<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_15_1518240</id>
	<title>Google Voice Apps Arrive For Android and Blackberry</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1247675700000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://keenpath.com/" rel="nofollow">Mark Mathson</a> writes <i>"Two Google Voice apps have been <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/14/google-voice-apps-for-android-and-blackberry-are-here/">released for Blackberry and Android phones</a>. The Android app is the most complete, and it takes over the native dialer, address book and call log. Users won't be bothered with accidentally dialing numbers through the device phone number. The Blackberry app is less integrated, accessing only the native address book, and uses its own dialer. Users can't simply go into the call log and return missed calls. They need to go back to the address book and select Google Voice to make the call. Still, it solves a big problem. The apps also allow users to <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/google-voice-mobile-app-for-blackberry.html">access the core features of Google Voice</a>. You can listen to or read voicemails and text messages (all voicemails are automatically transcribed), access call history, send SMS messages and place international calls at low rates."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mark Mathson writes " Two Google Voice apps have been released for Blackberry and Android phones .
The Android app is the most complete , and it takes over the native dialer , address book and call log .
Users wo n't be bothered with accidentally dialing numbers through the device phone number .
The Blackberry app is less integrated , accessing only the native address book , and uses its own dialer .
Users ca n't simply go into the call log and return missed calls .
They need to go back to the address book and select Google Voice to make the call .
Still , it solves a big problem .
The apps also allow users to access the core features of Google Voice .
You can listen to or read voicemails and text messages ( all voicemails are automatically transcribed ) , access call history , send SMS messages and place international calls at low rates .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mark Mathson writes "Two Google Voice apps have been released for Blackberry and Android phones.
The Android app is the most complete, and it takes over the native dialer, address book and call log.
Users won't be bothered with accidentally dialing numbers through the device phone number.
The Blackberry app is less integrated, accessing only the native address book, and uses its own dialer.
Users can't simply go into the call log and return missed calls.
They need to go back to the address book and select Google Voice to make the call.
Still, it solves a big problem.
The apps also allow users to access the core features of Google Voice.
You can listen to or read voicemails and text messages (all voicemails are automatically transcribed), access call history, send SMS messages and place international calls at low rates.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705187</id>
	<title>Re:This is great.</title>
	<author>ickleberry</author>
	<datestamp>1247681400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>you do realise that Chrome/Android are just pushing platforms for Google's Web services (and therefore AdWords) and the fact that they use the Linux kernel is just a minor technical detail since most of these devices will be too locked down to even get a bash session running without a day's worth of jailbreaking and (in the case of Android) unlocking.</htmltext>
<tokenext>you do realise that Chrome/Android are just pushing platforms for Google 's Web services ( and therefore AdWords ) and the fact that they use the Linux kernel is just a minor technical detail since most of these devices will be too locked down to even get a bash session running without a day 's worth of jailbreaking and ( in the case of Android ) unlocking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you do realise that Chrome/Android are just pushing platforms for Google's Web services (and therefore AdWords) and the fact that they use the Linux kernel is just a minor technical detail since most of these devices will be too locked down to even get a bash session running without a day's worth of jailbreaking and (in the case of Android) unlocking.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704699</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28707135</id>
	<title>I've been using the app since it was grand central</title>
	<author>DragonTHC</author>
	<datestamp>1247689860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was using the app on my G1 when it was still called grand central.</p><p>It's an excellent app.  Now you can place calls direct with GV.</p><p>The SMS portion is useless since I use the googletalk app.</p><p>The voicemail is great.  I just wish they included GV configuration in the app and the ringshare service.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was using the app on my G1 when it was still called grand central.It 's an excellent app .
Now you can place calls direct with GV.The SMS portion is useless since I use the googletalk app.The voicemail is great .
I just wish they included GV configuration in the app and the ringshare service .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was using the app on my G1 when it was still called grand central.It's an excellent app.
Now you can place calls direct with GV.The SMS portion is useless since I use the googletalk app.The voicemail is great.
I just wish they included GV configuration in the app and the ringshare service.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28708241</id>
	<title>Re:Hypocrites</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1247652180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tell me what they have done that's worse them MS or a fictional Government?</p><p>MS has earned hatred through crappy tools, lies, and being a bully. They're size isn't the point. Yes I know, you can't be a bully without being that size, but that is a seperate issue.</p><p>And Big Brother is a fictional government that can't, in all practicality, actually happen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tell me what they have done that 's worse them MS or a fictional Government ? MS has earned hatred through crappy tools , lies , and being a bully .
They 're size is n't the point .
Yes I know , you ca n't be a bully without being that size , but that is a seperate issue.And Big Brother is a fictional government that ca n't , in all practicality , actually happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tell me what they have done that's worse them MS or a fictional Government?MS has earned hatred through crappy tools, lies, and being a bully.
They're size isn't the point.
Yes I know, you can't be a bully without being that size, but that is a seperate issue.And Big Brother is a fictional government that can't, in all practicality, actually happen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704739</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705633</id>
	<title>Re:Unlimited Calling</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1247683020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aren't most of the Fav5 plans within about $20 of the unlimited plan from the phone company?</p><p>Looking, Alltel starts friends and family at $40 (for a local plan) and it look like a mostly unlimited national plan is $90.</p><p>Boost mobile has unlimited for $50:</p><p><a href="http://plans.boostmobile.com/monthlyunlimited.aspx" title="boostmobile.com" rel="nofollow">http://plans.boostmobile.com/monthlyunlimited.aspx</a> [boostmobile.com]</p><p>But I don't think they have quite the same coverage as the networks (I know they use Sprint's network, but I'm not sure if they have any roaming agreements with Verizon; if they do not, they would not have equivalent coverage to Sprint).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are n't most of the Fav5 plans within about $ 20 of the unlimited plan from the phone company ? Looking , Alltel starts friends and family at $ 40 ( for a local plan ) and it look like a mostly unlimited national plan is $ 90.Boost mobile has unlimited for $ 50 : http : //plans.boostmobile.com/monthlyunlimited.aspx [ boostmobile.com ] But I do n't think they have quite the same coverage as the networks ( I know they use Sprint 's network , but I 'm not sure if they have any roaming agreements with Verizon ; if they do not , they would not have equivalent coverage to Sprint ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aren't most of the Fav5 plans within about $20 of the unlimited plan from the phone company?Looking, Alltel starts friends and family at $40 (for a local plan) and it look like a mostly unlimited national plan is $90.Boost mobile has unlimited for $50:http://plans.boostmobile.com/monthlyunlimited.aspx [boostmobile.com]But I don't think they have quite the same coverage as the networks (I know they use Sprint's network, but I'm not sure if they have any roaming agreements with Verizon; if they do not, they would not have equivalent coverage to Sprint).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705365</id>
	<title>International?</title>
	<author>Svippy</author>
	<datestamp>1247682060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure, they say it can make "cheap international calls", but can it understand if I ask it to call someone in my native language (which, for the record, is not English)?</p><p>Can it transcript voicemails that are in another language than English?  Because very few of my voicemails are in English.  Very few of my contacts on my phone has an English clinging name.</p><p>When Apple released their Voice Control for the iPhone 3G S, they never came around this issue, yet speaking of it in the same keynote as they talked about how many countries they were going to sell it in and not only that, how great their internationalisation was going.</p><p>I guess multiple language support is just a fevered dream of mine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , they say it can make " cheap international calls " , but can it understand if I ask it to call someone in my native language ( which , for the record , is not English ) ? Can it transcript voicemails that are in another language than English ?
Because very few of my voicemails are in English .
Very few of my contacts on my phone has an English clinging name.When Apple released their Voice Control for the iPhone 3G S , they never came around this issue , yet speaking of it in the same keynote as they talked about how many countries they were going to sell it in and not only that , how great their internationalisation was going.I guess multiple language support is just a fevered dream of mine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, they say it can make "cheap international calls", but can it understand if I ask it to call someone in my native language (which, for the record, is not English)?Can it transcript voicemails that are in another language than English?
Because very few of my voicemails are in English.
Very few of my contacts on my phone has an English clinging name.When Apple released their Voice Control for the iPhone 3G S, they never came around this issue, yet speaking of it in the same keynote as they talked about how many countries they were going to sell it in and not only that, how great their internationalisation was going.I guess multiple language support is just a fevered dream of mine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704827</id>
	<title>Unlimited Calling</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247680020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just add your Google Voice # to your Fav5 plan or whatever and use these apps w/Google Voice to route all your outbound calls, the cellular company only thinks your calling the same number and google is routing it for you. If you willing to ditch caller-id you can configure google voice so all inbound calls have your Google # as caller ID.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just add your Google Voice # to your Fav5 plan or whatever and use these apps w/Google Voice to route all your outbound calls , the cellular company only thinks your calling the same number and google is routing it for you .
If you willing to ditch caller-id you can configure google voice so all inbound calls have your Google # as caller ID .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just add your Google Voice # to your Fav5 plan or whatever and use these apps w/Google Voice to route all your outbound calls, the cellular company only thinks your calling the same number and google is routing it for you.
If you willing to ditch caller-id you can configure google voice so all inbound calls have your Google # as caller ID.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705435</id>
	<title>Re:Hypocrites</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1247682300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They say "do no evil" or something, we gotta trust them<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>These people are actually running Google coded kernel, on a device advertised as "Google powered". It must be a bit late to convince them about the privacy risks.</p><p>I am actually surprised that Google doesn`t go more evil considering how ignorant people have become about their privacy and rights. Well, Google powered netbook will be probably free to grab and you will probably get shocked at people asking for "invitation codes".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They say " do no evil " or something , we got ta trust them : ) These people are actually running Google coded kernel , on a device advertised as " Google powered " .
It must be a bit late to convince them about the privacy risks.I am actually surprised that Google doesn ` t go more evil considering how ignorant people have become about their privacy and rights .
Well , Google powered netbook will be probably free to grab and you will probably get shocked at people asking for " invitation codes " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They say "do no evil" or something, we gotta trust them :)These people are actually running Google coded kernel, on a device advertised as "Google powered".
It must be a bit late to convince them about the privacy risks.I am actually surprised that Google doesn`t go more evil considering how ignorant people have become about their privacy and rights.
Well, Google powered netbook will be probably free to grab and you will probably get shocked at people asking for "invitation codes".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704739</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28714123</id>
	<title>US-only..</title>
	<author>(Score:1)</author>
	<datestamp>1247739360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I got my invite last week, but since GV is not "available" outside the US, I'm not even allowed to register..<br>It's (again) a US-only thing..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I got my invite last week , but since GV is not " available " outside the US , I 'm not even allowed to register..It 's ( again ) a US-only thing. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got my invite last week, but since GV is not "available" outside the US, I'm not even allowed to register..It's (again) a US-only thing..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705289</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28706689</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get the hysteria over Google Voice</title>
	<author>MooseMuffin</author>
	<datestamp>1247687880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>)</p><p>/stupid filter text</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>) /stupid filter text</tokentext>
<sentencetext>)/stupid filter text</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705181</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704699</id>
	<title>This is great.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247679360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just imagine what things like this will mean for Chrome OS too! I have Android running on a quad-core Core 2 Duo system and performance is amazing--GO LINUX!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just imagine what things like this will mean for Chrome OS too !
I have Android running on a quad-core Core 2 Duo system and performance is amazing--GO LINUX ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just imagine what things like this will mean for Chrome OS too!
I have Android running on a quad-core Core 2 Duo system and performance is amazing--GO LINUX!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28709443</id>
	<title>Porting numbers...</title>
	<author>Stormwave0</author>
	<datestamp>1247657460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google Voice is a really nice service but the key issue I have with it is that I can't port my number. Sure, I'd love all the extra little perks it offers like visual voice mail, but I won't get any of these features until I tell everyone to use my new Google number. Call me attached and lazy if you will, but that's a fair amount of effort. Let me port my number and then I'll use your services. <br> <br>

That being said I've only used my Grand Central / Google Voice number on two occasions: helping my parents buy a car and buying a car myself. It's fantastic to give them this number and throw it on Do Not Disturb mode. I never had to deal with a single sales call.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Voice is a really nice service but the key issue I have with it is that I ca n't port my number .
Sure , I 'd love all the extra little perks it offers like visual voice mail , but I wo n't get any of these features until I tell everyone to use my new Google number .
Call me attached and lazy if you will , but that 's a fair amount of effort .
Let me port my number and then I 'll use your services .
That being said I 've only used my Grand Central / Google Voice number on two occasions : helping my parents buy a car and buying a car myself .
It 's fantastic to give them this number and throw it on Do Not Disturb mode .
I never had to deal with a single sales call .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Voice is a really nice service but the key issue I have with it is that I can't port my number.
Sure, I'd love all the extra little perks it offers like visual voice mail, but I won't get any of these features until I tell everyone to use my new Google number.
Call me attached and lazy if you will, but that's a fair amount of effort.
Let me port my number and then I'll use your services.
That being said I've only used my Grand Central / Google Voice number on two occasions: helping my parents buy a car and buying a car myself.
It's fantastic to give them this number and throw it on Do Not Disturb mode.
I never had to deal with a single sales call.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705287</id>
	<title>Hope this crashes Skype for good</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1247681760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bet Symbian and even high end J2ME client will follow soon and if people choose an officially shipped, supported application instead of 3rd party clones, Skype will be really hit big time.</p><p>It has been YEARS that Symbian S60 client of Skype, the one you can click and download to any S60 device was promised but never shipped. It comes with some phone in UK I heard. That is it. They also spread some real FUD about J2ME in the process when people were naive enough to ask them.</p><p>Skype and eBay suits running it really needs a lesson. How hard to admit that it was a really massive fault, they can`t run a VOIP company which has to support thousands of different configurations and put it to market or something? Not just that, they released iPhone version in matter of months and Windows Mobile version is there for ages. Something really goes on in those offices, something really interesting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet Symbian and even high end J2ME client will follow soon and if people choose an officially shipped , supported application instead of 3rd party clones , Skype will be really hit big time.It has been YEARS that Symbian S60 client of Skype , the one you can click and download to any S60 device was promised but never shipped .
It comes with some phone in UK I heard .
That is it .
They also spread some real FUD about J2ME in the process when people were naive enough to ask them.Skype and eBay suits running it really needs a lesson .
How hard to admit that it was a really massive fault , they can ` t run a VOIP company which has to support thousands of different configurations and put it to market or something ?
Not just that , they released iPhone version in matter of months and Windows Mobile version is there for ages .
Something really goes on in those offices , something really interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet Symbian and even high end J2ME client will follow soon and if people choose an officially shipped, supported application instead of 3rd party clones, Skype will be really hit big time.It has been YEARS that Symbian S60 client of Skype, the one you can click and download to any S60 device was promised but never shipped.
It comes with some phone in UK I heard.
That is it.
They also spread some real FUD about J2ME in the process when people were naive enough to ask them.Skype and eBay suits running it really needs a lesson.
How hard to admit that it was a really massive fault, they can`t run a VOIP company which has to support thousands of different configurations and put it to market or something?
Not just that, they released iPhone version in matter of months and Windows Mobile version is there for ages.
Something really goes on in those offices, something really interesting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28706899</id>
	<title>Txt to voice</title>
	<author>xgr3gx</author>
	<datestamp>1247688780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be great if someone wrote a voice app that allowed you to dicate text messages to your friends, since typing on those little keypads can be a pain.</p><p>And it would be even cooler if your friends' phones had a voice app that could then dictate the text message back through the phone's speaker.</p><p>That would be a great set of apps for a phone, I hope someone comes up with it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p<br>(Yuk Yuk)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be great if someone wrote a voice app that allowed you to dicate text messages to your friends , since typing on those little keypads can be a pain.And it would be even cooler if your friends ' phones had a voice app that could then dictate the text message back through the phone 's speaker.That would be a great set of apps for a phone , I hope someone comes up with it : p ( Yuk Yuk )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be great if someone wrote a voice app that allowed you to dicate text messages to your friends, since typing on those little keypads can be a pain.And it would be even cooler if your friends' phones had a voice app that could then dictate the text message back through the phone's speaker.That would be a great set of apps for a phone, I hope someone comes up with it :p(Yuk Yuk)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704825</id>
	<title>Re:Hypocrites</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247680020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>when they DO EVIL(TM) like M$ then we shall come to that realization, dear sir. meanwhile, M$ is the GREAT EVIL(TM).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>when they DO EVIL ( TM ) like M $ then we shall come to that realization , dear sir .
meanwhile , M $ is the GREAT EVIL ( TM ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>when they DO EVIL(TM) like M$ then we shall come to that realization, dear sir.
meanwhile, M$ is the GREAT EVIL(TM).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704739</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705009</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get the hysteria over Google Voice</title>
	<author>CannonballHead</author>
	<datestamp>1247680800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I barely use it, but the voicemail transcription and text-messaging "conversation" history is cool.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I barely use it , but the voicemail transcription and text-messaging " conversation " history is cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I barely use it, but the voicemail transcription and text-messaging "conversation" history is cool.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704729</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28708195</id>
	<title>Re:It'd be nice...</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1247651940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>huh, I've been on that list since pretty close to day 1. Still no invite.<br>Must be my high standards~</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>huh , I 've been on that list since pretty close to day 1 .
Still no invite.Must be my high standards ~</tokentext>
<sentencetext>huh, I've been on that list since pretty close to day 1.
Still no invite.Must be my high standards~</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28706009</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28746363</id>
	<title>Android is google&#226;(TM)s phone!</title>
	<author>makemine</author>
	<datestamp>1247995440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>People have other phones than the iphone, its not the end all and everywhere machine you think it is. Android is google&#226;(TM)s phone, its natural they would come out with the app for their products before others. Also, Blackberrys (RIM) have more marketshare than iPhones (Apple) too</htmltext>
<tokenext>People have other phones than the iphone , its not the end all and everywhere machine you think it is .
Android is google   ( TM ) s phone , its natural they would come out with the app for their products before others .
Also , Blackberrys ( RIM ) have more marketshare than iPhones ( Apple ) too</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People have other phones than the iphone, its not the end all and everywhere machine you think it is.
Android is googleâ(TM)s phone, its natural they would come out with the app for their products before others.
Also, Blackberrys (RIM) have more marketshare than iPhones (Apple) too</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705105</id>
	<title>No luck on G1</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247681100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Sorry, Google Voice is not supported on your device."</p><p>Happens when I hit that site with my G1. OTOH, GV for Android still works well: <a href="http://docs.evancharlton.com/docs/GV" title="evancharlton.com" rel="nofollow">http://docs.evancharlton.com/docs/GV</a> [evancharlton.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Sorry , Google Voice is not supported on your device .
" Happens when I hit that site with my G1 .
OTOH , GV for Android still works well : http : //docs.evancharlton.com/docs/GV [ evancharlton.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Sorry, Google Voice is not supported on your device.
"Happens when I hit that site with my G1.
OTOH, GV for Android still works well: http://docs.evancharlton.com/docs/GV [evancharlton.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28708261</id>
	<title>Re:This is great.</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1247652240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, and?<br>You do realize that TV is just a platfor to push ads, right?<br>Big deal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , and ? You do realize that TV is just a platfor to push ads , right ? Big deal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, and?You do realize that TV is just a platfor to push ads, right?Big deal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705187</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705513</id>
	<title>fp 3it3h</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247682600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">in 8atio of 5 to would you like to</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>in 8atio of 5 to would you like to [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in 8atio of 5 to would you like to [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704917</id>
	<title>Anyone else have issues with this and GAFYD?</title>
	<author>$1uck</author>
	<datestamp>1247680380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is the second time I've come across issues with GAFYD and google services.   I'm using GAFYD on my g1 and I have a google Voice account with the same account,  yet when I try to run the android voice app it says I have no GV account associated with a different google account I have (one that isn't setup on the phone, not sure how it knew it was associated to me at all).

Anyone get it working successfully with a nonstandard google account?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the second time I 've come across issues with GAFYD and google services .
I 'm using GAFYD on my g1 and I have a google Voice account with the same account , yet when I try to run the android voice app it says I have no GV account associated with a different google account I have ( one that is n't setup on the phone , not sure how it knew it was associated to me at all ) .
Anyone get it working successfully with a nonstandard google account ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the second time I've come across issues with GAFYD and google services.
I'm using GAFYD on my g1 and I have a google Voice account with the same account,  yet when I try to run the android voice app it says I have no GV account associated with a different google account I have (one that isn't setup on the phone, not sure how it knew it was associated to me at all).
Anyone get it working successfully with a nonstandard google account?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28707933</id>
	<title>Cheap, Easy Phone Service At Last?</title>
	<author>CopaceticOpus</author>
	<datestamp>1247650440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is there a way to configure the phone to direct all calls through a wireless router, when the router is in range? I would like to make internet-based calls rather than cell-based calls when I am at home.</p><p>The reason for this is that I make very few calls away from home. This sort of setup would allow me to pay under $10 per month for all my phone calls, and yet have only a single number.</p><p>Currently I use a pay-as-you-go cell phone for when I am out, and Skype for when I am at home, but this is not ideal. I have to juggle two phone numbers, and I have to use my computer to make most calls. This could solve these problems once and for all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there a way to configure the phone to direct all calls through a wireless router , when the router is in range ?
I would like to make internet-based calls rather than cell-based calls when I am at home.The reason for this is that I make very few calls away from home .
This sort of setup would allow me to pay under $ 10 per month for all my phone calls , and yet have only a single number.Currently I use a pay-as-you-go cell phone for when I am out , and Skype for when I am at home , but this is not ideal .
I have to juggle two phone numbers , and I have to use my computer to make most calls .
This could solve these problems once and for all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there a way to configure the phone to direct all calls through a wireless router, when the router is in range?
I would like to make internet-based calls rather than cell-based calls when I am at home.The reason for this is that I make very few calls away from home.
This sort of setup would allow me to pay under $10 per month for all my phone calls, and yet have only a single number.Currently I use a pay-as-you-go cell phone for when I am out, and Skype for when I am at home, but this is not ideal.
I have to juggle two phone numbers, and I have to use my computer to make most calls.
This could solve these problems once and for all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704739</id>
	<title>Hypocrites</title>
	<author>ringbarer</author>
	<datestamp>1247679600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just how ubiquitous do Google have to be before geeks realise they're far, far worse than Microsoft and Big Brother combined?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just how ubiquitous do Google have to be before geeks realise they 're far , far worse than Microsoft and Big Brother combined ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just how ubiquitous do Google have to be before geeks realise they're far, far worse than Microsoft and Big Brother combined?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704791</id>
	<title>Interesting to see what the UK carriers will do...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247679840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a G1 through T-Mobile in the UK. My terms and conditions say that I'm not allowed to use VoIP services (well, the wording's a little more complicated than that, but that's the gist of it).</p><p>Be interesting to see what happens as and when Google Voice gets rolled out to the UK. In the meantime, can somebody invite me to join the US trial and provide the necessary details of harbour?</p><p>Nick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a G1 through T-Mobile in the UK .
My terms and conditions say that I 'm not allowed to use VoIP services ( well , the wording 's a little more complicated than that , but that 's the gist of it ) .Be interesting to see what happens as and when Google Voice gets rolled out to the UK .
In the meantime , can somebody invite me to join the US trial and provide the necessary details of harbour ? Nick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a G1 through T-Mobile in the UK.
My terms and conditions say that I'm not allowed to use VoIP services (well, the wording's a little more complicated than that, but that's the gist of it).Be interesting to see what happens as and when Google Voice gets rolled out to the UK.
In the meantime, can somebody invite me to join the US trial and provide the necessary details of harbour?Nick.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704729</id>
	<title>I don't get the hysteria over Google Voice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247679540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But I suppose that's because I'm usually on the phone less than an hour a month.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But I suppose that 's because I 'm usually on the phone less than an hour a month .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I suppose that's because I'm usually on the phone less than an hour a month.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28715979</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting to see what the UK carriers will do</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247755860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While you are using the mobile phone service, you are using the Internet access side of it. So you avoid using the (probably) more expensive cellular voice system.</p><p>This could really eat at the heart of the profits of the traditional carriers.</p><p>Another example would be using Google voice via a web browser to send/receive SMS. A few seconds usage of my Verizon account's "unlimited web and email" could transfer thousands of text messages. Net value of 1000 SMS is $150.</p><p>Today you will probably still want a cell phone service. But if you spend 90\% of your time within range of a wifi access point, how about a mobile device that looks like a cell phone, but uses wifi and costs about zero $ per month. A fancier version could switch to a pay as you go plan when out of reach of wifi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While you are using the mobile phone service , you are using the Internet access side of it .
So you avoid using the ( probably ) more expensive cellular voice system.This could really eat at the heart of the profits of the traditional carriers.Another example would be using Google voice via a web browser to send/receive SMS .
A few seconds usage of my Verizon account 's " unlimited web and email " could transfer thousands of text messages .
Net value of 1000 SMS is $ 150.Today you will probably still want a cell phone service .
But if you spend 90 \ % of your time within range of a wifi access point , how about a mobile device that looks like a cell phone , but uses wifi and costs about zero $ per month .
A fancier version could switch to a pay as you go plan when out of reach of wifi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While you are using the mobile phone service, you are using the Internet access side of it.
So you avoid using the (probably) more expensive cellular voice system.This could really eat at the heart of the profits of the traditional carriers.Another example would be using Google voice via a web browser to send/receive SMS.
A few seconds usage of my Verizon account's "unlimited web and email" could transfer thousands of text messages.
Net value of 1000 SMS is $150.Today you will probably still want a cell phone service.
But if you spend 90\% of your time within range of a wifi access point, how about a mobile device that looks like a cell phone, but uses wifi and costs about zero $ per month.
A fancier version could switch to a pay as you go plan when out of reach of wifi.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28708051</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28706531</id>
	<title>Re:International?</title>
	<author>NiteShaed</author>
	<datestamp>1247687220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Sure, they say it can make "cheap international calls", but can it understand if I ask it to call someone in my native language (which, for the record, is not English)?</p></div></blockquote><p>I'm not sure what you're asking here.....you dial the number, and the call is placed like any other phone.  What difference does it make what language the actual conversation is in?</p><blockquote><div><p>Can it transcript voicemails that are in another language than English? Because very few of my voicemails are in English. Very few of my contacts on my phone has an English clinging name.</p></div></blockquote><p>AFAIK, transcription is English only (at least for now).  Considering that the service is only available at this point in the U.S. though, that's not particularly surprising....</p><blockquote><div><p>I guess multiple language support is just a fevered dream of mine.</p></div></blockquote><p>Give 'em a chance.....so far they only have a limited run going, and it's only in the U.S..  If they get a good response and decide to go international with it, I would expect that multiple languages would go along with that.....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , they say it can make " cheap international calls " , but can it understand if I ask it to call someone in my native language ( which , for the record , is not English ) ? I 'm not sure what you 're asking here.....you dial the number , and the call is placed like any other phone .
What difference does it make what language the actual conversation is in ? Can it transcript voicemails that are in another language than English ?
Because very few of my voicemails are in English .
Very few of my contacts on my phone has an English clinging name.AFAIK , transcription is English only ( at least for now ) .
Considering that the service is only available at this point in the U.S. though , that 's not particularly surprising....I guess multiple language support is just a fevered dream of mine.Give 'em a chance.....so far they only have a limited run going , and it 's only in the U.S.. If they get a good response and decide to go international with it , I would expect that multiple languages would go along with that.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, they say it can make "cheap international calls", but can it understand if I ask it to call someone in my native language (which, for the record, is not English)?I'm not sure what you're asking here.....you dial the number, and the call is placed like any other phone.
What difference does it make what language the actual conversation is in?Can it transcript voicemails that are in another language than English?
Because very few of my voicemails are in English.
Very few of my contacts on my phone has an English clinging name.AFAIK, transcription is English only (at least for now).
Considering that the service is only available at this point in the U.S. though, that's not particularly surprising....I guess multiple language support is just a fevered dream of mine.Give 'em a chance.....so far they only have a limited run going, and it's only in the U.S..  If they get a good response and decide to go international with it, I would expect that multiple languages would go along with that.....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705365</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705181</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get the hysteria over Google Voice</title>
	<author>ajs</author>
	<datestamp>1247681400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But I suppose that's because I'm usually on the phone less than an hour a month.</p></div><p>I don't see why time on the phone is meaningful in evaluating Google Voice (and frankly, I'm shocked to hear that there's "hysteria", given that everyone I talk to has never heard of it.</p><p>Google Voice provides a number of useful features: portable phone numbers that can be directed at multiple devices simultaneously; Web-accessible voice mail; voice main transcription and so on. They're useful features. That's really all there is to it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But I suppose that 's because I 'm usually on the phone less than an hour a month.I do n't see why time on the phone is meaningful in evaluating Google Voice ( and frankly , I 'm shocked to hear that there 's " hysteria " , given that everyone I talk to has never heard of it.Google Voice provides a number of useful features : portable phone numbers that can be directed at multiple devices simultaneously ; Web-accessible voice mail ; voice main transcription and so on .
They 're useful features .
That 's really all there is to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I suppose that's because I'm usually on the phone less than an hour a month.I don't see why time on the phone is meaningful in evaluating Google Voice (and frankly, I'm shocked to hear that there's "hysteria", given that everyone I talk to has never heard of it.Google Voice provides a number of useful features: portable phone numbers that can be directed at multiple devices simultaneously; Web-accessible voice mail; voice main transcription and so on.
They're useful features.
That's really all there is to it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704729</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28708051</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting to see what the UK carriers will do</title>
	<author>Korin43</author>
	<datestamp>1247650980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google voice doesn't take the place of your phone service, it uses it. What you do is call the number Google gives you, then it places the call. So as far as your phone company is concerned, you spend the entire call connected to Google.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google voice does n't take the place of your phone service , it uses it .
What you do is call the number Google gives you , then it places the call .
So as far as your phone company is concerned , you spend the entire call connected to Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google voice doesn't take the place of your phone service, it uses it.
What you do is call the number Google gives you, then it places the call.
So as far as your phone company is concerned, you spend the entire call connected to Google.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704791</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705841</id>
	<title>Palm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247683860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once again us PalmOS users get left in the dust.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once again us PalmOS users get left in the dust .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once again us PalmOS users get left in the dust.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704763</id>
	<title>Re:This is great.</title>
	<author>bogaboga</author>
	<datestamp>1247679720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What apps are you using or running? Any pics/videos...Heck we have Youtube, right? Any issues you'd like Google to address? Just curious!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What apps are you using or running ?
Any pics/videos...Heck we have Youtube , right ?
Any issues you 'd like Google to address ?
Just curious !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What apps are you using or running?
Any pics/videos...Heck we have Youtube, right?
Any issues you'd like Google to address?
Just curious!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704699</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28715845</id>
	<title>Re:It'd be nice...</title>
	<author>mdm-adph</author>
	<datestamp>1247755380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Done that like three times with different email addresses.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Done that like three times with different email addresses .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Done that like three times with different email addresses.
:P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28706009</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28706661</id>
	<title>30 Second Review</title>
	<author>222</author>
	<datestamp>1247687700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Outbound SMS worked and appeared to come from my Google Voice number. My friend replied, and the SMS I recieved did not have his cell number as a sender. It did have my contact entry prefixing his message, though. <br> <br>Example SMS Body: -John Smith: Hey, I got your text.
<br> <br>Outbound calls using the Blackberry app looked like they were trying to connect but never went through. Maybe the load from the app release is a bit more than they planned on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Outbound SMS worked and appeared to come from my Google Voice number .
My friend replied , and the SMS I recieved did not have his cell number as a sender .
It did have my contact entry prefixing his message , though .
Example SMS Body : -John Smith : Hey , I got your text .
Outbound calls using the Blackberry app looked like they were trying to connect but never went through .
Maybe the load from the app release is a bit more than they planned on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Outbound SMS worked and appeared to come from my Google Voice number.
My friend replied, and the SMS I recieved did not have his cell number as a sender.
It did have my contact entry prefixing his message, though.
Example SMS Body: -John Smith: Hey, I got your text.
Outbound calls using the Blackberry app looked like they were trying to connect but never went through.
Maybe the load from the app release is a bit more than they planned on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28714303</id>
	<title>Re:Unlimited Calling</title>
	<author>crolix</author>
	<datestamp>1247741760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unlimited calling is already possible on Android phones. As I already mentioned in another thread, there is now a free application called Crolix Communicator that allows free VoIP calls from one Android phone to another. It uses XMPP/Jingle to do that. Check it out, it's available on the Android Market: <a href="http://www.androlib.com/android.application.crolix-communicator-jADw.aspx/" title="androlib.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.androlib.com/android.application.crolix-communicator-jADw.aspx/</a> [androlib.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unlimited calling is already possible on Android phones .
As I already mentioned in another thread , there is now a free application called Crolix Communicator that allows free VoIP calls from one Android phone to another .
It uses XMPP/Jingle to do that .
Check it out , it 's available on the Android Market : http : //www.androlib.com/android.application.crolix-communicator-jADw.aspx/ [ androlib.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unlimited calling is already possible on Android phones.
As I already mentioned in another thread, there is now a free application called Crolix Communicator that allows free VoIP calls from one Android phone to another.
It uses XMPP/Jingle to do that.
Check it out, it's available on the Android Market: http://www.androlib.com/android.application.crolix-communicator-jADw.aspx/ [androlib.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705289</id>
	<title>It'd be nice...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247681760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...if they released a few more invites to Google Voice to go along with this so people could test -- I mean, I'm sitting here with a G1 and I can't even use it.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...if they released a few more invites to Google Voice to go along with this so people could test -- I mean , I 'm sitting here with a G1 and I ca n't even use it .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...if they released a few more invites to Google Voice to go along with this so people could test -- I mean, I'm sitting here with a G1 and I can't even use it.
:P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28708037</id>
	<title>Re:Unlimited Calling</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247650920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Just add your Google Voice # to your Fav5 plan or whatever and use these apps w/Google Voice to route all your outbound calls, the cellular company only thinks your calling the same number and google is routing it for you. If you willing to ditch caller-id you can configure google voice so all inbound calls have your Google # as caller ID.</p></div><p>
This is clever, but I doubt it will work. First of all, Google will call you back when you make your calls, and you don't know what number Google will call from. (wait for it)</p><p><div class="quote"><p>the cellular company only thinks your calling the same number</p></div><p>Secondly,  even if Google is spoofing a caller ID# that is on your favorites list, its not really calling from that number... Do you really think Google's CallerID spoofing is going to fool your phone company? Really? If true, then all anyone would ever need to do to get free phone calls is be able to spoof caller ID. I doubt it can work. Caller ID spoofs the commercial caller ID, but the back end prolly still knows what the true number is. I bet you can't wait to see next month's bill.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just add your Google Voice # to your Fav5 plan or whatever and use these apps w/Google Voice to route all your outbound calls , the cellular company only thinks your calling the same number and google is routing it for you .
If you willing to ditch caller-id you can configure google voice so all inbound calls have your Google # as caller ID .
This is clever , but I doubt it will work .
First of all , Google will call you back when you make your calls , and you do n't know what number Google will call from .
( wait for it ) the cellular company only thinks your calling the same numberSecondly , even if Google is spoofing a caller ID # that is on your favorites list , its not really calling from that number... Do you really think Google 's CallerID spoofing is going to fool your phone company ?
Really ? If true , then all anyone would ever need to do to get free phone calls is be able to spoof caller ID .
I doubt it can work .
Caller ID spoofs the commercial caller ID , but the back end prolly still knows what the true number is .
I bet you ca n't wait to see next month 's bill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just add your Google Voice # to your Fav5 plan or whatever and use these apps w/Google Voice to route all your outbound calls, the cellular company only thinks your calling the same number and google is routing it for you.
If you willing to ditch caller-id you can configure google voice so all inbound calls have your Google # as caller ID.
This is clever, but I doubt it will work.
First of all, Google will call you back when you make your calls, and you don't know what number Google will call from.
(wait for it)the cellular company only thinks your calling the same numberSecondly,  even if Google is spoofing a caller ID# that is on your favorites list, its not really calling from that number... Do you really think Google's CallerID spoofing is going to fool your phone company?
Really? If true, then all anyone would ever need to do to get free phone calls is be able to spoof caller ID.
I doubt it can work.
Caller ID spoofs the commercial caller ID, but the back end prolly still knows what the true number is.
I bet you can't wait to see next month's bill.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28712051</id>
	<title>If you have T-Mobile and a Blackberry</title>
	<author>vaporland</author>
	<datestamp>1247674500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can set your Google Voice number to be your default voicemail answering number. I use it and it's great. It's in the setup for voicemail - you can set the phone number of the answering service to any number you like. I don't know if Verizon, etc, allow this, but I love having customized answering messages for my friends and family.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can set your Google Voice number to be your default voicemail answering number .
I use it and it 's great .
It 's in the setup for voicemail - you can set the phone number of the answering service to any number you like .
I do n't know if Verizon , etc , allow this , but I love having customized answering messages for my friends and family .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can set your Google Voice number to be your default voicemail answering number.
I use it and it's great.
It's in the setup for voicemail - you can set the phone number of the answering service to any number you like.
I don't know if Verizon, etc, allow this, but I love having customized answering messages for my friends and family.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705033</id>
	<title>Most of this functionality already existed on G1</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247680860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Android Market has had an app available for some time now called GV, written by Evan Charlton.  Not only does it have the "official" Google Voice app functionality, but allows for greater customization of what calls you route through Google Voice vs your regular number.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Android Market has had an app available for some time now called GV , written by Evan Charlton .
Not only does it have the " official " Google Voice app functionality , but allows for greater customization of what calls you route through Google Voice vs your regular number .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Android Market has had an app available for some time now called GV, written by Evan Charlton.
Not only does it have the "official" Google Voice app functionality, but allows for greater customization of what calls you route through Google Voice vs your regular number.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705437</id>
	<title>Cool!</title>
	<author>DJ DeFi</author>
	<datestamp>1247682300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just need a Google Voice invite now!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just need a Google Voice invite now !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just need a Google Voice invite now!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28706009</id>
	<title>Re:It'd be nice...</title>
	<author>Anonymous Psychopath</author>
	<datestamp>1247684520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just fill out the form on the main page. I got my invitation in less than 24 hours last week.</p><p>Here's the link: <a href="https://services.google.com/fb/forms/googlevoiceinvite/" title="google.com">https://services.google.com/fb/forms/googlevoiceinvite/</a> [google.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just fill out the form on the main page .
I got my invitation in less than 24 hours last week.Here 's the link : https : //services.google.com/fb/forms/googlevoiceinvite/ [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just fill out the form on the main page.
I got my invitation in less than 24 hours last week.Here's the link: https://services.google.com/fb/forms/googlevoiceinvite/ [google.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705289</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1518240_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704763
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704699
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1518240_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28708037
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704827
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1518240_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28706689
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705181
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704729
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1518240_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704739
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1518240_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28706531
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705365
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1518240_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705009
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704729
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1518240_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28714303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704827
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1518240_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28715845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28706009
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1518240_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28708261
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705187
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704699
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1518240_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28714123
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1518240_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28708241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704739
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1518240_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28715979
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28708051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704791
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1518240_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705633
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704827
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1518240_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28708195
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28706009
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705289
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_15_1518240_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705435
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704739
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1518240.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704791
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28708051
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28715979
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1518240.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705033
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1518240.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704827
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28714303
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705633
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28708037
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1518240.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28706899
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1518240.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705289
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28706009
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28708195
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28715845
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28714123
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1518240.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704729
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705009
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705181
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28706689
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1518240.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704699
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705187
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28708261
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704763
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1518240.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705365
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28706531
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1518240.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28707933
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1518240.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704739
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705435
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28704825
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28708241
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1518240.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28707135
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_15_1518240.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_15_1518240.28705287
</commentlist>
</conversation>
