State .
We have a powerless monarchy ( and in the UK case the prospect of a tree hugging left wing eco-friendly King ) precisely because we 've seen how Presidential systems work , and we want nothing of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nine other European democracies also have "Royal families" and put their heads on their notes.
The reason for this is simple (and it applies to Australia and NZ too.
) So long as we have the Battenbergs notionally in power, there is no risk of a member of the Bush or Murdoch families ever becoming British (or Head of State.
We have a powerless monarchy (and in the UK case the prospect of a tree hugging left wing eco-friendly King) precisely because we've seen how Presidential systems work, and we want nothing of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725899</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727181</id>
	<title>Super hungry</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247825940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>brb Hungry Jacks on Chapel</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>brb Hungry Jacks on Chapel</tokentext>
<sentencetext>brb Hungry Jacks on Chapel</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726095</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247765160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.</p></div><p>This can't be false, just look how accurate the word count is.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.This ca n't be false , just look how accurate the word count is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.This can't be false, just look how accurate the word count is.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28729899</id>
	<title>Re:Thanks America!</title>
	<author>Holi</author>
	<datestamp>1247845800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now now Mr. Gibson</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now now Mr. Gibson</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now now Mr. Gibson</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725779</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247761080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Consider this: The Ten Commandments contain 297 words, the Bill of Rights 463 words, and Lincoln's Gettysburg Address 266 words. A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.</p></div><p>I'm shocked nobody has called bullshit on this one yet.  Damn, dude.  Check snopes.<br><a href="http://www.snopes.com/language/document/cabbage.asp" title="snopes.com">http://www.snopes.com/language/document/cabbage.asp</a> [snopes.com]</p><p>Unless of course you also read this on snopes and decided it was a good time to perpetrate an urban legend.  *shrugs*</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Consider this : The Ten Commandments contain 297 words , the Bill of Rights 463 words , and Lincoln 's Gettysburg Address 266 words .
A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.I 'm shocked nobody has called bullshit on this one yet .
Damn , dude .
Check snopes.http : //www.snopes.com/language/document/cabbage.asp [ snopes.com ] Unless of course you also read this on snopes and decided it was a good time to perpetrate an urban legend .
* shrugs *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Consider this: The Ten Commandments contain 297 words, the Bill of Rights 463 words, and Lincoln's Gettysburg Address 266 words.
A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.I'm shocked nobody has called bullshit on this one yet.
Damn, dude.
Check snopes.http://www.snopes.com/language/document/cabbage.asp [snopes.com]Unless of course you also read this on snopes and decided it was a good time to perpetrate an urban legend.
*shrugs*
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725859</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247762040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably the latter, but there is a lot to be said about the proliferation of laws and the fact that we (U.S.) keep electing lawyers.   Kind of goes hand in hand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably the latter , but there is a lot to be said about the proliferation of laws and the fact that we ( U.S. ) keep electing lawyers .
Kind of goes hand in hand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably the latter, but there is a lot to be said about the proliferation of laws and the fact that we (U.S.) keep electing lawyers.
Kind of goes hand in hand.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725731</id>
	<title>Sorta like Amazon.com banning sales...</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1247760660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... by affiliates in certain states that just can't resist the temptation to wield the law in ways unfavorable to Amazon and the rest of its customers, huh?  Sound vaguely familiar?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... by affiliates in certain states that just ca n't resist the temptation to wield the law in ways unfavorable to Amazon and the rest of its customers , huh ?
Sound vaguely familiar ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... by affiliates in certain states that just can't resist the temptation to wield the law in ways unfavorable to Amazon and the rest of its customers, huh?
Sound vaguely familiar?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28737663</id>
	<title>Plot summary</title>
	<author>Brandybuck</author>
	<datestamp>1247844000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nutbag Troofer sues for being exposed as a nutbag Troofer. Hilarity ensues.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nutbag Troofer sues for being exposed as a nutbag Troofer .
Hilarity ensues .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nutbag Troofer sues for being exposed as a nutbag Troofer.
Hilarity ensues.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725925</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>jamesswift</author>
	<datestamp>1247762700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Snopes says... <a href="http://www.snopes.com/language/document/cabbage.asp" title="snopes.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.snopes.com/language/document/cabbage.asp</a> [snopes.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Snopes says... http : //www.snopes.com/language/document/cabbage.asp [ snopes.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Snopes says... http://www.snopes.com/language/document/cabbage.asp [snopes.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725961</id>
	<title>Re:Australia is a little jumpy right now</title>
	<author>bertoelcon</author>
	<datestamp>1247763120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Congratulation, you have been awarded "BIGGEST DUMBASS ON SLASHDOT" award for posting the dumbest comment I have ever read on here.</p></div><p>Judging by your UID, there wasn't much competition. Its the dumbest I have seen too, but I know there is years worth that I have never seen.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulation , you have been awarded " BIGGEST DUMBASS ON SLASHDOT " award for posting the dumbest comment I have ever read on here.Judging by your UID , there was n't much competition .
Its the dumbest I have seen too , but I know there is years worth that I have never seen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulation, you have been awarded "BIGGEST DUMBASS ON SLASHDOT" award for posting the dumbest comment I have ever read on here.Judging by your UID, there wasn't much competition.
Its the dumbest I have seen too, but I know there is years worth that I have never seen.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28729669</id>
	<title>Re:Australia is a little jumpy right now</title>
	<author>fast turtle</author>
	<datestamp>1247844900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Governor Schwarzenegger is Austrian, not Australian as you can tell simply by listening to his speech. He doesn't say G'Day Mate, nor does he properly pronounce "put nother shrimp on the barbie"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Governor Schwarzenegger is Austrian , not Australian as you can tell simply by listening to his speech .
He does n't say G'Day Mate , nor does he properly pronounce " put nother shrimp on the barbie "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Governor Schwarzenegger is Austrian, not Australian as you can tell simply by listening to his speech.
He doesn't say G'Day Mate, nor does he properly pronounce "put nother shrimp on the barbie"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725783</id>
	<title>Re:Australia is a little jumpy right now</title>
	<author>justinlee37</author>
	<datestamp>1247761080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Expertly trolled. 10/10.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Expertly trolled .
10/10 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Expertly trolled.
10/10.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725975</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247763300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interesting if it were true!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting if it were true !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting if it were true!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726103</id>
	<title>Re:Australia is a little jumpy right now</title>
	<author>jaxtherat</author>
	<datestamp>1247765220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think he was referring to this:<br><br>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-480494/Bush-confuses-Austria-Australia-latest-gaffe.html</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think he was referring to this : http : //www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-480494/Bush-confuses-Austria-Australia-latest-gaffe.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think he was referring to this:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-480494/Bush-confuses-Austria-Australia-latest-gaffe.html</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726967</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>juancnuno</author>
	<datestamp>1247821980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Consider this: The Ten Commandments contain 297 words, the Bill of Rights 463 words, and Lincoln's Gettysburg Address 266 words. A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.</p></div></blockquote><p>Not true:</p><p>http://snopes.com/language/document/cabbage.asp</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Consider this : The Ten Commandments contain 297 words , the Bill of Rights 463 words , and Lincoln 's Gettysburg Address 266 words .
A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.Not true : http : //snopes.com/language/document/cabbage.asp</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Consider this: The Ten Commandments contain 297 words, the Bill of Rights 463 words, and Lincoln's Gettysburg Address 266 words.
A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.Not true:http://snopes.com/language/document/cabbage.asp
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727415</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247828880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And how many arguments are caused by different interpretations of the bill of rights? Even 1 or 2 of the ten commandments has had people trying to in vain to pin down the exact meaning (coveting a neighbours ass is bad, but no mention of coveting anything else? his wfie would be ok to covet?)</p><p>IF we hadn't invented weasel lawyers that twist the laws to their own devices, then maybe we wouldn't need 25k word directives on the sale of cabbage. But we did, and we do - otherwise our distant future descendants will be going to war over whether cabbage should be 23c or 28c.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And how many arguments are caused by different interpretations of the bill of rights ?
Even 1 or 2 of the ten commandments has had people trying to in vain to pin down the exact meaning ( coveting a neighbours ass is bad , but no mention of coveting anything else ?
his wfie would be ok to covet ?
) IF we had n't invented weasel lawyers that twist the laws to their own devices , then maybe we would n't need 25k word directives on the sale of cabbage .
But we did , and we do - otherwise our distant future descendants will be going to war over whether cabbage should be 23c or 28c .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And how many arguments are caused by different interpretations of the bill of rights?
Even 1 or 2 of the ten commandments has had people trying to in vain to pin down the exact meaning (coveting a neighbours ass is bad, but no mention of coveting anything else?
his wfie would be ok to covet?
)IF we hadn't invented weasel lawyers that twist the laws to their own devices, then maybe we wouldn't need 25k word directives on the sale of cabbage.
But we did, and we do - otherwise our distant future descendants will be going to war over whether cabbage should be 23c or 28c.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726061</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>Landshark17</author>
	<datestamp>1247764680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't be so quick to trust snopes... <a href="http://xkcd.com/250/" title="xkcd.com">http://xkcd.com/250/</a> [xkcd.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't be so quick to trust snopes... http : //xkcd.com/250/ [ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't be so quick to trust snopes... http://xkcd.com/250/ [xkcd.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725779</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28729247</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>david\_thornley</author>
	<datestamp>1247843040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
According to snopes.com, nobody has found that directive, and that claim has circulated for several different documents, none of which are identifiable, always just below 27,000 words.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to snopes.com , nobody has found that directive , and that claim has circulated for several different documents , none of which are identifiable , always just below 27,000 words .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
According to snopes.com, nobody has found that directive, and that claim has circulated for several different documents, none of which are identifiable, always just below 27,000 words.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726243</id>
	<title>Bill of Rights.</title>
	<author>sc0ob5</author>
	<datestamp>1247767020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've said it before and I'll say it again we need a Bill of Rights in the country. Currently we have almost none. Freedom of religion and free opinion of the government. Nothing else... Free speech would be nice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've said it before and I 'll say it again we need a Bill of Rights in the country .
Currently we have almost none .
Freedom of religion and free opinion of the government .
Nothing else... Free speech would be nice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've said it before and I'll say it again we need a Bill of Rights in the country.
Currently we have almost none.
Freedom of religion and free opinion of the government.
Nothing else... Free speech would be nice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726015</id>
	<title>Banned?  Not so much.</title>
	<author>Fex303</author>
	<datestamp>1247764080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Due to the risk of incurring even greater legal costs the company is closing its doors in Australia, and will ban their fellow countrymen from posting there again.</p></div></blockquote><p>Wait what?</p><p>As a longtime user (~10 years) of Zgeek, and an Aussie, I'm pretty sure we haven't been banned.  It's just that the site, which is hosted in the US already is going to legally set up shop outside of Australia to avoid these kinds of legal hassles.</p><p>For the record, the whole lawsuit thing is a joke, and everyone's aware that it's doomed to failure.  The problem is that since Zgeek is essentially run by one guy in his spare time, he doesn't have the resources to fight it effectively, so it's better to run away rather than set yourself up for future problems.</p><p>For the record, the site really isn't too much more than a place were people post random news, and a forum which is dominated by in-fighting, trolling, and a bizarre 'shit-in-his-shoes' meme (it was started after Google started rating us highly as place to get life advice).  And yes, it's as much fun as it sounds.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Due to the risk of incurring even greater legal costs the company is closing its doors in Australia , and will ban their fellow countrymen from posting there again.Wait what ? As a longtime user ( ~ 10 years ) of Zgeek , and an Aussie , I 'm pretty sure we have n't been banned .
It 's just that the site , which is hosted in the US already is going to legally set up shop outside of Australia to avoid these kinds of legal hassles.For the record , the whole lawsuit thing is a joke , and everyone 's aware that it 's doomed to failure .
The problem is that since Zgeek is essentially run by one guy in his spare time , he does n't have the resources to fight it effectively , so it 's better to run away rather than set yourself up for future problems.For the record , the site really is n't too much more than a place were people post random news , and a forum which is dominated by in-fighting , trolling , and a bizarre 'shit-in-his-shoes ' meme ( it was started after Google started rating us highly as place to get life advice ) .
And yes , it 's as much fun as it sounds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Due to the risk of incurring even greater legal costs the company is closing its doors in Australia, and will ban their fellow countrymen from posting there again.Wait what?As a longtime user (~10 years) of Zgeek, and an Aussie, I'm pretty sure we haven't been banned.
It's just that the site, which is hosted in the US already is going to legally set up shop outside of Australia to avoid these kinds of legal hassles.For the record, the whole lawsuit thing is a joke, and everyone's aware that it's doomed to failure.
The problem is that since Zgeek is essentially run by one guy in his spare time, he doesn't have the resources to fight it effectively, so it's better to run away rather than set yourself up for future problems.For the record, the site really isn't too much more than a place were people post random news, and a forum which is dominated by in-fighting, trolling, and a bizarre 'shit-in-his-shoes' meme (it was started after Google started rating us highly as place to get life advice).
And yes, it's as much fun as it sounds.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725835</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>Bobb9000</author>
	<datestamp>1247761680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's some validity to your point, though I think you're overstating things. Larger populations with more communication and more encompassing economies require more regulation. However, instead of engaging you further on this interesting political question, I would merely like to point out that the thing about cabbage regulation is a long-time rhetorical legend with no basis in fact. Please take more care about repeating stories without checking them.<br> <br>

<a href="http://www.snopes.com/language/document/cabbage.asp" title="snopes.com">See Snopes for more info.</a> [snopes.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's some validity to your point , though I think you 're overstating things .
Larger populations with more communication and more encompassing economies require more regulation .
However , instead of engaging you further on this interesting political question , I would merely like to point out that the thing about cabbage regulation is a long-time rhetorical legend with no basis in fact .
Please take more care about repeating stories without checking them .
See Snopes for more info .
[ snopes.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's some validity to your point, though I think you're overstating things.
Larger populations with more communication and more encompassing economies require more regulation.
However, instead of engaging you further on this interesting political question, I would merely like to point out that the thing about cabbage regulation is a long-time rhetorical legend with no basis in fact.
Please take more care about repeating stories without checking them.
See Snopes for more info.
[snopes.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727173</id>
	<title>Re:Australia is a little jumpy right now</title>
	<author>Godwin O'Hitler</author>
	<datestamp>1247825880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You, Sir, circletimessquare, are my hero. Without even trying you have managed to make about fifteen people look like fools with their answers.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>This could indeed be a record-breaking post.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You , Sir , circletimessquare , are my hero .
Without even trying you have managed to make about fifteen people look like fools with their answers .
: ) This could indeed be a record-breaking post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You, Sir, circletimessquare, are my hero.
Without even trying you have managed to make about fifteen people look like fools with their answers.
:)This could indeed be a record-breaking post.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726345</id>
	<title>Re:Banned? Not so much.</title>
	<author>superdana</author>
	<datestamp>1247768280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>For the record, the site really isn't too much more than a place were people post random news, and a forum which is dominated by in-fighting, trolling, and a bizarre 'shit-in-his-shoes' meme</i> <br>
<br>
So you're saying it's essentially identical to Slashdot, but with an unfortunate twist on "hot-grits-in-pants."</htmltext>
<tokenext>For the record , the site really is n't too much more than a place were people post random news , and a forum which is dominated by in-fighting , trolling , and a bizarre 'shit-in-his-shoes ' meme So you 're saying it 's essentially identical to Slashdot , but with an unfortunate twist on " hot-grits-in-pants .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the record, the site really isn't too much more than a place were people post random news, and a forum which is dominated by in-fighting, trolling, and a bizarre 'shit-in-his-shoes' meme 

So you're saying it's essentially identical to Slashdot, but with an unfortunate twist on "hot-grits-in-pants.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28729947</id>
	<title>Re:Bill of Rights.</title>
	<author>Zorque</author>
	<datestamp>1247846040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Freedom of speech, at least in the US, only applies to Government censorship. You can still sue people in civil court for saying things you don't like.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Freedom of speech , at least in the US , only applies to Government censorship .
You can still sue people in civil court for saying things you do n't like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Freedom of speech, at least in the US, only applies to Government censorship.
You can still sue people in civil court for saying things you don't like.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725781</id>
	<title>Bandwagon</title>
	<author>BatGnat</author>
	<datestamp>1247761080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think I might sue them as well - it is a clear cut case of discrimination.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think I might sue them as well - it is a clear cut case of discrimination .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think I might sue them as well - it is a clear cut case of discrimination.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726989</id>
	<title>Re:Australia is a little jumpy right now</title>
	<author>kramerd</author>
	<datestamp>1247822400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Holy crap, there are 15 hidden comments on this troll...at 0.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Holy crap , there are 15 hidden comments on this troll...at 0 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Holy crap, there are 15 hidden comments on this troll...at 0.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725899</id>
	<title>British...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247762460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm starting to have serious concerns about anyone who puts the queen on their money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm starting to have serious concerns about anyone who puts the queen on their money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm starting to have serious concerns about anyone who puts the queen on their money.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726741</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247861460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Consider this: The Ten Commandments contain 297 words, the Bill of Rights 463 words, and Lincoln's Gettysburg Address 266 words. A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.</p><p>I see this as a plus point, if they could regulate cabbage in 269 words they could pass 100 times as many laws.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Consider this : The Ten Commandments contain 297 words , the Bill of Rights 463 words , and Lincoln 's Gettysburg Address 266 words .
A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.I see this as a plus point , if they could regulate cabbage in 269 words they could pass 100 times as many laws .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Consider this: The Ten Commandments contain 297 words, the Bill of Rights 463 words, and Lincoln's Gettysburg Address 266 words.
A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.I see this as a plus point, if they could regulate cabbage in 269 words they could pass 100 times as many laws.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726475</id>
	<title>Re:Australia is a little jumpy right now</title>
	<author>Aussie</author>
	<datestamp>1247770380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's just the kangaroos.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's just the kangaroos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's just the kangaroos.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725875</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>kzieli</author>
	<datestamp>1247762280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most of the ten commandments are not enforceable by law though. Murder the  theft are crimes. Bearing false witness is only a crime in some circumstances. More to the point it is against the law to enforce some of them, seeing as most western countries have some provisions for freedom of religion).

</p><p>Laws do get removed and replaced over time. What tends to happen is that breaches of some particular law first start getting minimal sentences. Then cases invoking it start getting dismissed the public prosecutor stops bringing the charges forward.

</p><p>After a while no one remembers the law and no one heeds it. Eventually someone will notice and it will get repealed. These days there are openly practicing Wiccans in most western countries. Go back far enough and you will find laws prohibiting the practice of witchcraft. It was once a crime but is no longer viewed as a crime.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of the ten commandments are not enforceable by law though .
Murder the theft are crimes .
Bearing false witness is only a crime in some circumstances .
More to the point it is against the law to enforce some of them , seeing as most western countries have some provisions for freedom of religion ) .
Laws do get removed and replaced over time .
What tends to happen is that breaches of some particular law first start getting minimal sentences .
Then cases invoking it start getting dismissed the public prosecutor stops bringing the charges forward .
After a while no one remembers the law and no one heeds it .
Eventually someone will notice and it will get repealed .
These days there are openly practicing Wiccans in most western countries .
Go back far enough and you will find laws prohibiting the practice of witchcraft .
It was once a crime but is no longer viewed as a crime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of the ten commandments are not enforceable by law though.
Murder the  theft are crimes.
Bearing false witness is only a crime in some circumstances.
More to the point it is against the law to enforce some of them, seeing as most western countries have some provisions for freedom of religion).
Laws do get removed and replaced over time.
What tends to happen is that breaches of some particular law first start getting minimal sentences.
Then cases invoking it start getting dismissed the public prosecutor stops bringing the charges forward.
After a while no one remembers the law and no one heeds it.
Eventually someone will notice and it will get repealed.
These days there are openly practicing Wiccans in most western countries.
Go back far enough and you will find laws prohibiting the practice of witchcraft.
It was once a crime but is no longer viewed as a crime.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28735829</id>
	<title>Fucking crybabies</title>
	<author>BozoForPresident</author>
	<datestamp>1247830320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What a loss that their movie got axed - I'm so devastated.  10 points to anyone that knows who they are...</htmltext>
<tokenext>What a loss that their movie got axed - I 'm so devastated .
10 points to anyone that knows who they are.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What a loss that their movie got axed - I'm so devastated.
10 points to anyone that knows who they are...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726205</id>
	<title>Re:Australia is a little jumpy right now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247766540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>and their favorite Australian son, Arnold Schwarzenegger, is having major troubles in Caleefornya</p><p>but Australians will always have the Sound of Music, Mozart, the Tyrolean Alps, and Hitler</p></div><p>Um dude, Schwarzenegger is Austrian, not Australian...  Wrong hemisphere and wrong side of the planet...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and their favorite Australian son , Arnold Schwarzenegger , is having major troubles in Caleefornyabut Australians will always have the Sound of Music , Mozart , the Tyrolean Alps , and HitlerUm dude , Schwarzenegger is Austrian , not Australian... Wrong hemisphere and wrong side of the planet.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and their favorite Australian son, Arnold Schwarzenegger, is having major troubles in Caleefornyabut Australians will always have the Sound of Music, Mozart, the Tyrolean Alps, and HitlerUm dude, Schwarzenegger is Austrian, not Australian...  Wrong hemisphere and wrong side of the planet...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726013</id>
	<title>Shame shame shame</title>
	<author>unreadepitaph</author>
	<datestamp>1247764080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As an Australian I am disgusted at this decision. To show my distain for this website I will never be visiting it again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As an Australian I am disgusted at this decision .
To show my distain for this website I will never be visiting it again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As an Australian I am disgusted at this decision.
To show my distain for this website I will never be visiting it again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725669</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>Derkec</author>
	<datestamp>1247760000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're used to it, because iocane comes from Australia, as everyone knows, and Australia is entirely peopled with criminals, and criminals are used to having people not trust them</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're used to it , because iocane comes from Australia , as everyone knows , and Australia is entirely peopled with criminals , and criminals are used to having people not trust them</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're used to it, because iocane comes from Australia, as everyone knows, and Australia is entirely peopled with criminals, and criminals are used to having people not trust them</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725869</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>Werkhaus</author>
	<datestamp>1247762220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.</p></div><p>Ah, yes. Also known as "Cole's Law".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.Ah , yes .
Also known as " Cole 's Law " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.Ah, yes.
Also known as "Cole's Law".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28730691</id>
	<title>Re:Microsoft can sue Slashdot, or any other pro-Li</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1247849160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It isn't slander or lible if it's true.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is n't slander or lible if it 's true .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It isn't slander or lible if it's true.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725987</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611</id>
	<title>Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247759040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why does everyone keep treating them like a bunch of criminals?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does everyone keep treating them like a bunch of criminals ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does everyone keep treating them like a bunch of criminals?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725935</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>FatdogHaiku</author>
	<datestamp>1247762820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.</p></div><p>Please, oh PLEASE tell me they called it "Cole's Law".<br> <br>Sorry, I'll go be quite now...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.Please , oh PLEASE tell me they called it " Cole 's Law " .
Sorry , I 'll go be quite now.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.Please, oh PLEASE tell me they called it "Cole's Law".
Sorry, I'll go be quite now...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28729263</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>BoothbyTCD</author>
	<datestamp>1247843100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Consider this: The Ten Commandments contain 297 words, the Bill of Rights 463 words, and Lincoln's Gettysburg Address 266 words. A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.snopes.com/language/document/cabbage.asp" title="snopes.com" rel="nofollow">Nice try</a> [snopes.com] but that is a very old troll indeed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Consider this : The Ten Commandments contain 297 words , the Bill of Rights 463 words , and Lincoln 's Gettysburg Address 266 words .
A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words .
Nice try [ snopes.com ] but that is a very old troll indeed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Consider this: The Ten Commandments contain 297 words, the Bill of Rights 463 words, and Lincoln's Gettysburg Address 266 words.
A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.
Nice try [snopes.com] but that is a very old troll indeed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727945</id>
	<title>Re:Australia is a little jumpy right now</title>
	<author>deniable</author>
	<datestamp>1247835900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Niiiice one, maaate. You've mastered a classic Austrian sport, baiting foreigners. All we need to do now is show our new tourism ad, "Wolf Creek."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Niiiice one , maaate .
You 've mastered a classic Austrian sport , baiting foreigners .
All we need to do now is show our new tourism ad , " Wolf Creek .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Niiiice one, maaate.
You've mastered a classic Austrian sport, baiting foreigners.
All we need to do now is show our new tourism ad, "Wolf Creek.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28729935</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1247845980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Most of the ten commandments are not enforceable by law though</i></p><p>They were in the time and country they were written in. You could be stoned to death for blasphemy, for example.</p><p><i>Bearing false witness is only a crime in some circumstances</i></p><p>Bearing false witness against your neighbor is slander, a civil offense. Do it in court and you'll go to jail. A better example would have been adultery, which in Illinois bears no penalty whatever as I found when I divorced my adulterous ex-wife.</p><p>Why is it legal to fuck your congressman's wife but not to pay her for it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of the ten commandments are not enforceable by law thoughThey were in the time and country they were written in .
You could be stoned to death for blasphemy , for example.Bearing false witness is only a crime in some circumstancesBearing false witness against your neighbor is slander , a civil offense .
Do it in court and you 'll go to jail .
A better example would have been adultery , which in Illinois bears no penalty whatever as I found when I divorced my adulterous ex-wife.Why is it legal to fuck your congressman 's wife but not to pay her for it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of the ten commandments are not enforceable by law thoughThey were in the time and country they were written in.
You could be stoned to death for blasphemy, for example.Bearing false witness is only a crime in some circumstancesBearing false witness against your neighbor is slander, a civil offense.
Do it in court and you'll go to jail.
A better example would have been adultery, which in Illinois bears no penalty whatever as I found when I divorced my adulterous ex-wife.Why is it legal to fuck your congressman's wife but not to pay her for it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725875</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727959</id>
	<title>Re:Sad to see you go.</title>
	<author>deniable</author>
	<datestamp>1247836020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry, I'm only in my thirties. I don't remember the time before pricks in Parliament. Neither do my parents.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , I 'm only in my thirties .
I do n't remember the time before pricks in Parliament .
Neither do my parents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, I'm only in my thirties.
I don't remember the time before pricks in Parliament.
Neither do my parents.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28728253</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247838360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Consider this: The Ten Commandments contain 297 words, the Bill of Rights 463 words, and Lincoln's Gettysburg Address 266 words. A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.</p></div><p> For a little diversion, consider ALR (The 1794 Prussian general law of the land). About 19000 regulations. A lot more than OVER NINE THOUSAND regulations or words.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Consider this : The Ten Commandments contain 297 words , the Bill of Rights 463 words , and Lincoln 's Gettysburg Address 266 words .
A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words .
For a little diversion , consider ALR ( The 1794 Prussian general law of the land ) .
About 19000 regulations .
A lot more than OVER NINE THOUSAND regulations or words .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Consider this: The Ten Commandments contain 297 words, the Bill of Rights 463 words, and Lincoln's Gettysburg Address 266 words.
A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.
For a little diversion, consider ALR (The 1794 Prussian general law of the land).
About 19000 regulations.
A lot more than OVER NINE THOUSAND regulations or words.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726193</id>
	<title>Re:Australia is a little jumpy right now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247766420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forgot one of the most famous Australians ever: basement dad</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot one of the most famous Australians ever : basement dad</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot one of the most famous Australians ever: basement dad</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1247760180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why does everyone keep treating them like a bunch of criminals?</p></div><p>Because the purpose of every country's legislative branch is to add laws, not remove them. The judiciary's job is to review laws, not remove them. And the executive branch's job is to suggest, review, and approve laws, not remove them. Therefore, the older the country, the more laws. And it doesn't take long before all the major ones required have been added, so there is an inevitable climb toward the bottom, to regulate even the smallest matters, until everyone is a criminal, though they may not know or consider themselves as such, in some fashion.</p><p>Consider this: The Ten Commandments contain 297 words, the Bill of Rights 463 words, and Lincoln's Gettysburg Address 266 words. A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does everyone keep treating them like a bunch of criminals ? Because the purpose of every country 's legislative branch is to add laws , not remove them .
The judiciary 's job is to review laws , not remove them .
And the executive branch 's job is to suggest , review , and approve laws , not remove them .
Therefore , the older the country , the more laws .
And it does n't take long before all the major ones required have been added , so there is an inevitable climb toward the bottom , to regulate even the smallest matters , until everyone is a criminal , though they may not know or consider themselves as such , in some fashion.Consider this : The Ten Commandments contain 297 words , the Bill of Rights 463 words , and Lincoln 's Gettysburg Address 266 words .
A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does everyone keep treating them like a bunch of criminals?Because the purpose of every country's legislative branch is to add laws, not remove them.
The judiciary's job is to review laws, not remove them.
And the executive branch's job is to suggest, review, and approve laws, not remove them.
Therefore, the older the country, the more laws.
And it doesn't take long before all the major ones required have been added, so there is an inevitable climb toward the bottom, to regulate even the smallest matters, until everyone is a criminal, though they may not know or consider themselves as such, in some fashion.Consider this: The Ten Commandments contain 297 words, the Bill of Rights 463 words, and Lincoln's Gettysburg Address 266 words.
A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28734761</id>
	<title>Watch out!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247823660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just to warn all attorneys, Jonathan Nolan rapes and kills all of his legal representation.  There's no two ways about it; if you represent Jonathan Nolan in a legal manner, he will rape and kill you.</p><p>Mmmm, nothing beats an afternoon session of pseudo-anonymous internet libel.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just to warn all attorneys , Jonathan Nolan rapes and kills all of his legal representation .
There 's no two ways about it ; if you represent Jonathan Nolan in a legal manner , he will rape and kill you.Mmmm , nothing beats an afternoon session of pseudo-anonymous internet libel .
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just to warn all attorneys, Jonathan Nolan rapes and kills all of his legal representation.
There's no two ways about it; if you represent Jonathan Nolan in a legal manner, he will rape and kill you.Mmmm, nothing beats an afternoon session of pseudo-anonymous internet libel.
:D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28730215</id>
	<title>42 million what</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1247847240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>42 million Australian dollar dollars?   I wonder if the author is 6' feet 3" inches tall.</htmltext>
<tokenext>42 million Australian dollar dollars ?
I wonder if the author is 6 ' feet 3 " inches tall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>42 million Australian dollar dollars?
I wonder if the author is 6' feet 3" inches tall.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726375</id>
	<title>Re:Banned? Not so much.</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1247768700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>For the record, the site really isn't too much more than a place were people post random news, and a forum which is dominated by in-fighting, trolling, and a bizarre 'shit-in-his-shoes' meme (it was started after Google started rating us highly as place to get life advice). And yes, it's as much fun as it sounds.</i></p><p>So doesn't that mean it violates<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. IP?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the record , the site really is n't too much more than a place were people post random news , and a forum which is dominated by in-fighting , trolling , and a bizarre 'shit-in-his-shoes ' meme ( it was started after Google started rating us highly as place to get life advice ) .
And yes , it 's as much fun as it sounds.So does n't that mean it violates / .
IP ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the record, the site really isn't too much more than a place were people post random news, and a forum which is dominated by in-fighting, trolling, and a bizarre 'shit-in-his-shoes' meme (it was started after Google started rating us highly as place to get life advice).
And yes, it's as much fun as it sounds.So doesn't that mean it violates /.
IP?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725877</id>
	<title>Re:Australia is a little jumpy right now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247762340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*WHOOSH*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* WHOOSH *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*WHOOSH*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727987</id>
	<title>Re:British...</title>
	<author>deniable</author>
	<datestamp>1247836260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Better a harmless old lady (and her useless offspring) half a world away than some idiot who believes he has a mandate from the people and the power to do something about it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Better a harmless old lady ( and her useless offspring ) half a world away than some idiot who believes he has a mandate from the people and the power to do something about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better a harmless old lady (and her useless offspring) half a world away than some idiot who believes he has a mandate from the people and the power to do something about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725899</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725989</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247763660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>a penile colony? well hey at least you can't complain when they all act like dicks (...or cocks!!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a penile colony ?
well hey at least you ca n't complain when they all act like dicks ( ...or cocks ! !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a penile colony?
well hey at least you can't complain when they all act like dicks (...or cocks!!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725683</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727303</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>evan\_arrrr!</author>
	<datestamp>1247827500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whoosh.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whoosh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whoosh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725765</id>
	<title>Sad to see you go.</title>
	<author>slack\_justyb</author>
	<datestamp>1247760960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dear Australia,
<br> <br>
Hate to see you guys drop off the face of the Internet, but I guess that's what happens when you get a bunch of pricks in Parliament.
<br>
But I guess that the government will figure it out when no one wants to deal with Australia as far as the Internet goes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear Australia , Hate to see you guys drop off the face of the Internet , but I guess that 's what happens when you get a bunch of pricks in Parliament .
But I guess that the government will figure it out when no one wants to deal with Australia as far as the Internet goes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear Australia,
 
Hate to see you guys drop off the face of the Internet, but I guess that's what happens when you get a bunch of pricks in Parliament.
But I guess that the government will figure it out when no one wants to deal with Australia as far as the Internet goes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726109</id>
	<title>Re:Sad to see you go.</title>
	<author>VoltageX</author>
	<datestamp>1247765400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm in Australia and I just registered and posted.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm in Australia and I just registered and posted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm in Australia and I just registered and posted.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726903</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247863740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>These days there are openly practicing Wiccans in most western countries. Go back far enough and you will find laws prohibiting the practice of witchcraft. It was once a crime but is no longer viewed as a crime.</p></div><p>This is because Wicca was invented by a former civil-servant in the 1950s. Other than the appropriation of some terminology, it bears very little resemblance to the sort of witchcraft described in the Malleus Maleficarum.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>These days there are openly practicing Wiccans in most western countries .
Go back far enough and you will find laws prohibiting the practice of witchcraft .
It was once a crime but is no longer viewed as a crime.This is because Wicca was invented by a former civil-servant in the 1950s .
Other than the appropriation of some terminology , it bears very little resemblance to the sort of witchcraft described in the Malleus Maleficarum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These days there are openly practicing Wiccans in most western countries.
Go back far enough and you will find laws prohibiting the practice of witchcraft.
It was once a crime but is no longer viewed as a crime.This is because Wicca was invented by a former civil-servant in the 1950s.
Other than the appropriation of some terminology, it bears very little resemblance to the sort of witchcraft described in the Malleus Maleficarum.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725875</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727457</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>ted.hansson</author>
	<datestamp>1247829360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Because the purpose of every country's legislative branch is to add laws, not remove them.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Actually, this is a flaw exclusive to the common law system. In systems with civil law, it is fairly common to have the legislative body remove old laws that no longer serve a purpose or have been replaced by modernised versions.
<br> <br>
It is also a plus that civil law can be applied in the smallest matters without thereby adding new laws through precedent, though I'm sure it makes cabbage feel more important.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because the purpose of every country 's legislative branch is to add laws , not remove them .
Actually , this is a flaw exclusive to the common law system .
In systems with civil law , it is fairly common to have the legislative body remove old laws that no longer serve a purpose or have been replaced by modernised versions .
It is also a plus that civil law can be applied in the smallest matters without thereby adding new laws through precedent , though I 'm sure it makes cabbage feel more important .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because the purpose of every country's legislative branch is to add laws, not remove them.
Actually, this is a flaw exclusive to the common law system.
In systems with civil law, it is fairly common to have the legislative body remove old laws that no longer serve a purpose or have been replaced by modernised versions.
It is also a plus that civil law can be applied in the smallest matters without thereby adding new laws through precedent, though I'm sure it makes cabbage feel more important.
:)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28730135</id>
	<title>Re:Australia is a little jumpy right now</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1247846880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>and their favorite Australian son, Arnold Schwarzenegger, is having major troubles in Caleefornya</i></p><p>Arnold is Austrian, not Australian. Australia is in the southern hemisphere, Austria is in Europe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and their favorite Australian son , Arnold Schwarzenegger , is having major troubles in CaleefornyaArnold is Austrian , not Australian .
Australia is in the southern hemisphere , Austria is in Europe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and their favorite Australian son, Arnold Schwarzenegger, is having major troubles in CaleefornyaArnold is Austrian, not Australian.
Australia is in the southern hemisphere, Austria is in Europe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727251</id>
	<title>Who owns the Movie rights for</title>
	<author>Big Hairy Ian</author>
	<datestamp>1247826840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This Idea????</htmltext>
<tokenext>This Idea ? ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This Idea???
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725713</id>
	<title>damn mood killer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247760420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>weeps. I hate you lawyers. I hate you stupid money grubbing world. Why are you so stupid. Damnit, if you need to sue someone, sue yourself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>weeps .
I hate you lawyers .
I hate you stupid money grubbing world .
Why are you so stupid .
Damnit , if you need to sue someone , sue yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>weeps.
I hate you lawyers.
I hate you stupid money grubbing world.
Why are you so stupid.
Damnit, if you need to sue someone, sue yourself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726155</id>
	<title>Some snippets of the thread from caches.</title>
	<author>Doug52392</author>
	<datestamp>1247765880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here it is, ladies and gentlemen, The Thread That Cost Someone $42.5 Million Dollars:<br> <br>

<a href="http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:2S-QziRHuSYJ:www.zgeek.com/forum/f60/aussie-publishes-9-11-book-the-third-truth-t83756/+site:zgeek.com+\%22The+Third+Truth\%22&amp;cd=1&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=us&amp;client=firefox-a" title="74.125.47.132">Page 1</a> [74.125.47.132].
<br>

<a href="http://74.6.239.67/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&amp;p=site\%3Azgeek.com+\%22The+Third+Truth\%22&amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;u=www.zgeek.com/forum/f60/thread-t83756/page2.html&amp;w=\%22the+third+truth\%22&amp;d=FwFYUxlMS9C-&amp;icp=1&amp;.intl=us" title="74.6.239.67">Page 2 (John posts as "Doghead" on this page)</a> [74.6.239.67]. <br>

<a href="http://74.6.239.67/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&amp;p=site\%3Azgeek.com+\%22The+Third+Truth\%22&amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;u=www.zgeek.com/forum/f60/thread-t83756/page4.html&amp;w=\%22the+third+truth\%22&amp;d=Fcf\_GxlMS81D&amp;icp=1&amp;.intl=us" title="74.6.239.67">Page 4</a> [74.6.239.67].<br>
<a href="http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:gfKKjFd\_29QJ:www.zgeek.com/forum/showpost.php\%3Fp\%3D1461225\%26postcount\%3D232+site:zgeek.com+\%22The+Third+Truth\%22&amp;cd=4&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=us&amp;client=firefox-a" title="74.125.47.132">Greg Smith's threat/post</a> [74.125.47.132].<br>
<br>

<a href="http://dougsdomain.dyndns.org/pub/filedump/aussie\_flamewar\_cache/page1.htm" title="dyndns.org">Mirror - Page 1</a> [dyndns.org] <br>
<a href="http://dougsdomain.dyndns.org/pub/filedump/aussie\_flamewar\_cache/page2.htm" title="dyndns.org">Mirror - Page 2</a> [dyndns.org] <br>
<a href="http://dougsdomain.dyndns.org/pub/filedump/aussie\_flamewar\_cache/page4.htm" title="dyndns.org">Mirror - Page 4</a> [dyndns.org] <br>
<a href="http://dougsdomain.dyndns.org/pub/filedump/aussie\_flamewar\_cache/gregthreat.htm" title="dyndns.org">Mirror - Greg's Threat</a> [dyndns.org] <br> <br>
If there are any other pages I missed that got picked up in the cache, post them here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here it is , ladies and gentlemen , The Thread That Cost Someone $ 42.5 Million Dollars : Page 1 [ 74.125.47.132 ] .
Page 2 ( John posts as " Doghead " on this page ) [ 74.6.239.67 ] .
Page 4 [ 74.6.239.67 ] .
Greg Smith 's threat/post [ 74.125.47.132 ] .
Mirror - Page 1 [ dyndns.org ] Mirror - Page 2 [ dyndns.org ] Mirror - Page 4 [ dyndns.org ] Mirror - Greg 's Threat [ dyndns.org ] If there are any other pages I missed that got picked up in the cache , post them here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here it is, ladies and gentlemen, The Thread That Cost Someone $42.5 Million Dollars: 

Page 1 [74.125.47.132].
Page 2 (John posts as "Doghead" on this page) [74.6.239.67].
Page 4 [74.6.239.67].
Greg Smith's threat/post [74.125.47.132].
Mirror - Page 1 [dyndns.org] 
Mirror - Page 2 [dyndns.org] 
Mirror - Page 4 [dyndns.org] 
Mirror - Greg's Threat [dyndns.org]  
If there are any other pages I missed that got picked up in the cache, post them here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727363</id>
	<title>Re:Australia is a little jumpy right now</title>
	<author>oliderid</author>
	<datestamp>1247828280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lol, it reminds me that picture posted a while ago "The world according to America "<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)

<a href="http://i8.tinypic.com/6h89yes.gif" title="tinypic.com">http://i8.tinypic.com/6h89yes.gif</a> [tinypic.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lol , it reminds me that picture posted a while ago " The world according to America " : - ) http : //i8.tinypic.com/6h89yes.gif [ tinypic.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lol, it reminds me that picture posted a while ago "The world according to America " :-)

http://i8.tinypic.com/6h89yes.gif [tinypic.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726251</id>
	<title>Re:Australia is a little jumpy right now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247767140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdot really needs a -1 Dumbass for people like you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot really needs a -1 Dumbass for people like you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot really needs a -1 Dumbass for people like you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725965</id>
	<title>Re:Australia is a little jumpy right now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247763180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>In our defence, we did vote Hitler out at the last Federal election.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In our defence , we did vote Hitler out at the last Federal election .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In our defence, we did vote Hitler out at the last Federal election.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28732325</id>
	<title>Re:Australia is a little jumpy right now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247856000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You don't seem very bright. Are you Slashdot's token retard?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't seem very bright .
Are you Slashdot 's token retard ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't seem very bright.
Are you Slashdot's token retard?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725987</id>
	<title>Microsoft can sue Slashdot, or any other pro-Linux</title>
	<author>Doug52392</author>
	<datestamp>1247763540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Using the logic used in this lawsuit, Microsoft could sue Slashdot, and every other pro-Linux website for defamation, claiming millions of dollars in lost sales due to attacks on Windows.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Using the logic used in this lawsuit , Microsoft could sue Slashdot , and every other pro-Linux website for defamation , claiming millions of dollars in lost sales due to attacks on Windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Using the logic used in this lawsuit, Microsoft could sue Slashdot, and every other pro-Linux website for defamation, claiming millions of dollars in lost sales due to attacks on Windows.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725931</id>
	<title>Re:Australia is a little jumpy right now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247762760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...and clearly you have no idea where Hitler or Mozart was from, or basic European geography.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and clearly you have no idea where Hitler or Mozart was from , or basic European geography .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and clearly you have no idea where Hitler or Mozart was from, or basic European geography.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725799</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711</id>
	<title>Australia is a little jumpy right now</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1247760420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what with Sasha Baron Cohen making a contentious movie about a flamboyant gay Australian</p><p>and their favorite Australian son, Arnold Schwarzenegger, is having major troubles in Caleefornya</p><p>but Australians will always have the Sound of Music, Mozart, the Tyrolean Alps, and Hitler</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what with Sasha Baron Cohen making a contentious movie about a flamboyant gay Australianand their favorite Australian son , Arnold Schwarzenegger , is having major troubles in Caleefornyabut Australians will always have the Sound of Music , Mozart , the Tyrolean Alps , and Hitler</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what with Sasha Baron Cohen making a contentious movie about a flamboyant gay Australianand their favorite Australian son, Arnold Schwarzenegger, is having major troubles in Caleefornyabut Australians will always have the Sound of Music, Mozart, the Tyrolean Alps, and Hitler</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727567</id>
	<title>Re:Bill of Rights.</title>
	<author>Ben1220</author>
	<datestamp>1247830740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It would be nice!
It would also put a stop to nonsense like this filter, do you ever wonder why stuff like this never gets off the ground in USA, despite the massive number of brain dead Fundies?
They have actually tried, I remember reading about it a year ago or so, but its always deemed unconstitutional instantly.  Thanks to their bill of rights.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be nice !
It would also put a stop to nonsense like this filter , do you ever wonder why stuff like this never gets off the ground in USA , despite the massive number of brain dead Fundies ?
They have actually tried , I remember reading about it a year ago or so , but its always deemed unconstitutional instantly .
Thanks to their bill of rights .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be nice!
It would also put a stop to nonsense like this filter, do you ever wonder why stuff like this never gets off the ground in USA, despite the massive number of brain dead Fundies?
They have actually tried, I remember reading about it a year ago or so, but its always deemed unconstitutional instantly.
Thanks to their bill of rights.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726243</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726177</id>
	<title>Lawyers...</title>
	<author>XDirtypunkX</author>
	<datestamp>1247766180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The system seems to be broken if lawyers can bring about this kind of boobery.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The system seems to be broken if lawyers can bring about this kind of boobery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The system seems to be broken if lawyers can bring about this kind of boobery.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727445</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1247829180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>They didn't have Lawyers when the 10 Commandments were written.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They did n't have Lawyers when the 10 Commandments were written .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They didn't have Lawyers when the 10 Commandments were written.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726055</id>
	<title>Re:Australia is a little jumpy right now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247764620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>what with Sasha Baron Cohen making a contentious movie about a flamboyant gay Australian</p><p>and their favorite Australian son, Arnold Schwarzenegger, is having major troubles in Caleefornya</p><p>but Australians will always have the Sound of Music, Mozart, the Tyrolean Alps, and Hitler</p></div><p>Im sorry but you have to be the dumbest person on the internet. there is quite a difference between Australia and Austria, google and wikipedia may help you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>what with Sasha Baron Cohen making a contentious movie about a flamboyant gay Australianand their favorite Australian son , Arnold Schwarzenegger , is having major troubles in Caleefornyabut Australians will always have the Sound of Music , Mozart , the Tyrolean Alps , and HitlerIm sorry but you have to be the dumbest person on the internet .
there is quite a difference between Australia and Austria , google and wikipedia may help you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what with Sasha Baron Cohen making a contentious movie about a flamboyant gay Australianand their favorite Australian son, Arnold Schwarzenegger, is having major troubles in Caleefornyabut Australians will always have the Sound of Music, Mozart, the Tyrolean Alps, and HitlerIm sorry but you have to be the dumbest person on the internet.
there is quite a difference between Australia and Austria, google and wikipedia may help you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725757</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Aussies</title>
	<author>ObsessiveMathsFreak</author>
	<datestamp>1247760900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.</p></div></blockquote><p>Which would be notable, if that was the only thing it was regulating.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.Which would be notable , if that was the only thing it was regulating .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A recent federal directive regulating the price of cabbage contains 26,911 words.Which would be notable, if that was the only thing it was regulating.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726359</id>
	<title>Thanks America!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247768400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not only did we get your internets. We gained your jew ethics too. Thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only did we get your internets .
We gained your jew ethics too .
Thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only did we get your internets.
We gained your jew ethics too.
Thanks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727041</id>
	<title>Re:Bill of Rights.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247823600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and it still wouldn't stop civil defamation cases and privately run web sites being allowed to accept or block whoever they choose.</p><p>You don't actually understand what it is you say you want, do you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and it still would n't stop civil defamation cases and privately run web sites being allowed to accept or block whoever they choose.You do n't actually understand what it is you say you want , do you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and it still wouldn't stop civil defamation cases and privately run web sites being allowed to accept or block whoever they choose.You don't actually understand what it is you say you want, do you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726243</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28730135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727959
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725765
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28732325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28729263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725765
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28729247
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726103
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28729669
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727041
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28730691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725987
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725899
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28729935
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725875
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726989
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28728253
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727093
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28729947
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726243
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725931
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726741
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726251
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726375
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726205
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725989
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725683
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726475
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726903
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725875
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725835
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725669
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725935
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28729899
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726359
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726055
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727987
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725899
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727457
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727363
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_17_0142253_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0142253.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725607
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0142253.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726015
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726375
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726345
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0142253.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725711
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726193
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725965
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726475
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725799
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726103
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725877
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725961
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725931
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726251
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28732325
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727945
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726989
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727363
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28729669
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727173
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725783
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726055
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726205
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28730135
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0142253.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726359
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28729899
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0142253.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725765
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727959
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726109
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0142253.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725899
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727987
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0142253.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725611
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725687
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725975
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28728253
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727415
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725757
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725875
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726903
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28729935
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725779
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726095
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725859
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726061
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727093
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725925
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725869
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727445
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727457
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726741
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726967
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725835
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28729247
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725935
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727303
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28729263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725669
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725683
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725989
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0142253.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28726243
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727567
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28729947
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28727041
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_17_0142253.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28725987
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_17_0142253.28730691
</commentlist>
</conversation>
