<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_15_2313231</id>
	<title>Indian Tiger Park Now Tiger-Free</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1247670060000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Panna National Park is now officially tiger free making it the second <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south\_asia/8150382.stm">Indian tiger sanctuary to no longer have a tiger population</a>. A census was conducted in the park, after authorities reported no Bengal Tiger sightings for a long time. Three years ago the park had a population of 24 tigers; however, none were found this year. Forest minister Rajendra Shukla is optimistic about the news and says, "Panna is our only park which has lost on this count. Three of state's reserve forests &mdash; Kanha, Bandhavgarh and Pench &mdash; have been adjudged among the best managed tiger reserves in the country."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Panna National Park is now officially tiger free making it the second Indian tiger sanctuary to no longer have a tiger population .
A census was conducted in the park , after authorities reported no Bengal Tiger sightings for a long time .
Three years ago the park had a population of 24 tigers ; however , none were found this year .
Forest minister Rajendra Shukla is optimistic about the news and says , " Panna is our only park which has lost on this count .
Three of state 's reserve forests    Kanha , Bandhavgarh and Pench    have been adjudged among the best managed tiger reserves in the country .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Panna National Park is now officially tiger free making it the second Indian tiger sanctuary to no longer have a tiger population.
A census was conducted in the park, after authorities reported no Bengal Tiger sightings for a long time.
Three years ago the park had a population of 24 tigers; however, none were found this year.
Forest minister Rajendra Shukla is optimistic about the news and says, "Panna is our only park which has lost on this count.
Three of state's reserve forests — Kanha, Bandhavgarh and Pench — have been adjudged among the best managed tiger reserves in the country.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28716737</id>
	<title>Bengali's can visit Cincinnati</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247759040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If Bengali's tiger population disappears, they can visit the Cincinnati Zoo to see Bengal tigers.</p><p>"Who Dey!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If Bengali 's tiger population disappears , they can visit the Cincinnati Zoo to see Bengal tigers .
" Who Dey !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Bengali's tiger population disappears, they can visit the Cincinnati Zoo to see Bengal tigers.
"Who Dey!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712011</id>
	<title>if evolution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247674140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>if evolution allowed them to prosper we wouldn't even be in the way!

causing the eventual end of a species is just that the end!</htmltext>
<tokenext>if evolution allowed them to prosper we would n't even be in the way !
causing the eventual end of a species is just that the end !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if evolution allowed them to prosper we wouldn't even be in the way!
causing the eventual end of a species is just that the end!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715931</id>
	<title>If it Pays, then it Stays</title>
	<author>Syncerus</author>
	<datestamp>1247755680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the third-world wildlife either pays for itself or it vanishes, plain and simple. With a desperate population on the verge of starvation, any resource not viewed as life-improving will quickly vanish. That's why tourism and well-regulated sport hunting are so important to the management of wildlife in the third world. It's also why game ranches for commercial purposes are a necessary tool for the successful restoration of many endangered species. John Stossel's video article below is very illuminating, and offers a new way of viewing the issue.</p><p>http://jezebel.com/5249594/we-can-save-endangered-species-byeating-them</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the third-world wildlife either pays for itself or it vanishes , plain and simple .
With a desperate population on the verge of starvation , any resource not viewed as life-improving will quickly vanish .
That 's why tourism and well-regulated sport hunting are so important to the management of wildlife in the third world .
It 's also why game ranches for commercial purposes are a necessary tool for the successful restoration of many endangered species .
John Stossel 's video article below is very illuminating , and offers a new way of viewing the issue.http : //jezebel.com/5249594/we-can-save-endangered-species-byeating-them</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the third-world wildlife either pays for itself or it vanishes, plain and simple.
With a desperate population on the verge of starvation, any resource not viewed as life-improving will quickly vanish.
That's why tourism and well-regulated sport hunting are so important to the management of wildlife in the third world.
It's also why game ranches for commercial purposes are a necessary tool for the successful restoration of many endangered species.
John Stossel's video article below is very illuminating, and offers a new way of viewing the issue.http://jezebel.com/5249594/we-can-save-endangered-species-byeating-them</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712033</id>
	<title>Electronic tracking?</title>
	<author>lyinhart</author>
	<datestamp>1247674320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>They weren't tracking these things electronically? The technology to track animals has existed for years and surely they would have access to electronic tags and GPS tracking devices.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They were n't tracking these things electronically ?
The technology to track animals has existed for years and surely they would have access to electronic tags and GPS tracking devices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They weren't tracking these things electronically?
The technology to track animals has existed for years and surely they would have access to electronic tags and GPS tracking devices.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713965</id>
	<title>Re:Bribes.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247737740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sadly that could be true.<br>Unlike cops in countries like UK and USA, Indian cops don't get paid that much. Neither do they have great insurance coverages: a measly $2,500 is paid to their family if they are killed. Add to that weapons that are antiquated even by 1940s standards. So, you have deadly combination of corruption.<br>Why would any fool throw away his life for a miserable tiger? So that his family suffers?<br>No. It would be far better to make sure he's alive &amp; safe &amp; rich. So a tiger gets killed: so what?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly that could be true.Unlike cops in countries like UK and USA , Indian cops do n't get paid that much .
Neither do they have great insurance coverages : a measly $ 2,500 is paid to their family if they are killed .
Add to that weapons that are antiquated even by 1940s standards .
So , you have deadly combination of corruption.Why would any fool throw away his life for a miserable tiger ?
So that his family suffers ? No .
It would be far better to make sure he 's alive &amp; safe &amp; rich .
So a tiger gets killed : so what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly that could be true.Unlike cops in countries like UK and USA, Indian cops don't get paid that much.
Neither do they have great insurance coverages: a measly $2,500 is paid to their family if they are killed.
Add to that weapons that are antiquated even by 1940s standards.
So, you have deadly combination of corruption.Why would any fool throw away his life for a miserable tiger?
So that his family suffers?No.
It would be far better to make sure he's alive &amp; safe &amp; rich.
So a tiger gets killed: so what?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28736331</id>
	<title>edebiyat forum</title>
	<author>edebiyat</author>
	<datestamp>1247833500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>yeah <a href="http://www.dostyakasi.com/" title="dostyakasi.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dostyakasi.com/</a> [dostyakasi.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah http : //www.dostyakasi.com/ [ dostyakasi.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah http://www.dostyakasi.com/ [dostyakasi.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712137</id>
	<title>Maybe this explains why...</title>
	<author>ls671</author>
	<datestamp>1247675280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I haven't seen Tony the Tiger ( <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony\_the\_Tiger" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony\_the\_Tiger</a> [wikipedia.org] ) for a while on TV.</p><p>Maybe he is from that Park and he has just vanished...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have n't seen Tony the Tiger ( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony \ _the \ _Tiger [ wikipedia.org ] ) for a while on TV.Maybe he is from that Park and he has just vanished... ; - (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I haven't seen Tony the Tiger ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony\_the\_Tiger [wikipedia.org] ) for a while on TV.Maybe he is from that Park and he has just vanished... ;-(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712527</id>
	<title>next stop, tiger free world</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247679600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why go to tiger free park when you can go to tiger free world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why go to tiger free park when you can go to tiger free world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why go to tiger free park when you can go to tiger free world.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713081</id>
	<title>ridiculous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247684400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>poaching is rampant there and i would not be surprised if some of the park officials are in on it. However, that's not the real cause. The real cause would be its demand in primarily oriental countries like China, Vietnam etc where they use tiger meat and bones (I think every part of their body) for medicinal/spiritual purposes.
I think the open border into India's Himalayan neighbor Nepal has also affected Nepal's own tiger and rhino population. Hope the NGO's and the government clamps down these poachers. I am not sure what the remedy to the demand from the Oriental countries is besides Education and stricter rules about imports of the remains of these Endangered species.</htmltext>
<tokenext>poaching is rampant there and i would not be surprised if some of the park officials are in on it .
However , that 's not the real cause .
The real cause would be its demand in primarily oriental countries like China , Vietnam etc where they use tiger meat and bones ( I think every part of their body ) for medicinal/spiritual purposes .
I think the open border into India 's Himalayan neighbor Nepal has also affected Nepal 's own tiger and rhino population .
Hope the NGO 's and the government clamps down these poachers .
I am not sure what the remedy to the demand from the Oriental countries is besides Education and stricter rules about imports of the remains of these Endangered species .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>poaching is rampant there and i would not be surprised if some of the park officials are in on it.
However, that's not the real cause.
The real cause would be its demand in primarily oriental countries like China, Vietnam etc where they use tiger meat and bones (I think every part of their body) for medicinal/spiritual purposes.
I think the open border into India's Himalayan neighbor Nepal has also affected Nepal's own tiger and rhino population.
Hope the NGO's and the government clamps down these poachers.
I am not sure what the remedy to the demand from the Oriental countries is besides Education and stricter rules about imports of the remains of these Endangered species.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713753</id>
	<title>Yeah, sure...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247777820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should have evolved a bulletproof skin, a gun on their forehead and a lawyer on their back.<br>One to protect them from direct attack by humans, one to protect their home with force and the third to do the same - only in court.</p><p>And even that probably wouldn't do them much good considering that "civilized" humans had up until recently found "local" humans to be less than those tigers and little more than apes.<br>When I say "civilized" and "local" I mean white and brown.</p><p>Heck! White humans have nearly killed off an entire continent's population of red humans - who had guns and horses and whatnot...<br>And oversized cats should "evolve".<br>Yeah, sure...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should have evolved a bulletproof skin , a gun on their forehead and a lawyer on their back.One to protect them from direct attack by humans , one to protect their home with force and the third to do the same - only in court.And even that probably would n't do them much good considering that " civilized " humans had up until recently found " local " humans to be less than those tigers and little more than apes.When I say " civilized " and " local " I mean white and brown.Heck !
White humans have nearly killed off an entire continent 's population of red humans - who had guns and horses and whatnot...And oversized cats should " evolve " .Yeah , sure.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should have evolved a bulletproof skin, a gun on their forehead and a lawyer on their back.One to protect them from direct attack by humans, one to protect their home with force and the third to do the same - only in court.And even that probably wouldn't do them much good considering that "civilized" humans had up until recently found "local" humans to be less than those tigers and little more than apes.When I say "civilized" and "local" I mean white and brown.Heck!
White humans have nearly killed off an entire continent's population of red humans - who had guns and horses and whatnot...And oversized cats should "evolve".Yeah, sure...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712011</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712107</id>
	<title>Re:What the fuck</title>
	<author>underqualified</author>
	<datestamp>1247674920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>so i guess american companies won't be outsourcing their tiger parks to india...</htmltext>
<tokenext>so i guess american companies wo n't be outsourcing their tiger parks to india.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so i guess american companies won't be outsourcing their tiger parks to india...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715481</id>
	<title>Re:Electronic tracking?</title>
	<author>khallow</author>
	<datestamp>1247753280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They weren't tracking these things electronically? The technology to track animals has existed for years and surely they would have access to electronic tags and GPS tracking devices.</p></div><p>That would make it easier for the poachers to find the tigers. Not sure how it'd help the rangers though.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They were n't tracking these things electronically ?
The technology to track animals has existed for years and surely they would have access to electronic tags and GPS tracking devices.That would make it easier for the poachers to find the tigers .
Not sure how it 'd help the rangers though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They weren't tracking these things electronically?
The technology to track animals has existed for years and surely they would have access to electronic tags and GPS tracking devices.That would make it easier for the poachers to find the tigers.
Not sure how it'd help the rangers though.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712079</id>
	<title>Re:What the fuck</title>
	<author>erroneus</author>
	<datestamp>1247674800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Poaching.  Pure and simple.  And these governments simply don't set their priorities on conserving endangered species.  First they tend to enrich themselves, next they enrich their friends and associates, and if they EVER get done serving their own interests, the rest of what's left over goes to the people.  They probably have no idea of what a budget committee is and no public involvement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Poaching .
Pure and simple .
And these governments simply do n't set their priorities on conserving endangered species .
First they tend to enrich themselves , next they enrich their friends and associates , and if they EVER get done serving their own interests , the rest of what 's left over goes to the people .
They probably have no idea of what a budget committee is and no public involvement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Poaching.
Pure and simple.
And these governments simply don't set their priorities on conserving endangered species.
First they tend to enrich themselves, next they enrich their friends and associates, and if they EVER get done serving their own interests, the rest of what's left over goes to the people.
They probably have no idea of what a budget committee is and no public involvement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28718793</id>
	<title>With apologies to Douglas Adams</title>
	<author>RealGrouchy</author>
	<datestamp>1247766540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Ford," he said, "how many tigers are there?"<br>"None," said Ford.<br>Zaphod gibbered.<br>"Did you count them?" he yelled.<br>"Twice!"</p><p>- RG&gt;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Ford , " he said , " how many tigers are there ?
" " None , " said Ford.Zaphod gibbered .
" Did you count them ?
" he yelled. " Twice !
" - RG &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Ford," he said, "how many tigers are there?
""None," said Ford.Zaphod gibbered.
"Did you count them?
" he yelled."Twice!
"- RG&gt;</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715485</id>
	<title>Poor little cute things...</title>
	<author>greyhueofdoubt</author>
	<datestamp>1247753280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's so special about tigers that makes them more important than all the other species that we've hunted to extinction?</p><p>-b</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's so special about tigers that makes them more important than all the other species that we 've hunted to extinction ? -b</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's so special about tigers that makes them more important than all the other species that we've hunted to extinction?-b</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712069</id>
	<title>Tony the Tiger says...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247674560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're....GOOOONNNNE!!</p><p>(No, really, this is awful news)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're....GOOOONNNNE ! !
( No , really , this is awful news )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're....GOOOONNNNE!!
(No, really, this is awful news)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715097</id>
	<title>Re:What the fuck</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1247751120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, the Bush administration was over two years ago. Now it's Obama's problem<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>Oh, wait, you were talking about India. Sorry, got a bit confused there for a second.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , the Bush administration was over two years ago .
Now it 's Obama 's problem ...Oh , wait , you were talking about India .
Sorry , got a bit confused there for a second .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, the Bush administration was over two years ago.
Now it's Obama's problem ...Oh, wait, you were talking about India.
Sorry, got a bit confused there for a second.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712079</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714637</id>
	<title>Aww come on,</title>
	<author>zwarte piet</author>
	<datestamp>1247746200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't believe people still fall for this hoax...
There is no such thing as tigers!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe people still fall for this hoax.. . There is no such thing as tigers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe people still fall for this hoax...
There is no such thing as tigers!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28723385</id>
	<title>Re:What the fuck</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247741760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You hit the nail on the head. Shouldn't we more angry with the Chinese and educate them that tiger dick is a folklore? Maybe if the ignorant Chinese knew better, they're wouldn't be a market for poaching tigers. You cant blame the poachers really.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You hit the nail on the head .
Should n't we more angry with the Chinese and educate them that tiger dick is a folklore ?
Maybe if the ignorant Chinese knew better , they 're would n't be a market for poaching tigers .
You cant blame the poachers really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You hit the nail on the head.
Shouldn't we more angry with the Chinese and educate them that tiger dick is a folklore?
Maybe if the ignorant Chinese knew better, they're wouldn't be a market for poaching tigers.
You cant blame the poachers really.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712073</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715437</id>
	<title>I saw this movie</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247753040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Now eventually you might have tigers on your, on your tiger tour, right?"</p><p>RIP, Jeff Goldblum.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Now eventually you might have tigers on your , on your tiger tour , right ?
" RIP , Jeff Goldblum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Now eventually you might have tigers on your, on your tiger tour, right?
"RIP, Jeff Goldblum.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28719521</id>
	<title>Re:What the fuck</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247769240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Poaching.  Pure and simple.  And these governments simply don't set their priorities on conserving endangered species.  First they tend to enrich themselves, next they enrich their friends and associates, and if they EVER get done serving their own interests, the rest of what's left over goes to the people.  They probably have no idea of what a budget committee is and no public involvement.</p></div><p>These governments? It seems like my government does most of these things as well. And I am cowardly posting this from the USA...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Poaching .
Pure and simple .
And these governments simply do n't set their priorities on conserving endangered species .
First they tend to enrich themselves , next they enrich their friends and associates , and if they EVER get done serving their own interests , the rest of what 's left over goes to the people .
They probably have no idea of what a budget committee is and no public involvement.These governments ?
It seems like my government does most of these things as well .
And I am cowardly posting this from the USA.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Poaching.
Pure and simple.
And these governments simply don't set their priorities on conserving endangered species.
First they tend to enrich themselves, next they enrich their friends and associates, and if they EVER get done serving their own interests, the rest of what's left over goes to the people.
They probably have no idea of what a budget committee is and no public involvement.These governments?
It seems like my government does most of these things as well.
And I am cowardly posting this from the USA...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712079</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713943</id>
	<title>Re:What the fuck</title>
	<author>meerling</author>
	<datestamp>1247737440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>err... maintain the tiger population?  <br>
We thought it was a themed hunting park.<br> <br>
For a measly $10,000 you too can try to bag your own trophy tiger in a natural habitat...<br>
We still have spots left in our other 3 sites, but they're going fast, so contact your Extinction Hunting Tours Representative now before there all gone, forever...</htmltext>
<tokenext>err... maintain the tiger population ?
We thought it was a themed hunting park .
For a measly $ 10,000 you too can try to bag your own trophy tiger in a natural habitat.. . We still have spots left in our other 3 sites , but they 're going fast , so contact your Extinction Hunting Tours Representative now before there all gone , forever.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>err... maintain the tiger population?
We thought it was a themed hunting park.
For a measly $10,000 you too can try to bag your own trophy tiger in a natural habitat...
We still have spots left in our other 3 sites, but they're going fast, so contact your Extinction Hunting Tours Representative now before there all gone, forever...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715975</id>
	<title>Re:What the fuck</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247755860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><blockquote><div><p>Poaching. Pure and simple.</p></div></blockquote><p>This is the part I never understand. What on earth are they poaching the tigers for?</p></div><p>For quack herbal medicine in places like China, and elsewhere.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Poaching .
Pure and simple.This is the part I never understand .
What on earth are they poaching the tigers for ? For quack herbal medicine in places like China , and elsewhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Poaching.
Pure and simple.This is the part I never understand.
What on earth are they poaching the tigers for?For quack herbal medicine in places like China, and elsewhere.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712261</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28717465</id>
	<title>people suck</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247761920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>right no one will probably see this post but what ever.  This is extremly fucked up.  24 tigers dissapear in 3 years and the dude is optimistic about the news?? WTF??  ITS A TIGER SANCTUARY!!! They (the tigers) have been poached.  God damned lazy assed uncaring assholes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>right no one will probably see this post but what ever .
This is extremly fucked up .
24 tigers dissapear in 3 years and the dude is optimistic about the news ? ?
WTF ? ? ITS A TIGER SANCTUARY ! ! !
They ( the tigers ) have been poached .
God damned lazy assed uncaring assholes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>right no one will probably see this post but what ever.
This is extremly fucked up.
24 tigers dissapear in 3 years and the dude is optimistic about the news??
WTF??  ITS A TIGER SANCTUARY!!!
They (the tigers) have been poached.
God damned lazy assed uncaring assholes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715989</id>
	<title>Who cares</title>
	<author>kenp2002</author>
	<datestamp>1247755920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In a world where people thing eating body parts of animals brings good luck and potentcy, wage war, give Brittney Spears a Grammy, do we seriously consider preserving Tiger populations?</p><p>I think we expect too much of ourselves when stopping and taking a good hard look at the majority of our priorities are.</p><p>I don't think we are getting smarter collectively anymore, if anything we've turned on the stupid and are drinking deep from the spiggot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In a world where people thing eating body parts of animals brings good luck and potentcy , wage war , give Brittney Spears a Grammy , do we seriously consider preserving Tiger populations ? I think we expect too much of ourselves when stopping and taking a good hard look at the majority of our priorities are.I do n't think we are getting smarter collectively anymore , if anything we 've turned on the stupid and are drinking deep from the spiggot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a world where people thing eating body parts of animals brings good luck and potentcy, wage war, give Brittney Spears a Grammy, do we seriously consider preserving Tiger populations?I think we expect too much of ourselves when stopping and taking a good hard look at the majority of our priorities are.I don't think we are getting smarter collectively anymore, if anything we've turned on the stupid and are drinking deep from the spiggot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712265</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>Luke727</author>
	<datestamp>1247676720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i lol'd</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i lol 'd</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i lol'd</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714599</id>
	<title>You can joke all you want</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247745720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>But I see a world that's getting more screwed by humanity every day; we're all guilty.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But I see a world that 's getting more screwed by humanity every day ; we 're all guilty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I see a world that's getting more screwed by humanity every day; we're all guilty.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713881</id>
	<title>Re:What the fuck</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247736540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>First they tend to enrich themselves, next they enrich their friends and associates, and if they EVER get done serving their own interests, the rest of what's left over goes to the people.</p></div><p>Well, at least we've exported American Democracy to one place in the world!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>First they tend to enrich themselves , next they enrich their friends and associates , and if they EVER get done serving their own interests , the rest of what 's left over goes to the people.Well , at least we 've exported American Democracy to one place in the world !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First they tend to enrich themselves, next they enrich their friends and associates, and if they EVER get done serving their own interests, the rest of what's left over goes to the people.Well, at least we've exported American Democracy to one place in the world!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712079</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714049</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>JosKarith</author>
	<datestamp>1247738460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sorry - I've got mod points but have posted on this so can't Underrate your Troll mod. Can someone with mod points please mod parent up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry - I 've got mod points but have posted on this so ca n't Underrate your Troll mod .
Can someone with mod points please mod parent up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry - I've got mod points but have posted on this so can't Underrate your Troll mod.
Can someone with mod points please mod parent up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713993</id>
	<title>What did the tigers eat ?</title>
	<author>noddyxoi</author>
	<datestamp>1247737920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Could they have died from starvation ? a tiger must eat alot of freshly hunted food. It is not only the tigers that must be preserved, it's the whole food chain bellow the tiger !</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could they have died from starvation ?
a tiger must eat alot of freshly hunted food .
It is not only the tigers that must be preserved , it 's the whole food chain bellow the tiger !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could they have died from starvation ?
a tiger must eat alot of freshly hunted food.
It is not only the tigers that must be preserved, it's the whole food chain bellow the tiger !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715123</id>
	<title>Re:Electronic tracking?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247751300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm thinking of applying for some funding and turning my back garden into a tiger sanctuary.  In a few years time, when the money runs out, I'll express regret that all the tigers seem to have died.</p><p>Are you quite sure the tigers ever existed?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm thinking of applying for some funding and turning my back garden into a tiger sanctuary .
In a few years time , when the money runs out , I 'll express regret that all the tigers seem to have died.Are you quite sure the tigers ever existed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm thinking of applying for some funding and turning my back garden into a tiger sanctuary.
In a few years time, when the money runs out, I'll express regret that all the tigers seem to have died.Are you quite sure the tigers ever existed?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712493</id>
	<title>Re:The Tiger</title>
	<author>Greyfox</author>
	<datestamp>1247679300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sokay we can just clone them from DNA samples in a few decades. Then our great-great-grandchildren will know the joys of a good tiger steak!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sokay we can just clone them from DNA samples in a few decades .
Then our great-great-grandchildren will know the joys of a good tiger steak !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sokay we can just clone them from DNA samples in a few decades.
Then our great-great-grandchildren will know the joys of a good tiger steak!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713805</id>
	<title>Re:What the fuck</title>
	<author>Yvanhoe</author>
	<datestamp>1247735220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What is even worse is the argument that 3 other reserves are doing fine... It takes 3 years of poor management to have tigers disappear in a reserve, but you can then have good management during 100 years, they won't spontaneously reappear. Even if you bring new specimens, some biological variation has irremediably been lost.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What is even worse is the argument that 3 other reserves are doing fine... It takes 3 years of poor management to have tigers disappear in a reserve , but you can then have good management during 100 years , they wo n't spontaneously reappear .
Even if you bring new specimens , some biological variation has irremediably been lost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is even worse is the argument that 3 other reserves are doing fine... It takes 3 years of poor management to have tigers disappear in a reserve, but you can then have good management during 100 years, they won't spontaneously reappear.
Even if you bring new specimens, some biological variation has irremediably been lost.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28736177</id>
	<title>Re:Poaching and the rise of china too.</title>
	<author>edebiyat</author>
	<datestamp>1247832540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.masaldiyari.net/" title="masaldiyari.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.masaldiyari.net/</a> [masaldiyari.net] thanks!</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.masaldiyari.net/ [ masaldiyari.net ] thanks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.masaldiyari.net/ [masaldiyari.net] thanks!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714511</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712191</id>
	<title>It's Really All Quite Simple To Explain</title>
	<author>CyberSlammer</author>
	<datestamp>1247675760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They outsourced the Tigers to the United States.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They outsourced the Tigers to the United States .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They outsourced the Tigers to the United States.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712959</id>
	<title>Cheese shop</title>
	<author>quenda</author>
	<datestamp>1247683440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not much of a cheese shop, is it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not much of a cheese shop , is it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not much of a cheese shop, is it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28711953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712285</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247676960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know what? You're right.  Please begin the great purge with yourself.  Make yourself an example for all of us to follow.</p><p>You are truly a great human...  No...  A truly great living thing!</p><p>Congratulations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know what ?
You 're right .
Please begin the great purge with yourself .
Make yourself an example for all of us to follow.You are truly a great human... No... A truly great living thing ! Congratulations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know what?
You're right.
Please begin the great purge with yourself.
Make yourself an example for all of us to follow.You are truly a great human...  No...  A truly great living thing!Congratulations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714805</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, sure...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247748600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>other animals have become resistant to humans, they haven't.
thus evolution didn't have it in for them.

my motto against protectionists: evolution is a bitch!
if you don't like how the cards are dealt you could as well give up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>other animals have become resistant to humans , they have n't .
thus evolution did n't have it in for them .
my motto against protectionists : evolution is a bitch !
if you do n't like how the cards are dealt you could as well give up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>other animals have become resistant to humans, they haven't.
thus evolution didn't have it in for them.
my motto against protectionists: evolution is a bitch!
if you don't like how the cards are dealt you could as well give up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712065</id>
	<title>Rock</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247674560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, I guess this rock that's supposed to keep tigers away really does work.    Suck it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , I guess this rock that 's supposed to keep tigers away really does work .
Suck it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, I guess this rock that's supposed to keep tigers away really does work.
Suck it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713925</id>
	<title>Re:Tiger park profit</title>
	<author>martas</author>
	<datestamp>1247737140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>in india, tiger funds YOU!</htmltext>
<tokenext>in india , tiger funds YOU !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in india, tiger funds YOU!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712091</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28720091</id>
	<title>Umm...</title>
	<author>Impy the Impiuos Imp</author>
	<datestamp>1247771340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;  Three years ago the park had a population of 24 tigers, however none were found this year.</p><p>In a completely unrelated story, 24 flabulously wealthy men around the world are suing an undisclosed business because they were not actually able to get erections after taking a certain hideously expensive medicine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Three years ago the park had a population of 24 tigers , however none were found this year.In a completely unrelated story , 24 flabulously wealthy men around the world are suing an undisclosed business because they were not actually able to get erections after taking a certain hideously expensive medicine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;  Three years ago the park had a population of 24 tigers, however none were found this year.In a completely unrelated story, 24 flabulously wealthy men around the world are suing an undisclosed business because they were not actually able to get erections after taking a certain hideously expensive medicine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714069</id>
	<title>The Market will decide!</title>
	<author>fantomas</author>
	<datestamp>1247738760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obvious isn't it? "The Market will decide". This famous beastie called the market will decide what survives and what doesn't... and in India where there's a fair few people living on a dollar a day (say a hundred million or so people) then the idea of making a couple of thousand dollars for a days work hunting down and killing (poaching) a tiger seems quite attractive. What would you do for 6 years your current salary as a day's work?</p><p>India - developing country - limited resources - can't fund its nature reserves or equip its park rangers like a western country might, versus a lot of folk who see an opportunity to make several years wages in a day.</p><p>The west has to take a lot of the blame for reducing the numbers down to where they are right now, hunting tigers in India was big sport at the turn of the last century.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obvious is n't it ?
" The Market will decide " .
This famous beastie called the market will decide what survives and what does n't... and in India where there 's a fair few people living on a dollar a day ( say a hundred million or so people ) then the idea of making a couple of thousand dollars for a days work hunting down and killing ( poaching ) a tiger seems quite attractive .
What would you do for 6 years your current salary as a day 's work ? India - developing country - limited resources - ca n't fund its nature reserves or equip its park rangers like a western country might , versus a lot of folk who see an opportunity to make several years wages in a day.The west has to take a lot of the blame for reducing the numbers down to where they are right now , hunting tigers in India was big sport at the turn of the last century .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obvious isn't it?
"The Market will decide".
This famous beastie called the market will decide what survives and what doesn't... and in India where there's a fair few people living on a dollar a day (say a hundred million or so people) then the idea of making a couple of thousand dollars for a days work hunting down and killing (poaching) a tiger seems quite attractive.
What would you do for 6 years your current salary as a day's work?India - developing country - limited resources - can't fund its nature reserves or equip its park rangers like a western country might, versus a lot of folk who see an opportunity to make several years wages in a day.The west has to take a lot of the blame for reducing the numbers down to where they are right now, hunting tigers in India was big sport at the turn of the last century.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28716325</id>
	<title>I Concurr</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247757420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree.. if they weren't busy being lazy and on the dole, maybe they would have evolved already.

Hell.. maybe they transcended mortal existence!

Maybe they are actually like Dolphins and escaped earth due to our imminent demise?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree.. if they were n't busy being lazy and on the dole , maybe they would have evolved already .
Hell.. maybe they transcended mortal existence !
Maybe they are actually like Dolphins and escaped earth due to our imminent demise ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.. if they weren't busy being lazy and on the dole, maybe they would have evolved already.
Hell.. maybe they transcended mortal existence!
Maybe they are actually like Dolphins and escaped earth due to our imminent demise?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712595</id>
	<title>rock</title>
	<author>arazor</author>
	<datestamp>1247680380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Turns out Lisa's rock really did work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Turns out Lisa 's rock really did work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Turns out Lisa's rock really did work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28718939</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>kevinNCSU</author>
	<datestamp>1247767080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>.... the species whose members will literally do anything to "get ahead" of their neighbour in terms of money and power, the species who does nothing more than crave constant entertainment and shoveling their faces with as much food as they can get their fat hands on... yes, surely this is the species that deserves to dominate the planet.</p></div><p>As opposed to the noble male Tiger, renowned for eating just enough to stave off hunger after politely waiting for an elderly member of another species to die, and then distributes the left overs to other Male Tigers so that they will thrive as a happy community of goodwill and Tiger Friendship rather than "getting ahead".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>.... the species whose members will literally do anything to " get ahead " of their neighbour in terms of money and power , the species who does nothing more than crave constant entertainment and shoveling their faces with as much food as they can get their fat hands on... yes , surely this is the species that deserves to dominate the planet.As opposed to the noble male Tiger , renowned for eating just enough to stave off hunger after politely waiting for an elderly member of another species to die , and then distributes the left overs to other Male Tigers so that they will thrive as a happy community of goodwill and Tiger Friendship rather than " getting ahead " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.... the species whose members will literally do anything to "get ahead" of their neighbour in terms of money and power, the species who does nothing more than crave constant entertainment and shoveling their faces with as much food as they can get their fat hands on... yes, surely this is the species that deserves to dominate the planet.As opposed to the noble male Tiger, renowned for eating just enough to stave off hunger after politely waiting for an elderly member of another species to die, and then distributes the left overs to other Male Tigers so that they will thrive as a happy community of goodwill and Tiger Friendship rather than "getting ahead".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712967</id>
	<title>Re:The Tiger</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247683560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let ole planet Earth roll on her belly a few hundred million more times and she'll come up with a replacement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let ole planet Earth roll on her belly a few hundred million more times and she 'll come up with a replacement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let ole planet Earth roll on her belly a few hundred million more times and she'll come up with a replacement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715433</id>
	<title>You go first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247752980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You go first. Seriously. Go kill yourself and reduce the burden on the planet. Put your money where your mouth is. If you have kids, kill them too. And everyone you love. No? You don't want to? Then go fuck yourself. I'm sick of people like you who project their own feelings of shame and inadequacy on the entire population.</p><p>Have a great day,<br>-b</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You go first .
Seriously. Go kill yourself and reduce the burden on the planet .
Put your money where your mouth is .
If you have kids , kill them too .
And everyone you love .
No ? You do n't want to ?
Then go fuck yourself .
I 'm sick of people like you who project their own feelings of shame and inadequacy on the entire population.Have a great day,-b</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You go first.
Seriously. Go kill yourself and reduce the burden on the planet.
Put your money where your mouth is.
If you have kids, kill them too.
And everyone you love.
No? You don't want to?
Then go fuck yourself.
I'm sick of people like you who project their own feelings of shame and inadequacy on the entire population.Have a great day,-b</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712481</id>
	<title>Re:What the fuck</title>
	<author>Greyfox</author>
	<datestamp>1247679240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In a couple of minutes conflicting information on Wikipedia will show that the population of tigers in the tiger park has tripled in the last three months.
<p>
Hey, it worked for the elephants!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In a couple of minutes conflicting information on Wikipedia will show that the population of tigers in the tiger park has tripled in the last three months .
Hey , it worked for the elephants !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a couple of minutes conflicting information on Wikipedia will show that the population of tigers in the tiger park has tripled in the last three months.
Hey, it worked for the elephants!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714457</id>
	<title>I am not offering a defense</title>
	<author>Shivetya</author>
	<datestamp>1247743740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>of this reserves managers, however I think India has a whole lot more to worry about than tigers.  Yeah, while I sit in my comfy chair in an air conditioned building I can see where other people get off beating on countries for not doing what we want.</p><p>The simple matter is, India at least is trying to protect the tigers.  They also are trying to manage a large population of people who essentially live like they have for thousands of years and bring them into what many of us would still not consider acceptable living let alone modern.</p><p>So yeah, we lose a few tigers.  If the tigers are so important to the rest of the world then I suggest the rest of the world establish sanctuaries in their own territories and save them.</p><p>I am more concerned with India figuring out how to live peacefully with Pakistan and keeping religious strife between Hindu's and Muslims in check.  While it is nice to look at tigers and appreciate nature's beauty the number of people who died to violence in the time it took me to write this far exceeds any tiger loss.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>of this reserves managers , however I think India has a whole lot more to worry about than tigers .
Yeah , while I sit in my comfy chair in an air conditioned building I can see where other people get off beating on countries for not doing what we want.The simple matter is , India at least is trying to protect the tigers .
They also are trying to manage a large population of people who essentially live like they have for thousands of years and bring them into what many of us would still not consider acceptable living let alone modern.So yeah , we lose a few tigers .
If the tigers are so important to the rest of the world then I suggest the rest of the world establish sanctuaries in their own territories and save them.I am more concerned with India figuring out how to live peacefully with Pakistan and keeping religious strife between Hindu 's and Muslims in check .
While it is nice to look at tigers and appreciate nature 's beauty the number of people who died to violence in the time it took me to write this far exceeds any tiger loss .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>of this reserves managers, however I think India has a whole lot more to worry about than tigers.
Yeah, while I sit in my comfy chair in an air conditioned building I can see where other people get off beating on countries for not doing what we want.The simple matter is, India at least is trying to protect the tigers.
They also are trying to manage a large population of people who essentially live like they have for thousands of years and bring them into what many of us would still not consider acceptable living let alone modern.So yeah, we lose a few tigers.
If the tigers are so important to the rest of the world then I suggest the rest of the world establish sanctuaries in their own territories and save them.I am more concerned with India figuring out how to live peacefully with Pakistan and keeping religious strife between Hindu's and Muslims in check.
While it is nice to look at tigers and appreciate nature's beauty the number of people who died to violence in the time it took me to write this far exceeds any tiger loss.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712079</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712271</id>
	<title>The Tiger</title>
	<author>mindbrane</author>
	<datestamp>1247676780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Tiger! Tiger! burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?

In what distant deeps or skies
Burnt the fire of thine eyes?
On what wings dare he aspire?
What the hand dare seize the fire?

And what shoulder, and what art,
Could twist the sinews of thy heart?
And when thy heart began to beat,
What dread hand? and what dread feet?

What the hammer? what the chain?
In what furnace was thy brain?
What the anvil? what dread grasp
Dare its deadly terrors clasp?

When the stars threw down their spears,
And watered heaven with their tears,
Did he smile his work to see?
Did he who made the Lamb make thee?

Tiger! Tiger! burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Dare frame thy fearful symmetry?
<p>

William Blake
</p><p>
Given that I'm a strong environmentalist my bias is unabashedly strong, but as a confirmed atheist even I can say that if we loose this species by way of our ignorance and greed we may have grounds for establishing original sin in our kind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tiger !
Tiger ! burning bright In the forests of the night , What immortal hand or eye Could frame thy fearful symmetry ?
In what distant deeps or skies Burnt the fire of thine eyes ?
On what wings dare he aspire ?
What the hand dare seize the fire ?
And what shoulder , and what art , Could twist the sinews of thy heart ?
And when thy heart began to beat , What dread hand ?
and what dread feet ?
What the hammer ?
what the chain ?
In what furnace was thy brain ?
What the anvil ?
what dread grasp Dare its deadly terrors clasp ?
When the stars threw down their spears , And watered heaven with their tears , Did he smile his work to see ?
Did he who made the Lamb make thee ?
Tiger ! Tiger !
burning bright In the forests of the night , What immortal hand or eye Dare frame thy fearful symmetry ?
William Blake Given that I 'm a strong environmentalist my bias is unabashedly strong , but as a confirmed atheist even I can say that if we loose this species by way of our ignorance and greed we may have grounds for establishing original sin in our kind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tiger!
Tiger! burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?
In what distant deeps or skies
Burnt the fire of thine eyes?
On what wings dare he aspire?
What the hand dare seize the fire?
And what shoulder, and what art,
Could twist the sinews of thy heart?
And when thy heart began to beat,
What dread hand?
and what dread feet?
What the hammer?
what the chain?
In what furnace was thy brain?
What the anvil?
what dread grasp
Dare its deadly terrors clasp?
When the stars threw down their spears,
And watered heaven with their tears,
Did he smile his work to see?
Did he who made the Lamb make thee?
Tiger! Tiger!
burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Dare frame thy fearful symmetry?
William Blake

Given that I'm a strong environmentalist my bias is unabashedly strong, but as a confirmed atheist even I can say that if we loose this species by way of our ignorance and greed we may have grounds for establishing original sin in our kind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28711953</id>
	<title>Tiger-free tiger park...</title>
	<author>Shag</author>
	<datestamp>1247673720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How do you say "you're doing it wrong" in their local language?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you say " you 're doing it wrong " in their local language ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you say "you're doing it wrong" in their local language?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015</id>
	<title>What the fuck</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247674140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your number one priority in a Tiger Park is... to maintain the tiger population. How the fuck do you let 24 tigers die in 36 months? Am I the only one that thinks that maybe after the first 12 months someone should have said, "wait a minute, we've got less tigers now than 12 months ago" and tried to figure out what the fuck was going wrong? How the fuck do you not notice anything is wrong in three years? Surely 24 tigers did not die in the past few months, right?<br>
<br>
Maybe I'm assuming too much; I was sick the day they taught tiger maintenance at tiger school.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your number one priority in a Tiger Park is... to maintain the tiger population .
How the fuck do you let 24 tigers die in 36 months ?
Am I the only one that thinks that maybe after the first 12 months someone should have said , " wait a minute , we 've got less tigers now than 12 months ago " and tried to figure out what the fuck was going wrong ?
How the fuck do you not notice anything is wrong in three years ?
Surely 24 tigers did not die in the past few months , right ?
Maybe I 'm assuming too much ; I was sick the day they taught tiger maintenance at tiger school .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your number one priority in a Tiger Park is... to maintain the tiger population.
How the fuck do you let 24 tigers die in 36 months?
Am I the only one that thinks that maybe after the first 12 months someone should have said, "wait a minute, we've got less tigers now than 12 months ago" and tried to figure out what the fuck was going wrong?
How the fuck do you not notice anything is wrong in three years?
Surely 24 tigers did not die in the past few months, right?
Maybe I'm assuming too much; I was sick the day they taught tiger maintenance at tiger school.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715737</id>
	<title>Re:if evolution</title>
	<author>Nursie</author>
	<datestamp>1247754840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tigers aren't going extinct, they're becoming a captive species.</p><p>The largest population of tigers in the world is in the USA. Hell, there are more tigers in Texas than there are in the wild.</p><p>It's weird, sick and sad in equal measure. Poor bastards. This international symbol of power and grace is being wiped out in the wild by fear, ignorance and superstition and becomes little more than a colourful pet for rich, fat americans.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tigers are n't going extinct , they 're becoming a captive species.The largest population of tigers in the world is in the USA .
Hell , there are more tigers in Texas than there are in the wild.It 's weird , sick and sad in equal measure .
Poor bastards .
This international symbol of power and grace is being wiped out in the wild by fear , ignorance and superstition and becomes little more than a colourful pet for rich , fat americans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tigers aren't going extinct, they're becoming a captive species.The largest population of tigers in the world is in the USA.
Hell, there are more tigers in Texas than there are in the wild.It's weird, sick and sad in equal measure.
Poor bastards.
This international symbol of power and grace is being wiped out in the wild by fear, ignorance and superstition and becomes little more than a colourful pet for rich, fat americans.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712011</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713561</id>
	<title>Re:What the fuck</title>
	<author>linzeal</author>
	<datestamp>1247775900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>1.5 Genetically engineer fat impotent Asian men with 500 large Tiger penises all over their body.</htmltext>
<tokenext>1.5 Genetically engineer fat impotent Asian men with 500 large Tiger penises all over their body .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.5 Genetically engineer fat impotent Asian men with 500 large Tiger penises all over their body.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712073</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712347</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>MaskedSlacker</author>
	<datestamp>1247677680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go back to throwing paint on socialites.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go back to throwing paint on socialites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go back to throwing paint on socialites.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712261</id>
	<title>Re:What the fuck</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247676660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Poaching. Pure and simple.</p></div></blockquote><p>This is the part I never understand. What on earth are they poaching the tigers for? Tigers are actually a fairly common animal in captivity.</p><p>The only explanation I can come up with is that there are people who will pay money to their own, or own the skin of, one of the last $ANIMAL simply because it is the last, and for no other reason. I think there was a Star Trek episode about that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Poaching .
Pure and simple.This is the part I never understand .
What on earth are they poaching the tigers for ?
Tigers are actually a fairly common animal in captivity.The only explanation I can come up with is that there are people who will pay money to their own , or own the skin of , one of the last $ ANIMAL simply because it is the last , and for no other reason .
I think there was a Star Trek episode about that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Poaching.
Pure and simple.This is the part I never understand.
What on earth are they poaching the tigers for?
Tigers are actually a fairly common animal in captivity.The only explanation I can come up with is that there are people who will pay money to their own, or own the skin of, one of the last $ANIMAL simply because it is the last, and for no other reason.
I think there was a Star Trek episode about that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712079</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712073</id>
	<title>Re:What the fuck</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247674620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. Setup Tiger farm<br>2. Economic crisis<br>3. Sell to Chinese herbalist<br>4. Profit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Setup Tiger farm2 .
Economic crisis3 .
Sell to Chinese herbalist4 .
Profit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Setup Tiger farm2.
Economic crisis3.
Sell to Chinese herbalist4.
Profit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713947</id>
	<title>Re:Tiger-free tiger park...</title>
	<author>JosKarith</author>
	<datestamp>1247737500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>How do you say "you're doing it wrong" in their local language?</p></div></blockquote><p>
Have you tried turning it off and on again?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you say " you 're doing it wrong " in their local language ?
Have you tried turning it off and on again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you say "you're doing it wrong" in their local language?
Have you tried turning it off and on again?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28711953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28720049</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247771220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>okay. go ahead. kill yourself, you dont deserve to live.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>okay .
go ahead .
kill yourself , you dont deserve to live .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>okay.
go ahead.
kill yourself, you dont deserve to live.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712373</id>
	<title>Re:What the fuck</title>
	<author>StokedForYou</author>
	<datestamp>1247677980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is the part I never understand. What on earth are they poaching the tigers for?</p></div><p>There is a multimillion dollar demand in Asian countries for, among other pieces of the tigers, the male tiger penis. It is seen in many Asian cultures as a sacred aphrodisiac. From personal experience with people who have actually contributed to the black market, the penis from the tiger bred in captivity is not as effective as one taken from the wild.
<br>
Whether it is scientifically proven that it actually does anything at all is still uncertain. Personally I think it is a placebo, but to some cultures, a sacred placebo is preferable to the most effective medicine without religious/cultural connotations.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the part I never understand .
What on earth are they poaching the tigers for ? There is a multimillion dollar demand in Asian countries for , among other pieces of the tigers , the male tiger penis .
It is seen in many Asian cultures as a sacred aphrodisiac .
From personal experience with people who have actually contributed to the black market , the penis from the tiger bred in captivity is not as effective as one taken from the wild .
Whether it is scientifically proven that it actually does anything at all is still uncertain .
Personally I think it is a placebo , but to some cultures , a sacred placebo is preferable to the most effective medicine without religious/cultural connotations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the part I never understand.
What on earth are they poaching the tigers for?There is a multimillion dollar demand in Asian countries for, among other pieces of the tigers, the male tiger penis.
It is seen in many Asian cultures as a sacred aphrodisiac.
From personal experience with people who have actually contributed to the black market, the penis from the tiger bred in captivity is not as effective as one taken from the wild.
Whether it is scientifically proven that it actually does anything at all is still uncertain.
Personally I think it is a placebo, but to some cultures, a sacred placebo is preferable to the most effective medicine without religious/cultural connotations.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712261</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712185</id>
	<title>Bribes.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247675700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The manager lets the poacher hunt the tigers for their own reasons, and gets a chunk of the profit. Everyone is happy except the conservationists and the tigers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The manager lets the poacher hunt the tigers for their own reasons , and gets a chunk of the profit .
Everyone is happy except the conservationists and the tigers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The manager lets the poacher hunt the tigers for their own reasons, and gets a chunk of the profit.
Everyone is happy except the conservationists and the tigers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28720819</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247774100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>well that is rather hypocritical.</p><p>Obviously you are not living entirely "naturally" either, or else you'd be naked in the bush and not posting on slashdot.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I just hope we destory things faster so that the Earth can wipe us out</p></div><p>Oh, so in that case I suppose you are doing your part to consume and destroy everything you can?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>What's really amusing is watching people try to rationalize why they deserve to exist.</p></div><p>So why do you continue to exist and waste precious resources?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>well that is rather hypocritical.Obviously you are not living entirely " naturally " either , or else you 'd be naked in the bush and not posting on slashdot.I just hope we destory things faster so that the Earth can wipe us outOh , so in that case I suppose you are doing your part to consume and destroy everything you can ? What 's really amusing is watching people try to rationalize why they deserve to exist.So why do you continue to exist and waste precious resources ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well that is rather hypocritical.Obviously you are not living entirely "naturally" either, or else you'd be naked in the bush and not posting on slashdot.I just hope we destory things faster so that the Earth can wipe us outOh, so in that case I suppose you are doing your part to consume and destroy everything you can?What's really amusing is watching people try to rationalize why they deserve to exist.So why do you continue to exist and waste precious resources?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714941</id>
	<title>O RLY</title>
	<author>rlp</author>
	<datestamp>1247749800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Three of state's reserve forests - Kanha, Bandhavgarh and Pench - have been adjudged among the best managed tiger reserves in the country."</i></p><p>Have you counted the tigers there recently?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Three of state 's reserve forests - Kanha , Bandhavgarh and Pench - have been adjudged among the best managed tiger reserves in the country .
" Have you counted the tigers there recently ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Three of state's reserve forests - Kanha, Bandhavgarh and Pench - have been adjudged among the best managed tiger reserves in the country.
"Have you counted the tigers there recently?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714339</id>
	<title>Well thats a relief..</title>
	<author>slashmojo</author>
	<datestamp>1247742300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tigers are clearly a danger to the parks visitors so the new visitor safety campaign appears to be a great success and tourists can now roam freely around the tiger park without worrying that they or their children might become a tiger snack.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tigers are clearly a danger to the parks visitors so the new visitor safety campaign appears to be a great success and tourists can now roam freely around the tiger park without worrying that they or their children might become a tiger snack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tigers are clearly a danger to the parks visitors so the new visitor safety campaign appears to be a great success and tourists can now roam freely around the tiger park without worrying that they or their children might become a tiger snack.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712175</id>
	<title>sad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247675640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Magnificent animals.</p><p>Meanwhile the human population of India goes exponential.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Magnificent animals.Meanwhile the human population of India goes exponential .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Magnificent animals.Meanwhile the human population of India goes exponential.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712091</id>
	<title>Tiger park profit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247674800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just set up a tiger park in my office - where do I apply for funding to look after the tigers?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just set up a tiger park in my office - where do I apply for funding to look after the tigers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just set up a tiger park in my office - where do I apply for funding to look after the tigers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714351</id>
	<title>In what sense is it a tiger park, without tigers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247742480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hyde Park in central London is as much a tiger park as the one in India. No doubt my back garden could be a hippopotamus  reserve too.</p><p>This makes India the laughing stock of the world. It is difficult to see how they could be more inept.</p><p>Still, they don't care. More space to build the high rises and shopping malls now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hyde Park in central London is as much a tiger park as the one in India .
No doubt my back garden could be a hippopotamus reserve too.This makes India the laughing stock of the world .
It is difficult to see how they could be more inept.Still , they do n't care .
More space to build the high rises and shopping malls now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hyde Park in central London is as much a tiger park as the one in India.
No doubt my back garden could be a hippopotamus  reserve too.This makes India the laughing stock of the world.
It is difficult to see how they could be more inept.Still, they don't care.
More space to build the high rises and shopping malls now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712059</id>
	<title>Re:What the fuck</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247674560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>They're tigers, not elephants. They don't spend much time visible around humans.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're tigers , not elephants .
They do n't spend much time visible around humans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're tigers, not elephants.
They don't spend much time visible around humans.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713919</id>
	<title>Re:What the fuck</title>
	<author>martas</author>
	<datestamp>1247737020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>well, these things happen... especially when you use the money for maintaining the park to buy your wife diamond earrings.</htmltext>
<tokenext>well , these things happen... especially when you use the money for maintaining the park to buy your wife diamond earrings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well, these things happen... especially when you use the money for maintaining the park to buy your wife diamond earrings.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714431</id>
	<title>Re:Electronic tracking?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247743560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you've never worked on a wildlife preserve in a country like this, I guess it's hard to understand how understaffed and underfunded they are.  I worked on a rhino preserve and these people were happy we brought boots, shovels and hoses for them to use.  That's how little they had and how little funding they got.  A man actually almost broke down into tears over a waterhose...imagine what they'd do with GPS.</p><p>Just because technology exists does not  mean it is available.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 've never worked on a wildlife preserve in a country like this , I guess it 's hard to understand how understaffed and underfunded they are .
I worked on a rhino preserve and these people were happy we brought boots , shovels and hoses for them to use .
That 's how little they had and how little funding they got .
A man actually almost broke down into tears over a waterhose...imagine what they 'd do with GPS.Just because technology exists does not mean it is available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you've never worked on a wildlife preserve in a country like this, I guess it's hard to understand how understaffed and underfunded they are.
I worked on a rhino preserve and these people were happy we brought boots, shovels and hoses for them to use.
That's how little they had and how little funding they got.
A man actually almost broke down into tears over a waterhose...imagine what they'd do with GPS.Just because technology exists does not  mean it is available.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28721599</id>
	<title>Re:Duh</title>
	<author>DahGhostfacedFiddlah</author>
	<datestamp>1247777400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, and Rome was built in a day.</p><p>What, you want the tribe-mentality ape descendants to live in harmony with nature?  After millions of years of being hunted down and killed (or left to die in horrible pain) by creatures just like the ones you want to "preserve"?</p><p>Get a grip, dude, we're animals.  And we're doing the best we can.  We're barely a few thousand years past the point where being the strongest - not the nicest or the smartest - was the definition of evolutionarily fit.</p><p>If we die out, do you think the next species is going to be any better?  Here's a hint - if we go down, there's going to be *more* scarcity for whoever inherits the earth.  We've used up a ton of the low-hanging fruit like petroleum and surface minerals.  More scarcity means more competition for a limited amount of resources, which generally means more pain.</p><p>Yes, we suck.  Yes, as a species we seem to have no long-term awareness.  But we're the best the earth has to offer at the moment, and I honestly believe we're getting better.  The only question is whether we'll be able to become truly self-sustaining (needing little more than the sun and raw materials) before our resources run out.  If we can manage that, I think we can turn this thing around.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , and Rome was built in a day.What , you want the tribe-mentality ape descendants to live in harmony with nature ?
After millions of years of being hunted down and killed ( or left to die in horrible pain ) by creatures just like the ones you want to " preserve " ? Get a grip , dude , we 're animals .
And we 're doing the best we can .
We 're barely a few thousand years past the point where being the strongest - not the nicest or the smartest - was the definition of evolutionarily fit.If we die out , do you think the next species is going to be any better ?
Here 's a hint - if we go down , there 's going to be * more * scarcity for whoever inherits the earth .
We 've used up a ton of the low-hanging fruit like petroleum and surface minerals .
More scarcity means more competition for a limited amount of resources , which generally means more pain.Yes , we suck .
Yes , as a species we seem to have no long-term awareness .
But we 're the best the earth has to offer at the moment , and I honestly believe we 're getting better .
The only question is whether we 'll be able to become truly self-sustaining ( needing little more than the sun and raw materials ) before our resources run out .
If we can manage that , I think we can turn this thing around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, and Rome was built in a day.What, you want the tribe-mentality ape descendants to live in harmony with nature?
After millions of years of being hunted down and killed (or left to die in horrible pain) by creatures just like the ones you want to "preserve"?Get a grip, dude, we're animals.
And we're doing the best we can.
We're barely a few thousand years past the point where being the strongest - not the nicest or the smartest - was the definition of evolutionarily fit.If we die out, do you think the next species is going to be any better?
Here's a hint - if we go down, there's going to be *more* scarcity for whoever inherits the earth.
We've used up a ton of the low-hanging fruit like petroleum and surface minerals.
More scarcity means more competition for a limited amount of resources, which generally means more pain.Yes, we suck.
Yes, as a species we seem to have no long-term awareness.
But we're the best the earth has to offer at the moment, and I honestly believe we're getting better.
The only question is whether we'll be able to become truly self-sustaining (needing little more than the sun and raw materials) before our resources run out.
If we can manage that, I think we can turn this thing around.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713303</id>
	<title>Damn Poachers</title>
	<author>seekret</author>
	<datestamp>1247686560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They should just start shooting poachers on site and selling their body parts to the Chinese. Everyone wins. The article did say it's possible the tigers migrated to another park, but if they weren't keeping track of them I guess it's going to be hard to verify.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They should just start shooting poachers on site and selling their body parts to the Chinese .
Everyone wins .
The article did say it 's possible the tigers migrated to another park , but if they were n't keeping track of them I guess it 's going to be hard to verify .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should just start shooting poachers on site and selling their body parts to the Chinese.
Everyone wins.
The article did say it's possible the tigers migrated to another park, but if they weren't keeping track of them I guess it's going to be hard to verify.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714511</id>
	<title>Poaching and the rise of china too.</title>
	<author>140Mandak262Jamuna</author>
	<datestamp>1247744340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Expect heavy pressure on all products derived from mega fauna due to the new found wealth and affordability of china. Rhino horns, elephant ivory, bengal tiger skin, claws and other body parts... <p>
The salary and benefits of a typical forest ranger in India is about 250$ a month, while his nephew in the city with barely passable English makes some 700$ a month in IT, phone bank, help desk jobs and more if technically qualified. Any wonder the warden turns a blind eye to poaching and accepts bribes?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Expect heavy pressure on all products derived from mega fauna due to the new found wealth and affordability of china .
Rhino horns , elephant ivory , bengal tiger skin , claws and other body parts.. . The salary and benefits of a typical forest ranger in India is about 250 $ a month , while his nephew in the city with barely passable English makes some 700 $ a month in IT , phone bank , help desk jobs and more if technically qualified .
Any wonder the warden turns a blind eye to poaching and accepts bribes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Expect heavy pressure on all products derived from mega fauna due to the new found wealth and affordability of china.
Rhino horns, elephant ivory, bengal tiger skin, claws and other body parts... 
The salary and benefits of a typical forest ranger in India is about 250$ a month, while his nephew in the city with barely passable English makes some 700$ a month in IT, phone bank, help desk jobs and more if technically qualified.
Any wonder the warden turns a blind eye to poaching and accepts bribes?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713139</id>
	<title>Re:What the fuck</title>
	<author>icebike</author>
	<datestamp>1247685000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those people who were supposed to notice the reduction in tigers were missing as well.</p><p>Their boss went out to find them, but he did not come back either.</p><p>The senior administrator, the only employee left suggested the tigers moved on due to dwindling local food supply.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those people who were supposed to notice the reduction in tigers were missing as well.Their boss went out to find them , but he did not come back either.The senior administrator , the only employee left suggested the tigers moved on due to dwindling local food supply .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those people who were supposed to notice the reduction in tigers were missing as well.Their boss went out to find them, but he did not come back either.The senior administrator, the only employee left suggested the tigers moved on due to dwindling local food supply.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712149</id>
	<title>roscoes chicken and waffles opened up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247675400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>next town over, maybe the tigers RELOCATED?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>next town over , maybe the tigers RELOCATED ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>next town over, maybe the tigers RELOCATED?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712085</id>
	<title>Re:Tiger-free tiger park...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247674800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>How do you say "you're doing it wrong" in their local language?</i></p><p>"Please hold while we bring up your account"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you say " you 're doing it wrong " in their local language ?
" Please hold while we bring up your account "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you say "you're doing it wrong" in their local language?
"Please hold while we bring up your account"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28711953</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714211</id>
	<title>Free as in beer</title>
	<author>ciderVisor</author>
	<datestamp>1247740560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this one of the 4 Freedoms I keep hearing about ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this one of the 4 Freedoms I keep hearing about ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this one of the 4 Freedoms I keep hearing about ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715615</id>
	<title>Re:Yeah, sure...</title>
	<author>afidel</author>
	<datestamp>1247754180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The most likely cause of their demise is canine distemper from human introduced dog populations. I know that distemper was what wiped out a large  percentage of the population of some of the African lion populations in preserves that have human developments around their edge and that lions and tigers can reproduce ergo it's a likely cause of the dieoff.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The most likely cause of their demise is canine distemper from human introduced dog populations .
I know that distemper was what wiped out a large percentage of the population of some of the African lion populations in preserves that have human developments around their edge and that lions and tigers can reproduce ergo it 's a likely cause of the dieoff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The most likely cause of their demise is canine distemper from human introduced dog populations.
I know that distemper was what wiped out a large  percentage of the population of some of the African lion populations in preserves that have human developments around their edge and that lions and tigers can reproduce ergo it's a likely cause of the dieoff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712061</id>
	<title>Coincidentally...</title>
	<author>Hansele</author>
	<datestamp>1247674560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The asian manager of the reserve experienced massive penile growth over the past three years, and when asked about the secret of his "LONGevity", he credited "eating tiger pen^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hchinese herbs".</htmltext>
<tokenext>The asian manager of the reserve experienced massive penile growth over the past three years , and when asked about the secret of his " LONGevity " , he credited " eating tiger pen ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ Hchinese herbs " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The asian manager of the reserve experienced massive penile growth over the past three years, and when asked about the secret of his "LONGevity", he credited "eating tiger pen^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hchinese herbs".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712139</id>
	<title>Duh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247675280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Humans are destroying everything natural in this world. I just hope we destory things faster so that the Earth can wipe us out and then start over with some newer species that will hopefully not rip the planet apart the way we do. The way we handle everything natural (trees, animals, air, water, soil), we deserve to be added to the list of species that have gone extinct.</p><p>What's really amusing is watching people try to rationalize why they deserve to exist. Right, because the species that chooses to force animals to mate in cages in order to be mass-slaughtered for food and clothing, the species that tears down forests to clear space for agrigulture and cities, the species whose members will literally do anything to "get ahead" of their neighbour in terms of money and power, the species who does nothing more than crave constant entertainment and shoveling their faces with as much food as they can get their fat hands on... yes, surely this is the species that deserves to dominate the planet.</p><p>Of course, the most disgusting and saddening thing is that almost all people don't see anything wrong with us as a species. That somehow since we're just flesh and blood, everything we do is "natural". Yeah ok. Go back to drinking your Coke or Pepsi. It has absolutely no benefit to your body. But do it anyway, because it tastes good. That's all that matters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Humans are destroying everything natural in this world .
I just hope we destory things faster so that the Earth can wipe us out and then start over with some newer species that will hopefully not rip the planet apart the way we do .
The way we handle everything natural ( trees , animals , air , water , soil ) , we deserve to be added to the list of species that have gone extinct.What 's really amusing is watching people try to rationalize why they deserve to exist .
Right , because the species that chooses to force animals to mate in cages in order to be mass-slaughtered for food and clothing , the species that tears down forests to clear space for agrigulture and cities , the species whose members will literally do anything to " get ahead " of their neighbour in terms of money and power , the species who does nothing more than crave constant entertainment and shoveling their faces with as much food as they can get their fat hands on... yes , surely this is the species that deserves to dominate the planet.Of course , the most disgusting and saddening thing is that almost all people do n't see anything wrong with us as a species .
That somehow since we 're just flesh and blood , everything we do is " natural " .
Yeah ok. Go back to drinking your Coke or Pepsi .
It has absolutely no benefit to your body .
But do it anyway , because it tastes good .
That 's all that matters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Humans are destroying everything natural in this world.
I just hope we destory things faster so that the Earth can wipe us out and then start over with some newer species that will hopefully not rip the planet apart the way we do.
The way we handle everything natural (trees, animals, air, water, soil), we deserve to be added to the list of species that have gone extinct.What's really amusing is watching people try to rationalize why they deserve to exist.
Right, because the species that chooses to force animals to mate in cages in order to be mass-slaughtered for food and clothing, the species that tears down forests to clear space for agrigulture and cities, the species whose members will literally do anything to "get ahead" of their neighbour in terms of money and power, the species who does nothing more than crave constant entertainment and shoveling their faces with as much food as they can get their fat hands on... yes, surely this is the species that deserves to dominate the planet.Of course, the most disgusting and saddening thing is that almost all people don't see anything wrong with us as a species.
That somehow since we're just flesh and blood, everything we do is "natural".
Yeah ok. Go back to drinking your Coke or Pepsi.
It has absolutely no benefit to your body.
But do it anyway, because it tastes good.
That's all that matters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712873</id>
	<title>Re:What the fuck</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247682600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> What on earth are they poaching the tigers for?</p> </div><p>Probably weirdo magic medicine and other stuff like <a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/\_sRDhbC46aKs/Sepm3wddOtI/AAAAAAAAAJM/1tFWHwTfRcA/s1600-h/HN09poster2tiger.jpg" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">this</a> [blogspot.com].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What on earth are they poaching the tigers for ?
Probably weirdo magic medicine and other stuff like this [ blogspot.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> What on earth are they poaching the tigers for?
Probably weirdo magic medicine and other stuff like this [blogspot.com].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712261</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714617</id>
	<title>Re:Bribes.</title>
	<author>ls671</author>
	<datestamp>1247745900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>very possible indeed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>very possible indeed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>very possible indeed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713291</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>Ian Alexander</author>
	<datestamp>1247686380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess I was lucky. I was able to see one at the Corbett reserve in Ramnagar last year (there aren't too many and they're very people-shy- I was there three days, went all over the park and only saw one). Sounds like with the typical poor governance/law enforcement and general bad management in India the poachers are having a field day. Who knows how many more years anybody will be able to find a tiger in a tiger park in India?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess I was lucky .
I was able to see one at the Corbett reserve in Ramnagar last year ( there are n't too many and they 're very people-shy- I was there three days , went all over the park and only saw one ) .
Sounds like with the typical poor governance/law enforcement and general bad management in India the poachers are having a field day .
Who knows how many more years anybody will be able to find a tiger in a tiger park in India ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess I was lucky.
I was able to see one at the Corbett reserve in Ramnagar last year (there aren't too many and they're very people-shy- I was there three days, went all over the park and only saw one).
Sounds like with the typical poor governance/law enforcement and general bad management in India the poachers are having a field day.
Who knows how many more years anybody will be able to find a tiger in a tiger park in India?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713555</id>
	<title>Re:What the fuck</title>
	<author>Geheimagent</author>
	<datestamp>1247775720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Your number one priority in a Tiger Park is... to maintain the tiger population. How the fuck do you let 24 tigers die in 36 months? Am I the only one that thinks that maybe after the first 12 months someone should have said, "wait a minute, we've got less tigers now than 12 months ago" and tried to figure out what the fuck was going wrong? How the fuck do you not notice anything is wrong in three years? Surely 24 tigers did not die in the past few months, right?</i> <br> <br>

Go RTFA: "warning bells were sounded regularly for the last eight years", so they did notice, but couldn't come up with the reason for the decline.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your number one priority in a Tiger Park is... to maintain the tiger population .
How the fuck do you let 24 tigers die in 36 months ?
Am I the only one that thinks that maybe after the first 12 months someone should have said , " wait a minute , we 've got less tigers now than 12 months ago " and tried to figure out what the fuck was going wrong ?
How the fuck do you not notice anything is wrong in three years ?
Surely 24 tigers did not die in the past few months , right ?
Go RTFA : " warning bells were sounded regularly for the last eight years " , so they did notice , but could n't come up with the reason for the decline .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your number one priority in a Tiger Park is... to maintain the tiger population.
How the fuck do you let 24 tigers die in 36 months?
Am I the only one that thinks that maybe after the first 12 months someone should have said, "wait a minute, we've got less tigers now than 12 months ago" and tried to figure out what the fuck was going wrong?
How the fuck do you not notice anything is wrong in three years?
Surely 24 tigers did not die in the past few months, right?
Go RTFA: "warning bells were sounded regularly for the last eight years", so they did notice, but couldn't come up with the reason for the decline.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714155</id>
	<title>Re:What the fuck</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247739840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i find your outrage more surprising than the fact that 24 of the most endangered animals didnt survive..</p><p>how big is the park?  maybe its 1 tiger per 100,000 hectares - for all you know..</p><p>also maybe they dont have the funds for lots of rangers, or poorly paid rangers open to corruption...</p><p>maybe there was a disease that they couldnt afford to research and treat in time</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i find your outrage more surprising than the fact that 24 of the most endangered animals didnt survive..how big is the park ?
maybe its 1 tiger per 100,000 hectares - for all you know..also maybe they dont have the funds for lots of rangers , or poorly paid rangers open to corruption...maybe there was a disease that they couldnt afford to research and treat in time</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i find your outrage more surprising than the fact that 24 of the most endangered animals didnt survive..how big is the park?
maybe its 1 tiger per 100,000 hectares - for all you know..also maybe they dont have the funds for lots of rangers, or poorly paid rangers open to corruption...maybe there was a disease that they couldnt afford to research and treat in time</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712173</id>
	<title>Thank God.</title>
	<author>HideyoshiJP</author>
	<datestamp>1247675580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm so glad they got rid of the all the tiger that fouled up the place. It really brought down the whole place.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm so glad they got rid of the all the tiger that fouled up the place .
It really brought down the whole place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm so glad they got rid of the all the tiger that fouled up the place.
It really brought down the whole place.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712269</id>
	<title>So tiger-free is good now?</title>
	<author>dogmatixpsych</author>
	<datestamp>1247676780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reading the headline you'd think that was a good thing. Yay! Our park is now free from those nasty tigers!<br> <br>
Hopefully the tigers just went elsewhere (other than to the great big tiger preserve in the sky). No, I did not read the article.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reading the headline you 'd think that was a good thing .
Yay ! Our park is now free from those nasty tigers !
Hopefully the tigers just went elsewhere ( other than to the great big tiger preserve in the sky ) .
No , I did not read the article .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reading the headline you'd think that was a good thing.
Yay! Our park is now free from those nasty tigers!
Hopefully the tigers just went elsewhere (other than to the great big tiger preserve in the sky).
No, I did not read the article.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712185
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712959
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28711953
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28716325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713753
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712011
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28721599
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714155
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715123
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712033
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713555
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712079
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713561
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712073
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712873
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712261
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712079
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712481
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715481
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712033
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713139
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714805
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713753
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712011
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28723385
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712073
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714617
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712185
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712059
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28719521
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712079
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712261
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712079
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715485
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28720819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714457
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712079
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712373
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712261
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712079
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714069
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715615
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713753
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712011
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28736177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714511
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712265
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713805
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715737
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712011
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714431
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712033
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28718939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712091
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713947
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28711953
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712079
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28720049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28711953
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713919
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713943
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28736331
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713753
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712011
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712493
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_2313231_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_2313231.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712015
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712481
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712149
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712059
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712079
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714457
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713881
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712261
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715975
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712373
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712873
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715097
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28719521
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712107
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713805
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714155
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713139
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712073
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28723385
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713561
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714069
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713919
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713555
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713943
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_2313231.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714511
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28736177
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_2313231.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712091
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713925
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_2313231.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713081
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_2313231.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714599
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_2313231.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712139
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28718939
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28720819
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714049
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715433
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712265
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712285
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712347
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28721599
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28720049
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_2313231.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715437
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_2313231.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28711953
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712085
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713947
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712959
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_2313231.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712185
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713965
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714617
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_2313231.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712271
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712493
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715485
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712967
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_2313231.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713993
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_2313231.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712033
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715481
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715123
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714431
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_2313231.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715931
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_2313231.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712137
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_2313231.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28712011
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28713753
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715615
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28736331
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28716325
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28714805
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_2313231.28715737
</commentlist>
</conversation>
