<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_07_14_2113256</id>
	<title>Microsoft Readies a Rival To Spotify</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1247561880000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">Barence</a> writes <i>"Microsoft has confirmed it is preparing to <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/technology/microsoft/5817049/Microsoft-is-launching-a-music-streaming-service-this-month.html">launch a music streaming service</a>. The service will be a direct rival to Spotify, hugely popular in the UK (but unavailable in the US), which allows users to stream music for free in return for listening to around a minute's worth of advertisements every half hour. 'It will be a similar principle to Spotify but we are still examining how the business model will work,' said Peter Bale, executive producer of MSN."</i> The article claims that the new service will boost the popularity of the Zune player, though how this is to happen is not explained. There doesn't seem to be a close tie-in between device and service, as there is between the iPod and the iTunes Store.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Barence writes " Microsoft has confirmed it is preparing to launch a music streaming service .
The service will be a direct rival to Spotify , hugely popular in the UK ( but unavailable in the US ) , which allows users to stream music for free in return for listening to around a minute 's worth of advertisements every half hour .
'It will be a similar principle to Spotify but we are still examining how the business model will work, ' said Peter Bale , executive producer of MSN .
" The article claims that the new service will boost the popularity of the Zune player , though how this is to happen is not explained .
There does n't seem to be a close tie-in between device and service , as there is between the iPod and the iTunes Store .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Barence writes "Microsoft has confirmed it is preparing to launch a music streaming service.
The service will be a direct rival to Spotify, hugely popular in the UK (but unavailable in the US), which allows users to stream music for free in return for listening to around a minute's worth of advertisements every half hour.
'It will be a similar principle to Spotify but we are still examining how the business model will work,' said Peter Bale, executive producer of MSN.
" The article claims that the new service will boost the popularity of the Zune player, though how this is to happen is not explained.
There doesn't seem to be a close tie-in between device and service, as there is between the iPod and the iTunes Store.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702159</id>
	<title>Re:Had this for decades...</title>
	<author>durin</author>
	<datestamp>1247665380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's not a bug. That's definitely a feature.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not a bug .
That 's definitely a feature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not a bug.
That's definitely a feature.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703835</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me?</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1247674800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I mean, Zune (iPod), Bing (Google), this (Spottify)... Lagging behind the competition a little, are we?</i></p><p>You're missing something.</p><p>Until a couple of years ago, Microsoft didn't compete with the iPod, they didn't compete with Google (well... mostly), they didn't compete with Pandora or whatever, they didn't compete in console gaming.</p><p>This isn't Microsoft playing catch-up, this is Microsoft entering new markets they weren't in previously. Completely different scenario. So you're not really making any point, not any that's meaningful.</p><p>"A late-comer to the market is struggling to keep up with the established market" isn't news.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , Zune ( iPod ) , Bing ( Google ) , this ( Spottify ) ... Lagging behind the competition a little , are we ? You 're missing something.Until a couple of years ago , Microsoft did n't compete with the iPod , they did n't compete with Google ( well... mostly ) , they did n't compete with Pandora or whatever , they did n't compete in console gaming.This is n't Microsoft playing catch-up , this is Microsoft entering new markets they were n't in previously .
Completely different scenario .
So you 're not really making any point , not any that 's meaningful .
" A late-comer to the market is struggling to keep up with the established market " is n't news .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, Zune (iPod), Bing (Google), this (Spottify)... Lagging behind the competition a little, are we?You're missing something.Until a couple of years ago, Microsoft didn't compete with the iPod, they didn't compete with Google (well... mostly), they didn't compete with Pandora or whatever, they didn't compete in console gaming.This isn't Microsoft playing catch-up, this is Microsoft entering new markets they weren't in previously.
Completely different scenario.
So you're not really making any point, not any that's meaningful.
"A late-comer to the market is struggling to keep up with the established market" isn't news.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28705387</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me?</title>
	<author>msormune</author>
	<datestamp>1247682180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hasn't that been the situation since the days of MS-DOS? I remember they snubbed out competition like DR-DOS with promises of the similar features for MS-DOS "just around the corner"? Features which never happened.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has n't that been the situation since the days of MS-DOS ?
I remember they snubbed out competition like DR-DOS with promises of the similar features for MS-DOS " just around the corner " ?
Features which never happened .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hasn't that been the situation since the days of MS-DOS?
I remember they snubbed out competition like DR-DOS with promises of the similar features for MS-DOS "just around the corner"?
Features which never happened.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701863</id>
	<title>Re:Had this for decades...</title>
	<author>squoozer</author>
	<datestamp>1247662740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Damn you Linux hippes. On my Windows client I'm getting nothing but adverts to make up for all the ones you aren't getting. Yet another reason to hate the penguin.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn you Linux hippes .
On my Windows client I 'm getting nothing but adverts to make up for all the ones you are n't getting .
Yet another reason to hate the penguin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn you Linux hippes.
On my Windows client I'm getting nothing but adverts to make up for all the ones you aren't getting.
Yet another reason to hate the penguin.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697107</id>
	<title>This will affect the Zune in the UK ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247569680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I better tell him the news</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I better tell him the news</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I better tell him the news</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701553</id>
	<title>Re:Last.fm is just fine</title>
	<author>luca</author>
	<datestamp>1247658720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe it is if you live in the US, UK or Germany.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it is if you live in the US , UK or Germany .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it is if you live in the US, UK or Germany.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702599</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247668020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Surface (multitouch), IE8 (any halfway standards-compliant browser)...</p><p>It's tough when they can't out-and-out buy the competition and rebrand it as their own.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Surface ( multitouch ) , IE8 ( any halfway standards-compliant browser ) ...It 's tough when they ca n't out-and-out buy the competition and rebrand it as their own .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Surface (multitouch), IE8 (any halfway standards-compliant browser)...It's tough when they can't out-and-out buy the competition and rebrand it as their own.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702897</id>
	<title>Re:scale &amp; quality</title>
	<author>hedwards</author>
	<datestamp>1247669460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, that's how they operate. They bring in scale and build quality until everybody is conditioned to only buy their products, then they cut out the quality. Observe how craptastic Windows, Office and Internet explorer are compared with the products they sell that have to compete. Say the Zune, office hardware, money and search. I know some smart ass is going to scoff, but Bing and the Zune are quite a bit better than what people suggest.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , that 's how they operate .
They bring in scale and build quality until everybody is conditioned to only buy their products , then they cut out the quality .
Observe how craptastic Windows , Office and Internet explorer are compared with the products they sell that have to compete .
Say the Zune , office hardware , money and search .
I know some smart ass is going to scoff , but Bing and the Zune are quite a bit better than what people suggest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, that's how they operate.
They bring in scale and build quality until everybody is conditioned to only buy their products, then they cut out the quality.
Observe how craptastic Windows, Office and Internet explorer are compared with the products they sell that have to compete.
Say the Zune, office hardware, money and search.
I know some smart ass is going to scoff, but Bing and the Zune are quite a bit better than what people suggest.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696985</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697025</id>
	<title>Re:Microsoft feeling the pinch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247569260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft got this far by being absolute bastards when they're playing the underdog.  To simply write them off is a mistake.  If they are becoming irrelevant only vigilance is going to keep it that way!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft got this far by being absolute bastards when they 're playing the underdog .
To simply write them off is a mistake .
If they are becoming irrelevant only vigilance is going to keep it that way !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft got this far by being absolute bastards when they're playing the underdog.
To simply write them off is a mistake.
If they are becoming irrelevant only vigilance is going to keep it that way!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696887</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701183</id>
	<title>Re:Had this for decades...</title>
	<author>RotateLeftByte</author>
	<datestamp>1247652360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Planet Rock (UK www.planetrock.com ) is certainly not 50\% adverts and available over this funny thing called 'the internet' &amp; DAB. Pity it is not available on Freeview.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Planet Rock ( UK www.planetrock.com ) is certainly not 50 \ % adverts and available over this funny thing called 'the internet ' &amp; DAB .
Pity it is not available on Freeview .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Planet Rock (UK www.planetrock.com ) is certainly not 50\% adverts and available over this funny thing called 'the internet' &amp; DAB.
Pity it is not available on Freeview.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701197</id>
	<title>Is it just me?</title>
	<author>alx5000</author>
	<datestamp>1247652660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it me, or lately MS looks like a fireman with a watering can, running around trying to put out fires everywhere?</p><p>I mean, Zune (iPod), Bing (Google), this (Spottify)... Lagging behind the competition a little, are we?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it me , or lately MS looks like a fireman with a watering can , running around trying to put out fires everywhere ? I mean , Zune ( iPod ) , Bing ( Google ) , this ( Spottify ) ... Lagging behind the competition a little , are we ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it me, or lately MS looks like a fireman with a watering can, running around trying to put out fires everywhere?I mean, Zune (iPod), Bing (Google), this (Spottify)... Lagging behind the competition a little, are we?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28707681</id>
	<title>Re:My prediction...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247649300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the most advanced libraries?</p><p>It's almost exactly the same as the Objective C interface builder that was in NeXTStep 2.0 that shipped going on two decades ago.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NET is far more modern than the IB that comes with OS X.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NET also is well documented, while most of Apple's API calls have little to no documentation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the most advanced libraries ? It 's almost exactly the same as the Objective C interface builder that was in NeXTStep 2.0 that shipped going on two decades ago .
.NET is far more modern than the IB that comes with OS X .
.NET also is well documented , while most of Apple 's API calls have little to no documentation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the most advanced libraries?It's almost exactly the same as the Objective C interface builder that was in NeXTStep 2.0 that shipped going on two decades ago.
.NET is far more modern than the IB that comes with OS X.
.NET also is well documented, while most of Apple's API calls have little to no documentation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703559</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701287</id>
	<title>Re:Hugely popular?</title>
	<author>117</author>
	<datestamp>1247654040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Last.fm haven't 'cut the UK off', in fact the UK is one of three countries (along with the US and Germany), where Last.fm is still available for free.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Last.fm have n't 'cut the UK off ' , in fact the UK is one of three countries ( along with the US and Germany ) , where Last.fm is still available for free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last.fm haven't 'cut the UK off', in fact the UK is one of three countries (along with the US and Germany), where Last.fm is still available for free.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696979</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701227</id>
	<title>Re:Hugely popular?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247652960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Neither you nor TWO of your online contacts?<br>Wow! You must be like, all the statistics-savvy people in the UK!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Neither you nor TWO of your online contacts ? Wow !
You must be like , all the statistics-savvy people in the UK !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Neither you nor TWO of your online contacts?Wow!
You must be like, all the statistics-savvy people in the UK!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696979</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28706693</id>
	<title>Re:Why not last fm</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1247687880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because Last.fm sends information about you to the RIAA (via parent ABC).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because Last.fm sends information about you to the RIAA ( via parent ABC ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because Last.fm sends information about you to the RIAA (via parent ABC).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701305</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702377</id>
	<title>Re:My prediction...</title>
	<author>mythz</author>
	<datestamp>1247666700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft itself supports silverlight on OSX (with safari/FF), so it will guaranteed to run there.</p><p>Any other platform/browser variant will probably need to be supported by moonlight to run (http://mono-project.com/Moonlight).</p><p>Moonlight compatibility is actually pretty advanced, as far as I understand there is a support contract between MS and Novell (Mono) that gives Novell access to all their Silverlight test suites, which is actually a big step in true-compatibility as if all the tests pass there is a very good chance that your silverlight app will work under linux as well.</p><p>Although even if Silverlight works it wont be able provide the User Experience that Spotify does, which is a very well-written truly native application with a primary focus on speed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft itself supports silverlight on OSX ( with safari/FF ) , so it will guaranteed to run there.Any other platform/browser variant will probably need to be supported by moonlight to run ( http : //mono-project.com/Moonlight ) .Moonlight compatibility is actually pretty advanced , as far as I understand there is a support contract between MS and Novell ( Mono ) that gives Novell access to all their Silverlight test suites , which is actually a big step in true-compatibility as if all the tests pass there is a very good chance that your silverlight app will work under linux as well.Although even if Silverlight works it wont be able provide the User Experience that Spotify does , which is a very well-written truly native application with a primary focus on speed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft itself supports silverlight on OSX (with safari/FF), so it will guaranteed to run there.Any other platform/browser variant will probably need to be supported by moonlight to run (http://mono-project.com/Moonlight).Moonlight compatibility is actually pretty advanced, as far as I understand there is a support contract between MS and Novell (Mono) that gives Novell access to all their Silverlight test suites, which is actually a big step in true-compatibility as if all the tests pass there is a very good chance that your silverlight app will work under linux as well.Although even if Silverlight works it wont be able provide the User Experience that Spotify does, which is a very well-written truly native application with a primary focus on speed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702847</id>
	<title>Re:Last.fm is just fine</title>
	<author>hedwards</author>
	<datestamp>1247669220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps it's good enough for you, but what about all those that want to listen to the big names? The way that Last.fm gets to be free is that it's mainly independent artists with very few if any of the big names. At some point if one wishes to hear whatever the major star of the moment is they'll have to pay in some fashion. Listening to a couple of minutes of commercials is something which is perfectly reasonable to expect in exchange for not paying.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps it 's good enough for you , but what about all those that want to listen to the big names ?
The way that Last.fm gets to be free is that it 's mainly independent artists with very few if any of the big names .
At some point if one wishes to hear whatever the major star of the moment is they 'll have to pay in some fashion .
Listening to a couple of minutes of commercials is something which is perfectly reasonable to expect in exchange for not paying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps it's good enough for you, but what about all those that want to listen to the big names?
The way that Last.fm gets to be free is that it's mainly independent artists with very few if any of the big names.
At some point if one wishes to hear whatever the major star of the moment is they'll have to pay in some fashion.
Listening to a couple of minutes of commercials is something which is perfectly reasonable to expect in exchange for not paying.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697111</id>
	<title>Wow !!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247569680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's a huge advance, Just Genius,free music just for some advertising who would have thought of that...   Oh wait...</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a huge advance , Just Genius,free music just for some advertising who would have thought of that... Oh wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a huge advance, Just Genius,free music just for some advertising who would have thought of that...   Oh wait...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701817</id>
	<title>Re:why anything Microsoft</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247662140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe DRM was part of the deal with the RIAA that prevents Spotify accessing the US market.</p><p>If you dance with the devil the devil don't change: the devil changes you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe DRM was part of the deal with the RIAA that prevents Spotify accessing the US market.If you dance with the devil the devil do n't change : the devil changes you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe DRM was part of the deal with the RIAA that prevents Spotify accessing the US market.If you dance with the devil the devil don't change: the devil changes you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697151</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696951</id>
	<title>Last.fm is just fine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247569020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Last.fm is good enough.  There are others.  I don't see the value in another service like theirs.  Last.fm has no commercials.  I wouldn't want to trade a commercial free site for one with commercials.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Last.fm is good enough .
There are others .
I do n't see the value in another service like theirs .
Last.fm has no commercials .
I would n't want to trade a commercial free site for one with commercials .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last.fm is good enough.
There are others.
I don't see the value in another service like theirs.
Last.fm has no commercials.
I wouldn't want to trade a commercial free site for one with commercials.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28708317</id>
	<title>Re:How do you not see the tie-in?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247652540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For once its the American's who are going to be complaining about not getting something all the Europeans have.  Okay except for a Healthcare system...  But you still can't watch Hulu!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For once its the American 's who are going to be complaining about not getting something all the Europeans have .
Okay except for a Healthcare system... But you still ca n't watch Hulu !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For once its the American's who are going to be complaining about not getting something all the Europeans have.
Okay except for a Healthcare system...  But you still can't watch Hulu!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701305</id>
	<title>Why not last fm</title>
	<author>wjh31</author>
	<datestamp>1247654280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So why should i use this instead of lastfm which features no adverts per half hour of music</htmltext>
<tokenext>So why should i use this instead of lastfm which features no adverts per half hour of music</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So why should i use this instead of lastfm which features no adverts per half hour of music</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701491</id>
	<title>Re:Why not last fm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247657760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Spotify application is like no other application ever made - it is impossibly FAST.</p><p>It is actually FASTER to search for and play for a song (that you have never listened to before) than it is to play a song from your local library in any other music player.</p><p>The App, the service, the streaming is so instant that it seems technically impossible to achieve.</p><p>Seriously, no other application even compares - Microsoft will be incapable of delivering anything that comes remotely close to the User Exprience that Spotify has.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Spotify application is like no other application ever made - it is impossibly FAST.It is actually FASTER to search for and play for a song ( that you have never listened to before ) than it is to play a song from your local library in any other music player.The App , the service , the streaming is so instant that it seems technically impossible to achieve.Seriously , no other application even compares - Microsoft will be incapable of delivering anything that comes remotely close to the User Exprience that Spotify has .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Spotify application is like no other application ever made - it is impossibly FAST.It is actually FASTER to search for and play for a song (that you have never listened to before) than it is to play a song from your local library in any other music player.The App, the service, the streaming is so instant that it seems technically impossible to achieve.Seriously, no other application even compares - Microsoft will be incapable of delivering anything that comes remotely close to the User Exprience that Spotify has.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701305</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696887</id>
	<title>Microsoft feeling the pinch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247568780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just how relevant are they these days?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just how relevant are they these days ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just how relevant are they these days?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702677</id>
	<title>Re:Had this for decades...</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1247668440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Depends on the station. Mainstream pro-payola radio stations operate exactly like this, but less "visible" stations actually have variety that matches internet radio, and very few commercials (somehow).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends on the station .
Mainstream pro-payola radio stations operate exactly like this , but less " visible " stations actually have variety that matches internet radio , and very few commercials ( somehow ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends on the station.
Mainstream pro-payola radio stations operate exactly like this, but less "visible" stations actually have variety that matches internet radio, and very few commercials (somehow).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696941</id>
	<title>apple / itunes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247568960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>There doesn't seem to be a close tie-in between device and service, as there is between the iPod and the iTunes Store.</i></p><p>Blah blah, if it's not the way Apple did it then it's wrong, blah blah</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There does n't seem to be a close tie-in between device and service , as there is between the iPod and the iTunes Store.Blah blah , if it 's not the way Apple did it then it 's wrong , blah blah</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There doesn't seem to be a close tie-in between device and service, as there is between the iPod and the iTunes Store.Blah blah, if it's not the way Apple did it then it's wrong, blah blah</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702049</id>
	<title>Re:Why not last fm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247664540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If there's a Flash standalone player available for your platform of choice (Win, Mac for sure - dunno about linux) you can use the Grooveshark player with a footprint of about 10-20MB</p><p>It's not exactly small, but on par with classic Winamp. Plus Grooveshark has a pretty decent collection of music and some nice features.</p><p>If you want it even smaller, create a playlist and then use the embedded Player instead of the main player - ~6MB</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If there 's a Flash standalone player available for your platform of choice ( Win , Mac for sure - dunno about linux ) you can use the Grooveshark player with a footprint of about 10-20MBIt 's not exactly small , but on par with classic Winamp .
Plus Grooveshark has a pretty decent collection of music and some nice features.If you want it even smaller , create a playlist and then use the embedded Player instead of the main player - ~ 6MB</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If there's a Flash standalone player available for your platform of choice (Win, Mac for sure - dunno about linux) you can use the Grooveshark player with a footprint of about 10-20MBIt's not exactly small, but on par with classic Winamp.
Plus Grooveshark has a pretty decent collection of music and some nice features.If you want it even smaller, create a playlist and then use the embedded Player instead of the main player - ~6MB</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701461</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697121</id>
	<title>WTF man</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247569740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>O come the fuck on I'm totally sick of this shit. I'm driving my ass over to there tomorrow and I'm going to have a few words for the management over there.</p><p>This shit has got to motherfucking stop. Microsoft! Please, for the children, SPEND more time working on your god damn OS and less time trying to corner every other market.</p><p>Mod this shit down. I don't give a fuck about any of you... this is fucking bullshit. You fucking know what I'm talking about. someone needs to stand the hell up and say so and apparently I'm the fucking luser who's seen one two many fucking slashdot articles and has totally fucking snapped...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.FUCK.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>O come the fuck on I 'm totally sick of this shit .
I 'm driving my ass over to there tomorrow and I 'm going to have a few words for the management over there.This shit has got to motherfucking stop .
Microsoft ! Please , for the children , SPEND more time working on your god damn OS and less time trying to corner every other market.Mod this shit down .
I do n't give a fuck about any of you... this is fucking bullshit .
You fucking know what I 'm talking about .
someone needs to stand the hell up and say so and apparently I 'm the fucking luser who 's seen one two many fucking slashdot articles and has totally fucking snapped... .FUCK .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>O come the fuck on I'm totally sick of this shit.
I'm driving my ass over to there tomorrow and I'm going to have a few words for the management over there.This shit has got to motherfucking stop.
Microsoft! Please, for the children, SPEND more time working on your god damn OS and less time trying to corner every other market.Mod this shit down.
I don't give a fuck about any of you... this is fucking bullshit.
You fucking know what I'm talking about.
someone needs to stand the hell up and say so and apparently I'm the fucking luser who's seen one two many fucking slashdot articles and has totally fucking snapped... .FUCK.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703907</id>
	<title>There's already a US version - imeem</title>
	<author>illectro</author>
	<datestamp>1247675280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.imeem.com/" title="imeem.com">imeem</a> [imeem.com] has  been doing something similar for a long time - supposedly it was started by some ex-napster people and has basicly turned into napster in a browser, where people can share any music by uploading it to the site, and anyone can listen to it. Advertising is all over the plance and is used to pay the labels/artist/lawyers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>imeem [ imeem.com ] has been doing something similar for a long time - supposedly it was started by some ex-napster people and has basicly turned into napster in a browser , where people can share any music by uploading it to the site , and anyone can listen to it .
Advertising is all over the plance and is used to pay the labels/artist/lawyers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>imeem [imeem.com] has  been doing something similar for a long time - supposedly it was started by some ex-napster people and has basicly turned into napster in a browser, where people can share any music by uploading it to the site, and anyone can listen to it.
Advertising is all over the plance and is used to pay the labels/artist/lawyers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703893</id>
	<title>Re:My prediction...</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1247675220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Zune already has an app. Given, it's not cross-platform, but it would be goofy if Microsoft replaced their perfectly functional (and in fact quite good!) Zune app with a Silverlight app.</p><p>BTW, if you want to try the Zune app, you don't need to own the hardware. It runs approximately 50 times faster than iTunes, with the same featureset.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Zune already has an app .
Given , it 's not cross-platform , but it would be goofy if Microsoft replaced their perfectly functional ( and in fact quite good !
) Zune app with a Silverlight app.BTW , if you want to try the Zune app , you do n't need to own the hardware .
It runs approximately 50 times faster than iTunes , with the same featureset .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Zune already has an app.
Given, it's not cross-platform, but it would be goofy if Microsoft replaced their perfectly functional (and in fact quite good!
) Zune app with a Silverlight app.BTW, if you want to try the Zune app, you don't need to own the hardware.
It runs approximately 50 times faster than iTunes, with the same featureset.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702399</id>
	<title>Re:My prediction...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247666820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So not only would this allow MS to target a larger market, it would get SL on to a huge amount of machines.</p></div><p>What makes you believe the site will be visited and used by a huge number of machines. Remember Soapbox? Microsoft's YouTube killer from yesteryear?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So not only would this allow MS to target a larger market , it would get SL on to a huge amount of machines.What makes you believe the site will be visited and used by a huge number of machines .
Remember Soapbox ?
Microsoft 's YouTube killer from yesteryear ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So not only would this allow MS to target a larger market, it would get SL on to a huge amount of machines.What makes you believe the site will be visited and used by a huge number of machines.
Remember Soapbox?
Microsoft's YouTube killer from yesteryear?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701771</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me?</title>
	<author>nschubach</author>
	<datestamp>1247661660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having just read a quote from Ballmer on Engadget: <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/07/14/steve-ballmer-calls-chrome-os-highly-interesting-says-google/" title="engadget.com">"I don't know if they can't make up their mind or what the problem is over there, but the last time I checked, you don't need two client operating systems. It's good to have one."</a> [engadget.com] Maybe someone should tell him it's good to have one streaming music service, one web search, and one video game console as well.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Having just read a quote from Ballmer on Engadget : " I do n't know if they ca n't make up their mind or what the problem is over there , but the last time I checked , you do n't need two client operating systems .
It 's good to have one .
" [ engadget.com ] Maybe someone should tell him it 's good to have one streaming music service , one web search , and one video game console as well .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having just read a quote from Ballmer on Engadget: "I don't know if they can't make up their mind or what the problem is over there, but the last time I checked, you don't need two client operating systems.
It's good to have one.
" [engadget.com] Maybe someone should tell him it's good to have one streaming music service, one web search, and one video game console as well.
;)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702465</id>
	<title>Re:Why not last fm</title>
	<author>intheshelter</author>
	<datestamp>1247667180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Milliseconds?  I'm afraid I'm going to have to call shenanigans on that statement.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Milliseconds ?
I 'm afraid I 'm going to have to call shenanigans on that statement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Milliseconds?
I'm afraid I'm going to have to call shenanigans on that statement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701461</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701355</id>
	<title>Re:Hugely popular?</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1247655240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you're in the UK, you're missing out. I'm serious.<br> <br> <a href="http://www.spotify.co.uk/" title="spotify.co.uk">Spotify</a> [spotify.co.uk] I've not downloaded music in months.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're in the UK , you 're missing out .
I 'm serious .
Spotify [ spotify.co.uk ] I 've not downloaded music in months .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're in the UK, you're missing out.
I'm serious.
Spotify [spotify.co.uk] I've not downloaded music in months.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696979</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701987</id>
	<title>Re:Hugely popular?</title>
	<author>netean</author>
	<datestamp>1247664000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>what do you mean cut off the UK. I'm in the UK and use last.fm all the time - at home, in internet cafe's etc.

last.fm works just fine in the uk.</htmltext>
<tokenext>what do you mean cut off the UK .
I 'm in the UK and use last.fm all the time - at home , in internet cafe 's etc .
last.fm works just fine in the uk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what do you mean cut off the UK.
I'm in the UK and use last.fm all the time - at home, in internet cafe's etc.
last.fm works just fine in the uk.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696979</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703903</id>
	<title>Re:My prediction...</title>
	<author>Pop69</author>
	<datestamp>1247675280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oddly enough, I'm sitting here using Firefox on an iBook G4 which says that it doesn't run any version of Silverlight above 1.x.

<br> <br>

Seems I can't use their service, never mind.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oddly enough , I 'm sitting here using Firefox on an iBook G4 which says that it does n't run any version of Silverlight above 1.x .
Seems I ca n't use their service , never mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oddly enough, I'm sitting here using Firefox on an iBook G4 which says that it doesn't run any version of Silverlight above 1.x.
Seems I can't use their service, never mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702451</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703407</id>
	<title>They fight the future (!)</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1247672160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you think about it, they target multi platform things.</p><p>If you only use Google services, Last.fm, Youtube like flash video hosting sites, why would you need Windows for? Netbook vendors proved it until they probably had a call from MS reminding their usual business is owned by Microsoft pyramid scheme.</p><p>Their real panic is about web applications/services which works anywhere. It is absolutely related to panic since there is no point doing another jukebox service. Last.fm owns it. They were clever doing the thing open source, multi platform, documented and they now enjoy it. My Nokia E65 can stream last.fm from an 3rd party instant messenger. Can you imagine the degree of the compatibility? 3rd party instant messenger has SDK (Fring BTW), last.fm has sdk too. So, one can code a plugin for it using its SDK with last.fm SDK&amp;API.</p><p>Someone really buries his head to sand in this already crazy scene which nothing which doesn't tie to some standard and multi platform succeeds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you think about it , they target multi platform things.If you only use Google services , Last.fm , Youtube like flash video hosting sites , why would you need Windows for ?
Netbook vendors proved it until they probably had a call from MS reminding their usual business is owned by Microsoft pyramid scheme.Their real panic is about web applications/services which works anywhere .
It is absolutely related to panic since there is no point doing another jukebox service .
Last.fm owns it .
They were clever doing the thing open source , multi platform , documented and they now enjoy it .
My Nokia E65 can stream last.fm from an 3rd party instant messenger .
Can you imagine the degree of the compatibility ?
3rd party instant messenger has SDK ( Fring BTW ) , last.fm has sdk too .
So , one can code a plugin for it using its SDK with last.fm SDK&amp;API.Someone really buries his head to sand in this already crazy scene which nothing which does n't tie to some standard and multi platform succeeds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you think about it, they target multi platform things.If you only use Google services, Last.fm, Youtube like flash video hosting sites, why would you need Windows for?
Netbook vendors proved it until they probably had a call from MS reminding their usual business is owned by Microsoft pyramid scheme.Their real panic is about web applications/services which works anywhere.
It is absolutely related to panic since there is no point doing another jukebox service.
Last.fm owns it.
They were clever doing the thing open source, multi platform, documented and they now enjoy it.
My Nokia E65 can stream last.fm from an 3rd party instant messenger.
Can you imagine the degree of the compatibility?
3rd party instant messenger has SDK (Fring BTW), last.fm has sdk too.
So, one can code a plugin for it using its SDK with last.fm SDK&amp;API.Someone really buries his head to sand in this already crazy scene which nothing which doesn't tie to some standard and multi platform succeeds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702121</id>
	<title>why Microsoft will eventually fail...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247665080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because someone at Microsoft feels the need to answer every existing web service with one of their own, they will ultimately fail.</p><p>This strategy is ludicrous and speaks volumes about the corporate mentality at the software giant.  This "we must have our hand on the top of every arena" mentality will be their downfall.  They are spreading too thin and have lost sight of their purpose.  When you try to compete with everyone, you compete with no one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because someone at Microsoft feels the need to answer every existing web service with one of their own , they will ultimately fail.This strategy is ludicrous and speaks volumes about the corporate mentality at the software giant .
This " we must have our hand on the top of every arena " mentality will be their downfall .
They are spreading too thin and have lost sight of their purpose .
When you try to compete with everyone , you compete with no one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because someone at Microsoft feels the need to answer every existing web service with one of their own, they will ultimately fail.This strategy is ludicrous and speaks volumes about the corporate mentality at the software giant.
This "we must have our hand on the top of every arena" mentality will be their downfall.
They are spreading too thin and have lost sight of their purpose.
When you try to compete with everyone, you compete with no one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696985</id>
	<title>scale &amp; quality</title>
	<author>neonprimetime</author>
	<datestamp>1247569140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>In what is becoming an increasingly competitive marketplace, Mr Bale thinks Microsoft can bring <b>"scale and a quality of product"</b> to the music streaming scene. </i>
<br>
<br>
is this the same microsoft i know?</htmltext>
<tokenext>In what is becoming an increasingly competitive marketplace , Mr Bale thinks Microsoft can bring " scale and a quality of product " to the music streaming scene .
is this the same microsoft i know ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In what is becoming an increasingly competitive marketplace, Mr Bale thinks Microsoft can bring "scale and a quality of product" to the music streaming scene.
is this the same microsoft i know?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28709559</id>
	<title>Re:Had this for decades...</title>
	<author>Albert Sandberg</author>
	<datestamp>1247658000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm paying for spotify and I would not bother how many times something would break my playlist for commercials, it is such a good service and good service is definitely worth 9 euro a month.</p><p>Voddler.com is going to be the next big thing here in europe, we don't have netflix and such.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm paying for spotify and I would not bother how many times something would break my playlist for commercials , it is such a good service and good service is definitely worth 9 euro a month.Voddler.com is going to be the next big thing here in europe , we do n't have netflix and such .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm paying for spotify and I would not bother how many times something would break my playlist for commercials, it is such a good service and good service is definitely worth 9 euro a month.Voddler.com is going to be the next big thing here in europe, we don't have netflix and such.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701175</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701429</id>
	<title>Re:why anything Microsoft</title>
	<author>Godwin O'Hitler</author>
	<datestamp>1247656620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why Microsoft fails in the music market is they have next to no leverage. The only crowbar MS has ever had is their OS monopoly, and that has already jacked up as much weight as it can without bending.</p><p>In markets where they have to compete without leverage, they have never been able to dominate. The gaming market (hardware and software) is one example and music looks like going the same way. I wonder if they themselves seriously believe they have a future outside of the Windows lock-in world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why Microsoft fails in the music market is they have next to no leverage .
The only crowbar MS has ever had is their OS monopoly , and that has already jacked up as much weight as it can without bending.In markets where they have to compete without leverage , they have never been able to dominate .
The gaming market ( hardware and software ) is one example and music looks like going the same way .
I wonder if they themselves seriously believe they have a future outside of the Windows lock-in world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why Microsoft fails in the music market is they have next to no leverage.
The only crowbar MS has ever had is their OS monopoly, and that has already jacked up as much weight as it can without bending.In markets where they have to compete without leverage, they have never been able to dominate.
The gaming market (hardware and software) is one example and music looks like going the same way.
I wonder if they themselves seriously believe they have a future outside of the Windows lock-in world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697151</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702533</id>
	<title>Re:Microsoft feeling the pinch</title>
	<author>c00rdb</author>
	<datestamp>1247667540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Writing off the Zune was a huge mistake! What have I done!!!??</htmltext>
<tokenext>Writing off the Zune was a huge mistake !
What have I done ! ! ! ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Writing off the Zune was a huge mistake!
What have I done!!!?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697025</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696947</id>
	<title>How do you not see the tie-in?</title>
	<author>basementman</author>
	<datestamp>1247568960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Launching their own in house streaming music service  allows them to compete with both iTunes and Pandora in the music market, something they care currently getting their ass handed to them in. After all who would pay for music when they can just stream it for free on their Zune HD? It's a smart move on Microsofts part.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Launching their own in house streaming music service allows them to compete with both iTunes and Pandora in the music market , something they care currently getting their ass handed to them in .
After all who would pay for music when they can just stream it for free on their Zune HD ?
It 's a smart move on Microsofts part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Launching their own in house streaming music service  allows them to compete with both iTunes and Pandora in the music market, something they care currently getting their ass handed to them in.
After all who would pay for music when they can just stream it for free on their Zune HD?
It's a smart move on Microsofts part.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701933</id>
	<title>yawn...  I'm sticking with Radio Paradise.</title>
	<author>DougReed</author>
	<datestamp>1247663580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>30 minutes of Vista ads followed by 'Against The Wind', then 'Free Bird', and back to Windows ads.  No thanque.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>30 minutes of Vista ads followed by 'Against The Wind ' , then 'Free Bird ' , and back to Windows ads .
No thanque .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>30 minutes of Vista ads followed by 'Against The Wind', then 'Free Bird', and back to Windows ads.
No thanque.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701733</id>
	<title>My prediction...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247661240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...is that will use Silverlight. My initial reaction to this was "My God, it will suck: it won't be cross platform". Then it occurred to me - <i>Silverlight</i> <b>is</b> cross-platform. So not only would this allow MS to target a larger market, it would get SL on to a huge amount of machines. Oh, and it could be an additional 'pull' factor for Windows: You get free streaming, but you can only download (onto a device) if you have a Zune. And you can only use the Zune if you have Windows... or some such strategy like that</p><p>Obviously this is only my personal prediction, but I'm personally expecting this to be an offline app with embedded Silverlight stuff. Either that, or a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NET app (but I'm uncertain on that - what's the status of Mono with OS X?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...is that will use Silverlight .
My initial reaction to this was " My God , it will suck : it wo n't be cross platform " .
Then it occurred to me - Silverlight is cross-platform .
So not only would this allow MS to target a larger market , it would get SL on to a huge amount of machines .
Oh , and it could be an additional 'pull ' factor for Windows : You get free streaming , but you can only download ( onto a device ) if you have a Zune .
And you can only use the Zune if you have Windows... or some such strategy like thatObviously this is only my personal prediction , but I 'm personally expecting this to be an offline app with embedded Silverlight stuff .
Either that , or a .NET app ( but I 'm uncertain on that - what 's the status of Mono with OS X ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...is that will use Silverlight.
My initial reaction to this was "My God, it will suck: it won't be cross platform".
Then it occurred to me - Silverlight is cross-platform.
So not only would this allow MS to target a larger market, it would get SL on to a huge amount of machines.
Oh, and it could be an additional 'pull' factor for Windows: You get free streaming, but you can only download (onto a device) if you have a Zune.
And you can only use the Zune if you have Windows... or some such strategy like thatObviously this is only my personal prediction, but I'm personally expecting this to be an offline app with embedded Silverlight stuff.
Either that, or a .NET app (but I'm uncertain on that - what's the status of Mono with OS X?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697095</id>
	<title>Re:Had this for decades...</title>
	<author>Russ1642</author>
	<datestamp>1247569620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Radio stations are roughly 50\% ads and 50\% the same songs they played two hours ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Radio stations are roughly 50 \ % ads and 50 \ % the same songs they played two hours ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Radio stations are roughly 50\% ads and 50\% the same songs they played two hours ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28716397</id>
	<title>Re:Had this for decades...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247757780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>libspotify is the official core from Spotify, and it's linux-only.<br>While it's true that the main client is win32/osx "only", it runs nicely under Wine.</p><p>If you don't like the official client, just hack something together with libspotify.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>libspotify is the official core from Spotify , and it 's linux-only.While it 's true that the main client is win32/osx " only " , it runs nicely under Wine.If you do n't like the official client , just hack something together with libspotify .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>libspotify is the official core from Spotify, and it's linux-only.While it's true that the main client is win32/osx "only", it runs nicely under Wine.If you don't like the official client, just hack something together with libspotify.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697063</id>
	<title>Isn't this...</title>
	<author>Em Emalb</author>
	<datestamp>1247569500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't this like trying to buy a ticket for the Titanic as it's going down?</p><p>Also...where's the outrage that a specific music service is available only in the UK?  I live in the US!  Information wants to be free!  FREEEDOMMMMMMM.</p><p>I kid, I kid.  Mostly though, I'm sick of seeing those comments from posters who can't access content because they live in a different country.  WAAAAH.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this like trying to buy a ticket for the Titanic as it 's going down ? Also...where 's the outrage that a specific music service is available only in the UK ?
I live in the US !
Information wants to be free !
FREEEDOMMMMMMM.I kid , I kid .
Mostly though , I 'm sick of seeing those comments from posters who ca n't access content because they live in a different country .
WAAAAH .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this like trying to buy a ticket for the Titanic as it's going down?Also...where's the outrage that a specific music service is available only in the UK?
I live in the US!
Information wants to be free!
FREEEDOMMMMMMM.I kid, I kid.
Mostly though, I'm sick of seeing those comments from posters who can't access content because they live in a different country.
WAAAAH.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696971</id>
	<title>Spotify and the US</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247569140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hopefully this will lead to Spotify speeding up their work towards a US launch.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully this will lead to Spotify speeding up their work towards a US launch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully this will lead to Spotify speeding up their work towards a US launch.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701649</id>
	<title>Re:Had this for decades...</title>
	<author>Ginger Unicorn</author>
	<datestamp>1247660340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>mine stopped playing adverts too - i heard that it's a bug in the linux client</htmltext>
<tokenext>mine stopped playing adverts too - i heard that it 's a bug in the linux client</tokentext>
<sentencetext>mine stopped playing adverts too - i heard that it's a bug in the linux client</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701175</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703661</id>
	<title>Re:My prediction...</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1247673840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it the same moonlight which had to get a special feed for Obama inauguration since it didn't support Silverlight 2 that time? I submitted the original story to slashdot I remember and if it wasn't there, you weren't be able to watch it from official site since MS bribed site didn't even bother with your clone plugins existence at all!</p><p>BTW MS only hires Developers who were born and raised in Windows scene unless they would serve them as in another form like trojaning Debian with MS patents. I mean, in case some people thinks astroturfing would benefit for their future. It doesn't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it the same moonlight which had to get a special feed for Obama inauguration since it did n't support Silverlight 2 that time ?
I submitted the original story to slashdot I remember and if it was n't there , you were n't be able to watch it from official site since MS bribed site did n't even bother with your clone plugins existence at all ! BTW MS only hires Developers who were born and raised in Windows scene unless they would serve them as in another form like trojaning Debian with MS patents .
I mean , in case some people thinks astroturfing would benefit for their future .
It does n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it the same moonlight which had to get a special feed for Obama inauguration since it didn't support Silverlight 2 that time?
I submitted the original story to slashdot I remember and if it wasn't there, you weren't be able to watch it from official site since MS bribed site didn't even bother with your clone plugins existence at all!BTW MS only hires Developers who were born and raised in Windows scene unless they would serve them as in another form like trojaning Debian with MS patents.
I mean, in case some people thinks astroturfing would benefit for their future.
It doesn't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702377</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28710081</id>
	<title>Re:How do you not see the tie-in?</title>
	<author>cbhacking</author>
	<datestamp>1247660700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, the Zune can stream music. The 3.0 firmware allows connecting to wireless access points and accessing the online store, including some very limited streaming, via the Internet. There's no reason they couldn't expand this - I'd love a Pandora client for the thing - but the SDK doesn't allow third-party developers to use this functionality yet. That said, I can totally see MS making this available to Zune user whenever they happen to be near a WAP. Given their excellent track record thus far on back-porting firmware updates, it'll probably even be available on my 2nd-gen flash-based Zune.</p><p>iPod Touch supports streaming too, but that (and probably the ZuneHD) are better classed as PDAs than as PMPs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the Zune can stream music .
The 3.0 firmware allows connecting to wireless access points and accessing the online store , including some very limited streaming , via the Internet .
There 's no reason they could n't expand this - I 'd love a Pandora client for the thing - but the SDK does n't allow third-party developers to use this functionality yet .
That said , I can totally see MS making this available to Zune user whenever they happen to be near a WAP .
Given their excellent track record thus far on back-porting firmware updates , it 'll probably even be available on my 2nd-gen flash-based Zune.iPod Touch supports streaming too , but that ( and probably the ZuneHD ) are better classed as PDAs than as PMPs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the Zune can stream music.
The 3.0 firmware allows connecting to wireless access points and accessing the online store, including some very limited streaming, via the Internet.
There's no reason they couldn't expand this - I'd love a Pandora client for the thing - but the SDK doesn't allow third-party developers to use this functionality yet.
That said, I can totally see MS making this available to Zune user whenever they happen to be near a WAP.
Given their excellent track record thus far on back-porting firmware updates, it'll probably even be available on my 2nd-gen flash-based Zune.iPod Touch supports streaming too, but that (and probably the ZuneHD) are better classed as PDAs than as PMPs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701839</id>
	<title>Re:My prediction...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247662380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, but you have to remember that Microsofts current idea of cross platform is that it runs on XP and Vista !</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but you have to remember that Microsofts current idea of cross platform is that it runs on XP and Vista !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but you have to remember that Microsofts current idea of cross platform is that it runs on XP and Vista !</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701999</id>
	<title>Re:Had this for decades...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247664120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>mine stopped playing adverts too - i heard that it's a bug in the linux client</p></div><p>Eh, you mean the linux client that doesn't exist, forcing us to use the windows client through wine?</p><p>Either it's a bug in the windows client, a bug in the server software or wine does something (has a bug) that prevents it from working.</p><p>- Peder</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>mine stopped playing adverts too - i heard that it 's a bug in the linux clientEh , you mean the linux client that does n't exist , forcing us to use the windows client through wine ? Either it 's a bug in the windows client , a bug in the server software or wine does something ( has a bug ) that prevents it from working.- Peder</tokentext>
<sentencetext>mine stopped playing adverts too - i heard that it's a bug in the linux clientEh, you mean the linux client that doesn't exist, forcing us to use the windows client through wine?Either it's a bug in the windows client, a bug in the server software or wine does something (has a bug) that prevents it from working.- Peder
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697151</id>
	<title>why anything Microsoft</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247569860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>why anything Microsoft fails is because they too strongly believe in DRM.
the entire iTunes store for example is now completely DRM free, and all the market leaders right now are so DRM free.

rental services have died a horrible death because DVD/CD media has become affordable enough not to pirate them (as in costing more time to download, then the money it costs to buy)..
i put into account my minimum wage is at least 6euro's, put that over the time it costs to download 3 to 8 hours it's too expensive after about 2 hours.
the same goes for subscription movies, it's a fucking waste of my money as its cheaper time wise to just get the dvd..</htmltext>
<tokenext>why anything Microsoft fails is because they too strongly believe in DRM .
the entire iTunes store for example is now completely DRM free , and all the market leaders right now are so DRM free .
rental services have died a horrible death because DVD/CD media has become affordable enough not to pirate them ( as in costing more time to download , then the money it costs to buy ) . . i put into account my minimum wage is at least 6euro 's , put that over the time it costs to download 3 to 8 hours it 's too expensive after about 2 hours .
the same goes for subscription movies , it 's a fucking waste of my money as its cheaper time wise to just get the dvd. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why anything Microsoft fails is because they too strongly believe in DRM.
the entire iTunes store for example is now completely DRM free, and all the market leaders right now are so DRM free.
rental services have died a horrible death because DVD/CD media has become affordable enough not to pirate them (as in costing more time to download, then the money it costs to buy)..
i put into account my minimum wage is at least 6euro's, put that over the time it costs to download 3 to 8 hours it's too expensive after about 2 hours.
the same goes for subscription movies, it's a fucking waste of my money as its cheaper time wise to just get the dvd..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28705713</id>
	<title>Re:How do you not see the tie-in?</title>
	<author>AmberBlackCat</author>
	<datestamp>1247683380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>After all who would pay for music when they can just stream it for free on their Zune HD?</p></div><p>People who don't want to hear the commercials ever. And people who want to be able to play music while there is no internet connection. And people who want to hear the music on their iPods.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>After all who would pay for music when they can just stream it for free on their Zune HD ? People who do n't want to hear the commercials ever .
And people who want to be able to play music while there is no internet connection .
And people who want to hear the music on their iPods .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all who would pay for music when they can just stream it for free on their Zune HD?People who don't want to hear the commercials ever.
And people who want to be able to play music while there is no internet connection.
And people who want to hear the music on their iPods.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696947</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696979</id>
	<title>Hugely popular?</title>
	<author>Manip</author>
	<datestamp>1247569140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So hugely popular I've never heard of it? Nor have two of my online contacts?</p><p>I've used Last.fm before they cut the UK off, and Sky.fm for streaming radio. I'm not sure what "Spotify" is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So hugely popular I 've never heard of it ?
Nor have two of my online contacts ? I 've used Last.fm before they cut the UK off , and Sky.fm for streaming radio .
I 'm not sure what " Spotify " is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So hugely popular I've never heard of it?
Nor have two of my online contacts?I've used Last.fm before they cut the UK off, and Sky.fm for streaming radio.
I'm not sure what "Spotify" is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701413</id>
	<title>Re:Why not last fm</title>
	<author>Laukei</author>
	<datestamp>1247656320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Last.fm, at least in the UK (I'm not sure about in the US) doesn't allow you to create playlists, or listen to one song over and over an unlimited amount of times. Nor does it allow you to listen, start to finish, to an album.<br> <br>Spotify does. As previously stated by someone in the comments, it's basically just iTunes with a massive, cloud-stored library of music that plays as soon as you click it (the buffering is completely unnoticeable.)<br> <br>Laukei</htmltext>
<tokenext>Last.fm , at least in the UK ( I 'm not sure about in the US ) does n't allow you to create playlists , or listen to one song over and over an unlimited amount of times .
Nor does it allow you to listen , start to finish , to an album .
Spotify does .
As previously stated by someone in the comments , it 's basically just iTunes with a massive , cloud-stored library of music that plays as soon as you click it ( the buffering is completely unnoticeable .
) Laukei</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last.fm, at least in the UK (I'm not sure about in the US) doesn't allow you to create playlists, or listen to one song over and over an unlimited amount of times.
Nor does it allow you to listen, start to finish, to an album.
Spotify does.
As previously stated by someone in the comments, it's basically just iTunes with a massive, cloud-stored library of music that plays as soon as you click it (the buffering is completely unnoticeable.
) Laukei</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701305</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703559</id>
	<title>Re:My prediction...</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1247673180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Silverlight is i386 Windows/OS X only with no kind of developer tool support for OS X. Don't even dare to mention Eclipse. Average designer thinks it is a cool named Virus, I am not joking.</p><p>Moonlight is just a half ass clone of Silverlight which has no function rather than make couple of ignorant people or basic MS astroturfers believe that MS would ever do anything which will work same way on anything other than Windows.</p><p>Mono on OS X? These people (Developers) have access to Cocoa, one of the World's most advanced UI libraries and Objective C. They can also use UNIX 03 certified underlying layer. Why would they monkey with Mono? It is not like MS saved their company from going chapter 11 with some undisclosed agreements and made it hire some rejected Developer to top position.</p><p>Last.fm client must be really alerting to MS since it is basically Flash and Trolltech (Nokia) Qt 4. Works in same quality on every popular platform and CPU of today, INCLUDING PowerPC and ARM.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Silverlight is i386 Windows/OS X only with no kind of developer tool support for OS X. Do n't even dare to mention Eclipse .
Average designer thinks it is a cool named Virus , I am not joking.Moonlight is just a half ass clone of Silverlight which has no function rather than make couple of ignorant people or basic MS astroturfers believe that MS would ever do anything which will work same way on anything other than Windows.Mono on OS X ?
These people ( Developers ) have access to Cocoa , one of the World 's most advanced UI libraries and Objective C. They can also use UNIX 03 certified underlying layer .
Why would they monkey with Mono ?
It is not like MS saved their company from going chapter 11 with some undisclosed agreements and made it hire some rejected Developer to top position.Last.fm client must be really alerting to MS since it is basically Flash and Trolltech ( Nokia ) Qt 4 .
Works in same quality on every popular platform and CPU of today , INCLUDING PowerPC and ARM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Silverlight is i386 Windows/OS X only with no kind of developer tool support for OS X. Don't even dare to mention Eclipse.
Average designer thinks it is a cool named Virus, I am not joking.Moonlight is just a half ass clone of Silverlight which has no function rather than make couple of ignorant people or basic MS astroturfers believe that MS would ever do anything which will work same way on anything other than Windows.Mono on OS X?
These people (Developers) have access to Cocoa, one of the World's most advanced UI libraries and Objective C. They can also use UNIX 03 certified underlying layer.
Why would they monkey with Mono?
It is not like MS saved their company from going chapter 11 with some undisclosed agreements and made it hire some rejected Developer to top position.Last.fm client must be really alerting to MS since it is basically Flash and Trolltech (Nokia) Qt 4.
Works in same quality on every popular platform and CPU of today, INCLUDING PowerPC and ARM.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697059</id>
	<title>Re:Microsoft feeling the pinch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247569500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really? Because they entered a new market? Yeah, the company with a 90\% market share, with competitors that define themselves as being "not microsoft", they are totally irrelevant today!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
Because they entered a new market ?
Yeah , the company with a 90 \ % market share , with competitors that define themselves as being " not microsoft " , they are totally irrelevant today !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
Because they entered a new market?
Yeah, the company with a 90\% market share, with competitors that define themselves as being "not microsoft", they are totally irrelevant today!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696887</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701403</id>
	<title>Re:Had this for decades...</title>
	<author>noundi</author>
	<datestamp>1247656260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Radio stations are roughly 50\% ads and 50\% the same songs they played two hours ago.</p></div><p>Roughly? I'd say pretty much exactly.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Radio stations are roughly 50 \ % ads and 50 \ % the same songs they played two hours ago.Roughly ?
I 'd say pretty much exactly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Radio stations are roughly 50\% ads and 50\% the same songs they played two hours ago.Roughly?
I'd say pretty much exactly.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702185</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me?</title>
	<author>Alkonaut</author>
	<datestamp>1247665620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sometimes they ARE at the frontline of ideas and research (singularity, photosynth etc.), but more often for a huge company such as MS it is more convenient and cost efficient to take good ideas and either buy them or reinvent as something either better because it is newer than the competition (.net vs java), has a more efficient development model than the competition (directx vs opengl). If you have all the money in the world you can be second with an idea and still make it work. Sometimes it is even better to be second.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NET has all the clever afterthought that java developers had no chance of having.
<p>
If you can pay the best people in the world to develop something, it will be great. It will be better than the project those people worked on before coming to microsoft, be it google, java, spotify...
</p><p>
Also, if you have all the money in the world you can market your project more than the other project. Your project will thus have more users. Once you have critical mass, it doesn't really matter how good your project is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sometimes they ARE at the frontline of ideas and research ( singularity , photosynth etc .
) , but more often for a huge company such as MS it is more convenient and cost efficient to take good ideas and either buy them or reinvent as something either better because it is newer than the competition ( .net vs java ) , has a more efficient development model than the competition ( directx vs opengl ) .
If you have all the money in the world you can be second with an idea and still make it work .
Sometimes it is even better to be second .
.NET has all the clever afterthought that java developers had no chance of having .
If you can pay the best people in the world to develop something , it will be great .
It will be better than the project those people worked on before coming to microsoft , be it google , java , spotify.. . Also , if you have all the money in the world you can market your project more than the other project .
Your project will thus have more users .
Once you have critical mass , it does n't really matter how good your project is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sometimes they ARE at the frontline of ideas and research (singularity, photosynth etc.
), but more often for a huge company such as MS it is more convenient and cost efficient to take good ideas and either buy them or reinvent as something either better because it is newer than the competition (.net vs java), has a more efficient development model than the competition (directx vs opengl).
If you have all the money in the world you can be second with an idea and still make it work.
Sometimes it is even better to be second.
.NET has all the clever afterthought that java developers had no chance of having.
If you can pay the best people in the world to develop something, it will be great.
It will be better than the project those people worked on before coming to microsoft, be it google, java, spotify...

Also, if you have all the money in the world you can market your project more than the other project.
Your project will thus have more users.
Once you have critical mass, it doesn't really matter how good your project is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702629</id>
	<title>Reincarnation of PlaysForSure</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1247668140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hope they become successful with this project, but not in the "Let's-create-PlaysForSure-just-to-lure-them-in" kind of way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope they become successful with this project , but not in the " Let 's-create-PlaysForSure-just-to-lure-them-in " kind of way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope they become successful with this project, but not in the "Let's-create-PlaysForSure-just-to-lure-them-in" kind of way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701511</id>
	<title>Re:why anything Microsoft</title>
	<author>lordandmaker</author>
	<datestamp>1247658180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>i put into account my minimum wage is at least 6euro's, put that over the time it costs to download 3 to 8 hours it's too expensive after about 2 hours. the same goes for subscription movies, it's a fucking waste of my money as its cheaper time wise to just get the dvd..</p></div>
</blockquote><p>

It's a waste of time to sit there waiting for it to download, sure.<br> <br>

Mine download in the background while I'm doing other things, mostly while I'm asleep. The total time expended on that activity is likely less than 10 minutes to find the torrent and initiate the download. That's 1euro for a film, which is certainly pretty cheap compared to what we pay in the UK.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>i put into account my minimum wage is at least 6euro 's , put that over the time it costs to download 3 to 8 hours it 's too expensive after about 2 hours .
the same goes for subscription movies , it 's a fucking waste of my money as its cheaper time wise to just get the dvd. . It 's a waste of time to sit there waiting for it to download , sure .
Mine download in the background while I 'm doing other things , mostly while I 'm asleep .
The total time expended on that activity is likely less than 10 minutes to find the torrent and initiate the download .
That 's 1euro for a film , which is certainly pretty cheap compared to what we pay in the UK .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i put into account my minimum wage is at least 6euro's, put that over the time it costs to download 3 to 8 hours it's too expensive after about 2 hours.
the same goes for subscription movies, it's a fucking waste of my money as its cheaper time wise to just get the dvd..


It's a waste of time to sit there waiting for it to download, sure.
Mine download in the background while I'm doing other things, mostly while I'm asleep.
The total time expended on that activity is likely less than 10 minutes to find the torrent and initiate the download.
That's 1euro for a film, which is certainly pretty cheap compared to what we pay in the UK.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697151</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702451</id>
	<title>Re:My prediction...</title>
	<author>mythz</author>
	<datestamp>1247667120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is because its Microsoft right? and Microsoft is incapable cross-platform software right?</p><p>So its just co-incidence that it also runs in OS X right?</p><p>I wish there was a filter to remove these baseless un-informed comments.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is because its Microsoft right ?
and Microsoft is incapable cross-platform software right ? So its just co-incidence that it also runs in OS X right ? I wish there was a filter to remove these baseless un-informed comments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is because its Microsoft right?
and Microsoft is incapable cross-platform software right?So its just co-incidence that it also runs in OS X right?I wish there was a filter to remove these baseless un-informed comments.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701839</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703059</id>
	<title>Good luck with that</title>
	<author>Nerdposeur</author>
	<datestamp>1247670420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm all for competition, but previous music efforts by Microsoft have been hilariously bad. <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/245859/qa-microsoft-defends-return-to-drm.html" title="pcpro.co.uk">This interview</a> [pcpro.co.uk] is comedic gold for cluelessness. An actual Q&amp;A with Hugh Griffiths, Head of Mobile at Microsoft UK:</p><blockquote><div><p> <b>If I buy these songs on your service - and they're locked to my phone - what happens when I upgrade my phone in six months' time?</b> <br> <br>

Well, I think you know the answer to that.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm all for competition , but previous music efforts by Microsoft have been hilariously bad .
This interview [ pcpro.co.uk ] is comedic gold for cluelessness .
An actual Q&amp;A with Hugh Griffiths , Head of Mobile at Microsoft UK : If I buy these songs on your service - and they 're locked to my phone - what happens when I upgrade my phone in six months ' time ?
Well , I think you know the answer to that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm all for competition, but previous music efforts by Microsoft have been hilariously bad.
This interview [pcpro.co.uk] is comedic gold for cluelessness.
An actual Q&amp;A with Hugh Griffiths, Head of Mobile at Microsoft UK: If I buy these songs on your service - and they're locked to my phone - what happens when I upgrade my phone in six months' time?
Well, I think you know the answer to that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696947</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701351</id>
	<title>Re:How do you not see the tie-in?</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1247655120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can't stream to a PMP. It's pointless. If it's a streaming service, it's not going to help Zune sales, as Zune is a storage device for bought music. Spotify, if MS competing with it as the stub says, has no store. You listen at your computer in exchange for listening to some advertisments.<br> <br>If it's selling music like iTunes then it'll compete with Apple and help boost Zune sales, if it's good. If it's streaming music then it'll compete with Spotify, and nobody will care as spotify is great.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't stream to a PMP .
It 's pointless .
If it 's a streaming service , it 's not going to help Zune sales , as Zune is a storage device for bought music .
Spotify , if MS competing with it as the stub says , has no store .
You listen at your computer in exchange for listening to some advertisments .
If it 's selling music like iTunes then it 'll compete with Apple and help boost Zune sales , if it 's good .
If it 's streaming music then it 'll compete with Spotify , and nobody will care as spotify is great .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't stream to a PMP.
It's pointless.
If it's a streaming service, it's not going to help Zune sales, as Zune is a storage device for bought music.
Spotify, if MS competing with it as the stub says, has no store.
You listen at your computer in exchange for listening to some advertisments.
If it's selling music like iTunes then it'll compete with Apple and help boost Zune sales, if it's good.
If it's streaming music then it'll compete with Spotify, and nobody will care as spotify is great.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696947</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701187</id>
	<title>Better streaming services needed</title>
	<author>Goateee</author>
	<datestamp>1247652480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think good music streaming services is what will get many pirates to pay for their music, be it by a subscription or by listening to Commercials.  While there are now some good non-DRM music to buy online, I usually wish to listen to hundreds of new tracks each month. At around 1$/track this would limit my listening in a fashion I would not consider. Streaming music on the other hand could work, since I would listen to any amount of music available. It also has the advantage of the music being available immediately instead of in a very short time.<br><br>Currently I use Spotify, and it seem to be the best streaming service available as of yet. It is still however too limited both when it comes to the amount of music available and the functions of the client. Allowing plugins could fix most of the limitations of the client however. I really hope more and better streaming options becomes available.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think good music streaming services is what will get many pirates to pay for their music , be it by a subscription or by listening to Commercials .
While there are now some good non-DRM music to buy online , I usually wish to listen to hundreds of new tracks each month .
At around 1 $ /track this would limit my listening in a fashion I would not consider .
Streaming music on the other hand could work , since I would listen to any amount of music available .
It also has the advantage of the music being available immediately instead of in a very short time.Currently I use Spotify , and it seem to be the best streaming service available as of yet .
It is still however too limited both when it comes to the amount of music available and the functions of the client .
Allowing plugins could fix most of the limitations of the client however .
I really hope more and better streaming options becomes available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think good music streaming services is what will get many pirates to pay for their music, be it by a subscription or by listening to Commercials.
While there are now some good non-DRM music to buy online, I usually wish to listen to hundreds of new tracks each month.
At around 1$/track this would limit my listening in a fashion I would not consider.
Streaming music on the other hand could work, since I would listen to any amount of music available.
It also has the advantage of the music being available immediately instead of in a very short time.Currently I use Spotify, and it seem to be the best streaming service available as of yet.
It is still however too limited both when it comes to the amount of music available and the functions of the client.
Allowing plugins could fix most of the limitations of the client however.
I really hope more and better streaming options becomes available.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701459</id>
	<title>Re:How do you not see the tie-in?</title>
	<author>corsec67</author>
	<datestamp>1247657100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They would end up competing with the Slacker G2, then.</p><p>I hope MS is big enough to make this a world-wide thing, so that other people can offer world-wide streaming service.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They would end up competing with the Slacker G2 , then.I hope MS is big enough to make this a world-wide thing , so that other people can offer world-wide streaming service .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They would end up competing with the Slacker G2, then.I hope MS is big enough to make this a world-wide thing, so that other people can offer world-wide streaming service.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696947</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701337</id>
	<title>Cross Subsidy to undercut the competition</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247654880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now I am not a Competition Lawyer but isn't this yet another case of Microsoft taking their big War Chest of cash from Windows (DoJ and EU convicted monopoly abuser) and Office and using it to undercut the pricing and business models of other companies?</p><p>When British Airways set up GO, a low cost spin-off, they had to do a single payment and make sure they were separate so as to stop cross subsidising distorting the market.  This is exactly what Microsoft do.  The first XBox was a loss for them but thanks to their pockets they could do what SEGA couldn't and take the losses.  The Zune is a loss but they can still keep pumping money into it. Cloud is yet another case where they are leveraging both the monopoly position of windows and combining it with the war chest to try and dominate in another area and undercut the competition.</p><p>This streaming music thing is exactly the same thing.  Apple couldn't have built up the iPod and iTunes unless it made money pretty much from the start, Microsoft can burn for 5 years and undercut the competition thanks to the cash cow in the background.</p><p>HOW THE HELL IS THIS LEGAL?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now I am not a Competition Lawyer but is n't this yet another case of Microsoft taking their big War Chest of cash from Windows ( DoJ and EU convicted monopoly abuser ) and Office and using it to undercut the pricing and business models of other companies ? When British Airways set up GO , a low cost spin-off , they had to do a single payment and make sure they were separate so as to stop cross subsidising distorting the market .
This is exactly what Microsoft do .
The first XBox was a loss for them but thanks to their pockets they could do what SEGA could n't and take the losses .
The Zune is a loss but they can still keep pumping money into it .
Cloud is yet another case where they are leveraging both the monopoly position of windows and combining it with the war chest to try and dominate in another area and undercut the competition.This streaming music thing is exactly the same thing .
Apple could n't have built up the iPod and iTunes unless it made money pretty much from the start , Microsoft can burn for 5 years and undercut the competition thanks to the cash cow in the background.HOW THE HELL IS THIS LEGAL ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now I am not a Competition Lawyer but isn't this yet another case of Microsoft taking their big War Chest of cash from Windows (DoJ and EU convicted monopoly abuser) and Office and using it to undercut the pricing and business models of other companies?When British Airways set up GO, a low cost spin-off, they had to do a single payment and make sure they were separate so as to stop cross subsidising distorting the market.
This is exactly what Microsoft do.
The first XBox was a loss for them but thanks to their pockets they could do what SEGA couldn't and take the losses.
The Zune is a loss but they can still keep pumping money into it.
Cloud is yet another case where they are leveraging both the monopoly position of windows and combining it with the war chest to try and dominate in another area and undercut the competition.This streaming music thing is exactly the same thing.
Apple couldn't have built up the iPod and iTunes unless it made money pretty much from the start, Microsoft can burn for 5 years and undercut the competition thanks to the cash cow in the background.HOW THE HELL IS THIS LEGAL?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701837</id>
	<title>Re:Last.fm is just fine</title>
	<author>fastest fascist</author>
	<datestamp>1247662380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Last.FM radio also isn't free these days outside the US, UK and Germany. Costs 3 euro/ month.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Last.FM radio also is n't free these days outside the US , UK and Germany .
Costs 3 euro/ month .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last.FM radio also isn't free these days outside the US, UK and Germany.
Costs 3 euro/ month.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696977</id>
	<title>Had this for decades...</title>
	<author>canUbeleiveIT</author>
	<datestamp>1247569140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>which allows users to stream music for free in return for listening to around a minute's worth of advertisements every half hour.</i> <br> <br>
I've had one of these for decades--it's called a radio.</htmltext>
<tokenext>which allows users to stream music for free in return for listening to around a minute 's worth of advertisements every half hour .
I 've had one of these for decades--it 's called a radio .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>which allows users to stream music for free in return for listening to around a minute's worth of advertisements every half hour.
I've had one of these for decades--it's called a radio.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703777</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me?</title>
	<author>trifish</author>
	<datestamp>1247674440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forgot the Silverlight (Flash), XPS (PDF), and ~OOXML (ODF).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot the Silverlight ( Flash ) , XPS ( PDF ) , and ~ OOXML ( ODF ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot the Silverlight (Flash), XPS (PDF), and ~OOXML (ODF).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703365</id>
	<title>Re:Had this for decades...</title>
	<author>miike</author>
	<datestamp>1247671980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>mine stopped playing adverts too - i heard that it's a bug in the linux client</p></div><p>I run spotify under wine it definitely plays ads from time to time, at least the "Jonathan from spotify" one. There is however a bug in wine or the client that prevents the banner ads in the client from showing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>mine stopped playing adverts too - i heard that it 's a bug in the linux clientI run spotify under wine it definitely plays ads from time to time , at least the " Jonathan from spotify " one .
There is however a bug in wine or the client that prevents the banner ads in the client from showing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>mine stopped playing adverts too - i heard that it's a bug in the linux clientI run spotify under wine it definitely plays ads from time to time, at least the "Jonathan from spotify" one.
There is however a bug in wine or the client that prevents the banner ads in the client from showing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701649</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701461</id>
	<title>Re:Why not last fm</title>
	<author>mythz</author>
	<datestamp>1247657160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So why should i use this instead of lastfm which features no adverts per half hour of music</p></div><p>Because it's the fastest music player with the smallest footprint available that lets you listen to *any song* you want.<br>You can search and play a song in milliseconds.</p><p>There is no equal, period.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So why should i use this instead of lastfm which features no adverts per half hour of musicBecause it 's the fastest music player with the smallest footprint available that lets you listen to * any song * you want.You can search and play a song in milliseconds.There is no equal , period .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So why should i use this instead of lastfm which features no adverts per half hour of musicBecause it's the fastest music player with the smallest footprint available that lets you listen to *any song* you want.You can search and play a song in milliseconds.There is no equal, period.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701305</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28706791</id>
	<title>Re:My prediction...</title>
	<author>HermMunster</author>
	<datestamp>1247688360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's actually pretty funny and totally obvious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's actually pretty funny and totally obvious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's actually pretty funny and totally obvious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701839</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28707569</id>
	<title>Re:Had this for decades...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247648700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your radio is still in a time warp.  These days, a standard FM radio station streams 30 minutes of ads in return for the ability to listen to around a minute or two of one of the same 100 songs every half hour.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your radio is still in a time warp .
These days , a standard FM radio station streams 30 minutes of ads in return for the ability to listen to around a minute or two of one of the same 100 songs every half hour .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your radio is still in a time warp.
These days, a standard FM radio station streams 30 minutes of ads in return for the ability to listen to around a minute or two of one of the same 100 songs every half hour.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697047</id>
	<title>zune possibility</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247569380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it will probably tie into the zune in that the zune will become a porta-spoty - through the magic of drm and expiring content - you will most likely be able to sync your favorite streams to your zune for X days as part of your regular subscription price - and permanently for the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.99.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it will probably tie into the zune in that the zune will become a porta-spoty - through the magic of drm and expiring content - you will most likely be able to sync your favorite streams to your zune for X days as part of your regular subscription price - and permanently for the .99 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it will probably tie into the zune in that the zune will become a porta-spoty - through the magic of drm and expiring content - you will most likely be able to sync your favorite streams to your zune for X days as part of your regular subscription price - and permanently for the .99.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28708295</id>
	<title>Re:How do you not see the tie-in?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247652480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If it's selling music like iTunes then it'll compete with Apple and help boost Zune sales, if it's good. If it's streaming music then it'll compete with Spotify, and nobody will care as spotify is great.</p></div><p>Is it impossible to stream music with an option to buy so it can be put on your mobile device? Or can you not compete with 2 competitors at one time?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it 's selling music like iTunes then it 'll compete with Apple and help boost Zune sales , if it 's good .
If it 's streaming music then it 'll compete with Spotify , and nobody will care as spotify is great.Is it impossible to stream music with an option to buy so it can be put on your mobile device ?
Or can you not compete with 2 competitors at one time ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it's selling music like iTunes then it'll compete with Apple and help boost Zune sales, if it's good.
If it's streaming music then it'll compete with Spotify, and nobody will care as spotify is great.Is it impossible to stream music with an option to buy so it can be put on your mobile device?
Or can you not compete with 2 competitors at one time?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701351</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701865</id>
	<title>Re:Hugely popular?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247662740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You must not be a junior high student. Almost all of my students use Spotify  here in Sweden.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You must not be a junior high student .
Almost all of my students use Spotify here in Sweden .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must not be a junior high student.
Almost all of my students use Spotify  here in Sweden.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696979</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703359</id>
	<title>Re:Is it just me?</title>
	<author>cathars1s</author>
	<datestamp>1247671920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The strategy worked pretty well for xbox.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The strategy worked pretty well for xbox .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The strategy worked pretty well for xbox.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703257</id>
	<title>simple idea</title>
	<author>sl0ppy</author>
	<datestamp>1247671500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>why not build an app for it, and sell it on the itunes store?</p><p>there's no reason to tie this to a single product.  if they are making money off of one advertisement per half hour per user, then it should hold that raising the number of users significantly would also raise their profits.</p><p>who cares if it's from microsoft or apple?  if the service is good, and can attract enough users to survive, then it could be a good product.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>why not build an app for it , and sell it on the itunes store ? there 's no reason to tie this to a single product .
if they are making money off of one advertisement per half hour per user , then it should hold that raising the number of users significantly would also raise their profits.who cares if it 's from microsoft or apple ?
if the service is good , and can attract enough users to survive , then it could be a good product .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why not build an app for it, and sell it on the itunes store?there's no reason to tie this to a single product.
if they are making money off of one advertisement per half hour per user, then it should hold that raising the number of users significantly would also raise their profits.who cares if it's from microsoft or apple?
if the service is good, and can attract enough users to survive, then it could be a good product.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701645</id>
	<title>Re:Hugely popular?</title>
	<author>gsslay</author>
	<datestamp>1247660280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So hugely popular I've never heard of it? Nor have two of my online contacts?</p></div><p>Seriously?  Spotify is everywhere just now, and not just among techie circles.  You are more out of touch than you think.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So hugely popular I 've never heard of it ?
Nor have two of my online contacts ? Seriously ?
Spotify is everywhere just now , and not just among techie circles .
You are more out of touch than you think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So hugely popular I've never heard of it?
Nor have two of my online contacts?Seriously?
Spotify is everywhere just now, and not just among techie circles.
You are more out of touch than you think.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696979</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701275</id>
	<title>Re:Hugely popular?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247653740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So hugely popular I've never heard of it? Nor have two of my online contacts?</p><p>I've used Last.fm before they cut the UK off, and Sky.fm for streaming radio. I'm not sure what "Spotify" is.</p></div><p>Yes, hugely poplar. http://www.google.com/trends?q=spotify\%2Clast.fm&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=all&amp;sort=0</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So hugely popular I 've never heard of it ?
Nor have two of my online contacts ? I 've used Last.fm before they cut the UK off , and Sky.fm for streaming radio .
I 'm not sure what " Spotify " is.Yes , hugely poplar .
http : //www.google.com/trends ? q = spotify \ % 2Clast.fm&amp;ctab = 0&amp;geo = all&amp;date = all&amp;sort = 0</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So hugely popular I've never heard of it?
Nor have two of my online contacts?I've used Last.fm before they cut the UK off, and Sky.fm for streaming radio.
I'm not sure what "Spotify" is.Yes, hugely poplar.
http://www.google.com/trends?q=spotify\%2Clast.fm&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=all&amp;date=all&amp;sort=0
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696979</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701311</id>
	<title>Re:Last.fm is just fine</title>
	<author>Asclepius99</author>
	<datestamp>1247654400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Even if that site turns out to be better and it's only 2 minutes of commercials per hour?  Shouldn't the site come out before we start saying it's not as good as what's out there already?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if that site turns out to be better and it 's only 2 minutes of commercials per hour ?
Should n't the site come out before we start saying it 's not as good as what 's out there already ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if that site turns out to be better and it's only 2 minutes of commercials per hour?
Shouldn't the site come out before we start saying it's not as good as what's out there already?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696951</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701251</id>
	<title>Re:why anything Microsoft</title>
	<author>IBBoard</author>
	<datestamp>1247653320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>rental services have died a horrible death because DVD/CD media has become affordable enough not to pirate them</p></div></blockquote><p>I think that depends on the rental service. I've got an account with LoveFilm and can rent as many DVDs as I want each month for ~&pound;15. Even when DVDs are cheap there's no way I'm getting the number of films I can watch for that kind of money!</p><p>As for the tie-in, maybe the DRM is where it lies - the service will be free as long as you're using a Windows Vista/7 PC or a Zune!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>rental services have died a horrible death because DVD/CD media has become affordable enough not to pirate themI think that depends on the rental service .
I 've got an account with LoveFilm and can rent as many DVDs as I want each month for ~   15 .
Even when DVDs are cheap there 's no way I 'm getting the number of films I can watch for that kind of money ! As for the tie-in , maybe the DRM is where it lies - the service will be free as long as you 're using a Windows Vista/7 PC or a Zune !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>rental services have died a horrible death because DVD/CD media has become affordable enough not to pirate themI think that depends on the rental service.
I've got an account with LoveFilm and can rent as many DVDs as I want each month for ~£15.
Even when DVDs are cheap there's no way I'm getting the number of films I can watch for that kind of money!As for the tie-in, maybe the DRM is where it lies - the service will be free as long as you're using a Windows Vista/7 PC or a Zune!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697151</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701175</id>
	<title>Re:Had this for decades...</title>
	<author>Timmmm</author>
	<datestamp>1247652240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, with Spotify you can choose the songs you listen to yourself. It's basically iTunes with a massive library and occasional adverts.</p><p>Actually I say occasional adverts. For some reason mine has completely stopped playing any. I have no idea why but I'm not complaining!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , with Spotify you can choose the songs you listen to yourself .
It 's basically iTunes with a massive library and occasional adverts.Actually I say occasional adverts .
For some reason mine has completely stopped playing any .
I have no idea why but I 'm not complaining !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, with Spotify you can choose the songs you listen to yourself.
It's basically iTunes with a massive library and occasional adverts.Actually I say occasional adverts.
For some reason mine has completely stopped playing any.
I have no idea why but I'm not complaining!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696977</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701229</id>
	<title>***subspace transmission***&#226;&#166;</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247653020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the Borg cube is on the move again</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the Borg cube is on the move again</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the Borg cube is on the move again</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28704305</id>
	<title>Re:why anything Microsoft</title>
	<author>zyzko</author>
	<datestamp>1247677320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>the entire iTunes store for example is now completely DRM free, and all the market leaders right now are so DRM free.</p></div><p>The videos and games on iTunes store are now drm-free? Wow, I have completely missed this...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the entire iTunes store for example is now completely DRM free , and all the market leaders right now are so DRM free.The videos and games on iTunes store are now drm-free ?
Wow , I have completely missed this.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the entire iTunes store for example is now completely DRM free, and all the market leaders right now are so DRM free.The videos and games on iTunes store are now drm-free?
Wow, I have completely missed this...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697151</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28718263</id>
	<title>Re:Last.fm is just fine</title>
	<author>HermMunster</author>
	<datestamp>1247764800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is free in the US and you can get it free in the UK and other countries if you know how.  But I suspect there will be other issues also that interfere with the "service like spotify" in the UK and other countries once their servers are up.</p><p>There's nothing to be impressed here with.  It's just another category that Microsoft wants to dominate and rule like a monopoly.  Hopefully everyone has already wised up to their tactics and can forcefully act against any nefarious ones.  Please tell me that citizens of the UK are able to do that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is free in the US and you can get it free in the UK and other countries if you know how .
But I suspect there will be other issues also that interfere with the " service like spotify " in the UK and other countries once their servers are up.There 's nothing to be impressed here with .
It 's just another category that Microsoft wants to dominate and rule like a monopoly .
Hopefully everyone has already wised up to their tactics and can forcefully act against any nefarious ones .
Please tell me that citizens of the UK are able to do that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is free in the US and you can get it free in the UK and other countries if you know how.
But I suspect there will be other issues also that interfere with the "service like spotify" in the UK and other countries once their servers are up.There's nothing to be impressed here with.
It's just another category that Microsoft wants to dominate and rule like a monopoly.
Hopefully everyone has already wised up to their tactics and can forcefully act against any nefarious ones.
Please tell me that citizens of the UK are able to do that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701837</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701265</id>
	<title>My solution...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1247653560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My linux box keeps ripping some shoutcast stations 24/7. Everything I dislike is moved to a folder, a shell script adds them to a blacklist and another one deletes these tracks if they are played again (sort of local last.fm).<br>This way I keep getting new tracks in mp3 format which are more or less ready to copy to my mp3 player - and it is legal where I'm located<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>My linux box keeps ripping some shoutcast stations 24/7 .
Everything I dislike is moved to a folder , a shell script adds them to a blacklist and another one deletes these tracks if they are played again ( sort of local last.fm ) .This way I keep getting new tracks in mp3 format which are more or less ready to copy to my mp3 player - and it is legal where I 'm located : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My linux box keeps ripping some shoutcast stations 24/7.
Everything I dislike is moved to a folder, a shell script adds them to a blacklist and another one deletes these tracks if they are played again (sort of local last.fm).This way I keep getting new tracks in mp3 format which are more or less ready to copy to my mp3 player - and it is legal where I'm located :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701179</id>
	<title>Re:Hugely popular?</title>
	<author>salmacis2</author>
	<datestamp>1247652240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, hugely popular. Sign up and give it a go.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , hugely popular .
Sign up and give it a go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, hugely popular.
Sign up and give it a go.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696979</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696951
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702897
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696985
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703059
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702847
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696951
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702465
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701305
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703835
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701645
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696979
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701553
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696951
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28716397
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701999
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701175
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28705387
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28705713
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697059
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696887
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701183
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701287
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696979
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28707681
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703559
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701459
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703777
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703365
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701175
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701251
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697151
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702533
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696887
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701429
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697151
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28704305
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697151
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702399
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701355
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696979
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701179
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696979
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701275
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696979
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701511
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697151
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703903
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702451
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701839
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28710081
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702599
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28718263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696951
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701227
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696979
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28708295
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701413
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701305
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701461
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701305
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28706791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701839
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28707569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28709559
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701175
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701863
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701175
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701987
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696979
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697151
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696979
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702677
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697095
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702159
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701649
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701175
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696977
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701491
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701305
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28708317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696947
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703661
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702377
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_07_14_2113256_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28706693
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701305
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2113256.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701197
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703359
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28705387
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703777
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702599
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701771
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703407
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702185
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703835
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2113256.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697151
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28704305
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701511
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701429
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701817
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701251
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2113256.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697107
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2113256.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696887
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697059
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697025
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702533
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2113256.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703907
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2113256.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696941
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2113256.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696951
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701553
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702847
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701837
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28718263
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2113256.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702121
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2113256.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696971
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2113256.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696977
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28707569
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701175
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701649
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701863
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703365
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701999
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28716397
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702159
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28709559
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697095
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701403
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702677
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701183
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2113256.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701305
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28706693
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701461
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702465
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702049
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701491
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701413
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2113256.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696985
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702897
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2113256.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697111
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2113256.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696947
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701459
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703059
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701351
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28708295
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28708317
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28710081
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28705713
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2113256.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701733
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702399
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703893
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703559
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28707681
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702377
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703661
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701839
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28706791
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28702451
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28703903
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2113256.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701337
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2113256.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28697121
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_07_14_2113256.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28696979
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701287
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701865
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701355
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701645
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701987
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701179
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701227
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_07_14_2113256.28701275
</commentlist>
</conversation>
