<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_15_1532223</id>
	<title>Asus Launches Eee PC T91, a Touch-Screen Tablet Netbook</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1247673060000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hothardware.com/" rel="nofollow">MojoKid</a> writes <i>"Asus today launched yet another addition to their Eee PC netbook product offering.  The Eee PC T91 is unlike any Eee PC we've seen before, primarily because <a href="http://hothardware.com/Articles/Asus-Eee-PC-T91-SwivelScreen-Netbook-Review/">the screen can be spun around and flipped down in the style of a tablet</a>. This so-called 'netvertible' sector is still in its earliest stages, making the T91 one of the first netbooks available that also doubles as a full-fledged tablet PC. Unlike the Eee PC 'Seashell' line, which is largely just a sleeker take on the tried-and-true Eee
PC netbook, the T91 takes a completely different approach to computing. Its 8.9&quot; resistive touchscreen literally puts a new spin on the netbook and enables a new usage model."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>MojoKid writes " Asus today launched yet another addition to their Eee PC netbook product offering .
The Eee PC T91 is unlike any Eee PC we 've seen before , primarily because the screen can be spun around and flipped down in the style of a tablet .
This so-called 'netvertible ' sector is still in its earliest stages , making the T91 one of the first netbooks available that also doubles as a full-fledged tablet PC .
Unlike the Eee PC 'Seashell ' line , which is largely just a sleeker take on the tried-and-true Eee PC netbook , the T91 takes a completely different approach to computing .
Its 8.9 " resistive touchscreen literally puts a new spin on the netbook and enables a new usage model .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MojoKid writes "Asus today launched yet another addition to their Eee PC netbook product offering.
The Eee PC T91 is unlike any Eee PC we've seen before, primarily because the screen can be spun around and flipped down in the style of a tablet.
This so-called 'netvertible' sector is still in its earliest stages, making the T91 one of the first netbooks available that also doubles as a full-fledged tablet PC.
Unlike the Eee PC 'Seashell' line, which is largely just a sleeker take on the tried-and-true Eee
PC netbook, the T91 takes a completely different approach to computing.
Its 8.9" resistive touchscreen literally puts a new spin on the netbook and enables a new usage model.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705403</id>
	<title>Re:Does it ...</title>
	<author>GNious</author>
	<datestamp>1247682240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But does it run OSX if I put an apple-sticker on it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But does it run OSX if I put an apple-sticker on it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But does it run OSX if I put an apple-sticker on it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28706553</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247687340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>some of us actually READ the fucking article, so we know how much it costs. i wish you could do that, instead of wasting time moaning about irrelevant bullshit or writing retarded crap about how you fuck hookers and wish you could suck on rms and linus's ballsack and how you are in general a miserable sack of shit. maybe then you'd have saved us from another worthless mcgrew post.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>some of us actually READ the fucking article , so we know how much it costs .
i wish you could do that , instead of wasting time moaning about irrelevant bullshit or writing retarded crap about how you fuck hookers and wish you could suck on rms and linus 's ballsack and how you are in general a miserable sack of shit .
maybe then you 'd have saved us from another worthless mcgrew post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>some of us actually READ the fucking article, so we know how much it costs.
i wish you could do that, instead of wasting time moaning about irrelevant bullshit or writing retarded crap about how you fuck hookers and wish you could suck on rms and linus's ballsack and how you are in general a miserable sack of shit.
maybe then you'd have saved us from another worthless mcgrew post.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704413</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705163</id>
	<title>Re:Does it ...</title>
	<author>xlotlu</author>
	<datestamp>1247681340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been waiting for a while to see some development with the PowerVR drivers (wanted to get a Poulsbo netbook).</p><p>Soon enough the AlwaysInnovating touchbook should be out, which is built around the TI OMAP3530. That's Cortex A8 + PowerVR SGX530 and it's gonna run linux, so we'll see if it's just more binary blobs or there's some real work going on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been waiting for a while to see some development with the PowerVR drivers ( wanted to get a Poulsbo netbook ) .Soon enough the AlwaysInnovating touchbook should be out , which is built around the TI OMAP3530 .
That 's Cortex A8 + PowerVR SGX530 and it 's gon na run linux , so we 'll see if it 's just more binary blobs or there 's some real work going on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been waiting for a while to see some development with the PowerVR drivers (wanted to get a Poulsbo netbook).Soon enough the AlwaysInnovating touchbook should be out, which is built around the TI OMAP3530.
That's Cortex A8 + PowerVR SGX530 and it's gonna run linux, so we'll see if it's just more binary blobs or there's some real work going on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704401</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28712995</id>
	<title>Re:I'm still waiting...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247683800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sony Vaio UX280</p><p>touch screen + track point, screen slides up to reveal qwerty keyboard</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sony Vaio UX280touch screen + track point , screen slides up to reveal qwerty keyboard</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sony Vaio UX280touch screen + track point, screen slides up to reveal qwerty keyboard</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704307</id>
	<title>Re:Does it ...</title>
	<author>TaggartAleslayer</author>
	<datestamp>1247677320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am going to say yes.

Asus is pretty great about providing drivers for their EEE line. My EEE Netbook came with a terrible Xandros build pre-installed, and I switched to Windows 7 pretty quickly, but all of the support was there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am going to say yes .
Asus is pretty great about providing drivers for their EEE line .
My EEE Netbook came with a terrible Xandros build pre-installed , and I switched to Windows 7 pretty quickly , but all of the support was there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am going to say yes.
Asus is pretty great about providing drivers for their EEE line.
My EEE Netbook came with a terrible Xandros build pre-installed, and I switched to Windows 7 pretty quickly, but all of the support was there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704811</id>
	<title>It's the price.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247679960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;Is it relevant because they shrunk the overall thing and now its a "netbook" ?</p><p>No, it's relevant because it's $500 instead of, say, a $2000 Fujitsu Lifebook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Is it relevant because they shrunk the overall thing and now its a " netbook " ? No , it 's relevant because it 's $ 500 instead of , say , a $ 2000 Fujitsu Lifebook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;Is it relevant because they shrunk the overall thing and now its a "netbook" ?No, it's relevant because it's $500 instead of, say, a $2000 Fujitsu Lifebook.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704189</id>
	<title>Touch my Junk</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247676780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love it my girl plays with my junk.</p><p>I go crazy when she puts it in her mouse.</p><p>And I ejaculate when I put it i her cunt (without a condom of course)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love it my girl plays with my junk.I go crazy when she puts it in her mouse.And I ejaculate when I put it i her cunt ( without a condom of course )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love it my girl plays with my junk.I go crazy when she puts it in her mouse.And I ejaculate when I put it i her cunt (without a condom of course)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219</id>
	<title>Does it ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247676900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>run Linux? Seriously.</p><p>Oh, wait here we go:</p><p># Intel Atom Z520 @ 1.33GHz, 533MHz FSB; 512K Cache<br># Intel US15W chipset<br># 1GB of DDR2 Memory<br># 8.9 inch LCD (1024x600 resolution); LED backlight, Resistive Touch Panel<br># Intel GMA 500 integrated graphics<br># 16GB ASUS-JM S41 solid state drive (SSD)<br># 16GB SDHC Card Included<br># 10GB Eee Online Storage<br># 802.11b/g/n Wi-Fi<br># Bluetooth 2.1+EDR<br># No optical drive<br># 0.3 megapixel webcam + Digital Array Microphone<br># VGA Output<br># USB 2.0 x 2<br># RJ-45 (Ethernet 10/100)<br># Headphone / Mic Input Jacks<br># MMC/SD card reader<br># Twin speakers<br># Gesture-enabled trackpad<br># 2.11 Pounds (with battery installed)<br># 0.99 - 1.11 inches thick<br># Non-Removable Li-ion Battery (Up To 5 Claimed Hours of Computing)<br># 8.85" (W) x 6.45" (D) x 0.99 - 1.11" (H)<br><b># Windows XP Home</b><br># Color Options: White, Black<br># Protective Sleeve<br># 1-year limited warranty</p><p>Guess we'll have to find out for ourselves (as usual)!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>run Linux ?
Seriously.Oh , wait here we go : # Intel Atom Z520 @ 1.33GHz , 533MHz FSB ; 512K Cache # Intel US15W chipset # 1GB of DDR2 Memory # 8.9 inch LCD ( 1024x600 resolution ) ; LED backlight , Resistive Touch Panel # Intel GMA 500 integrated graphics # 16GB ASUS-JM S41 solid state drive ( SSD ) # 16GB SDHC Card Included # 10GB Eee Online Storage # 802.11b/g/n Wi-Fi # Bluetooth 2.1 + EDR # No optical drive # 0.3 megapixel webcam + Digital Array Microphone # VGA Output # USB 2.0 x 2 # RJ-45 ( Ethernet 10/100 ) # Headphone / Mic Input Jacks # MMC/SD card reader # Twin speakers # Gesture-enabled trackpad # 2.11 Pounds ( with battery installed ) # 0.99 - 1.11 inches thick # Non-Removable Li-ion Battery ( Up To 5 Claimed Hours of Computing ) # 8.85 " ( W ) x 6.45 " ( D ) x 0.99 - 1.11 " ( H ) # Windows XP Home # Color Options : White , Black # Protective Sleeve # 1-year limited warrantyGuess we 'll have to find out for ourselves ( as usual ) !
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>run Linux?
Seriously.Oh, wait here we go:# Intel Atom Z520 @ 1.33GHz, 533MHz FSB; 512K Cache# Intel US15W chipset# 1GB of DDR2 Memory# 8.9 inch LCD (1024x600 resolution); LED backlight, Resistive Touch Panel# Intel GMA 500 integrated graphics# 16GB ASUS-JM S41 solid state drive (SSD)# 16GB SDHC Card Included# 10GB Eee Online Storage# 802.11b/g/n Wi-Fi# Bluetooth 2.1+EDR# No optical drive# 0.3 megapixel webcam + Digital Array Microphone# VGA Output# USB 2.0 x 2# RJ-45 (Ethernet 10/100)# Headphone / Mic Input Jacks# MMC/SD card reader# Twin speakers# Gesture-enabled trackpad# 2.11 Pounds (with battery installed)# 0.99 - 1.11 inches thick# Non-Removable Li-ion Battery (Up To 5 Claimed Hours of Computing)# 8.85" (W) x 6.45" (D) x 0.99 - 1.11" (H)# Windows XP Home# Color Options: White, Black# Protective Sleeve# 1-year limited warrantyGuess we'll have to find out for ourselves (as usual)!
:-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28711119</id>
	<title>Re:How much?</title>
	<author>dokebi</author>
	<datestamp>1247667360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is great news!</p><p>Now that we've been sensitized to these low, low prices, $250 difference seems like a lot. Still, it's much better than the $1000 price difference normal tablets have over regular laptops. Progress!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is great news ! Now that we 've been sensitized to these low , low prices , $ 250 difference seems like a lot .
Still , it 's much better than the $ 1000 price difference normal tablets have over regular laptops .
Progress !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is great news!Now that we've been sensitized to these low, low prices, $250 difference seems like a lot.
Still, it's much better than the $1000 price difference normal tablets have over regular laptops.
Progress!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704335</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705241</id>
	<title>Re:I'm still waiting...</title>
	<author>Neil Watson</author>
	<datestamp>1247681580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I dislike the touch pads too.  My thumbs often brush them causing my cursor to move unexpectedly.  In general I find the mouse/track/touch to be rather clumsy versus the keyboard.  I've been able eliminate a lot of mouse work by configuring hot keys through the window manager (openbox and now compiz) as well as xbindkeys.  For email I use Mutt and for web browsing I use the Vimperator Firefox plugin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dislike the touch pads too .
My thumbs often brush them causing my cursor to move unexpectedly .
In general I find the mouse/track/touch to be rather clumsy versus the keyboard .
I 've been able eliminate a lot of mouse work by configuring hot keys through the window manager ( openbox and now compiz ) as well as xbindkeys .
For email I use Mutt and for web browsing I use the Vimperator Firefox plugin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dislike the touch pads too.
My thumbs often brush them causing my cursor to move unexpectedly.
In general I find the mouse/track/touch to be rather clumsy versus the keyboard.
I've been able eliminate a lot of mouse work by configuring hot keys through the window manager (openbox and now compiz) as well as xbindkeys.
For email I use Mutt and for web browsing I use the Vimperator Firefox plugin.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28709425</id>
	<title>Re:Does it ...</title>
	<author>loki\_tiwaz</author>
	<datestamp>1247657400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>being that we already know intel graphics works out of the box with any moderately recent x server, i can't see how anything else is not going to work, the bluetooth (a very nice addition) is probably the same as the dongle asus sells, which i've personally configured and used with linux. the only issue might be the touchscreen driver. i'm sure we won't have to wait long for someone to sus this one out for us... and fix it if it's not working.</p><p>i personally would probably try and slap a cut down vista on it, but i'm a bit crazy like that. 16gb ssd is definitely big enough.</p><p>given a memory upgrade i think this machine would be pretty sweet all in all. i used to own an eee pc 901 and i imagine that this one will definitely be an improvement - and i didn't find the speed of my 901 an unacceptable tradeoff for being able to hold the laptop in one hand with ease.</p><p>i don't understand why this whinge about it not playing high def content... it's not a high def display, it's only just slightly larger than standard definition pal DVD resolution. if it can play those ok who cares about whether it can render and then scale down content bigger than it is capable of displaying. this is an area where the gigabyte m912 would be superior, having a higher resolution 1280x800 display and a gruntier processor. but those kinds of extras are where your extra 200-300 dollars goes on the 912 (if you can get one).</p><p>i also see this as being a hot seller for children. it has an SSD, it's cheap but decent build quality, and a touchscreen with stylus. kids would love to scribble on that screen i'm sure, and the keyboard size would be ideal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>being that we already know intel graphics works out of the box with any moderately recent x server , i ca n't see how anything else is not going to work , the bluetooth ( a very nice addition ) is probably the same as the dongle asus sells , which i 've personally configured and used with linux .
the only issue might be the touchscreen driver .
i 'm sure we wo n't have to wait long for someone to sus this one out for us... and fix it if it 's not working.i personally would probably try and slap a cut down vista on it , but i 'm a bit crazy like that .
16gb ssd is definitely big enough.given a memory upgrade i think this machine would be pretty sweet all in all .
i used to own an eee pc 901 and i imagine that this one will definitely be an improvement - and i did n't find the speed of my 901 an unacceptable tradeoff for being able to hold the laptop in one hand with ease.i do n't understand why this whinge about it not playing high def content... it 's not a high def display , it 's only just slightly larger than standard definition pal DVD resolution .
if it can play those ok who cares about whether it can render and then scale down content bigger than it is capable of displaying .
this is an area where the gigabyte m912 would be superior , having a higher resolution 1280x800 display and a gruntier processor .
but those kinds of extras are where your extra 200-300 dollars goes on the 912 ( if you can get one ) .i also see this as being a hot seller for children .
it has an SSD , it 's cheap but decent build quality , and a touchscreen with stylus .
kids would love to scribble on that screen i 'm sure , and the keyboard size would be ideal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>being that we already know intel graphics works out of the box with any moderately recent x server, i can't see how anything else is not going to work, the bluetooth (a very nice addition) is probably the same as the dongle asus sells, which i've personally configured and used with linux.
the only issue might be the touchscreen driver.
i'm sure we won't have to wait long for someone to sus this one out for us... and fix it if it's not working.i personally would probably try and slap a cut down vista on it, but i'm a bit crazy like that.
16gb ssd is definitely big enough.given a memory upgrade i think this machine would be pretty sweet all in all.
i used to own an eee pc 901 and i imagine that this one will definitely be an improvement - and i didn't find the speed of my 901 an unacceptable tradeoff for being able to hold the laptop in one hand with ease.i don't understand why this whinge about it not playing high def content... it's not a high def display, it's only just slightly larger than standard definition pal DVD resolution.
if it can play those ok who cares about whether it can render and then scale down content bigger than it is capable of displaying.
this is an area where the gigabyte m912 would be superior, having a higher resolution 1280x800 display and a gruntier processor.
but those kinds of extras are where your extra 200-300 dollars goes on the 912 (if you can get one).i also see this as being a hot seller for children.
it has an SSD, it's cheap but decent build quality, and a touchscreen with stylus.
kids would love to scribble on that screen i'm sure, and the keyboard size would be ideal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705089</id>
	<title>Re:Does it ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247681040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even from an embedded perspective such as the <a href="http://www.beagleboard.org/" title="beagleboard.org" rel="nofollow">beagleboard</a> [beagleboard.org] using the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerVR#Series5\_.28SGX.29" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">TI OMAP3530 SoC (<i>PowerVR SGX530 + ARM Cortex-A8</i>)</a> [wikipedia.org].</p><p>From what I've experienced you have to jump through a bunch of hoops to get a chance to the closed source graphics libraries in order to utilize the SGX530 graphics controller and those libraries aren't quite stable either. If you look on youtube for demonstrations of the beagleboard and PowerVR's SGX530 controller you'll notice those who posted those videos are all TI employees or associates since they're the only ones who have easy access to such libraries at this time.</p><p>Of which I find to be a huge disappointment since the beagleboard developers are all showing off Linux on the board, yet give no love to the community to actually give them a helping hand. I have since figured out that the beagleboard project isn't very well organized when it comes to getting the thing up and running. Blackfin's uclinux community project is far more organized and at least gives you a good starting point by using their distribution. Beagleboard it's just references to a bunch of distributions of which have no actual documented use with beagleboard.</p><p>OK enough of my ranting, sorry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even from an embedded perspective such as the beagleboard [ beagleboard.org ] using the TI OMAP3530 SoC ( PowerVR SGX530 + ARM Cortex-A8 ) [ wikipedia.org ] .From what I 've experienced you have to jump through a bunch of hoops to get a chance to the closed source graphics libraries in order to utilize the SGX530 graphics controller and those libraries are n't quite stable either .
If you look on youtube for demonstrations of the beagleboard and PowerVR 's SGX530 controller you 'll notice those who posted those videos are all TI employees or associates since they 're the only ones who have easy access to such libraries at this time.Of which I find to be a huge disappointment since the beagleboard developers are all showing off Linux on the board , yet give no love to the community to actually give them a helping hand .
I have since figured out that the beagleboard project is n't very well organized when it comes to getting the thing up and running .
Blackfin 's uclinux community project is far more organized and at least gives you a good starting point by using their distribution .
Beagleboard it 's just references to a bunch of distributions of which have no actual documented use with beagleboard.OK enough of my ranting , sorry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even from an embedded perspective such as the beagleboard [beagleboard.org] using the TI OMAP3530 SoC (PowerVR SGX530 + ARM Cortex-A8) [wikipedia.org].From what I've experienced you have to jump through a bunch of hoops to get a chance to the closed source graphics libraries in order to utilize the SGX530 graphics controller and those libraries aren't quite stable either.
If you look on youtube for demonstrations of the beagleboard and PowerVR's SGX530 controller you'll notice those who posted those videos are all TI employees or associates since they're the only ones who have easy access to such libraries at this time.Of which I find to be a huge disappointment since the beagleboard developers are all showing off Linux on the board, yet give no love to the community to actually give them a helping hand.
I have since figured out that the beagleboard project isn't very well organized when it comes to getting the thing up and running.
Blackfin's uclinux community project is far more organized and at least gives you a good starting point by using their distribution.
Beagleboard it's just references to a bunch of distributions of which have no actual documented use with beagleboard.OK enough of my ranting, sorry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704401</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28707351</id>
	<title>Finally!</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1247690940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been waiting for this to change from 'vapor' to 'solid' ever since I read about it in CES coverage in January, when it was supposed to ship 'in a month or two'. At the time, sites were saying it'd be available with a TV tuner and GPS. I see the tuner mentioned on Asus' (ridiculously crappy) site but not the GPS. Anyone know about that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been waiting for this to change from 'vapor ' to 'solid ' ever since I read about it in CES coverage in January , when it was supposed to ship 'in a month or two' .
At the time , sites were saying it 'd be available with a TV tuner and GPS .
I see the tuner mentioned on Asus ' ( ridiculously crappy ) site but not the GPS .
Anyone know about that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been waiting for this to change from 'vapor' to 'solid' ever since I read about it in CES coverage in January, when it was supposed to ship 'in a month or two'.
At the time, sites were saying it'd be available with a TV tuner and GPS.
I see the tuner mentioned on Asus' (ridiculously crappy) site but not the GPS.
Anyone know about that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704385</id>
	<title>Sweet timing...</title>
	<author>Zocalo</author>
	<datestamp>1247677740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm having some back problems at the moment and tend to most comfortable in positions that don't suit either a desktop or full size laptop setup.  I was just thinking last night how useful a subnote with a flippable screen would be for letting me do things like reviewing and marking up documents that don't really require a fast startup and processor but is beyond the capabilities of most (all?) eBook readers.<br> <br>

SOLD!  When does it ship in the UK?<br> <br>

It <em>is</em> going to ship in the UK, isn't it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm having some back problems at the moment and tend to most comfortable in positions that do n't suit either a desktop or full size laptop setup .
I was just thinking last night how useful a subnote with a flippable screen would be for letting me do things like reviewing and marking up documents that do n't really require a fast startup and processor but is beyond the capabilities of most ( all ?
) eBook readers .
SOLD ! When does it ship in the UK ?
It is going to ship in the UK , is n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm having some back problems at the moment and tend to most comfortable in positions that don't suit either a desktop or full size laptop setup.
I was just thinking last night how useful a subnote with a flippable screen would be for letting me do things like reviewing and marking up documents that don't really require a fast startup and processor but is beyond the capabilities of most (all?
) eBook readers.
SOLD!  When does it ship in the UK?
It is going to ship in the UK, isn't it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28706851</id>
	<title>Re:the T91 takes a completely different approach..</title>
	<author>greenbird</author>
	<datestamp>1247688540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Does it? Does the T91 take a completely different approach to computing? Really? What is this marketing fluff?</p></div><p>No. It probable means they patented it. The lawsuits start in 3...2...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it ?
Does the T91 take a completely different approach to computing ?
Really ? What is this marketing fluff ? No .
It probable means they patented it .
The lawsuits start in 3...2.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it?
Does the T91 take a completely different approach to computing?
Really? What is this marketing fluff?No.
It probable means they patented it.
The lawsuits start in 3...2...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704449</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28716339</id>
	<title>Re:Non-removable battery?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247757480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Network World or Infoworld had an article discussing the non-removable battery in the new MacBookPro. It sort of convinced me that it was a win.</p><p>One point mentioned is that you can buy an external battery. It connects to the magsafe power in, and comes in various sizes of 12 to 24 hours capacity. It also worked with some other brands I think. The price didn't seem to be all that much more than an extra battery from Apple. You could also run/charge USB powered devices from it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Network World or Infoworld had an article discussing the non-removable battery in the new MacBookPro .
It sort of convinced me that it was a win.One point mentioned is that you can buy an external battery .
It connects to the magsafe power in , and comes in various sizes of 12 to 24 hours capacity .
It also worked with some other brands I think .
The price did n't seem to be all that much more than an extra battery from Apple .
You could also run/charge USB powered devices from it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Network World or Infoworld had an article discussing the non-removable battery in the new MacBookPro.
It sort of convinced me that it was a win.One point mentioned is that you can buy an external battery.
It connects to the magsafe power in, and comes in various sizes of 12 to 24 hours capacity.
It also worked with some other brands I think.
The price didn't seem to be all that much more than an extra battery from Apple.
You could also run/charge USB powered devices from it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704397</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28706259</id>
	<title>It is better with Windows (no, seriously!)</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1247685900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wouldn`t rely on Asus for any kind of Linux support. If you want to run Linux, stay away from Asus and especially netbooks of them.</p><p>Why? They have a site to explain why, they openly say their products run best under Windows.</p><p>Here is the news story <a href="http://www.osnews.com/story/21589/Asus\_Microsoft\_Launch\_Anti-Linux\_Netbook\_Campaign" title="osnews.com">http://www.osnews.com/story/21589/Asus\_Microsoft\_Launch\_Anti-Linux\_Netbook\_Campaign</a> [osnews.com]</p><p>Here is the site: <a href="http://www.itsbetterwithwindows.com/" title="itsbetterwithwindows.com">http://www.itsbetterwithwindows.com/</a> [itsbetterwithwindows.com]</p><p>You would wish it was a joke but it isn`t. Perhaps Asus better go back to their mainboard and Apple manufacturing business.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wouldn ` t rely on Asus for any kind of Linux support .
If you want to run Linux , stay away from Asus and especially netbooks of them.Why ?
They have a site to explain why , they openly say their products run best under Windows.Here is the news story http : //www.osnews.com/story/21589/Asus \ _Microsoft \ _Launch \ _Anti-Linux \ _Netbook \ _Campaign [ osnews.com ] Here is the site : http : //www.itsbetterwithwindows.com/ [ itsbetterwithwindows.com ] You would wish it was a joke but it isn ` t .
Perhaps Asus better go back to their mainboard and Apple manufacturing business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wouldn`t rely on Asus for any kind of Linux support.
If you want to run Linux, stay away from Asus and especially netbooks of them.Why?
They have a site to explain why, they openly say their products run best under Windows.Here is the news story http://www.osnews.com/story/21589/Asus\_Microsoft\_Launch\_Anti-Linux\_Netbook\_Campaign [osnews.com]Here is the site: http://www.itsbetterwithwindows.com/ [itsbetterwithwindows.com]You would wish it was a joke but it isn`t.
Perhaps Asus better go back to their mainboard and Apple manufacturing business.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705701</id>
	<title>Re:I'm still waiting...</title>
	<author>jmpvm</author>
	<datestamp>1247683380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I personally hate trackpads, but check out the Sony P-Series.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I personally hate trackpads , but check out the Sony P-Series .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I personally hate trackpads, but check out the Sony P-Series.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704935</id>
	<title>Re:Does it ...</title>
	<author>Ahnteis</author>
	<datestamp>1247680560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; this has resulted in the reliance of out dated closed source Linux drivers.</p><p>So pretty much like any other graphics "card" under Linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; this has resulted in the reliance of out dated closed source Linux drivers.So pretty much like any other graphics " card " under Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; this has resulted in the reliance of out dated closed source Linux drivers.So pretty much like any other graphics "card" under Linux?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704401</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704861</id>
	<title>Re:I'm still waiting...</title>
	<author>notthepainter</author>
	<datestamp>1247680200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You might want to try a Macintosh, they are speed sensitive. As I move my finger slowly it moves slowly, you can't even get more than a few hundred pixels. When I move fast, I can move across all 1900 pixels with room to spare.  Mice work the same same way, I can barely use a Windows machine because of the mouse/trackpad. Apple really has sweated the details on this one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You might want to try a Macintosh , they are speed sensitive .
As I move my finger slowly it moves slowly , you ca n't even get more than a few hundred pixels .
When I move fast , I can move across all 1900 pixels with room to spare .
Mice work the same same way , I can barely use a Windows machine because of the mouse/trackpad .
Apple really has sweated the details on this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You might want to try a Macintosh, they are speed sensitive.
As I move my finger slowly it moves slowly, you can't even get more than a few hundred pixels.
When I move fast, I can move across all 1900 pixels with room to spare.
Mice work the same same way, I can barely use a Windows machine because of the mouse/trackpad.
Apple really has sweated the details on this one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704439</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705091</id>
	<title>Re:Does it ...</title>
	<author>csimpkin</author>
	<datestamp>1247681040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Intel GMA500 graphics are very broken on linux right now. I wouldn't buy this if you want 3d acceleration to work. Also, if you want to use it for watching HD video, you should wait until the driver problems are addressed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Intel GMA500 graphics are very broken on linux right now .
I would n't buy this if you want 3d acceleration to work .
Also , if you want to use it for watching HD video , you should wait until the driver problems are addressed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Intel GMA500 graphics are very broken on linux right now.
I wouldn't buy this if you want 3d acceleration to work.
Also, if you want to use it for watching HD video, you should wait until the driver problems are addressed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705129</id>
	<title>Re:Does it..</title>
	<author>Shikaku</author>
	<datestamp>1247681160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="https://www.gizmocall.com/gc/app?class=GizmoCall&amp;proc=gcStart" title="gizmocall.com">https://www.gizmocall.com/gc/app?class=GizmoCall&amp;proc=gcStart</a> [gizmocall.com]</p><p>If you are OK with the limitations, yes, for free.</p><p>Yes it runs on Linux (it's flash).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>https : //www.gizmocall.com/gc/app ? class = GizmoCall&amp;proc = gcStart [ gizmocall.com ] If you are OK with the limitations , yes , for free.Yes it runs on Linux ( it 's flash ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>https://www.gizmocall.com/gc/app?class=GizmoCall&amp;proc=gcStart [gizmocall.com]If you are OK with the limitations, yes, for free.Yes it runs on Linux (it's flash).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704327</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705859</id>
	<title>Pivot</title>
	<author>copponex</author>
	<datestamp>1247683920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I still wonder today why I can't buy a large non-widescreen format LCD monitor for &lt; an arm and a leg...</p></div><p>Get a widescreen that pivots. 1200x1920 is spectacular for spreadsheets, reading, and code, and you can get used ones for less than $200.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I still wonder today why I ca n't buy a large non-widescreen format LCD monitor for Get a widescreen that pivots .
1200x1920 is spectacular for spreadsheets , reading , and code , and you can get used ones for less than $ 200 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still wonder today why I can't buy a large non-widescreen format LCD monitor for Get a widescreen that pivots.
1200x1920 is spectacular for spreadsheets, reading, and code, and you can get used ones for less than $200.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704463</id>
	<title>Finally a tablet at a reasonable price.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247678220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I recently was gifted a Dell Inspiron Mini 10. I have no complaints (for what it is). It runs fine and what I really like about it is the HDMI output lets me<b> easily </b>hook it up to my plasma and watch movies with netflix. If this was available a month ago I would've seriously considered it, even though it has VGA out. Put an HDMI connector in it and I'd be in heaven.</p><p>I have always wondered why they charge such a premium for tablets, just like I still wonder today why I can't buy a large non-widescreen format LCD monitor for &lt; an arm and a leg...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I recently was gifted a Dell Inspiron Mini 10 .
I have no complaints ( for what it is ) .
It runs fine and what I really like about it is the HDMI output lets me easily hook it up to my plasma and watch movies with netflix .
If this was available a month ago I would 've seriously considered it , even though it has VGA out .
Put an HDMI connector in it and I 'd be in heaven.I have always wondered why they charge such a premium for tablets , just like I still wonder today why I ca n't buy a large non-widescreen format LCD monitor for</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I recently was gifted a Dell Inspiron Mini 10.
I have no complaints (for what it is).
It runs fine and what I really like about it is the HDMI output lets me easily hook it up to my plasma and watch movies with netflix.
If this was available a month ago I would've seriously considered it, even though it has VGA out.
Put an HDMI connector in it and I'd be in heaven.I have always wondered why they charge such a premium for tablets, just like I still wonder today why I can't buy a large non-widescreen format LCD monitor for </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705263</id>
	<title>Re:I'm still waiting...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247681700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I got a new thinkpad x61 tablet for 700 Euro (~985 USD). Its fast, lightweight, got a trackpoint, works fine with linux and got a *replaceable battery!</p><p>Not a netbook but 12" is a good compromise for me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I got a new thinkpad x61 tablet for 700 Euro ( ~ 985 USD ) .
Its fast , lightweight , got a trackpoint , works fine with linux and got a * replaceable battery ! Not a netbook but 12 " is a good compromise for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got a new thinkpad x61 tablet for 700 Euro (~985 USD).
Its fast, lightweight, got a trackpoint, works fine with linux and got a *replaceable battery!Not a netbook but 12" is a good compromise for me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28708507</id>
	<title>Is it really a new product?</title>
	<author>chrisarn</author>
	<datestamp>1247653320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is this really a new product? On the 7'th of July i saw it in a local computer store here in the Czech republic.

And i even took a leaflet about it with me home.

If it's new, it's quite impressing that things get launched here before the rest of the world...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this really a new product ?
On the 7'th of July i saw it in a local computer store here in the Czech republic .
And i even took a leaflet about it with me home .
If it 's new , it 's quite impressing that things get launched here before the rest of the world.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this really a new product?
On the 7'th of July i saw it in a local computer store here in the Czech republic.
And i even took a leaflet about it with me home.
If it's new, it's quite impressing that things get launched here before the rest of the world...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28712371</id>
	<title>Re:Does it ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247677980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>good to find inspiration laptop that we want to thank article</htmltext>
<tokenext>good to find inspiration laptop that we want to thank article</tokentext>
<sentencetext>good to find inspiration laptop that we want to thank article</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28709771</id>
	<title>Re:the T91 takes a completely different approach..</title>
	<author>cbhacking</author>
	<datestamp>1247659080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tablet computers have actually beguin taking off a lot more now. I see them at university and work all the time. Heck, I have one myself, and am extremely happy with it. Hardware has finally reached the point where such a minimal system still has acceptible performance, and software (most of it Windows-based; tablet support in Linux is still pretty rudimentary) has come a LONG way. Running Win7, the tablet can decode handwriting that I would ahve trouble reading myself, and the pen flicks are a very fast and intuitive interface.</p><p>I think the main difference is cost. The cheapest brand-new tablets I've ever seen were still over $700, and very, very few are under $1000.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tablet computers have actually beguin taking off a lot more now .
I see them at university and work all the time .
Heck , I have one myself , and am extremely happy with it .
Hardware has finally reached the point where such a minimal system still has acceptible performance , and software ( most of it Windows-based ; tablet support in Linux is still pretty rudimentary ) has come a LONG way .
Running Win7 , the tablet can decode handwriting that I would ahve trouble reading myself , and the pen flicks are a very fast and intuitive interface.I think the main difference is cost .
The cheapest brand-new tablets I 've ever seen were still over $ 700 , and very , very few are under $ 1000 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tablet computers have actually beguin taking off a lot more now.
I see them at university and work all the time.
Heck, I have one myself, and am extremely happy with it.
Hardware has finally reached the point where such a minimal system still has acceptible performance, and software (most of it Windows-based; tablet support in Linux is still pretty rudimentary) has come a LONG way.
Running Win7, the tablet can decode handwriting that I would ahve trouble reading myself, and the pen flicks are a very fast and intuitive interface.I think the main difference is cost.
The cheapest brand-new tablets I've ever seen were still over $700, and very, very few are under $1000.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704449</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704735</id>
	<title>Re:Does it ...</title>
	<author>shacky003</author>
	<datestamp>1247679600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext># Gesture-enabled trackpad

hmm.. with xp, a non-removable battery pack, and just for the hell of it the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.3mp webcam (hello 2000!) I've got a gesture for it - I wonder if it'll crash on receiving it..</htmltext>
<tokenext># Gesture-enabled trackpad hmm.. with xp , a non-removable battery pack , and just for the hell of it the .3mp webcam ( hello 2000 !
) I 've got a gesture for it - I wonder if it 'll crash on receiving it. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext># Gesture-enabled trackpad

hmm.. with xp, a non-removable battery pack, and just for the hell of it the .3mp webcam (hello 2000!
) I've got a gesture for it - I wonder if it'll crash on receiving it..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28706191</id>
	<title>Re:Kindle killer</title>
	<author>pebs</author>
	<datestamp>1247685480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can't kill the Kindle without <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic\_paper" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">electronic paper</a> [wikipedia.org].</p><p>I also do all my reading on my laptop (and sometimes my iPhone), but I'm generally only reading programming books in which case its nice to be able to try things out as I go along.  I've read non-programming books on a laptop, and while it was ok, if I was reading a lot of non-programming books I would much rather do it on something like a Kindle (I don't think I ever want to go back to paper books, though).  There are even some programming books which I would've read on a Kindle (instead of my laptop) if I had one.  But I read so few books of any kind that I can't justify the expense at its current price.</p><p>It's really the people who read tons of books who are going to buy products like the Kindle (at its current prices).  They are the kind of people who would otherwise be reading dead tree and they don't want to read books on a computer screen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't kill the Kindle without electronic paper [ wikipedia.org ] .I also do all my reading on my laptop ( and sometimes my iPhone ) , but I 'm generally only reading programming books in which case its nice to be able to try things out as I go along .
I 've read non-programming books on a laptop , and while it was ok , if I was reading a lot of non-programming books I would much rather do it on something like a Kindle ( I do n't think I ever want to go back to paper books , though ) .
There are even some programming books which I would 've read on a Kindle ( instead of my laptop ) if I had one .
But I read so few books of any kind that I ca n't justify the expense at its current price.It 's really the people who read tons of books who are going to buy products like the Kindle ( at its current prices ) .
They are the kind of people who would otherwise be reading dead tree and they do n't want to read books on a computer screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't kill the Kindle without electronic paper [wikipedia.org].I also do all my reading on my laptop (and sometimes my iPhone), but I'm generally only reading programming books in which case its nice to be able to try things out as I go along.
I've read non-programming books on a laptop, and while it was ok, if I was reading a lot of non-programming books I would much rather do it on something like a Kindle (I don't think I ever want to go back to paper books, though).
There are even some programming books which I would've read on a Kindle (instead of my laptop) if I had one.
But I read so few books of any kind that I can't justify the expense at its current price.It's really the people who read tons of books who are going to buy products like the Kindle (at its current prices).
They are the kind of people who would otherwise be reading dead tree and they don't want to read books on a computer screen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705325</id>
	<title>Re:I'm still waiting...</title>
	<author>PainKilleR-CE</author>
	<datestamp>1247681940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's a checkbox option in the mouse settings on Windows. I turn it off if I'm ever using a machine where I find it turned on, because it's irritating that the same physical distance suddenly becomes a different virtual distance on the screen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a checkbox option in the mouse settings on Windows .
I turn it off if I 'm ever using a machine where I find it turned on , because it 's irritating that the same physical distance suddenly becomes a different virtual distance on the screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a checkbox option in the mouse settings on Windows.
I turn it off if I'm ever using a machine where I find it turned on, because it's irritating that the same physical distance suddenly becomes a different virtual distance on the screen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704397</id>
	<title>Non-removable battery?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247677800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Non-removable battery? What if I'm traveling for hours and my battery runs out? Oh I'll just pop in my spare! Or not...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Non-removable battery ?
What if I 'm traveling for hours and my battery runs out ?
Oh I 'll just pop in my spare !
Or not.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Non-removable battery?
What if I'm traveling for hours and my battery runs out?
Oh I'll just pop in my spare!
Or not...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705569</id>
	<title>Re:I'm still waiting...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247682780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why? What's the advantage of a trackpoint over a touchpad?
<br> <br>
I've found the little rubber nipples to be quite annoying, you don't have the same control over the speed and precision of it since you're just operating a joystick. With the touchpad, the cursor is going to move relative to the speed you're moving your finger. If you want to draw something it's quite a bit easier, just move your finger where you want the cursor to go. With the trackpoint there's no actual movement it's just applying pressure in one direction or another, there's not much in the way of feedback to let you know how fast the cursor is going to move.
<br> <br>
Though it could just be that I'm much more used to a touchpad (which I doubt since my first laptop had only a trackpoint and it wasn't until many years later that I got a laptop with a touchpad.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ?
What 's the advantage of a trackpoint over a touchpad ?
I 've found the little rubber nipples to be quite annoying , you do n't have the same control over the speed and precision of it since you 're just operating a joystick .
With the touchpad , the cursor is going to move relative to the speed you 're moving your finger .
If you want to draw something it 's quite a bit easier , just move your finger where you want the cursor to go .
With the trackpoint there 's no actual movement it 's just applying pressure in one direction or another , there 's not much in the way of feedback to let you know how fast the cursor is going to move .
Though it could just be that I 'm much more used to a touchpad ( which I doubt since my first laptop had only a trackpoint and it was n't until many years later that I got a laptop with a touchpad .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?
What's the advantage of a trackpoint over a touchpad?
I've found the little rubber nipples to be quite annoying, you don't have the same control over the speed and precision of it since you're just operating a joystick.
With the touchpad, the cursor is going to move relative to the speed you're moving your finger.
If you want to draw something it's quite a bit easier, just move your finger where you want the cursor to go.
With the trackpoint there's no actual movement it's just applying pressure in one direction or another, there's not much in the way of feedback to let you know how fast the cursor is going to move.
Though it could just be that I'm much more used to a touchpad (which I doubt since my first laptop had only a trackpoint and it wasn't until many years later that I got a laptop with a touchpad.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373</id>
	<title>I'm still waiting...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247677680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>... for a netbook to ship with a trackpoint instead of a damned touchpad.  When someone (are you listening, lenovo?) finally brings out an affordable netbook with a trackpoint, I'll bring out my checkbook.  Until then I'll keep to my old thinkpad, thank you very much.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... for a netbook to ship with a trackpoint instead of a damned touchpad .
When someone ( are you listening , lenovo ?
) finally brings out an affordable netbook with a trackpoint , I 'll bring out my checkbook .
Until then I 'll keep to my old thinkpad , thank you very much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... for a netbook to ship with a trackpoint instead of a damned touchpad.
When someone (are you listening, lenovo?
) finally brings out an affordable netbook with a trackpoint, I'll bring out my checkbook.
Until then I'll keep to my old thinkpad, thank you very much.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704327</id>
	<title>Does it..</title>
	<author>popeyethesailor</author>
	<datestamp>1247677440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>make phone calls?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>make phone calls ?
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>make phone calls?
:P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704613</id>
	<title>Nice try but I'll wait</title>
	<author>Taibhsear</author>
	<datestamp>1247678880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My eee pc 1000 has the perfect size keyboard for me, although the right shift button could have had better placement. So 8.9" is going to be a little too small for me. The non-removable battery is also a deal killer. My issue with my netbook is the network card isn't supported by some of the software, uh, 'tools' I use, the battery life is almost half what they say it is, and the performance could be a tiny bit faster (only issue that really bugs me is not being able to watch 720p on it). What I ultimately want is a 10" netbook with a touch screen, linux (preferably ubuntu), removable battery that actually lasts longer than 5 hours, enough performance to watch 720p, solid state drives (for durability), fast wifi with long range and support for the software I use, and bluetooth, for $500 or less. I don't understand why they make tablets with keyboards on them. My gf has a phone that is touchscreen and just has a plastic flip cover that the touchscreen can still recognize touch commands through. Why they don't make the whole computer with the touchscreen on top and just a clear flip cover on it instead of the keyboard and trackpad is beyond me. Just have a virtual keyboard pop up when you tap a keyboard button on the desktop or on the spot to enter text like my Archos media player does. If they put all this together and engineered it well I'd scoop it up in a heartbeat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My eee pc 1000 has the perfect size keyboard for me , although the right shift button could have had better placement .
So 8.9 " is going to be a little too small for me .
The non-removable battery is also a deal killer .
My issue with my netbook is the network card is n't supported by some of the software , uh , 'tools ' I use , the battery life is almost half what they say it is , and the performance could be a tiny bit faster ( only issue that really bugs me is not being able to watch 720p on it ) .
What I ultimately want is a 10 " netbook with a touch screen , linux ( preferably ubuntu ) , removable battery that actually lasts longer than 5 hours , enough performance to watch 720p , solid state drives ( for durability ) , fast wifi with long range and support for the software I use , and bluetooth , for $ 500 or less .
I do n't understand why they make tablets with keyboards on them .
My gf has a phone that is touchscreen and just has a plastic flip cover that the touchscreen can still recognize touch commands through .
Why they do n't make the whole computer with the touchscreen on top and just a clear flip cover on it instead of the keyboard and trackpad is beyond me .
Just have a virtual keyboard pop up when you tap a keyboard button on the desktop or on the spot to enter text like my Archos media player does .
If they put all this together and engineered it well I 'd scoop it up in a heartbeat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My eee pc 1000 has the perfect size keyboard for me, although the right shift button could have had better placement.
So 8.9" is going to be a little too small for me.
The non-removable battery is also a deal killer.
My issue with my netbook is the network card isn't supported by some of the software, uh, 'tools' I use, the battery life is almost half what they say it is, and the performance could be a tiny bit faster (only issue that really bugs me is not being able to watch 720p on it).
What I ultimately want is a 10" netbook with a touch screen, linux (preferably ubuntu), removable battery that actually lasts longer than 5 hours, enough performance to watch 720p, solid state drives (for durability), fast wifi with long range and support for the software I use, and bluetooth, for $500 or less.
I don't understand why they make tablets with keyboards on them.
My gf has a phone that is touchscreen and just has a plastic flip cover that the touchscreen can still recognize touch commands through.
Why they don't make the whole computer with the touchscreen on top and just a clear flip cover on it instead of the keyboard and trackpad is beyond me.
Just have a virtual keyboard pop up when you tap a keyboard button on the desktop or on the spot to enter text like my Archos media player does.
If they put all this together and engineered it well I'd scoop it up in a heartbeat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704471</id>
	<title>Uh this has been around for years..</title>
	<author>carn1fex</author>
	<datestamp>1247678220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why is this news?  Flip screen tablets have been around for about 5 years.. my Toshiba M209 from 2004 for example.. Is it relevant because they shrunk the overall thing and now its a "netbook" ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is this news ?
Flip screen tablets have been around for about 5 years.. my Toshiba M209 from 2004 for example.. Is it relevant because they shrunk the overall thing and now its a " netbook " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is this news?
Flip screen tablets have been around for about 5 years.. my Toshiba M209 from 2004 for example.. Is it relevant because they shrunk the overall thing and now its a "netbook" ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28711551</id>
	<title>Re:It's the price.</title>
	<author>MojoStan</author>
	<datestamp>1247670720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>&gt;Is it relevant because they shrunk the overall thing and now its a "netbook" ?
</p><p>
No, it's relevant because it's $500 instead of, say, a $2000 Fujitsu Lifebook.</p></div><p>I don't think it's relevant enough for the front page, since <a href="http://techreport.com/discussions.x/15064" title="techreport.com">Gigabyte released their first "touch-screen tablet netbook" a year ago</a> [techreport.com].
</p><p>
Gigabyte has since released an <a href="http://www.gigabyte.us/Products/Notebook/Products\_Spec.aspx?ProductID=3027" title="gigabyte.us">updated 10.1" model</a> [gigabyte.us], so potential buyers should know that ASUS isn't the only curent player in this netbook sub-category.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Is it relevant because they shrunk the overall thing and now its a " netbook " ?
No , it 's relevant because it 's $ 500 instead of , say , a $ 2000 Fujitsu Lifebook.I do n't think it 's relevant enough for the front page , since Gigabyte released their first " touch-screen tablet netbook " a year ago [ techreport.com ] .
Gigabyte has since released an updated 10.1 " model [ gigabyte.us ] , so potential buyers should know that ASUS is n't the only curent player in this netbook sub-category .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;Is it relevant because they shrunk the overall thing and now its a "netbook" ?
No, it's relevant because it's $500 instead of, say, a $2000 Fujitsu Lifebook.I don't think it's relevant enough for the front page, since Gigabyte released their first "touch-screen tablet netbook" a year ago [techreport.com].
Gigabyte has since released an updated 10.1" model [gigabyte.us], so potential buyers should know that ASUS isn't the only curent player in this netbook sub-category.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704811</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704439</id>
	<title>Re:I'm still waiting...</title>
	<author>PatrickThomson</author>
	<datestamp>1247678040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I couldn't agree more. Using a trackpad is like trying to use a mouse with a broken arm swaddled in plaster. you're lucky if you can get the pointer 1/3 of the way across the screen without reseating your finger, and at higher sensitivities it's even more of a cumbersome pain to use.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I could n't agree more .
Using a trackpad is like trying to use a mouse with a broken arm swaddled in plaster .
you 're lucky if you can get the pointer 1/3 of the way across the screen without reseating your finger , and at higher sensitivities it 's even more of a cumbersome pain to use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I couldn't agree more.
Using a trackpad is like trying to use a mouse with a broken arm swaddled in plaster.
you're lucky if you can get the pointer 1/3 of the way across the screen without reseating your finger, and at higher sensitivities it's even more of a cumbersome pain to use.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705057</id>
	<title>Re:Does it ...</title>
	<author>Nursie</author>
	<datestamp>1247680920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Umm, no. Intel GFX chips are in general well supported with new, FOSS drivers. nVidia have modern closed drivers. ATI have some of both. Any of those would be better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm , no .
Intel GFX chips are in general well supported with new , FOSS drivers .
nVidia have modern closed drivers .
ATI have some of both .
Any of those would be better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm, no.
Intel GFX chips are in general well supported with new, FOSS drivers.
nVidia have modern closed drivers.
ATI have some of both.
Any of those would be better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704935</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705997</id>
	<title>Re:Nice try but I'll wait</title>
	<author>Comboman</author>
	<datestamp>1247684460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I don't understand why they make tablets with keyboards on them.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Why they don't make the whole computer with the touchscreen on top and just a clear flip cover on it instead of the keyboard and trackpad is beyond me.</p></div></blockquote><p>Most people will want a separate keyboard at least some of time.  What's so bad about having a keyboard built into the 'flip cover' of your touchscreen?  What <b>I</b> want is dual touchscreens (a la Nintendo DS) so one can be a reconfigurable keyboard/input device.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand why they make tablets with keyboards on them .
... Why they do n't make the whole computer with the touchscreen on top and just a clear flip cover on it instead of the keyboard and trackpad is beyond me.Most people will want a separate keyboard at least some of time .
What 's so bad about having a keyboard built into the 'flip cover ' of your touchscreen ?
What I want is dual touchscreens ( a la Nintendo DS ) so one can be a reconfigurable keyboard/input device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand why they make tablets with keyboards on them.
... Why they don't make the whole computer with the touchscreen on top and just a clear flip cover on it instead of the keyboard and trackpad is beyond me.Most people will want a separate keyboard at least some of time.
What's so bad about having a keyboard built into the 'flip cover' of your touchscreen?
What I want is dual touchscreens (a la Nintendo DS) so one can be a reconfigurable keyboard/input device.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28710501</id>
	<title>Re:Does it ...</title>
	<author>nadavwr</author>
	<datestamp>1247662980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, Nokia Internet Tablet (runs Linux) has a PowerVR chip, and guess what? no 3D acceleration. You do, however, get XWindows at 800x480 to work just fine, thank you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , Nokia Internet Tablet ( runs Linux ) has a PowerVR chip , and guess what ?
no 3D acceleration .
You do , however , get XWindows at 800x480 to work just fine , thank you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, Nokia Internet Tablet (runs Linux) has a PowerVR chip, and guess what?
no 3D acceleration.
You do, however, get XWindows at 800x480 to work just fine, thank you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704401</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704265</id>
	<title>Does it run...</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1247677080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does it run GoogleOS?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it run GoogleOS ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it run GoogleOS?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704569</id>
	<title>Kindle killer</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1247678760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Add a little decrease in cost and a touch screen and the kindle dies a well deserved death. No loss.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Add a little decrease in cost and a touch screen and the kindle dies a well deserved death .
No loss .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Add a little decrease in cost and a touch screen and the kindle dies a well deserved death.
No loss.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704205</id>
	<title>Mine!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247676840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Want...Want...Want...Want!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Want...Want...Want...Want !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Want...Want...Want...Want!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704287</id>
	<title>How much?</title>
	<author>hamburgler007</author>
	<datestamp>1247677260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Article gives most of the specs but omits any mention of cost?  Presumably it will be more expensive, but how much more expensive than their current line of netbooks?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Article gives most of the specs but omits any mention of cost ?
Presumably it will be more expensive , but how much more expensive than their current line of netbooks ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Article gives most of the specs but omits any mention of cost?
Presumably it will be more expensive, but how much more expensive than their current line of netbooks?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704391</id>
	<title>Touchscreen?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247677800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh wait... its a <i>resistive</i> (ie worthless) touchscreen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh wait... its a resistive ( ie worthless ) touchscreen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh wait... its a resistive (ie worthless) touchscreen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704545</id>
	<title>Netvertible?</title>
	<author>CopaceticOpus</author>
	<datestamp>1247678580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's call the Windows based version a winnetvertible, and the Ubuntu version a netvertibuntu. If they add the ability for the Ubuntu version to make calls, it's a netphonevertibuntu. The aquatic version which comes with tools to help you catch fish and move boats will be a fishnetphonevertibuntugboat.</p><p>Or, we could stop making up stupid names for shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's call the Windows based version a winnetvertible , and the Ubuntu version a netvertibuntu .
If they add the ability for the Ubuntu version to make calls , it 's a netphonevertibuntu .
The aquatic version which comes with tools to help you catch fish and move boats will be a fishnetphonevertibuntugboat.Or , we could stop making up stupid names for shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's call the Windows based version a winnetvertible, and the Ubuntu version a netvertibuntu.
If they add the ability for the Ubuntu version to make calls, it's a netphonevertibuntu.
The aquatic version which comes with tools to help you catch fish and move boats will be a fishnetphonevertibuntugboat.Or, we could stop making up stupid names for shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28709633</id>
	<title>Re:Does it ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247658360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well I've got a Kohjinsha SX3 for some time now. Which I will compare with the parent's specs (V in front of the # to mark a difference):</p><p># Intel Atom Z520 @ 1.33GHz, 533MHz FSB; 512K Cache<br># Intel US15W chipset<br>V # 2GB of DDR2 Memory<br>V # 8.9 inch LCD (1280x768 resolution); LED backlight, Resistive Touch Panel<br># Intel GMA 500 integrated graphics<br>V # 60gb HD<br>V # SDHC+SD+MS Mini Card reader<br>X # 10GB Eee Online Storage<br>X # 802.11b/g Wi-Fi<br># Bluetooth 2.1+EDR<br>V # Included DVD burner<br>V # 0.3 megapixel front webcam + 1.3 mp back webcam + Digital Array Microphone<br># VGA Output<br># USB 2.0 x 2<br># RJ-45 (Ethernet 10/100)<br># Headphone / Mic Input Jacks<br># Twin speakers<br>V # Synaptics trackpad<br>X # 2.5 Pounds (with battery installed)<br>X # 0.99 - 1.11 inches thick<br>V # 3 cell battery, 3 hr lifetime<br>X # 8.85" (W) x 6.45" (D) x 0.99 - 1.11" (H) --- don't remember, but it's a bit larger<br>V # Currently running Windows 7 RC<br># Color Options: White, Black<br># Protective Sleeve</p><p>KJS also had slower and smaller 7" convertibles.</p><p>Fujitsu also have a convertible 5.6" netbook with a 2ghz atom capable of running 720p movies flawlessly. (also a trackpoint for fans of those~ and the same amazing 1280x768 resolution).... some version include a 3G modem for ultimate portability.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well I 've got a Kohjinsha SX3 for some time now .
Which I will compare with the parent 's specs ( V in front of the # to mark a difference ) : # Intel Atom Z520 @ 1.33GHz , 533MHz FSB ; 512K Cache # Intel US15W chipsetV # 2GB of DDR2 MemoryV # 8.9 inch LCD ( 1280x768 resolution ) ; LED backlight , Resistive Touch Panel # Intel GMA 500 integrated graphicsV # 60gb HDV # SDHC + SD + MS Mini Card readerX # 10GB Eee Online StorageX # 802.11b/g Wi-Fi # Bluetooth 2.1 + EDRV # Included DVD burnerV # 0.3 megapixel front webcam + 1.3 mp back webcam + Digital Array Microphone # VGA Output # USB 2.0 x 2 # RJ-45 ( Ethernet 10/100 ) # Headphone / Mic Input Jacks # Twin speakersV # Synaptics trackpadX # 2.5 Pounds ( with battery installed ) X # 0.99 - 1.11 inches thickV # 3 cell battery , 3 hr lifetimeX # 8.85 " ( W ) x 6.45 " ( D ) x 0.99 - 1.11 " ( H ) --- do n't remember , but it 's a bit largerV # Currently running Windows 7 RC # Color Options : White , Black # Protective SleeveKJS also had slower and smaller 7 " convertibles.Fujitsu also have a convertible 5.6 " netbook with a 2ghz atom capable of running 720p movies flawlessly .
( also a trackpoint for fans of those ~ and the same amazing 1280x768 resolution ) .... some version include a 3G modem for ultimate portability .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well I've got a Kohjinsha SX3 for some time now.
Which I will compare with the parent's specs (V in front of the # to mark a difference):# Intel Atom Z520 @ 1.33GHz, 533MHz FSB; 512K Cache# Intel US15W chipsetV # 2GB of DDR2 MemoryV # 8.9 inch LCD (1280x768 resolution); LED backlight, Resistive Touch Panel# Intel GMA 500 integrated graphicsV # 60gb HDV # SDHC+SD+MS Mini Card readerX # 10GB Eee Online StorageX # 802.11b/g Wi-Fi# Bluetooth 2.1+EDRV # Included DVD burnerV # 0.3 megapixel front webcam + 1.3 mp back webcam + Digital Array Microphone# VGA Output# USB 2.0 x 2# RJ-45 (Ethernet 10/100)# Headphone / Mic Input Jacks# Twin speakersV # Synaptics trackpadX # 2.5 Pounds (with battery installed)X # 0.99 - 1.11 inches thickV # 3 cell battery, 3 hr lifetimeX # 8.85" (W) x 6.45" (D) x 0.99 - 1.11" (H) --- don't remember, but it's a bit largerV # Currently running Windows 7 RC# Color Options: White, Black# Protective SleeveKJS also had slower and smaller 7" convertibles.Fujitsu also have a convertible 5.6" netbook with a 2ghz atom capable of running 720p movies flawlessly.
(also a trackpoint for fans of those~ and the same amazing 1280x768 resolution).... some version include a 3G modem for ultimate portability.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704381</id>
	<title>Weak screen mount?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247677740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Although the computer looks nice, I am a bit concerned as to the quality of the screen attachment. I have friend who has a computer with a similar configuration and after a year the screen would become wobbly, probably because of wear on the joint. Does anyone know whether Asus has taken care of this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Although the computer looks nice , I am a bit concerned as to the quality of the screen attachment .
I have friend who has a computer with a similar configuration and after a year the screen would become wobbly , probably because of wear on the joint .
Does anyone know whether Asus has taken care of this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although the computer looks nice, I am a bit concerned as to the quality of the screen attachment.
I have friend who has a computer with a similar configuration and after a year the screen would become wobbly, probably because of wear on the joint.
Does anyone know whether Asus has taken care of this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28707691</id>
	<title>Re:Kindle killer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247649360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic\_paper</p><p>People comparing laptops/netbooks/phones to e-book readers have no clue what they're talking about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic \ _paperPeople comparing laptops/netbooks/phones to e-book readers have no clue what they 're talking about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic\_paperPeople comparing laptops/netbooks/phones to e-book readers have no clue what they're talking about.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704335</id>
	<title>Re:How much?</title>
	<author>TaggartAleslayer</author>
	<datestamp>1247677440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Last page of the article states: "The T91 is less powerful, more cramped and has a less spectacular display than pretty much any other newly released netbook, yet it is priced at $499."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Last page of the article states : " The T91 is less powerful , more cramped and has a less spectacular display than pretty much any other newly released netbook , yet it is priced at $ 499 .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last page of the article states: "The T91 is less powerful, more cramped and has a less spectacular display than pretty much any other newly released netbook, yet it is priced at $499.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704287</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704881</id>
	<title>Re:Nice try but I'll wait</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247680260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, I have the eeepc 1000 too, running pre-installed Xandros... I recently used it on a trip across the atlantic, and it worked without complaints for about 7 1/2 hours, working mostly in Writer with my MP3 collection on shuffle in the background, and occassional forays into OpenTTD...</p><p>I think the WiFi is the real battery drainer, as I had the antenna turned off (Airplane, ya know)... I ended the flight with about 10\% battery power remaining.</p><p>As for the interface... The keyboard is definitely terrific compared to others I've used, but having to use Fn+Arrow for Home/End/PgUp/PgDn can make things difficult sometimes... I suppose there isn't really a way around that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I have the eeepc 1000 too , running pre-installed Xandros... I recently used it on a trip across the atlantic , and it worked without complaints for about 7 1/2 hours , working mostly in Writer with my MP3 collection on shuffle in the background , and occassional forays into OpenTTD...I think the WiFi is the real battery drainer , as I had the antenna turned off ( Airplane , ya know ) ... I ended the flight with about 10 \ % battery power remaining.As for the interface... The keyboard is definitely terrific compared to others I 've used , but having to use Fn + Arrow for Home/End/PgUp/PgDn can make things difficult sometimes... I suppose there is n't really a way around that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I have the eeepc 1000 too, running pre-installed Xandros... I recently used it on a trip across the atlantic, and it worked without complaints for about 7 1/2 hours, working mostly in Writer with my MP3 collection on shuffle in the background, and occassional forays into OpenTTD...I think the WiFi is the real battery drainer, as I had the antenna turned off (Airplane, ya know)... I ended the flight with about 10\% battery power remaining.As for the interface... The keyboard is definitely terrific compared to others I've used, but having to use Fn+Arrow for Home/End/PgUp/PgDn can make things difficult sometimes... I suppose there isn't really a way around that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28708891</id>
	<title>Re:Does it ...</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1247655240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>run Linux? Seriously.</p></div></blockquote><p>The first few marketing seem to show it running Moblin, which is based on Linux and is 100\% the perfect OS and interface for this style of computer.</p><p>But of course, the spec sheet lists Windows XP. And lately Asus has been <a href="http://www.itsbetterwithwindows.com/" title="itsbetterwithwindows.com">totally putting out</a> [itsbetterwithwindows.com] for Microsoft.</p><p>One of these days, I keep praying that OEMs will wise up to the fact that the importance of quality software is rapidly overtaking the importance of the quality of the hardware.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>run Linux ?
Seriously.The first few marketing seem to show it running Moblin , which is based on Linux and is 100 \ % the perfect OS and interface for this style of computer.But of course , the spec sheet lists Windows XP .
And lately Asus has been totally putting out [ itsbetterwithwindows.com ] for Microsoft.One of these days , I keep praying that OEMs will wise up to the fact that the importance of quality software is rapidly overtaking the importance of the quality of the hardware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>run Linux?
Seriously.The first few marketing seem to show it running Moblin, which is based on Linux and is 100\% the perfect OS and interface for this style of computer.But of course, the spec sheet lists Windows XP.
And lately Asus has been totally putting out [itsbetterwithwindows.com] for Microsoft.One of these days, I keep praying that OEMs will wise up to the fact that the importance of quality software is rapidly overtaking the importance of the quality of the hardware.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28710033</id>
	<title>Re:Does it ...</title>
	<author>kzieli</author>
	<datestamp>1247660520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe the problem here is Intel GMA 500 Integrated Graphics. The driver only works with old kernels, add to this that we have an unusual screen resolution and we are done.

For me that puts this one in the strict no go category.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe the problem here is Intel GMA 500 Integrated Graphics .
The driver only works with old kernels , add to this that we have an unusual screen resolution and we are done .
For me that puts this one in the strict no go category .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe the problem here is Intel GMA 500 Integrated Graphics.
The driver only works with old kernels, add to this that we have an unusual screen resolution and we are done.
For me that puts this one in the strict no go category.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705149</id>
	<title>Re:Does it ...</title>
	<author>diegocgteleline.es</author>
	<datestamp>1247681280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In other words, is very Linux-unfriendly. So I won't buy such crap. It's sad that we have lost a company that supports linux, fortunately there are others.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In other words , is very Linux-unfriendly .
So I wo n't buy such crap .
It 's sad that we have lost a company that supports linux , fortunately there are others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other words, is very Linux-unfriendly.
So I won't buy such crap.
It's sad that we have lost a company that supports linux, fortunately there are others.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704401</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704765</id>
	<title>Re:Does it ...</title>
	<author>erroneus</author>
	<datestamp>1247679720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Convenient breakdown.  It really looks like other ASUS devices in terms of specs.  Looks like they merely adapted the mods that others have been doing to them for a while and added a swivel screen.</p><p>What they should have done is included the 1080p display screens that have been emerging lately.  The higher pixel count really helps a lot when it comes to running various operating systems on it.  And while other people were asking what OSes can run on it, Windows or Linux, I was thinking "Is ASUS trying to beat Apple to the punch?"  So will it run the variety of MacOSX that Apple will put onto its yet to be announced touch screen netbook?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Convenient breakdown .
It really looks like other ASUS devices in terms of specs .
Looks like they merely adapted the mods that others have been doing to them for a while and added a swivel screen.What they should have done is included the 1080p display screens that have been emerging lately .
The higher pixel count really helps a lot when it comes to running various operating systems on it .
And while other people were asking what OSes can run on it , Windows or Linux , I was thinking " Is ASUS trying to beat Apple to the punch ?
" So will it run the variety of MacOSX that Apple will put onto its yet to be announced touch screen netbook ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Convenient breakdown.
It really looks like other ASUS devices in terms of specs.
Looks like they merely adapted the mods that others have been doing to them for a while and added a swivel screen.What they should have done is included the 1080p display screens that have been emerging lately.
The higher pixel count really helps a lot when it comes to running various operating systems on it.
And while other people were asking what OSes can run on it, Windows or Linux, I was thinking "Is ASUS trying to beat Apple to the punch?
"  So will it run the variety of MacOSX that Apple will put onto its yet to be announced touch screen netbook?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704413</id>
	<title>Yes, but...</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1247677860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What does it cost? TFA doesn't say. If this thing is three or four hundred bucks I'd love to get one, but if it's damned expensive then no way.</p><p>Some of us actually have to WORK for our money, and we have limited supplies of it. I wish these overpaid pundits could understand that. WHAT DOES THE DAMNED THING COST???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What does it cost ?
TFA does n't say .
If this thing is three or four hundred bucks I 'd love to get one , but if it 's damned expensive then no way.Some of us actually have to WORK for our money , and we have limited supplies of it .
I wish these overpaid pundits could understand that .
WHAT DOES THE DAMNED THING COST ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What does it cost?
TFA doesn't say.
If this thing is three or four hundred bucks I'd love to get one, but if it's damned expensive then no way.Some of us actually have to WORK for our money, and we have limited supplies of it.
I wish these overpaid pundits could understand that.
WHAT DOES THE DAMNED THING COST??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28709921</id>
	<title>Re:Uh this has been around for years..</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1247659920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be fair, the summary doesn't say it's first. It's news because it's a new product by a major company. Given we get a story everytime there's a mere rumour about an Apple product, I think actual new products should qualify as news.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair , the summary does n't say it 's first .
It 's news because it 's a new product by a major company .
Given we get a story everytime there 's a mere rumour about an Apple product , I think actual new products should qualify as news .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair, the summary doesn't say it's first.
It's news because it's a new product by a major company.
Given we get a story everytime there's a mere rumour about an Apple product, I think actual new products should qualify as news.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28714697</id>
	<title>Re:Does it ...MODDER UP!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247747040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the parent is the only comment this slashvertisement is worth</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the parent is the only comment this slashvertisement is worth</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the parent is the only comment this slashvertisement is worth</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705575</id>
	<title>Re:Finally a tablet at a reasonable price.</title>
	<author>PainKilleR-CE</author>
	<datestamp>1247682840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The premium, in both cases, is for a part that isn't in common use and/or demand. Touch-screens aren't made in massive numbers over the size of an iPhone, and LCD screens aren't made in 4;3 ratios in massive numbers because most of the LCD screens are made for HDTVs (even at small sizes).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The premium , in both cases , is for a part that is n't in common use and/or demand .
Touch-screens are n't made in massive numbers over the size of an iPhone , and LCD screens are n't made in 4 ; 3 ratios in massive numbers because most of the LCD screens are made for HDTVs ( even at small sizes ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The premium, in both cases, is for a part that isn't in common use and/or demand.
Touch-screens aren't made in massive numbers over the size of an iPhone, and LCD screens aren't made in 4;3 ratios in massive numbers because most of the LCD screens are made for HDTVs (even at small sizes).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704905</id>
	<title>Re:Weak screen mount?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247680380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thats one of the things i love about <a href="https://www.alwaysinnovating.com/touchbook/" title="alwaysinnovating.com">this</a> [alwaysinnovating.com], the screen comes of entirely and i assume/hope that you can just flip it over entirely so there is no joint to break.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thats one of the things i love about this [ alwaysinnovating.com ] , the screen comes of entirely and i assume/hope that you can just flip it over entirely so there is no joint to break .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thats one of the things i love about this [alwaysinnovating.com], the screen comes of entirely and i assume/hope that you can just flip it over entirely so there is no joint to break.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704381</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28708351</id>
	<title>Printable (aka everything on one page) Version</title>
	<author>Shoone</author>
	<datestamp>1247652660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://hothardware.com/printarticle.aspx?articleid=1348" title="hothardware.com" rel="nofollow">http://hothardware.com/printarticle.aspx?articleid=1348</a> [hothardware.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //hothardware.com/printarticle.aspx ? articleid = 1348 [ hothardware.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://hothardware.com/printarticle.aspx?articleid=1348 [hothardware.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704449</id>
	<title>the T91 takes a completely different approach....</title>
	<author>MattGWU</author>
	<datestamp>1247678100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does it? Does the T91 take a completely different approach to computing? Really?  What is this marketing fluff?</p><p>It's a touchscreen.  We've seen that.  It spins around.  We've seen that (GRiD 2260 anybody? Ruggedized convertable laptop from 1992.  Incidentally, only eBay auction I ever got screwed on, but it was resolved)  It's small. Damn sure we've seen that.  Were touchscreen laptops ever that big of a deal?  They were The Next Big Thing a few years ago but never got the impression people liked them that much.</p><p>Maybe I'm not 100\% clear on what 'a completely different approach to compting' looks like (why I'm here, doing what I'm doing, and not out buying my new car for the day), but I'm pretty sure the T91 isn't it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it ?
Does the T91 take a completely different approach to computing ?
Really ? What is this marketing fluff ? It 's a touchscreen .
We 've seen that .
It spins around .
We 've seen that ( GRiD 2260 anybody ?
Ruggedized convertable laptop from 1992 .
Incidentally , only eBay auction I ever got screwed on , but it was resolved ) It 's small .
Damn sure we 've seen that .
Were touchscreen laptops ever that big of a deal ?
They were The Next Big Thing a few years ago but never got the impression people liked them that much.Maybe I 'm not 100 \ % clear on what 'a completely different approach to compting ' looks like ( why I 'm here , doing what I 'm doing , and not out buying my new car for the day ) , but I 'm pretty sure the T91 is n't it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it?
Does the T91 take a completely different approach to computing?
Really?  What is this marketing fluff?It's a touchscreen.
We've seen that.
It spins around.
We've seen that (GRiD 2260 anybody?
Ruggedized convertable laptop from 1992.
Incidentally, only eBay auction I ever got screwed on, but it was resolved)  It's small.
Damn sure we've seen that.
Were touchscreen laptops ever that big of a deal?
They were The Next Big Thing a few years ago but never got the impression people liked them that much.Maybe I'm not 100\% clear on what 'a completely different approach to compting' looks like (why I'm here, doing what I'm doing, and not out buying my new car for the day), but I'm pretty sure the T91 isn't it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28709209</id>
	<title>Re:Sweet timing...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247656320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought the Gigabyte T1028 was being sold in the UK already. <a href="http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/04/gigabyte-touchnote-t1028m-unboxing" title="umpcportal.com" rel="nofollow">Or so they said</a> [umpcportal.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought the Gigabyte T1028 was being sold in the UK already .
Or so they said [ umpcportal.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought the Gigabyte T1028 was being sold in the UK already.
Or so they said [umpcportal.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704385</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28708109</id>
	<title>Re:Non-removable battery?!</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1247651400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh great, ANOTHER iPhone story.  Wait, what?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh great , ANOTHER iPhone story .
Wait , what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh great, ANOTHER iPhone story.
Wait, what?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704397</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28711305</id>
	<title>Re:I'm still waiting...</title>
	<author>jobin</author>
	<datestamp>1247668800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use macs only occasionally, and find this feature extremely annoying. It completely throws off my eye/hand coordination. I'm sure it's wonderful if you're used to it, but it makes it annoyingly difficult to put the cursor where I want it. If I want to move it just couple of inches to the left, I move the mouse slowly, and it only moves a few pixels. If I speed up, acceleration kicks in and the cursor is halfway across the screen when, according to my (linear, subconscious) estimate, it should be on target.</p><p>This would be fine if I could find the option to turn it off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use macs only occasionally , and find this feature extremely annoying .
It completely throws off my eye/hand coordination .
I 'm sure it 's wonderful if you 're used to it , but it makes it annoyingly difficult to put the cursor where I want it .
If I want to move it just couple of inches to the left , I move the mouse slowly , and it only moves a few pixels .
If I speed up , acceleration kicks in and the cursor is halfway across the screen when , according to my ( linear , subconscious ) estimate , it should be on target.This would be fine if I could find the option to turn it off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use macs only occasionally, and find this feature extremely annoying.
It completely throws off my eye/hand coordination.
I'm sure it's wonderful if you're used to it, but it makes it annoyingly difficult to put the cursor where I want it.
If I want to move it just couple of inches to the left, I move the mouse slowly, and it only moves a few pixels.
If I speed up, acceleration kicks in and the cursor is halfway across the screen when, according to my (linear, subconscious) estimate, it should be on target.This would be fine if I could find the option to turn it off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704861</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704401</id>
	<title>Re:Does it ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247677800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Does it run Linux? Seriously.</p></div><p>Not very well, probably. From the Wikipedia article on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel\_GMA#GMA\_500" title="wikipedia.org">Intel GMA:</a> [wikipedia.org] </p><p>
The Intel System Controller Hub US15W for the Atom processor Z5xx series features a GMA 500 graphic system. Rather than being developed in-house, this core is a PowerVR SGX core licensed from Imagination Technologies. Since PowerVR is not cooperative with the open source movement, <em>this has resulted in the reliance of out dated closed source Linux drivers<em>.</em></em></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it run Linux ?
Seriously.Not very well , probably .
From the Wikipedia article on Intel GMA : [ wikipedia.org ] The Intel System Controller Hub US15W for the Atom processor Z5xx series features a GMA 500 graphic system .
Rather than being developed in-house , this core is a PowerVR SGX core licensed from Imagination Technologies .
Since PowerVR is not cooperative with the open source movement , this has resulted in the reliance of out dated closed source Linux drivers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it run Linux?
Seriously.Not very well, probably.
From the Wikipedia article on Intel GMA: [wikipedia.org] 
The Intel System Controller Hub US15W for the Atom processor Z5xx series features a GMA 500 graphic system.
Rather than being developed in-house, this core is a PowerVR SGX core licensed from Imagination Technologies.
Since PowerVR is not cooperative with the open source movement, this has resulted in the reliance of out dated closed source Linux drivers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704565</id>
	<title>Re:the T91 takes a completely different approach..</title>
	<author>Bill, Shooter of Bul</author>
	<datestamp>1247678760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The reason why I never got a convertible touchscreen laptop was they were at least twice as expensive as a normal laptop with similar specs. Close to $2500 to start, with a weak celeron cpu &amp; little ram. If you make it closer in price,you'll find it will become more popular. Its basically like the Google phone in a bigger form factor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason why I never got a convertible touchscreen laptop was they were at least twice as expensive as a normal laptop with similar specs .
Close to $ 2500 to start , with a weak celeron cpu &amp; little ram .
If you make it closer in price,you 'll find it will become more popular .
Its basically like the Google phone in a bigger form factor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason why I never got a convertible touchscreen laptop was they were at least twice as expensive as a normal laptop with similar specs.
Close to $2500 to start, with a weak celeron cpu &amp; little ram.
If you make it closer in price,you'll find it will become more popular.
Its basically like the Google phone in a bigger form factor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704449</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28713267</id>
	<title>Better than the 399$ Touchbook?</title>
	<author>Artemis3</author>
	<datestamp>1247686200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.alwaysinnovating.com/touchbook/" title="alwaysinnovating.com">http://www.alwaysinnovating.com/touchbook/</a> [alwaysinnovating.com]</p><p># Texas Instruments OMAP3530 with Micron 256MB (RAM) + 256MB (NAND) Memory<br># 8.9 inches 1024x600 A+ screen<br># Main storage: 8GB SD card -- we decided to change from Micro SD to standard SD, so that you can easily upgrade it<br># Internal USB wifi 802.11 b/g/n powered by a Ralink 3070 chipset<br># Internal USB bluetooth class 2.1<br># FCC, CE, UL-certified, 5V, 3.5A power adapter<br># 8.9 inches pressure sensitive touch screen<br># US Qwerty 24cm-large keyboard -- around 95\% of the size of a standard keyboard<br># Cirque Touchpad<br># Two Owolff high-quality internal stereo speakers<br># 3D accelerometer<br># Two internal batteries 6000 and 12000 mAh -- it can be replaced with a screw driver<br># 7 USB ports: three external, four internal, three of them may be reserved for wifi, bluetooth and keyboard<br># Bi-color silver/black case -- see photos -- with a beautiful dark-red back cover (we decided to go only for red for the first batch as it really jumps out, you won't regret it).<br># Secured attachment system of tablet into keyboard<br># Independent magnet system for the tablet -- we don't want your Touch Book to un-magnetize all your credit cards while carrying it in your bag!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.alwaysinnovating.com/touchbook/ [ alwaysinnovating.com ] # Texas Instruments OMAP3530 with Micron 256MB ( RAM ) + 256MB ( NAND ) Memory # 8.9 inches 1024x600 A + screen # Main storage : 8GB SD card -- we decided to change from Micro SD to standard SD , so that you can easily upgrade it # Internal USB wifi 802.11 b/g/n powered by a Ralink 3070 chipset # Internal USB bluetooth class 2.1 # FCC , CE , UL-certified , 5V , 3.5A power adapter # 8.9 inches pressure sensitive touch screen # US Qwerty 24cm-large keyboard -- around 95 \ % of the size of a standard keyboard # Cirque Touchpad # Two Owolff high-quality internal stereo speakers # 3D accelerometer # Two internal batteries 6000 and 12000 mAh -- it can be replaced with a screw driver # 7 USB ports : three external , four internal , three of them may be reserved for wifi , bluetooth and keyboard # Bi-color silver/black case -- see photos -- with a beautiful dark-red back cover ( we decided to go only for red for the first batch as it really jumps out , you wo n't regret it ) . # Secured attachment system of tablet into keyboard # Independent magnet system for the tablet -- we do n't want your Touch Book to un-magnetize all your credit cards while carrying it in your bag !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.alwaysinnovating.com/touchbook/ [alwaysinnovating.com]# Texas Instruments OMAP3530 with Micron 256MB (RAM) + 256MB (NAND) Memory# 8.9 inches 1024x600 A+ screen# Main storage: 8GB SD card -- we decided to change from Micro SD to standard SD, so that you can easily upgrade it# Internal USB wifi 802.11 b/g/n powered by a Ralink 3070 chipset# Internal USB bluetooth class 2.1# FCC, CE, UL-certified, 5V, 3.5A power adapter# 8.9 inches pressure sensitive touch screen# US Qwerty 24cm-large keyboard -- around 95\% of the size of a standard keyboard# Cirque Touchpad# Two Owolff high-quality internal stereo speakers# 3D accelerometer# Two internal batteries 6000 and 12000 mAh -- it can be replaced with a screw driver# 7 USB ports: three external, four internal, three of them may be reserved for wifi, bluetooth and keyboard# Bi-color silver/black case -- see photos -- with a beautiful dark-red back cover (we decided to go only for red for the first batch as it really jumps out, you won't regret it).# Secured attachment system of tablet into keyboard# Independent magnet system for the tablet -- we don't want your Touch Book to un-magnetize all your credit cards while carrying it in your bag!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28709349</id>
	<title>Multi-touc?</title>
	<author>johncandale</author>
	<datestamp>1247657100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At the last trade show demos just over a month ago the T91 had a Multi-touch screen(!), and everyone who like "cool!!"  but it was rumored the ones released July 15 won't be multi touch?? That only the ones that ship with Win 7 in a few months would have the better screen.  TFA doesn't say anything about this either way, anyone know if there is a better screen in a few months?</htmltext>
<tokenext>At the last trade show demos just over a month ago the T91 had a Multi-touch screen ( !
) , and everyone who like " cool ! !
" but it was rumored the ones released July 15 wo n't be multi touch ? ?
That only the ones that ship with Win 7 in a few months would have the better screen .
TFA does n't say anything about this either way , anyone know if there is a better screen in a few months ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At the last trade show demos just over a month ago the T91 had a Multi-touch screen(!
), and everyone who like "cool!!
"  but it was rumored the ones released July 15 won't be multi touch??
That only the ones that ship with Win 7 in a few months would have the better screen.
TFA doesn't say anything about this either way, anyone know if there is a better screen in a few months?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705043</id>
	<title>Re:I'm still waiting...</title>
	<author>Khyber</author>
	<datestamp>1247680920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A netbook with a trackpoint?</p><p>As if the damned keyboard wasn't small enough, now I'll have to deal with brushing up against a nipple in the center of my keyboard and having it accidentally click on shit while I'm trying to type on keys smaller than what my index finger can comfortably sweep across..</p><p>Seriously, what fucking moron decided to make the trackpoint function as a mouse button? This is why I burn off every trackpoint I find nestled in the center of any laptop keyboard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A netbook with a trackpoint ? As if the damned keyboard was n't small enough , now I 'll have to deal with brushing up against a nipple in the center of my keyboard and having it accidentally click on shit while I 'm trying to type on keys smaller than what my index finger can comfortably sweep across..Seriously , what fucking moron decided to make the trackpoint function as a mouse button ?
This is why I burn off every trackpoint I find nestled in the center of any laptop keyboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A netbook with a trackpoint?As if the damned keyboard wasn't small enough, now I'll have to deal with brushing up against a nipple in the center of my keyboard and having it accidentally click on shit while I'm trying to type on keys smaller than what my index finger can comfortably sweep across..Seriously, what fucking moron decided to make the trackpoint function as a mouse button?
This is why I burn off every trackpoint I find nestled in the center of any laptop keyboard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28708329</id>
	<title>Re:Does it ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247652600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>all the kernel mode part of the driver is open source, but all the usermode (api support) is closed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>all the kernel mode part of the driver is open source , but all the usermode ( api support ) is closed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>all the kernel mode part of the driver is open source, but all the usermode (api support) is closed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704401</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704631</id>
	<title>Re:Weak screen mount?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247679000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've owned their R1F model laptop/tablet (fullsize) for about 2 and a half years now, same type of screen mount (just slightly larger to accomodate the bigger screen), and it's steady as ever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've owned their R1F model laptop/tablet ( fullsize ) for about 2 and a half years now , same type of screen mount ( just slightly larger to accomodate the bigger screen ) , and it 's steady as ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've owned their R1F model laptop/tablet (fullsize) for about 2 and a half years now, same type of screen mount (just slightly larger to accomodate the bigger screen), and it's steady as ever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704381</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705145</id>
	<title>Re:Nice try but I'll wait</title>
	<author>Nemyst</author>
	<datestamp>1247681220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Try Googling the T101H then...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Try Googling the T101H then.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try Googling the T101H then...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704457</id>
	<title>I hate corp-speak.</title>
	<author>InfinityWpi</author>
	<datestamp>1247678160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can we never, ever see the phrase 'new usage model' on Slashdot again? How about "New way to use it"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we never , ever see the phrase 'new usage model ' on Slashdot again ?
How about " New way to use it " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we never, ever see the phrase 'new usage model' on Slashdot again?
How about "New way to use it"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28710173</id>
	<title>Re:Nice try but I'll wait</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247661300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please look at the bigger picture - This is only one model from one manufacturer.</p><p>If all the other netbook manufacturers are forced to jump on board, touchscreens could well become a standard feature. So don't panic if this particular model doesn't float your boat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please look at the bigger picture - This is only one model from one manufacturer.If all the other netbook manufacturers are forced to jump on board , touchscreens could well become a standard feature .
So do n't panic if this particular model does n't float your boat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please look at the bigger picture - This is only one model from one manufacturer.If all the other netbook manufacturers are forced to jump on board, touchscreens could well become a standard feature.
So don't panic if this particular model doesn't float your boat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704761</id>
	<title>Re:I'm still waiting...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247679720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... for a netbook to ship with a trackpoint instead of a damned touchpad.</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?catalogId=10551&amp;storeId=10151&amp;langId=-1&amp;categoryId=8198552921644608896" title="sonystyle.com" rel="nofollow">Vaio P Series</a> [sonystyle.com]. Beautiful and small. Unfortunately, it is terribly expensive.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... for a netbook to ship with a trackpoint instead of a damned touchpad .
Vaio P Series [ sonystyle.com ] .
Beautiful and small .
Unfortunately , it is terribly expensive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... for a netbook to ship with a trackpoint instead of a damned touchpad.
Vaio P Series [sonystyle.com].
Beautiful and small.
Unfortunately, it is terribly expensive.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705315</id>
	<title>Re:Does it ...</title>
	<author>initialE</author>
	<datestamp>1247681880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>GMA 500: this means no osx86 on this baby for the moment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GMA 500 : this means no osx86 on this baby for the moment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GMA 500: this means no osx86 on this baby for the moment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28711503</id>
	<title>Re:I'm still waiting...</title>
	<author>4181</author>
	<datestamp>1247670240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... for a netbook to ship with a trackpoint</p></div><p>
Amen brother!
</p><p>
Have you ever heard of someone hardware-hacking their laptop to add a trackpoint to their keyboard.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... for a netbook to ship with a trackpoint Amen brother !
Have you ever heard of someone hardware-hacking their laptop to add a trackpoint to their keyboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... for a netbook to ship with a trackpoint
Amen brother!
Have you ever heard of someone hardware-hacking their laptop to add a trackpoint to their keyboard.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705397</id>
	<title>Re:Finally a tablet at a reasonable price.</title>
	<author>jabelli</author>
	<datestamp>1247682180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, there's some markup because they sell fewer of them, but it's not like adding touch sensing to the screen is free.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , there 's some markup because they sell fewer of them , but it 's not like adding touch sensing to the screen is free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, there's some markup because they sell fewer of them, but it's not like adding touch sensing to the screen is free.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704463</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705529</id>
	<title>Re:I'm still waiting...</title>
	<author>doti</author>
	<datestamp>1247682660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That, and digital video output (ex DVI).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That , and digital video output ( ex DVI ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That, and digital video output (ex DVI).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704527</id>
	<title>Re:Weak screen mount?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247678460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I have friend who has a computer with a similar configuration and after a year the screen would become wobbly, probably because of wear on the joint. Does anyone know whether Asus has taken care of this?</i> </p><p>I'm sure they have. Their plan is probably to sell you next year's model to replace the one you've worn out, once it goes out of warranty.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have friend who has a computer with a similar configuration and after a year the screen would become wobbly , probably because of wear on the joint .
Does anyone know whether Asus has taken care of this ?
I 'm sure they have .
Their plan is probably to sell you next year 's model to replace the one you 've worn out , once it goes out of warranty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have friend who has a computer with a similar configuration and after a year the screen would become wobbly, probably because of wear on the joint.
Does anyone know whether Asus has taken care of this?
I'm sure they have.
Their plan is probably to sell you next year's model to replace the one you've worn out, once it goes out of warranty.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704381</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705057
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704935
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28708329
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704631
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704381
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704463
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28712371
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704307
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28710173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704613
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704613
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704613
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28706259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28706851
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704449
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28709771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704449
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705163
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28711119
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704335
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704287
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28707691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28714697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28709921
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704471
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28711503
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28711551
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704471
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28709209
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704385
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28708891
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705529
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28709633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705129
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704327
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28710501
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28709425
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705575
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704463
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705091
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28711305
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28710033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28706191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704381
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28712995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28708109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704397
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704527
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704381
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704735
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704761
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704565
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704449
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705397
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704463
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704613
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28706553
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704413
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1532223_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28716339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704397
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1532223.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704545
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1532223.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704413
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28706553
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1532223.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704449
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28706851
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28709771
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704565
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1532223.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704373
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705043
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704439
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704861
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705325
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28711305
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705569
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705241
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28711503
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705701
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28712995
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704761
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705529
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1532223.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704463
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705575
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705397
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1532223.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704569
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28707691
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28706191
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1532223.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704381
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704905
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704527
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704631
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1532223.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704613
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28710173
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705145
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705997
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704881
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1532223.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704397
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28708109
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28716339
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1532223.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704391
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1532223.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704327
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705129
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1532223.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704385
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28709209
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1532223.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704265
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1532223.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704471
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28709921
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704811
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28711551
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1532223.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704219
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28712371
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704307
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28706259
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705315
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28708891
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704735
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704765
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28709425
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28709633
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705403
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28714697
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28710033
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704401
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28708329
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705149
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705163
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704935
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705057
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705089
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28710501
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28705091
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1532223.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704189
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1532223.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704287
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28704335
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1532223.28711119
</commentlist>
</conversation>
